Menaka Guruswamy's case for same-sex marriage

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 2 тра 2023
  • Why legalise queer marriages… Do you find Menaka Guruswamy’s argument convincing?
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brut India is the fastest-growing digital video publisher in the country. We're a young, independent platform producing compelling journalism in new formats.
    You can also find us here:
    Facebook: / brutindia
    Instagram: / brut.india
    Twitter: / brutindia
    Snapchat: Brut India
    Snapchat: Brut India Stories

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,3 тис.

  • @memebytes
    @memebytes Рік тому +1333

    "The majority cannot decide the rights of the minority". Well said! Even the basic right, i.e., the right to love cannot be stripped away from the citizens of India.

    • @Trollge398
      @Trollge398 Рік тому +77

      I also support the LGBTQUIAVTV HD community

    • @HadEs5_3
      @HadEs5_3 Рік тому +36

      @@Trollge398 lgtv*

    • @Rohit-cj6eb
      @Rohit-cj6eb Рік тому +16

      Right to love is crime
      Punishment: mob lynching/death

    • @ChandranPrema123
      @ChandranPrema123 Рік тому

      Well rights don't apply for illegal immigrants

    • @AdiAditii
      @AdiAditii Рік тому +4

      Yup, definitely well said

  • @ojuuyu
    @ojuuyu Рік тому +591

    This issue of same-sex marriage not being recognised is not just an outcome of ignorance, but also an outcome of a colonial/western mindset of a social and biological binary, when eastern cultures (like south asia) have almost always had a fluid relationship with gender and sexuality (even as seen in hindu mythology). it is genuinely disheartening to see this persist for this long when i and so many others deserve the same basic rights to love and marriage as any other person because it is human nature to love who you love.

    • @Rudra-rf5cn
      @Rudra-rf5cn Рік тому +30

      Kuch bhi? Same sex marriage kabse hamara hissa ban gya?

    • @ojuuyu
      @ojuuyu Рік тому +76

      @@Rudra-rf5cn what do you mean "hamara hissa"? pehle ke zamane mein marriage was only considered to be something for procreation but then log pyaar ke liye shaadi karne lage. toh same sex marriage doesn't come under that issue unless we talk about love marriages in today's times. however, in ancient hindu texts, homosexuality has not been considered a crime or a sin or anything like that, balki in many cases, homosexuality has been seen in regular circumstances, for example lord ayyapa was born of vishnu and shiva (mohini's form showing gender fluidity). therefore, it has not been explicitly called to be anything because it is considered nature to love whoever you do. the material world is of less importance than the soul's and it's wishes.

    • @only_treats_no_tricks
      @only_treats_no_tricks Рік тому +31

      ​@@Rudra-rf5cn do your research man.

    • @Trollge398
      @Trollge398 Рік тому +5

      @@Rudra-rf5cn Bro got completely Ratio in a battle of wits by an lgbt clown
      You should truly feel ashamed of yourself

    • @Rudra-rf5cn
      @Rudra-rf5cn Рік тому +1

      @@only_treats_no_tricks Already did maam

  • @rohan34
    @rohan34 Рік тому +412

    It's good to see a country like India, that has treated these issues as some western imports, actually have the discussions in the highest court. This is a positive thing.

    • @HadEs5_3
      @HadEs5_3 Рік тому +22

      That's the complete opposite, lmao. Just India trying to be "woke"

    • @kishandubey7882
      @kishandubey7882 Рік тому +36

      ​@@HadEs5_3Why are you using internet then?
      It is a woke product fyi

    • @fegeleinthesithlord8910
      @fegeleinthesithlord8910 Рік тому +5

      @@kishandubey7882 what?

    • @sayanghosh3544
      @sayanghosh3544 Рік тому +16

      There are lakhs of cases pending and our highest court is discussing such rubbish stuffs.

    • @kishandubey7882
      @kishandubey7882 Рік тому +2

      @@sayanghosh3544 May you be living like a transgender in your next life.......

  • @memebytes
    @memebytes Рік тому +491

    “The majority cannot decide the rights of minority”👏👏

    • @anishentundra6481
      @anishentundra6481 Рік тому +60

      But minority can decide for majority in india. That is indian democracy.

    • @theuseless4219
      @theuseless4219 Рік тому +31

      @@anishentundra6481 koi sense hai is baat ka

    • @Kalinga_yodha
      @Kalinga_yodha Рік тому +21

      ​@@theuseless4219 bilkul sense he bas shone ki acting mat karo.

    • @Ariyan_BloodHitler
      @Ariyan_BloodHitler Рік тому +10

      A group lead by 3 genius Is better than a group lead by 100 dump 🎉.

    • @shaikh.quadeer
      @shaikh.quadeer Рік тому

      @@Ariyan_BloodHitler chutiye dumb hota wo likhna sikh pehle 🤣

  • @dualapeepa7719
    @dualapeepa7719 Рік тому +132

    "of all the things to hate, we chose love"
    There is so much injustice and problems in our country, why are we trying to decide and deny basic rights of consenting adults? Live and let live. That is what India has always stood for.

    • @GobiSubramaniam
      @GobiSubramaniam 8 місяців тому +7

      Because two "consenting adults" are not the bases for society.
      If you go to a prostitute and both are consent to have sex (by agreeing to the price and hour of service), does that mean you are now married to that prostitute?
      That is the difference between sex through marriage (which could create family) and sex through hook-up culture. You cannot equalize both with a simple nonsense like "consenting" and basic rights. You are human living in a human society, not a stray dog.

    • @sayanichatterjee199
      @sayanichatterjee199 6 місяців тому +2

      @@GobiSubramaniam Consent is basis of humanity, we left barbaric ages long back. And that is by far the greatest. Sex is not a determinant of marriage (going by your short-sighted example). Marriage is a choice and a promise, a legally valid one. But that does not criminalise consenting adults to form relationships. "Consent" is NOT "nonsense".

    • @GobiSubramaniam
      @GobiSubramaniam 6 місяців тому

      @@sayanichatterjee199 - Consent is basis of humanity? Is that included the relationship between a prostitute and her client who she had sexual interaction with based on mutual consent (and agreed payment)?
      If that is true, are these lawyers who are fighting for LGBTQ now going to fight to legalise prostitution next since that too is illegal in India?

    • @naina986
      @naina986 6 місяців тому

      ​@@GobiSubramaniam​Prostitution in india is not a crime. I'm pretty sure I remember reading that somewhere.

    • @yungman7053
      @yungman7053 3 місяці тому

      ​@@naina986it is a crime in India in many states

  • @shivanginegi1699
    @shivanginegi1699 Рік тому +51

    The design of nature exists in spectrums, not just black or white. That's what makes it so complex and amazing. We humans, in an attempt to classify and organise something in simple terms for our simple minded brains have become so rigid that we cannot look beyond it anymore.

