4.5 GEN JETS will bring A LOT OF UPGRADES! BUT what exactly are those? - War Thunder

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 13 жов 2024
  • Talking about the 4.5 GENS and what will they have in difference to the current meta in War Thunder?
    Patreon: / matawg
    Canal em Português/BR: / @matawg-brasil
    Donate with Paypal: www.paypal.com...
    Join this channel to get access to perks:
    / @matawg

КОМЕНТАРІ • 321

  • @churchiee-gaming
    @churchiee-gaming 9 днів тому +315

    Radar not gonna matter if they keep having us play maps the size of my back yard...

    • @Abigail_Nikolaev
      @Abigail_Nikolaev 9 днів тому +18

      People kept complaining that they hate EC maps now this?

    • @MULTIANGEL223
      @MULTIANGEL223 9 днів тому

      Facts

    • @mlgrocket
      @mlgrocket 9 днів тому +8

      @@Abigail_Nikolaev EC has always been awful, people just aren't willing to admit it.

    • @user-mc9cv9zw3x
      @user-mc9cv9zw3x 9 днів тому +21

      @@Abigail_Nikolaevec maps are only good for top tier where jets are able to engage at much longer ranges.

    • @Paganmine-WT
      @Paganmine-WT 9 днів тому +10

      We need maps big like dcs ones

  • @robidius
    @robidius 8 днів тому +64

    I think, before 5th gen is even considered, they need to add mechanics for ECM combat like is used by the E/A 18 G Growler. Things to mess with radar and false radar contacts etc and reducing radar range or jamming them so much they might as well be fighting stealth aircraft. The famous story of the early 80s conflict where an intruder jammed some libyan migs and tomcats came up, took a picture and flipped them off until they left because they didnt even see them on scan

    • @Янус_Ырт
      @Янус_Ырт 8 днів тому

      That was used by MiG-21s already, I don't think they will add it soon

  • @aspinthereddragon9302
    @aspinthereddragon9302 9 днів тому +61

    we don't even have mig25 or the mig31 yet but we have the F15A which was made to compete the mig25

    • @Hamster....
      @Hamster.... 9 днів тому +8

      What would the mig 25 even bring for war thunder... it would just be another go fast missile jet

    • @hamidshahriari6474
      @hamidshahriari6474 9 днів тому +15

      @@Hamster....f104 says hi, and mig 25 is too iconic not to add

    • @martingamer7239
      @martingamer7239 9 днів тому +13

      The Mig 25 will either suck or be absolutely broken. It can't turn, climbs slower than the F15, goes slower than the F15, carries less missiles than the F15 it will probably just be the Maus of air rb

    • @thatoneguy1741
      @thatoneguy1741 9 днів тому +6

      @@hamidshahriari6474don’t be suprised if it’s hot ass when it ends up being added 💀

    • @angelnunez6476
      @angelnunez6476 8 днів тому +2

      It has ultra long range missiles though that could be a phoenix counter.

  • @SuperTrb0
    @SuperTrb0 9 днів тому +40

    We need bigger maps. BVR isn’t really BVR right now. We need maps that are hundreds of square miles so that people can actually employ their missiles and radars the way they were intended. A lot of BVR involves lots of speed, lots of altitude to be successful. In some ways the BVR fight is boring and in other ways the BVR fight can be terrifying.

    • @CoolLink-Zelda
      @CoolLink-Zelda 8 днів тому +4

      Than they should increase the match lengh and reduce the player nubers constantly. But what are we doing with the planes that do not have fox3 stock? I wont be able to fire an AIM9L at 600km

    • @petrkdn8224
      @petrkdn8224 8 днів тому

      128x128km is currently engine limit (its 131x131km, but for proper power of 2 sake they use 128x128km), and before Dagor 6, a major dagor update was released ever 2 years or so. And Dagor 6 released 4 years ago almost. We had a mid engine upgrade of Dagor 6.5 2 years ago, which would mean we should be seeing Dagor 7 with expanded map limits very soon, maybe december update.

    • @exoticxenon5005
      @exoticxenon5005 8 днів тому +1

      simulator battles in vr in a top tier jet with bvr would be so much fun off an adrenaline rush seeing yourself get locked up lots off ground targets would be fun as well being able to run s.e.a.d missions would be cool as well imagine you start flying intercept missions against the people flying the sead mission would be so fun

    • @theDarkside798
      @theDarkside798 7 днів тому

      Also we Need some objectives. Like guarding a bomber group or something like this.

  • @PvtPartzz
    @PvtPartzz 9 днів тому +30

    The Su35 sounds amazing. I love how the Su27 looks but its radar is such a handicap.

    • @jacobbaumgardner3406
      @jacobbaumgardner3406 9 днів тому +2

      They’d probably go with the Su-27SM2/3 first (SM2 is upgrade of old airframes, while SM3 is new airframes. In WT they’d be functionally identical). It’s an Su-27 with the PESA radar of the Su-35, and would probably get R-77-1. This would be a good counter to the F-15C with AESA and AIM-120C-5.
      Su-35 would be a good match to the F-15EX, as both those have airframe and engine upgrades, and would get the latest R-77M and AIM-120D.

