Present! - A Scientist in Varanasi, India Claims to "Prove" that God Exists "in just ten minutes"

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 22 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 3,9 тис.

  • @astrovandan
    @astrovandan 7 років тому +492

    friends he is my father
    I proud of you papaji
    love you papa

    • @RajeshwarSBoke
      @RajeshwarSBoke 5 років тому +18

      Madamji hame bhi proud hai uncle ji pr...😊

    • @pinkypandeypinkypandey9332
      @pinkypandeypinkypandey9332 4 роки тому +11

      We are also proud!

    • @rahulraina56
      @rahulraina56 4 роки тому +11

      I watched this year's back. Watching it again today. Uncle ji ko mera pranaam. Bohut pyare and gyani hai.

    • @birla9960
      @birla9960 4 роки тому +5

      दीदी प्रणाम ।
      जो अपने आप को चार किताब पड़ कर सवाल करते ह की भगवान कहा है इन नास्तिकों को बहुत ही सुंदर जवाब।।
      अगर ये वीडियो हिन्दी में मिल सकता है क्या अगर आप ये वीडियो हिन्दी में उपल ध करवा सके तो आप की बहुत महरबनी होगी
      9635431202 व्हाट्स एप

    • @vikr4m
      @vikr4m 4 роки тому

      Respect to your father...Pranam.

  • @rjtjaggi
    @rjtjaggi 8 років тому +437

    This man is full of knowledge and i am full of shit. He inspire me to read more and more books.
    Moral: Never judge a person from his looks.
    Thank You for sharing.

    • @americanpankaj
      @americanpankaj 8 років тому +1

      Rajat Jack ryt nd the best part the examples he shared was amazing tht if we are following hindusim or sikhishm or christianity every religion taking towards god like he said if we have sent a letter from delhi to bombay or varanasi to bombay all are reaching to their destination but different was nature or travel time

    • @cjt5560
      @cjt5560 8 років тому +2

      :) Thank you Rajat ... it's very big lesson ... Thank you , always be like that

    • @AshisKumar
      @AshisKumar 8 років тому +1

      If only you would have read books in logical reasoning :)
      He looks intelligent though. Nonetheless, your moral stands correct.

    • @udaykiranbanoth1565
      @udaykiranbanoth1565 8 років тому

      whats wrong in it?

    • @udaykiranbanoth1565
      @udaykiranbanoth1565 8 років тому +1

      How an electron got into that stationary orbit
      ?Firstly there must be some energy that must be applied to place that in those stationary orbits?

  • @winistan
    @winistan 8 років тому +55

    I as a Muslim am blown away by this man's flawless reasoning and how he described God as being full of energy because in order for everything to move there has to be energy. Where is that energy coming from?
    Respect.

  • @sameert31
    @sameert31 8 років тому +139

    Many world's top Quantum Physicist scientists were inspired by Hindu scriptures Vedas and Upanishads. Scientists like Erwin Schrodinger, Neil Bohr, Heisenberg, Robert Oppenheimer are few to name. Computer also works on binary system of Pingala a Sanskrit mathematician. And the computer language grammar is derived from Panini grammar of ancient Sanskrit grammarian Panini of 500 BC.

    • @abhishekpal6106
      @abhishekpal6106 5 років тому +2

      Aur bhai hindu upnishad me likha hau k hindu me idol worship ban hai

    • @beingsocial1084
      @beingsocial1084 4 роки тому

      @@abhishekpal6106 kis chutiya ne kahaaa?

    • @abhishekpal6106
      @abhishekpal6106 4 роки тому +1

      @@beingsocial1084 tumharaa upnishad

    • @beingsocial1084
      @beingsocial1084 4 роки тому +7

      @@abhishekpal6106 idol worship is not banned! Idols are tools to understand existence. We do know God(bhagvantha) is niraakara and nirguna.

    • @beingsocial1084
      @beingsocial1084 4 роки тому +6

      @@abhishekpal6106 there is nothing called ban in Upanishads, commandment and ban are the words which is affiliated to abrahmic religion not in Hindu dharma.

  • @mohdwaquarkhan9637
    @mohdwaquarkhan9637 8 років тому +47

    According to "Maslow's hierarchy of needs" Dr. L. Panday has been reached the last stage of Need i.e. Self Actualization. I have been there for 10 years. Love and respect for Varanasi.

    • @500suren
      @500suren 8 років тому +3

      thank you for your info on Maslow's hierarchy, did not know of it before. Thank you once again.

    • @nik4bros
      @nik4bros 8 років тому +3

      Md.Waquar Khan self actualization??? more like self delusion....

    • @mohdwaquarkhan9637
      @mohdwaquarkhan9637 8 років тому +1

      Most Welcome sir!

    • @mohdwaquarkhan9637
      @mohdwaquarkhan9637 8 років тому +2

      Nikhil Charbhai No brother Self actualization is like the initial stage of "Nirvaana ‎निर्वाण"...this is the stage where people stop thinking about the world or started avoid Physical pleasure...

  • @iamsumith
    @iamsumith 8 років тому +85

    Very true pay, I pay my respect to him. Its amazing to see that how clearly he explained his views about God, without insulting other religions. A true follower of hinduism can't hate other religions....

    • @jckensway2956
      @jckensway2956 4 роки тому +2

      Sumith Tulasidharan .....and yet Muslims get attacked and beaten up by Hindus? I think you’ve described here what we call ‘The No True Scotsman’ fallacy. If you’re unfamiliar with it please look it up. P.S. please note I’m not attacking Hinduism here. Christians attack Muslims etc. etc.. I’m simply pointing out facts.

    • @jckensway2956
      @jckensway2956 4 роки тому

      jayvir jadeja you’ve failed to take the point of my ‘no true Scotsman’ mention. It is wholly applicable to your original comment. Instead of accepting my point you’ve gone to a ‘Hindus aren’t as bad as Muslims’ position which is irrelevant to my argument . I was simply pointing out that people will often go beyond mere insult in the name of their religion. Buddhist literature had revelled for years in its non-violent nature (e.g. ‘no wars fought in the name of Buddhism etc.’) yet violence perpetrated by Buddhists has been commonplace in recent history.

    • @papalisahoo7239
      @papalisahoo7239 3 роки тому

      Yup

    • @anonymousanonymous2319
      @anonymousanonymous2319 2 роки тому +1

      @@jckensway2956 Muslims not Islam. Otherwise you'd see violence from Hindus in different countries (whereas if you look at Afghanistan and Bangladesh for example, it's the other way around) and also you'd see Hindus hating Jews but Jews state that anti-semitism never existed in India. What do you expect when Muslims have been ethnically cleansing Hindus as well as Sikhs in areas they were in for generations be it Afghanistan, Pakistan, Bangladesh or Kashmir? What do you think when Hindus have been persecuted daily in Bangladesh and undergo forced conversions in Pakistan?
      I'm not advocating violence but it isn't a problem with Islam but historical and political relations with Muslims. (okay some Hindus have a problem with cattle slaughter but that's a state by state matter, there are states in India where you can slaughter cattle - it's like how you can drink in countries like Egypt or Lebanon but if you tried to drink in a country like Saudi, you'd be punished ie it's about respecting the state law)

  • @kushbhalerao744
    @kushbhalerao744 8 років тому +38

    According to me, what I believe is that god is an energy and an energy cannot be created or destroyed it can only be transformed from one form to another.

    • @prasadsardesai
      @prasadsardesai 8 років тому +1

      Awesome bro

    • @shawnawasthi
      @shawnawasthi 8 років тому +2

      it can be created by mantras.that what sanatan dharma was all about

    • @naro108
      @naro108 8 років тому

      kush bhalerao god, actually, is the energetic, and not just 'energy'. We dont have any example in this world of an energy, existing without a source. Energy shall have a source, and thus the source if all material and spirtual energies, is god. ☺

    • @amilshrivastava3798
      @amilshrivastava3798 8 років тому

      Mantras itself are created by the energy. Sun's Energy. What you eat give you energy and it is all processed sunlight.

    • @samb23692
      @samb23692 8 років тому

      Rajat Shirali good example. :)

  • @prakharankit562
    @prakharankit562 8 років тому +21

    The ganga arti song just brought back 3 years flashing when I was studying in BHU. The place has a lot to offer, just like this incredible man relating science and spirituality. :)

  • @zengagamingz
    @zengagamingz 8 років тому +25

    finally i found best video on youtube. this man is great. i studied science four years but never thinks about it. india is great country and i proud to be an indian and hindu...

  • @The.sag3d
    @The.sag3d 8 років тому +11

    This man has a lot of knowledge, i salute him. He doesn't even have to think he has the answers to all of it.

  • @mr_underscore5320
    @mr_underscore5320 8 років тому +39

    "Yeah I don't understand how that happened"
    >It must be 'God'

    • @saimtanweer5720
      @saimtanweer5720 3 роки тому

      GOD OF GAPS ARGUMENT

    • @yousefalkhudair4420
      @yousefalkhudair4420 3 роки тому

      Yeah I don't understand how that happened"
      There must not be God.

    • @sauravthakur2915
      @sauravthakur2915 3 роки тому

      @@yousefalkhudair4420 Yeah totally. There's no such thing as god. It can be gravitational force too.

  • @babinda1001
    @babinda1001 8 років тому +39

    boys, he had worked in the field of science more than the years you have gone through in life. so think before you criticize

    • @prakharpatil739
      @prakharpatil739 3 роки тому +6

      Asking questions is not criticizing... 🙏🏻

    • @AdmiralSP
      @AdmiralSP 3 роки тому +7

      Age and experience are not relevant in any scientific discourse.
      What's important is the person argument.
      And critisism is necessary for everything, especially in science.

    • @chendu2215
      @chendu2215 3 роки тому

      @@AdmiralSP exactly

    • @guesswho2306
      @guesswho2306 3 роки тому +1

      Being educated doesn’t make someone enlightened.
      When Vivekananda asked where is the God and his guru Ramkrishna Paramahans said, he is in front of me.

