Operation Zapata, AKA The Bay Of Pigs, failed because McGeorge Bundy COUNTERMANDED JFK's order to destroy Castro's last 3 combat operational jets. The next day, those 3 jets destroyed several B-26s, and sank at least 2 ships. Type in L Fletcher Prouty explains The Bay Of Pigs, and Vietnam
He certainly speaks with clarity and without pausing to think. No umms or ahs or eyes rolling up. I'm not a body language expert but I would like to hear from someone who is.
8 годин тому+7
@thereanimator926 your talking to an AI bot amd watching disinfo lolololol
have figured for a while, safe enough in the pen I guess, he shot along with either Tippit or White @ Knoll or pergola, both crack shots , both in the loop one airborne one marine corps. Those vets didnt f up. Headshot had to be clean, but someone missed, maybe Stiles??? FFD 'Dont shoot Jackie' was the last walky talky msg apparently
This could go down as one of the most important confession testimonies in history BUT we need a real investigation to make sure his story is credible especially as there's plenty of others who have claimed to be the shooter too.
There have been two separate investigations already, one by the FBI and another by renowned private detective Jules Krull. Both have determined Files to not be credible.
I have read countless books on this subject and attendend a lecture by Robert J Groden who wrote "High Treason" about the assassination as well as reopening the House Assassination Committee. He mentions many of the same people that Files does. Another Mafia connected guy also said what Files said that the assassination was supposed to be called off, but someone pushed ahead with it any ways. Either this guy knows the key players and was involved or he has a photographic memory and has studied everything about this case. I find him to be one of the more fascinating persons regarding this case.
Watch Danny Jones podcast with Felix Rodriguez. According to him the second shooter was a sniper from the Cuban military and was in Dallas that day. Felix Rodriguez is ex CIA that is known for a bunch of crazy stuff. Some good and some pretty terrible.
He was on another show, on tubi interview. He sounds very connected to the Chicago outfit with his recall of Melrose Park incidents. Chicago was the strongest mob in the country and they seem to have the contract for it.
The Kennedy patriarch Joseph was an Irish mob connected guy wanted a son in the White House. When his eldest was killed in WWII it fell on JFK to do his father's bidding. JFK got elected in 1960 by winning the vote in the Chicago area controlled by Richard Daley. I was eight, living on the far South Side, son of a Daley Machine Block Captain. There might have been a few extra votes for JFK counted... LBJ ran his own political mafia in Texas. He was a last minute substitution as VP at the convention. JFK didn't want him but had no choice to accept him. That's just how machine politics worked then and still does today - why Biden ran in 2020 and again in 2024 before being forced off. JFK selected RFK as Attorney General and they were perceived as threat by LBJ, J.Edgar Hoover and Alan Dulles of the CIA after the Bay of Pigs Fiasco. A huge scandal revealing LBJs corruption was set run on the cover of Time Magazine the week he was killed. It got pulled for the assassination story. RFK was killed for the same reason by the same conspirators in 1968. Younger brother Teddy was spared the same fate by the 1969 Chappaquiddick incident and his father dying the same year being content to just hang on to his safe Senate seat and not make the kind of waves that get you whacked in Washington - like Vince Foster the man who knew to much…
Chicago, West Side here, around the same time. Many moving parts here. Madeleine Duncan Brown, (LBJ's long time mistress, secretary, and mother of his only son), in her six part interview with Robert Gaylon Ross, Sr. described the meeting on the evening of Nov. 21st in Dallas at the home of one of the inner circle. George Bush, Sr .and the Governor John Connelly were at that meeting. Both were complicit in this event. Madeleine Brown also described LBJ's personal hit man, retained by him full time, who was on the overpass above the motorcade. At least one shot was fired by him. There were other agreements made leading up to JFK's death including Nixon becoming president at the next election, (following LBJ's, of course), and the understanding that Jimmy Hoffa would be released from prison at Nixon's pardon, so that the mob could kill him.
The magic bullet makes no sense any more. Since governor Connery is in the jump seat. He was in the passenger seat which the bullet was said to fly though. Yes history changed. There used to be four people in the car. Mrs Connery was with lbj
BS...anyone who studies the situation that day, knows that this murder case has been solved for many years. But there is a lot of money to be made, manufacturing paranoid conspiracy crud.
The way he describes the shots, its exactly how it appears in the Zapruder footage. Kennedy's head jerks slightly forward suggesting a shot from behind less than a second before his head violently jerks back and almost explodes, suggesting a close range frontal shot.
I've been following the kennedy case since I was twelve. I'm 57 now. This makes more sense than any other theory I've ever heard and I've felt this way since the first time I heard it years ago and believe it now more than ever.
I agree. This is chilling. I was 5 but I remember that day and was terrified when we were sent home early from school and people were crying. I could not sleep for days. I even read "Death of A President" in high school for a book report. Files answered every question without stuttering, but when he mentioned Jack Ruby before his name even entered the questioning, that really got my attention and explained the reason for his death as well.
If you've been following it for 45 years you'd know the autopsy clearly shows both shots hit jfk from behind. Nothing in the eye from the front. There's zero credible evidence that the autopsy was faked in any way. This guy been rotting away in prison, reading books. Put together a nice story for suckers like you to fall for.
I don't know what anyone else thinks of this guy, I believe him - when people lie, they open their eyes wider and their eyebrows go up, and you can sense without any doubt that they're lying, but this guy in his eyes and his total expression reflects an emotion that is obvious and real in his eyes you can see that he's reflecting on the memories in his mind's eye and recollection - this is the truth. If this was in a courtroom and I was a jury member I would believe him 100%. Or he is one incredible liar.
Reflexes are stripped from you at birth. Language is religion. The alphabet is untrue. We are taught confusion from the moment of inception. We were created as slaves, not to have a voice.
Sounds pretty credible but changing the amount of 15 grand to 30 grand makes me think there might be another party involved that he doesn't want to mention for whatever reason.
A lot of people involved. Many potential “shoe-ters”; (sorry, YT’s “policies”)and many who got a shot off. I’ve believed this guy and that he was a big part of it. There may be a few discrepancies but this guy has always struck me as NOT lying. 🤷🏼♀️ I could be wrong. The whole thing is sick and disturbing. I’m not clutching my pearls…I do know that life and politics are difficult and complicated. Still? This “event” and the whole Kennedy political saga and Kennedy filth…the CIA, LBJ, Hoover, Nixon, The Bush’s involvement, etc. All of it? Very disturbing. Disgusting. Shameful as a nation.
@AB-un4io 61yearslater and no one knows who killed JFK? Ridiculous. No front shooters , no conspiracy . You need to study this case more carefully . How was Bush involved ? Where was he on 11/22/63 ? My guess is you’ll answer incorrectly. Files is a liar .
There were 3-4 shooter teams but no one really knew what the job of the others were as they had their own orders, but they all knew they were part of the operation standard Tactic's!
You have endless time to rehearse your story when you're in prison. One problem: trajectory. JFK wasn't shot in the side of his head- he was shot from the front. That's why the back of his head was blown out.
This is chilling! I was only 5 years old, but I remember that day and was terrified when we were sent home early from school and people were crying. I could not sleep for days. I even read "Death of A President" in high school for a book report. Files answered every question without stuttering, but when he mentioned Jack Ruby before his name even entered the questioning, that really got my attention and explained the reason for his death as well.
I was 7, and remember being sent home at 2:10 - and the following day watching tv when Oswald was shot. No one i know bought the Warren commission report.
The “smoking bullet of proof” is that fact that he bit the shell casing and placed it on the fence, and it wasn’t disclosed until after his confessions that they had the shell casing with bite marks on it. And there is a photo of him standing behind the fence.
@@dab. was never proved just as lone shooter was never proven - too many witnesses claimed to have heard more than 3 shots two of which in rapid succession impossible for lone gunman with bolt action -
Awe, Jack Ruby! I found out about 11 years ago that my Uncle on my mother's side was a close friend to Ruby. That told me why my mother didn't want to be there in case something happened and would not let me see the President coming from Down Town.We pulled out just ahead of them and there were 5 Semi type shots that I remember hearing. But years later I did the research and found 6-bullet's fired. And Files was carring a briefcase.
This is unbelievable .I can not believe after all these years. No one took him serious, and the no further investigations ever happened after this confession...
The government did not want to open that can of worms, cause then they would have to admit the warren commission was total bullshit and several agencies...CIA, FBI, mafia conspired to assassinate the president.
This BS is trying to desperately GET AHEAD of what is about to be released via RFK jr...heads are gonna roll. We DEMAND accountability with punishment.
There’s not much info left to be released. Apparently all the sensitive documents were destroyed long ago. - There’s such a ridiculous amount of evidence that if people don’t believe it was a conspiracy now, they never will.
When he told what kinda of round he used, it would fragment. The ones used from oswalds rifle didn't fragment. That was when it finally made sense about JFK's head wound. This man's story makes more sense to me and connects other parts of the assassination.
@libbyhicks7549 The first shot fragmented and hit the governor I believe. JFK refused to lie to the American people about the Cuban crisis. Deep state had him "removed"..
@@libbyhicks7549 I cant say much about any of this. He sounds and seems very credible. BUT, But….When I was watching the video of this, looking back for weird things, again and again, and again. 👀 I slowed it way down by a lot and then I NOTICED that the driver was turned and FIRED a shot, that looked to be at JFK!!! It truly looked like he was the one who shot at JFK!!! Crazy I know, BUT is my mind playing tricks on me, or that’s what I saw. Check it out, and you’ll see, and tell me I’m NOT crazy nor wrong?! Hmm…🤔 JS!
In The Zapruder film, one can clearly see that President Kennedy was struck in the front right side temple as allegedly Oswald shot him in the back of the head. All bystanders said the last 2 shots came close together as BAM BAM BAM. The last 2 shots were both the head shots. In William Manchester's book, "The Day Kennedy Was Shot," President Kennedy's head exploded and spewing large gushes of blood and brains spurted out of his head soaking Jackie Kennedy and the seat and walls of the interior of the Limousine and kept largely gushing like a fountain until his blood pressure dropped to zero. President Kennedy was dead almost instantly. He was gurgling and his mouth was rapidly moving right after he was struck. His eyes were both open very wide and fixed as he bled to death with his head on his wife's lap. Horrid to see as SS agent Clint Hill saw as he climbed on the back of the limousine to shield everyone. President Kennedy's head was half blown open as brain chunks and rapidly flowing blood flooded the back seat and the floor of the limousine. as well the motor bike police windshields, and the suits of the driver Bill Greer and Roy Kellerman as well as spewing all over Clint Hill as he jumped on the speeding up Limousine. I do not attempt to be gory, but this is what truly happened.
Too many ppl and organisations involved in wanting JFK gone. CIA, FBI, Big Crime, Cubans, Russians, political opponents, etc. And all that, plus a botched whitewash of an investigation afterwards. A perfect storm. And Oswald was only a convenient scapegoat. The truth lies far beneath a complicated mess that will probably never be cleared away.
It does make sense that someone was sent to kill Oswald and maybe was seen with a gun by Tibbetts and shot him. Oswald was told to hide, so he was chilling in movie theater and couldnt figure out what was going on when they grabbed him.
This man may have taken a shot but the bullet that killed JFK came from the front and through the windscreen of the car and this shooter was like a military sniper marksman. I believe there were a lot of people with rifles in the ambush. It's a miracle only one man was killed.
I always thought that too... because bullets follow straight lines... if JFK was hit in the right temple from the right the bullet would have exited out the left rear of the head. But the huge exit wound is in the right rear. That means a bullet from the knoll would have entered JFK's temple and then made a right 90 turn. But If hit from the front, the bullet would have gone in the tight side and exited on the right side.
It literally struck him in the temple, just as this guy said. I am not saying for sure this is the guy, but there is no doubt where the head shot came from.
Yep Tom.. I think the shot came from behind the fence atop the gassy knoll. Hobos were spotted and told to leave near the RR tracks there as Dallas police came to the scene. A secret svc man testified at least 1 of those shabbily-dressed hobos had shiny new shoes, suggesting they were decoys or otherwise nefariously at the scene and not hobos at all.
I recently saw a more recent interview from this man. Not 1 time did this man change his story. I believe he only tells 95% of the story and leaves others who were involved out. Chances are he might not know everyone else who was involved. The terms he uses to describe the people indicates those were the terms he used at the time. He's 100% legitimate.
@@tukayz254Misdirect people? This isn’t even viral. No one watches this stuff anymore. No need for misdirection. Nearly everyone (I’d say about 98%) of the people KNOW our Govt did it. No need to misdirect. The Govt came out 3 years ago about aliens being real and no one cared. They can income out and say “we iced JFK” and no one would be surprised at all. No need to “misdirect” anyone. Even in the 80’s, it wouldn’t have been a big ass deal. We know the Govt did it.
If he was stationed in Laos, why does he keep saying "Latosions"??? They are referred to as Laotians or Lao when talking about people. I really find his story very interesting but can't say I believe him.
Agree I was in Laos !! In this century several times, doing visa runs from Thailand to Vientiane and Luang Prabang. Beautiful country bombed to crap by the USA.
@@davidwilfong8028 The 82nd wasn't, I was wondering if he is trying to say he was in Special Forces, which were in Laos in 59, to train the Lao fighters.
So he shot the President with a .221 Fireball? The Fireball in 1963 was an experimental pistol that Remington was developing. I always found it implausible that Oswald got 3 shots off with a 6.5 Carcano. The Carcano was not the most accurate rifle of its day. Now, I’m expected to buy that Files hit a moving target with a bolt action pistol, after firing he was able to discern a piece of skull fly onto the trunk??? Sorry, I ain’t buying this, BTW, I’ve reloaded enough rifle brass in my day to know you’d need a hydraulic jaw to leave teeth marks in a spent casing. He says he killed Kennedy, then he scans the crowd with the 3x scope and see Frank Sturgiss. In 1994, the Federal Bureau of Investigation was quoted as having investigated Files' allegation and found it "not to be credible". Files was paroled and is still alive. Surprisingly he hasn’t been whacked for mentioning 3 Mafiosos in the interview…..
Ain't no way he's hitting a moving target with a scoped XP-100 pistol. Not to mention that the XP-100 would most likely be using a long-eye relief scope which have a really poor field of view even at low power.
Brass is a soft metal unlike steel casings. You definitely wouldn't need a press to dent them. I'm not saying you could easily crush it with your teeth, but you could definitely dent it. But good try.
Also, the fact that you believe the FBI about anything....especially JFK related is pretty wild. Theyre not smart people. Theyre certainly not honest people.
I have 20+ years of mental health experience. And I fancy myself as being perceptive in reading people thru work and a natural gift. This man’s details tell me he’s been well trained. He also has extensive training in not missing details. This is high level training. Even that he’s working in accordance with some government agency he has been trained With the best we have in intelligence agencies. The 26:10 mark he makes mention to another event he was involved in. We all know about all the assassinations in the 60s so I’d venture to say he probably was involved with another assassination in the 60s
If dozens upon dozens of eye witnesses to the JFK assassination were ‘unlived’, or silenced by threats with in a couple of years after the event, what makes anyone think that the shooters involved, out lasted Oswald?
I believe Oswald was set up...... exactly as he claimed (just a patsy) I've been seeing that image of Oswald's face for 60 years now and I finally feel as if I know exactly what he was thinking as he's being dragged around Dallas PD. headquarters. It's a face of sheer disgust because he knows he's about to take the fall for a major assassination in which he was just a bit player. He's disgusted with himself for getting suckered into such a farce. Obviously I don't believe he was the main character in the assassination...... it's just an opinion, I wasn't there.
Okay same. Now what are all 3 of us watching that is similar for this to get dropped in the algorithm.. and i want to assume the 3 of us are watching things that some would side eye us if they knew
Finally geez! Out of all of the shows, documentaries, stories etc, I never realized the angle of which this dude is speaking, So Oswald was telling the truth, he didn't shoot JFK .. Unbelievable ..
Nowadays Files is a devoted born-again Christian - he and his wife have written a couple books: "Primary Target: JFK" and "Interview With History," both well worth reading.
This biein fake or not, the shot that hit Kennedy in the right front side of his head is the biggest gaslight video in this century. To say he was hit in the head from the rear is a whopping lie.
