Mercedes-AMG C63 S v E43 comparison

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 4 гру 2017
  • So you've got $160k in your hip pocket and fancy a four-door wearing an AMG badge. Fortunately for you, Affalterbach offers two distinctly different choices, if separated in price by only a couple of grand.
    In one corner sits the perennial favourite nameplate, the 2017 Mercedes-AMG C63 S.
    Mid-sized and with a Herculean 375kW and 700Nm from its 4.0-litre biturbo V8 fed through the rear tyres, it arrives in your driveway with a big reputation and much sonic fanfare for $157,211 list. As a cleanskin, though - those optional ceramic brakes nudge an extra five figures. Temper the C63 S's hunger for wheelspin and it'll sprint to 100km/h from a standstill, says AMG, in just four seconds neat.
    Quite a large step over to the opposing corner lurks the relative newcomer from the Merc skunkworks, the 2017 Mercedes-AMG E43. Its twin-turbocharged 3.0-litre V6 produces a more modest 295kW and a lower 520 Newton Metre count, and the form guide states it's six-tenths slower in the 0-100km.h sprint. However, it's a larger and roomier sedan, plies all-wheel drive for sweat-free performance and promises a more balanced experience between performance and luxury.
    -------------------------------------------------------------
    CarAdvice.com is where Australians turn to for the most comprehensive independent reviews of new cars.
    Our videos are created by expert and unbiased journalists who are passionate about their work. We have fun making these videos and we hope you enjoy them too.
    We welcome the opportunity to answer your questions and encourage discussion. Don’t hesitate to ask us a question in the comments section.
    Subscribe to CarAdvice for your regular fix of automotive news, reviews and entertainment.
    SUBSCRIBE TO OUR UA-cam CHANNEL HERE
    ua-cam.com/users/subscription_cente...
    CONNECT WITH US
    - / caradvice
    - / car_advice
    - plus.google.com/+caradvice
    - / caradvice
    JOIN OUR EMAIL NEWSLETTER
    Get the latest news, reviews and videos fast-tracked to your inbox by registering for 'The Shortcut' here: www.caradvice.com.au/theshortc...
    LINKHERE/?UA-cam&YT_DESC - Read the article here.
  • Авто та транспорт

КОМЕНТАРІ • 160

  • @garyaustin6400
    @garyaustin6400 6 років тому +146

    “Merc that wants to be a Audi” that’s the silliest statement I’ve ever heard 👎

    • @V8V88
      @V8V88 6 років тому +11

      Gary Austin I agree the whole conversation is bs. They are trying too hard to be like top gear but they are too far from achieving that and that makes it cringey lol

    • @TOShorts
      @TOShorts Рік тому

      Shut the video off as soon as I heard that. It's not surprising that this channel is still making videos and cant get past 10k views on each 😂

  • @swietiboyxd
    @swietiboyxd 6 років тому +57

    I would prefer the e43, it is more well rounded and more usable but still fast enough and it has the better tech 😉👍🏻

    • @beslemeto
      @beslemeto 4 роки тому +7

      It is the perfect sedan.Who would need more power in a car in a regular daily usage anyway?

    • @gottliebdee263
      @gottliebdee263 3 роки тому +3

      Cool, leaves the way open for me to have the V8, (already have one by the way).
      You don't have to press the throttle all the way down.

    • @jamielclarke524
      @jamielclarke524 2 роки тому

      That’s the best choice

  • @aychihuahua99
    @aychihuahua99 6 років тому +13

    Both very nice cars. E43 if you're a bit older and want a more luxurious daily driver, C63S for the pure speed and driving thrill.

  • @Ridwan-yn3md
    @Ridwan-yn3md 6 років тому +23

    E class looks better

  • @saltii2
    @saltii2 6 років тому +40

    What I don't get, is that if it wasn't a real AMG, why did AMG call it an AMG.

    • @jeanhubsch4757
      @jeanhubsch4757 6 років тому +2

      Because when it comes to marketing and advertising, you always make something more than it actually is

    • @desburnett5406
      @desburnett5406 4 роки тому

      MB own AMG so they can do what they like with the name.

