I'm so scared not knowing what is to come And I'd hoped by now our leaders were done. But there are clowns to the left of me and jokers to the right Here I am wanting Brexit from EU
Hey Commenters. The channel creators clearly tried to rush this video out with a quick turnaround so we could stay informed on May's Plan B even though they didn't get their usual weekend break to produce a new one. The people who create this channel have other jobs or attend school. How about we cut them some slack? Or I don't know, pay them enough money to devote to these videos full time so they can quit their jobs/school and focus on only this? Don't like the second option? Then go with the first one: Cut them some slack.
cut them some slack? depends on what you mean with that. Quality changes should be called out, or we open the door for worse and worse quality content. So the creators should know. It is the content they decide on presenting. If what they show in that isn't up to a level we like, we unsub/stop watching. However before doing so by commenting they get a chance to change. i feel like a comment like yours adds very little value. It doesnt change what we get presented with. It only looks down upon those that give feedback. i would have preffered to see something like "hey we made some mistakes rushing this out. We dont do this for a living and wanted to keep you up to date. We seem to have overlooked some errors doing so." But hey that is just my opinion. Then i would take it as being heard and understand the issues. sincerely a commentor
@@user-qz2ld3vt2d - We really appreciate feedback from our viewers. Our videos are produced by a tiny team (In most cases one person) who all have full time jobs / study outside of TLDR. It's a struggle trying to find that perfect compromise to keep our content flowing at a regular pace with the time constraints that Brexit is currently allowing! I'm part of the web team who manage the site and it's content, I read our comments regularly and I pass them onto the video team so your feedback is taken into account, helping us improve our content for you the subscriber. We hope you stick around as we have some amazing things in the works for the next couple of months! - Ross (TLDR Web Team)
Glad you enjoyed it. Looks like there is more to come. How it will end is the big question. This is testing the resolve of the EU and the UK. Personally thinking, it's stalemate in favour of the EU presently. It will be checkmate to the EU if the UK signs up to the horrible deal that was just voted down. No Deal is looking possible once again and where things go from there will be interesting.
UK cannot create a new deal unilaterally and cannot rule out a no deal. Whoever is asking to rule out a no deal has no clue on anything and should be sent back to school with children.
@@ChristianIce No deal can be ruled out because it would be a major catastrophe. The two real options are going with May's current deal or revoking article 50.
@@kyou42 No deal is the default if you won't accept the deal, or revoke art 50. You don't "rule out" a no deal, you "rule in" a different option, otherwise no deal is automatic.
@@ChristianIce Ruling out No Deal of course means that Remain would become the new default. Itʼs the sanest thing to do right now for the country, but interferes with certain political agendas.
So basically again a lot of talk, but no really action or solution. May's entire plan B is to make changes to her deal in cooperation with other parties, however this is a fruitless endeavour and is in the end only something cosmetic ("see I reach out a hand, I am open for working together), but seein that most likely any of these changes will not be accepted by the EU, it is just posing to come to a solution, instead of actually working to a solution. May's plan now is thus involving more parties into an already ended negotation. This is just absurd and is clearly just another way of kicking the can down the road (again). At this moment there are only three real options possible (which can be reached in different ways): - revoking article 50 (either due to a referendum, the parliament voting for it or May caving ot remain however unlikely) - Accepting May's deal (practically impossible, seeing the enormous defeat. Maybe parliament would agree to it if the only other possibility is a no deal, so we won't know until somewhere near the end of march) - Leaving without a deal (basically doing nothing or not reaching a majority for another option in parliament in time) Yet for some reason they keep focusing on something that isn't even an option: renegotiation.
Yep that's where we are , No deal ,, May/ EU ,, Revoke . As i see it no deal looks most likely now but as B day gets closer May/EU will gain ground also Revoke will also gain , it'll come down to can parliament force a revoke on Gov ? Or will May eventually scare MP's into her camp ?or will everyone miscalculate and we crash out ?
People don't seem to understand what a big concession the back stop already is on behalf of EU. It is an insurance policy in case the Brits sign up to a deal with US or some other country whose standards are below that of EU and hence a great deal cheaper (which is what the main purpose of Brexit is) and want to sell it in EU avoiding inspection.
Renegotiation IS an option. It’s all part of negotiation to say it’s not! Why didn’t the EU want to remove the Backstop? It could lead to a hard border in Ireland, due to different customs. Well different customs happen with No Deal any way. Being pragmatic, it’s better to amend the withdrawal and agree it rather than having a hard border now, so push it down the road where we have a chance of agreeing a trade deal before it must happen!
Politics is different from you average job so I don't think saying "a lot of talk, but no real action" is fair too be honest. Simply speaking has a massive impact in politics, and the whole Idea of Brexit is daunting for any Politician. That''s why they keep talking because if they do then there can be some form of resolution between the two major parties. If you look at Theresa May's last few speeches compared to this one there was a LOT less heckling from the opposition, which in my eyes seems to suggest that both the right and left are starting to understand that decisions must be made as a collective whole, and that Theresa May will go through will it regardless, so they might as well come together to think of the best plan to do so. It's a small change (that should of happened months ago tbh) but a positive one none the least.
Hasn't the EU already confirmed that a no-deal brexit would automatically mean a hard border in Ireland? May wants to rule out a hard border in Ireland, but not rule out a no-deal brexit. There's an obvious contradiction here. Something has to give.
As a Danish Social Democrat, and even a tad further left leaning than the current SD party. I am surprised to agree with May upon her point regarding the second referendum, and how it would be a dangerous demonstration of how the UK handles referendums. Moreover, my agreement with May continues, as she discuss the social implications such a referendum would have upon society, and how it undermines the democracy present in the UK. I am not a brexiteer, I fully support the EU, and sees myself as a globalist. However, if one thing goes above my belief in a united Europe, it is democracy and each country's sovereignty. The UK held a public referendum regarding membership in the EU, as we all know, the public wanted out by a slight majority. Can the process of which the campaigns and the entire referendum be criticized? Definitely, however, a referendum is direct democracy in its essence and disregarding that would be as if disregarding democracy as a whole. I am deeply saddened to see the UK leave the EU, but that is how democracy works, and that I respect. P.S. I wish the UK would stay and the entire referendum had not been held to start out, but we cannot travel back and avoid it. I respect the decision of those, whom I disagree with.
I am suspecting No Deal now. There was a concern it might be taken away or we'd have to vote again. Personally, I don't think the EU will change its position. They are going to take this all the way to the last minute. So we should walk away and let the chase us for a deal.
Complete list of typos/spelling errors in the video: 2:10 5:13 5:48 6:16 6:31 6:41 6:50 6:51 7:01 7:05 8:50 Please note that I've only made this as constructive criticism and I really do enjoy these videos.
Exactly, the UK has consistently shown itself to be the toxic trading partner I say let the brexit fools have their no deal this country deserves to pay for its stupidity!
Either this video was done in a hurry or these are some rendering errors. This is not the first time, either. I say: A little bit more care for future videos would be appreciated. I know everything is going fast now, but don't sacrifice the status TLDRNews has achieved just for being first. Leave that to others with less care and time for fact checking.
ChristianIce Ironically the problems and impossibility of Brexit comes from the Brexiteers themselves. Leave campaign painted and promised so many different versions and visions of Brexit that it got the disenfranchised to vote for it. Great, but now those visions that are often incompatible with each other have split voters, MPs and other fractions to the point that there is no consensus for anything. Some have hardened their stance and others have switched camp since. So while the saga continues, the businesses are moving shop and there will be nothing to bargain with other than we are 60 odd million hungry consumers type market and you can sell us anything because we are desperate.
@@JayJay5244 The only way the UK can leave without a deal is by a legally binding People's Vote aka. 2nd referendum (although it's really the 3rd referendum on the matter).
@@charleskelsall6549 We all know that's not going to happen. There is an overwhelming majority in parliament for taking no deal off the table. The front benches on both sides is just waiting for the back benchers to take the matter into their own hands, so they can support the motion without having proposed it themselves. And that is precisely what will happen next week. No deal is dead unless there is a legally binding People's Vote. And then only if it's even an option.
She said: A no deal can not be writen off And then: The irish deal will stay, But thats contradictory, because if a crash happens then there will be a border
For E.U. a NO DEAL means hard borders on sea and land without exceptions. In the case of No Deal If a member of E.U. does not like a hard border with U.K. then there will be consequences and probably its ejection from E.U. Switzerland and Norway are not members of E.U. but with a DEAL have soft borders with EU countries.
How is it possible possible that 2 months before leaving the UK seems to still have no idea what they actually want? We even got the likes of Orban, the Italians and Poles to not interfere with our negotiations.
It's simple, the message of what leave meant has become distorted by our own politicians. Many thought leaving meant creating a deal to leave. That was incorrect. We were leaving anyway on 29th March, the deal was an opportunity to create an alternative free trade option to limit any problems between the EU and UK and create a new relationship. But the EU being the EU, they just want control and in this case took control. The UK should have refused and said: "This doesn't work. We're leaving, come back to us when you want to talk sense.". They'd have come running in the end if they wanted a deal.
