Neumann U47 vs U87

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 11 вер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 82

  • @wingtheproducer
    @wingtheproducer 2 роки тому +24

    Both are incredible sounding mics. To me the 87 sounded nice and tight and clean - but the moment I heard the 47 on your voice I was like "oh that's the one." Huge and powerful presence that made it feel like you're in the room with me.

    • @HarvinderSingh-yy8th
      @HarvinderSingh-yy8th Рік тому

      True naumann U 47 fet sounds natural and warm. U47 is kung of condenser microphones. U 87AI can't compete it.

    • @huhkgerry
      @huhkgerry 10 місяців тому

      @@HarvinderSingh-yy8th ? FET ? u meant the neumann u47 tube ? it sounds diffrent i have tried both of them in the studio

    • @huhkgerry
      @huhkgerry 10 місяців тому

      @@HarvinderSingh-yy8th Telefunken was the US distributor for Neumann microphones , so telefunken u47 is the neumman u47 , but the fet one is diffrents

  • @wizofozland
    @wizofozland 3 роки тому +5

    Shows what a fantastic mic the U87 is... and it will work on just about anything... thanks for sharing.

  • @andivax
    @andivax 3 роки тому +7

    Wow. 47 sounds awesome on your voice Christian!

  • @everthcahui
    @everthcahui Рік тому +1

    Top sounding mics, good comparison, if I had the money I would buy the U47 but what I really liked most was the song. Excellent job Christian

  • @peteralbert9805
    @peteralbert9805 3 роки тому +5

    Now this is a truly useful and professional comparison video. Thank you, Christian!

  • @juliansemler7050
    @juliansemler7050 3 роки тому +4

    cool! i needed this so thank you! u87 seems to need just a point of more gain to be really close to the 47. i made a patchwork between the two tracks in the daw and if im not looking it is really hard to notice the changes.
    Thanks for this video

    • @Christian_svedin
      @Christian_svedin  3 роки тому +3

      I measured the lufs but sure it will never be completely the same ofc. What I've noticed is that most vintage Neumanns actually sound very close to each other especially if you process them! Thanks for watching

    • @ramspencer5492
      @ramspencer5492 3 місяці тому

      Not really. The energy just sits in different frequencies. the U47 is a bit forward... Frequencies closer to the human voice... Your hearing is attuned to those. The U87 has quite a bit more highs and a little more energy in the high- lows. The U47 also has both even and of harmonics... Where as the u87 only has a transformer with mostly 2nd order harmonic saturation.
      Their both great mics... The U47 is extra special in my opinion.... It's great with man sources... Especially vocals...But maybe doesn't shine quite as brightly for some applications.... It also takes EQ, very, very well.

  • @astralaudio101
    @astralaudio101 2 роки тому +1

    The U47 has an amazing presence on your voice. I found the U87 to be harder sounding with less presence.. The U47 could suit a male baritone? Excellent review 🙏

  • @JaymeSilverstein
    @JaymeSilverstein 8 місяців тому +2

    The 47 sounds more 3D and it's midrange glows. The 87 just sits there.

  • @user-jo3np3qe8q
    @user-jo3np3qe8q 3 роки тому +1

    Thank you so much for this Comparison!

  • @valerijgransen
    @valerijgransen 10 місяців тому

    Super Content! Thank you, Christian!

  • @MusicChannel-rf5zz
    @MusicChannel-rf5zz Місяць тому

    I seem to like the 47 in this wonderful singing!

  • @JeroBagg
    @JeroBagg 4 місяці тому

    The 87 sounded a little congested in the low mids. The 47 sounded surprisingly more present than the 87. I was not expecting that especially just after listening to the 47 vs the FET47 comparison, where the FET47 was noticeably brighter than the tube 47.

  • @richlodato106
    @richlodato106 Місяць тому

    The 47 is brilliant! Makes the 87 sound thin.

  • @marin4311
    @marin4311 3 роки тому +3

    Two different flavors. The U87 seems a bit more deep in the low-end. I like both.

    • @Christian_svedin
      @Christian_svedin  3 роки тому +2

      Since I recorded them both at the same time/same take I had to be a bit further away, only 30cm or so but the u47 is famous for its proximity build up which isn't as audioable in this example. The u87 seem to have allot more 400hz. U47 also is a bit more even which is nice (tube!?) But they're allot closer then I remembered. I borrowed the u87 since I sold my pair a couple of years ago. Thanks for listening!

    • @kristianalexanderpedersen7382
      @kristianalexanderpedersen7382 10 місяців тому +1

      it's the opposite 🤣

  • @manuchalud7455
    @manuchalud7455 4 місяці тому +1

    For me u87 is winner. Just sounds better

  • @dariuspranckevicius3167
    @dariuspranckevicius3167 2 роки тому

    What a great peace, record and performance ! :)

  • @bricechandler5772
    @bricechandler5772 3 роки тому

    They both sound like Neumanns that's for sure! I'm a huge huge 87 fan but your U47 is magical!

