This interviewer isn't very professional. He comes across as biased, judgmental, and smart alecky. Regardless of how guilty you think a person is, you should always remain fair and objective when conducting an interview.
nancy brown you’re not alone in feeling that way. This is one of the rare instances where I don’t care, however. I truly think someone should be inappropriate and as harsh as possible. Spark this sociopath’s flame.
Skeeter Doo You do realize how old OJ is right? The first book written that even made DNA widespread public knowledge was released and even then they had just barely even figured out what the shape of it was.
Tell me how a man murders 2 ppl that had significant defense wounds and had 0 bruises on his body and a small cut knowing ron was like a black belt come on OJ had arthritis in both knees he can barley move no way he killed 2 ppl like that and had 0 bruises on his body lol
@JJ Penley I suggest you watch his interview titled; “If I did it”. He describes how he did it & mentions he had never seen so much blood & had to get rid of his bloody clothes. There is also an animated video on YT done by crime analysts based on the wounds showing how it happened.
And in China, Russia, Syria, North Korea, Most of the Middle East ...... Its not what you did its what they say you did. Is OJ guilty? Yea 99% sure of that... But the prosecution Fucked up.... And OJ got off...
The police messed up and the prosecution went into it way to cocky. Every little mistake from police or prosecution was pounced and magnified by the defense. Everything went the of the defense. Anyone else well they been on death row. Biggest mistake : camera in courtroom. It then became a spectacle. The glove being shrunk and not fitting mistake 2. Mistake 3 fuhrman lying about saying the n word and thus taking the fifth so he wouldn't further incriminate himself. If Furhman had said yes he has regretabbly used that eord.i. the past and if Darden didnt ask the oj out on blood soaked shrunk gloves on top of other gloves, and if the trial was not done in the inner city, guilty as fuck
You make a good observation. However, this is a man that had the cash to employ (and for 2 years) THE BEST legal brains in America to keep his ass out of prison. Personally, I don't believe OJ Simpson murdered both Ron Goldman & Nicole. However and quite clearly he's NOT entirely innocent. Therefore and for two years, the legal professionals that he employed to defend him would have also trained him (and forever) to talk about the case in this manner & fashion as quite clearly he has got a dark secret. OJ Simpson knows what really happened that night. As do major players of his defence team, many of which would have taken THE TRUTH to the grave. I'll put it out there. From my own independent research, I believe OJ Simpson hired Glen Edward Rogers to rob Nicole (after becoming acquainted with him via Faye Resnick) of some expensive jewellery both were in dispute over the ownership of. However and in a tragic twist of fate, the robbery attempt spiralled out of control when out of the blue, Ron Goldman turned up. The only reason why R.Goldman turned up was because earlier on that evening, Nicole's mother had not noticed that she had dropped her reading glasses on the pavement outside the Meezaluna restaurant. As soon as Goldman turned up, Glen Edward Rogers killer & animalistic instincts kicked in. There was only ever going to be one outcome. Rogers then fled the scene. OJ Simpson is expecting & left waiting for a call from Rogers to say that he's done his deed (i.e. robbed Nicole) and is waiting to meet OJ Simpson to hand over the disputed items & get paid. However, the call never comes. OJ Simpson sensing something is wrong goes to Nicole's to see what's up but unwittingly walks into a murder scene. Therefore, this is a murder that ultimately OJ Simpson is responsible for BUT has unwittingly instigated through the hire of Glen Edward Rogers. However, as soon as the news breaks that both Ron Goldman & Nicole have been found butchered and that OJ Simpson's DNA is to be found all over the place, the scenario & story is so sensational that the police, along with the media and the public all get caught up in the notion that OJ and only OJ Simpson must be the killer. BIG MISTAKE and a huge physiology advantage for both OJ Simpson & his defence team. If the police & the prosecution hadn't have taken such a narrow approach, then OJ Simpson would have been snookered, lock stock & barrel. With the overwhelming evidence against OJ Simpson, the police with the prosecution should have stepped back, taken a deep breath and calmly thought "OK, we know for fact you've visited the crime scene & not reported it. Why is this? Why would one do that, especially given the relationship between the accused & the victim." But both the police & the prosecution got sucked into the sensational aspect that OJ & only OJ Simpson alone could have been the killer. Well IF that's what you THINK, OK. But guest what? Both he and his defence team know that he's NOT entirely innocent, but at the same time he's also NOT the killer. Once again, both he & his defence team know this and this crucial piece of knowledge (more than race, money, celebratory status, etc) played right into their hands. The climax of this strategy was when C.Darden got OJ Simpson to try on the glove(s) the killer wore. From here it was plain sailing, "if it doesn't fit, you must acquit." Guest what? That's EXACTLY what the jury did. They had no other choice because that piece of FACTUAL evidence tipped the balance of the scales in favour of OJ and showed the world that OJ Simpson was NOT the killer. Once again, that's what the police (via there shoddy "police work") and the prosecution set out to prove wasn't it? In a court of law, "words must mean what they say." The FACTUAL evidence was not compatible with accusation and the prosecution's case crumbled & FAILED miserably. But IF the criminal case against OJ Simpson and starting with the initial police work from the L.A.P.D. was more broad and set out to show or prove his involvement and from there, implicating others following up other credible leads, then NOBODY in the world could have successfully defended OJ Simspon. Hence why and as you correctly point out the "lawyer" talk. In my humble opinion, OJ Simpson is not the killer. However, OJ Simpson (quite clearly) is NOT 100% innocent. For the rest of his life and quite clearly, when asked about this event, OJ Simpson must be EXTREMELY careful what he says. Quite clearly we see this throughout this entire interview.
Also remember this is 1996 before all his other legal troubles. He's desperately trying to restore his "Juice" persona that was previously so celebrated by the public. He's a narcissist sociopath who thinks he can actually restore his legacy and image that he enjoyed so much prior to the murders. Only pure narcissism mixed with sociopathic detachment could overcome the sheer foolishness and stupidity of doing such a thing after having been acquitted and essentially freed from the burden of murder. His lawyers must have been shaking their heads.
He spins a good tale. He claims in this interview that he cut his hand in Chicago.So why in his interview with Vannatter and Lange, does he say he reopened a cut in Chicago that he had done getting ready for his flight to Chicago?
What ? This interview is after he just sat through the most infamous trial in probably the public's memory? Of course he is fucking well versed on all of it.... And knows what to say ajd when to say it.
