Solubility Product Constant (Ksp)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 22 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 192

  • @NourAhmed-go5jo
    @NourAhmed-go5jo 5 років тому +481

    7:53 x = 1.3 * 10 ^-3 not -9
    for anyone who found it confusing it's just a mistake in the video

    • @ProfessorDaveExplains
      @ProfessorDaveExplains  5 років тому +229

      Ah shoot! What a dumb mistake, thanks for catching that.

    • @mycrafts5701
      @mycrafts5701 4 роки тому +6

      S there is mistake in powers

    • @claudatwork
      @claudatwork 3 роки тому +20

      @@ProfessorDaveExplains I thank all of the saints in heaven for the existence of your videos. One small mistake out of an amazing series! THANK YOU

    • @arnavagarwal7871
      @arnavagarwal7871 3 роки тому +8

      @@ProfessorDaveExplains no mistake is dumb sir

    • @FortressFour444
      @FortressFour444 2 роки тому +2

      I keep on getting that answer raised to 4 instead of 3. Don't know what I'm doing wrong though, I've punched it into my calculator in different ways.

  • @gabrielunskii5280
    @gabrielunskii5280 4 роки тому +97

    It's almost 1 am I have my chemistry final exam tomorrow and I've been watching your videos all the afternoon and I have learned more with 5 MINUTE VIDEOS than with MONTHS of chemistry classes. Thank you so much and keep going cause I'm starving for new ones hahahaha

    • @briankarani4322
      @briankarani4322 2 роки тому +1

      Me too

    • @dettol8949
      @dettol8949 2 роки тому +4

      it's 3AM, and i have my exams tomorrow at 10 AM. and yes dave is the one who's gonna save me.

    • @noobednatherium4082
      @noobednatherium4082 6 місяців тому +1

      @@dettol8949 Did he! I hope he did!

    • @dettol8949
      @dettol8949 6 місяців тому

      @@noobednatherium4082 he did. I’m at my dream college’s dorm now. 😀

  • @alexshanto7285
    @alexshanto7285 3 роки тому +12

    Man, I want to hug you or kiss your hands.You have cleared my doubts of 3 months in 8 minutes.
    Our teachers only deal with quation and formula , they don't explain pre -state or condition with this solution.Thanks man.As a citizen of developing country, we, students, always are out of modern laboratory and experiment, Kind people like you are giving free highly valued education.I don't want to disrespect your efforts by saying " Thank You ".
    May Allah bless you.

  • @sohailahakeem231
    @sohailahakeem231 5 років тому +63

    I really respect your style of covering the topic in a simple way . I suggest making a quiz about the topic in the description box . this will be helpful

    • @ProfessorDaveExplains
      @ProfessorDaveExplains  5 років тому +23

      there is a checking comprehension question at the end of the video

  • @shanebergeron690
    @shanebergeron690 5 років тому +26

    Hey Proof. Dave ... Haven't forgotten about my promised donation to you for your help with orgo chem in general. It's been a few months. There has been a major delay in my tax returns. The beloved IRS. Anyway will be sending you something soon. It was to be in March but that wasn't the case. I continue to be a huge fan of the science you bring to Life via you tube !

  • @SoloJedi_
    @SoloJedi_ 3 роки тому +1

    Studying for the MCAT and THIS VIDEO has SAVED ME!!!!!!! THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU. Wish I knew about you during Chemistry

  • @joyridinYT
    @joyridinYT 4 роки тому +50

    woah! had to restart this video cause I couldn't get over how good prof looks with this haircut😅but thank you for the videos - they're always so helpful.

    • @achaides
      @achaides 3 роки тому +1

      me too! glad he wasn't in the whole video! hahaha

  • @angelaandrade6983
    @angelaandrade6983 4 роки тому +19

    I literally watched 1 minute of this and understood the entire chapter. Thank u

  • @samsouyave-murphy986
    @samsouyave-murphy986 5 років тому +141

    Oh my God! You cut your hair!

