He did not answer the question. He talked in circles. He spoke of committing treason as being a reason to execute someone. The man asks if someone leaves Islam and they are executed isn't that compulsion? The answer is yes that is compulsion.
@@johngurvan8279 it's been a minute since I watched this video but I think he's saying that leaving Islam and the fact that you know so many things about Islam that they can kill you for treason I'm going to tell you something I prayed with I prayed with Muslims for several years and they on one occasion drugged me and robbed me of everything in my briefcase inside of a Masjid and then another time they kept it insulting me calling me an FBI agent no kidding and then when I stopped going to the prayers I got a phone call telling me that if I stopped going to prayers I should be executed but guess what there's a cafe next to my Masjid that I went to and there's always pakistanis and Arabs over at the cafe during prayer but they don't threatened execute them they use these rules against people they don't like and that's the end of the story my life is almost over now and I will be just fine dying all by my lonesome have a nice day whoever you are
You are not suppose to force any one into a religion. But if you are a muslim and leave islam that the punishment either you face it in this life or the next life.
U r biggest lier if u say Islam was false after knowing it, or may be unknowingly and intentionally It's not a culture And for those non muslims who disagree on punishment, first disproove islam and after u leave islam
So if a person leaves Islam it has to be compared to revealing vital secrets to an enemy if he decides to advocate against Islam? Well, this only reinforces the general view that Islam is an aggressive religion.
Lol then every country is an aggressive country. This is about violating a social contract, between the apostate and an Islamic government and the muslim people. You get a bunch of benefits as a Muslim at several levels in those governments. If you leave a war, you're marked for execution too.
U r biggest lier if u say Islam was false after knowing it, or may be unknowingly and intentionally It's not a culture And for those non muslims who disagree on punishment, first disproove islam and after u leave islam
And if u had little of brain, u would think for a false religion to claim 100℅ true ppl first going against it will be it's own ppl, instead of following it strictly
@vaccino3359 Absolutely pathetic. If you blaspheme Allah you get to live. If you blaspheme Mohammed it's the death penalty. Who is more important?...not in theory but in practice?????
@vaccino3359 You know it's idiots like you that made me become an ex muslim. You say that like as if it's some rational behavior to kill apostates who just wants to live life in peace and not be disturbed.
@HallowValor but if all religious texts (Bible, Quran, Talmud, etc..) theories, and teachings are open to the public, which is true of all religions ...how is it in any way "giving away secrets" to an enemy? That makes no sense at all, and sounds logically ignorant.
@@pancakesafterdark3335 because back then armies were based onto the basis of religion, the muslims fought the christians, the hindus fought the muslims, the christians, we have the thirty years war that was found fought primarily between catholic and protestant forces, the list goes on.
In my point of view , at that time means 1400 yrs ago, this rule of killing a murtad because of some another reasons and conditions was applicable but not because that he became murtad. If a person can join Islam willingly , then he has the right to leave it also. Because Islam advocates freedom of religion. Think if in a non-muslim country if a nonmuslim becomes muslim and government is killing that person because of becoming a muslim then we muslims will cry for freedom of religion. I resperct Dr Zakir but I totally disagree with this talk of him. Like if u agree to , to let me know that my message is conveyed.
@@donkeyhead68 it is not medieval....read the entire quran and see it is a guide for humanity ...due to not following quran the world us in a BIG mess today
@@donkeyhead68 You have not read the quran and v little understanding if it unfortunately.It does not instigate violence as you say.There are so many signs in the Quran that is unable to be explained by mankind.....u are free to believe what you want....Becoming rude and personal shows the calibre of yr mentality
I don't agree with his view here, if Quran says that u can force a person to follow a religion, then a country who has shariya law can't order death penalty to someone who leaves Islam, in a way ur forcing a person to follow a religion. It's against the fundamental or Islam. Dr. Zakhir disappoints me here, may Allah guide him to follow Qur'anic teachings in every possible way.
@@hasibabdullah3463 If you read what the Islamic scholars say, basically all agree that the no compulsion verse has been abrogated (read Ibn Kathir for example). Also, it's part of the Sharia, if you read Reliance of the Traveler, section O8 - this law is supported by Islamic sources and all school of law agree on it.
@@hasibabdullah3463 Also, why did Muhammad say in Sahih Muslim 22 "I have been commanded to fight against people till they testify that there is no god but Allah, that Muhammad is the messenger of Allah, and they establish prayer, and pay Zakat and if they do it, their blood and property are guaranteed protection on my behalf" Notice, it says "if they do it", they are safe. If they don't, they are not "safe" from Muhammad.
@@theastronomer5800 no you misunderstood If they pay zakat they are protected even if they are nonbelievers and that is proven by the prophet history when he let jews live in the islamic country under his protection from any enemies with the condition that they pay zakat
He always puts baseless analogies to defend what islam says . It's simple, an ex christians or an ex hindu never feel like they will get kiled but ex muslim always stays in fear . Muslims just want to keep there population
THE MURDER FOR APOSTASY WAS AT THE TIME OF WAR. OF COURSE IT'S COMPULSION. EVERY COUNTRY have it's own laws, but no country will kill you just because you change name into another country. We don't live in Medievial times.
you don't have to fast Monday and Thursday, but it's a good thing that the prophet told us we can do, I do it too you stop eating and drinking from sunrise to sunset, check the times of prayers for your city on internet, you have to fast from the call to the fajr (sunrise) prayer and break your fast at the call to the maghrib (sunset) prayer. may Allah bless you
There is an app called "Muslims Pro" . It has all the time of prayers and you are suppose to break your fast at sunset (During Maghrib). And congratulations 🤗
@@faisalharun-qt1qz God will punish him. God gives the final judgment on his creatures. Killing someone is acting out of love, love being His message, and moreover : it is denying that a sinner can redeem himself. After his punishment, a sinner can still admit his faults, work to do and be better, and come out as a good man. That's redemption, and killing someone denies him this opportunity.
@@williampitt1537 this depends on the type of sins they are doing . And that’s why there are punishments established so even they feel it’s not wrong doing that sin but still the punishment will stop them on acting on their plans . Same in any country you live . Different punishment for different crimes . Hope you got my answer . Most of the people doesn’t do any sin bcz of the punishment they will get here . If we don’t have any punishment in world and leave it on god only the crime rates will be so high bcz who’s gonna stop them in world? Indeed god will punish hereafter but it’s important to establish punishment for wrongs so the world can go in order 🤍
@@faisalharun-qt1qz I agree with you on that point. I believe in punishment. But I also believe it's a testament of an advanced civilisation to be able to do justice on people without the use of killing.
I find this religious supremacism quite amusing. "Mine is the only true religion". A person who has left Islam has left it obviously because he has found issues with it and to expect him to sing praises of Islam even after he/she left it is beyond me. That is not treason, that is freedom of religion for you. If it is acceptable for a person who converts from any other religion to Islam and then propagates it and vilifies his earlier religion to prove the superiority of his newly adopted Islamic faith than the opposite should also be acceptable, that's fairness and equal rights for you. Zakir rightly said that in an Islamic State the apostate will be punished with the death penalty. That's exactly the reason level headed individuals do not support a theocratic state and more so an Islamic state. Because definitions of equality, fairness and justice have been twisted beyond recognition.
Dr zaki Naik gave wrong information about Islam QURAN 4 : 137 Those who belives and disbelives and again belives and then disbelive , Allah will not forgove them . In this verse, Allah did not mention about death penalty . A beliver is allowed to disbelive and then belive
@@TuthOnlyreal stuff these ppl want to appease their own material position in life, driving me away from Islam too cause Quran is sound but then UA-cam scholars want to kill everyone and try to say that the Quran “actually meant this…” blah blah blah. Like Quran says “They tell lies about god and they know it” ( referencing the Jews tho) Lots of these scholars remind me of the Pharisees and scribes from Bible that Jesus dealt with when he scolds them
@@TuthOnly Jesus is the only way to heaven, the truth and the light. Whoever confesses their belief in him as their personal lord and saviour, repent and accept the free salvation he brought to everyone, will inherit eternal life in his kingdom.
My wife was/is Muslim, islam and her family/parents was the reason she attempted suicide as a teen, they did not approve of me becouse I was a " non believer " not allowed to go to public school or have friends she said her religion was a prison , she escaped at 16 and has not talked to per parents in years, she told me yesterday that she is the happiest shes ever been, what does that tell you about Islam? I'd say it's not for everyone
family's behavior is not Islaam, they are not prophets sent by Allah. If some name sake Muslims come and allow you to roam naked ,go pub , drink alcohol will you say it is due to Islaam or permissible in Islaam? you perhaps are exaggerating, if they were so scary she would not fall in love with you, you as a non-believer would not connect with her, and she would never dare to leave the house, maybe she is a rebel who don't care what Allah says and willingly wanted to go out of the fold of Isaam. Isaam says things which are better for society, do you want your daughter to be with 7-8 men sexually in the name of freedom? you too have boundaries, right? She and you should ask God Almighty to guide you to truth and read at least a translation of glorious Quraan in language you understand better. May Allah guide you both, Ameen. I wanted good for you for the sake of Allah otherwise I would not have commented to your message, I do not know why you messaged here. If you are so afraid of us, why would you care to come to this channel and give a reply? Can't you be threatened here? Truth is they didn't kill you or your wife, so they are not scary as you are portraying and you are commenting here with dare, so you two seem stubborn, that is it. you have time till you are alive to seek guidance and accept truth if you got the message, so keep asking Allah to guide you and understand. wish you goodness from Almighty.
@welcome9470 I don't speak for everyone I'm just explaining my wife's case, in her own words she didn't belong with her family, no 14 year old girl should be beaten with a closed fist in front of her family for wanting to go to a normal school and dress more "normal". This is before I met my wife! This started way before me so i was not the cause of this and yes maybe she was rebellious but what's more important your religion or your daughter happiness? but as I stated I'm my wife's own words Islam was not for her
@@armedgunman01 So same thing can be said for different reasons for families who are atheists, agnostics, Christians, Jews, Hindus or Muslims. Any country, culture, tradition etc. a daughter/son can do bad with parents and vice versa. And there can be cases where people want to take rights of covering like in France, what is more evil harassing a woman to take off clothes for evil things or cover? I think former is worst. What do you want to imply with your situation? it doesn't make sense. there are also people who want to influence children in school about lgbtq+ sickness and manipulate and legalize even for a child to change gender, we Muslims Alhamdulillah condemn those atrocities widely and laws of God Almighty is for the best and this life is a test.
OK, I think the desertion analogy is better- if a person deserts his army then he is likely to be executed. Similarly, every Muslim was a potential recruit for the Caliphate and non Muslims are exempt from national service. Also, the death penalty was only supposed to be implemented in the event the apostasy is combined with treason and part of warring against the Muslims. There have been a number of murtads during the Caliphate who were not put to death, Al Ma'ari being one of them.
I agree that the desertion analogy makes more sense. The treason-analogy that Zakir gave makes no sense to me since there is a big difference between leaving something as opposed to leaving something and conveying information to the opponent. With becoming a disbeliever [i.e. leaving Islam], you're not really betraying people or a country.
🔫 A-tharva Veda 1 2 . 5 . 6 2 🗡 Rend, rend to bits, rend through and through, scorch and consume and burn to dust, the one Who rejects the Vedas kill All those who are not Christians 😱 🔪 🧕 🧔 🗡 D-euteronomy 1 3 :1 0 - 2 0
The Atharva Veda as spells for many things, it's not a rule book. Remember though that karma applies to everyone and everything, so do it at your own risk.
deuteronomy 13:6-10 If your brother, the son of your mother, tempts you in secret or your son, or your daughter, or the wife of your embrace, or your friend, who is as your own soul saying, "Let us go and worship other gods, which neither you, nor your forefathers have known." Of the gods of the peoples around you, [whether] near to you or far from you, from one end of the earth to the other end of the earth; You shall not desire him, and you shall not hearken to him; neither shall you pity him, have mercy upon him, nor shield him. But you shall surely kill him, your hand shall be the first against him to put him to death, and afterwards the hand of all the people. And you shall stone him with stones so that he dies, because he sought to lead you astray from the Lord, your God, Who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage.
" In this the love of God was manifested toward us, that God has sent His only begotten Son into the world, that we might live through Him. In this is love, not that we loved God, but that He loved us and sent His Son to be the propitiation for our sins." - 1 John 4:9-10
Wouldn’t a more apt analogy be if a person decided to give up his country of origin, immigrate to a different country, and then explain to people why he/she left? Free countries allow you to do that no problem. Like, imagine a different religion had that standard. Imagine if Christianity said, “there’s no compulsion in Christianity, and you can freely leave it if you choose, but if you convert out and then start telling people why you left, you get the death penalty.” No one would actually believe them when they said, “There’s no compulsion in Christianity.” No disrespect, but this seems to be a pretty weak example of apologetics from Dr. Naik. Btw, if you read this comment and decide to respond with hate, you’re not doing yourself any favors. I’m willing to listen, but I won’t bother if you can’t calmly explain why you think I’m mistaken.
@@mainhoonna4485 Nope. Since posting that I have become more familiar with the extreme sophistry of Zakir Naik as well as the extreme moral and intellectual failings of Islam as a whole.
@@ARKAN9765 No, probably not a different interpretation for the most part. But if you’re saying that a Muslim scholar would come to a different conclusion about whether or not Islam is good, then obviously yes. It means nothing. If I said that I didn’t like Buddhism and then your referred me to the opinions of Buddhist priests, I’d do my best to understand their interpretation of Buddhism as well as Buddhist texts, but I could then hardly be called “wrong” if I came to a different conclusion about the moral or logical status of Buddhism.
@@One-rr8um He is most regular attendee of ZN's question answer setion whenever it held in Dubai There are lots of videos of him I think in this one Rahul look more younger
I have said it earlier. The more I hear him, the more I am convinced that he is a one man army to create negativity about Islam and to justify Islamophobia. He talks freely about jang, jihad, killing etc. Where is universal brotherhood, love, compassion, kindnesd in his talks ?
Wars and killings are real ... happen every were in the world ..if we talk about it or not...it wont make any difference..and now a days it is so much commen that their are news channel who openly show false news...
I am not a muslim. But I am a sympathiser of all religions. I think all religions should be seen as tools provided by God to upgrade human beings...so, religious scholars should talk about good things and promote world harmony.
@@krishnaswamyjagannathan8708Brother,i am understanding ur thinking...please,read this link..Holy Quran has NOT given any punishment for Apostate www.huffpost.com/entry/does-the-koran-endorse-ap_b_5539236
@@krishnaswamyjagannathan8708 Koran also talks about feeding the poor,helping the Orphan,freeing the Slaves...i m not lieing,..here are references.... Holy Quran 17.7-- "If you do GOOD, you do GOOD for YOURSELVES; and if you do EVIL, [you do it] to YOURSELVES." Quran 41.46-- Whoever does RIGHTEOUS - it is for his [own] SOUL; and whoever does EVIL [does so] AGAINST it. And your Lord is not ever UNJUST to [His] servants Holy Quran 31.18---And DONOT Turn your CHEEK [in Contempt] Toward PEOPLE and DONOT WALK through the Earth EXULTANTLY. Indeed, Allah DOES NOT like everyone SELF-DELUDED and BOASTFUL. Holy Quran 17.34---And DONOT Approach the Property of an ORPHAN, Except in the way that is best, until he Reaches MATURITY. And Fulfill [every] COMMITMENT. Indeed, the Commitment is Ever [that about which one will be] QUESTIONED. Holy Quran 90.13---It is the FREEING of a SLAVE Holy Quran 90.14---Or FEEDING on a day of Severe HUNGER Holy Quran 90.15---An ORPHAN of Near Relationship Holy Quran 90.16---Or a NEEDY Person in MISERY Holy Quran 17.37---And DONOT WALK upon the Earth EXULTANTLY. Indeed, you will Never TEAR the Earth [apart], and you will Never Reach the MOUNTAINS in HEIGHT. Holy Quran 41.34---And NOT EQUAL are the GOOD DEED and the BAD. REPIL [Evil] by that [deed] Which is BETTER; and thereupon the one whom Between You and Him is ENMITY [will become] as though he was a DEVOTED FRIEND. Holy Quran 41.35---But None is GRANTED it Except those who are PATIENT, and none is granted it Except one having a Great Portion [of GOOD]. Holy Quran 60.8----Allah DOESNOT FORBID you from those who DONOT FIGHT you because of Religion and DONOT EXPEL you from your homes - from being RIGHTEOUS Toward Them and Acting JUSTLY Toward Them. Indeed, Allah loves those who act JUSTLY. Holy Quran 2.271-- If you DISCLOSE your CHARITABLE EXPENDITURES, they are GOOD; but if you CONCEAL them and give them to the POOR, it is BETTER for you, and He will REMOVE from you some of your MISDEEDS [thereby]. And Allah, with what you do, is [fully] Acquainted.
Since you believe liberal secular law is the best, your biases and impartiality are towards that. If you look at statistics, you will find most crime-ridden countries are western countries or other countries that have very secular laws. THAT IS A FACT. Whereas countries like Saudi Arabia have very little crime rate. These measures are in place for the betterment and protection of society. So you wont find smuggling of drugs, mass killing or terrorism or any other major crimes being rampant in these countries while you will, without a shadow of a doubt, find them widespread in western countries and similiar to them. Matter of fact, western countries and similar to them have seen more terrorist attacks because the liberal nature of these countries makes it EASY for these people to carry out these acts. Besides, the penalty of apostacy is NOT for the common people. As it is NOT correct to say that any person can carry out the execution. These cases MUST be evaluated by a QUALIFIED judge as that is evident in Islaam.