At 11:05…..so 19 officers originally responding to the murder scene and having done a walk-through found no second glove, but then Mark Fuhrman comes along a couple hours later, somehow finds the second glove everyone else missed and then decides to plant it at OJ's house at EXACTLY the spot where Kato heard a thump a just minutes after the murders had been committed…???
No matter what he says or denies I'd be like " Wasn't all that blood sticky ? & When you snatched their lives was it the same rush you got when you made a touch down , and what did you see in there eyes be for you sliced and do you think you got it out of your system or do you think you might enjoy another good sticking ?" You know and on and on !
Oj murdered ron and Nicole no doubt about it in my opinion.... I've read for hours about this case and ain't nobody telling me that the evidence presented in court wasn't enough to convict him! Oj was a very smart confident charming man also arrogant according to all sources.. let's not forget he was an actor too... The reason he can speak so confidently in this interview Is 2 reasons.. 1 he'd already been acquitted at this point so it doesn't really matter if there's any inconsistencies with what he said previously during the trial.. The interviewer isn't exactly pressing him hard after oj gives his answers etc oj also knows hell never be tried for this murder ever again.. secondly ojs defence main argument for ojs innocence is unreliable dna evidence/ racism etc... So Simpson can pretty much deflect any kind of scrutiny by simply saying the lapd is racist or the dna handlers were incompetent etc this interview really wouldn't be difficult for oj at all... if you watch the civil trial tapes when Simpson Is being pressed by Daniel petrocelli it's a completey different story... Petrocelli hammers Simpson with everything and picks up on every inconsistency... Petrocelli asks Simpson about Nicole's clearly beaten face.. shows him a picture and Simpson says Nicole was wearing makeup... Hes also shown evidence of him wearing those Bruno magli shoes.. Simpson is shown a picture of him wearing the exact shoes that matched the footprints at the murder scene and says there not his shoes haha.....The one thing that pisses me off about this case is that people turned it into a race issue particularly Simpsons defence team ... Shouldn't matter if your black white yellow or green the evidence presented was more than enough to convict Simpson of the crime... The fact that quite alot of black people celebrated because Simpson got off simply because he's black says alot about those people's character... Imagine if Nicole was your mum or imagine ron was your son... How would you feel if Simpson got off despite the overwhelming evidence against him?
Since video 1 he keeps deflecting the questions regarding the evidence makin them a legal matter. It's like Oj what about the blood trails, oh the dna sample improper handling , oh the witnesses picked by the prosecution didn't accused me.
When the murders happened, the last thing I wanted to hear, was OJ did it. He was handsome, charming, very likable guy, just like in this interview, but I am convinced he did it. It's such a shame that families were destroyed over jealousy and rage.
"O.J., when all of this was going on, did you ever think that one day, twenty years from now, that Cuba Gooding, Jr. would be portraying you in a movie on FX?"
TheRanhughes , Cuba was terrible pick for OJ, no ? He was all wrong for the part. Voice , body language , all wrong. The rest of the casting was pretty damn good.
THEBYGONE , I thought most of the casting was ok , to very good (Marcia Clark /Darden/Cochran were homeruns ) , but wasn’t impressed with F Lee Bailey pick either. Weak. Though not as bad as OJ/Cuba. Cuba just a terrible pick. How do you get the main character so wrong ? F Lee Bailey pick is at least forgivable. If they had gotten OJ part right, that would have been a great, great production.
@@PhenomenalDiva Travolta at least nailed Shapiro’s body lanuage and facial expressions. The most important character to get right was OJ, and it was the most wrongly casted, by a country mile
The way he answers these questions makes me think for sure he's thought about what to say if anything comes up and know to execute exact phrases as if he's looking at himself in the mirror. If you see other sociopaths/murder interviews on the killer speaks, you can see the way they look you in your eyes when they talk.. because they believe a complete other person did it.
You're so right. I know people where nothing is their fault. OJ only cares about how others perceive him. He was addicted to fame. Normal people would sink into reclusion when 80% of the world thinks they're a murderer. OJ tried desperately to restore his image.
I find the difference in opinion that everyone has on this case is so fascinating. I too have been watching these videos and noticed at certain points I believe him 100%, but at other points it sounds like he's lying like a mothafucka lol! He's a good actor so idk. I'm one of the people who thinks the evidence against him is absolutely overwhelming and yes I think he did it but I also think someone helped him in some way...
This interview is going for more than an hour and Ronald Goldmans name has not been uttered. If he, or his relationship with Nicole was supposed to be the motive I find this the most unprofessional and unrealistic act of journalism!!! His name should have been mentioned at least once every 5 mins to see hoe OJ would have reacted and see would he have gotten angry. I don't doubt OJ believed he loved Nicole, but i think if he was pushed on Ronald Goldman it would have been a different interview.
When the spirit of God breaks through to this man he is going to shock the world by letting go of his ego, narcissism, image, self will, and he is going to confess that he truly did commit those murders
Because Ron Goldman was fucking Nicole. People believed that he was going over there to drop her glasses off to her. Hell no he was going over there to fuck her. It just so happens that he showed up in the right place, at the wrong time.
he was driving a collegues vehicle from mezzaluna to her house to drop off her mothers glasses and then was meeting up with co workers at a night club... fact
i believe him. i have a feeling he was the obvious suspect and most people, "crucial" people have come to that conclusion very quickly and like it is with most things in life once u set urself up on one belief system u dont want anything to shake it, because it would mean you were wrong and spend a part of your life and energy believing in something that is wrong. For some reason that can hurt people on a very basic level. I think a very strange thing happened to this man...with this whole incident...it would seem that there were all these "coincidences" that bring up doubt in his testimony...but they are only looked upon and highlighted as such because there is a predetermined view on the matter. If a person is capable to look at the matter in a truly objective manner these strange coincidences would no longer be perceived as such. The strange thing i mentioned earlier is that all of this has happened to him. It really would seem like life has it in for him. Perhaps this experience is meant to teach him something...to evolve his spirit. In which case he may be considered lucky, if he manages it! :) All this said, i have to admit that my opinion has derived purely from watching this interview and studying the man from it. Many times we become blinded by our external sensors...we get confused by words and get lost in translation...sometimes it is a lot easier to see the truth simply by trying to feel it...when things get so convoluted...to quiet the rational part of your brain and try listening to your inner voice...try and use some of those sixth senses we supposedly have...:P Another thing that most of us forget about ourselves when we look at a person and judge...is that we have far more in common with this person, than we wish to admit. I have never killed anyone but i have a temper...i have had a "few" arguments with people who are close to me...that got me pretty excited...i can loose my cool, my hands begin to shake i raise my voice...i am a woman...a young pleasantly looking one...if i were a strong, big black male with this temper...hmm... If my coworker whom ive had harsh arguments with a few times...got killed and somehow i got tied into the investigation as a potential killer there would be "a lot" of these instances and coincidences and parts of my personality, which other people could testify to, that would seem to support the idea...so it can happen and i believe it does quite often that the truth is not revealed by this system we have set up...a very large chunk is missing...its all fragmented...little bits and pieces of a persons life and character...the system needs work! :) I say this because even though he was acquitted it would seem that the predominant belief of the mass is that he is indeed guilty.
