🎥 Watch more than 200+ other exclusive videos on youtube: ua-cam.com/channels/MmaBzfCCwZ2KqaBJjkj0fw.htmljoin or patreon: www.patreon.com/kingsandgenerals. Support us on Paypal www.paypal.com/paypalme/kingsandgenerals as well!
SCRIPT AND LANGUAGE FOUND IN INDIA Archaeological Evidence and Strong Proof (Unlike unsupported theories such as the Aryan invasion or the Vedic period that have zero evidence-India’s real history is supported by archaeology.) • The INDUS SCRIPT, dating back to around 2600-1900 BCE, is approximately 4600-3900 years old and represents a sophisticated system of writing from the Indus Valley Civilization. • Later, the DHAMMA LIPI, used between 500 BCE and 300 CE, emerged as a significant script. - This script, over 2500 years old, is found on Ashoka’s pillars, inscriptions, and other structures. - There are similarities between the letters of the Indus Valley Script and Ashokan Dhamma Lipi. The letters of Indus valley script over the time involved and turned into dhamma lipi • Over time, between 1 CE and 6 CE, the Ashokan script evolved and contributed to the development of Sanskrit. • Gautama Buddha, widely recognized today, was the last famous Buddha, but many Buddhas existed before him. • There is substantial evidence linking Buddhism to the Indus Valley Civilization, indicating that early Buddhism is over 4000 years old. Evidence of Buddhism in the Indus Valley Civilization • In Mohenjo-daro, a Buddhist stupa was discovered. - While some claim it dates to the 1st century CE, evidence suggests it is from the Indus Valley period, as its brick size matches that of other Indus Valley structures like houses. • A Buddha pendant was discovered in Mohenjo-daro, indicating early Buddhist influence. • The spoked-wheel symbol (☸️), was also found in the Indus Valley. • Gautama Buddha statues from 1-10 CE share stylistic similarities with the so-called "Priest-King" statue of the Indus Valley, especially in clothing style. • A meditation statue was found in the Indus Valley, though its head is broken. • Indus Valley Early Buddhism: Over 4000 years old then turned into • Modern Buddhism: Began with Gautama Buddha. • Gautama Buddha: Born 2500 years ago. • Ashoka the Great: Born 2300 years ago, he spread Buddhism to many countries. Ashoka’s Edict 13 (Rock Edicts of Kalsi) • Ashoka said: I spread Dhamma (Buddhism) from India to Egypt and Greece. Recent Discoveries Supporting Ashoka’s Statement • In 2022, archaeologists discovered a 2000-year-old **Buddha statue** in Berenike, Egypt. • Similar Buddha statues have also been found in Indonesia, Mongolia, Japan, China, and other countries, indicating the spread of Buddhism.
don't use false British translations, root word is ling/lingam means symbol, shivalingam means symbol of Shiva. there is a popular Sanskrit word to describe gender - "stree linga" means symbol of stree (women) it doesn't mean women's penis. just like this, there is a Sanskrit word "purling," in that pur stands for purusha (man) and ling stands for (symbol), purling means symbol of man. both words are translated as feminine and masculine. correct your dictionary.
@@Atheist-hy6xqThe last time a paper titled ‘The Genomic Formation of South and Central Asia’ was released online, in March 2018, it created a sensation in India and around the world. Mostly because the paper, co-authored by 92 scientists, many of them doyens of different disciplines, said that between 2000 BCE and 1000 BCE, there were significant migrations from the Central Asian Steppe that most likely brought Indo-European languages into Indian subcontinent - just as Steppe pastoralist migrations into Europe a thousand years earlier, beginning around 3000 BCE, had spread Indo-European languages to that continent as well. In other words, the paper supported the long-held idea of an ‘Arya’ migration into Indian subcontinent - or, to put it more accurately, a migration of Indo-European language speaking people who called themselves ‘Arya '
@@Atheist-hy6xqA report from Beta Analytic Testing Laboratory, in Florida , United States , on the carbon dating from the Alagankulam excavation site . The carbon Dating found it to be from 345 BC. "Since many potteries found at the site have Tamil inscriptions, It proven that the age of Tamil Brahmi script is more than 345 BC and much older than Dhamma Lipi ( Prakrit in the Brahmi Script ) of Ashoka Edicts
I can already hear the, “as an Indian” comments. Edit: I didn’t mean to say some Indians are not real Indians, that’s not what I meant. All I meant to say that many Indians will give their opinions, and will always start their comment with “as an Indian”.
What probably happened was a mix of invasion and migration, similar to what the German tribes did with the Roman Empire. Lombardy in Northern Italy has more Germanic influence than Sicily in Southern Italy, which is similar to the Northern Aryan and Southern Dravidian distinction in India.
Old Europeans themselves were completely conquered by the Indo Europeans from the steppes. I think Hindu nationalist don't like the word "European" in INDO European. If it was called Indo Asian I think they had less problems with that theory.
So, from the evolutionary point of view, indo Europeans were indeed better equipped and quashed others and propagated their own progeny manifolds more than others 🤔. .. Today, huge swathes of world population and languages are of indo Europeans.. A master race??
Indians ( mostly those who follow Hindutva ideology) dont like the theory because They use the term " invader " or "foreigners" mainly to denigrate Indian Muslims. And the Aryan invasion or migration theory also puts them in the same filter.
It is not Hindu nationalist stuff. It is south Tamil dravadian nonsense start stuff that the whole south Indian are original Indian and north Indian are outsiders and Hinduism is Aryan religion and people say Aryan invasion theory is British divide and rule tactic to divide the north and south that reason why in online bjp user against if you say Aryan migraintion theory it okay they do not have problem Indo European you itself conspiracy pretend to be Indian political expert
Yeah, they're extremely racist not to mention ignorant AF. I've never met a European descended person who had a problem with the indo part. I never cared one bit, because I understood it referred to a common ancestry that later became Indian and European. It's not difficult to understand unless it threatens an ideology.
I somehow doubt that "completely conquered". It may very well be that it was there a similar process. That does mean it was peacefull, but in almost all cases we have a mixture of alliances, coexistence, but also conquest and sometimes even enslavment and mass-murder.
@@BHARATHA-SAMPRAJYA i wrote that comment before I even saw the video. I mean any sort of ideology that discourages people from making or talking abt any interesting topic... Sometimes people are so stuck in their mindset that they don't allow good faith conversation or content abt certain issues
The Aryans are the Thracians. The Thracians invented the chariot and mastered horsemanship in ancient times and no one could match them, just read Strabo, Herodotus etc. Herodotus even states "The Thracians are the second most numerous people in the world only behind the Indians who are the most numerous", he wouldn't have referenced India if they didn't come in contact. The oldest swastikas are from the Balkans and Ukraine (13 000 BC). Sout Slavic languages are the closest surviving relatives of the Sanskrit language and they share tons of cognates. Greek also has significant amount of cognates with Sanskrit but considerably less. Stephanus of Byzantium writes that Thrace is a greek exonym and that it used to be called Arya and Perkia. Thrace is located in modern day Bulg-Aria, Greece and Turkey. This truth is the reason haplogroups I2a1 and E1b1b (exclusive to the Balkans and Turkey) are very common among Northern Indians and Pakistani who are descendant from Aryan immigrants and local Indian peoples, or they descend from Alexander the Greats conquerers who brought Greek, Thracian and other Balkan ancestry again. This legacy is why Alexander the Great, a macedonian which is a hellenized thracian megatribe, sought to expand the influence of his people as far as India again. Before him, long ago there was also the conquest of India by the thracian king Dionysius but few people have heard of it. The horse race tradition in the Roman Empire called Ludi was imported by assimilated Thracians from Anatolia, their tribe and empire was known as Lydia. In Rome even slaves and recently freed men were encouraged to participate in this event. This aligns with the etymology of the word Ludi which matches the South Slavic word Lude (Люде) that means Free-man. In Sanskrit Lude means "to freely move" The Thracians were so obsessed with horses that men were buried with their favorite horses in their tombs. This obsession is what caused the Trojan horse incident, Troy was a noble Thracian house in the city which was actually called Illios, the old name of Helios the sun God. That's why Thracians sided with Troy in the Trojan war, because they were related. The supreme divinities in Rigveda are the Aditi - twelve expressions of the ultimate sun God - Bhaga. In slavic the word for god is Boga. This is why the modern country located in Thrace is called Bhaga-Aria (Bulgaria). Turkey is named after the Thracian tribe Tyrcheni, half of which migrated west to Italy and became known as Etruscans, they moved due to famine according to a story told by Herodotus. The actual name of Greece - Hellas - is the greek name for the sun god Bhaga which is Helios. Also all Greeks say that the god of war Ares is the father of all Thracian people, that his abode was Thrace. The land of Ares is Aria according to Stephanus of Byzantium. The alternate name of Thrace was Perkia which is named after the Indo-European god of Thunder anaologous to Zeus - Perkuwnos known in slavic religion as Perun. Thracians/Illyrians/Dacians/Phrygians/Lydians/Aryans/Greeks/Macedonians/Scythians/Tyrchenians are different names for the same ancient people, these are labels corresponding to their region, empire or confederation. In the present day no single nation can alone claim this heritage. The most direct Thracian descendants live in the Balkan countries of Bulgaria, Turkey, Greece, Serbia, Bosnia, Romania, Ukraine, Croatia, Slovenia, Montenegro, Albania and Kosovo. The places with the second most Thracian ancestry are Northern Portugal, Western Spain, Iran, Southern and Central Italy, Sicily, and the third most are Northern India, Afghanistan and Pakistan. Thracians also migrated to Ireland, the area around Paris, Israel and Lebanon but genetic traces are very rarely found among people living there today. Fun fact, the Thracians had an immense cultural influence on the Celts, because as Herodotus and Strabo attest, they had a somewhat friendly relationship, and since ancient times they formed temporary unified Thraco-Celtic tribes that un-merged once the Celts were ready to continue their migration. For example the Parisii tribe who settled around the city of Paris were such thracianized celts, their tribe was named after the thracian hero Paris of Troy. That's why the thracian cap/phrygian cap/liberty cap became a symbol of liberation during the French revolution.
@@BHARATHA-SAMPRAJYAexample Christians don't believe in the theory of evolution. But that doesn't mean we should be discouraged into creating content or conversation on the theory of evolution.
Kind of find it funny how Indians are more focused on this whole thing when later the greeks and huns also entered and mingled with the local populace Yeah it's been made a political movement in India but seriously, what's the point of being proud whether you are native or not for something which happened 5k years ago and you have no control over it
Huns never mingled with the local population scythians and kushans did. The huns got wiped out by the warrior clans of the north after the huns battle with the gupta empire.
If someone has mingled the most with native hindus that would be the Turk muslims from kazakstan, afghanistan, uzbekistan and Pakistan due to the mughal invasion consisting all of these people
@@Welfu1Right? Nobody's talking about the Mughals and they have a profound and lasting influence on Indian culture and politics right now! It's bizarre.
It was likely more of a gradual migration than an "invasion" per se and eventually led to intermarriage and cultural hybrization. This happened with the Sumerians and the Akkadians as well as with the Persians and Elamites, not to mention the Romans and Etruscans. One group didn't simply "push out" the other.
Invasions almost never "push out" any population. The conquerors simply become the rulers of the conquered peoples (much easier and more profitable in the long run than their utter annihilation). This was most certainly the case anywhere the Aryans invaded and conquered.
@@lambert801if they Trade frequently & close proximity mostly likely elite from both Indus valley & bacteria region have familiar ties they marry each other led to cross-pollination of culture and religion rather than invasion
Etruscans and Romans are a great example as the Etruscans didn't speak an indo-european language yet were surrounded by Celts, Latin, and Greeks who did. Really shows that despite thousands of years there were definitely some holdouts from before the migrations. The Basque of today still speak their ancient language. I think migration just better illustrates the indo-european movement, probably had some conquering chiefs for sure, but no one was invading as what we would think of nowadays.
The Aryans are the Thracians. The Thracians invented the chariot and mastered horsemanship in ancient times and no one could match them, just read Strabo, Herodotus etc. Herodotus even states "The Thracians are the second most numerous people in the world only behind the Indians who are the most numerous", he wouldn't have referenced India if they didn't come in contact. The oldest swastikas are from the Balkans and Ukraine (13 000 BC). Sout Slavic languages are the closest surviving relatives of the Sanskrit language and they share tons of cognates. Greek also has significant amount of cognates with Sanskrit but considerably less. Stephanus of Byzantium writes that Thrace is a greek exonym and that it used to be called Arya and Perkia. Thrace is located in modern day Bulg-Aria, Greece and Turkey. This truth is the reason haplogroups I2a1 and E1b1b (exclusive to the Balkans and Turkey) are very common among Northern Indians and Pakistani who are descendant from Aryan immigrants and local Indian peoples, or they descend from Alexander the Greats conquerers who brought Greek, Thracian and other Balkan ancestry again. This legacy is why Alexander the Great, a macedonian which is a hellenized thracian megatribe, sought to expand the influence of his people as far as India again. Before him, long ago there was also the conquest of India by the thracian king Dionysius but few people have heard of it. The horse race tradition in the Roman Empire called Ludi was imported by assimilated Thracians from Anatolia, their tribe and empire was known as Lydia. In Rome even slaves and recently freed men were encouraged to participate in this event. This aligns with the etymology of the word Ludi which matches the South Slavic word Lude (Люде) that means Free-man. In Sanskrit Lude means "to freely move" The Thracians were so obsessed with horses that men were buried with their favorite horses in their tombs. This obsession is what caused the Trojan horse incident, Troy was a noble Thracian house in the city which was actually called Illios, the old name of Helios the sun God. That's why Thracians sided with Troy in the Trojan war, because they were related. The supreme divinities in Rigveda are the Aditi - twelve expressions of the ultimate sun God - Bhaga. In slavic the word for god is Boga. This is why the modern country located in Thrace is called Bhaga-Aria (Bulgaria). Turkey is named after the Thracian tribe Tyrcheni, half of which migrated west to Italy and became known as Etruscans, they moved due to famine according to a story told by Herodotus. The actual name of Greece - Hellas - is the greek name for the sun god Bhaga which is Helios. Also all Greeks say that the god of war Ares is the father of all Thracian people, that his abode was Thrace. The land of Ares is Aria according to Stephanus of Byzantium. The alternate name of Thrace was Perkia which is named after the Indo-European god of Thunder anaologous to Zeus - Perkuwnos known in slavic religion as Perun. Thracians/Illyrians/Dacians/Phrygians/Lydians/Aryans/Greeks/Macedonians/Scythians/Tyrchenians are different names for the same ancient people, these are labels corresponding to their region, empire or confederation. In the present day no single nation can alone claim this heritage. The most direct Thracian descendants live in the Balkan countries of Bulgaria, Turkey, Greece, Serbia, Bosnia, Romania, Ukraine, Croatia, Slovenia, Montenegro, Albania and Kosovo. The places with the second most Thracian ancestry are Northern Portugal, Western Spain, Iran, Southern and Central Italy, Sicily, and the third most are Northern India, Afghanistan and Pakistan. Thracians also migrated to Ireland, the area around Paris, Israel and Lebanon but genetic traces are very rarely found among people living there today. Fun fact, the Thracians had an immense cultural influence on the Celts, because as Herodotus and Strabo attest, they had a somewhat friendly relationship, and since ancient times they formed temporary unified Thraco-Celtic tribes that un-merged once the Celts were ready to continue their migration. For example the Parisii tribe who settled around the city of Paris were such thracianized celts, their tribe was named after the thracian hero Paris of Troy. That's why the thracian cap/phrygian cap/liberty cap became a symbol of liberation during the French revolution.
If that was the case you wouldn't see total language replacement over 1 million square miles. The migration theory is only been added later because no evidence of invasion has been found, but has a fatal problem now explaining why the indus people stopped speaking their own languages and started speaking the alleged coming Aryan languages. We now know the indus people were vastly much larger and advanced than central Asian hordes. So the idea is similar to proposing Cuba taking over America and everybody in America stops speaking English and only speaks complete Cuban.
I’ve not watched the video yet, but the theory that I have been holding for years is that, it was not an outright invasion but a slow migration and the assimilation of the existing local population.
There was no assimilation. The Aryans imposed a harsh and strict caste system on their conquered populations wherever they went, thinking themselves "the worthiest people." They were the original N*zis.
Guys, having ~35% Steppe DNA doesn’t make you less native to India The Austroasiatic speaking Adivasi tribes have roughly the percentage of Southeast Asian DNA. This was because there was a migration from Southeast Asia from around the same time as the Indo European migration. If people are okay with the calling the Santhali or Mundas as native, I am pretty sure the majority of Indians would technically be native as well. Of course we ruse the term “indigenous” to refer to the marginalized groups, but that is regarding a separate thing altogether. What makes the Indo European migration different from the Greeks, Huns, or Turks coming to India is that the Indo Europeans became a defining feature for the Indian genetics and culture and by the time of the Greeks, Huns, and Turks, there was already a distinct people with a distinct identity tied to the land. Once you develop deep cultural ties to the land, you are native.
Biggest fact in whole world human civilization and population form by there oldest ancestors homo sepian tribes who migrate from African continent all are outsiders in Asia europe and whole world except African continent also this earth not make there one place for particular individual or community for all
Precisely. But then again, the roots of the so-called Proto Indo-Europeans, in genetic terms, go back to the paleo-siberians or the Ancient North Eurasians, which goes back to Sundaland, South East Asia again. As such, for the R1a-carrying 'Aryans' the Tribals of Eastern India and nothing but a little Distant Cousins. :-)
@@rahul.dadwalyou are wrong the most diverse of R1a is in India . So the migration happened outward to Europe. Even Marxist professors stopped teaching Aryan invasion theory and being slowly abandoned . By the way do you know how the date of 1500BC for Vedas come about? Take a guess.
So does that mean that whites in places like Australia are also native, since they have developed a deep connection to the land over hundreds of years and know no other home?
@@vamsikrishna3855 NO! The diversity of R1a in India is under the clades L657 and some Z2124, and there is one odd Z283, but that is quite rare(found among a non-Baloch in Balochistan). Bottomline the primary clades are all under Z93>Z93. What other clades have you heard of in South Asia? Is that what you call diversity?
@preyalneupane1296 I've already heard about that theory and aware of it, but I doubt it. The thing I said above about Iran's name isn't my personal theory.
