Medical exemptions and Ivermectin
Вставка
- Опубліковано 5 бер 2021
- Friendly Pharmacy 5: / friendlypharmacy5
Videos:
• Vitamin D & Immunity: • Vitamin D & Immunity i...
• Oxford/AstraZeneca Vaccine: • Oxford AstraZeneca Vac...
• COVID-19 VACCINE Q&A PART 1: Ingredients, Speed of Production, mRNA: • COVID-19 VACCINE: Ingr...
• Interval between vaccine doses stretched up to 4 months: www.cbc.ca/news/politics/naci...
• Health Canada Epidemiology summary: health-infobase.canada.ca/cov...
• COVID-19 CANADA Vaccine Production: www.cp24.com/news/canada-sign...
• COVID-19 Vaccines in Canada: www.canada.ca/en/public-healt...
IVERMECTIN:
• US National Library of Medicine: medlineplus.gov/druginfo/meds...
• Pharmacokinetic considerations on the repurposing of ivermectin for treatment of COVID‐19: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti...
www.thelancet.com/journals/ec...
I was a COVID long hauler and got infected in March 2020. 6.5 months into my long haul symptoms, I took 12 mg of ivermectin for 4 days. Within 24 hrs, I felt an improvement. After 48 hrs, all my symptoms were gone. They have not come back since over the last 5 months.
I drank a glass of water, 48hrs later all my symptoms were gone, proves nothing... but I do advocate staying hydrated :)
Christie two in my flock with Covid long haulers took Ivermectin and also were cleared in 4 days
@@shardlake Except that you didn't have Covid so your snarky analogy is pointless.
In my country Homeopathy is quite a thing so I know many people who swear this "medicine" helped them against almost anything. The placebo effect can be extremely strong. Of course we should look into Ivermectin but as long as we don’t have a double blind study everything is just anecdotal evidence.
My hematologist was astounded with the before and after results of using Ivermectin.
As a former vet tech I can tell you animals use a LOT of medications that are also prescribed to people.
Do you have any info on the differences between the human version, and the ani,al versions. I heard that the injectable version has same molecule use as human version, but is the paste also the same molecule do you know ?
That's true. However I would advise caution when giving animal medications to people. Even if the packet comes with dosage instructions for dogs or cats or horses, working out the dose for a human by taking the weight of the intended animal patient and the weight of the human patient and multiplying the dosage by that ratio isn't necessarily going to give you the correct dose. Humans may need either more or less per unit of body weight than dogs or horses or guinea pigs or whatever.
I also suspect that the inactive ingredients in animal medications may not be the same as those in human medications. The inactive ingredients that don't harm your dog may not be the best choice for you.
@@roseskyschmolesky ivermectin has been used by humans yes dosage is different in animals.
Of course if you do take this and have diarrhea that's quite common side effect especially if you do have parisites in your tummy,and nausea is to be expected
This pharma. lady for some reason I just don't care for her much. If you're interested in ivermectin check out the FLCCC.net site alot of information there
ALL medicines are developed and tested and used on animals long before ever used on humans
Ivermectin in the paste for horses is based on human dosage per weight. Move the plunger to your weight and administer the medicine. Goes well with jelly. It comes out about half the amount of toothpaste.you would put on a toothbrush
Dr Mobeen Syed, who has been putting on brilliant videos on UA-cam, has explained the mechanism of action of Ivermectin in great detail. He uses this drug extensively, both for prevention and treatment, in conjunction with a number of other interventions. He is a hugely knowledgeable man, and seems to be a delightful, compassionate man.
Yes, agreed.. I'm extremely disappointed in this video
Dr Mobeen is sharing all the actual questions concerning this pandemic, Dr Campbell is sharing the predetermined answers.
@@robinhood4640 Yeah, I'd really recommend the pharmacist check out Dr. Been's vids on IVM -- not because he's the Voice of Truth, but because his presentations are logical and specific. If you disagree, the assertions and the logical inferences are right there, out in the open, for you to address.
He teaches medical students
Ah admit it John. You like Dr Been’s “Ivermectin Man”. My super hero!
Why don't you interview Dr Paul Marik about ivermectin.
EXACTLY.....it was a great waste of my time this episode
Not watching this episode....seriously thanks
Why do interviews about it at all unless it is connected with actual scientific proof?
@@debbiekostiuk8825
Funny, science is not for you.
@thecomfortstation
If you need somebody to interpret meta-analysis on RCTs, the studies simply aren’t good enough. You can use it for political decision making, maybe, but that is something entirely different.
I scanned the many comments here and very many are for ivermectin. You can see this same pattern throughout many other ivermectin videos. Ivermectin works.
Many people recognize the obvious corporate, government bias in favor of vaccines.
Big Pharma cannot earn a billion dollar profit from a two cent cure and governments need the tax revenue.
Bill Gates said, the purpose of vaccines is to reduce global population.
It is well documented that many vaccines sterilized their recipients. See VAXXED for details.
@@timothyjohnson1511
All you said there, was fearmongering and misinformation.
It's the modus operandi for you anti-vacc.
Vaxxed 1 and 2 are anti vacc propaganda.
Yell BigDollar is one of the best paid in the whole anti-vaccer grifting industry.
Watch Jeff Holidays review about Vaxxed 1 and 2, it is hilarious.
Apart from in the study that lindsay just described. But of course I believe you Grasshopper.
A long hauler, I posted recent hematology results before and after taking the medication and the post was pulled. The product worked for this long hauler.
@@nomebear Glad to hear!
Where did you post? And who the heck did the pulling?
Staggering ignorance about Ivermectin.
Love watching Dr Campbell but consider yourself told off.
You just showed your own ignorance
@@Shelmerdine745 fair enough, he covered IVM in the next show in detail. I was wrong
@@chrisemery914
It was not in more detail, you just happened to like what they said. Stop being biased. There is not enough evidence to approve ivermectin as a drug against covid-19, fact.
@@Shelmerdine745 from someone who is both science and statistics trained, I can tell you that the only way this is effective. Unless all these independent teams in multiple countries have colluded and everyone has kept quiet.
I was polite before. If you don't get the facts then don't throw your weightt around.
@@Shelmerdine745 all the more reason to do more trials and testing and be sure of the outcomes ? whats the harm ? It's a safe drug .. very safe...
Can be ignored. A study in south america involving prophylaxis of medical personnel showed not a single case of covid in the 800 subjects given ivermectin and a 58.8% covid infection rate in the control group not given ivermectin. Other studies have shown highly effective rates for premedication but the protocols varied widely. Again how can this be ignored?
It suits them. Money and greed. Money and greed. Shameful.
Please provide a reference to the peer reviewed article.
It can be ignored because it's not true
Very true and well said....extremely disappointed...trashed Ivermectin, using his well loved channel so that you can all go and get jabbed....with experimental chemicals...that no one knows its long term side effects. Pathetic is the word!
@@mykingslove7 Merck already came out with a statement saying it doesn`t work for Covid
Who agrees Dr. Campbell NEEDS to have an interview with Dr. Kory ???
Dammit, I had grown to trust this man, and his calm unbiased assessments.
All destroyed in one video.
Does anyone else detect a hint of shame and embarrassment in his face ?
Why has he done this ?
Has he received a warning from UA-cam ?
He is rather shameful in his bias --- He claims to follow the data, but it is so clear that he is selective against it. I honestly can't stand him anymore and so many sheep come to his channel thinking that he is going to be a savior, but all that he is doing is sending them to the gallows.
Yes I think an email from youtube is the answer
@@wd1501 I agree.
give em enough rope and they will hang themselves
You shouldn't dismiss evidence that goes against your own personal bias/belief. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias
Dr. Campbell, why don't you interview someone from the FLCCC to find out why they believe in Ivermectin? I understand that you are skeptical, and I don't blame you for that, but scientists should also keep an open mind and be willing to converse with colleagues in the field who have a different point of view.
Think about it.....please consider going to. HEALTH IMPACT NEWS. On Bitchute or Rumble. Very important info on the vax... very scary.. please get info from January thru today.... great Truthful info... please share with your friends and family. Thanks
He is keeping an open mind! That's why he brings Ivermectin up! Jeez!
2 months ago he was more on board with it, has he been bought out by big pharma?
Watch the U.S. Homeland security hearings, with Dr. Kory! It works. He is also the same Doc that informed the world to use steriods as well!