OJ said he didn't do it and he was found not guilty...................................................................................................................
He was convicted 2 months after this in a separate civil trial for the murders of Goldman and Brown. Because he got off on the criminal trial, he didn't have to serve time, but in his civil trial, he was ordered to pay 33.5 million dollars in damages to the goldman family. He's been paying that ever since.
I don’t think he actually does. I think he believes he is genuine-sounding and acting enough to actually convince people but that’s actually the fourth way thing from the truth. He is fascinating, I have to say that.
Never once mentions who he thinks might have done it. Never. If someone killed my ex-husband I was still involved with, I would be racking my mind who did it and have some ideas of who might have done it. Really? OJ doesn’t guess once, ever.
@@THEBYGONE well, Faye Resnick is still alive, walking around, not hiding. You think these COLUMBIAN drug dealers would have sorted her by now if they were out to get her. OJ is guilty as sin.
People might hate me for this, but I have always liked Mark Furhman, his comments were taken waaaay out of context ( why no cross examination to clarify?) and he went way out of his way to get a black man aquited. He was a tough cop and even if he did say racist things ( regardless of context) I know many cops ( of varying ethnicity) who talk like that. It's almost like Guerilla or "Street " lingo. By no means am I saying it's right, but that does not a bad cop make. As time progresses, Furhman just sounds more and more credible. Lang and Van Atter seemed to resent him for being a "go getter" as well.
+Roonie Jones He wasn't "the" reason they lost, but certainly "a" reason. The prosecution made so many blunders, plus with the racial tension at that time, coupled with "celebrity worship" the case was almost unwinnable.
OJ Simpson was lucky that he was not convicted of murders but his life will be miserable for the rest of his life. His children will turn against him someday when they find out what happened to their mother.
How does oj kill Ronald Goldman who is a black belt in martial arts with no bruises or injuries. He doesn’t. He had arthritis in his knees he can’t kill two people. He is and forever will be innocent
At least 14 cops were on the crime scene when Fuhrman arrived... NONE of them saw TWO gloves. Fuhrman didn't steal a glove and plant it -- he FOUND the glove at Rockingham.
Greg Halvorson You sound stupid. An army of cops and forensic people missed the blood on the gate the first time around so unless you want to say they planted the blood on the gate after the fact then it is possible for the first bunch of cops to miss the other glove
Look at his eyes 00:20 to :0036... When he is in the moment of making up a story he looks into nowhere. Its clear sign of lying and looking for a narrative to come up with.
Trust me by this point he didn't need to make anything up. He knows what to say he is answering none of these on a wim. So I disagree with the "you can't tell he's making something up by looking st his eyes" at this point he's not creating anything new
So he said in the previous part that 'at no point did I try to comitt suicide' and yet right at the beginning of this part he practically admitted that he 'wanted it all to end'. In my opinion that tells me he's lying or is he toying with us?!
I don't understand why the interviewer would make a claim like "O.J. thinks the prosecution and LAPD were out to get him" Well the prosecution has a job. And if they can twist and manipulate anything to win a case, that's what they do. They do that even if they genuinely feel the defense is innocent. As far as the LAPD, well, we know they also need to come up with answers. Otherwise people lose jobs.
Why does O.J Simpson bash Fuhrman when Fuhrman let him walk on an assualt and battery charge, disproving Nicole's one beating. O.J Simpson talks about giving to the community not true. He turned his back on the black community, name a charity or black community he has given money to.
We shouldn't forget that actors are professional liers, and it is unbelievable how oj created this alternate universe in which he believes himself to be innocent, yet people forget that it takes a tremendous amount of brain work to lie because yo lie your neurons have to connect many paths to fall into the narrative of the false story, this is why oj finally got caught, he thought he could getaway with crime all over. I hope he never makes it out of jail.
I believe one day these videos will be looked at as an important artifact for the study of psychology. He is lying with every breath yet claims everyone else is lying. Yet he won’t come right out and say he was framed or that there was some conspiracy.
luciobarbarino How do you know he is lying? You cant convict someone because you think he is guilty . You have to prove he is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt . That's the law like it or not.
@@christiansoldier77OJ has CTE, for sure. And, we know he’s lying because he’s lied to the detectives, and told a different story in this interview to that interview. He’s a liar.
At 4:26 he mentions Tracy Savage who is an L.A.based reporter, but used to be an actress who was in Friday the 13th pt. 3 She was the girl Jason stabs thru the hammock
I am confused as to why Becker aggressively asked OJ an asinine question as to why he felt the police and the prosecution were out to get him! Mr. Simpson should have replied that it was literally a directive of their job duty and mission to move heaven and earth to produce evidence, aggressively prosecute, and convict him for this crime regardless of innocence. I thought Becker conducting a good interview and was being fair and unbiased until I realized he wasn't after he asked that ridiculous question with that tone.
+eldivino1980ful No he isnt! Have you ever seen any of his movies?? He's the worst actor, maybe ever. Makes me wonder if he really is telling the truth
-- OJ comes across as quite intelligent and, to be honest, as innocent of crime. I never believed he killed those two. That crime to me looked like a professional execution... holding Nicole from behind and cutting her throat that way. He might have come by the house, seen the bodies of his ex-wife lying there, dead, and ran in panic. In fact all his behaviour soon after that was of a man in panic. He did not kill Nicole and her Goldman friend.... but the killer might have said to OJ at the time 'if you tell the press or the police about me, your children will die'... To protect his children, we have the OJ of post-verdict. OJ did not execute his ex-wife but OJ knows who did it.. and OJ loves his children..
