Great lady but I don't think you can generalize her example to all women of the region at the time. She was educated and independent because of her wealth and royal status. And she had very close relationship with the powerful men in her family who gave her protection, essentially everyone's favorite auntie.
I don't think she tried to generalize. Her message was that at that time women who chould afford to go to the pilgrimage and could have security, could go to pilgrimage. In other words those who were able to do what they wanted to, could do. Also you can't say that women in general did not have freedom because we don't know! Even if they had freedom, they all weren't historic figures. So we can't know about the society of that time on a minute level. All we can do is to research to find tales of events or writings and because we have a tale of 'her' pilgrimage one could assume the situation of the society. And if you think womens rights are doing whatever they want, than this very present world is also violenting womens rights. Be it East, be it West! Not only that rghts have to be described as well, otherwise can't say that womens didn't have freedom!
@@REZA-TheRigorous I think you are reading too much into my post. I did not comment on the state of women’s rights then or now. But the Moghul Empire was a deeply stratified society, like any other at the time, and romanticizing the experience of elite women often overshadows the more sordid reality of most people, men or women.
Bega Begum (c. 1511 - 17 January 1582) was Empress consort of the Mughal Empire from 26 December 1530 to 17 May 1540 and 22 June 1555 to 27 January 1556 as the first wife and chief consort of the second Mughal emperor Humayun.[1][2][3][4] She was known as Zan-i-Kalan being the first wife of Humayun and was also known as Haji Begum after she performed the Hajj pilgrimage
Just a thought could it be that we don't have the details about the journey in humayun nama or akbar nama , because she didn't want people to know about her good deeds , I mean I have seen people hiding there good deeds and act of worship and keep it just between them and God.
Wonderful. How encouraging. I never knew such a thing happened during Emperor Akbar's rule. Thank you for such an enchanting story. I would love to remember this as long as I live.
None of this makes sense to me as her dad had named her GUL-BADAN. Gul (گل): Means "flower." Badan (بدن): Means "body." which translates to "flower-bodied" or "a body as delicate and beautiful as a flower."
@3:12 thousands of rupees in cash 😂. Darling, there used to be no cash in rupees back then. Sounds you barely managed to pass history subject in your high school !! 😂
Hi I recently visited Udaipur the city has great historical architecture the guide gave me information about the kingdom of mewar but want to know more facts about that great dynasty ❤
No source in any Nama numa. So the only source left is gulbadan Begum and sultan murad revealed this in your dreams, or you were present there when she was honoured with gifts and welcome. And also the fact that Akbar didn't scold her for staying put in Mecca. As if Akbar was her uncle and not vice versa.
@@abdussamadshaikh3467 Your INTENTIONS in the posts are clear! 😅 What you might not like to notice is that the narrator clearly stated that in the absence of complete historical sources, she is telling a "story", which is called "generalisation" in history & is acceptable as long as one has acknowledged it as it is - a part-story. 🙂
Interesting, but there must be more to this story than just a rivalry brought on by a princess. Both dynasties were of Turkish origins, but with little historical information today we cannot know for sure what had tranpired between the two great dynasties.🐞
@@madeehajamal6772 Akbar the great. He was a real emperor. Smart, wise, and surrounded by wise advisors. He was a Muslim but secular in his thoughts which proved him a great politician in holding and expanding his kingdom over the period of many decades. He was hated by some of the religious radicals babas of his time. Who spread the rumors of him creating his own version of Islam Deen E Elahi. Which was actually a guide book of do’s and don’ts. Only to keep the melting bowl of Hindu Muslim in order.
Daughter of a King,Sister of a King and Aunt of a King and sitting in house of Lord of the worlds,a place from where power is being distributed to the leaders around the world. . Doing charity on the name of Allah. What else do you expect? Her conscious was clear, so she was unafraid of any worldy power.
I did not find she being sent away but many Mughal/Indian pilgrimers were sent away because they were disrupting the local population which came to the Sultans ears.
Mughals or Gurkanis never recognised ottomans as Caliph, infact Akber, jahangir, shah Jahan, Aurangzeb,etc styled themselves as Caliph and Delhi as seat of the Caliphate. They referred to ottomans as zamindar of Constantinople (as mentioned in a letter of Shah Jahan).
And you are a righteous ruler. He was shrewed politician and tried to create a faith that is amalgamation of indegenious relegions and Islam for political expediency. Despite many of his excesses was a capable ruler and directly or indirectly aided in spread of islam. I wonder what have you achieved apart from being a DIY Jurist.