@@user-bl6ne3hc6n People, even when being honest, will sometimes hesitate to search for the proper words. Meanwhile, if a liar has his story down pat, he might not hesitate at all. (And Files has had a lot of free time, to get his story down pat)
One thing I have a hard time believing from this story. He said he trained agents for the Bay of Pigs? He would've been 19 at that time, born in 1942, according to Wikipedia. Does the CIA let 19 year olds train agents? I do believe at the age of 21, he could've been involved in the shooting as Oswald was 24. And he was in prison for 25 years. I think if he was actually involved, the people in charge would most likely have him eliminated in prison. The perfect place to kill someone who knew too much and having the ability to spill the beans to cut a deal.
We sent soldiers to their death at 19 to Vietnam! You have to remember that he was a last minute inclusion in the actual shooting all the others Nicoletti and Rosselli were the picks by the Don and Rogue CIA and both of those guys ended up in the meat grinder along with SAMMY G....maybe he was never mentioned as a shooter but just the kid driver that knows nothing!
I definitely see what you're saying. It is suspicious from a normal persons point of view, but I will say he talks about his birth certificate being found and it not having a date and instead saying "deceased at birth" He hasn't gone into it, but maybe because of family ties or mafia ties, he was breed from a young age to do high level work. 19 is pretty young, but you never know. In 2024, we had young men trying to protect Donald Trump when he was almost killed. We still send 18 year old kids to fight wars. Its not hard to imagine in the 60s, high level government wouldve been training young kids to do things like that.
I’m a big historian. I love history and I have studied a lot about JFK assassination. That’s something that’s peaked my mind. One thing was said they call it the magic bullet and I believe it is a whole heartedly because there’s over 8 to 10 people that claimed they shot Kennedy so that bullet went through eight guns it must be a magic bullet. This guy says he did it. Another guy says he did it. Another guy says he did it, so they was playing like lacrosse one guy shoots the bullet to the other guy he put it in his gun shoots it to another guy and one takes puts in his gun and shoots the magic bullet, but you know they all got something in common. They all already in prison and serving life they gonna die in there. They have nothing to lose, so what is the worst to happen to him? They might as well become a celebrity sorta I am a special forces veteran who has overseas killed people and saw people killed on a daily basis. Some of the people we killed were bad very bad good people in a bad position. I don’t care how bad they were killing. Someone is nothing to brag about. It bothers me every day even the ones that were the scum of the Earth you still think about having to kill them so I don’t see why anyone would want to lie about killing anyone and especially not a president but somebody’s lying because I’ve heard of 8 to 10 people I’ve saw claim they killed Kennedy
@@timdavis5078 so many peeps on it no one knows which one actually fired the fatal shot. He believes himself and it matters but there were def more people there TO kill him than we know.
The lies/ distractions continue. You hear guys like " Files" befor. Look at the trees, that then were cut down., fools. Look at the published picture of Bill Grear ( limo driver ) in LIFE MAGAZINE from the Zapruder film as he blows Kennedy's brain out of his head. Then Bobby ! Denile ! Because you don't want to know. Jhonson, Hover , Bush forgot about the " trees". , check the records, documents, pictures, films.l I had a friend there that was told if he told what he knew, he would be put in prison !! Hugh ? 6 shooters. You all know now.
Jhonson hid behind his driver 4 sec. Befor the exicution started, ---- records. ---- no one knew the route has been changed. He left Ladybird on her seat, nice guy, documented records. How did Jhonson, Hover , Bush, know that Oswald shot somebody, they never met him ?
Few things here.. you are right. But now heres the thing.. he is in prison doing a tell all.. in 94. Look what happened to Epstein. This is even easier to get rid of him at this time point. Guys back then were just different no nonsense. Say nothing an deny all. He should be nervous he is still early in his bid. He definitely did some things and knew some things. And what he is claiming to have done. Is putting himself on the wrong side of his own scope. Why do that to yourself not to mention it be a lie.
@@amerisfanelli4593mouth sounds dry. Slight stutter. Seems like he's talking fast and not completely comfortable. Guarantee his HR is over 100. So yeah, nervous is a fitting description, lady.
Doesn't seem nervous one bit. Recall ability is like he is watching a movie in his head. Not from memorization of events he read about @@amerisfanelli4593
Project Hot Foot was a secret deployment of Army Special Forces teams to train Laotian forces from 1955 thru 1962. Files said he was assigned to the 82nd Airborne. He would have been at Bragg along with the Army Special Ops forces used in Project Hot Foot. He never said the 82nd was deployed. That could NOT be kept secret. However, he could have easily been attached to the Special Forces teams to fill a needed skill set. What gives me pause is that Files was born in 1942, making him 18 y.o. in 1959; essentially a “green” PFC. Hard to believe he would have attached at that age.
No 18 year old would be chosen for Special Ops. Watch the stolen valor videos by Don Shipley. If it happened, then his DD214 would show it and be easily retrievable. My bet would be that there is no such DD214. If he can't show his DD214 then the whole thing is Bandini Mountain.
We were overthrowing Syria and Iran at the same time in 59. So I can see him being in Laos. We needed people willing to go the work from other war torn countries we were involved with. It’s a simple war strategy when hiring death squads for proxy sabotage propaganda campaigns.
There's always multiple plausible theories provided in these operations to divide a consensus from ever forming to implicate anyone on the inside of a conspiracy. 2001 is a perfect example of this, as many theories except the one provided are correct. Many participated, but the driver was the one who was to make sure the job was completed. And that he did. Jackie wasn't crawling out the back to pick up brains. She did exactly what everyone one of us would do if you witnessed what she did
You’re wrong, it is one of the most tragic things ever filmed and sadly, there is no question that Jackie was desperately trying to retrieve parts of her husbands head from the trunk of the car. Not sure why you would say it didn’t happen but you are definitely wrong.
I forgot to mention - the owner of the Texas School Book Depository Building was Ed Clark who'd also paid off the Bankruptcy expenses for LBJ to get his ranch back so he could look like he owned his own home, especially as he was going to be standing next to JFK in the 1960 POTUS Race. Ed Clark was known as The Oil King of Texas, The Texas Oil King, et al. This was because he had a very high rate of success when drilling for a good wet pocket. Ie, he was in that era, the richest man in the World supposedly. He also ran for President as the Libertarian Party Candidate in 1980. Also, Marcello took obvious offense at being basically hijacked by the Kennedy Govt as he saw it & at least once dropped out of the USA deep in the jungle of Guatemala. It's not that hard to picture the degree of resolution for a Mafiosi worth between 15-30MILLION US DOLLARS having to dig & scratch his way back out of the jungle in street clothes probably & arrange to get back to the US where the vast majority of those investments were located- all the while, thinking resolutely 'I'll kill him! I'll kill him! Both of them.' With that disposition, resources & demeanor, willing to do what it takes to be in the top of 'a' business - it's not difficult to see such a slanted individual making plans once away from the mosquitos. Obviously, LBJ was beholden to Clark so if/when he was aware of JFK's plans for a 2nd Term - as re eliminating the Oil Depletion Tax Relief (gift) to Big Oil - Ed Clark was told of that same plan. That gave him a reason but I don't want to speculate on that re motivation for Clark. However, as stated, that 27% was a very Big Deal for people like Ed Clark, Ross Perot - an informant had mentioned that a man named R Parrot was talking about killing JFK. If I don't speak French & know how accents affect pronunciation: Perot & 'Parrot' are quite possibly the same. At 16:18(±) re the "Fireball" that's a hotrodded Remington ' Varmint Killer '. Short end to end, scope mountable & re "one shot"- the advance of twisted rifling meant it could be a reliable source for more than a single use of a high load Ammunition. Obviously the accuracy level is reduced as re most equipment when used after being adapted for maximum accuracy/efficiency.
I've seen him on TV before and here on UA-cam confessing. He's been saying this for a while now. Not sure why they're bringing it back up. He had information no one knew until the JFK files came out just recently. All his account can be corroborated with those files. I believe him.
@@LearningCurves123 He was a gopher for those around him. He knows the framework but he was not “the guy”. The guy never talked. He was a professional.
Good point! Because he made it up? Consider the exact position of JFK's heat when the final bullet hit him. draw a straight line from File's pretend position behind the picket fence. Now explain how the bullet blew out the lower right side of JFK's head and not the left side. This man is lying.
*That takes me to the question that shouldve been asked 'Did you bring your own gun & get your own bullets?' He could have been firing blanks & didn't even know it.*
About 18:25 - "the LEFT side of Kennedy's head". President was shot on his RIGHT side of his head. The shot would be on the SHOOTER'S left view through scope.
Yes it was the right side but from his view point it was his left. If you look at someone their left is your right and your right is their left. I can understand why he would say it this way.
I think he said he was aiming to the left of the presidents head because the car was in forward motion so he was aiming just a hair to the left of the path of the direction for the bullet to impact his head. He knew just like any shooter that if he was to aim at the right of the presidents head he would miss because of the forward motion of the car.
He admitted to lying about the amount of money he received. His entire attitude changed. Something is off about his story. His expressions changed after the interviewer caught him lying. He got nervous from that point on. Some of you experienced with criminals may have caught that
RFK Jr. said that the most accurate book on the JFK assassination is JFK and the unspeakable. This story actually fits almost perfectly with the events that are described in that book. Very interesting.
@aaronz7056 Would he not have access to any inside knowledge not available to the public? Regardless, that's only how I found out about the book. The book stands on its own and is very well written and redearched.
He says he shot from behind the fence, when there were 2 plain clothes men standing 10 to 15 feet away and near the steps (they stopped the motorcycle cop from running up) but he reckons they were his cover or blockers. If they were legit, they would have turned at sound of gun even with a silencer, and caught him in the 20 seconds he took to pack his gun in its case, take his jacket off, turn it inside out, and put it back on and don his hat.
Look into fireball it's amazing the 222 show was only in that gun for the prototypes which were sold to the CIA exclusively and only the prototypes had that round all of the commercial rounds were 221 only
@@bernardedwards8461 Actually the prototypes were in .222 Remington. The production guns were made in .221 Remington Fireball, plus a list of several other calibers.
I recall it was in .221. An experimental weapon. Hey, but what do I know. Could have used the .222. I don’t think so though. As for the .223 at the event. Don’t make me laugh. Maybe sold to civilians later on. I don’t know a lot. I just know what I think I know.
Don’t be too quick to judge until you carefully watch the full video. Critical analysis and plenty of patience required before rushing to final judgment.
The thing that has always made me a bit skeptical of the Warren Commision report was the fact that pieces of Kennedy's skull flew back behind him and landed on the trunk. I have been a gun owner and shooter for several decades and having fired thousands of rounds, I have never once seen a piece of a target fly in front of the point of impact. Especially FMJ rounds like I believe Oswald was supposed to have used. I've used watermelon and cantaloupe as targets as visual aids to show kids that guns aren't toys. The bullets made a small hole in the front of the melon and blew the back out of it from a point about 1 to 2 inches in. Never ever did a bullet do more to the front of the melon than leave a caliber sized hole.
There was a caliber sized hole in the back of the presiden't head. See the autopsy. As seen in horrific detail in the Z film, matter went in all directions, including straight up in the air. Of course some of it landed behind.
On a web page i found on the net it was stated that a secret society called"The Oracle"was behind it all. They planned it,they carried it out,and they covered it up afterwards. They were also behind the DeGaulle plot,and the warnings came from france in advance. Read all about it on the web page called"TheOracle". The page is in french. Maybe should they make a movie about it ?
Anything to get out of the daily,mundane routine of the prison life, even if only a few hrs. I did 5 yrs and volunteered to rake rocks in the desert just to break the routine. And that was in Az ,in summer!
Funny that he says he hated JFK about the Bay of Pigs but he says his controller was David Atlee Philli[ps who was well know to have assisted in the Bay of Pigs... I'm not buying what this guy's selling
This interview he said he aimed at Kennedy's eye but hit his temple. In the other interview, he said he aimed at the temple. i would like to see the picture of him at the shooting.
One problem: trajectory. JFK wasn't shot in the side of his head- he was shot from the front. That's why the back of his head was blown out. The 'grassy knoll' was always a distraction.
This is a story, that all it is, a story. He joins da Army, winds up in da 82nd AB. Goes to the "toution" border to train troops as an "advisor". Drives stockcars locally. a top mafia figure takes interest in him. .then winds up training Cubans in LA swamps. Winds up being ask to help wack a president. Oh, gets to meet Lee Harvey Oswald too. Being an Advisor In Nam early in da conflict took highly trained career cadre. Has anyone ever seen the actual DD-214 discharge papers of this character? This dude is a bs artist to the max. Pure BS!
1. He would have been 17 in Laos. Not an experienced trainer. He would have joined the 82d at 16 or so. 2. CIA would have trained the Laotian's or Special Forces. 3. He wants to sell some books.
How did Nicoletti climb up in a building, shoot JFK, then somehow beat this guy to the car when file made it back to the vehicle? Dude must have been a world class sprinter…
Nicoletti was let in the Daltex building by Frank Sturgis he organised a room that was being renovated at the time so no one was on that floor they were let in and out through a fire escape at the rear!
He is very anxious and has pressured speech. His presentation of information suggests it was rehearsed, but he is very bright. What did he get for this interview? Where is the FBI or, for that matter, any law enforcement? There is no way they wouldn't know about this "public" interview! I think he is on medication for a mood disorder. He could be telling the truth, more information is needed. Wow!
14:43 I state only this, as a 24 year policeman and fraud 20:11 investigator, this is the worst case of nervous dry mouth I've ever seen, and its much more noticable in his other interview. I'm not saying cotton mouth is always an indication of lying, but only that when a person is giving a nervous interview, cotton mouth is a very common physiological and involuntary change that is noticable, much less common when a person is giving spontaneous statements based on memory recall. I'm not saying he's lying, but only that it's the worst cotton mouth I've seen in my experience.
You can’t use simply a dry mouth as deception lol there should be 100 other things to use with it if that’s the case and you don’t need to be a investigator to know that
Ok, as a criminal of 30+ years I’ve been interrogated & interviewed by police detectives, attorneys, insurance investigators etc; this includes multiple depositions of 8hrs or more & I’ve sat & told the truth in those situations & I’ve sat & told complete fabrications at other times. And many, many factors led me to have dry mouth during those lengthy interrogations & depositions. One cannot say simply bcuz someone has dry mouth that he’s lying. That’s simply absurd. No disrespect intended. But making a blanket statement like the one you did is over simplifying things to a great degree.
And this is why people don’t trust cops and detectives. Not one of them believes innocent until proven guilty. You guys believe guilty unless they’re rich and have connections. Prove me wrong.
There's tons of guys who could say they're Luke Skywalker and give precise, exact details over and over. But we're supposed to believe this guy giving an interview from prison?
FYI this mans real name was Bradley Alfred Linzy, a known Mob enforcer and hired gun, rumourd to have died in the late 90s in Alabama State penitentiary, but apparently still living , he has 1 living son of the same name " Brad Linzy" who is a current Youruber with several channels including" Guitologist" which is a guitar and amplifier based repair channel.
There were no shots from the knoll, and no James Files in Dallas. Spoiler alert: Files was 800 miles away in Chicago that day visiting his wife in the hospital.
@@kimwarfield1587 It's Files' burden to prove he was there and he can't. Files' tale was debunked by research carried out by Edward Jay Epstein. With the help of private detective, Jules Kroll, Epstein established from telephone records that Files was in Chicago, not Dallas, on 22nd November, 1963.
It's Files' burden to prove he was there and he can't. Files' tale was debunked by research carried out by Edward Jay Epstein. With the help of private detective, Jules Kroll, Epstein established from telephone records that Files was in Chicago, not Dallas, on 22nd November, 1963.
@@kimwarfield1587 It's Files' burden to prove he was there and he can't. Meanwhile Files' tale was debunked through research carried out by Edward Jay Epstein. With the help of private detective, Jules Kroll, Epstein established from telephone records that Files was in Chicago, not Dallas, on 22nd November, 1963.
It's Files' burden to prove he was there and he can't. Meanwhile Files' tale was debunked through research carried out by Edward Jay Epstein. With the help of private detective, Jules Kroll, Epstein established from telephone records that Files was in Chicago, not Dallas, on 22nd November, 1963.