OJ's blood was at the murder scene. He wore the size 12 bruno Magli's that he was photographed wearing before the murders. A further point, the blood drops at the murder scene were immediately to the left of the killer's bloody shoe print. OJ's deep cut came from his left hand. His hair follicles, were found, it was proven that he owned the type of glove the killer used. There's never been a more obvious case of guilt in American Judicial history. all this talk about planting evidence. provide one shred of proof and not conjecture that evidence was planted. no one can. OJ killed these two people.
I paid close attention to what you wrote. I concede that Fuhrman is racist, but that doesn't mean he framed OJ. In fact, the LAPD loved the guy. He'd be the last black person they would frame. The prosecution only made conjecture and could not put forth any evidence to prove that Fuhrman planted the glove. They only said he did, because he used the N word and lied about it which had absolutely no connection to the OJ case.
-- True and I know that, at least in Englans, the on a balance of probabilities" does not apply to finding a verdict in criminal law cases but only in civil cases but ON A BALANCE OF PROBABILITIES, a cop who speaks about blacks in that manner can safely be deemed to have acted during his investigation in a less than professional manner and cannot therefore be considered a useful witness, hence the prosecution declaring him an 'hostile witness'.
So O.J. believes Fuhrman seeing a bloody glove at a murdered blondes house,THOUGHT of O.J.?Did Fuhrman KNOW it was Nicole Simpson condo when he arrived? 10:05 Mark Fuhrman said he talked to O.J.( he meant Kato) and spent 20 minutes looking around.O.J. said: "It takes you 2/3 minutes 5 tops ,to look around the back of Kato's house".HOW would he KNOW?
He knew because police had a history of calls from nicole at that address for previous altercations. So they knew it was her house before going to the scene
Whoever thinks O.J is smart is only because you are so easy to fool. This monster is a terrific liar. He can't be that smart when everyone knows he's lying
I agree. All murderers should be freed! I mean they didn't kill themselves either. Only right. Thanks for being so enlighteming Jerry. And to think all these years I thought OJ was guilty just because there was overwhelming evidence!
If you were going to place a glove at the scene , it would have been bigger rather than smaller ...just so you know it fits . Leather srinks in the wet ..
This interviewer isn't very professional. He comes across as biased, judgmental, and smart alecky. Regardless of how guilty you think a person is, you should always remain fair and objective when conducting an interview.
+nancy brown He being that way, I think, because OJ never testified during the trial. He was never cross examined.
The interviewer has contempt for O.J. He is frustrated because O.J. sits there and lies through his teeth about every single thing he asks him.
+nancy brown the interviewer is racist thats why
nancy brown you’re not alone in feeling that way. This is one of the rare instances where I don’t care, however. I truly think someone should be inappropriate and as harsh as possible. Spark this sociopath’s flame.
Because he knows the dude got off killing two people and is sitting across the table from him feeding him a line of bullshit
So before this case even began OJ read through multiple books on the science of DNA evidence? Seems like an odd pastime.
Agree!
+max springfeild Not when you sit around thinking about killing people.
+adrenacrumb right?!!
+max springfeild ROFL
Skeeter Doo You do realize how old OJ is right? The first book written that even made DNA widespread public knowledge was released and even then they had just barely even figured out what the shape of it was.
i think he must be a textbook psychopath. He is so charming and matter of fact, so convinced of himself. so absent of emotion. its facinating
It only seems that way to you bc you're already convinced f his guilt.
@@mr_knowitall yes
He and Jodie Arias should be forced to live together.
Tell me how a man murders 2 ppl that had significant defense wounds and had 0 bruises on his body and a small cut knowing ron was like a black belt come on OJ had arthritis in both knees he can barley move no way he killed 2 ppl like that and had 0 bruises on his body lol
@JJ Penley
I suggest you watch his interview titled; “If I did it”. He describes how he did it & mentions he had never seen so much blood & had to get rid of his bloody clothes. There is also an animated video on YT done by crime analysts based on the wounds showing how it happened.
This guy could have been a politician.
I agree. He was a very good liar, or was he?
He was in vegas
The ONLY good thing I can say about OJ in this interview...
I like his sweater
Kiero B - Tough to go wrong with a nice cable-knit
Me too
Orenthal always looks good in yellow or gold. I'm not sure about the undershirt.
It IS a nice sweater.
In America it's not what you did, it's what they can prove you did.
yes !
And in China, Russia, Syria, North Korea, Most of the Middle East ...... Its not what you did its what they say you did. Is OJ guilty? Yea 99% sure of that... But the prosecution Fucked up.... And OJ got off...
True!! 100%
he's living on the police mistakes.
exactly
+The Word lol
So many people fucked up in this case ... lol
key word THERE..mistakes n blood before n after pics with no blood..then all of a sudden 2/3 days later ..Blood
The police messed up and the prosecution went into it way to cocky. Every little mistake from police or prosecution was pounced and magnified by the defense. Everything went the of the defense. Anyone else well they been on death row. Biggest mistake : camera in courtroom. It then became a spectacle. The glove being shrunk and not fitting mistake 2. Mistake 3 fuhrman lying about saying the n word and thus taking the fifth so he wouldn't further incriminate himself. If Furhman had said yes he has regretabbly used that eord.i. the past and if Darden didnt ask the oj out on blood soaked shrunk gloves on top of other gloves, and if the trial was not done in the inner city, guilty as fuck
He lives peacefully because he believes in his own lies
I think the Interviewer must have been thinking shit I am in the same room as a cold blooded murderer
Every now and then you see the flash of anger in his eyes. Scary man..and Nicole knew it
Exactly
Evil man
Yep! Scary dude.
Damn the person who taught him the word "pundit"
😂😂😂😂
+Black Pelasgian But OJ pronounces the word as "pun-dint" which is incorrect.
There. Now I taught you how to pronounce "pun-dit."
You're welcome.
Pundits and rhetoric is key in wording bc the media spun things in their favor. It was a masterful production
Alan Dershowitz
oh snap, burn, mag g 😂
OJ is behaving and talking as a lawyer. NOT as an innocent man defending himself.
GUILTY according to facial and body language.
+Real Mentalism Every time he said, "I submit..." I felt like puking.
+Real Mentalism how the hell is he suppose to talk, he's answering questions. What should he use ebonics.