Best leave this sect of Judaism called Islam and convert to Eslaum my brother. Saudi Kingdom, Iran, etc are all Zionist Satanist Freemasons like USA and Russia, Israel, etc.
There is a hypocrisy there. The no compulsion came as a response to the wars against Quraysh. Quraysh was trying to use its military to compel Meccans who became Muslims to go back to paganism. The prophet was basically saying via the Quran "You have your faith, we have ours.". At that time, the Muslims weren't as powerful militarily. Once they were very powerful, they became like Quraysh because they were now supreme. The action of forcing someone born Muslim to remain contradicts no compulsion. It shouldn't matter if someone was born Christian or Muslim. They should have a free choice to believe as they wish.
As a born muslim who searched in religions and found islam the most logic and correct one ,why would i have choice to leave ?even the converts to islam ,the converts they did thier research and found that islam is the most righteous religion then why would he leave ,if some joined islam and left it then he just wants to plant doubt in muslims faiths who are not good knowing about islam(a well knowing about islam his faith will not be shaken)
your example is not right, things happen with Allah's will, prophet's journey of life was revelation of conduct itself for people to take understanding. if he was weak then surrendering was an option, idol worship was an option, why didn't he select that? Because he is true prophet of God Almighty. Why would the enemies of Islaam care what was revealed in Quraan and there is compulsion in religion or not? if they can defeat, they will plainly defeat so that is incorrect argument. the first treaty in Makkah for Muslims in Madina was unfair to Muslims but still Allah called it a victory in Quraan. that time Makkah was filled with disbelievers. in that treaty if someone wants to go to Makkah from Muslims in Madina they should be allowed, but is someone goes to Madina they should not be allowed and if anyone become murtad then he should be sent to Makkah, but what happened? People accepted Isaam in multitudes by seeing conduct of Muslims, so Allah said it was clear victory in Quraan, Alhamdulillah.
also, even if you become murtad you are executed with conditions like: it is a land with laws of Islam you know about Islaam but still reject knowingly you are spreading corruption in land where law is Isaam and people already accepted Isaam, you are spreading falsehood. there is no agreement/treaty from any other non-Muslim country to send you to their place if you become Kaafir etc. someone is not a Muslim then he is son of non-Muslim family generally of other religion, but born Muslims have their family as Muslims, so they are Muslims and know Islaam while growing, so what is their purpose of becoming murtad except evil? for born non-Muslim there is no compulsion in gunpoint even if we are in power in state with laws of Islaam. if you see scenario of prophet's time, Muslims were weak and starting, people leaving Islaam would be Treson if you look that time, but still if you have treaty to not kill, you cannot. if you see scenario of today, hardly you will find the laws and that too if someone influencing others. it is like wanting to be naked in college with much worse level, it is like treason towards one's country, all have their boundaries, you have laws in every country, this world belongs to none of us, no one created it except Allah, then why do you pay to buy land, resources and pay taxes and obey laws of land? can't you be a free bird everywhere then? it is not practical. previous true scriptures didn't claim to be only true to be followed and they gave message of final prophet, so all should follow final scripture Quraan and final prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) but still it is a mercy for them that "there is no compulsion in religion". may Allah guide me and you, hope you understood.
I once interested in Islam. But then I encountered this what I considered an issue, apostasy can be killed. I asked my muslim friend if it is true, and he said that it is true. When I asked why, he cannot provide answer. For me, it is against my morality to kill other people, let alone just because someone switch or change their religion. And this is the reason why I stayed away and I am glad that I did. I agree with some comments below that this Zakir Naik did not really answer the question. His analogy is wrong. People who change their religion is not the same with treason to their country. And also as I know, traitor to the country are usually only executed only during war times. These days, modern democratic countries only imprisoned traitor who leaked information to their enemies or to the very hostile countries. Usually only countries ruled by dictators or facism implemented this death penalty for traitors. The more suitable analogy for changing religion is changing nationality. They can change their nationality to the other countries if those countries allowed them. If Zakir Naik compared changing religion to treason against country, then he means Islam treat other religions as enemies.
i agree his analogy was ridiculous. but even if we grant that analogy, he's basically admitting that there is a contradiction because having a law against treason IS compulsion. i think he need to look up that word in the dictionary.
This is a primary reason i can never be muslim. God would not declare himself most merciful and most forgiving and then want his followers to kill people for leaving the faith and telling people why they left it. Especially considering that allah dictates who believes and who doesnt. You have great points on many things but no serman will ever justify the killing or apostates period…
Yes, thats what people dont understand. Islam is brainwashing of the highest degree of deception(love and fear). It programms you so much that you dont dare to question him because he loves and created you - right? . And if even when you still question him you are scum and eternal hell fire will await you. There so many flaws in Islam, its absurd. But to be honest, Islam has some good values that someone can support.
@@hammadjahangir1404 You should read a bit of Islamic history my friend. An excellent survey is in a book called The History of Jihad by R. Spencer - he heavily uses Islamic contemporary sources to show how Islam expanded and what "choices" people were given. This is NOT an easy book to read, but I guarantee you that you will change you mind very quickly, if you take the time to read your own history.
@@hasibabdullah3463 FALSE. because there is no example of an apostate being punished at the time of prophet. if there is then show me otherwise u r wrong.
He did not answer the question, don't understand why people are clapping. Army and religion are two different things, very absurd anology as always from Mr. Naik.
When Humanity is ruled by religion and whatever nonsense people believe. This happens and Humanity will vanishes from the world. they kill and always fight each other while trying prove religion and its teachings. When idiots become too confident on what they believe then the world is in danger.
Islam is more than just a religion. Islam teaches how to pray to God and ALSO how to run a country. normal apostates dont get punished. only spying apostates get punished.
@@fareazalrazi585 I won't take it to the direction of true or false. I want to say that his words are disgusting in a civic and moral sense of humanity.
@@fareazalrazi585 freedom of expression of religion should be a basic human right if you just give a little bit about ethics. Most Muslims are born into a Muslim family and to think that they should be literally killed when they become atheistic is disgusting. If they thing atheism is the moral most moral ideology then they should have the right to preach that message. Freedom of speech is a basic human right. How can you defend a religion that doesn’t care about your basic human rights?
THE MURDER FOR APOSTASY WAS AT THE TIME OF WAR. OF COURSE IT'S COMPULSION. EVERY COUNTRY have it's own laws, but no country will kill you just because you change name into another country. We don't live in Medievial times.
If converting at the point of sword is wrong..why is there no penalty for muslims who actually convert at the point of sword? Why does no muslim speak against it?
@@Meetabasit After destroying all their temples, raping their women, killing all men, destroying all its sacred knowledge bases like nalanda university, why was the need of all this if it was so easy?
There is no comparison between treason and leaving Islam, at least in the modern sense. This is a shallow way of trying to wiggle out of the issue. Even in earlier times, leaving religion is not the same as committing treason against the state. If someone leaves a religion and then joins the enemy, okay. But if someone says, "I do not believe anymore," he has done nothing against the state, and nothing should be done to him. Any argument that tries to justify that this is somehow against the community is really pushing the limits of what makes sense. Even if that person were to speak out against Islam, there are other ways of handling the situation. To just kill the person is not right.
This guy's name is rahul who has asked question, he asked these kinds several difficult questions All the questions were answered by zakir naik I think he might have reverted to islam... May god give long life with health to zakir naik🤲🤲🤲
My brother I swear by Allah when he got all the hard questions answered by Dr zakir Naik Rahul said that he is going to become Muslim but not in public and he finally reverted to Islam as I heard from Dr Zakir naik speech.
I think most people in the comments misunderstood his answer The punishment is ONLY applicable to a person IF that person spreads falsehood of the religion OR make treason to a community or country Anyone can have doubts at the start in Islam even believers, but that's the ppint of exploring the religion, to study, believe and understand deeper
@@hasibabdullah3463 Assalamualaikum brother, after seeing your well-made answer I want to ask an out of topic question. This world is entering a new era, an era where freedom of expression is everywhere, which means people are continuously breaking the human moral law, for example gays, lesbians,bisexuals, and finally transgenders or shortly called LBGT. The LBGT community grew so fast that it can be overwhelming and even there are thousands and thousands and thousands of people who are beginning to support LGBT like it's the most logical human's right and all. We as muslims, how are we supposed to approach this issue ? Try to "save" the LBGTs people by telling them that it's wrong and try to *actively* change the supporters mind *OR* accept that the world is changing and rather protect our muslim community from those influences ?
What he responded to the message is incredibly closed minded and assumes Islam is correct. Every reasonable human being must accept that they may be at least in theory incorrect. And furthermore, should act accordingly offering others point of view respect.
I kinda agree with you But when it comes to religion A way of life(rules) by God himself There is no falsehood You can't accept the fact that there is one wrong point in a religion or else the whole religion is false Because logically God can never be wrong or false in something He knows the best (logically)
I rather be "close minded" but correct than "open minded" but wrong. A reasonable human being can definitely believe in something to be objectively correct
compulsion : disinheritance compulsion : outcast compulsion : threats compulsion : fact! But Jesus is God & He catered for this because He Himself as Savior was outcast, threatened etc. you have NO RIGHT TO TAKE A LIFE! NONE.
I can't believe someone like that promoting violence and criminal acts agianst people who choose a certain beliefs and still being followed and admired by millions of people. That's really scary and unbelievable.
deuteronomy 13:6-10 If your brother, the son of your mother, tempts you in secret or your son, or your daughter, or the wife of your embrace, or your friend, who is as your own soul saying, "Let us go and worship other gods, which neither you, nor your forefathers have known." Of the gods of the peoples around you, [whether] near to you or far from you, from one end of the earth to the other end of the earth; You shall not desire him, and you shall not hearken to him; neither shall you pity him, have mercy upon him, nor shield him. But you shall surely kill him, your hand shall be the first against him to put him to death, and afterwards the hand of all the people. And you shall stone him with stones so that he dies, because he sought to lead you astray from the Lord, your God, Who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage.
@@abhi.ku2432deuteronomy 13:6-10 If your brother, the son of your mother, tempts you in secret or your son, or your daughter, or the wife of your embrace, or your friend, who is as your own soul saying, "Let us go and worship other gods, which neither you, nor your forefathers have known." Of the gods of the peoples around you, [whether] near to you or far from you, from one end of the earth to the other end of the earth; You shall not desire him, and you shall not hearken to him; neither shall you pity him, have mercy upon him, nor shield him. But you shall surely kill him, your hand shall be the first against him to put him to death, and afterwards the hand of all the people. And you shall stone him with stones so that he dies, because he sought to lead you astray from the Lord, your God, Who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage.
Ibn Taymiyyah (may Allah have mercy on him) said: “If that person - i.e. the apostate - had not been killed, the one who entered the religion would have left it. So killing him is a protection for the people of the religion and for the religion, because that prevents any deficiency and prevents them from leaving it, unlike the one who did not enter it.” End quote from Majmoo’ al-Fataawa (20/102). Ibn Ashour, may God have mercy on him, said: “The wisdom behind legislating the killing of the apostate - even though the disbeliever is not to be killed in principle - is that apostasy is the departure of an individual or a group from the Islamic community. Thus, by leaving Islam after entering it, he is calling out that when he mixed with this religion, he found it to be unrighteous, and he found that what he was upon before that was better. So this is It is an insinuation of religion and belittling it. It also paves the way for those who want to slip away from this religion, and that leads to the dissolution of the community. If there was no deterrent for that, people would not be deterred, and we do not find anything as deterrent as the expectation of death. Therefore, death was made the punishment for the apostate, so that no one enters the religion except on Insight, and so that no one leaves it after entering it. This is not from the compulsion in religion that is denied by the Most High’s saying: {There is no compulsion in religion} [Al-Baqarah: 256] according to the opinion that it is not abrogated, because compulsion in religion is forcing people to leave their religions and enter Islam. As for this, it is from “Forcing one to remain in Islam.” End of “Al-Tahrir wa Al-Tanwir” (2/336).
This treason camparison is very poor. Muslims who leave Islam are not soldiers, are not leaking information which puts lives in danger and are not working with any enemy because there is no enemy. I feel that Zakir Zaik needs to spend more time conversing with critics of Islam because he needs to understand how embarrassing these kinds of arguments are for intelligent Muslims.
I agree that ex-Muslims should not be executed but they should not propagate apostasy ideas, do you agree? This is Zakir Naik's point pleases don't misrepresent his fantastic lectures.
@@fahamitaha2532 What is the definition of ‘propagate’ here? Should people be able to be open and honest and say when they have left Islam, or say when they disagree with claims within Islam?
@@fahamitaha2532No, people should have the freedom to propagate their ideas. If you say that apostates shouldn't be given the freedom to propagate their ideas, then are you okay if a government doesn't allow Muslims to propagate Islam?
You cannot take 2+2=4 in this case bcz in the religious base people are having different views. Wht u feel right may not be right for the other. And even if we take case of teacher who teaches 2+2=5 she should be fired from the school, not to be killed. But what if she is just believing 2+2=5 and unless like the case of teacher, a common civilian cannot be exiled (fired) from the nation(school). But sadly these laws oppress freedom of religion
THE MURDER FOR APOSTASY WAS AT THE TIME OF WAR. OF COURSE IT'S COMPULSION. EVERY COUNTRY have it's own laws, but no country will kill you just because you change name into another country. We don't live in Medievial times.
Yes, what I feel right may not feel right for other people, but ultimately there has to be one absolute truth. Muslims are 100% confident it is their faith. They cannot let anyone preach falsehood and lead people astray.
The compulsion part emerged when Muslims were under pressure against Quraysh that wanted to force the Meccan Muslims to become pagans. Then it was said no compulsion, but it doesn't apply to a peron who was already a Muslim is what he's saying. There is a contradiction though because if you're forcing someone to stay part of a religion, you're still compelling them, so it violates the objection that was voiced to Quraysh when they were
brother you are wrong not all the Hadith’s which is claimed to be authentic is authentic any Hadith which is against the rulings of The holy Quran is not authentic and not words of Prophet Muhammad pbuh the according to islam the only thing which is %100 authentic is the holy Quran and yes the verse says “Let there be no compulsion in religion” and if it was only for Dawah(asking people to accept islam) it would have mentioned in the verse so its true that we should “Let there be no compulsion in religion” i have respect for you it doesn’t matter whatever you believe and follow and and i hope you think the same about me and muslims. Peace🤍 Note: what i said is not only my view but its the view of a lot of scholars and all quraniiis
@@bahezkurdish8421 You should convert to Eslaum. Islam is fake, a sect of Judaism and the Islamic governments are all Zionist Satanists and these sheikhs are their agents. There are no sheikhs in original Eslaum, no rabbis and laymen who follow blindly/worship the rabbis, there are only only brothers and sisters. The holy Goraun, book of Allauh, also clearly says "whoever wants to believe, let him believe, and whoever wants to disbelieve, let him disbelieve". They are Zionist Satanist, Kabbalist Jew/Yahudis, monafegeen, thats why Saudi is allied with America and Russia, and also Iran helped them to invade Iraq and after they massacred the people, USA gave entire Iraq to the Iran. They are fake, whoever is allied with them is one of them.
Even if an apostate advocates against Islam that still should not be any excuse to put such person to death! The comparison to treason in a war situation makes no sense.
Leaving a religion is NOT the same as selling your country's secret. His analogy is completely wrong. 1. Other religions (Christianity, Judaism.) or atheism are NOT considered enemies of Islam. If Islam considers all other religion or Atheism as the enemy, then there is wrong with Islam. 2. A country's law Should be secular. If country enforces any sort of law based on a particular religion, this by itself is already wrong, especially death penalty. 3. Who are you to claim Islam is the truth and who are you to force such "truth" on an ex-Muslim. verdict : yes there is absolute compulsion in Islam.
deuteronomy 13:6-10 If your brother, the son of your mother, tempts you in secret or your son, or your daughter, or the wife of your embrace, or your friend, who is as your own soul saying, "Let us go and worship other gods, which neither you, nor your forefathers have known." Of the gods of the peoples around you, [whether] near to you or far from you, from one end of the earth to the other end of the earth; You shall not desire him, and you shall not hearken to him; neither shall you pity him, have mercy upon him, nor shield him. But you shall surely kill him, your hand shall be the first against him to put him to death, and afterwards the hand of all the people. And you shall stone him with stones so that he dies, because he sought to lead you astray from the Lord, your God, Who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage.
@@Pomni740 but Christian and Jew have long been secular and don't enforce the content of this text, last time they kill some one for leaving Christianity or Judaism was almost 1000 years ago.
* Leaving Islam is not an apostate * The apostate is someone who goes to something of his own free will and then abandons it. This does not apply to someone who was born to Muslim parents and converted to Islam by dependency. **Perhaps this applies only to those who entered Islam by their will and by their pure decision and at an age that denies ignorance.
So what happens to a person born into a muslim family, they are under compulsion because they cannot leave. And they were immediately compelled to join. So it’s a trap.
And who is better in speech than one who invites to Allah and does righteousness and says, "Indeed, I am of the Muslims." Quran (41:33) I invite to All of you to learn the Quran in Hindi and English Translation... 😊😊😊
Convert to Eslaum my brother. These people are Kabbalist Jews/Yahudis and monafegeen, Zionist Satanist Freemasons. Saudi Kingdom, Iran, etc are all Zionists.