In my country(Brazil) there are tons of people reporting to their doctors they took Ivermectin as a preventive treatment just as they are being moved to the ICU. And it gets worse, patients with mild cases threated with Ivermectin are STILL being moved to the ICUs by the bunch, and still dying. Oh wait.... but it gets even worse! Some people are leaving the hospital with liver damage due to Ivermectin abuse by doctors on hospital admission (those that survive anyways... we will never know how many perished from covid-19 made worse by Ivermectin-trigered toxic hepatitis). But wait again... It can always get worse.... Some people will actually need liver transplant because of Ivermectin abuse, and among those, are young people who never were really infected with covid-19, they were just taking it as a 'prevention'. Due to incidents like that, most doctors are ditching Ivermectin and going out of their way to raise awareness to these issues, and they are clashing often with other doctors that pretend this whole think is not happening. Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD), the manufacturer of Ivermectin made public statements, both in portuguese and english, pointing out the fact they've found no scientific basis for a potential therapeutic effect against covid-19 in vivo and no meaningful evidence for clinical efficacy in patients with covid-19 at any stage of the desase, and the risk that it may be unsafe as it's being used. I felt the need to share this, it has been happening for a while, but only now I've found the time to write it down with the level of detail and consideration it deserves.
How come dr Campbell , hasn’t heard much about ivermectin but, I have heard nothing but, positives? He is so passionate about newly developed vaccines but, contorts in anguish when ivermectin is mentioned. Also, the interviewee goes to great lengths to highlight the possible side effects but, doesn’t stress the benefits.
Yes, there is always a risk/benefit balance to be taken. I think what Dr Campbell comes down to is that while there might only be a tiny risk to Ivermectin, it is not actually a 'cure' and the benefits have not been officially quantified. There may be significant benefits, as there is for VitaminD. Both have certain risks. Where there is a paradox is that despite a very low recommended dose and blood level officially indicated for Vat D, Dr Campbell does recommend and recognise that far higher doses are desirable. Yet despite the same kind of evidence for the efficacy and indeed risks of Ivermectin, he does not come to a similar conclusion. The evidence is of a similar type in both cases. He is taking a personal perspective in both cases and there is nothing wrong with that as long as it doesn't conflict with the evidence, which I don't think it does.
Huw Williams is like to see him interview dr Pierre Cory who has front line experience and coordinating several trials against great resistance. Why the apathy for a drug around for decades with minuscule side effects.
trained and paid up by the pharmaceutical dogma I guess
He is in the UK. Ivermectin is not licensed here. I am guessing he might want to work for/with the NHS again so his hands are somewhat tied. The place to lobby isn't on this channel, it's the MHRA and NICE websites - only through them can any real change occur in the UK. It was raised in Parliament without much success in the face of it, although the MP in question is unlikely to let go of the issue.
Yvonne Wilson the question is, how does he not know much about it?? He has showed such knowledge of other things.. this treatment has had such great success why would he not be encouraging it? It doesn’t make sense!!
Ivermectin works, picking and choosing studies doesn’t
You are right. Ivm seems to do really well or really badly depending on which study you choose, or what you believe. So it gets us nowhere and leads to hysterical fanaticism.
It worked for us !👍🏼
Could you please post links to your studies?
Dr. Campbell has done videos on ivermectin before but UA-cam took the down. I don't think, he's picking and choosing which studies to report on. You can email him and perhaps you've found a study he hasn't seen. IMHO, the good doctor will consider any study he's overlooked as he's a reasonable medical professional, not a conspiracy theorist.
It actually doesn't work, read the research, even Flccc shows it.
@@jimjamson9534 Hear! Hear! And as John & Lyndsay imply, wait for some EVIDENCE.
Doctors from the FLCCC would be glad to participate in a video with you, I’m sure. They are trying to save lives with Ivermectin, and succeeding beyond any expectations.
FLCCC to Merck: Data Shows Ivermectin’s Strong Efficacy Against COVID-19:
The Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) has issued a public statement in response to a press release issued by Merck last week.
COVID19 isn't a parasite. Using a parasitic medication against a virus is like using a wart cream for your fever. One has nothing to do with the other.
@@amelie2626 Ivermectin is also anti-viral. Yep.
@@juliagulia3414 No, it isn't.
Maybe you make a interview with dr. Paul Marik about ivermectin.
DR BEEN DONE IT ALREADY. SEE HIS VIDEO
Given the large frown and negative reaction when he mentioned Ivermectin I doubt Dr. John will be open to pursuing more info about ivermectin which is a shame. His body language indicated his bias.
@@taradrolma7612 Or he could be farting.
Conspiracy farting. With his 5G gas, he is seding messages to Bil Gates, CCP and his Reptillian Overlords. 🤣🤣🤣
@@taradrolma7612 yup .... disappointing. Definitely biased. Sadly so.
@@taradrolma7612 I'm sure he has be shown all these studies before ,but he denies them as if they dont exist ; google it c19ivermectin
Database of all ivermectin COVID-19 studies. 65 studies, 31 peer reviewed, 44 with results comparing treatment and control groups
"Don't know much about it" - Has John Campbell got a short memory? He covered Ivermectin in a video called "Therapeutics and a human experience" on 26 May, 2020. He's rather dropped the ball on it since then though, whereas Dr. Mobeen Syed has kept on updating his viewers on the topic.
sadly - youre SPOT ON !
try march 6th 2021 Medical exemptions and Ivermectin
He has "Ivermectin Evidence with Dr Tess Lawrie" also published on Mar 6. Not clear which why he would release both on the same day and say this.
Ivermectin has been in use for nine months in India.
@@patriciafarrow9586 - don’t tell me ivermectin doesn’t work with India’s strain? God help us.
Dr. John so very disappointed in you regarding Ivermectin. Wow, I expected more open minded, scientific, critical thinking on your part.
dr john is not open minded
I totally agree with you, he’s a vax man through and through
@@antheablackmore5838 yea because vaccines work.
Gina, me also, he is slowly losing my trust. It's becoming obvious he's biased towards big government and their handling of them pandemic. I believe he's too trusting of the pharmaceutical companies and the government.
I'm sorry to say I have to agree Dr j was sorely disappointing I I myself have lost two people to covid when I became ill I took Ivm and I totally believe in it may be people will say it was a placebo effect I can only say I felt better very quickly that's why I believe in Ivermectin I just wish my two relatives had been given it ,as I ll never know if it would have worked for them
Seems most people here watch Dr Been too, who is fantastic and looks at all the studies, positive and negative on IVM.
Yes - I watch mr. Mobeen too and he is a capacity many doctors could learn from
Yes he is a very good doctor who looks at all studies to try to determine the truth.
My brain can't process this video and how many doctors are trying desperately to discredit ivermectin
@@geritoooooo97 Yes it's a disgrace , after all the studies that been conducted they still deny ivermectin as a effective treatment against sar-cov2
@@mariannehart8000 aka Tom johnson aka Rab j.
im a veterinarian.. i work in afrika, s america and asia. we use veterinary medicines for people all the time..grow john.. all medicines are tested on animals long before they are ever approved for humans.. ivermectin has been used in 7 billion people worldwide
i also have an MD from oxford
Used on 7 billion people 😳!! There are only 9 billion people on the planet 😱😂😂😂
@@curlew-3592 The figure that I have seen was 3.7 billion. And that is since 1987. I have a feeling it could also mean 3.7 billion doses, since many people use it once or twice every year.
Dr Campbell is officially an idiot
Further to my comment This quote from The British Ivermectin Development Panel’s report on page 40 in the conclusions section:
“The British Ivermectin Recommendation Development Panel recommends Ivermectin for the prevention and treatment of covid-19 to reduce morbidity and mortality associated with covid-19 infection and to prevent covid-19 infection among those at higher risk”
“Whilst the panel agreed that ivermectin should be immediately rolled out, they suggested that further randomized trials of Ivermectin for covid-19 within individual country settings would be of value to investigate optimal dosage(dose, duration) and combination treatments according to covid-19 severity and risk factors
Excellent news
There is also a report on Horse.com where people are told not to take horse medicines because of the risk of impurities. "I can't stress this highly enough", was the direct quote.
@@YvonneWilson312 That is something you should be telling to government so they can make it available for people that are infected with the virus and need it, if people dont have any other option they will use other medicines it's that simple.
@@YvonneWilson312 so why give it to horses
@@bartbley1269 Er, because it's for worming horses?
A call out to John Campbell: Interview Dr. Paul Marik or Dr. Pierre Kory.
