Project Nazi: The Industry of War | Full History Documentary

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 20 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 225

  • @shengyi1701
    @shengyi1701 10 місяців тому +32

    Amateurs talk strategy. Professionals talk logistics. - General Omar Bradley

    • @EForchetto
      @EForchetto 10 місяців тому

      Oh how true! I was dismayed by a conversation in the movie Heartbreak Ridge where Major Malcom powers says "I haven't as yet had the privilege of combat. I've recently come over from supply and logistics".
      Sergeant Major Choozoo (in a sort of dismissive, sarcastic tone) replies : An unappreciated field of endeavor, sir...Whoever wrote the script obviously doesn't appreciate that Logistics are of paramount importance in any war.

    • @rudolphguarnacci197
      @rudolphguarnacci197 9 місяців тому

      ​@@EForchetto
      One of Clint's lesser endeavors.

    • @JoaoSoares-rs6ec
      @JoaoSoares-rs6ec 9 місяців тому +1

      it actualy predates him,

    • @dr.barrycohn5461
      @dr.barrycohn5461 5 місяців тому

      Right.

    • @Odysseus88
      @Odysseus88 4 місяці тому

      Meanwhile the country the size of Texas tried to take over the world!
      Ya I got to go!

  • @trexxg1436
    @trexxg1436 10 місяців тому +28

    There are two ear marks of insanity, the desire to conquer the world and to live forever.

    • @arostwocents
      @arostwocents 10 місяців тому +1

      The US have conquered and occupied most of the world quite successfully. Bloodlessly too in many vassals cases such as UK

    • @AshleyHarding-ho4dj
      @AshleyHarding-ho4dj 10 місяців тому +3

      I’m certifiably insane @trexxg

    • @chriscarrol9373
      @chriscarrol9373 10 місяців тому +5

      You forgot thinking your still attractive indefinitely. Ask a few celebrities.

    • @itwasagoodideaatthetime7980
      @itwasagoodideaatthetime7980 10 місяців тому +2

      I don't know as long as I didn’t get old & had the money to live comfortably I wouldn't mind living forever.

    • @uxb1112
      @uxb1112 10 місяців тому

      ​@@chriscarrol9373fortune is always attractive

  • @glennmcdonald2028
    @glennmcdonald2028 10 місяців тому +26

    He consistently underestimated Russian Strength and Resolve...

    • @larryspiller6633
      @larryspiller6633 10 місяців тому +5

      Never underestimate your enemy!!!. Ever!!!!

    • @chriscarrol9373
      @chriscarrol9373 10 місяців тому +8

      Oh and the Russian winter as well. Ask Napoleon about .He actually captured Moscow then realized his army would starve and freeze.Oh and vodka does help prevent frost bite by causing blood to circulate to the extremities. Yes you'll get hypothermia quicker but not if you're clothing is warm and dry. Means you can fire weapons in extreme cold longer without your fingers falling off. I ski and it works.

    • @Voigt465
      @Voigt465 10 місяців тому +2

      The only resolve shown was the American capacity to keep Russia in the fight. Without the enormous quantity of resources and finished goods supplied to Russians, they would have lost the war in 1944, despite all the mistakes the Germans were making.

    • @stingingmetal9648
      @stingingmetal9648 10 місяців тому +2

      Nonsense

    • @uxb1112
      @uxb1112 10 місяців тому +2

      Funny how history repeats

  • @glps6167
    @glps6167 10 місяців тому +27

    Archangelsk was never occupied by German troops.

    • @AshleyHarding-ho4dj
      @AshleyHarding-ho4dj 10 місяців тому +2

      Rot. 1943-44. How you do t know? 🤔

    • @rdallas81
      @rdallas81 10 місяців тому +14

      Anyone who thinks they could take Russia needs to get their heads checked

    • @kalfunai
      @kalfunai 10 місяців тому +1

      ​@@rdallas81Is putin checking his head atm

    • @liamhickey359
      @liamhickey359 10 місяців тому +5

      ​@@kalfunai the Ukes have run out of men.