@@marksimons8861 Lol, not sure if you're trolling, but I understand "we need to take back control" a bit more now :P it's for Tories to have the whip over the nation isn't it ? :D
Ireland/Northern Ireland is what will make any deal fail. There will hardly ever be a solution that pleases the four parties involved. The Irish, the Northern Irish, the UK governme (lol) and the EU want something the other party rejects. There can be no middle ground, someone will have to back down one way or another. All solutions are drastic. The Irish and NI don't want a physical border, but the NI wants to stay in the UK and not be treated differently than the other nations, yet they voted to remain. At the same time, the UK doesn't want free passage between the UK and the EU, meaning checks would be necessary between NI and I. What I don't know is how crazy the possibilty of a reunion is. I guess it's pretty high up, I've only seen one Unionist NI politician who was viciously pro-Brexit and avoided the question of the Good Friday Agreement. Can people from NI tell me what they want to see happen? To me, they are the key to this whole shitshow. Love from France, I wish all involved parties a peaceful Brexit, even though I believe such a thing is impossible 2 months before the fated day. The governme (haha) has cured me of my own procrastination.
The UK doesn't speak with one voice, and that is doubly true of Northern Ireland. I think of the UK as evenly divided between wanting (1) a Hard Brexit; (2) a Soft Brexit, and (3) to Remain in the EU. It's not that the UK doesn't know what is wants. For any option, two-thirds of the country disagree. Then you get Northern Ireland with its difficult history between the two communities, Unionist and Republican. NI is as divided as the rest of the UK. Unionist tend to be more pro-Brexit and might even support a Hard Brexit. Republicans tend to be anti-Brexit and virtually none would support a Hard Brexit. Since NI will be the only land border between the UK and EU, the risk of Brexit introducing the need for a border is very emotive. Republican bitterly oppose a land border in Ireland, and would tolerate an Irish Sea border if necessary. Unionist bitterly oppose an Irish Sea border, and would tolerate a land border in Ireland if necessary. Politically NI is a bit of a mess at the moment, since the devolved NI assembly collapsed two years ago and shows no hope of being restored any time soon. Disagreement between the main parties (Sinn Fein and the DUP) on Brexit, has been added to some other unrelated issues. You should not think of the DUP as necessarily reflecting the views of the Unionist community, they reflect the more extreme views; the same could be said for Sinn Fein. As for a United Ireland, I would argue it is extremely unlikely in the foreseeable future. It is a potent topic right now, because the demographics between Unionist and Republican are getting close to 50/50, as well as Brexit. The problem is that with the devolved NI assembly collapses, rhetoric from both political parties has become more toxic, and people had been pushed back to their communities, rather than finding common ground. A United Ireland, if it were to happen, will be a high risk process whenever it happens. At the moment, the risk of it being a complete disaster seems extremely high. I would suggest a referendum on a United Ireland will happen within the next 10 years, but is at least 5 years away.
All problems disappear if we stay in the Customs Union. Belfast Agreement(GFA) is satisfied since no border is required. We leave the EU and we keep the benefits. Only thing we don't get is the opportunity of independent trade deals.
I’m American, but the lack of concern for the Irish border since before the referendum has continuously blown my mind. Forget the NHS buses, who on earth believed the lie that the border would be easy to sort out? It’s no wonder that England & Wales voted to Leave since they can’t even be bothered to care about an entire nation within the UK itself. It’s like that Spitting Image sketch where Thatcher and her cabinet keep asking, “What’s Scotland?” and none of them know.
@@iluvcamaros1912 Unfortunately the subtle genius of Saint George Mitchell and the Good Friday Agreement has been lost in the emotion of Brexit: "it is the birthright of the people of Northern Ireland to identify themselves and be accepted as Irish or British, or both." The GFA is open to interpretation, that's the very point of it. To Unionists it means, NI is British, always has been and always will be (they hope). To Republicans it means, NI might be British but that doesn't interfere with your life, you can travel from Derry to Dublin, as easily as to Belfast. One of the many sad things about Brexit is a return to the black and white mentality of the 1980s in Britain, which I can only describe as Unionists are "loyal British people" whose concerns count, while Republicans are "disloyal British people" who don't. There is no black and white in NI, only shades of grey.
@@paulprosser1289 If UK leaves the EU but keep the free market and movement then it will be worse than staying in the EU, because the UK will have to follow every decision EU takes regarding trading and not have any voice/vote. It also allow free movement which the UK doesnt want. Which might as well just stay in the EU. Makes no sense for the EU to give the UK free market and no free movement.
"We will have to form an expert team of negotiators including trade negotiators and security experts". So her negotiating teams from the last two years were apparently not experts and didn't include trade negotiators or security experts?
@@omgfackdehell It's not a sure thing but it is likely. France already announced they refuse any new negociation and started implenting a no deal response (Don't quote me but it's a 800k€ response for now). It should tell you the way the wind in blowing.
First you need to know what you want and need to achieve with negotiations, also assess W you can achieve. Second, you need someone to negotiate with. Third, you need to negotiate. Last, you need confirmation of the negotiated result by every party involved. Since the first three steps are missing and unlikely to happen, the probability of the fourth step is quite moot.
One video I would like to see from TLDR News is would be explaining why uk political figures think they can negoticate a new deal when EU leaderships keep saying "May's deal is our best AND final offer."
I'm sorry where is the UK breaking up?? All pollsters I trust have shown no members of the UK wanting a vote for independence or wanting independence at all! This has been remainer drivel from day one. The closest to wanting independence is Scotland and they are still about 10% apart which is as it was in 2014. So please do tell me where the UK is breaking up? Support for the SNP dropped dramatically at the last election and the trend continues in this way. So please do elaborate for us all...
@@ademw7 it depends on the future long-term economic growth in England, compared to the EU: if the EU growth outpaces England's - Scots & Northern Irish will feel better off with the EU
@@ireneuszpyc6684 And you really believe the EU will outpace the UK, do you?? Just as Germany is about to enter a recession, France the same, much of the EU is/was already in a recession, Greece already bankrupt, Italy on the brink of bankruptcy, Spain and Portugal the same. The EU is not going to be an emerging market for a very long time so it ain't gonna be outpacing anyone anytime soon mate lmao!!! The UK has the strongest growth out of most of the EU economies right now and certainly out of all the large economies. There is a world of emerging markets out there ripe for our grasp and involvement, special tailored deals for us the UK can be forged out. We are well-developed postindustrial nations, there is not a lot of room and opportunity at any one time for us to grow significantly, we are not going to be outpacing anyone in growth if we stick to protectionist policies and only trade with one another anyway... That aside, ANY nation in the UK will take a bigger hit economically by leaving the UK than it can gain by joining the EU by a huge margin! Any economist will tell you this. Which is why all separatist parties never mention the economy and only talk about sovereignty, for all the separatist voters in Scotland, northern island their vote has never and will never be about the economy. So, please don't tell me why so and so will now leave because of so and so economic reason. The Scottish separatists are nationalists... they should be every remainers/socialists worst enemy. ; )
Scotland voted to remain in the UK in a "once in a lifetime" vote. They all knew a EU referendum was inevitable, with parties like Ukip demanding one. So if they thought long term they would have withdrew from the UK to forever be in the EU if they love it so much. Also SNP are losing dominance.
Again, should do a video on what of Scotland leaves, Not only has SNP started the ball rolling, Teresa may even mentions breaking up the union in this speech,
If Scotland left then leave would win a second vote by a large margin. Around half a million more votes difference. Question is if there was an election on tories supporting no deal or a Canada deal vs labour trying to renegotiate a better deal who would win.
@@James-sk4db it's not that, it's the other implications, the no party of last Scottish referendum said if we voted no (stay) we would have use of the pound, be in the e.u., have stability and security, and have more powers devolved... So far... We still have use of the pound....
How does the UK expect to "take back control" of immigration if they insist on no hard border in neither Ireland nor the irish Sea? Any illegal immigrant could freely fly to The Republic of Ireland and take a bus into Northern ireland and from there to England without being challenged.
1 - Changing the legal status changes reality. Given a choice between illegally living in a similarly rich country like Germany or Sweden, and living illegally in Britain (threat of deportation, which can also involve confiscation of income earned illegally), why would an EU citizen choose the latter? This legal immigration seems to be the main focus for British anti-immigrant rhetoric. 2 - For non-EU citizens, there's really no change from today. Ireland has immigration checks for those arriving from the EU, and non-citizens are still screened according to very similar standards to arriving directly at a UK border.
This is so silly on so many levels. First, she's right in that there probably is no majority for a second referendum in the parliament... the same can be said about **any** other proposal including no deal, her deal or remaining in the EU. That is exactly the problem here. There are more than two opinions and none of them have a majority behind them and not enough people are willing to change their mind on it for that stalemate to resolve itself. Secondly, if by some miracle she managed to actually get a deal that a majority of people would agree on (which I doubt for the above reasons), it would still have to be accepted by the EU. It's one thing to ask for something, it's another one to actually get it. These is a trade _negotiation_ not the dictating of terms to another party. Any deal that might have even a remote chance of getting a majority in parliament, would probably be so far removed from anything the EU would agree to as to be completely worthless. So what does that all lead to? Unless the parliament manages to change the default scenario for what happens if no agreement can be found by the 29th of March, all signs indicate towards a no deal Brexit. If no deal is what happens if nothing else happens and everything else (including no deal ironically) can't get a majority, that's just what's going to happen automatically.
