Can German Skynex Air Defense Systems Prevail in Ukraine?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 25 вер 2024
  • The Skynex is a short-range air defense system, which was introduced during the 35mm Air Defence Systems Group event in 2021. The core of this air defense system is the Oerlikon Skymaster Battle Management System, which serves as the control node. It allows for the modular integration of various sensors and effectors, tailored to meet specific mission requirements. The Skynex system features a truck-mounted version and is specifically developed with lightweight and mobile design. Therefore, the Skynet system is particularly well-suited for short- and very-short-range air defense capabilities, where guided missiles may be ineffective. The standard version of Skynex can engage various threats, including aircraft, cruise missiles, tactical drones of varying sizes, air-to-ground missiles, as well as mortars and artillery rockets, at distances up to 2.5 miles. This feature makes Skynex an optimal solution for safeguarding critical stationary assets like military and civilian infrastructures, including airfields, military bases, harbors, bridges, and nuclear power plants, against aerial attacks in diverse weather conditions, both day and night.
    Subscribe Now :
    / @military-tv

КОМЕНТАРІ • 295

  • @kermecke
    @kermecke Рік тому +21

    Folks, you have an international audience!
    Would you mind bury the antiquated US measuring system and go metric?

  • @igorsergeev6716
    @igorsergeev6716 Рік тому +18

    2 Skynex cost EUR 182M! Wow! 😮

    • @painthuret
      @painthuret Рік тому +8

      Money laundry 101

    • @Alexander_Kale
      @Alexander_Kale Рік тому +4

      It's more than just two trucks with cannons on top. A "system" includes a truck to mount the cannon, the cannon itself, a separate station that fires anti-missiles, a tracking radar and a bunch of computers to coordinate between the weapons, plus rather specialized ammunition.
      Plus, this thing isn't just firing shells. Every projectile is programmed on the fly to explode at a given distance to the target - a distance that changes constantly as the target moves.
      SO yeah. 90 million is expensive, but considering what you get for it....?

    • @Stephanthesearcher
      @Stephanthesearcher 4 місяці тому

      2 systems, not 2 guns.
      thats several guns on trucks central firecontol radar battle management missile launcher container amunition delivery training etc, PER SYSTEM !

  • @bits2646
    @bits2646 Рік тому +5

    Now that's proper... Probably best drone defence tool I've seen

  • @artiomvv569
    @artiomvv569 Рік тому +105

    Imagine buying two of these for 192 million $ and then they get destroyed by a bunch of 500$ drones with an rpg ductaped to it

    • @anteeko
      @anteeko Рік тому +18

      "they get destroyed by a bunch of 500$ drones with an rpg ductaped to it"
      Unlikely a drone could get any close, this thing can shoot out artillerie round so a drone should be easy.. (unless they drone don't show on radar?)

    • @artiomvv569
      @artiomvv569 Рік тому +16

      @@anteeko a single drone is no problem but more like a swarm of 100-200 drones least one is most likely going to make it through, as they said the range of this gun is 2.5 miles with guided programmable airburst ammo. Within the time it takes to destroy the other drones, at least some may get past the defense and strike the target. One of these suicide drones costs around 500-1000$ so 200 of them would be 100-200k $. Using 100-200k $ worth of drones to destroy a 192 million dollars system would be extremely cost effective

    • @genem895
      @genem895 Рік тому +14

      You don't have imagine it, we will see it soon.
      Patriot air defense systems cost and lost in Kiev is much higher 😂😂😂

    • @VinhNguyen-fb9lk
      @VinhNguyen-fb9lk Рік тому +3

      That why war is big business

    • @hisvin
      @hisvin Рік тому +10

      Imagine, you created a thing called human, you build during 18 years and then a bullet costing 50 cents destroys that thing...Brhhhh!!!

  • @blacmagicwand
    @blacmagicwand Рік тому +9

    I've seen a lancet destroy a geppard. How's this any different. And the outrageous cost? 😭

    • @wolfswinkel8906
      @wolfswinkel8906 Рік тому +9

      They are not trying to learn any lessons, just sell some units on a juicy contract. To them, it's not war, it's a business opportunity.

