2001 World Championships - Women's All Around
Вставка
- Опубліковано 25 чер 2024
- Nov. 2, 2001 - Flanders Sports Arena - Ghent, Belgium
Hit that LIKE button to show your support for USA Gymnastics!
SUBSCRIBE to the USA Gymnastics UA-cam Channel: bit.ly/1DOeeZj
You can check out all event PLAYLISTS here: bit.ly/1EJjcoA
Follow USA Gymnastics on Social Media:
- Facebook: on. 1DCkP8V
- Twitter: bit.ly/1vTcz3n
- Instagram: bit.ly/1ajqWV0
Visit our website: usagym.org/pages/index.html
USA Gymnastics News: usagym.org/pages/postList.htm...
USA Gymnasts and Teams: usagym.org/pages/home/nationa...
Full List of USA Gymnastics Events: usagym.org/pages/events/pages...
Check Out the USA Gymnastics Photo Album: usagymnastics.zenfolio.com
Learn about USA Gymnastics University: usagym.org/pages/education/pa... - Спорт
I really love that Bart's commentary throughout this championships included translations of what the Romanian girls were saying.
bbhouk1 Nadia is from Romania
That would be courtesy of his wife- Nadia Comaneci who is Romanian. I’m sure she taught him some Romanian.
schwikert's tumbling was so effortless!!! always loved watching her and cheering her on.
True about Schwikert, powerful on all events really, and always reliable in team competitions. Yim brought the lyrical artistic quality though. A shame she didn't make the Athens team in '04. and Schwikert only as an alternate.
@@misina211it was a shame, but it was predominantly on her for not being chosen for the actual team. She wasn’t training as seriously as she should have been if she wanted to make it- and her coaches stated as such. If she’d been truly focused on making it - instead of her admitted assumption she would- it’s likely she’d have gone instead of McCool. At least in the end she received that rightful team bronze from Sydney.
It's funny looking back at Tabitha Yim's way of starting and ending her floor routine. I remember at the time thinking it was so strange, and yet, now everyone's doing it. I've even seen some JO girls "present" that way!
Not everyone (except for the Dutch girls). But I'm surprised I never heard of Tabitha in my years of watching this sport. Very elegant and artistic.
I really hated the code during this quad. I think the scoring, especially start values, were so out of whack. With the perfect 10.00 practically unattainable I think it turned off a lot of casual fans. Nobody gets excited when a "great score" of 9.487 flashes on the scoreboard.
It's true the low scores were unappealing for the general audience, but I somehow find this code easier to comprehend than the 1997-2000 one.
misina211 it was better than every Romanian getting 9.7 + on bars during the previous quad when we all know they should’ve received 9.1, 9.2 at best.
I HATED the stupid full-twisting belly flop that women basically had to do in their routines. Always loved Tasha Schwikert though . .such a bummer she never got Olympic glory.
I bet those "casual fans" would be even more confused now that the perfect 10 system is abolished :"D but to be honest, I see this quad scoring system as a transition moment in history before they changed it to the current scoring system. The seeds that difficulty and execution should deserve two different scores can be seen planted here.
The code made more sense in this quad than any previous one, although of course they are all flawed. I'm not sure if the scores dropping by an average of .1 really made much difference, nobody had received higher than 9.8's since 1992 anyway, the perfect 10 was long gone and simply never going to be given again. Broadcasters should have just set expectation better for the audience that 9.5 is considered a good score and 9.8 would probably be the ceiling.
Part of the problem though, is competitors weren't gaming the code well enough. It wasn't that hard to get a 10.0 start value on Bars and Beam, but tons of people seemed confused about how to build a routine, and even when people did have 10.0 start values, most of those routines were not optimized to the code and worked harder than they needed for the 10.0 start value, which means more deduction is going to happen. This was already a problem people had in the 97-2000 code, but since the 2001-2005 code required a bit more difficulty, the issue increased.
For example, Khorkina in this quad was doing Cast 1/2 and Stalder 1/1 out of a Pak and 1.5 pirouette in her routine, when there was an easier way to get 10.0 difficulty: start the routine with a Clear-hip 1/2, then do the Stalder 1/1 later on from handstand, and replace the 1.5 pirouette with an easier Stalder 1/2.
Another example, Nastia Liukin in 2005 did Inbar 1/2 + Ono + Endo 1/2 + Stalder 1/2 + Lgrip 1/1 + Lgrip 1/2 + Gienger...which is cool to see, but wasn't code efficient. If she had simply started the routine with a straight jump to handstand, then she could have cut out 3 of those moves on the high bar and still had a 10.0 start value.
Zingashina had original and pretty gymnastics, as well as Tabitha. I've never watched these world's but I'm glad I did now. Great gymnasts. And good for Khorkina, after that Sydney disaster.
Whatever happened to her? I was surprised when she wasn’t on the Russian Olympic squad. Injuries?
@@saragrant9749 She actually was on the 2004 Russian Olympic team but had declined at all and was barely used, but was on the team. Well she did the AA in qualifications but only 1 event- bars, in team finals.
It seems like they made a major mistake, only giving Ziganshina a 9.8 start value for this Bar routine - 31:42 - her elements are D + D + D + D, C + E, D, D - this is exactly the 1.2 points of skill value needed, and all the routine requirements were fulfilled.
