Inside the SC's hearing on same-sex marriages

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 1 тра 2023
  • "Majority cannot decide the rights of a minority." They wore their emotions on their sleeves, and called history and precedence to action, as they made their case for same-sex marriage in India.
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brut India is the fastest-growing digital video publisher in the country. We're a young, independent platform producing compelling journalism in new formats.
    You can also find us here:
    Facebook: / brutindia
    Instagram: / brut.india
    Twitter: / brutindia
    Snapchat: Brut India
    Snapchat: Brut India Stories

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,7 тис.

  • @ShivaniSingh-qm9to
    @ShivaniSingh-qm9to Рік тому +971

    The amount of common but valid points they pointed out is truly satisfying to watch. Hoping for the best.

    • @mohitanand1844
      @mohitanand1844 Рік тому

      There can be no valid point for same sex marriage. Nothing. Human civilization was found on the basis of marriage between man and woman that
      led to our present state .anything else is unacceptable

    • @Kumar-fg1cj
      @Kumar-fg1cj Рік тому

      Aree sab ko patta hai judgment enn ganduo ke favour mai aane wala hai CJI bss time pas kar raha hai......😅😅😅

    • @entermenot8917
      @entermenot8917 Рік тому

      There are only two genders male and female!!
      Look at the animals

    • @srbr999
      @srbr999 Рік тому +4

      Hahah.. All valid arguments in the comments actually got reported and deleted 😃😂 the channel itself being biased.

    • @ShivaniSingh-qm9to
      @ShivaniSingh-qm9to Рік тому

      They've to upload short videos. I don't think they're being biased. They've been continuously uploading about this unlike main stream media.
      This is more than enough for us.

  • @aaliyahzeawesome7701
    @aaliyahzeawesome7701 Рік тому +1735

    "The majority cannot decide the rights of the minority". Well said! Even the basic right, i.e., the right to love cannot be stripped away from the citizens of India.

    • @LordeGaurangan
      @LordeGaurangan Рік тому

      guessing by your name, you are a Muslim. You should be against LGBTQ+ totally in everyway according to Islam.

    • @arizkabir2628
      @arizkabir2628 Рік тому +1

      And you call yourself a Muslim 😒...don't support these LGBHDTV community, initially it feels alright to allow these bisexual ( they are absolutely normal but identify themselves as so just to get attention) to love eachother , adopt kids and have family but in a long term this will impact the society negatively.... Think about it very carefully

    • @Rudra-rf5cn
      @Rudra-rf5cn Рік тому +71

      But why limit it to hindus only?

    • @udibabagaming3243
      @udibabagaming3243 Рік тому

      Its mental illness…. Get help mfs

    • @anirbanghosh1670
      @anirbanghosh1670 Рік тому

      ​​​@@Rudra-rf5cn ​​muslm aren't progressive that's why their religion is strong. Right? But what religion gave them? Their health indicator, education indicator, wealth indicator all are far low than Hindu community. By following religion they gained nothing, only been used by maulavis and politician.
      And they are changing special marriage Act. Not hindu marriage Act.

  • @ankita19871
    @ankita19871 Рік тому +571

    I don’t know what the decision will be but I feel that our country has come to that point where people are actually discussing these things as mature adults stating facts.

    • @theeducator8574
      @theeducator8574 Рік тому

      Wasting time
      When 3 crore important cases are pending including r@pez and murders

    • @yashdwivedy4726
      @yashdwivedy4726 Рік тому +20

      Before the Britishers everyone was free to Express their views be whoever they wanted to be..

    • @shravangubbi5670
      @shravangubbi5670 Рік тому

      Yepp

    • @debjyotisarkar2492
      @debjyotisarkar2492 Рік тому +8

      ​@@yashdwivedy4726 let me correct a bit, its before mughals and other invasion

    • @azidahaka8543
      @azidahaka8543 Рік тому +2

      @@debjyotisarkar2492 no thanks, Mughals made India the richest and most prosperous country in the world. Please read a history book

  • @smohanakrishna8608
    @smohanakrishna8608 Рік тому +927

    As a farmer from south india. I would love to support for their rights

    • @skunky_fink
      @skunky_fink Рік тому +137

      As a businessman from Northeast India, I too support their rights

    • @anirudh-no4bc
      @anirudh-no4bc Рік тому +38

      WOW...respect....I too support for their rights

    • @srbr999
      @srbr999 Рік тому +41

      Waah.. All farmers businessman leaving their job and supporting UA-cam shorts 😂🤣🤣🤣 hahaha... So called businessman and farmer. Listen full argument of tushar mehta sir. All your bogus hypothetical thoughts will be perished my dear

    • @islamisevil7
      @islamisevil7 Рік тому +2

      As a Army chief of India. I would always to support for their rights.

    • @ppppppppppppyyyyyyyyyyy
      @ppppppppppppyyyyyyyyyyy Рік тому +47

      @@srbr999 biological man is a medical terminology which is only related to your body parts , it has nothing to do with your emotions, attractions or societal genders , gender is a completely different concept than sex(biological man or woman), gender is sociological and society builds gender , gender is not limited to your biology, sex or genitals , gender includes emotions and the feeling of attractions therefore even if any person who is medically biological man they can prefer to have a different gender because gender has nothing to do with sex , gender can be made and changed because it is a social thing

  • @narayansingh9407
    @narayansingh9407 Рік тому +298

    Some highly educated people having a great discussion is worth watching. Thanks ❤. It kind of makes me feel that maybe in future, India will become an example of human rights. Let's do this India

    • @triggeredgamer206
      @triggeredgamer206 Рік тому

      There is a reason why sperm always goes into female part idiot's democracy allows to do business not to change society values, then advance society can also marry a dog fk no 💀brh I'm dead. I categories same sex marriage as a animal abuse okey idiots of democracy.

    • @triggeredgamer206
      @triggeredgamer206 Рік тому

      Watch out louder with crowder channel this guy is far more literate then entire I dian population combined . This is an American guy

    • @anubhavsoni7620
      @anubhavsoni7620 Рік тому

      Stfu same sex marriage should be ban this thing is just mental illness going against nature biology wth

    • @Ayanok0jikiyotoka
      @Ayanok0jikiyotoka Рік тому +1

      Human rights ought not to deal with bullshit

    • @Skirbiy
      @Skirbiy 9 місяців тому +1

      This shit is genuinely haram, if this law gets passed, as an indian I will move to pakistan.

  • @Blaze6432
    @Blaze6432 Рік тому +696

    Incredible India : Where marrying the same gender is wrong, but marrying a tree is completely logical.

    • @user-sh6ek8kr1f
      @user-sh6ek8kr1f Рік тому +30

      Bruhh💀🤣🤣

    • @shaishavsharma5833
      @shaishavsharma5833 Рік тому

      Yeah bro it is better rather than having 86 fokin genders and seeing my country degrade like US

    • @ujjawalk6780
      @ujjawalk6780 Рік тому +72

      Japan where marrying a pillow is logical

    • @namitkumar4754
      @namitkumar4754 Рік тому

      Both are illogical and should not be allowed

    • @namitkumar4754
      @namitkumar4754 Рік тому

      Lemme tell you about Peaceful Islamic nations ad well where its ok to kill LGBTQ by stoning or throwing from roof tops....India is much better and LGBTQ ppl want to live together do it but dont force it down someones throat, its unnatural and not as per any religion.Marriage ia a ritual from religion,you cant mock it and ask to marry by Hindu or any other tradition.