Yes, he was. Thankfully he didn’t force it on others, and ran the country according to Sharia(partially). That's a credit to him. But yes, he was a Mushrik.
Today, I found something interesting: 2300 years ago, According to Emperor Ashoka in Edict 13 (Rock Edicts of Khalsi, a place name) Ashoka said: "I spread Dhamma (Buddhism) from India to Egypt and Greece." In 2022, archaeologists discovered a 2000-year-old Buddha statue in Egypt (the Berenike Buddha). Similar Buddha statues have also been found in Indonesia, Mongolia, Japan, China, and other countries. Perhaps in the future, we may even find a Buddha statue in Greece. The remarkable fact is this: without war, Indian civilization, over 2000 years ago, spread its religion and culture from Indonesia, China, Korea, Japan, and Mongolia to Egypt and Greece.
Correct me if I’m wrong but I’m pretty sure it’s spread to Greece through Alexander the Great.Its so interesting.I went to taxila museum in Pakistan,it shows all ancient statues and sculptures of Buddha ans you can see how different people distorted him over time and made him look different.You can clearly tell which sculptures are Greek,which are Indian etc.
Afaik, both of you are partially correct. The presence of Buddha statues anywhere means there was a presence of Buddhists, and that there were Buddhist merchants in those areas. This does not mean that Indian culture became a dominant or even popular force in those regions. I am referring to the west, ofc. We still share an incredible amount of cultural heritage with SE Asia and East Asia. The Greco-Buddhists of Bactria were influential in Buddhist art and patronage, but I don't think they spread Buddhism to the west.
@AAH-td7kg No, you're wrong. There's no proof that Alexander came in contact with Buddhism or Alexander ever accepted Buddhism. The fact is with Alexander's conquest, Greeks came close to India's borders. Greeks became neighbors of India. And after the death of Alexander and the birth of Ashoka, Greeks and Ashoka came in contact. And then Buddhism transferred to Greeks living in Afghanistan. Then through Afghanistan, Greeks (to Greeks) in Egypt, then to mainland Greece. Greek kings names are mentioned in Ashoka's inscriptions. Ashoka's Major Rock Edict No. 13 mentions five Hellenistic kings: * Antiochus II Theos of Syria (261-246 BCE) * Ptolemy II Philadelphos of Egypt (285-247 BCE) * Antigonus II Gonatas of Macedon (278-239 BCE) * Magas of Cyrene (300-258 BCE) * Alexander II of Epirus (272-258 BCE)
@AAH-td7kg SCRIPT AND LANGUAGE FOUND IN INDIA Archaeological Evidence and Strong Proof (Unlike unsupported theories such as the Aryan invasion or the Vedic period that have zero evidence-India’s real history is supported by archaeology.) • The INDUS SCRIPT, dating back to around 2600-1900 BCE, is approximately 4600-3900 years old and represents a sophisticated system of writing from the Indus Valley Civilization. • Later, the DHAMMA LIPI, used between 500 BCE and 300 CE, emerged as a significant script. - This script, over 2500 years old, is found on Ashoka’s pillars, inscriptions, and other structures. - There are similarities between the letters of the Indus Valley Script and Ashokan Dhamma Lipi. The letters of Indus valley script over the time involved and turned into dhamma lipi • Over time, between 1 CE and 6 CE, the Ashokan script evolved and contributed to the development of Sanskrit. • Gautama Buddha, widely recognized today, was the last famous Buddha, but many Buddhas existed before him. • There is substantial evidence linking Buddhism to the Indus Valley Civilization, indicating that early Buddhism is over 4000 years old. Evidence of Buddhism in the Indus Valley Civilization • In Mohenjo-daro, a Buddhist stupa was discovered. - While some claim it dates to the 1st century CE, evidence suggests it is from the Indus Valley period, as its brick size matches that of other Indus Valley structures like houses. • A Buddha pendant was discovered in Mohenjo-daro, indicating early Buddhist influence. • The spoked-wheel symbol (☸️), was also found in the Indus Valley. • Gautama Buddha statues from 1-10 CE share stylistic similarities with the so-called "Priest-King" statue of the Indus Valley, especially in clothing style. • A meditation statue was found in the Indus Valley, though its head is broken. • Indus Valley Early Buddhism: Over 4000 years old then turned into • Modern Buddhism: Began with Gautama Buddha. • Gautama Buddha: Born 2500 years ago. • Ashoka the Great: Born 2300 years ago, he spread Buddhism to many countries. Ashoka’s Edict 13 (Rock Edicts of Kalsi) • Ashoka said: I spread Dhamma (Buddhism) from India to Egypt and Greece. Recent Discoveries Supporting Ashoka’s Statement • In 2022, archaeologists discovered a 2000-year-old **Buddha statue** in Berenike, Egypt. • Similar Buddha statues have also been found in Indonesia, Mongolia, Japan, China, and other countries, indicating the spread of Buddhism.