    • @hmsvanguard2918
      @hmsvanguard2918 9 днів тому +1

      ​​@jacobbaumgardner3406 SM2 or 3 doesn't have Irbis E
      Just wikipedia mention which is wromg

    • @jacobbaumgardner3406
      @jacobbaumgardner3406 9 днів тому

      @@hmsvanguard2918 I’m aware. I don’t get my information from Wikipedia. I’m not sure, but weren’t some Su-27’s fit with the N011M Bars, the predecessor to Irbis? I’m sure Gaijin could find some work around.

    • @maxmax-lo7pj
      @maxmax-lo7pj 9 днів тому +2

      @@jacobbaumgardner3406 No the radar of the Su-27SM3 is just an upgrade from the previous radar making it able to fire R-77-1.

    • @plymouth258
      @plymouth258 8 днів тому +1

      Prob they will give russia su30 first

  • @occho787
    @occho787 9 днів тому +12

    Hoping for the Eurofighter to Germany, German air tree have suffering a whole lot.

    • @notoriousrome5985
      @notoriousrome5985 4 дні тому

      FR. Playing the MiG 29 has been actual pain.

    • @occho787
      @occho787 4 дні тому

      @@notoriousrome5985 me with F-4F ICE, kinda enjoying it but Germany need something more competitive and fun.

  • @jan-yu7sx
    @jan-yu7sx 9 днів тому +62

    I need eurofighter😢

    • @sirbonobo3907
      @sirbonobo3907 9 днів тому

      Maybe at the end If next years But i doubt it.

    • @fred3965
      @fred3965 9 днів тому +5

      Because its going to britain and italy too they wont make it as good as it should be mark my words lol

    • @owaisansari069
      @owaisansari069 9 днів тому +3

      For Germany, it dosnt have a good tootier

    • @leonsyndikus5485
      @leonsyndikus5485 9 днів тому

      I think you forgot Germany ​@@fred3965

    • @sucuaranaancap9366
      @sucuaranaancap9366 9 днів тому +1

      We need;
      Eurofighter
      Rafaele
      F-18
      F16I-Sufa
      Super Tucano A-29
      Kfir C10
      IAI Lavi (Israel)
      And
      Cargo, Transport, Radar, Comand center etc planes like
      Hercules
      KC130
      Etc

  • @Ogivekrew
    @Ogivekrew 9 днів тому +19

    First they need the F-18A through F-18C, then Eurofighter and Rafale… then Su-33, Su-35 and Su-34.. theeeeeeeen R-37, Meteor and AIM120D… theeeeen F35, F22, Su-57, J20…. Theeeeeeeeeeeen NGAD… then the world ends 😂

    • @skythewolf5329
      @skythewolf5329 5 днів тому +1

      Get me the su47 Femboy in there

    • @ColossalFailure-qv9jc
      @ColossalFailure-qv9jc 5 днів тому

      Rafale would be a nice addition

    • @Naively_Posityive
      @Naively_Posityive 3 дні тому

      They could do F/A-18A&C this October, then add the Eurofighter and Rafale (maybe even the F/A-18E) this December. Would give Germany a good top tier quickly, while letting the hornet be the headliner for its update.

  • @Skibidy_rizzler_
    @Skibidy_rizzler_ 9 днів тому +23

    They need to fix the su 27 flight model before adding more top tier jets

    • @Vrooto
      @Vrooto 8 днів тому +1

      sure, after the f22 gets added.

    • @monaro34
      @monaro34 8 днів тому

      Just fix the damn radar it's trash

    • @-..----.--.-...
      @-..----.--.-... 8 днів тому

      ​@@Vrooto How's this related in any way lol

    • @СергейНикольский-я2ц
      @СергейНикольский-я2ц 7 днів тому

      @@-..----.--.-...cause they nerfed/made underpowered both Su-27’s FM and flare sensitivity of R-73’s (look at DCS there’s no way you are able to flare off R-73 inside 1km but by preflaring from any aspect, and now look at WT - if it wasn’t launched from a perfect 0deg aspect (when you’re on target’s 6) then the R-73 will go to a single flare) to not make Su-27 OP in game at close ranges cause 9X’s are still not there and most likely will be added with F-35’s/22’s so then they’ll fix its FM at the same time adding 9X’s to other planes such as late F-16’s etc

    • @-..----.--.-...
      @-..----.--.-... 7 днів тому

      ​@@СергейНикольский-я2ц I think they nerfed fm not because of possibility of su-27 being op. Look at mig-29, when it was added it also had bad fm for about a month, but then they fixed it and it actually became competitive in a dogfight with f-16a. But then they just nerfed it without any reason, while buffing f-16.
      The reason is not, that they afraid of it becoming op

  • @SkullH4T
    @SkullH4T 9 днів тому +15

    give me the thrust vectoring flankers

    • @LDZMarder
      @LDZMarder 9 днів тому +4

      They face trust vectoring EF2000´s and F22.....

    • @Arkhmar
      @Arkhmar 8 днів тому +2

      @@LDZMarder Thrust.

    • @-..----.--.-...
      @-..----.--.-... 8 днів тому +3

      ​@@LDZMarder eurofighter doesn't have tvc

    • @LDZMarder
      @LDZMarder 8 днів тому

      @@-..----.--.-... yes and no, it is developed and tested but not build in for the simpel reason that there is no airplane that can keep up with EF in maneuver field. So practically there is no reason to build it in for maintenance reasons. But you can check it your self the tech is tested and developed for the EF2000.

