Tamron 28-75mm f2.8 for Sony - JUST BUY IT

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 13 лип 2024
  • Tamron 28-75mm f2.8: bhpho.to/2CQIZSm amzn.to/2UWbl5e
    Equipment Used:
    Camera➡ bhpho.to/2CNnl02 amzn.to/2nxXYcl
    Long Lens➡ bhpho.to/2Jj0Eoz amzn.to/2wH9zw9
    Medium Lens➡ bhpho.to/2CQIZSm amzn.to/2TjZVHS
    Wide Lens➡ bhpho.to/2CSATbX amzn.to/2TmQW90
    Microphone➡ bhpho.to/2fzF8BF amzn.to/2jujjT9
    Tripod➡ bhpho.to/2PhBf4f amzn.to/2jC34B2
    Action Camera➡ bhpho.to/2xhUJO0 amzn.to/2yf8l9V
    Dave's Camera Courses:
    www.learningvideo.com/store/
    Royalty free music by www.premiumbeat.com/?...
    Shop Amazon with Dave's Affiliate Link: amzn.to/2RCAPCJ
    ➥ Dave's 2nd UA-cam Channel:
    / 3dlistings
    ➥ Twitter: / dugdale
    ➥ Instagram: / davedugdale
    ➥ Facebook: / learningdslrvideo
    ➥ Flickr: www.flickr.com/photos/davedugd...
    I bought this lens late compared to everyone else, I should have pre-ordered it when it was announced because this lens is pretty amazing especially for the price. My advice if you don't own it yet, just buy it.
    Tamron should have put a G master on it, because this acts like a Sony lens, you can update the firmware within the Sony camera body, it has fast AF, it has eye AF, and I had to test it but all the lens correction happens right inside the body, not only for stills via Lightroom but for video files too, the barrel distortion correction works, the shading correction works and I couldn't verify the CA correction works because I couldn't find any.
    The two things I dislike about the lens are the lens hood, it was taking me way too long to figure out how to put it on, most lens hoods you keep turning it while you are thinking about something else, but this one I had to put two labels on it. Also it is taking me sometime over the past month trying to figure out which barrel is for zoom and which for focus. The bokeh balls have concentric rings.
    My trio of zooms have changed recently, when this happens I like to see which lens to use when I have overlap, for instance when shooting around 70mm do I use my Sony 70-200 or my new Tamron 28-75mm?
    When picking between the Tamron 28-75mm and the Sony 16-35mm when I am between 28-35mm, the Tamron won every single time, the biggest differences came when shooting wide open. The Sony 16-35mm was so bad at f4 I was like wow note to self do not use this wide open between 28-35mm.
    When picking between the Sony 70-200 and the Tamron at 70mm - 75mm, the differences were not as big. The Sony won at the higher f stops like f16 and f22 but Tamron own wide open.
    16-35mm vs 28-75mm at 28mm f22: Tamron win in center and edge
    16-35mm vs 28-75mm at 28mm f16: Tamron win in center and edge
    16-35mm vs 28-75mm at 28mm f8: Tamron tie in center and Tamron big win at edge. Video: Tamron wins at edge
    16-35mm vs 28-75mm at 28mm f4: Tamron big win center and Tamron big win at edge. Video: Tamron wins at edge
    16-35mm vs 28-75mm at 35mm f22: tie
    16-35mm vs 28-75mm at 35mm f16: tie in center, Tamron win at edge
    16-35mm vs 28-75mm at 35mm f8: Tamron win in center and edge
    16-35mm vs 28-75mm at 35mm f4: Tamron big win in center and edge. Tamron f2.8 is better than Sony at f4
    Colors looked similar for Tamron and wide Sony
    70-200mm vs 28-75mm at 72mm f22: slight win to Sony
    70-200mm vs 28-75mm at 72mm f16: slight win to Sony
    70-200mm vs 28-75mm at 72mm f8: tie in center, Tamron wins at edges. Video is a tie.
    70-200mm vs 28-75mm at 72mm f4: tie in center, Tamron wins at edges
    70-200mm vs 28-75mm at 72mm f2.8: Tamron wins at center and edges. Video: tie, but Sony wins for vignetting.
  • Фільми й анімація

КОМЕНТАРІ • 88

  • @peshrawable
    @peshrawable 5 років тому +23

    welcome back sir to your channel , we really miss you

  • @WarriorsPhoto
    @WarriorsPhoto 5 років тому +4

    Thank you for all this information. Your reviews are thankfully short and to the point. Which is appreciated.

  • @JacobCarlson
    @JacobCarlson 5 років тому

    Thanks for the tip, Dave! Really appreciate the thorough but concise review.

  • @HarshanPushpakumara
    @HarshanPushpakumara 5 років тому +2

    I really like this short video. explains the most important points and no gimiics.. thanks..