  • @hemanko007
    @hemanko007 8 років тому +159

    tht's bihar for u ,even after achieving so much in life and with tons of knowledge he's so humble

    • @nik4bros
      @nik4bros 8 років тому +4

      Hemanko Kashyap humble?? he just assumed his opinion is the answer... that's hardly humble

    • @hemanko007
      @hemanko007 8 років тому +5

      dude he's a phd from bhu and look at his appreance and surroundings he belongs to a porshe club house not the banks of ganga and yet he's sitting there so peacefully

    • @freddiemercurybulsara3876
      @freddiemercurybulsara3876 8 років тому +4

      Hemanko Kashyap that is a good man Educated and a Hindu not just a bihari

    • @hemanko007
      @hemanko007 8 років тому

      no my man u re goin somewhere else tht's not my focus here i m just sayin tht there are ppl who are equally educated who leave the motherland in other persuit but in most cases biharis in particular like to stick bak to their village no matter how high they grow

    • @abhijeetdeshmukh9600
      @abhijeetdeshmukh9600 8 років тому +13

      Hemanko Kashyap that's not Bihar...Varanasi is in UP

  • @sameert31
    @sameert31 8 років тому +95

    Hinduism says that God pervades all this creation. Erwin Schrodinger the Quantum physicist was also inspired by Hindu scriptures Upanishads or Vedanta. He wrote about similarity between Hinduism and science in his books.
    "This life of yours which you are living is not merely a piece of this entire existence,but in a certain sense the whole; only this whole is not so constituted that it can be surveyed in one single glance. This, as we know, is what the Brahmins express in that sacred, mystic formula which is yet really so simple and so clear: tat tvam asi, this is you. Or, again, in such words as “I am in the east and the west, I am above and below, I am this entire world."". - Erwin Schrodinger.

    • @sameert31
      @sameert31 8 років тому +2

      @***** : Read Hindu law book Manusmriti, it is very simple to understand Hinduism if you read that. All your confusion will be removed. Hinduism has one God Brahman or OM on whom you can meditate and connect only through internal senses. But he doesn't comunicate to fulfill the desires of people. To fulfill desires and manage the world Brahman created 33 demi-gods with different names. But worshiping these demi-gods is same as worshipping the Brahman because they are all same. And those who take Vedic education they become Arya. Ramayana and Mahabharata are equvivalent of Vedas. So all Hindus have got Vedic knowledge and they all are Arya now. If you don't have Vedic knowledge then you are a non-Arya. Aryan is not a race it is based on whether you have knowledge of Vedas or not.
      And if you are Muslim or Christian then both these religions are based on belief in Jesus who is a false Messiah. Both these religions are copied from Judaism. Now if you are a Jew then Judaism is also a man-made religion, it's a religion based on race and false stories and is also copied from ancient tribal religions in Jerusalem and some practices from Egypt.

    • @sameert31
      @sameert31 8 років тому +2

      @***** : And Rama and Krishna refer to same Supreme Purusha(Cosmic Being of Divine Light) or God who created this world. And this Divine Light exists in all living creatures. Ramayana and Mahabharata use metaphors to refer to spiritual process of Enlightenment. Spiritual Enlightenment or Samadhi is the last stage of Yoga. But for that a devotee have to go through previous Yogic stage of Dhyana(Meditation). And to do Dhyana you have to meditate on names or image of Rama and Krishna and follows the Vedic values that Rama and Krishna stood for. Thus his ignorance is destroyed by Vedic knowledge and he approaches path of spiritual Enlightenment and walks on path of Dharma. By doing so he is satisfied in his heart, there is peace in this world and after death he will go to heaven.

    • @nirmalpadwal2055
      @nirmalpadwal2055 8 років тому +1

      Anonymous Anon
      hmm. so according to u.. which religion is true? or more sensible?

    • @sameert31
      @sameert31 8 років тому +2

      @***** : Islam and Christianity both are based on belief in false Messiah Jesus. Jews rejected Jesus as Messiah because he didn't fulfill the Messianic prophecies. Jesus was killed for blasphemy against Judaism. Anyone who considers Jesus as Messiah is going against the Bible which is originally the book of Jews. Christianity is copied from Judaism and Roman religion. Quran copied from Jewish scriptures and Christian folklore. And Quran was written by companions of Muhammad after the death of Muhammad. So Quran is not holy nor it will take anyone to heaven. It is copied and blasphemous against Jewish Bible and written by humans.
      And it has claims of many miracles in it like Abraham not burning in fire when thrown in fire, Jesus born through virgin mother, Jesus making birds from clay and when he breathed then they became alive and flew in sky. Therefore there are many such illogical things in Quran.
      So Quran is copied book, blasphemous book against Jewish Bible, it has claims of miracles and hence is also illogical. And it is not holy nor it will take anyone to heaven. It can only take people to hell because it is false, copied and blasphemous against Jewish Bible. Same is for Christianity. Both are copied from Judaism, both believe in a false Messiah, Jesus, and hence both are blasphemous against Judaism.

    • @sameert31
      @sameert31 8 років тому +2

      @***** : Messiah was not suppose to bring new message. According to Judaism, Messiah is suppose to be a King and descendant of Jewish King David. He will sit on throne in Jerusalem and rule the world and spread message of God and bring peace. He will rebuild Jewish fire temple and offer sacrifices in fire according to Jewish rituals. But Jesus didn't fulfill these and other Messianic prophecies mentioned in Jewish scriptures. So he is not a Messiah. That's why Jews rejected him as Messiah. Christianity and Islam both are false religions based on belief in false Messiah, Jesus.
      Christians believe in Jewish Bible but not Jewish laws and they have also invented their own book New Testament. Christianity is based on Jewish Bible and ancient Roman religious beliefs. Muslims have invented Quran which is based on Jewish scriptures and Christian folklore. Both are man-made religions, copy pasted and are based on belief in Jesus who is a false Messiah.
      And virgin birth of Jesus is just a made up story by Roman Christians which became part of Christianity and then became part of Quran. Virgin birth is not for normal humans. It is for Avatars. Because God is inconceivable. Therefore even in Hinduism all avatars are born through Virgin mothers. So early Christians or Romans were correct to create a virgin birth story for Jesus in order to make him look Son of God or equal to God. But Quran calls him born through virgin mother and yet considers him as human being, this is against the very meaning why virgin birth was created. Born through virgin birth means you are either avatar of God or you are a Buddha. Even Buddha was born through virgin mother after his father did Yagya which is Hindu sacrificial fire ritual. Authors of Quran fails to understand this why virgin birth is mentioned in Christianity. Therefore they end up considering Jesus as a human being born though virgin mother. The virgin mother story was created by Romans to give status of Son of God to Jesus, like in ancient Roman religions they had similar beliefs. And thus Romans created Christianity. And through Christianity and Judaism, another religion Islam was created by men. So nowhere is God involved in creation of Christianity or Islam. They both are man-made religions based on belief in false Messiah, Jesus. They don't take you to heaven. But they can certainly take you to hell fire for believing in Jesus as Messiah who is actually a false Messiah.

  • @losaltenzin8033
    @losaltenzin8033 3 роки тому +16

    I really appreciate this insight of the Chemist; proving the existence of the god. A lot of respect for him and the guy that made this video. Thank you so much!

  • @Springs_secrets
    @Springs_secrets 8 років тому +32

    best part is when Radhe radhe started in background on exact proved part.
    Second part whn a person seating behind started shacking his head even though he didn't got anything in English :)

    • @Springs_secrets
      @Springs_secrets 8 років тому +11

      Shivesh bro I born is SIKH Family with defence background, Even though I am an atheist, but still believe in Humanity nothing and none religion is bigger than Humanity

    • @Springs_secrets
      @Springs_secrets 8 років тому

      AndavanThiruvadi ,bro I said a person seating next to him was a common man who might not familiar with English, even though he shaken his head. .its as simple as it is... take a chill 💊

    • @SanjayShukla-mk4qn
      @SanjayShukla-mk4qn 8 років тому

      Sandy Singh "didn't got" who tought you such English? Before pointing that uncle see your English loll

    • @Springs_secrets
      @Springs_secrets 8 років тому

      Sanjay Shukla lol, you seems like orthodox... you better brush up, you way far from contemporary, no wonder you are Shukla ....

    • @SanjayShukla-mk4qn
      @SanjayShukla-mk4qn 8 років тому

      To be contemporary, one need to write wrong English, is this what you want to say? And yes I am "Shukla", why are you so prejudice? what's your point here, I didn't get you! Anyway, you should go to google and search me. Well, lets save you time here is my "Google Scholar" and Linkedin link. Hope you will find me contemporary now :)
      scholar.google.co.in/citations?user=VodphbwAAAAJ&hl=en
      www.linkedin.com/in/sanjay-shukla-50a19613?trk=nav_responsive_tab_profile

  • @spacewavematrix3009
    @spacewavematrix3009 7 років тому +10

    For those commenting, Newton's law and quantum law separately until you find an abstract representation you will define specific law.
    Max Planck understood clearly..here is the statement
    There is no matter as such, All matter originates and exists only by virtue of a force which brings the particle of an atom to vibration and holds this most minute solar system of the atom together. We must assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent Mind. This Mind (Source or God) is the matrix of all matter.
    -- Max Planck

  • @kunalkaushik661
    @kunalkaushik661 8 років тому +52

    I am schooling student and highly interested in science and space.
    this forced me to study many theories by which I came to conclusion that I believe in this scientist of Varanasi. It is very much logical about his proving of god. Are the rituals the path to attain God ? I think that these rituals are made to have faith or be live in source of vital force.

    • @arvindsharma3548
      @arvindsharma3548 5 років тому +8

      kunal kaushik being a physics student (masters) I tell you rituals are equally important if you’re science student you know about energy .... and if u have studied solid state u know structure , the two things ,in terms of science the rituals are based on like if you look at the structure of a temple it’s pointing towards sky like an antenna and you know how signals are transmit in modern communication similarly the holy places are full of positive energies ...where there are higher possibilities of deeper consciousness..... and jaagran itself says “Jaagna” and that’s what’s the basis of Keertan and prayers to awake consciousness and connect to god ....as antenna does to satellite constantly taking signals from up there ... humans are in constant touch with the god but they’r not aware ... if you have studied quantum physics and oscillations and waves properly you will understand how this universe in working in terms of energy ,frequency and vibrations ...so take an example while you chant om the vibration of certain frequency is produced from navel and the vibration is matched with holy
      I think you probably shouldn’t have studied higher physics else there are 50 more ways that too with science I can prove this man is right .

    • @nothingpersonalkid
      @nothingpersonalkid 3 роки тому

      What are you doing now?

