Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.

Talking about OJ Simpson with Carl Douglas

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 13 кві 2024
  • On The Stephen A. Smith Show, Smith gives you his renowned point of view, breaking barriers beyond the world of sports, and tackling pertinent issues across entertainment, pop culture, society, business, and politics. Three times a week, you'll hear his LIVE unfiltered opinions on the day's biggest headlines as well as straight-shooting interviews with top celebrities, game-changers, and thought leaders across the societal arena.
    The Stephen A. Smith Show is sure to entertain, inform, and motivate anyone who tunes in.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 893

  • @realpublicfeedbckrpftoday1502
    @realpublicfeedbckrpftoday1502 3 місяці тому +84

    RIP Emmit Till❤

    • @kp2855
      @kp2855 3 місяці тому +2

      Conflating is not mentally healthy

    • @williamj.crofts41
      @williamj.crofts41 3 місяці тому +7

      ​@@kp2855...Not really, the murderers of Emmett till got away with murder too....How do you like that???

    • @cindyb2525
      @cindyb2525 3 місяці тому

      @@kp2855 Well, neither is what happened with Robert Blake either and his wife, was that mentally healthy ? Hell no!

    • @gregjackson-ks1gh
      @gregjackson-ks1gh 3 місяці тому

      I'm a white guy and I also don't like what happened to Emmit.
      I hope you and the black community found some retribution and closure in the deaths of Ron and Nichol at the hand's of a black brother.
      Can we now call it even and move on?

    • @cindyb2525
      @cindyb2525 3 місяці тому

      @@gregjackson-ks1gh It goes beyond that, look to the history of the 20th century, did you have a problem with Robert Blake when he was accused of the same thing as O.J.? How did he get a pass, it never got out of hand with the media like it did with O.J.

  • @rafail32
    @rafail32 3 місяці тому +32

    And for those of you who don't know Johnny was Carl's mentor.

  • @patriciayoung9298
    @patriciayoung9298 3 місяці тому +36

    As a woman in her 60's Attyn Carl Douglas spoke the truth about all those murders in LA. Darden was not an experienced trial lawyer at that time.

  • @Mr.CEO888
    @Mr.CEO888 3 місяці тому +35

    Stephen A. Smith isn't smart enough to go against Johnnie Cochran.

    • @Muskogee
      @Muskogee 3 місяці тому +7

      He wants people to think he's smarter than he is. Steven A is no lawyer and JC was to seasoned.

    • @Mr.CEO888
      @Mr.CEO888 3 місяці тому +8

      @@Muskogee True, He really sounded like a true idiot saying he would beat the legend Johnny Cochran in the courtroom.

  • @glenbrown7423
    @glenbrown7423 3 місяці тому +38

    THANK YOU COUNSELOR FOR YOUR LEGAL PERSPECTIVE.

  • @LA-rv2fr
    @LA-rv2fr 3 місяці тому +19

    Carl Douglas is truly charismatic. The picture of a happy warrior. His commentary in the exceptional documentary, OJ: Made In America, is spellbinding.

  • @StacksOnBricks
    @StacksOnBricks 3 місяці тому +31

    When the title said Carl Douglas, I admit I was hoping it was going to be the man who sung “Kung Fu Fighting”

    • @s.davesayers9415
      @s.davesayers9415 3 місяці тому

      HellHohHell 🇯🇲😂😂😂

    • @kshinokevin
      @kshinokevin 3 місяці тому +1

      "Hong Kong Phooey" - that is a 1970's cartoon character = a dog who can fight crime with Kung Fu (if not, "kung foolery."); the lead character was voiced by Scatman Crothers (Richard Hallorann, the head chef of the Overlook Hotel: "The Shining (1980)").

    • @crystalanderson6345
      @crystalanderson6345 3 місяці тому +1

      😂😂😂

  • @transformationinprogress
    @transformationinprogress 3 місяці тому +20

    It was awesome that Mr. Smith allowed Mr. Douglas, to explaining and give insight and facts that on the case, but I am still very disappointed in Mr. Smith’s comments

  • @ernestwilliams3854
    @ernestwilliams3854 3 місяці тому +34

    Give Johnny cockrin his due and you would have lost period!!!!

    • @augustabates5470
      @augustabates5470 3 місяці тому

      AND MORE THING WE DON'T DO WHAtT YOU DO. IF WE FEEL A BLACK PERSON OR ANYONE ELSE IS GUILTY OF SOMETHINGS. WE DON'T Cape like that. It's certain things black folks don't do. We don't cape if we think you are at the wrong. So miss black people with your shit.

  • @marilynharris2637
    @marilynharris2637 3 місяці тому +29

    THANK YOU, CARL DOUGLAS, A Brilliant ATTORNEY IN HIS OWN RIGHT!! THANK YOU, JOHNNY COCHRAN , GENIUS! A movie should be made of your life & career! Great Interview!