@KavitaPatil-hg5qm Iran is vast region from China to Syria, Iraq to Armenia , Georgia.... . The '-stan' suffix in Tajikstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Afghanstan, Kyrgyzstan,... is a persian (Iranian) suffix for places. so part of Iran was above the north of india.
today's Hinduism is not Vedic, it is highly diverse including various traditions similar of Indus animism, tantrism, and other traditions of bhakti, At its core, modern Hinduism embraces a multitude of deities, believes philosophies, and rituals, allowing for personal interpretations and expressions of spirituality. The worship of gods and goddesses, each embodying different aspects of life and the cosmos, is a testament to this diversity. Moreover, the integration of local customs and traditions has led to a vibrant array of festivals and celebrations, each with its unique significance and flavor.
Literally what seperates Hinduism from Buddhism, Jaina and other Nashtika schools are the Vedas. It is Vedic. Including local customs doesn't make it non-Vedic, just more inclusive than say... the Abrahamic religions.
@@AmachiEligwe Actually, it's mostly non-vedic and at times with minimal Vedic influence. 70-80% of people who identify themselves as Hindu don't even know about the existence of vedas. And Hinduism is more like a mix of different folk religions. Most people have their family deity, village deity and clan/regional deity who are more important for them in most important occasion. Praying to major Hindu deities is a relatively new thing that started with the Bhagti movement. Before that these deities were not that mainstream.
@@AmachiEligweWhat we read in theory is completely different from what we observe in real life. This nastik and aastik classification don't understand these nuances.
Only South Indian Brahmins follow Vedic tradition properly. Veda parayana, agamas, Vedanta, samkhya, observance of proper tithis, etc is alive in South Indians. North Indians have lost their tradition.
It was a migration due to climate change (ice age) the Arya moved from southern Russia to central Asia and then to greater Iran and India, hence why Sanskrit and old Avestan are so similar, this is ancient history and now the Hindus and Zarathushtrians (Parsis) are brothers who just happen to worship and believe differently. No need for a war.
Ohh boy the comment section is gonna blew up. Here before Indian nationalists, bjpists, congressis, pakistani, south indians, punjabis, sindhis gonna start civil war.
Don't drag Pakistanis into this. We may have our issues, but whenever this particular topic is concerned, it's just you guys and your ethno-religious nationalist historical revisionist brainwashing agendas that have an issue with the subject topic at hand.
Indian here ✋🏿. Of course there were various migrations into the sub-continent. How could there not have been? Our species is always on the move and always mingling with whoever came before. Those who deny this does not understand humanity.
The Aryans are the Thracians. The Thracians invented the chariot and mastered horsemanship in ancient times and no one could match them, just read Strabo, Herodotus etc. Herodotus even states "The Thracians are the second most numerous people in the world only behind the Indians who are the most numerous", he wouldn't have referenced India if they didn't come in contact. The oldest swastikas are from the Balkans and Ukraine (13 000 BC). Sout Slavic languages are the closest surviving relatives of the Sanskrit language and they share tons of cognates. Greek also has significant amount of cognates with Sanskrit but considerably less. Stephanus of Byzantium writes that Thrace is a greek exonym and that it used to be called Arya and Perkia. Thrace is located in modern day Bulg-Aria, Greece and Turkey. This truth is the reason haplogroups I2a1 and E1b1b (exclusive to the Balkans and Turkey) are very common among Northern Indians and Pakistani who are descendant from Aryan immigrants and local Indian peoples, or they descend from Alexander the Greats conquerers who brought Greek, Thracian and other Balkan ancestry again. This legacy is why Alexander the Great, a macedonian which is a hellenized thracian megatribe, sought to expand the influence of his people as far as India again. Before him, long ago there was also the conquest of India by the thracian king Dionysius but few people have heard of it. The horse race tradition in the Roman Empire called Ludi was imported by assimilated Thracians from Anatolia, their tribe and empire was known as Lydia. In Rome even slaves and recently freed men were encouraged to participate in this event. This aligns with the etymology of the word Ludi which matches the South Slavic word Lude (Люде) that means Free-man. In Sanskrit Lude means "to freely move" The Thracians were so obsessed with horses that men were buried with their favorite horses in their tombs. This obsession is what caused the Trojan horse incident, Troy was a noble Thracian house in the city which was actually called Illios, the old name of Helios the sun God. That's why Thracians sided with Troy in the Trojan war, because they were related. The supreme divinities in Rigveda are the Aditi - twelve expressions of the ultimate sun God - Bhaga. In slavic the word for god is Boga. This is why the modern country located in Thrace is called Bhaga-Aria (Bulgaria). Turkey is named after the Thracian tribe Tyrcheni, half of which migrated west to Italy and became known as Etruscans, they moved due to famine according to a story told by Herodotus. The actual name of Greece - Hellas - is the greek name for the sun god Bhaga which is Helios. Also all Greeks say that the god of war Ares is the father of all Thracian people, that his abode was Thrace. The land of Ares is Aria according to Stephanus of Byzantium. The alternate name of Thrace was Perkia which is named after the Indo-European god of Thunder anaologous to Zeus - Perkuwnos known in slavic religion as Perun. Thracians/Illyrians/Dacians/Phrygians/Lydians/Aryans/Greeks/Macedonians/Scythians/Tyrchenians are different names for the same ancient people, these are labels corresponding to their region, empire or confederation. In the present day no single nation can alone claim this heritage. The most direct Thracian descendants live in the Balkan countries of Bulgaria, Turkey, Greece, Serbia, Bosnia, Romania, Ukraine, Croatia, Slovenia, Montenegro, Albania and Kosovo. The places with the second most Thracian ancestry are Northern Portugal, Western Spain, Iran, Southern and Central Italy, Sicily, and the third most are Northern India, Afghanistan and Pakistan. Thracians also migrated to Ireland, the area around Paris, Israel and Lebanon but genetic traces are very rarely found among people living there today. Fun fact, the Thracians had an immense cultural influence on the Celts, because as Herodotus and Strabo attest, they had a somewhat friendly relationship, and since ancient times they formed temporary unified Thraco-Celtic tribes that un-merged once the Celts were ready to continue their migration. For example the Parisii tribe who settled around the city of Paris were such thracianized celts, their tribe was named after the thracian hero Paris of Troy. That's why the thracian cap/phrygian cap/liberty cap became a symbol of liberation during the French revolution.
It's not about the migration. The issue is about calling Hindu culture as foreign to indian subcontinent. These Westerners who favour Western sources have their own agenda. You can see the sheer racism Europeans are showing. They can't accept the fact that we have a better civilization than their barbaric culture.
As an Indian I believe in the Aryan Invasion/ Migration possibly did happen according to genetic, linguistic & historic data. But this doesn't make my fellow Indians less Indian because our ancestors have been living here for thousands of years. At the end of the day everyone is an immigrant because mankind started from Africa.
The main problem is that most indian think oneis aryan and other is dravidian. thats not true. for all mainland indians (excl. Andamanese and peripheral tibetan group esp. in northeast), the composition is same only the percentage varies by place and caste
No not really, we Dravidians are not migrated from Africa but entire Indian plate broke off from Africa and merged into Asian plate, we never migrate on foot/chariot but on Indian plate itself. Infact piece of africa going to join Indian west coast 1000s of years from now
@@raja4521 You are right about Indian plate breaking from Africa but it happened 200 million years ago while the first homo sapiens appeared 200 thousand years ago. There is no connection between these two events
@@rajk.9098 No, evolution connected two events, Part of same species evolved to be homo sapiens in Africa also evolved to be homo sapiens in India. Just like Indian Elephant and African Elephants. Migration from Africa never happened but evolution of same species happened both on Africa and Indian Plates
One more thing I like to add. Still there is a stereotypic statement in Indian public that Northerners are fair, tall and well built and Southerners are mostly dark, short and not well built. That's a generalization. Not all North Indians are taller and fair with sharp features. If you compare with state wise in north Punjabis, Delhiites, Kashmiris and Haryanvis are the tallest. In South, Malayalis, Tuluvas, Kodavas and Telugus are tallest. In West and East people are generally short or medium. If you go through community wise, Pashtuns, Jatts, Khatris, Uttar Pradesh Brahmins, Yadavas, Rajputs, South Indian Brahmins, Nairs, CKPs, Bunts, Nasranis, Wodeyars, Kodavas will be the tallest. People who eat more barley, wheat, milk, curd, paneer and meat will have more height in general compared to rice eaters. Same goes to wheat eating, lactose tolerant and meat eating Northern and Central Chinese (Mandarin speakers) compared with rice eating, lactose intolerant, meat eating Southern Chinese. (Cantonese speakers) Ancestral North Indian is a combination of Sintastha people (From Russia - Kazakhstan Border) mixed with IVC people. (Zagrosian Iranian Hunters mixed with AASI ie, Basal East Eurasians from East Africa.) Ancestral South Indian is a mix of IVC plus AASI and Sintastha people.(Sintasthans have BMAC DNA too. BMAC DNA is a mix of Anatolian Farmers, Iranian Neolithic Farmers & Caucasus Hunters) North Indians have 18% - 38% Sintastha Steppe DNA, 35% - 55% IVC, 5% - 22% BMAC, 2% - 10% Sino-Tibetan & 25% AASI. South Indians have 3% - 20% Sintastha Steppe DNA, 48% - 72% IVC, 5% - 15% BMAC, 2% - 8% Sino -Tibetan & 15% - 56% AASI. Eastern Indians have 3% - 23% Sintastha Steppe DNA. 5 - 12% Sino Tibetan, 3 - 13% BMAC, 25% IVC & 33 - 65% AASI. Western Indians have 10% - 20% Sintastha Steppe DNA. 4 - 14% BMAC, 3% Sino Tibetan, 45 - 68% IVC & 22 - 45% AASI. North Easterners have 33% - 65% Sino - Tibetan & 33% AASI. Courtesy: South Asian Ancestry/Reddit Northern Chinese descendants are Ancient North East Asians. (Genetically related to Tibetans, Mongols, Koreans & Japanese.) While Southern Chinese are mix of Ancient South East Asians (Genetically related to Austronesians, Kra-Dai, Austro Asiatic peoples) and Ancient North East Asians.
dude have you seen people from Tirunelveli, Kanyakumari, Madurai districts of Tamil nadu?. many of them especially Men will be of 6 feet & have strong physical features. it's because of they eat more non - veg foods & involve in more physicals activities like sports, martial arts etc.
@@hariprasath3913 Lol it has nothing to do with diet and sports. You find strong people across India regards of diet and sports across India. One region is NOT superior to another region.
rarh region brahmin,mahishya and kayastha have more r1a1 and steepe dna since they are descended from north india, since the ancestral east is now in bangladesh we need improved data from all the groups here including namasudra and bagdi and mondol
Mainly South Asian population is mix population Indo aryans are mix of central Asian and eurasian steppes and local IVC peoples called ANI ancestry North Indians And Dravidian peoples mix of IVC and Local hunter and gatherers indo African population letter also mix with ANI peoples called ASI ancestry South Indians or Deccan peoples
@@agnelomascarenhas8990 if one identifies themselves as a zorastrian that is enough for you. We as Indians have a civilizational commitment to the zorastrians, Jews and the tibetans. We Hindus will always honour it, and the commitment is to return their homeland back to them. Until then they are our guests, and we have lived with them and protected them for centuries, even when we were occupied. We'll keep doing it.
Hindu was only religion code there is different religion believes in that sikh also called hindu because hindu us geographical identity more than faith or religion
maybe if it wasn't a total fabrication. this is almost as cringe as caucasainoids pretending to practice kundalini and yoga. face it, you can't steal a religion or culture as your own. stick to Walmart and McDonalds.
Or the waves of Germanic tribes entering Italy and Spain. I imagine the collapse of the Indus Valley Civilization was like that. Foreigners first being welcomed and then overwhelming the dying civilization. Then wave after wave coming and fighting the last. The modern west is experiencing the same thing.
It is a perfect example, but Nationalists refuse to accept it. It is just like the Bantu, after the initial invasions into what is now Nigeria (which were exceedingly violent, they were not migration), and the Han Chinese into Xiliand and south into Yue, Ba and Bai lands, or the Slavs as they moved south into Southern Slavic lands. It was series of invasions, migrations, assimilation some of the time, syncretism others, and cultural diffusion. People view it through a lens of modern nationalities, huge ethnic groups, even nation-states. But that isn't how the world worked unless an area had political and economic unity on a very large scale. Usually, it is small groups moving around, something grouping together, then breaking apart again. Invasion here, migration there. Intermarriage with a conquered people in one place, displacement of the nobility in another, replacement of a population that was wiped out due to famine, plague, natural disaster all coinciding in another place.
As an Indian i can attest to the fact that according to Rigveda the 1st of the four vedas which is the very ancient one of those four, yes the Aryan invasions definitely happened as Aryans themselves had written in the Rigveda.
Please stop talking nonsense. There is absolutely no evidence anywhere in Rigveda which can be used to prove that the Vedic people came from outside. Stop hallucinating !
What kind of fool are you damm!!🤡 Have you ever read the vedas? Talking this nonsense about vedas. Were you there to see how aryans wrote rig veda?? Damm!!🤦 There is literally 0 mention of the aryan word in vedas. Even There is also no mention of aryan people or race.. yes there is a mention of arya word which means nobal yeh nobal !! According to the west propaganda the aryans migrated to india around 1500 bce. And the wrote veds🤣🤣. There is a mention of Saraswati river in rigved and it talks about how it is the mother of floods, the disaster. But The Saraswati River dried up around 3792 years before present (BP), or approximately 1800 BCE. 🤣🤣 So how the hell they just came in 1500 bce amd called dried river the mother of floods 🤣🤣🤣🤦.
It's also written that Aryas themselves punished each other and had Dasas as their king and also how anyone can become Arya if they take part in sacrificial or homa-soma ritual, don't just pick and choose certain verses for whatever is your biases are!
Guys, even if the Indo Iranian language family is foreign to India, Sanskrit would still be indigenous to India. This is because when talking about where a language originates, it specifically about in which place a language took upon its own identity as a distinct language. It would be absurd to say that Spanish originated in Italy because it came from Latin.
You’re articulating a correct principle however I’m not sure it fully applies here. I think I read it argued by philologist that the Mitani ruling class spoke a language so close to Sanskrit that there was no meaningful distinction to be made between them. Sanskrit itself may have come from some Indo Iranian parent culture to the Vedics of India. Which would mean that, at best, you could say India developed a local dialect.
@@bencopeland3560 We don’t know what exactly the Mittani spoke. All we know is it was some Indo Aryan language. Sanskrit is noted for its retroflexes and some other Dravidian influences in grammar.
@@AbhiramN_1289 I think UA-cam will kill any comment that includes a direct link but I want to direct you to an article on SCROLL called Fact check India wasn't the first place Sanskrit was recorded - it was Syria. It reiterates the point I made with better citations. While it doesn’t deny that the language could have continued to develop locally in India (indeed it would be impossible for that not to have happened) it pretty unapologetically points to a location outside of India for the early-Sanskrit parent to later Mitanni and Indian dialectic variants.
Eurasian steppe Indic/Iranic peoples were not immigrants from the Near East but direct descendents of Andronovans, and the mixed character of the Indo-Iranian-speaking populations of Iran and India is the result of a new population spreading among aboriginals with whom a new language is probably to be associated. This conclusion is confirmed by the evidence of Indo-Iranian tradition. The Aryans in the Avesta are tall, light-skinned people with light hair, their women were light-eyed, with long, light tresses In the Rigveda light skin alongside language is the main feature of the Aryans, differentiating them from the aboriginal Dasa-Dasyu population who were a dark-skinned, small people speaking another language and who did not believe in the Vedic gods.
The indus valley people weren't native they were around 5,9 and already had the gene for fair hair and eyes due to admixturing with the iranic farmers.
Exactly, the Rig Veda literally talks about Indra crushing the Dasa Dasyu dark hordes. For the Aryans Indra was an important man who may have later been switched to a God however Indra is basically not worshipped at all today and in later “Hindu” texts he is ridiculed in some cases and outright put into a lower pantheon of “Godhood” in others although in the Rig Veda Indra was literally the most important. Does seem to hint at something being buried by later Brahmins.
@@Itdoesnotmatter786The modern Hinduism is predominantly puranic, and therefore puranic gods are predominantly worshipped like Shiva and Krishna. The puranic Hinduism evolved in the gangetic valley, whereas the Vedic Hinduism evolved in Northwest India. The main God of Vedic Hinduism is Indra, whereas the main Gods of puranic Hinduism are Shiva and Vishnu.
Of all things to be seething about I don't get why nationalists care so much about this. The vast, vast majority of peoples on the entire globe migrated from somewhere else at some point. From Turks to Japanese to Icelanders to the Zulu in South Africa. Yet all those people can be proud of their countries without crying like babies at videos like this
not really. the entire video is an attention grabber. these theories have been debunked a long time ago. people just have time on their hands bc they prefer to waste their time vs actually do anything relevant, you included.
5:38 Kings and Generals modelled that warrior using Malayalam actor Mammooty. He used his characters in Pazhasi Raja and Mamangam as references to do animation. 😀
It never ceases to amaze me that nations/peoples/cultures can actually believe that their 'home' whatever you want to call it is the only one in history that grew and developed without outside inclfluence/invasion/migration..... People moved and mixed in so many ways, no culture goes uninfluenced. even tribes that still exist have some, and those that limit, don't grow. Geeee, i wonder about the connection?
I'm Indian and I am damn sure about Aryan invasion. I'm now even referring for academic evidence, I can see the cultural differences as clear as glass.
Giving the "Out of India" theory even the time of day is stupid. It's like having a serious debate with a flat earther just because they have strong convictions. If you believe something despite all proof saying otherwise, your opinion can be disregarded and you can be ignored.
I think the convictions didn't classify the claim For an example in russia 10000 yr old statue of lord visnu avatar varah was found......what could you conclude about that......
Well off the top of my head I'm going to call BS. But I'd need to actually see it and examine it. Anyways the Pontiac Caspian steppe is the homeland of the Aryans. So I wouldn't be surprised to find something resembling it. All genetic evidence and all old historical accounts and just looking at language will tell you that Aryans didn't come from India. They invaded it the same way they kept coming out of the steppe and into Europe in different waves.
The DNA study of the skeletal remains found at the Harappan site of Rakhigarhi, Haryana, shows no trace of Steppe pastoralists genetic , indicating that Aryan were never present during Indus valley civilization Time period . This proven that IVC people does not have known Indo European language spoken by Steppe pastoralists.
I'm not a mythologist or archaeologist, so I'm not an expert on the matter, but Ive always suspected that the Daksha-Purana myth of Shiva suggests that Shiva was a non-Aryan god worshipped prior to the rise of vedic religion. He was an outsider god who had to be incorporated into the pantheon, at least as suggested by the myth. It would explain why he's not in the Vedas and could be consistent with the idea he or a related deity was worshipped by Harappans.
