Hey, I saw your post, and I think you're right. I'm a scientist who has studied biofield sciences, which is the scientific term for bioenergies. Initially, I was skeptical about what you were saying because it seemed like an attempt to disprove. However, I also believe that the Emotional Frequency Chart is flawed, not because emotions are unrelated to frequencies-I believe they are-but because the chart is overly simplistic and fails to accurately represent reality. In terms of measurable science, research in neuroscience and psychology has demonstrated that emotions can be associated with specific patterns of brain activity, as measured by EEG (electroencephalography). Different emotional states can lead to distinct patterns of brain waves, which indeed have measurable frequencies. For instance, certain types of meditation aimed at inducing states of love and compassion have been associated with gamma wave activity in the brain, a pattern of high-frequency brain waves. The issue is that there's a lot of misinformation out there, including many charlatans and so-called spiritual gurus who lack a genuine understanding of science or how the body functions. I do believe in the energetic components of emotions and that emotions are related to frequencies, which is evident in music and how different compositions can elicit varied emotional responses. However, emotions are highly complex physiological responses that cannot be overly simplified and that are still under research. You might find this article interesting: A Preliminary Investigation on Frequency Dependent Cues for Human Emotions.
I value this kind of elaborate and nuanced opinion, thank you and thanks for the article recommendation! I will definitely give it a read. Maybe a little addendum: I absolutley see that EEG or even fMRI show recognisable and somewhat predictable patterns during emotion processing (or construction?). I think many people outside the field are overestimating the "patternness" of those patterns. I also have the (totally unscientific) assumption that the closer we zoom in and the harder we try to separate noise from pattern the blurrier the picture will become. Clear borders and clean categories are not natures way. What do you think?
The editing is just phenomenal. I can't even express how impressed I am by this video. I really believe that if you just keep going your channel will grow. I certainly hope it will, because this is incredible content.
I was ill for many years, Neurologist told me to get a wheel chair and apply for disability. I decided to see a naturopath and through applied kinesiology I found out what was wrong. I went from every small movement my body made being painful to full recovery within 3 weeks!!! Through the testing I discovered that emotions you dismiss or ignore affect you physically sooner or later. I'm more in tune with my body after learning applied kinesiology. My husband having a scientific mind doesn't believe in it even though he saw my transformation, he has no explanation other than I was misdiagnosed, but if it was you who was in so much pain with no help from doctors, and then you try something new and it works, you may too believe. I do agree we should embrace all emotions the same but some emotions do drain you and some make you glad you are alive. I think this is why some are assigned a number on a vibration scale. By the way, my naturopath is now retired and she began this work way before David Hawkins.
I'm happy to hear this worked for you. I don't dismiss all these approaches as tools, but that does not meant that there is no space for improvement. What I criticise mostly in this video is accepting and adapting system like this as Truth at the prise of dismissing any other world view.
Wow. Just, wow. You should approach Netflix/HBO and get a show dude. Simply a fantastic video. I totally (vibrate), sorry resonate, with your conclusion and feelings man. Such a good exploration here and brilliant structure and aesthetic. Awesome. 🙌🏽
I actually make videos about frequencies 😆 However, in a singing sense with a frequency analyzer to measure the actual Hz of tones and how to change the overtones in ones voice. I just found this rainbow chart and was like "oh, that's a lot of B.S." right away. I am totally with you when you say that all emotions have value and importance. However, don't hate on meditation (21:57) 😁 Just because New Age folks put it into a weird context, maybe misinterpreting the greatest advantages of meditation, does not mean it's not super helpful for emotional development when done with adequate intention and goals. Anyhow: Thumbs up for your video. Great work!
It's funny and interesting how we find our ways to the same chart be completely different means, haha! Also: not hating on meditation at all, never would. I'm a passionate meditator and proponent myself.
The issue with New Agers is they have no idea what they're talking about. I call them "hippie spiritualists". As a pure mathematics / physics degree holder, emotional frequencies are very real. Your body is a toroidal electromagnetic field. Electromagnetic energy can be mapped, visually, through spectral analysis on the human biofield. High frequency, short wavelength auras (light) is "violet". Low frequency, long wavelength light is "red". As an electromagnetic being (which is an intrinsic property of all that exists), each thought you have is emitted both from your cranial brain in the form of an electrical impulse, together with a magnetic impulse, generated by your heartmind (which has more neurons and synapse junctions than your cranial brain). These electric + magnetic impulses (thoughts) converge in the Quantum Field, as a lightwave of a certain frequency, oscillating at rate proportional to the EMOTION with which you chose to emit it, (given that you're a conscious being.) The emotional frequency chart he is referring to is scientifically correct, as they are aligning the color of the biofield (or aura, which is controlled through conscious intent and emotional maturity / immaturity) with the electromagnetic spectrum (as are found in the results of a recently published study conducted by MIT.) Love and gratitude emit powerful electromagnetic energy, while anger, grief, sadness, etc... emit a very weak electromagnetic field. Frequency is a word used to describe waveform. Wave mechanics are physical properties that are affected through thoughts and emotions via quantum mechanics. You are a Frog sitting in the pond of cosmic vibration, where your very thoughts affect all of existence, exactly the same as a propagating wave. ua-cam.com/video/CCR5J1YYCiE/v-deo.htmlsi=vURKNdqBvWx2zLeL Hope this helps.
I didn't think he was hating on meditation, he used it to point out the error of the "high vibe" people. Notice that meditation and connection were found to be a LOW frequency, which I feel corroborates what the video is saying about this whole "raise your vibration" stuff as a load of harmful BS being pushed by fake gurus who wish to have a way to elevate themselves into egoistic superiority. Something I have felt/been saying for a long time: Schumann (earth) resonance is low, and that is one of the best known healing frequencies. High frequencies cause things to shatter apart, low frequencies are restful and hamonising. I notice it with sound too..a low note is more calming and soothing to the cells than a high pitched note. Balance is key. We must be whole. We must not reject our Self. A lot of this "high vibration" stuff seems to be about rejecting aspects of the Self that make us uncomfortable, instead of understanding and harmonising. No one ever processed their grief by putting on a happy face...and essentially that seems to be what the "raise your vibration" people are preaching: "Bottle it up, put on a happy face, pretend everything is great," and as most people are aware (or were until a few years ago), bottling up negative emotion is a brilliant way to give yourself an emotional/mental breakdown. I find myself in agreement to many of the sentiments expressed in the video.
thanks for this video! superb editing and obviously you put a lot of effort in creating..I just hope there were no cursing or foul words, it is so nice to show to kids to and to school so they will be more aware..I'll wait for your rated G videos , I am sure that will be awesome too!
