Okay I've heard about this Bobby Fischer guy before and heard that he's good but I was like "how good can he be really?" and then I saw this series and holy shit this is what Bobby Fischer is - the absolute machine. Thank you so much for expanding my vast knowledge mate.
@@sokolkristollari7895 20 game winning streak, 12-0 vs 2 top teir players and his 3rd opponent 6½/2½ vs Tigran with 4 wins in row on him; so Ficher crushed him as well, something Karpov an Kasperov couldn't do vs an older Tigran. He had a 11-0 in the US chess championship 63/64. And then in the Herceg Novi unofficial blitz tournament in 1970, considered one of the greatest blitz tournaments ever held, Ficher scored 19/22, 4 an half points ahead of Tal for first place, and his only loss was to Korchnoi which he split with him, and he beat all the Russians that played in that tournament 8½/1½. And in all 22 games from Herceq, Fischer only spent 2 an half minutes per game as they didn't have time increments then either. Then many months later in a Manhattan blitz tournament, Ficher scored 21½/22, and with those two blitz tournaments, he would of had a 2950 rating, and the obvious other achievements like 8-0 vs Nigel Short an what have you.
As I've said, I sat near Larsen when he won a big international tournament in Snowmass, Co. before this match. He had no problems with altitude or anything else then. Larsen's only real problem was facing the great Bobby Fischer over the board in 1971. Wonderful analysis of these games! Bravo!!
Looking back at your older videos, you seem so much more confident and open to your community.. Keep up the great work and attitude, highly appreciated by all of us!
The fact that Fischer basically invented the modern chess clock, an entirely new and recognized game of Fischer Random, the complete annihilation of the soviet chess machine single handedly, and the fact he was 120-130 points ahead of his closest competition cements the fact for that period of time, without any debate or question, he was and is the greatest chess player who ever lived..I think you need a category for "Other" when talking about the greatest ..in other words, Fischer was of course without question and for all time the greatest: but who could be classified below him? Watching Magnus play is like kissing ur sister.. his games are uninspired, robotic, obviously computer theory, and little to no creativity
Magnus wins because he plays the engine moves better. He doesn't make a mistake forgetting what move the engine would make. Most chess players now never think they just move the piece they are supposed to. The engine takes out any thought of, "let's move this piece." You don't move a piece trying a different defense or attack now. You move what the engine says you to move. The loser of a game makes a mistake. Getting away from the engine. Magnus pretty much never makes that mistake. As Fischer never much made a mistake to lose a game. Magnus bores his way to a match win. But that's the way chess it played now. The player that loses misses an engine move. The other didn't.
I have seen almost all GJ chess tricks series beside Agadmators every video and my rating is horrible, especially in blitz (actually it dropped from 1600 to 1200, rapid dropped to 1400, only classical remains 1700 and puzzles rose to 1800)...I think my brain simply haven't used to work fast because I've never played blitz games...anyway, I feel quite dumb 😰
I started playing chess 1 year ago and my rating increased from 900 to 1500 (in chess.com) ..I have seen my graph ...it was increasing slowly in beginning but after 4 months when I started watching this channel I learned a lot of things and increased rapidly...
Watching bobby fisher player is such a pleasure, it’s hard to imagine how his mind works. LIKE HOW DO YOU WIN ALL OF THOSE GAMES WITHOUT ONE LOSS. I go on lichess and lose 5 games before I win one 😂 thanks agadmator for this series I love it!
SUPER CHESS GAMES BY THE BEST CHESS PLAYER EVER-DEAR BOBBY FISCHER/GOD SUPER MAGIC!! I MISS YOU BOBBY FISCHER!!!THANKS FOR SHARE DEAR RADIC-SHARE MORE BOBBY AND MORPHY GAMES WILL YOU??THANKS IN FRONT!!!
Before the match Larsen predicted that he would win with a score of 6-5. It's amazing how almost everyone in the chess world at that time underestimated Fischer's strength. He was definitely in a class by himself.
@@davidcopson5800 The scoring was first player to get 6 points wins. So Larsen thought they would be tied 5-5 and he would win the next game. It was an embarrassing prediction.
#suggestion @agadmator can you cover this game, from utut adianto one of the strongest Indonesian grandmasters. I think you have enough subscribers from Indonesia, and also I think you have never covered an Indonesian chess grandmaster ... I think the beauty of this game is worthy of your coverage... Alexander Baburin (2530) vs Utut Adianto (2510) Liechtenstein (1993), LIE Queen's Gambit Accepted: Normal Variation (D25)
Picture in newspaper at 13:30 can't be from game 6. Board never had that position in game 6. Maybe they had to use stock photos if Bobby wouldn't allow cameras?
