I don’t see how it is anything except Charles emerging out of blood or maybe fire. The artist seems to have intended to make a different impression. The fact remains, however, the painting makes an entirely different impression than the artist intended. The work leaves the viewer with the impression that Charles as king is either bathed in the blood and sin of his family and country or is emerging from fire like some kind of demonic God. No amount of “we aktually” explaining no matter how clever changes that. Moreover, the fact that the intentions of the artist have to be explained at all and are not undeniable to anyone looking at the painting is conclusive proof of its failure as a work of art.
IMO the painting reminds me of the portrait of Obama and the green foliage background. I guess you can paint a head and choose your own background and then "SELL" the narrative as an afterthought. I have a BFA degree from a Canadian University and think the articles explaining the "HIDDEN" meanings is a more accurate description of dark undertone. It looks more like a Broadway marquee for an upcoming performance.
0:15 I like it. It's different. The red is almost as if the king is emerging. I don't get a sense of anything other than emerging. I love his uniform and how the artist used the red in bold flourishes to announce the King's emerging and accented it with the monarch butterfly. Long live King Charles III.😻
Many modern artists and fashion designers make ugly and shocking works just for the publicity. Potrait of the King filled with blood stains gave the painter a lot of publicity so it worked. I'm fine with that but then there's Art Galleries like Kiasma in Finland that bought a videotape of man torturing and killing a cat and having sex with the corpse and invited the criminal to all its events praising his deeds after he got convicted for the crimes, Art Gallery that seeked to starve and dehydrate dog to death in it's exhibition and Art Auction site Christies that sells child mannequin s.x dolls and Art Galleries that were going to showcase them as "art" but backtracked after child advocacy groups and public protested it.
I disagree with u. After seeing the new king"HISS" like an animal AT a servant, Purchase Draculas home and seeing a naked man escape from the castle window, really paints the true character of the man. Devilishly evil and dam proud of it... there is no bigger "red flag warning " you could get then by seeing someone request to be painted in red flames with a monarch butterfly. Nice try gas lighting everybody lady..
I like it a lot...it's stunning in a very modern way, but not abstract. It is beautifully painted and this woman's explanation is excellent and thought provoking. I love the butterfly
I like it you can See him emerging into this dangerous looking world and from the face, order without this there'd just be chaos, id like a animation to be made based on this picture with his face developing then the figure the his his green and pleasant land coming into view around him! Id like the animation to be about three minutes long and called saviour, id like pete townsend to score the music for it and id also like pete to do a modern opera type thing called bodisehia about a queen from the olden days who sees a vision of modern britain and marvels at it
I like it alot. Imagine it in blue, white, grey or any other colour and the warmth of the red fades. I imagine it being an underlying passion for his role. Great presentation 😁
Grotesque, demonic and bathed in blood and violence. Art speaks to us directly and bypasses the need for words. If it has to be explained then either the artist has failed or the person explaining it is lying.
Unfortunately the chaotic brush strokes in those colors seem to evoke the flames of hell. I admire King Charles, wish him the best and feel the last thing he probably needs is more controversy.
It’s a decent painting but I hate the colour. It should have been green to reference his green credentials. Painting him as though he is standing in hell is a bit of an insult.
My God, what a clueless and ignorant misinterpretation. As in, ignorant of the facts. Nice to see the overwhelming response in the comments section from those of us with eyes to see!
The painting is memorable for it's context, and cultural artefact - this hardly speaks to the painting's quality as a piece of art at all. Your complete lack of knowledge and understanding about the symbolic word as understood through an occult, esoteric lens betrays any credibility from your assessment overall. The comments and interpretation of the monarch butterfly was in itself laughable. King Charles is not your friend. The Royal family is not your friend. Only the initiated matter, people like Jimmy Saville...
Wholeheartedly agree with your entire analysis. Thank you for helping me see this portrait in such a clear & meaningful way. Charles without a doubt has been agonizing about this portrait for decades. There is not a chance that, with their the combined life-long loves of culture, both Charles and Camilla didn't analyze every aspect of many versions of this portrait. Charles is culpable of many sins, but being ignorant of the arts and having poor taste in them are not two of them.