  • @AryMozta
    @AryMozta 5 років тому

    I've been on the fence about getting this lens and your review just pushed me over. Always love your videos. Thank you, Dave!

  • @DroiMedia
    @DroiMedia 5 років тому

    awesome review, Dave! great combo of technical aspects and practical use

  • @TechLineHD
    @TechLineHD 5 років тому +4

    My go-to lens. Shot like a 1000 vids with it. Amazing quality. Would pay even a few hundred more.

  • @seankenneyfilms
    @seankenneyfilms 5 років тому +1

    Those in-camera lens corrections are awesome! I wish we could do that with every lens/ body combo. If that lens had stabilization, it would be near perfect.

  • @sed6717
    @sed6717 5 років тому

    I use it and very happy.
    For lot of my work it do the staff!

  • @ldm
    @ldm 5 років тому

    Thanks! Have you tried it next to an adapted Tamron 24-70 vc? I've heard it's not as sharp compared to the old one.

  • @ekphotography
    @ekphotography 5 років тому

    I pre ordered it!! No brainer! I love it, used it for over a year now. No regrets!

  • @TheSb1978
    @TheSb1978 5 років тому +1

    your video about d800 and 5diii got me on photography long time no see

  • @sayyar9
    @sayyar9 5 років тому

    I used the TAMRON last 5 months... simply its a BEAST and game changer..!!
    Great review Mr. Dave

  • @artmaltman
    @artmaltman 5 років тому

    Very interesting, thanks for the review. (Question) How much focus breathing? That is, do you really get 75mm at headshot range? Tamron historically has a lot of focus breathing.

  • @ThapasVlog
    @ThapasVlog 3 роки тому

    Wow amazing video I love it sir. Thanks for sharing please stay safe and healthy.

  • @tonysemenyuta6939
    @tonysemenyuta6939 5 років тому +10

    Just bought this lens about a month ago. I have to agree, this lens is the best lens for money.

  • @simba673
    @simba673 5 років тому

    I bought this lens and sold my 24-70 GM. Wide open the Tamron had better centre sharpness at all focal lengths except 28mm, where the Sony was a touch sharper. Love how light the Tamron is, makes it much easier to use on a gimbal. Also the manual focus on the Tamron is better than many Sony lenses I've used.

  • @david243121
    @david243121 5 років тому

    Thanks Dave - Question: for video, how do you feel about the MF feedback? I feel like it's SO slow when you move slow, and too fast when you move semi-fast with your hand movement. The AF works really well, but sometimes you need to MF for video - due to creative choices or w/e other reasons. Thoughts?

  • @genocideist
    @genocideist 4 роки тому +1

    Hi dave , i found my tamron kinda slow on my A7II on studio situation, when its dark its getting hard to focusing, how is it working on A7RII because im considering to get A7RII. on A7III the tamron works like butter

  • @MegaNardman
    @MegaNardman 5 років тому +1

    I have this lens, and agree on all counts with your review, it's simply brilliant. The crazy thing is that it performs even better around 50mm than either of the areas of overlap you mentioned! Also worth mentioning is that this lens has a fantastic close-focusing pseudo macro ability, and is generally par-focal (my copy, at least). It truly is a steal, even at its increased price.

  • @charruaporelmundo
    @charruaporelmundo 5 років тому +1

    I got it immediately hit the market, sold the GM and I make my mind already to build up the holy trinity with tamron, already ready to order the 17-28 2.8 :)

  • @Benkimah
    @Benkimah 5 років тому

    Hi Dave, I was certainly waiting for you to review this lens and yes it is a no brainer. Nothing to say about it, bought it as a second hand for 500$ and yet still in very good shape. Got it updated to V3. BTW I live in Morocco, no way to have a G Master, not even the nifty fifty around here ( pricy & rare ). It was so crucial for me to make the best choice and I'm in heaven i found the perfect fit for my A7III for video and photography.

  • @seandykink
    @seandykink 5 років тому

    I've been looking into switching completely to e-mount but the focus by wire system on the lenses I've used seemed not very responsive, is the manual focusing on this lens good?

  • @BasicFilmmaker
    @BasicFilmmaker 5 років тому +8

    I've never purchased or used a Tamron lens, as I always stick the with Canon glass. This gives me a lot of confidence in Tamron. If I can get the same glass and save myself $500 (replacing the 70-200), the for sure, unless you have an opinion on those particular models, since you were previously a Canon guy. Thanks! Your Sony videos help us all. :)

    • @MichaelMa
      @MichaelMa 5 років тому

      The bokeh is worse than any L lens though. If you can live with it the size is amazing.

    • @skakdosmer
      @skakdosmer 5 років тому

      I've owned two very good Tamron lenses and one really bad one. So always look at reviews (mind the plural!) before you buy.