Hey Poopjeet, don't use words and phrase you know not the meaning of. It exposes your lack of knowledge/education 😂😂😂. FYI, it means one who is against religious rules and customs and, thus, doesn't follow them ... LOL
Funny thing, Akbar sent members of his courts he no longer wanted, to hajj, as punishment/exile in disguise. Also, since Akbar claimed himself Zill-e-Ilahi, he totally disregarded Ottomans as khalifa. So we can totally see him getting annoyed with Ottomans.
Pity to zill-e-illahi that he owed much of his empire to a certain bairam khan who was a Persian soldier deputed by safavid shah tamasp to help his father to regain the lost territory.
@inthehindsight well pity to ottomans because precisely due to that reason Akbar persianised mughal court, started celebrating nauroz, banished sunni ulamas, grew tolerance towards shia and allowed them in court. All that ensured mughal do not comply with ottomans in future.
@3:39 even at that time ruling maslms did not trust Persian maslms countries for safety but trusted Portuguese and wanted to go thru their ports and fellow maslms Kaliph kicked them out as not trust worthy ... no change in the mentality of maslms even after these many centuries ... atleast this lady should have credited mugals as greatest than turkish but you know where the loyalty will be
I wont lie i do think staying in mecca and medina for 4 years was a little bit too much because ever since the ottomans had arabia it was a point of contention . Murad was probably scared he was going to get couped by the mughals.Rather then him suppressing her because she was giving charity to the poor
Not possible, the Mughals would need a substantial army, and a naval fleet to take Arabia. Things were running fine there, so no need for an expedition there. 🌴
@@Historic_Tales im speaking militarily akbar was way greater when it came to strategic planing and warfare then murad akbar the great was way better. akbar is like the rise of the mughals and murad marks the beginning of the decline of the ottomans
The double standards of Muslims from the Indian subcontinent (India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh): They say that they came from outside, made Hindus slaves, and ruled India for 1000 years. At the same time, they say that the Indus Valley is their history and that their ancestors built the civilization. Don't become a hypocrite, pick one side: Mohammad or Mohenjo-Daro.
South asian muslims (majority) were converted hindu/bhudist/jain/sikh their ancestors lived here and converted due to various reasons (marriage, jeziya, forceful, sufis,benefits....)
Mughals was wealthier because they had control of gold and diamond mines and had larger skilled population which can produce lot more weapons and luxury products and pay taxes. Mughals were more strong because they had a bigger army with more soldiers and weapons plus they not only had central asian turkic soldiers but also Persian and brave Hindu Rajput soldiers and commanders. Mughals were a Muslim dynasty with many Hindu vassal kings and Hindu ministers in Royal Court and Hindu Rajput military commanders. If you create a military force of brave Hindu and Muslim soldiers united under one flag than they are invincible.
@@User1204-ih3bj Yes Ottomans had a bigger territory with small population but Mughals had smaller territory with large population. India is 1.5 billion and if you add Pakistan and Bangladesh its nearly 2 biliion people who are manufacturing something everyday. India is technically a continet with more than 20 language and cultures and customs of those ethnic groups. I have seen Ottoman palace in Istanbul but the palace of Indian regional Rajput Hindu Kings and Muslim Nawabs palaces are bigger than Ottoman Palaces in Istanbul. Ottomans were strong but they ruled mostly Muslim population of North Africa and middle east verus Mughal kingdom which was 90 percent Hindu population. Mughals were mentally and physically much stronger than Ottomans and of course in modern wealth terms Ottomans were billionaire but Mughals were trillionaires.
Mam, You're seeing History from a feminist perspective, which is good but not true. No Royal Muslim woman from the days of the Prophet has been oppressed not even a single woman (if they committed any Crime that's a different thing) Mughals were no different. The actual oppression that happens in Islamic society is for the Common women who have no power and position they are oppressed by Men of Islam.