    • @kunalkaushik661
      @kunalkaushik661 3 роки тому +1

      @@nothingpersonalkid I don't even remember when I wrote this comment 😂. Currently I am pursuing Engineering from Indian Institute of Information technology Allahabad. The education system and family pushed me towards this rat race. No worries.

    • @nothingpersonalkid
      @nothingpersonalkid 3 роки тому +1

      @@kunalkaushik661 🥺sad4u, it happens with everyone, that's why I asked you. Still we will end up winner brother, love you ♥️. Promise

    • @kunalkaushik661
      @kunalkaushik661 3 роки тому +1

      @@nothingpersonalkid Thank you so much for the kind words. And yah, we will be winner for sure in any field we choose. ❤️

  • @futureobservation4814
    @futureobservation4814 8 років тому +73

    God exists and if God exists there is evil too and I can prove you in 10 seconds that there is evil. Look down to the comments section, look how the people react against God in this Kalyug.

    • @tanmaydesai5233
      @tanmaydesai5233 6 років тому +7

      Circular argument. There is God, because people are denying God. What impaccable logic. Amazing!

    • @halopeople6462
      @halopeople6462 5 років тому +1

      Future Observation ,well observed.

    • @abhishekpal6106
      @abhishekpal6106 5 років тому +1

      God exists ok but which

    • @abhishekpal6106
      @abhishekpal6106 4 роки тому

      @Infrared Chakra oh which God exist

    • @adamthapazz4137
      @adamthapazz4137 4 роки тому

      @Nostradamus Ka Baap and you know this how?

  • @gaganaggarwal7599
    @gaganaggarwal7599 8 років тому +22

    beautiful spiritual land , Varanasi .When I went there it thought it was waste of time but now I feel I must go once again.

  • @abhiknandi7022
    @abhiknandi7022 8 років тому +80

    Hinduism is the core of Everything

    • @ghost4613
      @ghost4613 6 років тому +2

      🚩Same...Tat Tvam Asi..
      Puruksha/Shiva/Parabhramam and Vishnu/
      Prakriti /Maya ...

    • @zedplus_7172
      @zedplus_7172 4 роки тому

      @@ghost4613 Then who is KALI, which Destroy Everything even SHIV

    • @sesina-reyna7684
      @sesina-reyna7684 4 роки тому

      Jesus is the core of everything dont belief in the myth

    • @gorgeous797
      @gorgeous797 4 роки тому +4

      @@sesina-reyna7684 LOL 😁😁😁

    • @sarabjeetsingh120
      @sarabjeetsingh120 4 роки тому +2

      Sanatan bro

  • @bhashuvbr
    @bhashuvbr 8 років тому +18

    It gets energy from heat i.e., temperature. If you create temperature at absolute zero u can see the physical properties disappear.

    • @premktiw4984
      @premktiw4984 8 років тому +6

      from where does temperature comes.. ? If temperature supplies the energy to electrons then why don't the temperature drops because of presence of particles.

    • @TheTinu000
      @TheTinu000 8 років тому

      bhaskar mudam also absolute zero temperature is unachievable. I mean it goes against the physics.

    • @manaskalita7859
      @manaskalita7859 8 років тому +1

      but then also electron moves, even in space there is sub zero, sun exists in sub zero surrounding, then also there is electron revolving

    • @venkatvenki2341
      @venkatvenki2341 8 років тому +3

      small correction to ur comment. why zero temperature is against to physics? we will not achieve bcoz our instruments are not accurate. for example in 1960's our instruments read 0 but with increase of accuracy we can go upto 10^-6K or nano kelvin (but still not zero according to quantum mechanics(QM)). one more important point from QM is that if any case any system reaches to 0K then still exhibits the Zero point energy which still vibrates with out any temperature. inherently molecule posses this energy. it is better to see 'how' wonderful the structure of universe(scientist view) than 'who' created the universe (Theists point of view). in conclusion there are different people in this world first type will always think 'who' and second kind of people think 'how'. The debate between them is ridiculous and outcome is Zero.

    • @anubhavgreen
      @anubhavgreen 8 років тому +3

      Just dont create an imaginary creature as answer to your questions, its just your brain is not developed to answer that question, when they didnt understand who put water in clouds , they creted indra dev , arey kuch nhi smjh aata toh ek cartoon bna do jo usse explain krde

  • @marydunn5393
    @marydunn5393 7 років тому +10

    The picture you often see of electrons as small objects circling a nucleus in well defined "orbits" is actually quite wrong. As we now understand it, the electrons aren't really at any one place at any time at all. Instead they exist as a sort of cloud. The cloud can compress to a very small space briefly if you probe it in the right way, but before that it really acts like a spread-out cloud. For example, the electron in a hydrogen atom likes to occupy a spherical volume surrounding the proton. If you think of the proton as the size of a grain of salt, then the electron cloud would have about a ten foot radius. If you probe, you'll probably find the electron somewhere in that region.
    The weird thing about that cloud is that its spread in space is related to the spread of possible momenta (or velocities) of the electron. So here's the key point, which we won't pretend to explain here. The more squashed in the cloud gets, the more spread-out the range of momenta has to get. That's called Heisenberg's uncertainty principle. It could quit moving if it spread out more, but that would mean not being as near the nucleus, and having higher potential energy. Big momenta mean big kinetic energies. So the cloud can lower its potential energy by squishing in closer to the nucleus, but when it squishes in too far its kinetic energy goes up more than its potential energy goes down. So it settles at a happy medium, with the lowest possible energy, and that gives the cloud and thus the atom its size.

  • @radhamadhavarockbandrmrb9662
    @radhamadhavarockbandrmrb9662 4 роки тому +15

    I am a scientist i have explored everything but finally there are many things in this world which will force you to believe in god . Jai shree ram.

    • @khushboovlogchannel
      @khushboovlogchannel 3 роки тому

      true and not just god however superstitious things and ghost spirits etc.

  • @melvandusen1924
    @melvandusen1924  8 років тому +169

    So much hate speech coming about a video on the possible existence of God. Why?

    • @raghu1186
      @raghu1186 8 років тому +25

      Everybody mistook the one GOD of Hinduism.
      This material world is diverse. When you examine it closely you will find diverse material are three things PROTON, ELECTRON AND NEUTRON. That is Three Gunas our Rishis mentioned as Satwam,RAJAS AND THAMAS( neutron is dark particle). Then you deeply examine this particle you will come to know that really one thing .All matter is energy. Now there are two different thing Lifeless material and life force.
      When you closely observe again. You will find that there are different type of energy ,all are interchangeable. One energy we can convert to another form using a suitable device
      Light energy plant can convert to life force or universal soul (Knower or consciousness) .So material world is consciousness itself. That is adwaitha of our RISHIS.
      Even if everything is same in finest form. When you are thirsty you need water, Bread will not solve your thirst. Same way God is one. Enormous number of spiritual body having different healing powers is a reality. God need not require any offering .In Hinduism Nothing is offering to BRAHMAN (OM). But we have to offer flower and other thing to Devi and devatas(Architype)Because they are living BEING like as who depend on BRAHMAN. But they are super powers and can solve our material problem. THIS IS THE TEACHING OF SREE NARAYANA GURU OF KERALA and ALL RISHIS OF INDIA. Everything in this world we are seeing is Midhya(not real) in past and future. Now I am seeing an apple in front of me .Presently it is real. When you search this apple in 10 years back, this apple was not present at 10 year back. If you search this apple after 10 year you will not get this apple. So apple is only real in present time. When you consider this universe, it was not same in the past. In future also it is not going to be same.
      ONE THING THAT IS SAME IN THE FUTURE PRESENT AND PAST IS BRAHMAN (CONCIOUSNESS) ONLY. That is the essence of everything. SO BRAHMAN SATYAM JAGAT MIDHYA.(world IS NOT REAL ONY BRAHMAN REAL). Everything is real including cloud at present. For a wise world is real because he is in the present. This is the teaching of Sree Narayana Guru
      I born in Kerala (south India) a predominant Christian Area. At least Weekly one time some Christians coming to my home and asking Why you are worshipping IDOL. Do you think it will save you. Now I know that calling GOD by name. sound is one form of energy. I am worshipping Idol that is Manifested form of energy. SO both I and they are worshing same thing ,but different form of energy.
      HINDU VEDA ADVICE IS THIS- If a truth is told by a child accept it. If an untruth is told by creator brahma reject it. This type of freedom I think no religion in the world is ever allowed
      Bible says that you do not worship other than me .That means Bible also saying other power present. If no Other God why God went to Egypt and Killed new born child because their only Crime is they pray to other God. So all religion says that t lot of God, but worship a particular God. Hinduism says that only one God (Brahman),but crores of divine powers .That is reality

    • @RazaSid
      @RazaSid 8 років тому +11

      This is clearly a man preying on gullible minds with his lack of knowledge on particle physics and quantum mechanics.

    • @rajendraray
      @rajendraray 8 років тому +4

      I know nothing about science but science always confused about god and spirit. when some people says that they know better than a 30 yrs experienced scientist even a undergraduate student said that he is talking illogical, Its question whether they all read the same book or not.

    • @RazaSid
      @RazaSid 8 років тому +5

      Science is the reason you are on a computer typing this comment, science allows you to go see a doctor when you're sick, science allowed man to travel in to space. Please don't perpetuate this stupidity about science, it may not be a perfect concept but it's the best we've got.

    • @eipler22b17
      @eipler22b17 8 років тому +3

      +Raza Siddiqui I agree 100%. Science does make mistakes, but religion is written in stone translated in their own interpretation to fit their agenda.

  • @multansab4132
    @multansab4132 8 років тому +8

    simple man has said very big thing, amazing, he is a sincere guy Allah bless you.

  • @jamesfrankmomin4195
    @jamesfrankmomin4195 8 років тому +6

    when science and religion fight, there is only one thing that i can think of …. the vastness of the universe, it endless boundaries and how minute and dispensable we are compared to thousands of suns (stars) which also ultimately dies and we are so dependent on one...

    • @adityaop5227
      @adityaop5227 2 роки тому

      Yeah then we can also think like ,we are not only one who are created by the god and in bhagvat geeta Krishna said “everything which has birth should ultimately die" so that is same to suns and galaxys they die and change to blackholes and like this everything is interlinked

  • @TANNIDAS-c2l
    @TANNIDAS-c2l 8 років тому +33

    this is our scientists...... proud of you sir..... PRANAAM

    • @sushrestha1
      @sushrestha1 8 років тому +6

      stupid country with stupid scientists no wonder why u lacked so much

    • @jayachandrank1075
      @jayachandrank1075 8 років тому +1

      chutiyaa thu kis country say hae?

