WHAT is the NEXT TOP TIER JET to come in EACH LINE of the US TECH TREE? - War Thunder

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 13 жов 2024
  • Talking about the future of the US tech tree!
    Patreon: / matawg
    Canal em Português/BR: / @matawg-brasil
    Donate with Paypal: www.paypal.com...
    Join this channel to get access to perks:
    / @matawg

КОМЕНТАРІ • 147

  • @masterclips7657
    @masterclips7657 9 годин тому +37

    Actually been waiting for an updated version of your future tech tree videos.Thank you Mat please keep this series alive 🙏🏾🙏🏾

  • @BruhMomentPatrick
    @BruhMomentPatrick 4 години тому +9

    F-16 Block 70/72
    F-15C with modern weapons and radar
    F-18 hornet
    F-15E

    • @fireextinguisher7404
      @fireextinguisher7404 13 хвилин тому

      In all fairness the F 15C already has modern weapons and radar but ik what you mean. Shits gonna be nuts when the 9X, 120D and equal missiles come across the other nations

  • @christopherchartier3017
    @christopherchartier3017 8 годин тому +36

    F-15E 1980 comes after F-111F, Hornet-D after harrier, Hornet A+/C after F-14B, F-15C with APG-63v2 and aim9X/aim-120C-5

    • @Pvt_Wade
      @Pvt_Wade 8 годин тому +2

      what does the F/A-18D offer over the F/A-18C other than extra weight in war thunder?

    • @christopherchartier3017
      @christopherchartier3017 8 годин тому +2

      @@Pvt_Wade It doesn’t offer anything but it’s the one the navy likes to use for it’s ground attack, the single seat hornets usually accompany for an escort

    • @theannihilator9167
      @theannihilator9167 8 годин тому +1

      ​@@Pvt_Wade we have the same situation in the israeli tech tree. Theres no proper bomber, so gaijin added the F16D. And IMO its a great idea to do the same with the F-18 double for the american striker line in their tech tree. And the fighters F-18A/C to the naval branch after F-14s.

    • @Nickjustdabs
      @Nickjustdabs 7 годин тому

      Warthunder don’t add vehicles based on their real life timeline bro😂

    • @Nickjustdabs
      @Nickjustdabs 7 годин тому +2

      And the f15 won’t be in the bomber cat the f111a c & f are strategic bombers that’s y it’s there, it’ll probably go before or after the f15 we already have lol

  • @rodolfohernandez3303
    @rodolfohernandez3303 9 годин тому +14

    I don't think the F-18 Hornet would be next to the Tomcat, It will be next to the AV-8B II Harrier following the real change made by the Marines when they switch the Harrier for the Hornet. Let's say an example The F-15C next one F-15E Strike Eagle, F-14B next one F-14D and so on. Remember First Hornet squadron went to the Marines

    • @RaodyOPS
      @RaodyOPS 8 годин тому +4

      I swear it better be not under av8

    • @theannihilator9167
      @theannihilator9167 8 годин тому +1

      But there is no "Marines" branch in the american tech tree. First is light fighters, then more heavy fighters, then naval fighters, then strike aircraft and at the far end to the right are the bombers. The F-18A or the C do not belong to the striker branch after the Harrier. Maybe a D variant like in the israeli tech tree (F-16D is last plane in bomber branch), but sorry, IMO the fighters need to be in the naval branch after F-14s.

    • @DzinkyDzink
      @DzinkyDzink 7 годин тому

      ​@@RaodyOPSthat would be so troll lol.
      But then what's after F-14D?F-35C?

    • @mikeyplayzwrld
      @mikeyplayzwrld 5 годин тому +1

      @@theannihilator9167 The F-18 is actually the F/A-18 officially. F/A means fighter/attacker. Since there are no attack aircraft after the harrier, the F/A-18s will have to go there. Not to mention it's original purpose was to be an attack jet.

    • @mikeyplayzwrld
      @mikeyplayzwrld 5 годин тому

      @@DzinkyDzink Nothing is after the F-14D and F-35C unless something new comes out. Both of those planes are classified.