Great production! Found your video trying to find anyone talking about the contradiction of all these frequencies in different context. I actually like to take from different areas and also don't mind some degree of spiritual context. But my pet peeves is when people mix up the terminology trying to justify their beliefs with 'science'. And it saddens me when good books are tarnished with these contradictions. I don't mind labeling some states as low or high just in laymen terms for quick explanation. But to build whole theory about it and not even double check the info is a whole another issue. For example, I was reading Joe Dispenza's Becoming Supernatural. Don't know if you know about it and what you think about it if you do. But I actually like his more psychological/self-improvement part of the books (even though I don't like this field much in general). For me, in general he is quite motivational. But in this book in spans of just 2 chapters he puts a similar emotional frequency chart and then in one or two chapters a brainwaves chart (alpha, beta, etc). I'm a bit disappointed, cause it looks like this book is not thoroughly checked. More like a compilation from his previous books plus other existing theories and suggestions. Maybe intention was great, but... I set the book aside for now cause I need to calm down 😅
I’ve actually looked into it! And I think you are spot on - he is a motivator and his self-help tactics are not totally off. But the science in this case can not be more then a metaphor or allegory. I’ve looked into several of the claims and it’s safe to say, that almost non of the “scientific” claims hold. What’s more, spirituality does not need science to be validated. The mere fact of being alive makes it relevant enough to be worth examining - in my opinion.
The issue with New Agers is they have no idea what they're talking about. I call them "hippie spiritualists". As a pure mathematics / physics degree holder, emotional frequencies are very real. Your body is a toroidal electromagnetic field. Electromagnetic energy can be mapped, visually, through spectral analysis on the human biofield. High frequency, short wavelength auras (light) is "violet". Low frequency, long wavelength light is "red". As an electromagnetic being (which is an intrinsic property of all that exists), each thought you have is emitted both from your cranial brain in the form of an electrical impulse, together with a magnetic impulse, generated by your heartmind (which has more neurons and synapse junctions than your cranial brain). These electric + magnetic impulses (thoughts) converge in the Quantum Field, as a lightwave of a certain frequency, oscillating at rate proportional to the EMOTION with which you chose to emit it, (given that you're a conscious being.) The emotional frequency chart he is referring to is scientifically correct, as they are aligning the color of the biofield (or aura, which is controlled through conscious intent and emotional maturity / immaturity) with the electromagnetic spectrum (as are found in the results of a recently published study conducted by MIT.) Love and gratitude emit powerful electromagnetic energy, while anger, grief, sadness, etc... emit a very weak electromagnetic field. Frequency is a word used to describe waveform. Wave mechanics are physical properties that are affected through thoughts and emotions via quantum mechanics. You are a Frog sitting in the pond of cosmic vibration, where your very thoughts affect all of existence, exactly the same as a propagating wave. ua-cam.com/video/CCR5J1YYCiE/v-deo.htmlsi=vURKNdqBvWx2zLeL Hope this helps.
As my comment was really long, and most won't read all that...the key take away: There is a lot in science and spritual healing to suggest that high frequencies are bad news. For example, let us look at light frequencies. It is now pretty widely accepted that some light frequencies are bad for us (blue light) and that other light frequencies have positive effects on us (red, yellow). So, what if we look at their respective frequencies? Well, the frequency of blue light is 620-670 Thz, whereas the frequencies of red and yellow light are 400-480 and 510-530 respectively, far lower than blue light. So, the positive, healing frequencies are lower than the damaging frequencies...this suggests that to "raise our vibration" is the opposite of what we need to do for healing and enlightenment.
Your videography is great. And thanks for sharing the results of your search. Finding how these vibrational frequencies were measured is challenging indeed. However, there is one element you seem to overlook. All emotions are necessary and important when they are related to actual events, they measure whether the probability of a need to be met goes up or down. However, there are emotional states that do not respond to the current events but to those far in the past. In these situations, the approach you refer to works quite well. I agree that it is still necessary to understand why. Still, observation of the phenomena usually precedes their understanding.
This was a seriously good video. You voiced a lot of my own critique. You didn't pick up on Scientology getting a mention on David Hawkins wiki page, it would be nice to know what the connection is there as I don't read German (Scientology, if you don't know, is a very shady organisation with a lot of pseudo-scientific claims)...I will do some of my own digging on connections between Hawkins, Scientology, and Applied Kinesiology (this didn't take long, a quick google has found that many of Hawkins ideas originated in the cult of Scientology, including his Map of Conciousness. If you're not familiar with Scientology, it's a pseudo-scientific cult which preys on the vulnerable and weak minded). I've been a Reiki Master since I was 18 years old (not that it means anything much, just to give a little context on me) which is about 20 years now, and since the moment these "high vibration" people appeared on the scene I have been saying it doesn't feel right. These people don't seem to have much experience of their own and seem to just regurgitate things they hear other people say, and they seem full of ego and materialism. High vibrations aren't always good. Low vibrations are peaceful, high fibrations are often anxiety inducing. The schumann resonance, the earth frequency, is a low vibration...and for a long time some circles consider this to be the most healing frequency there is. The higher a frequency is, the more interference it causes with matter and the physical state. The lower a frequency, the less interference it causes. There is a lot in science and spritual healing to suggest that high frequencies are bad news. For example, let us look at light frequencies. It is now pretty widely accepted that some light frequencies are bad for us (blue light) and that other light frequencies have positive effects on us (red, yellow). So, what if we look at their respective frequencies? Well, the frequency of blue light is 620-670 Thz, whereas the frequencies of red and yellow light are 400-480 and 510-530 respectively, far lower than blue light. So, the positive, healing frequencies are lower than the damaging frequencies...this suggests that to "raise our vibration" is the opposite of what we need to do for healing and enlightenment. These "high frequency" people are fake gurus and false prophets, nothing more.
The issue with New Agers is they have no idea what they're talking about. I call them "hippie spiritualists". As a pure mathematics / physics degree holder, emotional frequencies are very real. Your body is a toroidal electromagnetic field. Electromagnetic energy can be mapped, visually, through spectral analysis on the human biofield. High frequency, short wavelength auras (light) is "violet". Low frequency, long wavelength light is "red". As an electromagnetic being (which is an intrinsic property of all that exists), each thought you have is emitted both from your cranial brain in the form of an electrical impulse, together with a magnetic impulse, generated by your heartmind (which has more neurons and synapse junctions than your cranial brain). These electric + magnetic impulses (thoughts) converge in the Quantum Field, as a lightwave of a certain frequency, oscillating at rate proportional to the EMOTION with which you chose to emit it, (given that you're a conscious being.) The emotional frequency chart he is referring to is scientifically correct, as they are aligning the color of the biofield (or aura, which is controlled through conscious intent and emotional maturity / immaturity) with the electromagnetic spectrum (as are found in the results of a recently published study conducted by MIT.) Love and gratitude emit powerful electromagnetic energy, while anger, grief, sadness, etc... emit a very weak electromagnetic field. Frequency is a word used to describe waveform. Wave mechanics are physical properties that are affected through thoughts and emotions via quantum mechanics. You are a Frog sitting in the pond of cosmic vibration, where your very thoughts affect all of existence, exactly the same as a propagating wave. ua-cam.com/video/CCR5J1YYCiE/v-deo.htmlsi=vURKNdqBvWx2zLeL Hope this helps.