The second skill in Ziganshina's opening sequence was credited as Element 5.302 (giant circle swing forward in reverse grip to handstand with 1/1 turn in handstand phase).
While we don't have the best angle of the dismount, based on how piked the second salto becomes, I think that the judges downgraded it to a double pike to arrive at the 9.8 SV out of a planned 9.9 SV.
Tasha’s beam routine here was freaking phenomenal. Best one i remember seeing ffom her. Score was bleh, but everyone’s were. I stopped watching during that time and started watching NCAA.
I love khorkina’s leo here. Beautiful.
Also, although Im normally not a fan of white leos, Hypolito’s is pretty. Looks like one that would be worn today
I font remember bhardwaj evrr doing 2 1/2 on vault; if she didnt, she could have. Her vaulting was spectacular
And tashas floor was awesome here too. Her leap/jump dance elements were spot on here.
Tabitha and Tasha are great on BB, nice job !
I loved Tabitha Yim and all her floor routines. She had a great meet here. If only she had been healthier later in the quad. The code was so weird that quad, with hit routines scoring in the 8s and the start values all low and out of whack.
She was injured come 2004, wasn’t she? I don’t recall seeing her much at all that year.
What the heck kind of mats were they using here? With the dismounts off beam, there is zero give, and the landings are as loud as when they landed on the beam! I'm sure it wasn't the best feeling either.
I get Svetlana was a very tall gymnast. however, had any other gymnast landed double backs that low and lunged to knees bent, there would be helfy deductions. the rules shouldn't change because of height. in TF her FX was off ..a not. her whip to triple she tripped out of ans of course those landings.. I give her credit for her achievements but neber been a fan.
Wow your spelling is atrocious. At any rate, the fact that you don't like her is entirely irrelevant to her skill as a gymnast. Low landings almost never impacted a score before the introduction of the open ended scoring system as long as the landing was controlled, which Svetlanas almost always was, so implying she was overscored because of that very reason shows your complete ignorance towards this particularly code.
Shushunovafan What's irrelevant is you pointing out someones grammatical errors! And the only thing that's atrocious is your attitude, I can only suspect you're biased!
You could have easily made your point without belittling someone. We're all entitled to our own opinions; maybe learn to respect someones indifference. Try educating without berating!
@@l.a.smittie7412 thank you for your reply!! I was going to say the exact same thing!! Everyone is butt hurt if someone expresses an opinion that differs from their own!! I happen to agree entirely. I was NEVER a fan of Khorkina's gymnastics!! But I'm certainly capable of respecting those who are!! It's ashame when you really have nothing RELEVANT to say, so you bring the grammar police into the picture. Please get a life!!
shushunovafan lol, low landings were counted in this code, and they were always up for deduction. Speaking of grammatical errors, I don’t think you mean ‘particularly’ code, it would be ‘particular’ code. Keep the grammar tight if you’re going to correct it. Also, khorkina was awesome, but her assessment has validity.
Shushovafan Khorkina’s landings were the opposite of controlled a lot of the time. She was often falling forward/backward or shuffling her feet. She managed to pull her feet together, but she was usually leaning and not in control.
Dani quase ficou com o bronze :-)
Tabitha Yim and Kyla Ross are really similar, especially on bars.
Bart and Nadia are adorable
20 years later, I still can´t see anything wrong with the 01-04 Code of Points. Unlike its predecessors, it didn´t guarantee an automatic 10.0 start value (the previous codes effectively did) and ulike its successors, it still allowed for a lot of expression and choreo in the routines.
It focused TOO much on dance and completely disregarded form, particularly on tumbling. Just look at the floor final in Athens- won with completed dance but the most horrendous tumbling form ever. It also did nothing to reward difficulty at all.
Wow an 8.9 for TASHAS BARS👎😂👎👎👎😂😂😂 YOU ROCK TASHA Code of Points SUCK!!!
When did khorkina retire? What year ?
Some time after 2004,because she competed in those olympics
I don't think Khorkina's vault average was right
Those 90’s eyebrows though
29:22 what a joke of a score, so far beyond over the top too high for all the landing deductions that should have been accrued. Same thing with 31:36. Thank goodness the open ended scoring makes execution more relevant.
It's really odd that they only had 32 gymnasts for these AA finals.
The year after the Olympics quite often has fewer competitors. Some had retired, others were taking a break or were healing from injuries. Still definitely a little odd.
starting at 22:26, who is on floor?
Tasha Schwikert
where was china??
Perhaps they couldn't doctor the ages on their passports in time? Just kidding.
They were banned because of the age falseifcation
Thomas George They did not feel ready to send a team, so they did not send a full team. There was no issue of age in 2001.
kras118 there WAS an issue in 2000 which is why they werent ready. still don't know how '08 they got away with it again
When I said, 'no issue with age', I meant they were not banned due to age falsification in 2000, as they had not yet come to light. I am not sure what you mean by 2000 affecting their readiness in 2001. Sun Xiaojiao competed at these Worlds as an individual, so China was allowed to compete. And Sun was never under investigation, so there was no issue of age in 2001, as I stated in my original comment.
Daniele Hypolito looks like the twin sister of U.S. men's team member Raj Bhavsar.
He said it- it’s not about the beauty and artistry anymore. Very sad.