Hi Andy, your material and teaching style help so much. Most importantly, you are able to break down the problems and tackle them into digestible explanations for your students. This definitely makes learning sustainable! This is great. Thank you.
I had no idea what DFMEA or PFMEA was before seeing your video. One of our customers have asked for it, so thank you for all your time describing the process, a very easy to understand video. Now i have a good fundamental understanding, and will be able to make our own. A+👍
Hi Andy, I just discovered your channel today. I think all the material I've watched from you so far are simply awesome; you have a very concise way of explaining the topics! Thank you so much~
Hi Andy, Just wanted to thank you for the awesome material and resources you provide. I currently teach advanced manufacturing classes at a technical school. My students are all about chasing the almighty $ and I teach these topics with an emphasis on catching the $ through methodical thinking. Good stuff 👍
I found this material while looking for more info about FMEA. Like it a lot, but I think you forgot to tell about AIAG and VDA system. What you presenting is AIAG 4.0 standard and today one of the most popular is AIAG & VDA 1st edition standard. Anyway thank you for making some issues clear!
This is amazing, Thank you so much Andy, it's very informative with very smooth transition of fantastic slides.. Thanx once again for sharing those 'Free Give away', it's really helpful
Hey Marco!!! I just created a new video to talk about the 4 strategies for risk treatment - which includes Risk Transfer - and I've linked that video below: ua-cam.com/video/qrzC6LdQOKc/v-deo.html
hi， teacher， I like your videos very much, and I have been waiting your videos of the new version of FMEA, would you make it ? I do hope you can, I have been looking forward to it for a long time.
Hi Andy, this video is very good and easy to understand. However, today, we need to prepare AIAG and VDA systems instead, can you help to make a video for this issue? Thank you so much!
Great video man. One Question do you have a completely filled in form? I'd like to see a example of your theory. I am especially interrested in Unique Identifier
You're welcome Jason! We cover the control plan in my course (The CQE Master Class), and I"ve added it to the list of possible future videos here for the youtube channel!!
Hey @@jasonmark6262 , no that course only covers topics that are included in the CQE Body of Knowledge, which unfortunately doesn't include SQL and Python
In terms of effectiveness, you should re-consider things like severity, occurrence and detection when evaluating your corrective actions. If the measures are not quantifiable, the last resort is simply just the opinion of your subject matter experts.
great content! thank you and congrats! really! quick question, do you have one or two books/titles to indicate, which you were based on to make this video?
Thank you so much, it really helped and lot of informative. I am a R&D Engineer in Medical devices, i am looking for a real case studies of DFMEA and PFMEA in medical devices. If you know any good sources, please let me know. It really helps me.
Great channel!! New sub!! Question - any guidance for processes that are 90% virtual…but may have human intervention at certain steps? The virtual aspects are not as streamlined as one may think.
Thank you so much for explanation, I have a question: Is there other tool or step rather than RPN in FMEA method? because in FMEA we should calculate RPN 2 times, I mean rather than estimate severity, occurrence and detection of failure mode, I suggest one time is enough, and with other tool we could try minimise the level of risk.
Hey Akshaya! I thought about doing that in this presentation, but unfortunately my students often come from many different industries, where the scales for risk are different, and so an example may not translate perfectly for everyone, and I wanted to just cover the basic elements of the process. I might do an example in the future from one specific industry to go more in depth on the FMEA process
in the actions results section, are these new predicted estimates of SEV OCC and DET based upon a planned implementation of an improvement/change? or are these measured results AFTER actually implementing the change?
Thanks! Yes, I most definitely have a e-learning platform! Here's a free course: cqeacademy.teachable.com/p/top-10-topics I also have paid courses to check out as well!
Sir, I want to ask. For the action section taken, it should be filled after action recommended is complete? Or what? And also for the rpn value, it should be rate after action taken completed?
Hey Muhammad, GREAT QUESTION - okay, so the RPN can be completed before the action is completed, and then it can be revised after the action has been completed. Once you've completed an action and reduced the occurrence/severity/detection, you should update and revise your PFMEA, which should be a controlled document in your Quality System. The action recommended can be entered when the PFMEA is originally created - and then the actions taken can be added to the PFMEA once those actions are actually completed.
Would it make more sense to think the detection so that it measures how the failure is detected before the failure occurs and not after it has occured?
