frfr but my teacher does use real life examples like a shoe example the offer is when you look at the shoe, the consideration is when the employee gives you the shoe and acceptance is paying the employee
Thank you I am working on a assessment and you have helped me to better understand invitation to treat. So that the customer is actually the offeror and the assistant is the offeree thankyou
Everything I learned in yesterday's 3 hour class that is mandatory attendance, I learned in this 13 minute video. Easy to feel like a pleb when this happens, and this happens a lot.
The Pharmaceutical Society argued that placing the item in the bask was the acceptance. This was the artificial argument they created to mitigate the fact that a pharmacist was able to supervise transactions at the cash desk - thus meeting their duty under the Pharmacy and Poisons Act.
If someone sends the bank a promissory note and the bank scans the original into there system then allegedly destroys the original does that constitute acceptance by conduct ? And would they be liable to honour the note ?
my teacher does use real life examples like a shoe example the offer is when you look at the shoe, the consideration is when the employee gives you the shoe and acceptance is paying the employee
What happens if someone accepts someones offer verbally, but refuses to sign the written contract because they have changed their mind and do not want to accept it now
This Lecture is really educative, very precise and interesting. But the only concern is you did not talk about Implied waiver of the communication requirement in the case of a Unilateral contract. I am not sure, but I guess it’s probably because your focus is on Bilateral contracts
How should I go about the state agencies and the court system is saying that I was driving after saspencion and I never had a license and the law books show us we have the right to travel without a license and we can wave the payment and travel from point A to point B in our privete capacity and i was traveling in my privete automobile going to a funaral of my girlfriends mother and I told the Police that kidnapped me from the public Raods that are open to the public and a mater of right and not a privlige and the judge told me that I was to pay a$200 and 90 day's in jail there is no injury claim and iam not going to except that offer unless they are willing to compinsate me for a order for one million dollars every 30 days i spend in there jail for a living man and not a fictional entity or a employee of their kind
Hello, if a person makes an offer and the offeree does not accept the offer but another person or other persons do accept that offer what becomes of that? @LearnLoads
@@yojnasingh3529 In the scenarios I’m working on the other person’s are not making an offer they are accepting the original offer in different ways. Thanks for your input tho
In Indian corporate context, after all tendering / negotiation process, Purchaser sends a PO to seller for acceptance, with some additional terms. Normally, seller accepts PO with some comments & limit liability say 10 % of contract value. Afterward purchaser does not send revised PO (even doesn’t object on comments) and work started. Seller send deliverables and purchaser release payments. My question is whether PO is considered as valid. At this juncture, I want to safeguard interest of seller and not purchaser.
Who else has a law exam tomorrow looking at this?
Me, well the exam is one day from today, actually.
Brad Wilson i have one today
Have one tomorrow
i have a one tomorrow :D
Tomorrow law exam for me
omg..you explained this 100000 times better than my lecturer ...god bless you 😩😩😩❤️❤️❤️
Frl!!😂❤️😭
frfr but my teacher does use real life examples like a shoe example the offer is when you look at the shoe, the consideration is when the employee gives you the shoe and acceptance is paying the employee
you saved my gpa ,God sent you
Who is watching in 2024.
Love for them❤
Very well explained, especially you made it very visual. 100% thumbs up. you made contract law very easy to understand
Thank you I am working on a assessment and you have helped me to better understand invitation to treat. So that the customer is actually the offeror and the assistant is the offeree thankyou
Very clear for my students of Legal English. Impressed! Thank you.
Helen M. Denney Clift watch CA CS foundation students ua-cam.com/video/zzZgFdtDDI4/v-deo.html
You are just amazing!! Thank you so much. I wish u had more law videos x
3 years later tired of reading just wanted to hear someone's voice talking about the subject matter
Hi all your online lectures are very helpful! Please cover more on contract law ☺️
hello sir, your video is really helpful. you have a very soothing voice and explained the topic really well. stay blessed
Everything I learned in yesterday's 3 hour class that is mandatory attendance, I learned in this 13 minute video.
Easy to feel like a pleb when this happens, and this happens a lot.