I remember when Botvinnik wrote a book about grunfield or something and then Fisher just crushed it using a move not considered in the book. Writing the book was a huge mistake xD
Agadmator- as you head toward the epic Spassky-Fischer series I hope you have access to the great book "Russians vs. Fischer" A fantastic resource for the chess fanatic! I am and I have it.
The newspaper photo....was that Fischer and Larsen doing a post-mortem? In the game there was never a white pawn on f6 or black bishop on h8...I think that did happen in an earlier game, though?
I know! I thought I was seeing things... but none of the other games between Larsen and Fischer seem to have reached that position... I'm also thinking the photo is probably post game analysis or something, as the position resembles that game, but slightly.
What an amazing series! Imagine the slow creeping death crawling upon Larsen game after game! Uggghhhh I would not want to be in his position. Fischer truly is the best or at least he is in the conversation.
I know this is a year old post, but I don't see the position on the photo at the end in the actual chess game. Does Fischer ever have a bishop in H8? Am I missing something.
If you asked an AI computer in 1971, if there was one - "Hello, Alexa" - to calculate the odds of Fischer losing the next five games in a row to Larsen, imagine what it would say...
HELP! i found a position from a spassky game in a book published in 1974 however ive looked online everwhere and there is no record of the game anywhere. how can i find this game?
@7:59, When Fischer played Rb7, he had much better...simply QxC3...now there is a tactic in the position if white plays Bf3 as previously you said he loses the exchange..but now it doesnt work, as black would have Rxd4 Rxd4 Qxd4 Qxd4 and now Nxf3+ Rx f3 and BxQ...game over for white.
Sir can you suggest me some good books or a good way to learn chess. I started playing in december 2019 and i reached 1600 rating in lichess. Need some preparations now. Any suggestions would do.Thank you.
I know this is going to make me sound kind of stupid, but... Does anyone else feel like the games are analyzed too fast? Sometimes I find myself wanting to think about the positions or just enjoy a more methodical approach to why certain moves are made. I know I can pause the video any time I like, but then I lose the very enjoyable interactive element that Agadmator offers as I ponder the positions. I don't know... Maybe I'm just being picky here, but sometimes get lost between the different variations and then lose the enjoyment of following the main lines because of how quickly the board changes and there seems to be very little time to reorient my thinking when the logic shifts without a breathe between sentences. The older videos used to give more space to different positions and it was nice to just soak in the knowledge without having to rewind or pause the video. ChessNetwork is a good example of what I mean, here. But perhaps I'm missing the point, as I don't play often enough to keep up.
"Larsen tried a lot of ideas, and for the fina... 6th game" :D
""""WHAT ELSE WOULD TAL SUGGEST.??""" hahahaha
quick, what's the piece I can sacrifice the fastest from this position?
queen sacrifice
who/what is Tal?
What is Tahl jaja
Greatest line ever what else would Tahl suggest. Lmaof
''...attack the king, but what else would Tal suggest?''. Beautiful.
Okay I've heard about this Bobby Fischer guy before and heard that he's good but I was like "how good can he be really?" and then I saw this series and holy shit this is what Bobby Fischer is - the absolute machine. Thank you so much for expanding my vast knowledge mate.
Same here.
Thankfully we have increased our vast knowledge 😅
20-0 wins in a row at his peak, that's how really good Fischer was
xristolaris let the bodies hit the floor.....Next
@@sokolkristollari7895 20 game winning streak, 12-0 vs 2 top teir players and his 3rd opponent 6½/2½ vs Tigran with 4 wins in row on him; so Ficher crushed him as well, something Karpov an Kasperov couldn't do vs an older Tigran. He had a 11-0 in the US chess championship 63/64. And then in the Herceg Novi unofficial blitz tournament in 1970, considered one of the greatest blitz tournaments ever held, Ficher scored 19/22, 4 an half points ahead of Tal for first place, and his only loss was to Korchnoi which he split with him, and he beat all the Russians that played in that tournament 8½/1½. And in all 22 games from Herceq, Fischer only spent 2 an half minutes per game as they didn't have time increments then either. Then many months later in a Manhattan blitz tournament, Ficher scored 21½/22, and with those two blitz tournaments, he would of had a 2950 rating, and the obvious other achievements like 8-0 vs Nigel Short an what have you.
