El Clasico in Photography! Tamron 17-70mm F/2.8 VS Sony 18-105mm F/4.
Вставка
- Опубліковано 4 жов 2024
- You can also support my channel by Buying Me a Coffee here!
www.buymeacoff...
Best regards for all Your support!
Check Also My other Vids:
Samyang 85mm f1.4 low light test
• Samyang 85mm f/1.4 FE ...
Sony ZV-E10 SLOWMOTION TEST
• ZV-E10 SLOW MOTION TES...
You need only three lenses as a photographer
• 3 Best Lenses for Sony...
Testing Zv-e10 with 18-105mm on a basketball match
• Can This Cheap Setup H...
You need that CPL FILTER!
• Must Have CPL Filter.
f6.3 vs f1.8
• You Need That Sony E 5...
Sony E 50mm f1.8 OSS
• Sony Zv-E10 + Sony e 5...
Sony e 10-18mmf4 OSS
• Among The Woods with S...
18-105 vs 55-210 side By side
• Sony E PZ 18-105mm f/4...
18-105 OSS Test
• Leave Your Gimbal At H...
18-105 Low Light Photography
• Is F4 Enough for Low L...
18-105 Street Pov
• Sony 18-105mm f4. POV ...
18-105 vs Kit Lens comparison
• Does The Size Matter? ...
18-105 vs 55-210 Bokeh Comparison
• Sony 18-105mm f 4 vs S...
18-105 Sony My honest opinion
• Sony 18-105 f4 in 2022...
Sony ZV-E10 plus Sony 70-350 4.5-6.3 Sports Photography
• Shooting Sport with So...
Focal Lenght Comparison
• You will Be shocked Ho...
Sony 18-105 F4 Pros And Cons
• Sony E PZ 18-105mm F4 ...
Sony 70-350mm vs Sony 55-210mm
• Sony E 70-350mm 4.5-6....
Sony 70-350mm vs Sony 55-210mm Side By Side Sharpness Comparison
• Sony E 55-210mm 4.5-6....
Before and After Cine Lut
• Before and After Cine ...
zv-e10 high ISO Low Light
• Sony ZV-E10 Low Light,...
Sony 70-350mm OSS Test
• Sony 70-350mm 4.5-6.3 ...
Catalyst Browse Review
• Secret Weapon to Stabi...
I sold the 18-105 for the 17-70. But - I have to say - the one lens I really felt in love with is the Tamron 18-300. I own both (17-70 and 18-300). Clearly the 17-70 is a little bit sharper and has better bokeh, but the 18-300 has a nearly perfect overall quality. I'm shooting "impossibile" things with this lens.
I didnt have it yet :D but i believe it can be loved. All inc one :D 24-450 Ff eqv! Is something amazing ;)
would you say it´s sharper than the sony?
@@luisrobertovegatorreblanca2553 which Sony lens are you talking about?
@@claudiocarroccio5251vs Sony 18-105 F/4.0
2.8 is better for the darker environment, but the Sony is a native lens with fantastic oss and works perfectly with my a6400, it's smaller, it's not extending when zooming which makes it perfect for gimbal but above all, has a longer reach of 35mm. If the Tamron was 17-104 i maybe would swap but as most of my usage is for daytime on very sunny days like Sharm, Gibraltar Spain and summer location holidays, i don't see the need of a zoom lens for indoor shooting and night time shooting where i use my Sigma trio F 1.4.
If i should start shooting hand held at night, i will defineyly consider this lens.
But as i am thinking of upgrading my camera and maybe to a full frame.... If I decide to stay with my a6400 as my Sigma lenses they don't have stabilisationi I may go for this Tamron or a Sony mm 1.8 for hand-held indoor shooting or night time shooting. .
Both are great of course ❤️❤️ both have pros and cons 💯💯
Thx for. Your opinion 😉
Great comparison. Remembering that the Sony 18 -105mm maintains the same size when changing the millimeter and this makes it easier to use the gymball. Which one would you recommend for using videos on a Sony ZVE10?
Both of them are good lenses. In terms of handheld shooting 18-105 OSS is much better with any words. Tamron much brighter and has better image quality sharpness bokeh etc. If used on gimbal or tripod clearly tamron 17-70. Both good but i already sold 18-105 :D
Tamron hands down. Sharper and has OSS. 18-105 pales doesn't stack up F4 vs 2.8 lol
Both have image stabilization. But tamron clearly sharper with more bokeh. Tamron seems to be the ideal gun shot for weedings ;)
Sony is a video lens with OSS and constant size for gimbal. It is a best buy for this kind of use. TAMRON is for photography
@MobileCanal Sorry I have to disagree. Put the Tamron in a camera body with ibis and the combined stabilization will help wonders handheld.
In sharpness and land speed trumps the F4 in the old 18 and 105 quality. But whatever works for you. And we all know if we're dealing with a lens that's a bit heavier than we get a heavy duty gimbal.
Problem solved. But to each it's own, The Tamron 17-70mm is great for video. Just need to learn how to use it.
Exactly the two lenses I needed compared for fx30!! Thank you!!
Thx you appreciate :) at least i add that had 17-70 last week on a weeding day. I had it 90% of time on a body and it turned great so im really happy with that one :) tell me which one you prefer cause both of them are good :)
@@FreeLensImage I ended up buying the 17-70 Tamron. It should be here tomorrow. I need extra low light abilities too, so that 2.8 is what did it for me!
@@willpowermediagroupllc i hope you will enjoy it 😍. You can not be wrong with that lens :)
There’s an issue with the Tamron image stabilization and cameras with ibis. Besides, the power zoom is great for video on the fx30, compared with manual zoom on the Tamron.
The fx30 is more of a great video camera that shoots great photos, so the smooth power zoom clearly wins in this camera. Another thing, if you use a gimbal, the Sony won’t have issues since the zoom is internal, the Tamron with mess up the gimbal since it changes the length of the lens (weight distribution) when zooming.
It is not about numbers, it’s about the actual use.
Clearly the Sony is better for the fx30 at least
Mam oba i nie mogę się zdecydować który zabrać na spacer z psami😉
thank you
🙂
But the 18 - 105 mm isn't tropicalised, it's the most important problem of the 18 - 105mm.
Tropi ... What? I dont understand what you mean. 🤷😂🤪
@@FreeLensImage Traduct that : L'objectif sony 18-105mm n'est pas tropicalisé, c'est ça son plus gros défaut.
Between el clasico there is Atletico (sigma) 😂
🤪 did not use yet ;) maybe will some day, but for now i very like that tamron so dont see a reason to buy sigma now;)