  • @ABIRHOSSAIN-jy3ve
    @ABIRHOSSAIN-jy3ve 5 місяців тому

    I literally cannot thank you enough for making these vids!
    your a life saver.

  • @Danymok
    @Danymok 3 роки тому +1

    Dude, I couldn't understand this at all from my class, but you explained this so well! Thanks bruv!

  • @theCodyReeder
    @theCodyReeder 4 роки тому +54

    Thanks for the refresher!

    • @dennismwenda6078
      @dennismwenda6078 3 роки тому

      What refresher, this is the first time I'm studying this stuff.

    • @dennismwenda6078
      @dennismwenda6078 3 роки тому

      What refresher, this is the first time I'm studying this stuff.

  • @rohithn1812
    @rohithn1812 5 років тому +14

    Hi Sir, Your video is so Good
    Easy too understand and so much of colour text makes interest for learners, I love your every single videos
    Thanks a lot for making this all videos

  • @nathanpopp8227
    @nathanpopp8227 7 місяців тому

    Dude thank you so much for this clear and concise informational video! Saved me so much time compared to how I was studying before! Thank you!

  • @tannerfoust2346
    @tannerfoust2346 Рік тому +1

    woah, short hair professor dave looks good too but ive really grown to love the long hair professor dave that has helped me through gen chem

  • @ericpalmateer806
    @ericpalmateer806 3 роки тому

    Good job, I go to your channel to get a general idea of the concept before I try to learn how to do the multitude of different versions of the chemistry questions.
    Thank you again.

  • @someoneidkyeahok
    @someoneidkyeahok 5 місяців тому

    THIS VIDEO SAVED MY LIFE

  • @RahulKumawat-tp6tl
    @RahulKumawat-tp6tl 10 місяців тому

    Thanks....these little things helps a lot.... love from India ❤

  • @tashfeen_9728
    @tashfeen_9728 11 місяців тому

    No AI can replace these geniuses from UA-cam.

  • @bunnydream2087
    @bunnydream2087 4 роки тому +4

    Love your videos! Thank you so much, really. They're so helpful. You're honestly the best.

  • @sylvestermaruma4658
    @sylvestermaruma4658 5 років тому +4

    Thanks Prof. On Monday i am writing my exam with this things....

  • @erajkhan9403
    @erajkhan9403 7 місяців тому

    thankyou sir...u r the father of chemistry ❤

  • @ritkamaliha6994
    @ritkamaliha6994 4 роки тому +3

    Thanks for your help, professor. Hope to be a professor one day.

  • @jenniferdoran3290
    @jenniferdoran3290 5 років тому +6

    this was so helpful, thank you !!

  • @natan-elmensahsowah4581
    @natan-elmensahsowah4581 Рік тому +1

    Thank you !! However, I have a question. I understand that for (OH)2 in Ca(OH)2, 2 is the coefficient for OH and becomes its exponent when calculating Ksp. How do you decide to use the subscript as a coefficient. I was wondering why in the last question PbI2, 2 was used as the coefficient? The reason why I am confused was because in the CaCO3 example, 3 was not used as a coeeficient : just [Ca][CO]?

    • @arduino_8829
      @arduino_8829 Рік тому

      This may be a bit late but that's because carbonate is a polyatomic ion. CaCO3 is one calcium (Ca) and one carbonate (CO3). If it were Ca(CO3)3 then there would be three carbonate ions and the exponent would be 3, [Ca][CO3]^3. This means that the Ksp expression would be Ksp=(x)(3x)^3. Because the carbonate is not separating into individual molecules, it is functionally just another ion, similar to iodine.

  • @asadshaikh4853
    @asadshaikh4853 4 роки тому

    Excellent explanation

  • @paulayers3234
    @paulayers3234 4 роки тому

    Great explanation

  • @nakhorosualehe1543
    @nakhorosualehe1543 3 роки тому

    Thanks Professor Davis

  • @user-vo6fd6gg6i
    @user-vo6fd6gg6i 4 роки тому +1

    Omg this helped me so much with my homework thank you

  • @daniaaljufaili826
    @daniaaljufaili826 Місяць тому

    Thank you so much 😌

  • @adarshyadav2848
    @adarshyadav2848 Рік тому

    I got a confusion but this video help me a lot . Thanks for this video .. yyehhhh

  • @mynews9618
    @mynews9618 5 років тому +1

    Sir your classes are super I am a lecturer and fan of u

  • @parasuramang1860
    @parasuramang1860 5 років тому +4

    I been regularly asking this doubt ..Please help me with it.....
    I need reference book details that you use for yourself. If you could tell please share them.. and Thanks for your videos....