+Mitch Farkas 😂😂😂😂😂
triple double homicide at least he be using the language that got him through college lmao
You make a good observation. However, this is a man that had the cash to employ (and for 2 years) THE BEST legal brains in America to keep his ass out of prison. Personally, I don't believe OJ Simpson murdered both Ron Goldman & Nicole. However and quite clearly he's NOT entirely innocent. Therefore and for two years, the legal professionals that he employed to defend him would have also trained him (and forever) to talk about the case in this manner & fashion as quite clearly he has got a dark secret. OJ Simpson knows what really happened that night. As do major players of his defence team, many of which would have taken THE TRUTH to the grave.
I'll put it out there. From my own independent research, I believe OJ Simpson hired Glen Edward Rogers to rob Nicole (after becoming acquainted with him via Faye Resnick) of some expensive jewellery both were in dispute over the ownership of. However and in a tragic twist of fate, the robbery attempt spiralled out of control when out of the blue, Ron Goldman turned up. The only reason why R.Goldman turned up was because earlier on that evening, Nicole's mother had not noticed that she had dropped her reading glasses on the pavement outside the Meezaluna restaurant.
As soon as Goldman turned up, Glen Edward Rogers killer & animalistic instincts kicked in. There was only ever going to be one outcome. Rogers then fled the scene. OJ Simpson is expecting & left waiting for a call from Rogers to say that he's done his deed (i.e. robbed Nicole) and is waiting to meet OJ Simpson to hand over the disputed items & get paid. However, the call never comes. OJ Simpson sensing something is wrong goes to Nicole's to see what's up but unwittingly walks into a murder scene. Therefore, this is a murder that ultimately OJ Simpson is responsible for BUT has unwittingly instigated through the hire of Glen Edward Rogers.
However, as soon as the news breaks that both Ron Goldman & Nicole have been found butchered and that OJ Simpson's DNA is to be found all over the place, the scenario & story is so sensational that the police, along with the media and the public all get caught up in the notion that OJ and only OJ Simpson must be the killer. BIG MISTAKE and a huge physiology advantage for both OJ Simpson & his defence team. If the police & the prosecution hadn't have taken such a narrow approach, then OJ Simpson would have been snookered, lock stock & barrel. With the overwhelming evidence against OJ Simpson, the police with the prosecution should have stepped back, taken a deep breath and calmly thought "OK, we know for fact you've visited the crime scene & not reported it. Why is this? Why would one do that, especially given the relationship between the accused & the victim."
But both the police & the prosecution got sucked into the sensational aspect that OJ & only OJ Simpson alone could have been the killer. Well IF that's what you THINK, OK. But guest what? Both he and his defence team know that he's NOT entirely innocent, but at the same time he's also NOT the killer. Once again, both he & his defence team know this and this crucial piece of knowledge (more than race, money, celebratory status, etc) played right into their hands. The climax of this strategy was when C.Darden got OJ Simpson to try on the glove(s) the killer wore. From here it was plain sailing, "if it doesn't fit, you must acquit." Guest what? That's EXACTLY what the jury did. They had no other choice because that piece of FACTUAL evidence tipped the balance of the scales in favour of OJ and showed the world that OJ Simpson was NOT the killer. Once again, that's what the police (via there shoddy "police work") and the prosecution set out to prove wasn't it? In a court of law, "words must mean what they say." The FACTUAL evidence was not compatible with accusation and the prosecution's case crumbled & FAILED miserably. But IF the criminal case against OJ Simpson and starting with the initial police work from the L.A.P.D. was more broad and set out to show or prove his involvement and from there, implicating others following up other credible leads, then NOBODY in the world could have successfully defended OJ Simspon. Hence why and as you correctly point out the "lawyer" talk. In my humble opinion, OJ Simpson is not the killer. However, OJ Simpson (quite clearly) is NOT 100% innocent. For the rest of his life and quite clearly, when asked about this event, OJ Simpson must be EXTREMELY careful what he says. Quite clearly we see this throughout this entire interview.
Also remember this is 1996 before all his other legal troubles. He's desperately trying to restore his "Juice" persona that was previously so celebrated by the public. He's a narcissist sociopath who thinks he can actually restore his legacy and image that he enjoyed so much prior to the murders. Only pure narcissism mixed with sociopathic detachment could overcome the sheer foolishness and stupidity of doing such a thing after having been acquitted and essentially freed from the burden of murder. His lawyers must have been shaking their heads.
He spins a good tale. He claims in this interview that he cut his hand in Chicago.So why in his interview with Vannatter and Lange, does he say he reopened a cut in Chicago that he had done getting ready for his flight to Chicago?
Good point
I've been watching some of these videos about the murder and I heard the same thing.
He didn't do it
He would make a good defence lawyer
God, he is so smart. I truly believe he could have saved his money and defended himself and probably still been acquitted. lol.
+r762368 For sure. He probably shouldn't say prejudism though like he does in the next video. He needs to use real words I think to win this thing.
Simpson is smart could have been a attorney very handsome man
@@dixiedeed4918 sickening
What ? This interview is after he just sat through the most infamous trial in probably the public's memory? Of course he is fucking well versed on all of it.... And knows what to say ajd when to say it.
@@dixiedeed4918 More manipulative than smart
Oj has a point
At 11:05…..so 19 officers originally responding to the murder scene and having done a walk-through found no second glove, but then Mark Fuhrman comes along a couple hours later, somehow finds the second glove everyone else missed and then decides to plant it at OJ's house at EXACTLY the spot where Kato heard a thump a just minutes after the murders had been committed…???
There's more to this than we're being told..