    • @beslemeto
      @beslemeto 4 роки тому

      It is more right to say it is partly AMG.

    • @desburnett5406
      @desburnett5406 3 роки тому +1

      Possibly an overstatement; people like to bring up those 1990s AMG Mitsubishis and go "maha! This was an AMG, so a C43 must be an AMG!" - ignoring that the 'bishi had come through the Affalterbach works, whereas the 43s were designed by MB & came off MB lines straight to the showroom.

    • @taylorm3560
      @taylorm3560 3 роки тому +3

      This is a dumb comment. Why does a Supreme hoodie cost $100 more than a normal hoodie?
      Hint: it isn't because it's $100 better, it's the name brand. Slapping an AMG badge on a car is like Supreme slapping their logo on a hoodie.

  • @airobyou
    @airobyou 6 років тому

    awesome episode!!!

  • @kcheong00
    @kcheong00 5 років тому +10

    In all honestly, i love both cars but i have to completely agree.
    E43 is a perfect balance of sensible luxury and speed. 4 door, plenty of room and a good kick in it.
    C63 is mostly just speed, handling and grunt. The luxury does not compare to the E class but the drive experience would be much more fun.
    And last i should make the comment, when on earth are you going to blitz it on Sydney roads.
    The only sad bit is they don't make 43's in coupe's. Have to wait for the E53's which costs a bit more.

  • @salamicheeks7420
    @salamicheeks7420 4 роки тому +5

    E43 all day. Let’s be honest with ourselves here. None of us are professional drivers. And none of us commute on a race track to get to work in the morning. The e43 is just the better all around cat. Sure, you lose .6 seconds 0-60mph but the ride comfort, the awd system and the better looking exterior and interior is well worth it. But, I’m a yankee so what do I know right?

    • @junelcole6663
      @junelcole6663 3 роки тому

      0-60 means nothing within 1-2 seconds the c63s would be gone out of sight. E63s would be the perfect car the real amg

    • @salamicheeks7420
      @salamicheeks7420 3 роки тому +2

      @@junelcole6663 yea obviously I agree that the e63s is the perfect car but they are comparing the e43 with the c63. In my opinion I’d take the e43 over c63

    • @MrTroytroy
      @MrTroytroy Рік тому

      Very rarely do C63S do anywhere near their quoted 0-100 time. The E43 will beat a C63S at the traffic lights - the majority of times. Consistency and median average times matter

  • @BomberFletch31
    @BomberFletch31 6 років тому +35

    That acting at the start of the video was so fake.

  • @farooqali9809
    @farooqali9809 2 роки тому +3

    I had to choose between these 2 cars and I went with the e43 with a stage 2 tune I take stock c63 wayyy better interior and exterior and all wheel drive!

  • @jaikarchatha1967
    @jaikarchatha1967 6 років тому +11

    Funny video and a very informational

  • @gureno19
    @gureno19 6 років тому +48

    So after eminem sues a New Zealand political party....you guys do this!
    Eminem is going to own Car Advice in a few weeks haha

  • @jaylocke9574
    @jaylocke9574 6 років тому +14

    Nice to be energetic. But you two are no actors. Not meant to be I suppose.. Don't cheapen your style. It's an AMG. Just like when merc introduced the new A-class for the masses. Just because the engine is not hand build doesn't make it so..

    • @Fee.1
      @Fee.1 6 років тому +3

      Jay Locke I’m glad someone noticed this, if they’d cut out the nonsensical skits this video would be 3 minutes max and better for it. I mean it’s not even really funny when motortrend does it, and it wasn’t 10 years ago.

    • @jaylocke9574
      @jaylocke9574 6 років тому

      RE: Real AMG hand built engines. It maybe so in the wonders of yesteryear. Perhaps Mercedes should label them a 43e if they don't want to cheapen the brand or upset the purists or alternatively do something similar to BMW with their M sport line. ie. M240i. On another note, a lot of guys would love to be motoring journalists, so don't take your jobs for granted. Motoring enthusiasts are serious about the machines. Don't make them feel like you don't have the same passion..