  • @ernestwilliams3854
    @ernestwilliams3854 3 місяці тому +83

    Bottom line Johnny was a better lawyer, period!!!

    • @stlsanford1451
      @stlsanford1451 3 місяці тому

      ua-cam.com/video/URLYUAaH9iM/v-deo.html

    • @riverebec1
      @riverebec1 3 місяці тому +8

      Bottom line, that jury was never going to convict OJ Simpson.

    • @angelamiller3545
      @angelamiller3545 3 місяці тому +8

      Stop hating on my brother. Love me some Carl and all you do

    • @catbirdseat4849
      @catbirdseat4849 3 місяці тому +2

      Once you give up integrity, the rest is a piece of cake.

    • @ralphhopkins4751
      @ralphhopkins4751 3 місяці тому +2

      "racial reckoning"

  • @toddmullis8051
    @toddmullis8051 3 місяці тому +26

    You gotta get Carl Douglas back on.

    • @SpikeDeez-mm8qq
      @SpikeDeez-mm8qq 3 місяці тому

      Thank you Todd. I’m Carl Douglas, this is my burner account

    • @kendallandrews8691
      @kendallandrews8691 3 місяці тому

      I'm actually carl Douglas. Quit pretending you are me

  • @TheMightykdogg
    @TheMightykdogg 3 місяці тому +23

    Carl Douglas is sensational in this interview, I love his perspective and knowledge.

  • @Lifewithangiej
    @Lifewithangiej 3 місяці тому +7

    Carl Douglas is ageless❤

  • @newyork1975ful
    @newyork1975ful 3 місяці тому +13

    This guy Stephen A got destroyed by Carl Douglas in this interview , He shouldn't utter Johnny Cochrans name again...

    • @samsca8529
      @samsca8529 3 місяці тому +1

      Why do we in this country love to frame everything like it’s a boxing match?

    • @kendallandrews8691
      @kendallandrews8691 3 місяці тому

      Cochran helped oj get away with murder. He deserves no respect

    • @kendallandrews8691
      @kendallandrews8691 3 місяці тому +2

      It's an interview. Nobody got destroyed

  • @orglogic
    @orglogic 3 місяці тому +33

    Carl Douglas is the man!

    • @samsca8529
      @samsca8529 3 місяці тому

      … you get for when you kill your wife

  • @SS-ii6nz
    @SS-ii6nz 3 місяці тому +42

    R.I.P Mr. OJ Simpson and Mr. Johnnie Cochran. 💐 🌹 Thank you Mr. Carl Douglas for breaking down the truth about this major criminal case. The more things change, they remain the same. That is the truth. Great interview

    • @bryanjones4683
      @bryanjones4683 3 місяці тому +7

      Y’all clowns

    • @lennybeason1110
      @lennybeason1110 3 місяці тому

      Definitely proved that OJ was very unlikely to have committed the murders. The so called mountain of evidence was turned into a pile of rubble!

    • @cindyb2525
      @cindyb2525 3 місяці тому +1

      @@bryanjones4683 Whatever fool!

    • @samsca8529
      @samsca8529 3 місяці тому +4

      “Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers”

    • @cindyb2525
      @cindyb2525 3 місяці тому

      @@samsca8529 I totally agree; perfect example, Maga Trump stooges.

  • @fade680
    @fade680 3 місяці тому +5

    “Free all day like OJ” 2pac. Rest in peace OJ.

  • @kimelyreed8056
    @kimelyreed8056 3 місяці тому +18

    Wow what a great interview
    I remember the verdict I was working in surgery then and now . Now I truly understand why the verdict. True great attorneys.Definitely

    • @riverebec1
      @riverebec1 3 місяці тому

      One very gullible jury.

    • @MitchHennessy
      @MitchHennessy 3 місяці тому

      ​@riverebec1 so they should have ignored Mark Furman?

    • @riverebec1
      @riverebec1 3 місяці тому

      @@MitchHennessy Yes. His disgusting stupid racist commentary taped over a period of years had NOTHING to do with the murders. It was the trial of OJ Simpson NOT Mark Fuhrman!

    • @mcfact1827
      @mcfact1827 3 місяці тому

      ​@@riverebec1 are you gonna answer the question or continue the disappearing act LOL

    • @riverebec1
      @riverebec1 3 місяці тому

      @@mcfact1827 What was your question.

  • @kevinmooney9621
    @kevinmooney9621 3 місяці тому +5

    Stephen A lied in his book so many times lol😂 but upset because the man got found not guilty, he just told him they planted blood smh they took samples of blood implanted it’s in his vehicle. This is crazy. Why would he ask him about blood being in the truck or at his house?

