Very helpful for both law practioners as well as common man. Try to make videos on confusing words like subject to, notwithstanding, unless and otherwise and other such technical words of law in one minute videos. Thanks
Party filed a delay complaint and it was condoned. They told the delay was to due to medical leave, but i have evidence that party is lied in affidavit of the delay cause. If we bring perjury can we dismiss the case early?
DEAR SIR, I HAVE PURCHASED AN OLD FLAT WITH GARAGE. BUT THE GARAGE HAS BEEN CAPTURED BY A PERSON SINCE TWENTY YEARS, THE SELLER SUPPRESSED THIS FACT AND SOLD ME THE FLAT WITH GARAGE. FOR THIS I HAVE NOT CLEARED A CHEQUE AMONG THREE CHEQUES. I REPEATEDLY REQUESTED THE SELLER TO RESOLVE THE MATTER AND GET THE MONEY. THEY HAVE FILED A COMPLAINT UNDER SECTION 138. IS IT APPLICABLE HERE? PLEASE SUGGEST ME.
Well explained with case laws as examples. Thanks a lot Sir.
Sir These charts u made are really helping to understand the concepts very easily...thanks
Thank you
beautiful class .i never heard such a beautiful class
Very helpful session. Kindly share all important judgements together including the recent ones.
Very nice presentation of section s sir
Very helpful for both law practioners as well as common man.
Try to make videos on confusing words like subject to, notwithstanding, unless and otherwise and other such technical words of law in one minute videos. Thanks
yes sir. plz do it
Party filed a delay complaint and it was condoned. They told the delay was to due to medical leave, but i have evidence that party is lied in affidavit of the delay cause. If we bring perjury can we dismiss the case early?
Sir request you to consider taking insurance laws are the next subject of study
Sir what if the complaint is not able to provide the proof for how when and where he received the cheque?
Excellent
Thank you so much sir
DEAR SIR, I HAVE PURCHASED AN OLD FLAT WITH GARAGE. BUT THE GARAGE HAS BEEN CAPTURED BY A PERSON SINCE TWENTY YEARS, THE SELLER SUPPRESSED THIS FACT AND SOLD ME THE FLAT WITH GARAGE. FOR THIS I HAVE NOT CLEARED A CHEQUE AMONG THREE CHEQUES. I REPEATEDLY REQUESTED THE SELLER TO RESOLVE THE MATTER AND GET THE MONEY. THEY HAVE FILED A COMPLAINT UNDER SECTION 138. IS IT APPLICABLE HERE? PLEASE SUGGEST ME.
Nycc
Required Supreme Court judgment on 138 NI act
please teach the amendment of 2015 to sec 42
Sir try to make video on crossing 123-131A of crossed cheques too in negotiable instruments act 1881 bare act is difficult to understand
THANK YOU
Thankyou very much sir