    • @stingingmetal9648
      @stingingmetal9648 10 місяців тому

      Yes, deprogramming all the brainwashed pro Ukrainians

  • @HoverLambo
    @HoverLambo 10 місяців тому +5

    I think James Hollands figures are incorrect, HMSO "fighting with figures" states 20.17 million tons as the total of petroleum imports in 1944. Civilian consumption is just 2.26 million tons, with commercial vehicles using 1,6m. The basic ration allocated for private cars and motorcycles in 1944 was just 5,000 tons which is about 1.5m gallons....

    • @dennisweidner288
      @dennisweidner288 9 місяців тому

      @HoverLambo I think the key figure is the degree to which the British war effort was dependent on American oil.

  • @dennisweidner288
    @dennisweidner288 9 місяців тому +2

    Germany needed oil, but not for trains. German trains were vital for the Reich -- but the Reichbahn trains ran on coal. [2:00] And by 1942, the Reich was also running out pf coal. To exploit the economies of the occupied countries, Germany had to keep them running. And this meant providing some German coal -- creating a shortage in the Reich.

  • @nicholaskelly1958
    @nicholaskelly1958 7 місяців тому +2

    Actually Hitler was absolutely livid about the climbing of Mount Elbrus. Describing it as
    a "Pointless Stunt" He also threatened to Court Marshall General Hubert Lanz over the affair.

  • @Ensign_Nemo
    @Ensign_Nemo 10 місяців тому +14

    The area within a 50 mile radius of Pittsburgh, including the Monongahela Valley and the northern part of West Virginia, produced more steel than the Third Reich from 1942-1945. We couldn't do it again, because those steel mills are long gone.

    • @jimmarnell3964
      @jimmarnell3964 10 місяців тому +4

      Very sad state of America

    • @dennisweidner288
      @dennisweidner288 9 місяців тому

      America was producing more steel well before the War began, but of course it was going into cars, washing machines, refrigerators, etc.. and not armaments.

    • @johnweerasinghe4139
      @johnweerasinghe4139 8 місяців тому

      It was easy to outproduce Nazi Germany. The US wasn't fighting the world's largest army at the time ....love apples to oranges comparisons

    • @jonwingfieldhill6143
      @jonwingfieldhill6143 4 місяці тому

      Bruce Springsteen Youngstown 😂

  • @jeanenry
    @jeanenry 10 місяців тому +17

    Just shows that Churchill's insistence on a N. African campaign was correct. The oil was everything.

    • @dennisweidner288
      @dennisweidner288 9 місяців тому +1

      @jeanenry Yes, including Malta. And fortunately he convinced Roosevelt.

    • @chinajoe6510
      @chinajoe6510 7 місяців тому +1

      Libya oil’s has not been discovered in large quantity then. & even if it did, technology of that time did not allow for exploration

  • @deanshelton5664
    @deanshelton5664 10 місяців тому +6

    Never seen the 2nd world war in the logistic world before, brilliant

  • @luckyguy600
    @luckyguy600 10 місяців тому +2

    Well said/ well done

  • @MrWhiskers65
    @MrWhiskers65 Місяць тому +1

    These “experts” make certain claims and then immediately contradict the claim they just made in the very next sentence. It’s hilarious to listen to.

  • @damianousley8833
    @damianousley8833 10 місяців тому +19

    Without the synthetic fuel plants, the Nazis wouldn't have lasted for long after the war started, and after June 1941 invasion of the Soviet Union due to oil shortages. Economically, the German war economy was very poorly run and thus resulted in the cruel imposts on the occupied territories for resources and materials. Germany only dominated early in the war due to the long buildup from 1933 and weapons and ammunition stockpiling.

    • @plasticjock1090
      @plasticjock1090 8 місяців тому +1

      And the incredible ability of Albert Speer to motivate each manufacturer against each other to out produce the other..

    • @dr.barrycohn5461
      @dr.barrycohn5461 5 місяців тому +1

      And, Goring always promised this and that and couldn't deliver squat. So, by the time the krauts got to the Russian winter they were dead in the water. Out of ammo, food, and clothes. Goring just lied because he knew they couldn't do it.

  • @naciremasti
    @naciremasti 10 місяців тому +13

    It's funny that they didn't seem to think of taking the tools to fix the Soviet refineries that were sabotaged by the retreating Soviets.
    Also, if they were strapped for resources so much, why didn't they salvage the resources from downed planes, knocked out tanks, etc?

