I might be def from construction, factory work, and now a farrier. But my gun sounds like a car door being pushed closed softly. The noise dont bother me but if i can stay off the neighborhood radar thats all that matters! Thanks for the testing.
The barrels always have air in them.. they are not a vacuum chamber and there is turbulence in front of the pellet maybe not as much as in the rear because of the forcing air but there is air being compressed in the barrel in front of the pellet causing slight turbulence
Look up the actual definition of turbulence which is a violent shift in air flow, there is no violent air flow, just atmosphere air in front of the pellet if that was the case then people who shoot with a bare barrels and no moderater or shroud like many have before you'd never get it to shoot the pellet good cause it would be unstable to begin with, since the pellet is already in the rifling the puff of air stays behind it, pellets actually have two seals, the head and skirt so to say turbulent air is in front of the pellet or beats the pellet out of the barrel is definitely not accurate and when you actually tune a pellet you're tuning for the valve/hammer timing and rpms of the rifling not turbulence especially in front of a pellet in the barrel or leaving the barrel...good groups out of your Beeman btw
I'm. 56. But I heard it. That. Sound at the very end was gone. & the other. Like you Said. was a thud kinda sound. With nothing at the end. Good sound investigation . Good work James. Your always on top. of your game !
I hear the difference! but you keep saying the older you get yet you're doing measurements in meters instead of feet. ((With that being said)) us old guys relate to measuring in FEET 🐾only. Btw You still plan on making your own silencer and selling it? Thx ✌️
You need to show you filling up to max and loade three pellets when doing both test. First test didn't know your pressure on first and second test. And definitely didn't see you actually load the pellets. Using the pellets makes a difference and how much pressure. Should show the gage on both and see the pellets going into the clip. All in one take.
Just a reference next time you do a comparison. For next time. Just trying to help you. I work with five other guys on Utube. Thought your idea was a good one. Just wanted you to leave no doubt for the nah sayers. That's all.. Cheers mate
I think your take on the vent holes is sound and you have a great solution to fix the problem. However your tests are flawed. You will never duplicate the distance of the muzzle to the cell phone (not a true DB meter) when you hand hold the rifle. Duh! You need a bench and a gun vice so the rifle is always the exact same distance. If you are going to compare two different conditions you need to have consistent positioning and duplicatable data. I shouldn't need to explain this to you.
Where are these holes? Mine only has them at the base. Yours had them in the middle too?
I might be def from construction, factory work, and now a farrier. But my gun sounds like a car door being pushed closed softly. The noise dont bother me but if i can stay off the neighborhood radar thats all that matters! Thanks for the testing.
The barrels always have air in them.. they are not a vacuum chamber and there is turbulence in front of the pellet maybe not as much as in the rear because of the forcing air but there is air being compressed in the barrel in front of the pellet causing slight turbulence
Look up the actual definition of turbulence which is a violent shift in air flow, there is no violent air flow, just atmosphere air in front of the pellet if that was the case then people who shoot with a bare barrels and no moderater or shroud like many have before you'd never get it to shoot the pellet good cause it would be unstable to begin with, since the pellet is already in the rifling the puff of air stays behind it, pellets actually have two seals, the head and skirt so to say turbulent air is in front of the pellet or beats the pellet out of the barrel is definitely not accurate and when you actually tune a pellet you're tuning for the valve/hammer timing and rpms of the rifling not turbulence especially in front of a pellet in the barrel or leaving the barrel...good groups out of your Beeman btw
Didn't hear the whistle but could tell the ldc had more of a low thud sound👍🏻✌🏻
Right on!
Yeah same here.......... Proving I might be old? LOL
I'm. 56. But I heard it. That. Sound at the very end was gone. & the other. Like you Said. was a thud kinda sound. With nothing at the end. Good sound investigation . Good work James. Your always on top. of your game !
I agree the slower and more released air I believe would quit the overall sound of a sudden high pitched sound.
Thanks for your video, out of curiosity what was the decibels when shooting without the donnly modetator on the airgun
Pellets do have turbulence. Watch the FX videos. They show everything about that on a few barrel videos.
Yup I heard the difference Thank you for the video 😊
No problem 👍
I shoot in the house too lol ...I got a good 35 feet ..I use a steel plate in a cardboard box no mess of splattering lead
Nice!
They never ricochets out? What caliber? What's the box setup. Thx
I hear the difference! but you keep saying the older you get yet you're doing measurements in meters instead of feet. ((With that being said)) us old guys relate to measuring in FEET 🐾only. Btw You still plan on making your own silencer and selling it? Thx ✌️
Good job !!
Thanks!
You need to show you filling up to max and loade three pellets when doing both test. First test didn't know your pressure on first and second test. And definitely didn't see you actually load the pellets. Using the pellets makes a difference and how much pressure. Should show the gage on both and see the pellets going into the clip. All in one take.
I'm good bro, my calculations and shooting are confirmed by the best ballisticians not fx, fx boys cant do what i can do lol
Just a reference next time you do a comparison. For next time. Just trying to help you. I work with five other guys on Utube. Thought your idea was a good one. Just wanted you to leave no doubt for the nah sayers. That's all.. Cheers mate
appreciate it! but i do things a certain way and show true results
I think your take on the vent holes is sound and you have a great solution to fix the problem. However your tests are flawed. You will never duplicate the distance of the muzzle to the cell phone (not a true DB meter) when you hand hold the rifle. Duh! You need a bench and a gun vice so the rifle is always the exact same distance. If you are going to compare two different conditions you need to have consistent positioning and duplicatable data. I shouldn't need to explain this to you.
👍🐴
Thanks!
Very well demonstrated
Thank you!