Freewing F-14 Tomcat Twin 80mm EDF Jet - Feature Review and Flight Demo

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 23 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 158

  • @joshuaforbus5853
    @joshuaforbus5853 2 роки тому +7

    My goodness. Born in 78 and wow have the models grown past expectations....Beautiful RC plane

  • @blitznone1142
    @blitznone1142 5 років тому +6

    Nice. I was an airframe and hydraulic tech in the u.s. navy. VF213. I need one of these!

  • @GuitarGuys7299
    @GuitarGuys7299 8 років тому +7

    That is one cool Tomcat! The jet noise in the background @ 5:15 makes the Tomcat look and sound like a full scale.

  • @smaze1782
    @smaze1782 6 років тому +6

    You simply can't beat the Freewing stuff for value and quality. This plane is on sale for $499 right now at Motion.

    • @andrewchow2549
      @andrewchow2549 2 роки тому

      Can u let me know the website link I like to buy it ,thank u sir 🙏

  • @dancindestroyer
    @dancindestroyer 9 років тому +5

    Truly awesome! Pure art! Been waiting a long time for a quality Tomcat!!

    • @rchopby1533
      @rchopby1533 2 роки тому

      ua-cam.com/video/-9MipOPMouA/v-deo.html

  • @leonardharrod6416
    @leonardharrod6416 6 років тому +4

    Absolutely beautiful flying machine !

  • @AerospaceMatt
    @AerospaceMatt 3 роки тому +2

    My dream plane! One of these days...

  • @renegadebiker24
    @renegadebiker24 6 років тому +7

    I used to be in an actual F14 Tomcat squadron based at NAS Miramar. I would love to fly that, and make them into GI Joe Skystrikers and a Cobra Scythe, and have them launch and land on the USS Flagg.

    • @rchopby1533
      @rchopby1533 2 роки тому

      ua-cam.com/video/-9MipOPMouA/v-deo.html

    • @joshuaforbus5853
      @joshuaforbus5853 2 роки тому

      That's cool Sir, Semper Fi.....GO JOE!....

  • @nsbob70
    @nsbob70 Рік тому

    Stunning looking plane, and gorgeous flying.

  • @robertreynolds1044
    @robertreynolds1044 6 років тому +1

    My dad,Robert Reynolds,built a 1/10th scale fuselage,with1/8th scale,oversize wings,full swing ,slope soarer! Look it up,back in the 90's.

  • @estherakeode2580
    @estherakeode2580 4 роки тому +2

    You're kidding me are you I love those wingswaps

    • @MotionRC
      @MotionRC  4 роки тому +1

      Shes a great model for sure.

  • @1underground747
    @1underground747 5 років тому +2

    god I love the f-14 tomcat I wish it was still in service

  • @RCHeliJet
    @RCHeliJet 9 років тому +4

    Like the Wing-Swap :)

  • @mr.morgan5643
    @mr.morgan5643 3 роки тому +2

    Totally incredible!! Well done!

  • @MaverickAus
    @MaverickAus 9 років тому +1

    I expected to see the ectoplasim coming off the aircraft. Fantastic model

  • @Dg-zj6jo
    @Dg-zj6jo 3 роки тому

    that is mad well done sir what a amazing flight any of you guys seen an aircraft carrier ha

  • @derek777
    @derek777 7 років тому +2

    The f14 is one of my favorite jets with the f22

  • @jrouse6688
    @jrouse6688 4 роки тому +2

    I got a 4 inch flat 747 put together like a model plane kind of thing and havent heard from them

    • @MotionRC
      @MotionRC  4 роки тому

      From who?

    • @AerospaceMatt
      @AerospaceMatt 3 роки тому +1

      There’s an ad on UA-cam which shows the Freewing F-14 for a price of $20.00. The F-14 is worth every cent, so its hard to imagine it being that cheap. It’s a total scam, and the video showed onboard from the 90mm Freewing F-22! Someone on UA-cam made a video where they ordered from the scammers and got a metal bend together airplane.

    • @reignman0311
      @reignman0311 3 роки тому

      @@MotionRC From scammers advertising this beauty on YT,smh

  • @RX7JG83
    @RX7JG83 8 років тому +19

    I'd buy it just to put a fpv camera in it with head tracking

  • @ryancassens2118
    @ryancassens2118 2 роки тому

    I wonder what the CG shift is from wings out vs. wings in, if there is any.

