Under $25K Single Seat Aircraft! - Thatcher CX4 VW Powered

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 5 лип 2024
  • you can Build or Purchase already flying from another Builder!
    👇🏼 👇🏼👇🏼 Click "SHOW MORE" to see the LINKS Below! ✈️✈️✈️
    Learn more on how you can BUILD one of these Aircraft including buying Plans right HERE: www.thatchercx4.com/
    Please follow us on Facebook where we post nearly daily:
    / experimentalaircraftch...
    Check out our NEW WEBSITE!
    experimentalaircraftchannel.com/
    #experimentalaircraft #experimentalaircraftchannel
    ***SUBSCRIBE Right Now to Experimental Aircraft Channel
    (It's FREE) and get exclusive offers below!
    Our "Sister" Podcast Channel on UA-cam: / @eacaviationpodcast9668
    Please visit our Channel Sponsors here:
    *Dynon Avionics (Avionics for Experimental, Certified and Light Sport Aircraft)
    dynonavionics.com/
    *Flying Eyes Optics (Aviation Sunglasses and More!)
    Get 10% off your purchase by using Promo Code: EXPERIMENTAL
    flyingeyesoptics.com/eyewear/...
    *Airtech Coatings ("We Make Paint Fly" - Fabric and Paint Manufacturer)
    airtechcoatings.com/
    *South Mississippi Light Aircraft (Official Rotax Repair and Training Center)
    flysmla.com/
    *Clemens Insurance Agency (Aircraft insurance and other insurance products)
    www.clemensinsurance.net/
    *Edge Performance (High Performance Aircraft Engines)
    www.edgeperformance.no/
    *Foxtrot 95 Calhoun County Airport (Identifier F95) Panhandle of Florida
    www.flyfoxtrot95.com/
    Please visit our Affiliates Here:
    **Flying Eyes Optics - 10% Off Use Code: EXPERIMENTAL
    flyingeyesoptics.com/eyewear/...
    **Griplock Ties (Speaks for itself!) Free Shipping with Code: EXPERIMENTAL
    griplockties.com/?fill_cart=1...
    (Get FREE Shipping *USA ONLY*)
    Join the NEW Facebook GROUP where we encourage "Say it With VIDEO" build updates on YOUR current project:
    / experimentalaircraftch...
    And we are on INSTAGRAM too!
    / experimentalaircraftch...
    WE HAVE A PODCAST! Audio only can be found on iTune, GooglePlay and Podbean. Fill VideoPodcast (V-Podcast) on UA-cam by searching "EAC Aviation Podcast" or click: / @eacaviationpodcast9668
  • Розваги

КОМЕНТАРІ • 85

  • @TenorDad
    @TenorDad Рік тому +10

    God bless you, Bryan, for making content of different airframes. I never heard of the CX4 until today!

    • @ExperimentalAircraftChannel
      @ExperimentalAircraftChannel  Рік тому

      I am happy to see so many others share my passion for all things that FLY! Thank you for supporting here by watching and engaging. Much appreciated.

  • @FlyingShotsman
    @FlyingShotsman Рік тому +6

    A few minor corrections: 1. Once the original builder had an airworthiness inspection done and received the aircraft's operating limitations, there was no need for a second inspection. All that's necessary is to contact the FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO) that issued the operating limitations and apply to have them amended to change the Phase 1 testing area to suit the new owner. 2. Anyone can modify an Experimental aircraft, but there's no legal requirement for an A&P to inspect the work. If it's a major modification (affecting flight characteristics), the FSDO should be notified and they'll assign a new Phase 1 test period. Once that's complete, the owner simply makes a logbook entry to return the aircraft to Phase 2. 3. An A&P mechanic is only required to sign off condition inspections on Experimental aircraft if the owner doesn't hold the Repairman Certificate for that aircraft (only one Repairman Certificate can be issued for each homebuilt, and it must be issued to someone who was involved in the build; it cannot be transferred to another person). The A&P does not need to have inspection authorization (A&P/IA).

  • @jadams3427
    @jadams3427 3 місяці тому +1

    Super looking aircraft !

  • @wburtney5154
    @wburtney5154 Рік тому +15

    In Canada the owner of the homebuilt/experimental can sign off repairs and annual inspection whether they built it or not. A little more freedom in Canada .