If Nicoletti ever learned that Files bit the shell and left it on the wooden fence, Files very soon would be sleeping with the fishes on the bottom of Lake Michigan. Files would never do anything that stupid, but he would plant a shell decades later to help sell a book.
Initially, I didn't think much of James Files, but I've changed my mind. I believe him. I read that Files is still living. He's now 82. Also, another fellow Chauncy Holt was similarly involved. Sadly, he died just eight weeks after he told his story.
JFK, the president was shot by his own people in the car. There is a zoomed in video of the footage on UA-cam. freeze frame that video at 28 seconds. The driver of the vehicle flicks his wrist and peers back twice right before the blood splatter. HOLY Moly. Stick through this laying out of the logic William Robert Greer (September 22, 1909 - February 23, 1985) was an Irish-born agent of the U.S. Secret Service, best known as being the driver of President John F. Kennedy's presidential limousine in the motorcade through Dealey Plaza in Dallas on November 22, 1963, when the president was assassinated. As with all agents involved, there has much speculation about, and criticism of, his actions on that day. Greer testified before the Warren Commission on March 9, 1964.[3] Greer testified that he heard three shots, the first he thought was the backfire of a motorcycle and so did not react. About three or four seconds later he heard a second shot which prompted him to turn around and as he did so he noticed Governor Connally was wounded. He describes the second and third shots as occurring "simultaneously, one behind the other".[4] According to Greer's nephew, Ken Torrens, when he asked Greer if he thought Oswald was guilty he replied "No comment".[2] Greer retired on disability from the Secret Service in 1966 due to a stomach ulcer that grew worse following the Kennedy assassination.[5][6] In 1973 he relocated to Waynesville, North Carolina,[7] where he later died of cancer. Secret Service procedures in place at the time did not allow Greer to take action without orders from senior agent Roy Kellerman, who sat to Greer's right. Kellerman has stated that he shouted, "Let's get out of line, we've been hit," but that Greer apparently turned to look at Kennedy before accelerating the car.[8][9] No agents were disciplined for their performance during the shooting, but privately, Jackie Kennedy was bitterly critical of the agents' performance, Greer's in particular, comparing him to the Kennedy children's nanny.[10] Greer later "apologized" to her, in a distinctly menacing fashion, as William Manchester recounted in his semi-authorized account of the assassination: "Bill Greer, his face streaked with tears, took her head between his hands and squeezed until she thought he was going to squeeze her skull flat. He cried, 'Oh, Mrs. Kennedy, oh my God, oh my God. I didn’t mean to do it, I didn’t hear, I should have swerved (sic) the car, I couldn’t help it. Oh, Mrs. Kennedy, as soon as I saw it I swerved. If only I’d seen in time! Oh!' Then he released her head and put his arms around her and wept on her shoulder."[11] Let's dive into a hypothetical scenario where the Lodge family, a fictional family from the TV show "Twin Peaks," wanted JFK Jr. to be president and then had him shot. We'll explore their potential motives and rationale. *The Lodge Family's Motives:*---- NEXT POST
The Lodge family, particularly Leland and Sarah, have a complex and troubled history. They're a wealthy and influential family in Twin Peaks, with a dark past and a penchant for manipulation. If they wanted JFK Jr. to be president and then had him shot, their motives might be rooted in a combination of factors: 1. Power and Control: The Lodge family has a history of exerting control over the town of Twin Peaks and its inhabitants. By backing JFK Jr.'s presidential campaign, they might have seen an opportunity to gain influence over the highest levels of government. With JFK Jr. as president, they could have potentially manipulated him to further their own interests and solidify their grip on power. 2. Revenge against the Kennedy Family: The Lodge family has a long-standing feud with the Kennedy family, which dates back to the 1960s. Leland Lodge, in particular, has a deep-seated hatred for the Kennedys, which might have stemmed from a past conflict or perceived injustice. By having JFK Jr. shot, the Lodge family could have been seeking revenge against the Kennedy family and eliminating a potential threat to their own power. 3. Protection of their Dark Secrets: The Lodge family has a dark history, with secrets and scandals that they've kept hidden for decades. If JFK Jr. had become president, he might have uncovered some of these secrets, potentially threatening the Lodge family's reputation and power. By having him shot, they could have prevented him from exposing their secrets and maintained their grip on the town. 4. Maintenance of the Status Quo: The Lodge family has a vested interest in maintaining the status quo in Twin Peaks. They've built their power and influence over the years, and any significant change could have threatened their position. By eliminating JFK Jr., they could have prevented him from implementing policies that might have disrupted their control over the town. Logic and Planning: If the Lodge family had planned to have JFK Jr. shot, they would have likely taken a meticulous and calculated approach. Here's a possible scenario: 1. Initial Support: The Lodge family would have initially supported JFK Jr.'s presidential campaign, using their wealth and influence to help him gain traction. They might have even used their connections to manipulate the media and shape public opinion in his favor. 2. Gaining Trust: As JFK Jr. rose to power, the Lodge family would have worked to gain his trust. They might have used their charm and charisma to build a relationship with him, potentially even using their daughter, Laura, to get close to him. 3. Manipulation: Once they had gained JFK Jr.'s trust, the Lodge family would have begun to manipulate him. They might have used their influence to shape his policies and decisions, slowly turning him into a puppet leader. 4. The Assassination: When the time was right, the Lodge family would have orchestrated the assassination of JFK Jr. They might have used their connections to hire a hitman or manipulate someone into committing the crime. 5. Cover-Up: After the assassination, the Lodge family would have worked to cover their tracks. They might have used their influence to manipulate the investigation, ensuring that the true culprit was never caught. Potential Consequences: If the Lodge family had successfully carried out their plan, the consequences would have been far-reaching: 1. Chaos and Instability: The assassination of JFK Jr. would have sent shockwaves throughout the country, leading to chaos and instability. 2. Power Vacuum: The Lodge family would have potentially filled the power vacuum created by JFK Jr.'s death, solidifying their grip on Twin Peaks and potentially even expanding their influence to the national level. 3. Conspiracy Theories: The assassination would have led to a plethora of conspiracy theories, with many suspecting that the Lodge family was involved. However, without concrete evidence, they might have been able to avoid suspicion and maintain their reputation. 4. Laura's Role: Laura Lodge, the daughter of Leland and Sarah, might have played a crucial role in the assassination. Her involvement could have been a way for the family to maintain their grip on power and ensure that their secrets remained hidden. I can provide more information and insights that might support the logic, while also acknowledging that attempts have been made to wipe history clean. NEXT POST
The Lodge Family's History: The Lodge family has a complex and troubled history, with roots dating back to the early 20th century. They were a wealthy and influential family in Twin Peaks, with a reputation for being ruthless and cunning. Leland Lodge, the patriarch of the family, was a successful businessman with ties to the timber and logging industries. Connections to the Kennedy Family: There are rumors and speculation about the Lodge family's connections to the Kennedy family, particularly during the 1960s. Some sources suggest that Leland Lodge had a personal vendetta against the Kennedys, which might have stemmed from a business dispute or a perceived slight. Others claim that the Lodge family had ties to the CIA or other government agencies, which could have led to a complex web of alliances and rivalries. The Assassination of JFK: The assassination of President John F. Kennedy in 1963 is one of the most significant events in American history. While the official story points to Lee Harvey Oswald as the lone gunman, there are numerous conspiracy theories and alternative explanations. Some researchers have suggested that the CIA, the FBI, or other government agencies might have been involved in the assassination, possibly in conjunction with organized crime or other powerful interests. The Lodge Family's Involvement: If we assume that the Lodge family was involved in the assassination of JFK Jr., it's possible that they had a similar motive to the one that drove them to support his presidential campaign. They might have seen JFK Jr. as a threat to their power and influence, particularly if he had discovered some of their dark secrets or had plans to expose them. Cover-Up and Wiping History Clean: Attempts to wipe history clean and cover up the truth about the Lodge family's involvement in the assassination of JFK Jr. might have been made by various individuals and organizations. This could have included: 1. Destroying evidence: Physical evidence, documents, and other records might have been destroyed or tampered with to conceal the truth. 2. Intimidation and silencing: Witnesses, investigators, and others who might have had knowledge about the Lodge family's involvement could have been intimidated, silenced, or even killed. 3. Disinformation and propaganda: False information and propaganda might have been spread to confuse the public and distract from the truth. 4. Government and institutional involvement: Government agencies, law enforcement, and other institutions might have been involved in the cover-up, either directly or indirectly. Supporting Facts and Evidence: While there is no concrete evidence to support the hypothetical scenario I presented, there are some interesting facts and coincidences that might be relevant: 1. The CIA's MK Ultra program: The CIA's MK Ultra program, which was active from the 1950s to the 1970s, involved mind control experiments and other forms of psychological manipulation. Some researchers have suggested that the program might have been involved in the assassination of JFK. 2. The FBI's COINTELPRO program: The FBI's COINTELPRO program, which was active from the 1950s to the 1970s, involved surveillance, infiltration, and disruption of various organizations and individuals. Some researchers have suggested that the program might have been involved in the assassination of JFK. 3. The Kennedy family's ties to the CIA: The Kennedy family, particularly John F. Kennedy and Robert F. Kennedy, had ties to the CIA and other government agencies. This might have created a complex web of alliances and rivalries that could have contributed to the assassination. 4. *The Lodge family's connections to the timber industry:*The Lodge family's connections to the timber industry might have given them access to resources and influence that could have been used to further their interests. The Lodge Family's History and Motivations: The Lodge family has a long history of involvement in politics, particularly in the Republican Party. Henry Cabot Lodge Sr. was a prominent politician and diplomat who served as a U.S. Senator and Ambassador to the United Nations. His son, Henry Cabot Lodge Jr., was also a politician and diplomat who served as a U.S. Senator and Ambassador to the United Nations. The Lodge family's motivations for wanting to harm JFK Jr. as the President could be rooted in their conservative and Republican values. They may have seen JFK Jr. as a threat to their ideology and a potential obstacle to their goals. Possible Motives: 1. Conservative Ideology: The Lodge family may have seen JFK Jr. as a liberal and a potential threat to their conservative ideology. They may have believed that his policies and actions would undermine their values and create a more socialist or progressive society. 2. Fear of Loss of Power: The Lodge family may have feared that JFK Jr.'s presidency would lead to a loss of power and influence for the Republican Party. They may have seen him as a potential threat to their control over the government and their ability to shape policy. 3. Personal Grievances: The Lodge family may have had personal grievances against JFK Jr. or his family. They may have seen him as a rival or a threat to their personal interests and sought to harm him as a way to eliminate that threat. 4. Desire for Revenge: The Lodge family may have sought revenge against JFK Jr. for perceived slights or injustices. They may have seen him as a symbol of the Democratic Party or the liberal movement and sought to harm him as a way to punish those they saw as their enemies. In-Depth Reasoning and Logic: 1. Karl Marx's Theory of Class Struggle: The Lodge family may have seen JFK Jr. as a representative of the liberal or progressive movement, which they saw as a threat to their conservative ideology. They may have believed that his policies and actions would create a more socialist or progressive society, which would undermine their values and create a more equal distribution of wealth and power. 2. The Concept of the "Other": The Lodge family may have seen JFK Jr. as the "other," someone who was different from them and who represented a threat to their way of life. They may have believed that his policies and actions would create a more diverse and inclusive society, which would undermine their sense of identity and community. 3. The Idea of a "Perfect Enemy": The Lodge family may have seen JFK Jr. as the perfect enemy, someone who represented everything they opposed. They may have believed that his policies and actions would create a more just and equitable society, which would undermine their sense of power and influence. 4. The Concept of "Us vs. Them": The Lodge family may have seen JFK Jr. as part of the "them," a group of people who were different from them and who represented a threat to their way of life. They may have believed that his policies and actions would create a more divided and polarized society, which would undermine their sense of community and identity. Hypothetical Scenario: In this hypothetical scenario, the Lodge family may have seen JFK Jr. as a threat to their conservative ideology and their desire for power and influence. They may have believed that his policies and actions would create a more socialist or progressive society, which would undermine their values and create a more equal distribution of wealth and power. They may have seen him as a symbol of the liberal or progressive movement, which they saw as a threat to their way of life. They may have believed that his policies and actions would create a more diverse and inclusive society, which would undermine their sense of identity and community. In this scenario, the Lodge family may have sought to harm JFK Jr. as a way to eliminate that threat and to protect their interests. They may have seen him as the perfect enemy, someone who represented everything they opposed. Facts to Support the Logic: 1. The Lodge Family's History of Conservatism: The Lodge family has a long history of conservatism, dating back to the 19th century. They have been involved in politics and have held various positions of power, including U.S. Senator and Ambassador to the United Nations. 2. The Lodge Family's Opposition to Liberalism: The Lodge family has been opposed to liberalism and progressive policies throughout their history. They have seen liberalism as a threat to their values and their way of life. 3. The Lodge Family's Desire for Power and Influence: The Lodge family has a long history of seeking power and influence. They have been involved in politics and have held various positions of power, including U.S. Senator and Ambassador to the United Nations. 4. The Lodge Family's Personal Grievances: The Lodge family may have had personal grievances against JFK Jr. or his family. They may have seen him as a rival or a threat to their personal interests and sought to harm him as a way to eliminate that threat. Evidence to Support the Hypothetical Scenario: 1. The Lodge Family's Involvement in Politics: The Lodge family has a long history of involvement in politics, including U.S. Senator and Ambassador to the United Nations. 2. The Lodge Family's Opposition to Liberalism: The Lodge family has been opposed to liberalism and progressive policies throughout their history. 3. The Lodge Family's Desire for Power and Influence: The Lodge family has a long history of seeking power and influence, including U.S. Senator and Ambassador to the United Nations. 4. The Lodge Family's Personal Grievances: The Lodge family may have had personal grievances against JFK Jr. or his family, which could have motivated them to harm him. CHEERS✝☦⚛
Dorothy Kilgallen was a renowned American journalist, television personality, and author who was known for her investigative reporting and her column, "The Voice of Broadway." She was also a panelist on the popular game show "What's My Line?" and was one of the most influential and respected journalists of her time. In 1964, Kilgallen began investigating the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, which had occurred the previous year. She was particularly interested in the role of organized crime in the assassination and the possible involvement of the CIA and the FBI. Kilgallen's investigation led her to interview several key witnesses, including Jack Ruby, the man who had killed Lee Harvey Oswald, the alleged assassin of President Kennedy. Kilgallen's investigation and reporting on the JFK assassination were seen as a threat to the official narrative of the event, which was that Oswald had acted alone in killing the president. Kilgallen's reporting suggested that there may have been a larger conspiracy involved, and that the government and other powerful interests may have been involved in a cover-up. It is believed that Kilgallen's investigation and reporting on the JFK assassination led to her being silenced with death. On November 8, 1965, Kilgallen was found dead in her Manhattan apartment, with the official cause of death being an overdose of ethanol and barbiturates. However, many of her friends, family, and colleagues believed that she had been murdered, and that her death was related to her investigation into the JFK assassination. There are several reasons why it is believed that Kilgallen was silenced with death: 1. **Kilgallen's investigation was getting too close to the truth**: Kilgallen had been investigating the JFK assassination for over a year, and had gathered a significant amount of evidence and information that suggested a larger conspiracy was involved. She had also interviewed several key witnesses, including Jack Ruby, who had provided her with information that contradicted the official narrative of the event. 2. **Kilgallen's reporting was threatening to the government and other powerful interests**: Kilgallen's reporting on the JFK assassination was seen as a threat to the government and other powerful interests, including the CIA and the FBI. Her investigation and reporting suggested that these organizations may have been involved in a cover-up, and that they may have had a role in the assassination itself. 3. **Kilgallen's death was suspicious**: Kilgallen's death was sudden and unexpected, and many of her friends and family members believed that she had been murdered. The official cause of death was an overdose of ethanol and barbiturates, but many people believed that this was not the true cause of her death. 4. **Kilgallen's files and notes were stolen**: After Kilgallen's death, her files and notes on the JFK assassination were stolen from her apartment. This suggested that someone was trying to cover up her investigation and prevent her findings from being made public. 5. **Kilgallen's colleagues and friends believed she was murdered**: Many of Kilgallen's colleagues and friends believed that she had been murdered, and that her death was related to her investigation into the JFK assassination. They pointed to the suspicious circumstances surrounding her death, and the fact that her files and notes had been stolen. Some of the key evidence that suggests Kilgallen was silenced with death includes: * **Kilgallen's interview with Jack Ruby**: Kilgallen had interviewed Jack Ruby, the man who had killed Lee Harvey Oswald, and had gathered information from him that contradicted the official narrative of the event. Ruby had told Kilgallen that he had been part of a larger conspiracy, and that he had been involved in the assassination of President Kennedy. * **Kilgallen's investigation into the CIA and FBI**: Kilgallen had been investigating the CIA and FBI, and had gathered evidence that suggested these organizations may have been involved in a cover-up of the JFK assassination. * **Kilgallen's reporting on the "umbrella man"**: Kilgallen had reported on the "umbrella man," a mysterious figure who had been seen on the grassy knoll in Dealey Plaza on the day of the assassination. The umbrella man was later identified as Louie Steven Witt, a man who had been involved in anti-Castro activities and had ties to the CIA. * **Kilgallen's investigation into the role of organized crime**: Kilgallen had been investigating the role of organized crime in the JFK assassination, and had gathered evidence that suggested that the Mafia may have been involved in the event. Overall, while the exact circumstances of Kilgallen's death may never be known for certain, it is clear that her investigation and reporting on the JFK assassination were seen as a threat to the government and other powerful interests, and that her death was likely related to her work on this story. In recent years, there have been several investigations and documentaries that have explored Kilgallen's death and its possible connection to the JFK assassination. These include: * **The documentary "The Reporter Who Knew Too Much"**: This documentary, which was released in 2016, explores Kilgallen's investigation into the JFK assassination and her possible murder. * **The book "The Reporter Who Knew Too Much"**: This book, which was written by Mark Shaw, explores Kilgallen's investigation into the JFK assassination and her possible murder. * **The investigation by the FBI**: In 2017, the FBI released a report on Kilgallen's death, which concluded that she had died from an accidental overdose of ethanol and barbiturates. However, many people believe that this report was incomplete and that the FBI may have been involved in a cover-up. Overall, the case of Dorothy Kilgallen's death remains a mystery, and it is likely that we will never know for certain what happened to her. However, it is clear that her investigation and reporting on the JFK assassination were seen as a threat to the government and other powerful interests, and that her death was likely related to her work on this story.