@ this is true but rudra is a distinct form of shiva. There are many other forms of shiva like vidrabhadra. As I understand it rudra is the Vedic god that gets associated with shiva but that doesn’t mean they were always identified with each other
The pashupati seal and swastika motifs found at Harappan sites add more confusion. Recently discovered burial site of a royal clan near sinauli suggests a parallel existing culture which had chariots and ranged weapons
Very good video sir. Zagrosian Iranians who mixed with South Asian Hunter Gatherers(who were present all over south asia as hunter- gatherers) to form Indus Valley Civilization 8000 years ago were hunters and not farmers or pastoralists. That is the reason why there was neither Anatolian Farmer DNA nor Iranian Neolithic Farmer DNA in Rakhigarhi skeletons which belonged to early IVC. So the language spoke by IVC people would have been Zagrosian /proto Elamite mixed with some language spoken by South Asian hunter gatherers. Sintastha Culture people (ancestors of Indo Aryans/ Indo Iranians) came after the decline of Indus Valley Civilization. They came from Southern Russia bordering Kazhaksthan. Before entering Afghanistan and Pakisthan. They learned agriculture from people of Bactria Margiana Archaeological Complex. That's why agricultural methods and crops used by Indo Aryans in Vedic period was identical to BMAC and not related to IVC. (Aryans cultivated barley, pulses and lentils in the banks of Saptha Sindhu, West Punjab. It was only after they mixed with IVC people they began to farm rice on Yamuna &Gangetic plains. Later North Indians shifted their interest to wheat cultivation.) No proof for Australian aborgines (ancestors of hunter gatherers) speaking Tamil too. (Tamil is 2700 year old) Their languages are still spoken in Australia and Papua. Sanskrit, Avestan & Mittani are closely related languages. (3700 year old) There is a common ancestor for all Indo European languages originated in Eurasian Steppes spoken by all Indo European speakers. That is not Sanskrit. It is yet to be foundout. That is the only reason why some 20% words, meanings and pronounciation is similar to European languages. 80% Sanskrit originated in Afghanisthan. Later spread to Saptha Sindhu region, Ganga, Yamuna & Narmada. Finally came down to Southern Peninsula & Srilanka. Ok coming to genetics 70% Indians are mix of people from South Russian Steppes, Zagros,Iran& South Asia. (Sintastha people also have 7-22% DNA received from Bactria Margiana Archaeological Complex. BMAC is a mix of Iranian Neolithic Farmers, Anatolian Farmers and Caucasus Hunters) North Indians have more Steppe ancestry because of various invasions and settlements from Turkmenstan, Persia etc. But their basic DNA is same as South Indian Upper & Middle castes. North Easterners and Ladakhi people have Sino Tibetan and Sino Burmese ancestors. But their culture and traditions are like any indigenous tribal culture found around our country. No matter where we come from we are Indians first. Jai Hind. Yours Gouri Sankar.K 👍🙏🇮🇳
It is unlikely or at least unsure that they spoke proto-elamiate. remember elamites didn't even dominate all of Iran, there was Kassite to its North-East.
The last time a paper titled ‘The Genomic Formation of South and Central Asia’ was released online, in March 2018, it created a sensation in India and around the world. Mostly because the paper, co-authored by 92 scientists, many of them doyens of different disciplines, said that between 2000 BCE and 1000 BCE, there were significant migrations from the Central Asian Steppe that most likely brought Indo-European languages into Indian subcontinent - just as Steppe pastoralist migrations into Europe a thousand years earlier, beginning around 3000 BCE, had spread Indo-European languages to that continent as well. In other words, the paper supported the long-held idea of an ‘Arya’ migration into Indian subcontinent - or, to put it more accurately, a migration of Indo-European language speaking people who called themselves ‘Arya
@@AbhiramN_1289A study led by Dr Andrew Garrett from the University of California, Berkeley, provides evidence that a common ancestor of the Indo-European languages - Proto-Indo-European - originated in the Pontic-Caspian steppe stretching from Moldova and Ukraine
@@mscreationworks5787 I know that, but I am saying that when we talk about where a specific language itself originates, it is where it develops as independent idea. So Sanskrit originates where it split off from the rest of the Indo Iranian languages
Recently the Harappan script was deciphered by a computer programmer named Yajna Devam. It offers very interesting insights about the language spoken by Harappans. According to his findings, the Harappan script is more related to Sanskrit than to Tamil.
What probably happened was a mix of invasion and migration, similar to what the German tribes did with the Roman Empire. Lombardy in Northern Italy has more Germanic influence than Sicily in Southern Italy, which is similar to the Northern Aryan and Southern Dravidian distinction in India. The Puranas and the Agamas are a retcon of the Vedas and the spirituality that derives from them is more aboriginal or indigenous. For example, instead of Indra, Agni, and Varuna you have Brahma, Shiva, and Vishnu. In later traditions more emphasis is placed on goddesses like Kali, Durga, Shakti, etc. The Indo-Aryans were more patriarchal.
Why cant Indians handle the truth? Or people trying to find the truth? They are the only who act like this. They dont want anyone to destroy their perfect fantasy world it seems.
Indian nation is not based on any language or any ethnicity. it is based on principle of unity and diversity, that's why country is survived and will remain undivided
The answer is yes. And the attempt to change it from invasion to just a "migration" have been nothing but semantic change, little change in the actual original argument. Indo-Aryan languages originated outside of India, Indo-Iranian in Eastern Europe(like Belarus) and Sanskrit in Southern Central Asia(supporting evidence of the Mitanni language essentially being Sanskrit). The migrants were violent and imposed their culture and religion on the natives (DNA, comparative & Rigvedic evidence). Elements of the religion are probably native, for example Jati element of caste are probably Harappan but Varna and the extent of caste restrictiveness is probably Indo-Aryan but that doesn't really change the core of the religion, being from the migrant Indo-Aryans. 6:34 It is possible for such a migration to still be violent. Like something like the Germanic migrations into Rome, different dialects, over generations but still conquering tribes. The DNA evidence I was referring to is Indo-Aryan Y DNA(male lineage) being 40% while female lineage (M-DNA) being 10% which is consistent with the men of conquering tribes taking on large harems of native women
Imposed religion is a much harsh term. Much of the reason as to why folk traditions have been assimilated into hinduism has to do with 1st millenia hindu synthesis. And there is no evidences that show they were violent as of now
@@preyalneupane1296 the Rigveda mentions wars against the unbelievers actually reminiscent of Sassanid-Zoroastrian similar claims of destroying unbelievers. Now, both are probably exaggerations (certainly so in the latter case) and probably reflect the zeal of a revivalist period but even with that caveat, not like later Hindu Kings(like frankly most Kings) treated tribal religions with respect with most of them considered Dalit. "And there is no evidences that show they were violent as of now" Can you elaborate on this?.
@@preyalneupane1296 This is an argument against the name of the theory not the substance of it. The 1800s Brits that proposed the theory by that name did not claim they were an army, the claimed that Indo-Aryan tribes(not armies) conquered and subjugated the Indo-Gangetic plain. Which the evidence supports, for example Indo-Aryan Y DNA(male lineage) being 40% while female lineage (M-DNA) being 10% which is consistent with the men of conquering tribes taking on large harems of native women.
@preyalneupane1296 many Indians reject Aryan invasion theory on the basis that this theory came from Europeans especially Brits who used it to justify their control over India at that time.
Both indian right winger indigenous homogeneity claimers and leftist and Dravidian+mulnivasi nationalists needs to understand and have consensus on some points: >There was some kind of MIGRATION from Eurasia or steppe, it makes more sense than it's counter out migration theory >No tribes/people spawns from land everyone came from somewhere >Mostly none in india is pure but in gradients >Most of our gene pool is close to Indus valley people none one can claim them >Hinduism isn't foreign it is mixture of all indian faiths
Nobody's denying simple fact of migration. People migrated from one place to another. But it is what comes after. That after 400 years of migration. The absurd claims that, somehow after this migration native northern Indians suddenly stopped speaking their own language and started speaking some Indo-European language. And suddenly stopped following their own own culture but started following Vedic culture invented by these immigrants. If that was true, why didn't it happen during Mughal invasion of thousands of years. Or British colonization of 200 years. Why didn't the whole of northern India stopped speaking Hindi and Sanskrit and started speaking and writing in a branch of languages like Turkic and Persian or English. Why didn't the whole of Northern India started following Islam or Christianity.
Of the 1196 samples analyzed from all over India, 23% belong to R1a or downstream. 16% belong to R-Y3+ (including L657) whereas 7% belong to the non-Y3 branch of R1a, and can be assumed to be of steppe origin, especially the ones which are Z2124+. NW India has the highest % of R1a at 41%, of which the non-Y3 branches are 20% and the Y3+ samples are at 21%. Definite steppe impact is seen here with 13% Z2124+ samples. Ganga plains, central, east & south India have 23, 33, 20, and 17% R1a respectively. The bulk of that is Y3+, and only 4-10% is Y3-. None of the samples from the central, east and Ganga plains show Z2124+.
14:08 you have referred to shiv lingam as shiva's penis which is wrong. Shiva linga means symbol of shiva it's meant to represent pillar of fire in which form bhagwan shiva first appeared. Linga means symbol.
@preyalneupane1296 source?? Shiv puran and ling purana both don't recognise it as shiva's penis. If you know any other source do tell. Penis in sanskrit is known as shishna. Not linga. Linga means symbol.
14:06 This part is enough for me to conclude this video was 'badly researched'. Shiva's lingum means shiva's symbol. It is not a penis. Sources you have used to research are trash.
@@abhishekmaurya1642have you learnt Hindi grammar in school ? If so, can you tell me what pu-ling & stree-ling mean ? Does stree-ling mean female penis ? Use your sense before you believe BS about your own religion.
Its obvious when there were no fixed borders and people's movement were much fluid, it's not a surprise that people from the Central Asia and the Caucasus migrated to the subcontinent and vice versa. What the indian nationalists debate is the notion of people from these regions outside of south asia decimated the local population. The DNA haplographic data shows, they more likely integrated and intermingled with the local population. In any case, India is probably the least discussed of the ancient civilizations in the world. More discussion and research is definitely warranted. It would have been more conducive if you would have referred to a few of the local historians and their works rather than only Eurocentric works. Nothing wrong with that, but the immense data of work done hy local historians do warrant a mention i believe.
A note at 0:47, the word Hindu usually denotes a practitioner of the religion Hinduism, and Hindi is the language commonly spoken. Punjabi, is a word commonly used for both a people group and the language spoken.
By the time few centuries later after Aryan men mixed with Dravidian women in Gangetic plains and formed their new empire (Guptas), subsequent Aryan generations become secluded into superior caste and stay divided along ethnic line; hence these divisions are so obvious in South India where Aryans did not intermingle at all rather imposed their caste structures to keep their dominance over native people. No one talks about how did only Aryan men (not their women) mixed with Dravidian women in North India from results of ANI & ASI genetic studies if it is not invasion? If Aryans integrated and assimilated with Dravidians through their ideology, no one will be raising Aryan invasion/migration as an issue. Because Aryans stay divided as a superior race and used their ideology to keep caste divisions along racial/ethnic lines for millennium, it is still a problem for those who follow modern day Hinduism (Aryan vedic religion).
Aryan is not any other community in world they are mainly steppes of central Asia and euroasia migrated in indian subcontinent and mix with local IVC population There faith was nature worshipping and animalism Vedic faith made letter
Migration is a fact; all humans originated from Africa. However, the British used the Aryan invasion theory to suggest that Indians follow foreign religions and have always been under foreign rule, aiming to further divide them. While migration occurred, but today no one is pure like astrain painter . and there's no evidence that modern Hinduism originated in Eurasia. If it did, we'd reference of ritual on the banks of river Moscow or the Volga instead of the Indus and Ganges rivers. Today's Hinduism is not solely Vedic; it encompasses diverse traditions like Indus animism, tantrism, and bhakti. It embraces many deities and philosophies, allowing for personal spiritual expressions. The mix of local customs has created vibrant festivals, each with its own significance.
Hello, The language is Hindi and not Hindu. Check your video around 0:46. Hindu is a religion. My friends from western countries (European and Americas) often mix them up. This is important to folks from that part of the world.
We wuzz the Romans we wuzz aryans 🤡. You are more related the barbarian cave nomadic Germanic tribes than you are to the original Roman’s of the Roman Empire eurocuck.
For me, the Aryan migration indeed did occurred just like how the Turks became ruling class and assimilated Anatolia into Turkish land. But unlike Seljuk Turks or Ghurid or even Babur invasion, the Aryan migration was rather a slow and complex progress in which contributed to cultural, ethnic and language diversity in Indian subcontinent.
"was rather a slow and complex progress" how do you know? All published papers about IE migrations to Europe and Iran and Central Asia show that the IE people were violent and warlike. Why do we like to think they acted differently when they went to India?
I'll say my country needs to be developed eradicate poverty focus on education health technology. We already have tons of problem. This 'we wuzz this we wuzz natives you foreigner' things are so childish. Like im from north. So if someone calls me outsider what am supposed to do? Pack my bags sell my property and book my ticket and fly somewhere in ukraine/russia from where my ancestors came some thousands of years ago? Like is this really an important issue ? How about this why dont we pack out bags and and fly to africa because thats our home right ? This all religion ethnicity shit is used as political propagandas to distract people from real issues
Well no one told you to leave india,the thing is internet is full indians commenting they are the most powerful people and all the knowldge of current world is from india,and hinduism is the best religolion,these kind of comments makes people sick,no one wants to know more which is not interesting, indians need to stop asking for attention on the internet
So you must be doing something major to tackle Indian poverty. Are you? These topics are related to our history so saying it's childish, in my opinion is immature. Aryan invasion theory is mostly put forward without any concrete evidence or major proof. It was introduced by Max Muller, a German philologist in 1850s and 1860s and we all know what German did with the word "Aryans". It is basically made up to make people believe that superior "Aryans" migrated to India for 400 years during which time native languages became extinct, whole of North Idia started speaking Indo-European language. Native belief system crumbled, whole northern India started believing "Aryan" invented Vedic belief system. Tell me Mughals invaded India for thousands of Years massacred millions, enslaved women and children, tortured murdered people. Were they able to do it? British brutally colonized India for hundred of years through Divide and Rule policy. Were they able to do it?
@@amalxavier5102 And you on the other hand are a know it all, superior to all others, Aryans were the supreme beings who were able to do in 400 years what Mughals couldn't do in thousands of years and British couldn't do in 200 years kind of a guy. Aren't you?
The origin of Indo Aryans can be anywhere from Anatolia to Northern India, however during the British colonial era the origin was thought to be Northern Europe.
This involves a later war between two Vedic tribes. The Rig Vedas on the other hand covers the first battles between the invading steppe people and the natives of the Indus valley.
@@war_observer The indus valley people weren't natives either they were half breeds of Iranian farmers and ancestral north indians. Plus it is already widely accepted that their was no invasion but a large scale Migration did take place from around 2500-1500 B.C into the norther part of the subcontinent.
@@justaguyfromexcept that the so called "Iranian farmer" population was inhabiting a wide swathe of land from the Iranian plateau across Afghanistan to the North Indian plains. All the genetic evidence of the "Iranian farmer" population is derived from Iran. None of the genetics analysed have been sourced from India proper or even Afghanistan . What we have instead as per a new term coined for this phenomenon is Indus peripheral population which I think is self explanatory.
@@justaguyfrom It was most likely an invasion, because they imposed their own culture on the previous inhabitants. This also happened in England with the Norman invasion, which completely changed the English language, but the genetic impact of the Normans on the English was less than the genetic impact of the Steppe Aryans on the IV people
And dont forget Mahabharat, Pandu is Alexander and Pandava actually five most powerful Alexander General. Pandu is pale, have problem with his neck and die young
Great video although this disproves only a very narrow idea of what the Aryan invasion theory would propose. It's still very clearly a process of invasion even if it took many generations that weren't unified. It wasn't just "cultural blending".
𐎠𐎼𐎡𐎹 𐬀𐬌𐬭𐬌𐬌𐬀 आर्य Thats old Persian cuneiform, old Avestan, and Sanskrit, all say Arya, we are all as “Indo Europeans” descended from the same stock as their ancestors. (Just referring to India, Greater Iran and Europe here)
@ I do agree but ancient civilizations are in Pakistan part. Secondly Punjabi is one of the oldest languages of Hindustan. 56% Punjabi speaking people live in Pakistan when it conducted its census probably after fall of dacca
You mean to say many Hindus converted to islam, many voluntarily, many forcefully. Because hinduism existed long before any abrahamic religion existed. No one "went" to Hinduism. It was always organic to the land, Islam came from Arabia.
I feel like you chose to take the middle ground as to not insult either group to much. Now i'm not an expert and I look forward to opposing explanations, but I feel like the invasion theory has more evidence for it than you let on. A few examples: 1. Genetics An article in the Journal of Human Genetics points to a series of migrations to India in 2,000-1,500 BC that was transformative to the region, and overwhelmingly male dominated. 40% of the male lineages of northern India carry the R1a DNA marker associated with the Indo-European migration, compared to less than 10% of female lineages. In other words, it was largely males that had a genetic impact on these populations, which implies this migration was anything but peaceful. 2. Philology & History The Rigveda, the oldest text, describes many battles in which the Indra and his companions conquer the land. This is how these are described in the Rigveda: ''He (Indra), much invoked, hath slain Dasyus and Simyus, after his want, and laid them low with arrows. The mighty Thunderer with his fair-complexioned friends won the land, the sunlight, and the waters. May Indra evermore be our protector, and unimperilled may we win the booty” And ''Indra in battles help his Aryan worshipper, he who hath hundred helps at hand in every fray, in frays that win the light of heaven. Plaguing the lawless he gave up to Manu's seed the dusky skin; Blazing, 'twere, he burns each covetous man away, he burns, the tyrannous away.'' and ''O'er Sire and Mother they have roared in unison bright with the verse of praise, burning up riteless men, blowing away with supernatural might from earth and from the heavens the swarthy skin which Indra hates.'' and ''At the swift draught the Soma-drinker waxed in might, the Iron One with yellow beard and yellow hair. He, Lord of Tawny Coursers, Lord of fleet-foot Mares, will bear his Bay Steeds safely over all distress.'' and ''The Thunderer bestowed on his White friends the fields, bestowed the sun, bestowed the waters.'' and ''Stormy gods who rush on like furious bulls and scatter the black skin.'' These and many more lines in the text clearly seem to differentiate the Aryan invaders with the ''swarthy'' indiginious population, which again implies that this assimilation proces was (at least in the beginning) not very peaceful.