It’s like when you see George Carlin for the 1st time
A draw against fisher is a victory.
Fischer was so far ahead of his time. He just dominates the competition. It is truly awe inspiring to watch these classic games of his. Just wow!!
This is particularly satisfying because Larsen was so arrogant insisting he should be first board at the world vs soviet union tournament
i love that i can go back and watch these finally. i am astonished at the volume of great videos you have made over the years, and no mid roll ads!
As I've said, I sat near Larsen when he won a big international tournament in Snowmass, Co. before this match. He had no problems with altitude or anything else then. Larsen's only real problem was facing the great Bobby Fischer over the board in 1971. Wonderful analysis of these games! Bravo!!
Looking back at your older videos, you seem so much more confident and open to your community..
Keep up the great work and attitude, highly appreciated by all of us!
Though I feel sick right now, it still didn't stop me from clicking on this video at the speed of light!!
Thanks for covering this! I enjoy all of your videos :)
I've had an excellent Saturday, thank you, and it's about to get better!
Not only will this video improve my Saturday, but it will also improve my *vast* knowledge of the 1971 world chess championship candidates match
The fact that Fischer basically invented the modern chess clock, an entirely new and recognized game of Fischer Random, the complete annihilation of the soviet chess machine single handedly, and the fact he was 120-130 points ahead of his closest competition cements the fact for that period of time, without any debate or question, he was and is the greatest chess player who ever lived..I think you need a category for "Other" when talking about the greatest ..in other words, Fischer was of course without question and for all time the greatest: but who could be classified below him? Watching Magnus play is like kissing ur sister.. his games are uninspired, robotic, obviously computer theory, and little to no creativity
Magnus wins because he plays the engine moves better. He doesn't make a mistake forgetting what move the engine would make. Most chess players now never think they just move the piece they are supposed to. The engine takes out any thought of, "let's move this piece." You don't move a piece trying a different defense or attack now. You move what the engine says you to move. The loser of a game makes a mistake. Getting away from the engine. Magnus pretty much never makes that mistake. As Fischer never much made a mistake to lose a game. Magnus bores his way to a match win. But that's the way chess it played now. The player that loses misses an engine move. The other didn't.
I enjoyed your analysis of these games. Good commentary, thank you.
Shoutout to the watchers of the show. One day our vast knowledge will also be excellent
Great vid agad. I always looks forward to see a chess video everytime i look on my sub box. Thanks a lot!
Amazing quote from Fischer , Only few people Understood it completely
Do you mean the politics with the Cold War behind the scenes? (One reason Bobby was considered "crazy" was he didn't want to be a pawn of the CIA.)
just by watching you explain the idea behind the moves, I've climbed 100 points in ranking. keep up the good work! =)
Every time when I do not know what to play I literally ask myself: "What would Bent Larsen do?"
And then you lose
@@user-zb8tq5pr4x And then he tries something else!
There are 3 people playing in this game: Larsen, Fischer and Tal
Mr. Agadmator today is my birthday can i get a heart?
Happy birthday!
Sorry, I dont know how to give a heart, so I like will have to do. Happy birthday!!
@Dhananjay Kavoor I like this variation haha
Ruiran Oliveira 676 subscribers have birthdays every day on Agadmator’s channel. Count yourself lucky among them!
@@fienddube don't worry i will!!
oh man i've seen all your videos for the last year atleast and im still so bad hahaha
Antonio Soler Sueiro -Same with me
Not with me...you have to learn while you are watching..... learning is something that he can't teach you
I have seen almost all GJ chess tricks series beside Agadmators every video and my rating is horrible, especially in blitz (actually it dropped from 1600 to 1200, rapid dropped to 1400, only classical remains 1700 and puzzles rose to 1800)...I think my brain simply haven't used to work fast because I've never played blitz games...anyway, I feel quite dumb 😰
same im only 1k
I started playing chess 1 year ago and my rating increased from 900 to 1500 (in chess.com) ..I have seen my graph ...it was increasing slowly in beginning but after 4 months when I started watching this channel I learned a lot of things and increased rapidly...
Watching bobby fisher player is such a pleasure, it’s hard to imagine how his mind works. LIKE HOW DO YOU WIN ALL OF THOSE GAMES WITHOUT ONE LOSS. I go on lichess and lose 5 games before I win one 😂 thanks agadmator for this series I love it!
12 - 0.
Bring on Petrosian. Payback time.