  • @rodneytaylor6313
    @rodneytaylor6313 3 місяці тому +16

    Thanks for mentioning Natasha Harlens

    • @riverebec1
      @riverebec1 3 місяці тому

      Latasha Harlins. I'm as incensed by that trial verdict today as I was then. I feel the same about the OJ verdict. Injustice is injustice. It's ALWAYS wrong!!!

    • @rodneytaylor6313
      @rodneytaylor6313 3 місяці тому +1

      So you saying her verdict was wrong?? Store owner was convicted, the judge decided probation

    • @riverebec1
      @riverebec1 3 місяці тому

      @@rodneytaylor6313 Yes, the woman who shot that young girl in the back deserved serious prison time. And OJ Simpson deserved life in prison for murdering two people.

    • @thedefinitionisthis
      @thedefinitionisthis 3 місяці тому +2

      @@rodneytaylor6313 That verdict was terrible. Probation for killing a kid walking away? That should constitute a life sentence.

    • @GoldenJaguar-xy3gn
      @GoldenJaguar-xy3gn 3 місяці тому

      Remember so called Asian Hate?? When did American Blacks ever show them hate? Always been the other way though

  • @db.590
    @db.590 3 місяці тому +7

    If there are roaches in the spaghetti you must throw it out! Doesn’t rhyme but we got the point. It was the wrong time and place to try for a conviction.

  • @ethellee1486
    @ethellee1486 3 місяці тому +4

    This murder was committed by two people.not one.and who knows who these two people was.we probably will never know.

    • @jdhayes1837
      @jdhayes1837 3 місяці тому

      If it was 2 murderers where are the second set of footprints, it's only one set, OJ's ugly axx shoes, which he lied about owning in the Civil Trial!🤷🏾‍♂️

    • @kendallandrews8691
      @kendallandrews8691 3 місяці тому

      It was committed by oj Simpson. We know very well

  • @DrThinkSon
    @DrThinkSon 3 місяці тому +15

    When he starts hitting Stephen with the Bruh it was time to stop soft shoeing and let the issue go. Some know how to stay on code some like to BBQ their own for public entertainment🤦‍♂️

    • @valtown67
      @valtown67 3 місяці тому +5

      This dude is not us! Don't let the complexion fool you..

    • @TheWorshipful2008
      @TheWorshipful2008 3 місяці тому

      ​​@@valtown67There are a lot of these guys that love Mr. Charlie but will run to us when they get into trouble! OJ was a true/blue bootlicker. He didn't want anything to do with Black people untill that case.

    • @kp2855
      @kp2855 3 місяці тому +1

      Not saying Stephen A. is right but we as black people. Need stop conflating everybody base on color because as soon as we disagree. We disown them that easy, how hypocritical. We don't own each other, we either part of GOD'S family or we're not! #repent

    • @DrThinkSon
      @DrThinkSon 3 місяці тому

      @@kp2855 Right is based on opinion! Please don’t follow a statement that doesn’t require a response with a personal assumption of right. When you just as well could have done it without tagging anyone! With that said if the brother felt he was right he wouldn’t have gotten immediately on code. Additionally who are you to deny the perspective of a lawyer personally involved? The internet has y’all feeling yourself too much Champ. Take care and no response is necessary. This is not a debate 🤷🏾‍♂️

    • @samsca8529
      @samsca8529 3 місяці тому

      The issue will never be let go. It was the most televised trial of all time. Obviously people will keep talking about it and expressing their opinions #RipNicole&Ron

  • @stevengrewal9656
    @stevengrewal9656 3 місяці тому +10

    STEPHEN A.........STOP SHOUTING!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @terryjohnson1376
    @terryjohnson1376 3 місяці тому +2

    He went into Naked Gun Mode😂

  • @kinghenryxl1747
    @kinghenryxl1747 3 місяці тому +3

    Carl Douglas would be awesome as a legal analyst on cable news

    • @kendallandrews8691
      @kendallandrews8691 3 місяці тому

      Much better than Mark fuhrman being an analyst for foxnews

  • @tammieellis9281
    @tammieellis9281 3 місяці тому +14

    It was inappropriate for you to say that Stephen!! Totally 💯 inappropriate!

    • @mcfact1827
      @mcfact1827 3 місяці тому

      Money 💰💰💰

  • @terryalan4590
    @terryalan4590 3 місяці тому +5

    A good defense attorney always beats a prosecutor.