@@JustWojtek I don't take it as them thinking that they are better or higher than me. It's more like nonsense talk indicating they are spiritual in name only. By that I mean I realize that I'm better than them :D
I believe in the power of chioce! knowing your emotions which we are taught not to do as children, if you get to excited you will be shut down, which then can lead to frustration, boy what a ride and your only 3 years old life is an emotional rollacoster the trick is to know yourself which the chart helps you do and choose how do you want to feel or how is the situation making you feel its all in you! Your choice 🎉
wholeness is the ultimate goal of dharma in us life. But how do you want to feel? I believe this chart helps us to embrace all frequencies . Because a lot of people do not know how to feel anymore and only use there mind and forget the connection 💜 I love you perspective on this topic. Thank you! I see you
I dont know if you are religious but i just want to give you a rabbit hole to explore. In the bible God does hints at frequencies of things and how it can effect your health and mental wellbeing when He speaks about materials (for clothing) and which materials not to pair together as it cancels each other out. The demonic driven people also know how frequencies work. At some stage they changed the frequency of mainstream music to mess with peoples health and mental well being. Be particularly careful of music that have the E flat note in them. Another example is the 2024 olympics with their bell. We all know how openly demonic this years olympics was. They were fine tuning that bell several times to get it to make a very specific sound frequency, namely E flat. All of this information is freely availble on the internet for you to look up.
I’m analytical and I love science… I’ve tested dowsing on emotions and when someone is thinking a positive emotion the rods can pick up the energy from a distance. You then tell the person to think “sad” thought and the rods can’t sense your “aura?” “Field” till you get closer … it’s cool try it out 💗 and check out joe dispenza there’s a ton of science in his work 💗
I think you talk about something you dont undersstand vibration and emotions and you say lot of bullshit . i agree allmost people talking about the link between emotion and vibration and say bullshit and all things you search on google are bullshit like vibration color or raising vibration process and pp uses this bullshit for make money and its not honnest im aggree to this with that part. but man your lost your knowledge about how emotions work in brain with vibrations is sad for pretend its doesnt exist... my english is not perfect but if you interresed to know why emotions and vibrations vork together im ok to have a internet phonecall for speak about it dont miss evrithing vibe in univers
you clearly did not watch the full video nor any other of the videos I put out about emotions. if you want to complain at least put the effort in of sitting through one video.
It seems you are soooo triggered by those charts! Fine, those are not scientific at all, guy who invented them was a narcissistic and there are people who claims to be better cause they have higher frequency, which is not nice thing to do. I have found a lot of resources online which say when you are at love level you love all the people and wish them all the best and have genuine compassion to everyone. If you think you are better and think others are worse, maybe you are not really on the love level. Maybe there is no 'love level'. Maybe there are no emotional frequencies. You said it is a tool, you are right! You said it's not a good tool - you are wrong. Maybe you just don't know how to use this tool or maybe the tool is not for you. It's fine anyway. Question is: do you want to use this tool or do you just want to mock it and prevent everyone from using it cause 'you know better and just told the truth about this tool'? It seems like the second option Everyone is different and will have different paths. It's good that you did some research, it's good that you said your opinion. But maybe your research wasn't enough. And also it seems you had a really strong emotions against this chart. I can just feel how much you are triggered by this chart. What did it do to you? Did you believe in something just to be disappointed? So then you are trying to avoid to be believer just to no be disappointed again? And just to pause - all emotions matter is a popular opinion. Did you think that being at the love level means you never feel anger? I do feel anger towards you for example at the moment. And this is fine, all emotions have its purpose. What matters is not to stay on this anger emotion. Feel anger and let it go. And stay on love, on joy. Feel it, not think it. Spirituality it's not something you know, it's something you feel. Some people believe in Jesus and god and some in emotional frequency. As with every belief - everyone should have some distance and feel it for themselves, test it. Take the part you like, leave the rest, create your own unique spirituality which suppose to serve you and only you. Don't take all, don't go into dogmatism. Nothing ever will be objective truth. Have some decency and change the title to my truth. If you insist that what you say in the video is objective truth - how much do you differ from the narcissistic guy ('ohh look at me, listen to me, I know everything') who created emotional chart. Ever heard of projecting? 😏 in order to show your opinion you don't need to be mocking those charts and believers soooo much. You don't. You seem like a guy who can actually read this comment and even reply - so I am curious what the reply will be. Or maybe you won't reply or read it. Either way is fine. All good to you.
thank you for taking the time to write this comment. We might actually have more in common, than you think. Keep in mind, that this is just a YT video and not really a comprehensive representation of my opinion. And yes, that chart annoys the eff out of me 😂 but I’ve never said that I disregarded spirituality. Quite the contrary.
yeah i can relate to this commenter, i feel liek even if the science about the emotional frequencies is debunked or whatever the case. i think i suffer from low emotional intelligence and teh chart helps me identify my emotion and not only that i feel liek im literally hackign my brain to think more positively because the obvious concept is that if youre happier you will have postive effects onto yourself and the people around you, btu f you're negative you will have negative effects on yourself and the people around you. and i dont think science is necessarily mandatory to figure that out xD so yeah i guess when i came to find the chart it was through learning about manifesting and loa but in the end its really helped me understand my emotions and hack myself into more positive thinking.
Watch the double slit link I gave and you will see the reality we manifest (ie creat for ourselves) originates from the waves. Waves contain all option probabilities and are manifested into reality only when they are observed. The frequency state of the individual will create different observable outcomes for the observer (ie different realities). You chose how you see the world. And having a higher emotional frequency leads to a more positive observable outcome. Hope this makes sense to you? I think the simple experiment link I gave may give you a new perspective. It has nothing to do with brain waves etc. that’s apples and oranges
thank you for the link, I left a through response. but let me use this chance to say, that you seemed confused by what is happening in this video: I don't claim that it's either or. I just investigated where this chart and theory is coming from. And the answer is not collective consciousness and quantum physics, but David Hawking's and applied kinesiology. Adding any QM stuff to the picture comes after the fact, that this was never based in QM in the first places. A dude made a chart up based on his subjective experience. Which is what you are pointing towards. Humans create their own reality, based in their emotionally coloured worldview. But that's not the nature of reality, that's just affective realism.