    • @hassanharith6820
      @hassanharith6820 Рік тому +1

      ​@@wolfswinkel8906
      Exactly....💯% 🎯.

    • @horacecunningham7832
      @horacecunningham7832 Рік тому

      Not to mention fpv drones with rpg warhead ductaped to it destroying Leos etc. It's sad

    • @pitmarkovic4545
      @pitmarkovic4545 Рік тому +2

      Didnt destroy that was repair!!

    • @wolfswinkel8906
      @wolfswinkel8906 Рік тому

      @@pitmarkovic4545 pathetic copium from you. In what oblast was it repaired and where are the pictures?

  • @jonumine6250
    @jonumine6250 Рік тому +13

    Wowowow, 182 MILLION...!?
    A single kinzhal is said to be ~10mil, so this costs 18 hypersonics...??
    Juicy target, ofc unless a lacet doesn't do the job first, like with the Iris.

    • @darth_nihilus_
      @darth_nihilus_ 4 місяці тому

      The whole battery costs 182 million also Germany nearly 4 times the GDP per capita as Russia.

  • @artiomvv569
    @artiomvv569 Рік тому +14

    182 million euros for just two? Damn this is expensive as hell. That's a lot for a pair of close in weapons systems. A C-Ram for example costs 4 million $.

    • @HansPeters1234
      @HansPeters1234 Рік тому +2

      1 Skynex System does not mean 1 cannon. Should be 4 Trucks with 35mm Cannons in each system. So 182 million for 8 Trucks.

    • @artiomvv569
      @artiomvv569 Рік тому

      @@HansPeters1234 8 C-Rams would still be much less expensive

    • @HansPeters1234
      @HansPeters1234 Рік тому

      skynex includes way more than just these 8 trucks with mounted 35mm guns. Its not a cheap system but outperforms c-ram by a lot^^@@artiomvv569

    • @tomk3732
      @tomk3732 Рік тому

      Depends what they mean by a single system. It can be 6 cannons and one control station per system. Still, way, way, way too expensive. 20 Lancet 5 swarm attack drones is around 1m.

    • @artiomvv569
      @artiomvv569 Рік тому

      @@tomk3732 fpv drones are even much cheaper than lancets. I have another comment where I discussed the use of fpv drones as a way to overpower these V-SHORAD/CIWS systems

  • @ravigautam8685
    @ravigautam8685 Рік тому +15

    Skynex may get overwhelmed by 50 small missiles

    • @gloryx6316
      @gloryx6316 Рік тому +2

      As well as the ineffective patriot system.

    • @wstavis3135
      @wstavis3135 Рік тому +5

      ​@BOM_NLD😂😂😂 there's the clueless Russian fanboy.

    • @wolfswinkel8906
      @wolfswinkel8906 Рік тому +5

      ​@@wstavis3135 well he's not wrong. The most sophisticated western missiles haven't changed the tide for Ukraine, while Russia can strike every square inch of Ukraine if they feel like it.

    • @iiilllii140
      @iiilllii140 4 місяці тому +1

      @@wolfswinkel8906 nah, just extended the 3 day military operation, to how many?

    • @wolfswinkel8906
      @wolfswinkel8906 4 місяці тому

      @@iiilllii140 what does that have to do with Skynex being useless in Ukraine? 🤡

  • @peter-radiantpipes2800
    @peter-radiantpipes2800 Рік тому +10

    Sounds like someone’s making a sound effect with their mouth each time it fires. Lol

    • @SeminarioMAE
      @SeminarioMAE Рік тому +4

      sounds like my mom when i forget to do the dishes

    • @reynard4823
      @reynard4823 Рік тому

      Its to throw off the demonstration, they want us soft & stupid

  • @josmith4626
    @josmith4626 Рік тому +7

    Without a mobile search radar / command centre then its not going to help directly with the counter offensive in supporting the front lines.

    • @azymight
      @azymight Рік тому

      what else u need? how about wonde women? call hollywood now if they have stocks on those.

