However this is not a winning position for agadmator, as you can see the average videos on the board are equal now. But still coming back from a definitely losing situation is impressive. Let's see if agadmator can pull this off.
Fischer was a machine and arguably a sociopath, but he was still human. I wouldn't have put it past him to troll Petrosian on an off day to 'steal' a draw by forcing lines Petrosian has already played and remembers vividly to gain some psychological advantage for the entire series. Bobby couldn't play his best chess that day, so he decided to torment his opponent in another way. I'm drunk and probably overthinking it though.
No, I think you're about right. Fischer was the best of the humans, but as one, he was still fallible. People want perfection, and 6-0 scores all the time. That it happened once is extraordinary. That it happened twice is a miracle. Three times would have been God-like, or, Stockfish-like. And no human can reach that. The final score, 5-1, when draws are not counted, is still mighty impressive, considering what a impenetrable wall Petrosian presented to his opponents. Fischer was on another level in that period, and then he stopped playing.
Fischer was famous for knowing hundreds of thousands of games off the top of his head. He did exactly the same thing against spassky, tormenting him with lines his seconds already played and lines spassky himself played. So I believed you're right.
This game, as told by Petrosian himself, was a psycholohical battle. Fischer was known to play to death and Petrosian was demonstrating him that he can make quick draws with white as he wishes even if the opponent is Fischer. Moreover, before this match Petrosian and Korchnoi drew 9 and had only 1 decisive game. The journalists had been speculating the two were deliberately not winning so that they will not face Fischer. Petrosian was trying to prove two things: 1) to Fischer; he can draw as he wishes 2) to journalists: he does not mind, he can draw even with Fischer.
@@mr.alboss2856 , do not underestimate Petrosian's performance he performed in this battle. Fischer was lucky to survive the first 3 matches or even the first two matches.
This does not make sense. If a) Petrosian has white pieces b) Fischer is sick, then getting a draw is not something you would want to go for as Petrosian.
@@panda4247 , As Petrosian said, a quick draw in this game was intended to be a "psychological blow." Petrosian's team and seconds criticized him for going for a draw in this game and Petrosian replied saying he was proving Fischer that he can quickly draw as he wish with white. Why not go for a psychological attack? While going for win may be preferable, going for psychological attack is not something Petrosian woudl avoid or resent.
Petrosian was a sportsman and had a good sense of humor. Upon seeing Fischer was sick he decided that it would be unsporting to take advantage of this, and that it would be humorous to replay that drawn game.
Petrosian was everything but a gentleman. He did everything to undermine Korchoi's strength for example. This game, as told by Petrosian himself, was a psycholohical battle. Fischer was known to play to death and Petrosian was demonstrating him that he can make quick draws with white as he wishes even if the opponent is Fischer. Moreover, before this match Petrosian and Korchnoi drew 9 and had only 1 decisive game. The journalists had been speculating the two were deliberately not winning so that they will not face Fischer. Petrosian was trying to prove two things: 1) to Fischer; he can draw as he wishes 2) to journalists: he does not mind, he can draw even with Fischer.
Artur Koort seems pretty reasonable dude, thank you. i do not know petrosian's characteristics that much but, suppose you are not that much right about "undermining korchnoi's power". being "far from gentilesse and courtesy" is a big insult. rome was not built in one day and "iron tiger" name has its own burden just like any other, on the owners shoulders. showing the ability to draw in willing, is the burden of this particular name.
@@yusufsivridasdan8043 , I try to find and read accounts on chess history. I have read Korchnoi's account, ok it might be biased as it was by Korchnoi. Reading about their matches, I concluded Petrosian did every kind of dirty and cheap tricks to gain advantage against Korchnoi. I read some other accounts on how Petrosian acted by some others as well. It was very hard to conclude Tigran Petrosian was even a normal guy you could hang out with. On the other hand, Spassky says Korchnoi had to hate his opponents so that he could win. Maybe the book by Korchoi I read itself was a dirty trick by Korchnoi. And again on the other hand, Korchnoi could have been challenger to Karpov even in 84 by not being "gentleman." He was awarded win due to Kasparov's no show as USSR did not allow Kasparov to face Korchnoi in the decided venue. Korchnoi agreed to re-play of the match. Had he wanted Korchnoi could easily play in the candidates final, I guess the other finalist would mot be allowed as the other finalist also was from USSR
Artur Koort thank you man. as i said i don't know them much, and things seem more clearly now with that account explanation. on the other side, what an elegant guy victor, putting your ticket for the world championship finals on the table for the "earned success".. that shows great understanding and kindness.