    • @-..----.--.-...
      @-..----.--.-... 8 днів тому +2

      @@LDZMarder Yes it was tested by germans, but you won't find it on any production variant.
      And the reason is not because "no aircraft can keep up with ef", but because it greatly increases the price of the aircraft, but does not pay off with efficiency, as close range fight are very rare and aerodynamic configuration of ef already gives it good control at high speeds and high altitude

  • @howtobenormal5497
    @howtobenormal5497 9 днів тому +12

    F15EX will be crazy

    • @PvtPartzz
      @PvtPartzz 9 днів тому +4

      I doubt it. It’s a missile bus with a good radar, a second seat, and conformal fuel tanks. Any other 4th gen fighter would eat it alive in dogfight.

    • @jacobbaumgardner3406
      @jacobbaumgardner3406 9 днів тому +5

      @@PvtPartzzyeah, but how often are dogfights happening? It’s about missiles, radars, and engines. The F-15 has a great flight model as long as it stays above 500kts.
      The F-15EX would get an AESA array, AIM-120D’s, and the GE engine seen on the F-16C and F-14B, it would have a 1.3:1 T/W ratio. The only jet that would be quicker is the Typhoon.

    • @silentassassin3674
      @silentassassin3674 9 днів тому +3

      @@PvtPartzz u realize the more modern we get. engagements occur further and further? lol,f15EX would eat ant 4.5 gen in bvr(almost all your fights would be bvr)

    • @InterstellarTaco
      @InterstellarTaco 9 днів тому +3

      ​@@PvtPartzz bringing up dogfighting like that matters with modern aircraft is wild.

    • @Pvt_Wade
      @Pvt_Wade 8 днів тому +1

      ​@@jacobbaumgardner3406"active electronically scanned array array"

  • @SR71ABCD
    @SR71ABCD 7 днів тому +1

    Im not really into the Fighters I was hoping to see more bombers of the Cold War like the V-force, B-52's or a B-36, even perhaps a TSR*2.

  • @Nirqsa
    @Nirqsa 6 днів тому +1

    I think they should add stuff like the b52 or tu95, air refuelling for sim and intercept missions would be kinda hard because of map size and I guess if you wanted that then you can also just say play dcs but it think it would just add something else especially for sim

    • @Nirqsa
      @Nirqsa 6 днів тому

      Because everyone wants new fighters but I think it would make it a lot better and it would something different

  • @titortinhas228
    @titortinhas228 9 днів тому +4

    The enemy base should be invisible and random each map just like EC. also i hope EC comes for RB one day.

  • @mab2187
    @mab2187 8 днів тому +2

    I'm waiting for the Su-30 Flanker H with canard and TVC.

  • @generalironside8610
    @generalironside8610 9 днів тому +26

    The top tier keeps getting shittier and shittier...

    • @banshee4271
      @banshee4271 9 днів тому +1

      Yep

    • @sgtj.peldridge4567
      @sgtj.peldridge4567 9 днів тому +5

      To some people yeah my opinion bc I play sim I like it but that's because it's realistic and not just missile spam ppl use tactics

    • @-pr0vat70
      @-pr0vat70 9 днів тому +4

      @@sgtj.peldridge4567I mean one way they can improve air rb is by removing enemy marker when u spot them visually and force the player to use the aircrafts radar to identify if it’s friend or foe.

    • @CoolLink-Zelda
      @CoolLink-Zelda 8 днів тому

      The last br that i can enjoy is 11.3 with my beloved Tornado IDS MfG

    • @СергейНикольский-я2ц
      @СергейНикольский-я2ц 7 днів тому +1

      @@-pr0vat70that’ll be way too much for RB players since most of them can’t even read RWR properly or use manual radar controls, and most of them will delete the game cause of invisible 9M’s (look at sim, 9M’s were terrorising top tier without leaving a single chance for any plane that doesn’t carry them until fox-3’s were added and now 120’s do the same thing but they’re not nearly as OP as 9M’s were in IRCCM meta).
      I’d say that they should increase spotting range (from 2-5km to at least 10km), remove markers from targets that were spotted by allies and from allies (so you’ll see only those targets that you spotted by yourself and will have to use radar if there’re no targets nearby), immediately remove markers from those who hid behind terrain, remove maps such as small Afghan, small Spain, City, Sinai and other small/flat maps from top tier, add new maps with a normal terrain (like Afghan) and normal sized (150x150km+)

  • @shadow_spark8788
    @shadow_spark8788 9 днів тому +6

    I think the most notable improvement will be ESA radars. It will be a huge step up in situational awareness, bc current spotting system sucks, and mechanic radars have very narrow angles in TWS.

    • @LupusAries
      @LupusAries 8 днів тому

      Well, just you wait until ECM comes out, because then you will have to narrow that angle to achieve burn-through.
      What you really need before that is team-wide Voice comms with a test that requires you to set up your mike correctly and GCI/AWACS support during combat.
      The test for voice comms should be something along the lines of it making a test recording of you talking with game sounds in the background and if too much of the game sounds come through, you get rejected, so either no VOIP if too bad or Push-to-talk only. PTT should be standard imho. This should take care of all the idiots on speakers where you hear all the game sounds and feedback loops as soon as someone talks.
      Voice comms are needed for proper target indentification and too coordinate.

    • @shadow_spark8788
      @shadow_spark8788 8 днів тому

      @@-..----.--.-... where?

    • @sonwig5186
      @sonwig5186 8 днів тому

      @@-..----.--.-... no we don't, there is no mig 31 unfortunately

    • @-..----.--.-...
      @-..----.--.-... 8 днів тому

      @@sonwig5186 Aren't Zhuk-M radar of mig-29smt pesa?