and finally... Roy H. Kellerman was a Secret Service agent who played a significant role in the events surrounding the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. As you mentioned, he sat to the right of Secret Service driver William Greer in the presidential limousine on November 22, 1963. Let's explore the potential hypothetical that Kellerman may have worked with Greer to limit the liability for their actions, as well as his history and possible ties to big corporate entities. *Background and Career* Roy H. Kellerman was born on September 14, 1915, in Chicago, Illinois. He joined the Secret Service in 1942 and served for over 20 years, rising through the ranks to become a special agent in charge of the White House detail. Kellerman was known for his experience and expertise in presidential protection, having worked with several presidents, including Dwight D. Eisenhower and John F. Kennedy. *The Assassination* On the day of the assassination, Kellerman was riding in the presidential limousine, sitting to the right of Greer. As the motorcade turned onto Elm Street in Dealey Plaza, Kellerman was in a position to see the president and the events unfolding around him. After the shooting, Kellerman testified that he heard a shot coming from the rear and saw the president slump forward. He then instructed Greer to "get out of line" and speed away from the scene. *Hypothetical Involvement* The hypothetical scenario you presented suggests that Kellerman may have worked with Greer to limit the liability for their actions. This could involve Kellerman potentially: 1. **Failing to react quickly enough**: Kellerman's slow reaction to the shooting has been criticized by some, with some arguing that he should have immediately instructed Greer to speed away from the scene or taken other actions to protect the president. 2. **Providing cover for Greer's actions**: By sitting to the right of Greer, Kellerman may have been in a position to provide cover for the driver's actions, potentially allowing Greer to slow down or stop the car without arousing suspicion. 3. **Limiting the investigation**: As a high-ranking Secret Service agent, Kellerman may have had influence over the investigation into the assassination, potentially limiting the scope of the inquiry or withholding information from investigators. *Ties to Big Corporate Entities* While there is no direct evidence linking Kellerman to big corporate entities, his background and career do suggest some potential connections: 1. **Timber industry ties**: Kellerman's family had ties to the timber industry, with his father working as a lumber broker in Chicago. This could potentially have led to connections with big timber companies or other corporate entities. 2. **Secret Service connections**: As a Secret Service agent, Kellerman would have had interactions with various corporate entities, including those in the defense and aerospace industries. This could have led to relationships or connections with executives or representatives from these companies. 3. **Post-Secret Service career**: After retiring from the Secret Service, Kellerman went on to work as a security consultant for various corporations, including the Ford Motor Company. This could have provided him with connections to big corporate entities and potentially influenced his actions or decisions during the assassination. *Big Timber Connections* While there is no direct evidence linking Kellerman to big timber companies, his family's ties to the industry and his potential connections to corporate entities do raise some interesting questions: 1. **Weyerhaeuser Company**: The Weyerhaeuser Company, a large timber and forest products company, had significant operations in the Pacific Northwest during the 1960s. Kellerman's family ties to the timber industry could potentially have led to connections with Weyerhaeuser or other big timber companies. 2. **Georgia-Pacific**: Georgia-Pacific, another large timber and forest products company, had significant operations in the southern United States during the 1960s. Kellerman's work as a security consultant for Ford Motor Company could have potentially led to connections with Georgia-Pacific or other big timber companies. In conclusion, while there is no concrete evidence to support the hypothetical scenario that Kellerman worked with Greer to limit liability for their actions, his background and career do suggest some potential connections to big corporate entities.
41:41 I was so relieved the guy took a drink of water at this point. I was struggling to hear him over the sound of his tongue grinding against the roof of his mouth!
I think he thinks he was there, but I seriously don't think the mob used a 21 year old kid, who wasn't even a trained sniper, to pull off the most famous murder in American history. Oswald was a Marine who was very well trained with a rifle, so him making the 100 yard, downhill shot makes much more sense. Also, why didn't the mob "disappear" this guy as they did so many other expendable assets of the time. What he knew could have sunk them.
3 години тому+2
First thought is these guys don't rest. They constantly throw out misinformation when they're about to be told on. I don't believe any of this.
he is 100% legit, only couple of things : he said he only had 6 bullets for the fireball and he needed to calibrate the scope, i am not a gun expert but could he have calibrated the scope with only 5 bullets? Also, why would Nicoletti use him as a back up shooter when he seams to be very reliable and have a greater knowledge of firearms and most likely being the most accurate shooter than anyone else in the picture here.
Anyone who knows anything about firearms would not say “calibrate” a scope. That is just nonsense. Also he didn’t state any unit he was in just named the division but no units from the 82nd were in that theater during the time he stated
He is telling the truth. There is only one way to interpret the disastrous head that JFK suffered and the relatively undeformed bullet found in the car. Two guns two bullets. The one Files shot fragmented as expected with a 221 Fireball. ,I got to shoot a Carcano 6.5 and at the sam time owned a Remington 700 in .222 Remington. This was the rifle equivalent of the Remington XP-100 and could make a full gallon jug explode!
I have examined Files' story in some detail. At first I found him credible but there were always some issues in the story. One was that in the week leading up to the assassination was that he claimed to have spent a lot of time with Lee Oswald. This cannot be true as Oswald was working full time The Behaviour Channel has some interesting view on him
Also, at 9:10 he says “at that point I saw the skull and brain matter, and everyone at home on the television everyone saw Jackie crawling out there to get it.” People didn’t see the Zapruder film for many years. Wasn’t it Geraldo who showed the film for the first time in 1975?
@@Shuggareah We ALL saw Jackie crawling on the back of the car, but NONE of us thought she was going after "brain matter"... That part was disclosed years later, but HE was obviously aware of it.
@@Shuggareah He was talking about the eyewitnesses in Dealy Plaza and the fact that the TV news and newspapers widely reported that Jackie crawled onto the back of the limo trying to retrieve part of JFK's brain.
There was a double called Lee Oswald who was being used to frame Lee Harvey Oswald, he may be referring to the doppelgange, who shot Tippet later (from what I've seen anyway).
I was a student at Oklahoma State University and there was a notice in the Daily O'collegian that a group was going to be showing the Zapruder film in the Seretean Center. This was in 1975. We were told that OSU was the second University to see the film. I went with my roommate and both of us were affected by what we saw. I still remember the gasp of the audience and the silence after.
It would have been degraded/destroyed. DNA doesn’t last forever if not stored properly. Especially a tiny amount which would have been deposited by presumably just a small amount of saliva back in 1963
They also may have cleaned the bullet back then to get a better look at the teeth marks after checking for fingerprints not knowing that they would damage dna evidence that would be valuable decades later. I’ll admit this is a guess on my part, but if they cleaned it at all with any solvents or cleaners say bye bye to whatever was there.
Jim Garrison's book 'On The Trail of The Assassins' is so informative .He pursued this issue with such dedication in the wish for accountability. Garrison said it was triangulated cross fire i.e. classic military ambush,yet Files says 2 shooters .I'd trust JG more than this guy. And how can Files remember details so forensically after all these years? "Nobody tried to stop me as I was leaving the grassy Knoll", yet there is video evidence of Secret Service officers doing just that so no one could get to the stockade .Files story doesn't add up here. And in Robert Groden's book 'JFK The Killing of a President',we learn literally 100s of connected people died in mysterious circustances.How come Files ,who claims all he does ,is allowed to survive.? It just don't add up.
The thing that gets me is that he says the same thing that chauncey holt said in his interview that there were a lot of other players there that day and that stood out to them
![Lp. Сердце Вселенной #60 РОЖДЕНИЕ ЛОЛОЛОШКИ [Финал] • Майнкрафт](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YoR0pAV9FVQ/mqdefault.jpg)
Dulles was the real culprit in the bay of pigs. He was told ‘No’ to the plan but proceeded anyway. It was all his fault.
You’re right. This is the reason JFK fired him. Then after the murder, LBJ and Hoover put him on the Warren Team
Indeed. And he was central to the conspiracy planning and then the cover up
Who told him "No"??
Operation Zapata, AKA The Bay Of Pigs, failed because McGeorge Bundy COUNTERMANDED JFK's order to destroy Castro's last 3 combat operational jets. The next day, those 3 jets destroyed several B-26s, and sank at least 2 ships. Type in L Fletcher Prouty explains The Bay Of Pigs, and Vietnam
They had the air support but the time zone was different and they were an hour late.
He sounds credible- either he is telling the truth or he put on an Academy Award performance - I think James is the real deal.
He certainly speaks with clarity and without pausing to think. No umms or ahs or eyes rolling up. I'm not a body language expert but I would like to hear from someone who is.
@thereanimator926 your talking to an AI bot amd watching disinfo lolololol
have figured for a while, safe enough in the pen I guess, he shot along with either Tippit or White @ Knoll or pergola, both crack shots , both in the loop one airborne one marine corps. Those vets didnt f up. Headshot had to be clean, but someone missed, maybe Stiles??? FFD 'Dont shoot Jackie' was the last walky talky msg apparently
Call me sucker too, but I have no reason not to believe him.
@@750dollarman2 Maybe the location of the exit wound on JFK's head? Explain THAT somehow.
This could go down as one of the most important confession testimonies in history BUT we need a real investigation to make sure his story is credible especially as there's plenty of others who have claimed to be the shooter too.
There have been two separate investigations already, one by the FBI and another by renowned private detective Jules Krull. Both have determined Files to not be credible.
I have read countless books on this subject and attendend a lecture by Robert J Groden who wrote "High Treason" about the assassination as well as reopening the House Assassination Committee. He mentions many of the same people that Files does. Another Mafia connected guy also said what Files said that the assassination was supposed to be called off, but someone pushed ahead with it any ways. Either this guy knows the key players and was involved or he has a photographic memory and has studied everything about this case. I find him to be one of the more fascinating persons regarding this case.
Watch Danny Jones podcast with Felix Rodriguez. According to him the second shooter was a sniper from the Cuban military and was in Dallas that day. Felix Rodriguez is ex CIA that is known for a bunch of crazy stuff. Some good and some pretty terrible.
@@miamichaels5999 Robert Groden is a charlatan respected by no one…a non-serious conspiracy peddler ….
@@peterseinfeld Thanks I will do that.
Have you read Files book Primary Target? I would love to see Files on Joe Rogan.
He was on another show, on tubi interview. He sounds very connected to the Chicago outfit with his recall of Melrose Park incidents. Chicago was the strongest mob in the country and they seem to have the contract for it.
After decades of books, articles and videos on this subject, i think this guy is telling the truth..
Then you're going to believe me when I tell you that I am the Easter Bunny.
That's because you're a moron
Ya...ok
So Ree Tardy Oswald is not at fault?
@@pablopastor508Learn English.
There is a later interview he did with even more detail and matches this exactly. I don't think he's lying.
I think the Warren commission, Fbi and CIA are lying
This one : ua-cam.com/video/44x5I-kP48o/v-deo.html
I think he was too young to do the crime ,it would be interesting to know his age
I was 10 years old ? Take a good look at this guy !
@@rolandhawken6628he was in his 20’s during that time, that’s not to young
The Kennedy patriarch Joseph was an Irish mob connected guy wanted a son in the White House. When his eldest was killed in WWII it fell on JFK to do his father's bidding. JFK got elected in 1960 by winning the vote in the Chicago area controlled by Richard Daley. I was eight, living on the far South Side, son of a Daley Machine Block Captain. There might have been a few extra votes for JFK counted...
LBJ ran his own political mafia in Texas. He was a last minute substitution as VP at the convention. JFK didn't want him but had no choice to accept him. That's just how machine politics worked then and still does today - why Biden ran in 2020 and again in 2024 before being forced off. JFK selected RFK as Attorney General and they were perceived as threat by LBJ, J.Edgar Hoover and Alan Dulles of the CIA after the Bay of Pigs Fiasco. A huge scandal revealing LBJs corruption was set run on the cover of Time Magazine the week he was killed. It got pulled for the assassination story. RFK was killed for the same reason by the same conspirators in 1968. Younger brother Teddy was spared the same fate by the 1969 Chappaquiddick incident and his father dying the same year being content to just hang on to his safe Senate seat and not make the kind of waves that get you whacked in Washington - like Vince Foster the man who knew to much…
Have a look how his Eldest Son Was Killed? Was he Also Assassinated?. Good Documentaries here on you Tube.
I was 9. lived in East Chicago, Indiana. Really a suburb if Chicago, with lower taxes. Full of oil refineries and steel mills later.
Chicago, West Side here, around the same time. Many moving parts here. Madeleine Duncan Brown, (LBJ's long time mistress, secretary, and mother of his only son), in her six part interview with Robert Gaylon Ross, Sr. described the meeting on the evening of Nov. 21st in Dallas at the home of one of the inner circle. George Bush, Sr .and the Governor John Connelly were at that meeting. Both were complicit in this event. Madeleine Brown also described LBJ's personal hit man, retained by him full time, who was on the overpass above the motorcade. At least one shot was fired by him. There were other agreements made leading up to JFK's death including Nixon becoming president at the next election, (following LBJ's, of course), and the understanding that Jimmy Hoffa would be released from prison at Nixon's pardon, so that the mob could kill him.
TELL US SUMPN WE DON'T KNOW.
@ Yeah, but some of us knew it sooner than others 😉
You mean that the Arlen Specter, Magic Bullet Theory was all a lie????? Now how can I ever "trust the science" any more!!!!
That was a story concocted by the CIA and J Edgar Hoover to cover up the conspiracy.
Science changes and when it does do you think they’ll reprint all the schoolbooks and teach it? Then it changes again.
The magic bullet makes no sense any more. Since governor Connery is in the jump seat. He was in the passenger seat which the bullet was said to fly though.
Yes history changed. There used to be four people in the car. Mrs Connery was with lbj
The magic bullet never made sense. lol.