  • @sararahul3140
    @sararahul3140 Рік тому +124

    This women is just fabulous. What point to point reasoning. Way to go miss Guruswamy.

    • @yogeshkumarallum2540
      @yogeshkumarallum2540 Рік тому +8

      How do you know she is a woman?? 🤣🤣🤣

    • @GobiSubramaniam
      @GobiSubramaniam 11 місяців тому +5

      Is it Ms. Guruswamy or is it Mrs. Katja? Or is it Mr. Guruswamy and Ms. Katja? Someone clarify it, please.

    • @Namratha-no8pr
      @Namratha-no8pr 11 місяців тому +14

      @@yogeshkumarallum2540 haha you're so funny, how do you know you're a man?

    • @yogeshkumarallum2540
      @yogeshkumarallum2540 11 місяців тому

      @@Namratha-no8pr I have a penis . So I am a man.
      I don't believe in LGBTQ, that crap doesn't exist

    • @saddha1
      @saddha1 11 місяців тому +1

      It’s called chromosomes.

  • @radhikalo28.
    @radhikalo28. Рік тому +90

    You hit the nail on the head, salute Mam

    • @priyanshudas1
      @priyanshudas1 Рік тому +7

      mam he ya sir kaisa pata bhai sorry behen

  • @rishikabiswas6899
    @rishikabiswas6899 11 місяців тому +10

    The way she spoke my gawddd, I am having goosebumps. She is such a wonderful orator.

  • @memebytes
    @memebytes Рік тому +277

    Even the Hindu mythology narrates stories of same-sex relationships and also mentions about the existence of transgender deities. The discrimination that the lgbtq community faces today in india is solely an outcome of ignorance. They can't get away with saying same sex marriage can't be legalized because it will hurt religious sentiments. Great to hear so many lawyers voicing their thoughts. Hoping to see inclusiveness prevail one day!

    • @Trollge398
      @Trollge398 Рік тому

      Those Hindu Mythology stories were probably written by some pro Pakistani anti nationalist to defame bharat
      Burn them

    • @user-fu2xq3kw3m
      @user-fu2xq3kw3m Рік тому +15

      Lmao how many hindu scriptures have you read?

    • @Cash_2854
      @Cash_2854 Рік тому +1

      @@Trollge398 Sarcasm?

    • @Cash_2854
      @Cash_2854 Рік тому +11

      @@Vizorfam Go away💀

    • @Cash_2854
      @Cash_2854 Рік тому +8

      @@user-fu2xq3kw3m How many you've, sir?

  • @gamefever1892
    @gamefever1892 Рік тому +273

    And today lgbt people finally got legal rights promised. I thank all these lawyers for making this possible💯

    • @aarna6573
      @aarna6573 Рік тому +2

      Seriously??! Does that finally mean thay same-sex marriages are now legal?

    • @moshmosh4129
      @moshmosh4129 Рік тому +6

      @@aarna6573 nope

    • @aarna6573
      @aarna6573 Рік тому +1

      @@moshmosh4129 really? How's the case doing, then?

    • @gamefever1892
      @gamefever1892 Рік тому +35

      @@aarna6573 marriage is not yet legal....but the centre agreed to give us legal rights without an actual marriage....they will form a committee and see to it what all legal rights can be given.

    • @krishnas.7373
      @krishnas.7373 Рік тому

      ​@@gamefever1892 what about adoption ?

  • @debaratinandi7405
    @debaratinandi7405 Рік тому +28

    I hope this time, they will get their much needed right.

  • @ishubhamu6686
    @ishubhamu6686 Рік тому +48

    Very Well said mam….education is the only way can expand your area to think rationally …

  • @prakamyashukla2489
    @prakamyashukla2489 Рік тому +59

    No one should be denied of their rights. According to Constitution

    • @shreyasnadagouda4619
      @shreyasnadagouda4619 9 місяців тому +2

      What if one day no one come forward to donate sperm for lesbian couple and egg and womb for gay couple,
      Please enlighten me how Homo sapiens maintain its pace

    • @shreyasnadagouda4619
      @shreyasnadagouda4619 9 місяців тому

      It has become fashion to support LGBTQ with half knowledge without knowing it’s possible outcomes

    • @smiley_wiener
      @smiley_wiener 2 місяці тому

      ​@@shreyasnadagouda4619not everyone wants to have kids in this economy, some people are happy just being married too and there's a thing called Adoption. There are plenty of kids in need of support and love in this world. And if we're talking about future human existence and human reproduction, heterosexuals will not go extinct before the homosexuals. So yes I don't see a problem and not everyone likes the idea of surrogacy and the help of someone to reproduce a kid who isn't their spouse.

  • @smilekeshwer281
    @smilekeshwer281 Рік тому +64

    The ancient Indian text Kamasutra written by Vātsyāyana dedicates a complete chapter on erotic homosexual behaviour. Historical literary evidence indicates that homosexuality has been prevalent across the Indian subcontinent throughout history.
    Living in a country whose whole philosophy is of advaita, Upanishads which keep telling you that you are beyond this material body. These notions of gender were trivial things to fight for. It is victorian mindset where even the legs of table are covered, leave that of woman.

    • @mohitanand1844
      @mohitanand1844 Рік тому +10

      Kamasutra isn't a holy book. Not ours neither it's a history book. We don't follow it

    • @smilekeshwer281
      @smilekeshwer281 Рік тому +25

      @@mohitanand1844 I do not know how you read something and think other. I never said it is a scripture. It is a text of Indian origin. Our scriptures were foundation on which a society was built which was bold enough to accept a book on sexuality is what I pointed out.
      Making personal insults won't prove your point. You said it is not Indian which is wrong then there is not a chapter on homosexuality which is also wrong. A basic google search will help you sir. Read a bit, study a bit.
      Do not just start typing reply to this now. Calm down and think, make your opinions.

    • @prachipande3111
      @prachipande3111 Рік тому +4

      Kamasutra is a pretty disgusting book. Idk why we've been treating it like a holy book, why aren't we giving it the same treatment as manusmriti, since manusmriti was considered holy too? Kamasutra objectifies women, has a lot of instances of potential rape, and a lot more.