  • @bremnesen
    @bremnesen Рік тому +8

    Military hammer: USD 5000,-. Ladder for F-16: USD 100 000,-. Insane prices for systems turning out to be defenceless.

    • @Tounguepunchfartbox
      @Tounguepunchfartbox Рік тому +1

      Orders are accounted for in average cost. You talk about the 700$ hammer (real cost of the example your citing), but ignoring the 700$ turbofan blades worth 60,000 dollars lol.
      Ur dumb. Stop spreading misinfo.

    • @smartkking4984
      @smartkking4984 Рік тому +1

      Influence by apple

  • @mihirchitnis905
    @mihirchitnis905 Рік тому +19

    Is this another so called gamechanger ?
    Ukraine should swallow their pride and go to the negotiating table and agree on a peace deal.

    • @vemaraju
      @vemaraju Рік тому +6

      that's a big NO considering Rheinmetall won't make money when there is peace, Ukraine is a perfect replacement for Iraq and Afghanistan.

  • @rogeriodaconceicao2568
    @rogeriodaconceicao2568 Рік тому +3

    182mil for 2x skynex units????? That is ridiculously expensive

    • @jurycould4275
      @jurycould4275 9 місяців тому

      It shoots drones and artillery rounds in mid air. The people with IQ twice yours probably wouldn’t build or purchase this, if it wasn’t useful to them.

  • @makegaminggreatagain3907
    @makegaminggreatagain3907 Рік тому +8

    The U.S has a land based variant of the Phalanx called the Centurion c-ram (counter rocket artillery missile system)
    Military TV: 🧐
    Also Miliary TV: In our next video we take a look at and do a side by side comparison to the German made Skynex Air Defense System and the US made Centurion C-RAM.

    • @TheAngriestGamer.
      @TheAngriestGamer. Рік тому +3

      they dont compare tbh
      this german gun is much better. partly because of the larger projectile. raw physics dictates it goes farther, hits harder and can actually carry a payload.. the 2nd reason its better than Cram is the ahead ammo.
      this thing will YEET the shit out of drones and kamikaze munitions.
      Cram can do it too, but its not nearly as effective and wastes a ton of ammo trying to hit small targets.

    • @Allin7days
      @Allin7days Рік тому +1

      ...and it costs much less, $10M-$15M.
      C-RAM is much more suitable solution for Russia's drone attacts.

    • @jeannetteundadolfruf1803
      @jeannetteundadolfruf1803 8 місяців тому +1

      @@TheAngriestGamer. It's not German it's Oerlikon Bürle from Switzerland (Ingeniering) made in Italy (Construkt) Firma ist Rheinmetall Germany

  • @andreanderson8639
    @andreanderson8639 Рік тому +1

    7:35 it just dawned on me, it's like the Iron Dome in practice.

  • @ronaldof1336
    @ronaldof1336 Рік тому +10

    Can Skynex destroy the Russian loitering drones that put down systems like IRIS-T and others? Or que will see the Russians destroying and studying the remainings of this system in few weeks from now?

    • @gloryx6316
      @gloryx6316 Рік тому

      Of course it gets destroyed in no time. What I want to know is why is Germany pushing so hard against Russians? Even though the USA and the UK are not close to what Germany is doing, they'll have serious troubles later.

    • @BojanPeric-kq9et
      @BojanPeric-kq9et Рік тому +3

      Yes in theory, but with only 2 such systems in total, answer is no.

    • @darth_nihilus_
      @darth_nihilus_ 4 місяці тому

      @@BojanPeric-kq9etBatteries.

  • @ManChickin
    @ManChickin Рік тому +5

    these will be fantastic at countering cruise missles and hopefully drones... but if even just one 30k lancet or Iranian drone gets through... that's 200m down the drain. it would have to down almost 7000 drones to be cost effective

    • @Tounguepunchfartbox
      @Tounguepunchfartbox Рік тому +1

      How would a single lancet hit 4 separate targets at once?