Maybe Dr. Campbell doesn't want a debate, he just wants to give away his own conclusion.
@@edgarolivas5407 he's a big Pharma shill for sure
Larry, I absolutely agree.
Yes Please, such an interview is looong overdue, also with Dr.Borody
I hope Dr. Campbell actually reads these comments!!!!
Anna Brees just did an interview with Dr. Tess Lawrie about Invermectin. Very positive. But then again the vaccines only have emergency use approval which I understand is granted when there are no other available treatments. Could this be why Invermectin is not being considered by some countries?
Probably. The solution would be to change the rules for EUA of vaccines during a pandemic rather than to continue denying lifesaving treatment to those in need.
@@nomad7540 Our FDA in the US is corrupted by big pharma, and they only approve big pharma's patented drugs for Covid treatment, such as Remdesivir, which is worthless against Covid, and causes kidney damage in 25% of the people it's administered to. Effective drugs such as Ivermectin are never approved. Fortunately doctors can prescribe Ivermectin for Covid off label, even though it is not approved by the FDA for Covid treatment. I keep a supply at home that I ordered from an online pharmacy that doesn't require a prescription. I already cured Covid pneumonia back in March of 2020 with Ivermectin, doxycycline and zinc. If you ever catch Covid, this stuff definitely works. I know other people that have also cured Covid with it.
Politically and financially motivated, that's your answer. Their policy is to Protect Pharma, they own Congress and govts around the world lock, stock and barrel
It is absolutely the case, watch the interview with Dr Pierre Kory and Pat Kenny.
John, John, John, as an RN myself, I am impressed, if not elated, that you as a PhD RN has garnered such credibility in a media dominated by 'real' doctors (MDs). Watching your video, I am so disappointed that fame? perhaps has become more important than critical thinking. For example, why didn't you remark that most of the side effects from properly dosed IVM relate to the death of parasites in the body. Why did you allow you guest to leave the impression that IVM side effects are so dangerous, rather than emphasize the safety profile of IVM is unparalleled compared to any other drug, even Tylenol. My goodness John, 3.8 billion doses! Further, why didn't you know that your guest doc (a) purposely selected the Barcelona study because it fit her narrative and (b) the Barcelona study has already been discredited? John, what will you say to your friend whose ?? died of Covid's cytokine storm yesterday or ?? , when the WHO comes out in favor of IVM? John, years ago I learned (you must know this, as well) that the medical profession as noble as it is, is also fraught with bias, easily influenced by money, professional hubris and inertia. Yes, this can be said of any profession (even ours!), but when the medical profession is 'that' way, the consequences can result in poor health outcomes including the worst that can happen. At the very least, as a counterbalance this video, allow the FLCCC to express an opposing viewpoint. GK
His deliberate bias against lifesaving Ivermectin makes me wonder if he is the kind of nurse who smothers patients at night when nobody is watching. He pretends to be compassionate but has an agenda.
There are plenty of other doctors out there putting forward only one side of IVM. I trust you also ask them to put forward the negative side as a countervalance?
Yvonne Wilson ... why are you willing to hurt so many people by obfuscating the truth? The data is out there already and unlike the vaccines, Ivermectin is safe and has not killed anyone
@@douginorlando6260 Frankly, I hope he sues you for libel. The libel laws in the UK are different than in the US, he might get redress for your intolerable defamation of character. No, he does *not* have a "deliberate bias against" *any* "lifesaving' drug.
The facts are that despite your brazen claims, there is *not* any good evidence that it is anywhere near as wonderful as you claim.
We have already seen a few cases of a "wonder drug" preached as the final solution in UA-cam. But when we *finally* get a real double blind trial, it does not do so well. Remember chlorohydroquinone? My be is that IVM will end up the same way.
We never do figure out what was really going on in the hospitals and clinical trials that claim such good results for CHQ, Quercetin, Remdesivir etc. but we *do* know that they *fail* the double blind test, so no, we *cannot* count on them to work, far less to be the 'lifesaving' drug you claim IVM to be.
Then again, your truly stupid claim that IVM is harmless but the vaccines harmful shows your true colors: you are an anti-vaxer. We know not to expect truth from anti-vaxers.
Well said 👏👏
I have taken the Ivermectin Horse Paste at least 13 or 14 times ---- Absolutely no side effects -- My tenant also took it, but his wife refused and guess who came down with Covid 19 and who didn't. The wife and kids came down with it, but he didn't. So I believe that it works.
Interesting times when people "following the science" succumb
to Darwinian culling, but those following anecdotal evidence are
surviving at a 1500% better rate. Then "Go figure" what makes
more sense when the "control group" who didn't believe in the
silliness of prophylaxis or early treatment are dying at 15 times
the rate of these silly unscientific people who are still alive and
not dead like their prissy supercilious aristocratic intellectual
"betters" who sure got their comeuppance for being regular
Einsteins suffering from terminal academic snobbery.
I am astonished how superficial the discussion about ivermectin was. I am used to more depth on the channel here.. rare side effects - big description. Studies with anti-inflammatory and anti-viral pathways.. NOTHING. 😳
Yes almost dismissive on its benefits
I'm sure Campbell has be shown all these studies before ,but he denies them as if they dont exist ; google it c19ivermectin
Database of all ivermectin COVID-19 studies. 65 studies, 31 peer reviewed, 44 with results comparing treatment and control groups.
So the game they are playing is obvious to everyone, trying to down play the significance ivermectin, because they pick and choose which study they want to talk about in order to fit their narrative that they want to push.
There isn’t any established anti-viral pathway. The types of parasites that ivermectin kills are tiny animals with nervous systems. Ivermectin is a neurotoxin and it attacks the nervous system of these tiny critters. That’s its mechanism (or pathway, if you prefer).
There’s a lot superficial speculation, but NO in-depth science to even discuss. The “in-depth” discussions that I have seen here and there are completely within the realm of pseudoscience.
He's posted more in depth videos about Ivermectin before and they were pulled from UA-cam within minutes.
Campbell was not even sure how the drug is administered. With all respect two people with very little knowledge on the subject discussing Ivermectin.
This was a very vague discussion of ivermectin.
Ivermectin proposes many potentials effects to treat a range of diseases, with its antimicrobial, antiviral, and anti-cancer properties as a wonder drug. It is highly effective against many microorganisms including some viruses. In this comprehensive systematic review, antiviral effects of ivermectin are summarized including in vitro and in vivo studies over the past 50 years. Several studies reported antiviral effects of ivermectin on RNA viruses such as Zika, dengue, yellow fever, West Nile, Hendra, Newcastle, Venezuelan equine encephalitis, chikungunya, Semliki Forest, Sindbis, Avian influenza A, Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome, Human immunodeficiency virus type 1, and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Furthermore, there are some studies showing antiviral effects of ivermectin against DNA viruses such as Equine herpes type 1, BK polyomavirus, pseudorabies, porcine circovirus 2, and bovine herpesvirus 1. Ivermectin plays a role in several biological mechanisms, therefore it could serve as a potential candidate in the treatment of a wide range of viruses including COVID-19 as well as other types of positive-sense single-stranded RNA viruses. In vivo studies of animal models revealed a broad range of antiviral effects of ivermectin,
And the plethora of studies have yet to be on scales sufficient for a novel use so the topic itself is vague. Dr. Campbell succently stated this when he said all the studies are frustratingly enticing as they are only enough to suggest a benefit may exist. Studies of 24 cases are not studies of tens of thousands of cases with respect to novel uses no matter the plethora of such studies reported on the internet. And yes, some would say roll the dice if other options aren't available so a few authorities suggesting it be tried does not give proof either.
@@johnwang9914 And the the current mRNA vaccines where not tested on animals but the past mRNA vaccines that were tested killed the test animals if not immediately but as soon as a new virus was introduced. Somehow a spike protein created a deadly cytosine storm killing the animal. We may not know the actual effects of the vaccine until there is follow up virus introduced to the population by whatever means.
@@johnwang9914
Perhaps the scale isnt large enough... but such reasoning runs contrary to the emergency use authorization of Remdesivir which had very poor study results. The SIMPLE study showed minor efficacy in a very narrow specific group yet Ivermectin shows broad spectrum positive results.