    • @AshleyHarding-ho4dj
      @AshleyHarding-ho4dj 10 місяців тому

      Ahhh.. but that is you, thinking with a modern brain. Logical and reasonable.. imagine if you adopt the view that Russians were incompetent and useless.. than you would have no desire to take over their equipment and factories.. that is the actual reason, because in France and other invaded countries they did incorporate a lot of the vehicles and equipment into their own stuff!

    • @annpeerkat2020
      @annpeerkat2020 10 місяців тому +3

      significant effort to fix the refineries would be a pretty wasted effort.... unless they developed some strategy to get the oil back. Same problem as japan in the pacific... japan did have tankers, but didn't consider it sufficiently warrior like to defend the tankers, so they all go sunk mainly by US subs

    • @MuffinManUSN
      @MuffinManUSN 10 місяців тому +1

      Simple answer is nobody cares about Mechanics, Engineers and Tools until they need them. And war requires so much in so many places all the time that having that all accessible when and where it's needed with the desire to still do the job is impossible.
      That Can Do attitude can deal with only so much; on the offensive anyway.

    • @annpeerkat2020
      @annpeerkat2020 10 місяців тому +1

      @@MuffinManUSN Eric.... I care! Holds out my hand in friendship. ahem. In fact I love my toolery.

    • @gregorymalchuk272
      @gregorymalchuk272 8 місяців тому +1

      Did the Soviets repair the sabotaged refineries after victory, or did they demolish them and rebuild with new equipment?

  • @nigeh5326
    @nigeh5326 10 місяців тому +5

    Germany has always had to fight based on the knowledge that the longer the war goes on the more trouble Germany will be in.
    The number of enemies will rise, the resources needed by their enemies to produce weapons are on the enemies soil not Germany’s.
    The Royal Navy and the French Navy together could beat the German Navy even if Italy sided Germany.
    Once he attacked the USSR and stupidly declared war on the USA Germany was finished.
    Britain was an unsinkable unreachable base for land sea and air forces.
    The USA and the British Empire/Commonwealth could produce weapons and troops safely out of the reach of Nazi Germany.
    The USSR was a much tougher opponent than Nazi ideology and bad intelligence thought. The Soviets destroyed everything as they fell back and Germany used a different rail gauge to the USSR so moving equipment and troops was a massive problem. The Soviets also had large numbers of partisans disrupting logistics leading to thousands of troops being sent to fight them instead of the Red Army.
    Using slaves workers and forced labourers from other countries led to sabotage and poor production numbers. Nazi ideology meant that women weren’t used as they were in other countries limiting production again.
    Overall Germany plans to fight short sharp wars. Whether in 1871, 1914 or 1939 it’s all about a short sharp campaign as the longer it goes on the less likely Germany will win.

    • @dennisweidner288
      @dennisweidner288 9 місяців тому

      @nigeh5326 Absolutely correct, but the NAZIs had a chance if they could win early in the War as they did in France (1940), before their enemies were prepared. And it was only the Channel that prevented the Panzers from occupying Britain (1940). And they came perilously close to victory in the Soviet Union (1941). You are correct, that denied early victory, Germany was not going to win the War.
      It is comforting to think that slave workers were sabotaging production. I am not at all sure how important that was. The more important matter was how inefficient German war production was. There was nothing like mass production, assembly line production of America, Britain, and even the Soviet Union.. And the bombing which finally became important in 1942 forcing the Germans to take measures such as dispersing production which created further inefficiencies and quality problems.

    • @duniagowes
      @duniagowes 6 місяців тому

      So as to speak, it could have been better for them if they stop after France.

    • @dennisweidner288
      @dennisweidner288 6 місяців тому

      @@duniagowes Yes, but then they would have not been NAZIs. The primary goal of the War was to seize 1) the vast lands of the East and 2) kill Jews. In addition, they were caught in a vice between the Soviets in the East and the Brutish/Americans in the West.

    • @dennisweidner288
      @dennisweidner288 6 місяців тому

      @@duniagowes @duniagowes Yes, but then they would have not been NAZIs. The primary goal of the War was to seize 1) the vast lands of the East and 2) kill Jews. In addition, they were caught in a vice between the Soviets in the East and the British/Americans in the West.