  • @anirbanghosh1670
    @anirbanghosh1670 Рік тому +412

    U can not marry out of religion. Ankit Saxena got killed for loving a muslm girl.
    U can not marry out of caste.
    Ayushi yadav got killed for marrying a gujjar.
    U can't marry to a same sex
    Nobody killed for marrying, but arvey malhotra is indirectly killed by society for being gay, and thousands of other like him living a life of hell.
    This law is needed. Enough bloodshed.
    Im straight male, but this demeaning a person based on sexuality (which is not in his /her control) is absolutely cowardice and unjust. We have thousands of other pbm where other humans are affected. These people don't harm anybody. Let them have a life with dignity and respect.

    • @gayuaurora742
      @gayuaurora742 Рік тому +16

      Well said sir 👏🏽

    • @anirbanghosh1670
      @anirbanghosh1670 Рік тому +28

      ​@@gayuaurora742 ma'am this small things are useless to prohibit, In Israel lgbtq also included in army. But here people busy in honor killing and poking nose in other's sexuality though we are most self proclaimed sanskari country . People say why u don't say this to Muslim? They don't say by maintaining their faith they have nothing but faith only, their community is plagued by malnourishment, crime, female mortality etc.

    • @Mike10101
      @Mike10101 Рік тому +3

      💯

    • @ujjawalk6780
      @ujjawalk6780 Рік тому +1

      And that Abdullah who chopped the girl

    • @anirbanghosh1670
      @anirbanghosh1670 Рік тому +16

      ​@@ujjawalk6780 I wrote already about ankit saxena. Why u aren't concerned about the hatred within hindus community regarding one another. Ayushi murdered by her father for marrying another hindu, is lesser crime than any abdullha?

  • @arunkumarDevrajDC
    @arunkumarDevrajDC Рік тому +247

    "We the people & country"and parliment cannot prevent us from our basic fundamental rights 🔥, hats off to the lawyer who spoke atlast,

    • @foreverquarantine6151
      @foreverquarantine6151 Рік тому +9

      No need for parliament then?
      What is parliament? It is a body that represent the will of the people. SSM must be debated in parliament with all it's complexities and challenges and not imposed on Indian people by non elected. Judiciary can only interpret law not make new law or ask parliament to make a new law.

    • @arunkumarDevrajDC
      @arunkumarDevrajDC Рік тому +8

      @@foreverquarantine6151 I agree with you partly , still there is no use of discussing LGBTQ marrige rights in parliament when 90 % of members are old school, we are still far behind in terms of cultural liberation and went backwards from the middle of last decade, Dr.Ambedkar coverd most of the fundamental rights in the constitution but we have to make necessary changes depends upon the changing scenario around us. For that we have to listen to the People.

    • @arunkumarDevrajDC
      @arunkumarDevrajDC Рік тому

      @@mohitanand1844 ok good night 😴

    • @solving_irodov
      @solving_irodov Рік тому +3

      ​@@foreverquarantine6151 If the parliament decides according to what the majority wants, then minority will suffer. This is a matter where it is not an issue of majority vs minority. Why should the rights of minority depend on the will of the majority. If LGBT people get their rights, their life will improve and it will not affect the lives of heterosexual people. But if it goes to parliament, then I don't trust that they can decide in favor of minority.

    • @foreverquarantine6151
      @foreverquarantine6151 Рік тому +4

      @@solving_irodov First it's not majority vs minority issue. In fact LGBT are not distinct community they are part of various community.
      LGBT people have all the rights that any citizen need for their development.
      Marriage is a social institution that was created solely for the protection of and granting legal rights to children and protection of family.
      Marriage is a universal and time tested institution.
      LGBT people don't need marriage as they can't procreate and have family. Just because two people are living together doesn't make them equivalent to husband and wife. Role of husband and wife are defined (these roles can evolve based on nature of society and economy) but not to extent where they lose their entire meaning

  • @10shadows
    @10shadows Рік тому +905

    Even the Hindu mythology narrates stories of same-sex relationships and also mentions about the existence of transgender deities. The discrimination that the lgbtq community faces today in india is solely an outcome of ignorance. They can't get away with saying same sex marriage can't be legalized because it will hurt religious sentiments. Great to hear so many lawyers voicing their thoughts. Hoping to see inclusiveness prevail one day!

    • @Vizorfam
      @Vizorfam Рік тому +66

      Hindu mythology narrates nothing like we should support this as humanity no need of religion

    • @smartdoge
      @smartdoge Рік тому +85

      ​@@dhanshreeraut1534 bro he is talking about his fantasy dragging our dharma in it literally their is no such concept in our dharma. It's wrong........

    • @rishitomar67
      @rishitomar67 Рік тому +121

      @@smartdoge because it was carefully edited out of our culture after the mughal and british invasion, if you dont believe me just look up a entire chapter in the kamasutra dedicated to homosexual coupling and also the sculptures at khajuraho temples just go and look it up bro

    • @10shadows
      @10shadows Рік тому +61

      It's not your fault that you're asking this. Indian history has been rationalized in a way that it pushes heteronormativity and we never got to know about other communities. Khud thoda research wagera karo, there's plenty of evidences out there in Indian history supporting lgbtq relationships.

    • @AtheistIndian2024
      @AtheistIndian2024 Рік тому +7

      @@Vizorfam ok then why will muslim be immune by this according to code of conduct

  • @minhafathimaa
    @minhafathimaa Рік тому +254

    “The majority cannot decide the rights of minority”👏👏

    • @didd2810
      @didd2810 Рік тому +17

      This is in terms of LGBT unions however. Do you support them while making this statement?

    • @dudedude-su7pt
      @dudedude-su7pt Рік тому

      You need common sense, MAJORITY rules minorities can die, no one cares

    • @Rudra-rf5cn
      @Rudra-rf5cn Рік тому +17

      @@didd2810 Are nhi, unka toh sar tan juda hoga....

    • @kratistos7721
      @kratistos7721 Рік тому +39

      Your religion does not even give rights to 'kafir' forget recognising LGBT, so stop with this biased commentary to highlight other aspects of Indian society .
      Frankly please improve your religion to accommodate in the 21st century 🙏

    • @youwasheddishesright4925
      @youwasheddishesright4925 Рік тому

      Biology entered the chat

  • @indrejeetmilwar
    @indrejeetmilwar Рік тому +409

    Same sex marriage is acceptable
    But changing the definition of male and female is pure stupidity

    • @kanak-wg7hn
      @kanak-wg7hn Рік тому +42

      Allowing same sex marriage is going to do the same thing.

    • @shivangichatterjee7308
      @shivangichatterjee7308 Рік тому +52

      See for yourself in case of All the 32 countries who allowed it this see how much of a identity crisis they are having now if they have a solution for it well and good
      Ps I doubt they have any😂

    • @sritambehera7975
      @sritambehera7975 Рік тому

      Why stupidity???

    • @raghavrrs
      @raghavrrs Рік тому +1

      Please look at what transgender is defined as in the transgender protection act of 2019 that *this* government passed.
      Which is not to say that there are no man & woman but if someone who was born male registers with the authorities as being a transgender female, then yes, they are not to be considered as male anymore. This is the law. You would understand this if you watch the whole proceedings and not juicy tidbits from some very limited clips.

    • @stwkgupta
      @stwkgupta Рік тому +2

      exactly my thoughts

  • @unnati6281
    @unnati6281 Рік тому +266

    If two people willing to be together not harming anyone around them….. they should be allowed to do that without any difficulties.
    As if heterosexual marriages work out..:
    I mean, same sex marriage will have its own challenges and a lot of things has to looked upon once we decide to make this rule…. Let’s start the ground step by observing the changes of today’s society

    • @foreverquarantine6151
      @foreverquarantine6151 Рік тому +21

      After section 377 was struck down there are no legal problems with homosexual people living together but to think that just because two persons are living together and are attracted to each other makes them equivalent to Husband and wife is a mockery of institution of Marriage.

    • @junaid1682
      @junaid1682 Рік тому +5

      What about incest?