You purposefully skipped over the area that has the answer you’re looking for. Your trying to compare 3D frequencies to a 5D concept and it’s causing you confusion. Quantum theory (which you skipped) understands that waves (not particles like electrons) are the smallest unit. (You could technically go one step further to ether, but that’s another conversation). These waves represent every possible state that a particle can be in our observable 3D world. These waves have frequencies. And the frequencies of those waves will result in a different set of probable outcomes depending on the initial wave frequency. So it is that frequency you are trying to change and elevate. So that you resulting experience in the 3D will be more likely to have a positive outcome (ie. Personal growth and strength). I suggest looking at the double slit experiment to at least get you started at looking in the right area so you can understand the concept. Right now I only see you trashing a concept from a position of lack of understanding. I empathize because I was just like you not long ago. But now my understanding has grown. And the further you dig. The more it actually makes sense.
where should I start ... I purposely skipped nothing, but I'll be happy to help the quantum confusion here: 1. David Hawkins didn't speak of QM in his theory. It's all based in his interpretation of kinesiology. 2. Quantum objects behave like particles AND waves. Not either or. How depends on the interaction. 3. Waves are not a unit. Waves are a process. Particles are a unit. So which is it now? 3. Good luck fining the initial wave FQ in a causally correlated billion year old universe ... 4. Quantum effects vanish at macro scale because there is too much interference. To achieve quantum effects - amongst other things - you need to isolate particles/waves perfectly: meaning no outside interference. Which btw is why the double slit experiment does what it does. By adding an observer (which is not really QM terminology, but rather "measurement" which by definition is an interaction) you interfere with the environment resulting in decoherence, disturbing the wave like behaviour. What seems like an passive act at macro scale (observing) is a collision of (usually) photons with other particles/waves at quantum scale. 5. At macro scales everything interacts with everything, that's why we get classical physics at macro scale. The nature of the universe might be quantum, yes. But EXACTLY because of the quantum nature, we get classical physics at macro scale. Emotions are part of that scale, part of biology and psyche. No QM needed. I suggest looking into QM when speaking about QM. I empathise because not too long ago I didn't understand most of this. But now my understanding has grown. And the further you dig. The more it actually makes sense ... mocking aside: If you really want to understand QM better, please dig deeper than just a few YT videos that all repeat the same old confused paradigm of the Copenhagen interpretation, which is not even the only QM theory.
@@JustWojtek I tried to keep it simple and not get into a discussion of quantum theory, as obviously a comments section isn’t a place for that. I was trying to give you an example that directly applied to what you were referring to. In the double slit experiment you have two states… the wave (this state is ultimately represented with frequency. That’s how waves are measured). The wave has all possible outcomes based on that frequency contained within it. Our reality (and hence our interpretation of the event in our world) only occurs when we convert that wave into a particle through our observation of the event. So applying this phenomenon to what you are speaking of with negative emotions being lower vibration. Then it will effect your reality accordingly. So if your vibrational state is low (negative energy) then the probability of that initial wave structure being manifest into our observable world (3D/particle) will most likely match that vibrational state in which it originated. And you will see the world from that view. Raise your vibrational state and learn to master the effects of negative emotions and you will start to see the world from a new perspective. Oversimplistic example here…. It’s pouring rain outside Negative perspective - I’m going to get all wet and ruin my shoes Positive perspective- we needed the rain, my garden will grow better. Same event. But one observer sees it as a negative and one sees it as a positive. Your vibrational state greatly influences how you interpret events throughout life. One last thing. Do I agree with the chart you were looking at. Yes and know. How was it measured? Why are so many important emotions missing off it? I can’t say I give it validity for its content. But I believe there is validity for the overall concept it’s trying to convey.
controversially this answer was clearer and simpler than the initial one. still though, thank you for following up and engaging in a conversation. In my understanding it is right to think about the particle/wave as probability distribution (a wave of probability, which is a mathematical abstraction not an actual wave). The "observation" part is messy, though ⤵️ "We" are not needed to collapse the wave function, a (purely mechanical) sensor is enough. The wave function does not collapse through interpretation, observation or mind stuff, it collapses through interaction and intervention. What seems passive on the macro scale (e.g. seeing) is a super active process on quantum scale (photons shooting and jumping around). Our reality does not occur by collapsing the wave function, but by interpreting the world we encounter through our senses. No QM needed. Everything you mentioning in the paragraph afterwards - please think about this for a moment - does not need QM, it only needs common sense and an average level of introspection. Yes, emotions colour the way we perceive the world. I agree. Emotions are a physical sensation. Feelings are an appearance in consciousness. Neither of those realms needs particle physics to make sense or be understood.
@@JustWojtek that was my fear of using the oversimplified example is the message may get lost. I think it may have a bit. But no matter. And you’re correct on multiple things you said. As far as the real observer vs sensor collapsing the particle. I’m not going to go on on this much more. You are correct. What Im saying is the the probability outcome of a particular Manifestation can be influenced by the resonant frequency of the state of the initial wave. I also used an initial oversimplified example of the double slit experiment. Just to aid in attempting to have you see things from a potential new perspective (that our reality we see has its origins derived from a set of possibility contained within a wave/vibrational state. The ether of vibrational energy is not measured in brain waves or other measurements that I’m aware of. It’s the resonant frequency we emit and receive with the “universe”, higher dimensions, whatever u want to call it. We can’t see these other dimensions like the 4th or 5th despite them being all around us. Be cause the exist at a frequency we don’t perceive. So the answer your looking for with measuring frequency doesn’t exist and is exactly why you don’t look at brain waves as a measurement of our vibrational frequency. It’s a “prove to me their is a god” type of question. You can’t answer. You can only dig and learn and in the end believe in what feels right for you. But in the end know one knows what going on this blue rock. We just believe what feels right for ourselves. And I can truly say having a “higher vibrational state” on a fairly constant basis has been a transformational process for me personally. And you are obviously very knowledgeable and not making fly by night comments here. Yet your view is different and so is your path. And that’s fine too. There is no right or wrong here. (No one really knows). The only right there is, is what’s right for you. That’s all you control in the end.
You know, instead of inferring what I think or believe, I would have preferred you'd simply ask me. Like so many here, I am pretty sure you take me to be someone, I'm not. And you judge me by one video you might have not even watched in it's entirety. That - in itself - is a statement, too. Again, no QM needed.
Apparently he holds multiple titles from multiple institutions and countries nobody knows about until someone points out that it’s not a real title, which is when someone finds a new title he has always had. Apparently. But what do I know.
The level of editing and engagement in this is absolutely next level 🤯. I can't even imagine how long this took haha. Amazing job Wojtek
too long, haha 🙈 thanks buddy!
You got everything, storytelling, editing, delivery... You deserve more reach !
thanks - I’ll give it my all this year to get it 🙏
Hey, I saw your post, and I think you're right. I'm a scientist who has studied biofield sciences, which is the scientific term for bioenergies. Initially, I was skeptical about what you were saying because it seemed like an attempt to disprove. However, I also believe that the Emotional Frequency Chart is flawed, not because emotions are unrelated to frequencies-I believe they are-but because the chart is overly simplistic and fails to accurately represent reality.
In terms of measurable science, research in neuroscience and psychology has demonstrated that emotions can be associated with specific patterns of brain activity, as measured by EEG (electroencephalography). Different emotional states can lead to distinct patterns of brain waves, which indeed have measurable frequencies. For instance, certain types of meditation aimed at inducing states of love and compassion have been associated with gamma wave activity in the brain, a pattern of high-frequency brain waves.