    • @manjunathgangadharg7392
      @manjunathgangadharg7392 8 років тому +1

      sujan shrestha, today numbering system exist because of what u call stupid. else u woud be still in caves carving lines.

    • @sushrestha1
      @sushrestha1 8 років тому

      Manjunathgangadhar G their are other numbering system if you don't know

    • @ichigokurosaki5707
      @ichigokurosaki5707 8 років тому

      lmao go learn science

  • @AnandSatya
    @AnandSatya 8 років тому +11

    Electron is moving in a equi-potential surface. We dont need energy to move a body in equi-potential surface. As long as electron stays in a the orbit it neither dissipates energy nor absorbs energy.

    • @Mukeshmiktecrep
      @Mukeshmiktecrep 7 років тому +3

      Okay, every object in motion, somehow and someday became in motion by external force ......... Then tell me how all the electrons in this world started moving and still moving and will move ..........
      What's after the end part of this universe?
      Big bang theory has been proven, tell me how all the universe was compressed in the size of tennis ball?
      What just happened .......... There are many things which you can't prove by calculating and with maths .......
      Have you thought ever that what will happen to your self after you die, now you are either sleeping or doing something ........... you are made up of atoms, if you are just a collection of Atoms then the real question is who are you ......... without Atoms?

    • @tjjoseph3879
      @tjjoseph3879 7 років тому

      ? Where did you complete your schooling?

    • @amulyamallik5429
      @amulyamallik5429 3 роки тому

      What work of equi potential surface...??..quantum mechanics is also a big failure if it says..object move without energy...becouse everything thing in this universe is made of somekind of energy....all humans knows..science u called is an illusion created by Maha Maya a power of God Vishnu one singularity...to make u typ humans busy in ur lives..of surround by 3 gunas...thinks once..science will explains it's limit after a deep thinking...that u don't have technology to see others humans of others universe....can u see higher dimension creatures whom it quantum cellular eyes cant see...pathetic science u people have created...I hate becoz u r polluting our Mother nature Gaya..place..😓😓😓😓😠😭😭😭

  • @abstractpoetsahar
    @abstractpoetsahar 8 років тому +6

    No matter how beautiful. I can never accept that there is a controller called God.

  • @indrajeetdodia9646
    @indrajeetdodia9646 8 років тому +7

    this is the power common BHARTIYA (indian).
    jay hind
    jay jay shree ram

  • @amiyachourasiya
    @amiyachourasiya 8 років тому +7

    This Universe is a huge Code which we are continuously debugging.
    The eagerness to know "How" and "Why" keeps us going.

  • @abhijitsingh4806
    @abhijitsingh4806 8 років тому +4

    This man who has worked for Bhu and DRDO is full of knowledge, he has got a very valid point which is tough to deny.Really liked his speech.

  • @vemulaanandreddy
    @vemulaanandreddy 8 років тому +10

    Excellent sir feeling proud by hearing your views on god...

  • @innatelymystic
    @innatelymystic 8 років тому +10

    amazing great respect for the scientist ,salam from pak ! believers of GOD have universal respect granted by GOD .

  • @DocjassalMD
    @DocjassalMD 8 років тому +61

    the existance of GOD cannot be proved, it can only be felt,, i felt manny times👍

    • @simantahazarika2221
      @simantahazarika2221 6 років тому +7

      Can you tell me how did you feel?

    • @waifu_png_pl6854
      @waifu_png_pl6854 5 років тому +7

      and i feel that god doesnt exist

    • @shaurya4984
      @shaurya4984 5 років тому +7

      @@waifu_png_pl6854 in Gita lord Krishna says what u think and belive he maintain his/her believe on him in a Parmatma form living in person heart . If person want to believe in God lord will maintain his belief and make sure small incident which happen day to day will give reasons to believe on him . Same way happen with atheist if he didn't believe in God . He will maintain in belief and day to day small incident will happen on this way that his belief in atheist will become stronger . He said I maintain your belief on any demigod u want to worship . He maintain his belief on that demigod .

    • @shivamgupta7757
      @shivamgupta7757 5 років тому

      Talk to me....I will prove it to u

    • @AmanSingh-nz5hk
      @AmanSingh-nz5hk 4 роки тому

      @@shivamgupta7757 how???

  • @avinashmore4507
    @avinashmore4507 8 років тому +59

    I wish i could choose science stream in 12th standard so that i could understand this video

    • @AbhishekSingh-op2tr
      @AbhishekSingh-op2tr 8 років тому +4

      Avinash more I hope you get science stream, but remember one thing, to understand all the questions we humans have, 'scientific attitude' is far far more important than scientific education. Though, scientific attitude and understanding is suppose to come after scientific education, but even some scientist loose faith in science while answering complex questions and blindly starts believing in books written centuries back, despite having scientific knowledge.

    • @nikhilsharma129
      @nikhilsharma129 8 років тому +3

      i am a science student, then did my engineering, I really never cared or had the passion to learn what I was taught that time. I developed the passion for science and various fields engineering, bot only that, but also history and spirituality and and many other fields after I finished college.
      I'll tell you something, since that day till the end, I will keep on studying any random topic I like to study and to any depth I want. its very peaceful.
      if you want to understand what he is saying, read about orbitals in an atom, s,p,d,f, if you want to know more, read about things inside nucleus.
      also u can always study and learn whatever u want.

    • @AdmiralSP
      @AdmiralSP 8 років тому +2

      Avinash more I am a chemistry major. And this is bullshit.

    • @Worldpeace197
      @Worldpeace197 8 років тому

      Santhosh Prabhu please explain where he is wrong.

    • @AbhishekSingh-op2tr
      @AbhishekSingh-op2tr 8 років тому

      Santhosh Prabhu agreed! And that bullshit is coming from a so called scientist from BHU & ISRO.

  • @Ishamv3
    @Ishamv3 8 років тому +9

    Not that I agree with the views of the 'scientist' in the video, but everyone in the comments is a self-proclaimed expert on sub-atomic motion, God's existence, which is amusing.

  • @priyankabadhani4574
    @priyankabadhani4574 3 роки тому +2

    गुरुर्ब्रह्मा ग्रुरुर्विष्णुः गुरुर्देवो महेश्वरः । गुरुः साक्षात् परं ब्रह्म तस्मै श्री गुरवे नमः..... Wonderful explanation 😊😊

  • @manmanam3166
    @manmanam3166 8 років тому +121

    If we don't know the answer, is that means god?!!! Unknown = GOD = X

    • @sachinkoparde2052
      @sachinkoparde2052 8 років тому +2

      Man Manam good point

    • @sachinkoparde2052
      @sachinkoparde2052 8 років тому +9

      Man Manam years ago ppl didn't knew the answer for eclipse so they answered it with God , now science got the answer so religion moved to next step where science has not reached yet and again doing the same thing lol

    • @UdayReddy95
      @UdayReddy95 8 років тому +1

      Right in to the point...

    • @creativezebra5757
      @creativezebra5757 8 років тому +4

      god is like a joker in a cards deck.....he will become any thing you want him to be...even unknown or x or whatever.

    • @moinuddinkhan928
      @moinuddinkhan928 8 років тому

      pl see speeches of Hamza tzortzis on UA-cam.

  • @classical-bit
    @classical-bit 8 років тому +42

    Scientist uncle k piche jo Chacha baithe hai Mundi to aise hila rahe hai jaise sab samjh aarha hai.. 😂 😂

    • @donmodi4437
      @donmodi4437 8 років тому +2

      Deepanshu Mishra best comment here man ,,

    • @AnonIsHere
      @AnonIsHere 8 років тому +3

      nailed it ;)

    • @manish3889
      @manish3889 7 років тому

      Aapko kaisey pata chala ki nahi samajh rahey hey? Unka face dekhkey.

  • @mitchevans9315
    @mitchevans9315 7 років тому +8

    Newton's First and Third Law
    An object at rest tends to stay at rest unless moved by upon an equal and opposite force.
    Thermodynamics
    Energy is neither created nor destroyed.
    His proof is logical.

    • @adamthapazz4137
      @adamthapazz4137 4 роки тому

      not really sorry

    • @113poornachandran8
      @113poornachandran8 3 роки тому +1

      @@adamthapazz4137 oh shutup go read science or instead go be a tiktoker

    • @adamthapazz4137
      @adamthapazz4137 3 роки тому

      @@113poornachandran8 lol good one, but still doesn't prove "god", nice try though 👍

  • @rajannagane3688
    @rajannagane3688 8 років тому +19

    Yes he has convincingly proved his point.. I thank him and to the person who uploaded this video

    • @rajannagane3688
      @rajannagane3688 8 років тому +4

      Dear sir I could understand it fully.. I am a science graduate and I have some spiritual inclination too. It seems you too are inclined to know..

    • @biggb671
      @biggb671 8 років тому +2

      Rajan Nagane Sirji, classical mechanics doesn't apply to quantum level. Check that out first

    • @thebeast8281
      @thebeast8281 8 років тому

      Rajan Nagane sir i want know that is there life after death.

    • @sreenath1987
      @sreenath1987 8 років тому +1

      @Atul Gupta
      Did U?
      Ok what is the answer from the scientific community for his question?
      ...its fine. Go ahead and do what you would do next - Google answer for that question.
      But wait a minute, did u get the question that you must find answer for!?

    • @rajannagane3688
      @rajannagane3688 8 років тому

      There is a shocking answer to your question that you wont believe .. it is good that you got this question..But not here.

  • @abhishekmalik2333
    @abhishekmalik2333 8 років тому +47

    the essence of Hinduism...we don't believe ours is d only true religion...we respect other faiths..nd exactly as d man said...d target is reaching d god no matter what path u take...all religions reach to dat one place...god

    • @indianmilitary
      @indianmilitary 8 років тому +11

      This is where the old scientist and people like you get confused. NO, Not all religions are the same. Hindu (ism???) is not even a religion. It is a culture/tradition built around laws of nature. Also called as sanathana dharma or living in sync with laws of nature BUT modern hindus exactly don't live in sync with laws of nature. i agree with that

    • @abhishekmalik2333
      @abhishekmalik2333 8 років тому +1

      +kashsoldier yess i know hinduism is not a religion...its a way of life...but mentioning it specifically is not so necessary...i think its quite understood wt i m referring to .