Okay good question, and this is tough. So if a control is meant to prevent an issue from occurring, then that control factor should influence your occurrence score. If a control is meant to detect a failure mode after it's occurring, then that control factor should influence your detection score. And when evaluating the "detectability" of a control factor, you should make that assessment assuming that the failure has already occurred.
@@CQEAcademy Another question: Let's assume that I don't change oil --> cylinder seizes --> engine ignites --> the whole car is on fire --> I'm hurt etc. Is the failure mode the event that I observe most likely? In this example, it would be engine seizes and some warning light? Cases where there is a long chain reaction, it's hard to decide which is the mode, cause, mechanism and effect...
Hey @@kerguule !! That's a great question, when you're evaluating the effect of a failure mode, there can often be multiple effects. And those effects can have different levels of severity, and those effects might have different occurrences. So you can create a new line item in your FMEA to evaluate those different effects independently and give each of them their own severity score and their own occurrence score. I would say though, when evaluating the possible effects, you should only consider a "reasonable sequence of events" in terms of the potential effects. So you don't have to try and imagine every possibility.
One of the best FMEA videos around. Thank you so much.
FANTASTIC!! From a project management and quality engineering perspective, this is RIGHT ON! 👏👏👏
Thanks so much Bill!!!
You are simply unbelievable in your delivery... a shining star amongst good and not-so-good presenters of this material!!!
Wow, thanks so much Nicolas, I really appreciate that!!
Certainly, the best FMEA video on youtube! Thank you so much for this high-quality and didactic material!
Hi Andy, your material and teaching style help so much. Most importantly, you are able to break down the problems and tackle them into digestible explanations for your students. This definitely makes learning sustainable! This is great. Thank you.
Wow, thank you so much for your kind comment!! I appreciate that!
I had no idea what DFMEA or PFMEA was before seeing your video. One of our customers have asked for it, so thank you for all your time describing the process, a very easy to understand video. Now i have a good fundamental understanding, and will be able to make our own. A+👍
Awesome, thanks!!!!
You job the quality depart
Hi Andy, I just discovered your channel today. I think all the material I've watched from you so far are simply awesome; you have a very concise way of explaining the topics! Thank you so much~
Oh wow, thanks so much!!!
I appreciate that!!
Hi Andy, Just wanted to thank you for the awesome material and resources you provide. I currently teach advanced manufacturing classes at a technical school. My students are all about chasing the almighty $ and I teach these topics with an emphasis on catching the $ through methodical thinking. Good stuff 👍
the material is easy to understanding and i can image how different between P&DFMEA and also the meaning of each evaluation score
Thank you so much!!
Appreciate the organization and layout of this - best video explaining the ins and outs of FMEA I've seen so far.
amazing how well you explained everything, excited to see more videos of you
Thank you andy. Definitely important Risk Management Tool. Very nicely explained.
Really like your videos Andy. A good blend of theory and practice and always clearly communicated. Thank you.
Glad you like them!
Very informative, exceptionally demonstrated and explained. Thank you for your effort
Glad it was helpful!
Thank you so much for your support really appreciate!
You're welcome!!!!!
I found this material while looking for more info about FMEA. Like it a lot, but I think you forgot to tell about AIAG and VDA system. What you presenting is AIAG 4.0 standard and today one of the most popular is AIAG & VDA 1st edition standard. Anyway thank you for making some issues clear!
thanks for the informative video. watching from Kenya
Thank you!!!
One of the best videos of these types..Very crisp and short.. amazing Thank you
Wow, awesome, I'm glad you liked it!!!
Thanks for the comment!!
Super analysis and awesome presentation
Thank you so much!!!
Thank you very much, sir, for sharing this very informative video. I've learned a lot after watching your masterpiece.
Thanks Cristian!!!
great video with super detail explain
Thanks Kelvin!
Congratulations another excellent video it has a clear explanation about this tool. Greetings from Monterrey NL.
Thanks Mario!!!!
This is amazing, Thank you so much Andy, it's very informative with very smooth transition of fantastic slides.. Thanx once again for sharing those 'Free Give away', it's really helpful
You're welcome!
Subscribed! Your content is clear and concise, and makes manufacturing less boring 😆
Hahahaha, thanks Abraham!!!
Hello i am safety engineering and management student, its well explained thank!
This is brilliant! I am new to this and now I know what I am trying to do. Thanks
This is such a great piece. Thanks for sharing.
You're welcome!