    • @samsca8529
      @samsca8529 3 місяці тому

      Unless the prosecutor is better

    • @terryalan4590
      @terryalan4590 3 місяці тому

      @@samsca8529 a prosecutor is never better than a good defense attorney

    • @samsca8529
      @samsca8529 3 місяці тому

      @@terryalan4590 Wrong, Bugliosi is an amazing prosecutor. The prosecutors in the OJ trial were not

    • @terryalan4590
      @terryalan4590 3 місяці тому

      @@samsca8529 bugliosi was a wack job . He wanted to prosecute ozzy Osborne for “subliminal “ lyrics that he said made people kill themselves . He also said George w bush should be prosecuted for murder .

  • @RosDC
    @RosDC 3 місяці тому +2

    Carl and that smile...this is a great interview!

  • @billybatson22
    @billybatson22 3 місяці тому +1

    Had the good fortunate to communicate with Mr. Douglas years ago. One of the nicest and most gracious people on the Earth.

  • @reggiehooks8895
    @reggiehooks8895 3 місяці тому +2

    Carl Douglas is a very intelligent man.

  • @jstthomas1111
    @jstthomas1111 3 місяці тому +3

    Good interview! Good show; keep it going.

  • @Jeanpascal6519
    @Jeanpascal6519 3 місяці тому +19

    He was found not guilty Stephen a

    • @kendallandrews8691
      @kendallandrews8691 3 місяці тому +1

      A biased bad jury doesn't mean he didn't kill 2 people

  • @GeneralTHC
    @GeneralTHC 3 місяці тому +2

    He was guilty AF and anyone with a working brain knew it. And no, you do not clear him because the police did some sorry stuff before. That's absolute hogwash, Stephen. That is just such a lame copout.

  • @koreysantos3335
    @koreysantos3335 3 місяці тому +7

    If u got nothing nice to say dont say nothing AT ALL SMH DAMN

  • @kendallanthony6886
    @kendallanthony6886 3 місяці тому +37

    We will never know. Fact tho, Ron put up a fight and OJ had no bruises.

    • @user-od5sh1ck5g
      @user-od5sh1ck5g 3 місяці тому +5

      O was big as Andre! A machine! You’re comparing apples to oranges! And o had a deep cut in his hand!

    • @hitking683
      @hitking683 3 місяці тому

      ​@@user-od5sh1ck5g That was proven to happen in Chicago. So if the only injury happened in a different state where did all this oj blood come from? The smoking gun everyone looks past ...

    • @waygookinway1805
      @waygookinway1805 3 місяці тому +14

      @@user-od5sh1ck5g OJ had RA and Ron Goldman was a black belt martial artist. The way Ron was fighting back, OJ would have never made it to the airport for that flight. Besides, if he was that guilty, there would be no reason to tamper with evidence. That's not even considering the streets saying she owed drug money that was due that night.

    • @user-od5sh1ck5g
      @user-od5sh1ck5g 3 місяці тому +4

      @@waygookinway1805 omg owed money? lol! Believe what you want. He had bl all over his shoes, and a big cut on his hand. A innocent man wouldn’t write a book! He was proven guilty in the civil!

    • @cindyb2525
      @cindyb2525 3 місяці тому

      Ron was a drug trafficker and Nicole was a heavy drug user, Mezzaluna restaurant was drug haven and two other people who worked at that restaurant were murdered the same way Ron and Nicole died. Even the FBI was investigating that place…facts

  • @casillasj2002
    @casillasj2002 3 місяці тому +14

    Does this guy ever stop smiling?

    • @bizwiz5742
      @bizwiz5742 3 місяці тому +6

      I hope not!

    • @ericw4377
      @ericw4377 3 місяці тому +3

      It's actually a good communication device to smile, I think. Depending on the nature of the conversation, I'd rather someone talk to me with a genuine smile than be stone-faced the whole time.

    • @victordeltoids8609
      @victordeltoids8609 3 місяці тому +1

      Let me geuss. You hate the smiling.😄 Personally I find it inspirational. It's a great way to make the people around you comfortable too. I hope he never changes.

    • @casillasj2002
      @casillasj2002 3 місяці тому

      @@victordeltoids8609 I think it's funny and hard to do personally haha

    • @BoringDad1272
      @BoringDad1272 3 місяці тому

      Can you stop whining 😅

  • @lesliewashington8333
    @lesliewashington8333 3 місяці тому +22

    Why can’t attorneys give simple answers to questions. So annoying….

    • @ruban8135
      @ruban8135 3 місяці тому +4

      oh come on now, i think u know y

    • @EvaAnika
      @EvaAnika 3 місяці тому +5

      Because there is both context and nuance to the way the case played out. ESPECIALLY among those who weren't even there to witness the event, which includes this lawyer. The problem with our post-literate society nowadays is we know nothing about these items and prefer the partial truths of "yes" or "no" instead of the whole story. THAT SAID, Mr. Simpson physically and temperamentally could not have committed double murder ... but I think he was protecting whoever did.