Must say I really like this channel and your videos but the quality of production for this video has dropped. There are a lot of typos in this video and I find the captions only appear for a brief period making them difficult to read in some cases. Personally, I’d also have a quick fade in on the audio from the different video clips so you don’t get that harsh transition from your clips with no background noise to the parliament clips with lots of noise. Keep up the great work though guys
To be fair if its just the poor guy he's probably dying trying to assemble the animations and also the script in time for stuff happening at the moment.
Seems like he is succumbing to the same problems that are now showing in the Brexit process: Too much to do and not enough time! But the quality of content of these videos it brilliant, I agree.
Well we can respect that all options here to be considered. Preferably, a free trade deal should be the wisest option, but I'm thinking No Deal is looking more likely now if the EU won't budge.
That's the UK's fault they shouldn't think that they are the big thing in Europe they should tone down a bit and behave themselves instead of this nonsense
She's doing it on purpose. To force people to accept her "deal" and trying to convince the public that this is the default option. Shifting the goalposts.
3:33. Today I learned democracy means giving your opinion once based on your info then, making a decision and then sticking to your guns at all possible cost.
Democracy is about informing yourself and not about repeating what one side wants you to think. Considering today's globalised economic structure please don't make anyone believe you could exit the EU like a light switch. Democracy also means that the masses decide... btw and going back in time is still science fiction...
@@marvindujardin463 Imagine being in a car. In the distance you think you see a restaurant. You propose to your family in the car that you'd like to go and eat there and everyone agrees. As you get closer you realise, there is a cliff between the end of the road and the restaurant. You have 10 minutes to just stop the car and drive somewhere else. But you've made a decission. Better stick to it and drive off the cliff. Stop defending a dumb narrative out of sheer principals. You should be able to come back on decissions when you get more information and can see a better outcome. It's not about going back in time.
@@jeroenfeher8107 Why is there a cliff in the middle of a road ? Navigation system ? Btw your ten minutes have lasted for 2,5 years without reaching the cliff... Sounds pretty much like science fiction. Hey I am not attacking you personally but embrace your decision and stop trying to relativate it.
@Dr Downtime "It isn't governments job to educate you on the vote." Yet, government influences the vote by giving incorrect information. But I guess that's fine, since it fits your own narrative. And explain to me exactly why decisions should not be changed if you learn later on that your decision was wrong.
Not necessarily, maybe some tough times for a short while. We've been through worse and can tolerate a little bit of pain. But the UK will be free from control, freedom always comes with a price. At least this time it won't be in blood.
@@DanielM2006UK Yes, the UK has been through hard times and worse (civil war, Norman invasion, Vikings, even the World Wars) but "free from control"? You do realize the UK has the single more powerful vote in the EU and the most exemptions, correct? And what, precisely, is it that you are wanting to be free from considering the UK has voted with the EU between 82-97% of the time, yes? And every major bank and financial institution has said that the UK is worse off outside of the EU and the common market than within it where it had the power to shape and/or block policy and that leaving, no matter what, means a recession. That is why so many businesses are moving out! Sony to Amsterdam, P&O to Cyprus, Dyson to Singapore and that's just from the last few days.
@@Arcboltkonrad13 Bank's have been saying that for years. We were told the UK would be poorer without the Euro. That the country would be in recession overnight when the vote to Leave was announced. We're still here and still going. The EU is about control, it always had. Look at Articles 11 and 13, the creation of an EU army, mass immigration. Perhaps the UK voted for it, but the people didn't. If businesses want to leave, that's their choice, there are other avenues.
@@Crissov Being out of the EU is a loss of control that many are happy to for go. If we were stuck with the horrible deal just voted down, that would be a loss of control.
I'm sorry to say it, but you might have forgotten the very idea of what "TL;DR" means. The video, interesting as it is, lasts almost twelve minutes and uses too much real-world footage (that heavily contrasts with the clean infographic style of the previous videos). Please, try to remember what made your channel gather the attention of your viewers and don't fall into the trap of extending your videos unnecessarily to please the UA-cam algorithm. TL;DR: Brevity is the soul of wit.
Patient goes to a doctor for consultation before a difficult surgery - they start discussing the surgery and potential outcomes and the patient suddenly says "I want you to take the Death option off the table" Doctor says "Sorry its not a option, its a default - if we dont do anything it will be the outcome but we're not doing nothing so lets keep discussing options"
If you're expecting death your other options don't matter. When you're struggling for life and your surgeon is being deliberately blocked from trying to save you whether Norway, Canada or No Deal as anyone of them means you survive you don't need me to point out where you can stick your analogy!
This is ridiculous. The U.K. will leave the E.U. on March 29th with no deal. It's time to accept it and start planning for it. Arguing about whether you want it or not is pointless at this stage. No other alternative is possible, so the best thing they can do is make the most of it and start drafting free trade agreements with Australia, Canada, and New Zealand. Delaying the announcement of no deal is only going to increase chaos.
If they do that at this stage, where there is still some time left, they will get another vote of confidence, which will succeed. Then Article 50 will get extended, either for a renegotiation with a softer Brexit government or a General Election. It would have to be done closer to the deadline if one wants No Deal to actually happen.
@@Ladifour you cannot take ''no deal'' off the table because that would ruin our negotiating position. But that is exactly what remoaners want. To undermine the negotiation to only then cancel Brexit. Shameful!
a second referendum will undermine social cohesion and democracy? is she nuts? social cohesion is already undermined. and what more democratic exercise can there be if not to bring the whole issue back to the people? double-speak, as usual, from Ms. May...
You do realize that a second referendum would most likely yield a remain win by a very small margin. And that would devide the country even more. Maybe even leading to violent clashes between Brexiters and Remainers right? It would also lead to a split in the two major parties.. It's not an option and she is right. The first one should've never happened, but now that it has, the cat is out of the bag.
@@alen40to You do realize the results in the first refferenfum were 52:48 Thats near enough as devided as it gets. a second refferendum will land our country on a solid answer and stop the bickering and mayhem made by such indecisive mp's.
It is undemocratic because the people has already spoken, for politicians to say that the result isnt to be obeyed is to undermine the will of the people.
@@bnap3221 they are ignoring the people by asking them again? If they wanted to ignore the people they could just call it off without asking, as the referendum wasn't binding.
@@bnap3221 The people has spoken, but what it mumbled was hard to understand and self-contradicting. Nobody in their right mind would listen to and blindly act upon that. Asking for clarification or reaffirmation is a sane thing to do, but if you have the authority, knowledge and immanent pressure you need to lead by decision on the best interest of your constituency. In other words, _Parliament_ needs to vote between No Deal and No Brexit.
In the meantime an avid Brexit supporter, James Dyson, moves his company's HQ to Singapore. The company I work for moved it's operations out of UK earlier this month. Well done UK, you f***d up your economy, but you just don't realize this yet.
@@williambrown9053 wrong... You will have tariffs with entire EU the day you crash out with no deal. I am not laughing, I was responsible for moving our company's operation out of southern England to Poland and it was quite a bit of work. But it is done now, so no longer a problem for me. By end of next month our London head office will be moved to Ireland as well. You go and thrive in your strong economy, fingers crossed.
6. The I like the caption idea, makes the important points clear. Is potentially usefull for communicating complex issues clearly. Would help if they were correct though
@@tatianatub hear, hear. What really surprises me is that the major breaking point is the back stop but if the UK leaves without a deal there will be a hard border in Ireland no matter what. The Brexiteers are blamed for lacking logic. I can only see one logical conclusion to the struggles of the last two years. Brexit is not what they thought it would be. And they should have known.
@@williambrown9053 It's not like you can just replace two years of discussions on the freely accessible media channels with your own anecdotal evidence.
I am having an allergic reaction to a new type of fruit I just tried right now and am watching this to get my mind off the itching and swelling in my mouth and throat Wish me luck :D
The problem of Northern Ireland can only be resolved if any deal between UK and Northern Ireland includes UK remaining in the Custom Union. Those who don't see that are obviously ignorant of what a boarder and international trade imply. Except those who claim unsing technology which is crazy talk and has already been refused are welcome to provide a solution that does not include remaining in the Custom Union. Remaining in the Custom Union is least that Bresiteers need to compromise on for this whole shit storm to die down and as everyone seems to agree on we can "Get on with it" and bring the side together.
So true! It is comical that it does not seem obvious to many of the ones loving the idea of a Hard Brexit. The Custom Union like football require that you play by the same rules. A National football game where the Brits can use hands and you cannot penalise the Germans for kicking the British players would end up in a mess! Same rules, then there is no need for a border. Different rules then there is!
If this country was a democracy the only plan would be to respect the referendum result (as they said they would) and leave the e.u Parliament's quest for a deal is simply a remainer parliament trying to ensure we're never in truth free of their beloved e.u
I think you should tone it down with pushing your webiste and instagram and subscribers. Good stuff sells itself. I, as someone who has been watching your every video for some time now, find them really annoying, and every time more than the last.
So she tinkered with the Backstop but nothing else? I don't like Corbyn, I disagree with his attempt to prevent what is currently the only means to leave the EU properly but I don't blame him for calling her bs mind you!
