The Seven Years' War part 1

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 5 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 98

  • @Fot113
    @Fot113 7 років тому +48

    This made everything so much more simple than this stupid textbook

  • @varessi3810
    @varessi3810 4 роки тому +18

    Who else is here because of school?

    • @asloth4265
      @asloth4265 3 роки тому +7

      No, I came here on my own time....

    • @varessi3810
      @varessi3810 3 роки тому +2

      @@asloth4265 but why............

    • @asloth4265
      @asloth4265 3 роки тому +1

      @@varessi3810 it was a joke

    • @frostwolf746
      @frostwolf746 3 роки тому +3

      No. i just decided i wanted to learn about the 7 years' war randomly

    • @WyattRyeSway
      @WyattRyeSway 2 місяці тому

      🙋🏻‍♂️

  • @Kenibi_
    @Kenibi_ 7 років тому +41

    truly this should be called the first world war, so in true terms the earth has already experienced three world wars.

    • @miamicelebrations
      @miamicelebrations 7 років тому +2

      That's right

    • @banishedfromars
      @banishedfromars 7 років тому +4

      Big Ken the Napoleonic wars were a global war too.

    • @aurageneral4053
      @aurageneral4053 7 років тому +7

      Big Ken here are the world wars in real order
      The seven year war -1756-1762
      The Great War-1914- 1918
      The third Great War -1939-1945
      I call them the wars these names because people get it wrong

    • @johnlong1538
      @johnlong1538 6 років тому +2

      .....the American Revolution exploded into another world-wide conflict for the British vs.France,Holland & Spain.

    • @chessonso2610
      @chessonso2610 4 роки тому +1

      The British Philippines (Manila) 1762-1764.

  • @chissstardestroyer
    @chissstardestroyer 3 роки тому +7

    The name "French and Indian War" sounds a bit like it was the French verses the Amerindians; each of those two groups going after eachother in a dukeout of sorts. That's another reason why it is a relatively poor name, but "Seven Years War" is even more completely inept, same with the rest of the old world names for this conflict.

  • @russellstorm4224
    @russellstorm4224 Рік тому +4

    “The people who named this war seemed to be pretty bad at math”
    Yes, because wikipedia has it at six years.

  • @codefortl4937
    @codefortl4937 2 роки тому +2

    How to annoy a math/history teacher.
    1. start a war
    2. end and name war 7 years, when its actually 9
    3. time travel centuries into the future

  • @asloth4265
    @asloth4265 3 роки тому +4

    Tip...watch in x2

  • @user-qg8hw9km8z
    @user-qg8hw9km8z 8 років тому +4

    I really enjoy these types of vid and the lady's voice is so calming it like the best combo

  • @kellypaws
    @kellypaws 6 років тому +9

    England? By 1707 the Act of Union had been passed and the Scottish King James VI had been made king of England and Scotland some time previous (1603). It was Britain, not England.
    Why does that matter? Well, the British army was always heavily manned with Scots, and often Irish people. Without the English content at seeing Scots killed for the glory of Britain in somewhat larger numbers (proportionally) in the lower ranks (somewhat most probably), Britain would have fared rather less well.
    Why does the distinction matter to Scots? Well the Scottish people were in the streets protesting the Act of Union. It did NOT have the popular vote. Remind you of anything?
    Instead, the Scottish nobles, who were the only ones who actually empowered to make it law, were bribed with lands in England and massive wealth, to cede Scotland to the Union. The popular vote was overridden, by bribery. Sir John Clerk, may God rot him merrily, was the major proponent and benefactor from this hateful act.
    "Such a parcel of rogues as would sell a nation." Look that one up too.
    So, please, as we died fighting Britain's wars, can we remember it was NOT England, it is not now England. It's Britain. I don't particularly like that it's Britain, but to term us all 'English' is a huge disrespect to the other peoples of Britain, and to history.