The issue is that there's a lot of misinformation out there, including many charlatans and so-called spiritual gurus who lack a genuine understanding of science or how the body functions. I do believe in the energetic components of emotions and that emotions are related to frequencies, which is evident in music and how different compositions can elicit varied emotional responses. However, emotions are highly complex physiological responses that cannot be overly simplified and that are still under research.
You might find this article interesting: A Preliminary Investigation on Frequency Dependent Cues for Human Emotions.
I value this kind of elaborate and nuanced opinion, thank you and thanks for the article recommendation! I will definitely give it a read.
Maybe a little addendum: I absolutley see that EEG or even fMRI show recognisable and somewhat predictable patterns during emotion processing (or construction?). I think many people outside the field are overestimating the "patternness" of those patterns. I also have the (totally unscientific) assumption that the closer we zoom in and the harder we try to separate noise from pattern the blurrier the picture will become. Clear borders and clean categories are not natures way.
What do you think?
The editing is just phenomenal. I can't even express how impressed I am by this video. I really believe that if you just keep going your channel will grow. I certainly hope it will, because this is incredible content.
Thanks buddy! I appreciate it and I hope so, too. I will try a few more things this year and see what that does for the channel
I really enjoyed your humor, compassion, and research into this video. Thank you :)
uff, thank you! I hope that’s not meant sarcastic 😄
This was phenomenally made. Thank you for sharing
Glad you enjoyed it! 🙏
I was ill for many years, Neurologist told me to get a wheel chair and apply for disability. I decided to see a naturopath and through applied kinesiology I found out what was wrong. I went from every small movement my body made being painful to full recovery within 3 weeks!!! Through the testing I discovered that emotions you dismiss or ignore affect you physically sooner or later. I'm more in tune with my body after learning applied kinesiology. My husband having a scientific mind doesn't believe in it even though he saw my transformation, he has no explanation other than I was misdiagnosed, but if it was you who was in so much pain with no help from doctors, and then you try something new and it works, you may too believe. I do agree we should embrace all emotions the same but some emotions do drain you and some make you glad you are alive. I think this is why some are assigned a number on a vibration scale. By the way, my naturopath is now retired and she began this work way before David Hawkins.
I'm happy to hear this worked for you. I don't dismiss all these approaches as tools, but that does not meant that there is no space for improvement. What I criticise mostly in this video is accepting and adapting system like this as Truth at the prise of dismissing any other world view.
Your videos are sooo good, why, why, why don’t they have more views
Wow. Just, wow. You should approach Netflix/HBO and get a show dude. Simply a fantastic video. I totally (vibrate), sorry resonate, with your conclusion and feelings man. Such a good exploration here and brilliant structure and aesthetic. Awesome. 🙌🏽
You don’t happen to know anyone who works with these ominous companies? 😆 thanks buddy, I’m happy you enjoyed watching it 🙏
I actually make videos about frequencies 😆 However, in a singing sense with a frequency analyzer to measure the actual Hz of tones and how to change the overtones in ones voice. I just found this rainbow chart and was like "oh, that's a lot of B.S." right away. I am totally with you when you say that all emotions have value and importance. However, don't hate on meditation (21:57) 😁 Just because New Age folks put it into a weird context, maybe misinterpreting the greatest advantages of meditation, does not mean it's not super helpful for emotional development when done with adequate intention and goals. Anyhow: Thumbs up for your video. Great work!
It's funny and interesting how we find our ways to the same chart be completely different means, haha! Also: not hating on meditation at all, never would. I'm a passionate meditator and proponent myself.
The issue with New Agers is they have no idea what they're talking about. I call them "hippie spiritualists".
As a pure mathematics / physics degree holder, emotional frequencies are very real. Your body is a toroidal electromagnetic field. Electromagnetic energy can be mapped, visually, through spectral analysis on the human biofield.
High frequency, short wavelength auras (light) is "violet". Low frequency, long wavelength light is "red".
As an electromagnetic being (which is an intrinsic property of all that exists), each thought you have is emitted both from your cranial brain in the form of an electrical impulse, together with a magnetic impulse, generated by your heartmind (which has more neurons and synapse junctions than your cranial brain).
These electric + magnetic impulses (thoughts) converge in the Quantum Field, as a lightwave of a certain frequency, oscillating at rate proportional to the EMOTION with which you chose to emit it, (given that you're a conscious being.)
The emotional frequency chart he is referring to is scientifically correct, as they are aligning the color of the biofield (or aura, which is controlled through conscious intent and emotional maturity / immaturity) with the electromagnetic spectrum (as are found in the results of a recently published study conducted by MIT.)
Love and gratitude emit powerful electromagnetic energy, while anger, grief, sadness, etc... emit a very weak electromagnetic field.
Frequency is a word used to describe waveform. Wave mechanics are physical properties that are affected through thoughts and emotions via quantum mechanics.
You are a Frog sitting in the pond of cosmic vibration, where your very thoughts affect all of existence, exactly the same as a propagating wave.
ua-cam.com/video/CCR5J1YYCiE/v-deo.htmlsi=vURKNdqBvWx2zLeL
Hope this helps.
I didn't think he was hating on meditation, he used it to point out the error of the "high vibe" people.
Notice that meditation and connection were found to be a LOW frequency, which I feel corroborates what the video is saying about this whole "raise your vibration" stuff as a load of harmful BS being pushed by fake gurus who wish to have a way to elevate themselves into egoistic superiority.
Something I have felt/been saying for a long time: Schumann (earth) resonance is low, and that is one of the best known healing frequencies. High frequencies cause things to shatter apart, low frequencies are restful and hamonising.
I notice it with sound too..a low note is more calming and soothing to the cells than a high pitched note.
Balance is key. We must be whole. We must not reject our Self.
A lot of this "high vibration" stuff seems to be about rejecting aspects of the Self that make us uncomfortable, instead of understanding and harmonising. No one ever processed their grief by putting on a happy face...and essentially that seems to be what the "raise your vibration" people are preaching: "Bottle it up, put on a happy face, pretend everything is great," and as most people are aware (or were until a few years ago), bottling up negative emotion is a brilliant way to give yourself an emotional/mental breakdown.
I find myself in agreement to many of the sentiments expressed in the video.
Such a quality video, thanks! We need to get you more subs!!
thanks for this video! superb editing and obviously you put a lot of effort in creating..I just hope there were no cursing or foul words, it is so nice to show to kids to and to school so they will be more aware..I'll wait for your rated G videos , I am sure that will be awesome too!
thank you! I'll think about it, although I'm not sure I'll be able to bottle up all that passion 😅
Great production!
Found your video trying to find anyone talking about the contradiction of all these frequencies in different context. I actually like to take from different areas and also don't mind some degree of spiritual context. But my pet peeves is when people mix up the terminology trying to justify their beliefs with 'science'.
And it saddens me when good books are tarnished with these contradictions.
I don't mind labeling some states as low or high just in laymen terms for quick explanation. But to build whole theory about it and not even double check the info is a whole another issue.