  • @passitto86
    @passitto86 3 місяці тому +2

    The trial that taught us, hate and racism isn't isolated tto white supremacy

  • @bennyallen2394
    @bennyallen2394 3 місяці тому +76

    If they had overwhelming evidence they would not have tampered with the evidence.

    • @user-so6bu2zq3u
      @user-so6bu2zq3u 3 місяці тому +16

      Or get on the stand and Lie.(Mark Furman)

    • @ivawilson8229
      @ivawilson8229 3 місяці тому +6

      Facts 💯💯

    • @Muskogee
      @Muskogee 3 місяці тому +4

      Exactly

    • @papasul29
      @papasul29 3 місяці тому +3

      Agree

    • @danielcundiff290
      @danielcundiff290 3 місяці тому +8

      People actually think he was innocent??? 😅😅😅😅😅😂😂😂😂😂

  • @protochris
    @protochris 3 місяці тому +2

    Do people realize if OJ didn't commit the crime, then the LAPD would have pre-arranged framing OJ and brought samples of his blood ready to sprinkle and hair sample in the knit cap, knew that OJ couldnt have had an alibi, knew that OJ would have blood from the victims in his vehicle, knew that someone scaled the fence at Kato Katleins apartment at the time of the murder, knew that OJ wouldnt have been ready for the Limo driver waiting for him, knew that OJ would have a fresh cut on his finger. They also would have known that OJ would have owned a pair of Bruno Magli shoes to plant that evidence. They would have had to make an agreement with Ron Goldman ahead of time that he was to be a martyr and spill his blood at Nicole's house, and be placed in OJ's Bronco? This was not justice for black Americans, this is the same ignorant prejudice that once deemed them to be valued as a fourth of a person.

    • @boxkilla7314
      @boxkilla7314 3 місяці тому

      Exactly! This is why I know he's guilty.

    • @Angelfly625
      @Angelfly625 3 місяці тому

      Blood with EDTA in it ?? Blood was planted!! EDTA prevents blood clotting in vials after blood draws. EDTA is not present in the human body. OJ agreed to have his blood drawn. Doesn’t sound like someone with something to hide. ❤

  • @davidsyked9420
    @davidsyked9420 3 місяці тому +3

    The defense had a good forensic lawyer and was able to show mistakes was made

  • @vandouglasjr1613
    @vandouglasjr1613 3 місяці тому +8

    So you admitted that the Lapd messed with the evidence but he's gulty

    • @stephenasmith
      @stephenasmith  3 місяці тому +9

      Yes! They tried to embellish the evidence and stupidly tried to frame a guilty man. Is that the first time you e heard of that? Stop it! Ou know beyter

    • @user-od5sh1ck5g
      @user-od5sh1ck5g 3 місяці тому +1

      @@stephenasmith well said! Exactly what happened.

    • @peteyjones2094
      @peteyjones2094 3 місяці тому +2

      Why do you believe he was guilty? What evidence?

    • @user-od5sh1ck5g
      @user-od5sh1ck5g 3 місяці тому

      @@peteyjones2094 just watch the civil,

    • @NoLineNoWait123AbC
      @NoLineNoWait123AbC 3 місяці тому +1

      @@stephenasmith, you’re walking talking oxymoron, emphasis on the suffix. NOT GUILTY in the court of law means NOT GUILTY. End of story.

  • @HistoryonYouTube
    @HistoryonYouTube 3 місяці тому +2

    Carl says that the defence won because of 'better lawyering'. In other words, OJ won because he had the money to buy better lawyers. I appreciate that Carl and Johnny offered a lot of time on civil rights issues but such people are clearly not available to everyone. It is clearly a case of the verdict will go to the person who can afford to buy it, irrespective of the evidence.

    • @carolynbutter2810
      @carolynbutter2810 3 місяці тому +1

      He had the Best Lawyers and they were smart. Whether you believe it or not, he was acquitted. Robert Waggoner killed his wife, Robert Blake killed his wife, Kyle Rittenhouse gunned down 2 innocent people, Dillion Ruth walked in a Church and gunned down 8 innocent people. If it didn’t fit, you MUST acquit. LAPD killed them and planted evidence on OJ. Case Closed,

  • @terrelllanier-fox2028
    @terrelllanier-fox2028 3 місяці тому

    I love your voice and your theatrics 😂

  • @stevengrvp
    @stevengrvp 3 місяці тому +2

    This is a great interview

  • @opaulamorgan4265
    @opaulamorgan4265 3 місяці тому +2

    Kato Kalin was not a freeloader! He paid rent! And he was an honest and credible witness at the trial. He was and is a good man and was a friend of Nicole and the children loved him. Your depiction of Kato is not true and we do give #$&@ what he has to say!