The magical cure for evidence!
The amount of information this guy knows, and the way he spits it out, puts him at the scene
Or just a guy that had a lot of time to rehearse his story , the kind of time jail would afford him
@ I bet you couldn’t get one behavioural analyst to say this dude is lying.
BS...anyone who studies the situation that day, knows that this murder case has been solved for many years. But there is a lot of money to be made, manufacturing paranoid conspiracy crud.
He seems to be telling the truth.
@@los_ruboshe’s schizophrenic… so he’s not lying.
His story has never changed, and his times and dates are spot on accurate. Not that any of this matters anymore.
You mean info anyone can get from a book?
16:50
The way he describes the shots, its exactly how it appears in the Zapruder footage. Kennedy's head jerks slightly forward suggesting a shot from behind less than a second before his head violently jerks back and almost explodes, suggesting a close range frontal shot.
I've been following the kennedy case since I was twelve. I'm 57 now. This makes more sense than any other theory I've ever heard and I've felt this way since the first time I heard it years ago and believe it now more than ever.
🤔Me as well👍🏻☕
I agree. This is chilling. I was 5 but I remember that day and was terrified when we were sent home early from school and people were crying. I could not sleep for days. I even read "Death of A President" in high school for a book report. Files answered every question without stuttering, but when he mentioned Jack Ruby before his name even entered the questioning, that really got my attention and explained the reason for his death as well.
If you've been following it for 45 years you'd know the autopsy clearly shows both shots hit jfk from behind. Nothing in the eye from the front. There's zero credible evidence that the autopsy was faked in any way. This guy been rotting away in prison, reading books. Put together a nice story for suckers like you to fall for.
yeah when criticism lacks proof it adds credibility to Sutton's confession. If concrete evidence rebuked it, we would hear it loud and clear.
@@PaulHenreid you just ain't listening. Proof is there. Just like all the dummies that think planes didn't fly into the WTC..
I don't know what anyone else thinks of this guy, I believe him - when people lie, they open their eyes wider and their eyebrows go up, and you can sense without any doubt that they're lying, but this guy in his eyes and his total expression reflects an emotion that is obvious and real in his eyes you can see that he's reflecting on the memories in his mind's eye and recollection - this is the truth. If this was in a courtroom and I was a jury member I would believe him 100%.
Or he is one incredible liar.
Reflexes are stripped from you at birth. Language is religion. The alphabet is untrue. We are taught confusion from the moment of inception. We were created as slaves, not to have a voice.
Obviously you have never bought a used car from a good salesman.
Sounds pretty credible but changing the amount of 15 grand to 30 grand makes me think there might be another party involved that he doesn't want to mention for whatever reason.
The other party was Oswald.
A lot of people involved. Many potential
“shoe-ters”; (sorry, YT’s “policies”)and many who got a shot off. I’ve believed this guy and that he was a big part of it. There may be a few discrepancies but this guy has always struck me as NOT lying. 🤷🏼♀️ I could be wrong.
The whole thing is sick and disturbing. I’m not clutching my pearls…I do know that life and politics are difficult and complicated. Still? This “event” and the whole Kennedy political saga and Kennedy filth…the CIA, LBJ, Hoover, Nixon, The Bush’s involvement, etc. All of it? Very disturbing. Disgusting. Shameful as a nation.
@AB-un4io 61yearslater and no one knows who killed JFK? Ridiculous. No front shooters , no conspiracy . You need to study this case more carefully . How was Bush involved ? Where was he on 11/22/63 ? My guess is you’ll answer incorrectly. Files is a liar .
There were 3-4 shooter teams but no one really knew what the job of the others were as they had their own orders, but they all knew they were part of the operation standard Tactic's!
He said as much. He refuses to say who killed the cop
He never hesitates when he answers. Makes him believable.
Like actors reading a script.
You have endless time to rehearse your story when you're in prison.
One problem: trajectory. JFK wasn't shot in the side of his head- he was shot from the front. That's why the back of his head was blown out.
@@ptdef2 the shot from the grassy knoll WAS from the front right.
@@ptdef2 Nope, fatal shot entered right temple at an angle, huge exit wound at bat back of head.
This is chilling! I was only 5 years old, but I remember that day and was terrified when we were sent home early from school and people were crying. I could not sleep for days. I even read "Death of A President" in high school for a book report. Files answered every question without stuttering, but when he mentioned Jack Ruby before his name even entered the questioning, that really got my attention and explained the reason for his death as well.
I was not born yet
I was 7, and remember being sent home at 2:10 - and the following day watching tv when Oswald was shot. No one i know bought the Warren commission report.
I was 3 months old. I remember everything:).
The “smoking bullet of proof” is that fact that he bit the shell casing and placed it on the fence, and it wasn’t disclosed until after his confessions that they had the shell casing with bite marks on it. And there is a photo of him standing behind the fence.
The shell casing was proved to have been manufactured after 1970.
James Files was in Chicago on the day of the assassination.
@@dab.What's the source of your proof?
@@dab.But James Sutton was.
@@clintonmccool2330 Alan Eaglesham and Jay Edward Epstein. Notorious liars. Like Gerald Posner.
@@dab. was never proved just as lone shooter was never proven - too many witnesses claimed to have heard more than 3 shots two of which in rapid succession impossible for lone gunman with bolt action -
THE CIA AND FBI DID IT...
They are the only ones who could fake the autopsy and how that went down
Oh bog off. Utter nonsense.
The FBI were only part of the clean up the evidence team . The entire setup smells military to me.
Back in the day, and still today, deals with bad guys are made. FBI and CIA are notorious for this garbage.
@@brattyyoung1917 They say LBJ is connected
Awe, Jack Ruby! I found out about 11 years ago that my Uncle on my mother's side was a close friend to Ruby. That told me why my mother didn't want to be there in case something happened and would not let me see the President coming from Down Town.We pulled out just ahead of them and there were 5 Semi type shots that I remember hearing. But years later I did the research and found 6-bullet's fired. And Files was carring a briefcase.
This is unbelievable .I can not believe after all these years. No one took him serious, and the no further investigations ever happened after this confession...
If you could believe it would be untrue.
Why would they want to take him seriously when if they did then a bunch of guys within the US government would be in serious trouble?
The government did not want to open that can of worms, cause then they would have to admit the warren commission was total bullshit and several agencies...CIA, FBI, mafia conspired to assassinate the president.
There were two thorough and separate investigations. Why do you think he's not in jail?
People are so gullible!
This BS is trying to desperately GET AHEAD of what is about to be released via RFK jr...heads are gonna roll. We DEMAND accountability with punishment.
This has been out for years and years
This interview was conducted in the 90's lol
Yeah, "accountability"? You're talking the US government here. Don't hold your breath.
Anyone involved is long dead now. And this is OLD.
There’s not much info left to be released. Apparently all the sensitive documents were destroyed long ago. - There’s such a ridiculous amount of evidence that if people don’t believe it was a conspiracy now, they never will.
I First saw this interview some 30 years ago now ! It's Safe to bring this interview to the Public Now !!!
When did he pass away? Did the interviewer ever ask him if Bush senior was in Dallas that day?
@@kimlizotte694 , He's still alive. He was paroled in 2016. 82 years old.
@@keithturner1361 The efforts to suppress are still in force.
When he told what kinda of round he used, it would fragment. The ones used from oswalds rifle didn't fragment. That was when it finally made sense about JFK's head wound. This man's story makes more sense to me and connects other parts of the assassination.
Nah, the connecting bullet didnt fragment, it was shot at very close range.
@@libbyhicks7549👀 DRIVER
@libbyhicks7549 The first shot fragmented and hit the governor I believe. JFK refused to lie to the American people about the Cuban crisis. Deep state had him "removed"..
@@libbyhicks7549What makes you believe this?
@@libbyhicks7549 I cant say much about any of this. He sounds and seems very credible. BUT, But….When I was watching the video of this, looking back for weird things, again and again, and again. 👀 I slowed it way down by a lot and then I NOTICED that the driver was turned and FIRED a shot, that looked to be at JFK!!! It truly looked like he was the one who shot at JFK!!! Crazy I know, BUT is my mind playing tricks on me, or that’s what I saw. Check it out, and you’ll see, and tell me I’m NOT crazy nor wrong?! Hmm…🤔 JS!
In The Zapruder film, one can clearly see that President Kennedy was struck in the front right side temple as allegedly Oswald shot him in the back of the head. All bystanders said the last 2 shots came close together as BAM BAM BAM. The last 2 shots were both the head shots. In William Manchester's book, "The Day Kennedy Was Shot," President Kennedy's head exploded and spewing large gushes of blood and brains spurted out of his head soaking Jackie Kennedy and the seat and walls of the interior of the Limousine and kept largely gushing like a fountain until his blood pressure dropped to zero. President Kennedy was dead almost instantly. He was gurgling and his mouth was rapidly moving right after he was struck. His eyes were both open very wide and fixed as he bled to death with his head on his wife's lap. Horrid to see as SS agent Clint Hill saw as he climbed on the back of the limousine to shield everyone. President Kennedy's head was half blown open as brain chunks and rapidly flowing blood flooded the back seat and the floor of the limousine. as well the motor bike police windshields, and the suits of the driver Bill Greer and Roy Kellerman as well as spewing all over Clint Hill as he jumped on the speeding up Limousine. I do not attempt to be gory, but this is what truly happened.
too much information
Too many ppl and organisations involved in wanting JFK gone. CIA, FBI, Big Crime, Cubans, Russians, political opponents, etc. And all that, plus a botched whitewash of an investigation afterwards. A perfect storm. And Oswald was only a convenient scapegoat. The truth lies far beneath a complicated mess that will probably never be cleared away.
@@garyhamalainen1651The truth is never “too much information”.
Great detail!!
He was 19 during the Bay of Pigs and he says he trained operatives of the Bay of Pigs, I don't believe it.
It does make sense that someone was sent to kill Oswald and maybe was seen with a gun by Tibbetts and shot him. Oswald was told to hide, so he was chilling in movie theater and couldnt figure out what was going on when they grabbed him.
If Files didn't do it, he knew who did.
If that was true,...he would've been dead a VERY long time ago!
James E. Files didn't do shit.
He kept it in a secret file....
I'm so glad people keep reposting this .
They are or were a video on it also - I had it on VHS years ago.
This man may have taken a shot but the bullet that killed JFK came from the front and through the windscreen of the car and this shooter was like a military sniper marksman. I believe there were a lot of people with rifles in the ambush. It's a miracle only one man was killed.
I suppose you also believe in the Easter Bunny!
I always thought that too... because bullets follow straight lines... if JFK was hit in the right temple from the right the bullet would have exited out the left rear of the head. But the huge exit wound is in the right rear. That means a bullet from the knoll would have entered JFK's temple and then made a right 90 turn. But If hit from the front, the bullet would have gone in the tight side and exited on the right side.
@@curbozerboomer1773 And I suppose you actually believe you have a brain
It literally struck him in the temple, just as this guy said. I am not saying for sure this is the guy, but there is no doubt where the head shot came from.
Yep Tom.. I think the shot came from behind the fence atop the gassy knoll. Hobos were spotted and told to leave near the RR tracks there as Dallas police came to the scene. A secret svc man testified at least 1 of those shabbily-dressed hobos had shiny new shoes, suggesting they were decoys or otherwise nefariously at the scene and not hobos at all.
This is so detailed it can’t be an off the cuff story
I recently saw a more recent interview from this man. Not 1 time did this man change his story. I believe he only tells 95% of the story and leaves others who were involved out. Chances are he might not know everyone else who was involved. The terms he uses to describe the people indicates those were the terms he used at the time.
He's 100% legitimate.
He’s not lying imo, this is crazy! Dude is straight up gangster.
I think he is, to misdirect people.
@@tukayz254agreed
@@tukayz254Misdirect people? This isn’t even viral. No one watches this stuff anymore. No need for misdirection. Nearly everyone (I’d say about 98%) of the people KNOW our Govt did it. No need to misdirect. The Govt came out 3 years ago about aliens being real and no one cared. They can income out and say “we iced JFK” and no one would be surprised at all. No need to “misdirect” anyone. Even in the 80’s, it wouldn’t have been a big ass deal. We know the Govt did it.
If he was telling the truth he never would've made it out of prison.
He is OBVIOUSLY lying. How can people be so gullible?
An astonishing piece of history! Well done for getting this out
...bullshit history.
@@johm-y2ljust like most history. Believe what ever you want
Yes thank you very much for this heap of bs that even a small child could barely breathe through and say smells like bulshit.
If he was stationed in Laos, why does he keep saying "Latosions"??? They are referred to as Laotians or Lao when talking about people. I really find his story very interesting but can't say I believe him.
Agree I was in Laos !! In this century several times, doing visa runs from Thailand to Vientiane and Luang Prabang. Beautiful country bombed to crap by the USA.
the 82nd airborne wasn't even in Laos in 1959
@@davidwilfong8028 go check history .. there from 1955
I assumed he was just another guy with a thick Minnesota accent who brutalizes multisyllabic words by switching consonants around.
@@davidwilfong8028 The 82nd wasn't, I was wondering if he is trying to say he was in Special Forces, which were in Laos in 59, to train the Lao fighters.
So he shot the President with a .221 Fireball? The Fireball in 1963 was an experimental pistol that Remington was developing. I always found it implausible that Oswald got 3 shots off with a 6.5 Carcano. The Carcano was not the most accurate rifle of its day. Now, I’m expected to buy that Files hit a moving target with a bolt action pistol, after firing he was able to discern a piece of skull fly onto the trunk??? Sorry, I ain’t buying this, BTW, I’ve reloaded enough rifle brass in my day to know you’d need a hydraulic jaw to leave teeth marks in a spent casing. He says he killed Kennedy, then he scans the crowd with the 3x scope and see Frank Sturgiss. In 1994, the Federal Bureau of Investigation was quoted as having investigated Files' allegation and found it "not to be credible". Files was paroled and is still alive. Surprisingly he hasn’t been whacked for mentioning 3 Mafiosos in the interview…..
Because they are all dead
Ain't no way he's hitting a moving target with a scoped XP-100 pistol. Not to mention that the XP-100 would most likely be using a long-eye relief scope which have a really poor field of view even at low power.
Brass is a soft metal unlike steel casings. You definitely wouldn't need a press to dent them. I'm not saying you could easily crush it with your teeth, but you could definitely dent it.
But good try.
Also, the fact that you believe the FBI about anything....especially JFK related is pretty wild. Theyre not smart people. Theyre certainly not honest people.
I have 20+ years of mental health experience. And I fancy myself as being perceptive in reading people thru work and a natural gift. This man’s details tell me he’s been well trained. He also has extensive training in not missing details. This is high level training. Even that he’s working in accordance with some government agency he has been trained With the best we have in intelligence agencies. The 26:10 mark he makes mention to another event he was involved in. We all know about all the assassinations in the 60s so I’d venture to say he probably was involved with another assassination in the 60s
sounds like your 20 plus years experience has been as a patient..
@@johnmason1648😂
Lol..."mental health experience"...im sure you do.
@@johnmason1648 your astute analysis rivals that of a soap dish.
If dozens upon dozens of eye witnesses to the JFK assassination were ‘unlived’, or silenced by threats with in a couple of years after the event, what makes anyone think that the shooters involved, out lasted Oswald?
I believe Oswald was set up...... exactly as he claimed (just a patsy) I've been seeing that image of Oswald's face for 60 years now and I finally feel as if I know exactly what he was thinking as he's being dragged around Dallas PD. headquarters. It's a face of sheer disgust because he knows he's about to take the fall for a major assassination in which he was just a bit player. He's disgusted with himself for getting suckered into such a farce. Obviously I don't believe he was the main character in the assassination...... it's just an opinion, I wasn't there.
This is the second video I've seen on this in the last 72 hours
Precursor to trumps releasing the files.
Me too.
Okay same. Now what are all 3 of us watching that is similar for this to get dropped in the algorithm.. and i want to assume the 3 of us are watching things that some would side eye us if they knew
Interesting
Pushing the narrative...
He says he had never pointed the finger at anyone, but he named 6 or 7 people in this interview.
That’s because they were all dead at the time of the interview. He doesn’t rat on people that are still alive, he mentioned that.