Thanks for the video! Great explanation! I actually use someka's FMEA tool for google sheets but this is very informative.
Thanks so much Brent!
Holy shit this is amazing, u cooked w this video. Definitely gonna help w presentation tomorrow
Hahahaha thanks!
Great work .I learn lots
Thanks so much, I'm glad you learned alot!
Well presented... Thank You Sir
You're absolutely welcome Skhu!
Nice primer, thanks for putting it up! I’m likely to share with some colleagues in future.
I'm glad you like it!
Excellent video!
Thanks Madara!!!
What a great introduction and overview!
Thanks David!!
Thanks for your clarification. I am going to describe the same in Ukraine at my next work.
Thanks!!!
Excellent, you are a well learned person in your subjects and most of all of great presentation skills.
Wow, thanks Farid, I appreciate that!!!
Hi Andy, I suggest also to include risk transfer as part of the risk management process. Example is Insurance
Hey Marco!!!
I just created a new video to talk about the 4 strategies for risk treatment - which includes Risk Transfer - and I've linked that video below:
ua-cam.com/video/qrzC6LdQOKc/v-deo.html
Excellent... Good video.. 👍. Nice and clear explanation..
Very detailed introduction. Appreciate. Thank you.
Wow thanks so much, I appreciate that!!
Excellent Video Andy! Thank you!
Thanks Brandie!!!!
Another great video. Thank you Andy!
You're welcome Ivelys, I'm glad you liked it!!!
-Andy
@@CQEAcademy Are you planning to do an a similar video on control plans?
@@malichicu I definitely am! Not 100% sure on timing but it'll definitely happen
What a great material , and so nicely put together, it helped me a lot. thanks!!
Thanks Miguel!!!! I'm glad you enjoyed it!!!
Thank you so much, Andy!
You're welcome Asha!!!!
Very nicely done. Learned a lot. Many thanks!
You're absolutely welcome!
Good material training & good coacher. Thanks for instructing
Glad you enjoyed it!
Thank you Sir Andy.
This is timing. We'll get an AIAG cert. badge
Awesome, glad I was able to help!!!!
-Andy
hi， teacher， I like your videos very much, and I have been waiting your videos of the new version of FMEA, would you make it ? I do hope you can, I have been looking forward to it for a long time.
Thank you very much for your efforts mate! Just a super cool job!
You're very welcome!!!
Well presented. Thank you
Thanks so much Mohamed!!!
Hi Andy, this video is very good and easy to understand. However, today, we need to prepare AIAG and VDA systems instead, can you help to make a video for this issue? Thank you so much!
Great video man. One Question do you have a completely filled in form? I'd like to see a example of your theory. I am especially interrested in Unique Identifier
@CQE Academy, thank you for the detailed video. Do you also have a detailed video on how to effectively use the control document?
You're welcome Jason! We cover the control plan in my course (The CQE Master Class), and I"ve added it to the list of possible future videos here for the youtube channel!!
@@CQEAcademy thank you. Hope to get that notification bell soon. Does the CQE Masterclass cover SQL & Python too?
Hey @@jasonmark6262 , no that course only covers topics that are included in the CQE Body of Knowledge, which unfortunately doesn't include SQL and Python
Thank you I learned a lot. How do you measure the effectiveness of your corrective actions? Where the measures are not quantifiable or subjective?
In terms of effectiveness, you should re-consider things like severity, occurrence and detection when evaluating your corrective actions.
If the measures are not quantifiable, the last resort is simply just the opinion of your subject matter experts.
Great video
Thanks Adam!
Great explanation, thank you!
Thanks Salwa!
great content! thank you and congrats! really! quick question, do you have one or two books/titles to indicate, which you were based on to make this video?
You're absolutely welcome!
To be honest, I didn't really reference any books or titles when creating that video.
Out standing
Thanks!
The new VDA FMEA could also be covered in brief highlighting the differences.
Very Helpful! Thanks a ton!
Wow thanks so much, I appreciate that!!
Thank you, teacher, a very good and useful video.
awesome, thanks Neri!! I'm glad you enjoyed it!
Absolutely great stuff right here. Thank you.
Thanks Andy!
Excellent video
Thanks Patrick!
Thank you so much, it really helped and lot of informative. I am a R&D Engineer in Medical devices, i am looking for a real case studies of DFMEA and PFMEA in medical devices. If you know any good sources, please let me know. It really helps me.