    • @Muskogee
      @Muskogee 3 місяці тому

      He wasn't paying rent. Stop the BS. How old are you? I remember that case. We watched it in Criminal Law class throughout. He got on the stand and was caught in lies. He couldn't answer questions on the stand.

    • @opaulamorgan4265
      @opaulamorgan4265 3 місяці тому

      I am older than you, and I have followed this case!Kato's agreement with Nicole was $450-$500 for rent and then take care of the kids who were very fond of him! Kato was not a freeloader and has been portrayed unfairly for his role in this case. He has always come across as an honest and decent person, unlike you, who comes across as exactly the kind of person you really are. As far as Johnny Cochran and company, they had no other choice than to play the race card because their client, oriental James Simpson, was guilty of murdering two innocent people and they knew it! I have no interest in commenting further with you!

    • @opaulamorgan4265
      @opaulamorgan4265 3 місяці тому +3

      I am older than you and I have followed this case. Kato's agreement with Nicole was $450-500 per month for rent and take care of the children who were very fond of him! Do you even know this or do you just care to accuse him of something he is not guilty of!! He was not a freeloader and any attempt to portray him this way is unfair and untrue! Kato is an honest, kind and decent man who gave honest testimony at the trial about the events that happened on the night that Nicole and Ron were murdered. Despite your attempt to malign him he is still an honest, kind and decent man. As for Cochran and company, they played the race card because they had no other defense for their client who they all knew was guilty of murdering two innocent people.

    • @gregjackson-ks1gh
      @gregjackson-ks1gh 3 місяці тому

      ​@@opaulamorgan4265if Cochran is genius as they say he was then of course he knew Simpson did it.

  • @88mokeyz8k
    @88mokeyz8k 3 місяці тому +1

    OJ Simpsons wife handyman was a serial killer of 54 plus people, and it was said he admitted to killing both her and Ronald. Do your homework this this true. They hid this information😢

  • @craigallen4485
    @craigallen4485 3 місяці тому +2

    Incredible interview

  • @u.s.ninjaleague8930
    @u.s.ninjaleague8930 3 місяці тому +5

    OJ was also a Movie Star and actor

  • @Dusterbugless
    @Dusterbugless 3 місяці тому +2

    RIP to OJ Simpson. A true legend

  • @boxkilla7314
    @boxkilla7314 3 місяці тому +2

    I think there's a difference between innocent by law and innocent! Because it's not about what you know, it's about what you can prove beyond a reasonable doubt.

  • @whodatking26
    @whodatking26 3 місяці тому +3

    Jokic will win the MVP. You know the fact he aint even talking about it means its true.

  • @imaginaryplayer7573
    @imaginaryplayer7573 3 місяці тому +1

    This was great !

  • @randyharris3175
    @randyharris3175 3 місяці тому +3

    Lied about saying the N word.

  • @Mattyic313
    @Mattyic313 3 місяці тому +7

    I’d take OJ over any running back in NFL history

  • @leroysmith2937
    @leroysmith2937 3 місяці тому +2

    OJ Nicole N Ron rest in paradise
    We all come to experience in this beautiful simulation away from our original home
    We all come here as a tour of duty to this place called Earth 🌎 tough but we come
    Then we go home to a parade and celebration 🎉 praise our Divine creator for everything

  • @davidsyked9420
    @davidsyked9420 3 місяці тому +2

    People talk about the Jury's verdict, if OJ had a Public Defender for his Lawyer would the verdict be the same, the answer is no, it's takes $ to put on a good defense

    • @BoringDad1272
      @BoringDad1272 3 місяці тому

      Whoever accepts a public defender as a lawyer in a murder case deserves his/her fate.

  • @garygabriel8482
    @garygabriel8482 3 місяці тому +2

    REMEMBER Steven A Smith, you were there. BROTHER MALCOLM WOULD HAVE LOVED YOU.

  • @wa2k99
    @wa2k99 3 місяці тому

    Awesome interview

  • @RCCrosby
    @RCCrosby 3 місяці тому +4

    An unjust law is no law at all (Latin: lex iniusta non est lex) . St. Augustine
    One has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws.
    Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws. MLK

    • @seonwallace
      @seonwallace 3 місяці тому

      If that's the case it's no law for black people, y'all don't see it that way tho.

  • @frank6250
    @frank6250 3 місяці тому +1

    SAS: Are you willing to admit that OJ was guilty?
    CD: Let me tell you about the injustices of the world.

  • @Miqesavant
    @Miqesavant 3 місяці тому +1

    stephen a is clear cut example of what not to be as a black man. Shot to brother carl douglas.

    • @rsenior7140
      @rsenior7140 3 місяці тому

      douglas is a pimp. nothing more.