Like all the other comments cleverly pointed out there are some typos. Running a news channel is really difficult if you're a small youtubers, honestly as long as the information is accurate I couldn't care less about a couple mistakes here and then. We are all just human after all. Hopefully if he keeps it up and with our support this channel can keep growing and eventually be able to spend more time on each video. Besides, practice makes perfect. Keep it up TLDR News! Love ya/yall
I live in Ireland so letting our neighbours decide whether to break the GFA or not, even when they have little knowledge of the North, is some pretty scary shit
@@DanielM2006UK Which is essentially what she said is her aim, once Brexit is done May WILL NOT run for re-election. Her words. If you ask me she is doing ok in all other areas apart from Brexit and her party backbenchers agree, right now this country is building more homes than it ever has done before under mays leadership, and these are homes that everyone can own. You see the conservatives want you to own your own ((House)) and have control of how you spend your own money, they don't want you to be paying council rent all your life living like a sardine in tower blocks like labour does spending all your disposable income on taxes.
Here's what I keep wondering: Why does Corbin think he's going to get a different/better deal than May? The EU has made it clear that this is the one and only deal. Is his plan to take over, talk to the exact same EU reps, get the exact same deal, just in a different formatting, and repeat the exact same cycle again?
Corbyn / Labour would have entered the negotiations with different premises and constraints. They would probably have ended up with a deal that kept the UK in a Customs Union with the EU, which might have failed in Parliament as well. Itʼs now too late for that, though, or way too early.
Leave with no deal, this is what was voted for by 17.4 million people, the deal only serves to tie us into the EU and as a weaker member than we are already, what they are doing right now trying to negotiate a deal that means we don’t really leave is completely wrong, this and those that support this is the sole reason why the country is screwed, support the referendum result people support the winning side and get behind our country and be brave enough to leave on no deal, we can then start to re build and strengthen our unions un fettered in a way that benefits our country, we have to put our own house in order before we can think of helping others out,
7:02 Did someone forget to proof read the video before publishing? Think there is a T missing in status and much of relationship was missing earlier on (just said rela)
I don't like May's argument regarding a second vote. Clearly, the vast majority of the population was not well informed about what the consequences of Brexit were. Now that they see all the issues with it, the vote would be very different. And that's the real reason she doesn't want a second vote.
Imagine making UA-cam videos that are pretty much yesterdays news by the time they come out. You're doing great work! Just a nitpick: try to have someone proofread the video, I saw some typos in there.
If only we had a politician who has the strength of character to tell the pro Brexit voters that they are idiots and what they want can't happen. If only...
@@3d1e00 Like destroying British democracy and the constitution? With trust in politicians at an all time low, how do you think 17.4 million will think about you revoking A50? Not only that but considering the fact that the withdrawal act was passed through British law, and the leaving date was set. THEN, her majesty the queen gave the withdrawal bill royal assent. But you're going to be a dictator and revoke it anyway? You sir, are the idiot lol.
@@craig581 Yeah, you're right. We should accept the referendum result. The one where the campaign was based on huge lies and misinformation. The one with the serious spending fraud allegations. The one which was so poorly worded that it said "Should the United Kingdom remain a member of the European Union or leave the European Union?" which we can completely satisfy by staying in the EEA. That one right? Only a utter imbecile would say that it was "democracy" it was incompetence. Get over the stupidity, if it's the will of the people they can just come up with a better worded question and rerun the referendum. We will get the same result right? Refusing to accept this is undemocratic and born from the realisation that pro-Brexit muppets are 100 years out of date and unable to adapt to the realities of the modern world economy. Britain is an international joke, and rightly so. But keep up with the democracy line and will of the people, sounds good.
So after 2 years the Brits still demand a deal that puts borders in Northern Ireland and that no borders are put in Northern Ireland. The entire country has gone mad.
Orrrrrrrddeeeer, ORRRRRRDAAAHHHH
OHDAAAAH
OHHHHDAAAAAAAH
oida?
hold the ordahhh, hold the ordaahhhh
Or-dah
OORRRRRRRRRRRRDDEEEEEEHHHHR
OHHHHDAAAAHHH
Eyes to the right.
Nose to the left.
Here I am.
Stuck in a Brexit with EU.
And I don't know what the f I can do.
I'm so scared not knowing what is to come
And I'd hoped by now our leaders were done.
But there are clowns to the left of me and jokers to the right
Here I am wanting Brexit from EU
Look on the bright side, were not stuck in the purgatory deal that May hoped we would vote for.
👏👏👏
The Nose Have It. The Nose Have It.
It's No's to the left not you hooter!!
Plan B is Plan A in a wig.
Or a silly hat.
Soulrender95 Just like Theresa May herself then.🤷🏻♂️
Her precious !
Hilarious comment :)
And nose glasses
Hey Commenters. The channel creators clearly tried to rush this video out with a quick turnaround so we could stay informed on May's Plan B even though they didn't get their usual weekend break to produce a new one. The people who create this channel have other jobs or attend school. How about we cut them some slack? Or I don't know, pay them enough money to devote to these videos full time so they can quit their jobs/school and focus on only this?
Don't like the second option? Then go with the first one: Cut them some slack.
Couldn't we delay choosing an option?
@@russellg5022 or revoke it.
@@steviepurcell7051 we would need to have a referendum on that.
cut them some slack? depends on what you mean with that. Quality changes should be called out, or we open the door for worse and worse quality content. So the creators should know. It is the content they decide on presenting. If what they show in that isn't up to a level we like, we unsub/stop watching. However before doing so by commenting they get a chance to change. i feel like a comment like yours adds very little value. It doesnt change what we get presented with. It only looks down upon those that give feedback. i would have preffered to see something like "hey we made some mistakes rushing this out. We dont do this for a living and wanted to keep you up to date. We seem to have overlooked some errors doing so." But hey that is just my opinion. Then i would take it as being heard and understand the issues.
sincerely
a commentor
@@user-qz2ld3vt2d - We really appreciate feedback from our viewers. Our videos are produced by a tiny team (In most cases one person) who all have full time jobs / study outside of TLDR. It's a struggle trying to find that perfect compromise to keep our content flowing at a regular pace with the time constraints that Brexit is currently allowing! I'm part of the web team who manage the site and it's content, I read our comments regularly and I pass them onto the video team so your feedback is taken into account, helping us improve our content for you the subscriber. We hope you stick around as we have some amazing things in the works for the next couple of months! - Ross (TLDR Web Team)
Hey guys there are a lot of unfinished labels in this one
too long did not write
Maybe half the label closed office and moved to France?
They copy and pasted labels from another video
Dear UK,
thank you for the great entertainment.
Greetings from Germany
Np
Glad you enjoyed it. Looks like there is more to come. How it will end is the big question. This is testing the resolve of the EU and the UK. Personally thinking, it's stalemate in favour of the EU presently. It will be checkmate to the EU if the UK signs up to the horrible deal that was just voted down. No Deal is looking possible once again and where things go from there will be interesting.
Dear Germany, thanks for all the migrants coming to Europe
Guys keep it civil.
@@DanielM2006UK 50 million migrants should just about be enough.
So the TLDR is; May has no plan B. Full stop.
exclamation mark
UK cannot create a new deal unilaterally and cannot rule out a no deal.
Whoever is asking to rule out a no deal has no clue on anything and should be sent back to school with children.
@@ChristianIce No deal can be ruled out because it would be a major catastrophe. The two real options are going with May's current deal or revoking article 50.
@@kyou42
No deal is the default if you won't accept the deal, or revoke art 50.
You don't "rule out" a no deal, you "rule in" a different option, otherwise no deal is automatic.
@@ChristianIce Ruling out No Deal of course means that Remain would become the new default. Itʼs the sanest thing to do right now for the country, but interferes with certain political agendas.
So basically again a lot of talk, but no really action or solution.
May's entire plan B is to make changes to her deal in cooperation with other parties, however this is a fruitless endeavour and is in the end only something cosmetic ("see I reach out a hand, I am open for working together), but seein that most likely any of these changes will not be accepted by the EU, it is just posing to come to a solution, instead of actually working to a solution.
May's plan now is thus involving more parties into an already ended negotation. This is just absurd and is clearly just another way of kicking the can down the road (again).
At this moment there are only three real options possible (which can be reached in different ways):
- revoking article 50 (either due to a referendum, the parliament voting for it or May caving ot remain however unlikely)
- Accepting May's deal (practically impossible, seeing the enormous defeat. Maybe parliament would agree to it if the only other possibility is a no deal, so we won't know until somewhere near the end of march)
- Leaving without a deal (basically doing nothing or not reaching a majority for another option in parliament in time)
Yet for some reason they keep focusing on something that isn't even an option: renegotiation.
Yep that's where we are , No deal ,, May/ EU ,, Revoke . As i see it no deal looks most likely now but as B day gets closer May/EU will gain ground also Revoke will also gain , it'll come down to can parliament force a revoke on Gov ? Or will May eventually scare MP's into her camp ?or will everyone miscalculate and we crash out ?
People don't seem to understand what a big concession the back stop already is on behalf of EU.
It is an insurance policy in case the Brits sign up to a deal with US or some other country whose standards are below that of EU and hence a great deal cheaper (which is what the main purpose of Brexit is) and want to sell it in EU avoiding inspection.