    • @nsa_200
      @nsa_200 Рік тому +9

      Like your opinion. Simple & straightforward. Why do people need to interfere in which partner a neighbor chooses to share his/her life ✊🏻

    • @nsa_200
      @nsa_200 Рік тому +13

      @@junaid1682 technically no one (legally) can stop any heterosexual adults in engaging in a relationship as long as one/both of them are not married to someone else. There are various factors to this like moral, social & ethical factors why incest is a strict no. But the main reason to avoid inbreeding is there can be genetic malfunctions to put it in a simple way. This has nothing to do with same gender marriage issue.

    • @junaid1682
      @junaid1682 Рік тому

      @@nsa_200 Moral standards change from society to society. For some their morality stops at incest and for others their morality stops at homosexuality.
      Many incest laws invoke this concept of genetics. But this rationale won’t withstand close scrutiny or the march of technology. If genetics is the issue, just get a vasectomy. Then people can have their sisters. Or skip the vasectomy and bang your brother. Gay sex can’t make a baby, so the problem is solved.

  • @faithfulshadow
    @faithfulshadow Рік тому +21

    I don’t understand….. why two adults people with consent marrying each-other bother other people 🤣🤣🤣.

    • @aaaryan_goel
      @aaaryan_goel Рік тому +6

      Becoz Abrahamic told them so and rationality vo kya hota h?

    • @mohitanand1844
      @mohitanand1844 Рік тому +1

      @@aaaryan_goel long live Abraham and his progeny

    • @9535310131
      @9535310131 Рік тому +7

      If your sister marries your brother with truck load of consent, does it bother you 😂😂

    • @siddharthdhulipala24
      @siddharthdhulipala24 Рік тому +4

      ​@@9535310131 bhai porn kam dekha kr..

    • @9535310131
      @9535310131 Рік тому +1

      @@siddharthdhulipala24 Bhai mai toh tumare bare me bola tha.

  • @AnuditDas
    @AnuditDas Рік тому +15

    If genitals do not decide male and female .. then why Reservation for female on the basis of genitals they have?

    • @betrue755
      @betrue755 2 місяці тому

      Females are being given reservation because in our male dominated society their voice get oppressed

  • @PrateekSingh-qb4cn
    @PrateekSingh-qb4cn Рік тому +55

    What people in the comment section can't understand is the case is not against gay relationship but gay/same sex marriage. Being a gay and having a sexual relationship with another person of same sex is perfectly legal.

    • @universeno.13
      @universeno.13 Рік тому +14

      But in a relationship they don't have the rights that a heterosexual couple have in a marriage - they cannot opt for family plans, they cannot leave anything behind to their partner if they die, they cannot legally adopt a child, and many more things

    • @MuralidarSRamachandran7789
      @MuralidarSRamachandran7789 Рік тому

      So, is the homosexual community fighting for the rights only to have sexual relationships?! Only heterosexual people have the right to marry?? If relationships are legal, then why isn't marriage???

    • @freud7264
      @freud7264 Рік тому +9

      Are you a NPC? Literally everybody knows this.

    • @ArunaKamble.
      @ArunaKamble. Рік тому +3

      ​@@freud7264 There are actually people in the comments who are like this , trust me bruh they just wanna spew hate

    • @ramishkumar4354
      @ramishkumar4354 Рік тому

      @@universeno.13 the Rights are given as husband wife in same sex marriage who will be the husband or wife ?

  • @shubhamsankpal1946
    @shubhamsankpal1946 Рік тому +18

    Kudos to Brut for compiling such wonderful arguments, I wanted to hear the arguments but couldnt find time to watch lengthy procedures, thanks for compiling and do update us later too about the progress of the same.

  • @anonymously2570
    @anonymously2570 Рік тому +356

    i sat through all the hearings (online) and had countless fights over youtube comments and while i want same sex marriage to be legalised so that we can take a step forward inclusivity, right now i just want it to be legalised to piss off the homophobes-
    jokes apart, great work done in the court, i wish that the law changes for good. much love

    • @stevethepaidintern196
      @stevethepaidintern196 Рік тому +14

      thank you for your contribution haha ❤

    • @viditsinha7865
      @viditsinha7865 Рік тому +42

      It's a waste of energy to argue on internet
      Trust me I have experience

    • @Rudra-rf5cn
      @Rudra-rf5cn Рік тому

      Unfortunately, it will only apply to Hindus, as other religions have their own laws, so why this hypocrisy, Mr self proclaimed intellectual?

    • @anonymously2570
      @anonymously2570 Рік тому +13

      @@viditsinha7865 lmao i've learnt it the hard way too hehe

    • @anonymously2570
      @anonymously2570 Рік тому +3

      @@stevethepaidintern196 always happy to help lmao

  • @anweshanaskar5822
    @anweshanaskar5822 Рік тому +43

    Humbled to witness this historic judgement!

  • @Smpk12
    @Smpk12 Рік тому +9

    "Its far more complex than that"
    Proof?
    Trust me bruh💯

    • @infotraining4972
      @infotraining4972 Рік тому

      You must be an atheist ,because ‘trust me bruh’ proof is working perfectly there.
      And, Science isn’t a religion bruh to claim just anything without a proof.

  • @snailmailmagic1133
    @snailmailmagic1133 Рік тому +37

    Glad to know we are making progressing in this space too 🎉. Everyone should get equal opportunity to experience love in their own way ❤.

  • @keshavkumar-bl6im
    @keshavkumar-bl6im Рік тому +23

    Allow it. Anyways judiciary is carrying burden of so many non sense laws. One more will not cause much harm. Just let them feel happy. Pass it. Marriages between male and female is anyways creating more non sense than what these marriages may cause. Allow it.

    • @Rudra-rf5cn
      @Rudra-rf5cn Рік тому +3

      Par sirf hinduo ko kyu? Ye law sirf Hinduo ke liye hoga, baki sabke apne apne religious laws hai😂....Bolne se pehle kuch jan le nibbe

    • @keshavkumar-bl6im
      @keshavkumar-bl6im Рік тому

      @@Rudra-rf5cn sab janta hu hutiye. Yeh laudu desh hai aur yaha aise hi kaanoon paas hote hai. Aur baad mein uska misuse hota hai. Mere post ko padh badhiya se akal khol ke. Main is law ko praise nahi kar raha.

    • @dreamsofabsence7503
      @dreamsofabsence7503 Рік тому +17

      @@Rudra-rf5cn no one is changing hindu marriage act, it is occuring through same sex marraige act, no personal laws are touched, adhi knowledge harmful hai, gadhe buddhe!

    • @Rudra-rf5cn
      @Rudra-rf5cn Рік тому

      @@dreamsofabsence7503 Are you even hearing yourself? Jab mulle gand mei chaku gusa denge, toh sara bhoot utar jaega🤣

    • @dreamsofabsence7503
      @dreamsofabsence7503 Рік тому

      @@GurpreetKaur-gj6qo bhak, kuch bi, har din mein hearing sun raha hu, pata wata hai nahi bas logo ko distract karte ho

  • @annantpandey8468
    @annantpandey8468 Рік тому +31

    Both arguments were well framed and the SC was also responding adequately and efficiently to the sides

  • @zes_0323
    @zes_0323 Рік тому +5

    and this is how civilization came to an end kids.

  • @18football18
    @18football18 Рік тому +309

    So proud of the Indian judiciary system. Such progressive laws. Abortion to same sex marriage. Vande Mataram ❤

  • @tttttttttttttttt____________
    @tttttttttttttttt____________ Рік тому +23

    Seeing so many Hon’ble lawyers step up for the rights of lgbtq community makes me so happy and proud! And they speak with such finesse!

