I love Click, but I really hope the change to a studio format is only temporary. It really cheapens the whole tone for what is usually a classy programme.
I don't know I kinda like the change. There is more interaction with the public and the tech and it's a nice change from them doing the show from home.
I was in the audience for this and met one of the producers they’re going to be moving into BBC Scotland’s studios next year. Don’t know if they’ll keep a studio format but they’ll at least have a studio at their disposal.
@@karlhawkes do you walk everywhere? You must never have been anywhere outside of, say, 100 miles; there's a whole world you can see, but it requires carbon emissions of some sort to get anywhere
The previous format was much better, the show is not a stand up special where the audience is needed. It feels artificial and unnecessary. You did it brilliantly well before and please accept this constructive feedback!
Seriously, agriculture. When the heads of cattle have reduced over recent years. And the amount cows let off is tiny compared to the aviation industry.
Glad you guys covers Animal Agriculture and climate change. We can reduce even more carbon emissions by being Vegan. Or even try plan based meat, or mock meat, which can reduce greenhouse gases marginally. Thanks
Soy beans are grown in deforested lands and the products are transported from far away lands. Not every vegan product is environmentally friendly - some are awful.
@@wantblackwolf Using land to grow crops for animals is vastly inefficient. It takes 75% less land to feed someone on a plant-based (vegan) diet than it does to feed a meat-eater since the crops are consumed directly instead of being used to feed animals. According to the U.N., please do some research..
@@leticiaromano6054 There's nothing inherently environmentally damaging about farming any type of bean, including soybeans; they’re actually a highly efficient protein source. The damage is caused by growing said bean to fatten up tens of billions of farmed animals, because then an unreasonable and unsustainable amount of beans must be grown. The fact is that 85% of the world's soybean crop is used as animal feed (Oilseed & Grain News). Soy-fed livestock foods have a much larger environmental footprint than livestock-free soy foods, like all animals-source vs. plant-based foods in general. The way to prevent soy over-farming is by eating it directly in the form of vegan soy foods rather than cycling it through animals before consumption.
@@HowToBeta Because the U.N. knows what is best for us. Animals don't need us to feed them they can eat the grass they walk on. We cannot digest these crops you talk about as well as a cow, we can almost fully digest a steak with no side effects. You have to eat all day to get anything close to the nutrition I can get from one 2lb steak once a day. In the end plants make you sick and cause your body to become weak. We evolved on meat, plants are causing de-evolution. Farming plants for human consumption destroys the land, animals fertilize it naturally making it stronger. Animals can graze on land that cannot be farmed for your vegies. If everyone adopted a vegan diet it would only result in a dumber, and weaker population. And guess what it wouldn't do anything to help with climate change.
I agree with many others here, please guys, don't do this studio format again, it just makes it cheap and silly, it was very cool before, even the WFH was better than this gameshow format. I have to say, this is the only click episode that I've ever had to stop watching, don't make this an end of an era event
There are approximately 2 million dairy cows in the UK and 22 million Dairy cows overall in the EU ,but in the Indian subcontinent there are over 41 million dairy cows alone which are used for the production of yoghurt and Ghee and all this product is consumed in the country, so imagine the riots that would ensure in India if the Government would try to cull the dairy cows in the rural provinces in India
It's pretty ironic that you introduced the new, carbon intensive studio on the very show you feature COP26. The WFH setup was the least carbon intensive setup you could have.
agreed, we must stop everything because everything requires carbon emissions of some sort. Don't buy any goods or travel further than walking distance, and don't use electricity (although, you could if it were from renewables, but then don't watch or interact with anything that was produced by carbon emissions somewhere along the line i.e. everything)
Yeah i too thought about tomorrows world with the studio. Bring back tomorrows world I say. So much tech was missed out on when bbc cancelled the show.