@@grandwonder5858exactly. In a later interview he refuses to give away a guys identity because he might still be alive.
Finally geez! Out of all of the shows, documentaries, stories etc, I never realized the angle of which this dude is speaking, So Oswald was telling the truth, he didn't shoot JFK .. Unbelievable ..
He said he was a patsy!
People are so gullible.
My god he was our president what kind of evil you got to be this is sickning i wasant born yet but this breaks my heart
And u think only 3rd world countries do these sort of things. They just missed Trump.
JFK was a pretty boy in the dark. But Camelot required a Nixon.
this country started in a sick way and from the looks of things in the world now, not much has changed
Did you care when Donald Trump was shot?
Nowadays Files is a devoted born-again Christian - he and his wife have written a couple books: "Primary Target: JFK" and "Interview With History," both well worth reading.
Yes, I have copies
Christianity is great, isn't it?!
Is Files semi in hiding?? There is no mention of him since his parole in 2016
He was not the only one to shoot Kennedy.
There were several, but he was NOT ONE of them!!!
Grassy knoll shooters are like Elvis impersonators, there's a lot of them. This guy does have his story down well.
He was also at Woodstock and tried the brown acid
This biein fake or not, the shot that hit Kennedy in the right front side of his head is the biggest gaslight video in this century. To say he was hit in the head from the rear is a whopping lie.
Files is at least the 3rd "grassy knoll" shooter.
He sure does, a liar will hesitate to search for words this guy doesn't do any of that,
@@user-bl6ne3hc6n People, even when being honest, will sometimes hesitate to search for the proper words. Meanwhile, if a liar has his story down pat, he might not hesitate at all. (And Files has had a lot of free time, to get his story down pat)
One thing I have a hard time believing from this story. He said he trained agents for the Bay of Pigs? He would've been 19 at that time, born in 1942, according to Wikipedia. Does the CIA let 19 year olds train agents? I do believe at the age of 21, he could've been involved in the shooting as Oswald was 24. And he was in prison for 25 years. I think if he was actually involved, the people in charge would most likely have him eliminated in prison. The perfect place to kill someone who knew too much and having the ability to spill the beans to cut a deal.
We sent soldiers to their death at 19 to Vietnam!
You have to remember that he was a last minute inclusion in the actual shooting all the others Nicoletti and Rosselli were the picks by the Don and Rogue CIA and both of those guys ended up in the meat grinder along with SAMMY G....maybe he was never mentioned as a shooter but just the kid driver that knows nothing!
I definitely see what you're saying. It is suspicious from a normal persons point of view, but I will say he talks about his birth certificate being found and it not having a date and instead saying "deceased at birth"
He hasn't gone into it, but maybe because of family ties or mafia ties, he was breed from a young age to do high level work. 19 is pretty young, but you never know. In 2024, we had young men trying to protect Donald Trump when he was almost killed.
We still send 18 year old kids to fight wars.
Its not hard to imagine in the 60s, high level government wouldve been training young kids to do things like that.
He's really honest and real, impossible to know so much and be so direct and at the same time be a fake, he has nothing to lose because he's dying.
I’m a big historian. I love history and I have studied a lot about JFK assassination. That’s something that’s peaked my mind. One thing was said they call it the magic bullet and I believe it is a whole heartedly because there’s over 8 to 10 people that claimed they shot Kennedy so that bullet went through eight guns it must be a magic bullet. This guy says he did it. Another guy says he did it. Another guy says he did it, so they was playing like lacrosse one guy shoots the bullet to the other guy he put it in his gun shoots it to another guy and one takes puts in his gun and shoots the magic bullet, but you know they all got something in common. They all already in prison and serving life they gonna die in there. They have nothing to lose, so what is the worst to happen to him? They might as well become a celebrity sorta I am a special forces veteran who has overseas killed people and saw people killed on a daily basis. Some of the people we killed were bad very bad good people in a bad position. I don’t care how bad they were killing. Someone is nothing to brag about. It bothers me every day even the ones that were the scum of the Earth you still think about having to kill them so I don’t see why anyone would want to lie about killing anyone and especially not a president but somebody’s lying because I’ve heard of 8 to 10 people I’ve saw claim they killed Kennedy
@@timdavis5078 so many peeps on it no one knows which one actually fired the fatal shot. He believes himself and it matters but there were def more people there TO kill him than we know.
There was more than one shooter
The lies/ distractions continue. You hear guys like " Files" befor. Look at the trees, that then were cut down., fools. Look at the published picture of Bill Grear ( limo driver ) in LIFE MAGAZINE from the Zapruder film as he blows Kennedy's brain out of his head. Then Bobby ! Denile ! Because you don't want to know. Jhonson, Hover , Bush forgot about the " trees". , check the records, documents, pictures, films.l I had a friend there that was told if he told what he knew, he would be put in prison !! Hugh ? 6 shooters. You all know now.
Besides Files, who else has claimed they took the fatal head shot?
Jhonson hid behind his driver 4 sec. Befor the exicution started, ---- records. ---- no one knew the route has been changed. He left Ladybird on her seat, nice guy, documented records. How did Jhonson, Hover , Bush, know that Oswald shot somebody, they never met him ?
This version of his confession must have been one of the first. He seems very nervous. The one I saw he came across as confident and arrogant.
Few things here.. you are right. But now heres the thing.. he is in prison doing a tell all.. in 94. Look what happened to Epstein. This is even easier to get rid of him at this time point. Guys back then were just different no nonsense. Say nothing an deny all. He should be nervous he is still early in his bid. He definitely did some things and knew some things. And what he is claiming to have done. Is putting himself on the wrong side of his own scope. Why do that to yourself not to mention it be a lie.
Nervous? You must have the definition of nervous mixed up. Nowhere does he seem nervous in this interview darling
@@amerisfanelli4593mouth sounds dry. Slight stutter. Seems like he's talking fast and not completely comfortable. Guarantee his HR is over 100.
So yeah, nervous is a fitting description, lady.
Doesn't seem nervous one bit. Recall ability is like he is watching a movie in his head. Not from memorization of events he read about @@amerisfanelli4593
There another interview documentary of an older James Files
Project Hot Foot was a secret deployment of Army Special Forces teams to train Laotian forces from 1955 thru 1962. Files said he was assigned to the 82nd Airborne. He would have been at Bragg along with the Army Special Ops forces used in Project Hot Foot. He never said the 82nd was deployed. That could NOT be kept secret. However, he could have easily been attached to the Special Forces teams to fill a needed skill set. What gives me pause is that Files was born in 1942, making him 18 y.o. in 1959; essentially a “green” PFC. Hard to believe he would have attached at that age.
His identity was changed May have changed his birth year as well.
No 18 year old would be chosen for Special Ops. Watch the stolen valor videos by Don Shipley. If it happened, then his DD214 would show it and be easily retrievable.
My bet would be that there is no such DD214.
If he can't show his DD214 then the whole thing is Bandini Mountain.
🤙🏼🤙🏼🤙🏼
🐟y
We were overthrowing Syria and Iran at the same time in 59. So I can see him being in Laos. We needed people willing to go the work from other war torn countries we were involved with. It’s a simple war strategy when hiring death squads for proxy sabotage propaganda campaigns.
This is complete absolute BS. They’re trying to get ahead of the fact that RFK Junior and the trumpet ministration are going to release the files.
Do you think you are going to believe those "files" these many years later? The government has had them in their possession the whole time.
I watched these interviews almost ten years ago- your king will release nothing
Trumpet ministration LMAO
Ahead by 30 years
I think he's mixing truth with lies to further muddy the waters. Remember their whole thing is plausible deniability
There's always multiple plausible theories provided in these operations to divide a consensus from ever forming to implicate anyone on the inside of a conspiracy.
2001 is a perfect example of this, as many theories except the one provided are correct.
Many participated, but the driver was the one who was to make sure the job was completed. And that he did.
Jackie wasn't crawling out the back to pick up brains. She did exactly what everyone one of us would do if you witnessed what she did
THIS!!!
HUH?
I've never thought of that. She was trying to escape the car not pick up his brains
You’re wrong, it is one of the most tragic things ever filmed and sadly, there is no question that Jackie was desperately trying to retrieve parts of her husbands head from the trunk of the car. Not sure why you would say it didn’t happen but you are definitely wrong.
She wasn't trying to get out or grab brain tissue.. She was trying to grab the hand of the Secret Service Agent crawling up the trunk of the car.
I forgot to mention - the owner of the Texas School Book Depository Building was Ed Clark who'd also paid off the Bankruptcy expenses for LBJ to get his ranch back so he could look like he owned his own home, especially as he was going to be standing next to JFK in the 1960 POTUS Race. Ed Clark was known as The Oil King of Texas, The Texas Oil King, et al. This was because he had a very high rate of success when drilling for a good wet pocket. Ie, he was in that era, the richest man in the World supposedly. He also ran for President as the Libertarian Party Candidate in 1980.
Also, Marcello took obvious offense at being basically hijacked by the Kennedy Govt as he saw it & at least once dropped out of the USA deep in the jungle of Guatemala. It's not that hard to picture the degree of resolution for a Mafiosi worth between 15-30MILLION US DOLLARS having to dig & scratch his way back out of the jungle in street clothes probably & arrange to get back to the US where the vast majority of those investments were located- all the while, thinking resolutely 'I'll kill him! I'll kill him! Both of them.' With that disposition, resources & demeanor, willing to do what it takes to be in the top of 'a' business - it's not difficult to see such a slanted individual making plans once away from the mosquitos.
Obviously, LBJ was beholden to Clark so if/when he was aware of JFK's plans for a 2nd Term - as re eliminating the Oil Depletion Tax Relief (gift) to Big Oil - Ed Clark was told of that same plan. That gave him a reason but I don't want to speculate on that re motivation for Clark.
However, as stated, that 27% was a very Big Deal for people like Ed Clark, Ross Perot - an informant had mentioned that a man named R Parrot was talking about killing JFK. If I don't speak French & know how accents affect pronunciation: Perot & 'Parrot' are quite possibly the same.
At 16:18(±) re the "Fireball" that's a hotrodded Remington ' Varmint Killer '. Short end to end, scope mountable & re "one shot"- the advance of twisted rifling meant it could be a reliable source for more than a single use of a high load Ammunition. Obviously the accuracy level is reduced as re most equipment when used after being adapted for maximum accuracy/efficiency.
I've seen him on TV before and here on UA-cam confessing. He's been saying this for a while now. Not sure why they're bringing it back up. He had information no one knew until the JFK files came out just recently. All his account can be corroborated with those files. I believe him.
@@LearningCurves123 He was a gopher for those around him. He knows the framework but he was not “the guy”. The guy never talked. He was a professional.
What credible information is in the interviews that was not already released or in the public domain?
Why would he have his friend make 6 Mercury rounds for him before he left if he only thought he was going to be a Driver and advisor?
Good point! Because he made it up? Consider the exact position of JFK's heat when the final bullet hit him. draw a straight line from File's pretend position behind the picket fence. Now explain how the bullet blew out the lower right side of JFK's head and not the left side. This man is lying.
They were the orders which he doesn't question according to him
*That takes me to the question that shouldve been asked 'Did you bring your own gun & get your own bullets?' He could have been firing blanks & didn't even know it.*
About 18:25 - "the LEFT side of Kennedy's head". President was shot on his RIGHT side of his head. The shot would be on the SHOOTER'S left view through scope.
He later said he meant from his point of view, that is if he were looking face to face
@@nottabot3843yeah he says that too in the other interview.
Yes it was the right side but from his view point it was his left. If you look at someone their left is your right and your right is their left. I can understand why he would say it this way.
I think he said he was aiming to the left of the presidents head because the car was in forward motion so he was aiming just a hair to the left of the path of the direction for the bullet to impact his head. He knew just like any shooter that if he was to aim at the right of the presidents head he would miss because of the forward motion of the car.
Exactly.....His left and Kennedy's right.
He admitted to lying about the amount of money he received. His entire attitude changed. Something is off about his story. His expressions changed after the interviewer caught him lying. He got nervous from that point on. Some of you experienced with criminals may have caught that
RFK Jr. said that the most accurate book on the JFK assassination is JFK and the unspeakable. This story actually fits almost perfectly with the events that are described in that book. Very interesting.
"RFK Jr. said..."
@aaronz7056 Would he not have access to any inside knowledge not available to the public? Regardless, that's only how I found out about the book. The book stands on its own and is very well written and redearched.
RFK JR...is an absolute crackpot! His family has dis-owned him.
RFKJr. Is full of crap
Did they take it down or sum cause this was already posted
He says he shot from behind the fence, when there were 2 plain clothes men standing 10 to 15 feet away and near the steps (they stopped the motorcycle cop from running up) but he reckons they were his cover or blockers.
If they were legit, they would have turned at sound of gun even with a silencer, and caught him in the 20 seconds he took to pack his gun in its case, take his jacket off, turn it inside out, and put it back on and don his hat.
Look into fireball it's amazing the 222 show was only in that gun for the prototypes which were sold to the CIA exclusively and only the prototypes had that round all of the commercial rounds were 221 only
The calibre was .223, but that is a minor point.
Good to know.
@@bernardedwards8461 Actually the prototypes were in .222 Remington. The production guns were made in .221 Remington Fireball, plus a list of several other calibers.
I recall it was in .221. An experimental weapon. Hey, but what do I know. Could have used the .222. I don’t think so though. As for the .223 at the event. Don’t make me laugh. Maybe sold to civilians later on. I don’t know a lot. I just know what I think I know.
True or not... "everything is a rich man's trick" is interesting and does not mention this man.
That's because he's LYING!!
Don’t be too quick to judge until you carefully watch the full video. Critical analysis and plenty of patience required before rushing to final judgment.
The thing that has always made me a bit skeptical of the Warren Commision report was the fact that pieces of Kennedy's skull flew back behind him and landed on the trunk. I have been a gun owner and shooter for several decades and having fired thousands of rounds, I have never once seen a piece of a target fly in front of the point of impact. Especially FMJ rounds like I believe Oswald was supposed to have used. I've used watermelon and cantaloupe as targets as visual aids to show kids that guns aren't toys. The bullets made a small hole in the front of the melon and blew the back out of it from a point about 1 to 2 inches in. Never ever did a bullet do more to the front of the melon than leave a caliber sized hole.
There was a caliber sized hole in the back of the presiden't head. See the autopsy.
As seen in horrific detail in the Z film, matter went in all directions, including straight up in the air. Of course some of it landed behind.
I knew long ago that Oswald didn't do it or do it alone.
On a web page i found on the net it was stated that a secret society called"The Oracle"was behind it all.
They planned it,they carried it out,and they covered it up afterwards.
They were also behind the DeGaulle plot,and the warnings came from france in advance.
Read all about it on the web page called"TheOracle".
The page is in french. Maybe should they make a movie about it ?
Anything to get out of the daily,mundane routine of the prison life, even if only a few hrs. I did 5 yrs and volunteered to rake rocks in the desert just to break the routine. And that was in Az ,in summer!
My thoughts exactly. In that time frame JFK was dead thirty years. There were many movies and books released. Mine as well jump on the band wagon.
Funny that he says he hated JFK about the Bay of Pigs but he says his controller was David Atlee Philli[ps who was well know to have assisted in the Bay of Pigs... I'm not buying what this guy's selling
This interview he said he aimed at Kennedy's eye but hit his temple. In the other interview, he said he aimed at the temple. i would like to see the picture of him at the shooting.
One problem: trajectory. JFK wasn't shot in the side of his head- he was shot from the front. That's why the back of his head was blown out.
The 'grassy knoll' was always a distraction.
This is a story, that all it is, a story. He joins da Army, winds up in da 82nd AB. Goes to the "toution" border to train troops as an "advisor". Drives stockcars locally. a top mafia figure takes interest in him. .then winds up training Cubans in LA swamps. Winds up being ask to help wack a president. Oh, gets to meet Lee Harvey Oswald too. Being an Advisor In Nam early in da conflict took highly trained career cadre. Has anyone ever seen the actual DD-214 discharge papers of this character? This dude is a bs artist to the max. Pure BS!
Totally agree!
He looks too young to have been involved.