    • @smilekeshwer281
      @smilekeshwer281 Рік тому +15

      ​@@prachipande3111Any book which portrays how the society and individual life should be conducted is destined to change with time. Nobody considers it as a holy book. If a book on sexuality was accepted by a society at that time, it portrays what kind of society it has been. Sex was not a taboo for always in India, that's the point we are making. Nobody says we should follow it. The same way manusmriti tells the vices of that society, kamasutra shows the liberty that people were ready to take in their sexual life

    • @sampadnag2928
      @sampadnag2928 Рік тому +11

      ​@@smilekeshwer281 bro all these people you are saying that homosexuality is a western concept, they do not know 1 thing about India culture. Our society gave rights to homosexuals way before western people understood what homosexuality is. A book like Kamasutra has instances of homosexuality which was written by an Indian in ancient India still people deny it as an India concept. Our people think Kamasutra as a book filled with eroticism and deny it's contribution to our society, whereas the book has many more aspects other than just sex

  • @roopeshmesta456
    @roopeshmesta456 Рік тому +30

    She a got a very valid point

  • @vicky8919
    @vicky8919 Рік тому +15

    Great arguments by lawyer ! Everyone deserves equal rights.

  • @7kanak
    @7kanak Рік тому +10

    everybody in the comment sections have forgotten ancient texts, but now they are citing them.

    • @harshpalani
      @harshpalani 3 місяці тому +1

      they’ll have to when people treat homosexuality as a western import

  • @memebytes
    @memebytes Рік тому +242

    LGBTQ people are as much Indians as anyone else and everyone deserves the basic rights which they are entitled to as per the Constitution 🇮🇳🏳‍🌈

    • @shenivin6899
      @shenivin6899 Рік тому +23

      🤡

    • @Trollge398
      @Trollge398 Рік тому +43

      ​@@shenivin6899 How to identify an Fatherless or Motherless child
      Answer: having an edgy cringe anime profile picture

    • @HadEs5_3
      @HadEs5_3 Рік тому +25

      @@Trollge398 atleast he ain't delusional ☠️

    • @Trollge398
      @Trollge398 Рік тому +27

      @@HadEs5_3 I am not delusional I am completely schizophrenic but atleast I am not an fatherless child who tries to be edgy for the sake of being edgy

    • @only_treats_no_tricks
      @only_treats_no_tricks Рік тому +12

      ​@@HadEs5_3 you think you're okay?

  • @mathheadpaul8571
    @mathheadpaul8571 9 місяців тому +4

    I support her. I wish my mother had this kind of courage 👌

  • @sakshichoudhary01
    @sakshichoudhary01 Рік тому +63

    an excellent lawyer and an even more inspirational woman #westandformarraigeequality

    • @theeducator8574
      @theeducator8574 Рік тому +1

      I don't

    • @Inferno-rq5cd
      @Inferno-rq5cd Рік тому

      🏳️‍🌈⃠

    • @random-po6er
      @random-po6er Рік тому +12

      ​@@theeducator8574 no one asked

    • @priyac1238
      @priyac1238 11 місяців тому +6

      ​@@theeducator8574 ha homophobic people

    • @theeducator8574
      @theeducator8574 11 місяців тому +3

      @@priyac1238 tumhara husband na nikal jae homo 🤣🤣🤣🤣
      Roti rehna 🤣🤣
      Padosi ke yaha Jana 🤣🤣🤣🤡

  • @rmemorybox9320
    @rmemorybox9320 10 місяців тому +11

    Love your efforts guys ❤

  • @joshuajoshua8417
    @joshuajoshua8417 Рік тому +19

    She is a Kannadiga. Kannada Pride.

    • @anonymousforever330
      @anonymousforever330 Рік тому +6

      Brother we're all Indians here so let's think on national level and not on regional level

    • @AmitSingh-helloWorld
      @AmitSingh-helloWorld Рік тому +2

      😂😂 grow up form the regional mindset .

    • @joshuajoshua8417
      @joshuajoshua8417 Рік тому

      @@AmitSingh-helloWorld . Kannada Warriors General Thimmayya and General Cariappa won us Indian Independence. Or else u wud be kissing the British even today

    • @lakshyavarshney9942
      @lakshyavarshney9942 Рік тому

      Acceptance towards Homosexuality isn't something to be so proud of

    • @lakshyavarshney9942
      @lakshyavarshney9942 Рік тому

      ​@@joshuajoshua8417how?

  • @anonymously2570
    @anonymously2570 Рік тому +40

    so much has changed since 2018 and i hope we keep changing for the good. i hope for the best, much love to everyone fighting the fight

  • @proudhindustanihindu2725
    @proudhindustanihindu2725 Рік тому +12

    She very intelligently integrated Same sex marriage with that of discrimination faced by LGBTQ+...😊 however both are different both need different guidelines and judgements

  • @anipghose7751
    @anipghose7751 Рік тому +10

    Brut suddenly became Ekta Kapoor towards the end of the video. Whuss whuss whusss

  • @aum8136
    @aum8136 Рік тому +46

    The one's opposing are majority of those who were in favour of boy child. If this law is passed they won't get brides for their kids and also fear that most will come out in the open and accept their true selves.
    Everyone should have equal right in this world. Live and let live.

    • @MissionNeetPgMarch
      @MissionNeetPgMarch Рік тому +2

      ​@@Trollge398 you wanna marry a lesbian?

    • @prachipande3111
      @prachipande3111 Рік тому +17

      That is such a stupid theory💀

    • @HadEs5_3
      @HadEs5_3 Рік тому +5

      "true" selfes? Pardon me? Idk man a mentally ill would always he is right no matter who tries to help him. Wouldn't be surprised if India turns out to be the next America with this new law

    • @user-bw8yn3zr1s
      @user-bw8yn3zr1s Рік тому

      and the many boys and men and also women who are unmarried are against this rights for the same reason too. They are afraid of finding a spouse if they don't continue to have the sword of social system to control the people of their choice too. They are controlling and mentally ill.

    • @user-bw8yn3zr1s
      @user-bw8yn3zr1s Рік тому

      @@prachipande3111 no, it's actually true. I saw many comments of boys and men who are saying that they are not finding girls, and here people are talking about letting two girls get married. Then when I pointed out is this what he wants, to marry a girl against her will, who clearly wants to marry and be happy with a woman, then he went on about how homosexuality is abnormal, against the nature and biology, how lgbtq+ people are mentally ill and blah blah blah. Then when I called out his hypocrisy, he must have written some threatening comments, and that's why I can't see that comment now.

  • @fictionaldeviltv
    @fictionaldeviltv Рік тому +39

    Menaka mam aap inspiration ho ❤ such a intellectual woman 💯

  • @KarthiKeyan-co6cv
    @KarthiKeyan-co6cv 11 місяців тому +5

    People's are not understand LGBT feeling and also hurt them.please sir protect them

  • @aryajagannadham
    @aryajagannadham Рік тому +9

    I love how the homophobes hide in the replies of comments in this comment section lmao

  • @meetaksharamishra3088
    @meetaksharamishra3088 Рік тому +8

    Very well said by ma'am 👏🏼#lawyeroftheyear.
    Why this even a case or questions rise by court if anything they should fight it's about sexual harrasment , money laundering, education system, dirty politics 👀but no they want to simply distrub those people who simply wants to spend life as they want... marriage,love and child it #LGBTQ rights . They deserve to live there life in #peace #happily . What is issue with that? If anything they want to give them is there proper respect and insurance, child adoption these should be provided to them🌱. Then they say that today's youth are so rude towards government. 🙄 We not rude we just vocal about human rights.