    • @ManChickin
      @ManChickin Рік тому +1

      @@Tounguepunchfartbox just has to get the control modual and the whole system is offline

    • @wolfswinkel8906
      @wolfswinkel8906 Рік тому

      ​@@TounguepunchfartboxRussia has at least 200,000 Lancets in storage and a million more planned, according to a recent interview with Zala Aeronautics MD.

    • @Tounguepunchfartbox
      @Tounguepunchfartbox Рік тому

      @@ManChickin yes but the cost to replace that is a fraction of 200 million lmao.

  • @anteeko
    @anteeko Рік тому +2

    You can shoot out artillerie rounds with this? thats crazy

    • @herohero-fw1vc
      @herohero-fw1vc Рік тому

      Russians shoot about 20,000 a day.......Good luck with your new wonder weapon🤣

  • @jeffnelson2197
    @jeffnelson2197 Рік тому +2

    Soon to be found in bits and pieces in a smoking hole of a hypersonic missiles…

  • @cordellmohawk8408
    @cordellmohawk8408 Рік тому +11

    Ukraine just a testing ground lol but just another target for lancet

  • @PeterSWiley
    @PeterSWiley Місяць тому

    It will be interesting to see how they are countered....

  • @Marcelomedeiros76
    @Marcelomedeiros76 Рік тому +2

    Very interesting. Good explanation!

  • @atarit34
    @atarit34 Рік тому +2

    Seems like a really good weapon vs pesky drones, but with protection radius of 2.5 miles you gotta need like 2 orders more of these systems to protect stuff in a current war. The area to defend is HUGE, the front line spans thousand of kilometers, Kiev, the most air protected capital, is 840 square kilometers. So - cool stuff, but two short-range units? Well, at least Rheinmetal can test those :)

    • @NotUnymous
      @NotUnymous 8 місяців тому

      They can shoot down even incoming artillery rounds, rocktes, everything in it's range. It's a completly automated system that should - If it works as claimed - protect from anything in the air, no matter what.
      That beeing said, you are absolutely right. Way more of them are needed to realy make a difference.
      But they are completly new. The system got only recently invented and made combat-ready.
      So there litteraly aren't more in existance as those directly shipped to Ukraine.

  • @kendee9166
    @kendee9166 Рік тому

    Only if delivered Skynex are in large numbers that covers the entire front & networked with other air defense systems ( Patriot, Iris T & NASAMS ).

  • @Paul-pz3us
    @Paul-pz3us Рік тому +2

    This war is one hell of a cash cow for the arms dealers and manufacturers and ammo.
    Big big moneymaker.

    • @michpich6319
      @michpich6319 Рік тому

      @Paul-pz3us How true. Perhaps the world can now appreciate why the move to de-dollarize is being fought with such vigor by the G7. The west harvests money of the global south along with the others to fund all this military tech and the super yacht lifestyles that go with total domination. They (G7) aren't going to roll over and play nice just to appease the Third World. The US axis will simply push these people aside, like they did in Libya, Iraq and Syria(work in progress). There's just too much money (and power) at stake.

    • @martijnstam6186
      @martijnstam6186 4 місяці тому

      Cheaper then the little tyrant walking into the Baltics.

  • @youcantata
    @youcantata Рік тому +6

    It is just an upgrade of the old but faithful Oerlikon 35mm anti-air canon system. It has gone out of fashion in the age of superfast jet fighter aircraft. But with the advent of the threat of slow aerial drone system and recent meteoric rise of it, this old anti-air gun is now hot again. It will be an indispensable component of modern mechanized armored force.

    • @mackster85
      @mackster85 Рік тому +1

      C-RAM with ABM ammunition has not much in common with old 35mm AA cannons.

    • @NotUnymous
      @NotUnymous 8 місяців тому

      Nah, it's something completly different then just an Oerlikon canon. Therefore the different name.

  • @herohero-fw1vc
    @herohero-fw1vc Рік тому +1

    The next wonder weapon............will it end up like Bradley or Leopard.

  • @suny1265
    @suny1265 Рік тому +8

    Aha...we will see Drone footage how they burn also.