Campbell's guest revealed her biases by suggesting so many studies were inconclusive, raising the tried and true citation of the Australian Petri dish study which used a large dose where she falsely suggested that a high dosage level was needed in order to kill the virus in 48 hours. Wrong! It was the only level they tested. From the study; "we infected Vero/hSLAM cells with SARS-CoV-2 isolate Australia/VIC01/2020 at an MOI of 0.1 for 2 h, followed by the addition of 5 μM ivermectin. Supernatant and cell pellets were harvested at days 0-3 and analysed by RT-PCR for the replication of SARS-CoV-2 RNA". That was the extent of the testing, no reductions of testing minimum strength of ivermectin to kill the virus.
@@ricknash3055 what are your medical qualifications
UK BIRD study has just given Ivermectin the thumbs up and has also advised WHO to advise the world of this super drug. Found the scientist lacking in knowledge of worldwide successes.
Please interview Dr Kory asap will save lives
This ''Dr.'' will do nothing. He's with the big pharma..Or, too scared to do anything.Pitty.
For Ivermectin, invite Dr Pierre Kory to your show.
no chance - Dr Kory would completely embarrass him after this ridiculous bit of mis /under-representatiin spiced with misleading scaremongering.
No, Dr Paul Marik would be a better idea
Dr. Paul Marik is the very best in this area....
Don’t hold your breath ... Campbell has an agenda and FLCCC is the obstacle. His deliberate bias against lifesaving Ivermectin makes me wonder if he is the kind of nurse who smothers patients at night when nobody is watching. He pretends to be compassionate but then promotes deception like the pied piper, leading trusting children over the cliff to their death.
I really don’t think he will. Like another person here said. FLCCC is an obstacle. It’s more about money for him than saving people. The va****e killed people and he just dismissed it as nothing. Even the Pz**** CEO was on the news yesterday not wanting to take his own (you know what) that they developed and Israel didn’t let him in the country so he just delayed his arrival to another date. They obviously know something we don’t.
UA-cam has banned so many doctors and other medical experts for only mentioning or talking about medical studies about Ivermectin. Keep up the good work. This channel is very informative and I'm taking vitamin D since the day it was first discussed on this channel.
Do you have some examples of the many banned doctors?
@@johmyh14
It's doubtful he does. I know for a fact the Dr Mobeen had just had a rigorous inspection of his content, signed certain papers as an indication of his position and still has plenty of Ivermectin content on this channel. In fact, I can't imagine anyone having more.
First discussed 28th January 2020.
@@johmyh14 This comment section is not the place to start a discussion about it. Use a search engine with YT and a "forbidden" medicine or treatment.
@@johmyh14 Dr. Pierre Kory and footage of him testifying and sharing study results, was aggressively censored by the tech monopolies.
The federal gov’t has granted immunity from liability to the drug companies if something goes wrong w/vaccines
Looks like Dr. Been is the better scientist. I have followed JC for a long time, but this was a poor hatchet job on IVM, and missed most of the points about it that are important. Everyone, if you value a scientific analysis, switch to Dr Been.
They are just reporters. Taking their “analyses” seriously is stupid.
Let's all switch over to whomever the UA-cam addicts follow. Good plan
Unlike these two he can explain how and why it works.
@@steelcom5976
Haha, good point
my only concern with Dr. Been is that he seems to like the vaccines still even with all his "research" I would have thought he'd come across all the cautionary studies that other doctors have found and reported on as well that really give pause to folks considering these experimental vaccine "gene therapy" treatments that you cannot come back from, you can't detox the fake protein out of your body once you've been given the shot....
Your paper sounds a little older. Try the latest studies done in Israel great presentation by ...or invite Dr Kory or Dr Been on this topic. I have seen their latest on Ivermectin. Worth looking somemore. Thank you Dr Campell for your work.
The Israeli study you mustn't know much about. They had no proof of efficacy but thought that it reduced viral shedding. Gotta do your research before you blindly follow the UA-cam crowd
This paper was published January 19, 2021
I like the article in the paper that talked about an 80 year old in NY dying in the hospital of COVID. Family went to court to force the Dr’s to give her Ivermectin. It saved her life.
@@sherkirkpatrick8060 With that thinking we should stop the vaccination program because a few people died a few days after taking the shot
@@steelcom5976 I’m not seeing your point. We need both vaccines and therapeutic drugs. Ivermectin has been shown to have promising results based on studies in many countries. Read the NIH report. They changed their view on Ivermectin. FLCCC are frontline Drs that see the results first hand.
I seem to remember you have already spoken about ivermectin on a previous update and the FLCCC Alliance in the USA and how it should be investigated by governmens.
Follow the money!!!
He did indeed
Amnesia?
Dr Jab Jab is a bad actor
@@moonshotsilver hahha yes just like the rest of his goons haha
Question to all medical doctors: what's the point of vaccinating people who have naturally had a SARS-CoV-2 infection? Wouldn't a natural infection of Covid-19 give more immunity, why would they need to be vaccinated?
Vaccination should be for people who have NOT naturally had the disease or developed immunity from the virus.
Why don't they first test people for immunity of various levels (IgG, IgM & Memory T-Cells from the bone marrow)... and after it's confirmed that they have neither three of the above, then they can go ahead and be vaccinated... how about this?
To Dr. Nitai. It has a similar role of a booster dose. The same reason why people are given a second dose of the Pfizer or Moderna vaccines. To help the T-cells to gain longer memory. Data from Israel shows the recovered people have slightly less effectiveness than those who got the vaccines, to the British variant. It might, however have to do with the time passed since recovering vs. getting vaccinated.
@@uzipaz9557 Israel is implementing the green pass for people to live free with the vaccine. Israel is talking taking people's names that have not taken it. It is public knowledge that there is technology in the vaccine. The plans that this company has made are starting to come into place. Are you going to be a part of selling out the children. Combined with hydrogel biosensor, which to do not suffer from rejection, instead becoming one with your own tissue, we may also find outselves permanently connected to the internet based cloud,for better or worse.
www.lewrockwell.com/2020/09/joseph-mercola/injectable-biochip-for-sars-cov-2-detection-near-fda-approval/
There is also a need for digital solutions for contact tracing and control of citizens. There are 24×7 command and control centers for Covid-19.
The public distribution efficiency monitoring is also taking place. There will be blockchain-based citizen tracking for misuse and hoarding prevention. The citizen risk monitoring and access control will have app color codes for citizen risk factor such as red, yellow, or green. We will see a world evolving that will be much more smarter and digital place in future.
Thanks Dassault.
www.dqindia.com/world-towards-sustainable-resilient-urban-future/
Containment zones??? If you do not think they are not going to try this around the world, think again.
Dassault Systemes showcased a “Planning Pandemic Emergencies” solution that can enable public authorities and city administrators with thorough preparedness and response planning for a large-scale healthcare crisis. It offers a single window for “Area Referential for Pandemic Emergency Planning”, “Citizen Sentiment Analysis for Improving the Services Rendered” and “Mass X-ray Analytics for Testing and Segregation of COVID-19 positive Patients”. The 3DEXPEREINCE Platform enables digital referential for city, planning the hotspot clusters and containment zones in 3D context, planning the access to essential services, generation of heat maps based on data sets and analytics.
varindia.com/news/the-world-after--sustainable-and-resilient-urban-future-dassault-systemes
Vax protects better against variants. But a natural infection will have better long tern protection form the same virus.
deborah nagle , YOU are a TRULY GREAT HUMAN BEING. I WISH THAT the WORLD had more ANGELS LIKE YOU. 🙏. TRUTHSPEAKER.
Truth is that if you had Covid19, you are immune for 9 months!
So glad to see the 2 new ivermectin interviews with Dr. Tess Lawrie!
"Never take any medicine unless it's prescribed for you by your personal doctor." But please take our advice and go to a drive-through vaccination center.
Deadly hypocrite ... Campbell is the honest face sales man who knows he is killing many through deceit. Ivermectin is effective and safer than the vaccine. He would be more believable if he did not hide all the graves of people dead due to taking the vaccine.
Also, current protocol is to not test for Vit D levels or take more than 400 IUs per day. That's what the doctors will say.
Doug InOrlando , 💥💥💥 TRUTHSPEAKER ! Robert Kennedy Jr. “ Children’s Health Defense “. I despise this so called dr John Campbell...He’s NOT a Doctor or a Scientist....Why would anyone take this vAX ? Also go to. Health Impact News. On Bitchute. This is the Agenda...depopulation... go to. Headlines with a Voice “ The Father of Controlled Starvation “. Good luck to all who seek the truth...
Very well said. I've copied your statement to email to relatives and friends
Please go to your doctor so you can be denied an innocuous and potentially life-saving drug.