  • @mesobean
    @mesobean 8 годин тому +6

    I think we could see the strike eagle coming soon to war thunder, if not in December which is likely going to be focused on the hornet it will be sometime next year, probably in the April-June update

    • @seniorspaz8754
      @seniorspaz8754 8 годин тому +1

      The problem with the 15E is its radar. The E is, technologically-speaking, upgraded beyond the F-15C with ground mapping radar, AESA AA radar, etc. Unless Gaijin just decides to give it a fake PESA radar I doubt we will see a Strike Eagle before a later-model 15C.

    • @mesobean
      @mesobean 8 годин тому

      @@seniorspaz8754 they could give it the an/apg-70 which is still a PD radar and just not have ground tracking like with some other aircraft

    • @mangosuppe8706
      @mangosuppe8706 6 годин тому +1

      @@seniorspaz8754 Gaijin won't add "false" radars to a plane, a proper gaijin forum complaint and it will have it's correct radar

    • @seniorspaz8754
      @seniorspaz8754 6 годин тому

      @@mesobean I stand corrected, the APG70 installed in some 15Es is indeed a PESA. The APG63v2 also found in some 15Es is an AESA.

    • @seniorspaz8754
      @seniorspaz8754 6 годин тому

      @@mangosuppe8706 Gaijin has added false radars in the past, most recently with the Baz. Yes they eventually acquiesced and upgraded it to a true model but for a time it was a false radar they decided to purposely put in the game despite documentation supporting it having those features. And all I said was that if Gaijin wanted to add the 15E soon they’d have to give it a false PESA not an AESA. I didn’t say they would do that.

  • @nkvdcomradeorion7336
    @nkvdcomradeorion7336 8 годин тому +3

    Yes, these speculation vids are my favorite. Keep doing them for other nations plz

  • @si.ari.06
    @si.ari.06 9 годин тому +8

    Germany next?

  • @jayklink851
    @jayklink851 8 годин тому +4

    Important question. I created my War Thunder account 7 years ago, I have all the vehicles/planes in the game. And sadly, probably spent thousands on GE and premium time over the years. However, I forgot my PW for the account. And what really sucks, I used a different email address for that game; and it was one of the Gmail accounts that Google recently deleted due to inactivity. I've asked Gaijin, explaining the situation, they send an AI, or non-human, two sentence response, saying they'll send a code to the deleted email account.
    Man, it's really rough playing the game. I have to play on a 11 year old laptop with a busted graphics card. Meaning, even with HDMI and another monitor, due to the bad graphics card, the computer will make an 8x12 inch screen. Essentially, with such a small screen, I can only really bomb or due BVR via fox 3s. Ground RB and props are completely out of the question, too small of screen. And I have a couple of new computers, one quite powerful, that I could use if I recovered the pw. I can't imagine grinding every vehicle again.
    *I logged onto WT with that laptop Years ago when I was visiting family, so that's the only reason I can play.

    • @merajmasuk
      @merajmasuk 8 годин тому

      Did you ask on the Gaijin support? For me, wait time has always been usually 8hr-24hr between each reply. Considering where I live, that's pretty swift response time, and from actual humans. They may help you recover your account. Oh wait, you lost access to your Gaijin account too, haven't you?

    • @jayklink851
      @jayklink851 8 годин тому

      @@merajmasuk Thanks for responding. I have access to the Game(old laptop), and through that, support support staff/other stuff, which is using my account. When I've explained the situation, however, they say they sent a code to the deleted email account tied to the game. I don't know if they have to do that as the first few steps or not. It could be a human, but it's odd that their solution is to send a code to an email account that no longer exists.
      Once again, thanks for responding.

    • @merajmasuk
      @merajmasuk 8 годин тому

      @@jayklink851 Did you tell them you lost access to your mail?

    • @Veinseven
      @Veinseven 5 годин тому

      Have you tried googling "Recover a recently deleted Google Account" and followed the steps?