Smh leaving Islam and preaching a different religion is not the same as treason. It would be comparable to, for example, protesting the laws in America, which happens all the time. And sure a teacher who spreads misinformation may get fired but not killed.
You have a point 😊😊 Islam has a violent history... And logic, rationality and tolerance of other faiths is labelled as "Islamophobia" @@coffeyplaysgames
This is the most mentally ill comment section💀 so we dont have freedom of religion is the most high on crack thing you could say. Ignorance shines in these replys. Sharia doesnt apply to other religions and you are allowed to choose to pray tax or be muslim. That simple💀
@@Ausländer999 the Muslims preached there and the people accepted it. Conquest ≠ forced conversion and a primary example is Cyrus II if you doubt the fact that you can conquer and spread your faith but also not force convert
For all Muslims, please don't abandon Allah SWT commands in the Quran: 2:256 "There shall be no compulsion in the religion. The right course has become clear from the wrong. So whoever disbelieves in Taghut and believes in Allah has grasped the most trustworthy handhold with no break in it. And Allah is Hearing and Knowing." 18:29 "And say, "The truth is from your Lord, so whoever wills - let him believe; and whoever wills - let him disbelieve." Indeed, We have prepared for the wrongdoers a fire whose walls will surround them. And if they call for relief, they will be relieved with water like murky oil, which scalds [their] faces. Wretched is the drink, and evil is the resting place." 88:21-88:26 "So remind, [O Muhammad]; you are only a reminder" "You are not over them a controller" "However, he who turns away and disbelieves -" "Then Allah will punish him with the greatest punishment" "Indeed, to Us is their return." "Then indeed, upon Us is their account." - no islamic law should allow people to be killed for simply disbelieving in god or the religion! We are only here to warn them or remind them, not to punish them, especially not with death!
@@electro639 Here is what I found I'm sorry that it's so long, but we are talking about death penatly so we ahould take our time! And it seems in Islam there are two types of apostates, the more severe case is actually similar to High Treason and not about disblieving, it is about bringing actual danger to the Ummah: "Apostasy is divided into two types: major and minor. Muslim scholars, using the Prophet’s traditions as their guide, have divided unbelief, idolatry, hypocrisy, and sin into major and minor categories. Likewise, there is a distinction between an apostate who intends to physically harm the community and an apostate who only spiritually harms himself. Minor apostasy is when a person embraces Islam while knowing its virtues and later rejects it. There is no legal punishment for the minor apostate as long as they do not try to physically harm the Muslim community. Major apostasy is when a person embraces Islam while knowing its virtues and later rejects it and adds to this a call for violent rebellion against the Muslim authorities. Such a crime is equivalent to high treason and in its most severe case can carry the death penalty as an act of self-defense for the community. Allah said: إِنَّ الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا ثُمَّ كَفَرُوا ثُمَّ آمَنُوا ثُمَّ كَفَرُوا ثُمَّ ازْدَادُوا كُفْرًا لَّمْ يَكُنِ اللَّهُ لِيَغْفِرَ لَهُمْ وَلَا لِيَهْدِيَهُمْ سَبِيلًا Verily, those who believed and then disbelieved, then believed and then disbelieved and increased in disbelief, never will Allah forgive them nor will He guide them to a right way. Surah An-Nisa 4:137 In this verse, Allah describes a person who apostates from Islam twice and He does not prescribe legal punishment for him, but rather He only warns the apostate about severe punishment in the Hereafter. This demonstrates that the general rule is an apostate should be left alone, as the Quran prohibits compulsion in religion. Allah said: لَا إِكْرَاهَ فِي الدِّينِ قَد تَّبَيَّنَ الرُّشْدُ مِنَ الْغَيِّ There is no compulsion in religion. The truth is distinct from misguidance. Surah Al-Baqarah 2:256 And He said: وَقُلِ الْحَقُّ مِن رَّبِّكُمْ فَمَن شَاءَ فَلْيُؤْمِن وَمَن شَاءَ فَلْيَكْفُرْ Say: The truth is from your Lord. So whoever wills let him believe, and whoever wills let him disbelieve. Surah Al-Kahf 18:29 Because of this, the Prophet did not punish people simply because they rejected Islam. Jabir reported: A bedouin came to the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, and gave the pledge of allegiance for embracing Islam. The next day he came with a fever and said, “Please cancel my pledge.” The Prophet refused three times and he said: الْمَدِينَةُ كَالْكِيرِ تَنْفِي خَبَثَهَا، وَيَنْصَعُ طَيِّبُهَا Medina is like a furnace. It expels its impurities and collects what is pure. Source: Sahih Bukhari 1784, Grade: Sahih In this example, a man rejected Islam after embracing it but the Prophet did not apply legal punishment to him. Regarding the major apostasy, the Prophet was clear in advising us that legal punishment is not applied to a minor apostate, but only a major apostate. Abdullah ibn Mas’ud reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, applied legal punishment in the following case: وَالتَّارِكُ لِدِينِهِ الْمُفَارِقُ لِلْجَمَاعَةِ The one who leaves his religion and separates from the community. Source: Sahih Muslim 1676, Grade: Sahih The reference to one who “separates from the community” (al-mufariq lil-jama’ah) indicates that a person is not legally punished simply for not practicing Islam, but rather for high treason against Muslim authorities. This is made even clearer in another narration in which the Prophet describes the major apostate as: رَجُلٌ يَخْرُجُ مِنَ الإِسْلاَمِ يُحَارِبُ اللَّهَ عَزَّ وَجَلَّ وَرَسُولَهُ A man who rejects Islam and wages war against Allah the Exalted and His Messenger. Source: Sunan An-Nasa’i 4048 Ibn Abbas said: فَمَنْ قَتَلَ وَأَفْسَدَ فِي الأَرْضِ وَحَارَبَ اللَّهَ وَرَسُولَهُ ثُمَّ لَحِقَ بِالْكُفَّارِ قَبْلَ أَنْ يُقْدَرَ عَلَيْهِ لَمْ يَمْنَعْهُ ذَلِكَ أَنْ يُقَامَ فِيهِ الْحَدُّ الَّذِي أَصَابَ Whoever kills others, spreads corruption in the land, wages war against Allah and His Messenger, and he joins the unbelievers before he is subdued, then there is nothing to prevent the legal punishment from being applied to him because of what he did. Source: Sunan An-Nasa’i 4046 Indeed, some of the companions interpreted the phrase this way and described an apostate as: حَارَبَ اللَّهَ وَرَسُولَهُ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ One who wages are against Allah and His Messenger. Source: Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī 4334, Grade: Sahih What can be understood from these narrations is that legal punishment is only applied to a person who combines apostasy with high treason. This is because the Quran prohibits compulsion in religion as a general rule and because the believers should be the most restrained of the people when it comes to taking life. Abdullah ibn Mas’ud reported: The Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, said: أَعَفُّ النَّاسِ قِتْلَةً أَهْلُ الْإِيمَانِ The most restrained of the people regarding killing are the people of faith. Source: Musnad Ahmad 3720, Grade: Sahih Furthermore, cases of major apostasy do not necessitate the death penalty if a single Muslim seeks protection for the apostate. Ibn Abbas reported: كَانَ عَبْدُ اللَّهِ بْنُ سَعْدِ بْنِ أَبِي سَرْحٍ يَكْتُبُ لِرَسُولِ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ فَأَزَلَّهُ الشَّيْطَانُ فَلَحِقَ بِالْكُفَّارِ فَأَمَرَ بِهِ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ أَنْ يُقْتَلَ يَوْمَ الْفَتْحِ فَاسْتَجَارَ لَهُ عُثْمَانُ بْنُ عَفَّانَ فَأَجَارَهُ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ Abdullah ibn Sa’d ibn Abi Sarh would write to the Messenger of Allah but the devil deceived him and he joined the unbelievers. The Messenger of Allah ordered that he should be killed on the day of liberation, but Uthman ibn Affan sought protection for him, so the Messenger of Allah granted him protection. Source: Sunan Abu Dawud 4358, Grade: Sahih In this example, a man embraced Islam and then rejected it by joining the idolaters of Mecca who at the time were waging war against the Muslims. When Mecca surrendered to the Prophet without a fight, Uthman ibn Affan sought protection for this apostate and the Prophet honored this covenant. This is because, as a general rule, the protection granted by a single Muslim should be honored by all Muslims. Ali ibn Abu Talib reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said: ذِمَّةُ الْمُسْلِمِينَ وَاحِدَةٌ يَسْعَى بِهَا أَدْنَاهُمْ The covenant of the Muslims is one covenant, and they strive to fulfill it among the least of them. Source: Sunan Al-Kubra Al-Bayhaqi 15464, Grade: Sahih In conclusion, the death penalty for apostasy is restricted by the Prophet’s other statements and actions which make clear that this punishment applies only to those who commit high treason against the Muslim community."
@@electro639 I don't know, let's say because of a person, your entire family get's killed and your entire village burned down! Would you want the person responsible to live on? I mean you could argue against it, but there is obviously a reason why there is such a harsh punishment. The Muslims were also quite trusting, so if someone would have put them at risk I understand the rough punishment... this way people think twice before they betray a Muslim! And a Muslim feels safer in trusting others... But I understand your feeling and the Quran mentions that! 2:216 "Fighting has been enjoined upon you while it is hateful to you. But perhaps you hate a thing and it is good for you; and perhaps you love a thing and it is bad for you. And Allah Knows, while you know not." But yes we also value life 5:32 "Because of that, We decreed upon the Children of Israel that whoever kills a soul unless for a soul or for corruption [done] in the land - it is as if he had slain mankind entirely. And whoever saves one - it is as if he had saved mankind entirely. And our messengers had certainly come to them with clear proofs. Then indeed many of them, [even] after that, throughout the land, were transgressors." Basically never kill the innocent! And help people in need!
@@josefabuaisheh6262 Yes, you are right. But 5:32 "unless for corruption in the land" means idol worshippers or disbelievers, according to some tafsirs. Showing the mistakes if IsIam would be spreading corruption in the land. So, it's all about interpretations and that gets dangerous.
Glad you were able to listen through the bull**** he was saying. This gives me hope. One of the reasons I am an ex muslim is because while there are many good things taught, there are also many that go against my conscience. If you remain a muslim for life, please just take the good and leave the bad.
@@xyzabc6898 There are good and bad. Examples of the bad are the punishment for apostasy, the punishment for adultery, the legalised owning of sex slaves who are female captives of war, the allowing of marriage to really young girls, the way one is allowed to treat dhimmis in a Sharia country, allowing men to beat their wives as per the Qur'an, the requirement of wearing of niqaab, the consideration of superiority of men over women, and considering that good non-Muslims are destined for hell. But please remember in my original comment I said there was good and bad. But you asked for the bad, so no offense was meant in my response. I wanted to give you my honest response.
@@shaheed8485 Brother,Holy Quran has NO PUNISHMENT for Apostasy,Apostasy has NO PUNISHMENT in Holy Quranwww.huffpost.com/entry/does-the-koran-endorse-ap_b_5539236
I like that he's actually talking about it in detail and showing that these Ahadith don't refer to someone changing their religion in a world where people of different faiths "peacefully" co exist, but to betrayers who switch to the enemies side in the context of a religious battle. The Qur'an is clear about changing the religion alone: “Behold, as for those who come to believe, and then deny the truth, and again come to believe, and again deny the truth, and thereafter grow stubborn in their denial of truth - God will not forgive them, nor will guide them in any way” - 4:137 “People ask you about fighting in the holy month. Say: “Fighting in it is an awesome sin, but barring people from the Way of Allah, disbelieving in Him, and denying entry into the Holy Mosque and expelling its inmates from it are more awesome acts in the sight of Allah; and persecution is even more heinous than killing.” They will not cease fighting against you till they turn you from your religion if they can. (So remember well) that whoever from amongst you turns away from his religion and dies in the state of unbelief their work will go to waste in this world and in the Next. They are destined for the Fire and it is there that they will abide.” - 2:217 “There shall be no compulsion in [acceptance of] the religion. The right course has become clear from the wrong. So whoever disbelieves in Taghut and believes in Allah has grasped the most trustworthy handhold with no break in it. And Allah is Hearing and Knowing.” - 2:256 “So remind, [O Muhammad]; you are only a reminder. You are not over them a controller.” - 88:21 “And say [O Muhammad]: ‘the truth [has now come] from your Sustainer: let, then, him or her who wills, believe in it, and let him or her who wills, reject it” - 18:29
Yeah, but Ali Ibn Abi Talib executed a man who was born Christian and returned to Christianity, so they had the idea that people couldnt' leave the faith. The no compulsion was from the early days of Islam battling Quraysh saying you have your faith (i.e. paganism) and we have ours "Islam", so leave us alone, and we leave you alone, but eventually Islam was supreme and people weren't allowed to leave after they accepted the faith and it was more about not forcing people of Quraysh to become Muslims at that time, at least. Everyone knows the famous "Man Dakhal Dar Abu Sufyan Fahuwa Muslim". Whoever enters Abu Sufyan's home is a Muslim. Later, the Muawiya clan officially converted but plotted for power.
@@QUINTUSMAXIMUS no converting holds connotations on betrayal . That’s why hanafi jurisprudence doesn’t execute women apostates because they don’t fight back . The ahadith point at this two as the two specific ahadith either refers to apostates that fight the Islamic nation or just someone that leaves and fights the Islamic nation .
Both You and Zakr Naik and giving us explanations which make no sense to humanity. Why would u want to kill someone because he left your religion and decides to say the reasons why he left? That makes the religion satanic because it’s only satan who has that character and mindset. # JESUS is a man of love and He preached only Love on earth.
@@samk6417 So let's ignore native americans, the crusades, the Salem witch hunt and many other massacres... As you should know we have to use our crtitical thinking here. The Coran forbids compulsion of religion. The hadith was said in times of war most likely. Or maybe not even authentic because it doesn't follow the Quran. Im pretty sure your bible doesn't say to exterminate natives who believe in other faiths. Those people would be in the wrong. I also believe Jesus peace be upon him was a man of love. My respect.
U r biggest lier if u say Islam was false after knowing it, or may be unknowingly and intentionally It's not a culture And for those non muslims who disagree on punishment, first disproove islam and after u leave islam
This dude doesn’t make any sense he just flips the question and acts confident i lived in a muslim community and growing up as a muslim in an arabic country i can say that i see a judgmental community and not accept anyone outside of their community and not being peaceful
that's is in the Quran, that if anyone leaves Islam he must be put to death, that's an order by the prophet Muhammed but according to Dr. Zakir Naaik that has changed now, and looks like he try's to avoid this question strange? anyway if that's not the case now, that if you live Islam you will not get killed, surely you will at least loose your family.
@@maryamusman6674 They have left Islam but kept it as a secret because they know the consequences . As this people know how scriptures are interpreted eg like isis did
@@maryamusman6674 Abstract "A court ruling in Sudan sentencing a heavily pregnant woman to death has reignited debate about punishment for apostasy. Dr Meriam Yahya Ibrahim was condemned to hang for allegedly leaving Islam and marrying a Christian man. The court said that by doing so, she had abandoned her religious faith and was guilty of apostasy, which carries the ultimate penalty under Islamic law in the country."
@@mpc6912 Meriam had been sentenced to death for refusing to renounce her Christian faith. In May 2014, she was found guilty of the crime of apostasy under Sudan’s Sharia law. She was also due to be flogged for being married to a Christian man. On 23 June, Meriam’s lawyer confirmed that a court of appeal found Meriam innocent of all charges against her. Later that day, she walked out of the women’s prison
Dr. Zakir is WRONG. Dr. Zakir Naik is very good at quoting verses and other books on subjects. Indeed, he was too quick to even quote the verse of the questioner. He's well known for that. But he is unable to quote a verse for his wrong conclusion that a murtad should be killed. Islam doesnt allow the killing of any man except he who kills unjustly (5:32). No man therefore has the right to take the life of another because he leaves Islam. Zakir Naik is wrong.
assalmialikum doctor im a child im living with my parents my names is muhammad aayan and my father recently is ignoring my mom and me but not my younger sister and my father also ordered food from outside today and he is not telling the reason im stressed out doctor what should i do ???
