Euro NCAP Crash & Safety Tests of Lynk & Co 01 2021
Вставка
- Опубліковано 7 вер 2021
- Euro NCAP performs a series of crash and safety tests on car models:
- a frontal impact test, 50% of the width of the car is striking an oncoming deformable barrier, also travelling at 50 km/h
- a frontal impact test, the car impacts a rigid full width barrier
- a side impact test, a mobile deformable barrier impacts the driver's door and the robustness of the centre airbag is evaluated
- a pole test, the tested car is propelled sideways into a rigid pole.
A series of pedestrian tests are conducted with different impactors, adult and child head form, lower and upper leg form and whiplash tests are performed on a sled as well as AEB pedestrian and cyclist tests.
Active safety is tested based on the car’s equipment: autonomous emergency braking car-to-car scenarios, occupant status monitoring (including seatbelt reminders), lane support and speed assistance technologies.
All details on the Euro NCAP Website:
Lynk & Co 01 2021 test information www.euroncap.com/en/results/l...
Euro NCAP September 2021 Press release www.euroncap.com/en/press-med... - Авто та транспорт
This car shares a platform with the Volvo XC40 (they are from the same group, Geely). Now I understand everything 👍
Your videos satisfy me everyday❤
We love you euro ncap!!
Of course it’s gonna do well, it has a Volvo DNA
You mean copy
@@3.14name lynk & co is owned by geely, who owns volvo
@@3.14name This is not a copy, its the same platform and same owner. Geely, which owns parts of Mercedes too.
@@3.14name boo hoo you little 3rd worlder.
Brilliant. Thank you for doing these videos
I can't believe this is a car made in China. At the same price, it is even safer than Japanese and Korean cars.
I like how the rims look like flowers lol
I love how in the comments people are mad that a chinese car got a better score than their favourite european cars. This car is very safe and you can’t deny that.
edit: to the people who are saying the rollover from the side crash is really unsafe and shouldn’t deserve 96%
1. your just guy on the internet
2. doesn’t matter what happens to the car, as long as the people inside are good then it will get a good rating
Good work Lynk and Co
Excellent
It would be helpful if you included the speed of the ABB tests, like you used to do and in both MPH and KPH
Hi, We do the AEB tests at every speed. It would become a very long and boring video ;) if we added all the captions.
@@EuroNCAP_forsafercars суть в показе прохождения теста на максимум, т.е показать скорость на которой автомобиль останавливается гарантированно. а то сейчас вообще непонятно как сравнить машин. но у вас вообще никаких значений не видно. прилагайте каждое видео AEB с максимальной скоростью и указывайте её. спасибо!
@@EuroNCAP_forsafercars i love you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I am Indian but Indian people hate euro ncap and Latin ncap 😂😂
Why don't you test the Kia Sedona 2021 car?
do you test for potential hearing damage from the air bags?
Deaf is better than dead. 🤷
@@xDWhite4295x true still they're ways around that
Volvo once again proving to be the cornerstone of automotive safety, not even being bought by the Chinese managed to stray them away from their main principle.
The underlying racism in the comment…. Because they are chinese they cant make a safe vehicle?
@@Tom-tr4em it's not racism when actual vehicle tests from the past 20 years have shown that Chinese brand vehicles were straight up unsafe. partnership with Volvo also had this major concern.
just because you hate what you heard, doesn't mean it's racist. get your head out of your ass.
@@derek400004 thats the past get out of your cave. China has been making impressive vehicles in the past 3 years and are set to dominate the ev market. What cars does your country make? Horse chariots?
@@Tom-tr4em lmao what are you even talking about dude? OP is saying he is glad that Volvo's partnership with Geely did not cause the vehicle safety to worsen, and that is exactly a partnership from 10+ years ago at the height when all data showed Chinese cars sucked.
so what are you trying to say? are you saying people should be able to see into the future? are you saying these people from 10+ years ago were racist by responding to the data?
you know, for a country with as long a history as China, you little pink reds certainly seem awfully touchy about your own history. Insecure much?
@@derek400004 nah he is implying because they are chinese they cant make safe vehicles and thats just bruh
Euro NCAP test for the new Hyundai i20 when?
very soon :)
@@EuroNCAP_forsafercars Great! Hope your partner Global NCAP tests the one we get here in India too. Unlike you they don't drop any hints about what models will be tested soon.