  • @krittikabiswas8500
    @krittikabiswas8500 Рік тому +8

    Beautifully spoken!!!!!

  • @rahulsingha1911
    @rahulsingha1911 Рік тому +3

    A society where same sex marraige is not recognised is a society which forces rape upon the person who is homosexual by forcing and social conditioning of the heterosexual marraige upon the homosexual person and thus to live with a heterosexual person.
    If a woman does not like the touch of a man, but if the parents of her are forced out of social and legal conditions to give her daughter to a heterosexual man, the legalised sexual advance of that man to his lesbian mentality based wife is legalised rape, which may be allowed by law but is injustice or adharma.
    For this Sri Krishna said parampara main dharm rah sakta hai, parantu dharm parampara nahi hai hamesha....

  • @freakshit22
    @freakshit22 11 місяців тому +6

    “Marraige and sex should remain in the arena of responsibility not autonomy”, - Advocate Thomas in Supreme Court.
    “Fundamental rights don’t operate vacuum, they are all meant to operate in the context of a society” - Lawyer Dwivedi.

    • @reader7046
      @reader7046 11 місяців тому

      ​@C.S Braga We learn English ,our mother tongue is the native language of our place.

    • @reader7046
      @reader7046 11 місяців тому

      ​@C.S Braga Nice ,yaa as an Indian I too am surprised about casteism.
      God knows who follows them for I dont.

    • @reader7046
      @reader7046 11 місяців тому

      @C.S Braga I speak Hindi . नमस्ते ! 🙏☺️

    • @reader7046
      @reader7046 11 місяців тому

      @C.S Braga pleasure talking to you 🌟!

  • @trojanleo123
    @trojanleo123 18 днів тому +1

    I listened to most of the arguments made during the 10 days of hearing spread over almost a month and this argument from Guruswamy was the most succinct and the most compelling argument. She delivered a masterclass. It is sad to know that the majority of the judges were not persuaded and our brothers and sisters from the LGBT community continue to be treated as second class citizens.

  • @samayh5749
    @samayh5749 Рік тому +13

    Very well said. Equal rights for everyone. If I can marry, why can't you.

  • @hobihobi7
    @hobihobi7 Рік тому +4

    I saw her speech in one instagram reel and istg ekdam sherni lg rhi thik sherni.
    mae tho bhai fan ho gyii hu inki. I hope supreme court takes the right desicion and ensure marriage equality. Bhut logo ke opinion sunne h maine aur bhuto ek misconceptions about lgbtq+ community. It made me realize one again on how important sex education is for India.
    I hope they make a movie about her

  • @krutikamotdhare9754
    @krutikamotdhare9754 Рік тому +19

    Love you ma'am!!! I am a lawyer and i really hope ,i am able to present my arguements as eloquently as you have put yours

  • @khushichauhan4183
    @khushichauhan4183 Рік тому +2

    shee explained so wellll ,,, good job👏👏👏👏👏👏❣❣

  • @janhvitiwari9156
    @janhvitiwari9156 Рік тому +8

    Truly not able to understand what is the issue with two people who love each other wanting to marry is wrong! Our culture have always respected love and have not bound them with any gender, Krishna se pyaar gopiyon ne bhi kiya tha aur krishna ke rang mein gwale bhi saje the. Jab bhagwan ne pyaar karne mein humara gender, caste, status nahi dekho toh hum kyu pyaar ko sirf body aur gender ke aspects mein dekh rahe.

    • @theeducator8574
      @theeducator8574 Рік тому

      Bro at gopi times lord Krishna was only 9
      It was not the love u think

    • @janhvitiwari9156
      @janhvitiwari9156 Рік тому

      ​@@theeducator8574 it was indeed not the love we know today. It was majestical, magnificent and the best of all❤. But my only point is why to just associate love with gender, body, needs, etc. It is way more than that.

    • @theeducator8574
      @theeducator8574 Рік тому

      @@janhvitiwari9156 noo i mean, a 9 year child's love is different

  • @muhammedfavask8963
    @muhammedfavask8963 Рік тому +5

    Legalize Same sex marriage is not a problem for me personally, it doesnt mean that i support this Lgbtq+ idea. However, one cannot force this ideology onto someone everyone has their own rights and preferences so respect it. Also keep in mind that Western ideologies always not right. Most of the people think that "this idea is from western developed countries so it must not be false". Hypocricy is still there in the world.

    • @byebyedislikecount939
      @byebyedislikecount939 Рік тому +2

      This is not a western idea. But okay

    • @muhammedfavask8963
      @muhammedfavask8963 Рік тому

      @@byebyedislikecount939 yup... I meant the gender identity crisis that's going on in Western countries ☺️

    • @SophisticatedArc
      @SophisticatedArc Рік тому +5

      I think gay people should be accepted no matter what because they ARE real people.

  • @memebytes
    @memebytes Рік тому +77

    Biological man is not a definition of what your definition of a man is. It's far more complex"
    I love the judge for making this statement.

    • @Rudra-rf5cn
      @Rudra-rf5cn Рік тому

      The same judges criticise army for their nda selections...Bloody wokes and biology fails...

    • @sayakmaity7494
      @sayakmaity7494 Рік тому

      a biological man is a biological male, this is reality.

    • @chinnappal9122
      @chinnappal9122 Рік тому +6

      could you explain me how is it far more complex?

    • @aarna6573
      @aarna6573 Рік тому

      @@chinnappal9122 the genitals of a man i.e. biological proof is not enough to be a man. This is what a judge regarding this case said. Perhaps what they meant is there are many societal standards that a man must live up to or a propriety that he must have to be considered masculine enough to be a man.

    • @byron2477
      @byron2477 Рік тому +10

      Biological man is not complex
      It just means that a person with XY chromosomes

  • @varshaiyer9395
    @varshaiyer9395 Рік тому +18

    Kudos to Brut for their excellent journalism in bringing these matters to light

  • @s.g2068
    @s.g2068 6 місяців тому +2

    Brut when will you put the other side of the argument present by advocate sai deepak?