Already three people in New York up-state had to sue their hospital to get the full course of ivmct.
(They all got better.)
*“The world is engaged in the largest clinical trial, the largest global vaccination trial ever.” Greg Hunt, Australian Federal Health Minister, February 2021.*
Greg hunt is an idiot and does not belong in that job further more neither does almost every minister in the Australian Fedral Government.
Scary stuff , they made a MRNA message then put it in a lipid envelope that then enters and takes over your body cells (sure sounds like they created a virus) and reprogrammed it to make copies or parts of another virus? The immune system attacks the mimic virus. What happens to the vaccine virus, can it keep changing to get around the immune system? Guess we will find out.
@@jmm8021 Yes, the virus can change in way that allows it back as a threat.
First concern, though, because that is always possible and LIKELY when constraints such as lockdowns are put on the widespread situation, is mutation success that makes it more easily spread. This is because if the "normal" one is hampered, mutations that always arise would likely include ones that CAN spread under lockdown conditions.
The mutants that are already known and worried about are riding the wavefront of expanding horizons.
What is going on by governments in killing economies and childrens' present lives, is unscientific and counterproductive, and EVIL, no matter how many times they repeat their "following the science" mantra.
The first polio vaccine campaign went forward with little or no testing.
@@jmm8021 you might. I won't.
Line up an interview with DR Vernon Coleman. He would love to debate with you. Then you can debunk all of his claims.
What have you got to lose? "Informed consent" means we need to hear all sides of the arguement. Dare you do it?
Sorry, but you do not approve medicines based on arguments.
@@Shelmerdine745 True, but maybe it will reveal true motives of various parties. Ivermectin is cheap, so there is an incentive to set it up to fail in an experiment run with the hope of "failure". Good to be suspicious .
I would prefer too see him debate Ivor Cummings. It won't happen because it doesn't fit the agenda.
@@andrewcollins4458 Yes very good choice for a debate with the Nurse.
@@Shelmerdine745 Then how exactly do we find where the truth lies if we are not able to check claims via debate and listening to both sides "arguing" their cases?
I am puzzled by Johns clearly dismiisive attitude to Ivermectin.
Having not done any groundwork.
I've watched him take us in detail through many studies on other agents, successful and not.
I see many Ivermectin studies that look good to me, the Barcelona one being non-typically indecisive.
Can you please do Ivermectin properly, John.
Not just getting a canadian doctor to point you to one study, and discussing her opinions.
We trust you because you read the stuff yourself, form your OWN opinions, and show us your logic, in detail.
Why are you failing us this time ?
The dismissiveness towards Ivermectin seems to have started after he claimed he’d had his jabs.
Even though I respect Dr Campbell very much, he seems to have a naivete to him that is confounding. He always seems to defer to whatever authorities say. "The drugs are the same", he says, but he's against self prescribing. All anybody has to do is assess the risks for themselves. The rest is an informed choice.
Please check FLCCC information with dr Pierre Kory and DrBeen medical info on ivermectin prophylaxis
EXACTLY !!
The Dr has already done an update on ivermectin and the FLCCC on Dec 2020
I had a consistent flu symptoms for more than 6 months; nose running, throat sore etc. However Covid-19 test found negative. So I decided to try ivermetin. First dosage (2 pills for 2 days) my condition improved but returned to the old symptoms. So I repeated after 2 weeks. My flu system totally disappeared after the third dosage! Surely ivermetin has help to fight other types of flu. This was my experience with this drug but yours may be different.
I suspect this is exactly WHY they don’t want it rolled out , it would eliminate the flu vax !
This is just an anecdote, not evidence. Sounds to me like an allergy problem if you had it that long (I deal with similar symptoms all the time).
I saw a study on Ivermectin that reviewed about 50 studies, all showing effectiveness. The fact that Dr. John does not know anything about it is surprising, as is his guest finding only one very limited study to talk about.
Also, when talking about new vaccines that use a novel mechanism, you severely understate the risk when you talk of known counter indications, and don't mention that there is a lot that is not known. If Ivermectin were a new drug, used as seldom as these vaccines, you would not have a long list of rare side effects. People are resorting to taking horse paste because doctors and scientists don't care about the truth, and care more about making money for the large pharma companies, who are using this crisis to make people into their guinea pigs.
Give me a treatment with a known safety profile and side effects and stop pushing experimental vaccines promoted by people like Bill Gates who is on the record as saying that promoting vaccines is intended as population control, and has talked about the need to lessen population as if it were a number in his computer and not people he is consigning to death, or at least, non-existence.
Please explain the Bill Gates conspiracy again it’s hilarious
👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼Well Said!!!
Robert
It's not hilarious. And it is hardly a conspiracy theory. Check out his Ted Talks. He openly speaks of funding vaccinations in Africa as a means of population control by reasoning that if people know their children will survive, they will have fewer children. Not to save lives. Not to lessen suffering. To lessen population.
I suspect that the increasing African population since he said this, and fact that the Catholic Bishops in Nigeria are pointing to infertility agents being found in tetanus shots targeted at women of childbearing age has something to do with the failure of this reasoning and an attempt to use another mechanism to control population.
He has also listed out a formula for contributors to climate change, which he sees as a serious problem. One of the factors is population. He then suggests that since these numbers are being multiplied together, in order for the product to approach zero, one of the numbers will need to approach zero. Population is one of the numbers that must approach zero. Think about that. Now, go get your vaccine funded by the Gates Foundation.
Incredible, it only took one or two studies and a JAMA publication to conclude IVM is not for Covid. How about Jonh Campbell addressing the conclusions of Dr. Andrew Hill virologist of University of Liverpool, Dr. Paul Marik's experience and knowledge, Dr. Pierre Kory of the FLCCC, Dr. Tess Lawrie. I get it what Dr. Campbell here wants is a NON-DEBATE, what he want is his own dogmatic conclusion.
Thats because he has his own agenda --- Vitamin D -- Too bad it isn't as effective as Ivermectin
Agree ! Please consider going to. HEALTH IMPACT NEWS. on Bitchute or Rumble. Important info on the vax.. very important you share with your friends and family... best to you
You're ignoring Professor Thomas Borody who started the Ivermectin treatment for Covid 19 patients in the first place, along with the American critical care doctors of FLCC who are lobbying for Ivermectin to be pushed as THE Covid19 treatment. It has already been moved from not allowed use ( that's virtually every drug in the world) to allowed for use as Covid19 treatment but it's not recommended like the vaccines which are, "Recommended for Emergency Use" .
@@wd1501 . The thousands of tests actually still recommend Vit D3 and Zinc as part of the Standard Treatment and should symptoms be other than mild then Dexamethasone.
Have a look at the FLCC alliance protocol for ivermectin. They have all the answers.
Dr Campbell please compare Iver Mectin to Paracetamol ! Which of the two is the most dangerous and why is it one of these isn't available in the UK for general sale !
It is very profesional to invite a Big Pharma Lady to talk and present a study of IVM. It proves a great vision of science and medicine in particular.
I'm actually surprised that she hasn't talked about medical contraindications. Many people have reported sudden spikes in inflammation reported by CRP that can lead to multiple organ damage, sudden spike in blood pressure, vertigo etc
Dr Campbell why don’t you talk to Dr Paul Marik, the author of the covid staging chart you use frequently He will explain Ivermectin simply and clearly. Very accomplished Dr who strongly supports Ivermectin use.
Can we have details of medication to be taken for ivermectin
The very real fact is that nobody -- NOBODY-- knows the long-term side-effects of these shots.
Thank you for at least addressing Ivermectin but I'm not to pleased that you ve made out that you dont no much about Ivermectin you have done a vidio on it and you actually said that according to what you where seeing in the paper work it looked highly effective, disappointing Dr Cambel
He seems to be a liar
Surely the best exemption is that I'm not old or riddled with comorbidities and therefore don't need it?
Thank you for having something on Ivermectin
You know this video doesn't have a very long life expectancy lol
In this case they did more harm then good. Because the women knew nothing about ivermectin. Please invite a doctor from the FLCCC.net on your show. There are over 8 to choose from. Dr Hill is evaluating ivermectin for the WHO
@@LLCoolPass
That's why it's updated daily.
@@mikewatch1487
Profound thanks for referring us to
I hadn't heard of the 'Front-Line Covid19 Critical Care Alliance.' I expect to see our South Florida physicians there when I have time to read the mass of info. My intro was an article in the Miami Herald. (Search 'ivermectin covid florida' to find it.) Best regards from Florida ... 'Where covid variants come to meet & mingle!'