This truly makes sense, thank you
Thanks a lot for your online lectures! Things are more clearer now!
The Pharmaceutical Society argued that placing the item in the bask was the acceptance. This was the artificial argument they created to mitigate the fact that a pharmacist was able to supervise transactions at the cash desk - thus meeting their duty under the Pharmacy and Poisons Act.
If someone sends the bank a promissory note and the bank scans the original into there system then allegedly destroys the original does that constitute acceptance by conduct ? And would they be liable to honour the note ?
my teacher does use real life examples like a shoe example the offer is when you look at the shoe, the consideration is when the employee gives you the shoe and acceptance is paying the employee
Good explaination..thank you sir
Sounds confusing invitation to treat isn’t an offer . It’s an invitation to attract people .
What happens if someone accepts someones offer verbally, but refuses to sign the written contract because they have changed their mind and do not want to accept it now
You can't do that .
There is no need for contract to be written .
Once your acceptance comes in knowledge of other party you can't back out
I have my contract law exam tomorrow and this literally saved my ass
Good work
Very clear and helpful
That was really helpful
Very good explanation!
This Lecture is really educative, very precise and interesting. But the only concern is you did not talk about Implied waiver of the communication requirement in the case of a Unilateral contract. I am not sure, but I guess it’s probably because your focus is on Bilateral contracts
Thanks great content
Give me my money now
Give me my money now
Re: Poshmark - Buy & Sell FashionRe: Poshmark - Buy & Sell Fashion
I want my money now
all
How should I go about the state agencies and the court system is saying that I was driving after saspencion and I never had a license and the law books show us we have the right to travel without a license and we can wave the payment and travel from point A to point B in our privete capacity and i was traveling in my privete automobile going to a funaral of my girlfriends mother and I told the Police that kidnapped me from the public Raods that are open to the public and a mater of right and not a privlige and the judge told me that I was to pay a$200 and 90 day's in jail there is no injury claim and iam not going to except that offer unless they are willing to compinsate me for a order for one million dollars every 30 days i spend in there jail for a living man and not a fictional entity or a employee of their kind
Please make the rest for consideration and intention
There is a consideration one now as well - see learnloads law playlist.
VERY helpful! Thank you!
Amazing
I didn't really get the exception number 3 of communication of acceptance
Guys do more like this .....that would be greatly helpful
Krishnaleela Shanthakumar watch ua-cam.com/video/KCYak1UBEJc/v-deo.html
Excellent , Make more videos for law pls
Hello, if a person makes an offer and the offeree does not accept the offer but another person or other persons do accept that offer what becomes of that? @LearnLoads
I suppose here, the new person is making an offer to the original offeror, therefore it is up to the latter to accept it or not
@@yojnasingh3529 In the scenarios I’m working on the other person’s are not making an offer they are accepting the original offer in different ways. Thanks for your input tho
Have my law exam tomorrow this was so helpful. Wish u were my teacher tbh
Serena Potter, I would like to discuss your legal aspirations, email me please.. montezrashaadwilliamsbey@gmail.com
Please make more law videos
In Indian corporate context, after all tendering / negotiation process, Purchaser sends a PO to seller for acceptance, with some additional terms. Normally, seller accepts PO with some comments & limit liability say 10 % of contract value. Afterward purchaser does not send revised PO (even doesn’t object on comments) and work started. Seller send deliverables and purchaser release payments.
My question is whether PO is considered as valid. At this juncture, I want to safeguard interest of seller and not purchaser.
Extremely helpful!
Currie v. Misa (1875) can you explain that one
The case can just be used to define consideration. Don’t quote me on this though.
thank you sir!
@UKZN Students where re you?
Thank you
Not me with an exam tomorrow watching this only now
Thank you!!
Can you address Hartley v. Wharton
Can you explain Chapter agency ?
2019 !
Here because of my law exam tomorrow lol
hey is there anyone who is studying Cambridge A2 law on 9084 , i really could use some notes to solve past papers.
So cooked I might as well be deep fried... Exam in like one hr
ukzn guys where are you?
It
Law exam tomorrow like
My exam is at 10h00 is tomorrow.
2020
Extremely helpful!