  • @kingietk
    @kingietk 3 місяці тому +1

    Fascinating to hear the name Baku which is where I am now

  • @lorimeyers3839
    @lorimeyers3839 10 місяців тому +4

    Terrific video. Great marerial

  • @250txc
    @250txc 10 місяців тому +2

    Climbing that mountain was stupid. It served absolutely no purpose. Stupidly like this is why they lost...

    • @dennisweidner288
      @dennisweidner288 9 місяців тому

      @250txc That is exactly what Hitler said.

  • @GraemeS-pk9cz
    @GraemeS-pk9cz 3 місяці тому +1

    Well done, thank you. Not enough fuel for the 1942 campaign? Is it not more of a question of an inability to supply that fuel? I would suggest that that's what the air supply of fuel was about, rather than an insufficiency of oil produced. It's an important distinction, as such statements can create major misconceptions.
    Robert Kershaw, how can you say that the 1942 oil campaign was the correct move for Germany?. The Germans not only had to capture the oil fields, but also hold the huge area, and then somehow exploit the oil fields, something that had been given far too little attention by German planners (and by historians), especially as the Soviets could be counted on destroying the drilling equipment. The whole operation looks to be completely misconceived.
    Why no mention of the Rumanian oil?

  • @AndrewLambert-wi8et
    @AndrewLambert-wi8et 8 місяців тому +2

    DESPITE HAVING MANUFACTURING CAPACITY TO PRODUCE OIL FROM COAL THEY NEVER WERE ABLE TO PRODUCE ALL THE OIL THEY NEEDED.

  • @JosephDent-qd9ih
    @JosephDent-qd9ih 9 місяців тому +1

    Beatty Nevada/ food repository/ Yucca Mountain. Billions of food storage.

  • @dereks1264
    @dereks1264 4 місяці тому +1

    "War Is Peace" - George Orwell, 1984.

  • @irishalbino9308
    @irishalbino9308 10 місяців тому +1

    Britain agreed Not to interfere with Germany occupying czechoslovakia, in return they received 8,000 ounces of gold.

    • @dennisweidner288
      @dennisweidner288 9 місяців тому

      Nonsence. You are either lying or have never opened a history book printed outside Russia. Britain did accept German occupation of the Sudetenland, but got a pledge from Hitler NOT to occupy the rest of Czechoslovakia. Gold was not discussed at Munich or part of the Munich Agreement. You seem to be one of Putin's bots. The gold matter was pursued by the Bank of England and had noting to do with Munich. Of course, Hitler broke his pledge 6 months later, but that cannot be blamed on Britain. Britain never became a NAZI ally. It was the Soviets' who became a NAZI ally and these two brutal dictatorship's jointly launched the War by invading Poland (September 1939).

  • @zeronzemesh7718
    @zeronzemesh7718 3 місяці тому

    At 31:24 who is that midget standing behind Molotov? That little guy is adorable. I mean Molotov was a already a short chunky troll, but that guy is half his size. That is awesome. I could see Molotov and Stalin both keeping dwarfs around so that they look taller. I think Molotov overdid it with this little feller, he looks like he should be in the circus.

  • @bond12
    @bond12 4 місяці тому +2

    The Economy Of War!!!

  • @duellingscarguevara
    @duellingscarguevara 9 місяців тому +1

    Well, well, isnt that something...war without end?..

  • @Richard-g4u1r
    @Richard-g4u1r 10 місяців тому

    In the 1,930's, a huge amount of scrap metal was sold, and shipped off to, Japan, by companies in The United States. In the 1,940's, Japan returned it to the US, in the form of bombs and bullets.

  • @jamesgardner8048
    @jamesgardner8048 10 місяців тому

    On youtube Robert Sephr has some interesting versions of the war it really is a interesting insight from the uther side that is if you can listen to some points that completely go against what we were told.

    • @uxb1112
      @uxb1112 10 місяців тому +1

      Funny how history repeats

    • @dennisweidner288
      @dennisweidner288 9 місяців тому

      @jamesgardner8048 An educated person does not rely on being told important matters, but pursues the facts. And in the West we don not have to rely on a single source.