  • @Shinyboy29
    @Shinyboy29 Рік тому +1

    Portugal and Italy expecting their Leopard 2’s “returned” after the war? They should go retrieve it themselves in the mine-infested fields
    They became scrap metal in the battlefield

  • @DaLizMs
    @DaLizMs Рік тому +7

    For defense yes, to win the war? hell no.

    • @dieterdodel835
      @dieterdodel835 Рік тому +3

      First and foremost it should read: To protect lives? hell yeah!!!

    • @gustaafpeeters6173
      @gustaafpeeters6173 Рік тому +9

      @@dieterdodel835 The delivery of Western weapons to Ukraine only costs lives. The war had only lasted for a few weeks whitout it. Thousands of lives saved, ukraine not rubbled, no refugees, energy-crisis, inflation, resession etc...

    • @wolfswinkel8906
      @wolfswinkel8906 Рік тому +2

      @@gustaafpeeters6173 back when they were warned, they said "appeasement doesn't work on dictators" like negotiating means appeasement. Very unreasonable people, they pushed Ukraine to ruin.

  • @electricaviationchannelvid7863

    A typical fixed wing air launch optical missile range is 8-9 miles at 15000 feet...so well outside this system gun range...Helicopters like the KA-52 shoots guided missiles from ~8 km which is 3-4 miles very low level...

    • @webcrawler9782
      @webcrawler9782 8 місяців тому

      it's only the last layer in the concept of layered air defence. A NASAMS or IRIS-T will take down the Helicopter from a longer distance. And for balistic missiles at the longest distance there still is Patriot.

    • @electricaviationchannelvid7863
      @electricaviationchannelvid7863 8 місяців тому

      @@webcrawler9782 The Patriot proved its ops. failure just now in UA and before that in Israel...
      Besides the astronomical price the production bottleneck is also real...so it never became widespread asset not even in NATO countries...there is a 1600km wide frontline which would require 10 Patriot batteries...UA got 4-6...

  • @michaeldavid4857
    @michaeldavid4857 Рік тому

    About $95 million a piece! Where do they come up with these figures. This system should not cost more than $2- or $3 million each.

  • @johncherskov5755
    @johncherskov5755 Рік тому +2

    I was telling the usual people who all said Germany's military has terrible performance and issues (such as the G36 rifle small issue, which was fixed)- they really are a sleeper build that is ahead of the others. Others may critique or compare as if these things aren't quite good or needed, but are simply low iq..They don't realize how important it is to have electronic systems that mark friendly positions, enemy positions, and integrate everything into one system. These systems especially made by Rheinmetall and similar companies are impressive even on the public side. The US hasn't even integrated many of these systems yet, even if they do have many capable systems themselves; even as large as the US is, they are 'aware' of some of it, or due to deploy it, but haven't yet made it or distributed it themselves; their 'future infantry' upgrades are due in the next decades. Germany would surely be more effective than we think and even though much smaller in scale, they are many times ahead in electronics and futuristic tech that while some acknowledge it, lower IQs will continue to neglect it and say it's not needed. Yet some of these are 'already' quite better than the existing ones you are comparing them to. Sure it wouldn't be enough to stand alone against the top world militaries, their numbers and other weapons would win. But if they scaled up their numbers/personnel, using all German technologies, tanks, defense systems, then it would be a threat, or become ahead of the adversaries. They aren't as weak or as useless as you think, even with the armchair idea that they have small problems and inefficiencies; similar to huge novels written by armchair inexperienced nobodies that likely wasted gigabytes of bandwidth through the last decade, by losers debating about how T72s and some russian were 'good tanks' with 'secret capabilities' on them, until now in 2022-2023. Only some people 'get it', that's why Yugoslavia is the only group who shot down a US stealth bomber, etc. while Russia has yet to do it, and so on, even if that group no longer exists. However for all western nations, it's likely a model that is all about money, they aren't mass producing it for a war, but only to test it on a smaller scale anyway.

  • @ele4984
    @ele4984 Рік тому

    The most important ingredient in modern war is 'Human lives' so far there are humans to keep fueling the war the cost of weapons are a small significance.