  • @alloutofdonuts3998
    @alloutofdonuts3998 4 роки тому +1

    The reason I watched this vid(which is a great vid btw)is because I keeping getting ads on other vids I’m watching for this rc plane. When I went to ‘visit advertiser’, it brings me to a website called ‘winter rose’. The jet is listed for $19.99 + $14.99 shipping. I’m surprised that UA-cam openly and blatantly allows scammers to come on here to poach and rip people off. But hey if they’re paying for advertising then I guess it ok, right UA-cam?

  • @zzzxxzzz3248
    @zzzxxzzz3248 2 роки тому +1

    Thanks for sharing!

  • @ricardopr54
    @ricardopr54 9 років тому +1

    Awesome plane....Thanks for the dedication....Thumbs up!

  • @fishinggeek3121
    @fishinggeek3121 5 років тому +17

    Once I get this every time I fly I'm playing DANGERZONE!

    • @steamfan4014
      @steamfan4014 2 роки тому +1

      Danger Zone and the Top Gun Anthem

    • @dutchthespitfire3204
      @dutchthespitfire3204 2 роки тому +1

      @@steamfan4014 Don't forget Mighty wings!

    • @steamfan4014
      @steamfan4014 2 роки тому

      @@dutchthespitfire3204 Yes, and through the fire

  • @gooniac33
    @gooniac33 9 років тому +2

    Awesome!! My only concern is with the aileron mixing while the wings are swept.... How does that work? With another f-14 that I know of, when swept the tail works as ailerons with the wings surfaces not moving.... How does it fly with the wings swept?

    • @fhuber7507
      @fhuber7507 7 років тому +3

      Did a test flight with ailerons mixed to tailerons when wings swept. The plane is extremely sensitive to ailerons in this setup.
      I changed to using computer mixing instead of the board for the ailerons so the ailerons (and flaps) are locked in neutral when the wings are swept This helped a lot. Needs minimum of a 9 channel radio to do this.

  • @luqmankhalil5935
    @luqmankhalil5935 4 роки тому

    I wonder if you can drop the missile

  • @greenseaships
    @greenseaships 6 років тому +55

    Requesting permission to put this thing together!
    Negative, Ghostrider. Work table is full.

  • @BellaZuikaku4785
    @BellaZuikaku4785 4 роки тому +2

    Woah!!! I suddenly want to get this! Imagine flying this and you see an RC helicopter or Drone!!!
    “I got Tone!!! FIRE!!!!”

    • @geimenberg1718
      @geimenberg1718 2 роки тому

      You don’t say fire

    • @geimenberg1718
      @geimenberg1718 2 роки тому

      You say fox 1, 2 or 3 depending on how the missile tracks the target and you don’t say fire because people might actually think your plane is on fire

  • @timn4481
    @timn4481 4 роки тому +1

    its an incredible piece of work but really, do they need the flaps?...even the rudder is only used on the ground.

  • @mikew9788
    @mikew9788 6 років тому

    I wish I saw this when it was available

  • @ignaciovera8107
    @ignaciovera8107 3 роки тому +1

    what happens if we put actual reaction turbines with real afterburners and instead of plastic at the back, iron? at least would look nice.

    • @MotionRC
      @MotionRC  3 роки тому

      do it! People have put turbines in foamies before, I don't know why, but you can

    • @ignaciovera8107
      @ignaciovera8107 3 роки тому

      @@MotionRC mmmm, Idk, reason 1: too expensive, reaction turbines are more than 5000, usually reason 2, I've never flown anything, tomcat is for advanced pilots. BUT, If i can, I Will ;)

  • @kendonnelly3248
    @kendonnelly3248 7 років тому +1

    Sorry Goose.. but it's time to buzz the tower... What happens if flaps are deployed and you sweep wings? is there a safety mix for that in the controller?. I want to buy this but still very expensive.

  • @jean-claudeterretaz7464
    @jean-claudeterretaz7464 9 років тому

    Nice jet , the turbine F14 I know flew only with tailerons and flaps. Look very cool and very good flying time. Definitively need brake!