    • @shadow_spark8788
      @shadow_spark8788 8 днів тому

      @@-..----.--.-... No. Wiki: "The antenna is a mechanically scanned slotted planar array"

  • @gustavofelix3433
    @gustavofelix3433 9 днів тому +10

    Realese the beast, realese the rafale

  • @FilippoDonna
    @FilippoDonna 6 днів тому +1

    I hope the eurofighter comes tomorrow😭

  • @Kyle_Train
    @Kyle_Train 9 днів тому +1

    They can just an eurofigther with normal weapons , gbu´s 16/48 and some jdams , slap some aim 9´s on it with some aim 120´s and they fixed the problem for germany that they don´t have an REAL jet fighter/ground pounder . and after some time they can give it real wepons iris-t and meteors . they could have given germany all ready an f18 from swiss but made it not to strong just to give germany an new ground pounder / jet fighter .

  • @nichendrix
    @nichendrix 8 днів тому

    Also stealth fighter are not invisible to radar, you just needed to get way closer to be able to get a lock on them, given the very long range of missiles like the newer versions of the AIM-120, or the MDBA Meteor, the stealth plane will he able to aquire a lock way before its opponents will be able to lock on them, and probably by the time their opponents realize they have a missile, or bombs coming their way, the stealth plane will be very far away.
    This is one of the reasons why many 4.5 Gen fighters kind of skipped the PESA family of Electrically Scanned Array Radars and were upgraded directly to the AESA radar standard. Since the AESA, and other new technologies provide both a very great range and sensibility that's useful to reduce the stealth fighters' advantage.
    In the Grinpen's case there are a humber of active research lines on the Gripen Program to replace some of its parts to composite materials that are radar absorbent, increasing its capabilities even further, if compared to the C/D variants.

  • @exonys3838
    @exonys3838 9 днів тому +6

    tbh i am a bit worried about the Rafale, because gaijin can make it realistic and let him be one of the top 3, or they can just introduce it as a complete disapointement (like every french top tier vehicles), his BVR capabilites are pretty difficult to balance, because they can leave the MICA in his current state of underperforming, they can fix it or they could potential give it the R77-1 (Serbia recently bought some Rafale and have planned to add R77-1 to it), it would balance the things out, especially since i think the 4.5 will come with better ARH missile like the AIM120C but that wouldn't be realistic since serbia will have their Rafale in 2029 and that the he greatly evolved between the first variants and 2029, there is also another option (the most unlikely i think) is that they add the MICA NG but it would be a power creep, AESA radar, double stage trust vectoring engine with the same range as the AIM120C and it's not even in service yet. I would prefer the second option (fix the MICA), currently the MICA is the worst BVR ARH but IRL he should be on par or even out-performing the AIM 120A and B, by doing that it would still be the plane with the worst BVR ARH at top tier (if the 120C and the R77-1 get added) but it would still be way better, and the combination of the Rafale + MICA + PESA radar + HMD (if they do like the mirage and they give it even if his earliest standards)it would created a mid range monster, like the current M2K-5F but on steroids. but after a few years of playing the french TT, i don't place much hope in gaijin capacity to make a french vehicle realistic, there is so much to say on most french top tier.
    (btw, it's not pronouced Rafaleee but Rafal, you don't pronounce the E since in french it would be wrote like that 'Rafali") anyway, good and usefull video as always, keep going mat, but mind take some poses, a lot of youtubers have got trought burn-out with such rythm and none of you subscriber want you to experience that, love

    • @specc_s1452
      @specc_s1452 8 днів тому

      What? The mirage 2000-5f is an incredible dogfighter, with one of, if not the best, radas in-game. The best fox 3 too. The 4k is even better kinematically. France hasn't been a disappointment air wise for a long time

    • @cahdoge
      @cahdoge 8 днів тому +1

      Why use the R-77?
      The french navy already uses the MDBA Meteor on their Rafale.

    • @mathieu722
      @mathieu722 8 днів тому +2

      What worries me more about the Rafale is that even if it's not totally stealth like a 5th gen (but it does have a big reduction in its radar area, and anyway I don't think stealth gameplay will be useful on WT as long as the maps are 20km²...), it puts more emphasis on electronic warfare, notably with its EW suit SPECTRA.
      In India's latest tests, a Su30's radar fried against the Rafale, which could give it some advantages, but I don't see Gaijin working on anything like that unfortunately.

    • @exonys3838
      @exonys3838 8 днів тому

      @@mathieu722 I don’t think honk they will SPECTRA, the active jamming would just either be too OP or useless

    • @exonys3838
      @exonys3838 8 днів тому

      @@specc_s1452 yeah but he still lack on the high speed and low speed performance, look at the DCS mirage, there is a whole world between them. Yeah I really love the M2K and it’s obviously one of the best dogfight, but he lacks some capabilities like the roll rate or high speed manoeuvrability

  • @JustSebi_
    @JustSebi_ 8 днів тому

    IMO that basically already is the Gripen C in WT. Highly Maneuverable, amazing Air to Air as well as Air to Ground capabilities with the newest and most modern weapon systems, a good radar and if newer weapon systems get added it still is compatible with them.

  • @thorluis226
    @thorluis226 9 днів тому +1

    Dont forget most 4.5 gen fighters have rwr with the capability of targeting planes with radars on using esm

  • @BartBarrett
    @BartBarrett 3 дні тому

    Wisdom is easily acquired when hiding under the bed with a saucepan on your head.