  • @gchudasamadarshit9111
    @gchudasamadarshit9111 Рік тому +5

    The most fundamental argument is that LGBTQ individuals have the same rights as anyone else to marry the person they love. Denying them this right is a violation of their fundamental human rights and goes against the principle of equality.
    Marriage is a celebration of love and commitment between two individuals. LGBTQ individuals have the same capacity for love and commitment as anyone else, and they deserve to have their relationships recognized and celebrated.
    Marriage provides important legal and financial benefits, including access to healthcare, inheritance rights, tax benefits, and the ability to make decisions for each other in times of crisis. Denying LGBTQ individuals the right to marry denies them access to these important benefits.
    Legal recognition of same-sex marriages can contribute to greater social acceptance and equality for LGBTQ individuals. It sends a message that LGBTQ relationships are just as valid and deserving of respect as heterosexual relationships.
    It's important to recognize that marriage equality is not about disrupting the equilibrium of society, but about creating a more just and equal society where all individuals are treated with respect and dignity, regardless of their sexual orientation or gender identity
    Legalizing LGBTQ marriages does not make everyone want to become homosexuals. Sexual orientation is a complex and deeply ingrained aspect of a person's identity that is not influenced by external factors such as legal recognition of same-sex relationships. People do not choose their sexual orientation, and research has shown that attempts to change one's sexual orientation are ineffective and harmful.
    The LGBTQ community is a natural part of human diversity. Sexual orientation and gender identity are aspects of human variation that exist in every culture and throughout history. They are not a choice or a lifestyle but rather an intrinsic part of a person's identity. The scientific consensus is that sexual orientation is determined by a combination of genetic, hormonal, and environmental factors.
    It is important to respect and celebrate the diversity of human sexuality and gender identity. Everyone should have the right to love and form relationships with whomever they choose, regardless of their sexual orientation or gender identity. Legalizing same-sex marriage is a step towards achieving this goal of equality and acceptance.
    there is no evidence to suggest that LGBTQ relationships are harmful to society. In fact, research has consistently shown that LGBTQ individuals are just as capable of being good parents, building strong families, and contributing positively to their communities as heterosexual individuals.
    Ultimately, people should be free to love who they choose, regardless of gender or sexual orientation, and society should embrace and celebrate diversity in all its forms.

    • @paraparnoid113
      @paraparnoid113 11 місяців тому

      It is not natural to humanity it is nothing but corruption of human psychy. Entire western world is living example of how destructive it is for the society where they have come to the point where they have invented 65+ genders, asking for hormon & surgery subsidiaries from government. This corruption of senses has no ending.

    • @saddha1
      @saddha1 11 місяців тому

      Marriage is a religious institution for a man and woman, it is created by religion in which governments should stay out.

  • @nidhisharma5738
    @nidhisharma5738 Рік тому +12

    We have a long way to go now is not the time I think we need more supportors in real life 🌈 all up for lgbtq marriages here thou but i can't stress this enough is we need more people to treat them like human 🏳️‍🌈

  • @unfortunatelyhuman5330
    @unfortunatelyhuman5330 Рік тому +97

    Full support to the LGBTQ community of India!!! 💪

    • @Vivi-Core
      @Vivi-Core Рік тому +7

    • @Inferno-rq5cd
      @Inferno-rq5cd Рік тому

      🏳️‍🌈⃠

    • @shreyasnadagouda4619
      @shreyasnadagouda4619 9 місяців тому +3

      Bro do you even know what are core outcome of same sex marriage,
      Don’t just go emotionally think once in evolutionary way.

    • @Inferno-rq5cd
      @Inferno-rq5cd 9 місяців тому

      @@shreyasnadagouda4619 well said✊️
      there is no end explaining this simple logic to ignorant stupid masses of emotional fools.

    • @unfortunatelyhuman5330
      @unfortunatelyhuman5330 9 місяців тому +2

      @@shreyasnadagouda4619 Bro!!
      I have introspected my decision again and again about this issue
      but when I look at the other problems of the society like - women and children being raped and killed, human trafficking, illegal conversions, murders, robberies, communal riots etc....etc
      Then I get that these issues are having much bad and dark impact on the society than the LGBTQ law will do.
      Yes I agree that it will bring a
      difference but now the time has come to accept it.
      They are human beings too!!!!

  • @strawberry_and_cigarette
    @strawberry_and_cigarette Рік тому +4

    This is not only queer phobic but that the lovely old misogony. And they will be treated as mother and mother. And vice versa. And simply as parents. There are singleee parents in india raising kids. If there the law can work why can't in the case.

  • @ManishSirmour
    @ManishSirmour 11 місяців тому +9

    I am not someone who advocates for LGBTQ right but As long as something doesn't HARM others, I don't see any reason to oppose it

  • @syntheticsilkwood2206
    @syntheticsilkwood2206 11 місяців тому +1

    She spoke with such grace and respect not like others in the parliament shouting at the top of their lungs trying to prove a point that doesn't even have any logic to it

  • @rohitavadhani6995
    @rohitavadhani6995 11 місяців тому +2

    to start off, civil partnership could be made legal. this could help with most issues she has raised.

  • @rangitbapiofficial7111
    @rangitbapiofficial7111 Рік тому +3

    Sabka jine ka pura adhikar hain pura samman ke sath.

  • @oneforallah
    @oneforallah Рік тому +9

    I agree blood relation is FALSE AND FAKE, my own family is my biggest enemy despite me being blood related, whereas some strangers I know have helped me 1000x more than my own BLOOD FAMILY.

  • @NetJrfEconomics
    @NetJrfEconomics 5 місяців тому +2

    Elegance... Elegance... Elegance 😎

  • @ayushmanbaruah8667
    @ayushmanbaruah8667 2 місяці тому +2

    She is a big source of inspiration to many of us. Salute to you Mam!

  • @abhishekbhaskar6268
    @abhishekbhaskar6268 11 місяців тому +4

    actually majority can ,thats what democracy means!!

    • @aliasuser_
      @aliasuser_ 11 місяців тому +2

      democracy is a government that decides on laws based on majority of its "elected members" not the "society"...
      also government cannot encroach fundamental rights of any individual (much less a community)

    • @abhishekbhaskar6268
      @abhishekbhaskar6268 11 місяців тому

      @@aliasuser_ lol they can , will of people u know for your info even government like congress and regional parties said noo to this degeneracy 😂

    • @aliasuser_
      @aliasuser_ 11 місяців тому +1

      @@abhishekbhaskar6268 will of people doesn't determine rights of minorities... You should read.

    • @abhishekbhaskar6268
      @abhishekbhaskar6268 11 місяців тому

      @@aliasuser_ it can and it will what u gonna do about it??

    • @abhishekbhaskar6268
      @abhishekbhaskar6268 11 місяців тому

      @@aliasuser_ who elect those member majority naa!! If they says we dont want, this thing to be legal, keep it illegal or lose your vote, what the elected government representative gonna do!! That's why I mention above even congress and other parties said nooo, even before bjp!! Why?? Because, they understand the will of people!! 5 percent of lgbtq+, doesnt represent whole nation!! Nor it's culture or system, all major religion institutes will oppose it, and you should not just make opinion while sitting in ur comfort zone, society doesn't work that way!!