Legal theory of Islam gives a lot of details about the rights of women. However, uneducated masses who don't know the Islamic Law create problems. Things also go the opposite way, where men are oppressed by women. In short, real problem is lack of education and lack of training of people to the right way.
Please cross check references before you state "FACTS" as most of the people, without historical knowledge, will believe it. Ofcourse, i do not think you are telling lies.
easily one of my favorite channels. both slept on and severely underrated
Great lady but I don't think you can generalize her example to all women of the region at the time. She was educated and independent because of her wealth and royal status. And she had very close relationship with the powerful men in her family who gave her protection, essentially everyone's favorite auntie.
I don't think she tried to generalize. Her message was that at that time women who chould afford to go to the pilgrimage and could have security, could go to pilgrimage. In other words those who were able to do what they wanted to, could do.
Also you can't say that women in general did not have freedom because we don't know! Even if they had freedom, they all weren't historic figures. So we can't know about the society of that time on a minute level. All we can do is to research to find tales of events or writings and because we have a tale of 'her' pilgrimage one could assume the situation of the society.
And if you think womens rights are doing whatever they want, than this very present world is also violenting womens rights. Be it East, be it West! Not only that rghts have to be described as well, otherwise can't say that womens didn't have freedom!
@@REZA-TheRigorous I think you are reading too much into my post. I did not comment on the state of women’s rights then or now. But the Moghul Empire was a deeply stratified society, like any other at the time, and romanticizing the experience of elite women often overshadows the more sordid reality of most people, men or women.
@@continentaldrift2170 moghul rule was not THAT restricting for women compared to later dynasties
very insightful thank you I never really considered learning about Ottoman relations with mogul India
Wrong, First Mughal woman who went to hajj was haji begam the first wife of humayun and also built humayuns tomb that's why her name is haji begam❤
Bega Begum (c. 1511 - 17 January 1582) was Empress consort of the Mughal Empire from 26 December 1530 to 17 May 1540 and 22 June 1555 to 27 January 1556 as the first wife and chief consort of the second Mughal emperor Humayun.[1][2][3][4] She was known as Zan-i-Kalan being the first wife of Humayun and was also known as Haji Begum after she performed the Hajj pilgrimage
@@starfootball6478.. Bhai ap donu ki agli fight UFC m kb h?😂
This mughal princess went first, alone. Which she claims.
Well researched…👍
Thank you for history I never read in the books.
Really appreciate your work keep it up
Make videos in Hindi urdu languages for Indian continent
Subcontinent*
Sorry, your view is a tunnel-vision, & is not applicable to all in the Indian subcontinent. English has its important role in the region. 🙂
English is better than Hindi if you want audience from all over India
Just a thought could it be that we don't have the details about the journey in humayun nama or akbar nama , because she didn't want people to know about her good deeds , I mean I have seen people hiding there good deeds and act of worship and keep it just between them and God.
Yes that's true, but 500 years later she realised her folly and narrated this story to this girl in her dreams with every minute details.
@@abdussamadshaikh3467 🤣🤣
But bro, she must have followed the orders of Murad III, who was a caliph. Obeying Caliph is necessary in Islam.
@@aub3365 why worry over a doubtful story.
@@aub3365Akbar was following Din-i-illahi and not the authentic islam that's why they didn't care to much about the orders from caliph.
Very interesting video and beautiful explained. Thanks 😊
Wonderful. How encouraging. I never knew such a thing happened during Emperor Akbar's rule. Thank you for such an enchanting story. I would love to remember this as long as I live.
Make ur video on Hindi also if u can..couz my mom nd dad would love to hear this stories
She has another channel called tareekhi tales urdu
Assalam o Alekum Mesha ! Are you really history professional or one of the learner plz.
None of this makes sense to me as her dad had named her GUL-BADAN. Gul (گل): Means "flower." Badan (بدن): Means "body." which translates to "flower-bodied" or "a body as delicate and beautiful as a flower."
What does her name have to do with all of this?& Gul badan is just a common cute name so what about it?
Can you make a video on Mughal prince Shahryar who ascended the throne after Jahangir but is not remembered in history books
Shah jahan father in law killed him
Gul Badan ❤
What a beautiful name!
ماءشاالله
Misha u r doing a great job!