It is very interesting to note that none of the Indo European religions, whether it is Mycenean Greek, Roman, Celtic, Slavic or Germanic religions have told or discussed or wrote about a one absolute reality/singularity/one ultimate truth. (Ekam Sat) Only Indo Aryans of Vedic Period said about it. The energy which started at a single point, expanded throughout the universe as a time spiral through space from which everything you see, hear, speak, touch and feel came. All stars, galaxies, planets, satellites, living beings, gods and goddesses all came from this Brahman. (Ekam Sat/Absolute One Reality) RigVeda was the first to introduce this philosophical and scientific concept. This was biggest inspiration for Atomic Theory and Big Bang Theory. Rig Veda also tells about fusion of Hiranya Garbha (Golden Womb/Golden Egg) and Hema Bheejam (Semen) from which came first god Prajapathi (Later become Brahma in Puranic texts which was written during Mahajanapadha Period.) And Prajapathi created this universe and everything in it. Vedic Gods are very different from Puranic Gods. Vedic Indra was omnipresent god, main god, god who protects us, helps to win wars, he protect us from floods and famines, we pray to getting more yield through farming, to protect our horses, sheeps, cows and bulls, to get beautiful, intelligent and brave sons and daughters, to become more humble, to control our lust, to earn more wealth. Not a single Vedic yagna ends without praising or paying respects to Indra, Mitra, Varuna and Agni. In Puranas Indra become a snobbish, lusty, jealous and a coward god who depends Brahma, Vishnu, Shiva, Shakthi, Ganesha and Karthikeya to defeat Asuras and Rakshasas. Puranic Indra is king of all demi gods and god of thunder, lightning and rain. Vedic Varuna and his partner Mitra are gods of justice, upholders of cosmic law, (those laws which determines how this universe should work, natural phenomenons should function) also judges what is morally right and wrong. Puranic Varuna is god of all waters in the earth's surface. Vedic Agni is the inner fire of desire and ambitions. Desire to achieve great heights in career. Desire to help people, desire to keep this earth a better place to live etc. Puranic Agni is god of fire only. Later Vedic texts focussed on more rituals and eager to lead luxury life through inter tribal wars and expansion of territories. (Battle Of Ten Kings/ Dasharajna Yuddham is a great example. That happened during last phase of RigVedic Period near Raavi River, Pakisthan Punjab. Bharatha tribe defeated all other nine tribes. Word Bharatham for India comes from Bharatha.) As opposed to RigVedic Period which gave more importance to philosophy, spirituality, advices to lead a simple life and not to indulge in unnecessary wars. Inorder to bring back people to Rig Vedic ideologies, Upanishads were written. Upanishads though began from the basics of RigVedic text, it explored much more on the ideas of absolute one reality (Ekam Sat/Brahman) through stories. Later Upanishads become ritualised too making way for Puranas. Manusmrithi was written for those residing in 16 Mahajanapadhas. (16 Republics) It was a law book which insists it's people how to do their duties, prescribes compulsory (but sometimes flexible) caste endogamy and duties of women. (Note : Manusmrithi is not Sharia Law it is like Old Testament Law. Only relevant on a particular large area and period.) Puranas and Ithihasas were written by those who broke away from Vedic and Vedantic way of life. They made least important Vedic gods like Vishnu, Shiva (Vedic Rudra) and Brahma (Vedic Prajapathi) into most important powerful gods. Sachi (Indrani) become Shakthi. Ithihasas were history told as exaggerated stories about great kings and dynasties. Ramayana and Mahabharata are two most important epics which describes the tales of Solar and Lunar dynasties. Bhagavatham and Bhagavat Geetha comes from Mahabharata. Bhagavat Geetha combines Vaishnava Bhakti (Devotion For Srimath Narayana) with Upanishadic/Vedantic Nyana (Knowledge From Upanishads)
Better read works of Western Indologists like Dr.Koenraad Elst,etc. who themselves have questioned and debunked this BS. Keep living in your own delusional bubble of 19th century racist delusions and Aryan race mythology.
😂😂😂 Mahabharata is way older than all this stuff buddy... Even AnkorWat is the greatest evidence of Mahabharata in its own form ❤❤❤ How r u so insecure buddy... Everyone respects Other Culture as we don't believe in any Foolish superior stuff We all are one soul ❤❤❤ Dosen't matter how deep u bury our scripts or Sculptures they will come back again or I should say Reincarnate again😊😊😊
@@divyanshsingh7542I am a Hindu but Ramayana, Mahabharata and Puranas are predominantly myths. I don't believe in any texts written in the gangetic valley (UP-Bihar). Only Vedas are trustworthy.
@@extreme4642 all text and faiths are mythology only make by humans add some scientific things and all other only faiths But fact there is no proof of God existence
One interesting take in genetics: There's a possibillity that the Y DNA haplogroup R1a1, which is related to Indo-European migration, could in fact originate in South Asia. In that case the lineage of men bearing R1a1 might migrate from South Asia to Pontic-Caspian, give rise to Yamnaya culture, then go North-West to form the Corded Ware culture, then migrate East to to form Sintashta and Andronovo culture, then move South to merge with BMAC culture and then further South and successfully re-migrate into South Asia again with the Aryan identity. So yes, as we say in Bengali, "Prithibi gol" (Its a round earth we live in).
14:20 - statement that shiva hardly appears in vedas is factually incorrect. Shiva appears right at the center and is inseparable from the Rudra form. I urge the makers of the videos to make a thorough study… independent study and not just put together an impressive animation with bits and pieces picked from the internet. Point is - nobody knows what exactly happened in those times and whether migrations have happened and in which way they happened. That’s the reason, the so called Hindu traditions and beliefs is called sanatana dharma = eternal law / code
"whether migrations have happened and in which way they happened" Archaeology and genetics can tell us what happened, that's how we know most of history in absence of written records. The Rakhigarhi (IVC) individual's DNA was analyzed by Indian scientists and no trace of European DNA was found. Whereas modern Northern Indians have significant genetic overlap with Europeans. If the migration was out of India, then how do you explain this?
@@saikpA word known as Shiva does not appear in Vedas . Another god named Rudra is mentioned in the Rig Veda .The Vedic texts do not mention bull or any animal as the transport vehicle (vahana) of Rudra . Shiva has pre-Vedic roots , and the figure of Shiva evolved as an amalgamation of various older non-Vedic deities Shiva has pre-Vedic Tribal roots , having "his origins in primitive tribes, signs and symbols." The figure of Shiva as he is known today is an amalgamation of various older deities into a single figure, due to the process of Sanskritization and the emergence of the Hindu synthesis in post-Vedic times.
Aryan is only title mainly all central Asian eurasian and middle Eastern tribes and steppes called aryans because there is no specific DNA of any community for them
Basic logic: if there was a time when the entire Indian subcontinent spoke Dravidian and then came a time when the north spoke a different language, something radical must have happened. I wouldn't be surprised if plague played a role.
I prefer more BC instead of BCE. BCE sounds more confusing and political without no apparent positive change to the calendar since it is literally the same calendar but with different terminology.
Aryan invasions happened and the evidence is overwhelming. Biggest evidence is the caste system and how higher castes have lighter skin and lower darker. Also Dardic people like Kalash Kashmiris in North Western mountains speak languages similar to rest of South Asia but resemble europeans.
I have Brahmin friends from Bihar and haryana and they have dark skintone, I myself from vaishya Barahapuriya caste I have light skin. Stop this caste propaganda separatist sleeper cell!!!
Even if this invasion happened, its been centuries and many other nations conquered India and there was so much race mixing in India, all indians I met don't look aryan or have any aryan features.
thats because an indian will not have more than 35% steppe gene. + Aryan migration was the last migration to make permanent and huge mark on indian genes
There's no ‘aryan’ features, arya was used by various indo-iranian as self designation for themselves, and for outsiders, An-Arya (non aryan) was used. if you travel across ancient Eurasia and asked a north indian person, a Persian/iranian person or an alan sacking the Western Roman empire.. who is he. He will reply, he is an Aryan (in his own language dialect, ofc).
EUROPE HAS ALWAYS BEEN INFLUENCED BY OUTSIDE Christianity is NOT native to Europe. You are trying to project, your history on Indians. India is Hindu, the native Indian culture prevails. This is the raw facts. Creating new mythical races to appropriate Indian heritage is laughable. There are a hundred trillion ways we can exploit this to our advantage. Just take the L.
The last time a paper titled ‘The Genomic Formation of South and Central Asia’ was released online, in March 2018, it created a sensation in India and around the world. Mostly because the paper, co-authored by 92 scientists, many of them doyens of different disciplines, said that between 2000 BCE and 1000 BCE, there were significant migrations from the Central Asian Steppe that most likely brought Indo-European languages into Indian subcontinent - just as Steppe pastoralist migrations into Europe a thousand years earlier, beginning around 3000 BCE, had spread Indo-European languages to that continent as well. In other words, the paper supported the long-held idea of an ‘Arya’ migration into Indian subcontinent - or, to put it more accurately, a migration of Indo-European language speaking people who called themselves ‘Arya
Skin color was the basis of social division of the Vedic Aryans; their society was divided into social groups varņa, literally 'color'. The varņas of Aryan priests (brāhmaņa) and warriors (kşatriya or rājanya) were opposed to the varņas of the aboriginal Dasa, called 'black-skinned'. Modern researchers propose that the Dasas were Dravidians, creators of the Harappan culture and script. Their homeland in the Punjab is proved by the Brahui who have preserved Dravidian language in the north and a cultural vocabulary reflecting an ancient acquaintance with the productive economy and developed crafts; moreover, some terms were later borrowed into the Indian languages as the newcomers adapted to a new ecological niche Proto-Dravidians are genetically connected with the Near East, and are probably related to the Elamites and are assigned to the Europoid Near Eastern anthropological type The Harappan population also had an Austronesian admixture. The greater part of the modern Indian population belongs to the Indo-Afghan type, forming a branch of the Mediterranian group. Genetically they go back to the Mohenjo- Daro, Mundigak and Sialk cultures.The representatives of the Munda people could also be included among the Dasa; they are assigned to the Austronesian language family, distinct from the south of Hindustan. Anthropologically, the Munda belong to the Australoid-Negroid population and are characterized by dark-skin pigmentation and a flattened face. Indian culture formed as the result of the active interaction of three aboriginal ethno-linguistic traditions: Proto-Dravidians of the Punjab, Munda of the south and Tibetan-Burmese of the north-east and the immigrant Indo-Aryans. In modern India the north-western population is much lighter than the southern; moreover, representatives of lower castes have darker skin color, while higher ethnic-caste groups, who trace their genealogy from the ancient Aryans, are lighter, and among the Brahmans even light-eyed people are occasionally found. considers "the thesis of T. V. Gamkrelidze and V. V. Ivanov about Iranians separating through western areas of Central Asia and their movement around the Caspian Sea to be insufficiently demonstrated." He localizes the Indo-Iranian homeland in the north and suggests that they advanced from Central Asia.
The major problem with relegating such a complex event into aryan vs dravidian, higher caste vs lower caste is formation of misconception. Generally speaking, there is no huge scale difference as even the most northwestern indian will not have more than 35% steppe dna (aka almost 2/3 of their dna is from IVC and Local Hunter gatherer). Its a gradient
While there is probably some truth to this, it is most certainly far from the fully truth and certainly not correct even to even be the simplified version of the story. The Varna colours are literally white(brahman), red(ksatriya), yellow(vishnaya) then black(shudra). Where are the Red and Yellow skinned peoples? in fact, why is the darker colour of red ranked above the lighter colour of yellow according to your claim?. "In modern India the north-western population is much lighter than the southern" Except this was probably always the case as Harappans had more Iranian farmer DNA than Southern Indians of that same time. Showing that is the case today only proves it has always been the case. If the religion originated in the Punjab, whether from foreigners or native the Brahman caste would still be lighter skinned than South Indians. And you don't even support ur claim that Varna was skin colour based u only showed that North East Indians are lighter skinned, well, okay but that doesn't show Varna is colour based just that India has a variaition of skin colours.
🎥 Watch more than 200+ other exclusive videos on youtube: ua-cam.com/channels/MmaBzfCCwZ2KqaBJjkj0fw.htmljoin or patreon: www.patreon.com/kingsandgenerals. Support us on Paypal www.paypal.com/paypalme/kingsandgenerals as well!
SCRIPT AND LANGUAGE FOUND IN INDIA
Archaeological Evidence and Strong Proof
(Unlike unsupported theories such as the Aryan invasion or the Vedic period that have zero evidence-India’s real history is supported by archaeology.)
• The INDUS SCRIPT, dating back to around 2600-1900 BCE, is approximately 4600-3900 years old and represents a sophisticated system of writing from the Indus Valley Civilization.
• Later, the DHAMMA LIPI, used between 500 BCE and 300 CE, emerged as a significant script.
- This script, over 2500 years old, is found on Ashoka’s pillars, inscriptions, and other structures.
- There are similarities between the letters of the Indus Valley Script and Ashokan Dhamma Lipi. The letters of Indus valley script over the time involved and turned into dhamma lipi
• Over time, between 1 CE and 6 CE, the Ashokan script evolved and contributed to the development of Sanskrit.
• Gautama Buddha, widely recognized today, was the last famous Buddha, but many Buddhas existed before him.
• There is substantial evidence linking Buddhism to the Indus Valley Civilization, indicating that early Buddhism is over 4000 years old.
Evidence of Buddhism in the Indus Valley Civilization
• In Mohenjo-daro, a Buddhist stupa was discovered.
- While some claim it dates to the 1st century CE, evidence suggests it is from the Indus Valley period, as its brick size matches that of other Indus Valley structures like houses.
• A Buddha pendant was discovered in Mohenjo-daro, indicating early Buddhist influence.
• The spoked-wheel symbol (☸️),
was also found in the Indus Valley.
• Gautama Buddha statues from 1-10 CE share stylistic similarities with the so-called "Priest-King" statue of the Indus Valley, especially in clothing style.
• A meditation statue was found in the Indus Valley, though its head is broken.
• Indus Valley Early Buddhism:
Over 4000 years old then turned into
• Modern Buddhism: Began with Gautama Buddha.
• Gautama Buddha: Born 2500 years ago.
• Ashoka the Great: Born 2300 years ago, he spread Buddhism to many countries.
Ashoka’s Edict 13 (Rock Edicts of Kalsi)
• Ashoka said:
I spread Dhamma (Buddhism) from India to Egypt and Greece.
Recent Discoveries Supporting Ashoka’s Statement
• In 2022, archaeologists discovered a 2000-year-old **Buddha statue** in Berenike, Egypt.
• Similar Buddha statues have also been found in Indonesia, Mongolia, Japan, China, and other countries, indicating the spread of Buddhism.
don't use false British translations,
root word is ling/lingam means symbol, shivalingam means symbol of Shiva.
there is a popular Sanskrit word to describe gender - "stree linga" means symbol of stree (women) it doesn't mean women's penis.
just like this, there is a Sanskrit word "purling," in that pur stands for purusha (man) and ling stands for (symbol), purling means symbol of man.
both words are translated as feminine and masculine.
correct your dictionary.
Make video about orgins of dravidans
@@Atheist-hy6xqThe last time a paper titled ‘The Genomic Formation of South and Central Asia’ was released online, in March 2018, it created a sensation in India and around the world.
Mostly because the paper, co-authored by 92 scientists, many of them doyens of different disciplines, said that between 2000 BCE and 1000 BCE, there were significant migrations from the Central Asian Steppe that most likely brought Indo-European languages into Indian subcontinent - just as Steppe pastoralist migrations into Europe a thousand years earlier, beginning around 3000 BCE, had spread Indo-European languages to that continent as well.
In other words, the paper supported the long-held idea of an ‘Arya’ migration into Indian subcontinent - or, to put it more accurately, a migration of Indo-European language speaking people who called themselves ‘Arya '
@@Atheist-hy6xqA report from Beta Analytic Testing Laboratory, in Florida , United States , on the carbon dating from the Alagankulam excavation site . The carbon Dating found it to be from 345 BC. "Since many potteries found at the site have Tamil inscriptions, It proven that the age of Tamil Brahmi script is more than 345 BC and much older than Dhamma Lipi ( Prakrit in the Brahmi Script ) of Ashoka Edicts
I can already hear the, “as an Indian” comments.
Edit: I didn’t mean to say some Indians are not real Indians, that’s not what I meant. All I meant to say that many Indians will give their opinions, and will always start their comment with “as an Indian”.
As a German 😏
Saar, don't insult India saar there were no ayrans invasions saar why you insult India saar
@@DasFuuk 🤣🤣🤣
I can already see the "wE europeans were master race fadar of all " comments
"smell"
Here come the Hindutva Horde in the comments in 1, 2, 3…
Hehe u r on track boy
The illest payeets on the sh$itting street.
Typical Mulla comment
Golden horde become hindutva horde 😮 next islamic horde then Christianic horde
Bindu eating too many ghee huh make bindu fat and slow like the Ganesha lindu
My man knows how to get video engagement.
He definitely does
naah saaar native indians are lindus saaar we report this vidu saar
You mean Indian history can't be discussed in a channel without the ulterior motive of gaining views?
What probably happened was a mix of invasion and migration, similar to what the German tribes did with the Roman Empire. Lombardy in Northern Italy has more Germanic influence than Sicily in Southern Italy, which is similar to the Northern Aryan and Southern Dravidian distinction in India.
@@grapeshott He means, he's baiting the indian nationalists into trying to "convince us" of their nationalist version by not totally refuting it.
Video idea: The Origins of the Dravidian Peoples
There is concrete Evidence establishing link Dravidian and IVC. IVC is mostly unknown for now
@@CHRS-ri5mfIVC?
A less controversial idea that'll likely take us the ice age let's do it
They came from Oman during the “Green Arabia” period.
@@adurpandya2742they share maternal linage with Ethiopians, East Africans, Senegalese, South Africans, Algerians and Mauritanians.
Old Europeans themselves were completely conquered by the Indo Europeans from the steppes. I think Hindu nationalist don't like the word "European" in INDO European. If it was called Indo Asian I think they had less problems with that theory.
So, from the evolutionary point of view, indo Europeans were indeed better equipped and quashed others and propagated their own progeny manifolds more than others 🤔. .. Today, huge swathes of world population and languages are of indo Europeans.. A master race??