  • @victormachuca6621
    @victormachuca6621 2 роки тому

    Made it seem so simple 😭thank u

  • @aziz10_
    @aziz10_ 5 років тому

    I am very thankful for your videos

  • @michaelsanchez3680
    @michaelsanchez3680 10 місяців тому +1

    Hi, a question: When one of the ions in the equlibrium concentration is, for example, 2x, why should also be squared?

    • @nikkoraymundo9634
      @nikkoraymundo9634 Місяць тому

      If it was for the 2OH, it was because the 2 aswell. The constant is multiplied with the X for the ice table but it is also used as the power for the ksp equation. I could be wrong though but thats what im understanding

  • @mechanical_engineering_passion

    Why we raise the power of concentration by its stoichiometric coefficient?
    Please explain

  • @astha_yadav
    @astha_yadav 2 роки тому +1

    OH THANK GOD U HAVE A VIDEO ON THIS

  • @chemistfatimasmartscientis3923
    @chemistfatimasmartscientis3923 4 роки тому

    Hello i am twelve years old and I am admired by your lessons and solubility too, so I subscribe u!!! And I love some chemistry college lessons and organic chemistry!

  • @azmanfaruqui2861
    @azmanfaruqui2861 Рік тому

    It's my first time I saw ur video...ur intro got me 😂 amazing 😁

  • @augustinegeorge633
    @augustinegeorge633 4 роки тому

    Your videos are really helpful

  • @theredmonkey236
    @theredmonkey236 3 роки тому

    I have two questions:
    1.For your first example problem (6:00) when you broke down CuBr into Cu and Br you didnt put a subscript of 2 on Br. isn't Br diatomic?
    2.In the Ksp formula do subscripts count as coefficents and go above the element? Or in the ICE table do you count them as a coefficent?

    • @ProfessorDaveExplains
      @ProfessorDaveExplains  3 роки тому

      Molecular bromine is diatomic. CuBr is an ionic compound consisting of one ion of each element. Coefficients that apply to each ion become exponents in the formula.

    • @theredmonkey236
      @theredmonkey236 3 роки тому

      @@ProfessorDaveExplains So are diatomic rules ignored when you break down a ionic compound?

    • @ProfessorDaveExplains
      @ProfessorDaveExplains  3 роки тому +1

      It's just a totally different compound. It has nothing to do with this one.

    • @theredmonkey236
      @theredmonkey236 3 роки тому

      @@ProfessorDaveExplains Oh ok, thanks for your help!

    • @FakharKhan-sj2tq
      @FakharKhan-sj2tq 9 місяців тому

      @@ProfessorDaveExplains I have a question that why we take square on [I-]2

  • @Chebe2
    @Chebe2 4 роки тому +4

    How did you get the 2.6 * 10 ^-3? I know what the single X comes from but not the concentration of Iodine.

    • @marislox1844
      @marislox1844 2 роки тому

      If he knew what he was talking about, he would have explained. I suggest not wasting your time with this person's videos.

    • @Absalonian
      @Absalonian 2 роки тому

      Basically, the subscript becomes the coefficient since the amount of iodine being dissolved is two per molecule. And then using what you learned about icebox earlier you just apply the same concepts. At least that’s what I got out of it.

    • @Absalonian
      @Absalonian 2 роки тому

      @@marislox1844 I don’t understand why a few people not being able to understand the explanations provided in the video automatically discredits “this person’s” entire channel. If anything, ask for whatever wasn’t understood to be cleared up.

  • @humairabinte5619
    @humairabinte5619 4 роки тому

    Hey Proffesor ! It's nice to bump into you again..