    • @waynevanhardeveld4707
      @waynevanhardeveld4707 Рік тому +2

      But…but…Freedom is made in the USA??

    • @wburtney5154
      @wburtney5154 Рік тому +3

      @@waynevanhardeveld4707 The human freedom index ranks Canada 6 and the USA 15 out of 165 countries. They are very close . Personal freedom is a little higher in Canada. Most owners of experimental/homebuilt aircraft maintain them to a high standard without the government scrutinizing them.

    • @ExperimentalAircraftChannel
      @ExperimentalAircraftChannel  Рік тому +4

      Happy to hear that is available to you there. (Provided that the ones doing the work have the mechanical aptitudes). :-)

    • @waynevanhardeveld4707
      @waynevanhardeveld4707 Рік тому

      ​@@wburtney5154LOL I know I'm Canadian 😋

    • @brianl7695
      @brianl7695 Рік тому +3

      Same in the US. I know most viewers here already know this, but if an owner of an E-AB, whether they built it or not, holds an Repairman's ticket, they can work on their own bird. An A&P ticket holder can do any aircraft. It is good that Transport Canada has very similar regulations as we do here; it is very good for our community!

  • @lancebeaudion4977
    @lancebeaudion4977 Рік тому

    Thanks for putting this out! I hope to build the cx-4 or 7 in the future and enjoy getting others take on the plane/s.

  • @tomcoryell
    @tomcoryell Рік тому +1

    Thanks for making me aware of this plane BrYan. Love your channel!

  • @jtuttle11
    @jtuttle11 Рік тому +5

    One recently sold in Joplin, Mo. for $12,000

    • @GeneralSirDouglasMcA
      @GeneralSirDouglasMcA Рік тому

      Hopefully a large tornado won’t hit the airport (waaay off topic, I just know that the most damaging tornado ever recorded took place there).

    • @ExperimentalAircraftChannel
      @ExperimentalAircraftChannel  Рік тому +2

      Wow! What a deal!
      Just the materials alone and engine costs.

  • @mts592
    @mts592 Рік тому +1

    That's a good looking airplane design too 👍

  • @bradmarcum2927
    @bradmarcum2927 3 місяці тому

    You can do any mod you want and no A&P sign off required. Only need A&P to conduct the annual condition inspection. For mod you make just need a logbook entry signed by you.

  • @chippyjohn1
    @chippyjohn1 Рік тому

    Nice little plane, engine sounds nice also.

  • @CFITOMAHAWK2
    @CFITOMAHAWK2 10 місяців тому

    Thats a cute looking mini plane.

  • @ThomasDoubting5
    @ThomasDoubting5 3 місяці тому

    Looks great.

  • @jlo7770
    @jlo7770 9 місяців тому

    Cool little unit

  • @chittychad18
    @chittychad18 10 місяців тому

    Saw the ad on a fan in Pensacola. Looking into this!

  • @SilvaAdventures
    @SilvaAdventures Рік тому

    Great interview and production! Keep it up…

  • @rob379lqz
    @rob379lqz 9 місяців тому

    It’s impressive.

  • @markthibault8579
    @markthibault8579 Рік тому +1

    Cool little airplane. Love the RAF paintjob too.

  • @redlywaxer
    @redlywaxer Рік тому +1

    Loved this interview! Wish he could have shown us the engine

    • @ExperimentalAircraftChannel
      @ExperimentalAircraftChannel  Рік тому

      Agreed.
      100%
      He was trying to be put before the thermals start really rising. Quite bumpy in such a light Aircraft.

  • @greybeard5774
    @greybeard5774 Рік тому +1

    Looks great .. just like a WW2 fighter replica .. 👍👍 ✌

  • @paulnagel8161
    @paulnagel8161 Рік тому

    Oh, I like that a lot!

  • @geoffreyherrick298
    @geoffreyherrick298 Рік тому

    Cute plane.

  • @reidwardle3992
    @reidwardle3992 Рік тому

    Well, done, Bryan!
    Thanks for sharing, Casey.
    Can it be put through gentlemanly rolls and loops?

    • @ExperimentalAircraftChannel
      @ExperimentalAircraftChannel  Рік тому

      Thank you very much!
      Not sure if KC is monitoring the comments from his end. I believe some have done light "unusual attitudes" in these. Best inquire with Glen at the web link provided in the Description Below for the fine details though.