7:16 What is your source, madam? I am just curious, but that information would make the details more reliable. 🙏🏼🙂
All sources are listed in the description box of each video. Thank you
@@TareekhiTalesThank you! Got the references. 👍🏼
Subscribed to your channel, too!
Keep doing the great work!! 💐💐👏🏼👏🏼
Very interesting story, presented with a calm doodling tone perfect whilst having a nice breakfast.
@3:12 thousands of rupees in cash 😂. Darling, there used to be no cash in rupees back then. Sounds you barely managed to pass history subject in your high school !! 😂
She meant bit coin! Come on lady..
Do u read comments if u read then please make a video on alamgir Auranzaib briefly
Hi I recently visited Udaipur the city has great historical architecture the guide gave me information about the kingdom of mewar but want to know more facts about that great dynasty ❤
No source in any Nama numa. So the only source left is gulbadan Begum and sultan murad revealed this in your dreams, or you were present there when she was honoured with gifts and welcome. And also the fact that Akbar didn't scold her for staying put in Mecca. As if Akbar was her uncle and not vice versa.
There were other historians at that time present as well
@nabeehasaeed7287 Who? Did they write these events in minute details? Which books?
@@abdussamadshaikh3467 Your INTENTIONS in the posts are clear! 😅
What you might not like to notice is that the narrator clearly stated that in the absence of complete historical sources, she is telling a "story", which is called "generalisation" in history & is acceptable as long as one has acknowledged it as it is - a part-story. 🙂
Mr., she has listed her sources in the description box of this video.🥱
Some miss information some information overall a mixture of things quite overwhelming
Interesting, but there must be more to this story than just a rivalry brought on by a princess. Both dynasties were of Turkish origins, but with little historical information today we cannot know for sure what had tranpired between the two great dynasties.🐞
Mughals were of Persian descent, not Turkish.
@@sk-ss1nu Mughals are turko-mogols.
Great
Jazakallah khair
Make video on dullah bhati
May be Akbari was dreaming to become Khalifa so he carefully planned to plant his sister but Ottoman King was alert
I just watched the whole video because i misred enraged as engaged😂😂😂
akbar was such a chill guy
@@madeehajamal6772
Akbar the great. He was a real emperor. Smart, wise, and surrounded by wise advisors. He was a Muslim but secular in his thoughts which proved him a great politician in holding and expanding his kingdom over the period of many decades. He was hated by some of the religious radicals babas of his time. Who spread the rumors of him creating his own version of Islam Deen E Elahi. Which was actually a guide book of do’s and don’ts. Only to keep the melting bowl of Hindu Muslim in order.
very interesting information
Strange. South Asia went from liberal to conservative
Great presentation. As always.
The story seems one sided.
Should be researched from the Ottoman's side also.
You're so so elegant and beautiful 😮
Almost after every sentence there is editing.
Daughter of a King,Sister of a King and Aunt of a King and sitting in house of Lord of the worlds,a place from where power is being distributed to the leaders around the world. . Doing charity on the name of Allah. What else do you expect? Her conscious was clear, so she was unafraid of any worldy power.
I did not find she being sent away but many Mughal/Indian pilgrimers were sent away because they were disrupting the local population which came to the Sultans ears.
Good
I don’t think during the Mogul empire the currency was rupees
They used silver coins as rupees
rupee used by sher shah suri
Mughals or Gurkanis never recognised ottomans as Caliph, infact Akber, jahangir, shah Jahan, Aurangzeb,etc styled themselves as Caliph and Delhi as seat of the Caliphate. They referred to ottomans as zamindar of Constantinople (as mentioned in a letter of Shah Jahan).
Humau nama and Akbar nama are the biography of Humayun and Akbar respectfully. Why would she write about herself?
Damn!
I read "enraged" as "engaged" before clicking on the link of this video🙂
Not Mughal empire, It was Baburid impire or Timurid
Keep crying 😂😂😂😅
Wtf 😂😂
Akbar was a mushrik, started his own religion Din-e-ILahi, a group of 16/19 people from hindu, sikh, shia and islam.
Another idiot who believes in Maulvis fake story of starting his own religion
And you are a righteous ruler. He was shrewed politician and tried to create a faith that is amalgamation of indegenious relegions and Islam for political expediency. Despite many of his excesses was a capable ruler and directly or indirectly aided in spread of islam. I wonder what have you achieved apart from being a DIY Jurist.
@mrnomad1737 amalgamation of indigenous religions???
Seriously!!
Are you a perennial, leftist, or a wicked atheist? trying to be a pedant.