    • @tamooo6315
      @tamooo6315 3 години тому

      I had the same issue, go onto your old laptop and add an additional email to your account, they can transfer ownership from one email to another, this should be possible since you are still able to play on your account on the other computer

  • @jonathanfarrell14
    @jonathanfarrell14 8 годин тому +5

    the f16 with an aesa is the block 70

    • @Ha-yeun
      @Ha-yeun 7 годин тому

      doesn't block 70 come with the stealth coating as well?

    • @jaek__
      @jaek__ 4 години тому

      no the USAF upgraded a bunch of their F-16C’s to the SABR standard, which is an AESA

  • @Pvt_Wade
    @Pvt_Wade 8 годин тому +14

    21st matawg f18 video

  • @BloodyRaccoon
    @BloodyRaccoon 3 години тому

    I agree with Christopher, 100% F-18C will be added under F-14, the super variant isn’t really needed since it is a copy paste, if anything it will just be another variant thingy, F-18D fs will go after harrier but maybe in later updates

  • @PerciusLive
    @PerciusLive 3 години тому

    the logical next step of the ardvark would be the bone/lancer to keep in theme of a "bomber" line

  • @doc7000
    @doc7000 7 годин тому

    I feel like they need more lines at top tier to better organize the aircraft if they want to keep them more sorted based on roles.
    The F-35A would be the plane to go after the F-16, though you do have options for F-16s with further upgrades that are used by other nations to go into the US tech tree. You have F-16 block 70 jets that I can see going in that line. For the F-15 I can see the F-15EX as well as the F-22 going into that line, which is pretty much it making those two lines the cleanest lines for the US tech tree.
    With the F-14 things get complicated as the F-16 is a multirole plane and the F-35A is a multirole plane while the F-15 A,B,C,D were air superiority fighters and the F-22 was designed as an air superiority platform. The F-14 entered service with two roles one being fleet defense and the other being air superiority and the Navy currently does not have a dedicated plane for these two roles so technically you can leave the F-14 line dead. Though later on the F-14 became a multirole platform, IMHO since the legacy hornet entered service for the NAVY replacing the A-7 corsair II with the ability to help the F-14 it make sense to add under the AV8B+. Before they had added that plane I could see them adding the Legacy hornet in either lines though it feels like it is going to go after the AV8B+.
    F-15E does make sense after the F-111 however I wish they would rethink bombers as I would love to see things like the, besides the B1 and B-52 I would love to see older bombers like the B-58 and B-36. Hell they can add the XB35 and XB36 in the line after the B-29.

  • @jjkrayenhagen
    @jjkrayenhagen 6 годин тому

    I feel like if they made BR dependent upon hardware(Weapons and Radar) instead of frame(F-16C) then that would help with some of the problems with grinding stock jets and we also don't need to copy paste a bunch of the same jet in a line.

  • @LouisGagne
    @LouisGagne 3 години тому +1

    Bro forgot about the F16 block 70 viper

  • @СергейНикольский-я2ц
    @СергейНикольский-я2ц 6 годин тому +1

    Btw, I always thought that letters in names of US aircraft mean types of aircraft like “F” - fighter, “A” - attacker, “B” - bomber, “F/A” - fighter-attacker, but why the F-111 wasn’t called B-111 then if it’s obvious that it isn’t a fighter or attacker, it’s literally just an older version of the Bone (B-1 Lancer) - supersonic bomber that supposed to penetrate enemies air defence at high speed at very low altitude

    • @jjkrayenhagen
      @jjkrayenhagen 6 годин тому +1

      There are a few 'Bombers' that were given the F designation to entice pilots to pick them because all the cool kids picked fighters. The F-117 might be a case of obfuscation for the sake of hiding the stealths.

    • @mikeyplayzwrld
      @mikeyplayzwrld 5 годин тому

      F-111 is a fighter and was meant to be what the F-14 was but it sucked at the job. F-117 was kinda a grey area in this regard but still it's consistent throughout the system.

    • @chesterhiggens
      @chesterhiggens 3 години тому

      @@mikeyplayzwrldf111 was a better choice than the f14 and wasn’t chosen because of politics.