@@108hindu I tend to agree. I remember the games from 1987: Karpov vs Kasparow. There have been many medicore games ending early in a draw, as they are anylyse the opening and their moves. So after a 4-6 hour + 2-6 hour anlyses they are worn out for at least a day, that lead to a early ending at the next day - silent agreement i guess.
Maybe Petrosyan did not want to catch a virus from Fischer and he made a quick draw? If they played for an hour it would be almost certain Petrosyan would get infected, even though he might have not gotten sick after that, but still it is a good precaution.
This game was a psychological blow attempt by Petrosian. He wanted to demonstrate Fischer that he [Petrosian] could make quick draws with white as he wishes
@@builderphill1361 , @Builderphill , not on command. Some were commentating that Petrosian and Korchnoi was playing for draw in order to evade a match against Fischer. When Fischer was asked about it, he made some statements saying something like I would not allow someone to play for draw against me. Referring to this comment of Fischer, Karpov also speculated that Spassky too was trying to prove that he could draw with white against Fischer in the first game and Fischer was trying the oppose
Two videos in a day. Definitely compensation for not posting a video yesterday. My Lichess rating has improved since I hav started watching ur games Agad, thanks a ton.
It's 1:AM here and I wasn't expecting another agadmator video. I was half asleep but as soon as I got the notification, I was like hell yeah! Full attention on deck. Can sleep peacefully after watching this 👍🏻👌🏻😎
Fischer was indeed lucky to get a draw, given he was sick. I do look forward to the remaining games :). By the way, would you be able to show the games of Alexander Alekhine and Emanuel Lasker, in particular, St. Petersburg 1914 and Zurich 1934, in the future or for a change of pace?
Agadmator is King, I think He is from another galaxie where the God, is Chess... He is One of Them... (I can't gear-down by watching other chess-channels)
Im not sure if this would be valid, but as Petrosian in chess often was a defensive player and loved counter attacking as I do, honestly I see many similarities between me and his style, even my coach does as well in chess. Anyway, its probably because he knew it would be a safe drawn game and that he can look/ wait for a far better opportunity to win another game where fischer thinks he can win, after all he likely saw fischer wasn't playing for a win from the early stages of the match and there is no real victory in defeating a resigned opponent. Often I find my own focus waning if I see my opponent isnt playing to win. Like when I'm playing French defense and White goes for the exchange variation I just sigh greatly.
I suspect nobody here is better suited that Antonio himself to discover if there are any insights into that question, perhaps via the commentary of Fischer himself or his “small entourage”. There may be no better explanation than that he was unwell, and satisfied with a draw as he recovered his stamina, which did not take long as he was soon complaining about his room, the food, and the playing conditions. ‘This was an indication he was fully recovered and back to his usual (cantankerous) self’. (The New York Times, Nov 14, 1971)
Last game Fischer offered a draw by trying to sacrifice his rook for a perpetual check and now he draws the game too early This is not the fischer we all know
@@hishamel-abbasy2337 , not only that. Petrosian was better than them + more focused on chess + better trained. As told by Nikolai Krogius who was coach of Spassky in 72 match, Entire Soviet chess federation launched "preperation against Fischer" even before Fischer - Taimanov game was played. All experts and masters of Sovidt Chess federation prepared their own view and report on Fischer. A soviet student even wrote a PHD thesis on Fischer. All these were being done for Spassky as the camp was dedicated to Spassky but I doubt Petrosian or even Taimanow would not be let benefit from it.