Exactly same question I have on other religion no one give this punishment people have their own choice but when it comes to Islam death penalty serious it’s sad definitely after a a lot of search I have to say Islam is not peaceful religion on some things Firstly all non Muslim go to hell Marry 4 women Death penalty on leaving Islam Jihad to kill kafir Dog is not allowed to hav pet otherwise angels will not come if you have Women cannot take divorce Permission to beat women if she sleep with another men Kill the person who disrespect beloved prophet These things tells Islam is not 100 percent peaceful high time others Muslims also understand
1.if the non muslim have not gotten the message or otherwise leaved in a place where there is no connection to the world then they wont go to hell. 2. Polygamy marriage is not mandatory and it prefers to have one wife as an option depends on the caltuer that you live in. 3. In all religions it Commands death to apostate, but when you have time where you can pacifying why you left the religion and reasons and and if you want corruption and deceive people then that would be consider as treason and work against the laws. 3. Jihad is not killing the kafir but its pushing miss treatment and corruption away from people and from yourself, it could be by mony or by just talking but if things went to another level and they wanted to fight then you can just do the jihad which is seld defense most of the time, and if the non believers wanted peace then you by the islamic law you are obligated to make peace with as you can help them if you want. 3. Dogs are not allowed to be bought because this is type of abusive treatment of taking there freedom of leaving, but its allowed to have dog for coming reasons: If the dogs help in hunting. If dogs helps in mental treatments. If dogs help to protect houses. But other than that is abusive and you know that most people dont know how to deal dogs and often mistreat them heavily, but cats are allowed all the time. 4. You know that no one likes to be cheated and gets no justice, not even women, men and women are ought to be punished if there is 4 eye witnessers witnessed the deed, but other than like more than 4 or less their witnessed would be rejected and they would be punished by 80 stricks for making a bad reputation of their victims aka blackmailing, but she/he got pouched to do or even raped ahe wouldn't be punished and the rapest will be killed, clearly both sex get beaten wtf you trying to do. 5. Divorce is a right for both spouses if the other one is abusive or neglectes his/her duty towards the other and the family but they want to fixs things then god would bless you. 6. Most of people will defend there public figure at any cost but there is no laws saying if the prophet got mocked then you are wrong because many people have mocked him at his time and when the apologized he have forgiven them all. Clearly islam is tge religion of peace ❤
@@MunibResponds totally false. Abrogated verses are still in the Quran. Every Muslim that follows the Sunna and is part of ahl sunna wa l jama3a knows that you are wrong.
@@MunibResponds Tabari, Suyuti, Ibn Kathir and all the classic moufasirin explain that this is verse is abrogated by Sourate Tawba verse 5. I strongly believe that they understand Quran better than you and I do.
Oops. Oh dear. The Snake Oil Salesman is wrong once again. For a start there are 195 countries in the world. The vast (and I mean VAST) majority of them do NOT have the death penalty for treason. And especially not because someone left a particular religion, where Naik is trying to equate freedom of religion with "treason". Literally the only countries where you can be "legally" executed for leaving it's prescribed religion are Islamic countries. Like Iran, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Indonesia, Sri Lanka, Nigeria, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Yemen, etc. And I'm not entirely certain, but has Saudi Arabia finally stopped bombing the absolute shite out of Yemen for containing "the wrong type of Muslim"? And how is Lebanon Street in Syria doing these days? Is everybody friends now, or are the "Righteous" still killing people who literally live across the road because, once again, they're the "wrong" type of Muslim? I'm prepared to put money on it that everyone who follows Zakir Naik absolutely detests American Evangelist preachers who charge money to see them. I hate them too, because they're exploiting the vulnerability and simplicity of people who really just want a seemingly easy answer, without ever getting a detailed or genuinely spiritual answer with regard to anything. Ever. Just like Zakir Naik. "Hope that answers the question, brother. Even though I know it didn't. But because you're surrounded by several thousand of my followers who, based upon their absolutely slavish devotion to the Qu'ran, will beat you to a pulp unless you sit down and go away. Alright, Anjem. How many hundreds of thousands (through an offshore company, obviously) did I make tonight for a few hours of my Qu'ranic memory act?"
Because you are not a Muslim and don't have knowledge about Islam (the only true religion on earth) . So, you can't enjoy his beautiful response. No offense. ❤
I left this terrorist religion that fights women, and I am in terror all day long because I am afraid that if my situation is discovered, I will be killed by extremist Muslims, and I am demanding my freedom because I am not at full strength.💔
there's nowhere in the Quran where it says to kill someone for leaving Islam. If someone leaves and keeps to himself, he has done no wrong or corruption to the people or country, so he has to be left alone. If someone can freely enter Islam, they can freely leave again.
Notice you said "if". The interesting thing is how the "corruption" is defined. Islamic scholars define it as teaching the Bible, trying to convert Muslims to other religions, and of course saying anything critical of the Quran - like that it cannot be from god because it contains scientific, historical and grammatical errors, putting it on the ground etc. People get arrested and spend years in jail for these things, some with death sentences. Is that OK with you? And, no, they cannot freely leave, have you not read your own sources? Dozens of sahih hadiths say otherwise, and if you read the Sharia manual, Reliance of the Traveler, in Section O8 it makes it VERY clear what happens to apostates. Oh, and what were the Ridda Wars about, if they can freely leave?
The quran does say to kill apostates [9:89] and contradicts 'no compulsion in religion' [2:256] so you are either ignorant or lying. Hadith confirms it in bukhari [52:260]
RELIGION OF PEACE - "They wish that you should disbelieve as they disbelieve, and then you would be equal; therefore take not to yourselves friends of them, until they emigrate in the way of God; then, ; take not to yourselves any one of them as friend or helper."
You know nothing about islam. You're one of those that think "if you kill someone you still don't deserve to be killed". Alhamdulillah I have knowledge about Islam more than you
@@GrandGamesReviews And because of this knowledge you support killing of thousands of people simply because of what they believe. This is not a reason to be proud of. This is a reason to be ashamed and to reflect on yourself.
@@baldwinthefourth4098 "Support killings of thousand of people simply because of what they believe" since when did we say that we will kill people who believe in religions other than Islam? I know how fun it is to act like the "Hero" in here by bringing some fake informations(Which obviously will make people believe you cuz they are lazy to do some research) but unfortunately that won't help you at all. Just being some info that makes sense cuz nobody will kill you for having different beliefs. Unless, you're talking about ISIS(The terrorist Organisation).
@@GrandGamesReviews You support death penalty for apostates. Right now there are thousands of apostates in the world, according to many sources that your apologists quote 100,000 muslims become atheists every year. Since you support the death penalty for apostasy, you support the killing of thousands of people due to what they believe. And that is what I condemn you for. I can't believe you didn't get this.
I disagree with him, strongly disagree. I'd like him to show the reference from the Qur'an for the punishment ( if there is any). Memorizing the Qur'an is not same as understanding İslam.
@@hasibabdullah3463 Holy Quran has NO PUNISHMENT for ApostasyApostasy has NO PUNISHMENT in Holy Quranwww.huffpost.com/entry/does-the-koran-endorse-ap_b_5539236
@@hasibabdullah3463 Holy Quran has NO PUNISHMENT for ApostasyApostasy has NO PUNISHMENT in Holy Quranwww.huffpost.com/entry/does-the-koran-endorse-ap_b_5539236
Many Islamic rulings and traditions are based on the hadiths as you know (for example the details of the pilgrimage etc). There are numerous sahih hadiths that say that anyone who changes their religion is to be killed (you can find them on sunnah.com). If you read the Sharia handbook, Reliance of the Traveller (PDF online), read section O8, this is what the scholars agree on.
Complete bullshit analogy, comparing religion with a nation state. You consider someone who leaves Islam an enemy. Which is forced belief and that leads to radicalisation of hard core believers of Islam, this is the reason why many are ready to kill non believers and apostates in the first place. If you are believing others as enemy of Islam by considering other religions as enemy, people should know religion is not a nation and and treason with a nation can be treated by laws, and if someone choses not to believe in a religion he should have a freedom to do so, it does not harm religion itself like in case of treason it harms national secrets.
Indeed. ISLAM is derived from the Arabic word 'Salam' which means 'Peace', it's also derived from the root word 'Silm' which means submitting ones will to Almighty God. Therefore I greet all of you, 'ASSALAMUALAIKUM WR WB ' (May the Peace, mercy and blessings of Almighty Allaah(SWT) be on all of you)
@Gurdeep Kumar May you (O love divine), the beholder of the path of enlightenment, purifying our mind and destroying the infidels who refuse to offer worship, come and stay in the prime position of the eternal sacrifice.”- Rig Veda 9.13.9, Tr. SatyaPrakash Saraswati, Vol 11, page 3619 ”O king, make progress in thy duty of administration, extend happiness to the virtuous. O terrible chastiser, burn down the irreligious foes. O splendid person, humiliate and consume utterly like dried up stubble, him, who encourages our foe.”- Yajur Veda 13.12, Tr. Devi Chand, page 138 Godly persons shall always be ready to kill irreligious people” [Kshemkarandas Trivedi (Arya Samaj) on Atharva Veda 12.5.62, page 576] These hymns indicates that Blasphamy laws holds in santana dharma too! So whoever criticizing islamic sharia law shall get to know that it is not only in Islam Ps: my statements are not to insult anyone!
@@maryamusman6674 we are not narrow minded.We don't believe in prophets and commandments of Gods.Veda is man made.We understand there are some verses which shouldn't be obeyed. We have the humility to not call it the most perfect creation...but are rational enough to reason. In short we are not brain washed people who follow a herd mentality. P.S-such things(blasphemy laws) were never put to practise even in the Vedic times.
Okay mera sawal hai k agar yehi logic hai to phir jo banda pehle non muslim tha (like british anchor who converted to muslim )us ne apny religion se gadari ki hai ab wo islam ki tableeg b krti hai . Us k pehle religion walon ko usy maar daina chahiey ? If you have any better logic tell me
Yeah right... I'm a non muslim living in a majority (Sunni)Muslim country, born & raised here, they even "forced" children to fast during Ramadhan, threatened them with hellfire etc.. if a healthy Muslim adult was caught eating during Ramadhan, they can be fined not more than few thousand $ or imprisoned not more than a year or both. I know a few who were charged with the penalty & that's only one of the example, if that's not a compulsion idk what is. Look I respect Islam, just stop beating around the bush & not mince words.
What if a Hindu enters to Islam and leaves hinduism and according to their rules suppose if the penalty is death how would a Muslim defend that person from not being killed 🫣🤔
He did not answer the question. He talked in circles. He spoke of committing treason as being a reason to execute someone. The man asks if someone leaves Islam and they are executed isn't that compulsion? The answer is yes that is compulsion.
He obviously does not know the definition of treason.
@@johngurvan8279 it's been a minute since I watched this video but I think he's saying that leaving Islam and the fact that you know so many things about Islam that they can kill you for treason I'm going to tell you something I prayed with I prayed with Muslims for several years and they on one occasion drugged me and robbed me of everything in my briefcase inside of a Masjid and then another time they kept it insulting me calling me an FBI agent no kidding and then when I stopped going to the prayers I got a phone call telling me that if I stopped going to prayers I should be executed but guess what there's a cafe next to my Masjid that I went to and there's always pakistanis and Arabs over at the cafe during prayer but they don't threatened execute them they use these rules against people they don't like and that's the end of the story my life is almost over now and I will be just fine dying all by my lonesome have a nice day whoever you are
You said it perfectly. He didn't answer the question. Just talking around the question which a clear contradiction which they are trying to cover up
You are not suppose to force any one into a religion. But if you are a muslim and leave islam that the punishment either you face it in this life or the next life.
U r biggest lier if u say Islam was false after knowing it, or may be unknowingly and intentionally
It's not a culture
And for those non muslims who disagree on punishment, first disproove islam and after u leave islam
So if a person leaves Islam it has to be compared to revealing vital secrets to an enemy if he decides to advocate against Islam? Well, this only reinforces the general view that Islam is an aggressive religion.
Remember there's no separation between religion and state in islam, so everything can be connected to treason/political betray.
Lol then every country is an aggressive country. This is about violating a social contract, between the apostate and an Islamic government and the muslim people. You get a bunch of benefits as a Muslim at several levels in those governments. If you leave a war, you're marked for execution too.
@@justsomevids4541 So islam is conformed to the evils of this world
U r biggest lier if u say Islam was false after knowing it, or may be unknowingly and intentionally
It's not a culture
And for those non muslims who disagree on punishment, first disproove islam and after u leave islam
And if u had little of brain, u would think for a false religion to claim 100℅ true ppl first going against it will be it's own ppl, instead of following it strictly
so, you cannot force somebody to embrace Islam, but once somebody converts to Islam you can force him not leave.
To bad if the person has ben raised a muslim. Not much of a choice really.
😆😁😁
exactly hypocrites
Doesn't apply to converts.
@@trajictempr8574 sounds like something important Dr Naik would have mentioned.
How absolutely disgusting.
If you can't leave Islam then it is clearly compulsion.
There is no compulsion in accepting Islam, not leaving it.
@vaccino3359 Absolutely pathetic. If you blaspheme Allah you get to live. If you blaspheme Mohammed it's the death penalty.
Who is more important?...not in theory but in practice?????
Spam@@Vocem_meam
u can leave, but not say bad things about it once you do.
@vaccino3359 You know it's idiots like you that made me become an ex muslim. You say that like as if it's some rational behavior to kill apostates who just wants to live life in peace and not be disturbed.
Soooooo.... not wanting to be apart of a religion after you joined is equivalent to giving your country's enemies top secret information. Got it. smh
What is your point here?
@@mohammedshakilhossan6925 that you are not a good person just like the colonialists you constantly blame
No, leaving a religion and preaching it to your former religion is equivalent to that, as you’re being mislead towards darkness.
@HallowValor but if all religious texts (Bible, Quran, Talmud, etc..) theories, and teachings are open to the public, which is true of all religions ...how is it in any way "giving away secrets" to an enemy? That makes no sense at all, and sounds logically ignorant.
@@pancakesafterdark3335 because back then armies were based onto the basis of religion, the muslims fought the christians, the hindus fought the muslims, the christians, we have the thirty years war that was found fought primarily between catholic and protestant forces, the list goes on.
In my point of view , at that time means 1400 yrs ago, this rule of killing a murtad because of some another reasons and conditions was applicable but not because that he became murtad. If a person can join Islam willingly , then he has the right to leave it also. Because Islam advocates freedom of religion. Think if in a non-muslim country if a nonmuslim becomes muslim and government is killing that person because of becoming a muslim then we muslims will cry for freedom of religion. I resperct Dr Zakir but I totally disagree with this talk of him.
Like if u agree to , to let me know that my message is conveyed.
We need intelligent people like you.
@@donkeyhead68 it is not medieval....read the entire quran and see it is a guide for humanity ...due to not following quran the world us in a BIG mess today
@@donkeyhead68 hi. So you're telling us to follow some 2000 year old fantasy collection written by anonymous authors?
@@donkeyhead68 You have not read the quran and v little understanding if it unfortunately.It does not instigate violence as you say.There are so many signs in the Quran that is unable to be explained by mankind.....u are free to believe what you want....Becoming rude and personal shows the calibre of yr mentality
@@hasibabdullah3463 Apostasy has NO PUNISHMENT in Holy Quranwww.huffpost.com/entry/does-the-koran-endorse-ap_b_5539236
I don't agree with his view here, if Quran says that u can force a person to follow a religion, then a country who has shariya law can't order death penalty to someone who leaves Islam, in a way ur forcing a person to follow a religion. It's against the fundamental or Islam. Dr. Zakhir disappoints me here, may Allah guide him to follow Qur'anic teachings in every possible way.
@@hasibabdullah3463 If you read what the Islamic scholars say, basically all agree that the no compulsion verse has been abrogated (read Ibn Kathir for example). Also, it's part of the Sharia, if you read Reliance of the Traveler, section O8 - this law is supported by Islamic sources and all school of law agree on it.
@@hasibabdullah3463 Also, why did Muhammad say in Sahih Muslim 22 "I have been commanded to fight against people till they testify that there is no god but Allah, that Muhammad is the messenger of Allah, and they establish prayer, and pay Zakat and if they do it, their blood and property are guaranteed protection on my behalf"
Notice, it says "if they do it", they are safe. If they don't, they are not "safe" from Muhammad.
Yes I was kind of confused too. But this video helped out a lot
ua-cam.com/video/k4GK2I6GMcc/v-deo.html
All of Islam disagrees with you. Maybe you should leave it
@@theastronomer5800 no you misunderstood
If they pay zakat they are protected even if they are nonbelievers and that is proven by the prophet history when he let jews live in the islamic country under his protection from any enemies with the condition that they pay zakat
If someone decides to leave their faith just let them leave. No reason to kill them!
All day long I am afraid that if they find out about me, they will kill me and I am not completely free
Yes, try telling that to a large portion of the Muslim population please...
@@MaryaRoroI will pray for you in Jesus name.
He always puts baseless analogies to defend what islam says . It's simple, an ex christians or an ex hindu never feel like they will get kiled but ex muslim always stays in fear . Muslims just want to keep there population
THE MURDER FOR APOSTASY WAS AT THE TIME OF WAR.
OF COURSE IT'S COMPULSION.
EVERY COUNTRY have it's own laws, but no country will kill you just because you change name into another country. We don't live in Medievial times.
It's a backwards religion.
@@r.m.k.1974 it wasn’t at the time of war. Not one scholar will tell you that it was about a time of war.
Okay. Ur clearly deaf
@@joeroganstrtshots881 this guy is a liar..
I recently converted to a muslim. How do I fast on monday and Thursday. And what time should I break my fast. I live in India.
you don't have to fast Monday and Thursday, but it's a good thing that the prophet told us we can do, I do it too
you stop eating and drinking from sunrise to sunset, check the times of prayers for your city on internet, you have to fast from the call to the fajr (sunrise) prayer and break your fast at the call to the maghrib (sunset) prayer.
may Allah bless you
There is an app called "Muslims Pro" .
It has all the time of prayers and you are suppose to break your fast at sunset (During Maghrib).
And congratulations 🤗
@@honouredsoul1405 thanks
@@honouredsoul1405 say, " Alhamthulillah" that's the prophet's path ...
Alhamthulillah brother.. may Allah guide you ....
You cannot EVER have me convinced that killing a creature of God is what He wanted us to do. Killing is killing and it's a sin
So what will you do if someone rapes your sis? Going for trials ?