  • @spectreplays9
    @spectreplays9 6 годин тому +2

    Unpopular opinion. I don’t think we will see the F/A-18 with 120s until December. However, there could be a small chance for the F/A-18A without them.

    • @Veinseven
      @Veinseven 6 годин тому

      i think that will be the case that first version comes at december

    • @mikeyplayzwrld
      @mikeyplayzwrld 5 годин тому

      yeah they'll probably make the F/A-18 an unrealistic UFO with insane performance and slap it into the game with no balance whatsoever

    • @peposad2588
      @peposad2588 3 години тому

      @@mikeyplayzwrld it wouldnt have that good performance, also a version would be like 13.0 as it doesnt have arh missles

  • @eren_e8138
    @eren_e8138 8 годин тому

    they could also add the E/A-18 Growler after F-111F or after the F-15E depending on which version of the F-18 they add since it's based on the Super Hornet

  • @jan-yu7sx
    @jan-yu7sx 3 години тому

    Grinded all the planes i wanted, premium time is running out. Never was more ready for the f18 and some sale. Let it come baby!

  • @GamerFromSpace
    @GamerFromSpace 5 годин тому

    I reckon f18c is the next plane to come in the naval line, especially that a lot of nations can get it

  • @jeremydeel1514
    @jeremydeel1514 8 годин тому +6

    It’s clear that you lack some information on US aircraft. For example the newest most modern F-16 is not the block 50 but rather the block 70. It’s more than just a radar upgrade. Reinforced wing spars, slightly enlarged wing surfaces along with other upgrades to the aircraft. PLEASE do more research before you post these videos.

  • @stigeon4771
    @stigeon4771 8 годин тому +1

    Nice video! Personally, i’d like them to stop focusing so much on top tier, and instead flesh out smaller tech trees. Maybe even add more ww2 self propelled artillery vehicles like the priest and hummel.

  • @mamilkman8614
    @mamilkman8614 3 години тому

    Dude everytime I see the f18 in your thumbnail I think it’s a leak list

  • @MetalGearArmA
    @MetalGearArmA 3 години тому

    After F-16C Block-50, i think after it we need F-16V Block-70 due to APG-83 and after that we have F-21 which is F-16V but with triple mount AIM-120, and before it the F-16C Block-25 since the B-40 and B-30 has minors difference between it and F-16 B-50, however F-16C B-25 have less advanced radar of which is APG-68 early variant unlike APG-68(V)9, Now the naval line, correct F-14D plus before it the F/A-18A and we have the F-15C line, i think new F-15C which i cannot remember the exact model, but it has APG-63(V)3, this new model would have APG-63(V)3 unlike the one we have, which has APG-63(V)1, which has the same air-to-air as APG-63(V)2 with additional air to ground, Now for the ground striker, yes the F/A-18B , since it was the Attack variant of F/A-18A (WSO and Pilot), and Now for Bombers, of course the F-15E

  • @mechfox
    @mechfox 9 годин тому +1

    Would like to see this for more countries cool idea 👍

  • @m3chgeek470
    @m3chgeek470 8 годин тому

    I can see the Nighthawk being after the F-111 definitely because then that gives the snail to test out stealth options and how to code it in game after after the F-16 and the F-15 I can see copy and paste with upgrades to newer weapons and radar systems to allow a pave way for the next gen aircraft and you already know where I think they have 18 is going to be😂

  • @malcolmseigmiller1622
    @malcolmseigmiller1622 7 годин тому

    personally what I am hoping for is the f/a 18a with aim9Ls and sparrows. the og had an insane thrust to weight ratio

    • @peposad2588
      @peposad2588 3 години тому

      it should be added this month tbh

  • @evanalook2840
    @evanalook2840 Годину тому

    F14d should be added next. That or the f18a or atleast give the f14b aim9ms

  • @faranghis5671
    @faranghis5671 8 годин тому

    well can we get an updated version of tech tree for every nation ? not only for plane, but helicopter, tanks or modern ships and submarine

  • @GamerFromSpace
    @GamerFromSpace 5 годин тому

    Matt.. Matt.. Matt... aim120 was never tested with f14D, it was tested on f14A

  • @Berto46
    @Berto46 8 годин тому

    Im soo curius for Italy, nice video idea!