    • @skrao565
      @skrao565 8 років тому

      Sorry, you are completely wrong. Hinduism is very much a religion with a set scriptures and doctrines. Just because you do not know about them or read them or follow or practice them does not mean they do not exist.
      Only difference is that Hinduism allows for a debate and harmonious existence of a contrary point of view, both a a different representation of the Hindu scriptures or a non-Hindu belief in the sense that it does not profess conversion or destruction ore even defamation of somebody with another point of view. It also allows for some flexibility in practice. But do not stretch these relaxations and open mindedness into believing that Hinduism is not a religion.

    • @abhishekmalik2333
      @abhishekmalik2333 8 років тому +1

      +SK Rao hinduism is not a religion as directed by d supreme court..its d "sanatan dharm" actually...

    • @skrao565
      @skrao565 8 років тому +3

      Abhishek Malik Hinduism was not created by the supreme court

  • @azzurra9874
    @azzurra9874 5 років тому +4

    Thank You @MelVanDusen for sharing this video, really fabulous. Would you please add sub-titles, PLEASE :) I truly like this scientist but am having trouble understanding. Blessings

  • @BuntFencer
    @BuntFencer 8 років тому +13

    It is safe to say that this scientist never studied quantum mechanics. Applying Newton's law to electron???

    • @indianmilitary
      @indianmilitary 8 років тому +6

      In some situations, the behavior of the sub-atomic particles can be described well enough by Newton's Laws, but the more general theory is the Quantum Mechanics.
      Regarding so called newton's laws of motion and gravity- Below paragraph copied from Capt Ajit vadakayil post on Isaac Newton the calculus thief
      Newton''s laws of motion were lifted from the Sanskrit texts of 4000 BC and Aryabhatta’s written work in 2700 BC in Sanskrit.. Newton of course had NO dang idea of quantum consciousness-- nor the intelligence to comprehend it..
      Newtons gravity laws whig makes attraction a sort of magnetic pull is all bullshit. It is explained in GURUTVAKARSHAN that gravity is a property of matter and akasha warp.
      His so called first law - Every object in a state of uniform motion tends to remain in that state of motion unless an external force is applied to it.
      i have heard a retarded imbecile telling ( like confucious ) the above when threatened by force while sitting , blocking a shop's path .
      His second law about Force - Mass X acceleration is in several of our Vedic texts.
      Newton's third law-about every action has an equal and opposite reaction is in our 5000 year old Panchantra stories--"whether a leaf falls on a thorn or a thron falls on a leaf, the effect is the same"
      The mathematical proofs which Newton gave on his own ( which were not lifted ) is all bullshit!
      Without understanding GURUTVAKARSHAN ,( the curvature of spacetime in a strong gravitational field and the effect on velocity -the acceleration of a radially falling object ) , and hence not having the foggest of idea what is gravity-- he published his classical gravity theories in haste just to patent the gravity knowledge --and Calculus

    • @sumitt2052
      @sumitt2052 8 років тому +2

      Why do you say it a law if doesn not apply in all the places? Simply because newton could not answer and scientists found an exception.?

    • @BuntFencer
      @BuntFencer 8 років тому +1

      Newton didn't know about electron, it was discovered 160 years after he died. Quantum mechanics was developed later to explain the behavior of molecules, atoms & electrons, since Newton's laws couldn't explain it.

    • @sumitt2052
      @sumitt2052 8 років тому

      So stop calling it a law now !!
      AND
      We(the particles/atoms etc etc) exist it means law on conservation of energy has an exception. Energy has not created but It got created by no one, not even by any God or anything for that sake.
      The only thing to find is - how?

    • @BuntFencer
      @BuntFencer 8 років тому +1

      Sumit T: Why? Newton's laws still valid for most applications. Most engineering applications are based on Newton's laws. Only electrical/electronic engineering is based on quantum mechanics.

  • @deepakjet-planesrobotic9788
    @deepakjet-planesrobotic9788 8 років тому +157

    aise Hi Scientist ko Zakir Naik jaise behrupiye k gathering mai Jana chahiye tab uske pole khulegaaa....

    • @prateekdgr8one123
      @prateekdgr8one123 8 років тому +4

      deepak mahavir dil jeet liya tune bhai

    • @jabirmosa
      @jabirmosa 8 років тому +3

      deepak mahavir bhai tu kyu Hindu Muslim ko under gusa raha hai tu samaz to le bhai kya baat karta hai ye baba

    • @ArnKnt
      @ArnKnt 8 років тому +1

      deepak mahavir ..no one say anything less or more than what someone know...including you or me. If you are able to answer which part of your body you all FEELINGS exist, you know GOD better?

    • @alexmateso1642
      @alexmateso1642 8 років тому +9

      Baat hindu muslim ki nahi hai.... chutiye aur akalmand ki hai.... Dharam ke nazariye se mat dekh.... agar zakir naik Ka naam Ram naik bhi hota par baatien wo waisi karta toh wo chutiya he hota..... asaram bapu hindu hone se koi mahaan nahi banjata.. uske karmo se wo paapi he hai aur rahega....

    • @vimalshah6750
      @vimalshah6750 8 років тому +1

      Alex Mateso p

  • @RahulSharma-sj3pm
    @RahulSharma-sj3pm 7 років тому +2

    @7:59 does electrons move in the orbit or the probability of finding the electronic in that space is more???? I don't understand mordern physics....

  • @idontcarei
    @idontcarei 8 років тому +230

    with due respect ... sorry ... nobody knows if god exists or not ...nobody can give guarantee ...but i love many aspects of hinduism ..

    • @idontcarei
      @idontcarei 8 років тому +6

      ***** spirituality is different than god ...i love spirituality of hinduism ..but dude come on no proof of god..if anyone has then please let me know ..i will be the first to follow him... and pls dont give me all the bull*** abt feelings and "belief" ...love spirituality

    • @jaspreetsingh-xg7if
      @jaspreetsingh-xg7if 8 років тому +2

      id
      there is spiritual organization in India named as 'Divya Jyoti Jagrati Sansthan',they can make you realize God inside you by opening your third eye. With the grace of perfect Master Shri Ashutosh Ji Maharaj, you can realize God in your inner being.Perfect Master touches forehead and open the third eye and can teach you how to do meditation.
      Spirituality is the practical realization of God by meditation.

    • @idontcarei
      @idontcarei 8 років тому +4

      ***** well u r right ...human thinks by brain,,,if we become brainless then surely we can believe in something which cant be proved ..any way ...no issues .. i dont hv any problem with people believing in fairy tales as far as they dont fight on this basis .but unfortunately thats what happens ...look around ..muslims hindus christians all r fighing for their so called gods.peace brother

    • @umeshxzs
      @umeshxzs 8 років тому

      +jaspreet singh are you serious bro? I am taking your review as truth but still want to ask one question, that you yourself had gone there and experienced it, or, someone else told you.
      Do they charge any fee? if I want to join, please help. Thanks

    • @kevinkumar9996
      @kevinkumar9996 8 років тому +2

      Nikhil Dhingra ..i agree wid u.in fact I share the same feelings about Hinduism, Islam and Christianity. we Hindus must stand together to fight against this forceful conversion as Hinduism is a way based on science itself not like Islam where qoran is unscientific in nature where the earth is still a flat object

  • @hariprasads82999
    @hariprasads82999 8 років тому +50

    I'm not a scientist or anything, but according to me, GOD is just a word as answer to satisfy our questions which are unexplainable.
    For example, If u have a trouble, u go to temples or church to spit out the pain which u have , and u truly believe a thing as GOD will fix it. If it's fixed, u thank God or else u just say even God is unlikely to it.
    god is just a belief ppl, which strengthens ur mind.
    Mystery is all over, man can find the answers slowly, until then ppl keep it as God.

  • @kanishkkumar8819
    @kanishkkumar8819 8 років тому +2

    Newton's first law says- An object at rest stays at rest and an object in motion stays in motion with the same speed and in the same direction unless any external force is applied. So electrons are in motion as they revolve and they will stay in same motion until any external force will applied. And it get energy because of potential difference between two charges, i. e, negatively charged electrons and positively charged protons.

  • @rupandey5273
    @rupandey5273 8 років тому +12

    Lovely Speech about the movement of electrons and other energies.. This Man is Amazing..

  • @deepakbhagat811
    @deepakbhagat811 8 років тому +4

    Great Respect to the grandpaa.. Love You Old Man, I just need people like him more and more.. Stay Blessed..

  • @mtarasios
    @mtarasios 8 років тому +4

    Very simple explaination. Sometimes the most profound truths are very simple. God bless him.

  • @solz6009
    @solz6009 8 років тому +4

    Well where did this source or God come into existence. Assigning something unknown or unexplainable yet into god ain't proof of existence of a god.

  • @doctorchandan748
    @doctorchandan748 8 років тому +3

    nuclear force is the reason for binding energy...and electrons are moving in a circle because of centripetal force provided by the electrostatic force between electron and proton.... but the problem is centripetal force comes to play if the body has some initial velocity...and where that initial velocity came from

    • @realname2404
      @realname2404 3 роки тому

      Thermal energy causing particles to vibrate ( refer: absolute zero / 0 kelvin)

  • @praveenojha33
    @praveenojha33 6 років тому +3

    He is wrong. No energy is needed by an electron to move in its orbital(he is referring it as orbit). His questions can be answered by Bohr's atomic model only. Rutherford model was discarded as he was unable to explain the same thing. Now we have much more advanced Quantum Mechanical Model which is based on uncertainty principle.

  • @swarnadeepgoswami2999
    @swarnadeepgoswami2999 8 років тому +11

    "GOD IS SOURCE OF ENERGY"...said by "Geeta"

    • @sebkurry9174
      @sebkurry9174 7 років тому +1

      swarnadeep goswami Sorry, don't care.

    • @adamthapazz4137
      @adamthapazz4137 3 роки тому +1

      so duracell battery

    • @achintachakraborty347
      @achintachakraborty347 3 роки тому +1

      @@adamthapazz4137 good luck with creating a Duracell battery which can replace sun as the primary source of energy in our solar system🤣🤣🤣

    • @adamthapazz4137
      @adamthapazz4137 3 роки тому

      @@achintachakraborty347 lol... What ?