    • @brianmaitai7685
      @brianmaitai7685 9 місяців тому

      Interesting fact...The early German tanks had small 37mm guns compared to heavier French Char B1 tanks.

    • @jamesgardner8048
      @jamesgardner8048 9 місяців тому

      @@dennisweidner288 Oh right well im so very sorry Dennis maybe next time i will do a massively big list just to make you feel better😁. You would think having a name like mine it would be obvious to educated men that I am from the West and whilst we're on the subject of educated men you have spelt (do!) wrong🤦. Wind your neck in if i want to recommend anything people will make their own mind up if they want to have a look or not. ✊💦

    • @jamesgardner8048
      @jamesgardner8048 9 місяців тому

      @@uxb1112 indeed!

  • @liverpool666
    @liverpool666 10 місяців тому +9

    is it just me or Nazis episodes on any channel been picking up like craZy??

    • @naradaian
      @naradaian 10 місяців тому +3

      I think your right - but its todays Nazis that matter..xx

    • @chriscarrol9373
      @chriscarrol9373 10 місяців тому +1

      I'm just waiting for history to echo back. It won't be the same but resold slightly different like bell bottoms and other fashions. Politics do the same thing.

    • @conzmoleman
      @conzmoleman 4 місяці тому +1

      @@naradaianthey are the same ones as before. the right wing.

  • @HEADBANGER4LIFE37
    @HEADBANGER4LIFE37 10 місяців тому +5

    Oyh vey the nazis!!!!

  • @dannynye1731
    @dannynye1731 9 місяців тому +1

    Forgot Roumanian and Hungarian oil fields

    • @dennisweidner288
      @dennisweidner288 9 місяців тому

      @dannynye1731 The Romanian fields were by far the most important, but they only provided a fraction of what the Germans needed. It was America that produced oil in the huge quantities needed for war.

  • @duckbizniz663
    @duckbizniz663 10 місяців тому +1

    Empty words spoken with no meaning. In the Autumn of 1942 the Wehrmacht did conquer vast expanse of land in the south of the Soviet Union (Caucasus). On their drive to the oil rich field of south Russia Hitler redirected the 6th Army to take Stalingrad. Hitler split his forces in two. Thereby weakened his drive to southern Russia and his forces at Stalingrad. But the Germans never made it to the oil fields of southern Russia, therefore the Germans never took the petroleum in the Caucasus. The Bolsheviks kept their oil and the Red Army kept on fighting. In addition, US bombers were attacking NAZI Germany's oil supply at Ploiesti Romania.

    • @dennisweidner288
      @dennisweidner288 9 місяців тому

      @duckbizniz663 Actually the video is correct. The Germans did take large areas in Southern Russia, adding to the huge expanses they already held to the north. And they did take one oil field--Maikop. American bombing attacks on Ploesti were ineffectual in 1942. The war situation looked very bad for the Soviets nd the Allies in general during the first half of 1942. There were major German victories before the Germans even launched Operation Blue, both in Crimea and around Rostov. The Battle of Kharkov was a huge disaster for the Soviets (May 1942). Soviet defenses before Stalingrad were destroyed as well as in the northern Caucuses. Only when the Germans got to the Caucus Maintains and Stalingrad proper did Soviet defenses begin to take hold.

  • @johnkeller6063
    @johnkeller6063 8 місяців тому

    Seeing the nazi flag raised in the USSR on the mountain I now realize why Stalin wanted the flag of the USSR raised in the roof of the Reich stag building when they entered Berlin in 1945

    • @conzmoleman
      @conzmoleman 4 місяці тому

      That’s standard procedure in basically every war and battle going back over 1000 years

  • @정복희-h5o
    @정복희-h5o 10 місяців тому

    Great wonder

  • @danielraymadden
    @danielraymadden 4 місяці тому

    The Russsian Nazi alliance began in 1922 Rapaloo treaty...Stalin Lenin were supplying the outsted nazi party with resources to build a military inside Russia...Stalin supplied the nazi party 1922 to 1942...

  • @masroor5672
    @masroor5672 4 місяці тому

    What if hitler remained focused on Leningrad and Moscow instead of on south in 1941 .. Moscow was overall nervous control of USSR..south was important but it can have been conquered after Moscow and should be an easier job ..

