SonarAngler 83 kHz vs 200 kHz 2D Sonar settings

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 22 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 8

  • @keithscott9774
    @keithscott9774 2 роки тому +1

    Thanks for the great tutorial. I've really learned something useful.

  • @WysteriaGuitar
    @WysteriaGuitar Рік тому

    Very educational thanks for posting.

  • @stevethedog1289
    @stevethedog1289 2 роки тому

    One of the easiest videos to understand fishfinder

  • @GM-outdoor
    @GM-outdoor 4 роки тому

    Thanks for the video! Just the info i was looking for! KR from the Netherlands.

    • @sonarangler
      @sonarangler  4 роки тому

      I'm delighted that it was helpful to you! Cheers, Capt. John

  • @akuseli
    @akuseli 3 роки тому

    Good info... ✌👍

  • @basehorhonda
    @basehorhonda 4 роки тому

    Is there a way to figure cone angle for a given kHz?

    • @sonarangler
      @sonarangler  4 роки тому

      Thanks for the question...the answer is a bit tricky... Transducer manufacturers can configure the crystals in a transducer any way they choose, so it isn't a linear relationship between kHz rating and cone angle. In some cases, the manufacturers have chosen to claim that their cone angles are proprietary (and therefore essentially a trade secret) making comparisons even more difficult. However, my research indicates that for 2D sonar transducers, the typical cone angles are as follows: 200kHz: about 20 degrees, 83kHz: about 60 degrees, and 50kHz: about 35 degrees (note that decreasing kHz doesn't always relate to wider cone angles). For scanning sonar (down and side imaging), CHIRP sonar (multi-frequency), and phased array sonar (LiveScope), comparisons of kHz to cone/beam angles--and resulting range capabilities--are highly unreliable. I hope this helps... Cheers, Capt. John