There is no better deal !
Renegotiation IS an option. It’s all part of negotiation to say it’s not! Why didn’t the EU want to remove the Backstop? It could lead to a hard border in Ireland, due to different customs. Well different customs happen with No Deal any way. Being pragmatic, it’s better to amend the withdrawal and agree it rather than having a hard border now, so push it down the road where we have a chance of agreeing a trade deal before it must happen!
Politics is different from you average job so I don't think saying "a lot of talk, but no real action" is fair too be honest. Simply speaking has a massive impact in politics, and the whole Idea of Brexit is daunting for any Politician. That''s why they keep talking because if they do then there can be some form of resolution between the two major parties. If you look at Theresa May's last few speeches compared to this one there was a LOT less heckling from the opposition, which in my eyes seems to suggest that both the right and left are starting to understand that decisions must be made as a collective whole, and that Theresa May will go through will it regardless, so they might as well come together to think of the best plan to do so. It's a small change (that should of happened months ago tbh) but a positive one none the least.
Hasn't the EU already confirmed that a no-deal brexit would automatically mean a hard border in Ireland? May wants to rule out a hard border in Ireland, but not rule out a no-deal brexit. There's an obvious contradiction here. Something has to give.
As a Danish Social Democrat, and even a tad further left leaning than the current SD party. I am surprised to agree with May upon her point regarding the second referendum, and how it would be a dangerous demonstration of how the UK handles referendums. Moreover, my agreement with May continues, as she discuss the social implications such a referendum would have upon society, and how it undermines the democracy present in the UK.
I am not a brexiteer, I fully support the EU, and sees myself as a globalist. However, if one thing goes above my belief in a united Europe, it is democracy and each country's sovereignty. The UK held a public referendum regarding membership in the EU, as we all know, the public wanted out by a slight majority. Can the process of which the campaigns and the entire referendum be criticized? Definitely, however, a referendum is direct democracy in its essence and disregarding that would be as if disregarding democracy as a whole.
I am deeply saddened to see the UK leave the EU, but that is how democracy works, and that I respect.
P.S. I wish the UK would stay and the entire referendum had not been held to start out, but we cannot travel back and avoid it. I respect the decision of those, whom I disagree with.
The whole campaign was run on lies?! I don’t understand how it was ever lawful to begin with.. it was ran like an election, facts were scarce
So who suspects a no deal then
I am suspecting No Deal now. There was a concern it might be taken away or we'd have to vote again. Personally, I don't think the EU will change its position. They are going to take this all the way to the last minute. So we should walk away and let the chase us for a deal.
I suspect and expect neglect in the reflect for a deflect.
@@Healermain15 A poet and clearly knows it.
Theresa isn't doing a great job of reaching a deal, that's for sure 😂
Sooo yea rn I think no deal is the most likely outcome
@@banky4943 Well there is a chance. Anything can happen.
Complete list of typos/spelling errors in the video:
2:10
5:13
5:48
6:16
6:31
6:41
6:50
6:51
7:01
7:05
8:50
Please note that I've only made this as constructive criticism and I really do enjoy these videos.
Perhaps you can volunteer to help edit the next one before it goes out instead of complaining afterwards?
The UK is not equal to the EU. That's the key. You won't get an special deal, you already had the best deal in all the EU.
p0l The UK are only the 2nd largest contributor into the EU pot, and biggest trading partner
Utter rubbish you remainer !
@@christophercook723 p0l isn't a British citizen. Can't you tell from the phrasing?
Exactly, the UK has consistently shown itself to be the toxic trading partner I say let the brexit fools have their no deal this country deserves to pay for its stupidity!
Anything out of the EU will be better than any deal you can get in the EU
Some typos in there, guys. Your proofreader is on holiday in the EU while it's still possible?
@TLDR News : Some of your written screens placed over the PM's dispatch are incomplete. It looks like the text got cut off.
Either this video was done in a hurry or these are some rendering errors. This is not the first time, either. I say: A little bit more care for future videos would be appreciated. I know everything is going fast now, but don't sacrifice the status TLDRNews has achieved just for being first. Leave that to others with less care and time for fact checking.
@@asshatteryengaged813 - Please could you give me a time stamp where you are facing the time being cut off? - Ross (TLDR Web Team)
5:10
@@alexbeardmore3588 Thanks! I've passed the time stamp on to the guys who do the Videos. - Ross (TLDR Web Team)
This is how bad things have become, Theresa May has had to make a jacket out of her Sofa, Welcome to Brexit Britain !
That is a great depiction, lol
UK can't rule out a no deal and can't negotiate a plan B unilaterally.
"Can't" doesn't mean shouldn't, can't means it's an impossibility.
ChristianIce Ironically the problems and impossibility of Brexit comes from the Brexiteers themselves. Leave campaign painted and promised so many different versions and visions of Brexit that it got the disenfranchised to vote for it. Great, but now those visions that are often incompatible with each other have split voters, MPs and other fractions to the point that there is no consensus for anything. Some have hardened their stance and others have switched camp since. So while the saga continues, the businesses are moving shop and there will be nothing to bargain with other than we are 60 odd million hungry consumers type market and you can sell us anything because we are desperate.
mi chiedo cosa stia facendo david cameron dopo aver dato via a questo delirio.
@@Michelrs
Probabilmente sta cercando prove di una sua discendenza irlandese e organizzando il trasloco :)
wow christianice! che ricordiiii ahah
@lasest2 "assuming that EU agrees."
Plot twist, the UK doesn’t leave the EU... unlimited subscribers!
How's that a plot twist. That's were it's been heading since the snap election made leaving an impossible option.
Samsonite Dove Nahh it’ll leave and hopefully without a deal.
@@JayJay5244 The only way the UK can leave without a deal is by a legally binding People's Vote aka. 2nd referendum (although it's really the 3rd referendum on the matter).
@@SaturnusDK No deal is the default. If no deal is agreed upon by March 29th the U.K. will automatically leave the E.U..
@@charleskelsall6549 We all know that's not going to happen. There is an overwhelming majority in parliament for taking no deal off the table. The front benches on both sides is just waiting for the back benchers to take the matter into their own hands, so they can support the motion without having proposed it themselves. And that is precisely what will happen next week. No deal is dead unless there is a legally binding People's Vote. And then only if it's even an option.
She said:
A no deal can not be writen off
And then:
The irish deal will stay,
But thats contradictory, because if a crash happens then there will be a border
For E.U. a NO DEAL means hard borders on sea and land without exceptions. In the case of No Deal If a member of E.U. does not like a hard border with U.K. then there will be consequences and probably its ejection from E.U.
Switzerland and Norway are not members of E.U. but with a DEAL have soft borders with EU countries.
The EU proposed the Norway solution but the UK refused. So this special deal was forged to accommodate UK's wishes. But well... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I bypass the Chinese internet censorship to come here and laugh at Theresa May
How is it possible possible that 2 months before leaving the UK seems to still have no idea what they actually want?
We even got the likes of Orban, the Italians and Poles to not interfere with our negotiations.
Because May is woman ... then never know what they want :DDD
Petr Rieger oh come on no one in the UK does know what they want
@@roadrunner6224 :D :D :D :D :D :D
@@roadrunner6224 Logical conclusion : the UK population exists only of women.
It's simple, the message of what leave meant has become distorted by our own politicians. Many thought leaving meant creating a deal to leave. That was incorrect. We were leaving anyway on 29th March, the deal was an opportunity to create an alternative free trade option to limit any problems between the EU and UK and create a new relationship. But the EU being the EU, they just want control and in this case took control. The UK should have refused and said: "This doesn't work. We're leaving, come back to us when you want to talk sense.". They'd have come running in the end if they wanted a deal.
It blows my mind how incapable and simply broken the govt in the UK is for the past 10+ years ... shocking
It's because they haven't been in control, of course.
@@marksimons8861 Lol, not sure if you're trolling, but I understand "we need to take back control" a bit more now :P it's for Tories to have the whip over the nation isn't it ? :D
@@krisrudecki9477 Perhaps I should have added LOL to my comment.
Mark Simons that was quality trolling ;) debated a few staunch brexiters recently so need to clarify even if it looks obvious :P sign of times I guess
@@krisrudecki9477
UK gov: We will respect peoples decision to leave the EU
also UK gov: We will not ask people what they've meant by "leave the EU"
Ireland/Northern Ireland is what will make any deal fail. There will hardly ever be a solution that pleases the four parties involved. The Irish, the Northern Irish, the UK governme (lol) and the EU want something the other party rejects. There can be no middle ground, someone will have to back down one way or another. All solutions are drastic. The Irish and NI don't want a physical border, but the NI wants to stay in the UK and not be treated differently than the other nations, yet they voted to remain. At the same time, the UK doesn't want free passage between the UK and the EU, meaning checks would be necessary between NI and I. What I don't know is how crazy the possibilty of a reunion is. I guess it's pretty high up, I've only seen one Unionist NI politician who was viciously pro-Brexit and avoided the question of the Good Friday Agreement.
Can people from NI tell me what they want to see happen? To me, they are the key to this whole shitshow.
Love from France, I wish all involved parties a peaceful Brexit, even though I believe such a thing is impossible 2 months before the fated day. The governme (haha) has cured me of my own procrastination.