  • @Johnny-w15
    @Johnny-w15 10 місяців тому +4

    Hmmmm

  • @Johnny-w15
    @Johnny-w15 10 місяців тому +3

    And who did they borrow all the money off ?????? I put who and my comments got deleted twice ???? Why I wonder

    • @bullettube9863
      @bullettube9863 10 місяців тому

      Well historians know they deposited gold and silver looted from the Jews into Swiss banks and used it as collateral for loans.

    • @liverpool666
      @liverpool666 10 місяців тому +2

      Wow USA ? Lol😅

    • @annpeerkat2020
      @annpeerkat2020 10 місяців тому +1

      @Johnny-w15 tell us who germany "borrowed all the money off" pre WW2?

    • @Johnny-w15
      @Johnny-w15 10 місяців тому

      @@annpeerkat2020 put it down and they removed it ,,,,, madness I put a certain religions group of bankers who the nazi scum did not like , and it was removed

    • @jimrich4192
      @jimrich4192 10 місяців тому +1

      All sides of WW2 borrowed $$$ from the carefully hidden International Bankers...for a small FEE! 😂

  • @marcomoreno3071
    @marcomoreno3071 6 місяців тому

    American engineering the best in the world. We made them fast and they fit .

  • @anthonyhorstman
    @anthonyhorstman 7 днів тому

    lots to accomplish solar winds make gold and silver he says

  • @anthonyhorstman
    @anthonyhorstman 7 днів тому

    whos next ill help them get started quote from emperor

  • @annpeerkat2020
    @annpeerkat2020 10 місяців тому +2

    soft core war porn... sacrificing accuracy

  • @frederikbjerre427
    @frederikbjerre427 9 місяців тому +2

    After this shitshow you should watch TIK history to get the real facts.

  • @lorenzbroll101
    @lorenzbroll101 9 місяців тому

    The first oil war?

  • @rickpere6266
    @rickpere6266 7 місяців тому

    And most of the german army was horse drawn. Germany was not materially superior. Most of the panzer divisions comprised of captured and plundered equipment from Czechoslavakia.

  • @anthonyhorstman
    @anthonyhorstman 7 днів тому

    someone ask hit how french juste grapes i think time heals all lol

  • @busterbiloxi3833
    @busterbiloxi3833 10 місяців тому +2

    Archangelsk Is Finland. Death to Moscow!

    • @rudolfkraffzick642
      @rudolfkraffzick642 10 місяців тому

      Archangelsk derives from the greek term archos angelos = arch angel. The Russians took their christian religion from the orthodox Byzantine Empire.
      Archangelsk was founded in a region which once belonged to finno-ugrian tribes, but never to Finland.

    • @stingingmetal9648
      @stingingmetal9648 10 місяців тому

      From whom did Finland gain their independence and when?

    • @dennisweidner288
      @dennisweidner288 9 місяців тому

      Pestamo was Finish, not Archangel. .

  • @The67wheelman
    @The67wheelman 9 місяців тому

    Imagine if they built uboats instead of surface ships. Donitz would have had his 300

  • @DaneRates
    @DaneRates 9 місяців тому

    Journalism writing reporting, must act is the correct term.

  • @jussikankinen9409
    @jussikankinen9409 10 місяців тому

    Hitler didnt want to make huge bombs, so they lost, then rocket men went to nasa naza

  • @dieppeboon9627
    @dieppeboon9627 7 місяців тому

    War without limits...Von Clausewitz theory... peace is just a short pause in War

  • @anthonyhorstman
    @anthonyhorstman 7 днів тому

    12milliom tons of plutonium in sixty hundred billion bars of solid metal beat that hitler but when the bars multiply none plutonium 900million zeros with8 infront

  • @labeckipiotrek
    @labeckipiotrek 10 місяців тому +3

    Watch "Europa - the last battle" Different perspective.

    • @conzmoleman
      @conzmoleman 4 місяці тому

      How so

    • @davidjackson2179
      @davidjackson2179 4 місяці тому +2

      It’s legitimately a neonazi recruitment film, that’s the “different perspective” he’s talking about. The film was financed by the Neonazi movement and has been widely condemned by absolutely any reputable historian as well as numerous anti-hate groups.