I also would like to know whether Petrosian knew that this game was even replicating a previous game. Sometimes players aren't aware or only realize it in the middle game. I have a few questions from this result. For instance, why would Petrosian have accepted the draw last game in a position where he may have been slightly better with the black pieces? I assumed that he wanted the draw so that he could take the white pieces and win! But then to draw again, and in this fashion, altogether confusing from a tactical perspective. But maybe it was a flex of poise. "Yes, I have beaten you, but I don't need to use my momentum, I don't need to crush you while you're sick, in fact I will resort back to playing for draws, and when you are better again, I will crush you with honor." Something like this
I'm not sure to what extent Fisher was truly ill. Let's say someone from Petrosian's team was approached by a member of Fischer's, and they asked that the players went to a draw because Fisher was sick. Petrosian seems like the type to accept this and play for a draw. Considering that Petrosian had kept the overall score even, and had beat Fischer, I think Petrosian knew that if he took advantage of Fischer's condition and won the game, that it would be a blemish on a very impressive and honorable set of results, because the people would say "Oh, but Fisher was ill, so it doesn't count" just like how they tried to do with Larsen vs Fischer and the whole "altitude sickness" excuse when Larsen was making terrible moves. I also think Fisher was a hypochondriac, and the pressure of the match, plus losing your win streak in that style, this was enough to make him become susceptible to illness. Or, he wasn't very sick, and these same events were having a major psychological effect.
Id imagine that Petrosian had probably analyzed that game after the fact and possibly had found an improvement on it, or was hoping that Fischer would fall for something. But by the time it got to that point he realized that Fischer was playing it out perfectly and offered a draw.
Petrosian allowed it because he was the Karjakin of his day - the Minister of Defense. He was a winter king , and was later ( after the WC) , in the seventies , fired from his own chess publication because his Russian masters deemed him too timid
I think they were both demonstrating to each other "perfect knowledge", neither wanted to be the deviant, and as said Petrosian could display some oneupmanship, "ill defeat you easily as black nex t time."
I just want to know how you keep your goatee/hair in such great shape all the time! Impressive! Do you cut it yourself or have a family member in the business?
#suggestion: How about choosing a game from today's (6th of September) upset in Speed Chess Championship? Lower ranked Jan Krzysztof Duda defeated a heavy favourite Sergey Karjakin.
Hey agad, I was watching a GM Ben finegold stream from the other day and you had some fans supporting you on the stream and he gave a shot at you saying you’re a 1300 player but mentioned he doesn’t know you. I’m a fan of both of you. You should review one of his games! That’d be awesome!!
A comment on chessgames.com has a quote from Petrosian cited in the book "Russians versus Fischer" - bit I do not own a copy and cannot verify the quote.
#suggestion @agadmator can you cover this game, from utut adianto one of the strongest Indonesian grandmasters. I think you have enough subscribers from Indonesia, and also I think you have never covered an Indonesian chess grandmaster ... I think the beauty of this game is worthy of your coverage... Alexander Baburin (2530) vs Utut Adianto (2510) Liechtenstein (1993), LIE Queen's Gambit Accepted: Normal Variation (D25)
Two Videos at one day, that is so much activity
Defently compensation for the missing video yesterday
However this is not a winning position for agadmator, as you can see the average videos on the board are equal now. But still coming back from a definitely losing situation is impressive. Let's see if agadmator can pull this off.
I bet he is going on a vacation or something and is giving this videos for compensation :D
Sacrificed yesterday's video for activity today.... Tal would like it.
lol
gabri gamer It's amazing how sophisticated people like you comment such amazing things to attract other people to like it!
lol yes !!!!
Morphy*
I'm finding this series absolutely riveting.
Fischer was a machine and arguably a sociopath, but he was still human. I wouldn't have put it past him to troll Petrosian on an off day to 'steal' a draw by forcing lines Petrosian has already played and remembers vividly to gain some psychological advantage for the entire series. Bobby couldn't play his best chess that day, so he decided to torment his opponent in another way. I'm drunk and probably overthinking it though.
No, I think you're about right. Fischer was the best of the humans, but as one, he was still fallible. People want perfection, and 6-0 scores all the time. That it happened once is extraordinary. That it happened twice is a miracle. Three times would have been God-like, or, Stockfish-like. And no human can reach that.