  • @aaliyahzeawesome7701
    @aaliyahzeawesome7701 Рік тому +39

    Oh yes, now this comment section will be filled with people disapproving with this idea and make sure they represent their distaste in same-sex marriages.

    • @ShivaniSingh-qm9to
      @ShivaniSingh-qm9to Рік тому +21

      So let's spread positivity before they spread hatred 🎉

    • @Vizorfam
      @Vizorfam Рік тому +1

      Don't worry we will rip them apart

    • @Rudra-rf5cn
      @Rudra-rf5cn Рік тому

      Because this law will only be applied for Hindus! not others as they have their own law!!

    • @lokeshjha5109
      @lokeshjha5109 Рік тому

      Marriage by definition is itself "A legal union b/w male and female." You can't marry a donkey or a dog and call that marriage. This should be banned always, families in are being ruined in US, children are getting of mutilated and given puberty blockers so all this shouldn't come to India. Again if you're gay or whatever wanna stay with your partner that's okay. Imagine, if it becomes legal then at the time of divorce, who's gonna get the alimony and receive it? Makes your head scratch? 😂 So everything can't be changed.

    • @junaid1682
      @junaid1682 Рік тому +3

      So you are suggesting people not to express what they feel? Pretty strange

  • @mohammedshafi9124
    @mohammedshafi9124 Рік тому +43

    "Majority cannot decide the rights of the minority"♥️♥️..., It's their life and it's none of your concerns...love is love no matter what..🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍🌈🔥

    • @aaatd7550
      @aaatd7550 Рік тому +5

      But tum musalman ho

    • @mohammedshafi9124
      @mohammedshafi9124 Рік тому +3

      @@aaatd7550 so, is it okay to interfere in someone else's life, it's ridiculous.

    • @mohammedshafi9124
      @mohammedshafi9124 Рік тому +4

      @@aaatd7550 for me, unlike you humanity comes first, not religion.

    • @aaatd7550
      @aaatd7550 Рік тому

      @@mohammedshafi9124 But doesn’t Islam prohibit lgbtq? Just asking

    • @mohammedshafi9124
      @mohammedshafi9124 Рік тому +3

      @@aaatd7550 tell me what religion allows LGBTQ?, you can't point any religious text verse which support LGBTQ, and i don't care whether islam prohibit or not LGBTQ, being a human, i can see them who they really are, i will always be an ally.

  • @airbender_aang
    @airbender_aang Рік тому +10

    "Man/Woman is not defined by genitals."
    Biology be like : Yeh kya koi mazaak hai? 😂

    • @infotraining4972
      @infotraining4972 Рік тому +7

      Anatomy doesn’t determine your gender. It really is a complex subject. Thodi research karo google pe samajh aajayega.

    • @airbender_aang
      @airbender_aang Рік тому +5

      @@infotraining4972 Vai ilaaj kara le apna.

    • @infotraining4972
      @infotraining4972 Рік тому +2

      @@airbender_aang dikh raha hai kise ilaj ki zarurat hai. Anatomy kya hai apko pata nahi hai. And jo information nahi pata ho na toh either kindly try to learn about it or stop commenting people who knows it. Aur haan, Mai doctor hun, aajana ilaj ke liye. Free me kardungi.

    • @airbender_aang
      @airbender_aang Рік тому +3

      @@infotraining4972 Ha kisiko nahi pata vai, tujhe hi aur cji ko hi pata hai. Chal bhokna bandh kar ab.

    • @infotraining4972
      @infotraining4972 Рік тому +1

      @@airbender_aang haan duniya ke saare medical doctors pagal hai aur aap sikhaoge hume kya sahi aur kya galat. Sahi kehte hai, izzat sabko raaz nahi aati. Peace out brother ✌️, khush raho apni duniya me🤍.

  • @Shailja_27
    @Shailja_27 Рік тому +4

    Thank you, Brut for this.

  • @jayantisen7174
    @jayantisen7174 Рік тому +284

    "Biological man is not a definition of what your definition of a man is. It's far more complex"
    I love the judge for making this statement.

    • @NoneOfTheAbove123
      @NoneOfTheAbove123 Рік тому +67

      But you can't simply change the chromosomes.

    • @prithwirajbhowmik6440
      @prithwirajbhowmik6440 Рік тому +27

      What is the complexity man??? Does Justice Chandrachur know that???

    • @ppppppppppppyyyyyyyyyyy
      @ppppppppppppyyyyyyyyyyy Рік тому

      The "Biological man " has nothing to do with the gender "man" , biological man is a medical term related to the body parts exclusive to a male or female body but it has nothing to do with the societal gender , gender is a completely different thing and therefore a biological male can choose to have a different gender instead of being a man

    • @oreocremeshake
      @oreocremeshake Рік тому +1

      Fucking lawyers arguing over biological facts wtf get someone who actually knows what they are talking about

    • @Accyut
      @Accyut Рік тому +38

      OK then define the complex definition of a man. So we can move ahead.

  • @cringeworld.a.i
    @cringeworld.a.i Рік тому +4

    There are so many cases pending bht they have time to discussion on unnecessary topics!

  • @harbinger_1984
    @harbinger_1984 Рік тому +134

    Here's a thing, a biological man IS a biological man, this can't be changed I accept that... But at the same time the people who are different than us, the people of LGBTQ community they also deserve the same rights as any other human in this country... Male and female is a fact and being queer and having the right to live like a normal person should also be okay.

    • @lovestarlightgiver2402
      @lovestarlightgiver2402 Рік тому +5

      Who gets to decide who is biological enough to be called a "biological man"? What if a man doesn't have XY chromosomes but has XYX or some other rare form, does that disqualifies him as being a man even though his body is male? What if a person is born with a male body but has a female brain inside of their body and feels like a woman? Should we call them female and ignore their male body or should we call them male and ignore that they have a female brain and that their brain is not male? Either way we would be ignoring reality and a biological part of their body which doesn't completely conform to "biological male" or "biological female". All of this can be avoided by allowing gay people to be married instead of discriminating by gender.

    • @lokeshjha5109
      @lokeshjha5109 Рік тому

      @@lovestarlightgiver2402 Can't beleive this wokeness is visible in India too, or if you're are from US, I would be happier. Don't make it too complicated it's very simple. There are two genders only, A man and woman. A man is biological male with a XY chromosome that can produce sperms. A female is someone that has XX chromosome and can mestruate also produce eggs. If there are alterations in the chromosome that means something have must gone wrong but doesn't change the science that having XY couldn't be a male or same with female. You can think and feel whatever you are but can't change the molecular level, which is your DNA 🧬 which all trillion of your cell identies. "A donkey dressing up into horse can never make it a horse." Doesn't matter what you identify it's your perception if you wanna stay in that delusion, good for you. Accepting the reality of what you are is called self love. Period.

    • @harbinger_1984
      @harbinger_1984 Рік тому

      @@lovestarlightgiver2402 first, it's not "who gets to decide" it's basic biology... A man has a penis and a woman has breasts and vagina and only they can give birth, that's the basic definition and there's nothing like having "female brain in male body" brain doesn't have a gender, just because a male human feels he's a woman that doesn't make him a woman, he can't give birth or grow breasts but that doesn't mean that society can't accept them for being different but this has to has a limit, you can't defy common sense... Stop with this nonsense that "men can be women also".

    • @harbinger_1984
      @harbinger_1984 Рік тому

      @@lovestarlightgiver2402 and by three chromosomes you mean the people with down syndrome and transgender, right?
      Well, I can accept transgend as the third gender but the people with down syndrome can be identified in two genders.