No matter what he says or denies I'd be like " Wasn't all that blood sticky ? & When you snatched their lives was it the same rush you got when you made a touch down , and what did you see in there eyes be for you sliced and do you think you got it out of your system or do you think you might enjoy another good sticking ?" You know and on and on !
yeah the reporter is another mind controlled subject letting OJ do his PR thing
Oj murdered ron and Nicole no doubt about it in my opinion.... I've read for hours about this case and ain't nobody telling me that the evidence presented in court wasn't enough to convict him! Oj was a very smart confident charming man also arrogant according to all sources.. let's not forget he was an actor too... The reason he can speak so confidently in this interview Is 2 reasons.. 1 he'd already been acquitted at this point so it doesn't really matter if there's any inconsistencies with what he said previously during the trial.. The interviewer isn't exactly pressing him hard after oj gives his answers etc oj also knows hell never be tried for this murder ever again.. secondly ojs defence main argument for ojs innocence is unreliable dna evidence/ racism etc... So Simpson can pretty much deflect any kind of scrutiny by simply saying the lapd is racist or the dna handlers were incompetent etc this interview really wouldn't be difficult for oj at all... if you watch the civil trial tapes when Simpson Is being pressed by Daniel petrocelli it's a completey different story... Petrocelli hammers Simpson with everything and picks up on every inconsistency... Petrocelli asks Simpson about Nicole's clearly beaten face.. shows him a picture and Simpson says Nicole was wearing makeup... Hes also shown evidence of him wearing those Bruno magli shoes.. Simpson is shown a picture of him wearing the exact shoes that matched the footprints at the murder scene and says there not his shoes haha.....The one thing that pisses me off about this case is that people turned it into a race issue particularly Simpsons defence team ... Shouldn't matter if your black white yellow or green the evidence presented was more than enough to convict Simpson of the crime... The fact that quite alot of black people celebrated because Simpson got off simply because he's black says alot about those people's character... Imagine if Nicole was your mum or imagine ron was your son... How would you feel if Simpson got off despite the overwhelming evidence against him?
jon knott he also got off because he was famous and had money 💵 💰
O.J. is cold blooded, Jesus he's creepy.
Since video 1 he keeps deflecting the questions regarding the evidence makin them a legal matter. It's like Oj what about the blood trails, oh the dna sample improper handling , oh the witnesses picked by the prosecution didn't accused me.
When the murders happened, the last thing I wanted to hear, was OJ did it. He was handsome, charming, very likable guy, just like in this interview, but I am convinced he did it. It's such a shame that families were destroyed over jealousy and rage.
I still don't think he did it I don't care what people think
@@ramslife7295then why tell us what you think? Counterproductive, isn’t it?
@@pommiebears not guilty
@@pommiebears not guilty
"O.J., when all of this was going on, did you ever think that one day, twenty years from now, that Cuba Gooding, Jr. would be portraying you in a movie on FX?"
TheRanhughes , Cuba was terrible pick for OJ, no ? He was all wrong for the part. Voice , body language , all wrong.
The rest of the casting was pretty damn good.
@@publikenemi49 worst fucking casting!!!!
THEBYGONE , I thought most of the casting was ok , to very good (Marcia Clark /Darden/Cochran were homeruns ) , but wasn’t impressed with F Lee Bailey pick either. Weak. Though not as bad as OJ/Cuba. Cuba just a terrible pick. How do you get the main character so wrong ? F Lee Bailey pick is at least forgivable. If they had gotten OJ part right, that would have been a great, great production.
@@publikenemi49 oh please Robert Shapiro doesn’t look or sound anything like John Travolta either .
@@PhenomenalDiva Travolta at least nailed Shapiro’s body lanuage and facial expressions. The most important character to get right was OJ, and it was the most wrongly casted, by a country mile
he never shuts up about himself. no defense lawyer would want him on the stand.
What if he isn't lying. How many people have been wrongly convicted and all the evidence was solid
The way he answers these questions makes me think for sure he's thought about what to say if anything comes up and know to execute exact phrases as if he's looking at himself in the mirror. If you see other sociopaths/murder interviews on the killer speaks, you can see the way they look you in your eyes when they talk.. because they believe a complete other person did it.
You're so right. I know people where nothing is their fault. OJ only cares about how others perceive him. He was addicted to fame.
Normal people would sink into reclusion when 80% of the world thinks they're a murderer. OJ tried desperately to restore his image.
Or he's telling the truth.
I find the difference in opinion that everyone has on this case is so fascinating. I too have been watching these videos and noticed at certain points I believe him 100%, but at other points it sounds like he's lying like a mothafucka lol! He's a good actor so idk. I'm one of the people who thinks the evidence against him is absolutely overwhelming and yes I think he did it but I also think someone helped him in some way...
This interview is going for more than an hour and Ronald Goldmans name has not been uttered. If he, or his relationship with Nicole was supposed to be the motive I find this the most unprofessional and unrealistic act of journalism!!! His name should have been mentioned at least once every 5 mins to see hoe OJ would have reacted and see would he have gotten angry. I don't doubt OJ believed he loved Nicole, but i think if he was pushed on Ronald Goldman it would have been a different interview.
The eyes are the gateway to our conscience. Pay attention as he explains all questions thrown his way.
Kevin Garcia I get what ur saying. But then again I often don’t use a lot of eye contact
The lack of eye contact - speaks volumes!
He's looking right at the man though
@@emilyb3902 lol exactly
Aubrey Plaza would disagree. Not everyone holds eye contact throughout conversation. On the other hand good liars can look your straight in the eye.
When the spirit of God breaks through to this man he is going to shock the world by letting go of his ego, narcissism, image, self will, and he is going to confess that he truly did commit those murders
But I'm wondering why was Ron Goldman driving Nicole's Ferrari in the first place?
Because Ron Goldman was fucking Nicole. People believed that he was going over there to drop her glasses off to her. Hell no he was going over there to fuck her. It just so happens that he showed up in the right place, at the wrong time.
he was driving a collegues vehicle from mezzaluna to her house to drop off her mothers glasses and then was meeting up with co workers at a night club... fact
Holy shit, he tells diff stories as to why they went back to Rockingham after the chase in a diff interview!
Why don’t you post a link to the other story that you heard?
I see people surprised that they actually don't think he did it.....ummm...he was found not guilty......
And if you’re innocent, your defence team wouldn’t have to resort to what they resorted to.
I agree he is good and was obviously listening in court.
He was... Should be when you kill 2 people
Ironic to hear him call anyone else a liar,
This should not have happened to OJ! He should sue the state of California for defamation!
The Juice is innocent! Ya'll need to be looking for that guy named Alter Ego. Alter seems to get away with a lot of crime.