  • @elikajavaheri733
    @elikajavaheri733 4 роки тому

    Excellent video! Thank you.

  • @PatrickMutale-i6d
    @PatrickMutale-i6d 11 місяців тому

    Looking good prof

  • @angieyang218
    @angieyang218 3 роки тому

    This is really awesome, thank you for the amazing video!

  • @bhaskar08
    @bhaskar08 5 років тому +188

    What happened to chem jesus?

  • @jeyasankar6069
    @jeyasankar6069 3 роки тому

    Thank you

  • @asmaaabdelghany4707
    @asmaaabdelghany4707 2 роки тому +1

    Can you explain calcium phosphate kidney stones formation through solubility product?
    I am a pediatrician and find it a bit difficult
    Thanks in advance 🙏

  • @minjinseo3681
    @minjinseo3681 7 місяців тому

    Hello, sir. What will happen to the solubility of BaSO4 if NaCl is being added, and why? Thank you so much.

  • @aldanadagimpaulos7511
    @aldanadagimpaulos7511 3 роки тому

    that was very helpful sir

  • @x-tr-igor5961
    @x-tr-igor5961 9 місяців тому

    I have a question: Why did you use solid compound I thought you can't use it or how does it work?

  • @ammarchen8850
    @ammarchen8850 2 роки тому

    thanks bro it helped a lot.

  • @gary9793
    @gary9793 4 роки тому

    Thanks Sir!

  • @sonali_2_
    @sonali_2_ 3 роки тому

    Thank you sir

  • @nismairshad7267
    @nismairshad7267 2 роки тому

    Great work 👍👍👍

  • @aaronn1397
    @aaronn1397 11 місяців тому

    i’m here cramming, need to be up in 5 hours for a final. 🙃

  • @ASTRO-tj2tk
    @ASTRO-tj2tk 4 роки тому

    Thank you professor

  • @amandabergkvist6896
    @amandabergkvist6896 2 роки тому

    Fantastic! Thank you.

  • @irrationalmostly
    @irrationalmostly 2 роки тому

    wait what do you mean by ''unitless equilibrium constant''? equilirium constants may have units..

  • @pumpkinproductivity3053
    @pumpkinproductivity3053 2 роки тому

    Awesome video

  • @hillan_4462
    @hillan_4462 3 роки тому

    Thanks alot

  • @negar1370
    @negar1370 2 роки тому

    thank you so much!

  • @deossegirinya1817
    @deossegirinya1817 2 роки тому

    What about the solubility of iron(II) hydroxide in a. Solution of ammonia solution

  • @nrr690
    @nrr690 5 років тому

    Thank you for this information👍💗

  • @sanjanapalliyaguruge9543
    @sanjanapalliyaguruge9543 4 роки тому

    Thank you professor Dave. 👍👍👍👌👌👌

  • @chemistryguy9679
    @chemistryguy9679 5 років тому

    Could you please make a video on Organometallic Chemistry?

  • @thulararanawaka3692
    @thulararanawaka3692 4 роки тому

    thanku prof.i was helpful to me❤️

  • @dibekululiul1665
    @dibekululiul1665 3 роки тому

    thanks mister

  • @rassimsimou1594
    @rassimsimou1594 5 місяців тому

    Good

  • @aaronius4444
    @aaronius4444 3 роки тому

    so when you're given Ksp of the reactant and find the solubility of the other products, how do you take pOH from that?

  • @realsh7992
    @realsh7992 4 роки тому

    I hate chemistry but it seem less intimidating with this guy, thanks sir :3

  • @reemissam6399
    @reemissam6399 Рік тому

    Am really confused how did u get the 1.3×10^-9 like i mean what do u write in the calculator to get that result?

  • @sharduljadhav250
    @sharduljadhav250 3 роки тому

    Thank u very much!!

  • @aht3261
    @aht3261 3 роки тому +1

    at 6:06 how didi you solve for the 7.9×10^-5?

  • @sofia4933
    @sofia4933 Рік тому +1

    for 7:00 why is the Ksp 4x^3 and not 2x^3 ??