Indians ( mostly those who follow Hindutva ideology) dont like the theory because They use the term " invader " or "foreigners" mainly to denigrate Indian Muslims. And the Aryan invasion or migration theory also puts them in the same filter.
It is not Hindu nationalist stuff. It is south Tamil dravadian nonsense start stuff that the whole south Indian are original Indian and north Indian are outsiders and Hinduism is Aryan religion and people say Aryan invasion theory is British divide and rule tactic to divide the north and south that reason why in online bjp user against if you say Aryan migraintion theory it okay they do not have problem Indo European you itself conspiracy pretend to be Indian political expert
Yeah, they're extremely racist not to mention ignorant AF.
I've never met a European descended person who had a problem with the indo part. I never cared one bit, because I understood it referred to a common ancestry that later became Indian and European. It's not difficult to understand unless it threatens an ideology.
I somehow doubt that "completely conquered". It may very well be that it was there a similar process. That does mean it was peacefull, but in almost all cases we have a mixture of alliances, coexistence, but also conquest and sometimes even enslavment and mass-murder.
Brave of you to delve into this topic...please ignore any negetive comments... We indians need content like this
by negative comments you mean people who doesnt belive in this european propoganda right ? well then iam fine
@@BHARATHA-SAMPRAJYA i wrote that comment before I even saw the video. I mean any sort of ideology that discourages people from making or talking abt any interesting topic... Sometimes people are so stuck in their mindset that they don't allow good faith conversation or content abt certain issues
The Aryans are the Thracians. The Thracians invented the chariot and mastered horsemanship in ancient times and no one could match them, just read Strabo, Herodotus etc. Herodotus even states "The Thracians are the second most numerous people in the world only behind the Indians who are the most numerous", he wouldn't have referenced India if they didn't come in contact. The oldest swastikas are from the Balkans and Ukraine (13 000 BC). Sout Slavic languages are the closest surviving relatives of the Sanskrit language and they share tons of cognates. Greek also has significant amount of cognates with Sanskrit but considerably less.
Stephanus of Byzantium writes that Thrace is a greek exonym and that it used to be called Arya and Perkia. Thrace is located in modern day Bulg-Aria, Greece and Turkey.
This truth is the reason haplogroups I2a1 and E1b1b (exclusive to the Balkans and Turkey) are very common among Northern Indians and Pakistani who are descendant from Aryan immigrants and local Indian peoples, or they descend from Alexander the Greats conquerers who brought Greek, Thracian and other Balkan ancestry again.
This legacy is why Alexander the Great, a macedonian which is a hellenized thracian megatribe, sought to expand the influence of his people as far as India again. Before him, long ago there was also the conquest of India by the thracian king Dionysius but few people have heard of it.
The horse race tradition in the Roman Empire called Ludi was imported by assimilated Thracians from Anatolia, their tribe and empire was known as Lydia. In Rome even slaves and recently freed men were encouraged to participate in this event. This aligns with the etymology of the word Ludi which matches the South Slavic word Lude (Люде) that means Free-man.
In Sanskrit Lude means "to freely move"
The Thracians were so obsessed with horses that men were buried with their favorite horses in their tombs. This obsession is what caused the Trojan horse incident, Troy was a noble Thracian house in the city which was actually called Illios, the old name of Helios the sun God. That's why Thracians sided with Troy in the Trojan war, because they were related. The supreme divinities in Rigveda are the Aditi - twelve expressions of the ultimate sun God - Bhaga. In slavic the word for god is Boga. This is why the modern country located in Thrace is called Bhaga-Aria (Bulgaria). Turkey is named after the Thracian tribe Tyrcheni, half of which migrated west to Italy and became known as Etruscans, they moved due to famine according to a story told by Herodotus. The actual name of Greece - Hellas - is the greek name for the sun god Bhaga which is Helios.
Also all Greeks say that the god of war Ares is the father of all Thracian people, that his abode was Thrace. The land of Ares is Aria according to Stephanus of Byzantium. The alternate name of Thrace was Perkia which is named after the Indo-European god of Thunder anaologous to Zeus - Perkuwnos known in slavic religion as Perun.
Thracians/Illyrians/Dacians/Phrygians/Lydians/Aryans/Greeks/Macedonians/Scythians/Tyrchenians are different names for the same ancient people, these are labels corresponding to their region, empire or confederation. In the present day no single nation can alone claim this heritage. The most direct Thracian descendants live in the Balkan countries of Bulgaria, Turkey, Greece, Serbia, Bosnia, Romania, Ukraine, Croatia, Slovenia, Montenegro, Albania and Kosovo. The places with the second most Thracian ancestry are Northern Portugal, Western Spain, Iran, Southern and Central Italy, Sicily, and the third most are Northern India, Afghanistan and Pakistan.
Thracians also migrated to Ireland, the area around Paris, Israel and Lebanon but genetic traces are very rarely found among people living there today. Fun fact, the Thracians had an immense cultural influence on the Celts, because as Herodotus and Strabo attest, they had a somewhat friendly relationship, and since ancient times they formed temporary unified Thraco-Celtic tribes that un-merged once the Celts were ready to continue their migration. For example the Parisii tribe who settled around the city of Paris were such thracianized celts, their tribe was named after the thracian hero Paris of Troy. That's why the thracian cap/phrygian cap/liberty cap became a symbol of liberation during the French revolution.
@@BHARATHA-SAMPRAJYAexample Christians don't believe in the theory of evolution. But that doesn't mean we should be discouraged into creating content or conversation on the theory of evolution.
Correct 💯@@BHARATHA-SAMPRAJYA
Kind of find it funny how Indians are more focused on this whole thing when later the greeks and huns also entered and mingled with the local populace
Yeah it's been made a political movement in India but seriously, what's the point of being proud whether you are native or not for something which happened 5k years ago and you have no control over it
Huns never mingled with the local population scythians and kushans did. The huns got wiped out by the warrior clans of the north after the huns battle with the gupta empire.
The issue is less the mingling and more its importance to Hindu identity. Greeks arriving there doesn't say anything about their religion.
If someone has mingled the most with native hindus that would be the Turk muslims from kazakstan, afghanistan, uzbekistan and Pakistan due to the mughal invasion consisting all of these people
@@Welfu1Right? Nobody's talking about the Mughals and they have a profound and lasting influence on Indian culture and politics right now! It's bizarre.
@@justaguyfromthey mingle bro with Gurjar may be
It was likely more of a gradual migration than an "invasion" per se and eventually led to intermarriage and cultural hybrization. This happened with the Sumerians and the Akkadians as well as with the Persians and Elamites, not to mention the Romans and Etruscans. One group didn't simply "push out" the other.
Invasions almost never "push out" any population. The conquerors simply become the rulers of the conquered peoples (much easier and more profitable in the long run than their utter annihilation). This was most certainly the case anywhere the Aryans invaded and conquered.
@@lambert801if they Trade frequently & close proximity mostly likely elite from both Indus valley & bacteria region have familiar ties they marry each other led to cross-pollination of culture and religion rather than invasion
@@lambert801 Yeah. An exception to these aryan habits was the stuff that was going on in 1939-1945
Etruscans and Romans are a great example as the Etruscans didn't speak an indo-european language yet were surrounded by Celts, Latin, and Greeks who did. Really shows that despite thousands of years there were definitely some holdouts from before the migrations. The Basque of today still speak their ancient language. I think migration just better illustrates the indo-european movement, probably had some conquering chiefs for sure, but no one was invading as what we would think of nowadays.
The Aryans are the Thracians. The Thracians invented the chariot and mastered horsemanship in ancient times and no one could match them, just read Strabo, Herodotus etc. Herodotus even states "The Thracians are the second most numerous people in the world only behind the Indians who are the most numerous", he wouldn't have referenced India if they didn't come in contact. The oldest swastikas are from the Balkans and Ukraine (13 000 BC). Sout Slavic languages are the closest surviving relatives of the Sanskrit language and they share tons of cognates. Greek also has significant amount of cognates with Sanskrit but considerably less.
Stephanus of Byzantium writes that Thrace is a greek exonym and that it used to be called Arya and Perkia. Thrace is located in modern day Bulg-Aria, Greece and Turkey.
This truth is the reason haplogroups I2a1 and E1b1b (exclusive to the Balkans and Turkey) are very common among Northern Indians and Pakistani who are descendant from Aryan immigrants and local Indian peoples, or they descend from Alexander the Greats conquerers who brought Greek, Thracian and other Balkan ancestry again.
This legacy is why Alexander the Great, a macedonian which is a hellenized thracian megatribe, sought to expand the influence of his people as far as India again. Before him, long ago there was also the conquest of India by the thracian king Dionysius but few people have heard of it.
The horse race tradition in the Roman Empire called Ludi was imported by assimilated Thracians from Anatolia, their tribe and empire was known as Lydia. In Rome even slaves and recently freed men were encouraged to participate in this event. This aligns with the etymology of the word Ludi which matches the South Slavic word Lude (Люде) that means Free-man.
In Sanskrit Lude means "to freely move"
The Thracians were so obsessed with horses that men were buried with their favorite horses in their tombs. This obsession is what caused the Trojan horse incident, Troy was a noble Thracian house in the city which was actually called Illios, the old name of Helios the sun God. That's why Thracians sided with Troy in the Trojan war, because they were related. The supreme divinities in Rigveda are the Aditi - twelve expressions of the ultimate sun God - Bhaga. In slavic the word for god is Boga. This is why the modern country located in Thrace is called Bhaga-Aria (Bulgaria). Turkey is named after the Thracian tribe Tyrcheni, half of which migrated west to Italy and became known as Etruscans, they moved due to famine according to a story told by Herodotus. The actual name of Greece - Hellas - is the greek name for the sun god Bhaga which is Helios.
Also all Greeks say that the god of war Ares is the father of all Thracian people, that his abode was Thrace. The land of Ares is Aria according to Stephanus of Byzantium. The alternate name of Thrace was Perkia which is named after the Indo-European god of Thunder anaologous to Zeus - Perkuwnos known in slavic religion as Perun.
Thracians/Illyrians/Dacians/Phrygians/Lydians/Aryans/Greeks/Macedonians/Scythians/Tyrchenians are different names for the same ancient people, these are labels corresponding to their region, empire or confederation. In the present day no single nation can alone claim this heritage. The most direct Thracian descendants live in the Balkan countries of Bulgaria, Turkey, Greece, Serbia, Bosnia, Romania, Ukraine, Croatia, Slovenia, Montenegro, Albania and Kosovo. The places with the second most Thracian ancestry are Northern Portugal, Western Spain, Iran, Southern and Central Italy, Sicily, and the third most are Northern India, Afghanistan and Pakistan.
Thracians also migrated to Ireland, the area around Paris, Israel and Lebanon but genetic traces are very rarely found among people living there today. Fun fact, the Thracians had an immense cultural influence on the Celts, because as Herodotus and Strabo attest, they had a somewhat friendly relationship, and since ancient times they formed temporary unified Thraco-Celtic tribes that un-merged once the Celts were ready to continue their migration. For example the Parisii tribe who settled around the city of Paris were such thracianized celts, their tribe was named after the thracian hero Paris of Troy. That's why the thracian cap/phrygian cap/liberty cap became a symbol of liberation during the French revolution.
0:48 Please don't already mess this up 😭 It is Hindi not Hindu. Hindi is a language, Hindu is a religion.
What a catastrophy!!!
Eh, hindi comes from hindustani anyway
Hindu - religion
Hindi- language
Hindusthan- country
Says a lot about the level of research put into these videos, despite the high number of subscribers.
If that was the case you wouldn't see total language replacement over 1 million square miles. The migration theory is only been added later because no evidence of invasion has been found, but has a fatal problem now explaining why the indus people stopped speaking their own languages and started speaking the alleged coming Aryan languages. We now know the indus people were vastly much larger and advanced than central Asian hordes. So the idea is similar to proposing Cuba taking over America and everybody in America stops speaking English and only speaks complete Cuban.
I’ve not watched the video yet, but the theory that I have been holding for years is that, it was not an outright invasion but a slow migration and the assimilation of the existing local population.
that's actually the most commonly accepted thesis. Slow migration and assimilation
Well in some places you are right in most of India this was the case but indus river civilization almost certainly got conquered by aryans
There was no assimilation. The Aryans imposed a harsh and strict caste system on their conquered populations wherever they went, thinking themselves "the worthiest people." They were the original N*zis.
@@BlueBird-q8k It is in IVC that it's the most wrong
@@ishanbajpai6940 okay whatever makes you happy
Guys, having ~35% Steppe DNA doesn’t make you less native to India
The Austroasiatic speaking Adivasi tribes have roughly the percentage of Southeast Asian DNA. This was because there was a migration from Southeast Asia from around the same time as the Indo European migration.
If people are okay with the calling the Santhali or Mundas as native, I am pretty sure the majority of Indians would technically be native as well.
Of course we ruse the term “indigenous” to refer to the marginalized groups, but that is regarding a separate thing altogether.
What makes the Indo European migration different from the Greeks, Huns, or Turks coming to India is that the Indo Europeans became a defining feature for the Indian genetics and culture and by the time of the Greeks, Huns, and Turks, there was already a distinct people with a distinct identity tied to the land. Once you develop deep cultural ties to the land, you are native.
Biggest fact in whole world human civilization and population form by there oldest ancestors homo sepian tribes who migrate from African continent all are outsiders in Asia europe and whole world except African continent also this earth not make there one place for particular individual or community for all
Precisely. But then again, the roots of the so-called Proto Indo-Europeans, in genetic terms, go back to the paleo-siberians or the Ancient North Eurasians, which goes back to Sundaland, South East Asia again. As such, for the R1a-carrying 'Aryans' the Tribals of Eastern India and nothing but a little Distant Cousins. :-)
@@rahul.dadwalyou are wrong the most diverse of R1a is in India . So the migration happened outward to Europe.
Even Marxist professors stopped teaching Aryan invasion theory and being slowly abandoned .
By the way do you know how the date of 1500BC for Vedas come about? Take a guess.
So does that mean that whites in places like Australia are also native, since they have developed a deep connection to the land over hundreds of years and know no other home?
@@vamsikrishna3855 NO! The diversity of R1a in India is under the clades L657 and some Z2124, and there is one odd Z283, but that is quite rare(found among a non-Baloch in Balochistan). Bottomline the primary clades are all under Z93>Z93. What other clades have you heard of in South Asia? Is that what you call diversity?
'Iran' means Aryans. The ancient form of 'Iran' name was 'Aryan' means Aryans.
aryans generally split into two, one who went in iran and other to india
@preyalneupane1296 I've already heard about that theory and aware of it, but I doubt it. The thing I said above about Iran's name isn't my personal theory.
@@mgr1282no one is denying that tho, hell even ancient hindu texts called the northern indian region "Aryavarta"
@KavitaPatil-hg5qm Iran is vast region from China to Syria, Iraq to Armenia , Georgia.... . The '-stan' suffix in Tajikstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Afghanstan, Kyrgyzstan,... is a persian (Iranian) suffix for places. so part of Iran was above the north of india.
aryan word is very popular in indian texts even in buddhism and jainism
Origins of Islam and Aryan Invasions
Two hell of a topics to gain attention
Well done Kings and Generals 👏👏👏
today's Hinduism is not Vedic, it is highly diverse including various traditions similar of Indus animism, tantrism, and other traditions of bhakti, At its core, modern Hinduism embraces a multitude of deities, believes philosophies, and rituals, allowing for personal interpretations and expressions of spirituality. The worship of gods and goddesses, each embodying different aspects of life and the cosmos, is a testament to this diversity. Moreover, the integration of local customs and traditions has led to a vibrant array of festivals and celebrations, each with its unique significance and flavor.
Literally what seperates Hinduism from Buddhism, Jaina and other Nashtika schools are the Vedas. It is Vedic.
Including local customs doesn't make it non-Vedic, just more inclusive than say... the Abrahamic religions.
@@AmachiEligwe Actually, it's mostly non-vedic and at times with minimal Vedic influence. 70-80% of people who identify themselves as Hindu don't even know about the existence of vedas. And Hinduism is more like a mix of different folk religions. Most people have their family deity, village deity and clan/regional deity who are more important for them in most important occasion. Praying to major Hindu deities is a relatively new thing that started with the Bhagti movement. Before that these deities were not that mainstream.
@@AmachiEligwe yes but we are not following vedas and dont worship vedic gods such as indra, surya is exception
@@AmachiEligweWhat we read in theory is completely different from what we observe in real life. This nastik and aastik classification don't understand these nuances.
Only South Indian Brahmins follow Vedic tradition properly.
Veda parayana, agamas, Vedanta, samkhya, observance of proper tithis, etc is alive in South Indians. North Indians have lost their tradition.
It was a migration due to climate change (ice age) the Arya moved from southern Russia to central Asia and then to greater Iran and India, hence why Sanskrit and old Avestan are so similar, this is ancient history and now the Hindus and Zarathushtrians (Parsis) are brothers who just happen to worship and believe differently. No need for a war.
Indian Hindus do not believe this
The term Arya is native to North India and Iran, not Europe and Central Asia.
Ohh boy the comment section is gonna blew up.
Here before Indian nationalists, bjpists, congressis, pakistani, south indians, punjabis, sindhis gonna start civil war.
South Indians not Dravidian idiots from tamil nadu
💀
Don't drag Pakistanis into this. We may have our issues, but whenever this particular topic is concerned, it's just you guys and your ethno-religious nationalist historical revisionist brainwashing agendas that have an issue with the subject topic at hand.
"start"
3/4 of them will be attacking Kashmiris. 😒
~0:47 Hindu is a religion, not a language. They presumably meant Hindi, one of the most widely spoken languages in India.
Ik
Indian here ✋🏿. Of course there were various migrations into the sub-continent. How could there not have been? Our species is always on the move and always mingling with whoever came before. Those who deny this does not understand humanity.
As if you being Indian gives you natural knowledge of these things
@boldjawad of course not. However, am adding in a kind of antidote to the Hindu nationalism the we now sees so openly on these matters.
The Aryans are the Thracians. The Thracians invented the chariot and mastered horsemanship in ancient times and no one could match them, just read Strabo, Herodotus etc. Herodotus even states "The Thracians are the second most numerous people in the world only behind the Indians who are the most numerous", he wouldn't have referenced India if they didn't come in contact. The oldest swastikas are from the Balkans and Ukraine (13 000 BC). Sout Slavic languages are the closest surviving relatives of the Sanskrit language and they share tons of cognates. Greek also has significant amount of cognates with Sanskrit but considerably less.
Stephanus of Byzantium writes that Thrace is a greek exonym and that it used to be called Arya and Perkia. Thrace is located in modern day Bulg-Aria, Greece and Turkey.