  • @colinkobel2868
    @colinkobel2868 8 місяців тому

    Great looking aircraft! Is it aerobatic at all? Sure seems to have the right power to weight ratio.

  • @Ezra_Hicks
    @Ezra_Hicks Рік тому +4

    That’s my grandpa😂

  • @johnfitzpatrick2469
    @johnfitzpatrick2469 Рік тому

    G, day from Sydney Australia.
    The experimental has really got some wing surface. Would be nice to have a look at the VW engine (1300-1600) and carburettor.
    🌏🇭🇲

    • @ExperimentalAircraftChannel
      @ExperimentalAircraftChannel  Рік тому

      Hello from Down under and Thanks for watching! We love put AUS Aviation Family. Most are in fact using the Revmaster. You can still find them on the web.

  • @gtr1952
    @gtr1952 Рік тому

    If Casey, or someone else see's this, can you share where you bought/got your flight suit? Over the last 6 years I had a big, intentional weight loss. From 370 to 205 lbs. Obviously, nothing fits anymore! Shirts went from 5X to 2X (still have big shoulders LOL) Levis, jeans & cargo from 54-56 to 40-42. But my beloved old flight suits are like tents now. At 71 I've had them so long none of the stores are open anymore. 8( Appreciate any suggestions!! Thanks much! --gary

    • @kcshokoui5687
      @kcshokoui5687 11 місяців тому

      I got the flight suit in that Video from eBay used AF suit.

  • @GT47179
    @GT47179 Рік тому +1

    Top speed is a stall speed but 3.5 gallons per hour is highly impressive 😮

    • @tomcoryell
      @tomcoryell Рік тому +1

      What do you mean top speed is a stall speed?

    • @GT47179
      @GT47179 Рік тому

      @@tomcoryell 120 knots is slow......just being mindful thats all.....beautiful aircraft

    • @ExperimentalAircraftChannel
      @ExperimentalAircraftChannel  Рік тому +1

      120 is slow? Compared to what? You fly Jets during the week? Hah! For LIGHT AIRCRAFT 120mph ( or anything near it) is quite common and respectable. If you are stalling at 120 you must be a Jet Pilot. COOL! Military or Corporate or Airlines?

  • @ManNomad
    @ManNomad Рік тому +1

    Impressive airplane. Only downside is the no flap or spoiler floating design which eats up runway.

    • @ExperimentalAircraftChannel
      @ExperimentalAircraftChannel  Рік тому +1

      Agreed. I understand however that the PLANS to build these offer a "Belly Flap/Spoiler" that does act as a Speed Brake and also slightly changed the angle of attack on approach. So....there 's that. 😂

  • @barrywood5357
    @barrywood5357 Рік тому +1

  • @bradboardwell8295
    @bradboardwell8295 Рік тому +2

    Would rather have a hummelbird :)

    • @ExperimentalAircraftChannel
      @ExperimentalAircraftChannel  Рік тому

      Intersting Aircraft as well. Almost build one from plans long ago. Now they have a kit available too. Very light Aircraft. Certainly.

  • @GaryBaird.Photography
    @GaryBaird.Photography 10 місяців тому

    This is so cool. I've got a couple of RC airplanes that look a lot like this. Wonder where I can get servos big enough to operate it? Just kiddin', but it is almost at that level, right there inbetween, Wish I was younger. Thanks for posting.

  • @korodski
    @korodski Рік тому

    I'll take it

  • @G_Money72
    @G_Money72 Рік тому +1

    New goal!! Fly my project to you one day..

    • @ExperimentalAircraftChannel
      @ExperimentalAircraftChannel  Рік тому

      Sounds like a great plan to me! What... are you building?

    • @G_Money72
      @G_Money72 Рік тому

      @@ExperimentalAircraftChannel I was building a Moni motor glider and a Sonex. Had a change of profession and a relocation. So, new plan is to build either the Panther or the REVO! Rumor is REVO is on final prototype and kits may be available in November.

  • @GeneralSirDouglasMcA
    @GeneralSirDouglasMcA Рік тому

    Is all-metal a plus if hangaring will not be available/affordable? I realize hangaring is always preferable, but there are aircraft that are decades old and spent their entire lives on the ramp and are still flying today.
    The performance seems a bit lackluster, but if it means an inexpensive airplane that’s easy to build, who cares? Not everyone necessarily needs to tear across the sky at high speeds, or be able to takeoff & land on a helipad. Some of us just want affordable flying.