Yes, he was. Thankfully he didn’t force it on others, and ran the country according to Sharia(partially). That's a credit to him. But yes, he was a Mushrik.
@mrnomad1737, He was a good ruler and a shrewd politician, no doubt. But all of his achievement can't help in the afterlife, which is unfortunate.
Today, I found something interesting:
2300 years ago,
According to Emperor Ashoka in Edict 13
(Rock Edicts of Khalsi, a place name)
Ashoka said:
"I spread Dhamma (Buddhism)
from India to Egypt and Greece."
In 2022, archaeologists discovered a 2000-year-old Buddha statue in Egypt (the Berenike Buddha).
Similar Buddha statues have also been found in Indonesia, Mongolia, Japan, China, and other countries.
Perhaps in the future, we may even find a Buddha statue in Greece.
The remarkable fact is this: without war, Indian civilization, over 2000 years ago, spread its religion and culture from Indonesia, China, Korea, Japan, and Mongolia to Egypt and Greece.
Correct me if I’m wrong but I’m pretty sure it’s spread to Greece through Alexander the Great.Its so interesting.I went to taxila museum in Pakistan,it shows all ancient statues and sculptures of Buddha ans you can see how different people distorted him over time and made him look different.You can clearly tell which sculptures are Greek,which are Indian etc.
Afaik, both of you are partially correct.
The presence of Buddha statues anywhere means there was a presence of Buddhists, and that there were Buddhist merchants in those areas. This does not mean that Indian culture became a dominant or even popular force in those regions. I am referring to the west, ofc. We still share an incredible amount of cultural heritage with SE Asia and East Asia.
The Greco-Buddhists of Bactria were influential in Buddhist art and patronage, but I don't think they spread Buddhism to the west.
Without war😂 do you know how dharmic religion was spread in the islands on Indonesia vietnam and other southeast Asians nations
@AAH-td7kg No, you're wrong. There's no proof that Alexander came in contact with Buddhism or Alexander ever accepted Buddhism. The fact is with Alexander's conquest, Greeks came close to India's borders. Greeks became neighbors of India. And after the death of Alexander and the birth of Ashoka, Greeks and Ashoka came in contact. And then Buddhism transferred to Greeks living in Afghanistan. Then through Afghanistan, Greeks (to Greeks) in Egypt, then to mainland Greece. Greek kings names are mentioned in Ashoka's inscriptions.
Ashoka's Major Rock Edict No. 13 mentions five Hellenistic kings:
* Antiochus II Theos of Syria (261-246 BCE)
* Ptolemy II Philadelphos of Egypt (285-247 BCE)
* Antigonus II Gonatas of Macedon (278-239 BCE)
* Magas of Cyrene (300-258 BCE)
* Alexander II of Epirus (272-258 BCE)
@AAH-td7kg
SCRIPT AND LANGUAGE FOUND IN INDIA
Archaeological Evidence and Strong Proof
(Unlike unsupported theories such as the Aryan invasion or the Vedic period that have zero evidence-India’s real history is supported by archaeology.)
• The INDUS SCRIPT, dating back to around 2600-1900 BCE, is approximately 4600-3900 years old and represents a sophisticated system of writing from the Indus Valley Civilization.
• Later, the DHAMMA LIPI, used between 500 BCE and 300 CE, emerged as a significant script.
- This script, over 2500 years old, is found on Ashoka’s pillars, inscriptions, and other structures.
- There are similarities between the letters of the Indus Valley Script and Ashokan Dhamma Lipi. The letters of Indus valley script over the time involved and turned into dhamma lipi
• Over time, between 1 CE and 6 CE, the Ashokan script evolved and contributed to the development of Sanskrit.
• Gautama Buddha, widely recognized today, was the last famous Buddha, but many Buddhas existed before him.
• There is substantial evidence linking Buddhism to the Indus Valley Civilization, indicating that early Buddhism is over 4000 years old.
Evidence of Buddhism in the Indus Valley Civilization
• In Mohenjo-daro, a Buddhist stupa was discovered.
- While some claim it dates to the 1st century CE, evidence suggests it is from the Indus Valley period, as its brick size matches that of other Indus Valley structures like houses.
• A Buddha pendant was discovered in Mohenjo-daro, indicating early Buddhist influence.
• The spoked-wheel symbol (☸️),
was also found in the Indus Valley.