  • @rockmeister33
    @rockmeister33 3 місяці тому

    Cockroach in spaghett analogy was spot on!

  • @williamkelly8026
    @williamkelly8026 3 місяці тому +11

    Stephen A is fantastic in both sports and social commentary. And he's a good and very fair man

  • @MelancholyOne
    @MelancholyOne 3 місяці тому

    😂🎉This was Way Beyond 😢IMAGINATION 😮I regret not reviewing it earlier😅😊❤❤❤❤❤

  • @jamesbingham1007
    @jamesbingham1007 3 місяці тому +6

    Carl Douglas sat at the kid's table during the trial, right?

  • @garygabriel8482
    @garygabriel8482 3 місяці тому +10

    Yeah you think he was guilty Steven A Smith because you were there

  • @e.m.6158
    @e.m.6158 3 місяці тому +10

    I've said repeatedly that no person who is innocent of such a heinous and horrendously brutal crime of the MOTHER of their children, would write a book entitled "If I did it." You wouldn't try to make up any scenario, you wouldn't joke about it, it wouldn't ever enter into your mind to try and envision it, and write it out NONE OF IT-- BECAUSE YOU CARE ABOUT AND LOVE YOUR KIDS!!! This was their MOTHER!! They will never be able to fathom the level of brutality used against their mom in her last moments, without being absolutely destroyed! Those poor children! That was the move of a completely depraved soulless person. You don't love your children more than you hate their mother. That sealed the deal for me. I always thought he was guilty anyways, but that book that he wrote was the last gavel in that case for me. RIP Nicole and Ron, and condolences to their families, even now.

    • @belindafoster-eb5sb
      @belindafoster-eb5sb 3 місяці тому +3

      Your comment makes a whole lot of sense. I never thought about that.

    • @jenkinsljenkinssquire9137
      @jenkinsljenkinssquire9137 3 місяці тому +1

      An innocent person wouldn't run away in a Bronco either

    • @markwilson4690
      @markwilson4690 3 місяці тому +2

      ​@@jenkinsljenkinssquire9137I as a black man would, I know how this society sees me.

    • @e.m.6158
      @e.m.6158 3 місяці тому

      @jenkinsljenkinssquire9137 Not necessarily. Running away doesn't always imply guilt. People can be really scared and the "fright or flight" instinct (I think that's what it's called) kicks in. Now in OJ's case he was guilty, but, sometimes people take off without a thought-- they're just scared out of their wits. And a lot of the time, they don't even have an experience to base it on. They just get super scared and flee...

    • @jenkinsljenkinssquire9137
      @jenkinsljenkinssquire9137 3 місяці тому

      @@markwilson4690 🙄

  • @jonathansteele1951
    @jonathansteele1951 3 місяці тому

    I thought we won because we was better lawyer bruh lol

  • @danieljean3319
    @danieljean3319 3 місяці тому +9

    What evidence you have that point out that he committed the crimes. There are all types of resources available for the prosecution to slam dunk the case, and they failed to do so.

    • @riverebec1
      @riverebec1 3 місяці тому

      You have to be brain dead not to see that every single piece of evidence pointed to OJ Simpson's guilt. That's why that jury let him off.

    • @mcfact1827
      @mcfact1827 3 місяці тому

      Like what?

  • @-Karnage
    @-Karnage 3 місяці тому

    Everybody was Kung Fu fighting

  • @charlottegibson3862
    @charlottegibson3862 3 місяці тому +7

    Juice wanted Cochran.Juice was a kind, funny and smart guy. When we were fighting for civil rights and integration, Juice was making history on the football field in Clege. I'm so happy, Juice was able to spend his later years enjoying his family and living what I believe he relished w his children and grands.

  • @hillbillyheaven-ig4kg
    @hillbillyheaven-ig4kg 3 місяці тому +1

    If I would have been on that jury, I would have had to voted not guilty just like the jury did. However, I do believe there have been people in the past, found guilty and was sentenced to death and executed on a lot less evidence than the O.J. case

  • @rjmoss4038
    @rjmoss4038 3 місяці тому

    At met Bro. Douglas at the Town House in Ladrea back in the day. Very cool and down to earth brother.

  • @markedwards5516
    @markedwards5516 3 місяці тому +1

    Get judge joe brown on your show. Get his take on the oj trail

  • @anythinggoes1396
    @anythinggoes1396 3 місяці тому

    Great interview

  • @lindahunter7469
    @lindahunter7469 3 місяці тому +1

    I'm going to have trouble eating spaghetti from here on in.....