@@faisalharun-qt1qz trials and he will go to prison. Do you think we are so great we can forego and ignore the ruling of God?
@@faisalharun-qt1qz God will punish him. God gives the final judgment on his creatures. Killing someone is acting out of love, love being His message, and moreover : it is denying that a sinner can redeem himself. After his punishment, a sinner can still admit his faults, work to do and be better, and come out as a good man. That's redemption, and killing someone denies him this opportunity.
@@williampitt1537 this depends on the type of sins they are doing . And that’s why there are punishments established so even they feel it’s not wrong doing that sin but still the punishment will stop them on acting on their plans . Same in any country you live . Different punishment for different crimes . Hope you got my answer . Most of the people doesn’t do any sin bcz of the punishment they will get here . If we don’t have any punishment in world and leave it on god only the crime rates will be so high bcz who’s gonna stop them in world? Indeed god will punish hereafter but it’s important to establish punishment for wrongs so the world can go in order 🤍
@@faisalharun-qt1qz I agree with you on that point. I believe in punishment. But I also believe it's a testament of an advanced civilisation to be able to do justice on people without the use of killing.
I find this religious supremacism quite amusing. "Mine is the only true religion". A person who has left Islam has left it obviously because he has found issues with it and to expect him to sing praises of Islam even after he/she left it is beyond me. That is not treason, that is freedom of religion for you. If it is acceptable for a person who converts from any other religion to Islam and then propagates it and vilifies his earlier religion to prove the superiority of his newly adopted Islamic faith than the opposite should also be acceptable, that's fairness and equal rights for you. Zakir rightly said that in an Islamic State the apostate will be punished with the death penalty. That's exactly the reason level headed individuals do not support a theocratic state and more so an Islamic state. Because definitions of equality, fairness and justice have been twisted beyond recognition.
Punarvasu Sinha, Relgion is teh opium of mankind!
@@SilentValley2023 atheism is the opium of psuedo intellectuals.
What's the difference between Islam and a death cult? The death cult let's you eat pork.
@@TakeTheVeilESP and more differences. Stfu
For reasons and issues whom he/she wrongly thought was wrong.
He just compared two incomparable things....he knows very well..hiw to manipulate things....such dumb argument it was
the problem is that all those people are clapping and think he knows it all . . .
@@cherchourabderrahmane3922 new generation prophet of Alllaaaaaaahhhh🥱🥱hhhh😴😴😴😴😴
Really dumb conparison.
Exactly..
Dr zaki Naik gave wrong information about Islam
QURAN 4 : 137
Those who belives and disbelives and again belives and then disbelive , Allah will not forgove them .
In this verse, Allah did not mention about death penalty .
A beliver is allowed to disbelive and then belive
The more scholars I listen to, the weaker my faith becomes. These people aren't smart enough to interpret the Quran correctly.
Because they are following books of hadiths written by human being and setting aside Quran, the most authentic source of Islam.
@@TuthOnly exactly hadiths that contradicts the quran should not be labeled as credible
@@TuthOnlyreal stuff these ppl want to appease their own material position in life, driving me away from Islam too cause Quran is sound but then UA-cam scholars want to kill everyone and try to say that the Quran “actually meant this…” blah blah blah. Like Quran says
“They tell lies about god and they know it” ( referencing the Jews tho)
Lots of these scholars remind me of the Pharisees and scribes from Bible that Jesus dealt with when he scolds them
Only you can do thag
@@TuthOnly Jesus is the only way to heaven, the truth and the light. Whoever confesses their belief in him as their personal lord and saviour, repent and accept the free salvation he brought to everyone, will inherit eternal life in his kingdom.
My wife was/is Muslim, islam and her family/parents was the reason she attempted suicide as a teen, they did not approve of me becouse I was a " non believer " not allowed to go to public school or have friends she said her religion was a prison , she escaped at 16 and has not talked to per parents in years, she told me yesterday that she is the happiest shes ever been, what does that tell you about Islam? I'd say it's not for everyone
family's behavior is not Islaam, they are not prophets sent by Allah. If some name sake Muslims come and allow you to roam naked ,go pub , drink alcohol will you say it is due to Islaam or permissible in Islaam? you perhaps are exaggerating, if they were so scary she would not fall in love with you, you as a non-believer would not connect with her, and she would never dare to leave the house, maybe she is a rebel who don't care what Allah says and willingly wanted to go out of the fold of Isaam. Isaam says things which are better for society, do you want your daughter to be with 7-8 men sexually in the name of freedom? you too have boundaries, right? She and you should ask God Almighty to guide you to truth and read at least a translation of glorious Quraan in language you understand better. May Allah guide you both, Ameen. I wanted good for you for the sake of Allah otherwise I would not have commented to your message, I do not know why you messaged here. If you are so afraid of us, why would you care to come to this channel and give a reply? Can't you be threatened here? Truth is they didn't kill you or your wife, so they are not scary as you are portraying and you are commenting here with dare, so you two seem stubborn, that is it. you have time till you are alive to seek guidance and accept truth if you got the message, so keep asking Allah to guide you and understand. wish you goodness from Almighty.
@welcome9470 I don't speak for everyone I'm just explaining my wife's case, in her own words she didn't belong with her family, no 14 year old girl should be beaten with a closed fist in front of her family for wanting to go to a normal school and dress more "normal". This is before I met my wife! This started way before me so i was not the cause of this and yes maybe she was rebellious but what's more important your religion or your daughter happiness? but as I stated I'm my wife's own words Islam was not for her
@@armedgunman01 So same thing can be said for different reasons for families who are atheists, agnostics, Christians, Jews, Hindus or Muslims. Any country, culture, tradition etc. a daughter/son can do bad with parents and vice versa. And there can be cases where people want to take rights of covering like in France, what is more evil harassing a woman to take off clothes for evil things or cover? I think former is worst. What do you want to imply with your situation? it doesn't make sense. there are also people who want to influence children in school about lgbtq+ sickness and manipulate and legalize even for a child to change gender, we Muslims Alhamdulillah condemn those atrocities widely and laws of God Almighty is for the best and this life is a test.
@@welcome9470What does it say in
70:22-30
23:5,6
4:24
33:50 I can keep going... are you sure the allah muhammad is speaking to is not a demon/devil?
OK, I think the desertion analogy is better- if a person deserts his army then he is likely to be executed. Similarly, every Muslim was a potential recruit for the Caliphate and non Muslims are exempt from national service. Also, the death penalty was only supposed to be implemented in the event the apostasy is combined with treason and part of warring against the Muslims.
There have been a number of murtads during the Caliphate who were not put to death, Al Ma'ari being one of them.
I agree that the desertion analogy makes more sense. The treason-analogy that Zakir gave makes no sense to me since there is a big difference between leaving something as opposed to leaving something and conveying information to the opponent. With becoming a disbeliever [i.e. leaving Islam], you're not really betraying people or a country.
🔫 A-tharva Veda 1 2 . 5 . 6 2 🗡 Rend, rend to bits, rend through and through, scorch and consume and burn to dust, the one Who rejects the Vedas
kill All those who are not Christians 😱 🔪 🧕 🧔 🗡 D-euteronomy 1 3 :1 0 - 2 0
The Atharva Veda as spells for many things, it's not a rule book. Remember though that karma applies to everyone and everything, so do it at your own risk.
So if you just leave without going against the Muslims. You don't die?
@@dgrdst5810 We all die, eventually! Lol! But, yes. Al Ma'ari is a prime example of an apostate who was not killed.
They never tell the converts this until it's too late.
deuteronomy 13:6-10 If your brother, the son of your mother, tempts you in secret or your son, or your daughter, or the wife of your embrace, or your friend, who is as your own soul saying, "Let us go and worship other gods, which neither you, nor your forefathers have known."
Of the gods of the peoples around you, [whether] near to you or far from you, from one end of the earth to the other end of the earth;
You shall not desire him, and you shall not hearken to him; neither shall you pity him, have mercy upon him, nor shield him.
But you shall surely kill him, your hand shall be the first against him to put him to death, and afterwards the hand of all the people.
And you shall stone him with stones so that he dies, because he sought to lead you astray from the Lord, your God, Who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage.
Lol classic muslim shuffle fails to address the problem then latches on to the bible like a parasite@Pomni740
@@Pomni740 Deuteronomy is a Jewish law book.
@@Pomni740 And let him who is without sin cast the first stone.
Dr.Zakir Naik is defender of Islam and pride of Muslim Ummah. May Allah bless him with long and healthy life.
Aameen
Ameen summa Ameen
Aameen
@shreyan kanvinde so y u subbed to a liar?
hypocrite.
" In this the love of God was manifested toward us, that God has sent His only begotten Son into the world, that we might live through Him.
In this is love, not that we loved God, but that He loved us and sent His Son to be the propitiation for our sins." - 1 John 4:9-10
Wouldn’t a more apt analogy be if a person decided to give up his country of origin, immigrate to a different country, and then explain to people why he/she left? Free countries allow you to do that no problem. Like, imagine a different religion had that standard. Imagine if Christianity said, “there’s no compulsion in Christianity, and you can freely leave it if you choose, but if you convert out and then start telling people why you left, you get the death penalty.” No one would actually believe them when they said, “There’s no compulsion in Christianity.” No disrespect, but this seems to be a pretty weak example of apologetics from Dr. Naik. Btw, if you read this comment and decide to respond with hate, you’re not doing yourself any favors. I’m willing to listen, but I won’t bother if you can’t calmly explain why you think I’m mistaken.
Well said and absolutely 💯
I agree. I am a Muslim but I still didn’t understand his point of view.. if you do now I would love to know
@@mainhoonna4485 Nope. Since posting that I have become more familiar with the extreme sophistry of Zakir Naik as well as the extreme moral and intellectual failings of Islam as a whole.
But of course all classical scholar have different interpretation from you right?
@@ARKAN9765 No, probably not a different interpretation for the most part. But if you’re saying that a Muslim scholar would come to a different conclusion about whether or not Islam is good, then obviously yes. It means nothing. If I said that I didn’t like Buddhism and then your referred me to the opinions of Buddhist priests, I’d do my best to understand their interpretation of Buddhism as well as Buddhist texts, but I could then hardly be called “wrong” if I came to a different conclusion about the moral or logical status of Buddhism.
That rahul is more known to me now 😁
How?
Yes he's there in most Q&A sections.
@@One-rr8um He is most regular attendee of ZN's question answer setion whenever it held in Dubai There are lots of videos of him I think in this one Rahul look more younger
@@One-rr8um ua-cam.com/video/vpRFKIIztbM/v-deo.html
@@One-rr8um ua-cam.com/video/D6xppOpq_Mc/v-deo.html
I have said it earlier.
The more I hear him, the more I am convinced that he is a one man army to create negativity about Islam and to justify Islamophobia.
He talks freely about jang, jihad, killing etc.
Where is universal brotherhood, love, compassion, kindnesd in his talks ?
First of all,
Are you a Muslim?
Don't get me wrong am not gonna hate on you brother
Wars and killings are real ... happen every were in the world ..if we talk about it or not...it wont make any difference..and now a days it is so much commen that their are news channel who openly show false news...
I am not a muslim. But I am a sympathiser of all religions. I think all religions should be seen as tools provided by God to upgrade human beings...so, religious scholars should talk about good things and promote world harmony.
@@krishnaswamyjagannathan8708Brother,i am understanding ur thinking...please,read this link..Holy Quran has NOT given any punishment for Apostate www.huffpost.com/entry/does-the-koran-endorse-ap_b_5539236
@@krishnaswamyjagannathan8708 Koran also talks about feeding the poor,helping the Orphan,freeing the Slaves...i m not lieing,..here are references....
Holy Quran 17.7--
"If you do GOOD, you do GOOD for YOURSELVES; and if you do EVIL, [you do it] to YOURSELVES."
Quran 41.46--
Whoever does RIGHTEOUS - it is for his [own] SOUL; and whoever does EVIL [does so] AGAINST it. And your Lord is not ever UNJUST to [His] servants
Holy Quran 31.18---And DONOT Turn your CHEEK [in Contempt] Toward PEOPLE and DONOT WALK through the Earth EXULTANTLY. Indeed, Allah DOES NOT like everyone SELF-DELUDED and BOASTFUL.
Holy Quran 17.34---And DONOT Approach the Property of an ORPHAN, Except in the way that is best, until he Reaches MATURITY. And Fulfill [every] COMMITMENT. Indeed, the Commitment is Ever [that about which one will be] QUESTIONED.
Holy Quran 90.13---It is the FREEING of a SLAVE
Holy Quran 90.14---Or FEEDING on a day of Severe HUNGER
Holy Quran 90.15---An ORPHAN of Near Relationship
Holy Quran 90.16---Or a NEEDY Person in MISERY
Holy Quran 17.37---And DONOT WALK upon the Earth EXULTANTLY. Indeed, you will Never TEAR the Earth [apart], and you will Never Reach the MOUNTAINS in HEIGHT.
Holy Quran 41.34---And NOT EQUAL are the GOOD DEED and the BAD. REPIL [Evil] by that [deed] Which is BETTER; and thereupon the one whom Between You and Him is ENMITY [will become] as though he was a DEVOTED FRIEND.
Holy Quran 41.35---But None is GRANTED it Except those who are PATIENT, and none is granted it Except one having a Great Portion [of GOOD].
Holy Quran 60.8----Allah DOESNOT FORBID you from those who DONOT FIGHT you because of Religion and DONOT EXPEL you from your homes - from being RIGHTEOUS Toward Them and Acting JUSTLY Toward Them. Indeed, Allah loves those who act JUSTLY.
Holy Quran 2.271-- If you DISCLOSE your CHARITABLE EXPENDITURES, they are GOOD; but if you CONCEAL them and give them to the POOR, it is BETTER for you, and He will REMOVE from you some of your MISDEEDS [thereby]. And Allah, with what you do, is [fully] Acquainted.
That's a huge straw man fallacy right there 😂😂🤣
Logic and reasoning is Islamophobic
Since you believe liberal secular law is the best, your biases and impartiality are towards that.
If you look at statistics, you will find most crime-ridden countries are western countries or other countries that have very secular laws. THAT IS A FACT. Whereas countries like Saudi Arabia have very little crime rate. These measures are in place for the betterment and protection of society. So you wont find smuggling of drugs, mass killing or terrorism or any other major crimes being rampant in these countries while you will, without a shadow of a doubt, find them widespread in western countries and similiar to them.
Matter of fact, western countries and similar to them have seen more terrorist attacks because the liberal nature of these countries makes it EASY for these people to carry out these acts.
Besides, the penalty of apostacy is NOT for the common people. As it is NOT correct to say that any person can carry out the execution. These cases MUST be evaluated by a QUALIFIED judge as that is evident in Islaam.
@@TheMagnificentGman you will find the only illogical person here is the one who thinks without impartiality and does not research all evidences.
@@diyaa_ulqamar logic is reserved for the believers of interstellar flying Don keys that possess the face of a woman.
@@diyaa_ulqamar UA-cam is deleting my comment. Didn't know Islam was so offensive to Muslims
IM A BLACK MUSLIM AND I DO NOT BELIEVE A PERSON SHOULD BE KILLED JUST BECAUSE THEY LEAVE ISLAM.
Believe it or not but thats the islam
You are a better person than Islam. Most muslims fortunately are.
Best leave this sect of Judaism called Islam and convert to Eslaum my brother. Saudi Kingdom, Iran, etc are all Zionist Satanist Freemasons like USA and Russia, Israel, etc.
If only the others thought like you my friend...
@@nameless533 no it’s not. Quran verse 2:256 says no compulsion in religion. You can’t force a person to become Muslim or to stay Muslim.
There is a hypocrisy there. The no compulsion came as a response to the wars against Quraysh. Quraysh was trying to use its military to compel Meccans who became Muslims to go back to paganism. The prophet was basically saying via the Quran "You have your faith, we have ours.". At that time, the Muslims weren't as powerful militarily. Once they were very powerful, they became like Quraysh because they were now supreme. The action of forcing someone born Muslim to remain contradicts no compulsion. It shouldn't matter if someone was born Christian or Muslim. They should have a free choice to believe as they wish.