The final score, 5-1, when draws are not counted, is still mighty impressive, considering what a impenetrable wall Petrosian presented to his opponents. Fischer was on another level in that period, and then he stopped playing.
@@SelfReflective how is the head to head 5-1 for Fischer ?
I don't think so
In this match I mean. Fischer won 5 games, Petrosian 1, and 3 draws.
Fischer was famous for knowing hundreds of thousands of games off the top of his head. He did exactly the same thing against spassky, tormenting him with lines his seconds already played and lines spassky himself played. So I believed you're right.
This game, as told by Petrosian himself, was a psycholohical battle. Fischer was known to play to death and Petrosian was demonstrating him that he can make quick draws with white as he wishes even if the opponent is Fischer.
Moreover, before this match Petrosian and Korchnoi drew 9 and had only 1 decisive game. The journalists had been speculating the two were deliberately not winning so that they will not face Fischer. Petrosian was trying to prove two things: 1) to Fischer; he can draw as he wishes 2) to journalists: he does not mind, he can draw even with Fischer.
Artur Koort he still got crushed
@@mr.alboss2856 , do not underestimate Petrosian's performance he performed in this battle.
Fischer was lucky to survive the first 3 matches or even the first two matches.
Actually , it's Fischer who's playing for quick draw.
This does not make sense. If a) Petrosian has white pieces b) Fischer is sick, then getting a draw is not something you would want to go for as Petrosian.
@@panda4247 , As Petrosian said, a quick draw in this game was intended to be a "psychological blow." Petrosian's team and seconds criticized him for going for a draw in this game and Petrosian replied saying he was proving Fischer that he can quickly draw as he wish with white.
Why not go for a psychological attack? While going for win may be preferable, going for psychological attack is not something Petrosian woudl avoid or resent.
Petrosian was a sportsman and had a good sense of humor.
Upon seeing Fischer was sick he decided that it would be unsporting to take advantage of this, and that it would be humorous to replay that drawn game.
I won a game last night against my friend after watching your last video. Thanks for the analysis and entertainment as always, Agadmator!
because he was such a gentleman and he would not benefit from his opponent's bad condition. these guys have the "respect" thing almost in the sky.
Petrosian was everything but a gentleman. He did everything to undermine Korchoi's strength for example.
This game, as told by Petrosian himself, was a psycholohical battle. Fischer was known to play to death and Petrosian was demonstrating him that he can make quick draws with white as he wishes even if the opponent is Fischer.
Moreover, before this match Petrosian and Korchnoi drew 9 and had only 1 decisive game. The journalists had been speculating the two were deliberately not winning so that they will not face Fischer. Petrosian was trying to prove two things: 1) to Fischer; he can draw as he wishes 2) to journalists: he does not mind, he can draw even with Fischer.
Artur Koort seems pretty reasonable dude, thank you. i do not know petrosian's characteristics that much but, suppose you are not that much right about "undermining korchnoi's power". being "far from gentilesse and courtesy" is a big insult. rome was not built in one day and "iron tiger" name has its own burden just like any other, on the owners shoulders. showing the ability to draw in willing, is the burden of this particular name.
@@yusufsivridasdan8043 , I try to find and read accounts on chess history.
I have read Korchnoi's account, ok it might be biased as it was by Korchnoi. Reading about their matches, I concluded Petrosian did every kind of dirty and cheap tricks to gain advantage against Korchnoi. I read some other accounts on how Petrosian acted by some others as well. It was very hard to conclude Tigran Petrosian was even a normal guy you could hang out with.
On the other hand, Spassky says Korchnoi had to hate his opponents so that he could win. Maybe the book by Korchoi I read itself was a dirty trick by Korchnoi.
And again on the other hand, Korchnoi could have been challenger to Karpov even in 84 by not being "gentleman." He was awarded win due to Kasparov's no show as USSR did not allow Kasparov to face Korchnoi in the decided venue. Korchnoi agreed to re-play of the match. Had he wanted Korchnoi could easily play in the candidates final, I guess the other finalist would mot be allowed as the other finalist also was from USSR
Artur Koort thank you man. as i said i don't know them much, and things seem more clearly now with that account explanation.
on the other side, what an elegant guy victor, putting your ticket for the world championship finals on the table for the "earned success".. that shows great understanding and kindness.