Thank you!
You're welcome!!
Great channel!! New sub!!
Question - any guidance for processes that are 90% virtual…but may have human intervention at certain steps? The virtual aspects are not as streamlined as one may think.
Great explanations 😎
Hi well presented.Since I am new to fmea ,I have doubt regarding vda evaluation tables.
Do we need to follow 5 steps if we are following rpn ??
Amazing video, thanks 🙏
Thanks Maedeh!!!!!
Thank you so much for explanation, I have a question: Is there other tool or step rather than RPN in FMEA method? because in FMEA we should calculate RPN 2 times, I mean rather than estimate severity, occurrence and detection of failure mode, I suggest one time is enough, and with other tool we could try minimise the level of risk.
you are a genius man thanks a lot
Thank you so much ❤️
You're absolutely welcome!!!
Thanks it was really useful
You're welcome!!!
-Andy
Andy you are THE best.
Awesome, I"m glad you enjoy the videos!!!!!!!!!!!!
How do I join the CQE academy?
great content, thank you.
Hi Andy, pl share a live case sheet to understand fmea much better.
Hey Akshaya! I thought about doing that in this presentation, but unfortunately my students often come from many different industries, where the scales for risk are different, and so an example may not translate perfectly for everyone, and I wanted to just cover the basic elements of the process. I might do an example in the future from one specific industry to go more in depth on the FMEA process
in the actions results section, are these new predicted estimates of SEV OCC and DET based upon a planned implementation of an improvement/change? or are these measured results AFTER actually implementing the change?
You shouldn't update your FMEA until after the changes are implemented and confirmed to have effectively reduced risk
well explained.
really appreciate your efforts! thanks so much!
Thanks I appreciate that!!!
Very useful. Thanks.
Thanks Derya!!!
Thank youuu so much!!!
Excellent thanks
Amazing man. I need to know do you have any course on e-learning platform
Thanks!
Yes, I most definitely have a e-learning platform!
Here's a free course: cqeacademy.teachable.com/p/top-10-topics
I also have paid courses to check out as well!
That's great
You're welcome!
thanks
You're welcome Dr. Joy!
Great 👍
Thank you 👍
GREAT
You're welcome!
Sir, I want to ask. For the action section taken, it should be filled after action recommended is complete? Or what?
And also for the rpn value, it should be rate after action taken completed?
Hey Muhammad, GREAT QUESTION - okay, so the RPN can be completed before the action is completed, and then it can be revised after the action has been completed. Once you've completed an action and reduced the occurrence/severity/detection, you should update and revise your PFMEA, which should be a controlled document in your Quality System.
The action recommended can be entered when the PFMEA is originally created - and then the actions taken can be added to the PFMEA once those actions are actually completed.
@@CQEAcademy Thank you Sir.
@@MuhammadFirdaus-yd5dw You're welcome!
Would it make more sense to think the detection so that it measures how the failure is detected before the failure occurs and not after it has occured?
Okay good question, and this is tough.
So if a control is meant to prevent an issue from occurring, then that control factor should influence your occurrence score.
If a control is meant to detect a failure mode after it's occurring, then that control factor should influence your detection score.
And when evaluating the "detectability" of a control factor, you should make that assessment assuming that the failure has already occurred.
@@CQEAcademy Another question: Let's assume that I don't change oil --> cylinder seizes --> engine ignites --> the whole car is on fire --> I'm hurt etc. Is the failure mode the event that I observe most likely? In this example, it would be engine seizes and some warning light? Cases where there is a long chain reaction, it's hard to decide which is the mode, cause, mechanism and effect...
Hey @@kerguule !! That's a great question, when you're evaluating the effect of a failure mode, there can often be multiple effects.
And those effects can have different levels of severity, and those effects might have different occurrences. So you can create a new line item in your FMEA to evaluate those different effects independently and give each of them their own severity score and their own occurrence score.
I would say though, when evaluating the possible effects, you should only consider a "reasonable sequence of events" in terms of the potential effects. So you don't have to try and imagine every possibility.
@@CQEAcademy Thank you!
You're welcome @@kerguule
💪
How to download this software and work on it
Hey Gautham, you can download the spreadsheet here: www.CQEAcademy.com/FMEA
Is there a global certification for FMEA?
Not that I’m aware of
Watching
😊😊😊
Glad you enjoyed that video!
Great job, thanks
Thanks Mark!