• Gautama Buddha statues from 1-10 CE share stylistic similarities with the so-called "Priest-King" statue of the Indus Valley, especially in clothing style.
• A meditation statue was found in the Indus Valley, though its head is broken.
• Indus Valley Early Buddhism:
Over 4000 years old then turned into
• Modern Buddhism: Began with Gautama Buddha.
• Gautama Buddha: Born 2500 years ago.
• Ashoka the Great: Born 2300 years ago, he spread Buddhism to many countries.
Ashoka’s Edict 13 (Rock Edicts of Kalsi)
• Ashoka said:
I spread Dhamma (Buddhism) from India to Egypt and Greece.
Recent Discoveries Supporting Ashoka’s Statement
• In 2022, archaeologists discovered a 2000-year-old **Buddha statue** in Berenike, Egypt.
• Similar Buddha statues have also been found in Indonesia, Mongolia, Japan, China, and other countries, indicating the spread of Buddhism.
woman can not go to hajj without mahram..
May be it is mentioned in Gulbadan Namah..
Good luck ❤❤
While I appreciate the video can you plz not juxtapose the image of these women alongside Kaaba. It hurts our religious sensibility. TIA
The lady showed an attitude which is allowed in islam. Like the lady who was rude and angry with Umar ra.the Khalifa.
Ma'am your voice is amazing 👏
Ye bat urdu me bhi ho skti thi wo jyada acha hota
Insecure men are scared of powerful women
Smriti Irani of their time lol
rupees in cash ?
گلبدن بیگم اکبر پپھی( Anty) لگتی ہے ۔ کیونکہ آپ کے رہی کہ . شاید اس زمانے میں کرنسی نوٹ نہیں ہوتے تھے۔
One of your video us spreading misinformation. Please correct it. Its title is " How did ancient Indians view the world "
What is the misinformation?
Na Meshru is not Turkish. I think it means not legitimate in Persian.
You think ??? 😂😂😂😂 You don't know what you are talking about....
Im persian and idk what it is.
Hey Poopjeet, don't use words and phrase you know not the meaning of. It exposes your lack of knowledge/education 😂😂😂. FYI, it means one who is against religious rules and customs and, thus, doesn't follow them ... LOL
The Ottoman Emperor was the Khalifa of the Muslims at that time and he was reprehending her for not following his order.
Seems like she was a trouble maker.
Funny thing, Akbar sent members of his courts he no longer wanted, to hajj, as punishment/exile in disguise.
Also, since Akbar claimed himself Zill-e-Ilahi, he totally disregarded Ottomans as khalifa. So we can totally see him getting annoyed with Ottomans.
Pity to zill-e-illahi that he owed much of his empire to a certain bairam khan who was a Persian soldier deputed by safavid shah tamasp to help his father to regain the lost territory.
@inthehindsight well pity to ottomans because precisely due to that reason Akbar persianised mughal court, started celebrating nauroz, banished sunni ulamas, grew tolerance towards shia and allowed them in court. All that ensured mughal do not comply with ottomans in future.
یہی کام پردے میں رہ کر کیا جا سکتا ہے،
cash??
You are pretty☺️
ua-cam.com/video/LHacpjKVqBM/v-deo.htmlsi=bJmhDnWWva0nt5Ga
@3:39 even at that time ruling maslms did not trust Persian maslms countries for safety but trusted Portuguese and wanted to go thru their ports and fellow maslms Kaliph kicked them out as not trust worthy ... no change in the mentality of maslms even after these many centuries ... atleast this lady should have credited mugals as greatest than turkish but you know where the loyalty will be
Yeah we now how trustworthy lecherous pajeets are
Iran is not a muslim country, aby chaman
Loyalty is only to our brothers and sisters only. We have love and hate for the sake of Allah. While you don't
I wont lie i do think staying in mecca and medina for 4 years was a little bit too much because ever since the ottomans had arabia it was a point of contention . Murad was probably scared he was going to get couped by the mughals.Rather then him suppressing her because she was giving charity to the poor
As a Muslim woman it’s her right to stay if she wanted to.
Not possible, the Mughals would need a substantial army, and a naval fleet to take Arabia. Things were running fine there, so no need for an expedition there. 🌴
@@mohabatkhanmalak1161 this is under the rule of akbar the great a far better military general then murad III.
@ZulqarnainKhan-y2jAbsolutely wrong.Emperor Akbar was the king of the Indian Subcontinent.