Artur Koort It was well known that Korchnoi and Petrosian hated each other. So I would not trust any Korchnoi opinion when it comes to Tigran.
When I saw their moves, I feel like they are both not in the mood to play chess.
kirby march barcena Good observation. They went to work. Put in the minimum effort. Then went and had a nice dinner. A regrouping day.
@@108hindu
I tend to agree. I remember the games from 1987: Karpov vs Kasparow. There have been many medicore games ending early in a draw, as they are anylyse the opening and their moves. So after a 4-6 hour + 2-6 hour anlyses they are worn out for at least a day, that lead to a early ending at the next day - silent agreement i guess.
Two videos today 😍😍😍
Agadmator uploaded a second video, and my sadness resigned. ;) Thanks Antonio!
Maybe Petrosyan did not want to catch a virus from Fischer and he made a quick draw? If they played for an hour it would be almost certain Petrosyan would get infected, even though he might have not gotten sick after that, but still it is a good precaution.
This game was a psychological blow attempt by Petrosian. He wanted to demonstrate Fischer that he [Petrosian] could make quick draws with white as he wishes
Is it really impressive to draw with white on command? It'd be more impressive if he could prove he could draw with black on command
@@builderphill1361 , @Builderphill , not on command. Some were commentating that Petrosian and Korchnoi was playing for draw in order to evade a match against Fischer. When Fischer was asked about it, he made some statements saying something like I would not allow someone to play for draw against me.
Referring to this comment of Fischer, Karpov also speculated that Spassky too was trying to prove that he could draw with white against Fischer in the first game and Fischer was trying the oppose
Two videos in a day.
Definitely compensation for not posting a video yesterday.
My Lichess rating has improved since I hav started watching ur games Agad, thanks a ton.
A really very impressive and bold Petrosian facing Bobby Fischer.
It's 1:AM here and I wasn't expecting another agadmator video. I was half asleep but as soon as I got the notification, I was like hell yeah! Full attention on deck. Can sleep peacefully after watching this 👍🏻👌🏻😎
Dr. MG M where are you from, pal?
india
Two Fischer matches in a day? Christmas is early :)
Yesss two videos in one day.i need more of it.
- HELLO EVERYONE TWICE IN A DAY
- 2 FISCHER VS PETROSIAN MATCHES IN A DAY.
PERFECT DAY-
HeLLo eVeRyOnE
Great competition .. Two amazing players
ah, my drug is here!
Was waiting for this. Thanks
That feel when I just commented on the last video I couldn't wait for the next one. Now I can sleep happy after watching this. : D
Two videos in a day.
Activity above all.
Needed an excuse to have a break from studying for tomorrow's exam.
agadmator uploaded a new video.
Perfect.
Same :P
I hope you guys dont fail,😉
Fischer was indeed lucky to get a draw, given he was sick. I do look forward to the remaining games :).
By the way, would you be able to show the games of Alexander Alekhine and Emanuel Lasker, in particular, St. Petersburg 1914 and Zurich 1934, in the future or for a change of pace?
I was really waiting for this !! ❤️
Great series!! Continue the good work!!
Would Nxg6+ at 3:50 work? So white would be up a pawn after the series of exchanges?
Christmas is early.... 2 videos in 8 he.. bliss
Tal move by uploading two videos, much love Antonio !
Wow 2 vids in one day, love your channel man :)
It seems to me that in an equal match Petrosian was simply not willing to take any risk at that moment and played for a draw.
Agadmator is King, I think He is from another galaxie where the God, is Chess... He is One of Them... (I can't gear-down by watching other chess-channels)
Im not sure if this would be valid, but as Petrosian in chess often was a defensive player and loved counter attacking as I do, honestly I see many similarities between me and his style, even my coach does as well in chess. Anyway, its probably because he knew it would be a safe drawn game and that he can look/ wait for a far better opportunity to win another game where fischer thinks he can win, after all he likely saw fischer wasn't playing for a win from the early stages of the match and there is no real victory in defeating a resigned opponent. Often I find my own focus waning if I see my opponent isnt playing to win. Like when I'm playing French defense and White goes for the exchange variation I just sigh greatly.