    • @ExperimentalAircraftChannel
      @ExperimentalAircraftChannel  Рік тому

      There are MANY slices of the pie in Aviation. The more money you can spend on it the more slices you can enjoy. And... there isn't a Swiss Army Kife design Aircraft put there that does it all anyway. So yes.... for economy flying then choose your slice(s). This one... you can build yourself.

    • @oneninerniner3427
      @oneninerniner3427 Рік тому

      Yah know, for 75hp i think it preforms pretty well.

    • @kcshokoui5687
      @kcshokoui5687 11 місяців тому

      Aluminum can weather much better than wood construction.

  • @laxplayer99
    @laxplayer99 Рік тому

    watching on my computer with 5.1 surround sound. this sounds like somebody beating on a floor tom.

    • @ExperimentalAircraftChannel
      @ExperimentalAircraftChannel  Рік тому

      Turn the BASS down a little! :-)
      I too... love the RUMBLE on most movies. I admit... the MIC was a little punchy at times (if that is what you were referening to).

  • @dundabird3203
    @dundabird3203 Рік тому

    What's the cheapest 2-seat do you think?

    • @ExperimentalAircraftChannel
      @ExperimentalAircraftChannel  Рік тому

      There is an MX5 which is built in the same manor and is planned as a 2-seater tandem. But... it is a little tight in the back seat. Smaller people etc.
      The Sonex (older kits especially) and maybe a Zenith CH701.

    • @orbitalair2103
      @orbitalair2103 Рік тому

      @@ExperimentalAircraftChannel CX5. the CX5 is a tandem(front/back) 2 seater. The CX7 is a sidebyside 2 seater. The Thacher design is quite conservative and should build to a sturdy aircraft. Problem is some parts are realyl expensive if you can even get them anymore, like a Canopy. All Thachers are PLANS only, so you have to fabricate all the parts yourself.

    • @orbitalair2103
      @orbitalair2103 Рік тому

      Other good choices are Kolb and Hummel. These may cost a tiny bit more, but both are complete kits with company support in things like spare parts and technical support. Plus $12-20,000 for getting your pilots license.

  • @PoochAndBoo
    @PoochAndBoo Рік тому

    When I bought my SONEX the insurance company only wanted 10 hours of dual time , in the airplane, to insure me. 40 hours seems a bit much.

    • @ExperimentalAircraftChannel
      @ExperimentalAircraftChannel  Рік тому +1

      There are FAR MORE Sonex Aircraft completed and flying out there that these. And most of the Sonex are two seaters (the Onex is the single seat). That might make a difference. They look at the number in the "fleet" flying.

    • @PoochAndBoo
      @PoochAndBoo Рік тому +1

      @@ExperimentalAircraftChannel Makes sense. I would have thought, though, that they would be less strict about a single seat airplane. Sometimes it does seem that the FAA is more concerned with passengers than the pilot.

    • @ExperimentalAircraftChannel
      @ExperimentalAircraftChannel  Рік тому

      It's all math isn't it? Even risk.
      I think many, at this price point investment, might just self insure or just get liability anyway.

  • @mattpoland8200
    @mattpoland8200 Рік тому +1

    Cant weigh more than 180lbs to meet weight and balance

    • @ExperimentalAircraftChannel
      @ExperimentalAircraftChannel  Рік тому

      Not sure exactly on that, you do sit on the spar on most of these designs so that CG is not affected. Small baggage area will certainly. On an Aircraft this small. You can probably lean forward and enter a gentle dive.

    • @rdwit659
      @rdwit659 Рік тому

      Wrong. The weight and balance sheet on mine lists the max pilot weight as 250.

    • @mattpoland8200
      @mattpoland8200 Рік тому

      I was into a prebuy inspection in one in AR about a month ago and the weight and balance on that airplane couldnt weigh more than 180lbs. At 230lbs with minimum fuel it fell outside of the aft cg

  • @Akilraham
    @Akilraham 7 місяців тому

    Toy Spitfire.

  • @Soravia
    @Soravia Рік тому +1

    Better come standard with instruments. You shouldn't risk your life hoping there will always be visibility. Too many died trying to make out of the clouds or fog

    • @orbitalair2103
      @orbitalair2103 Рік тому +1

      Its a plans built experimental plane, you can put whatever instruments you want in it.