  • @L300-nn
    @L300-nn 3 години тому

    I would love a F-15E Strike Eagle

  • @Stumbletie
    @Stumbletie 5 годин тому

    The AIM-120 was actually tested on an F-14A, not a D.

    • @mikeyplayzwrld
      @mikeyplayzwrld 5 годин тому

      It was being tested to be made compatible for the F-14D though. That's the point. And the tests were successful and the plane would've gotten the software to use them if the tomcat program wasn't killed.

  • @JackTheMacaw
    @JackTheMacaw 9 годин тому

    He's in your baffles.. Ohh wrong game

  • @TormentedPenguin
    @TormentedPenguin 7 годин тому

    They need to stop adding to top teir.. start decompression and add more filler light attack jets like the Dragonfly and so on. They have a ton of aircraft from mid to late cold war they can still add.

  • @oskarlesiak3682
    @oskarlesiak3682 7 годин тому

    I hope that in the next update we get at least f18 hornet, i dont think eurofighter or rafale will make it to the game right now but f18 should be added some time ago. If they wont add something like eurofighter, with F18 and swiss tech tree for germany they can have plane that can compete in top tier

    • @HornetCinematics
      @HornetCinematics 5 годин тому

      It will likely be December

    • @oskarlesiak3682
      @oskarlesiak3682 5 годин тому

      @@HornetCinematics yeah i know that it can come in december and I hope it will because rn i have swedish and finnish tech tree finished I have usa near finish and in grinding germany and maybe those 3 nations can get an f18 (in germany the swiss one and finnish one in sweden)

    • @oskarlesiak3682
      @oskarlesiak3682 4 години тому

      @@HornetCinematics and we are still faaar away from eurofighter

    • @peposad2588
      @peposad2588 3 години тому

      @@oskarlesiak3682 air rb needs to be fully reworked for newer fighters and missles, like meteor for example would have a range for whole map, and the rework would maybe allow planes like mig 25 to be added

  • @Professor_Ramen
    @Professor_Ramen 4 години тому

    Do u recon the su33 would go after the yak141?, because if so you would give me a massive reason to not grind the su27 tree

    • @peposad2588
      @peposad2588 3 години тому

      su 33 should really be after yak141 and it could be added very soon, for the flanker tree the su 30 or newer version of 27 should be next

  • @partisan3353
    @partisan3353 6 годин тому

    japan video finna be 5 minutes long
    (F-2 instead of F-16AJ, F-35 after F-15J (2003), T-4 after G8N1 and P-1 after the dive bomber

  • @mexicanyorkshire7617
    @mexicanyorkshire7617 7 годин тому

    Could the F-18 really be added by the end of the year ?

  • @typehyuga607
    @typehyuga607 3 години тому

    Mat there is a block75 f16

  • @si.ari.06
    @si.ari.06 9 годин тому +2

    Make more!

  • @baderq8ty99
    @baderq8ty99 Годину тому

    the f16 would be the v variant

  • @guyguy7757
    @guyguy7757 7 годин тому

    lets do a serie it could be cool

  • @G3ntl3man95
    @G3ntl3man95 8 годин тому

    pl gaijin explain me im in a10 and strela locked meg in front from 7-6.5 km and fire rocket on me this how works????? all aspect lock is 3.2 km this is duble really no russian biass...,.

  • @goldendiamond761
    @goldendiamond761 9 годин тому +2

    f18 is not better then f16 or f15 it should be around same tier then f35 and f22 i guess not many jets left for US and europe will get eurofighter and rafale and russia su30 su35 and su 57

    • @ichosolemanuel6048
      @ichosolemanuel6048 8 годин тому +1

      I think it has 12 missiles, which is double of what f16 can take and its also good dogfighter

    • @mikeyplayzwrld
      @mikeyplayzwrld 5 годин тому +2

      @@ichosolemanuel6048 If you carry even 4 missiles you not longer have that performance. The hornet is a brick. And it has 10. Not 12.