I suspect nobody here is better suited that Antonio himself to discover if there are any insights into that question, perhaps via the commentary of Fischer himself or his “small entourage”. There may be no better explanation than that he was unwell, and satisfied with a draw as he recovered his stamina, which did not take long as he was soon complaining about his room, the food, and the playing conditions. ‘This was an indication he was fully recovered and back to his usual (cantankerous) self’. (The New York Times, Nov 14, 1971)
Two videos a day. Dubious,but we likee
I love your chess videos!! ❤❤
Last game Fischer offered a draw by trying to sacrifice his rook for a perpetual check and now he draws the game too early
This is not the fischer we all know
He got cold after his 2nd game. I am not making excuses for him, even in game 1 Petrosian had better game
Artur Koort Aha ... Petrosian's stylr is totally different from taimanov and larsen styles
@@hishamel-abbasy2337 , not only that. Petrosian was better than them + more focused on chess + better trained.
As told by Nikolai Krogius who was coach of Spassky in 72 match, Entire Soviet chess federation launched "preperation against Fischer" even before Fischer - Taimanov game was played. All experts and masters of Sovidt Chess federation prepared their own view and report on Fischer. A soviet student even wrote a PHD thesis on Fischer. All these were being done for Spassky as the camp was dedicated to Spassky but I doubt Petrosian or even Taimanow would not be let benefit from it.
Artur Koort Wow .. chess wasn't just a game or sport these days
Ye this is Fischer-but-with-a-cold
Pozdrav, antonio
Super su ti videi, zanima me oces li dolazit uskoro u zagreb, i ako da da odigramo koju, bilo bi super. Pozdrav iz zg :)
Was waiting for this😍
In the desc box it says 'Chesk out Boris Spassky vs Tigran Vartanovich Petrosian'
CHESK
CHESK
CHESK!!!
Uploaded 2 minutes ago and already 21 comments, that's impressive
yay. 2 vids in 1 day (for me early mornign and late evening). damn agadmatr u got me hooked to your vids :)
One more draw then...
The crushing continues.
SenorQuichotte
Did u just spoiler us
I also would like to know whether Petrosian knew that this game was even replicating a previous game. Sometimes players aren't aware or only realize it in the middle game. I have a few questions from this result. For instance, why would Petrosian have accepted the draw last game in a position where he may have been slightly better with the black pieces? I assumed that he wanted the draw so that he could take the white pieces and win! But then to draw again, and in this fashion, altogether confusing from a tactical perspective. But maybe it was a flex of poise. "Yes, I have beaten you, but I don't need to use my momentum, I don't need to crush you while you're sick, in fact I will resort back to playing for draws, and when you are better again, I will crush you with honor." Something like this
Bottom line here for Fischer was that it was a much better result than the last time with the black pieces.
I think Petrosian caught a cold too, but did not tell it to the public.
Loving this match
I love vast knowledge
❤️
I'm sure you'll be covering the 2018 candidate games but damn am I excited for those #suggestions
Tow video in one day 😮😮😮😮
Came for the "It's ok"s stayed for the chess
I'm not sure to what extent Fisher was truly ill. Let's say someone from Petrosian's team was approached by a member of Fischer's, and they asked that the players went to a draw because Fisher was sick. Petrosian seems like the type to accept this and play for a draw. Considering that Petrosian had kept the overall score even, and had beat Fischer, I think Petrosian knew that if he took advantage of Fischer's condition and won the game, that it would be a blemish on a very impressive and honorable set of results, because the people would say "Oh, but Fisher was ill, so it doesn't count" just like how they tried to do with Larsen vs Fischer and the whole "altitude sickness" excuse when Larsen was making terrible moves. I also think Fisher was a hypochondriac, and the pressure of the match, plus losing your win streak in that style, this was enough to make him become susceptible to illness. Or, he wasn't very sick, and these same events were having a major psychological effect.