  • @lulzimymeri
    @lulzimymeri Рік тому

    Music in the background - source? Band? Anything plz.

  • @perkunast9680
    @perkunast9680 9 місяців тому

    Is it any better then the Gepard?.

  • @MrZlocktar
    @MrZlocktar Рік тому +3

    NATO: 192$ millions for 2 Skynex system - AA gun, no missiles.
    Russia: 26.30$ millions for 2 Pantsir-S1M system - AA gun, SAM, SRSAM (domestic price is even less, because this price is meant for export).
    - Does NATO has corruption and how much is it?
    - YES

  • @tomascastillo4676
    @tomascastillo4676 Рік тому +3

    This +100 million dollars weapon Will be easily destroyed by 20 thousand dollars Lancet drones. All Air defense Systems are obsolete versus killer drones.

  • @schrimpf
    @schrimpf Рік тому +7

    …the next western wonder weapon. Doomed to fail…

  • @Patriot2499
    @Patriot2499 Рік тому +5

    Russia gonna love this new toy.

  • @samiam5557
    @samiam5557 Рік тому

    'Cheecha' sound it makes just before firing.....LOL.

  • @ericbrasseur1581
    @ericbrasseur1581 Рік тому +3

    the russians are doing the same quality .... but cheaper..and more robust !

    • @iiilllii140
      @iiilllii140 4 місяці тому

      Yeah, imagine, their anti air flagship cruiser can now even operate underwater.

  • @AlbionTVLondon
    @AlbionTVLondon Рік тому +2

    One cheap Lancet drone and these $200 million will burn just as beautifully as German Leopards LOL.

  • @thanakornsophonwid9928
    @thanakornsophonwid9928 Рік тому

    Finally, what I had dreamed of had come true.

  • @behindenemylines.3103
    @behindenemylines.3103 Рік тому +3

    These systems on paper and computer graphics sounds and looks good,but when put to the test in real world situations are found lacking.IE.Leopard,high tech missiles etc etc.

  • @alfredneuman6488
    @alfredneuman6488 Рік тому +1

    Making war toys is such a great and profitable business!

  • @slimhope1
    @slimhope1 Рік тому +5

    I'm thinking a week or two until a Lancet destroys one.

    • @AlbionTVLondon
      @AlbionTVLondon Рік тому +5

      Lancet will hit them as they are being transported to Ukraine...

  • @thesaint6746
    @thesaint6746 Рік тому +1

    One Lancet drone is enough to destroy that skynex worth millions of dollars.

  • @vanhalem6990
    @vanhalem6990 Рік тому

    Que bonito, montaron un cañon de barco en un camion, próximamente un goalkeeper en un Iveco

  • @danos5181
    @danos5181 Рік тому +3

    At 100$ million a piece and a range of 2-3 miles, the Ukrainians would need 1000s to cover their huge front lines for effective drone control. Obviously this is not feasible so the effect of this pricey weapon is only felt in UA-cam and other morale boosting propaganda outlets. I guess that these units would likely be placed to protect very important Russian targets from attack (e.g., presidential palace, very strategic targets) etc.

    • @fungames24
      @fungames24 Рік тому

      Germany lost ww2 because its weapons were overcomplex junk. The russians will take it out with a few $40k drones. Clowns just don't understand basic economics. When war is done for profit, it is lost.

  • @davidrobertson5700
    @davidrobertson5700 Рік тому

    Can it engage a LASER ?

  • @finn3408
    @finn3408 Рік тому

    UKRAINE NEEDS 1,000 OF THESE NOW

  • @josephpacchetti5997
    @josephpacchetti5997 Рік тому +1

    Impressive System, with 16+ rounds per second, It can ruin your day! 👊 😎 🇺🇸

    • @wolfswinkel8906
      @wolfswinkel8906 Рік тому +3

      They're wasted on Ukraine.

    • @LordMarksman14
      @LordMarksman14 Рік тому +1

      ​@@Desmond-mk1mvit means it will just be destroyed by a $500 drone from Ali Express.