This is irresponsible reporting about cows - Magenta! In the UK grass-fed beef production IS sustainable and definitely not causing damage to our world. Of course, this cannot be said for beef production in other countries like Brazil or the USA, where beef production is causing huge (net) damage, but by lumping UK grass-fed organic production in with world-wide beef production data you are perpetuating a myth that UK production is bad - it is not! PLEASE put this right.
Don’t get me wrong. I eat a hell of a lot less meat than I did when I was younger but this whole cow methane issue feels like main stream media pushing the blame on us again. I get that if the whole world ate less meat would help but would it really help THAT much?
I'm not anti vegetarian or vegan but if we all Stop eating meat, what happens to all these breeds of animals? Keep them in a zoo/wildlife park? Who is going to pay for feeding and vet fees etc? Many areas of land aren't good enough to support growing vegetables etc. but are ok for grazing. Then there's this : ua-cam.com/video/vpTHi7O66pI/v-deo.html
Are you playing homage to "look around you". Capturing cow burps and penis shaped grain sorting drones; I was almost expecting a reminder that "Germs come from Germany", pity you couldn't get "HRH the Sir Prince Charles" to pop in.
I love Click, but I really hope the change to a studio format is only temporary. It really cheapens the whole tone for what is usually a classy programme.
I don't know I kinda like the change.
There is more interaction with the public and the tech and it's a nice change from them doing the show from home.
Fantastic achievement getting all their presenters to travel to Glasgow carbon free, NOT.
I switched off. Reminded me too much of the One Show
I was in the audience for this and met one of the producers they’re going to be moving into BBC Scotland’s studios next year. Don’t know if they’ll keep a studio format but they’ll at least have a studio at their disposal.
@@karlhawkes do you walk everywhere? You must never have been anywhere outside of, say, 100 miles; there's a whole world you can see, but it requires carbon emissions of some sort to get anywhere
Gives me good 'Tomorrow's World" vibes from a million years ago.
The previous format was much better, the show is not a stand up special where the audience is needed. It feels artificial and unnecessary. You did it brilliantly well before and please accept this constructive feedback!
I agree. Better to the source than bring in the source.
Seriously, agriculture. When the heads of cattle have reduced over recent years. And the amount cows let off is tiny compared to the aviation industry.
"Middle school teachers first lesson" vibes from most presenters distracts me from the quality content here.
More like primary school...incredibly cringe laden and far too many segments.
Hello,
Good day,
Happy children's day 2021 in advance!
Luara freaked on tge rover mixing up the grains....i feel that pain too.
Click is the best!
Glad you guys covers Animal Agriculture and climate change.
We can reduce even more carbon emissions by being Vegan. Or even try plan based meat, or mock meat, which can reduce greenhouse gases marginally.
Thanks
Cow pollution is recycled back into the grass they eat. Your veggie pollution just adds to the problem.
Soy beans are grown in deforested lands and the products are transported from far away lands. Not every vegan product is environmentally friendly - some are awful.
@@wantblackwolf Using land to grow crops for animals is vastly inefficient. It takes 75% less land to feed someone on a plant-based (vegan) diet than it does to feed a meat-eater since the crops are consumed directly instead of being used to feed animals. According to the U.N., please do some research..
@@leticiaromano6054 There's nothing inherently environmentally damaging about farming any type of bean, including soybeans; they’re actually a highly efficient protein source. The damage is caused by growing said bean to fatten up tens of billions of farmed animals, because then an unreasonable and unsustainable amount of beans must be grown. The fact is that 85% of the world's soybean crop is used as animal feed (Oilseed & Grain News). Soy-fed livestock foods have a much larger environmental footprint than livestock-free soy foods, like all animals-source vs. plant-based foods in general. The way to prevent soy over-farming is by eating it directly in the form of vegan soy foods rather than cycling it through animals before consumption.