The UK doesn't speak with one voice, and that is doubly true of Northern Ireland. I think of the UK as evenly divided between wanting (1) a Hard Brexit; (2) a Soft Brexit, and (3) to Remain in the EU. It's not that the UK doesn't know what is wants. For any option, two-thirds of the country disagree. Then you get Northern Ireland with its difficult history between the two communities, Unionist and Republican. NI is as divided as the rest of the UK. Unionist tend to be more pro-Brexit and might even support a Hard Brexit. Republicans tend to be anti-Brexit and virtually none would support a Hard Brexit. Since NI will be the only land border between the UK and EU, the risk of Brexit introducing the need for a border is very emotive. Republican bitterly oppose a land border in Ireland, and would tolerate an Irish Sea border if necessary. Unionist bitterly oppose an Irish Sea border, and would tolerate a land border in Ireland if necessary. Politically NI is a bit of a mess at the moment, since the devolved NI assembly collapsed two years ago and shows no hope of being restored any time soon. Disagreement between the main parties (Sinn Fein and the DUP) on Brexit, has been added to some other unrelated issues. You should not think of the DUP as necessarily reflecting the views of the Unionist community, they reflect the more extreme views; the same could be said for Sinn Fein. As for a United Ireland, I would argue it is extremely unlikely in the foreseeable future. It is a potent topic right now, because the demographics between Unionist and Republican are getting close to 50/50, as well as Brexit. The problem is that with the devolved NI assembly collapses, rhetoric from both political parties has become more toxic, and people had been pushed back to their communities, rather than finding common ground. A United Ireland, if it were to happen, will be a high risk process whenever it happens. At the moment, the risk of it being a complete disaster seems extremely high. I would suggest a referendum on a United Ireland will happen within the next 10 years, but is at least 5 years away.
All problems disappear if we stay in the Customs Union. Belfast Agreement(GFA) is satisfied since no border is required. We leave the EU and we keep the benefits. Only thing we don't get is the opportunity of independent trade deals.
I’m American, but the lack of concern for the Irish border since before the referendum has continuously blown my mind. Forget the NHS buses, who on earth believed the lie that the border would be easy to sort out? It’s no wonder that England & Wales voted to Leave since they can’t even be bothered to care about an entire nation within the UK itself. It’s like that Spitting Image sketch where Thatcher and her cabinet keep asking, “What’s Scotland?” and none of them know.
@@iluvcamaros1912 Unfortunately the subtle genius of Saint George Mitchell and the Good Friday Agreement has been lost in the emotion of Brexit: "it is the birthright of the people of Northern Ireland to identify themselves and be accepted as Irish or British, or both." The GFA is open to interpretation, that's the very point of it. To Unionists it means, NI is British, always has been and always will be (they hope). To Republicans it means, NI might be British but that doesn't interfere with your life, you can travel from Derry to Dublin, as easily as to Belfast. One of the many sad things about Brexit is a return to the black and white mentality of the 1980s in Britain, which I can only describe as Unionists are "loyal British people" whose concerns count, while Republicans are "disloyal British people" who don't. There is no black and white in NI, only shades of grey.
@@paulprosser1289 If UK leaves the EU but keep the free market and movement then it will be worse than staying in the EU, because the UK will have to follow every decision EU takes regarding trading and not have any voice/vote. It also allow free movement which the UK doesnt want.
Which might as well just stay in the EU.
Makes no sense for the EU to give the UK free market and no free movement.
"We will have to form an expert team of negotiators including trade negotiators and security experts". So her negotiating teams from the last two years were apparently not experts and didn't include trade negotiators or security experts?
The Only Certainty when it comes to Brexit is, BREXIT IS A MESS!!!!
May could send the uk military , that is what Winston Churchil would do ! 😆
Just so you know, there's issues with the graphics at 7:04 and 8:49
Females have smaller brain volume
@@tigercat418 you appear to be challenging that hypothesis.
Gotta get past the other 27 countries first to get this new deal signed off. I doubt that’ll happen
What new deal ?
If germany and france will vote one way, the rest will too
@@omgfackdehell It's not a sure thing but it is likely. France already announced they refuse any new negociation and started implenting a no deal response (Don't quote me but it's a 800k€ response for now). It should tell you the way the wind in blowing.
First you need to know what you want and need to achieve with negotiations, also assess W you can achieve.
Second, you need someone to negotiate with.
Third, you need to negotiate.
Last, you need confirmation of the negotiated result by every party involved.
Since the first three steps are missing and unlikely to happen, the probability of the fourth step is quite moot.
This "new deal" is identical to the original May deal. It's already been ratified by the EU.
Very helpful, thanks for the explainer.
Did anyone else hear the one random person shouting Jeremy corbyn 😂😂
One video I would like to see from TLDR News is would be explaining why uk political figures think they can negoticate a new deal when EU leaderships keep saying "May's deal is our best AND final offer."
So basically in the final 10 weeks she is finally doing what she should have started 2 years ago.
She should have triggered Article 50, trade on WTO, and then negotiate a deal with the EU from outside.
So, basically what's happening now according to you?? Do you usually throw out your old shoes before you buy new ones?
Oh yeah, the UK's breaking up, because England is clearly brexit-crazy.
I'm sorry where is the UK breaking up?? All pollsters I trust have shown no members of the UK wanting a vote for independence or wanting independence at all! This has been remainer drivel from day one. The closest to wanting independence is Scotland and they are still about 10% apart which is as it was in 2014.
So please do tell me where the UK is breaking up? Support for the SNP dropped dramatically at the last election and the trend continues in this way. So please do elaborate for us all...
@@ademw7 it depends on the future long-term economic growth in England, compared to the EU:
if the EU growth outpaces England's - Scots & Northern Irish will feel better off with the EU
@@ireneuszpyc6684 And you really believe the EU will outpace the UK, do you?? Just as Germany is about to enter a recession, France the same, much of the EU is/was already in a recession, Greece already bankrupt, Italy on the brink of bankruptcy, Spain and Portugal the same. The EU is not going to be an emerging market for a very long time so it ain't gonna be outpacing anyone anytime soon mate lmao!!! The UK has the strongest growth out of most of the EU economies right now and certainly out of all the large economies.
There is a world of emerging markets out there ripe for our grasp and involvement, special tailored deals for us the UK can be forged out. We are well-developed postindustrial nations, there is not a lot of room and opportunity at any one time for us to grow significantly, we are not going to be outpacing anyone in growth if we stick to protectionist policies and only trade with one another anyway...
That aside, ANY nation in the UK will take a bigger hit economically by leaving the UK than it can gain by joining the EU by a huge margin! Any economist will tell you this. Which is why all separatist parties never mention the economy and only talk about sovereignty, for all the separatist voters in Scotland, northern island their vote has never and will never be about the economy. So, please don't tell me why so and so will now leave because of so and so economic reason. The Scottish separatists are nationalists... they should be every remainers/socialists worst enemy. ; )
@@ademw7 do you recommend The Duran & RT channels?
Scotland voted to remain in the UK in a "once in a lifetime" vote. They all knew a EU referendum was inevitable, with parties like Ukip demanding one. So if they thought long term they would have withdrew from the UK to forever be in the EU if they love it so much. Also SNP are losing dominance.
Again, should do a video on what of Scotland leaves,
Not only has SNP started the ball rolling, Teresa may even mentions breaking up the union in this speech,
If Scotland left then leave would win a second vote by a large margin. Around half a million more votes difference.
Question is if there was an election on tories supporting no deal or a Canada deal vs labour trying to renegotiate a better deal who would win.
@@James-sk4db it's not that, it's the other implications, the no party of last Scottish referendum said if we voted no (stay) we would have use of the pound, be in the e.u., have stability and security, and have more powers devolved...
So far... We still have use of the pound....
How does the UK expect to "take back control" of immigration if they insist on no hard border in neither Ireland nor the irish Sea? Any illegal immigrant could freely fly to The Republic of Ireland and take a bus into Northern ireland and from there to England without being challenged.
I know. One almost can't escape the conclusion that they didn't think this whole Brexit thing though well enough ...
1 - Changing the legal status changes reality. Given a choice between illegally living in a similarly rich country like Germany or Sweden, and living illegally in Britain (threat of deportation, which can also involve confiscation of income earned illegally), why would an EU citizen choose the latter? This legal immigration seems to be the main focus for British anti-immigrant rhetoric.
2 - For non-EU citizens, there's really no change from today. Ireland has immigration checks for those arriving from the EU, and non-citizens are still screened according to very similar standards to arriving directly at a UK border.
This is so silly on so many levels.
First, she's right in that there probably is no majority for a second referendum in the parliament... the same can be said about **any** other proposal including no deal, her deal or remaining in the EU. That is exactly the problem here. There are more than two opinions and none of them have a majority behind them and not enough people are willing to change their mind on it for that stalemate to resolve itself.
Secondly, if by some miracle she managed to actually get a deal that a majority of people would agree on (which I doubt for the above reasons), it would still have to be accepted by the EU. It's one thing to ask for something, it's another one to actually get it. These is a trade _negotiation_ not the dictating of terms to another party. Any deal that might have even a remote chance of getting a majority in parliament, would probably be so far removed from anything the EU would agree to as to be completely worthless.