  • @nickzaccheo9294
    @nickzaccheo9294 9 днів тому +7

    GIVE US THE F-117 DAMNIT!!!!

    • @TackshooterOG
      @TackshooterOG 9 днів тому +1

      THIS

    • @STRYKER1467
      @STRYKER1467 9 днів тому +5

      why do you want a plane with only 2 bombs ?

    • @domkirk4408
      @domkirk4408 9 днів тому +2

      Have fun with no air to air capabilities.

    • @monaro34
      @monaro34 8 днів тому +1

      ​@@domkirk4408I mean a proper stealth bomber would be cool dodging the fights to sneak in and delete a base and get out

    • @kristijanmedved6066
      @kristijanmedved6066 8 днів тому

      ​@@STRYKER1467 ground rb

  • @CornellStella
    @CornellStella 3 дні тому

    Learning is a treasure that will follow its owner everywhere

  • @GustaveLewis
    @GustaveLewis 3 дні тому

    A suit of armor provides excellent sun protection on hot days.

  • @jch90z
    @jch90z 8 днів тому

    They must implement that condensation by height ends from about 13k meters

  • @EltonBloomer
    @EltonBloomer 3 дні тому

    A good example of a useful vegetable is medicinal rhubarb.

  • @Netanya-q4b
    @Netanya-q4b 9 днів тому +3

    I want mah hornet.

  • @ryanmabey1131
    @ryanmabey1131 6 днів тому

    Need bigger maps, multiple run ways, awacs, ground targets etc, basically mission objectives that aid in winning, roles for bombers, air sup and multirole. Sim is good but not enough going on and no space to really do anything

  • @mili8851
    @mili8851 9 днів тому +1

    I think when gajin said that j10 is 4,5 gen i think it is kinda introducion to f18 rafale eurofighter and much more they want us to be ready for this haos

    • @InterstellarTaco
      @InterstellarTaco 9 днів тому +1

      J10 is a 4.5 but is still inferior to things like the Rafael and Eurofighter. Even the F15 is still better than the J10.

  • @Lillspratt
    @Lillspratt 4 дні тому +1

    We need like a simulator battle, but with the controlls of realistic, and making it really large, so u can spawn in a gang of gripens, and make it so theres like very few players, it would be more fun than this braindead nonsense of just flying towords enemies and fireing everything you got. And make kill rewards in this said battle type muuch higher

  • @cecil7891
    @cecil7891 9 днів тому +1

    the problem is the servers cannot handle these powerful radars

  • @alexx-wh1bq
    @alexx-wh1bq 9 днів тому +2

    we got j10 but no fcking f18 yet... idk why is this f18 isnt that big of a deal i mean f16 or f15 are better on paper, and the multirole capability dont apply on air rb or gnd rb

    • @ferrous3262
      @ferrous3262 2 дні тому

      you people will never be satsified day after the f-18 comes you will be begging for the f-22

  • @leotsering
    @leotsering 9 днів тому +1

    Cant wait for any nation but us to get the latest techs

  • @airlightshockZOV
    @airlightshockZOV 8 днів тому

    Im afraid of the addition of the Su-35S, as it has an interesting system; an ADS, which is an air displacement sensor, which would break the game as it could track anything, stealth or not

  • @Just-S0me_space-cowboy
    @Just-S0me_space-cowboy 9 днів тому

    I think we're going to see later versions of what I'll call c models we have in game and maybe something like the Eurofighter before we get into the real 4.5 plus fighters. For instance, a Gripen C with meteor missiles and AIM-132s or AIM-9Xs or an F-15 with AIM-120C7s and AIM-9Xs

    • @Palpatine_e_sua_geminha
      @Palpatine_e_sua_geminha 9 днів тому

      The meteor will definitely broke top tier bvr, better range than phoenix and every 120

  • @fred3965
    @fred3965 9 днів тому +6

    5th gen is pretty much just 4.5gen with stealthy charactaristics with the exception of the rafale having a lower RCS than your typical 4.5 or 4th gen but not being enough to be classed as a stealth jet

    • @fred3965
      @fred3965 9 днів тому +1

      And we'll probably see a lot of electronic countermeasures too with these newer jets coming

    • @mikeyplayzwrld
      @mikeyplayzwrld 9 днів тому

      @@fred3965 electronic countermeasures is 4.5 gen

    • @fred3965
      @fred3965 9 днів тому

      @@mikeyplayzwrld Thats what i said mate or rather, what I meant.

    • @angelnunez6476
      @angelnunez6476 8 днів тому

      Electronic countermeasures should’ve already been in the game a long time ago with 3rd gen aircraft. For example the viggen and F-4 both had ew pods but the fact not even 4th gen’s have ew means it’s gonna be a long time before gaijoobble decides to add it. The main reason they probably haven’t added it yet is probably because it would make Russia unplayable. India did a lot of tests and found out most nato ew systems can actually completely shut down Russian aircraft radars and even the su-35 radar was made unusable when it was pitted up against a Rafael that only used the radar jamming systems and not even the built in jammers of the Rafael.

  • @The-ThunderTiger
    @The-ThunderTiger 8 днів тому +1

    The F-15EX is a 4.5 gen jet :))

  • @captainMony
    @captainMony 8 днів тому

    in a game with almost countless planes there isn't A NIGHTHAWK

  • @DaphneFrancis-h9s
    @DaphneFrancis-h9s 3 дні тому

    Dreams come true. Without that possibility, nature would not incite us to have them.