Sultan Murad 2 was the Caliph of the Islamic world.
@@Historic_Tales im speaking militarily akbar was way greater when it came to strategic planing and warfare then murad akbar the great was way better. akbar is like the rise of the mughals and murad marks the beginning of the decline of the ottomans
Are you beautiful are it is just a makeup and lighting effect.
The double standards of Muslims from the Indian subcontinent (India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh):
They say that they came from outside, made Hindus slaves, and ruled India for 1000 years.
At the same time, they say that the Indus Valley is their history and that their ancestors built the civilization.
Don't become a hypocrite, pick one side: Mohammad or Mohenjo-Daro.
1 percent videshi muslim hai baki 99 percent sc st OBC General cast session convert hai
Yeah, south asians are descendants of indus civilization. Mohammed was born in arabia
South asian muslims (majority) were converted hindu/bhudist/jain/sikh their ancestors lived here and converted due to various reasons (marriage, jeziya, forceful, sufis,benefits....)
Who hurt you 😂
@@sethijutt a pakistan saying this in comment section
This is why I did this comment
Change your thumbnail
It is vulgur you mechoo
Mughals was wealthier and stronger than ottomans
Mughals were wealthier but not stronger than Ottoman
Mughals was wealthier because they had control of gold and diamond mines and had larger skilled population which can produce lot more weapons and luxury products and pay taxes. Mughals were more strong because they had a bigger army with more soldiers and weapons plus they not only had central asian turkic soldiers but also Persian and brave Hindu Rajput soldiers and commanders. Mughals were a Muslim dynasty with many Hindu vassal kings and Hindu ministers in Royal Court and Hindu Rajput military commanders. If you create a military force of brave Hindu and Muslim soldiers united under one flag than they are invincible.
@ Mughals was regional power but ottoman was Super power and ruled over 3 continent for centuries .
@ True, tbh auragazeb and akbar was the wealthiest and strongest in world in their respective era
@@User1204-ih3bj Yes Ottomans had a bigger territory with small population but Mughals had smaller territory with large population. India is 1.5 billion and if you add Pakistan and Bangladesh its nearly 2 biliion people who are manufacturing something everyday. India is technically a continet with more than 20 language and cultures and customs of those ethnic groups. I have seen Ottoman palace in Istanbul but the palace of Indian regional Rajput Hindu Kings and Muslim Nawabs palaces are bigger than Ottoman Palaces in Istanbul. Ottomans were strong but they ruled mostly Muslim population of North Africa and middle east verus Mughal kingdom which was 90 percent Hindu population. Mughals were mentally and physically much stronger than Ottomans and of course in modern wealth terms Ottomans were billionaire but Mughals were trillionaires.
What kind of English 😃😃
Cambridge English
Our wonen always true Sanatani lol
😂 common sanatani women didn't have the right to have inheritance until the constitution
@abdulrahman9e haan because they took control of 100% of finances of their homes unlike those sharing their husbands with 3-4 others 😂😂😂
@abdulrahman9e yahoodpan tyaago Sanatan apnao
@@abdulrahman9e i request you to do debate with me
Look girl, don't compare Great Ottoman Sultans to ordinary Rulers of Mughals.
True
Mughal rulers was also powerful. Well for a while, and during Mughal times India was the richest kingdom in the world.
@ no where nearly as rich as ottomans
@RM-RF-z3h No, they were richer than the Ottoman.
@@user-zy3jg1dc3y not true lol, They would occasionally ask Ottomans for help.
Mam, You're seeing History from a feminist perspective, which is good but not true. No Royal Muslim woman from the days of the Prophet has been oppressed not even a single woman (if they committed any Crime that's a different thing) Mughals were no different. The actual oppression that happens in Islamic society is for the Common women who have no power and position they are oppressed by Men of Islam.
Legal theory of Islam gives a lot of details about the rights of women. However, uneducated masses who don't know the Islamic Law create problems. Things also go the opposite way, where men are oppressed by women. In short, real problem is lack of education and lack of training of people to the right way.
fascinating, indeed!
Good for her she was not in the era of selim i or Suleiman t😂😂😂😂
Please cross check references before you state "FACTS" as most of the people, without historical knowledge, will believe it. Ofcourse, i do not think you are telling lies.
ua-cam.com/video/LHacpjKVqBM/v-deo.htmlsi=bJmhDnWWva0nt5Ga
@@ashamsaud4737 ?????
@@ashamsaud4737 kya