  • @emotionalIntelligence2078
    @emotionalIntelligence2078 Рік тому +7

    As per PC-PNDT ACT (undeveloped genitals by birth), SC forbade parents to decide for their kid's surgery in favour of a Son before 18 yrs. Such kids after 18 may have difficulty being a boy and engulf into mixed emotions to homo or hetero sex. They may have harmonal urge of a girl to love a boy i.e. the surgical boy will love a boy - So no question of "marriage is b/w a *biological* male-female " can avert these unconventional conditions, as by NATURE itself such babies are born.

    • @byebyedislikecount939
      @byebyedislikecount939 Рік тому +1

      You are mixing two things.
      Biological sex and sexuality are different things.
      Sexuality is about what you are attracted to, so either same sex or different sex or both.
      Homosexual means same sex, heterosexual means opposite sex and bisexual is both.
      Sex is either male or female, but due to gender dysphoria, you do not identify with the sex assigned at birth. Hence, you undergo transition. These people are what we call transgender.
      Both gays and transgender are very different.
      You can be gay but not trans, or you can be trans but not gay. You can also be gay and trans.

    • @emotionalIntelligence2078
      @emotionalIntelligence2078 Рік тому +1

      @@byebyedislikecount939 Yeah I know. Just wanted them to counter the govt agent- solicitors' Biological Man remark. They roamed around it but didn't address the "natural" flow of things solicitor advocated.

    • @byebyedislikecount939
      @byebyedislikecount939 Рік тому +2

      @@emotionalIntelligence2078 I see. Sorry for the misunderstanding. The SG is a hypocrite.
      SMA existed so that intercaste and interreligious marriages could happen.
      Yet he tries to say that it is only about straight couples.

  • @gauravmehra5454
    @gauravmehra5454 Рік тому +2

    She literally made me recheck all my positions on this issue!!!
    I hope the SC comes with a decision the way Prime Minister comes out with his decisions.. Not the orthodox ones but something interestingly new that would make sense to both the sides!! I was already waiting... Now m excited too!!

    • @sakshamtyagi9652
      @sakshamtyagi9652 Рік тому +1

      What do you mean by "makes sense for both sides"? Why should we have to make sense of it for bigots?

    • @gauravmehra5454
      @gauravmehra5454 Рік тому +1

      @@sakshamtyagi9652 coz you are not living in a Dreamy Fairy land.
      It's society, and it cannot be twisted and tweaked just 'coz you're too arrogant and adamant to see the ground realities and complexities of the issue and judgement..

    • @sakshamtyagi9652
      @sakshamtyagi9652 Рік тому +1

      @@gauravmehra5454 right yeah using "ground realities" as an excuse to keep treating a whole community as second class citizens. Very democratic.

    • @gauravmehra5454
      @gauravmehra5454 Рік тому +1

      @@sakshamtyagi9652 lol so you want to ignore everything and get what you want that's all.. You think it's as simple and forward as u assume it to be and these ppl who are watching these arguments and the whole SC process is non sense?? You're like going back to square zero...

    • @sakshamtyagi9652
      @sakshamtyagi9652 Рік тому

      @@gauravmehra5454 that's not how it is but that's how it should be. We shouldn't have had to wait this long to be given the right to exist with dignity.
      Imagine being at our place imagine living in a society as a second class citizens even according to the law and when some rights may be given to your community they'd come with sacrifices.

  • @acharya8959
    @acharya8959 Рік тому +2

    This will crash TFR. Which is why UCs must support it. Express solidarity folks!🎉😊

  • @Daddy2Daddy
    @Daddy2Daddy Рік тому +5

    This is absolutely stupid. Look into the arguments put by advocates and Justices in this matter. Chief Justice just announced that the Honourable Supreme Court cannot entertain popular morality because if they go by what young people feel then they afterwards have to listen to what many other people feel. Listen to the arguments put forth by the Solicitor General and how the bench agreed on the devastating effects and ramifications of legalising same-sex marriage on the personal laws, Special Marriage Act, Constitutional laws, Criminal and Civil Procedure, and provisions and laws and safeguards for women. The problem is that people are seeing this without even a smidgeon of technical knowledge, and it is not a problem but people should restrain from speaking on the matters which are exceedingly severe. Same-Sex Marriage entails Identity-crisis (just like what is happening in USA) and after that Identity Politics. There would be thousands of petitions on the identity issues with the defence of 78th paragraph in NLSA v. UOI (2014).
    Attorney General is not wrong when he said to thr bench that no one id stopping them from marrying whomever they want without registering it. He even said that his marriage is not registered, and they don't depend on thr State in the matter of marriage.
    Same-sex marriage also entails people wanting special provisions, reservation, and so on. There is so much into this, and people are behaving like they understanf everything. First look at the severity of the matter, then think if you should dive into it or not.

    • @seeker7943
      @seeker7943 Рік тому +1

      Well informed and logical arguments.

    • @Daddy2Daddy
      @Daddy2Daddy Рік тому +1

      @@seeker7943 Thanks.

    • @SophisticatedArc
      @SophisticatedArc Рік тому +2

      @@seeker7943 unlike the majority of brain dead “it’s like incest!” comments

  • @isabell99840
    @isabell99840 Рік тому +1

    Wow
    . She is so articulate

  • @avinashmaharana8372
    @avinashmaharana8372 Рік тому +2

    Full power to mam guruswamy

  • @anupomkumarhazarika7046
    @anupomkumarhazarika7046 Рік тому +13

    Beautifully argued.

  • @beautifulmind2797
    @beautifulmind2797 Рік тому +14

    We want justice & equality 🙏💚💙💛💖💖💚💚💛💜💗💞💟💟💜💛💛💛💚💚💚💛💛💛💚💙💚💙💖💙💚💚💛💜

  • @pratyushkaushik9111
    @pratyushkaushik9111 Рік тому +15

    as a Jew i support her views

  • @bhunajeera
    @bhunajeera Рік тому +13

    Whatever she says.. We as a country aren't ready for it. Forget the moral obligations, even technically, when a male and a female parent is required in every verification and confirmation, long processes, etc, saying that we can just replace words with those gender neutral things is too soon. It'll take maybe 10 more years to this to be a thing realistically

    • @SophisticatedArc
      @SophisticatedArc Рік тому +9

      People who love each other SHOULD be able to marry. I mean

    • @franckfranciszek
      @franckfranciszek Рік тому +3

      if the currency notes could be changed in a year or two, basic human rights like these will take 10 years?