    • @0Turbox
      @0Turbox Рік тому

      @@LordMarksman14 Dude, this thing is made to shot down drones.

  • @d_lollol524
    @d_lollol524 Рік тому

    The missiles center and the command center are not mobile , are they ? That sucks because the enemy will have more time to locate the location of the system . For 182 million euro , I wish for mobility .

  • @diosdelcielo
    @diosdelcielo Рік тому +5

    Germany never learns....😂....

  • @lebohang8405
    @lebohang8405 Рік тому +1

    This article would probably leave Ukraineans asking more questions than displaying any joy. Their ports and cities continue to be decimated despite all hyped up weapons from the west

  • @peterlangan1181
    @peterlangan1181 Рік тому

    Short answer not a chance!

  • @frederickfrenchjr8667
    @frederickfrenchjr8667 Рік тому +5

    The west never ran out of game changing wonder weapon but the war in ukrain never changed in Ukrain's favor.😅😅😅😅😅😅

  • @ravigautam8685
    @ravigautam8685 Рік тому +4

    Skynex may be vulnerable to cluster bombs

    • @AlbionTVLondon
      @AlbionTVLondon Рік тому

      And cheap $500 drone. And when Lancet comes in, this Sky rubbish will be burning like fireworks....

  • @craig4867
    @craig4867 Рік тому +12

    Another game changer!
    Another wet dream!
    Another unhappy ending!
    🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺

  • @godofredocristobaljr.3955
    @godofredocristobaljr.3955 Рік тому

    Better officer this to the Philippines they need this to prevent China to occupy our country we need this

  • @belter9814
    @belter9814 Рік тому

    Is the skynex lancet proof?

  • @Obonye3rd
    @Obonye3rd Рік тому +3

    Lancet will easily destroy it

  • @hurtlocker8554
    @hurtlocker8554 Рік тому

    but they will still have soldiers but send to the front?

  • @ivankurtz1909
    @ivankurtz1909 Рік тому

    It's Germany's answer to the Supreme Russian Pantsir system.

  • @fahristorm9771
    @fahristorm9771 Рік тому

    lets see. one of those VS thousands of cheap iranian drones from multiple direction at once. who do you think gonna win ?

  • @ungijazapranje
    @ungijazapranje Рік тому

    Can this thing knock down supersonic missile?🎉

  • @JRjaime97
    @JRjaime97 Рік тому +1

    Ahh yesss.. another target for lancet.

  • @rusky325i
    @rusky325i Рік тому +3

    another wunderwaffe

  • @gloryx6316
    @gloryx6316 Рік тому +2

    The leopard tanks prevailed too

  • @georgiebestmanutd4746
    @georgiebestmanutd4746 Рік тому +1

    Skynex, the Hunter will be hunted down by Lancets

  • @RubbittTheBruise
    @RubbittTheBruise Рік тому

    I point you to Betteridge's Law.

  • @michaelanderson3096
    @michaelanderson3096 Рік тому +1

    Place a slat armour wood barrier around this anti aircraft gun.

    • @nikxohs3925
      @nikxohs3925 Рік тому +3

      no is better to hide it in a neutral country so you dont loose by a 1000 euro drone

  • @veronicalogotheti1162
    @veronicalogotheti1162 Рік тому

    The question is how did it happen 11 september
    Patriots didnt work

  • @jarnee1
    @jarnee1 Рік тому +1

    To answer your thumbnails question....NO it won't! It'll be as embarrassing as the Leopard.

  • @malsawmhluakhiangte4610
    @malsawmhluakhiangte4610 Рік тому

    Wow nice

  • @ivankurtz1909
    @ivankurtz1909 Рік тому

    Not a defence system for attack on a jet fighter or fighter bomber! It's 2.5 km range which is 2500 metres could only be used on a slow low attack jet like the Su-25.
    It's radar would be picked up and easily avoided.

    • @iiilllii140
      @iiilllii140 4 місяці тому

      You have no idea about integrated weapon systems, do you?