  • @jokdigitalvideo
    @jokdigitalvideo 5 років тому

    Thanks a lot for that Dave .

  • @blueckaym
    @blueckaym 5 років тому

    Could you share some examples (pics) when comparing the Tamron 28-75 at the overlapping range with the 2.8/16-35GM & 2.8/70-200GM (ie the Tamron's extremes)?
    You know - pics or it didn't happen ;)
    PS: also have you noticed in some range if closing the aperture (like going from f2.8 to 4 for example) to worsen sharpness? (I think Max Yuryev
    reported it in his review, so I wonder if it's a more of a production unit issue or a design issue)

  • @seken2nun
    @seken2nun 5 років тому

    Good stuff 👍🏾

  • @ricecrash5225
    @ricecrash5225 5 років тому

    Got it when it first came out, before the price rise. Amazing lens regardless of the price increasing.

  • @YensR
    @YensR 5 років тому

    This specific lens is probably not for me (prefer more range and willing to trade speed), but VERY excited that Tamron already has compatibility figured out so well. Thank you for that quick video :)
    3:40 To make it even easier, you could use different colour labels or even use one versus two strips so you can feel the position in the dark.

  • @TonySinyaev
    @TonySinyaev 5 років тому +1

    Bought it -- fantastic
    really, just buy it (already)

  • @john-5959
    @john-5959 5 років тому

    It was a bit disappointing that this lens doesn't have the VC, while that was the reason i bought the Tamron 24-70 2.8 since no Canon version had that feature . Any thoughts of SP 24-70mm F/2.8 Di VC USD G2 vs this lens?

  • @justdoittom8431
    @justdoittom8431 5 років тому

    Yeah I was going to buy it when it first came out...couldn’t get it anywhere. It went up in price. I now own it but it has taken a while to get back at a good price...I say good price I mean it’s release price, it was alway at a good price against the g-master.
    Just want them to bring the 70-200 2.8 out now. Unless I just take the plunge and buy the g-master.

  • @ded_waso
    @ded_waso 5 років тому +1

    JUst thanks!!!

  • @42Pros
    @42Pros 5 років тому +1

    Best lens for the money in the Sony E-mount system!

  • @Venidos
    @Venidos 5 років тому

    Im confused... My country sell's the lens for FE mount but all the videos I look are E mount. So if I get this for my Sony a73 is it combatible?

  • @GaryJahman
    @GaryJahman 5 років тому

    I bought and it is my moneymaker. I even did a review on it on my own channel 😀

  • @MIMCKMedia
    @MIMCKMedia 5 років тому

    I got the Tamron and it's a killer lens. Do you recommend it to keep distortion correction on auto (video) ? Does it adjust to the specific focal range?

    • @DaveDugdaleColorado
      @DaveDugdaleColorado  5 років тому

      Yes I would leave it on auto, yes it works on all focal ranges.

  • @obayedh
    @obayedh 5 років тому

    I have bought one just before Tamron has increased the price from $800.00 to $879.00! Used it for few hours - looks like a good buy for the price BUT it's not cheap lens for sure.

  • @simonsharp9162
    @simonsharp9162 5 років тому

    But what about it's manual focus capabilities for video ??

  • @TheSanibelCaptivaGuide
    @TheSanibelCaptivaGuide 5 років тому +2

    Agreed! just buy it!

    • @david243121
      @david243121 5 років тому

      IT JUST ARIVED ON MY DOORSTEP THIS MORNING.

  • @IanWilkinson
    @IanWilkinson 5 років тому

    Completely agree with your findings, apart from mine being a tad soft wide open (but otherwise very sharp and contrasty) in the extreme corners at 28mm. And that lens hood is a pain!
    BTW why are you still on version 1.01 of the a7RIII's firmware? Version 2.10 is available now, with version 3.00 (improved AF and time-lapse expected) in April.

    • @DaveDugdaleColorado
      @DaveDugdaleColorado  5 років тому

      Oh, I should upgrade the firmware, but I am really looking forward for the 3.0 update!

  • @tonipalmen
    @tonipalmen 5 років тому

    Just sold it. It's a nice lens and sharp and all that. But the bokeh was just so so. Sometimes great, sometimes ugly. And I like to use primes anyways. Just a personal preference, nothing really wrong with the lens. Might be interested of the upcoming 17-28mm though.