    • @StarBoy-ps1xc
      @StarBoy-ps1xc 11 місяців тому

      @@SophisticatedArc then legalize marriage between blood sisters and brothers
      Your opinion is trash✋️

    • @arpitasingh4946
      @arpitasingh4946 11 місяців тому +2

      Just because the country ain't ready don't mean a minority should be deprived of their rights, and they sound be left ignored saying the majority isn't ready to give them basic rights just yet.

    • @bhunajeera
      @bhunajeera 11 місяців тому

      I think y'all misunderstood. Even the West took time to get used to this stuff.. It's JUST budding in India so it'll definitely take 10 years.. You can't just compare human lives and their beliefs with currency, that's just plain stupid

  • @surbhisardana3029
    @surbhisardana3029 Рік тому +7

    Goosebumps 🥹

  • @AneesAhmed007
    @AneesAhmed007 11 місяців тому +3

    Basically her reason for legalizing same sex marriage is so that LGBTQ people can easily buy life, medical and home insurance like the normal couples (i.e husbands and wives) do .
    Why not just add/have a law to get those easily accessible to the LGBTQ community instead of legalizing same-sex marriage?
    You love someone of the same sex which is untraditional and want to convert what is traditional to suit your agenda. Thereby normalizing what you are? Great👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽

    • @NONAME-zi7sd
      @NONAME-zi7sd 11 місяців тому +7

      greek and hindu mythology have gay references. it is not untraditional.
      they don't want to interfere in hindu muslim personal laws. they are asking for same sex marriage under special marriage act.
      any other arguement ?

    • @AneesAhmed007
      @AneesAhmed007 11 місяців тому

      @@NONAME-zi7sd @NO NAME I'm guessing you're probably right about Hindu and Greek mythology although I have not read too much about it. By traditional I'm talking about what your parents, grandparents and your ancestors have done so far.
      Did any of them marry people of the same sex?
      One problem with legalizing same sex marriage is normalization of the LGBTQ views. Just like you're not supposed to force your religion down someone's throat why should the LGBTQ agenda be forced down people's throat . People want to be gay, great keep it yourself. You want to be a Muslim or Hindu keep it yourself.
      Don't try to change the law or add laws for your own selfish gains. You want traditional rights and norms you need to stick to traditional rights and norms.
      Cool?
      Sorry for using the word you...I just meant it in a general sense. Nothing against you. 🙏

    • @syntheticsilkwood2206
      @syntheticsilkwood2206 11 місяців тому +3

      @@AneesAhmed007 just like it is lawfully legal to change your religion
      Is that forcing your beliefs down people's throat?
      People just want to get married and lice normally like other people and they feel like they have to leave true own country just to have a family of their own
      Nobody is forcing anything on anyone other than you guys who want to dictate how others live their life

    • @AneesAhmed007
      @AneesAhmed007 11 місяців тому

      @@syntheticsilkwood2206 @Synthetic silkwood you don't have to change your religion legally if you don't want to. If I'm not wrong you still maintain the same rights as an Indian regardless of your faith. What I meant by shoving it down people's throat is when religious people (of any community) go around preaching that others should do what they believe in and believe that special laws should be created for their people.
      Marriage has always been between a man and woman. What is your reason for changing that law now? If you choose something out of the norm why do you want everyone else to adhere by it.
      Funny you say people like me dictate how others should live when you and the LGBTQ community want to dictate my world and the world my kids are going to grow up in by changing the law to suit your agenda of normalizing LGBTQ views.

    • @NONAME-zi7sd
      @NONAME-zi7sd 11 місяців тому

      @@AneesAhmed007 one thing i want to point out is that marriage is not a union between man and women. e.g: in a african tribe a women can marry women if she is infertile. though they are not lesbian. it's mainly for passing name and property.

  • @SagaramM
    @SagaramM Рік тому

    Well put... It's time India legalize the basic rights for every one... Come out of the traditional majority and minority way of resolving an issue... What's right is right... Stand with it.

  • @dsodragon8152
    @dsodragon8152 11 місяців тому +1

    Well the fact is also that marriage is a social institution, and the heteronormative character of Indian society cannot be ignored. As J.Sai Deepak already said in his deposition, the character of the society cannot be just thrown in the bin on a whim.
    "They have a cause, but they don't have a case"

    • @saddha1
      @saddha1 11 місяців тому

      Marriage is a religious institution between a man and a woman for raising families.
      Govt should stay out of it.

  • @ayushisingh8206
    @ayushisingh8206 11 місяців тому +5

    Menaka ji is the one of the boldest woman of the century ❤️❤️❤️

  • @oneforallah
    @oneforallah Рік тому +3

    She is right though, every Indian fills forms and there are fucking crazy restrictions in all of them, like if u have a single parent, u compulsorily have to give fathers name etc ....for LGBTQ people it must be 100x harder.

    • @sahy10204
      @sahy10204 Рік тому

      So true!!..... But look at these homophobes.... They're act like LGBT people are asking them to become one. Using reproduction as an excuse for thei hatred. Like seriously???

  • @rountysarkar288
    @rountysarkar288 11 місяців тому +1

    This matter not only solution of same sex marriage..... It's actually survival of those people who thinks different & personal orientation that they can't exhibit into our society & family..... Those people also have to right to live as they want.. They have the right to take equal civil rights... Afterall all are human being.......

  • @GreatIndian-is5sj
    @GreatIndian-is5sj 2 місяці тому

    This is call real argument.
    Which is come from heart

  • @lalitjyotiyana908
    @lalitjyotiyana908 Рік тому +3

    Ye to shukar manao ki LGBtq community valo ne education le or itne aye bade ki aaj lawyer doctor engineers bane..... Vrna ye log to education bhi nhi lene dete in bichara ko.....

  • @Ssc2969
    @Ssc2969 Рік тому +14

    Hats off to you mam. Totally for same-sex marriage and individual freedom and expressions.

    • @theeducator8574
      @theeducator8574 11 місяців тому

      Shame on u supporting those animals

    • @sandyy652
      @sandyy652 11 місяців тому +2

      Freedom I ghatiya majak is se jyada aur kya ....

    • @omshanti1960
      @omshanti1960 8 місяців тому

      ​@@theeducator8574 what is your problem?

    • @omshanti1960
      @omshanti1960 8 місяців тому

      ​​@@theeducator8574if you can't understand the LGBTQ community then stay away from this matter..😡

    • @omshanti1960
      @omshanti1960 8 місяців тому +1

      ​@@sandyy652 aur tum ullu ke paththe ja pahle thoda research karke aa phir kuch bhi bolna aur tumhe kya problem hai LGBT community se...bolo?