Perfect explanation 👏
As a born muslim who searched in religions and found islam the most logic and correct one ,why would i have choice to leave ?even the converts to islam ,the converts they did thier research and found that islam is the most righteous religion then why would he leave ,if some joined islam and left it then he just wants to plant doubt in muslims faiths who are not good knowing about islam(a well knowing about islam his faith will not be shaken)
@@zaidal-hindawi1784 my foot
your example is not right, things happen with Allah's will, prophet's journey of life was revelation of conduct itself for people to take understanding. if he was weak then surrendering was an option, idol worship was an option, why didn't he select that? Because he is true prophet of God Almighty. Why would the enemies of Islaam care what was revealed in Quraan and there is compulsion in religion or not? if they can defeat, they will plainly defeat so that is incorrect argument. the first treaty in Makkah for Muslims in Madina was unfair to Muslims but still Allah called it a victory in Quraan. that time Makkah was filled with disbelievers. in that treaty if someone wants to go to Makkah from Muslims in Madina they should be allowed, but is someone goes to Madina they should not be allowed and if anyone become murtad then he should be sent to Makkah, but what happened? People accepted Isaam in multitudes by seeing conduct of Muslims, so Allah said it was clear victory in Quraan, Alhamdulillah.
also, even if you become murtad you are executed with conditions like:
it is a land with laws of Islam
you know about Islaam but still reject knowingly
you are spreading corruption in land where law is Isaam and people already accepted Isaam, you are spreading falsehood.
there is no agreement/treaty from any other non-Muslim country to send you to their place if you become Kaafir etc.
someone is not a Muslim then he is son of non-Muslim family generally of other religion, but born Muslims have their family as Muslims, so they are Muslims and know Islaam while growing, so what is their purpose of becoming murtad except evil?
for born non-Muslim there is no compulsion in gunpoint even if we are in power in state with laws of Islaam.
if you see scenario of prophet's time, Muslims were weak and starting, people leaving Islaam would be Treson if you look that time, but still if you have treaty to not kill, you cannot.
if you see scenario of today, hardly you will find the laws and that too if someone influencing others.
it is like wanting to be naked in college with much worse level, it is like treason towards one's country, all have their boundaries, you have laws in every country, this world belongs to none of us, no one created it except Allah, then why do you pay to buy land, resources and pay taxes and obey laws of land? can't you be a free bird everywhere then? it is not practical. previous true scriptures didn't claim to be only true to be followed and they gave message of final prophet, so all should follow final scripture Quraan and final prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) but still it is a mercy for them that "there is no compulsion in religion". may Allah guide me and you, hope you understood.
So islam is a political organization. Thank you
I once interested in Islam. But then I encountered this what I considered an issue, apostasy can be killed. I asked my muslim friend if it is true, and he said that it is true. When I asked why, he cannot provide answer. For me, it is against my morality to kill other people, let alone just because someone switch or change their religion. And this is the reason why I stayed away and I am glad that I did.
I agree with some comments below that this Zakir Naik did not really answer the question. His analogy is wrong. People who change their religion is not the same with treason to their country. And also as I know, traitor to the country are usually only executed only during war times. These days, modern democratic countries only imprisoned traitor who leaked information to their enemies or to the very hostile countries. Usually only countries ruled by dictators or facism implemented this death penalty for traitors.
The more suitable analogy for changing religion is changing nationality. They can change their nationality to the other countries if those countries allowed them.
If Zakir Naik compared changing religion to treason against country, then he means Islam treat other religions as enemies.
i agree his analogy was ridiculous. but even if we grant that analogy, he's basically admitting that there is a contradiction because having a law against treason IS compulsion. i think he need to look up that word in the dictionary.
Social media exposed the reality of Islam ,there nothing to hide
This is a primary reason i can never be muslim. God would not declare himself most merciful and most forgiving and then want his followers to kill people for leaving the faith and telling people why they left it. Especially considering that allah dictates who believes and who doesnt. You have great points on many things but no serman will ever justify the killing or apostates period…
Yes, thats what people dont understand. Islam is brainwashing of the highest degree of deception(love and fear). It programms you so much that you dont dare to question him because he loves and created you - right? . And if even when you still question him you are scum and eternal hell fire will await you. There so many flaws in Islam, its absurd. But to be honest, Islam has some good values that someone can support.
Yeah,this is also the primary reason I left Islam
@@Bigchungus715 me too
I left Islam and have never been happier. Ironically being an atheist has made me a better person.
If you are tolerant for everything, you stand for nothing
He says you can’t convert people by sword but that’s how everyone became muslim
Nope
@@hammadjahangir1404 It was. Islam was spread by the sword. Read up on your history mate.
@@TheBarser not tru
@@hammadjahangir1404 You should read a bit of Islamic history my friend. An excellent survey is in a book called The History of Jihad by R. Spencer - he heavily uses Islamic contemporary sources to show how Islam expanded and what "choices" people were given. This is NOT an easy book to read, but I guarantee you that you will change you mind very quickly, if you take the time to read your own history.
@@hammadjahangir1404 And, what were the Ridda Wars about?
Not a logical explanation
Not satisfied
Keep watching. You will understand slowly slowly.
normal apostates dont get punished.
only spying apostates get punished.
@@hasibabdullah3463 FALSE.
because there is no example of an apostate being punished at the time of prophet.
if there is then show me otherwise u r wrong.
@@Meetabasit*You will bw brainwashed slowly slowly*. 😂
Because you did not watch clearly.
He did not answer the question, don't understand why people are clapping. Army and religion are two different things, very absurd anology as always from Mr. Naik.
What do you expect from that fraud?
When Humanity is ruled by religion and whatever nonsense people believe.
This happens
and Humanity will vanishes from the world.
they kill and always fight each other while trying prove religion and its teachings.
When idiots become too confident on what they believe then the world is in danger.
Islam is more than just a religion.
Islam teaches how to pray to God and ALSO how to run a country.
normal apostates dont get punished. only spying apostates get punished.
@@kstarentertainments8492 Two people responsible for most deaths in history were communists Stalin and Mao Zedong.
Such a shame people are clapping to it.
Shouldn’t you be shamed too for mocking at the truth and preaching falsehood?
@@fareazalrazi585 How on earth you think he's words are justifiable? Tell me how it is true?
@@paradona320 Give me one prove why His words aren’t supposed to be truth.
@@fareazalrazi585 I won't take it to the direction of true or false. I want to say that his words are disgusting in a civic and moral sense of humanity.
@@fareazalrazi585 freedom of expression of religion should be a basic human right if you just give a little bit about ethics. Most Muslims are born into a Muslim family and to think that they should be literally killed when they become atheistic is disgusting. If they thing atheism is the moral most moral ideology then they should have the right to preach that message. Freedom of speech is a basic human right. How can you defend a religion that doesn’t care about your basic human rights?
Wat nonsense
What do you find confusing?
THE MURDER FOR APOSTASY WAS AT THE TIME OF WAR.
OF COURSE IT'S COMPULSION.
EVERY COUNTRY have it's own laws, but no country will kill you just because you change name into another country. We don't live in Medievial times.
@@Raul-vs6ff The surah itself is revailed when it used to be religious war. not peacful times.
@@r.m.k.1974 how is it still right even in religious times... why was leaving islam in the past required death but not now...
@@bibaolaitan5189 I hope this video helps you brotherua-cam.com/video/k4GK2I6GMcc/v-deo.html
If converting at the point of sword is wrong..why is there no penalty for muslims who actually convert at the point of sword? Why does no muslim speak against it?
No one converted on point of sword. All Indian Muslim accepted Islam through Khwaja Moinuddin Chisti RA and jus disciples.
@@Meetabasit After destroying all their temples, raping their women, killing all men, destroying all its sacred knowledge bases like nalanda university, why was the need of all this if it was so easy?
@@pradeeps111
Please give reference for your claims. Don't copy paste WhatsApp messages.
@@pradeeps111 pakka tu rss ke Tabela institute ka lag rha
@@Meetabasit 😂😂 what? Who was babar? Who was taimur lung? Bhul gaye kya itne jaldi!
There is no comparison between treason and leaving Islam, at least in the modern sense. This is a shallow way of trying to wiggle out of the issue. Even in earlier times, leaving religion is not the same as committing treason against the state. If someone leaves a religion and then joins the enemy, okay. But if someone says, "I do not believe anymore," he has done nothing against the state, and nothing should be done to him. Any argument that tries to justify that this is somehow against the community is really pushing the limits of what makes sense. Even if that person were to speak out against Islam, there are other ways of handling the situation. To just kill the person is not right.
Spam
i am not convinced. well the example is not related to the question. selling country secret is completely different case.
This guy's name is rahul who has asked question, he asked these kinds several difficult questions
All the questions were answered by zakir naik
I think he might have reverted to islam...
May god give long life with health to zakir naik🤲🤲🤲
Yes! Back then he had long hairs! It's Rahul!
This program is very old one.
@@stephenralte6612 how?
My brother I swear by Allah when he got all the hard questions answered by Dr zakir Naik Rahul said that he is going to become Muslim but not in public and he finally reverted to Islam as I heard from Dr Zakir naik speech.
@@stephenralte6612 only if those apostates spy for the enemy.
same like underworld mafias. once you go out of it you will be in their hitlist. cause you will leak all the craps inside of it
Sounds more like Hinduism.
I think most people in the comments misunderstood his answer
The punishment is ONLY applicable to a person IF that person spreads falsehood of the religion OR make treason to a community or country
Anyone can have doubts at the start in Islam even believers, but that's the ppint of exploring the religion, to study, believe and understand deeper
In a secular world... Islam is as welcome as an asteroid 🌍
Fckk secularism
This is why i left islam in the first place smh
Did u become a christian or just an atheist ?
@@thefan974 of course atheist . Whenever a Muslim leave Islam become atheist
Same
@@wojak5308 Not necessarly, there are also Muslims who leave Islam for Christianity
@@Bigchungus715 why would someone go from tawheed to trinity idol worship ?
I don't understand this answer at all
What do you find confusing?
Maybe I cna answer you
@@hasibabdullah3463 Assalamualaikum brother, after seeing your well-made answer I want to ask an out of topic question.
This world is entering a new era, an era where freedom of expression is everywhere, which means people are continuously breaking the human moral law, for example gays, lesbians,bisexuals, and finally transgenders or shortly called LBGT. The LBGT community grew so fast that it can be overwhelming and even there are thousands and thousands and thousands of people who are beginning to support LGBT like it's the most logical human's right and all.
We as muslims, how are we supposed to approach this issue ? Try to "save" the LBGTs people by telling them that it's wrong and try to *actively* change the supporters mind *OR* accept that the world is changing and rather protect our muslim community from those influences ?
What he responded to the message is incredibly closed minded and assumes Islam is correct. Every reasonable human being must accept that they may be at least in theory incorrect. And furthermore, should act accordingly offering others point of view respect.
No they shouldn't, there's no belief that can stand on shaky ground.
Brother he stated that if they propogate a faith against islam or talks bad about islam then they are killed which to me makes sense
its the rule from god, i am sure god knows better on how to govern human then human is.
I kinda agree with you
But when it comes to religion
A way of life(rules) by God himself
There is no falsehood
You can't accept the fact that there is one wrong point in a religion or else the whole religion is false
Because logically God can never be wrong or false in something
He knows the best (logically)
I rather be "close minded" but correct than "open minded" but wrong. A reasonable human being can definitely believe in something to be objectively correct
compulsion : disinheritance
compulsion : outcast
compulsion : threats
compulsion : fact! But Jesus is God & He catered for this
because He Himself as Savior was outcast, threatened etc.
you have NO RIGHT TO TAKE A LIFE! NONE.
Honestly he didn't answer the question.
Did this guy just tried to justify killing of someone because he/she is leaving a religion?
Thank god Democracy exist
oh really? what happens if someone eats a hamburger?
@@suishere7629 What? Is this non-sequitur hour? What do hamburgers have to do with apostasy
@@siim605 i think he meant beaf instead of ham.
as majority of indians kill anyone who eats cows.
so democracy is a biatch in india.
@@suishere7629 so counter something wrong with other wrong? Nice
@@rahulakastardust he is not countering wrong with wrong.
he is showing how democracy is sometimes good but sometimes fails.
it is inconsistent.
I can't believe someone like that promoting violence and criminal acts agianst people who choose a certain beliefs and still being followed and admired by millions of people. That's really scary and unbelievable.
That's Islam...😂
deuteronomy 13:6-10 If your brother, the son of your mother, tempts you in secret or your son, or your daughter, or the wife of your embrace, or your friend, who is as your own soul saying, "Let us go and worship other gods, which neither you, nor your forefathers have known."
Of the gods of the peoples around you, [whether] near to you or far from you, from one end of the earth to the other end of the earth;
You shall not desire him, and you shall not hearken to him; neither shall you pity him, have mercy upon him, nor shield him.
But you shall surely kill him, your hand shall be the first against him to put him to death, and afterwards the hand of all the people.
And you shall stone him with stones so that he dies, because he sought to lead you astray from the Lord, your God, Who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage.
@@abhi.ku2432deuteronomy 13:6-10 If your brother, the son of your mother, tempts you in secret or your son, or your daughter, or the wife of your embrace, or your friend, who is as your own soul saying, "Let us go and worship other gods, which neither you, nor your forefathers have known."
Of the gods of the peoples around you, [whether] near to you or far from you, from one end of the earth to the other end of the earth;
You shall not desire him, and you shall not hearken to him; neither shall you pity him, have mercy upon him, nor shield him.
But you shall surely kill him, your hand shall be the first against him to put him to death, and afterwards the hand of all the people.
And you shall stone him with stones so that he dies, because he sought to lead you astray from the Lord, your God, Who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage.
Ibn Taymiyyah (may Allah have mercy on him) said: “If that person - i.e. the apostate - had not been killed, the one who entered the religion would have left it. So killing him is a protection for the people of the religion and for the religion, because that prevents any deficiency and prevents them from leaving it, unlike the one who did not enter it.” End quote from Majmoo’ al-Fataawa (20/102).
Ibn Ashour, may God have mercy on him, said: “The wisdom behind legislating the killing of the apostate - even though the disbeliever is not to be killed in principle - is that apostasy is the departure of an individual or a group from the Islamic community. Thus, by leaving Islam after entering it, he is calling out that when he mixed with this religion, he found it to be unrighteous, and he found that what he was upon before that was better. So this is It is an insinuation of religion and belittling it. It also paves the way for those who want to slip away from this religion, and that leads to the dissolution of the community. If there was no deterrent for that, people would not be deterred, and we do not find anything as deterrent as the expectation of death. Therefore, death was made the punishment for the apostate, so that no one enters the religion except on Insight, and so that no one leaves it after entering it. This is not from the compulsion in religion that is denied by the Most High’s saying: {There is no compulsion in religion} [Al-Baqarah: 256] according to the opinion that it is not abrogated, because compulsion in religion is forcing people to leave their religions and enter Islam. As for this, it is from “Forcing one to remain in Islam.” End of “Al-Tahrir wa Al-Tanwir” (2/336).
This treason camparison is very poor. Muslims who leave Islam are not soldiers, are not leaking information which puts lives in danger and are not working with any enemy because there is no enemy.
I feel that Zakir Zaik needs to spend more time conversing with critics of Islam because he needs to understand how embarrassing these kinds of arguments are for intelligent Muslims.
I agree that ex-Muslims should not be executed but they should not propagate apostasy ideas, do you agree? This is Zakir Naik's point pleases don't misrepresent his fantastic lectures.
And if they propagate, then the penalties should be applied harshly. Especially in an Islamic state.
@@fahamitaha2532 What is the definition of ‘propagate’ here?
Should people be able to be open and honest and say when they have left Islam, or say when they disagree with claims within Islam?
@@fahamitaha2532No, people should have the freedom to propagate their ideas. If you say that apostates shouldn't be given the freedom to propagate their ideas, then are you okay if a government doesn't allow Muslims to propagate Islam?
@@zipzap6783 I find it pointless to talk with stubborn people.
So according to jokerir Naik islam is a like army 😅
Imagine if he said you can leave islam no one will kill you. Boom! Everybody in the room would run out with joy. 😂🤣😂🤣😂
No not true
Lame joke 👎
Lame joke of the day
I loved the joke. Hahaha. 😆
@@electro639 cuz u r a joak 🤣
You cannot take 2+2=4 in this case bcz in the religious base people are having different views. Wht u feel right may not be right for the other. And even if we take case of teacher who teaches 2+2=5 she should be fired from the school, not to be killed. But what if she is just believing 2+2=5 and unless like the case of teacher, a common civilian cannot be exiled (fired) from the nation(school). But sadly these laws oppress freedom of religion
THE MURDER FOR APOSTASY WAS AT THE TIME OF WAR.
OF COURSE IT'S COMPULSION.
EVERY COUNTRY have it's own laws, but no country will kill you just because you change name into another country. We don't live in Medievial times.
Malayali have the sense❤ asif proud
Bingo
@@r.m.k.1974 exactly
Yes, what I feel right may not feel right for other people, but ultimately there has to be one absolute truth. Muslims are 100% confident it is their faith. They cannot let anyone preach falsehood and lead people astray.
The compulsion part emerged when Muslims were under pressure against Quraysh that wanted to force the Meccan Muslims to become pagans. Then it was said no compulsion, but it doesn't apply to a peron who was already a Muslim is what he's saying. There is a contradiction though because if you're forcing someone to stay part of a religion, you're still compelling them, so it violates the objection that was voiced to Quraysh when they were
brother you are wrong not all the Hadith’s which is claimed to be authentic is authentic any Hadith which is against the rulings of The holy Quran is not authentic and not words of Prophet Muhammad pbuh the according to islam the only thing which is %100 authentic is the holy Quran and yes the verse says “Let there be no compulsion in religion” and if it was only for Dawah(asking people to accept islam) it would have mentioned in the verse so its true that we should “Let there be no compulsion in religion”
i have respect for you it doesn’t matter whatever you believe and follow and and i hope you think the same about me and muslims. Peace🤍
Note: what i said is not only my view but its the view of a lot of scholars and all quraniiis
@@bahezkurdish8421 You should convert to Eslaum. Islam is fake, a sect of Judaism and the Islamic governments are all Zionist Satanists and these sheikhs are their agents. There are no sheikhs in original Eslaum, no rabbis and laymen who follow blindly/worship the rabbis, there are only only brothers and sisters. The holy Goraun, book of Allauh, also clearly says "whoever wants to believe, let him believe, and whoever wants to disbelieve, let him disbelieve".