    • @peposad2588
      @peposad2588 3 години тому

      @@mikeyplayzwrld the same thing goes for flanker doesnt it?

  • @notjunior5079
    @notjunior5079 8 годин тому

    yeah exactly
    the next major things that are going to happen to toptier are going to be better radars and better more modern missles
    it is going to go more thwards longer range BVR engagements because of better radars and longer range missiles that will make it harder to notch and defeat
    maybe more f15's with higher aim120 loads and for russia we can have loads of newer flankers and more modern missiles like better variants of r77's
    or even r37m and the new aim174
    god they have so much to do that can make top tier a lot more harder and more interesting
    and it's not going to be that hard to implement
    they have the mechanics implemented and the game is ready for more modern stuff
    I can see the time where people are going to do mainly bvr and will mostly try to avoid getting closer

    • @VIT-ey8wo
      @VIT-ey8wo 6 годин тому

      Aim-120b and R-77-1 next probably

  • @RalfG999
    @RalfG999 8 годин тому

    same video for germany?

  • @KjdPropulsion
    @KjdPropulsion 8 годин тому

    Much better video than usual (no offence intended)

  • @johannbezuidenhout2976
    @johannbezuidenhout2976 7 годин тому

    F-16V Block 70 lol.

  • @wolfgothicbowgod86
    @wolfgothicbowgod86 9 годин тому +1

    w8 for ru tree

  • @thegrayfoxx654
    @thegrayfoxx654 7 годин тому

    This channel is 99% speculation these days.

  • @urifriling3223
    @urifriling3223 8 годин тому

    What about the f16v?

  • @yair3219
    @yair3219 7 годин тому

    yes please make that seires

  • @tahmid-uz-zaman2214
    @tahmid-uz-zaman2214 8 годин тому

    Mig-25 and F-18 😊

  • @KillerSniper55
    @KillerSniper55 2 години тому

    With the trees in their current form I think it will look like this:
    Air Force Fighters: F-16C -> F-16C (2007)
    Heavy Fighters: F-15C MSIP -> F-15C MSIP II (2007)
    Naval Fighters: F-14B -> F-18C (I think the D Tomcat will come later as a foldered aircraft under the B but after the F-18)
    Attackers: AV-8B -> F-15E
    Bombers: F-111F -> F-117
    Premium: CF-188 (Canadian F-18A+)
    Squadron: F-18D
    Event: F-18A

  • @Fofol0an
    @Fofol0an 6 годин тому

    The US needs an agm better than mavericks I know there are a ton of other ones these aircraft can carry, I’m sick of mavericks getting easily intercepted

    • @thegamingjoeker5023
      @thegamingjoeker5023 5 годин тому

      Well mavericks are pretty much just as intercept-able as any other agm in the game.

    • @Fofol0an
      @Fofol0an 5 годин тому

      @@thegamingjoeker5023 you’ve never seen KH missles have you?😂

    • @thegamingjoeker5023
      @thegamingjoeker5023 5 годин тому

      @@Fofol0an I literally exclusively play top tier. they may have more range and speed but you can carry more mavericks. If you are talking about how intercept able they are both kh and mavericks still get shot down in one hit.

    • @Fofol0an
      @Fofol0an 4 години тому

      @@thegamingjoeker5023 so we got the KH missles which go Mach 2 and Turtle mavs… I’ve tried countless time to spot KH missles in an adats radar and shoot em down with it. Never works, sorry didn’t realize u were a Russian main 😂

  • @MarkMark-z8s
    @MarkMark-z8s 9 годин тому

    ussr next ?

  • @guimbitencourt
    @guimbitencourt 9 годин тому

    Just want a USSR aircraft with BVR capabilities.