This truth is the reason haplogroups I2a1 and E1b1b (exclusive to the Balkans and Turkey) are very common among Northern Indians and Pakistani who are descendant from Aryan immigrants and local Indian peoples, or they descend from Alexander the Greats conquerers who brought Greek, Thracian and other Balkan ancestry again.
This legacy is why Alexander the Great, a macedonian which is a hellenized thracian megatribe, sought to expand the influence of his people as far as India again. Before him, long ago there was also the conquest of India by the thracian king Dionysius but few people have heard of it.
The horse race tradition in the Roman Empire called Ludi was imported by assimilated Thracians from Anatolia, their tribe and empire was known as Lydia. In Rome even slaves and recently freed men were encouraged to participate in this event. This aligns with the etymology of the word Ludi which matches the South Slavic word Lude (Люде) that means Free-man.
In Sanskrit Lude means "to freely move"
The Thracians were so obsessed with horses that men were buried with their favorite horses in their tombs. This obsession is what caused the Trojan horse incident, Troy was a noble Thracian house in the city which was actually called Illios, the old name of Helios the sun God. That's why Thracians sided with Troy in the Trojan war, because they were related. The supreme divinities in Rigveda are the Aditi - twelve expressions of the ultimate sun God - Bhaga. In slavic the word for god is Boga. This is why the modern country located in Thrace is called Bhaga-Aria (Bulgaria). Turkey is named after the Thracian tribe Tyrcheni, half of which migrated west to Italy and became known as Etruscans, they moved due to famine according to a story told by Herodotus. The actual name of Greece - Hellas - is the greek name for the sun god Bhaga which is Helios.
Also all Greeks say that the god of war Ares is the father of all Thracian people, that his abode was Thrace. The land of Ares is Aria according to Stephanus of Byzantium. The alternate name of Thrace was Perkia which is named after the Indo-European god of Thunder anaologous to Zeus - Perkuwnos known in slavic religion as Perun.
Thracians/Illyrians/Dacians/Phrygians/Lydians/Aryans/Greeks/Macedonians/Scythians/Tyrchenians are different names for the same ancient people, these are labels corresponding to their region, empire or confederation. In the present day no single nation can alone claim this heritage. The most direct Thracian descendants live in the Balkan countries of Bulgaria, Turkey, Greece, Serbia, Bosnia, Romania, Ukraine, Croatia, Slovenia, Montenegro, Albania and Kosovo. The places with the second most Thracian ancestry are Northern Portugal, Western Spain, Iran, Southern and Central Italy, Sicily, and the third most are Northern India, Afghanistan and Pakistan.
Thracians also migrated to Ireland, the area around Paris, Israel and Lebanon but genetic traces are very rarely found among people living there today. Fun fact, the Thracians had an immense cultural influence on the Celts, because as Herodotus and Strabo attest, they had a somewhat friendly relationship, and since ancient times they formed temporary unified Thraco-Celtic tribes that un-merged once the Celts were ready to continue their migration. For example the Parisii tribe who settled around the city of Paris were such thracianized celts, their tribe was named after the thracian hero Paris of Troy. That's why the thracian cap/phrygian cap/liberty cap became a symbol of liberation during the French revolution.
@dimi2805 can you share your sources? I'm fascinated by this
It's not about the migration. The issue is about calling Hindu culture as foreign to indian subcontinent.
These Westerners who favour Western sources have their own agenda.
You can see the sheer racism Europeans are showing.
They can't accept the fact that we have a better civilization than their barbaric culture.
As an Indian I believe in the Aryan Invasion/ Migration possibly did happen according to genetic, linguistic & historic data. But this doesn't make my fellow Indians less Indian because our ancestors have been living here for thousands of years. At the end of the day everyone is an immigrant because mankind started from Africa.
The main problem is that most indian think oneis aryan and other is dravidian. thats not true. for all mainland indians (excl. Andamanese and peripheral tibetan group esp. in northeast), the composition is same only the percentage varies by place and caste
No not really, we Dravidians are not migrated from Africa but entire Indian plate broke off from Africa and merged into Asian plate, we never migrate on foot/chariot but on Indian plate itself. Infact piece of africa going to join Indian west coast 1000s of years from now
@@raja4521 You are right about Indian plate breaking from Africa but it happened 200 million years ago while the first homo sapiens appeared 200 thousand years ago. There is no connection between these two events
I agree even tho some hindus may have converted to different religions including Islam they are culturally and genetically still the same people
@@rajk.9098 No, evolution connected two events, Part of same species evolved to be homo sapiens in Africa also evolved to be homo sapiens in India. Just like Indian Elephant and African Elephants. Migration from Africa never happened but evolution of same species happened both on Africa and Indian Plates
One more thing I like to add. Still there is a stereotypic statement in Indian public that Northerners are fair, tall and well built and Southerners are mostly dark, short and not well built. That's a generalization. Not all North Indians are taller and fair with sharp features. If you compare with state wise in north Punjabis, Delhiites, Kashmiris and Haryanvis are the tallest. In South, Malayalis, Tuluvas, Kodavas and Telugus are tallest. In West and East people are generally short or medium. If you go through community wise, Pashtuns, Jatts, Khatris, Uttar Pradesh Brahmins, Yadavas, Rajputs, South Indian Brahmins, Nairs, CKPs, Bunts, Nasranis, Wodeyars, Kodavas will be the tallest. People who eat more barley, wheat, milk, curd, paneer and meat will have more height in general compared to rice eaters. Same goes to wheat eating, lactose tolerant and meat eating Northern and Central Chinese (Mandarin speakers) compared with rice eating, lactose intolerant, meat eating Southern Chinese. (Cantonese speakers)
Ancestral North Indian is a combination of Sintastha people (From Russia - Kazakhstan Border) mixed with IVC people. (Zagrosian Iranian Hunters mixed with AASI ie, Basal East Eurasians from East Africa.)
Ancestral South Indian is a mix of IVC plus AASI and Sintastha people.(Sintasthans have BMAC DNA too. BMAC DNA is a mix of Anatolian Farmers, Iranian Neolithic Farmers & Caucasus Hunters)
North Indians have 18% - 38% Sintastha Steppe DNA, 35% - 55% IVC, 5% - 22% BMAC, 2% - 10% Sino-Tibetan & 25% AASI.
South Indians have 3% - 20% Sintastha Steppe DNA, 48% - 72% IVC, 5% - 15% BMAC, 2% - 8% Sino -Tibetan & 15% - 56% AASI.
Eastern Indians have 3% - 23% Sintastha Steppe DNA. 5 - 12% Sino Tibetan, 3 - 13% BMAC, 25% IVC & 33 - 65% AASI.
Western Indians have 10% - 20% Sintastha Steppe DNA. 4 - 14% BMAC, 3% Sino Tibetan, 45 - 68% IVC & 22 - 45% AASI.
North Easterners have 33% - 65% Sino - Tibetan & 33% AASI.
Courtesy: South Asian Ancestry/Reddit
Northern Chinese descendants are Ancient North East Asians. (Genetically related to Tibetans, Mongols, Koreans & Japanese.) While Southern Chinese are mix of Ancient South East Asians (Genetically related to Austronesians, Kra-Dai, Austro Asiatic peoples) and Ancient North East Asians.
dude have you seen people from Tirunelveli, Kanyakumari, Madurai districts of Tamil nadu?. many of them especially Men will be of 6 feet & have strong physical features. it's because of they eat more non - veg foods & involve in more physicals activities like sports, martial arts etc.
@@hariprasath3913 Lol it has nothing to do with diet and sports. You find strong people across India regards of diet and sports across India. One region is NOT superior to another region.
rarh region brahmin,mahishya and kayastha have more r1a1 and steepe dna since they are descended from north india, since the ancestral east is now in bangladesh we need improved data from all the groups here including namasudra and bagdi and mondol
It's a generalization. If I wanted to find a blond Italian I would go to Lombardy, not Sicily 9 times out of 10.
Mainly South Asian population is mix population
Indo aryans are mix of central Asian and eurasian steppes and local IVC peoples called ANI ancestry North Indians
And Dravidian peoples mix of IVC and Local hunter and gatherers indo African population letter also mix with ANI peoples called ASI ancestry South Indians or Deccan peoples
Blessings to all peoples of India, the most diverse country on earth!
P.S. as a Zoroastrian we owe you a massive debt!
Brother ❤ our land will always welcome you, and we will make you feel as if you are in your home. Namaste
@ Ushta Te! Blessings and happiness to you brother, i cannot wait to visit!
Bawa or Irani, I bet Bawa after reading the PS! 🤣
@@agnelomascarenhas8990 if one identifies themselves as a zorastrian that is enough for you. We as Indians have a civilizational commitment to the zorastrians, Jews and the tibetans. We Hindus will always honour it, and the commitment is to return their homeland back to them.
Until then they are our guests, and we have lived with them and protected them for centuries, even when we were occupied. We'll keep doing it.
@@Subhradeep-o-bhavalol this kind of nature is harmful
Even the "dravida" word is Sanskrit origin
literally just ask chatgpt about the fake invasion and migration. these whities are so desperate its hilarious. the shame must be unimaginable.
0:46 *you probably meant to say either Hindi (हिन्दी) or 🪯Sikh here…*
Hindu is a religion whilst Punjabi is a language.
Not a big difference nor error actually. Common sense will do it's job.
such a poor mistake.
Hindu was only religion code there is different religion believes in that sikh also called hindu because hindu us geographical identity more than faith or religion
The Anglo-Saxon invasion/migration of post Roman Britain could provide an interesting comparison study
maybe if it wasn't a total fabrication. this is almost as cringe as caucasainoids pretending to practice kundalini and yoga. face it, you can't steal a religion or culture as your own. stick to Walmart and McDonalds.
Or the waves of Germanic tribes entering Italy and Spain. I imagine the collapse of the Indus Valley Civilization was like that. Foreigners first being welcomed and then overwhelming the dying civilization. Then wave after wave coming and fighting the last. The modern west is experiencing the same thing.
It is a perfect example, but Nationalists refuse to accept it. It is just like the Bantu, after the initial invasions into what is now Nigeria (which were exceedingly violent, they were not migration), and the Han Chinese into Xiliand and south into Yue, Ba and Bai lands, or the Slavs as they moved south into Southern Slavic lands. It was series of invasions, migrations, assimilation some of the time, syncretism others, and cultural diffusion.
People view it through a lens of modern nationalities, huge ethnic groups, even nation-states. But that isn't how the world worked unless an area had political and economic unity on a very large scale. Usually, it is small groups moving around, something grouping together, then breaking apart again. Invasion here, migration there. Intermarriage with a conquered people in one place, displacement of the nobility in another, replacement of a population that was wiped out due to famine, plague, natural disaster all coinciding in another place.
As an Indian i can attest to the fact that according to Rigveda the 1st of the four vedas which is the very ancient one of those four, yes the Aryan invasions definitely happened as Aryans themselves had written in the Rigveda.
Please stop talking nonsense. There is absolutely no evidence anywhere in Rigveda which can be used to prove that the Vedic people came from outside. Stop hallucinating !
What kind of fool are you damm!!🤡
Have you ever read the vedas?
Talking this nonsense about vedas. Were you there to see how aryans wrote rig veda??
Damm!!🤦 There is literally 0 mention of the aryan word in vedas.
Even There is also no mention of aryan people or race.. yes there is a mention of arya word which means nobal yeh nobal !!
According to the west propaganda the aryans migrated to india around 1500 bce. And the wrote veds🤣🤣.
There is a mention of Saraswati river in rigved and it talks about how it is the mother of floods, the disaster.
But The Saraswati River dried up around 3792 years before present (BP), or approximately 1800 BCE. 🤣🤣
So how the hell they just came in 1500 bce amd called dried river the mother of floods 🤣🤣🤣🤦.
There is no manuscripts of rigveda older than 600 years
Educate yourself over the methodologies involved in dating of a text@@Exhindupajeetkummar
It's also written that Aryas themselves punished each other and had Dasas as their king and also how anyone can become Arya if they take part in sacrificial or homa-soma ritual, don't just pick and choose certain verses for whatever is your biases are!
Guys, even if the Indo Iranian language family is foreign to India, Sanskrit would still be indigenous to India. This is because when talking about where a language originates, it specifically about in which place a language took upon its own identity as a distinct language. It would be absurd to say that Spanish originated in Italy because it came from Latin.
You are absolutely right
You’re articulating a correct principle however I’m not sure it fully applies here. I think I read it argued by philologist that the Mitani ruling class spoke a language so close to Sanskrit that there was no meaningful distinction to be made between them. Sanskrit itself may have come from some Indo Iranian parent culture to the Vedics of India. Which would mean that, at best, you could say India developed a local dialect.
@@bencopeland3560 We don’t know what exactly the Mittani spoke. All we know is it was some Indo Aryan language. Sanskrit is noted for its retroflexes and some other Dravidian influences in grammar.
The thing is it isn't foreign to India. Actual facts are stonewalled by western academia.
@@AbhiramN_1289 I think UA-cam will kill any comment that includes a direct link but I want to direct you to an article on SCROLL called Fact check India wasn't the first place Sanskrit was recorded - it was Syria. It reiterates the point I made with better citations. While it doesn’t deny that the language could have continued to develop locally in India (indeed it would be impossible for that not to have happened) it pretty unapologetically points to a location outside of India for the early-Sanskrit parent to later Mitanni and Indian dialectic variants.
Eurasian steppe Indic/Iranic peoples were not immigrants from the Near East but direct descendents of Andronovans, and the mixed character of the Indo-Iranian-speaking populations of Iran and India is the result of a new population spreading among aboriginals with whom a new language is probably to be associated.
This conclusion is confirmed by the evidence of Indo-Iranian tradition. The Aryans in the Avesta are tall, light-skinned people with light hair, their women were light-eyed, with long, light tresses In the Rigveda light skin alongside language is the main feature of the Aryans, differentiating them from the aboriginal Dasa-Dasyu population who were a dark-skinned, small people speaking another language and who did not believe in the Vedic gods.
The indus valley people weren't native they were around 5,9 and already had the gene for fair hair and eyes due to admixturing with the iranic farmers.
Exactly, the Rig Veda literally talks about Indra crushing the Dasa Dasyu dark hordes. For the Aryans Indra was an important man who may have later been switched to a God however Indra is basically not worshipped at all today and in later “Hindu” texts he is ridiculed in some cases and outright put into a lower pantheon of “Godhood” in others although in the Rig Veda Indra was literally the most important. Does seem to hint at something being buried by later Brahmins.
@@Itdoesnotmatter786The modern Hinduism is predominantly puranic, and therefore puranic gods are predominantly worshipped like Shiva and Krishna. The puranic Hinduism evolved in the gangetic valley, whereas the Vedic Hinduism evolved in Northwest India.
The main God of Vedic Hinduism is Indra, whereas the main Gods of puranic Hinduism are Shiva and Vishnu.
@@extreme4642
Shiva/Rudradev and Vishnu are also Vedic deities
@@satyamindnectar7052 No, they aren't. Shiva isn't mentioned in Vedas. Rudra is a different God.
0:47 Seriously, HINDU??? never thought this channel will make such an obvious mistake
? What mistake? You can confirm its language family with a simple google search
@@krislochlan5366 It's supposed to be Hindi not Hindu
@@krislochlan5366 I think it's more about the hindU-hindI confusion.
@@treslinguaesacrae "Hindu" is a religion and "Hindi" is the language. That's what he is pointing out.
Yes both derived from the river Sindh i believe
I see 'Kings and Generals i click'
This comments section should be fun
Of all things to be seething about I don't get why nationalists care so much about this. The vast, vast majority of peoples on the entire globe migrated from somewhere else at some point. From Turks to Japanese to Icelanders to the Zulu in South Africa. Yet all those people can be proud of their countries without crying like babies at videos like this
not really. the entire video is an attention grabber. these theories have been debunked a long time ago. people just have time on their hands bc they prefer to waste their time vs actually do anything relevant, you included.
@@bxzidffbxzidff EXACTLY we are all a results of human biotic interchange and migration
5:38 Kings and Generals modelled that warrior using Malayalam actor Mammooty. He used his characters in Pazhasi Raja and Mamangam as references to do animation. 😀
മമ്മൂട്ടി ഉണ്ടോ 😮
Imagine Siju Wilson gaining a spot in Kings & generals video 😂😂
@@Humanzee😂
It’s gratifying to see how much the channel has evolved throughout the years! Keep up the good work :)
Thanks!
It never ceases to amaze me that nations/peoples/cultures can actually believe that their 'home' whatever you want to call it is the only one in history that grew and developed without outside inclfluence/invasion/migration..... People moved and mixed in so many ways, no culture goes uninfluenced. even tribes that still exist have some, and those that limit, don't grow. Geeee, i wonder about the connection?
the first casualty of ultra nationalism is critical thinking
@@preyalneupane1296 The present Hindutva regime in India doesn't want people to know the truth.
I'm Indian and I am damn sure about Aryan invasion. I'm now even referring for academic evidence, I can see the cultural differences as clear as glass.
Giving the "Out of India" theory even the time of day is stupid. It's like having a serious debate with a flat earther just because they have strong convictions. If you believe something despite all proof saying otherwise, your opinion can be disregarded and you can be ignored.
I think the convictions didn't classify the claim
For an example in russia 10000 yr old statue of lord visnu avatar varah was found......what could you conclude about that......
Well off the top of my head I'm going to call BS. But I'd need to actually see it and examine it. Anyways the Pontiac Caspian steppe is the homeland of the Aryans. So I wouldn't be surprised to find something resembling it. All genetic evidence and all old historical accounts and just looking at language will tell you that Aryans didn't come from India. They invaded it the same way they kept coming out of the steppe and into Europe in different waves.
The DNA study of the skeletal remains found at the Harappan site of Rakhigarhi, Haryana, shows no trace of Steppe pastoralists genetic , indicating that Aryan were never present during Indus valley civilization Time period . This proven that IVC people does not have known Indo European language spoken by Steppe pastoralists.
Yes. Operation Barbarossa is extremely well documented with many living memory testimonies.
Pakistan, Poland, ukraine and western Russia have largest percentage of R1A in their Dna, which might indicate migrations between regions
I'm not a mythologist or archaeologist, so I'm not an expert on the matter, but Ive always suspected that the Daksha-Purana myth of Shiva suggests that Shiva was a non-Aryan god worshipped prior to the rise of vedic religion. He was an outsider god who had to be incorporated into the pantheon, at least as suggested by the myth. It would explain why he's not in the Vedas and could be consistent with the idea he or a related deity was worshipped by Harappans.