For example, I was reading Joe Dispenza's Becoming Supernatural. Don't know if you know about it and what you think about it if you do. But I actually like his more psychological/self-improvement part of the books (even though I don't like this field much in general). For me, in general he is quite motivational.
But in this book in spans of just 2 chapters he puts a similar emotional frequency chart and then in one or two chapters a brainwaves chart (alpha, beta, etc).
I'm a bit disappointed, cause it looks like this book is not thoroughly checked. More like a compilation from his previous books plus other existing theories and suggestions. Maybe intention was great, but...
I set the book aside for now cause I need to calm down 😅
I’ve actually looked into it! And I think you are spot on - he is a motivator and his self-help tactics are not totally off. But the science in this case can not be more then a metaphor or allegory. I’ve looked into several of the claims and it’s safe to say, that almost non of the “scientific” claims hold. What’s more, spirituality does not need science to be validated. The mere fact of being alive makes it relevant enough to be worth examining - in my opinion.
The issue with New Agers is they have no idea what they're talking about. I call them "hippie spiritualists".
As a pure mathematics / physics degree holder, emotional frequencies are very real. Your body is a toroidal electromagnetic field. Electromagnetic energy can be mapped, visually, through spectral analysis on the human biofield.
High frequency, short wavelength auras (light) is "violet". Low frequency, long wavelength light is "red".
As an electromagnetic being (which is an intrinsic property of all that exists), each thought you have is emitted both from your cranial brain in the form of an electrical impulse, together with a magnetic impulse, generated by your heartmind (which has more neurons and synapse junctions than your cranial brain).
These electric + magnetic impulses (thoughts) converge in the Quantum Field, as a lightwave of a certain frequency, oscillating at rate proportional to the EMOTION with which you chose to emit it, (given that you're a conscious being.)
The emotional frequency chart he is referring to is scientifically correct, as they are aligning the color of the biofield (or aura, which is controlled through conscious intent and emotional maturity / immaturity) with the electromagnetic spectrum (as are found in the results of a recently published study conducted by MIT.)
Love and gratitude emit powerful electromagnetic energy, while anger, grief, sadness, etc... emit a very weak electromagnetic field.
Frequency is a word used to describe waveform. Wave mechanics are physical properties that are affected through thoughts and emotions via quantum mechanics.
You are a Frog sitting in the pond of cosmic vibration, where your very thoughts affect all of existence, exactly the same as a propagating wave.
ua-cam.com/video/CCR5J1YYCiE/v-deo.htmlsi=vURKNdqBvWx2zLeL
Hope this helps.
As my comment was really long, and most won't read all that...the key take away:
There is a lot in science and spritual healing to suggest that high frequencies are bad news. For example, let us look at light frequencies. It is now pretty widely accepted that some light frequencies are bad for us (blue light) and that other light frequencies have positive effects on us (red, yellow). So, what if we look at their respective frequencies? Well, the frequency of blue light is 620-670 Thz, whereas the frequencies of red and yellow light are 400-480 and 510-530 respectively, far lower than blue light. So, the positive, healing frequencies are lower than the damaging frequencies...this suggests that to "raise our vibration" is the opposite of what we need to do for healing and enlightenment.
Your videography is great. And thanks for sharing the results of your search. Finding how these vibrational frequencies were measured is challenging indeed. However, there is one element you seem to overlook. All emotions are necessary and important when they are related to actual events, they measure whether the probability of a need to be met goes up or down. However, there are emotional states that do not respond to the current events but to those far in the past. In these situations, the approach you refer to works quite well. I agree that it is still necessary to understand why. Still, observation of the phenomena usually precedes their understanding.
I think I agree with that.
This was a seriously good video. You voiced a lot of my own critique. You didn't pick up on Scientology getting a mention on David Hawkins wiki page, it would be nice to know what the connection is there as I don't read German (Scientology, if you don't know, is a very shady organisation with a lot of pseudo-scientific claims)...I will do some of my own digging on connections between Hawkins, Scientology, and Applied Kinesiology (this didn't take long, a quick google has found that many of Hawkins ideas originated in the cult of Scientology, including his Map of Conciousness. If you're not familiar with Scientology, it's a pseudo-scientific cult which preys on the vulnerable and weak minded).
I've been a Reiki Master since I was 18 years old (not that it means anything much, just to give a little context on me) which is about 20 years now, and since the moment these "high vibration" people appeared on the scene I have been saying it doesn't feel right. These people don't seem to have much experience of their own and seem to just regurgitate things they hear other people say, and they seem full of ego and materialism.
High vibrations aren't always good. Low vibrations are peaceful, high fibrations are often anxiety inducing. The schumann resonance, the earth frequency, is a low vibration...and for a long time some circles consider this to be the most healing frequency there is. The higher a frequency is, the more interference it causes with matter and the physical state. The lower a frequency, the less interference it causes.
There is a lot in science and spritual healing to suggest that high frequencies are bad news. For example, let us look at light frequencies. It is now pretty widely accepted that some light frequencies are bad for us (blue light) and that other light frequencies have positive effects on us (red, yellow). So, what if we look at their respective frequencies? Well, the frequency of blue light is 620-670 Thz, whereas the frequencies of red and yellow light are 400-480 and 510-530 respectively, far lower than blue light. So, the positive, healing frequencies are lower than the damaging frequencies...this suggests that to "raise our vibration" is the opposite of what we need to do for healing and enlightenment.
These "high frequency" people are fake gurus and false prophets, nothing more.
This is awesome, thank you for making this!
happy to hear! Thank you for watching 🙏
Good Video, people who are in search of the truth should be open to all information and not be led by their emotions only.
Preach! 🙏
The issue with New Agers is they have no idea what they're talking about. I call them "hippie spiritualists".
As a pure mathematics / physics degree holder, emotional frequencies are very real. Your body is a toroidal electromagnetic field. Electromagnetic energy can be mapped, visually, through spectral analysis on the human biofield.
High frequency, short wavelength auras (light) is "violet". Low frequency, long wavelength light is "red".
As an electromagnetic being (which is an intrinsic property of all that exists), each thought you have is emitted both from your cranial brain in the form of an electrical impulse, together with a magnetic impulse, generated by your heartmind (which has more neurons and synapse junctions than your cranial brain).
These electric + magnetic impulses (thoughts) converge in the Quantum Field, as a lightwave of a certain frequency, oscillating at rate proportional to the EMOTION with which you chose to emit it, (given that you're a conscious being.)
The emotional frequency chart he is referring to is scientifically correct, as they are aligning the color of the biofield (or aura, which is controlled through conscious intent and emotional maturity / immaturity) with the electromagnetic spectrum (as are found in the results of a recently published study conducted by MIT.)
Love and gratitude emit powerful electromagnetic energy, while anger, grief, sadness, etc... emit a very weak electromagnetic field.
Frequency is a word used to describe waveform. Wave mechanics are physical properties that are affected through thoughts and emotions via quantum mechanics.