  • @athejaswi
    @athejaswi 8 років тому +25

    Newton's laws are valid for quantum mechanics??dont think so

    • @saishannu
      @saishannu 8 років тому +1

      Arun Thejaswi Madhu
      atomic theory is explained my quantum mechanics which fairly obeys Newton's laws.
      if you see Schrödinger's equation, it is analogous to Newton's laws.

    • @cybervoid8442
      @cybervoid8442 8 років тому +3

      newton's laws or classical mechanics in general is the averaged out effect of quantum mechanics..

    • @BinayRajKoirala
      @BinayRajKoirala 8 років тому

      Amarendra Mishra Sir
      Tapaai ho ?
      Class 12 Section B
      Bholi sodhnu la ! 😀

    • @cybervoid8442
      @cybervoid8442 8 років тому

      wut?

    • @cybervoid8442
      @cybervoid8442 8 років тому

      NEPAL X
      I dont understand what u'r saying

  • @shashankrai6070
    @shashankrai6070 8 років тому +5

    I am glad ...that I am a science student..
    I will surely ask my both physics & chemistry teachers this questions

  • @dagastya7007
    @dagastya7007 8 років тому +4

    before higgs boson an Indian scientist Satyendranath Bose said the same thing

  • @kunalsaraswat7366
    @kunalsaraswat7366 8 років тому +16

    It's really a good way to confuse others, I came across 2 conclusions after hearing this:
    1. From where electrons are getting the energy that they can revolve around the nucleus : The atom's center, or nucleus, is positively charged and the electrons that whirl around this nucleus are negatively charged, so they attract each other. The reason the force is strong is because the atom is so small. The distance between the nucleus and the electrons is about 1 Angstrom (named after a famous scientist); this is 0.00000001 cm (10-8 cm) or about 4 billionths of an inch. Since the electric force varies with the distance between the positive and negative charges like 1 over the distance squared, the force gets large for small distances.
    2.Why electrons (God particle ) are only moving, why not the protons or the neutrons : the mass of electron ( 1.6726 x 10-27 kg.) and mass of proton is ( 9.1 x 10-31 kg) and light objects can be moved easily in comparison to heavy objects that is the only reason electrons revolve around the nucleus while neutron is neutral in charge therefore it does not experience any kind of force and doesn't move.
    I think it might help you guys ... Thanks!! :)

    • @JidhinDas
      @JidhinDas 5 років тому +2

      This is the comment I was looking for....

    • @chendu2215
      @chendu2215 3 роки тому

      Me too

    • @nikhilvr917
      @nikhilvr917 3 роки тому +7

      You guys must read about the hard problem of consciousness, No Science has been able to define it...that's it...It is the proof of the Existence of God...

    • @sankaranarayanansubramania3702
      @sankaranarayanansubramania3702 3 роки тому +3

      Buy the newton's law is still valid. no object will move unless a force is applied. Electrons are negatively charged and nucleus is positively charged, but still some force makes it to be chrged in such a way one moves. Hence God exists. Also there is another proof is that when we cast a dice, to get a number , say 5, there are 1/6 chances. If we throw 2 dices, to get the chance of getting two 5s, there 1/36 chaance. similary if we cast 70 dices, the chance of getting all the dice are equal in number (say 5), the chance will be 1 in trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion ... So 118 elements make up this world. When the world expanded and for us to exist, the combination and permutation of these 118 elements has to be in such a way that the world with living things is made and exists. For this right combination to occur, even if we consider and try the combination to make this world, it would have taken trillion trillion trillion trillion...... years to do it. Unless it is externally planned and made this combination possible, it would not have occurred, as we know the universe is only 1000 crore years.

    • @Exiide89
      @Exiide89 3 роки тому +5

      You are telling the energies acting on various particles. Not the source. Where is all this energy coming from? From big bang? Where did big bang come from? From what energy? Where did that energy come from? Understand the probability of all this existence to come together is too low to even warrant an existence.

  • @hemanthdevaguptapu9615
    @hemanthdevaguptapu9615 8 років тому +1

    Extraordinarily explained sir, Wherever science stopped, then only Goddess is coming to frame..*Jai SriRam*

  • @AyubKhan-md4km
    @AyubKhan-md4km 8 років тому +9

    My greatest respect for him

  • @riteshgupta4434
    @riteshgupta4434 8 років тому +7

    Sir forget about electron and proton movement Tell me how earth revolved around sun that to at specific speed and velocity and how earth is placed exactly at proper distance from earth neither close or little bit away?

    • @aryannair9767
      @aryannair9767 4 роки тому +3

      Um, because of the gravitational force exerted by the sun!

  • @masa4936
    @masa4936 8 років тому +1

    This man is clearly intelligent and is very passionate about science, I used to hate Physics & Chemistry maybe because i didnt get it, but he explains well and i could listen to him all day.

  • @shraddhatekade3805
    @shraddhatekade3805 7 років тому +15

    Whatever he explained is just amazing and full of positivity. Very inspiring...

  • @deepaknirmal4506
    @deepaknirmal4506 7 років тому +3

    Sir , apko big salute ........Correctly explained ...........Science give the answers of 'How' and spirituality gives the answers of 'Why ' !!

  • @omkartripathy787
    @omkartripathy787 6 років тому +1

    Electrons doesn't move in circular path, its movement is unpredictable .

  • @veganath
    @veganath 8 років тому +6

    "The electron energy is coming from where?" - How about an honest answer - I do not know.
    Please investigate the question before presupposing the answer.....

    • @Alpha456
      @Alpha456 3 роки тому

      Ok then answer it

    • @veganath
      @veganath 3 роки тому +1

      @@Alpha456 *_"The electron energy is coming from where?"_* You ask *_"Ok then answer it"_* I do not know the answer, but I will investigate. Do you know the answer?

    • @10857
      @10857 3 роки тому +1

      @@veganath electron energy comes from the food that electron eats ,it's as simple as that

    • @veganath
      @veganath 3 роки тому

      @@10857 of course...lol.

  • @Movies4evers
    @Movies4evers 8 років тому +7

    i didn't believe because we have studied that electron revolve around nucleus and energy is provided to electron from the nucleus,so electron in the form of shell nucleus bound them and provide energy

    • @hardik983
      @hardik983 8 років тому +2

      True. But he is saying the God is the source of energy, not the energy. Just saying. I am an athiest though. But I do wonder what is the source ..

    • @DexScene
      @DexScene 8 років тому

      exactly!!

    • @hardik983
      @hardik983 8 років тому +1

      But then again .. if there is a source, and logic supports it, it would be wrong to name it God in this world. Cause the word God is just another excuse to insert people's very obsurd and sometimes distructive views into the argument.

    • @VikashSharmaVkey
      @VikashSharmaVkey 8 років тому

      Personally I feel God is divine term which calm the shit out of me , but I know deep down Its our own brain. And I feel good in spirituality like Yoga and Meditation which is also science like slowing frequency of brain. But as long as we don't know about it , WE can't criticize it and most of people who practice science , study or work , don't believe in God. So far as we all know , Its only human brain which has ability to think , compare and find logic in something and explain our feeling and thought by talking to each other. As long as its not proved , I believe in God as Power as energy which makes us destined to something to find truth about universe and science which gives us mean to do so. I believe in Both.

    • @DexScene
      @DexScene 8 років тому

      Vikash Sharma But most of war happens because of religion!

  • @samsungtabhome2743
    @samsungtabhome2743 8 років тому +1

    he is right.. even when rutherfold (who discovered the structure of atom) when questioned about why isn't the electron losing energy. he had no answer to it. Neil bohr later on gave the theory but he didn''t explains the reason to it.he told its a postulate in his theory

  • @ungoyyale
    @ungoyyale 7 років тому +5

    2:16 I really hated the translator at this time. he thinks he is the only one who knows English in India. come on man he was a damn scientist for atleast 30 years

    • @prakharpatil739
      @prakharpatil739 3 роки тому +3

      Knowledge and language are two different things... I don't think ki vo unka maza uda rhe the

  • @NishithKB
    @NishithKB 8 років тому +4

    The first law of Newtonian mechanics says"
    The velocity of a body remains constant unless the body is acted upon by an external force.
    So there is no need to spend energy to keep on moving, unless external forces are acting on the body.
    Electrons around a nucleus are not a classical problem, but conservation of energy holds also in the quantum states. The electron around the nucleus is in a quantized energy level and can change it only if an external interaction intervenes. It is quantization that guarantees this, since in the classical problem of a charge circulating around an opposite charge there would be continuous radiation which would have made the electron fall into the nucleus. Quantized energy states for the electrons are necessary for atoms to exist and were first proposed by Bohr.

    • @V1kram
      @V1kram 8 років тому +2

      There are plenty of external forces that can mess with such bodies in earth's atmosphere. Gravity being one of them.
      In space, there's no friction, gravity, air resistance etc.
      The law is stated only for celestial bodies.

    • @sitray89
      @sitray89 8 років тому

      isnt gravitation is a force that just exist not induced. It can be perpetuated as gods force.

    • @NishithKB
      @NishithKB 8 років тому

      Gravity is not as a force, but as a consequence of the curvature of spacetime caused by the uneven distribution of mass/energy.

    • @akshayblizz
      @akshayblizz 8 років тому

      velocity remains constant . but how did the circular movement of electron started at first ?

  • @shibrainam953
    @shibrainam953 3 роки тому +2

    Though I'm a muslim , I totally agree with his answer. He gave such a satisfactory answer by saying that every single thing is being run by God ( Creator) .whether we call it Allah or Bhagwan , it really doesn't matter . Atleast we all do believe in God .
    Sir , you really deserve respect.

  • @harsh4964
    @harsh4964 8 років тому +3

    Beautiful place, beautiful people, beautiful country and beautiful truth......
    #India love u always.....

  • @alphazero5653
    @alphazero5653 8 років тому +175

    jo piche baithe hai unko ghanta kuc samajh raha hai

    • @sharadsemilo
      @sharadsemilo 8 років тому +1

      Rishank Devadiga tujhe ghanta kuch samajh rai. jo bol raha hai, yeh budhdha usko ghanta kuch samjh rai. basic atomic chemistry toh aata nai hai isse

    • @alphazero5653
      @alphazero5653 8 років тому +3

      chutye.. mai Btech in chemical engineering hu.. NIT se.. toh thoda bohot toh pata hai muje atomic theory ke bare mei..