👻🤧💀🌴🌺🌴😷🌴🌸🌴
Thank you for having something on ivermectin?????? Nice joke sid, this is probably the worst ever video and knowledge about a drug anyone has ever put on any public platform the 2 of them should stick to speaking to the deaf with there whiteboard messages
It would be very interesting if you considered talking with Dr Tess Laurie about ivermectin.
Looks like he took your advice. My comment in similar vein seems to have been removed !
At leastJohn got the second opinion advice ! 👍🏻
@@amnoahwielwabbit3837 it was a very odd way for john to upload it yesterday. Had me very confused. Hopefully, now this information will reach a wider audience and get more people clued up.
We still don't know about any long-term effects of these vaccines....
Love the info Doc but please look up Dr Tess Lawrie on youtube. If you want a real UK analysis of ivermectin trials.
He just uploaded a two part interview with her.
check the newest video on his timeline
Thank you for keeping up with Ivermectin.
He is not keeping up with Ivermectim at all. Go to the drs who are using it with great effect.
@@cherylmcduff5388 🤣🤣🤣 You're funny...
@@cherylmcduff5388 exactly! FLCCC by frontline doctors trying to save lives, not make vaxine money
John Campbell has already done an update on ivermectin on December 2020 where he knew all about the treatment and said governmens should investigate the medication.
I suggest "TrialSite News" or "FLCCCA weekly updates" for extensive overview of the use of Ivermectine against Covid-19.
If I am trying to assess how objective an item is on You Tube I go to the comment section. TrialSite News commentators are almost exclusively conspiracy theorists. I also think that TrialSite News seems to only have one horse in the race, ivermectin. I have yet to see any other topic related to Covid 19 being discussed on that channel.
I have always received value from Dr. Johns updates and felt I was receiving clear unbiased information but this was disturbing Dr. John you owe yourself and all of us who have been depending on your clear communication regarding all thing Covid much better than what you just delivered here. You just discredited yourself, shame.
Dr Campbell has often shown a bias, so this bias should not come as a surprise. We don't need to agree with someone 100%. His videos are of great value and are much appreciated by many. They give us information and his opinion, which helps us to have our own opinion.
This video was pure garbage, probably pushed by Pharma
To Dr. Campbell's credit, his videos with Dr. Tess Lawrie within a day of this one, especially the second one which look at meta-analyses of RCTs concerning IVM, as well as a better perspective on the excellent safety record of IVM, are excellent.
You people need to open your eyes and learn how science works.
@@Shelmerdine745 Are you not confusing how science should work and what we are seeing with this coronavirus?
Oh good we are waiting on the WHO to report their findings. I really trust them. 🙄
And who controls The Who? I think we all know.
Well I was lucky enough to have the Oxford vaccine yesterday. After about 18 hrs I started feeling rough and could easily have taken painkiller but didn’t. I had a bath to bring my temperature down and now 24 hrs later all I have is a slight headache. I’m sure all the 4000ius of vitamin D I’ve been taking for months must have helped. Oh and the sun is shining and birds are tweeting - that all helps x
what on earth has a vitamin d supplement have to do with an injection of a gutted adinovirus?
Maybe get back to us and report the long term effects - since that wasn’t accounted for in these rushed vaccines. Or have your family do it if your not able.
@@nomorewar4189 ha yes well I'm hoping there are no long term effects!
@@salspace1957 - it was 2 yrs ago august my mom died after being vaccinated so I’ll do all I can to convince friends and family even strangers it’s a bad idea 👎
@@nomorewar4189 yes I'm afraid there are always people who will react badly to a vaccine or any medication. Good thing we are all allowed a choice. My daughter won't choose to have the vaccine, I have had to listen to her conspiracy theories for months!
As Dr Mobeen who advocates for IVM has said, governments that make getting IVM through your doctor DIFFICULT, force people to try and do it themselves with veterinarian meds. Its easily solved - make it easy for medical doctors to prescribe it.
Does Ivermectin ever lead to anaphylactic shock?
The mRNA vaccines can, as the lady says.
I thought the nano lipid particles were a conspiracy?
You are mixing terms nano lipid particle are very small fats. Not anano chip, which is a tin foil hat conspiracy.
@@jamesandrews1130 but all the 'tin foil hat' scientists say the nano lipid particles were used to trick the immune system into taking the mRNA. you can see the same technology in this patent wa0606062020 on google. don't be so derogarotory
ITS AN INCONVENIENT FACT THAT VACCINES HAVE KILLED OVER 1,300 IN THE US BUT NO ONE YET HAS DIED FROM IVERMECTIN USE FOR COVID
@@snowbird6855 evidence please. CDC Vaers doesn't demonstrate that.
Dr. Campbell said he is waiting for the WHO to perform the analysis of IVM for him. Why is he so capable and self-sufficient when the matter is Vitamin D, but so dependent of the WHO for some other matters?
Hmmm, very disappointing.....The fact that these two decided to cherry pick the ONE study that makes IVM sound worthless and report on it certainly removes a LOT of credibility from this channel in my viewpoint. So the same two who are telling me that IVM is worthless are also telling me to hurry up & go get a vaccine.......ANY vaccine. They are ALL fine & dandy. Hmmm, maybe I better hold off on rushing to get the vaccine.
@Myth Tree #+ lol pay
I'll get one asap. 294 million have had a vaccine now so not like it hasn't been tested.
alan4sure Not for long term effects! That’s why they are all “approved for emergency use” We have no knowledge of future effects.
@@alan4sure we don’t even know long term effects. If you look at the phase 3 trial of them, you’ll see it’s noted that health will be monitored for 2 years, so even the makers don’t fully know.
@@NotAverageAnymore long term monitoring of all vaccines is standard, not due to fear of unknown late side effects but to establish long-term efficacy and duration of immunity.
The Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) recommends Ivermectin as part of their treatment protocol.
One of the most persuasive studies using IVM took place in Peru. Each of its 25 states used the medication beginning at different times. Deaths plummeted in each state once mass use of IVM began. When the IVM was stopped, the deaths came roaring back. It would be nice to see you interview Dr. Kory or Dr. Scheim about this.
Many of us have written this here, an interview with Dr. Kory but I think it's better to deny and ignore.
I like how the rare side effects of a medicine already in use isn’t ok but the rare side effects of a jab not approved by FDA is ok.
I had to add one more comment, I was very hesitant about getting a vaccination, John! Because of you I'm getting vaccinated tomorrow morning which is Saturday here at 9:30 a.m. thank you so much for winning me over 👍
You can have my vaccine too
I'm pea-green with envy.
@@revealanation7778 - so you're volunteering yourself to provide a reservoir for the virus to mutate into new variants and strains causing more problems. Thanks. You're a real hero.
U better not be getting the vaccine they got in sweden. 40% got 40 degree C fever so they had to stop the vaccinations. (Malmoe hospital)
Congratulations.
KEEP away from the fearmongerers and avoid the misinformation.
People are only taking the veterinary Ivermectin because getting hold of the human version is almost impossible. In the UK a black market is developing for this drug. I tried to speak to my pharmacist and he didn't want to discuss it ! A wall of silence has descended on the medical and pharmaceutical profession and it is very sinister.
Did you not just watch the video, why are you here on a site that follows science not conspiracy theories?
Same with hcq. Mention that drug and watch your doctor pee their pants. They are being threatened by the licensing boards. These drugs jeopardize the vaccine.
@@janetairlines1351 The science is not good for HCQ the real reason... Seems I am not religious enough to blindly follow the HCQ god...
@@shardlake is listing motorcycle crash deaths as covid "following the science" as well? Im just glad the flu doesn't exist anymore (we just call it covid now)
@@shardlake Trials that were biased against HCQ by design showed poor performance. For example, extreme overdose, and treatments given way too late to help. Anti-virals must be given before massive replication. Trials that were designed to be accurate showed HCQ works very well when given early and in proper dose.
In the first week of the rollout in Australia we had a nurse that had anaphylaxis after her first jab , amazing that this rare reaction turned up in the first week . And the vaccine companies say if you have anaphylaxis don't take the vaccine but here we are forcing it onto nurses with anaphylaxis .
Sadly there is so much misinformation and loss of trust here in the U.S. Today's video was very helpful in answering questions I've had myself. I also shared it with my father (late 70's) because his doctor is recommending Moderna. A few years back he had an allergic reaction to contrast dye in hospital during a heart procedure. Your video was the first time I'd heard tromethamine allergy is a contraindication for the Moderna vaccine. Thank you.