    • @chetan1329
      @chetan1329 Рік тому +3

      @@lovestarlightgiver2402 THATS CALLED A DISORDER, AN ABNORMALITY

  • @rutuparnapattanaik2105
    @rutuparnapattanaik2105 Рік тому +100

    I think we should legalise same-sex marriages because first of all being able to identify and come out as gay and lesbian is such a stigma in our country and most people who come out to be a part of LGBTQ are disowned most of the times these people rely on their significant others for emotional, moral and financial support too. If these same sex couple marriage is being granted in our country most orphans will be able to have a home because people from these communities are the ones who are very enthusiastic and passionate about adopting

    • @vamshidhar8648
      @vamshidhar8648 Рік тому

      But not now

    • @rutuparnapattanaik2105
      @rutuparnapattanaik2105 Рік тому +5

      @@vamshidhar8648 why???

    • @adityadwivedi7672
      @adityadwivedi7672 Рік тому +2

      You know they cannot adopt as parents right ? Only individually they can adopt. So, nothing is stopping them to adopt now, why wait for marriage? Just a bad argument mam.

    • @rutuparnapattanaik2105
      @rutuparnapattanaik2105 Рік тому +2

      @@adityadwivedi7672 but it's easy to raise a child with a partner and it's often people from these communities who are very enthusiastic and passionate about adopting...

    • @rutuparnapattanaik2105
      @rutuparnapattanaik2105 Рік тому +1

      @@adityadwivedi7672 sir I'm just a teenager who supports LGBTQ I'm no judge...

  • @shreyas5781
    @shreyas5781 Рік тому +9

    I think CJI has made statement way ahead of time for commoners to understand, It will receive lot of backlash

    • @HG58058
      @HG58058 Рік тому +1

      Exactly 💯 many are still 100 years behind

    • @DZ-lw4po
      @DZ-lw4po Рік тому +3

      We all know y he supports this nonsense😂😂😂 trapped

    • @shreyas5781
      @shreyas5781 Рік тому

      @@DZ-lw4po DZ is group of people

  • @purushottam_paramdharma
    @purushottam_paramdharma Рік тому +46

    For those who oppose it on basis of hindu religious sentoments, I implore you to read the mahabharata, just the first 10 chapters shall suffice. Religiously speaking the body is considered to be a mere vessel for our souls. The mahabharata time and again jas characters who are described as neither completely man nor completely woman, cases where a man becomes woman and vice versa, the mahabharata is in fact quite explicit about sexual relations, and has paragraphs dedicated to explaining how intimacy and the likes have been misused as a reason for division.

    • @Sumit-rp5mx
      @Sumit-rp5mx Рік тому

      Means I can be identify as women for women private parties if I wanna?

    • @uddhevhm919
      @uddhevhm919 Рік тому +2

      Mahabharata don't support Homosexuality.

    • @Aradhaya45720
      @Aradhaya45720 Рік тому +1

      ​@@uddhevhm919 it does .... Read books properly then ask questions

    • @uddhevhm919
      @uddhevhm919 Рік тому +1

      @@Aradhaya45720 I have completed it from first to last. Didn't find any such thing as homosexuality. If you have proof then quote the verse ?

    • @krisgamingtm8234
      @krisgamingtm8234 Рік тому

      Yes ,Soul is the most important thing but dont forget people learn from history.Look at the USA ,what a a fked degenerate society,lgbtqs spreading degeneracy ,encouraging others to do adultery,gender identity,biological man changing genders to female because he feels like a female(WTF) detc all that BS.India must preserve its value just like the middle eastern countries.

  • @doseofcringevideos367
    @doseofcringevideos367 Рік тому +22

    The judge who said that there is no concept of men or women is high on weed.

    • @rishitomar67
      @rishitomar67 Рік тому +1

      So what about the people born with extra sets of chromosomes like xyy and xxy?

    • @freud7264
      @freud7264 Рік тому +3

      ​@@rishitomar67those are exceptions and not the norm.

    • @rishitomar67
      @rishitomar67 Рік тому +4

      @@freud7264 yes they are not the norm but they exist and they are still millions of people around the world , also being gay or bisexual is still not the norm in many countries around the world does that mean they dont exist and that we should exclude them?

  • @ritusharma8535
    @ritusharma8535 Рік тому +86

    🥺🥺....It's nice to see, they are speaking on their behalf , supporting the LGBTQ community

  • @user-yf9cg2zo9d
    @user-yf9cg2zo9d Рік тому +13

    I think adoption is such a center for same sex marriages too! it can literally change a kids life , which is much more likely to happen in such an arrangement.
    I mean its equal to giving someone a life. Everyday i cross by the red light and see children being beaten up ,having to work hard in the sun etc my heart aches even if its a 100 kid s being adopted its giving 100 kids a new life!

    • @adityadwivedi7672
      @adityadwivedi7672 Рік тому +2

      You know this right ..that even after "same sex marriage" is legalized, these people can only adopt individually, And not as parents. Because adoption is under a separate law, vis- the juvenile justice act and the hindu personal law. So, even after being a "married couple" the adopted child will legally and officially have a single parent.
      Also, there's nothing stopping them from adopting now. Why wait for marriage ? It's just a sham argument that after marriage they'll adopt.

    • @user-yf9cg2zo9d
      @user-yf9cg2zo9d Рік тому

      @@adityadwivedi7672 under same sex marriage they should allow adoption with collective partnership. And child rearing is much more easier with an helping hand / partner since it's a big responsibility

    • @adityadwivedi7672
      @adityadwivedi7672 Рік тому +1

      @@user-yf9cg2zo9d They cannot allow. Marriage and adoption are under different laws. So impossible right now.

    • @user-yf9cg2zo9d
      @user-yf9cg2zo9d Рік тому

      @@adityadwivedi7672 yep but i hope that genuinely changes

  • @nonamearts7889
    @nonamearts7889 Рік тому +5

    Continue to fight guys this should happen it will hope to so many closeted people

  • @antiwokehuman
    @antiwokehuman Рік тому +7

    Iam neutral when it comes to same sex marriage, but I'm completely against bringing gender identity nonsense into this country. It's ridiculous and shouldn't be legitimised, but treated

    • @aakansh45yearsago83
      @aakansh45yearsago83 11 місяців тому

      Gender identity has existed since the ancient Vedic period my friend what are you saying? Shikhandi was a trans man in Mahabharata, Vishnu changed his gender a lotta times into Mohini, and also intersex people exist as much as trans people exist. The only scientific treatment for gender dysphoria (which makes people trans) is transitioning into the opposite gender. conversion therapy would simply lead to an increase in gender dysphoria of a person and it has been proven not to work in most cases.

  • @aaaryan_goel
    @aaaryan_goel Рік тому +12

    You see in my opinion having a concept of civil union is very necessary. Say even if I don't marry a woman and I have a relationship with another man and he is the one who loved me most in this world (let's say not sexually) . So I will expect the state to give him all the power attorney given to a wife in heterosexual marriage like inheritance, pension, signing authority, tax benefits etc. By recognizing two individuals in a civil union, you can give them legal rights they are demanding. As far as civil rights like divorce, alimony, domestic violence and other things are concerned, let's wait for UCC then the parliament will debate on the matter of homosexual civil rights ( if rahul gandhi allows the parliament to do so).

    • @aaaryan_goel
      @aaaryan_goel Рік тому +1

      And yes lgbtq organizations are also demanding civil rights but that matter can be reserved for future as civil rights are not really fundamental rights. Rather they are created with a consensus between science and society like 18 and 21 as age of marriage in hindu the marriage act. Leave aside the muslim personal law stating 15 as minimum age of marriage for girls as islam and science going two opposite way is not really shocking but hindus yes they carry enough maturity and don't want to governed by some asmaani kitaab. One thing I forgot to add is that banning homosexuality is the provision in quran and bible not the hindu scriptures. So any hindu opposing homosexuality is actually supporting islamic values.