  • @andivax
    @andivax 5 років тому

    what about FOCUS SPEED and focus NOISE performance? My Sigma 18-35 + MC-11 is noisy as hell!!!! )

  • @futureof...
    @futureof... 5 років тому +1

    Thanks Dave, great to know. I am even later to the party

  • @senorfrog5605
    @senorfrog5605 5 років тому

    im within my return window and would probably return my sony for the tamron.... but i opted for the 24-105 instead of the 28-75 :(

    • @senorfrog5605
      @senorfrog5605 5 років тому

      haha thanks
      keeping the 24-105 anyway, but thanks for reassurance

  • @zigomatic
    @zigomatic 5 років тому +3

    I would compare to a sony 24-105 starting in f4 with the tamron

    • @ChaoticMatters
      @ChaoticMatters 5 років тому

      Literally just got that one today! My first expensive lens lol

    • @zigomatic
      @zigomatic 5 років тому

      I have it as well and it perform well

  • @Fotogoscar
    @Fotogoscar 5 років тому

    Would you recommend it for apsc as well?

    • @DaveDugdaleColorado
      @DaveDugdaleColorado  5 років тому

      Not sure, while it will work fine on a a6400 you might find other glass that is smaller.

  • @-123
    @-123 5 років тому

    I know about this Lens) Its good lens)

  • @amandineamandine7018
    @amandineamandine7018 5 років тому

    24 105 fe or 28 75
    Please

  • @missandeiking6717
    @missandeiking6717 5 років тому

    So I just found a used Fe 24-70 gm for 1400 bucks I’m thinking new tamron 28-75 vs used 24-70 gmaster? Help what should I do?

    • @MachuPichuu
      @MachuPichuu 5 років тому

      i would say save the extra $530 and go for the tamron unless you absolutely need the most bleeding edge sharpness. Tamron is coming out with 17-28mm and 35-150mm as well in the similar price range

  • @BurtTMacklin-fbi
    @BurtTMacklin-fbi 5 років тому

    is that tamron available for the F mount?

  • @DavidRFIT
    @DavidRFIT 5 років тому

    I really just can't get past the 28mm... too narrow :( There's a huge difference from 24mm IMO.

  • @joshuavega4563
    @joshuavega4563 5 років тому +2

    tamron 17-28 f2.8 fe just came out

  • @MichaelMa
    @MichaelMa 5 років тому

    The bokeh is brokeh but it's a good lens if you're brokeh?

  • @jd_6042
    @jd_6042 5 років тому

    Funny, because it is always bothered me the way Sony and Canaan do their zooming. It’s backwards to the way a screw works.

  • @brianduchateau
    @brianduchateau 5 років тому

    does it have AF Noise?

    • @DaveDugdaleColorado
      @DaveDugdaleColorado  5 років тому

      No, nice and quiet. I have used Zeiss 12mm f2.8 and that was really noisy.

  • @92OnTV
    @92OnTV 5 років тому +1

    It gain 80$ in price about a month ago :(

  • @atalipsos9799
    @atalipsos9799 5 років тому

    Yes and No .... I use my Sony A7R3 only in the studio with prime lenses. A telelens isn´t that useful there. For travelling, I prefer my A6000 and for that camera, the Tamron is too big. But yes, it is a great lens if you can afford 2 A7(R)3 and you use one outdoor.

  • @ChaoticMatters
    @ChaoticMatters 5 років тому

    Maaan I just bought the 24 to 105 :'(

  • @mopz2093
    @mopz2093 5 років тому

    Also works as a almost macro lens

  • @leledreher
    @leledreher 5 років тому

    I felt 2:26

  • @floatingrabbit3556
    @floatingrabbit3556 5 років тому

    but i already have an 18-200mm vc

  • @ProsixOfficial
    @ProsixOfficial 5 років тому

    If you are planning to use it in clubs or dark venues don t buy it! Test first and see .. :/ otherwise a good lens

    • @over1498
      @over1498 5 років тому

      I've done plenty of night photography with it, and it's excellent. If you're really looking to photograph a club, and you really need wider aperture than 2.8, then fair enough... But that's not the lens' fault.

    • @ProsixOfficial
      @ProsixOfficial 5 років тому

      dsid1127 i don t need more than 2.8 .. i now use 16-35 f4 because the tamron is hunting focus so much and it s so difficult to get the job done ... :(

  • @frankfeng2701
    @frankfeng2701 5 років тому

    Sony users rejoice. We don't need an f2 zoom that costs 4 times and weighs twice as this gem.

  • @OlaviMurto
    @OlaviMurto 5 років тому

    Uhh, typo in the description? "you can update the firmware in a Sony battery" Lmao what? The whole second paragraph is a bit odd.

  • @kojogyan3232
    @kojogyan3232 5 років тому

    Is it me or You went on a break?

    • @DaveDugdaleColorado
      @DaveDugdaleColorado  5 років тому

      Is this the first video you have seen from me in a long time? I just published about 3 videos in the past week or so.

    • @kojogyan3232
      @kojogyan3232 5 років тому +1

      My bad.....I missed them i guess. I will keep up then