Blood of Diana
Soooooo TRUE!! 🎉❤
Of the whole world.
I don’t see how it is anything except Charles emerging out of blood or maybe fire. The artist seems to have intended to make a different impression. The fact remains, however, the painting makes an entirely different impression than the artist intended. The work leaves the viewer with the impression that Charles as king is either bathed in the blood and sin of his family and country or is emerging from fire like some kind of demonic God. No amount of “we aktually” explaining no matter how clever changes that. Moreover, the fact that the intentions of the artist have to be explained at all and are not undeniable to anyone looking at the painting is conclusive proof of its failure as a work of art.
This is your perspective only. I see it quite differently. And the fact it elicits debate and analysis tells you it’s an important piece of art.
@@carolinebennett5615 I agree with this.
your impression iz too literal
IMO the painting reminds me of the portrait of Obama and the green foliage background. I guess you can paint a head and choose your own background and then "SELL" the narrative as an afterthought. I have a BFA degree from a Canadian University and think the articles explaining the "HIDDEN" meanings is a more accurate description of dark undertone.
It looks more like a Broadway marquee for an upcoming performance.
@@donaldziemer1919 the Broadway marquee is a good description. It could be a marquee for a new production of Hamlet or McBeth.
The Royal Monarch of UK in his element (HELL FIRES) 😂😂😂
That's how it appears to me as well! That he is burning in hell.
I too thought he was bathed in blood.
That really isn't a blood color.
@@nerdnam…suuuuuuurrrrrre 😂😂😂
0:15 I like it. It's different. The red is almost as if the king is emerging. I don't get a sense of anything other than emerging. I love his uniform and how the artist used the red in bold flourishes to announce the King's emerging and accented it with the monarch butterfly. Long live King Charles III.😻
I’m sorry you were born with no creativity, forethought, imagination & have total color blindness.
Absolute shite
Depravity calls to depravity
💯 🎉
I love the way it looks, and I love that it has people talking about art and how we interpret it. Bravo to the artist 👏
IT SUCKS!!!
You must’ve graduated from COLOR BY NUMBERS 😂😂😂 You have an interpretation of a 2nd grade
He is in denial about dissolving into a blurry menacingly red surroundings
? She has NO idea ; totally lost in sycophancy… Look up Monarch & the cia just for starters… ignorance is no excuse
Many modern artists and fashion designers make ugly and shocking works just for the publicity. Potrait of the King filled with blood stains gave the painter a lot of publicity so it worked.
I'm fine with that but then there's Art Galleries like Kiasma in Finland that bought a videotape of man torturing and killing a cat and having sex with the corpse and invited the criminal to all its events praising his deeds after he got convicted for the crimes, Art Gallery that seeked to starve and dehydrate dog to death in it's exhibition and Art Auction site Christies that sells child mannequin s.x dolls and Art Galleries that were going to showcase them as "art" but backtracked after child advocacy groups and public protested it.
Seems surrounded by blood
Charles is part of Satanic Hell
It’s grotesque - like the subject matter
I disagree with u. After seeing the new king"HISS" like an animal AT a servant, Purchase Draculas home and seeing a naked man escape from the castle window, really paints the true character of the man. Devilishly evil and dam proud of it... there is no bigger "red flag warning " you could get then by seeing someone request to be painted in red flames with a monarch butterfly. Nice try gas lighting everybody lady..
I like it a lot...it's stunning in a very modern way, but not abstract. It is beautifully painted and this woman's explanation is excellent and thought provoking. I love the butterfly
Keep the Monarch. Get rid of the rest. According to USFWS, Monarchs “may” be listed as endangered this year.
Oh please, it’s ghastly. No amount of posh artsy words can change that.
NOTICED the UA-camr didn’t put a like to our comments!!?😂 they are blind to the EVIL of the Royal family
Don’t like it.
I have to say it's quite.... 'edgy' . I rather think I like it. It has a similar atmosphere to Louis le Brocquys' work.
Maybe it represents bloodshed.