    • @monjyotiboro.
      @monjyotiboro. Рік тому

      Yes

  • @18football18
    @18football18 Рік тому +9

    I've never seen a homophobe with GENUINE arguments. W decision🎉

  • @harikrishnans1601
    @harikrishnans1601 Рік тому +2

    Chandrachud is the lawyer for the petitioner.

  • @crombajaa
    @crombajaa Рік тому +2

    I hope they ban it and save humanity!

  • @chandhand6539
    @chandhand6539 Рік тому +11

    Waiting so excitedly for a positive decision on same sex marriages in my country. This progressive mindset takes us far ahead of what we were before.

  • @BoseDkbhag
    @BoseDkbhag Рік тому +4

    BUT THE MAJORITY CANNOT DECIDE THE RIGHT OF MINORITIES..... That is the most rational and intelligent statement I've heard since 2014....

  • @Shabssaif
    @Shabssaif Рік тому +11

    It is always the majority that wants to dictate the terms. On a similar note, one community is trying to suppress others and become dominated in the country.

  • @Adarsh_amd
    @Adarsh_amd Рік тому +6

    2:49 this alone should be enough to understand and decide if most people were empathetic

  • @rohan34
    @rohan34 Рік тому +7

    These talks are so positive... I hope at the end of the day there will be a positive result

  • @004-prabhdeepsingh3
    @004-prabhdeepsingh3 Рік тому +1

    thanks god this is way better than parliamentary debates

  • @sakshyabanchhor2002
    @sakshyabanchhor2002 Рік тому +31

    I wish that this law is accepted. People have been discriminated for their truth. I, as a Hindu, has always heard the saying "Satyam, Shivam, Sundaram"; the Truth is Divine and the Truth is Beautiful. And we are rejecting that Truth!!!! That's absolute blasphemy!!!! May we awaken from this Discriminating Lie.

    • @mohitanand1844
      @mohitanand1844 Рік тому

      You aren't a Hindu if you suport this .also the truth isn't debauchery .both are different

    • @user-cc1so5tq2p
      @user-cc1so5tq2p Рік тому

      I am 22 years old and I have heard satyam shivam sundaram countless time.
      But didn't know its meaning.
      You wrote it so beautifully ❣️

  • @aadyasharma130
    @aadyasharma130 Рік тому +3

    My country is changing. And the best part is, for the good

  • @celebworld2068
    @celebworld2068 Рік тому +5

    The last lady is absolutely true. Her words are like fundamental, no one can deny this fact

  • @Tharaktalks
    @Tharaktalks Рік тому +4

    Some day they say rape is also sex it's just involves some force so it should be legalised

    • @divyanshgarg2401
      @divyanshgarg2401 Рік тому +1

      Just take a moment and rethink what you just said.
      U oppose LGBTQ marriage etc. that's fine.
      But atleast don't drop your standards this much

    • @Tharaktalks
      @Tharaktalks Рік тому

      @@divyanshgarg2401 I don't have a so called standard to begin with to tell the truth

  • @ni7784
    @ni7784 Рік тому

    Woah!!! Thank you thank you!!

  • @rishitomar67
    @rishitomar67 Рік тому +41

    very logical points made by the lady and people in the supporting group hope they change the laws that were imposed by british

    • @uddhevhm919
      @uddhevhm919 Рік тому +1

      What ? Hinduism forbidden Homosexuality from the ancient time.

  • @nushki.
    @nushki. Рік тому +3

    I truly hope Indian judiciary legalizes same sex marriage, for it is a basic human right! The lawyers fighting for the lgbtq rights, hatts off to them. Not a single point mentioned by them was absurd nd invalid, it definitely makes sense nd cannot be denied at any cost!

  • @poojashaw3953
    @poojashaw3953 Рік тому +2

    Wow those were some heated arguments

  • @michaelmarshall2375
    @michaelmarshall2375 Рік тому +21

    Hoping for an iconic and incredible verdict

  • @captainaditya7662
    @captainaditya7662 Рік тому +13

    A wise man once said, " Just like today people defend gender identity and same sex marriage, One day will come when people will say that pedophiles should be allowed because its love between two souls"
    I can certainly feel that today

  • @shambhawipandey8261
    @shambhawipandey8261 Рік тому +21

    I can see why the insurance thing is a problem, I can see that there are benefits homosexual couples cannot apply for. This should be ammended. But I also agree that there is no notion when speaking about biological sex. One must not confuse feminity and masculinity with XX and XY chromosomes. Science is absolute truth and there is no place for someone's notion. I would hate a US like crisis here in India where people don't even consider themselves human anymore and identify themselves as animals.

    • @annmarysabu626
      @annmarysabu626 Рік тому +1

      A nurse here. I wouldn't call science an absolute truth. More of a trial and error. But if you consider science as true , then please understand the ICD has already declared being trans or gay is not an illness.
      And while on the subject, there are a lot of people who just not have the majority chromosome constitution XX and XY. People can have a extra X chromosome or an extra Y.or may even miss a X . They are a minority but still exist. So, i would have to argue that the idea of just biological man and biological woman is a religious and social one.
      Identifying as a animal is whole another issue.

    • @lovestarlightgiver2402
      @lovestarlightgiver2402 Рік тому

      Not all men are XY and not all women are XX. Sometimes XYX and other forms exist too. Nature does not fit neatly into people's ideas of "pure man" or "pure woman". There are even people with male bodies but born with female brains or female bodies but with male brains. People should not be discriminated against just because they don't fit perfectly into another person's view of what a "real man" is. Discrimination against gay people is discrimination based on gender.

    • @devanshvajpeyee8440
      @devanshvajpeyee8440 Рік тому +8

      Lol you confused sex and gender. Educate yourself them come here

    • @chetan1329
      @chetan1329 Рік тому +4

      well these are the stepping stones to the chaos in usa

    • @shambhawipandey8261
      @shambhawipandey8261 Рік тому +7

      @@devanshvajpeyee8440 It is quite easy to call out a stranger on the internet the way you did. However we can always chose to be polite when conducting ourselves. Anyways I understand that gender identities are part of the social identity. Your social identity can be different percentages of femininity and masculinity and is quite fluid. Howver the biological truth is absolute. You cannot go and change each chromosome in your cell. That's why I say there is no notion when speaking about biological sex (or biological man in the context of this video). Hope you understand.

  • @namratrm4409
    @namratrm4409 9 місяців тому +2

    When can we expect the judgement? It's been 3 months since the hearing.

    • @sourabh2842
      @sourabh2842 9 місяців тому

      Please tell !!!

    • @subhmaypatra5562
      @subhmaypatra5562 8 місяців тому +1

      Most probably by the end of this month

    • @Carnage_101
      @Carnage_101 7 місяців тому

      Ina few decades, or not in our lifetime because this is the Indian judiciary

  • @joeyluwang2448
    @joeyluwang2448 Рік тому +4

    I have such a huge respect for CJI sir

  • @sayyedzarrar
    @sayyedzarrar Рік тому +8

    Learn from the mistakes of the west and make decisions based on real evidence.
    Jai hind

  • @XigorGaming
    @XigorGaming Рік тому +4

    WE ARE DEVELOPING JUST BACKWARD 😂

  • @sankhdeepmitra5332
    @sankhdeepmitra5332 Рік тому

    I think my awe of the judicial process just increased by a few notches. This was a fascinating watch.

  • @meme._.mensch
    @meme._.mensch Рік тому +7

    Guys screaming majority cannot decide rights of minority what the hell is then democracy .

    • @neerajnongmaithem392
      @neerajnongmaithem392 Рік тому

      Our constitution actually protects us in such special cases. Their are checks and balances in our constitution incase the majority tries to suppress the rights of the minrity

    • @neerajnongmaithem392
      @neerajnongmaithem392 Рік тому

      Majority can make laws and policies as long as it not negatively affect the life of the minority. Jews were a minority in Germany, do you think what the majority Nazi did to them was right ?