    • @Finnnloafin
      @Finnnloafin Рік тому +2

      (2x)^2 is the same as 2x times 2x, so you can solve that part by multiplying the 2's and the x's together, making 4x^2. Then you multiply that by the last x which makes 4x^3. Hope that helps!

  • @arway4766
    @arway4766 3 роки тому

    why does adding a solid not affect the equilibrium constant ?

  • @farahkhalid5859
    @farahkhalid5859 3 роки тому

    Thank you 😭🥰

  • @magnuswootton6181
    @magnuswootton6181 3 роки тому

    does this mean if the human body is in touch with distilled water u solute a tiny tiny amount into it?

  • @emelyjan9957
    @emelyjan9957 3 роки тому

    Thank u sir so much now i know how to make ICE chart💖

  • @maisyaagbh3774
    @maisyaagbh3774 4 роки тому

    Thx, you are great

  • @stimulantdaimamld2099
    @stimulantdaimamld2099 Рік тому

    great

  • @FireSniperShot
    @FireSniperShot 3 роки тому +1

    Why is the OH value doubled AND squared?

  • @faeidhussain2657
    @faeidhussain2657 3 роки тому

    why to raise the molarity to the power of stoichiometric component?

  • @omaremad4780
    @omaremad4780 2 роки тому

    thank you for simple explanation ♥️

  • @Franek-o5u
    @Franek-o5u Рік тому

    Why dont we consider solid reagents?

  • @EpmMaxim
    @EpmMaxim 4 роки тому

    thanks :)

  • @colephillips8070
    @colephillips8070 3 роки тому

    Can anyone explain why the book Ksp values very between different resources (even for the same temperature)?

  • @error-nc9gk
    @error-nc9gk 5 років тому +33

    I did not focus on this video, just his neck.

  • @miniwidget6407
    @miniwidget6407 3 роки тому

    you out here carrying my grade

  • @nikhilverma6398
    @nikhilverma6398 4 роки тому

    Thank you 😇 Dave ... .

  • @anikasmart203
    @anikasmart203 5 років тому

    @professorDaveExplains DId you say Ksp has no units? How is that possible? moldm-3 xmoldm-3 = mol2dm-6 for example

    • @ProfessorDaveExplains
      @ProfessorDaveExplains  5 років тому +1

      all equilibrium constants are unitless, they are just ratios of activity compared with a reference value, try not to think in terms of dimensional analysis

    • @anikasmart203
      @anikasmart203 5 років тому

      @@ProfessorDaveExplains this has never been my understanding. What are your thoughts here www.chemguide.co.uk/physical/ksp/calculations.html

    • @ProfessorDaveExplains
      @ProfessorDaveExplains  5 років тому

      hmm perhaps you're looking at molar solubility values

    • @anikasmart203
      @anikasmart203 5 років тому

      @@ProfessorDaveExplains I'm not sure I'm following your last comment.
      Equilibrium constants units are usually dependent on the specific reaction. Yes sometimes it can be unitless, if the molar quantity of reactants equals the molar quantities of the products. But they can also have units if the molar quantities are not equal.
      Thank you very much for your videos. They are very effective summaries.

  • @fernandagonzalez116
    @fernandagonzalez116 Рік тому

    I cant seem to understand the last practice problem can anyone explain?

  • @shikhajoshi6069
    @shikhajoshi6069 4 роки тому

    the X for Practice question is 1•381×10^-2

  • @gw5663
    @gw5663 4 роки тому +2

    This video helped me a lot. But the intro killed me.

  • @vschneider3389
    @vschneider3389 2 роки тому

    “This model is an oversimplification that serves the purpose of the moment” = all chemistry until Schrodinger and statistical thermodynamics 😂

  • @jwl796
    @jwl796 8 місяців тому

    thats helpful🎉🎉🎉

  • @diker5905
    @diker5905 Рік тому

    it is perfect, omg! I

  • @rav2254
    @rav2254 3 роки тому

    How do you know how many ions it dissolves to?