  • @SISTIC1
    @SISTIC1 5 років тому +4

    Confusing vid, left me none the wiser!

  • @arelaththewhitewolf230
    @arelaththewhitewolf230 6 років тому +3

    My Race mode on my cla45 AMG is the best thing there is!!

    • @flshstar1
      @flshstar1 6 років тому

      did you buy your car to race or just for pleasure of owning a Mercedes?

    • @arelaththewhitewolf230
      @arelaththewhitewolf230 6 років тому +2

      Rick Diamond are you asking because I use “Race” mode? Or just asking because I own the car. I bought this car because it is the best all around car in my opinion, fast, styling, Mercedes, safety technology etc.

  • @MrMilkalot
    @MrMilkalot 6 років тому +18

    Eminem is going to want his money.

  • @arelaththewhitewolf230
    @arelaththewhitewolf230 6 років тому +3

    I don’t want to upgrade from CLA45 to E43 because it’s slower. C63 S is good but I got my eyes on E63 S.. I hope they come out with a coupe version which is unlikely

    • @arelaththewhitewolf230
      @arelaththewhitewolf230 6 років тому +2

      xellossaxon bro, the new GT63 S coming out. Best of both world! 630hp, 4 door coupe!

    • @junelcole6663
      @junelcole6663 3 роки тому

      That’s too much for a big jump for you from a cla to a e63s you should go for like a c43

    • @arelaththewhitewolf230
      @arelaththewhitewolf230 3 роки тому

      @@junelcole6663 you know c43 is slower than cla45 right? Are you trolling me right now

    • @_.X74._
      @_.X74._ 3 роки тому +1

      @@arelaththewhitewolf230 speed is not the only thing about a car

    • @arelaththewhitewolf230
      @arelaththewhitewolf230 3 роки тому

      @@_.X74._ oh yah sure... if speed was my priority, I could find some used American horsepower that is 3 times cheaper with the same horsepower. Smh

  • @Riplure
    @Riplure 6 років тому +1

    more of these blind test 👍

  • @gottliebdee263
    @gottliebdee263 3 роки тому

    02:18. The most important part of this video, and I quote, "TO ME, a real AMG.........etc etc.".

  • @CarlssonMercedes
    @CarlssonMercedes 6 років тому

    tutorial AMG E43

  • @senorgato70
    @senorgato70 6 років тому +1

    Haha. Great video. Pretty entertaining way to talk about the distinction between these two cars and without any whining or nitpicking like some other reviewers.

    • @odubble
      @odubble 6 років тому +1

      All they did was whine and nitpick in this video. What were you watching????

    • @senorgato70
      @senorgato70 6 років тому

      Have you ever seen Camissa and Lieberman do a review? If you haven't then you don't really know what whining and nitpicking is. LOL

  • @OfficialMINIm
    @OfficialMINIm 6 років тому +30

    The little a45 amg hatchback is more of a real amg than the e43amg.
    A real amg should have a hand built engine and have it’s maker’s name written on the engine cover

    • @coopsnz1
      @coopsnz1 6 років тому +1

      wont fit the family in it

    • @OfficialMINIm
      @OfficialMINIm 6 років тому

      its not exactly a good family car aint it. its a sorta car you "can" carry up to 5 people time to time if you had to.

    • @ohgodwhy
      @ohgodwhy 6 років тому +11

      Sad that you think that's what makes an AMG. The Project ONE, Mercedes fastest AMG car, does not have an engine with it's makers name on it. Maybe we shouldn't call that an AMG either?

    • @ohgodwhy
      @ohgodwhy 6 років тому

      Simon Couch Who doesn't

    • @jondoe1310
      @jondoe1310 6 років тому +5

      ohgodwhy exactly, these people talk without thinking! My GLC43 is true AMG!

  • @Tomoyo0827
    @Tomoyo0827 6 років тому +16

    Always go for a higher tier model than the top spec or trim on a lower model if the cost is relatively close. In this case, E43 is always better than a C63s.