  • @eggroll3773
    @eggroll3773 Рік тому +44

    Been following this hearing for a time now and watching my right to love and to marry the one I love being discussed is almost like a fever dream. The fact that we are celebrating 75 years of independence from the British and this western mindset of fitting into this, this and this box makes you "normal" and a valid member of society, has not left us and it makes me so so sad.

  • @sourabh2842
    @sourabh2842 Рік тому +16

    Those who are saying it's a western thing , you guys should not assume this. Have you ever met or talked to someone who is from the community?? If not then please don't guess. I myself is from a little village, 18 years of my life i was just known that I was the only one who is attracted to the same gender. I grew up in a lower middle class family. I never seen someone who is from LGBTQIA in my entire childhood. I didn't even had access to mobile until i turned 18. I never been to west🙄 then wtf are you guys saing. From my early childhood i know that I was gay even I have no words to describe it. Please be sensible, for you it can be a mere comment or statement against LGBTQ but this is our day to day suffering. No need to have opinions if you don't understand something.🙏🙏

    • @anjum1130
      @anjum1130 Рік тому +1

      Fr like these people haven't even tried to talk to a LGBTQ person and tries to decides their rights for them lol if they've met one they'd know these queer people is as normal as them

    • @sourabh2842
      @sourabh2842 Рік тому

      @@anjum1130 True, in my case also my own friends say, "You don't look like gay, may be you are confused." They say it because they have seen or heard nonsense things about us, now when they see me as normal as them they are doubtful. It's all comes with miss representation.

    • @anjum1130
      @anjum1130 Рік тому +1

      @@sourabh2842 exactly it's sad how radical straight men are towards LGBTQ people I hope that changed in near future and people will be less backward minded

    • @anjum1130
      @anjum1130 Рік тому

      Changes*

    • @shivamparashar6334
      @shivamparashar6334 Рік тому

      So why you want to get married just live with your partner, marriage is a religious institution, no religion is ready to accept you, I think in hinduism we have this thing and I personally think that Hindus should accept it but now that Noone cares about religious text, so obviously even Hindus won't accept you, forget about Islam and Christianity. Why you want to get married, if it is for insurance and other practical perpose then you should fight for that.

  • @montage1926
    @montage1926 Рік тому +2

    I love the fact that one of the lawyers defending same sex marriage is a lesbian

  • @AnitaSharma-oe6tu
    @AnitaSharma-oe6tu Рік тому +2

    So they think that adopted children would have bad impact if they have parents like us !
    Do you think every child have safe environment now or they don't have bad environment in their homes ?? come on let us live like what we want we are also humans beings just like everyone !!

    • @adityadwivedi7672
      @adityadwivedi7672 Рік тому

      Adoption of children and legalizing same sex marriage are different issues. Same sex marriage can only be legalized under the special marriage act and not under the personal laws. But, adoption is under the JJ Act and the hindu personal law... so any validation of same sex marriage won't let you legally adopt a child as parents. The child will only have a single parent ...you or your partner. You cannot legally be the mom-mom /dad - dad of the child on the official documents. So if adoption is your issue, you can adopt now also, ....not an issue.

  • @childishgambino3623
    @childishgambino3623 Рік тому +29

    Gender is not a notion, XY and XX chromosomes are basic science. You should not challenge the basic science that defines not only the scientific community but the nation as whole.

    • @subhmaypatra5562
      @subhmaypatra5562 Рік тому +12

      There's a difference between Gender and Sex. I think you have studied this in your High school.

    • @devanshvajpeyee8440
      @devanshvajpeyee8440 Рік тому +8

      If you can't differentiate between sex and gender, please educate yourself before blatantly spreading misinformation

    • @ultimate6243
      @ultimate6243 Рік тому +6

      ​@@subhmaypatra5562 Which scientist says that Sex is different from Gender?
      The idea of Gender itself is a myth.

    • @sampanna6983
      @sampanna6983 Рік тому +3

      Gender ≠ sex

    • @18football18
      @18football18 Рік тому +2

      ​@@devanshvajpeyee8440 W

  • @mayankghadge9177
    @mayankghadge9177 Рік тому +3

    Men and women only

  • @rahulanand2142
    @rahulanand2142 Рік тому +1

    You cannot buy Insurance but you are able to become a supreme court advocate.

  • @rvind000
    @rvind000 Рік тому +5

    Why are their seats disproportionate in size?

    • @subhmaypatra5562
      @subhmaypatra5562 Рік тому +3

      The seats are based upon the comfort of each judge.

  • @riddhimadas7469
    @riddhimadas7469 Рік тому +3

    l really hope that the Supreme court comes forward with the right judgement and that is legalising marrige for the lgbtq community , they are all humans and deserve all the love and kindness . lt absolutely disgusts me whenever some narrow minded people criticize them without knowing the actual essence of the person .....personal opinion a human should if ever be judged it shouldbe based on character LOVE ALWAYS WINS🌈 P.S : this is is the first time l ever written a comment on public platform so if did make a mistake regarding any words please forgive me.

  • @chandrakantmahapatra1317
    @chandrakantmahapatra1317 10 місяців тому +3

    I cannot think of any logical reason against gay marriage.

  • @sararahul3140
    @sararahul3140 Рік тому +2

    What solid logics being presented in the court for legalisation of same sex marriage and the man against the motion is just stuck on one point biological man and women. Stupidity at its peak.

  • @TheAditya1655
    @TheAditya1655 Рік тому

    Whatever the judgement, glad to know comment are matured and to the point, will help us to grow as a country. 🤘

  • @strawberry_and_cigarette
    @strawberry_and_cigarette Рік тому +3

    "Biological men and biologic women are the only two creation of god." Yeah and the intersexual people just dropped from thin air.

  • @ordinary..1
    @ordinary..1 Рік тому +16

    It's not your business, It's their wish..And who the hell are you to decide and control them.

    • @mohitanand1844
      @mohitanand1844 Рік тому +3

      It's everybody's business .it's the society that has been built upto since vedic ages . Introducing new ideas that threaten the very existence of it becomes each of us 's buisnesses

    • @sampanna6983
      @sampanna6983 Рік тому

      @@mohitanand1844 Mald and cope

    • @18football18
      @18football18 Рік тому +1

      ​@@mohitanand1844 they won't harm you or your children dw

    • @mohitanand1844
      @mohitanand1844 Рік тому

      @@sampanna6983 go rope

    • @mohitanand1844
      @mohitanand1844 Рік тому +3

      @@18football18 lol. They aren't known for not harming children

  • @AnirudhRajBansal
    @AnirudhRajBansal Рік тому +2

    From media to lawyers to all educated common men, all are supporting same sex marriage rights. This is beautiful. India is soon becoming a first world country❤❤❤❤❤

  • @somyajain8525
    @somyajain8525 Рік тому +2

    Justice DY Chandrachud undoubtedly is one of the best and most articulate CJIs India has ever seen.