  • @nitebones1
    @nitebones1 9 днів тому

    i think 5th gens would work fine in the game if they dont put any of the stealth or lower radar cross section as with them it would just be next to imposable to properly balance expecally with countries that dont have those proper 5th gen aircraft, with out it you just have a very effective plane which is much easier to balance with the other countries

  • @Anthony1102www
    @Anthony1102www 9 днів тому +3

    The First thing Gaijin should do is give the true tracking ablitiy about AAM3 and AAM4

  • @ryangilbert2416
    @ryangilbert2416 6 днів тому

    It’s essentially gonna be f35vf35 plus some others whence 5th gens come out

  • @Mr_Lukasgrim
    @Mr_Lukasgrim 9 днів тому +19

    If the F-22 or F-35 will get added, i am afaraid There wont be anything so good to counter them. Not even the Su-57 (Su-75 didnt even fly yet) That is why i want Gaijin to add more cold war stuff we dont have yet like F-101 or Su-15

    • @mangosuppe8706
      @mangosuppe8706 9 днів тому +5

      Agreed I already know as a USSR main our future isn't bright whatsoever no matter what jets gaijin gives us lol. But I do hope the F-22 is added after 2027

    • @Stardust_the_F-104C
      @Stardust_the_F-104C 9 днів тому +3

      Oooooo i do want F-102 delta dart and F-106 delta dagger in game

    • @MacedonianChristian
      @MacedonianChristian 9 днів тому +1

      Su 57 can counter them if they have stealth coating applied.

    • @Shaboomquisa
      @Shaboomquisa 9 днів тому +1

      maps are too small for f22s and f35. when youre that close to them you should be able to radar lock them we really aren't that far from each other map wise

    • @lars7747
      @lars7747 9 днів тому

      ​@@MacedonianChristianit has exposed rivots. It lights up like a Christmas tree on radar. We can detect them from outside of russia

  • @StiveGuy
    @StiveGuy 9 днів тому +1

    So, heavily upgraded gen4 jets?

  • @talltale9760
    @talltale9760 9 днів тому +3

    Russia might finally get a semi decent radar lol

    • @STRYKER1467
      @STRYKER1467 9 днів тому +2

      with the SU-30M2 they get a pretty good radar.

  • @Pedarkhor
    @Pedarkhor 9 днів тому +1

    F-22? I dont think so I mean what could they possibly give other factions to compete with it? :/

    • @SashaVhd
      @SashaVhd 8 днів тому

      rafale and eurofighter and the gripen

  • @nichendrix
    @nichendrix 8 днів тому

    I don't doubt that Gaijin will eventually introduce 5th Gen fighters on WT, but if and when it does so, it will have to solve a lot of major problem in the current nations' lineup, because not all of them operates 5th Gen fighters, also, even those which do operates them, most have only have one model of this type of fighter, which are, for most nations in the game the F-35.
    We can argue that each of the F-35 is a different type of fighters, but yet, France, Germany and Sweden operates no stealth fighter, Britain and Italy only operates 2 variants, the F-35A and F-35B, Israel just one variant, the F-35A.
    Russia and China have only one stealth fighter in service, the Su-57 Fellon and J-20 Mighty Dragon. Arguably you can give Russian and China another 5th Gen fighter by assuming that Shenyang FC-31 Gyrfalcon, and Su-71 Checkmate are available to these nations, but that would be stretching the reality quite a bit. Specialy in the case of Russia, since the Su-71 didn't even reach prototype stage yet, just static mockup for airshows, no prototype was, and at this point, Russian economy is so weak after the sanctions that it probably no prototype will ever be made. At least the FC-31 actualy is a real paane, prototypes were made, tested and evaluated by the PLAAF, and even though it lost the bid to the J-20, it is still in active development since Shenyang opted to keep developing the fighter in order to attempt to sell it to the PL Navy, or to be allowed to sell it for China's allies, both of which didn't materialize yet.
    This gives a clear advantage to the USA would have not only all three variants of the F-35, as well as the F-22, which would greatly favor the USA tech tree over the others.
    And if you go on to put ou technology demonstrator and prototypes that lost bids in the mix, like the FC-31 and the Su-71, then the USA could have as many as 6 different stealth fighters, as there are also the YF-23 Back Widow and the X-32.
    It would be a nightmare to balance 5th Gen fighter, not even counting the fact that we barely have nuch tangible real world information about them, as msot of what we think we know about them is highly classified, and a lot of what isn't is either fluff or too generic to make a realistic flight model.

    • @SashaVhd
      @SashaVhd 8 днів тому

      rafale, eurofighter and gripen can compete with the f35 and f22

  • @Arocksy
    @Arocksy 8 днів тому

    Still waiting for a Trust vectoring for planes, ECM and stealth

  • @fremenGaming
    @fremenGaming 8 днів тому

    No it would not look like that. AESA does not "scan" in the way you think with normal radar.

  • @Gurubashy
    @Gurubashy 8 днів тому

    The first plane with a PESA array in War Thunder will be Mig 31. The first AESA will be the Japanese F2. Mig 25 might be a premium and the tech tree will jump straight to Mig 31.