    • @pushparajshetty4819
      @pushparajshetty4819 8 років тому

      Rishank Devadiga Yenchi saav be ninna

    • @pushparajshetty4819
      @pushparajshetty4819 8 років тому +3

      ashish shetty Ninada yeer pateriyer be.. Nai da maagga.. Daiy enna pinkan nakare baraba. Patinge.. Rande magga..

    • @AnOldSchoolGuy
      @AnOldSchoolGuy 8 років тому +3

      Rishank Devadiga but at least they all seem very curious about what uncle ji is saying!

  • @amit_anand_jha
    @amit_anand_jha 7 років тому +1

    Haribol ! Wonderful and insightful . The arguments could have been more strong and invincible but who cares . Extremely well presentation of the truth . Hare Krishna
    Thanks to the uploader and Haribol

  • @ravikiranpradhan6853
    @ravikiranpradhan6853 8 років тому +10

    Donno how much he said is true but i am really satisfied by the way he explained the proof of god.....thank you sir

    • @sushrestha1
      @sushrestha1 8 років тому

      he is saying energy is being created by some supreme being which according to science is false ,energy can't be create and if some one is creating energy he/she should be borrowing it from some one else so that mean our god has his god and so on..

    • @Saikumar-yamjala
      @Saikumar-yamjala 8 років тому +1

      sujan shrestha , Haha.... There are many things that Science can't Explain .... Science is partially true but not Exactly !!

    • @sushrestha1
      @sushrestha1 8 років тому

      Sai kumar
      do you mean religion is completely true

    • @Saikumar-yamjala
      @Saikumar-yamjala 8 років тому +1

      Haha, I didn't Said that too !!

    • @LiveAndLetLive121
      @LiveAndLetLive121 8 років тому

      His explanation regarding movement of electron is completely flawed. The electron movement and its state should be explained by using Quantum Mechanics, not by Classical Mechanics ( or Newtonian Mechanics) as he mentioned. The Schrodinger's Equation explains the state of electron in time and space.

  • @teufelhunden2764
    @teufelhunden2764 5 років тому +3

    Spirituality is itself the science.

  • @defaultuser9423
    @defaultuser9423 7 років тому +2

    Well if Mr Pandey told this proof to someone with actual knowledge of atomic structure, then he would unfortunately end up being his "servant for the rest of his life" as he himself said

  • @slimshady8100
    @slimshady8100 8 років тому +4

    and what about the genocide-wars-rape-corruption-epidemic whose supplying energy?

  • @008tejas
    @008tejas 8 років тому +5

    Many of comments posted here agree or don't agree on this, so here's my question to all of you
    If god is not a source of energy how the universe might be created and what initiated the "BIG BANG"?

    • @The13thMaker
      @The13thMaker 8 років тому +6

      Uh we dont know. But see, rational people dont jump to conclusions when they don't know something... There have been so many things in the world that humans couldnt explain at first, and through rational thought, experimentation, and scientific observation, we found our way to the truth. So just because we don't know the cause of the creation of the Universe doesnt mean it was god.

    • @sharathnb
      @sharathnb 8 років тому +1

      tejas khairnar if everything source of energy to begin, like u said bing bang needed source of energy, then how did God start. Go's started with our source of energy?? U r okay to assume that God was always there without any source of energy

    • @avirocks2007
      @avirocks2007 8 років тому

      God as a supreme being is a super consiosness in which we are as small as a atom. He is infinite being which has no beginning and end. We refer to that consiosness as shiva or brahman. Now this consiousness has enormous energy just like we have physical mental energy which is making us breathe play laugh sing eat, similary that infinite being has infinite energy which is referred to as shakti. She is feminine because she is responsible for creation and hence as vivekananda said creation and creator are running in parallel. Shiva and shakti are one and the same but still in different modes of operation. That energy is also inside us deep at the base of the spine. ITs tremendous energy like a nuclear energy. ITs called kundalini. When it rises then your journey towards god starts. She is your real mother who has taken you from life to birth to death.

    • @avirocks2007
      @avirocks2007 8 років тому

      BlaBablyBoo it can only be realized in deep meditaion. since you are just a part of infinite consiousness you can experience that infinite being by merging into it. Religions, sufis, yogis, tantriks all are saying the same thing..there are ways to raiseyour consiousness to experience that bliss that infinite is madeup of. it requires practise disipline and follwing certain breathing methods to raise your consiosness. even if yo experiene a drop of it your ife will change competly since that is something which ccanoot be valued and compared with. the bliss is greater than any other thing in this material world

    • @avirocks2007
      @avirocks2007 8 років тому

      BlaBablyBoo i am not a enlightened being but at the same time i say all the scriptures are useless if you haven't put it into your practise. The self is god in a way all living beings arepart of it but are not aware of it since god doesnt want us to know but he wants us to keep us busy in his game!!!! dont believe it EXPERIENCE IT and then come and speak to me. I am sure you wouldn't speak a word if you truly experiencced it for a second :) untill and uness your heart ries for god and tears come down your face that you want to know..untill then all this things are rubbish. Yoga is a scientific systematic way to raise your consiousness to that extent that it uncovers the viel which has been put deliberably to make us forget. Even this eyes what they show you is false. Untill your third ee opes you are living in ignorance. It shows you the other dimesnions present in this existence.

  • @sr-zk4up
    @sr-zk4up 4 роки тому +2

    Classic example of how little knowledge can be dangerous.
    My deepest sympathies for everyone who had to sit in this man's lectures.
    He's bringing Classical Newtonian Mechanics into quantum world. Newtonian Mechanics simply does not hold in atomic scale.
    If anyone is interested to learn properly..
    Go and start reading about the 'Standard Model of Physics'. It may be confusing at first but over time you'll learn.

    • @sarak220
      @sarak220 3 роки тому +1

      Go read upnishad and vedas where Newton stole the knowledge from

    • @dawnstudios7813
      @dawnstudios7813 3 роки тому +1

      His reasoning is flawed.
      A) Moving in circular orbits is an old idea from the times of Rutherford. Orbits don't exist as far as we know, orbitals do. We can say something about the probability of an electron being somewhere, but can't say deterministic things like electrons move in circular orbits.
      B) Moving clockwise or anticlockwise is not around the nucleus, but it's around its own axis, called as spin. An electron has an angular momentum as well apart from spin angular momentum We can't imagine an electron as a particle. We also can't imagine it as a wave. The shapes of p-orbital (he should have said orbital not orbit) are correct as mentioned by him but he imagines them as path of the electron, but rather they describe probability density of electron around the nucleus.
      C) He states Newton's first law correctly, but he applies it incorrectly. There are external forces acting on an electron, namely the electrostatic forces of attraction by the protons in its own nucleus and surrounding nuclei, the repulsion from other electrons in its own atom and other atoms around it.
      D) He says that in order for electrons to keep moving, there should be a source of energy. But that's not true, things can keep moving without losing energy. When vehicles move on the road, their energy gets converted to heat energy due to losses from friction. But if moved in a perfect vaccuum with levitation, a vehicle can move indefinitely without losing energy at all. One can also wonder how a satellite moves around the earth in a fixed orbit without losing much energy (only loses a tiny fraction due to friction with atmosphere). Actually, if you think about a satellite, its velocity can be seen as a sum of two components, one towards the earth, and one parallel to the earth. From some time t1 to t2, the satellite because of its velocity towards the earth falls towards the earth, but because of its velocity parallel to the earth and earth's circular shape, the ground also goes far from it. You can understand it better if you draw it on a sheet of paper.
      E) The Higgs Boson particle is just a sub-atomic particle which has properties which say that it gives mass to the atom. You can say that it's the most significant sub-atomic particle if we talk about where most of the mass comes from in an atom. Somebody can correct me here, I'm not a nuclear scientist. But how I understand sub-atomic particles is that scientists keep breaking atomic particles to discover new sub-atomic particles and then they analyze their properties to understand the original particle better. Breaking things in smaller things to understand the whole better basically.
      I believe in God and my reasoning follows the simulation hypothesis. Perhaps watch this "Jailbreaking the Simulation with George Hotz".

  • @vish4544
    @vish4544 8 років тому +4

    I am happy this was recommended to me

  • @sameert31
    @sameert31 8 років тому +5

    Erwin Schrodinger who is called as the Father of Quantum Mechanics also considered Hindu scriptures Vedas in similarity with Quantum physics and he wrote in his book:
    "This life of yours which you are living is not merely a piece of this entire existence,but in a certain sense the whole; only this whole is not so constituted that it can be surveyed in one single glance. This, as we know, is what the Brahmins(Hindu sages) express in that sacred, mystic formula which is yet really so simple and so clear: tat tvam asi, this is you. Or, again, in such words as “I am in the east and the west, I am above and below, I am this entire world.”"

    • @Krishnadarshan1212
      @Krishnadarshan1212 8 років тому +1

      hare bol. ....hare Krishna...wonderful explanation.....

  • @ashfaqali5083
    @ashfaqali5083 8 років тому +1

    there are only a few scientists who understand science.... Mr Jang Jaswal is one of them... Mashallah.. God Bless him... My respects!

  • @akyubachang9753
    @akyubachang9753 8 років тому +3

    such a knowledgeable old man , respect Him ✌

  • @ivarhakuse8572
    @ivarhakuse8572 8 років тому +28

    How is religion related to spirituality? OMG! Religion is politics and nothing else! Spirituality transcends all divisiveness! Religion is a devisive seditious tool of western imperialist ideology which explains why church missionaries followed armies or vise versa or jihad. You can't kill all the people but we can mentally subjugate them and make them bow to Rome or Mecca! That explains the violence involved. Hitler, Stalin Mao killed millions to reach their political ends, funnily enough that is what happens with religion, I.e. Christianity, Islam too! See the connection? Hinduism has never termed itself as religion but Dharma, an investigation into nature of self not god.

    • @Ishamv3
      @Ishamv3 8 років тому +6

      True. Western words and concepts such as religion and spirituality are always mis-translated when discussing Hinduism. Our concept of God doesn't fits in alignment with theirs, either.