Funny how he reffers to himself in third person, "Where's is OJ?", "No one asked where OJ was", "Mark Fuhrman claimed he talked to OJ"
PSYCHOPATH! It’s so obvious.
i believe him. i have a feeling he was the obvious suspect and most people, "crucial" people have come to that conclusion very quickly and like it is with most things in life once u set urself up on one belief system u dont want anything to shake it, because it would mean you were wrong and spend a part of your life and energy believing in something that is wrong. For some reason that can hurt people on a very basic level. I think a very strange thing happened to this man...with this whole incident...it would seem that there were all these "coincidences" that bring up doubt in his testimony...but they are only looked upon and highlighted as such because there is a predetermined view on the matter. If a person is capable to look at the matter in a truly objective manner these strange coincidences would no longer be perceived as such. The strange thing i mentioned earlier is that all of this has happened to him. It really would seem like life has it in for him. Perhaps this experience is meant to teach him something...to evolve his spirit. In which case he may be considered lucky, if he manages it! :)
All this said, i have to admit that my opinion has derived purely from watching this interview and studying the man from it. Many times we become blinded by our external sensors...we get confused by words and get lost in translation...sometimes it is a lot easier to see the truth simply by trying to feel it...when things get so convoluted...to quiet the rational part of your brain and try listening to your inner voice...try and use some of those sixth senses we supposedly have...:P
Another thing that most of us forget about ourselves when we look at a person and judge...is that we have far more in common with this person, than we wish to admit.
I have never killed anyone but i have a temper...i have had a "few" arguments with people who are close to me...that got me pretty excited...i can loose my cool, my hands begin to shake i raise my voice...i am a woman...a young pleasantly looking one...if i were a strong, big black male with this temper...hmm...
If my coworker whom ive had harsh arguments with a few times...got killed and somehow i got tied into the investigation as a potential killer there would be "a lot" of these instances and coincidences and parts of my personality, which other people could testify to, that would seem to support the idea...so it can happen and i believe it does quite often that the truth is not revealed by this system we have set up...a very large chunk is missing...its all fragmented...little bits and pieces of a persons life and character...the system needs work! :)
I say this because even though he was acquitted it would seem that the predominant belief of the mass is that he is indeed guilty.
He was making some points tho!!!
🤣🤣🤣
OJ said he didn't do it and he was found not guilty...................................................................................................................
He was convicted 2 months after this in a separate civil trial for the murders of Goldman and Brown. Because he got off on the criminal trial, he didn't have to serve time, but in his civil trial, he was ordered to pay 33.5 million dollars in damages to the goldman family. He's been paying that ever since.
He believes his lies, How sad
You believe the media. THAT is even sadder considering how often they are caught lying. Sad really.
@@mr_knowitall are you mad hes a lying bastard 🤬🤬😏
I don’t think he actually does. I think he believes he is genuine-sounding and acting enough to actually convince people but that’s actually the fourth way thing from the truth. He is fascinating, I have to say that.
Never once mentions who he thinks might have done it. Never. If someone killed my ex-husband I was still involved with, I would be racking my mind who did it and have some ideas of who might have done it. Really? OJ doesn’t guess once, ever.
Untrue. He has a clear theory
@@THEBYGONE well, Faye Resnick is still alive, walking around, not hiding. You think these COLUMBIAN drug dealers would have sorted her by now if they were out to get her. OJ is guilty as sin.
Oj is a legend
And a murderer!
Legendary killer
Many more contradictions from "If I Did It" in this segment as well.
Amazing how this narcissist refers to himself as "O. J." LOL.
The same ppl who tell black people to respect the verdict of Trayvon Martin have never respected the verdict of this case.
People might hate me for this, but I have always liked Mark Furhman, his comments were taken waaaay out of context ( why no cross examination to clarify?) and he went way out of his way to get a black man aquited. He was a tough cop and even if he did say racist things ( regardless of context) I know many cops ( of varying ethnicity) who talk like that. It's almost like Guerilla or "Street " lingo. By no means am I saying it's right, but that does not a bad cop make. As time progresses, Furhman just sounds more and more credible. Lang and Van Atter seemed to resent him for being a "go getter" as well.
your boy furhman was the reason they lost the case! How that work out for you
+Roonie Jones He wasn't "the" reason they lost, but certainly "a" reason. The prosecution made so many blunders, plus with the racial tension at that time, coupled with "celebrity worship" the case was almost unwinnable.
The jures didn't believe him after he pleated the 5 credibility, not race
+Tommy Petersen He plead the 5th couldn't cross him genius.
+Tommy Petersen Convince yourself!!!
OJ didn't do shit
He totally did it... that jury fell for the bait hard
That’s how he led his entire life.
Charming, giving and a friend to everyone so they all loved him.
Behind closed doors…..watch out
So well prep'd by his team
I don't believe he did it...never did
why not
Idiot.
OJ Simpson was lucky that he was not convicted of murders but his life will be miserable for the rest of his life. His children will turn against him someday when they find out what happened to their mother.
OJ woulda made a great Lawyer.
If you were innocent you wouldn’t have to explain every little detail!
Every one of his answers is perpetrated by anger!
How does oj kill Ronald Goldman who is a black belt in martial arts with no bruises or injuries. He doesn’t. He had arthritis in his knees he can’t kill two people. He is and forever will be innocent
I love pre-2000 OJ.
There's no such thing as "the best lawyers"...Even the best lawyers lose cases.
That's .. not true
Yeah well if I was black and famous in the 90s I'd call Cochran. He got Michael Jackson and OJ off and they both probably did it.
I'm actually believing this guy now I think they had it in for him 😏😏
😆
At least 14 cops were on the crime scene when Fuhrman arrived... NONE of them saw TWO gloves. Fuhrman didn't steal a glove and plant it -- he FOUND the glove at Rockingham.
Greg Halvorson You sound stupid. An army of cops and forensic people missed the blood on the gate the first time around so unless you want to say they planted the blood on the gate after the fact then it is possible for the first bunch of cops to miss the other glove
@markmacI didnt say the cops were lying but something seems to be amiss if they missed the blood the first time around
you realize OJ has recently confessed to the murder right?
Look at his eyes 00:20 to :0036... When he is in the moment of making up a story he looks into nowhere. Its clear sign of lying and looking for a narrative to come up with.
Trust me by this point he didn't need to make anything up. He knows what to say he is answering none of these on a wim. So I disagree with the "you can't tell he's making something up by looking st his eyes" at this point he's not creating anything new
So he said in the previous part that 'at no point did I try to comitt suicide' and yet right at the beginning of this part he practically admitted that he 'wanted it all to end'. In my opinion that tells me he's lying or is he toying with us?!
Great interviews.Thanks
BBC did a good expose on the OJ trial
Perfectly rehearsed. I doubt he has any remorse to this day!