So what does that all lead to? Unless the parliament manages to change the default scenario for what happens if no agreement can be found by the 29th of March, all signs indicate towards a no deal Brexit. If no deal is what happens if nothing else happens and everything else (including no deal ironically) can't get a majority, that's just what's going to happen automatically.
Must say I really like this channel and your videos but the quality of production for this video has dropped. There are a lot of typos in this video and I find the captions only appear for a brief period making them difficult to read in some cases. Personally, I’d also have a quick fade in on the audio from the different video clips so you don’t get that harsh transition from your clips with no background noise to the parliament clips with lots of noise. Keep up the great work though guys
To be fair if its just the poor guy he's probably dying trying to assemble the animations and also the script in time for stuff happening at the moment.
Kevin Spratling it’s not a big channel, and they produce fast. And if I as Austrian can read it;)
Yeah, considering the time pressure and their limited resources, they're doing quite well.
I like their little drawings that they use 💜 (o^^o) 💜
Seems like he is succumbing to the same problems that are now showing in the Brexit process: Too much to do and not enough time!
But the quality of content of these videos it brilliant, I agree.
All of her options are unrealistic except for 'no deal'
Well we can respect that all options here to be considered. Preferably, a free trade deal should be the wisest option, but I'm thinking No Deal is looking more likely now if the EU won't budge.
That's the UK's fault they shouldn't think that they are the big thing in Europe they should tone down a bit and behave themselves instead of this nonsense
She's doing it on purpose. To force people to accept her "deal" and trying to convince the public that this is the default option.
Shifting the goalposts.
@@cykablin1104 That works both ways you know. The EU hasn't example you been behaving themselves much either.
@@Madhattersinjeans I don't think things will change much on the deal. No deal is the only other option to take.
The British Parliament is 90% full of remainers, they are not carrying out the will of the people.
Leave means leave, not in name only.
3:33. Today I learned democracy means giving your opinion once based on your info then, making a decision and then sticking to your guns at all possible cost.
Democracy is about informing yourself and not about repeating what one side wants you to think. Considering today's globalised economic structure please don't make anyone believe you could exit the EU like a light switch. Democracy also means that the masses decide... btw and going back in time is still science fiction...
@@marvindujardin463 Imagine being in a car. In the distance you think you see a restaurant. You propose to your family in the car that you'd like to go and eat there and everyone agrees. As you get closer you realise, there is a cliff between the end of the road and the restaurant. You have 10 minutes to just stop the car and drive somewhere else. But you've made a decission. Better stick to it and drive off the cliff.
Stop defending a dumb narrative out of sheer principals. You should be able to come back on decissions when you get more information and can see a better outcome. It's not about going back in time.
@@jeroenfeher8107 Why is there a cliff in the middle of a road ? Navigation system ? Btw your ten minutes have lasted for 2,5 years without reaching the cliff... Sounds pretty much like science fiction. Hey I am not attacking you personally but embrace your decision and stop trying to relativate it.
Relativate my decision? I'm not British.
@Dr Downtime "It isn't governments job to educate you on the vote." Yet, government influences the vote by giving incorrect information. But I guess that's fine, since it fits your own narrative. And explain to me exactly why decisions should not be changed if you learn later on that your decision was wrong.
May's deal means recession, Hard Brexit means depression
Not necessarily, maybe some tough times for a short while. We've been through worse and can tolerate a little bit of pain. But the UK will be free from control, freedom always comes with a price. At least this time it won't be in blood.
@@DanielM2006UK Yes, the UK has been through hard times and worse (civil war, Norman invasion, Vikings, even the World Wars) but "free from control"? You do realize the UK has the single more powerful vote in the EU and the most exemptions, correct? And what, precisely, is it that you are wanting to be free from considering the UK has voted with the EU between 82-97% of the time, yes? And every major bank and financial institution has said that the UK is worse off outside of the EU and the common market than within it where it had the power to shape and/or block policy and that leaving, no matter what, means a recession. That is why so many businesses are moving out! Sony to Amsterdam, P&O to Cyprus, Dyson to Singapore and that's just from the last few days.
@@DanielM2006UK By leaving the EU, the UK actually loses more control than it gains.
@@Arcboltkonrad13 Bank's have been saying that for years. We were told the UK would be poorer without the Euro. That the country would be in recession overnight when the vote to Leave was announced. We're still here and still going. The EU is about control, it always had. Look at Articles 11 and 13, the creation of an EU army, mass immigration. Perhaps the UK voted for it, but the people didn't. If businesses want to leave, that's their choice, there are other avenues.
@@Crissov Being out of the EU is a loss of control that many are happy to for go. If we were stuck with the horrible deal just voted down, that would be a loss of control.
You guys make phenomenal videos
0:35 Me shouting at my phone when it doesn’t recognise my fingerprint/face id
I'm sorry to say it, but you might have forgotten the very idea of what "TL;DR" means. The video, interesting as it is, lasts almost twelve minutes and uses too much real-world footage (that heavily contrasts with the clean infographic style of the previous videos). Please, try to remember what made your channel gather the attention of your viewers and don't fall into the trap of extending your videos unnecessarily to please the UA-cam algorithm.
TL;DR: Brevity is the soul of wit.
Your videos are amazing, guys. Really informative and to the point :D congrats on the great work! cheers from brazil
Patient goes to a doctor for consultation before a difficult surgery - they start discussing the surgery and potential outcomes and the patient suddenly says "I want you to take the Death option off the table"
Doctor says "Sorry its not a option, its a default - if we dont do anything it will be the outcome but we're not doing nothing so lets keep discussing options"
Brilliant analogy. Personally the death option is the only option I’d take with regards to leaving.
If you're expecting death your other options don't matter.
When you're struggling for life and your surgeon is being deliberately blocked from trying to save you whether Norway, Canada or No Deal as anyone of them means you survive you don't need me to point out where you can stick your analogy!
Except for 'No-Deal' isn't a 'death' option. It's the EU that is in urgent need of medical attention.
@@6chhelipilot yes I don't understand what Macron is doing!
Plot twist, it's a toenail removal surgery.
This is ridiculous. The U.K. will leave the E.U. on March 29th with no deal. It's time to accept it and start planning for it. Arguing about whether you want it or not is pointless at this stage. No other alternative is possible, so the best thing they can do is make the most of it and start drafting free trade agreements with Australia, Canada, and New Zealand. Delaying the announcement of no deal is only going to increase chaos.
Too late for preparations for that, the uk will just have to take it like a big boy
If they do that at this stage, where there is still some time left, they will get another vote of confidence, which will succeed. Then Article 50 will get extended, either for a renegotiation with a softer Brexit government or a General Election.
It would have to be done closer to the deadline if one wants No Deal to actually happen.
@@Ladifour you cannot take ''no deal'' off the table because that would ruin our negotiating position. But that is exactly what remoaners want. To undermine the negotiation to only then cancel Brexit. Shameful!
Nah, No Brexit is still an option.
Tom J no it's not. The referendum was binding.
a second referendum will undermine social cohesion and democracy? is she nuts? social cohesion is already undermined. and what more democratic exercise can there be if not to bring the whole issue back to the people? double-speak, as usual, from Ms. May...
You do realize that a second referendum would most likely yield a remain win by a very small margin. And that would devide the country even more. Maybe even leading to violent clashes between Brexiters and Remainers right? It would also lead to a split in the two major parties.. It's not an option and she is right. The first one should've never happened, but now that it has, the cat is out of the bag.
@@alen40to You do realize the results in the first refferenfum were 52:48 Thats near enough as devided as it gets. a second refferendum will land our country on a solid answer and stop the bickering and mayhem made by such indecisive mp's.
It is undemocratic because the people has already spoken, for politicians to say that the result isnt to be obeyed is to undermine the will of the people.
@@bnap3221 they are ignoring the people by asking them again?
If they wanted to ignore the people they could just call it off without asking, as the referendum wasn't binding.
@@bnap3221 The people has spoken, but what it mumbled was hard to understand and self-contradicting. Nobody in their right mind would listen to and blindly act upon that. Asking for clarification or reaffirmation is a sane thing to do, but if you have the authority, knowledge and immanent pressure you need to lead by decision on the best interest of your constituency. In other words, _Parliament_ needs to vote between No Deal and No Brexit.
In the meantime an avid Brexit supporter, James Dyson, moves his company's HQ to Singapore.
The company I work for moved it's operations out of UK earlier this month.
Well done UK, you f***d up your economy, but you just don't realize this yet.
I love watching Europeans get all salty that they'll have to pay their fair share to the European Empire. Love it.
@@craig581 Actually UK will pay more than before for the privilege of accessing common EU market. This is going to be hilarious...
@@williambrown9053 wrong... You will have tariffs with entire EU the day you crash out with no deal. I am not laughing, I was responsible for moving our company's operation out of southern England to Poland and it was quite a bit of work. But it is done now, so no longer a problem for me. By end of next month our London head office will be moved to Ireland as well. You go and thrive in your strong economy, fingers crossed.
@@williambrown9053 no you won't. In case of no deal tariffs will be introduced on 30th March.
@@williambrown9053 article 24 of what?
6. The
I like the caption idea, makes the important points clear. Is potentially usefull for communicating complex issues clearly. Would help if they were correct though
I bet the MPs HATE going to work everyday lmfao!