  • @talmagejames3835
    @talmagejames3835 2 роки тому

    When are you going to up the power in the f-14? It’s my favorite plane by far but the power was pretty disappointing. It felt sluggish regardless of the batteries I used.

  • @SGTconty
    @SGTconty 6 років тому

    Really nice too the builder, well done

  • @mlk4life
    @mlk4life 8 років тому +17

    camera man is fired!

    • @dogzer
      @dogzer 7 років тому

      I don't understand the "fired ---> fat" reference ...

    • @shouldercem7195
      @shouldercem7195 4 роки тому

      @@dogzer referance Ottoman.

  • @toddjoris5785
    @toddjoris5785 6 років тому

    That is freaking awesome!! I want one!!

  • @fhuber7507
    @fhuber7507 8 років тому

    Been noticing mine gains nothing above 75% throttle with wings swept... The motors spin faster but the plane doesn't go faster.
    I'm looking at modifying the cheater holes and outlets.

  • @gavstreet8976
    @gavstreet8976 4 роки тому

    Anyone notice one of the flaps got crunched

  • @richardwebb8729
    @richardwebb8729 2 роки тому

    ☃️ Hello 👋, a realy nice presentation 👍.

  • @219cafe
    @219cafe 4 роки тому

    I did not see it doing vertical!
    Could someone tell me the advantage of wing sweep?

    • @MotionRC
      @MotionRC  4 роки тому +2

      With the wings swept she will exhibit more speed, faster roll rate. Similar to the real thing.

    • @219cafe
      @219cafe 4 роки тому

      Motion RC then why un-sweep the wings?

    • @MotionRC
      @MotionRC  4 роки тому +2

      @@219cafe For Takeoffs and landings, floats much better. Also its an awesome scale feature as the real one would have.

    • @MotionRC
      @MotionRC  4 роки тому

      @@219cafe here is more info: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variable-sweep_wing

    • @howardbartlett3026
      @howardbartlett3026 3 роки тому

      ​ @Motion RC Back in the day while F-14's were serving in Afghanistan when they retired our beloved big ole Tomcats from service they had a big problem. The USAF didn't have enough A-10 Warthogs to cover all of the requests for CAS (Close Air Support) so they would send in F-16's. The problem was A-10 Warthogs have a stall speed of 127 to 161 miles per hour. The F-16 has a stall speed of between 185 to 200 miles per hour depending on conditions (some say as high as 250 mph under certain conditions) which isn't as effective at supplying CAS. Before that the F-16 was A: Never, EVER Requested by anyone with a lick of sense. It was a last resort measure (think Hail Mary Pass) as the F-16 sucked at CAS. B: F-16's unlike the A-10 Warthog & F-14 Tomcat don't take to getting beat on very well they are excellent at many things but taking damage isn't one of them. C: They would have been better off (CAS wise) having Brett Favre throwing hand grenades in -30F degree weather, soaking wet & wearing nothing but a jockstrap, pumps & a tiara while on the run (Now get that mental image out of your head).
      Before the F-14 was retired he was often the second BEST option for situations requiring CAS (Close Air Support). Some like family members of mine preferred & requested Navy Close Air Support (mostly Marine Recon who were called Black Diamonds loved seeing F-14's flying in like Avenging Angels to the rescue). But wished the Navy & Marines had their own squadrons of A-10 Warthogs (they won't work on carriers because of that offset forward landing gear) as while less versatile the A-10's were best at CAS. Why would the F-14 be the second best CAS option you ask ? A; A Tomcat could drop down as low as 170 miles per hour with its wings fully extended (so slower than an F-16). B: Still maneuver like a whirling dervish as their wings can open & close independently while jockeying the throttle. Then get the H. E. double hockey sticks out of there in a hurry to avoid enemy fire & then jump right back into the fray without blinking. C. Take a beating & still kick some serious arse while taking it. Then get their pilots back home alive, get repairs & go back for more in relatively short order.
      How do I know I was a U.S. Navy Aviation Structural Mechanic (ASM) F-14 Tomcats. On a DEP (Delayed Entry Program) that signed a 3x6 year program. I studied aerospace engineering so I could get into flight school with the hope of flying F-14's. At the 2 & 1/2 mark I got crushed damaging my lower spine, 6 months later I was sent home. Once flight school wasn't possible (and the dream of flying F-14's) it no longer was a pure joy & the pain was insane. On a bright note at least I got my ride in a F-14 Tomcat (I didn't puke no matter how hard the climbs, dives, twists, rolls & maneuvers were........To be fair it was better than the best sex I ever had in my life. In fact I teased the pilot a bit about how he drove like my Southern Grandma (Actually he was "Looking a Little Green around the Gills" afterwards"). Which was the only thing cooler than my beloved 1993 British Racing Green McLaren F-1 that I acquired years later. That same pilot threw up(and others) in my car later down the road when we got together once again.