Misinformation?
Maybe contradicting information would be a better description than misinformation.
Strange body language here! a lot of raised eyebrows and gurning at the mere mention of Ivermectin then excited like kids at christmas when talking about vaccines. Dr Paul Marik has done an excellant study well worth taking into consideration.
What about antibody dependent enhancement? Why isn’t this discussed? That taking a vaccine can cause you to become Sicker should you encounter a spike protein in the future?
encounter a spike protein in the future?
13
@@dth999 Any corona virus or virus that may have a similar spike protein recognized as similar enough to launch an immune response
Just saw that the UK panel of scientists called BIRD just sent their recommendations to the WHO on ivermection. They recommend the sweeping world wide use of ivermection for treatment of Covid-19. Good news!
Why didn't you bring up your interview with Dr Tess Lawrie when talking about Ivermectin?
It seems to be, looking at the comments below, that most people do not understand a double blind study. Unfortunately the one mentioned here was so small as to be of little use. Surely this could quite easily be set up? Maybe something in ivermectin does have anti-viral properties and we could use that for treatment in future.
NO PROOF Parachutes work either until you do A DB RCT.
It's hard to "trust the science" when so many ghost written papers are used to advocate the "results".
Getting a strange feeling about Dr.JC,he is barking with the dogs and howling with the wolves.Its a conflict of interest.
me too, been thinking the same for 4 or 5 months now......he's just part of the vaccine promotional industry
Do we have any facts regarding mortality rates of Ivermectin use Vs the current recorded mortality rate for the Vaccines to-date?
There was a similar placebo controlled randomized research done by Prof. Eli Schwartz et. al., and the statistics was higher than the small size research mentioned by Lindsey.It showed a considerable reduction in viral load.
How about checking clinical studiesFLCCC, Dr Andrew Hill and others re Ivermectin treatment for Covid-19 ?
NO MONEY.
@@esecallum
$1 per tablet profit(?)
3-4 tablets per dose
4 day course.
Potential for *7 BILLION People to take the course*
That's *$100 BILLION PROFIT*
(And it's EASY to make! Not like vaccines)
@@rogerstarkey5390 no no no... 100 billion is peanuts. they want at least 3 or 4 TRILLION.
Appreciate all these wonderful insights into the vaccines , so interesting even for the layperson , my respect to all the scientists who made this possible on record time , I've had my first AZ jab .
Kudus for the interview. Congratulations from Portugal.👍🙏
It was extremely poor and limited. Here is information on ivermectin by the specialist doctors who developed the treatment, including over 56 published studies;
FLCCC.net
@@snowbird6855 I've been following dr. Lucy Kerr in Brasil. All this farce makes me laugh.👍
Very disappointed in you Dr. Campbell. I guess this is where I get off your bus.
"Covid 19 is not a parasite" this is true. The immune system deals with parasites and the immune system deals with covid. Ivermectin affects the immune response. Arguing that Ivermectin should not be used for an immune response from covid because it was intended to treat an immune response from a parasite, is a very weak argument.
AND MADDENING !
Hold on a minute - part of what you;ve said is not accurate. The immune system cannot deal/dispose of parasites - get a tapeworm and you ain't getting rid of it without drug treatment, same is true of other parasites such as roundworm and more tropical parasites.
@@mjwilliamsb2676 I do agree with your point. However, if you do a google search pre 2020, to eliminate the noise created by this pandemic, you can see the questions arising with regard the effectiveness of ivermectin in many diseases, because of it's effects on the immune response.Treating the parasite is only one aspect of the mechanism which makes it effective. The effects it has on the immune response is also contributing to it's effectiveness, and it is this part which is thought to be having a beneficial effect on covid patients, hence my initial remark that the argument was weak.
@@robinhood4640 I'm aware of that, but perhaps you should correct your original statement that the immune system can 'deal with' parasites, which implies the immune system can get rid of them without assistance.
Ivermectin binds the spike proteins to prevent cell penetration and has multiple methods of action. Immune system comments like this are vague and counter productive. Go to FLCCC and get educated
I want to thank you both for using big graphics, it can be difficult to catch chemical names, especially in those whose English is not their strongest language, and seeing them in print helps them stick in the mind and gives us time to write them down, if needed.
Thanks John. Once again you are quite welcome on a screen in my home today. => Not that it is important to the medical discussion, but the reason for polyethylene glycol in the vaccines wasn’t described correctly. As we are not constructing vaccines, this is really irrelevant, just a small amount must be included, so from a reaction perspective, the reason for the presence isn’t really important. I only mention this as my understanding is different from what was presented. I always appreciate having potential areas where I can refine or improve my understanding pointed out, particularity if done politely. => Next, to diminish concerns with polyethylene glycol, this is the same chemical as is used in motor vehicle cooling systems - the primary additive to lower freezing points, so anyone who has been about or exposed to such cooling fluids and didn’t have a severe reaction can have more comfort with the vaccines with polyethylene glycol. Also, one concerned might just start reading labels to see what products they have been using for years contain polyethylene glycol. One might then not worry, as one already ran an exposure to much larger doses than a vaccine would contain. I hope this is reassuring to some. => Another point where it seems the implications of this video are not as reassuring on taking vaccines as it could, is a vaccine is a very limited exposure to the virus that originated from Wuhan, Hubei, China and is causing the COVID-19 pandemic - much less than an infection would have. The spike protein focused vaccines don’t contain most of the virus, just a small part. Also, the numbers of viral particles from the initial phases of a disease causing infection are much larger than the number of deactivated viral particles contained in a vaccine or the number of spike proteins contained in or produced from a vaccine. With respect to the active part of the vaccine, there is nothing that wouldn’t be in an infection of COVID-19. Unlike the cowpox vaccine, which contained a different virus, nothing new or different here. So those concerned about vaccines can be more comfortable. Any unknown, long term consequence from the pandemic should be less with a vaccine, as the amount of the virus and the number of viral particles are smaller with the vaccine and the vaccine doesn’t contain anything viral or protein different from the active virus. Slight protein difference with all the tens or hundreds of thousands different variants, only a handful of which seem to have different disease progression. So, bottom line, vaccine is disease light, not something different. Not really saying anything different from what you, John have said over your videos, just pulling together to try to help some people be a bit more comfortable with these vaccinations. => Also, given vaccination is disease light, the idea of waiting if one has active COVID-19 or just had it isn’t based on concern of over stressing one immune system. The only reason I can think is that a delay will have the first vaccine act as a booster, but since one overcame the actual infection a vaccine will be trivial and not significant. => Your guest chose her words poorly, some of the vaccines do replicate - but not the virus, just the spike protein - the mRNA vaccines. The adenovaccines don’t replicate, but they aren’t the whole vaccine picture. => It may also be helpful to consider the concern that a contraindication would be someone who was very frail. This seems like an indication. If a vaccine would be life threatening, the full disease will be much worse, so unless one wants to count the frail as already dead and not worth care, vaccination would seem the right thing to do, even if the fragility of the patient made one concerned. => I believe you’ve missed the boat on Ivermectin. Drugs and chemicals have multiple uses. Example ethylene glycol as motor vehicle antifreeze - far more use than in vaccines. I would not apply your reasoning and suggest one avoid a vaccine as people are not motor vehicles. Let’s follow the science whoever it goes. => One might believe one can determine which medications your guest has emotional ties with, as she shifts from diminishing side effects talking about how infrequent vaccine side effects are and how no one died from them in Canada, to just listing the side effects of ivermectin - a drug given in some billions of doses - perhaps the safest drug on the planet. It was also provided absolutely free to much of the world, years ago to treat parasites, and received a Nobel prize. Quite a shift and one that seems not to be based in science. One notes that the NIH went from opposing this use to neutral, even though it has more positive results than many approved drugs. One also notes that reports say it is commonly used in India and Bangladesh, places where the infection rate is much lower than the US , Canada and the UK. Over the Counter. Hummm. => Veterinary drugs may be the same, but the purification and non-active components may be different. Just as tuna cat food may contain the same tuna, but I agree one shouldn’t consume either. => Your guest says there are 47 studies and she picks one. Doesn’t seem science driven. Ivermectin has a half-life of 12 hours so measuring impact from one dose 7 days later, seems perhaps a questionable experiment design. One might think it better to measure outcomes when the drug is still in therapeutic concentrations in the body. One notes that the vaccines were measured for efficiency when the mechanism said there was still a therapeutic response from the vaccine. Again, it seems to this one that the discussion and science diverged. Sad. => I stopped watching, too little science. => Sorry John, not your best effort.