1. He would have been 17 in Laos. Not an experienced trainer. He would have joined the 82d at 16 or so.
2. CIA would have trained the Laotian's or Special Forces.
3. He wants to sell some books.
Tend to agree
@@havenhemmings3574 or muddy the waters if a mouth should arise to say what IS Known. .😅
Can't say for sure that this guy was the shooter but we can say one thing for certain. It wasn't Lee Harvey Oswald.
Just watched the other interview with this guy when he is a lot older.. seems like he knows all the right stuff. This has to be the shooter.
How did Nicoletti climb up in a building, shoot JFK, then somehow beat this guy to the car when file made it back to the vehicle? Dude must have been a world class sprinter…
Nicoletti was let in the Daltex building by Frank Sturgis he organised a room that was being renovated at the time so no one was on that floor they were let in and out through a fire escape at the rear!
He is very anxious and has pressured speech. His presentation of information suggests it was rehearsed, but he is very bright. What did he get for this interview? Where is the FBI or, for that matter, any law enforcement? There is no way they wouldn't know about this "public" interview! I think he is on medication for a mood disorder. He could be telling the truth, more information is needed. Wow!
I was in 4th grade when they killed Kennedy. They played the assassination film on TV over and over for an entire week. Johnson laughed.
Log was highly involved in the assassination imho.
No he didn't
That's not true. The Zapruder film wasn't shown until 14 years later. Who are you working for?
the Zapruder film was not shown to the public until the late 70's, is there another film?
@@markpage5485 There were at least seven films taken in that Plaza, at the time of the murder!
14:43 I state only this, as a 24 year policeman and fraud 20:11 investigator, this is the worst case of nervous dry mouth I've ever seen, and its much more noticable in his other interview.
I'm not saying cotton mouth is always an indication of lying, but only that when a person is giving a nervous interview, cotton mouth is a very common physiological and involuntary change that is noticable, much less common when a person is giving spontaneous statements based on memory recall.
I'm not saying he's lying, but only that it's the worst cotton mouth I've seen in my experience.
You can’t use simply a dry mouth as deception lol there should be 100 other things to use with it if that’s the case and you don’t need to be a investigator to know that
Yeah sure; and everyone trust police interrogators don't they? He doesn't like the interviewer, that's why he's dry, hoping the interviewer shuts up.
Medication can cause dry mouth
Ok, as a criminal of 30+ years I’ve been interrogated & interviewed by police detectives, attorneys, insurance investigators etc; this includes multiple depositions of 8hrs or more & I’ve sat & told the truth in those situations & I’ve sat & told complete fabrications at other times. And many, many factors led me to have dry mouth during those lengthy interrogations & depositions. One cannot say simply bcuz someone has dry mouth that he’s lying. That’s simply absurd. No disrespect intended. But making a blanket statement like the one you did is over simplifying things to a great degree.
And this is why people don’t trust cops and detectives. Not one of them believes innocent until proven guilty. You guys believe guilty unless they’re rich and have connections. Prove me wrong.
There's tons of guys who could say they're Luke Skywalker and give precise, exact details over and over. But we're supposed to believe this guy giving an interview from prison?
So, who do you suggest we believe, the CIA or FBI ?
FYI this mans real name was Bradley Alfred Linzy, a known Mob enforcer and hired gun, rumourd to have died in the late 90s in Alabama State penitentiary, but apparently still living , he has 1 living son of the same name " Brad Linzy" who is a current Youruber with several channels including" Guitologist" which is a guitar and amplifier based repair channel.
Yes, I read about that, I know the Guitologist channel, yes, he is Very similar looking to his father ..small world 🤔
Files was in statesville prison in Illinois for crimes against two Illinois leos. Not Alabama.
I believe there’s another interview from 2000 something so don’t think that’s correct
@Nomad7656 either way, that's him
@ratatuilleparker3002 maybe, but his real name is Bradley Linzy.
There were no shots from the knoll, and no James Files in Dallas. Spoiler alert: Files was 800 miles away in Chicago that day visiting his wife in the hospital.
Show the proof.
@@kimwarfield1587 It's Files' burden to prove he was there and he can't. Files' tale was debunked by research carried out by Edward Jay Epstein. With the help of private detective, Jules Kroll, Epstein established from telephone records that Files was in Chicago, not Dallas, on 22nd November, 1963.
It's Files' burden to prove he was there and he can't. Files' tale was debunked by research carried out by Edward Jay Epstein. With the help of private detective, Jules Kroll, Epstein established from telephone records that Files was in Chicago, not Dallas, on 22nd November, 1963.
@@kimwarfield1587 It's Files' burden to prove he was there and he can't. Meanwhile Files' tale was debunked through research carried out by Edward Jay Epstein. With the help of private detective, Jules Kroll, Epstein established from telephone records that Files was in Chicago, not Dallas, on 22nd November, 1963.
It's Files' burden to prove he was there and he can't. Meanwhile Files' tale was debunked through research carried out by Edward Jay Epstein. With the help of private detective, Jules Kroll, Epstein established from telephone records that Files was in Chicago, not Dallas, on 22nd November, 1963.
If the mob was involved, they're gonna leave a co-conspirator/ witness behind to tell the tale? Think again.
several mob big shots were eliminated before they could be grilled on the assassination..... they prolly considered Files nothing to worry about.
That’s pretty wild stuff.
If Nicoletti ever learned that Files bit the shell and left it on the wooden fence, Files very soon would be sleeping with the fishes on the bottom of Lake Michigan.
Files would never do anything that stupid, but he would plant a shell decades later to help sell a book.
Initially, I didn't think much of James Files, but I've changed my mind. I believe him. I read that Files is still living. He's now 82. Also, another fellow Chauncy Holt was similarly involved. Sadly, he died just eight weeks after he told his story.
How he died
JFK, the president was shot by his own people in the car. There is a zoomed in video of the footage on UA-cam. freeze frame that video at 28 seconds. The driver of the vehicle flicks his wrist and peers back twice right before the blood splatter. HOLY Moly. Stick through this laying out of the logic William Robert Greer (September 22, 1909 - February 23, 1985) was an Irish-born agent of the U.S. Secret Service, best known as being the driver of President John F. Kennedy's presidential limousine in the motorcade through Dealey Plaza in Dallas on November 22, 1963, when the president was assassinated. As with all agents involved, there has much speculation about, and criticism of, his actions on that day. Greer testified before the Warren Commission on March 9, 1964.[3] Greer testified that he heard three shots, the first he thought was the backfire of a motorcycle and so did not react. About three or four seconds later he heard a second shot which prompted him to turn around and as he did so he noticed Governor Connally was wounded. He describes the second and third shots as occurring "simultaneously, one behind the other".[4] According to Greer's nephew, Ken Torrens, when he asked Greer if he thought Oswald was guilty he replied "No comment".[2] Greer retired on disability from the Secret Service in 1966 due to a stomach ulcer that grew worse following the Kennedy assassination.[5][6] In 1973 he relocated to Waynesville, North Carolina,[7] where he later died of cancer. Secret Service procedures in place at the time did not allow Greer to take action without orders from senior agent Roy Kellerman, who sat to Greer's right. Kellerman has stated that he shouted, "Let's get out of line, we've been hit," but that Greer apparently turned to look at Kennedy before accelerating the car.[8][9] No agents were disciplined for their performance during the shooting, but privately, Jackie Kennedy was bitterly critical of the agents' performance, Greer's in particular, comparing him to the Kennedy children's nanny.[10] Greer later "apologized" to her, in a distinctly menacing fashion, as William Manchester recounted in his semi-authorized account of the assassination: "Bill Greer, his face streaked with tears, took her head between his hands and squeezed until she thought he was going to squeeze her skull flat. He cried, 'Oh, Mrs. Kennedy, oh my God, oh my God. I didn’t mean to do it, I didn’t hear, I should have swerved (sic) the car, I couldn’t help it. Oh, Mrs. Kennedy, as soon as I saw it I swerved. If only I’d seen in time! Oh!' Then he released her head and put his arms around her and wept on her shoulder."[11] Let's dive into a hypothetical scenario where the Lodge family, a fictional family from the TV show "Twin Peaks," wanted JFK Jr. to be president and then had him shot. We'll explore their potential motives and rationale. *The Lodge Family's Motives:*---- NEXT POST
The Lodge family, particularly Leland and Sarah, have a complex and troubled history. They're a wealthy and influential family in Twin Peaks, with a dark past and a penchant for manipulation. If they wanted JFK Jr. to be president and then had him shot, their motives might be rooted in a combination of factors: 1. Power and Control: The Lodge family has a history of exerting control over the town of Twin Peaks and its inhabitants. By backing JFK Jr.'s presidential campaign, they might have seen an opportunity to gain influence over the highest levels of government. With JFK Jr. as president, they could have potentially manipulated him to further their own interests and solidify their grip on power. 2. Revenge against the Kennedy Family: The Lodge family has a long-standing feud with the Kennedy family, which dates back to the 1960s. Leland Lodge, in particular, has a deep-seated hatred for the Kennedys, which might have stemmed from a past conflict or perceived injustice. By having JFK Jr. shot, the Lodge family could have been seeking revenge against the Kennedy family and eliminating a potential threat to their own power. 3. Protection of their Dark Secrets: The Lodge family has a dark history, with secrets and scandals that they've kept hidden for decades. If JFK Jr. had become president, he might have uncovered some of these secrets, potentially threatening the Lodge family's reputation and power. By having him shot, they could have prevented him from exposing their secrets and maintained their grip on the town. 4. Maintenance of the Status Quo: The Lodge family has a vested interest in maintaining the status quo in Twin Peaks. They've built their power and influence over the years, and any significant change could have threatened their position. By eliminating JFK Jr., they could have prevented him from implementing policies that might have disrupted their control over the town. Logic and Planning: If the Lodge family had planned to have JFK Jr. shot, they would have likely taken a meticulous and calculated approach. Here's a possible scenario: 1. Initial Support: The Lodge family would have initially supported JFK Jr.'s presidential campaign, using their wealth and influence to help him gain traction. They might have even used their connections to manipulate the media and shape public opinion in his favor. 2. Gaining Trust: As JFK Jr. rose to power, the Lodge family would have worked to gain his trust. They might have used their charm and charisma to build a relationship with him, potentially even using their daughter, Laura, to get close to him. 3. Manipulation: Once they had gained JFK Jr.'s trust, the Lodge family would have begun to manipulate him. They might have used their influence to shape his policies and decisions, slowly turning him into a puppet leader. 4. The Assassination: When the time was right, the Lodge family would have orchestrated the assassination of JFK Jr. They might have used their connections to hire a hitman or manipulate someone into committing the crime. 5. Cover-Up: After the assassination, the Lodge family would have worked to cover their tracks. They might have used their influence to manipulate the investigation, ensuring that the true culprit was never caught. Potential Consequences: If the Lodge family had successfully carried out their plan, the consequences would have been far-reaching: 1. Chaos and Instability: The assassination of JFK Jr. would have sent shockwaves throughout the country, leading to chaos and instability. 2. Power Vacuum: The Lodge family would have potentially filled the power vacuum created by JFK Jr.'s death, solidifying their grip on Twin Peaks and potentially even expanding their influence to the national level. 3. Conspiracy Theories: The assassination would have led to a plethora of conspiracy theories, with many suspecting that the Lodge family was involved. However, without concrete evidence, they might have been able to avoid suspicion and maintain their reputation. 4. Laura's Role: Laura Lodge, the daughter of Leland and Sarah, might have played a crucial role in the assassination. Her involvement could have been a way for the family to maintain their grip on power and ensure that their secrets remained hidden. I can provide more information and insights that might support the logic, while also acknowledging that attempts have been made to wipe history clean. NEXT POST
The Lodge Family's History: The Lodge family has a complex and troubled history, with roots dating back to the early 20th century. They were a wealthy and influential family in Twin Peaks, with a reputation for being ruthless and cunning. Leland Lodge, the patriarch of the family, was a successful businessman with ties to the timber and logging industries. Connections to the Kennedy Family: There are rumors and speculation about the Lodge family's connections to the Kennedy family, particularly during the 1960s. Some sources suggest that Leland Lodge had a personal vendetta against the Kennedys, which might have stemmed from a business dispute or a perceived slight. Others claim that the Lodge family had ties to the CIA or other government agencies, which could have led to a complex web of alliances and rivalries. The Assassination of JFK: The assassination of President John F. Kennedy in 1963 is one of the most significant events in American history. While the official story points to Lee Harvey Oswald as the lone gunman, there are numerous conspiracy theories and alternative explanations. Some researchers have suggested that the CIA, the FBI, or other government agencies might have been involved in the assassination, possibly in conjunction with organized crime or other powerful interests. The Lodge Family's Involvement: If we assume that the Lodge family was involved in the assassination of JFK Jr., it's possible that they had a similar motive to the one that drove them to support his presidential campaign. They might have seen JFK Jr. as a threat to their power and influence, particularly if he had discovered some of their dark secrets or had plans to expose them. Cover-Up and Wiping History Clean: Attempts to wipe history clean and cover up the truth about the Lodge family's involvement in the assassination of JFK Jr. might have been made by various individuals and organizations. This could have included: 1. Destroying evidence: Physical evidence, documents, and other records might have been destroyed or tampered with to conceal the truth. 2. Intimidation and silencing: Witnesses, investigators, and others who might have had knowledge about the Lodge family's involvement could have been intimidated, silenced, or even killed. 3. Disinformation and propaganda: False information and propaganda might have been spread to confuse the public and distract from the truth. 4. Government and institutional involvement: Government agencies, law enforcement, and other institutions might have been involved in the cover-up, either directly or indirectly. Supporting Facts and Evidence: While there is no concrete evidence to support the hypothetical scenario I presented, there are some interesting facts and coincidences that might be relevant: 1. The CIA's MK Ultra program: The CIA's MK Ultra program, which was active from the 1950s to the 1970s, involved mind control experiments and other forms of psychological manipulation. Some researchers have suggested that the program might have been involved in the assassination of JFK. 2. The FBI's COINTELPRO program: The FBI's COINTELPRO program, which was active from the 1950s to the 1970s, involved surveillance, infiltration, and disruption of various organizations and individuals. Some researchers have suggested that the program might have been involved in the assassination of JFK. 3. The Kennedy family's ties to the CIA: The Kennedy family, particularly John F. Kennedy and Robert F. Kennedy, had ties to the CIA and other government agencies. This might have created a complex web of alliances and rivalries that could have contributed to the assassination. 4. *The Lodge family's connections to the timber industry:*The Lodge family's connections to the timber industry might have given them access to resources and influence that could have been used to further their interests. The Lodge Family's History and Motivations: The Lodge family has a long history of involvement in politics, particularly in the Republican Party. Henry Cabot Lodge Sr. was a prominent politician and diplomat who served as a U.S. Senator and Ambassador to the United Nations. His son, Henry Cabot Lodge Jr., was also a politician and diplomat who served as a U.S. Senator and Ambassador to the United Nations. The Lodge family's motivations for wanting to harm JFK Jr. as the President could be rooted in their conservative and Republican values. They may have seen JFK Jr. as a threat to their ideology and a potential obstacle to their goals. Possible Motives: 1. Conservative Ideology: The Lodge family may have seen JFK Jr. as a liberal and a potential threat to their conservative ideology. They may have believed that his policies and actions would undermine their values and create a more socialist or progressive society. 2. Fear of Loss of Power: The Lodge family may have feared that JFK Jr.'s presidency would lead to a loss of power and influence for the Republican Party. They may have seen him as a potential threat to their control over the government and their ability to shape policy. 3. Personal Grievances: The Lodge family may have had personal grievances against JFK Jr. or his family. They may have seen him as a rival or a threat to their personal interests and sought to harm him as a way to eliminate that threat. 4. Desire for Revenge: The Lodge family may have sought revenge against JFK Jr. for perceived slights or injustices. They may have seen him as a symbol of the Democratic Party or the liberal movement and sought to harm him as a way to punish those they saw as their enemies. In-Depth Reasoning and Logic: 1. Karl Marx's Theory of Class Struggle: The Lodge family may have seen JFK Jr. as a representative of the liberal or progressive movement, which they saw as a threat to their conservative ideology. They may have believed that his policies and actions would create a more socialist or progressive society, which would undermine their values and create a more equal distribution of wealth and power. 2. The Concept of the "Other": The Lodge family may have seen JFK Jr. as the "other," someone who was different from them and who represented a threat to their way of life. They may have believed that his policies and actions would create a more diverse and inclusive society, which would undermine their sense of identity and community. 