  • @relentless_taco
    @relentless_taco 2 роки тому +3

    this makes my brain feel twisted yet i'm still _learning_

  • @sirsnailson7703
    @sirsnailson7703 4 роки тому +5

    I watched the video Mrs. Wittich :D

  • @capt.justinwilliamson-mast8314
    @capt.justinwilliamson-mast8314 2 роки тому

    Dear Mr Khan,
    Its always magnificent to see the pride and best practice principles you apply to your presentations - magnificent!!!
    I think I noticed copy-cat english writings translated from meetings of other readings of maybe anotherologist type language.
    It's like not knowing the Hebrew lanquege and claiming to have translated the Old Testament into English really!!!
    All gods bless you and your family, friends, work-mates and loved ones.
    Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called Sons Of God.
    Mathew 5:9 KJV
    P.S. I've heard there's lots of financiers looking for elite C.E.O. business acumen in your master-ship - offering annual renumeration of 1 million plus. All expenses personal, privacy, security and comfort expected.
    Capt. Justin C. Williamson,
    Master V (Maritime).

  • @notweath3r
    @notweath3r 3 роки тому +4

    Who was sent here from social studies I need to know

  • @greyever7820
    @greyever7820 2 роки тому +2

    New France should have never ended.

  • @lewiswilson3430
    @lewiswilson3430 4 роки тому +5

    Correction: it is not England, rather Great Britain.

  • @rosaallanoor8530
    @rosaallanoor8530 7 років тому +13

    lol I expected Sal Khan to be talking

    • @chessonso2610
      @chessonso2610 4 роки тому +1

      The British Philippines (Manila) 1762-1764.

  • @evanhackney7077
    @evanhackney7077 7 років тому +3

    this is really helpful

    • @jjyork46
      @jjyork46 2 роки тому

      what grade are you in now?

  • @merrillhannis5373
    @merrillhannis5373 6 років тому +3

    Great video! Such quality content.

  • @thewildfloridawolf9905
    @thewildfloridawolf9905 4 роки тому +1

    thank

  • @Pixelnova_
    @Pixelnova_ 8 років тому +1

    Because 7 years war is such an original name

  • @merrillhannis5373
    @merrillhannis5373 6 років тому +3

    This was the First World War not the one in 1914

  • @chessonso2610
    @chessonso2610 4 роки тому +1

    The British Philippines (Manila) 1762-1764.

  • @Anmol34
    @Anmol34 8 років тому +18

    I am an Indian (a real Indian from India, that is) and I want to sue the Americans and Christopher Columbus for misusing the term "Indian". :)

    • @fallenstraw291
      @fallenstraw291 8 років тому +1

      Gross

    • @edbreallife8190
      @edbreallife8190 7 років тому

      Anmol S Let them know!! African Americans ain't African!!

    • @Just.Kidding
      @Just.Kidding 5 років тому +2

      Hailey Stephenson No. If one is born in America, one is an American. If one is born in Africa and migrates to America, one is then an African-American.

    • @walkingamongdarksouls5981
      @walkingamongdarksouls5981 5 років тому

      You are Hindu not Indian bro , like I'm spanish and not latino 😛

    • @howdidyoufindmyaccount1012
      @howdidyoufindmyaccount1012 4 роки тому

      @Hailey Stephenson no, for example.
      Since I was born in Canada I'm a Canadian.
      If I was born in Canada and migrated to let's say Mexico.
      Then I'd be Canadian-mexican.

  • @CrunchyNorbert
    @CrunchyNorbert 7 років тому +1

    Did the war begin late 1754 and end early 1763?

  • @FrankOceanLover3169
    @FrankOceanLover3169 6 років тому +6

    Good Job France
    You as a powerful empire was allied with five other powerful empires and managed to lose against three empires who were barely your match

  • @fredmiddleton4814
    @fredmiddleton4814 8 років тому +1

    Since India is a Persian name - and the Hindi name is Bharat, shouldn't you be a Bharati?

  • @GeggZ0
    @GeggZ0 7 років тому +3

    British, not English, the unions both crown and paliaments had already happened by this point

  • @user-qg8hw9km8z
    @user-qg8hw9km8z 8 років тому +1

    I think southern native Americans had more of a united power like Aztecs even tho some southern native fight each other's. In the south like Mexico they where bigger and United

    • @zachfoxtrot1115
      @zachfoxtrot1115 7 років тому +1

      In Mexico, they were united in human sacrifice. There are theories today that suggest that people were actually bred for that specific purpose. It's kind of funny- not much has changed since then- look at the murder rates.

    • @Just.Kidding
      @Just.Kidding 5 років тому +1

      The Haudenosaunee (around the east/southeast edge of the great lakes) were without a doubt the most united of the native Americans. They were comprised of the Mohawk, Seneca, Oneida, Cayuga, Onondaga, and later (after 1722), the Tuscarora.