@@HowToBeta Because the U.N. knows what is best for us. Animals don't need us to feed them they can eat the grass they walk on. We cannot digest these crops you talk about as well as a cow, we can almost fully digest a steak with no side effects. You have to eat all day to get anything close to the nutrition I can get from one 2lb steak once a day. In the end plants make you sick and cause your body to become weak. We evolved on meat, plants are causing de-evolution. Farming plants for human consumption destroys the land, animals fertilize it naturally making it stronger. Animals can graze on land that cannot be farmed for your vegies. If everyone adopted a vegan diet it would only result in a dumber, and weaker population. And guess what it wouldn't do anything to help with climate change.
Ok, so at 1:08 pretty sure someone says «what the well-that-a-lovely-electric-scooter». I had to check twice, but it’s there 😉
I agree with many others here, please guys, don't do this studio format again, it just makes it cheap and silly, it was very cool before, even the WFH was better than this gameshow format. I have to say, this is the only click episode that I've ever had to stop watching, don't make this an end of an era event
It’s not about the world. It’s about us. The world will go on…
My favourite show ❤
Cheers for the video 😎 👌
There are approximately 2 million dairy cows in the UK and 22 million Dairy cows overall in the EU ,but in the Indian subcontinent there are over 41 million dairy cows alone which are used for the production of yoghurt and Ghee and all this product is consumed in the country, so imagine the riots that would ensure in India if the Government would try to cull the dairy cows in the rural provinces in India
Think per capita.
you don't a lot cows if you don't eat them.
And you don't need to cull in any scenario their life span is 15-20 years only.
Tommorrow's World vibes
It's pretty ironic that you introduced the new, carbon intensive studio on the very show you feature COP26. The WFH setup was the least carbon intensive setup you could have.
agreed, we must stop everything because everything requires carbon emissions of some sort. Don't buy any goods or travel further than walking distance, and don't use electricity (although, you could if it were from renewables, but then don't watch or interact with anything that was produced by carbon emissions somewhere along the line i.e. everything)
@@neanda Sarcasm won't change the truth. Here's the thing - the way everyone is living, more and more people will not have that choice in the future.
BBC click is slacking there's so much more interesting tech they could have showed
Yeah i too thought about tomorrows world with the studio. Bring back tomorrows world I say. So much tech was missed out on when bbc cancelled the show.
I don't like veggies, but I would prefer instead of bugs, no way
Denim!
In this week's news Yahoo pulls out of China. In other news Yahoo still exists!!
silver
Finally in the studio no network distances 😊
6:13
This is irresponsible reporting about cows - Magenta! In the UK grass-fed beef production IS sustainable and definitely not causing damage to our world. Of course, this cannot be said for beef production in other countries like Brazil or the USA, where beef production is causing huge (net) damage, but by lumping UK grass-fed organic production in with world-wide beef production data you are perpetuating a myth that UK production is bad - it is not! PLEASE put this right.
Burping cows? You should have interviewed Nicola Sturgeon if she was only next door.
Don’t get me wrong. I eat a hell of a lot less meat than I did when I was younger but this whole cow methane issue feels like main stream media pushing the blame on us again. I get that if the whole world ate less meat would help but would it really help THAT much?
I'm not anti vegetarian or vegan but if we all Stop eating meat, what happens to all these breeds of animals? Keep them in a zoo/wildlife park? Who is going to pay for feeding and vet fees etc?
Many areas of land aren't good enough to support growing vegetables etc. but are ok for grazing.
Then there's this : ua-cam.com/video/vpTHi7O66pI/v-deo.html
Plus, the vegan meat alternatives are overly processed, with added chemical protein. What's the environmental impact of producing those products?
am too early for 4K?
you will be eating I wouldn't deprive you of them
Love Click, don’t like the studio format. It’s like This Time with Alan Partridge. Very cheesy and fake feeling.
Wow 2nd to watch this, chelsea loses a point , my lucky day
Easy answer to that question: STOP BUYING THINGS....
Are you playing homage to "look around you". Capturing cow burps and penis shaped grain sorting drones; I was almost expecting a reminder that "Germs come from Germany", pity you couldn't get "HRH the Sir Prince Charles" to pop in.
🇬🇧👍✌👏
A dying show.
6:45
6:17
6:20