  • @jaypandya7441
    @jaypandya7441 Рік тому +2

    The Chief Justice saying that gender is not biological, shows he skipped Biology class in school. What type if judges are we including in the SC? I think the Parliament needs to force the Judiciary to make their collegium system public. So that we know what goes into making such decisions

    • @srikanthsv79
      @srikanthsv79 Рік тому

      Sex is biological but not gender fyi, a trans is not a male because of biological parts

    • @jaypandya7441
      @jaypandya7441 Рік тому

      @@divysurana2122 chutiyap mat kar. Bakvas arguments daalke tu sensible nahi banne waala. Transgender, genuine transgender ke actual problems hote hai. But ye identifying as a man or woman total bankum hai. Tu soja. Tera bakvas sunke kaan me corona ho gaya mujhe

    • @jaypandya7441
      @jaypandya7441 Рік тому

      @@divysurana2122 so i will keep my biology and logic with me, while u keep on ranting and raving about a topic that isn't going to be legal in India for decades. Hmmm. Sounds like a great deal. Good luck

    • @aqtpotato1674
      @aqtpotato1674 Рік тому

      Gender isn't just your biological make-up. Does it play a part? Absolutely. That's why the majority of people you see out there are comfortable being born and living as the gender they were assigned at birth on the basis of their sex. But at the same time, gender is also psychological. You are a man because you were born a male and you psychologically perceive yourself to be one. That's the norm but it isn't true for some people who may be trans or non binary. So it's not that simple

  • @dr.amanraj6326
    @dr.amanraj6326 Рік тому +9

    Feels emotions as a doctor 😢before I never understood but after getting a license as a doctor I understood what it’s it’s quite normal and natural

    • @sujanchakraborty5629
      @sujanchakraborty5629 Рік тому +1

      Same here😅

    • @sujanchakraborty5629
      @sujanchakraborty5629 Рік тому +1

      I wish I could explain u more over here😅

    • @dr.amanraj6326
      @dr.amanraj6326 Рік тому +2

      @@sujanchakraborty5629 definitely

    • @sujanchakraborty5629
      @sujanchakraborty5629 Рік тому

      @@dr.amanraj6326 Anyways lets see how SC deals this coz i don't think parliament is gonna do something fr it as every single party is behind the vote banks politics And At the end we remember not the words of our our enemies but the silence of our friends.

  • @srbr999
    @srbr999 Рік тому +1

    But the rights of minority, cannot be against the will of majority. That's how democracy works!

  • @ShaikhMdFaizaan
    @ShaikhMdFaizaan Рік тому +9

    Pov: you are reading the comments and thinking how we are evolving backwards

    • @suka127
      @suka127 Рік тому +2

      factsss.. but pheww atleastt i found some good comments as well/// i still have hope !!

  • @tejug1161
    @tejug1161 Рік тому +4

    1. Because of the societal pressure and stigma against gay people, many gay men still marry straight women. The lives of these men and women is far worse than hell! Loneliness becomes their life. Hence, Gay people should be allowed to marry.
    2. However, gay rights should stop here with marriage, health insurance, etc. Trans women should not be allowed to participate in women's competitions or should not able to get jobs under women's quota. Create a completely different category for gay and trans people legally. Just like there are men's and women's tournaments, there should be separate tournaments for trans men and trans women in which they can compete with each other. We don't need to ape each and everything that US does! US society is collapsing and is headed towards a race and gender war.

    • @elizabethhalam6277
      @elizabethhalam6277 Рік тому

      True...As much as I support this community I fear that in the future it will lead astray the future generations just like what is happening in the US...

    • @joiceabraham2102
      @joiceabraham2102 Рік тому

      Gay, lesbians 🧐 tournaments 🤦gay=men and lesbian=women..men,women,transmen,transwomen is enough

    • @tejug1161
      @tejug1161 Рік тому

      @@joiceabraham2102 Agree

  • @chaoslord07
    @chaoslord07 Рік тому +4

    India has two laws set of laws for men and women in almost everything especially when related to family matters like age of marriage and adoption laws (single men can't adopt girls), divorce , child rights and in cases of assault. Saying that there is no absolute concept of gender when the legal framework distinguishes so throughly will lead to people claiming the rights (i honestly believe Men and women should be equal and therefore there shouldn't exist anything special just for girls but anyways) and benefits of women with malicious intent or as legal loopholes as it can lead to people thinking there is no absolute and hence anyone can claim anyone's gender as it's happening in many western countries right now.

    • @theredstar6493
      @theredstar6493 Рік тому

      And this is the sole reason why I'm supporting it, honestly idgaf if they marry or not atleast normal men will be able to claim similar support from courts that women have been doing for decades
      At one side you are saying everyone is equal and this marriage should be allowed on the basis of equal rights whereas at the other you do blatant injustice with men

  • @vikasgaikwad3018
    @vikasgaikwad3018 Рік тому +2

    Heart shattered into the pieces 💔 when one cannot understand or even try to understand , every person has its right to live . If being lgbtq community was as option in our country why one would choose to be a gay or either . Being Straight was not a choice ? No it was not then live and let live

  • @evilhalo
    @evilhalo Рік тому +6

    my pets and me want to have the same kind of relationship, love and marriage status that humans enjoy with each other in private & public spaces
    i just can't wait for a wide acceptance and IegaIization of beastality 🥰🥰

    • @monjyotiboro.
      @monjyotiboro. Рік тому +3

      Bruh are you s****d by any chance?

    • @theredstar6493
      @theredstar6493 Рік тому +7

      Exactly, if all it takes is agreement between two parties to do whatever they want then it won't be long before we start witnessing people marrying their family members/very close relatives
      If all it takes it consent between two people then many things which are illegal (and should be) will get legalised

    • @evilhalo
      @evilhalo Рік тому +1

      @@monjyotiboro. i couldn't fill in the stars, you'll have to give me a hint 😅

    • @evilhalo
      @evilhalo Рік тому +3

      @@theredstar6493 true, i don't see the point in stressing on regulations and legalizations as this century progresses
      especially in a century where everybody are being melted down to individuals
      also,
      It wouldn't be surprising if some individuals began to argue that incest is only a concern when it leads to reproduction, and that the identity of the partner is irrelevant as long as contraception is used,
      particularly in situations where individuals of the same gender within the family engage in mating.

    • @theredstar6493
      @theredstar6493 Рік тому

      @@evilhalo bruh government should straight up impeach CJI at this point, he's hell bent on imposing western ideologies of "freedom" here
      Even the LGBTQ supports fail to realise marriage is a social concept and not a "right" or "necessity" for living, it is a societal concept developed for common human race at large, you can't come and force society to amend their ideologies just to include you
      Society is not a part of you but you are a part of society, imagine you create a certain sect of rules/moral guidelines for your family and a outsider comes out of nowhere forcing you to make changes in it? This is what they're doing
      The people who developed marriage did it with a concept to bond a biological male and female together, it was their choice to include who they wanted to since it was their concept and people who decided to go against it should not participate in first place
      You created your own new concept of live-in relationships for a reason, with decriminalization of 377 and government agreeing to make some changes to allow inheritance, medical and other issues there is practically no difference in the life of a married heterosexual couple and homosexual couple, you can't dilute the concept of marriage to fit your narratives

  • @punchieeiy
    @punchieeiy Рік тому +5

    The lady . She is 😩

  • @itsPunith
    @itsPunith Рік тому +4

    India ko America banane ki chakkar main baughty America ho gaya 😅

  • @trap4990
    @trap4990 Рік тому +2

    Same sex marriage should be allowed but not the pronouns drama that happens in the west.

  • @Lindagoriga
    @Lindagoriga Рік тому +3

    I support you 🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍🌈 LGBT community As a straight

  • @one-eyedgaming6767
    @one-eyedgaming6767 Рік тому +7

    Justice Shall Prevail ⚖️

  • @somu02
    @somu02 Рік тому +1

    There are many serious issues which needs The Hon'ble SC's perusal ignoring them this case is heard and I find this very fascinating that all the highly paid lawyers are arguing on this case.

  • @foundingtitan7
    @foundingtitan7 Рік тому +1

    Wow. That's an insight.

  • @Vizorfam
    @Vizorfam Рік тому +21

    We should promote this thing it is high time ofcourse it will only affect some so called religious people who don't have anything better to do in life

  • @purplebreeze106
    @purplebreeze106 Рік тому +3

    They took a decade to realise mbbs and ayurvedic doctors are functionally different. I trust them to make wrong decisions