I built many 2v Clevor engines back in the 80s and 90s. They were cheap and easy to build. The Cleveland blocks were just too pricey but 302 and 351 windsor blocks were and still are very plentiful and inexpensive. Those 2V closed chamber heads sold in 😊Australia were so interesting but scarce here in the states. Now the aluminum heads are more plentiful but if using a 302/5.0L block, you have so few reasonably priced intake manifolds.
@@craighansen7594 cool stuff Craig thanks for sharing, yes Closed Chamber 2V’s were the heads to use, I’ve done a few back then👌🏼🏁….351W blocks were scarce for us back then down here🤷🏻♂️🏁
@@danielwilson6665 i agree DW, the port entry & size of the runners are a little restricted hence the claimed 6500rpm limit of it 🤷🏻♂️, 2V combos in general don’t really see getting up to 7k rpm+ , so despite the look of this intake can seem it has more in it, but was infact a well designed unit that did work with good HP/Tq as seen here from mild 351ci - 378ci & considerably all under 7k rpm 💪🏼🏁
@@69JANKS Excellent point, my friend. This particular manifold LOOKS like a total badass thanks to the taller height and provisions for nitrous/ F.I. bungs. But the internal dimensions might fall a little short in terms of a max effort stroker Cleveland build. Thanks for another excellent post, Sir Janks 🏁
Hey janks hope you're doing well ,that's some good parts you have there them parts still work well and make good power, you always bring us good stuff thanks for sharing with us 👍
I built many 2v Clevor engines back in the 80s and 90s. They were cheap and easy to build. The Cleveland blocks were just too pricey but 302 and 351 windsor blocks were and still are very plentiful and inexpensive. Those 2V closed chamber heads sold in 😊Australia were so interesting but scarce here in the states. Now the aluminum heads are more plentiful but if using a 302/5.0L block, you have so few reasonably priced intake manifolds.
@@craighansen7594 cool stuff Craig thanks for sharing, yes Closed Chamber 2V’s were the heads to use, I’ve done a few back then👌🏼🏁….351W blocks were scarce for us back then down here🤷🏻♂️🏁
Another great fact filled post my friend. I remember the Eradicator Intake but never had the opportunity to use one. Looks good for a moderate build 👍
@@danielwilson6665 i agree DW, the port entry & size of the runners are a little restricted hence the claimed 6500rpm limit of it 🤷🏻♂️, 2V combos in general don’t really see getting up to 7k rpm+ , so despite the look of this intake can seem it has more in it, but was infact a well designed unit that did work with good HP/Tq as seen here from mild 351ci - 378ci & considerably all under 7k rpm 💪🏼🏁
@@69JANKS Excellent point, my friend. This particular manifold LOOKS like a total badass thanks to the taller height and provisions for nitrous/ F.I. bungs. But the internal dimensions might fall a little short in terms of a max effort stroker Cleveland build.
Thanks for another excellent post, Sir Janks 🏁
@@danielwilson6665 💯% DW👍🏼, & we’ll said👌🏼……thanks for tuning in🏁
Hey janks hope you're doing well ,that's some good parts you have there them parts still work well and make good power, you always bring us good stuff thanks for sharing with us 👍
@@terrygrover6440 Thanks TG👍🏼, doing good & hope all is good with you boys…..
OldSchool gear & making it work is best😎🏁appreciate the comment buddy
I like it. Yes, Old School is still Cool.
@@gmans7859 💯%👍🏼🏁
Cool, never seen manifolds like that here in the states.
@@gearbanger57 right on gb57👍🏼, you have to have had all Cleveland 2V/4V (closed/open chamber) Combinations to be a “real” Cleveland man 😉🏁
That's going back a few years . Ian Moody did them
@@gregh6794 way back 👍🏼🏁
What are some good sources to use find these intakes? Thanks in Advance.