    • @ivankurtz1909
      @ivankurtz1909 4 місяці тому

      @@iiilllii140 I didn't make myself clear......the Su-34 & 35 have a highly effective EWD which deflects missiles off target at about 200 metres. So integrated or not it gets deflected if it's a missile! If the 34's came in low then it's possible that heavy machine gun fire could damage the plane.
      To this date no wreckage has been presented of 34's or 35's being downed, a small number did make it back with damage. MOD did state one 34 crashed from mechanical failure no 35's whatsoever have been downed.

  • @sparta777-id7xz
    @sparta777-id7xz 7 місяців тому

    Skynet??? Is here
    Where's the terminators??

  • @mtf_savage_beasts2565
    @mtf_savage_beasts2565 Рік тому +2

    Might be Useful Might be not

  • @jwsangyun
    @jwsangyun Рік тому

    솔직히 말해서...
    가격에 비해 좋아보이지 않는다...
    저렇게 비싸면... 유지보수비용 (운영비)도 엄청나게 비싸다...

  • @tomk3732
    @tomk3732 Рік тому +1

    No. If you measure it against Lancet 5 - clearly no. It is way too expensive. Lancet 5 has a swarm attack capability.
    The non mobile version - just engage the radar station, then once taken care of, single drone per gun platform.

    • @DJ1573
      @DJ1573 Рік тому

      The electronics are in the middle, defended by ALL linked weapons 😂

  • @lius20608
    @lius20608 Рік тому +1

    Russian lancer3=hold my vodka!!!❤😂🎉.

  • @swerwerindiewind7334
    @swerwerindiewind7334 Рік тому

    You can buy 2 F35’s for less. Pretty sure that’s the price of a package including other goodies.

  • @MarkonDivinity4
    @MarkonDivinity4 Рік тому +1

    Even this wonder weapons shall fall in Russian hands , an it will not make a difference

  • @KrystylSummers-ho8he
    @KrystylSummers-ho8he Рік тому

    Dominoes?

  • @privatepilot4064
    @privatepilot4064 Рік тому +1

    Sad.

  • @th3lev1athan22
    @th3lev1athan22 Рік тому

    Skynex looks like a big ouchy gun

  • @sparta777-id7xz
    @sparta777-id7xz 7 місяців тому

    Mercedes Benz of Guns

  • @JoseLopez-mc7kw
    @JoseLopez-mc7kw 5 місяців тому

    Try new things use new opts now

  • @maksimm.8502
    @maksimm.8502 Рік тому

    if attacked from 3 sides by drones this system have no chance like others...fancy gun on truck, pffff

  • @damienfoster256
    @damienfoster256 Рік тому +3

    As someone who has not lost s single family member skynex sounds to much like sky net

  • @andreww1225
    @andreww1225 Рік тому +6

    Russians are falling like flies, good work Ukraine 👍

    • @mrslippy6530
      @mrslippy6530 Рік тому +7

      you know the footage is from a game?

    • @wolfswinkel8906
      @wolfswinkel8906 Рік тому +1

      🤡🤣

    • @andreww1225
      @andreww1225 Рік тому

      @@mrslippy6530 not talking about that footage I’m talking about how many are dying every day, there’s lots of footage lol 😆

  • @GameC3nt
    @GameC3nt Рік тому +1

    russia is laughing about the price🤣🤣🤣🤣

  • @xtrgamingzone3056
    @xtrgamingzone3056 Рік тому +5

    russian love

  • @gsh64
    @gsh64 Рік тому

    Customer,

  • @lennartgosman3640
    @lennartgosman3640 Рік тому

    miles????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
    We want km

  • @IlyaMikov
    @IlyaMikov Рік тому

    International COSTUMER :)))) which must be wearing really nice costumes.

  • @rogerairborne
    @rogerairborne Рік тому +1

    It will wind up in the junk yard just like all of the other "game changers" sent to Ukraine.

  • @M88881
    @M88881 Рік тому

    Ne moze , naravno..

  • @marinkopasic5480
    @marinkopasic5480 Рік тому

    LANCEEEEET!!! All burried!