Options left for the UK:
1. Hard Brexit.
2. No Brexit.
I'll put my bets on 1.
or cancellation
@@tatianatub hear, hear. What really surprises me is that the major breaking point is the back stop but if the UK leaves without a deal there will be a hard border in Ireland no matter what. The Brexiteers are blamed for lacking logic. I can only see one logical conclusion to the struggles of the last two years. Brexit is not what they thought it would be. And they should have known.
@@williambrown9053 It's not like you can just replace two years of discussions on the freely accessible media channels with your own anecdotal evidence.
@@williambrown9053 And what sources would these facts come from?
I love this channel, you make things so clear and simplify everything! Thank you!
I am so early that the video is still in 360p.
same
same mate
I'm so early it has 301 views
She can not rule out no deal. If fact, no deal is now the most likely outcome.
I am having an allergic reaction to a new type of fruit I just tried right now and am watching this to get my mind off the itching and swelling in my mouth and throat
Wish me luck :D
Lol gl m8
@@cykablin1104 I popped 3 antihistamine pills and survived
Brexit is not the end of the world bro
Just wanted to say, the format of this video is fantastic. I'd love to see more breakdowns like this of PMQs and other important debates.
The problem of Northern Ireland can only be resolved if any deal between UK and Northern Ireland includes UK remaining in the Custom Union.
Those who don't see that are obviously ignorant of what a boarder and international trade imply.
Except those who claim unsing technology which is crazy talk and has already been refused are welcome to provide a solution that does not include remaining in the Custom Union.
Remaining in the Custom Union is least that Bresiteers need to compromise on for this whole shit storm to die down and as everyone seems to agree on we can "Get on with it" and bring the side together.
So true! It is comical that it does not seem obvious to many of the ones loving the idea of a Hard Brexit. The Custom Union like football require that you play by the same rules. A National football game where the Brits can use hands and you cannot penalise the Germans for kicking the British players would end up in a mess!
Same rules, then there is no need for a border. Different rules then there is!
@@thegrandmuftiofwakanda right? Hard Brexit is the right answer. I love when kids talk about things they don't understand.
If this country was a democracy the only plan would be to respect the referendum result (as they said they would) and leave the e.u
Parliament's quest for a deal is simply a remainer parliament trying to ensure we're never in truth free of their beloved e.u
Couldn't agree more. Respect the British constituent, and British democracy. Democracy is what stops people from going to the streets afterall.
I got an EU-advertisement on this video, something like "the EU cares for you" lmao
Lol, brilliant.
So what is actualy the down side of no deal?
I think you should tone it down with pushing your webiste and instagram and subscribers. Good stuff sells itself. I, as someone who has been watching your every video for some time now, find them really annoying, and every time more than the last.
I wonder if it will be rejected too.
So she tinkered with the Backstop but nothing else?
I don't like Corbyn, I disagree with his attempt to prevent what is currently the only means to leave the EU properly but I don't blame him for calling her bs mind you!
Darkwintre she didn’t tinker a single thing. She only explained what she agreed upon already. So the second deal is the first deal better explained
@@MrWhiteVzla bloody hell it's even worse!
8:50 Why did you flash up 'Me' on the screen? I don't get it.
From the beginning i thought that her plan it was to do such a terrible job that they have to go for another referendum.
Good point. I don't know if anyone so be so dire at anyjob if it's not on purpose.
Or an asylum for crazy.
Like all the other comments cleverly pointed out there are some typos. Running a news channel is really difficult if you're a small youtubers, honestly as long as the information is accurate I couldn't care less about a couple mistakes here and then. We are all just human after all. Hopefully if he keeps it up and with our support this channel can keep growing and eventually be able to spend more time on each video. Besides, practice makes perfect.
Keep it up TLDR News! Love ya/yall
I live in Ireland so letting our neighbours decide whether to break the GFA or not, even when they have little knowledge of the North, is some pretty scary shit
I can imagine there's a lot of fear mongering going on over there. I would be pretty scared too if violence was being threatened like that.
What animation software do you use?
revoke, revoke, revoke. brexit is pure foolishness and utterly stupid.
Interesting take on democracy
no. You are stupid. Stupid to think that the EU is of any use in the 21st century.
JimBeam yeah sure we’ll just draft trad deals with global and regional superpowers with no leverage by ourselves.
Good video but did you sell enough advertising?
no deal ftw then get may out
I believe we may have to face another General Election, sooner than we may think. I think she'll get us through Brexit and that might be it.
@@DanielM2006UK Which is essentially what she said is her aim, once Brexit is done May WILL NOT run for re-election. Her words. If you ask me she is doing ok in all other areas apart from Brexit and her party backbenchers agree, right now this country is building more homes than it ever has done before under mays leadership, and these are homes that everyone can own. You see the conservatives want you to own your own ((House)) and have control of how you spend your own money, they don't want you to be paying council rent all your life living like a sardine in tower blocks like labour does spending all your disposable income on taxes.
6:00 and who was negotiating this one?
WOW this must be the first video TLDR News has done that isnt bias.
Here's what I keep wondering: Why does Corbin think he's going to get a different/better deal than May? The EU has made it clear that this is the one and only deal. Is his plan to take over, talk to the exact same EU reps, get the exact same deal, just in a different formatting, and repeat the exact same cycle again?
Corbyn / Labour would have entered the negotiations with different premises and constraints. They would probably have ended up with a deal that kept the UK in a Customs Union with the EU, which might have failed in Parliament as well. Itʼs now too late for that, though, or way too early.
Good question and good logical comment. Can't disagree with common sense here.
Leave with no deal, this is what was voted for by 17.4 million people, the deal only serves to tie us into the EU and as a weaker member than we are already, what they are doing right now trying to negotiate a deal that means we don’t really leave is completely wrong, this and those that support this is the sole reason why the country is screwed, support the referendum result people support the winning side and get behind our country and be brave enough to leave on no deal, we can then start to re build and strengthen our unions un fettered in a way that benefits our country, we have to put our own house in order before we can think of helping others out,
7:02 Did someone forget to proof read the video before publishing? Think there is a T missing in status and much of relationship was missing earlier on (just said rela)
Many thanks for your hard work and clarity guys.
I rly dugg what you were going for but found myself confused by some of the editing choices in this video.
There seems to be problems with the text in the video - some is missing or cut short. Just a FYI as great video! Thank you
Filling up my cupboard with tinned beans, rice and flour just in case.
She must be really confused when she gets up in the morning.......lol
All and all, I really liked this format :) Hope we can see more like it!
What happened to some of the text?? 🤔
was some of the on-screen text over May speaking broken?
I don't like May's argument regarding a second vote. Clearly, the vast majority of the population was not well informed about what the consequences of Brexit were. Now that they see all the issues with it, the vote would be very different. And that's the real reason she doesn't want a second vote.
Imagine making UA-cam videos that are pretty much yesterdays news by the time they come out. You're doing great work!
Just a nitpick: try to have someone proofread the video, I saw some typos in there.
If only we had a politician who has the strength of character to tell the pro Brexit voters that they are idiots and what they want can't happen. If only...
It wouldn't change much this far into the proceedings. Brexit happens,one way or another.
@@tunnar79 Well I would follow that up with revoking article 50 and actually doing something of value.
@@3d1e00 Like destroying British democracy and the constitution? With trust in politicians at an all time low, how do you think 17.4 million will think about you revoking A50? Not only that but considering the fact that the withdrawal act was passed through British law, and the leaving date was set. THEN, her majesty the queen gave the withdrawal bill royal assent. But you're going to be a dictator and revoke it anyway? You sir, are the idiot lol.
@@craig581 Yeah, you're right. We should accept the referendum result. The one where the campaign was based on huge lies and misinformation. The one with the serious spending fraud allegations. The one which was so poorly worded that it said "Should the United Kingdom remain a member of the European Union or leave the European Union?" which we can completely satisfy by staying in the EEA. That one right? Only a utter imbecile would say that it was "democracy" it was incompetence. Get over the stupidity, if it's the will of the people they can just come up with a better worded question and rerun the referendum. We will get the same result right? Refusing to accept this is undemocratic and born from the realisation that pro-Brexit muppets are 100 years out of date and unable to adapt to the realities of the modern world economy. Britain is an international joke, and rightly so. But keep up with the democracy line and will of the people, sounds good.
Quality video mate
lol this channel's subscriber dial is going off the charts!
Does your keyboard and spellcheck work?
What’s with the random annotations that are misspelled or unfinished?
How can you underhand faith in democracy if there is no faith in democracy in the first place?
If there's one organisation that I don't trust to protect my rights, it's the British Government.
So after 2 years the Brits still demand a deal that puts borders in Northern Ireland and that no borders are put in Northern Ireland. The entire country has gone mad.
This was a bit messy. The slides were incomplete and only half the words if any came up on screen. Needs to be proofread and uploaded again.
Why is the video only half edited words pop up that aren't finished or are wrong
It's REALLY hard to see how this can end well.
I'm not entirely sure how UA-cam video ads work
But please stop spamming them in your videos.
She's finally being sincere about giving the majority their brexit.
Did your editor have a ceisure while working on this video or something ? Great channel otherwise