  • @abartlett66
    @abartlett66 8 днів тому

    I just want Ground RB jet spawns to be at least 20km out instead of in range of spaa

  • @willbrigham2121
    @willbrigham2121 9 днів тому

    We’re still missing a ton of gen3 and gen4 aircraft. Maybe we should get those right first……

  • @Lulzwhat
    @Lulzwhat 9 днів тому +2

    It's just a new jets, nothing special in terms of War Thunder.
    BTW, I remind you guys: No Eurofighter, Rafale, F-18, Su-30, ARM's = no money next year. Warn Gaijin every way you can!

  • @TristaMorley
    @TristaMorley 3 дні тому

    Strong people make as many mistakes as weak people. Difference is that strong people admit their mistakes, laugh at them, learn from them. That is how they become strong.

  • @mayhem8744
    @mayhem8744 9 днів тому +1

    Yay my favourite generation of jets

  • @eagelseye8089
    @eagelseye8089 8 днів тому

    I predict that 5th Gen will come either christmas 2025 or 2026

  • @ivan5595
    @ivan5595 9 днів тому +1

    more power creeping yeaaah

  • @timpan4387
    @timpan4387 4 дні тому

    you mention the JAS39 that we have in game as a "Gen4", thing is that the JAS39C in game is what the JAS39A should be. even the original JAS39C should be a "4.5" and later variants even more so. right now the C is capped for some BS reason, there is no reason for it to be in the game as it is right now.
    same thing with the JA37D, it is just what the JA37C should be. the real reason to we made the JA37D was for it to be operational along side with the JAS39A WITH AIM120......
    Gripen E is more like a "Gen5" with it's top of the line electronics suite.

  • @flybird4629
    @flybird4629 8 днів тому

    Guys i have a question, is the AV-8B+ a 3.5+ gen or a 4th gen.

  • @Sean74218
    @Sean74218 8 днів тому

    Bro keeps gooning over the eurofighter

  • @CruLisP
    @CruLisP 8 днів тому

    they should add world war size maps

  • @Likeaworm
    @Likeaworm 9 днів тому

    The f35 would be the best jet in the game if they modeled the Das. IRST cameras looking in every direction……..

  • @FreeRojava2025
    @FreeRojava2025 8 днів тому +5

    The problem is the Europfighter and Rafael are too good. Russian aircraft can’t really compete, and the US you would need a late variant F-16 or something.

    • @jjnmr
      @jjnmr 8 днів тому

      does the early variant on both plane really that good?

    • @FreeRojava2025
      @FreeRojava2025 8 днів тому

      @@jjnmr pretty good yes. Very good manoeuvrability and (I believe) capable of carrying later variants of Fox-3. I don’t think they have the meteor or ASRAAM but some AMRAAMs or something similar could be quite over powered on such a fast and manoeuvrable platform.

    • @jjnmr
      @jjnmr 8 днів тому +1

      @@FreeRojava2025 hopefully those plane come after a couple update, i really want new sukhoi variant, f18, and rafale since im done with these nation tech tree

    • @zoega0850
      @zoega0850 8 днів тому +3

      The early Eurofighters tranch 1 and 2 and the early Rafaels can easily be implemented right now, they are on par with the Gripen C.

    • @ethereal1356
      @ethereal1356 7 днів тому +1

      Yeah I can totally imagine how those two will outmatch russian stuff. Gaijin probably scared to add.

  • @ronniefairley2388
    @ronniefairley2388 8 днів тому

    We never got out f18

  • @ScourgeZer
    @ScourgeZer 3 дні тому

    Are they gonna see alt with radar? Finally?

  • @idotlmor4359
    @idotlmor4359 9 днів тому +1

    Wil an update will be coming out soon?

    • @Sj_20h9
      @Sj_20h9 9 днів тому +1

      i think so

    • @idotlmor4359
      @idotlmor4359 9 днів тому

      @@Sj_20h9like close to the end of the week I hope

    • @airlightshockZOV
      @airlightshockZOV 8 днів тому +1

      @@idotlmor4359nah, the next update should begin in like 2 weeks minimum

    • @idotlmor4359
      @idotlmor4359 8 днів тому

      @@airlightshockZOV will there be a new Israeli jet?

    • @maperdiole
      @maperdiole 8 днів тому +1

      @@idotlmor4359 most likely

  • @a_random_viewer_7169
    @a_random_viewer_7169 9 днів тому +2

    SU-30 and SU-35S :/

  • @kotokoheaven2402
    @kotokoheaven2402 9 днів тому +1

    agora solta o mesmo video no canal BR porfavo

  • @razvy6949
    @razvy6949 8 днів тому

    Come on man I just want my F2 man, I NEED GUIDED BOMBS AAAAA

  • @nukeman360
    @nukeman360 9 днів тому +4

    I want to see F-22 so bad and I'm USSR main LOL. Ill start grinding US soon

  • @JoseHernandez-jp9pv
    @JoseHernandez-jp9pv 9 днів тому +2

    To put it more simply, the 4.5 generation are improved aircraft but they do not have a technology that marks a before and after, or they do not have an overwhelming technological advantage compared to the previous generation.

  • @sicksixgamer2694
    @sicksixgamer2694 8 днів тому

    And the maps and game modes won't be updated....

  • @jfd9616
    @jfd9616 2 дні тому

    If Korea gets added Id want the boramae

  • @sonwig5186
    @sonwig5186 8 днів тому

    Excited for J10C and J16. China will be really competetive in this rank, better than Russia probably. I wonder when they will implement electronic warfare properly.

