That's like comparing a musket to a high powered sniper rifle. Everything advances, you're stuck in the past. that's not to say there's anything wrong with traditional archery; it's absolutely fine. But if that's what you like watch videos of that, don't hate on this just because the tech is more advanced.
It's like 3 people are talking at the same time, very annoying and hard to listen! I want to listen to something but I cant. Turned the video off, can't watch.
He's/she's complaining because "real archery" is considered to be completely bare bow; no sights, pins, stabilizers, kissers, all the "bells and whistles" so to speak are gone so the shot is purely down to the skill of the archer. But look at my response to his comment for my own opinion- I admit it takes less skill, but it still takes a LOT.
Olympic sight is nothing different than a static reference point, just a thing to refer... No technology. It does not do any help to shoot better. Stabilizer set is just like a piece of weight that barebow shooters got, just that. All kinds of archery are equally hard and require a TON of effort. If anyone not believe me, try one yourself. And see what score you can do. Oh this comment is for anyone, not actually to the thread :))
@@blizzbee if it doesn’t help them shoot, then why is it on the bow? If it didn’t make it easier to shoot the arrow where you want to, it wouldn’t be on every single Olympic Recurve or Compound. I’m not a bare bow purist, but don’t try and say a sight doesn’t make it easier to be more accurate
@@abnormallynormal8823 when i say it doesn't help them shoot, i said in aspect of a "reference point". That means the sight can be replaced with anything solidly attached to the bow for the eye to look through.. that's it. The sight itself has no spaceship technology to help shooting better. It's just a reference point. That's what i mean.
the three simultaneous commentary audio is truly disorienting
Who is rewatching this from jake's youtube channel❤
Me! Getting into archery with my 2 Young boys, learning from Jake :)
Two sets of commentary at same time doesn’t work guys
Here in 2020 forget the equipment, its who has the "better" Korean coach 😆. But seriously, both these guys are awesome archers.
Yeah. Here in 2020 in light of his groundbreaking vids on form and all things archery I was SO rooting for him in that shoot off 🤣
So true
3:29. Jake whipping his bow into high gear.
Fantastic Match !!!
That's like comparing a musket to a high powered sniper rifle. Everything advances, you're stuck in the past. that's not to say there's anything wrong with traditional archery; it's absolutely fine. But if that's what you like watch videos of that, don't hate on this just because the tech is more advanced.
Hey it's Dennis Nedry, before he REALLY got into computers.
18 meters?
there's so many commentator
lol
Not sure I could handle the coach in me ear before every shot !! JMO
Jake is the man !
its not over until its over !!!!!
It’s like 12 people are talking at once
Bravo Marco Galeazzo sei un mito
Hey, it's Enrico Palazzo!
bravissimo marco
+Olga Peña 18 meters
What a match!
I think the judge's name is Pat
It's like 3 people are talking at the same time, very annoying and hard to listen! I want to listen to something but I cant. Turned the video off, can't watch.
Great match
can anyone tell me if Kaminski is using gas pro vanes?
Alan Chan I think it’s range o matic the one for indoors
I was gonna say...since when are archers ridiculously good looking?
Should of told him to put a couple clicks to that sight
"Loud Noises!!!"
i'm going to start this year doing 60 m so... well, 18 m its the distance that I have in my club.
He looks so young here
What a shame, shooting tens almost all the time, then rushed the shoot off and fumbled it. Great match though
40 cm face?
i can even try to do that! how many meters away are they?
18m
that is a regular recurve bow
vai italia
Very good! I was rooting for Italy!
Grande Galeazzo
He's/she's complaining because "real archery" is considered to be completely bare bow; no sights, pins, stabilizers, kissers, all the "bells and whistles" so to speak are gone so the shot is purely down to the skill of the archer. But look at my response to his comment for my own opinion- I admit it takes less skill, but it still takes a LOT.
Olympic sight is nothing different than a static reference point, just a thing to refer... No technology.
It does not do any help to shoot better.
Stabilizer set is just like a piece of weight that barebow shooters got, just that.
All kinds of archery are equally hard and require a TON of effort.
If anyone not believe me, try one yourself. And see what score you can do.
Oh this comment is for anyone, not actually to the thread :))
@@blizzbee if it doesn’t help them shoot, then why is it on the bow?
If it didn’t make it easier to shoot the arrow where you want to, it wouldn’t be on every single Olympic Recurve or Compound.
I’m not a bare bow purist, but don’t try and say a sight doesn’t make it easier to be more accurate
@@abnormallynormal8823 when i say it doesn't help them shoot, i said in aspect of a "reference point". That means the sight can be replaced with anything solidly attached to the bow for the eye to look through.. that's it.
The sight itself has no spaceship technology to help shooting better.
It's just a reference point. That's what i mean.
Sir your Second hand bow are selling. If you sell I will purchase it. U must be reply sir.
hahahaahha wtf
18 m
What's the distance between them and the targets?
ThinKing Does 18m
Or, equivalent distance in imperial measurements: 20yds.
Acualy 19.97
poor Marco, lol
USA Rambo gold medal hahaha
Grande Marco
Grande Marco