    • @Christian_svedin
      @Christian_svedin  3 роки тому +1

      Yeah know that I've owned and tried all vintage LDC from Neumann (except m49 😭) I have to say they're extremely similar with some Eq in a mixed environment. I think I could take a fet design even closer to one of their tube mics if I added some harmonic saturation to that signal. Thanks for listening 💪💪

  • @iamjuandemarcus
    @iamjuandemarcus 2 роки тому +2

    Neumann u87 sounds a lit bit better..both sound great!

  • @cristopherjohansson1323
    @cristopherjohansson1323 5 місяців тому +1

    Am I the only one here in the comments who prefered the U87 on your voice lol

  • @keithrowe7617
    @keithrowe7617 2 роки тому +3

    3:51 vs 4:04
    4:38 vs 4:52
    5:07 vs 5:18
    A U87 is fantastic, until you hear it beside that other beast.

  • @corneliuiftode1317
    @corneliuiftode1317 2 роки тому

    Thank you sir!

  • @tybvx.1505
    @tybvx.1505 2 роки тому +1

    U47 hands down!

  • @corneliuiftode1317
    @corneliuiftode1317 2 роки тому

    Very useful!

  • @Barncore
    @Barncore 3 роки тому +1

    1:30 Wait did you EQ them differently? Doesn't that kinda interfere with the comparison of the mics? Adds more variables

    • @Christian_svedin
      @Christian_svedin  3 роки тому +1

      Yes, but I also provide raw files if you want to check those out! In the raw comparison on YT there are no Eq or FX thougj

  • @adamaddamus1327
    @adamaddamus1327 Рік тому

    The u87 is just perfectly clear, but U47... it has this vintage mojo consiled within

  • @mdelonghi406
    @mdelonghi406 3 роки тому +3

    What a difference in sound .. U47 wins by a mile more U87 was also good btw. Maybe Iam biased I think.. Thanks for your shootout.

    • @Christian_svedin
      @Christian_svedin  3 роки тому +1

      I was surprised how similar they actually was. Maybe pairing a u87 with a v76 or similar will make it as magical I will also be including a u87 tube mod later this spring. Thanks for watching!

  • @apri9306
    @apri9306 2 роки тому

    Did you use the Telefunken U-47 (11k) or the Neumann U-47 (3,5k)? I´m a bit confused. Great comparison! Thumbs up!

  • @ApolloJetsonKND
    @ApolloJetsonKND 2 роки тому

    Dawg. Im Listen to this on my tv! And dude u can completely here the difference. The U47 Blows the U87 out of the water! Like other ppl was saying. It feels like im in the room with u. It has body, presence. Good top in. The vocal is alot smoother. The u87 sounds more compressed which could probably be better for rap vocals. But for singing that u47 (tube mic ) just sounds alot better. Amazing. Great video!

  • @stanleyassor3172
    @stanleyassor3172 2 роки тому +1

    87 FOR ME

  • @11dremoss
    @11dremoss Рік тому

    Felt like the 87 was choking the performance and the 47 just let it breath and radiate

  • @SirRodney4Ever
    @SirRodney4Ever 2 роки тому +1

    I don’t hear a difference in the mics

  • @ZanBailey94
    @ZanBailey94 3 роки тому +1

    they both sound good the u47 is warmer cause of the tube but you can make hit songs on both they sound good what do you think ?

    • @Christian_svedin
      @Christian_svedin  3 роки тому +1

      Yes ofc! I just like to use tube mics for vocals. It always feels a bit more inspiring 🙂

    • @Christian_svedin
      @Christian_svedin  3 роки тому +1

      I will be showcasing the u87 with a tube mod later this spring. Seems like a cool choice adding some tube flavour!

    • @ZanBailey94
      @ZanBailey94 3 роки тому

      @@Christian_svedin cant wait it be dope to put it up against the u47

    • @Christian_svedin
      @Christian_svedin  2 роки тому

      @@stanleyc6225 yeah sure. It's up (y)

  • @producerbenford
    @producerbenford 2 роки тому

    Have you compared the vintage U87 and U87ai?

    • @Christian_svedin
      @Christian_svedin  2 роки тому

      Not directly but I've owned both and the vintage is allot better. Vintage doesn't have the same bad capsule peak at 2.5-3khz it has better lowmids. Hopefully I can make a YT comparison in the future!

  • @OysterPir8
    @OysterPir8 3 роки тому +1

    I dig the 87. A bit brighter and more energetic.

  • @mixtownstudios4770
    @mixtownstudios4770 2 роки тому

    are both roll offs on?