    • @peposad2588
      @peposad2588 2 години тому

      we have to wait long for newer versions of r-77, and intercept missles would break the game

  • @howtobenormal5497
    @howtobenormal5497 7 годин тому

    How bout the f15ex tho

    • @peposad2588
      @peposad2588 2 години тому

      its from 2021 buddy

    • @howtobenormal5497
      @howtobenormal5497 2 години тому

      @peposad2588 Not from my sources it says it's from 1942

  • @Lulzwhat
    @Lulzwhat 8 годин тому +5

    I remind you guys: No Eurofighter, Rafale, F-18, Su-30, ARM's = no money next year. Warn Gaijin every way you can!

    • @peposad2588
      @peposad2588 2 години тому

      top tier isnt even good with current aircrafts tho

  • @IgrikShit
    @IgrikShit 4 години тому

    Let them just fix the flight model Su 27 and MiG 29, they don’t have to add anything. Let them just fix these damn flight models. I've already had enough. It’s as if they were paid for in order to humiliate Russian planes, I just don’t see any other explanation. There are a million proofs on their damn forum, but they don’t seem to notice.

    • @IgrikShit
      @IgrikShit 4 години тому

      I even saw footage of the F15 maneuvering better than the Su 27 in this game. It's just some kind of joke

    • @peposad2588
      @peposad2588 3 години тому

      flanker is a heavy fighter so it wont turn fast with lots of missles but yes, its fm is really messed up

    • @IgrikShit
      @IgrikShit 2 години тому

      @@peposad2588 Bro, this plane, even without missiles, loses a lot of energy when maneuvering. This is just a straight-flying trough that cannot turn without losing all its energy. The F15 should be something like this, but for some reason it’s maneuverable. It feels like they mixed up the F15 and Su27. You can go to DCS and compare the flight model there. And there are a lot of proofs on the forums, with numbers that developers try not to notice.

    • @peposad2588
      @peposad2588 2 години тому

      @@IgrikShit i just wantet to notice that su 27 sholdnt be turning like a ufo, but i feel like gajin made it this way so us mains wouldnt cry

    • @IgrikShit
      @IgrikShit Годину тому

      @@peposad2588 they cry anyway. now in simulator battles it is impossible to find a room with at least half filled with the red team. nobody wants to play on this. nobody is saying to make a UFO out of the su27, for that there will be another su35. but the flight model at least needs to be brought to the aircraft documentation data

  • @PlaytoWin8008
    @PlaytoWin8008 8 годин тому

    What do you think is coming to Russian air next ???

    • @peposad2588
      @peposad2588 2 години тому

      tbh not much, mig 25 is a meme already and newer flankers are to good to be added atm

  • @xrz8659
    @xrz8659 7 годин тому

    can you do a same video but with the ussr tech treee??

  • @ImChrisl
    @ImChrisl 7 годин тому

    wehn germany dont get the eurofighter we all know gajin hates German players...

  • @mangosuppe8706
    @mangosuppe8706 6 годин тому

    At this point I think gaijin should just add the 120C-7 and 9-X with a F-15EX and a F/A-18G so the US mains can be happy and maybe then they realise how good of a nation they are

    • @thegamingjoeker5023
      @thegamingjoeker5023 5 годин тому +1

      That is a terrible idea

    • @mangosuppe8706
      @mangosuppe8706 5 годин тому +1

      @@thegamingjoeker5023 I know that, but I think it would be funny so we can see how the us mains react when 14.0+ would be empty

    • @peposad2588
      @peposad2588 2 години тому

      @@mangosuppe8706 they will be crying about everything tho, where is f111 where is the hornet where is f22, gajin fix your game my f117 got shoot down by radar missle

  • @masonmonroe4336
    @masonmonroe4336 7 годин тому

    No

  • @liu_un8284
    @liu_un8284 4 години тому

    Man your vids contain useful infos and all, but you yap alot of nonsense and rlly slow (i be watchin your vids x1.5 to hear it normal)

  • @CallMeAK
    @CallMeAK 7 годин тому

    Bvr is soo cringe, just stop radar missiles so we can have proper dog fights and actually have fun

  • @goose9941
    @goose9941 9 годин тому +1

    First :)