    • @ivarhakuse8572
      @ivarhakuse8572 8 років тому +3

      AndavanThiruvadi You are a typical Hindu, well meaning and ignorant. The only group experience offered by religion is genocide. Don't go about trying to give meaningful explanations by using your own yardstick to something that bears no relation to your yardstick please. When Maharishi mahesh yogi talked about Mass meditation, was that not an example of a group experience? When thousands of people sat with Buddha or Mahaveer in Dhyana yoga was that not an example of a mass experience? What do you suppose the term Buddhafield mean? What does Satsangh? Sangham Sharanum Gatchami? Mean? In Shwetawastara Upanishad there is a congregation of meditators, At the Oslo camp in Pune meditators gather in thousands. So, I'm not being rude but asking you to please read Koran, Bible and your own history. When Timurlane killed 100 000 people in Delhi I think that was a mass experience, nothing particularly holy, SAINT Francis Xavier killed god knows how many around Goa, it was a mass experience of the most unholy type. The Hindus have always denied theirs as religion whilst Christians and Jews have rammed religion into every non gang member what is sacred about it?
      Neither the Hindus, nor the Amerindian nor Maori nor aborigine, nor Daoist nor Shinto has ever mentioned religion. The only people filled with this religiosity were the Christians and Muslims.
      Why is Europe Christian? And why is morality such an immoral word in Europe? It's because Christianity was spread by the romans as a mechanism to divide and subjugate people even after the fall of the Roman Empire. Didn't you notice where the pope lives and in which direction Roman Catholics bow?
      If religion had even the slightest relation to god it would not be busy causing so much pain and suffering! Did you ever hear about African Mbuntu or Hawaiian kahuna ever cause pain and suffering?
      The mafia will kill you if you leave their gang! Hello! What does that tell you? Ever hear about apostasy being punishable by death? In which case isn't religion another term for gang?
      Political parties never come to power by telling voters that their policies are the same as other parties!
      Does that not tell you the reason why Christian denominations hate each other so vehemently why Shias and sunnies, ahmeddiyas hate each other so much. Why they point out differences so keenly.
      Anything to do with god should be a catalyst for unity not an excuse for murder!

    • @Ishamv3
      @Ishamv3 8 років тому +2

      Ivar Hakuse The Pope lives in the Vatican. Which direction the Roman Catholics bow?
      ***** "Where have you seen 2 or more religion pray one God?" It happens only in India, because many Hindus are somewhat stupid. I wonder if your Catholic friends pray in a Hindu temple. I doubt it.
      Also, I feel that taking stances like "every religion has good and bad people in it", and "misunderstandings of religion cannot be attributed to religion itself" are an easy way out. It's hasty generalisation, and rather too generous a stand. I think such individual incidents need to be studied, and then neutrally compared overall. If the cause of the wrongdoing roots back into their religious texts, it WILL have to be blamed for it. The followers of the religions will also have to be questioned regarding what they're doing to reduce/remove these misunderstandings. For example, how can the religion of peace be misinterpreted to the point that its followers start killing themselves and others? And if it can be, why not omit such controversial verses, seemingly more apt for the middle ages, from its texts? Such religions have been known to have an inbuilt mechanism to differentiate between the followers of it, who get the perks, and the rest. Conversion too, is a core principle of such Abrahamic religions. There has been so much of bloodshed in the middle-East and Europe because their religions claim exclusivity. "The one true religion", something which really can't be scientifically proved. This is bound to cause conflicts, and a race towards dominance. On the contrary, ahimsa has been in the core of the Hindu dharma. Dharma itself for us, simply means the right thing to do in a situation, and has nothing to do with propagating the message of any 'God'.

    • @Ishamv3
      @Ishamv3 8 років тому +1

      ***** Of course, it's just a surname. I think we've the same surname, and I'm sure that you haven't read any of the Vedas, either.
      What pissed you off?

    • @Ishamv3
      @Ishamv3 8 років тому +1

      ***** Oh, I'm not saying that God doesn't exists. I think we've some confusion here... I believe in God, but for us it's not a man up in the skies. It's all around, and within us. The Hindus' concept of God is much-much different from that of the West. I think we can both agree on this. This is what I was trying to highlight. In their religion, they go to heaven for believing in God and following His path. But for us Hindus, it is more about karma, following our dharma (not religion), and finding our true self and potential.
      I don't understand Sanskrit. So, can you tell me the number of that Bhagwad Gita shlok? 'Lord' is a title given to high-officials in the UK, which is why Macaulay, Curzon and Mountbatten were called lords. Nothing wrong with it. But we should stop using English words (such as Lord) for our Bhagwaans, because they never translate too well, and cause confusion. Yes, I understand what you mean, but we'd misunderstanding.
      Well, if crores of Hindus believe in Shirdi Sai for no good reason. And make fun of/criticise their own Shankaracharya for opposing it, I'm bent to say that many are stupid! The religion indeed is great, but how many of us are truly following it? How many of us fully know about it? The India of today would've been the India of our dreams if we were all true, practising Hindus. Again, I think you misunderstood me. I was calling ourselves stupid for a very different set of reasons. :)

  • @omanarao6689
    @omanarao6689 Рік тому +1

    Param Shanti Bapuji ❤

  • @Lordof_Chaos
    @Lordof_Chaos 8 років тому +9

    WTF 😂😂😂 Newton's law of motion in quantum mechanics. Great work 😂😂😂

    • @gurugauravbhatt3351
      @gurugauravbhatt3351 3 роки тому +1

      Same I think quantum in Newtonian

    • @ranjithk7626
      @ranjithk7626 3 роки тому

      Can u explain in detail if he is wrong don't just laugh

    • @heisenberg2508
      @heisenberg2508 3 роки тому +1

      @rajnith k.... are you a student of science?

  • @lakshitdagar
    @lakshitdagar 8 років тому +4

    the force moving the electrons is the centrifugal force of the the electric field between the nucleus and the electrons

    • @realname2404
      @realname2404 3 роки тому

      Also the particles stops motion at 0 degree kelvin

  • @arundhatidevi120
    @arundhatidevi120 8 років тому +34

    Such a small example but so logical and a fact!!.....👍👍👍

    • @liwoodm3621
      @liwoodm3621 8 років тому +6

      Arundhati Devi Dr fool. he dont having any idea what he is saying. I want to correct the Dr.fool I.e
      no.1 ) Newton law is applicable to only rigid body . atom is a particle not a rigid body
      no.2) quantum machanics is branch which explain each and every movement of an electron and proton too.
      no.3) dont try to mix physics and chemistry and quantum mechanics all to make khichadi
      no.4) I conclude that this Doctor is chutiya or fool
      no.5) only fool people believe what he says

    • @swadeshbhattacharjee1205
      @swadeshbhattacharjee1205 8 років тому +1

      prasad Dubey just tell me whr frm is the Sun getting energy ?

    • @aniketpathrabe2815
      @aniketpathrabe2815 8 років тому +2

      prasad Dubey; don't Newton's law act on water jst bcoz its not rigit,
      even i m a chemical engineer , if u don't have any knowledge and u pretend to b a wise man.thn u should simply stay quite, or else u would b trolled badly

    • @liwoodm3621
      @liwoodm3621 8 років тому +1

      Swadesh Bhattacharjee there are hydrogen molecules inside the sun which generate nuclear fusion reaction which release energy in the form of heat and light
      this is explain in std book 7 . go study well bro. are you anpad?

    • @liwoodm3621
      @liwoodm3621 8 років тому +1

      saste nashe oh! you are chemical engineer then define me what giffs rule and reduce giffs phase rule . this is the ans of your water question. if you dont give the ans that means you are f.ucking person

  • @shashi10ka
    @shashi10ka 8 років тому +34

    beauty of Hindu culture, we are way ahead of everyone, but unfortunately ruined by politics

    • @gullazero
      @gullazero 8 років тому +2

      What bs....how did you come to that ignorant conclusion?

    • @shantilalsonstravel7722
      @shantilalsonstravel7722 8 років тому

      Shashi-10KiloAmps

    • @shashi10ka
      @shashi10ka 8 років тому +1

      why u disagree?

    • @mohitr5768
      @mohitr5768 8 років тому

      Shashi-10KiloAmps nooo the old man i n d video is wrong bro

    • @shashi10ka
      @shashi10ka 8 років тому

      prove with your data points

  • @ashishyadav0505
    @ashishyadav0505 8 років тому +1

    I m very much impressed by senior citizen so much knowledge gain from this sir

  • @ChunaraRahim
    @ChunaraRahim 8 років тому +12

    When i started reading title i first though he was gonna prove Einstein e=mc^2 equation

  • @globalcreations1977
    @globalcreations1977 8 років тому +6

    I may agree at science part not on spiritual part. U don't have to religious to understand spiritual. Because all religions are man made. And are different according to time and places in the world. And spirituality are based on individual spirit. Which is existed in everybody.

  • @davinderkaur1951
    @davinderkaur1951 Рік тому +2

    बेहद के बेहद की परम परम परम महा शांति है महा शांति हैं। महा शांति है बापूजी माजी अनंत साक्षी। 🙏🌼💖🌟💛🌹💞💐🥀🌷

  • @srilathavenkateshkancha1728
    @srilathavenkateshkancha1728 5 років тому +6

    Behad ki param mahashanti he 🙏💐💯☑️👍👍👌👌👌👌⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️

  • @MrWarriorspirit
    @MrWarriorspirit 7 років тому +5

    This is really the age old argument from design, but a more sophisticated version of it relying on atomic theory. In fact, there is a version of this in the Hindu philosophical school of atomism, known as Vaiseshika, perhaps the oldest ever description of atoms by Maharishi Kananda. In a later commentary by Udayanacharya around the 10th century it makes an argument to prove God exists by showing that God is that which initiates movements in the atoms and keeps them in movement. The earlier school did not speculate on this, but instead called this unknown force "Adrishya" meaning unseen force or destiny. Udayana arguments, like the good scientist in this video, is that something must be maintaining the movements of atoms, that too along predictable paths, so that atoms do not collide with one another or fall apart the next moment.
    The so-called refutations of the arguments that Newton laws do not apply at the quantum level is no refutation at all. The fact that they do not apply is the reason why there is an explanation gap between in physics between GTR and QM. We use two models to describe behaviour of physical objects, GTR at the macro level and quantum physics at the micro level, which are contradictory. This cannot be correct, hence the search is on for a unified theory which can reconcile GTR and QM, which Einstein sought in unified field theory and String theory attempts to do the same by showing that quantum uncertainty disappears if you posit extra spatial dimensions, showing the universe actually has a perfectly elegant order. The fact remains that that something unknown maintains order and coherence in this universe, something is providing the energy to move atoms in exact paths, such that we can predict with the billionth of a part the position of the atom and if we could not do that, transistors and lasers would be impossible. It is definitely not probabilistic, and hence why Einstein famously said "God does not pay dice"