3. The Idea of a "Perfect Enemy": The Lodge family may have seen JFK Jr. as the perfect enemy, someone who represented everything they opposed. They may have believed that his policies and actions would create a more just and equitable society, which would undermine their sense of power and influence. 4. The Concept of "Us vs. Them": The Lodge family may have seen JFK Jr. as part of the "them," a group of people who were different from them and who represented a threat to their way of life. They may have believed that his policies and actions would create a more divided and polarized society, which would undermine their sense of community and identity. Hypothetical Scenario: In this hypothetical scenario, the Lodge family may have seen JFK Jr. as a threat to their conservative ideology and their desire for power and influence. They may have believed that his policies and actions would create a more socialist or progressive society, which would undermine their values and create a more equal distribution of wealth and power. They may have seen him as a symbol of the liberal or progressive movement, which they saw as a threat to their way of life. They may have believed that his policies and actions would create a more diverse and inclusive society, which would undermine their sense of identity and community. In this scenario, the Lodge family may have sought to harm JFK Jr. as a way to eliminate that threat and to protect their interests. They may have seen him as the perfect enemy, someone who represented everything they opposed. Facts to Support the Logic: 1. The Lodge Family's History of Conservatism: The Lodge family has a long history of conservatism, dating back to the 19th century. They have been involved in politics and have held various positions of power, including U.S. Senator and Ambassador to the United Nations. 2. The Lodge Family's Opposition to Liberalism: The Lodge family has been opposed to liberalism and progressive policies throughout their history. They have seen liberalism as a threat to their values and their way of life. 3. The Lodge Family's Desire for Power and Influence: The Lodge family has a long history of seeking power and influence. They have been involved in politics and have held various positions of power, including U.S. Senator and Ambassador to the United Nations. 4. The Lodge Family's Personal Grievances: The Lodge family may have had personal grievances against JFK Jr. or his family. They may have seen him as a rival or a threat to their personal interests and sought to harm him as a way to eliminate that threat. Evidence to Support the Hypothetical Scenario: 1. The Lodge Family's Involvement in Politics: The Lodge family has a long history of involvement in politics, including U.S. Senator and Ambassador to the United Nations. 2. The Lodge Family's Opposition to Liberalism: The Lodge family has been opposed to liberalism and progressive policies throughout their history. 3. The Lodge Family's Desire for Power and Influence: The Lodge family has a long history of seeking power and influence, including U.S. Senator and Ambassador to the United Nations. 4. The Lodge Family's Personal Grievances: The Lodge family may have had personal grievances against JFK Jr. or his family, which could have motivated them to harm him. CHEERS✝☦⚛
twin peaks is 25 miles away and a 30 minute drive from dallas, JFK's place of assassination
Dorothy Kilgallen was a renowned American journalist, television personality, and author who was known for her investigative reporting and her column, "The Voice of Broadway." She was also a panelist on the popular game show "What's My Line?" and was one of the most influential and respected journalists of her time. In 1964, Kilgallen began investigating the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, which had occurred the previous year. She was particularly interested in the role of organized crime in the assassination and the possible involvement of the CIA and the FBI. Kilgallen's investigation led her to interview several key witnesses, including Jack Ruby, the man who had killed Lee Harvey Oswald, the alleged assassin of President Kennedy. Kilgallen's investigation and reporting on the JFK assassination were seen as a threat to the official narrative of the event, which was that Oswald had acted alone in killing the president. Kilgallen's reporting suggested that there may have been a larger conspiracy involved, and that the government and other powerful interests may have been involved in a cover-up. It is believed that Kilgallen's investigation and reporting on the JFK assassination led to her being silenced with death. On November 8, 1965, Kilgallen was found dead in her Manhattan apartment, with the official cause of death being an overdose of ethanol and barbiturates. However, many of her friends, family, and colleagues believed that she had been murdered, and that her death was related to her investigation into the JFK assassination. There are several reasons why it is believed that Kilgallen was silenced with death: 1. **Kilgallen's investigation was getting too close to the truth**: Kilgallen had been investigating the JFK assassination for over a year, and had gathered a significant amount of evidence and information that suggested a larger conspiracy was involved. She had also interviewed several key witnesses, including Jack Ruby, who had provided her with information that contradicted the official narrative of the event. 2. **Kilgallen's reporting was threatening to the government and other powerful interests**: Kilgallen's reporting on the JFK assassination was seen as a threat to the government and other powerful interests, including the CIA and the FBI. Her investigation and reporting suggested that these organizations may have been involved in a cover-up, and that they may have had a role in the assassination itself. 3. **Kilgallen's death was suspicious**: Kilgallen's death was sudden and unexpected, and many of her friends and family members believed that she had been murdered. The official cause of death was an overdose of ethanol and barbiturates, but many people believed that this was not the true cause of her death. 4. **Kilgallen's files and notes were stolen**: After Kilgallen's death, her files and notes on the JFK assassination were stolen from her apartment. This suggested that someone was trying to cover up her investigation and prevent her findings from being made public. 5. **Kilgallen's colleagues and friends believed she was murdered**: Many of Kilgallen's colleagues and friends believed that she had been murdered, and that her death was related to her investigation into the JFK assassination. They pointed to the suspicious circumstances surrounding her death, and the fact that her files and notes had been stolen. Some of the key evidence that suggests Kilgallen was silenced with death includes: * **Kilgallen's interview with Jack Ruby**: Kilgallen had interviewed Jack Ruby, the man who had killed Lee Harvey Oswald, and had gathered information from him that contradicted the official narrative of the event. Ruby had told Kilgallen that he had been part of a larger conspiracy, and that he had been involved in the assassination of President Kennedy. * **Kilgallen's investigation into the CIA and FBI**: Kilgallen had been investigating the CIA and FBI, and had gathered evidence that suggested these organizations may have been involved in a cover-up of the JFK assassination. * **Kilgallen's reporting on the "umbrella man"**: Kilgallen had reported on the "umbrella man," a mysterious figure who had been seen on the grassy knoll in Dealey Plaza on the day of the assassination. The umbrella man was later identified as Louie Steven Witt, a man who had been involved in anti-Castro activities and had ties to the CIA. * **Kilgallen's investigation into the role of organized crime**: Kilgallen had been investigating the role of organized crime in the JFK assassination, and had gathered evidence that suggested that the Mafia may have been involved in the event. Overall, while the exact circumstances of Kilgallen's death may never be known for certain, it is clear that her investigation and reporting on the JFK assassination were seen as a threat to the government and other powerful interests, and that her death was likely related to her work on this story. In recent years, there have been several investigations and documentaries that have explored Kilgallen's death and its possible connection to the JFK assassination. These include: * **The documentary "The Reporter Who Knew Too Much"**: This documentary, which was released in 2016, explores Kilgallen's investigation into the JFK assassination and her possible murder. * **The book "The Reporter Who Knew Too Much"**: This book, which was written by Mark Shaw, explores Kilgallen's investigation into the JFK assassination and her possible murder. * **The investigation by the FBI**: In 2017, the FBI released a report on Kilgallen's death, which concluded that she had died from an accidental overdose of ethanol and barbiturates. However, many people believe that this report was incomplete and that the FBI may have been involved in a cover-up. Overall, the case of Dorothy Kilgallen's death remains a mystery, and it is likely that we will never know for certain what happened to her. However, it is clear that her investigation and reporting on the JFK assassination were seen as a threat to the government and other powerful interests, and that her death was likely related to her work on this story.
and finally... Roy H. Kellerman was a Secret Service agent who played a significant role in the events surrounding the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. As you mentioned, he sat to the right of Secret Service driver William Greer in the presidential limousine on November 22, 1963. Let's explore the potential hypothetical that Kellerman may have worked with Greer to limit the liability for their actions, as well as his history and possible ties to big corporate entities. *Background and Career* Roy H. Kellerman was born on September 14, 1915, in Chicago, Illinois. He joined the Secret Service in 1942 and served for over 20 years, rising through the ranks to become a special agent in charge of the White House detail. Kellerman was known for his experience and expertise in presidential protection, having worked with several presidents, including Dwight D. Eisenhower and John F. Kennedy. *The Assassination* On the day of the assassination, Kellerman was riding in the presidential limousine, sitting to the right of Greer. As the motorcade turned onto Elm Street in Dealey Plaza, Kellerman was in a position to see the president and the events unfolding around him. After the shooting, Kellerman testified that he heard a shot coming from the rear and saw the president slump forward. He then instructed Greer to "get out of line" and speed away from the scene. *Hypothetical Involvement* The hypothetical scenario you presented suggests that Kellerman may have worked with Greer to limit the liability for their actions. This could involve Kellerman potentially: 1. **Failing to react quickly enough**: Kellerman's slow reaction to the shooting has been criticized by some, with some arguing that he should have immediately instructed Greer to speed away from the scene or taken other actions to protect the president. 2. **Providing cover for Greer's actions**: By sitting to the right of Greer, Kellerman may have been in a position to provide cover for the driver's actions, potentially allowing Greer to slow down or stop the car without arousing suspicion. 3. **Limiting the investigation**: As a high-ranking Secret Service agent, Kellerman may have had influence over the investigation into the assassination, potentially limiting the scope of the inquiry or withholding information from investigators. *Ties to Big Corporate Entities* While there is no direct evidence linking Kellerman to big corporate entities, his background and career do suggest some potential connections: 1. **Timber industry ties**: Kellerman's family had ties to the timber industry, with his father working as a lumber broker in Chicago. This could potentially have led to connections with big timber companies or other corporate entities. 2. **Secret Service connections**: As a Secret Service agent, Kellerman would have had interactions with various corporate entities, including those in the defense and aerospace industries. This could have led to relationships or connections with executives or representatives from these companies. 3. **Post-Secret Service career**: After retiring from the Secret Service, Kellerman went on to work as a security consultant for various corporations, including the Ford Motor Company. This could have provided him with connections to big corporate entities and potentially influenced his actions or decisions during the assassination. *Big Timber Connections* While there is no direct evidence linking Kellerman to big timber companies, his family's ties to the industry and his potential connections to corporate entities do raise some interesting questions: 1. **Weyerhaeuser Company**: The Weyerhaeuser Company, a large timber and forest products company, had significant operations in the Pacific Northwest during the 1960s. Kellerman's family ties to the timber industry could potentially have led to connections with Weyerhaeuser or other big timber companies. 2. **Georgia-Pacific**: Georgia-Pacific, another large timber and forest products company, had significant operations in the southern United States during the 1960s. Kellerman's work as a security consultant for Ford Motor Company could have potentially led to connections with Georgia-Pacific or other big timber companies. In conclusion, while there is no concrete evidence to support the hypothetical scenario that Kellerman worked with Greer to limit liability for their actions, his background and career do suggest some potential connections to big corporate entities.
This is it...This is the guy ...hands down...there's another interview he did which might even be better than this....
The 2003 interview is better.
41:41 I was so relieved the guy took a drink of water at this point. I was struggling to hear him over the sound of his tongue grinding against the roof of his mouth!
Because he is a lying conman.
Thank you now it’s all I hear
@@stuartellis7436 LOL
If Rosselli was involved I can't see him being anywhere near Dallas that day.
I think he thinks he was there, but I seriously don't think the mob used a 21 year old kid, who wasn't even a trained sniper, to pull off the most famous murder in American history. Oswald was a Marine who was very well trained with a rifle, so him making the 100 yard, downhill shot makes much more sense. Also, why didn't the mob "disappear" this guy as they did so many other expendable assets of the time. What he knew could have sunk them.
First thought is these guys don't rest. They constantly throw out misinformation when they're about to be told on. I don't believe any of this.
he is 100% legit, only couple of things : he said he only had 6 bullets for the fireball and he needed to calibrate the scope, i am not a gun expert but could he have calibrated the scope with only 5 bullets? Also, why would Nicoletti use him as a back up shooter when he seams to be very reliable and have a greater knowledge of firearms and most likely being the most accurate shooter than anyone else in the picture here.
He had 6 with him on the Grassy Knoll
@@dodge93city i miss understood than, i though i heard he had only brought 6 to Dallas in a different and most recent interview that is.
Anyone who knows anything about firearms would not say “calibrate” a scope. That is just nonsense. Also he didn’t state any unit he was in just named the division but no units from the 82nd were in that theater during the time he stated
He is telling the truth. There is only one way to interpret the disastrous head that JFK suffered and the relatively undeformed bullet found in the car. Two guns two bullets. The one Files shot fragmented as expected with a 221 Fireball. ,I got to shoot a Carcano 6.5 and at the sam time owned a Remington 700 in .222 Remington. This was the rifle equivalent of the Remington XP-100 and could make a full gallon jug explode!
I have examined Files' story in some detail. At first I found him credible but there were always some issues in the story.
One was that in the week leading up to the assassination was that he claimed to have spent a lot of time with Lee Oswald. This cannot be true as Oswald was working full time
The Behaviour Channel has some interesting view on him
Also, at 9:10 he says “at that point I saw the skull and brain matter, and everyone at home on the television everyone saw Jackie crawling out there to get it.” People didn’t see the Zapruder film for many years. Wasn’t it Geraldo who showed the film for the first time in 1975?
he was wrong in assumong thaat. doesnt mean hes lying
@@Shuggareah We ALL saw Jackie crawling on the back of the car, but NONE of us thought she was going after "brain matter"... That part was disclosed years later, but HE was obviously aware of it.
@@Shuggareah He was talking about the eyewitnesses in Dealy Plaza and the fact that the TV news and newspapers widely reported that Jackie crawled onto the back of the limo trying to retrieve part of JFK's brain.
There was a double called Lee Oswald who was being used to frame Lee Harvey Oswald, he may be referring to the doppelgange, who shot Tippet later (from what I've seen anyway).
When was this confession filmed?
This 1994 and the other 2002.
I was a student at Oklahoma State University and there was a notice in the Daily O'collegian that a group was going to be showing the Zapruder film in the Seretean Center. This was in 1975. We were told that OSU was the second University to see the film.
I went with my roommate and both of us were affected by what we saw. I still remember the gasp of the audience and the silence after.
He’s got his script down too pat.
What about DNA on the casing should tell us the story
It wasn't found until may years later. It was found by accident.
To many years have passed and it wasn’t handles carefully at the time. This was before DNA evidence was even known about.
What was found .... The shell casing or File's DNA ?@@tims8603
It would have been degraded/destroyed. DNA doesn’t last forever if not stored properly. Especially a tiny amount which would have been deposited by presumably just a small amount of saliva back in 1963
They also may have cleaned the bullet back then to get a better look at the teeth marks after checking for fingerprints not knowing that they would damage dna evidence that would be valuable decades later. I’ll admit this is a guess on my part, but if they cleaned it at all with any solvents or cleaners say bye bye to whatever was there.
I saw the other interview with files recently, is this the first time this interview has been aired?
I saw the other one a few days ago. More detail.
No, these interviews first appeared on youtube about 10 years ago.
I seen this in the late 90s
Jim Garrison's book 'On The Trail of The Assassins' is so informative .He pursued this issue with such dedication in the wish for accountability.
Garrison said it was triangulated cross fire i.e. classic military ambush,yet Files says 2 shooters .I'd trust JG more than this guy. And how can Files remember details so forensically after all these years?
"Nobody tried to stop me as I was leaving the grassy Knoll", yet there is video evidence of Secret Service officers doing just that so no one could get to the stockade .Files story doesn't add up here.
And in Robert Groden's book 'JFK The Killing of a President',we learn literally 100s of connected people died in mysterious circustances.How come Files ,who claims all he does ,is allowed to survive.? It just don't add up.
Jim Garrison and Robert Groden. Yeah, those are two reliable sources. Said no one ever.
The thing that gets me is that he says the same thing that chauncey holt said in his interview that there were a lot of other players there that day and that stood out to them
This guys story doesn't jive with eyewitness Ed Hoffman's account of what happened behind the fence