  • @KLm912
    @KLm912 5 років тому +1

    The scripted communication between these two is ridiculous

  • @ZoogaZig
    @ZoogaZig 2 роки тому +1

    People really believe AMG hand-builds every engine? Lol. Because of the plaque?

    • @sn7686
      @sn7686 2 роки тому

      amg=marketing, just factory v6/v8

  • @ahmadbilal8911
    @ahmadbilal8911 6 років тому +9

    Best review ever. "Will the real amg stand up please?" 😂

  • @bjalilian
    @bjalilian 5 років тому +6

    Bad storyline combined with worse acting!

  • @BenzinioB
    @BenzinioB 6 років тому +4

    43 isn't and will never be AMG
    I have no clue why Merc insist to ruin the AMG badge with such models and flooding the market. We have AMG line, fake 43 AMG's and then the real AMG's what a stupidity :(

    • @hasanal-habbobi4018
      @hasanal-habbobi4018 6 років тому +5

      Its not up to you to define what is an amg and what isn't. An amg product goes well beyond just an engine. The 43 and amg line are both amg whether you think so or not. Amg themselves say its amg for crying out loud. They would know way more about what makes an amg then you ever will.
      This isn't stupid at all. What amg are doing is creating a spectrum of amg. You have the standard e class which is luxurious by default. Then you have the amg line which spicins up the standard e class to make it a little sport wise visually but still have similar dynamics of the standard e class. Then you have the 43 line which improves the dynamics and styling to be more sporty. And ofcourse you have the e63 which is all out beast. Thing is not everyone has the money to pay for a e63 but still want the looks and character of an amg to some degree... So amg create a spectrum of amg.... Essentially an entry level amg model of a particular class of Mercedes... In this case the e class. The 43 has its benefits... In addition to being sporty and fun to drive and cheaper than the e63 its also lighter which makes it a little bit more agile sometimes and its no where bear as much of a musquito gas guzzler which the e63 is. So their definitely is a market for this and its not stupid at all.

    • @BenzinioB
      @BenzinioB 6 років тому +1

      AMG model has always been dominated by monstrously powerful engines. NO 43 isn't a real AMG. For what you say there is a sport line!

    • @aychihuahua99
      @aychihuahua99 6 років тому +3

      "real AMG" "fake AMG" lol Mercedes themselves says the 43's are AMGs, what's the point crying about how it's still not a "real" AMG?

    • @hasanal-habbobi4018
      @hasanal-habbobi4018 6 років тому +2

      Benzinio yes it is an amg. Just because amgs traditionally build v8s and v12s doesn't mean there isn't any room for a v6 which is inevitable. So by your logic the project one isn't an amg??? Neither is the Mercedes f1 car?? Because both have v6s. Lmao when in fact the both the f1 and project one are the ultimate amgs. So yes 43 is real amg.

    • @BenzinioB
      @BenzinioB 6 років тому

      NO it isn't! Not because it is not V8 the C32 was V6 as well, but it was mighty powerful which 43 isnt.
      43 is the ex 450 engine and it is nothing special. Not sure if it is true but there was information this engine is based on Chrysler Pentastar engine families AND IT ISN'T AN AMG. It is just a bloody marketing and I have argued how stupid the Mercedes marketing is many times!

  • @bwest6275
    @bwest6275 6 років тому

    This is the fault of Mercedes Benz. Had they never marketed their sport models as AMGs, this type of comparison would never be an issue. Actually, it's BMW's fault for starting the factory badge engineering of their sport models as M cars. MB just had to follow suit to satisfy those would would want an "AMG" but couldn't afford the up-charge. @5:43 sums up why the E43 is not a real AMG :)

    • @IhateYoutube
      @IhateYoutube 6 років тому

      But let me guess, this was a real AMG right? LOL
      hips.hearstapps.com/roa.h-cdn.co/assets/16/14/wallpapers_mitsubishi_galant_1989_2.jpg

    • @bwest6275
      @bwest6275 6 років тому

      That was a tragedy.

    • @IhateYoutube
      @IhateYoutube 6 років тому

      Yeah? Well... It's part of AMG's history.