@@TicTechToe Once in a while we can drop a hint :)
I am from Vietnam.And you? Where are you from?
Acabo de tener un accidente con el lynk & co.. Coche trasero un coche que no prendo y se estampó a unos 80km.. El coche un Renault scenic quedo casi totalmente destrozado.. Menos mal no hubo heridos. Nosotros dentro dentro del vehículo estamos bien con algunos traumatismos dados por el movimiento del coche y el choque en cuestión. Pero en consecuencia el Lynk&co resistió muy bien y absorvio bastante bien el coche. Pudimos seguir con nuestra ruta dirección un garaje. El otro coche quedó como lentamente destroza lo la parte delantera. Constato que el Lynk&co absorbe muy bien el choque trasero y efectivamente freno automáticamente.
Basically a xc40 underneath
1:12 OMG Rollover
:v
Lol and I survived crash that was frontal with another car, we both were going around 70kmh. Cars were destroyed. I bended steering wheel with a head even I was belted. Here 50 kmh crash looks scary but it isn't at all.
When There Will Be Tested The 2021 Fabia? Its Allready On Sales!
so no more 64km/h 40% overlap test?
They replaced it.
@@artym5560 thank you captain obvious but why?
96% really?
1:12 Is it safe?
I don't agree the score.
Why? The rollover? What is the problem with that ?
I wondered that because a Jeep was penalised for it in the IIHS tests and Jeep said they were looking at a solution.
@@androo4519 IIHS is way stricter and have way more power over automakers than the NCAP, unfortunately.
Y’all they dropped a shipping container on it and it did well
Машина должна сминаться, чтобы гасить кинетическую энергию. В танке влети в бетонные плиты, танк будет целым а внутри фарш
3:00 What an a-hole 😆
Dovete rimettere la prova a 64kmh
volvo
Euro NCAP does not perform small overlap tests for perhaps good reason. But the result is that car makers like this 'cheap out' by fitting curtain airbags that don't extend far enough forward. Just look at the puny little things. They don't fill in the gap between the front airbag and the corner of the dashboard. This bad news in a small overlap crash. You can bet that this car will get better curtain airbags if it goes through the IIHS tests in the US. So they'll get a safer version of the same car. It's just like Latin America getting less safe versions of cars Europeans drive. Is this the car maker's fault or NCAP's fault, or both? Where else has Link & Co saved money, apart from on somebody to choose a good name?
Euro NCAP looks at the safety performance of vehicles in a crash test, it is not part of our remit to consider specific elements of a car’s structure.
The strength of the car structure is assured by other parts of the car rather than the roof (like the A, B and C pillars, door beams, sills, seam or spot welded door and window apertures and the floor structure) and the legislative type approval sets minimum standards for this (these type approval requirements define whether a car can be sold or not).
In a roll-over, wearing seat belts is the best way of controlling occupant ejection, provided that roof pillars are doing the job.
This is what happens when the Chinese buy Volvo otherwise they would be at the bottom of the list
I'm sorry but you cannot give this thing 96% if it rolls over from a side crash test
wut? 96 percent? sounds a lil sus
1:12 roll over
Can you believe it? This car, which is claimed to be safe and of uniform global manufacturing standards, has taken a differentiated approach when it comes to actual production. The model sold in China was recently found to have been treated with a reduction in steel strength, which does not match the strength advertised earlier, and one guesses that this was done to reduce production costs, which is a serious fraud! And it cannot be ruled out that the vehicles used for testing are not of the same steel strength as the actual vehicles sold! NCAP should have taken anonymous purchases for secondary spot checks!
Do you have any source for that información?
Are you joking?? Adult Occupant 96% ??? See 1:17 👎
but thats a good result
Maybe the result is 96% for the sensors, but visual for me is far from that. The center of gravity is to high, in both frontal and side impact the car jumped like it was empty box, even rolled... Again, I can see the structure of the car is good, even if the side pole was a little bit too deep into the drivers seat, that's why i wouldn't feel safe in it, not 96%.
Only a Tank can be 100% 96% is perfect for a stupid little car XD
@@BogdanDuceac have a read of the full report on the website. The video doesn’t do it justice for why it got this score.
what’s wrong with 1:17 ? stop acting like these people from NCAP are stupid like you. They’ve went to college for years