    • @overbeb
      @overbeb 4 місяці тому +1

      Follow your leader

  • @anthonyhorstman
    @anthonyhorstman 7 днів тому

    bombed or not i still have wealth from above its just the same as enrichment besides the war

  • @anthonyhorstman
    @anthonyhorstman 7 днів тому

    most improved college student was me but thats because i had to impvove by born again i think still young we stand a chace being close too the suns and what i found in space for me as emporer of admission real position as 98th structure

  • @mplsyrp2
    @mplsyrp2 10 місяців тому +4

    I detest these
    Propaganda films. Filled with biased remarks, and incorrect, nonfactual, hyperbolic, statements.

    • @dennisweidner288
      @dennisweidner288 9 місяців тому +1

      @mplsyrp2 Just because someone does not repeat Soviet propaganda does not mean that they are "biased remarks, and incorrect, nonfactual, hyperbolic, statements". I notice you do not give even one actual example that can be discussed.

  • @anthonyhorstman
    @anthonyhorstman 7 днів тому

    full scale planets every hundred miles and just one bar of gold or silver or platnium all increasing in size 75000miles 89000miles 200000 miles and no end too heat now from my first group of sand it was easy winning oil from ten thousand miles of sand never there practiclly

  • @mileristic2084
    @mileristic2084 10 місяців тому

    Big Dislike !!! For Germany war industry 1933-1945.years ...

  • @250txc
    @250txc 9 місяців тому

    F every germ on this video

  • @hernanrojas3549
    @hernanrojas3549 2 місяці тому

    Está propaganda me tiene arto

  • @JoJo-ie8sl
    @JoJo-ie8sl 10 місяців тому

    The way he pronounces aluminum made me chuckle

    • @chriscarrol9373
      @chriscarrol9373 10 місяців тому

      Ya them Brits say potahtoe and tomahtoe and still have a king and princes. Kinda stuck in the middle ages still maybe? Oh and think they still rule the world.

    • @itwasagoodideaatthetime7980
      @itwasagoodideaatthetime7980 10 місяців тому +1

      ​@@chriscarrol9373 The English created the language Americans speak, hence why it's called *ENGLISH!* Americans are the ones who have bastardized the English language not the British. We Americans are the ones mispronouncing everything not them. After all its originally *THEIR* language not ours. They were the ones who invented it, not us Americans.

    • @liamhickey359
      @liamhickey359 10 місяців тому

      ​@@chriscarrol9373 the Yanks think they rule the world. Look how that's going. Ha ha.

    • @jayhellyer5406
      @jayhellyer5406 10 місяців тому +2

      You spelt aluminium with only 1 i, that seems to be where you went wrong.

    • @uxb1112
      @uxb1112 10 місяців тому

      Wow, you only just realised its got letters in the word?

  • @GordonHouston-Smith
    @GordonHouston-Smith 4 місяці тому

    Load of cobblers, badly researched.

  • @RayullahUllah-ch9dz
    @RayullahUllah-ch9dz 10 місяців тому +1

    I'm

  • @anthonyhorstman
    @anthonyhorstman 7 днів тому

    its close too troll hearts its real

  • @TravelatorH8r
    @TravelatorH8r 4 місяці тому

    Wieraboo ⚠️

  • @billyholiday4947
    @billyholiday4947 9 місяців тому

    Could barely watch seconds before the nonsense!

    • @conzmoleman
      @conzmoleman 4 місяці тому

      nazi incel says what? (i checked out account lmao)

  • @andrewallen9993
    @andrewallen9993 9 місяців тому

    So Germany lost due to being socialist.

    • @dennisweidner288
      @dennisweidner288 9 місяців тому

      @andrewallen9993 In part yes. German industry was highly inefficient.

  • @billyholiday4947
    @billyholiday4947 9 місяців тому

    British propaganda!

  • @SkyAIChannel
    @SkyAIChannel 9 місяців тому +1

    The area within a 50 mile radius of Pittsburgh, including the Monongahela Valley and the northern part of West Virginia, produced more steel than the Third Reich from 1942-1945. We couldn't do it again, because those steel mills are long gone.