  • @MrGchiasson
    @MrGchiasson 5 років тому

    Absolutely beautiful!

  • @AidenSimial
    @AidenSimial 8 місяців тому

    Thanks for not having some dumb music in the background drowning out the jet. That real plane looked awfully close.

  • @philmontejano5971
    @philmontejano5971 5 років тому +1

    Does someone build an aircraft carrier to land on.
    That would be AWESOME and a first

  • @joeshmoe12301230
    @joeshmoe12301230 6 років тому

    Can it be programmed to have the wings stop at half sweep?

    • @MotionRC
      @MotionRC  6 років тому

      I'm sure anything can be programmed, but why would you want them to stop at half sweep?

    • @joeshmoe12301230
      @joeshmoe12301230 6 років тому +4

      Motion RC For a couple reasons. This model actually looks like it flies better than most F-14 models while the wings are in full sweep, but I'm sure it's still pretty sensitive. I think half sweep would be a good in between setting. Real F-14s utilize a half swept position depending on the speed and maneuvers that are being flown. Plus I think half sweep looks cool. 😎

  • @Sam-fp6in
    @Sam-fp6in 5 років тому +7

    Me: Permission to buy this?
    Wallet: negative the tank is empty

  • @t1callahan
    @t1callahan 9 років тому +38

    The F-14 is my favorite plane of all time, but this thing looks like it could be a hand-full. I'm afraid it would be a hangar queen if i owned it, as i would be too nervous when flying it and wreck it.

    • @GBLynden
      @GBLynden 7 років тому

      Tom Callahan It is an amazing plane!

    • @fhuber7507
      @fhuber7507 7 років тому +4

      Wings spread and flaps slightly (about 7 to 1 deg) down, its a heavy, slightly fast, trainer. Very smooth and predictable.
      Definitely needs a lot of runway available for both takeoff and landing.
      Wings swept it isn't quite "rocket ship" fast. Roll becomes very sensitive.

    • @Billy_Darley
      @Billy_Darley 7 років тому

      they always say "scale" but exactly what scale is it? 1/10th?

    • @Advection357
      @Advection357 7 років тому +3

      Looks like too much jet for a beginner... the wing retracts add considerable weight to an already fast flying airframe

    • @dogzer
      @dogzer 7 років тому +4

      I would be afraid it got shot down by local airforce

  • @JHill-hv1po
    @JHill-hv1po 7 років тому +1

    can the next jet you guys make be the F18F superhornet kinda like the one Lx models made but better freewi g has come such a long way you guys are the best

  • @JTMarlin8
    @JTMarlin8 4 роки тому +2

    This thing is way more awesome than the F-13 Timcat.

  • @MegaControltv
    @MegaControltv 5 років тому +1

    hermoso aeromodelo! esperamos probar uno asi en megacontroltv! ;)

  • @bibolcs
    @bibolcs 5 років тому +1

    This is so, so Amazing..¡
    Tremendous video for christ sake..¡

  • @blackcat3383
    @blackcat3383 6 років тому +1

    Amazing!How much does it costs?

  • @joubertvonallemann2062
    @joubertvonallemann2062 9 років тому +24

    'Cause I was inverted'!

    • @skytalon74
      @skytalon74 9 років тому +5

      +joubert von Allemann "Bull Sh!t" -cough ... lol. Good stuff.

  • @Lt_Krispy
    @Lt_Krispy 3 роки тому

    Can it take a 6000mAh?

  • @Georgewrigley
    @Georgewrigley 6 років тому

    Awesome guys. Love it. One day I think I'll be getting one. :)

  • @mr.morgan5643
    @mr.morgan5643 3 роки тому +1

    I feel the need..... The need.... For speed!!