  • @tiationaearesarutonasothar5289
    @tiationaearesarutonasothar5289 9 днів тому +1

    Next update idea: F-14D(AIM-120A, AGM-88 Harms), F-14B(gets AIM-9M), F-14A(AIM-9Ls), F/A-18A/C(USA), AIM-120C/D, R-77-1, F-14's getting there VTAS(HMS like F-4S)

    • @lazer2238
      @lazer2238 9 днів тому +4

      too much stuff for US. Also F14 couldn't fire aim 120, it was a failed test although the Iran f14 getting r27 which it couldn't guide does change that.

    • @brodykloster2102
      @brodykloster2102 6 днів тому

      First off the f14d never used the aim 120 or the agm88, second why would they add the aim 120d lol, the most I could see them adding is an aim 120c-5 and that’s a stretch, but they could add the c5 since the r77-1 and pl12 are very similar to it, I could see an f18a with 9l and 7ms added but the c I think will come in December, and the r77-1 would come with the aim 120c-5 but the thing is is that no jet currently uses it in game, the smt or su27sm use it, so they would have to add a new jet (probably an su30) and last the f14s never used hmd or hms so it will never ever receive it

    • @tiationaearesarutonasothar5289
      @tiationaearesarutonasothar5289 6 днів тому

      @@lazer2238 F-14, couldn't directly use the AIM-120, because it was never installed into the fleet. However, the some F-14's were modified to be able to, for testing

  • @hansthesoldier8700
    @hansthesoldier8700 9 днів тому

    do you think F2 will ne possible?

    • @razvy6949
      @razvy6949 8 днів тому

      It's actually the next step for the game

  • @bentonstaffel2471
    @bentonstaffel2471 9 днів тому

    We have 4.5s in the game

  • @PaPaFiggy69
    @PaPaFiggy69 8 днів тому +2

    Would need F/A-18 A-D first then add those in with the F/A-18E and F. Maybe add the F-15EX as well lol but hopefully the F-16XL gets added

  • @wing_sweep
    @wing_sweep 8 днів тому

    I love your videos

  • @JAS39Gripen__438
    @JAS39Gripen__438 8 днів тому

    I'm really getting tired of Mat overhyping the J-10. He says it’s like a Eurofighter, or should I say "Aerofighter"? 😂 It’s just not accurate

  • @mantusl
    @mantusl День тому

    when su 27 fm update

  • @animeweeb2595
    @animeweeb2595 8 днів тому

    F35 and f22 are never coming

  • @idotlmor4359
    @idotlmor4359 9 днів тому

    I need f16i and f15i

  • @karolkotowski754
    @karolkotowski754 8 днів тому +1

    4.5 gen is not a thing

  • @mythicfour
    @mythicfour 9 днів тому +1

    Top tier isn't even fun with the current BVR meta and super flat maps. I wish there was a way to force more dogfights and merges.

    • @bigmemer4398
      @bigmemer4398 9 днів тому +1

      Literally multipathing and notching
      The problem is 16v16

  • @alexandreaudard4309
    @alexandreaudard4309 8 днів тому +2

    RAFALE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @minenite0
    @minenite0 9 днів тому +2

    hi :3

  • @Grover_89
    @Grover_89 9 днів тому +1

    an F22 will never come to this game brother☠

    • @141menace
      @141menace 8 днів тому +2

      uhm yes it will, just a matter of time

    • @petrkdn8224
      @petrkdn8224 8 днів тому +1

      lol i remember when people were saying "Abrams will never come to the game" and its been 7 years since its introduction

  • @brunoqueiros2971
    @brunoqueiros2971 8 днів тому +1

    top tier is just broken, not fun to play anymore, we need bigger maps, different matchmaking, 1v1´s, theres no bvr anymore, its just a fox-3 dogfight 5 minute match we need dcs like gameplay or gaijin will start losing many players

  • @kristijanmedved6066
    @kristijanmedved6066 8 днів тому +1

    Bvr is most boring thing ever

    • @ethereal1356
      @ethereal1356 7 днів тому

      Well it will be the only thing in this game when they keep adding more of the modern BVR that is immune to countermeasures and inescapable like ASRAAM or MICA IR. Especially the BVR IR missiles those are so OP that even F22 and F35 will struggle against it.

    • @kristijanmedved6066
      @kristijanmedved6066 7 днів тому

      @@ethereal1356 then whats the point of adding different planes if their unique features doesent matter (turn rate speed etc.) instead its just who has better missile i dont see fun in that we need no bvr mode

    • @ethereal1356
      @ethereal1356 7 днів тому

      @@kristijanmedved6066 Yeah I agree but gaijin never listens when we ask them to make stuff more accurate and I am sure they don't play test their own game to know how bad it is. I hope they add new game mode with more dogfights and less op missiles.

    • @kristijanmedved6066
      @kristijanmedved6066 7 днів тому

      @@ethereal1356 yeah or limit op missile to 1 per plane so people would not just spam it

  • @collegeincrypto
    @collegeincrypto 2 дні тому

    Lmappopo

  • @aydenpalmer4647
    @aydenpalmer4647 8 днів тому

    I dont care about new jets... i just want the mig29smt to stop underperforming 😢. The thing is basically a russian f4.

  • @theroach2204
    @theroach2204 8 днів тому

    If their is no Eurofighter next update, gaijin are cringe.
    stop with all these shitty copy paste variants.