  • @beverlycromwell9805
    @beverlycromwell9805 3 місяці тому +10

    not guilty oj

  • @beverlykey3595
    @beverlykey3595 3 місяці тому +2

    Yes he did it

    • @gregjackson-ks1gh
      @gregjackson-ks1gh 3 місяці тому

      Anyone with the intelligence of a nat knows that.

  • @jonathanbogan6275
    @jonathanbogan6275 26 днів тому

    Whoever this brother is - MAD LOVE!!!
    💯

  • @rafail32
    @rafail32 3 місяці тому +2

    You Are A Joke Stephen A. Smith. Bring back the old Stephen A. who got fired from ESPN and went to FOX back in the day. I like that Stephen A

  • @growgod3283
    @growgod3283 3 місяці тому +4

    It’s a difference if you believing it and making others believe itit!

  • @opticscolossalandepicvideo4879
    @opticscolossalandepicvideo4879 3 місяці тому +1

    Johnnie Cochrans was brilliant. Great lawyers. Johnnie cochrans would have gotten Lee Harvey Oswald and Ted Bundy off. Amazing lawyer.

  • @matts.3514
    @matts.3514 3 місяці тому

    lol that was a weird random shot at Kato Kaelin.

  • @BUFFALO_NY
    @BUFFALO_NY 3 місяці тому +1

    Carl Douglass looked all geeked out on coke

  • @darinsmith2458
    @darinsmith2458 3 місяці тому

    I watched this and read the comments.. I was SoCal from 7-21-2019 to 3-10-2021.. I was in LA from 12-26-2019 to 3-10-2021.. I specifically stayed at a motel in Whittier.. I was out there for Covid and the Election and BLM.. I am a white guy and there was some rich neighborhoods in the hills that I thought people were going to call the police on me.. When I told non white people they told me that if they went up in the hills the helicopter would be after them.. I saw people confronting the police out there because they did not trust the police and the police was doing suspicious behavior.. You mentioned Santa Monica.. The police would let rioting and looting happen there and most of LA but Beverly Hills and many other wealthy areas have their own police and that was not going to happen in those areas..

  • @licecestep9411
    @licecestep9411 2 місяці тому +1

    You’d lambaste the jury if it was your family

  • @RShaun
    @RShaun 3 місяці тому

    I miss hearing CD on Max & Marcellus. Great listen.

  • @cremedelacreme4202
    @cremedelacreme4202 3 місяці тому +1

    say it aint so. he survive like 10 years prison and covid but cancer got him. dont make sense like most celebrity deaths.

  • @briannilles1303
    @briannilles1303 3 місяці тому

    Are you guys on the college football committee?

  • @Lifewithangiej
    @Lifewithangiej 3 місяці тому +1

    Carl Douglas is a professional deflector….lol

    • @mcfact1827
      @mcfact1827 3 місяці тому +1

      How so??? He directly explained everything

  • @MrDavlee77
    @MrDavlee77 3 місяці тому +1

    No one person could have killed those two people.

    • @slabbusterrtr7690
      @slabbusterrtr7690 3 місяці тому

      BS a woman and it's dark as hell and he's got a knife and you can't see it would be pretty easy

    • @victordeltoids8609
      @victordeltoids8609 3 місяці тому

      He 100% did it.

    • @johnp82
      @johnp82 3 місяці тому

      Dumbest take ever.

  • @hygory8576
    @hygory8576 3 місяці тому +3

    🙏🏿🙏🏿🌑🌃🎷RIP🪦to Da Great Juice OJ Simpson/BlackMan
    👑🖤🍊

  • @patrickdunning8662
    @patrickdunning8662 3 місяці тому +1

    stick to sports Stephen. In that regard, please try to keep your emotions from creating your show's agenda. God bless.

  • @cross6588
    @cross6588 3 місяці тому

    In Kato’s defense SAS the only reason he was living with OJ is because OJ said it wouldn’t look right living with Nicole and his kids so he offered him free place to stay rather than a little rent with Nicole. He probably made Kato an offer he couldn’t resist.

  • @zabluoc4549
    @zabluoc4549 3 місяці тому

    This one the best take about the OK case. SAS sum up everything...

  • @otiscarlwhite8745
    @otiscarlwhite8745 3 місяці тому +1

    Soooo listening to this guy, everything is about race, got it.

  • @gregjackson-ks1gh
    @gregjackson-ks1gh 3 місяці тому +1

    Answer this question...
    If you had been given the chance to spend the night at Simpson's house without locking your bedroom door, would you?
    If not, why?

    • @Benny53
      @Benny53 3 місяці тому

      If O J really committed those horrible murders then he was a lunatic, but it was a crime of passion, still no excuses. I can't say for sure if he did or did not do it because I wasn't there.
      If I was not having an affair with his wife, hurting his children or anything like that, then sure I will spend a night or nights at his house without locking my door. Everything must be in context.