    • @bwest6275
      @bwest6275 6 років тому

      Brett DiMichele Studios as I said. A tragedy.

    • @IhateYoutube
      @IhateYoutube 6 років тому

      Well here's the plus. You aren't AMG and I doubt they care :) Just like they don't care if anyone debates what's a real AMG. Because at the end of the day Mercedes Benz wholly owns AMG and anything they put an AMG badge on, is in fact (as in not opinion) an AMG. So if they want to make an AMG golf cart, they can do that! And I wish they would because the butt hurt videos would be fantastic to watch. :D
      I'll also be sure to grin extra hard when I slaughter those C63's with my 43 whilst screaming out the window at them *But don't take it seriously mate, it's not a real AMG and I couldn't afford the zero dollar price difference* Hahahahah.
      But seriously though... Wasn't the real tragedy, the Mustang II????

  • @stefanfreestylez
    @stefanfreestylez 6 років тому

    The c63 is actually very quiet cabin wise outside sure its ok lil boring the note tbh
    The e43 with an exhuast sounds a lot better altho id still probably take the c63

  • @ImmortalRises
    @ImmortalRises 6 років тому +2

    LOL did he just say it’s German and smells like money so it must be an AUDI? Lmao AUDI’s are bigger VW’s 😂 GERMAN + MONEY = Mercedes or BMW

  • @midokils
    @midokils 6 років тому

    obviously scripted yet entertaining.

  • @Thorgal85
    @Thorgal85 5 років тому +1

    why did they not compare the same class? C63 vs C43??

    • @xuy7938
      @xuy7938 5 років тому +4

      maybe the reason is that these two has same price

  • @luzazul78
    @luzazul78 2 роки тому

    C63 AMG THE KING

  • @jdord4838
    @jdord4838 6 років тому +1

    The c63 is the biz..."Yeshua / Jesus is the way "

  • @ryanwells5303
    @ryanwells5303 6 років тому +1

    A real modern amg can beat an 04 mustang gt, (yes I raced an e43 and it lost)

    • @trihardcx6743
      @trihardcx6743 4 роки тому +2

      Stock for stock the E43 would eat an 04 GT.

  • @marsallen4298
    @marsallen4298 Рік тому +2

    If MB calls it an AMG its an AMG😂 no matter your opinion you arent MB their opinion matters not yours

    • @SteveSUX2BU
      @SteveSUX2BU Місяць тому

      Their marketing department does, not the AMG tuning house.

  • @giurcas
    @giurcas 5 років тому +3

    Wtf?? Audi amg?? Hmm...

  • @luisjano7273
    @luisjano7273 3 роки тому

    Don’t fucking call it an Audi... they don’t compare to AMG

  • @gurjitparmar8694
    @gurjitparmar8694 6 років тому +4

    Extreme cringe

  • @junelcole6663
    @junelcole6663 3 роки тому

    You can compare a fake amg to a c63

  • @wagner0110
    @wagner0110 6 років тому +3

    Had a E43, traded it for a C63s

    • @iddicted
      @iddicted 6 років тому

      wagner0110 wow. 43 disappointing ???

    • @wagner0110
      @wagner0110 6 років тому +3

      Not the car itself, but the sound was almost nonexistant, you had to really push it to get some decent sounds. But the C63 growls even at low rpm's. So i guess it depends on what you want.
      For me it came down to the driving experience, and IMO the sounds is half of that.

    • @wagner0110
      @wagner0110 6 років тому +1

      Well, not the car itself, it is fast, and felt fast, but the sound was nonexistant, had to push it really hard in sport+ to get some noise. The C63 grunts even in comfort and low rpm's.
      The C43 on the other hand, with performance exhaust has a really good exhaus note IMO.
      This is not an available option on the E43.
      I guess it comes down to how much you value the noise in your daily driving experience.