You are a Frog sitting in the pond of cosmic vibration, where your very thoughts affect all of existence, exactly the same as a propagating wave.
ua-cam.com/video/CCR5J1YYCiE/v-deo.htmlsi=vURKNdqBvWx2zLeL
Hope this helps.
Anytime I hear about someone using a word "frequency" I know they know nothing about actual spirituality.
"my spirituality vibes higher than yours" 🤦🏻♂️
@@JustWojtek I don't take it as them thinking that they are better or higher than me. It's more like nonsense talk indicating they are spiritual in name only.
By that I mean I realize that I'm better than them :D
I believe in the power of chioce! knowing your emotions which we are taught not to do as children, if you get to excited you will be shut down, which then can lead to frustration, boy what a ride and your only 3 years old life is an emotional rollacoster the trick is to know yourself which the chart helps you do and choose how do you want to feel or how is the situation making you feel its all in you! Your choice 🎉
How exactly are we "not taught to know our emotions" ?
wholeness is the ultimate goal of dharma in us life. But how do you want to feel? I believe this chart helps us to embrace all frequencies . Because a lot of people do not know how to feel anymore and only use there mind and forget the connection 💜 I love you perspective on this topic. Thank you! I see you
mind is the only dharma.
@@JustWojtekyou are pretty lost my dude
I'll be as lost as you want me to be@@theoneeyedghoulofdreams1557
no people make drama 😂@@JustWojtek
they do indeed! 😄@@kellyjegerslife
I dont know if you are religious but i just want to give you a rabbit hole to explore. In the bible God does hints at frequencies of things and how it can effect your health and mental wellbeing when He speaks about materials (for clothing) and which materials not to pair together as it cancels each other out. The demonic driven people also know how frequencies work. At some stage they changed the frequency of mainstream music to mess with peoples health and mental well being. Be particularly careful of music that have the E flat note in them. Another example is the 2024 olympics with their bell. We all know how openly demonic this years olympics was. They were fine tuning that bell several times to get it to make a very specific sound frequency, namely E flat. All of this information is freely availble on the internet for you to look up.
I very much appreciate the end where he told people to go f themselves 😂
gotta keep it real 🤷🏻♂️
It’s an evolution ❤ thank you for your research 🙌🏽
I’m analytical and I love science… I’ve tested dowsing on emotions and when someone is thinking a positive emotion the rods can pick up the energy from a distance. You then tell the person to think “sad” thought and the rods can’t sense your “aura?” “Field” till you get closer … it’s cool try it out 💗 and check out joe dispenza there’s a ton of science in his work 💗
JD's research seems to mostly contain claims of brain scans nobody has ever seen and a very murky and misleading interpretation of QM ...
I think you talk about something you dont undersstand vibration and emotions and you say lot of bullshit . i agree allmost people talking about the link between emotion and vibration and say bullshit and all things you search on google are bullshit like vibration color or raising vibration process and pp uses this bullshit for make money and its not honnest im aggree to this with that part. but man your lost your knowledge about how emotions work in brain with vibrations is sad for pretend its doesnt exist... my english is not perfect but if you interresed to know why emotions and vibrations vork together im ok to have a internet phonecall for speak about it dont miss evrithing vibe in univers
you clearly did not watch the full video nor any other of the videos I put out about emotions. if you want to complain at least put the effort in of sitting through one video.
It seems you are soooo triggered by those charts! Fine, those are not scientific at all, guy who invented them was a narcissistic and there are people who claims to be better cause they have higher frequency, which is not nice thing to do. I have found a lot of resources online which say when you are at love level you love all the people and wish them all the best and have genuine compassion to everyone. If you think you are better and think others are worse, maybe you are not really on the love level. Maybe there is no 'love level'. Maybe there are no emotional frequencies. You said it is a tool, you are right! You said it's not a good tool - you are wrong. Maybe you just don't know how to use this tool or maybe the tool is not for you. It's fine anyway. Question is: do you want to use this tool or do you just want to mock it and prevent everyone from using it cause 'you know better and just told the truth about this tool'? It seems like the second option
Everyone is different and will have different paths. It's good that you did some research, it's good that you said your opinion. But maybe your research wasn't enough. And also it seems you had a really strong emotions against this chart. I can just feel how much you are triggered by this chart. What did it do to you? Did you believe in something just to be disappointed? So then you are trying to avoid to be believer just to no be disappointed again? And just to pause - all emotions matter is a popular opinion. Did you think that being at the love level means you never feel anger? I do feel anger towards you for example at the moment. And this is fine, all emotions have its purpose. What matters is not to stay on this anger emotion. Feel anger and let it go. And stay on love, on joy. Feel it, not think it. Spirituality it's not something you know, it's something you feel. Some people believe in Jesus and god and some in emotional frequency. As with every belief - everyone should have some distance and feel it for themselves, test it. Take the part you like, leave the rest, create your own unique spirituality which suppose to serve you and only you. Don't take all, don't go into dogmatism. Nothing ever will be objective truth. Have some decency and change the title to my truth. If you insist that what you say in the video is objective truth - how much do you differ from the narcissistic guy ('ohh look at me, listen to me, I know everything') who created emotional chart. Ever heard of projecting? 😏 in order to show your opinion you don't need to be mocking those charts and believers soooo much. You don't. You seem like a guy who can actually read this comment and even reply - so I am curious what the reply will be. Or maybe you won't reply or read it. Either way is fine. All good to you.
thank you for taking the time to write this comment. We might actually have more in common, than you think. Keep in mind, that this is just a YT video and not really a comprehensive representation of my opinion.
And yes, that chart annoys the eff out of me 😂 but I’ve never said that I disregarded spirituality. Quite the contrary.
yeah i can relate to this commenter, i feel liek even if the science about the emotional frequencies is debunked or whatever the case. i think i suffer from low emotional intelligence and teh chart helps me identify my emotion and not only that i feel liek im literally hackign my brain to think more positively because the obvious concept is that if youre happier you will have postive effects onto yourself and the people around you, btu f you're negative you will have negative effects on yourself and the people around you. and i dont think science is necessarily mandatory to figure that out xD so yeah i guess when i came to find the chart it was through learning about manifesting and loa but in the end its really helped me understand my emotions and hack myself into more positive thinking.
Watch the double slit link I gave and you will see the reality we manifest (ie creat for ourselves) originates from the waves. Waves contain all option probabilities and are manifested into reality only when they are observed. The frequency state of the individual will create different observable outcomes for the observer (ie different realities). You chose how you see the world. And having a higher emotional frequency leads to a more positive observable outcome. Hope this makes sense to you? I think the simple experiment link I gave may give you a new perspective. It has nothing to do with brain waves etc. that’s apples and oranges
thank you for the link, I left a through response. but let me use this chance to say, that you seemed confused by what is happening in this video: I don't claim that it's either or. I just investigated where this chart and theory is coming from. And the answer is not collective consciousness and quantum physics, but David Hawking's and applied kinesiology. Adding any QM stuff to the picture comes after the fact, that this was never based in QM in the first places. A dude made a chart up based on his subjective experience.