  • @jefsut
    @jefsut 8 років тому

    This stops after a few seconds.

  • @rodentperson237
    @rodentperson237 7 років тому +13

    *dies of information overrload*

  • @DaWindyCityProductions
    @DaWindyCityProductions 8 років тому +3

    Ahhh I remember the good ole days of APUSH. Wait remove the good tho

  • @squirrel4136
    @squirrel4136 2 роки тому

    Shouldn't it be called WW 1 and ww1 as we know it be called ww2?

  • @tredtredtred
    @tredtredtred 8 років тому +3

    The name, The Seven Years' War "shows there was a global war". Really? What about The 100 Years' War or The Six Day War?

    • @goodmorningkanye9240
      @goodmorningkanye9240 7 років тому

      Deus Liberum how were that global? A global war happens all around the globe

    • @dapride323
      @dapride323 7 років тому

      that's not the point because the video said that The Seven Years' War was global, you would think those 2 wars would be too since they have similar names.

  • @faizanali383
    @faizanali383 8 років тому +1

    Ahh I did a whole naval campaign for the Seven Years' War in Assassin's Creed: Rogue.

  • @seatown2000
    @seatown2000 8 років тому

    1493. Charles C. Mann.

  • @PrimaMostra
    @PrimaMostra 7 років тому

    the american pronunciation of iroquois, huron and appalachian gets me rofl ahaha

    • @DylanDude
      @DylanDude 7 років тому

      BurntKumquat Go to Versailles, Indiana. The people there pronounce it "Versails." Granted, having an ocean between France and America will do that, but it's still pretty funny.

    • @RADGarage
      @RADGarage 5 років тому

      Canada has an ocean between it and France and we seem to manage!

  • @walkingamongdarksouls5981
    @walkingamongdarksouls5981 5 років тому +1

    1756-1763 (7 years not 9)

    • @EdinburghFive
      @EdinburghFive 4 роки тому +1

      The French & Indian Wars starts earlier and is a integral part of the Seven Years War thus the longer period.

  • @jacquelineho4769
    @jacquelineho4769 7 років тому +1

    hi denise

  • @datedk1ng680
    @datedk1ng680 6 років тому +3

    Oversimplified is better

  • @edlutz7218
    @edlutz7218 2 роки тому

    These petty comments won't matter in 100 years anyway!

  • @emmacavagnetto7861
    @emmacavagnetto7861 4 роки тому

    Hiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii

  • @beyondlegend9379
    @beyondlegend9379 8 років тому

    First

  • @ciana6250
    @ciana6250 Рік тому

    “The sheven yearsh war” 🤓

  • @andrewrae8064
    @andrewrae8064 2 роки тому

    Why is this so us centric 😴

  • @humpty457
    @humpty457 7 років тому +2

    Just to let you know, that "indians" is not the proper way of saying aboriginals. Instead call them "first nations".

    • @zachfoxtrot1115
      @zachfoxtrot1115 7 років тому +7

      Political correctness is silly. We've been calling Native Americans "Indians" for a very long time. If you really want to help them, I suggest figuring out a way to reintegrate them into their former lands, and out of the 3rd world- esque reservations they live in...their name is the least of their problems.

    • @MegaTouchy
      @MegaTouchy 7 років тому

      You can do both: try to be politically correct while tackling those more practical issues, such as helping to improve the poor situations in reservations. Being PC is still something that shouldn't be ignored just because it's not as important.

    • @crazymedellon7247
      @crazymedellon7247 7 років тому

      nah m8 im sticking with indians thanks.

    • @DylanDude
      @DylanDude 7 років тому +3

      "Native Americans" is more respectful, not just more politically correct. The name clearly denotes that they were here first, while also acknowledging the difference between them and Americans. Calling them "Indians" is confusing for obvious reasons, while also being disrespectful seeing as we've known better for centuries.
      Granted, the ideal name to use would be that of their tribe, but that's not something that's going to happen in this country.

    • @DylanDude
      @DylanDude 6 років тому

      Jack Pine In this context, formal/correct.

  • @alithepotato7211
    @alithepotato7211 2 роки тому

    I HATE THIS APP MADE A DEVIL