I don't understand why the interviewer would make a claim like "O.J. thinks the prosecution and LAPD were out to get him" Well the prosecution has a job. And if they can twist and manipulate anything to win a case, that's what they do. They do that even if they genuinely feel the defense is innocent. As far as the LAPD, well, we know they also need to come up with answers. Otherwise people lose jobs.
Why does O.J Simpson bash Fuhrman when Fuhrman let him walk on an assualt and battery charge, disproving Nicole's one beating. O.J Simpson talks about giving to the community not true. He turned his back on the black community, name a charity or black community he has given money to.
I think Cano had something to do with this murder
Or Keith. Dude looked creepy back then.
howard stern interview oj
We shouldn't forget that actors are professional liers, and it is unbelievable how oj created this alternate universe in which he believes himself to be innocent, yet people forget that it takes a tremendous amount of brain work to lie because yo lie your neurons have to connect many paths to fall into the narrative of the false story, this is why oj finally got caught, he thought he could getaway with crime all over. I hope he never makes it out of jail.
I believe one day these videos will be looked at as an important artifact for the study of psychology. He is lying with every breath yet claims everyone else is lying. Yet he won’t come right out and say he was framed or that there was some conspiracy.
luciobarbarino How do you know he is lying? You cant convict someone because you think he is guilty . You have to prove he is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt . That's the law like it or not.
@markmac Oj doesnt have any head injuries
@@christiansoldier77OJ has CTE, for sure. And, we know he’s lying because he’s lied to the detectives, and told a different story in this interview to that interview. He’s a liar.
Free oj
I like the Mad TV version better 😮
Heard his last interview?
hey man, you want to come on here and comment, refrain from using that word. whether you think he's guilty or innocent, keep it respectable.
At 4:26 he mentions Tracy Savage who is an L.A.based reporter, but used to be an actress who was in Friday the 13th pt. 3 She was the girl Jason stabs thru the hammock
One thing we have learned from this is never ever believe anyone playing the race card!!
He was prep'd soo well damn
He is his own prep...a natural
I am confused as to why Becker aggressively asked OJ an asinine question as to why he felt the police and the prosecution were out to get him! Mr. Simpson should have replied that it was literally a directive of their job duty and mission to move heaven and earth to produce evidence, aggressively prosecute, and convict him for this crime regardless of innocence. I thought Becker conducting a good interview and was being fair and unbiased until I realized he wasn't after he asked that ridiculous question with that tone.
They really tried to railroad OJ. Thank God the jury did the right think. Fuhrman should still be in prison.
The interview let OJ lead this interview. He initiated the narrative and went from there...
Oj is a great Actor. Notice how he messed up and said 100% convicted. Lol I think he did it for sure lol. He is really deceptive
absolutely.
+eldivino1980ful No he isnt! Have you ever seen any of his movies?? He's the worst actor, maybe ever. Makes me wonder if he really is telling the truth
-- OJ comes across as quite intelligent and, to be honest, as innocent of crime.
I never believed he killed those two. That crime to me looked like a professional execution... holding Nicole from behind and cutting her throat that way. He might have come by the house, seen the bodies of his ex-wife lying there, dead, and ran in panic. In fact all his behaviour soon after that was of a man in panic. He did not kill Nicole and her Goldman friend.... but the killer might have said to OJ at the time 'if you tell the press or the police about me, your children will die'... To protect his children, we have the OJ of post-verdict. OJ did not execute his ex-wife but OJ knows who did it.. and OJ loves his children..
OJ's blood was at the murder scene. He wore the size 12 bruno Magli's that he was photographed wearing before the murders. A further point, the blood drops at the murder scene were immediately to the left of the killer's bloody shoe print. OJ's deep cut came from his left hand. His hair follicles, were found, it was proven that he owned the type of glove the killer used. There's never been a more obvious case of guilt in American Judicial history. all this talk about planting evidence. provide one shred of proof and not conjecture that evidence was planted. no one can. OJ killed these two people.
When your fresh bright red blood is found at the murder scene, that's really the end of the ball game.
1badassmofo100
...unless of course that racist policeman planted it there. (why don't you pay attention when people tell yo something ?! )
I paid close attention to what you wrote. I concede that Fuhrman is racist, but that doesn't mean he framed OJ. In fact, the LAPD loved the guy. He'd be the last black person they would frame. The prosecution only made conjecture and could not put forth any evidence to prove that Fuhrman planted the glove. They only said he did, because he used the N word and lied about it which had absolutely no connection to the OJ case.
-- True and I know that, at least in Englans, the on a balance of probabilities" does not apply to finding a verdict in criminal law cases but only in civil cases but ON A BALANCE OF PROBABILITIES, a cop who speaks about blacks in that manner can safely be deemed to have acted during his investigation in a less than professional manner and cannot therefore be considered a useful witness, hence the prosecution declaring him an 'hostile witness'.
And Ron Goldman did not deserve what you did he was fighting for his life he would have kicked your ass if it wasn't for your knife
DIGENOVA??? Is he talking about Joe Digenova?
Ya know he is innocent but your hate for the truth says otherwise
So O.J. believes Fuhrman seeing a bloody glove at a murdered blondes house,THOUGHT of O.J.?Did Fuhrman KNOW it was Nicole Simpson condo when he arrived? 10:05 Mark Fuhrman said he talked to O.J.( he meant Kato) and spent 20 minutes looking around.O.J. said: "It takes you 2/3 minutes 5 tops ,to look around the back of Kato's house".HOW would he KNOW?
He knew because police had a history of calls from nicole at that address for previous altercations. So they knew it was her house before going to the scene
akilhikari You're thinking about,Gretna Green Way.
Whoever thinks O.J is smart is only because you are so easy to fool. This monster is a terrific liar. He can't be that smart when everyone knows he's lying
Oh wow! He's a great actor, thats for sure. He could convince a jury of his innocence. Johnny Cochrane educated this idiot very well.
He calls it FACTS not TRUTH
Facts are true
Wow 😶
I agree. All murderers should be freed! I mean they didn't kill themselves either. Only right. Thanks for being so enlighteming Jerry. And to think all these years I thought OJ was guilty just because there was overwhelming evidence!
If you were going to place a glove at the scene , it would have been bigger rather than smaller ...just so you know it fits .
Leather srinks in the wet ..