Let the crushing continue.
There is a flashing light on the right side of the screen in case no one has mentioned it. Bravo your coverage of the match!
SUPER CHESS GAMES BY THE BEST CHESS PLAYER EVER-DEAR BOBBY FISCHER/GOD SUPER MAGIC!! I MISS YOU BOBBY FISCHER!!!THANKS FOR SHARE DEAR RADIC-SHARE MORE BOBBY AND MORPHY GAMES WILL YOU??THANKS IN FRONT!!!
6 great games by Fischer. I feel bad for poor Larsen. I hope you will show a game that he wins at some point in future to redeem him.
Yes, still enjoying the series, thanks.
Suyeah!
Post another of your games sometime.
Really enjoying the channel going back through the years.
Thanks buddy, thanks a lot for this show and for ur channel
Another hammering. Taimanov in the bin with Larson. Petrosian next.
Fischer was ,is and will always be the best.
what about magnus carlsen?
I disagree if that's who you trust in battle I simply call upon the magician mikhail tal😏
@@RavielSafer Only time will tell with Carlsen. It is too soon to say he's the best.
Love this series and looking forward to its continuation.
Before the match Larsen predicted that he would win with a score of 6-5. It's amazing how almost everyone in the chess world at that time underestimated Fischer's strength. He was definitely in a class by himself.
How could the score be 6-5 when only ten potential games were played in this match?
@@davidcopson5800 The scoring was first player to get 6 points wins. So Larsen thought they would be tied 5-5 and he would win the next game. It was an embarrassing prediction.
@@rafanifischer3152 Okay. In that case it was certainly an embarrassing prediction.
@@davidcopson5800 Yes. 6-0 was an embarrassing result but Larsen's "prediction" made it much more so.
not even pass move 50 daaaammmnnnn
Hi Agadmator,
I also hope you are having an excellent Saturday.
Thanks for the video!
I am! Thanks :)
#suggestion
Pragnanandha's sister just became WGM. Show a game on her.
Bent Larsen picture looks like he was pictured right after the defeat
9:26 there is a defense against Qg7, namely Kf8
#suggestion @agadmator can you cover this game, from utut adianto one of the strongest Indonesian grandmasters. I think you have enough subscribers from Indonesia, and also I think you have never covered an Indonesian chess grandmaster ... I think the beauty of this game is worthy of your coverage...
Alexander Baburin (2530) vs Utut Adianto (2510)
Liechtenstein (1993), LIE Queen's Gambit Accepted: Normal Variation (D25)
Watching this video on Saturday, Nov 28th, 2020!!
Check out Fischer's hands in the photo near the end. He looks like he could be a concert pianist. And why not, he's an artist.
9:25 fawn pawn gets installed
Thanks!
I wonder what a Fischer-Korchnoi final would have looked like
Tomislav Blažević Why were we all fond of Korchnoi?
@@stefanversac5539 he was a badass :)
Picture in newspaper at 13:30 can't be from game 6. Board never had that position in game 6. Maybe they had to use stock photos if Bobby wouldn't allow cameras?
I remember when Botvinnik wrote a book about grunfield or something and then Fisher just crushed it using a move not considered in the book. Writing the book was a huge mistake xD
Thank You Agad!!
The newspaper photo doesn't appear to feature a position from this game! Bishop on h8... when did that occur? Sneaky reporting at the time, it seems
#suggestion Paul Morphy vs Henry Bird 1858 London, though not a technically correct game, but a nice example of Morphy's attacking brilliance.
Agadmator- as you head toward the epic Spassky-Fischer series I hope you have access to the great book "Russians vs. Fischer" A fantastic resource for the chess fanatic! I am and I have it.
Dang. Experts can tell with your first move, you’ve already lost.
The newspaper photo....was that Fischer and Larsen doing a post-mortem? In the game there was never a white pawn on f6 or black bishop on h8...I think that did happen in an earlier game, though?
I know! I thought I was seeing things... but none of the other games between Larsen and Fischer seem to have reached that position... I'm also thinking the photo is probably post game analysis or something, as the position resembles that game, but slightly.
Reading yours, and skepticlogician's comments, I came to realize (partly) what chess fanhood actually means.
Those who under-estimate fischer should see him crushing the soviet GMs in this candidates
big heart ❤💙❤💙❤💙❤💙🌻🌻
from Kurdistan
This video promoted my lunch to queen lunch.
Bent was always critical of Bobby so this was the ultimate righteous revenge.