  • @govegsaveanimals1972
    @govegsaveanimals1972 Рік тому +1

    Anyone has the right to ruin their lives via marriage... I truly believe that. Equal-opportunity possibility of destruction for all.

  • @sonnynenghoi9372
    @sonnynenghoi9372 Рік тому +2

    @BrutIndia ..Hi Brut India, Im sorry that im gonna have to go off topic, But Can u Please please Cover the Communal Violence happening in Manipur, Churches, Lands, Homes are burnt down and people are killed and all that started in response to a peaceful unarmed Tribal Rally which was only held against the Govt. And not against another community....please help us People are dying in Manipur😭😭🙏🙏🙏

  • @MrStranger-rl6bp
    @MrStranger-rl6bp 11 місяців тому +2

    Lots of issues in this Country and they choose to discuss this shit🤮

  • @beautifulmind2797
    @beautifulmind2797 Рік тому +12

    💛💜💗💞💟💚💙💖💙💚💛💚💚💙💖💚💚💛💜💜💛💚💚💙💖💙💚💛💛💜💛💚💙💖💖💚💚💛💜💜💛💚💙💖 we want justice & equality 🤔 we want basic common rights like other HETEROSEXTUAL PERSON 🙏

    • @HadEs5_3
      @HadEs5_3 Рік тому

      First go make ur mind up to which gender u belong to. U sure u ain't a cat?

  • @Mramitshri10
    @Mramitshri10 9 місяців тому +1

    I am in favour of individual choices and they must be part of our society... but anyone can explain how to implement them in this multicultural society. There are other religions and societies where all claims are completely deniable

  • @telmonk003
    @telmonk003 Рік тому +1

    India is not ready yet, let things move at their pace. Article 377 was not passed overnight. These things take time.

  • @paragrane4760
    @paragrane4760 Рік тому +4

    What about adoption?

  • @krittikabiswas8500
    @krittikabiswas8500 Рік тому +4

    The way she moves her hands and body reminds me of the witch in Snow white.....😂
    But jokes aside, I loved her points !!!!! You go ma'am! You're a hero.

  • @CX45-jo2rr
    @CX45-jo2rr Місяць тому +1

    I identify as a King. I need a palace and pocket money for my expenses.

  • @gamerbruh2587
    @gamerbruh2587 7 місяців тому +1

    she is amazing

  • @AbhinavVatsAVVA
    @AbhinavVatsAVVA Рік тому +5

    Religion wise, it doesn't make sense that a Hindu country does not have same sex marriage. It should be natural considering that all living beings have divinity (Om) in them equally. Besides the philosophy of Ardhnarishwar is all gender embracing. Thousands of years back, it was a more Inclusion based society than it is now.

  • @shrutidixit3337
    @shrutidixit3337 11 місяців тому +5

    Amazing advocate. Lady hats off. ❤❤. More power to you.

    • @theeducator8574
      @theeducator8574 11 місяців тому

      Shame on u
      I curse u with transgender husband
      Now cry

    • @theeducator8574
      @theeducator8574 11 місяців тому

      U will not get sex u will cry for a man

    • @omshanti1960
      @omshanti1960 8 місяців тому +2

      ​@@theeducator8574shame on you too 😂 for being evil with lgbt community 😡

  • @pronsias
    @pronsias 11 місяців тому +2

    based woman

  • @NHCVMohammedNawaz
    @NHCVMohammedNawaz Рік тому +4

    What a brilliant lawyer she is.

  • @feelgoodspace
    @feelgoodspace Рік тому +5

    Marriage is between man and woman period

  • @morsumroy8725
    @morsumroy8725 11 місяців тому +1

    very well said

  • @Me_di
    @Me_di 11 місяців тому +2

    For those saying gender-fluidity/ homosexuality is a “Western concept” 😂
    At the Lakshmana temple in Khajuraho (954 CE), a man receives fellatio from a seated male as part of an orgiastic scene.
    A number of Hindu texts have portrayed homosexual experience as natural and joyful,[1] the Kamasutra affirms and recognises same-sex relations,[2] and there are several Hindu temples which have carvings that depict both men and women engaging in homosexual acts.[3] The Vedas do not restrict homosexuality and there are numerous Hindu deities that are shown to be gender-fluid and falling into the LGBT spectrum.[4][5] Same-sex relations and gender variance have been represented within Hinduism from the Vedic times through to the present day, in rituals, law books, religious or narrative mythologies, commentaries, paintings, and even sculptures.
    Psychoanalyst Sudhir Kakar writes that Hindus are more accepting of "deviance or eccentricity" that are adherents of Western religions, who typically treat sexual variance as "anti-social or psychopathological, requiring 'correction' or 'cure'".
    "A woman known for her independence, with no sexual bars, and acting as she wishes, is called svairini. She makes love with her own kind. She strokes her partner at the point of union, which she kisses." (Jayamangala on Kama Sutra 2.8.13). The various practices of lesbians are described in detail within the Second Part, Eighth Chapter of the Kama Sutra.
    Hindus commonly identify with and worship the various Hindu deities connected with gender diversity such as Ardhanarisvara (the androgynous form of Shiva and his consort Parvati), Aravan (a hero whom the god Krishna married after becoming a woman), Harihara (an incarnation of Shiva and Vishnu combined), Bahuchara Mata (a goddess connected with transsexuality and eunuchism), Gadadhara (an incarnation of Radha in male form), Chandi-Chamunda (twin warrior goddesses), Bhagavati-devi (a Hindu goddess associated with cross-dressing), Gangamma (a goddess connected with cross-dressing and disguises) and the goddess Yellamma.

  • @RohitSingh-vo6sq
    @RohitSingh-vo6sq Рік тому +2

    Idk what's right or wrong....but she's gonna impress CJI with her hand gestures 😂😂😂❤

  • @silaakkidumma
    @silaakkidumma Рік тому +3

    when logic takes center stage...just see its magic!

  • @JJ-gl3qr
    @JJ-gl3qr Рік тому +3

    Sadly I do agree with her however waaaay too many laws are centrex around husband & wife, man &women and just simply replacing them with the term person would bring about a ton of loopholes in the law that may be abused

  • @kousikghosh752
    @kousikghosh752 Рік тому +1

    Are vai argument mai background music keu.... chutiyapa keu vai....thik se sunne to de....

  • @ancientthots
    @ancientthots Рік тому +1

    if majority got to decide everything, today untouchability could still not be illegal or abolished by law. So yes, the court has to decide equal rights over tyranny of the majority

  • @user-zc6oe2mt4l
    @user-zc6oe2mt4l 11 місяців тому +2

    There is no concept called trans. This is all a delusion and just validating feelings

  • @parijatgoswami9134
    @parijatgoswami9134 Рік тому +3

    Supporting Same Sex Marriage