His name is Rudra in the Vedas, just as Vishnu is Narayan.
(from what I know)
@ this is true but rudra is a distinct form of shiva. There are many other forms of shiva like vidrabhadra. As I understand it rudra is the Vedic god that gets associated with shiva but that doesn’t mean they were always identified with each other
The pashupati seal and swastika motifs found at Harappan sites add more confusion.
Recently discovered burial site of a royal clan near sinauli suggests a parallel existing culture which had chariots and ranged weapons
@@_UNISTAR_Rudra and Shiva are different. If he was shiva, they would directly call him shiva.
@@extreme4642
Shiva is epithet of Rudra
Shiva means auspiciousness
Very good video sir. Zagrosian Iranians who mixed with South Asian Hunter Gatherers(who were present all over south asia as hunter- gatherers) to form Indus Valley Civilization 8000 years ago were hunters and not farmers or pastoralists. That is the reason why there was neither Anatolian Farmer DNA nor Iranian Neolithic Farmer DNA in Rakhigarhi skeletons which belonged to early IVC. So the language spoke by IVC people would have been Zagrosian /proto Elamite mixed with some language spoken by South Asian hunter gatherers. Sintastha Culture people (ancestors of Indo Aryans/ Indo Iranians) came after the decline of Indus Valley Civilization. They came from Southern Russia bordering Kazhaksthan. Before entering Afghanistan and Pakisthan. They learned agriculture from people of Bactria Margiana Archaeological Complex. That's why agricultural methods and crops used by Indo Aryans in Vedic period was identical to BMAC and not related to IVC. (Aryans cultivated barley, pulses and lentils in the banks of Saptha Sindhu, West Punjab. It was only after they mixed with IVC people they began to farm rice on Yamuna &Gangetic plains. Later North Indians shifted their interest to wheat cultivation.)
No proof for Australian aborgines (ancestors of hunter gatherers) speaking Tamil too. (Tamil is 2700 year old) Their languages are still spoken in Australia and Papua.
Sanskrit, Avestan & Mittani are closely related languages. (3700 year old) There is a common ancestor for all Indo European languages originated in Eurasian Steppes spoken by all Indo European speakers. That is not Sanskrit. It is yet to be foundout. That is the only reason why some 20% words, meanings and pronounciation is similar to European languages.
80% Sanskrit originated in Afghanisthan. Later spread to Saptha Sindhu region, Ganga, Yamuna & Narmada. Finally came down to Southern Peninsula & Srilanka.
Ok coming to genetics 70% Indians are mix of people from South Russian Steppes, Zagros,Iran& South Asia. (Sintastha people also have 7-22% DNA received from Bactria Margiana Archaeological Complex. BMAC is a mix of Iranian Neolithic Farmers, Anatolian Farmers and Caucasus Hunters) North Indians have more Steppe ancestry because of various invasions and settlements from Turkmenstan, Persia etc. But their basic DNA is same as South Indian Upper & Middle castes. North Easterners and Ladakhi people have Sino Tibetan and Sino Burmese ancestors. But their culture and traditions are like any indigenous tribal culture found around our country. No matter where we come from we are Indians first. Jai Hind. Yours Gouri Sankar.K 👍🙏🇮🇳
It is unlikely or at least unsure that they spoke proto-elamiate. remember elamites didn't even dominate all of Iran, there was Kassite to its North-East.
Proto Indo Aryan likely originated in Afghanistan, Sanskrit as an independent languages originated in India.
The last time a paper titled ‘The Genomic Formation of South and Central Asia’ was released online, in March 2018, it created a sensation in India and around the world.
Mostly because the paper, co-authored by 92 scientists, many of them doyens of different disciplines, said that between 2000 BCE and 1000 BCE, there were significant migrations from the Central Asian Steppe that most likely brought Indo-European languages into Indian subcontinent - just as Steppe pastoralist migrations into Europe a thousand years earlier, beginning around 3000 BCE, had spread Indo-European languages to that continent as well.
In other words, the paper supported the long-held idea of an ‘Arya’ migration into Indian subcontinent - or, to put it more accurately, a migration of Indo-European language speaking people who called themselves ‘Arya
@@AbhiramN_1289A study led by Dr Andrew Garrett from the University of California, Berkeley, provides evidence that a common ancestor of the Indo-European languages - Proto-Indo-European - originated in the Pontic-Caspian steppe stretching from Moldova and Ukraine
@@mscreationworks5787 I know that, but I am saying that when we talk about where a specific language itself originates, it is where it develops as independent idea.
So Sanskrit originates where it split off from the rest of the Indo Iranian languages
Recently the Harappan script was deciphered by a computer programmer named Yajna Devam.
It offers very interesting insights about the language spoken by Harappans. According to his findings, the Harappan script is more related to Sanskrit than to Tamil.
it hasnt been deciphered
Yeah, he used cryptogram and mathematical logic. It's great
Dude the language is yet to be deciphered. Don't follow news 18 type shits.
His work is absolute psuedoscience lmfao
What probably happened was a mix of invasion and migration, similar to what the German tribes did with the Roman Empire. Lombardy in Northern Italy has more Germanic influence than Sicily in Southern Italy, which is similar to the Northern Aryan and Southern Dravidian distinction in India. The Puranas and the Agamas are a retcon of the Vedas and the spirituality that derives from them is more aboriginal or indigenous. For example, instead of Indra, Agni, and Varuna you have Brahma, Shiva, and Vishnu. In later traditions more emphasis is placed on goddesses like Kali, Durga, Shakti, etc. The Indo-Aryans were more patriarchal.
Someone's gonna throw a tantrum
Why cant Indians handle the truth? Or people trying to find the truth? They are the only who act like this. They dont want anyone to destroy their perfect fantasy world it seems.
Indian nation is not based on any language or any ethnicity. it is based on principle of unity and diversity, that's why country is survived and will remain undivided
Not according to BJP, RSS and their supporters
@@raja4521 hinduism is itself based on that idea
@@raja4521 BJP didn't exist in 1947.
@@raja4521 Stop attending ricebag institute of technology and come to reality.
@@raja4521 BJP didn't launch ops against the Golden Temple of Punjab or aid the ethnic genocide against Sri Lankan Tamils.
Fun Fact: India also has an ancient name “Aryavarta” which is a Sanskrit word meaning “Land of the Aryans”.
It's religious and cultural things
Not race or genetics or launguage
It's originated in one of many rigvedic tribes - the bharata puru
Not India. Few villages & towns around Ganges.
@@Mo.Sa. BS. its all the way from himalayas to the vindhyas
@@SonofIndia1999 yes
@@Mo.Sa. no,aryavart is name of region from indus to the ganga
The answer is yes. And the attempt to change it from invasion to just a "migration" have been nothing but semantic change, little change in the actual original argument.
Indo-Aryan languages originated outside of India, Indo-Iranian in Eastern Europe(like Belarus) and Sanskrit in Southern Central Asia(supporting evidence of the Mitanni language essentially being Sanskrit). The migrants were violent and imposed their culture and religion on the natives (DNA, comparative & Rigvedic evidence). Elements of the religion are probably native, for example Jati element of caste are probably Harappan but Varna and the extent of caste restrictiveness is probably Indo-Aryan but that doesn't really change the core of the religion, being from the migrant Indo-Aryans.
6:34 It is possible for such a migration to still be violent. Like something like the Germanic migrations into Rome, different dialects, over generations but still conquering tribes.
The DNA evidence I was referring to is Indo-Aryan Y DNA(male lineage) being 40% while female lineage (M-DNA) being 10% which is consistent with the men of conquering tribes taking on large harems of native women
nice try
Imposed religion is a much harsh term. Much of the reason as to why folk traditions have been assimilated into hinduism has to do with 1st millenia hindu synthesis. And there is no evidences that show they were violent as of now
@@preyalneupane1296 the Rigveda mentions wars against the unbelievers actually reminiscent of Sassanid-Zoroastrian similar claims of destroying unbelievers. Now, both are probably exaggerations (certainly so in the latter case) and probably reflect the zeal of a revivalist period but even with that caveat, not like later Hindu Kings(like frankly most Kings) treated tribal religions with respect with most of them considered Dalit.
"And there is no evidences that show they were violent as of now" Can you elaborate on this?.
@@AmachiEligwe By that i meant they didnt come in massive army and genocided the natives
@@preyalneupane1296 This is an argument against the name of the theory not the substance of it. The 1800s Brits that proposed the theory by that name did not claim they were an army, the claimed that Indo-Aryan tribes(not armies) conquered and subjugated the Indo-Gangetic plain. Which the evidence supports, for example Indo-Aryan Y DNA(male lineage) being 40% while female lineage (M-DNA) being 10% which is consistent with the men of conquering tribes taking on large harems of native women.
14:10 ohh you touched a hot topic there, be ready for Hindus lashing out
Aren't you a Hindu too or are you liberal atheist?
Whats hot about it? Its a taboo only if particular society think so
@preyalneupane1296 many Indians reject Aryan invasion theory on the basis that this theory came from Europeans especially Brits who used it to justify their control over India at that time.
root is ling/lingam means symbol, word stree linga mean symbol of stree(women) it doesnt mean women's peni$
Both indian right winger indigenous homogeneity claimers and leftist and Dravidian+mulnivasi nationalists needs to understand and have consensus on some points:
>There was some kind of MIGRATION from Eurasia or steppe, it makes more sense than it's counter out migration theory
>No tribes/people spawns from land everyone came from somewhere
>Mostly none in india is pure but in gradients
>Most of our gene pool is close to Indus valley people none one can claim them
>Hinduism isn't foreign it is mixture of all indian faiths
Nobody's denying simple fact of migration.
People migrated from one place to another.
But it is what comes after.
That after 400 years of migration.
The absurd claims that, somehow after this migration native northern Indians suddenly stopped speaking their own language and started speaking some Indo-European language.
And suddenly stopped following their own own culture but started following Vedic culture invented by these immigrants.
If that was true, why didn't it happen during Mughal invasion of thousands of years.
Or British colonization of 200 years.
Why didn't the whole of northern India stopped speaking Hindi and Sanskrit and started speaking and writing in a branch of languages like Turkic and Persian or English.
Why didn't the whole of Northern India started following Islam or Christianity.
Hindu Nationalist bots will destroy the comment section 😂
Asia's history is very complicated and rich everything could have happened
Everything all at once or everything over time. That is the problem?
@truefact844 over time 👍
What about the theory that the hurrians were indo European and that indo eourpeans came from mountains Caucasus
Of the 1196 samples analyzed from all over India, 23% belong to R1a or downstream. 16% belong to R-Y3+ (including L657) whereas 7% belong to the non-Y3 branch of R1a, and can be assumed to be of steppe origin, especially the ones which are Z2124+. NW India has the highest % of R1a at 41%, of which the non-Y3 branches are 20% and the Y3+ samples are at 21%. Definite steppe impact is seen here with 13% Z2124+ samples. Ganga plains, central, east & south India have 23, 33, 20, and 17% R1a respectively. The bulk of that is Y3+, and only 4-10% is Y3-. None of the samples from the central, east and Ganga plains show Z2124+.
Linguistics =/= Genetics, this is what we need to remember...
14:08 you have referred to shiv lingam as shiva's penis which is wrong. Shiva linga means symbol of shiva it's meant to represent pillar of fire in which form bhagwan shiva first appeared.
Linga means symbol.
it is both. the union between linga and yoni, shaiva shakta symbols, represent creation of life and also represent other things.
@preyalneupane1296 source?? Shiv puran and ling purana both don't recognise it as shiva's penis. If you know any other source do tell. Penis in sanskrit is known as shishna. Not linga. Linga means symbol.
@@vb98518 Hail to the mighty 🍆
root is ling/lingam means symbol, word stree linga mean symbol of stree(women) it doesnt mean women's peni$
Funny, I call my penis the "Pillar of Fire."
Me as a Tibeto-Burma, watching this video and comment section
14:06 This part is enough for me to conclude this video was 'badly researched'. Shiva's lingum means shiva's symbol. It is not a penis. Sources you have used to research are trash.
Lingum is the representation of ideas and philosophy in form of the organ. The union between it and Yoni, another shakta symbol
Hail to the mighty 🍆
please say then wat does lingum mean ???
@@abhishekmaurya1642 lmao I hope he knows what it means
@@abhishekmaurya1642have you learnt Hindi grammar in school ? If so, can you tell me what pu-ling & stree-ling mean ? Does stree-ling mean female penis ? Use your sense before you believe BS about your own religion.
Its obvious when there were no fixed borders and people's movement were much fluid, it's not a surprise that people from the Central Asia and the Caucasus migrated to the subcontinent and vice versa. What the indian nationalists debate is the notion of people from these regions outside of south asia decimated the local population. The DNA haplographic data shows, they more likely integrated and intermingled with the local population. In any case, India is probably the least discussed of the ancient civilizations in the world. More discussion and research is definitely warranted. It would have been more conducive if you would have referred to a few of the local historians and their works rather than only Eurocentric works. Nothing wrong with that, but the immense data of work done hy local historians do warrant a mention i believe.
A note at 0:47, the word Hindu usually denotes a practitioner of the religion Hinduism, and Hindi is the language commonly spoken. Punjabi, is a word commonly used for both a people group and the language spoken.
0:44 The mondern language is Hindi not Hindu right?
Made a whole video about Aryans without knowing the difference between Hindi and Hindu. God.
By the time few centuries later after Aryan men mixed with Dravidian women in Gangetic plains and formed their new empire (Guptas), subsequent Aryan generations become secluded into superior caste and stay divided along ethnic line; hence these divisions are so obvious in South India where Aryans did not intermingle at all rather imposed their caste structures to keep their dominance over native people.
No one talks about how did only Aryan men (not their women) mixed with Dravidian women in North India from results of ANI & ASI genetic studies if it is not invasion?
If Aryans integrated and assimilated with Dravidians through their ideology, no one will be raising Aryan invasion/migration as an issue.
Because Aryans stay divided as a superior race and used their ideology to keep caste divisions along racial/ethnic lines for millennium, it is still a problem for those who follow modern day Hinduism (Aryan vedic religion).
Aryan is not any other community in world they are mainly steppes of central Asia and euroasia migrated in indian subcontinent and mix with local IVC population
There faith was nature worshipping and animalism
Vedic faith made letter
That 10:57 is incorrect. The BMAC culture wasn't Indo-European; they were a completely different people indigenous to the area.
I just know that this video will be another classic of this channel
Migration is a fact; all humans originated from Africa. However, the British used the Aryan invasion theory to suggest that Indians follow foreign religions and have always been under foreign rule, aiming to further divide them. While migration occurred, but today no one is pure like astrain painter .
and there's no evidence that modern Hinduism originated in Eurasia. If it did, we'd reference of ritual on the banks of river Moscow or the Volga instead of the Indus and Ganges rivers.
Today's Hinduism is not solely Vedic; it encompasses diverse traditions like Indus animism, tantrism, and bhakti. It embraces many deities and philosophies, allowing for personal spiritual expressions. The mix of local customs has created vibrant festivals, each with its own significance.
Aayan migration is well accepted world wide ,don't confuse it with aaryan invasion. Delulu indians like you are embarrassing for us indians.
@@drjagritisingh6569 YOU ARE REAL DELULU
OR MAY BE LEFTIST BOT
Hello, The language is Hindi and not Hindu. Check your video around 0:46.
Hindu is a religion.
My friends from western countries (European and Americas) often mix them up.
This is important to folks from that part of the world.
Indian cope incoming
We wuzz Yamnaia and shiz
No. I'm indian and this video is absolutely right.
We wuzz the Romans we wuzz aryans 🤡. You are more related the barbarian cave nomadic Germanic tribes than you are to the original Roman’s of the Roman Empire eurocuck.
We all come from Africa. So..................
I am an Indian and I do believe in Aryan migration, but not Aryan invasion.
Very good use of the english language and one of the best accents I have heard!
Well done!
For me, the Aryan migration indeed did occurred just like how the Turks became ruling class and assimilated Anatolia into Turkish land. But unlike Seljuk Turks or Ghurid or even Babur invasion, the Aryan migration was rather a slow and complex progress in which contributed to cultural, ethnic and language diversity in Indian subcontinent.
"was rather a slow and complex progress" how do you know?
All published papers about IE migrations to Europe and Iran and Central Asia show that the IE people were violent and warlike.
Why do we like to think they acted differently when they went to India?
Awesome video as usual
I'll say my country needs to be developed eradicate poverty focus on education health technology. We already have tons of problem. This 'we wuzz this we wuzz natives you foreigner' things are so childish. Like im from north. So if someone calls me outsider what am supposed to do? Pack my bags sell my property and book my ticket and fly somewhere in ukraine/russia from where my ancestors came some thousands of years ago? Like is this really an important issue ? How about this why dont we pack out bags and and fly to africa because thats our home right ?
This all religion ethnicity shit is used as political propagandas to distract people from real issues
Well said, religion is personal belief, each thinking man for himself, and thus has no place anywhere near politics or the running of states.
Well no one told you to leave india,the thing is internet is full indians commenting they are the most powerful people and all the knowldge of current world is from india,and hinduism is the best religolion,these kind of comments makes people sick,no one wants to know more which is not interesting, indians need to stop asking for attention on the internet
So you must be doing something major to tackle Indian poverty. Are you?
These topics are related to our history so saying it's childish, in my opinion is immature.
Aryan invasion theory is mostly put forward without any concrete evidence or major proof.
It was introduced by Max Muller, a German philologist in 1850s and 1860s and we all know what German did with the word "Aryans".
It is basically made up to make people believe that superior "Aryans" migrated to India for 400 years during which time native languages became extinct, whole of North Idia started speaking Indo-European language.
Native belief system crumbled, whole northern India started believing "Aryan" invented Vedic belief system.
Tell me Mughals invaded India for thousands of Years massacred millions, enslaved women and children, tortured murdered people.
Were they able to do it?
British brutally colonized India for hundred of years through Divide and Rule policy.
Were they able to do it?
@@amalxavier5102 And you on the other hand are a know it all, superior to all others,
Aryans were the supreme beings who were able to do in 400 years what Mughals couldn't do in thousands of years and British couldn't do in 200 years kind of a guy. Aren't you?
The origin of Indo Aryans can be anywhere from Anatolia to Northern India, however during the British colonial era the origin was thought to be Northern Europe.
One of the most significant Vedic text is Epic of Ramayana. There, basically is clash of two distinctive civilization.
This involves a later war between two Vedic tribes. The Rig Vedas on the other hand covers the first battles between the invading steppe people and the natives of the Indus valley.