6:33 i hoped you would say "excellently maneuvered by fisher"
I don't even play chess or know any of its rules. why do I watch this channel so much
What an amazing series!
Imagine the slow creeping death crawling upon Larsen game after game!
Uggghhhh I would not want to be in his position.
Fischer truly is the best or at least he is in the conversation.
'But of course you know what would Tal suggest'. 🤣
Petrosian & Korchnoi was a game decided by the Soviets. It was planned that Petrosian would advance.
maybe So vs Caruana next? looking forward for champions clash too!
Larsen was apparently a great believer in the Bird, actually.
The picture in the end with the caption, game six, was never an actual state of the board of game 6. What game was the picture taken from?
I know this is a year old post, but I don't see the position on the photo at the end in the actual chess game. Does Fischer ever have a bishop in H8? Am I missing something.
So yeah......great series!!
woot woot you're at 248k subs!!
"What else would Tal suggest," haha!
Anyone else watches the videos religiously but doesn't play a single chess game? 😁
probably not XDDDDD excluding some but hey do whatever ya want (unless its illegal)
haha how could you watch these videos and never have played a single game!
people watch gaming video
I mean when I grew up on it, but haven't touched it in 10+ years
@@eyto96 get the chess.com app and add me as a friend. ... my user name is cheekslapper.( .. but i don't really live up to it)
Simply great video and game
I have this strange and pleasant sensation when Agadmator says: "capture, capture". Anyone?
No, maybe you putt from the rough?
It comes from the fact of the pleasure I feel when I capture a piece. I don't know, hear him saying feels similar.
Tal suggested to move the Queen blah blah blah and then start an attack on Kings side
Agadmator: Of course, what else.
Exactly my thoughts
We like Mikhail Tal's commentary
Fischers rb7 reminds me of fabi's ra1 against So
6:48 - What would happen if black knight moved to D7 to defend the Rook?
is that picture in the newspaper of Fischer and Larsen really the 6'th game ? When was black's bishop on H8 during the game ?
Hey agadmator can u show us a game between fischer and nezhmetdinov.It's my earnest request to u
they never played
Ok... I thought that they had played
At the resignation position the knight is trapped
was waiting for this ...
If you asked an AI computer in 1971, if there was one - "Hello, Alexa" - to calculate the odds of Fischer losing the next five games in a row to Larsen, imagine what it would say...
12:20 Most likely? Havent seen Rh6?
HELP! i found a position from a spassky game in a book published in 1974 however ive looked online everwhere and there is no record of the game anywhere. how can i find this game?
How can I get rid of the annoying transcript that is covering part of the board?
#suggestion Karpov vs Kasparov 1985 world championship series pls
@7:59, When Fischer played Rb7, he had much better...simply QxC3...now there is a tactic in the position if white plays Bf3 as previously you said he loses the exchange..but now it doesnt work, as black would have Rxd4 Rxd4 Qxd4 Qxd4 and now Nxf3+ Rx f3 and BxQ...game over for white.
Happy Saturday to you!
Where do you stream? What's the link?
He played 5 games seriously and then gave him the bird
why tal was not playing ?
You think Larsen played chess, but maybe he was a mystic practicing ego-death.
Did he say prophylactic move?
#suggestion Judit Polgar vs Peter Sinkovics 1990
Sir can you suggest me some good books or a good way to learn chess. I started playing in december 2019 and i reached 1600 rating in lichess. Need some preparations now. Any suggestions would do.Thank you.
Two books I would suggest : Chess Fundamentals by Jose Raul Capablanca and My System by Aron Nimzowitch.
I know this is going to make me sound kind of stupid, but... Does anyone else feel like the games are analyzed too fast? Sometimes I find myself wanting to think about the positions or just enjoy a more methodical approach to why certain moves are made. I know I can pause the video any time I like, but then I lose the very enjoyable interactive element that Agadmator offers as I ponder the positions. I don't know... Maybe I'm just being picky here, but sometimes get lost between the different variations and then lose the enjoyment of following the main lines because of how quickly the board changes and there seems to be very little time to reorient my thinking when the logic shifts without a breathe between sentences. The older videos used to give more space to different positions and it was nice to just soak in the knowledge without having to rewind or pause the video. ChessNetwork is a good example of what I mean, here. But perhaps I'm missing the point, as I don't play often enough to keep up.
So bobby fischer is basically the Micheal jordan of chess?
i clicked the notification as it poped up
11:24
If at Q×g4, why not R×d4?