It is….but you got idiots thinking it is beauty!! 😂😂
The picture speaks volumes for their plans
Wow! Thanks for the explanation.
I thought I was the only one that liked it! I applaud Charles for accepting it.
I like the portrait
He’s part of HELL!!
@@CanTho2022 You are part of Hell!!!
thank you! great comments!
nope nope nope
''Although I'm surrounded by tumultuous times, my face and my hands will stay clean and see the light!'' This may be the message; a declaration...
As someone who paints, I must say those hands are amateur garbage.
I like it you can
See him emerging into this dangerous looking world and from the face, order without this there'd just be chaos, id like a animation to be made based on this picture with his face developing then the figure the his his green and pleasant land coming into view around him! Id like the animation to be about three minutes long and called saviour, id like pete townsend to score the music for it and id also like pete to do a modern opera type thing called bodisehia about a queen from the olden days who sees a vision of modern britain and marvels at it
Do you really call British Artists?
How many of them can work more than 30 minutes without smoking or taking a break?
I find it hard to look at with my eyes, as in optical. It's a incredible portrait of King Charles, I just wish I could see it better.
Not a good idea at all. Face look good
though.
I like it alot. Imagine it in blue, white, grey or any other colour and the warmth of the red fades. I imagine it being an underlying passion for his role. Great presentation 😁
It's a stunning, memorable work of art.
Grotesque, demonic and bathed in blood and violence.
Art speaks to us directly and bypasses the need for words. If it has to be explained then either the artist has failed or the person explaining it is lying.
Hasn't anyone else thought it might be representative of a sea of red poppies behind a king in uniform?
Unfortunately the chaotic brush strokes in those colors seem to evoke the flames of hell. I admire King Charles, wish him the best and feel the last thing he probably needs is more controversy.
Painting makes me physically ill. Think of bloody battlefield!
Artist of course is talented but he has a STRONG dislike for Charles!!!
He’s related to Vlad The Impaler…. Aka Dracula
It’s a decent painting but I hate the colour. It should have been green to reference his green credentials. Painting him as though he is standing in hell is a bit of an insult.
His vampire bloodline & future
Cant look at it; revolting.
Looks like he is burning in hell for killing Diana.
Is he being stoic or unaware of his surroundings?
I think stoic
@@aboutartbytatyana…😂😂😂😂 you must’ve graduated from color by numbers!! 😂😂
I think it's represents the storm of death that may be coming. Goal 500,000,000
My God, what a clueless and ignorant misinterpretation. As in, ignorant of the facts. Nice to see the overwhelming response in the comments section from those of us with eyes to see!
Good analysis. The job was to make a regal portrait and I think the artist succeeded beyond all expectations.
Seriously?
DIANA & KATES BLOOD...
I am not amused .......
i like it
I love the painting.
This portrait certainly provoked conversation. It invigorated debates of style, symbolistic choices, and politics.
It's disgusting!
Yes, the red signifies King Kotex has got his wish, living inside Cruella the Ills trousers. 👍
The painting is memorable for it's context, and cultural artefact - this hardly speaks to the painting's quality as a piece of art at all. Your complete lack of knowledge and understanding about the symbolic word as understood through an occult, esoteric lens betrays any credibility from your assessment overall. The comments and interpretation of the monarch butterfly was in itself laughable.
King Charles is not your friend. The Royal family is not your friend. Only the initiated matter, people like Jimmy Saville...
charles is coming out of closet. what does this mean ??? what does pope say ??
Wholeheartedly agree with your entire analysis. Thank you for helping me see this portrait in such a clear & meaningful way.
Charles without a doubt has been agonizing about this portrait for decades. There is not a chance that, with their the combined life-long loves of culture, both Charles and Camilla didn't analyze every aspect of many versions of this portrait.
Charles is culpable of many sins, but being ignorant of the arts and having poor taste in them are not two of them.
Makes me think - 0ff with his head! hmmmm....???
I like it...😊❤
not a big fan of it I do like your explanation!
It's a great painting!
Dracula
Just shows, up front, He is evil. This is exactly why his mother never gave him power during her life.