They are Zionist Satanist, Kabbalist Jew/Yahudis, monafegeen, thats why Saudi is allied with America and Russia, and also Iran helped them to invade Iraq and after they massacred the people, USA gave entire Iraq to the Iran. They are fake, whoever is allied with them is one of them.
Even if an apostate advocates against Islam that still should not be any excuse to put such person to death! The comparison to treason in a war situation makes no sense.
Leaving a religion is NOT the same as selling your country's secret. His analogy is completely wrong.
1. Other religions (Christianity, Judaism.) or atheism are NOT considered enemies of Islam. If Islam considers all other religion or Atheism as the enemy, then there is wrong with Islam.
2. A country's law Should be secular. If country enforces any sort of law based on a particular religion, this by itself is already wrong, especially death penalty.
3. Who are you to claim Islam is the truth and who are you to force such "truth" on an ex-Muslim.
verdict : yes there is absolute compulsion in Islam.
deuteronomy 13:6-10 If your brother, the son of your mother, tempts you in secret or your son, or your daughter, or the wife of your embrace, or your friend, who is as your own soul saying, "Let us go and worship other gods, which neither you, nor your forefathers have known."
Of the gods of the peoples around you, [whether] near to you or far from you, from one end of the earth to the other end of the earth;
You shall not desire him, and you shall not hearken to him; neither shall you pity him, have mercy upon him, nor shield him.
But you shall surely kill him, your hand shall be the first against him to put him to death, and afterwards the hand of all the people.
And you shall stone him with stones so that he dies, because he sought to lead you astray from the Lord, your God, Who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage.
@@Pomni740 but Christian and Jew have long been secular and don't enforce the content of this text, last time they kill some one for leaving Christianity or Judaism was almost 1000 years ago.
@@Bobxchen333Its your own problem not our's! same goes for muslims
* Leaving Islam is not an apostate *
The apostate is someone who goes to something of his own free will and then abandons it. This does not apply to someone who was born to Muslim parents and converted to Islam by dependency.
**Perhaps this applies only to those who entered Islam by their will and by their pure decision and at an age that denies ignorance.
@@Jroc834
religion is the Opium of the people
So what happens to a person born into a muslim family, they are under compulsion because they cannot leave. And they were immediately compelled to join. So it’s a trap.
If you truly study the Quran, you will not be saying this fecal matter out of your mouth.
You just hate Islam don't you?
And who is better in speech than one who invites to Allah and does righteousness and says, "Indeed, I am of the Muslims."
Quran (41:33)
I invite to All of you to learn the Quran in Hindi and English Translation...
😊😊😊
Sorry as a Muslim your explanation doesn't make sense
Convert to Eslaum my brother. These people are Kabbalist Jews/Yahudis and monafegeen, Zionist Satanist Freemasons. Saudi Kingdom, Iran, etc are all Zionists.
Smh leaving Islam and preaching a different religion is not the same as treason. It would be comparable to, for example, protesting the laws in America, which happens all the time. And sure a teacher who spreads misinformation may get fired but not killed.
u misunderstood him.
regular apostates dont get punished.
only spying apostates gets punished.
@@Servant_0f_Allah. He said anyone who leaves Islam and literally just preaches the new religion. I agree the Islamic punishment refers to treason
@@Servant_0f_Allah. WTF is spying apostate? How can you spy on some fucking religion lmao?
I’m feeling peace after leaving Islam.
Me too
@@MaryaRorohe is hindu
Logic left the chat 😂😂
That's logical cause that's how Islam is protected
@@coffeyplaysgames Protected by strict authority and fear. What a loser cult.
You have a point 😊😊
Islam has a violent history...
And logic, rationality and tolerance of other faiths is labelled as "Islamophobia"
@@coffeyplaysgames
@@Obanai_Iguro720It might have been the worst response that I’ve heard.
This is the most mentally ill comment section💀 so we dont have freedom of religion is the most high on crack thing you could say. Ignorance shines in these replys. Sharia doesnt apply to other religions and you are allowed to choose to pray tax or be muslim. That simple💀
But historically, Islam forced people to recite the shahada or face death. Is that not compulsion?
We didn’t
@@abdulHaqqqqSo how Islam was entred in north africa?
@@Ausländer999 the Muslims preached there and the people accepted it. Conquest ≠ forced conversion and a primary example is Cyrus II if you doubt the fact that you can conquer and spread your faith but also not force convert
For all Muslims, please don't abandon Allah SWT commands in the Quran:
2:256
"There shall be no compulsion in the religion. The right course has become clear from the wrong. So whoever disbelieves in Taghut and believes in Allah has grasped the most trustworthy handhold with no break in it. And Allah is Hearing and Knowing."
18:29
"And say, "The truth is from your Lord, so whoever wills - let him believe; and whoever wills - let him disbelieve." Indeed, We have prepared for the wrongdoers a fire whose walls will surround them. And if they call for relief, they will be relieved with water like murky oil, which scalds [their] faces. Wretched is the drink, and evil is the resting place."
88:21-88:26
"So remind, [O Muhammad]; you are only a reminder"
"You are not over them a controller"
"However, he who turns away and disbelieves -"
"Then Allah will punish him with the greatest punishment"
"Indeed, to Us is their return."
"Then indeed, upon Us is their account."
- no islamic law should allow people to be killed for simply disbelieving in god or the religion!
We are only here to warn them or remind them, not to punish them, especially not with death!
Josef, Muhammad ordered to kill the murtad.
@@electro639 Here is what I found I'm sorry that it's so long, but we are talking about death penatly so we ahould take our time!
And it seems in Islam there are two types of apostates, the more severe case is actually similar to High Treason and not about disblieving, it is about bringing actual danger to the Ummah:
"Apostasy is divided into two types: major and minor. Muslim scholars, using the Prophet’s traditions as their guide, have divided unbelief, idolatry, hypocrisy, and sin into major and minor categories. Likewise, there is a distinction between an apostate who intends to physically harm the community and an apostate who only spiritually harms himself.
Minor apostasy is when a person embraces Islam while knowing its virtues and later rejects it. There is no legal punishment for the minor apostate as long as they do not try to physically harm the Muslim community. Major apostasy is when a person embraces Islam while knowing its virtues and later rejects it and adds to this a call for violent rebellion against the Muslim authorities. Such a crime is equivalent to high treason and in its most severe case can carry the death penalty as an act of self-defense for the community.
Allah said:
إِنَّ الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا ثُمَّ كَفَرُوا ثُمَّ آمَنُوا ثُمَّ كَفَرُوا ثُمَّ ازْدَادُوا كُفْرًا لَّمْ يَكُنِ اللَّهُ لِيَغْفِرَ لَهُمْ وَلَا لِيَهْدِيَهُمْ سَبِيلًا
Verily, those who believed and then disbelieved, then believed and then disbelieved and increased in disbelief, never will Allah forgive them nor will He guide them to a right way.
Surah An-Nisa 4:137
In this verse, Allah describes a person who apostates from Islam twice and He does not prescribe legal punishment for him, but rather He only warns the apostate about severe punishment in the Hereafter. This demonstrates that the general rule is an apostate should be left alone, as the Quran prohibits compulsion in religion.
Allah said:
لَا إِكْرَاهَ فِي الدِّينِ قَد تَّبَيَّنَ الرُّشْدُ مِنَ الْغَيِّ
There is no compulsion in religion. The truth is distinct from misguidance.
Surah Al-Baqarah 2:256
And He said:
وَقُلِ الْحَقُّ مِن رَّبِّكُمْ فَمَن شَاءَ فَلْيُؤْمِن وَمَن شَاءَ فَلْيَكْفُرْ
Say: The truth is from your Lord. So whoever wills let him believe, and whoever wills let him disbelieve.
Surah Al-Kahf 18:29
Because of this, the Prophet did not punish people simply because they rejected Islam.
Jabir reported: A bedouin came to the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, and gave the pledge of allegiance for embracing Islam. The next day he came with a fever and said, “Please cancel my pledge.” The Prophet refused three times and he said:
الْمَدِينَةُ كَالْكِيرِ تَنْفِي خَبَثَهَا، وَيَنْصَعُ طَيِّبُهَا
Medina is like a furnace. It expels its impurities and collects what is pure.
Source: Sahih Bukhari 1784, Grade: Sahih
In this example, a man rejected Islam after embracing it but the Prophet did not apply legal punishment to him.
Regarding the major apostasy, the Prophet was clear in advising us that legal punishment is not applied to a minor apostate, but only a major apostate.
Abdullah ibn Mas’ud reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, applied legal punishment in the following case:
وَالتَّارِكُ لِدِينِهِ الْمُفَارِقُ لِلْجَمَاعَةِ
The one who leaves his religion and separates from the community.
Source: Sahih Muslim 1676, Grade: Sahih
The reference to one who “separates from the community” (al-mufariq lil-jama’ah) indicates that a person is not legally punished simply for not practicing Islam, but rather for high treason against Muslim authorities. This is made even clearer in another narration in which the Prophet describes the major apostate as:
رَجُلٌ يَخْرُجُ مِنَ الإِسْلاَمِ يُحَارِبُ اللَّهَ عَزَّ وَجَلَّ وَرَسُولَهُ
A man who rejects Islam and wages war against Allah the Exalted and His Messenger.
Source: Sunan An-Nasa’i 4048
Ibn Abbas said:
فَمَنْ قَتَلَ وَأَفْسَدَ فِي الأَرْضِ وَحَارَبَ اللَّهَ وَرَسُولَهُ ثُمَّ لَحِقَ بِالْكُفَّارِ قَبْلَ أَنْ يُقْدَرَ عَلَيْهِ لَمْ يَمْنَعْهُ ذَلِكَ أَنْ يُقَامَ فِيهِ الْحَدُّ الَّذِي أَصَابَ
Whoever kills others, spreads corruption in the land, wages war against Allah and His Messenger, and he joins the unbelievers before he is subdued, then there is nothing to prevent the legal punishment from being applied to him because of what he did.
Source: Sunan An-Nasa’i 4046
Indeed, some of the companions interpreted the phrase this way and described an apostate as:
حَارَبَ اللَّهَ وَرَسُولَهُ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ
One who wages are against Allah and His Messenger.
Source: Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī 4334, Grade: Sahih
What can be understood from these narrations is that legal punishment is only applied to a person who combines apostasy with high treason. This is because the Quran prohibits compulsion in religion as a general rule and because the believers should be the most restrained of the people when it comes to taking life.
Abdullah ibn Mas’ud reported: The Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, said:
أَعَفُّ النَّاسِ قِتْلَةً أَهْلُ الْإِيمَانِ
The most restrained of the people regarding killing are the people of faith.
Source: Musnad Ahmad 3720, Grade: Sahih
Furthermore, cases of major apostasy do not necessitate the death penalty if a single Muslim seeks protection for the apostate.
Ibn Abbas reported:
كَانَ عَبْدُ اللَّهِ بْنُ سَعْدِ بْنِ أَبِي سَرْحٍ يَكْتُبُ لِرَسُولِ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ فَأَزَلَّهُ الشَّيْطَانُ فَلَحِقَ بِالْكُفَّارِ فَأَمَرَ بِهِ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ أَنْ يُقْتَلَ يَوْمَ الْفَتْحِ فَاسْتَجَارَ لَهُ عُثْمَانُ بْنُ عَفَّانَ فَأَجَارَهُ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ
Abdullah ibn Sa’d ibn Abi Sarh would write to the Messenger of Allah but the devil deceived him and he joined the unbelievers. The Messenger of Allah ordered that he should be killed on the day of liberation, but Uthman ibn Affan sought protection for him, so the Messenger of Allah granted him protection.
Source: Sunan Abu Dawud 4358, Grade: Sahih
In this example, a man embraced Islam and then rejected it by joining the idolaters of Mecca who at the time were waging war against the Muslims. When Mecca surrendered to the Prophet without a fight, Uthman ibn Affan sought protection for this apostate and the Prophet honored this covenant. This is because, as a general rule, the protection granted by a single Muslim should be honored by all Muslims.
Ali ibn Abu Talib reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said:
ذِمَّةُ الْمُسْلِمِينَ وَاحِدَةٌ يَسْعَى بِهَا أَدْنَاهُمْ
The covenant of the Muslims is one covenant, and they strive to fulfill it among the least of them.
Source: Sunan Al-Kubra Al-Bayhaqi 15464, Grade: Sahih
In conclusion, the death penalty for apostasy is restricted by the Prophet’s other statements and actions which make clear that this punishment applies only to those who commit high treason against the Muslim community."
@@josefabuaisheh6262 Hmm, I see. Well, I disagree with the killing part. A good religion would not allow it.
@@electro639 I don't know, let's say because of a person, your entire family get's killed and your entire village burned down! Would you want the person responsible to live on?
I mean you could argue against it, but there is obviously a reason why there is such a harsh punishment. The Muslims were also quite trusting, so if someone would have put them at risk I understand the rough punishment... this way people think twice before they betray a Muslim! And a Muslim feels safer in trusting others...
But I understand your feeling and the Quran mentions that!
2:216
"Fighting has been enjoined upon you while it is hateful to you. But perhaps you hate a thing and it is good for you; and perhaps you love a thing and it is bad for you. And Allah Knows, while you know not."
But yes we also value life
5:32
"Because of that, We decreed upon the Children of Israel that whoever kills a soul unless for a soul or for corruption [done] in the land - it is as if he had slain mankind entirely. And whoever saves one - it is as if he had saved mankind entirely. And our messengers had certainly come to them with clear proofs. Then indeed many of them, [even] after that, throughout the land, were transgressors."
Basically never kill the innocent! And help people in need!
@@josefabuaisheh6262 Yes, you are right. But 5:32 "unless for corruption in the land" means idol worshippers or disbelievers, according to some tafsirs. Showing the mistakes if IsIam would be spreading corruption in the land. So, it's all about interpretations and that gets dangerous.
I couldn't understand the similarity between the verse and the example of espionage.
Holy Quran has NO PUNISHMENT for ApostasyApostasy has NO PUNISHMENT in Holy Quranwww.huffpost.com/entry/does-the-koran-endorse-ap_b_5539236
Glad you were able to listen through the bull**** he was saying. This gives me hope. One of the reasons I am an ex muslim is because while there are many good things taught, there are also many that go against my conscience. If you remain a muslim for life, please just take the good and leave the bad.
@@xyzabc6898 There are good and bad. Examples of the bad are the punishment for apostasy, the punishment for adultery, the legalised owning of sex slaves who are female captives of war, the allowing of marriage to really young girls, the way one is allowed to treat dhimmis in a Sharia country, allowing men to beat their wives as per the Qur'an, the requirement of wearing of niqaab, the consideration of superiority of men over women, and considering that good non-Muslims are destined for hell.
But please remember in my original comment I said there was good and bad. But you asked for the bad, so no offense was meant in my response. I wanted to give you my honest response.
I should have also mentioned the homophobia that is sanctioned by the religion, but this is not unique to Islam
@@shaheed8485 Brother,Holy Quran has NO PUNISHMENT for Apostasy,Apostasy has NO PUNISHMENT in Holy Quranwww.huffpost.com/entry/does-the-koran-endorse-ap_b_5539236
I like that he's actually talking about it in detail and showing that these Ahadith don't refer to someone changing their religion in a world where people of different faiths "peacefully" co exist, but to betrayers who switch to the enemies side in the context of a religious battle. The Qur'an is clear about changing the religion alone:
“Behold, as for those who come to believe, and then deny the truth, and again come to believe, and again deny the truth, and thereafter grow stubborn in their denial of truth - God will not forgive them, nor will guide them in any way” - 4:137
“People ask you about fighting in the holy month. Say: “Fighting in it is an awesome sin, but barring people from the Way of Allah, disbelieving in Him, and denying entry into the Holy Mosque and expelling its inmates from it are more awesome acts in the sight of Allah; and persecution is even more heinous than killing.” They will not cease fighting against you till they turn you from your religion if they can. (So remember well) that whoever from amongst you turns away from his religion and dies in the state of unbelief their work will go to waste in this world and in the Next. They are destined for the Fire and it is there that they will abide.” - 2:217
“There shall be no compulsion in [acceptance of] the religion. The right course has become clear from the wrong. So whoever disbelieves in Taghut and believes in Allah has grasped the most trustworthy handhold with no break in it. And Allah is Hearing and Knowing.” - 2:256
“So remind, [O Muhammad]; you are only a reminder. You are not over them a controller.” - 88:21
“And say [O Muhammad]: ‘the truth [has now come] from your Sustainer: let, then, him or her who wills, believe in it, and let him or her who wills, reject it” - 18:29
Yeah, but Ali Ibn Abi Talib executed a man who was born Christian and returned to Christianity, so they had the idea that people couldnt' leave the faith. The no compulsion was from the early days of Islam battling Quraysh saying you have your faith (i.e. paganism) and we have ours "Islam", so leave us alone, and we leave you alone, but eventually Islam was supreme and people weren't allowed to leave after they accepted the faith and it was more about not forcing people of Quraysh to become Muslims at that time, at least. Everyone knows the famous "Man Dakhal Dar Abu Sufyan Fahuwa Muslim". Whoever enters Abu Sufyan's home is a Muslim. Later, the Muawiya clan officially converted but plotted for power.
@@QUINTUSMAXIMUS no converting holds connotations on betrayal . That’s why hanafi jurisprudence doesn’t execute women apostates because they don’t fight back . The ahadith point at this two as the two specific ahadith either refers to apostates that fight the Islamic nation or just someone that leaves and fights the Islamic nation .