If it doesn't kill you it will only make you stronger 🤣😂🤣😂🥕
All the more reason for my decision not to take any of these EXPERIMENTAL vaccines. Too much risk.. over 1,309 dead in the US from their covid vaccine.
Gosh, Dr John you really need to research Ivermectin. “Not knowing much about Ivermectin” is frankly not encouraging. Check out recent updates at Trail Site News online. The evidence is very compelling.
"TrialSite News"
I do hope he reads the comments.
Thank you again!
Celebrating booking my first dose for the 18th! 💉👍
Mine's on the 10th! Congratulations, Paula!
@@YvonneWilson312 Congratulations to you too! We'll have to compare side-effects!
@@paulavandenbroeck1333 Indeed we will!
Evidence based this video was not. It is lamentable that John Campbell chose to highlight the weakest clinical trial on Ivermectin which was extremely under powered because of the small cohort involved. John Campbell could have done the world a lot of good by taking a balanced approach on Ivermectin. He did not ... and he wasted a chance to save health and lives ... and lost a lot of credibility as well.
Exactly, it only took one weak and non-significant trial to give a dogmatic veredict.
Totally agree, all this doctor is doing is filling everyone with fear mostly with his graphs and numbers, although the vitamin talks are benifical, all I see now is how many videos can I get out in a day to make more money. do you think he'd be allowed back on TV screens if he indorced ivermectin... No I don't think so, this shall be the last video of his I shall watch for pure bias against ivermectin and the study wasnt really a study maybe he could have read what he was about to talk about instead of a media drive for you to get a vaccine
@@fannybasher7268 What's ironic of all this, is that he is denying all the clinical experience of Doctors that are fighting everyday in the frontline with sick and very sick patients like Dr.Kory. But I guess it is very easy to talk from my bedroom and computer, just reading papers. I wonder how many patients Dr. Campbell has treated of Covid? I think we all know the answer. Yeah he has previous and enormous experience, but not the same as being in the frontline.
He's become just another vaccine salesman, unfortunately.
I was wondering why there was silence from Dr John on Ivemectin since first mentioning it in December...now we know....how much silver was paid?..unfollowing over this now and its such a shame as I did love this channel, redeem yourself by having Professor Marik on!
The moment he started praising china’s draconian, lockdown response to covid, I ran for the nearest exit. This nurse seems to have a low bar for ethics
It's no longer ETHICAL to randomize pts to placebo. You won't see a large scale RCT. The multiple meta analyses have made this fact crystal clear. And we aren't frustrated. We're using ivermectin in prophylaxis and carrying on with our lives.
well yes, there already were one but I think 2 randomised dble blind studies showing significant IVM viral load reduction.
I have said from day one that we need anti viral drugs for this disease.
What makes you qualified?
@@surfraptor I am about as qualified as any of the other millions who are watching these videos, but surprisingly enough quite a few " qualified" people are coming to the same conclusion.
Please include the Flccc in your analysis. Keep up the good work
I went into the ER with covid pneumonia and respiratory failure. The docter let my family come in to say goodbye to me. My grown kids smuggled in ivermectin and helped me take the first dose. In 15 hrs i was turning around. Each day i took another dose.....two weeks in all. I am home now and im ALIVE!!!!
SO glad for you and my family :-) I am in the UK, mid-70's, and have the same worry for myself, wife and family (not having had the shot) but it is a prescribed drug only and will have to buy online (very risky - lots of scammers/fake placebo's) if my doctor refuses it me. I will ask next week, saying they are then having me risk my health, if I am refused. I feel very vulnerable, especially if secretly rounded up and taken off, which our laws were quietly changed to allow in early 2020, in any govt-deemed "emergency" situation.
@@EnlightenedPatriot1 i took the cattle and sheep injectable but i swallowed it. 1cc per 100lbs. Ive used it in Africa and Belize for parasites. Treated entire villages including small children and never saw a bad side effect.
Thank you for all your good work Dr. John Campbell. Is there any information if the Astra Zenecas vaccine works for them with type 1 diabetes? I mean can a person with an autoimmune disease benefit from a vaccine?
Doubt people in poorer countries will even know they're allergic to these ingredients and wonder how they will be treated for anaphylaxis shock or if at all. The guildlines in this video are really for countries with a very developed health care system.
This is the best UA-cam comment I have ever seen during the lockdown. This is true and also the west don’t give a fuck about poor countries it’s a disgrace
Countries with high indications of intestinal worms regularly take these medicines.
At the height of the peak in New York a Consultant who was born in Africa , used Invermectin . Its taken regularly in her home country . She was trying to save lives in a poor area ,and the ICU was swamped .She used a protacol that existed in her home country . Even though it was not the first line treatment she knew it would not harm .
She got better results than her neighbouring hospital . I admire the scientific testing but sometimes its at the treatment end that people make discoveries out of necessity .
At somepoint in ICU someone realised the older practice of proning would help , also someone realised that intubating and use of ventilators was not always the best route to health .
Luckily the best route for. Places where the health facilities are not so westernised and available .
Theres an interesting possibility , my family has a weakness and alergies hayfever and history of anaphlaxis . In a less developed country at least 5 of my family would not have made it to adulthood and had children .
In some Countries anaphlaxis is rare but sadly nearly always deadly . This means that the people with this hereditary problem dont have children so the instance of anaphlaxis is not as common .
For example some conditions are barely found in Africa , say MS
Which occurs in much greater numbers in Canada ,UK and US..
I have never gotten a vaccine or any health treatment in one of those poorer countries so I have no idea if they will watch for anaphylaxis shock or will be prepared to treat it, have you? Are you thinking there are a lot of people in these countries that are allergic like in wealthier countries? If I recall, allergies aren't common in poorer countries because everyone is exposed to lots of contaminants while growing up. I grew up on a farm with animals and no one in my family have any allergies which is what we see statistically with children who grew up around farm animals.
@@jollyandwaylo I was explaining one the reasons why there are less people with alergies is that the people who have them dont go on to have children
themselves . So yes there are far fewer alergies in some less developed countries .
It may also be that the population is exposed in early childhood to infectios diseases and that their immune systems are 💪 Stronger so they fight things off well .
I read a piece that said in the slums in Mumbai , that 80% of people had ,had cov id and recovered . This was mostly because they could not avoid catching it , but also because the population are younger and mostly had few symptoms
The number of deaths was limited and low in comparison .
The India Govt was studying more and thankfully , they can make their own supply af Astra Zenica.
@@jollyandwaylo Hi you are so right , I have lived in those countries but as with everything it comes down to money . I have had superb care as it exists . But when I work abroad ,I am covered by my Company to get the best healthcare .
For example , if I needed dental care in the Middle East , then I had access to dentist .
And as for innoculations I would have everything up to date before hand , and done in the UK or France .
So I dont know what they do after innoculations .
But those mobile clinics that travel in some parts of Rural Africa , would be strugling to keep someone alive who had a reaction , as ICU is too far away .
I would hope that some charity would set up mobile clinics in vehicles with full ICU facilities .
Thank you for addressing autoimmune issues and taking the vaccination. I have been questioning whether to get it vs the risk.
DR. Nancy Klimas at Nova University in Florida has recommendations for people with ME/CFS which is a neuro inflammatory disease. You might find it helpful. I have the same concerns. I am already quite ill and don't know if I can withstand another relapse.
@@taradrolma7612 Thank you. I had a rare case of GBS and still have residuals after fifteen years. Stay safe.
I look forward to the next 9 years to learn what longterm effects it might have, you know, like the usual time for vaxine trials.
@@peacefuljourney4994 EXACTLY! In the meantime and between time, I'll just continue to protect myself and go about my merry way. All the people who are still living since last year at this time AND still have not contacted the virus w doing something right, so if they continue to do what they're doing they will never get it anyway. Because, if you do the same things you get the same results. Prevention is the best thing for not getting the flu or covid.
I loved this video. Thank you Dr. John, and Lindsey. You are a winning team! Best wishes to all.
Basically worthless.
Dr Andrew Hill, contracted by the WHO will put out his 3rd study findings in the next 2 weeks. His first 2 studies were positive but numbers were not large enough to make a recommendation.. We are not going to see the large (6000+ patient), randomised controlled study because there is no drug company funding for these trials.