  • @jesselo1969
    @jesselo1969 9 років тому +3

    were do I pay already?!! ill take a twin 90mm F4E Phantom with jungle camo too!!!

  • @gisenkliem9324
    @gisenkliem9324 6 років тому +1

    How i can buy this one

  • @timothydavenport2714
    @timothydavenport2714 9 років тому

    That's a LOT of aircraft!

  • @bernardo4202
    @bernardo4202 9 років тому

    hello good morning ... friend where I buy an F-14 80mm EDF

  • @johnatkinson6759
    @johnatkinson6759 9 років тому +3

    WOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Are you allowed to fly THAT close to light aircraft??? ..Oh Very nice plane great sound too(a la F-86)

    • @brianpayne2478
      @brianpayne2478 6 років тому +1

      John Atkinson he wasn’t that close, certainly not at the same altitude, which is all that matters for the faa

  • @derek777
    @derek777 7 років тому

    Awesome,nice plane

  • @dailyhindustan5843
    @dailyhindustan5843 4 роки тому

    Plzzz make turbo cats from swat kats

  • @zoltangremsperger5361
    @zoltangremsperger5361 5 років тому +1

    my favourite ! I'm TOG GUN generation :)

  • @blackcat3383
    @blackcat3383 6 років тому +4

    Goose it s time to buzz the tower!

  • @overheadcam32
    @overheadcam32 5 років тому

    Cost of this aircraft?

  • @stephenreno7909
    @stephenreno7909 6 років тому

    nice bird,but,as someone who knows,NE is Rangers designation not the Connies!,other than that,nice bird!!!

  • @phivuong4757
    @phivuong4757 5 років тому

    Would you like to sale the F 14

  • @dogzer
    @dogzer 7 років тому

    No FPV?

  • @MrDjrecon
    @MrDjrecon 5 років тому

    I know what I am buying this Christmas

  • @markdavid801
    @markdavid801 4 роки тому

    This is at Apollo!

  • @jamesboelter3548
    @jamesboelter3548 8 років тому +29

    FOR THE LOVE OF GOD>> GIVE ME A B-1B!!!

    • @brianpayne2478
      @brianpayne2478 6 років тому

      That would be cool. I’d be up for one of them.

    • @AerospaceMatt
      @AerospaceMatt 3 роки тому

      That would be awesome!

  • @reubendowd8668
    @reubendowd8668 5 років тому

    Awesome

  • @jkepps
    @jkepps 9 років тому

    Pure Awesome Sauce!

  • @pradeepkumarmane
    @pradeepkumarmane 6 років тому

    Price?

  • @BrianBurke74
    @BrianBurke74 8 років тому +1

    very nice indeed :)

  • @jxsdf1523
    @jxsdf1523 4 роки тому

    How much is this?

    • @MotionRC
      @MotionRC  4 роки тому

      Here you go: www.motionrc.com/collections/rc-jets/products/freewing-f-14-tomcat-twin-80mm-edf-jet-pnp

    • @jxsdf1523
      @jxsdf1523 4 роки тому

      @@MotionRC thank you

  • @brucelongdog
    @brucelongdog 8 років тому +1

    Holy Moses...one needs a lot of Airmiles to fly one of those!

  • @AvengerII
    @AvengerII 6 років тому +4

    They call this representative of a late-Tomcat VF-2 plane BUT the problem is--
    The F-14D has a DUAL-chin pod and this EDF only had a SINGLE chin pod!
    Everything else is accurate including the gun exhaust shape but they screwed up THE major identifying feature of the D-model from the A- and B-model Tomcats!
    I thought they were going for an F-14D but the way this looks (going by exhaust nozzle shape and the chin pod) is more like an F-14B which VF-2 did NOT fly. VF-2 was equipped with F-14As from first Tomcat deployment (1974) to 1993 when they transitioned the D-model and they flew the F-14D until 2003.
    This model looks like it flies nice but the sweepback feature doesn't seem useful or the pilot didn't push the speed. In real life, the performance was markedly better with the wings swept back. The wings on the Tomcat are really only swept forward for their three basic configs -- landing, takeoff, and cruise and even at cruise they would be swept back a bit further because the plane simply flies too fast at cruise to have the wings fully swept forward. The plane rolled faster with wings swept and accelerated quicker as well. I didn't seen an appreciable difference with this model with the wings swept back but it may be that the scale is too small (and the engines simply aren't powerful enough) to make much aerodynamic difference.