@@war_observer The indus valley people weren't natives either they were half breeds of Iranian farmers and ancestral north indians. Plus it is already widely accepted that their was no invasion but a large scale Migration did take place from around 2500-1500 B.C into the norther part of the subcontinent.
@@justaguyfromexcept that the so called "Iranian farmer" population was inhabiting a wide swathe of land from the Iranian plateau across Afghanistan to the North Indian plains.
All the genetic evidence of the "Iranian farmer" population is derived from Iran.
None of the genetics analysed have been sourced from India proper or even Afghanistan .
What we have instead as per a new term coined for this phenomenon is Indus peripheral population which I think is self explanatory.
@@justaguyfrom It was most likely an invasion, because they imposed their own culture on the previous inhabitants. This also happened in England with the Norman invasion, which completely changed the English language, but the genetic impact of the Normans on the English was less than the genetic impact of the Steppe Aryans on the IV people
And dont forget Mahabharat, Pandu is Alexander and Pandava actually five most powerful Alexander General. Pandu is pale, have problem with his neck and die young
Great video although this disproves only a very narrow idea of what the Aryan invasion theory would propose. It's still very clearly a process of invasion even if it took many generations that weren't unified. It wasn't just "cultural blending".
𐎠𐎼𐎡𐎹
𐬀𐬌𐬭𐬌𐬌𐬀
आर्य
Thats old Persian cuneiform, old Avestan, and Sanskrit, all say Arya, we are all as “Indo Europeans” descended from the same stock as their ancestors.
(Just referring to India, Greater Iran and Europe here)
So the dwellers of Hindustan are Pakistanis and northern Indians. However later they some went for Islam and some for hinduism
Its not really fair to say "Pakistani" or "Northern Indian" in this context
@ I do agree but ancient civilizations are in Pakistan part. Secondly Punjabi is one of the oldest languages of Hindustan. 56% Punjabi speaking people live in Pakistan when it conducted its census probably after fall of dacca
You mean to say many Hindus converted to islam, many voluntarily, many forcefully. Because hinduism existed long before any abrahamic religion existed. No one "went" to Hinduism. It was always organic to the land, Islam came from Arabia.
@@ahmadsaeedbajwa6246 Wrong. Many IVC cities are found in present day INDIA such as Lothal, Dholavira, Kalibangan, Rakhighari, etc
@@ahmadsaeedbajwa6246 A messy partition in 1947 doesn't allow you to claim thousands of years of history.
14:36 rudra is mentioned in RV 1.114, 2.33, and 7.46,and the evidences of rudra goes beyond it,it is indeed a pre indo aryan
I feel like you chose to take the middle ground as to not insult either group to much. Now i'm not an expert and I look forward to opposing explanations, but I feel like the invasion theory has more evidence for it than you let on. A few examples:
1. Genetics
An article in the Journal of Human Genetics points to a series of migrations to India in 2,000-1,500 BC that was transformative to the region, and overwhelmingly male dominated. 40% of the male lineages of northern India carry the R1a DNA marker associated with the Indo-European migration, compared to less than 10% of female lineages. In other words, it was largely males that had a genetic impact on these populations, which implies this migration was anything but peaceful.
2. Philology & History
The Rigveda, the oldest text, describes many battles in which the Indra and his companions conquer the land. This is how these are described in the Rigveda:
''He (Indra), much invoked, hath slain Dasyus and Simyus, after his want, and laid them low with arrows. The mighty Thunderer with his fair-complexioned friends won the land, the sunlight, and the waters. May Indra evermore be our protector, and unimperilled may we win the booty”
And
''Indra in battles help his Aryan worshipper, he who hath hundred helps at hand in every fray, in frays that win the light of heaven. Plaguing the lawless he gave up to Manu's seed the dusky skin; Blazing, 'twere, he burns each covetous man away, he burns, the tyrannous away.''
and
''O'er Sire and Mother they have roared in unison bright with the verse of praise, burning up riteless men, blowing away with supernatural might from earth and from the heavens the swarthy skin which Indra hates.''
and
''At the swift draught the Soma-drinker waxed in might, the Iron One with yellow beard and yellow hair. He, Lord of Tawny Coursers, Lord of fleet-foot Mares, will bear his Bay Steeds safely over all distress.''
and
''The Thunderer bestowed on his White friends the fields, bestowed the sun, bestowed the waters.''
and
''Stormy gods who rush on like furious bulls and scatter the black skin.''
These and many more lines in the text clearly seem to differentiate the Aryan invaders with the ''swarthy'' indiginious population, which again implies that this assimilation proces was (at least in the beginning) not very peaceful.
The title has multiple meanings depending on your political beliefs.
It is very interesting to note that none of the Indo European religions, whether it is Mycenean Greek, Roman, Celtic, Slavic or Germanic religions have told or discussed or wrote about a one absolute reality/singularity/one ultimate truth. (Ekam Sat) Only Indo Aryans of Vedic Period said about it. The energy which started at a single point, expanded throughout the universe as a time spiral through space from which everything you see, hear, speak, touch and feel came. All stars, galaxies, planets, satellites, living beings, gods and goddesses all came from this Brahman. (Ekam Sat/Absolute One Reality) RigVeda was the first to introduce this philosophical and scientific concept. This was biggest inspiration for Atomic Theory and Big Bang Theory. Rig Veda also tells about fusion of Hiranya Garbha (Golden Womb/Golden Egg) and Hema Bheejam (Semen) from which came first god Prajapathi (Later become Brahma in Puranic texts which was written during Mahajanapadha Period.) And Prajapathi created this universe and everything in it.
Vedic Gods are very different from Puranic Gods.
Vedic Indra was omnipresent god, main god, god who protects us, helps to win wars, he protect us from floods and famines, we pray to getting more yield through farming, to protect our horses, sheeps, cows and bulls, to get beautiful, intelligent and brave sons and daughters, to become more humble, to control our lust, to earn more wealth. Not a single Vedic yagna ends without praising or paying respects to Indra, Mitra, Varuna and Agni.
In Puranas Indra become a snobbish, lusty, jealous and a coward god who depends Brahma, Vishnu, Shiva, Shakthi, Ganesha and Karthikeya to defeat Asuras and Rakshasas. Puranic Indra is king of all demi gods and god of thunder, lightning and rain.
Vedic Varuna and his partner Mitra are gods of justice, upholders of cosmic law, (those laws which determines how this universe should work, natural phenomenons should function) also judges what is morally right and wrong.
Puranic Varuna is god of all waters in the earth's surface.
Vedic Agni is the inner fire of desire and ambitions. Desire to achieve great heights in career. Desire to help people, desire to keep this earth a better place to live etc. Puranic Agni is god of fire only.
Later Vedic texts focussed on more rituals and eager to lead luxury life through inter tribal wars and expansion of territories. (Battle Of Ten Kings/ Dasharajna Yuddham is a great example. That happened during last phase of RigVedic Period near Raavi River, Pakisthan Punjab. Bharatha tribe defeated all other nine tribes. Word Bharatham for India comes from Bharatha.) As opposed to RigVedic Period which gave more importance to philosophy, spirituality, advices to lead a simple life and not to indulge in unnecessary wars. Inorder to bring back people to Rig Vedic ideologies, Upanishads were written. Upanishads though began from the basics of RigVedic text, it explored much more on the ideas of absolute one reality (Ekam Sat/Brahman) through stories. Later Upanishads become ritualised too making way for Puranas. Manusmrithi was written for those residing in 16 Mahajanapadhas. (16 Republics) It was a law book which insists it's people how to do their duties, prescribes compulsory (but sometimes flexible) caste endogamy and duties of women. (Note : Manusmrithi is not Sharia Law it is like Old Testament Law. Only relevant on a particular large area and period.)
Puranas and Ithihasas were written by those who broke away from Vedic and Vedantic way of life. They made least important Vedic gods like Vishnu, Shiva (Vedic Rudra) and Brahma (Vedic Prajapathi) into most important powerful gods. Sachi (Indrani) become Shakthi. Ithihasas were history told as exaggerated stories about great kings and dynasties. Ramayana and Mahabharata are two most important epics which describes the tales of Solar and Lunar dynasties. Bhagavatham and Bhagavat Geetha comes from Mahabharata. Bhagavat Geetha combines Vaishnava Bhakti (Devotion For Srimath Narayana) with Upanishadic/Vedantic Nyana (Knowledge From Upanishads)
0:07 Aravallis and Nilgiri Plateau not well defined in the physical map, neither our rivers. Please pay attention to minor details.
get ready for the hilarious Indian comments 😂
Better read works of Western Indologists like Dr.Koenraad Elst,etc. who themselves have questioned and debunked this BS. Keep living in your own delusional bubble of 19th century racist delusions and Aryan race mythology.
14:10 No, no, no, no, no. Lingams ARE NOT phalluses. Instead, they're simply aniconic representations of Shiva.
Of course it happened... In 1939
Germans did not know, that Slavic people (for Adolf sub-people ) has more R1a gens than Germans.
i think it was aryan migration and not aryan invasion
Exactly... It was just a migration
About damn time. Let's bury the Mahabharata nonsense
😂😂😂 Mahabharata is way older than all this stuff buddy... Even AnkorWat is the greatest evidence of Mahabharata in its own form ❤❤❤
How r u so insecure buddy...
Everyone respects Other Culture as we don't believe in any Foolish superior stuff
We all are one soul ❤❤❤
Dosen't matter how deep u bury our scripts or Sculptures they will come back again or I should say Reincarnate again😊😊😊
@@divyanshsingh7542I am a Hindu but Ramayana, Mahabharata and Puranas are predominantly myths. I don't believe in any texts written in the gangetic valley (UP-Bihar). Only Vedas are trustworthy.
@@divyanshsingh7542 it's make by rulers of Cambodia who followers of Vaishnavism by chola times spread there where is mahabharat evidence??
@@extreme4642 all text and faiths are mythology only make by humans add some scientific things and all other only faiths
But fact there is no proof of God existence
Dharmik and ibrahimic both culture and religions are only mythologies
Reality is different
One interesting take in genetics: There's a possibillity that the Y DNA haplogroup R1a1, which is related to Indo-European migration, could in fact originate in South Asia. In that case the lineage of men bearing R1a1 might migrate from South Asia to Pontic-Caspian, give rise to Yamnaya culture, then go North-West to form the Corded Ware culture, then migrate East to to form Sintashta and Andronovo culture, then move South to merge with BMAC culture and then further South and successfully re-migrate into South Asia again with the Aryan identity. So yes, as we say in Bengali, "Prithibi gol" (Its a round earth we live in).
14:20 - statement that shiva hardly appears in vedas is factually incorrect. Shiva appears right at the center and is inseparable from the Rudra form.
I urge the makers of the videos to make a thorough study… independent study and not just put together an impressive animation with bits and pieces picked from the internet.
Point is - nobody knows what exactly happened in those times and whether migrations have happened and in which way they happened. That’s the reason, the so called Hindu traditions and beliefs is called sanatana dharma = eternal law / code
is there any reference to the name 'Shiva' in the Vedas?
"whether migrations have happened and in which way they happened"
Archaeology and genetics can tell us what happened, that's how we know most of history in absence of written records.
The Rakhigarhi (IVC) individual's DNA was analyzed by Indian scientists and no trace of European DNA was found. Whereas modern Northern Indians have significant genetic overlap with Europeans. If the migration was out of India, then how do you explain this?
@@jawadkhan3948yes ofcourse
@@saikpA word known as Shiva does not appear in Vedas . Another god named Rudra is mentioned in the Rig Veda .The Vedic texts do not mention bull or any animal as the transport vehicle (vahana) of Rudra .
Shiva has pre-Vedic roots , and the figure of Shiva evolved as an amalgamation of various older non-Vedic deities
Shiva has pre-Vedic Tribal roots , having "his origins in primitive tribes, signs and symbols."
The figure of Shiva as he is known today is an amalgamation of various older deities into a single figure, due to the process of Sanskritization and the emergence of the Hindu synthesis in post-Vedic times.
As an Indian, I’m proud
You aren't an Indian buddy but still u can be proud as we don't kill anyone or invade anyone unnecessarily ❤❤❤
Love u mate 😊😊😊
Nordic and Baltic people are the closest to the original Aryans
Aryan is only title mainly all central Asian eurasian and middle Eastern tribes and steppes called aryans because there is no specific DNA of any community for them
No they’re not no one is
Basic logic: if there was a time when the entire Indian subcontinent spoke Dravidian and then came a time when the north spoke a different language, something radical must have happened. I wouldn't be surprised if plague played a role.
Language basically indus is himself is unique Dravidian languages make letter
1:20 It looks like Jesus came to Earth and became a disciple of Indiana Jones.
Come on aryan don't cry 😂😂...
Underrated comment
I prefer more BC instead of BCE. BCE sounds more confusing and political without no apparent positive change to the calendar since it is literally the same calendar but with different terminology.
Aryan invasions happened and the evidence is overwhelming. Biggest evidence is the caste system and how higher castes have lighter skin and lower darker. Also Dardic people like Kalash Kashmiris in North Western mountains speak languages similar to rest of South Asia but resemble europeans.
Nope. These fake evidences
These skin Related Stuff is already Debunked.. Racist Ideology
it isnt universal. moreover all high caste people also have ivc and hunter gatherer genes too (combining both will always outweigh indo aryan genes)
I have Brahmin friends from Bihar and haryana and they have dark skintone, I myself from vaishya Barahapuriya caste I have light skin. Stop this caste propaganda separatist sleeper cell!!!
Pakistani sleeper cell mujeet
CHOLAS MENTIONED 💯💯💥💥💥🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🐯🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
CHOLA WERE AFRICAN NOT INDIA
Amazing video as always Please make a video on the Vijayanagara Empire
Great video
Even if this invasion happened, its been centuries and many other nations conquered India and there was so much race mixing in India, all indians I met don't look aryan or have any aryan features.
thats because an indian will not have more than 35% steppe gene. + Aryan migration was the last migration to make permanent and huge mark on indian genes
There's no ‘aryan’ features, arya was used by various indo-iranian as self designation for themselves, and for outsiders, An-Arya (non aryan) was used.
if you travel across ancient Eurasia and asked a north indian person, a Persian/iranian person or an alan sacking the Western Roman empire.. who is he. He will reply, he is an Aryan (in his own language dialect, ofc).
I identify as a 6'2 blonde aryan from hyperborea
EUROPE HAS ALWAYS BEEN INFLUENCED BY OUTSIDE
Christianity is NOT native to Europe. You are trying to project, your history on Indians. India is Hindu, the native Indian culture prevails. This is the raw facts. Creating new mythical races to appropriate Indian heritage is laughable. There are a hundred trillion ways we can exploit this to our advantage. Just take the L.
Believing any culture/civilization, specifically yours, is the only one to never have had outside influence is the only laughable thing here.
The last time a paper titled ‘The Genomic Formation of South and Central Asia’ was released online, in March 2018, it created a sensation in India and around the world.
Mostly because the paper, co-authored by 92 scientists, many of them doyens of different disciplines, said that between 2000 BCE and 1000 BCE, there were significant migrations from the Central Asian Steppe that most likely brought Indo-European languages into Indian subcontinent - just as Steppe pastoralist migrations into Europe a thousand years earlier, beginning around 3000 BCE, had spread Indo-European languages to that continent as well.
In other words, the paper supported the long-held idea of an ‘Arya’ migration into Indian subcontinent - or, to put it more accurately, a migration of Indo-European language speaking people who called themselves ‘Arya
As always, a wonderfully informative video , thank you!
Skin color was the basis of social division of the Vedic Aryans; their society was divided into social groups varņa, literally 'color'. The varņas of Aryan priests (brāhmaņa) and warriors (kşatriya or rājanya) were opposed to the varņas of the aboriginal Dasa, called 'black-skinned'. Modern researchers propose that the Dasas were Dravidians, creators of the Harappan culture and script. Their homeland in the Punjab is proved by the Brahui who have preserved Dravidian language in the north and a cultural vocabulary reflecting an ancient acquaintance with the productive economy and developed crafts; moreover, some terms were later borrowed into the Indian languages as the newcomers adapted to a new ecological niche Proto-Dravidians are genetically connected with the Near East, and are probably related to the Elamites and are assigned to the Europoid Near Eastern anthropological type The Harappan population also had an Austronesian admixture. The greater part of the modern Indian population belongs to the Indo-Afghan type, forming a branch of the Mediterranian group. Genetically they go back to the Mohenjo- Daro, Mundigak and Sialk cultures.The representatives of the Munda people could also be included among the Dasa; they are assigned to the Austronesian language family, distinct from the south of Hindustan. Anthropologically, the Munda belong to the Australoid-Negroid population and are characterized by dark-skin pigmentation and a flattened face. Indian culture formed as the result of the active interaction of three aboriginal ethno-linguistic traditions: Proto-Dravidians of the Punjab, Munda of the south and Tibetan-Burmese of the north-east and the immigrant Indo-Aryans. In modern India the north-western population is much lighter than the southern; moreover, representatives of lower castes have darker skin color, while higher ethnic-caste groups, who trace their genealogy from the ancient Aryans, are lighter, and among the Brahmans even light-eyed people are occasionally found. considers "the thesis of T. V. Gamkrelidze and V. V. Ivanov about Iranians separating through western areas of Central Asia and their movement around the Caspian Sea to be insufficiently demonstrated." He localizes the Indo-Iranian homeland in the north and suggests that they advanced from Central Asia.
The major problem with relegating such a complex event into aryan vs dravidian, higher caste vs lower caste is formation of misconception. Generally speaking, there is no huge scale difference as even the most northwestern indian will not have more than 35% steppe dna (aka almost 2/3 of their dna is from IVC and Local Hunter gatherer). Its a gradient
If that was right why would aryans worship dravidian gods
This was most absurd Statement. Proven to be baseless
While there is probably some truth to this, it is most certainly far from the fully truth and certainly not correct even to even be the simplified version of the story.
The Varna colours are literally white(brahman), red(ksatriya), yellow(vishnaya) then black(shudra). Where are the Red and Yellow skinned peoples? in fact, why is the darker colour of red ranked above the lighter colour of yellow according to your claim?.
"In modern India the north-western population is much lighter than the southern" Except this was probably always the case as Harappans had more Iranian farmer DNA than Southern Indians of that same time. Showing that is the case today only proves it has always been the case. If the religion originated in the Punjab, whether from foreigners or native the Brahman caste would still be lighter skinned than South Indians.
And you don't even support ur claim that Varna was skin colour based u only showed that North East Indians are lighter skinned, well, okay but that doesn't show Varna is colour based just that India has a variaition of skin colours.