Both You and Zakr Naik and giving us explanations which make no sense to humanity.
Why would u want to kill someone because he left your religion and decides to say the reasons why he left?
That makes the religion satanic because it’s only satan who has that character and mindset.
# JESUS is a man of love and He preached only Love on earth.
@@samk6417 So let's ignore native americans, the crusades, the Salem witch hunt and many other massacres... As you should know we have to use our crtitical thinking here. The Coran forbids compulsion of religion. The hadith was said in times of war most likely. Or maybe not even authentic because it doesn't follow the Quran. Im pretty sure your bible doesn't say to exterminate natives who believe in other faiths. Those people would be in the wrong. I also believe Jesus peace be upon him was a man of love. My respect.
U r biggest lier if u say Islam was false after knowing it, or may be unknowingly and intentionally
It's not a culture
And for those non muslims who disagree on punishment, first disproove islam and after u leave islam
This dude doesn’t make any sense he just flips the question and acts confident i lived in a muslim community and growing up as a muslim in an arabic country i can say that i see a judgmental community and not accept anyone outside of their community and not being peaceful
If zakir says "brether asketd a vary geud qeschan" , you know the question is a hard one for him and he is about to beat around the bush. 🤣😂
And he still answered those questions so go cry about it
@@GrandGamesReviews he worships death in Islam that the right answer, are you scare to die as well?😁
@@GrandGamesReviews nice reply
Thats very important question once you are muslim you cannot accept any other religions
In my christian environment if i was to convert id just be told i was going to hell and they would pray for me. No death sentence.
that's is in the Quran, that if anyone leaves Islam he must be put to death, that's an order by the prophet Muhammed but according to Dr. Zakir Naaik that has changed now, and looks like he try's to avoid this question strange? anyway if that's not the case now, that if you live Islam you will not get killed, surely you will at least loose your family.
ITS NOT IN THE QURAN THAT IF SOMEBODY LEAVE ISLAM THEY MUST BE PUT TO DEATH.
If this law is removed then will Islam crumble like a pack of cards 🤔🤔🤔🤔
Btw no is executed yet according to this law😶😶😶
@@maryamusman6674
They have left Islam but kept it as a secret because they know the consequences .
As this people know how scriptures are interpreted eg like isis did
@@maryamusman6674
Abstract
"A court ruling in Sudan sentencing a heavily pregnant woman to death has reignited debate about punishment for apostasy.
Dr Meriam Yahya Ibrahim was condemned to hang for allegedly leaving Islam and marrying a Christian man.
The court said that by doing so, she had abandoned her religious faith and was guilty of apostasy, which carries the ultimate penalty under Islamic law in the country."
@@mpc6912 Meriam had been sentenced to death for refusing to renounce her Christian faith. In May 2014, she was found guilty of the crime of apostasy under Sudan’s Sharia law. She was also due to be flogged for being married to a Christian man. On 23 June, Meriam’s lawyer confirmed that a court of appeal found Meriam innocent of all charges against her. Later that day, she walked out of the women’s prison
@@mpc6912 She wasnt excecuted either She is living happily with her husband in USA
Biggest hypocrites of the century.. Joker zaik
Dr. Zakir is WRONG.
Dr. Zakir Naik is very good at quoting verses and other books on subjects. Indeed, he was too quick to even quote the verse of the questioner. He's well known for that. But he is unable to quote a verse for his wrong conclusion that a murtad should be killed.
Islam doesnt allow the killing of any man except he who kills unjustly (5:32). No man therefore has the right to take the life of another because he leaves Islam.
Zakir Naik is wrong.
Top most reason for me that I become non religious
Thanku again for letting me realize that islam is not at all peaceful religion
Me to
What are the secrets of Islam which can be betrayed by an apostate?
assalmialikum doctor im a child im living with my parents my names is muhammad aayan and my father recently is ignoring my mom and me but not my younger sister and my father also ordered food from outside today and he is not telling the reason im stressed out doctor what should i do ???
Involve your other elder family members from your father side or mother or leave unto your mother if she says you to go then only leave them
Brother call your grandmother or grandfather or your uncle. May Allah solve your family problem.
@@sheikhmessi3622 Brother he has a family problem. Some problem between his father and mother. Pray for him .
NS Ahmed i dont have any elder brother or sister only me my mother and mu sister and my father
Abdur Rashid Ahmed my grandmother and my father cannot do anything except for praying cuz they live in a another country
Exactly same question I have on other religion no one give this punishment people have their own choice but when it comes to Islam death penalty serious it’s sad definitely after a a lot of search I have to say Islam is not peaceful religion on some things
Firstly all non Muslim go to hell
Marry 4 women
Death penalty on leaving Islam
Jihad to kill kafir
Dog is not allowed to hav pet otherwise angels will not come if you have
Women cannot take divorce
Permission to beat women if she sleep with another men
Kill the person who disrespect beloved prophet
These things tells Islam is not 100 percent peaceful high time others Muslims also understand
1.if the non muslim have not gotten the message or otherwise leaved in a place where there is no connection to the world then they wont go to hell.
2. Polygamy marriage is not mandatory and it prefers to have one wife as an option depends on the caltuer that you live in.
3. In all religions it Commands death to apostate, but when you have time where you can pacifying why you left the religion and reasons and and if you want corruption and deceive people then that would be consider as treason and work against the laws.
3. Jihad is not killing the kafir but its pushing miss treatment and corruption away from people and from yourself, it could be by mony or by just talking but if things went to another level and they wanted to fight then you can just do the jihad which is seld defense most of the time, and if the non believers wanted peace then you by the islamic law you are obligated to make peace with as you can help them if you want.
3. Dogs are not allowed to be bought because this is type of abusive treatment of taking there freedom of leaving, but its allowed to have dog for coming reasons:
If the dogs help in hunting.
If dogs helps in mental treatments.
If dogs help to protect houses.
But other than that is abusive and you know that most people dont know how to deal dogs and often mistreat them heavily, but cats are allowed all the time.
4. You know that no one likes to be cheated and gets no justice, not even women, men and women are ought to be punished if there is 4 eye witnessers witnessed the deed, but other than like more than 4 or less their witnessed would be rejected and they would be punished by 80 stricks for making a bad reputation of their victims aka blackmailing, but she/he got pouched to do or even raped ahe wouldn't be punished and the rapest will be killed, clearly both sex get beaten wtf you trying to do.
5. Divorce is a right for both spouses if the other one is abusive or neglectes his/her duty towards the other and the family but they want to fixs things then god would bless you.
6. Most of people will defend there public figure at any cost but there is no laws saying if the prophet got mocked then you are wrong because many people have mocked him at his time and when the apologized he have forgiven them all.
Clearly islam is tge religion of peace ❤
@@KMoon-mf6mdgreat answer
these ex-Muslims (or. Non-Muslims) believe everything, Best your wife? What does the Quran say?
No compulsion in religion is an abrogated verse.
So forget about it, there is compulsion in Islam.
Nope, abrogated verses aren't written in the Quran, like stoning.
@@MunibResponds totally false. Abrogated verses are still in the Quran. Every Muslim that follows the Sunna and is part of ahl sunna wa l jama3a knows that you are wrong.
@@viktorclementovitch Show me a proof, which says Quran 2:256 is abrogated
@@MunibResponds Tabari, Suyuti, Ibn Kathir and all the classic moufasirin explain that this is verse is abrogated by Sourate Tawba verse 5.
I strongly believe that they understand Quran better than you and I do.
Woahhh the answer is not directed to the point 😮
In pakistan.if apostle forest repent in 3 days for leavin Islam..death is given by law...
Oops. Oh dear. The Snake Oil Salesman is wrong once again. For a start there are 195 countries in the world. The vast (and I mean VAST) majority of them do NOT have the death penalty for treason.
And especially not because someone left a particular religion, where Naik is trying to equate freedom of religion with "treason".
Literally the only countries where you can be "legally" executed for leaving it's prescribed religion are Islamic countries.
Like Iran, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Indonesia, Sri Lanka, Nigeria, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Yemen, etc.
And I'm not entirely certain, but has Saudi Arabia finally stopped bombing the absolute shite out of Yemen for containing "the wrong type of Muslim"?
And how is Lebanon Street in Syria doing these days? Is everybody friends now, or are the "Righteous" still killing people who literally live across the road because, once again, they're the "wrong" type of Muslim?
I'm prepared to put money on it that everyone who follows Zakir Naik absolutely detests American Evangelist preachers who charge money to see them.
I hate them too, because they're exploiting the vulnerability and simplicity of people who really just want a seemingly easy answer, without ever getting a detailed or genuinely spiritual answer with regard to anything. Ever.
Just like Zakir Naik.
"Hope that answers the question, brother. Even though I know it didn't. But because you're surrounded by several thousand of my followers who, based upon their absolutely slavish devotion to the Qu'ran, will beat you to a pulp unless you sit down and go away.
Alright, Anjem. How many hundreds of thousands (through an offshore company, obviously) did I make tonight for a few hours of my Qu'ranic memory act?"
Great question! I pray you will find Jesus Christ and be blessed brothers!
In the USA we basically don’t punish treason seriously. No death penalty.
Jesus (pbuh) isn’t God
@@Slave-of-the-most-merciful Muhammad isnt a prophet
@@ZakirNaikIsGod who are you to say that when it was declared by God himself
@@Slave-of-the-most-merciful Islam is faksey
But how is someone leaving Islam the same as leaking secrets of your country?
Imagine a religion so peaceful, you are killed for leaving it.😂
What a stupid logic and people clapped
Those guys r clapping …. Man what the hell
Because they got their answers
Because you are not a Muslim and don't have knowledge about Islam (the only true religion on earth) . So, you can't enjoy his beautiful response. No offense. ❤
I left this terrorist religion that fights women, and I am in terror all day long because I am afraid that if my situation is discovered, I will be killed by extremist Muslims, and I am demanding my freedom because I am not at full strength.💔
I'm so sorry to hear that. Please be strong and don't let these thoughts/people bring you down
there's nowhere in the Quran where it says to kill someone for leaving Islam. If someone leaves and keeps to himself, he has done no wrong or corruption to the people or country, so he has to be left alone. If someone can freely enter Islam, they can freely leave again.
It is in the authentic hadiths
Notice you said "if". The interesting thing is how the "corruption" is defined. Islamic scholars define it as teaching the Bible, trying to convert Muslims to other religions, and of course saying anything critical of the Quran - like that it cannot be from god because it contains scientific, historical and grammatical errors, putting it on the ground etc. People get arrested and spend years in jail for these things, some with death sentences. Is that OK with you?
And, no, they cannot freely leave, have you not read your own sources? Dozens of sahih hadiths say otherwise, and if you read the Sharia manual, Reliance of the Traveler, in Section O8 it makes it VERY clear what happens to apostates.
Oh, and what were the Ridda Wars about, if they can freely leave?
The quran does say to kill apostates [9:89] and contradicts 'no compulsion in religion' [2:256] so you are either ignorant or lying. Hadith confirms it in bukhari [52:260]
Im glad people in the comments see where the problem is and doesn't just nod to whatever these islamists say
word
RELIGION OF PEACE - "They wish that you should disbelieve as they disbelieve, and then you would be equal; therefore take not to yourselves friends of them, until they emigrate in the way of God; then, ; take not to yourselves any one of them as friend or helper."
sorry but what did you mean
I'm Muslim but his answer is wrong we won't kill anyone 😡
That's good that you don't want to kill anyone. Sadly your prophet and most apologists disagree with you.
You know nothing about islam. You're one of those that think "if you kill someone you still don't deserve to be killed". Alhamdulillah I have knowledge about Islam more than you
@@GrandGamesReviews And because of this knowledge you support killing of thousands of people simply because of what they believe. This is not a reason to be proud of. This is a reason to be ashamed and to reflect on yourself.
@@baldwinthefourth4098 "Support killings of thousand of people simply because of what they believe" since when did we say that we will kill people who believe in religions other than Islam? I know how fun it is to act like the "Hero" in here by bringing some fake informations(Which obviously will make people believe you cuz they are lazy to do some research) but unfortunately that won't help you at all. Just being some info that makes sense cuz nobody will kill you for having different beliefs. Unless, you're talking about ISIS(The terrorist Organisation).
@@GrandGamesReviews You support death penalty for apostates. Right now there are thousands of apostates in the world, according to many sources that your apologists quote 100,000 muslims become atheists every year. Since you support the death penalty for apostasy, you support the killing of thousands of people due to what they believe. And that is what I condemn you for. I can't believe you didn't get this.
I disagree with him, strongly disagree. I'd like him to show the reference from the Qur'an for the punishment ( if there is any). Memorizing the Qur'an is not same as understanding İslam.
@@hasibabdullah3463 Holy Quran has NO PUNISHMENT for ApostasyApostasy has NO PUNISHMENT in Holy Quranwww.huffpost.com/entry/does-the-koran-endorse-ap_b_5539236
@@hasibabdullah3463 Holy Quran has NO PUNISHMENT for ApostasyApostasy has NO PUNISHMENT in Holy Quranwww.huffpost.com/entry/does-the-koran-endorse-ap_b_5539236
@@hasibabdullah3463 please,talk to me on this issue
@@hasibabdullah3463 You're lost. Hadith are narrations not even remotely similar to Quran. Go do some studying.
Many Islamic rulings and traditions are based on the hadiths as you know (for example the details of the pilgrimage etc). There are numerous sahih hadiths that say that anyone who changes their religion is to be killed (you can find them on sunnah.com). If you read the Sharia handbook, Reliance of the Traveller (PDF online), read section O8, this is what the scholars agree on.
How can someone talk and preach like this, and be applauded by the crowd. This is ridiculous and evil! Do they not have brains to think ?
They follow blindly/worship their rabbi just like JUDAISM teaches and also it is JUDAISM that teaches to kill apostates. Islam is sect of Judaism.
Complete bullshit analogy, comparing religion with a nation state. You consider someone who leaves Islam an enemy. Which is forced belief and that leads to radicalisation of hard core believers of Islam, this is the reason why many are ready to kill non believers and apostates in the first place. If you are believing others as enemy of Islam by considering other religions as enemy, people should know religion is not a nation and and treason with a nation can be treated by laws, and if someone choses not to believe in a religion he should have a freedom to do so, it does not harm religion itself like in case of treason it harms national secrets.
It doesn't make any sense, but something is to be expected from Zakir Naik.
Islam is the religion of Peace 🥰
You cant only write u have to show them actions speak louder than words those idiots won't b lieve us if we dont
Indeed.
ISLAM is derived from the Arabic word 'Salam' which means 'Peace', it's also derived from the root word 'Silm' which means submitting ones will to Almighty God.
Therefore I greet all of you, 'ASSALAMUALAIKUM WR WB '
(May the Peace, mercy and blessings of Almighty Allaah(SWT) be on all of you)
@Gurdeep Kumar
May you (O love divine), the beholder of the path of enlightenment, purifying our mind and destroying the infidels who refuse to offer worship, come and stay in the prime position of the eternal sacrifice.”- Rig Veda 9.13.9, Tr. SatyaPrakash Saraswati, Vol 11, page 3619
”O king, make progress in thy duty of administration, extend happiness to the virtuous. O terrible chastiser, burn down the irreligious foes. O splendid person, humiliate and consume utterly like dried up stubble, him, who encourages our foe.”- Yajur Veda 13.12, Tr. Devi Chand, page 138
Godly persons shall always be ready to kill irreligious people” [Kshemkarandas Trivedi (Arya Samaj) on Atharva Veda 12.5.62, page 576]
These hymns indicates that Blasphamy laws holds in santana dharma too! So whoever criticizing islamic sharia law shall get to know that it is not only in Islam
Ps: my statements are not to insult anyone!
@@maryamusman6674 we are not narrow minded.We don't believe in prophets and commandments of Gods.Veda is man made.We understand there are some verses which shouldn't be obeyed.
We have the humility to not call it the most perfect creation...but are rational enough to reason.
In short we are not brain washed people who follow a herd mentality.
P.S-such things(blasphemy laws) were never put to practise even in the Vedic times.
Okay mera sawal hai k agar yehi logic hai to phir jo banda pehle non muslim tha (like british anchor who converted to muslim )us ne apny religion se gadari ki hai ab wo islam ki tableeg b krti hai . Us k pehle religion walon ko usy maar daina chahiey ?
If you have any better logic tell me
thank the lord that this apostacy law does not exist in non islamian country. especially in malaysia and indonesia.
this law is only for punishing spying apostates.
normal apostates dont get punished.
Muslim Imam Converts To Christianity After Reading In Surah That Jesus Christ Is Coming Again
Lmao
Lol
Yeah right... I'm a non muslim living in a majority (Sunni)Muslim country, born & raised here, they even "forced" children to fast during Ramadhan, threatened them with hellfire etc.. if a healthy Muslim adult was caught eating during Ramadhan, they can be fined not more than few thousand $ or imprisoned not more than a year or both. I know a few who were charged with the penalty & that's only one of the example, if that's not a compulsion idk what is. Look I respect Islam, just stop beating around the bush & not mince words.
What if a Hindu enters to Islam and leaves hinduism and according to their rules suppose if the penalty is death how would a Muslim defend that person from not being killed 🫣🤔
haha where is the proof for that ?😂
Bro we dont have death penality for non belivers. Forefathers of indians and pakistanis were hindus
Proud ex Muslim