Sicilian accelerated dragon variation is the coolest variation just because of the name 🤣🤣🤣
Rip ears.
From that hello everyone.
"I don't know how many times Mr. Fisher changed his room. Everyday. I think." - Hotel Manager.
Id imagine that Petrosian had probably analyzed that game after the fact and possibly had found an improvement on it, or was hoping that Fischer would fall for something. But by the time it got to that point he realized that Fischer was playing it out perfectly and offered a draw.
Best chess videos ever !
i love your videos, bro.
4:40 Why Q takes and not B takes?
leyubar1 because its already ending when queen off the board
Gauging an opponent is important thing in very battle.
Petrosian allowed it because he was the Karjakin of his day - the Minister of Defense. He was a winter king , and was later ( after the WC) , in the seventies , fired from his own chess publication because his Russian masters deemed him too timid
Bullshit say that after games 6 to 9
Which book is best in your opinion to learn chess??
I think they were both demonstrating to each other "perfect knowledge", neither wanted to be the deviant, and as said Petrosian could display some oneupmanship, "ill defeat you easily as black nex t time."
Hey man, can you show some #urasov gambit games played at top level. if there are any?
What “reaching time control” and “pawn island” means?
The brainless UA-camr It means you need some brains after all to understand chess
the time control:you have 2h for the first 40 moves then 1h is added
00:53 - On what basis @agadmator do you say that it could have been 3-0 to Petrosian? You must be crazy to make such assumptions?
Pls do lela 0 machs she is a monster right now.
STRONGER THE FIDE!!!
AGADMATOR!!!
2 vids in one day=
With the pawn on c4, this is not a Sicilian
First agad video under 10 min :)
... no
I just want to know how you keep your goatee/hair in such great shape all the time! Impressive! Do you cut it yourself or have a family member in the business?
Could Petrosian do Bishop to H6 instead of Rokh to C1?
Maybe Petrosian was scared of losing?? Or maybe he thought that every move was actually the best possible move in the position?
gentleman. just a fast draw so fisher did not have to play with his cold
What's a pawn island?
I think it means a pawn that's isolated from any other pawns of the same color.
respect
#suggestion: How about choosing a game from today's (6th of September) upset in Speed Chess Championship? Lower ranked Jan Krzysztof Duda defeated a heavy favourite Sergey Karjakin.
@agadmator 0:50 "It could've been 3 to 0 for Tigran Petrosian" , what does that even mean sir? enlighten me.
HeLLo eVeRYoNe
Show Leela please!
why didn't PEtrosian push for more in this game and wear Fischer out given that she's sick?
maybe he took the draw because he knew fisher was not feeling well, not very strategic but respectable
should change title to deja vu
Go Fischer ❤️
Feel free to increase our vast knowledge 😂😂😂
HELLO Antonio!
I wouldn't want to be a world champion that got there by exploiting someone's health issues. Maybe Petrosian thought the same?
Hey agad, I was watching a GM Ben finegold stream from the other day and you had some fans supporting you on the stream and he gave a shot at you saying you’re a 1300 player but mentioned he doesn’t know you. I’m a fan of both of you. You should review one of his games! That’d be awesome!!
He would allow this, because he doesnt believe the bullsh1t that it could have easily been 3-0 for him, maybe?
A comment on chessgames.com has a quote from Petrosian cited in the book "Russians versus Fischer" - bit I do not own a copy and cannot verify the quote.
sorry for messing up the link there
Hi
#suggestion @agadmator can you cover this game, from utut adianto one of the strongest Indonesian grandmasters. I think you have enough subscribers from Indonesia, and also I think you have never covered an Indonesian chess grandmaster ... I think the beauty of this game is worthy of your coverage...
Alexander Baburin (2530) vs Utut Adianto (2510)
Liechtenstein (1993), LIE Queen's Gambit Accepted: Normal Variation (D25)
Who the hell are these 4 "haters" (so far) ?
Last!
What if all the old school GM's got a team to face all the new school GM's.
Who would be on the teams?
And who would win?
It will be the same as in any sport. New champs would simply destroy old ones. Every sport (so chess too) evolved enormously.
False.
Watched
First finally !