Which is what you are pointing towards. Humans create their own reality, based in their emotionally coloured worldview. But that's not the nature of reality, that's just affective realism.
You purposefully skipped over the area that has the answer you’re looking for. Your trying to compare 3D frequencies to a 5D concept and it’s causing you confusion. Quantum theory (which you skipped) understands that waves (not particles like electrons) are the smallest unit. (You could technically go one step further to ether, but that’s another conversation). These waves represent every possible state that a particle can be in our observable 3D world. These waves have frequencies. And the frequencies of those waves will result in a different set of probable outcomes depending on the initial wave frequency. So it is that frequency you are trying to change and elevate. So that you resulting experience in the 3D will be more likely to have a positive outcome (ie. Personal growth and strength). I suggest looking at the double slit experiment to at least get you started at looking in the right area so you can understand the concept. Right now I only see you trashing a concept from a position of lack of understanding. I empathize because I was just like you not long ago. But now my understanding has grown. And the further you dig. The more it actually makes sense.
where should I start ... I purposely skipped nothing, but I'll be happy to help the quantum confusion here:
1. David Hawkins didn't speak of QM in his theory. It's all based in his interpretation of kinesiology.
2. Quantum objects behave like particles AND waves. Not either or. How depends on the interaction.
3. Waves are not a unit. Waves are a process. Particles are a unit. So which is it now?
3. Good luck fining the initial wave FQ in a causally correlated billion year old universe ...
4. Quantum effects vanish at macro scale because there is too much interference. To achieve quantum effects - amongst other things - you need to isolate particles/waves perfectly: meaning no outside interference. Which btw is why the double slit experiment does what it does. By adding an observer (which is not really QM terminology, but rather "measurement" which by definition is an interaction) you interfere with the environment resulting in decoherence, disturbing the wave like behaviour. What seems like an passive act at macro scale (observing) is a collision of (usually) photons with other particles/waves at quantum scale.
5. At macro scales everything interacts with everything, that's why we get classical physics at macro scale. The nature of the universe might be quantum, yes. But EXACTLY because of the quantum nature, we get classical physics at macro scale. Emotions are part of that scale, part of biology and psyche. No QM needed.
I suggest looking into QM when speaking about QM. I empathise because not too long ago I didn't understand most of this. But now my understanding has grown. And the further you dig. The more it actually makes sense ... mocking aside:
If you really want to understand QM better, please dig deeper than just a few YT videos that all repeat the same old confused paradigm of the Copenhagen interpretation, which is not even the only QM theory.
@@JustWojtek I tried to keep it simple and not get into a discussion of quantum theory, as obviously a comments section isn’t a place for that. I was trying to give you an example that directly applied to what you were referring to. In the double slit experiment you have two states… the wave (this state is ultimately represented with frequency. That’s how waves are measured). The wave has all possible outcomes based on that frequency contained within it. Our reality (and hence our interpretation of the event in our world) only occurs when we convert that wave into a particle through our observation of the event.
So applying this phenomenon to what you are speaking of with negative emotions being lower vibration. Then it will effect your reality accordingly. So if your vibrational state is low (negative energy) then the probability of that initial wave structure being manifest into our observable world (3D/particle) will most likely match that vibrational state in which it originated. And you will see the world from that view. Raise your vibrational state and learn to master the effects of negative emotions and you will start to see the world from a new perspective.
Oversimplistic example here….
It’s pouring rain outside
Negative perspective - I’m going to get all wet and ruin my shoes
Positive perspective- we needed the rain, my garden will grow better.
Same event. But one observer sees it as a negative and one sees it as a positive. Your vibrational state greatly influences how you interpret events throughout life.
One last thing. Do I agree with the chart you were looking at. Yes and know. How was it measured? Why are so many important emotions missing off it? I can’t say I give it validity for its content. But I believe there is validity for the overall concept it’s trying to convey.
controversially this answer was clearer and simpler than the initial one. still though, thank you for following up and engaging in a conversation. In my understanding it is right to think about the particle/wave as probability distribution (a wave of probability, which is a mathematical abstraction not an actual wave). The "observation" part is messy, though ⤵️
"We" are not needed to collapse the wave function, a (purely mechanical) sensor is enough. The wave function does not collapse through interpretation, observation or mind stuff, it collapses through interaction and intervention. What seems passive on the macro scale (e.g. seeing) is a super active process on quantum scale (photons shooting and jumping around). Our reality does not occur by collapsing the wave function, but by interpreting the world we encounter through our senses. No QM needed.
Everything you mentioning in the paragraph afterwards - please think about this for a moment - does not need QM, it only needs common sense and an average level of introspection. Yes, emotions colour the way we perceive the world. I agree. Emotions are a physical sensation. Feelings are an appearance in consciousness. Neither of those realms needs particle physics to make sense or be understood.
@@JustWojtek that was my fear of using the oversimplified example is the message may get lost. I think it may have a bit. But no matter. And you’re correct on multiple things you said. As far as the real observer vs sensor collapsing the particle. I’m not going to go on on this much more. You are correct. What Im saying is the the probability outcome of a particular Manifestation can be influenced by the resonant frequency of the state of the initial wave. I also used an initial oversimplified example of the double slit experiment. Just to aid in attempting to have you see things from a potential new perspective (that our reality we see has its origins derived from a set of possibility contained within a wave/vibrational state. The ether of vibrational energy is not measured in brain waves or other measurements that I’m aware of. It’s the resonant frequency we emit and receive with the “universe”, higher dimensions, whatever u want to call it. We can’t see these other dimensions like the 4th or 5th despite them being all around us. Be cause the exist at a frequency we don’t perceive. So the answer your looking for with measuring frequency doesn’t exist and is exactly why you don’t look at brain waves as a measurement of our vibrational frequency. It’s a “prove to me their is a god” type of question. You can’t answer. You can only dig and learn and in the end believe in what feels right for you. But in the end know one knows what going on this blue rock. We just believe what feels right for ourselves. And I can truly say having a “higher vibrational state” on a fairly constant basis has been a transformational process for me personally. And you are obviously very knowledgeable and not making fly by night comments here. Yet your view is different and so is your path. And that’s fine too. There is no right or wrong here. (No one really knows). The only right there is, is what’s right for you. That’s all you control in the end.
You know, instead of inferring what I think or believe, I would have preferred you'd simply ask me. Like so many here, I am pretty sure you take me to be someone, I'm not. And you judge me by one video you might have not even watched in it's entirety. That - in itself - is a statement, too. Again, no QM needed.
dr hawkims ahs phd in sociology from northwestern
Apparently he holds multiple titles from multiple institutions and countries nobody knows about until someone points out that it’s not a real title, which is when someone finds a new title he has always had. Apparently. But what do I know.
Your hands move too much, it's like your blowing wind in my face
Fwwooshh fwoosshh
Must feel refreshing! You’re welcome 😉