  • @vsboy2577
    @vsboy2577 6 років тому

    C63 is too expensive

    • @coopsnz1
      @coopsnz1 5 років тому

      Taxes $56000 blame Australian Government ripping off consumer / $114,000 aud shipped

  • @levinovod
    @levinovod 2 роки тому

    Who the fuck are these guys?🤨

  • @perthsmileyboy
    @perthsmileyboy 5 років тому +1

    Stop the crappy acting and just do a review

  • @CorvusHyperion
    @CorvusHyperion 4 роки тому

    Enjoyed the review guys! Mercedes should call the E43, C43 etc. “Mercedes Sport” or something like that. They are not real AMGs, they are a tad softer than a full house AMG. They are trashing the brand.

  • @xSleeper.
    @xSleeper. 5 років тому +1

    its not a real AMG you are right!!!!!

  • @BenzinioB
    @BenzinioB 6 років тому +1

    By the way... I bet a non car guy cant find the differences between C and E class... took at bot cars at the end of the video - they are not similar they a re bloody IDENTICAL! Despite the second LED in the headlights it is the same in front as well... Shame on you Merc :(

    • @hasanal-habbobi4018
      @hasanal-habbobi4018 6 років тому +2

      Benzinio car guy or not you are blind if you can't tell the difference. There is a similarity no doubt but they are definitely distinguishable even to a non car guy. Its not only the second led curve of the head lights, the whole front and grill of the e class is more angular whereas the c class is more curvy like a semi circle grill. And the tail lights and rear of the c class are noticably much more narrower.
      And the e class interior especially is completely different from the c class.
      Shame on merc? Actually one Mercedes isn't the only one who does, virtually every manufacturer does this one way or another and frankly there is nothing to be ashamed off and nothing wrong with this design philosophy. Its a great design. It strengthens brand identity of the company and as sales suggest it does very well.
      Think about it. Lets say e class had a completly different design to the c class. Let's say you like the design of the c class but hate the e class design. Now all of a sudden you will have to give up the e class's better Interior and go for the not as good c class... Or go to another company altogether. So with this philosophy you don't have to compromise things like that. Furthermore these cars are not meant to be attention grabbing. They are meant to be under the radar. Hence the concept of stealth wealth. So by looking similar to each other they can better achieve that.
      So frankly there is nothing wrong with this kind of design philosophy. It strengthens brand identity and it works as sales suggest. Shame on you for failing to see why many manufacturers do this and why it works for both them and the customers.

    • @BenzinioB
      @BenzinioB 6 років тому +1

      I've said "non car guy" put C, E and S class side by side and bet from 20 metres people (if not familiar with the brand) wouldn't get the differences except the size... at 50 meters they wouldn't get even that!

    • @toghrul.karimli
      @toghrul.karimli 6 років тому +1

      Benzinio believe or not, every guy can see difference between these car from 50 meters as their daylight leds differs. C class has one led, e class has 2 , s class has long and it is more curved in the end.
      So, basicially, it is easy to differ them

    • @hasanal-habbobi4018
      @hasanal-habbobi4018 6 років тому

      Benzinio what the hell are you talking about. Yes they would GE the difference. Only the e and c look similar. S class is completely distinguishable. And either way there is nothing wrong with this design philosophy. It strengthens brand identity and as sales suggest. Not to mention that nearly every car maker does this one way or another.

  • @Fee.1
    @Fee.1 6 років тому +1

    Y’all can cut out all the memorized lines nonsense it’s rubbish. Ugh sorry but rubbish was too kind a word, I figured you’d lay off it eventually but not that I have watched the whole thing it’s clear the majority of my 9 minutes was wasted on a video with 2 minutes of actual substance and a bunch of nonsensical dialogue added onto it

  • @CallMeByMyMatingName
    @CallMeByMyMatingName 6 років тому +3

    Unsubscribed :(

  • @04tsxpower
    @04tsxpower 5 років тому

    Holy painful

  • @MLG-zu2hg
    @MLG-zu2hg 4 роки тому

    Fun fact your REALLY Bad at car reviews

    • @Drivecomau
      @Drivecomau  4 роки тому +5

      Fun fact, you can’t spell.

    • @1Nevergone
      @1Nevergone 2 роки тому

      @@Drivecomau I though the review was a blast.