  • @justinshaffer4521
    @justinshaffer4521 2 роки тому +1

    Thanks for doing this! Surprised by all the superlatives for the 87... sounds like an absolute telephone in the mix compared to the 47 for me here. Doesn't mean it doesn't have its uses, but here the 47 just makes it sound like a toy. Just mho.

  • @dumpydoctor7670
    @dumpydoctor7670 2 роки тому

    47 so open and full. i use 87ai daily and thought it couldnt get better wow

    • @Christian_svedin
      @Christian_svedin  2 роки тому

      Most mics are more fun then the u87 🙈😁✌️

  • @astralaudio101
    @astralaudio101 2 роки тому

    The U47 has an amazing presence on your voice. I found the U87 support less range & have less presence.. The U47 could suit a male baritone? Excellent review 👍

    • @Christian_svedin
      @Christian_svedin  2 роки тому +1

      Yeah the U47 is usually described as "the baritone" mic! John Legend is a good example!

  • @peteralbert9805
    @peteralbert9805 3 роки тому

    Which vintage U87 is it exactly, Christian?

  • @LosFicosMusic
    @LosFicosMusic 2 роки тому

    Great job should of did also u67

  • @alexanderlinkevich
    @alexanderlinkevich 2 роки тому

    47 is most colored mic ever. Need for charismatic and famous voice. 87 - very commercial sound. Ready for print!

  • @sassas7128
    @sassas7128 2 роки тому +1

    47 wins,87 has some nassal ton.

  • @almerinofirmino6832
    @almerinofirmino6832 2 роки тому +1

    One your voice the 47 is better , more open .

  • @Jjf109nine
    @Jjf109nine 3 роки тому +1

    I prefer the U87 is this case. Better transient response and dynamically more engaging.

    • @Christian_svedin
      @Christian_svedin  3 роки тому

      Nice it is allot cheaper that's for sure! Thanks for tuning in!

    • @Jjf109nine
      @Jjf109nine 3 роки тому

      @@Christian_svedin Yes, however I’m pretty confident my U87 would beat any mic. It’s a very special Klaus Heyne U87.

    • @Christian_svedin
      @Christian_svedin  3 роки тому +1

      @@Jjf109nine mics are quite personal so if you found a mic you love it's great! I hold my m269c as the best mic I've tried. It's fun non the less! I recently tried a tube mod to a u87 vintage and WOW. Completely transformed the mic. You should try it if you have the chance

    • @jochenh.7428
      @jochenh.7428 3 роки тому +1

      I have never heard a Klaus Heyne U87. But I would like to hear that against an Andreas Grosser U87. Just 200€ for the mod and it sounds so good, much more open etc. I'm pretty sure, that the Klaused U87 is not better.

    • @Jjf109nine
      @Jjf109nine 2 роки тому +1

      @@jochenh.7428 You cannot even compare a Klaus Heyne mod to Andreas Grosser, since the mod costs more than the mic itself and the quality you get is a 15k mic. Klaus does not do a generic mod. He listens, adjusts, listens, adjusts, listens, adjusts. For one week he does this only. The mod takes months and you have a 3-4 year waiting list. If you are lucky to get in. Klaus has the best ears in the industry, he knows how it should sound. Bruce Swedien used Klaus Heyne mics, so did Al Schmitt, Celine Dion, Whitney Houston etc… You cannot compare these two and I come from Hamburg, so no disrespect to Andreas here. With a Klaus Heyne mic you push up the fader and it sounds like a finished record, the best sounding, most emotionally engaging record you have ever heard. It‘s that good. All of these mics here and the shootouts cannot hold against any Klaus mod. Out of 5 mics, Klaus said that mine came out the best. The first time I heard it after the mod, I started to cry…I rarely cry in life.

  • @norwegiansniper9713
    @norwegiansniper9713 3 роки тому

    I wonder how the u47 compares to a u87 ai

    • @Christian_svedin
      @Christian_svedin  3 роки тому

      From memory the u87ai had a bit more 400hz and more 3khz resonance then the u87 vintage but I haven't done an a/b comparison

    • @norwegiansniper9713
      @norwegiansniper9713 3 роки тому

      @@Christian_svedin That makes more sense because I out of experience didn’t understand how the 87 was so close to the 47, but the vintage 87 or c414 are much warmer than the new ones that are designed to fit pop production

    • @esco.letsgo
      @esco.letsgo 2 роки тому +1

      @@norwegiansniper9713 so what would you say the vintage ones fit?

  • @einavbuch4803
    @einavbuch4803 28 днів тому

    Not raw, 47 wins, but 87 wins Raw

  • @doraysmith
    @doraysmith 2 роки тому

    u47 on this one....

  • @astralaudio101
    @astralaudio101 2 роки тому +1

    The U47 has an amazing presence on your voice. I found the U87 to be harder sounding with less presence.. The U47 could suit a male baritone? Excellent review 🙏