  • @BLThackrey
    @BLThackrey 9 років тому +1

    Highway to the Dangerzone @ 0:35
    love it .

  • @crazzylee
    @crazzylee 9 років тому

    Now add two jet jeo jr's duel head tracking FPV with OSD GPS auto pilot and breaks.

  • @winnerwolf9546
    @winnerwolf9546 9 років тому

    O sheet ...... gonna need brakes for sure but well worth it flight times with twin 4000? Looks like it can fit twin 5000s ....;)

    • @fhuber7507
      @fhuber7507 7 років тому

      Can fit 4X 5500 mah 3S packs. (or pair of 6S5500 mah)
      It needs a little tail weight for CG with the heavier packs.
      I like doing 2X3S in series instead of a single 6S because at landing you can pull the packs and they cool better. That leads to longer pack life (many more charge/discharge cycles)

  • @blakjack3053
    @blakjack3053 2 роки тому

    Ok that there is cool af

  • @hawaiianpunch6534
    @hawaiianpunch6534 6 років тому +1

    It would be cool if you can mount a camera in it so you can fly it with FPV goggles.

  • @whome7004
    @whome7004 4 роки тому

    Don't get me started on here with Top Gun References, I already get yelled at around the house AMAZING how you make them fit for so many things.
    Im not sure who made this RC Aircraft but when you see a UNREALISTIC PRICE BE PUT ON AVIATION HISTORY U WONDER IS IT REALL OR TO GOOD TO BE TRUE!?!?!? I seen advertisement popping up all over utub, Finally I had to see, to soon to tell Shipping Please come on, how long, lipos needed and put together ANYTHING ELSE NEEDED I DID NOT MENTION, THE PICTURE SHOWS CONTROLLER????

  • @gunsmoke6230
    @gunsmoke6230 5 років тому

    VF-1 Wolfpack with the solid red wolf head would have looked better! We were sister squadrons and we’re decommissioned before VF-2......Should have been USS Ranger not The constellation

  • @jimbonito3766
    @jimbonito3766 9 років тому

    what a plane for pro's Talk about killa ... Fugetabouttit!!!

  • @sambuvca22
    @sambuvca22 5 років тому

    Stay below the flight deck now! Lol

  • @raminmb
    @raminmb 6 років тому

    You made me crazy!!!

  • @adisakkuphanlam2404
    @adisakkuphanlam2404 9 років тому +1

    Freewing is going to make BVM go out of business....

    • @scarjss613
      @scarjss613 7 років тому +1

      Adisak Kuphanlam most pilots can't afford BVM.

  • @mrhay2u
    @mrhay2u 6 років тому

    NO NO NO NO!! NO IT HAS TO HAVE GI JOE SKYSTRIKER DECALS ON IT BESIDES THAT PERFECT!!

    • @slugmaster64
      @slugmaster64 6 років тому

      mrhay2u no. It needs some VF84 Jolly Roger badging.

  • @EnterpriseXI
    @EnterpriseXI 5 років тому

    Crashed mine. Will be getting a new one

  • @skypilot23
    @skypilot23 5 років тому

    next time im reincarnated as a rich guy

  • @DavidRJones82
    @DavidRJones82 5 років тому

    F-14 V2

  • @josipvrandecic2472
    @josipvrandecic2472 7 років тому

    I sign the opinion of Mr. Tom Callahan....UUhhhhhh.

  • @rickythrower5892
    @rickythrower5892 8 років тому +1

    Sweeeeeet

  • @interman7715
    @interman7715 5 років тому

    6 kg ready to fly ,bit of a porky but flies well 👍

  • @therctutor8100
    @therctutor8100 2 роки тому

    Words move WAY to fast

  • @9999plato
    @9999plato 5 років тому

    The cheesey midi music from a super cheap casio keyboard is hidious. Got an icepick?

  • @MASSARMS3
    @MASSARMS3 3 роки тому

    $600 for Styrofoam??? Maybe if it was fiberglass but hell no! It's nice though.👍

    • @reignman0311
      @reignman0311 3 роки тому

      Bro, a f-glass jet goes for thousand of dollars, maybe not your cup a tea,lol