LG Display’s next-gen OLED panels address the tech’s biggest weakness
Вставка
- Опубліковано 8 січ 2024
- This year, LG Display came to CES 2024 with something to prove. It had multiple sizes of transparent OLEDs (the show's theme appears to be transparent displays) and a gaming monitor capable of 480Hz refresh rates - double what we’re used to seeing. Perhaps the most interesting things at its showroom were LG Display’s most advanced OLED panels yet, featuring its META technology 2.0. While it sounds like promotional fluff (and there’s some of that here), the company is trying to address arguably OLED’s biggest weakness.
#ces2024 #lg #oled
Subscribe: / engadget
Like us on Facebook: / engadget
Follow us on Twitter: / engadget
Follow us on Instagram: / engadget
Follow us on TikTok: / engadget
The Engadget Podcast: itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/t...
More about Engadget Audio: www.engadget.com/podcasts/
Read more: www.engadget.com - Наука та технологія
You don't need to say "O.L.E.D." btw. Pretty much everyone just says "OLED" these days.
The transparent screens have a holographic look to the image displayed which in a retailer environment is huge.
imagine a shop storefront with the window being entirely a OLED screen in it's back layer, oof the sci fi future looks are gonna become reality once this is mainstream and affordable
Am I wrong or does this see through screen herald a potential for another 3D technology?
Many images behind another by using multi screens projecting multi images?
If they do something like iron man did with a transparent phone
Lg has rollables why havent they released more rollables
I think it's because nobody wants to pay for them.
obrigado pelas informações dos aparelhos.
biggest weakness of OLEDs is burn in in my opinion...
I've had an OLED TV for 5 years.
I made all the tests and I haven't seen any sign of burn-in.
It's mostly an unfounded phobia
been running the last gen samsung G8 OLED as my main pc montior and i easily use my pc 10+ hours a day almost everyday still dont have a single sign of burn in since i got it at release and i use it on full max britness all the time aswell. They have come a long way unlike the earlier days of AMOLED on phones that will burn in within 6 months. It might still be a potential issue in like 8+ years but to most people by then they are shopping around for a new one anyway
@@8bits955it doesn’t matter that you use it alot, the problem is if you leave it running static images, meaning having it on for no reason and not touching it at all
OLED these days rarely suffer from burn in anymore.
How often have you come across someone actually complaining about burn in? If there have been what's the statistics? Besides most manufacturers offer extended burn in warranty
why is this video so low bitrate ?
Again, all the movies that come to Netflix, Apple, and Disney
Filmed up to 1000 NITS
Broadcast up to 1000NITS
So what is relevant about the 3000NITS screen ????
Not everybody streams their media. Those are compressed and don't have as much dynamic range as 4k blurays.
4k Blu-rays are mastered at 3000nits and aren't compressed like what you get on Netflix, Disney Plus, Apple TV, Amazon Prime Video, Hulu, etc.
where the 45'' bendable ?
I'm grabbing their monitor that uses these tech for sure, in 2025.
Biggest issue is burnout. It is one of the reasons of brigtness limits at the same time
If it is a see through panel, does it have 360 viewing angle?
Eh? ?
We miss lg mobile plz relaunch thay segment
Dang.... how bright do people need their TV's. I have a Sony OLED and I feel like it burns out my retinas sometimes. Is this a spec sheet thing or when you compare one TV to anther is a super bright room. Maybe close the shades. LOL
The simple fact is that despite people saying "my OLED is too bright for ME!" HDR content is mastered at a much higher peak brightness, and in order to display that content correctly, you need a tv capable of it. This coming from someone with an OLED as well, having seen plenty of extremely bright LCD panels from competitors which look better with bright HDR content. So these advancements in brightness for OLED tvs are essential if they want to keep beating up on other tv tech in the long term.
Ur leader in world innovation
What's the deal with better HDR?
All movies are shot at 1000 NITS level on Netflix
So what does 3000 NITS matter ???
Some movies are mastered at 4000 nits. They’re rare, but they do exist. And going forward, Sony as well as others, want to push 4000 to be the new standard.
gaming
@@rayenwoomed5323 Indeed, and some are even mastered at 10000 nits.
Purists buy blurays, hardly any home theater snob even uses streaming unless it's kaleidoscope, Emby, plex or similar
@@rayenwoomed5323 Most big budget are, dolby vision is mastered at 4k nits, dolby cinema will be 10k
Lol, please stop calling it O-L-E-D. That just hurts my ears. It's OLED. 2 syllables, not 4. 😂
Lmao my cx had green burn in at tge middle of the screen lmao without over using lmao it was from family guy 😅😅😅 I gamed on that TV more than anything 😅 😂 don't let people cap
99.9% of people won't know or care about refresh rates > 120hz or resolutions > 4k or in some cases in even Full HD.
There’s a good difference between 120hz and 240hz. I didn’t see the difference at first but it’s there. Anything past that is crazy though. Anything past 4K is crazy as well
This is a load of nonsense. If you put 240hz side by side to 120hz and spend even just a few seconds using it, you'll notice it.
My old oled is at about 50% brightness and 50% oled light and its still borderline too bright. I dont get why people complain about oled brightness. Unless the "color brightness" does something to improve color accuracy/capability then I dont get why they're perusing more brightness
It is not directly about the brightness, it is about the contrast. OLEDs traditionally can only show 0 - 1,000 nits of brightness, so only 1,000 levels. LED TVs can generally show 0 - 10,000 nits of brightness, so 10,000 levels. So if there is a film scene that has part of the screen showing 0 brighness, part showing 10 brightness, and part of it showing 10,000, then on an OLED it must fit that in to the same brightness space, so 10 is scaled down to 0, and 10,000 is scaled down to 1,000, and the 0 and 10 brightness end up looking the same and you lose detail.
Not as good as Samsung new qd oled gen 3
The weakness of OLED is not capable of being seamless like traditional fine pitch LED screen
What's the deal with better HDR?
All movies are shot at 1000 NITS level on Netflix
So what does 3000 NITS matter ???
I think 1000 nits on a phone/laptop are different than a 50+ inch tv's 1000 nits
Sony has developed a 4,000 nit mastering monitor. This is what professionals use when making a movie or high quality tv show. Because they can grade for higher peaks with this, consumer tvs will want to keep up. If your display cannot keep up, it will need to tone map very well down to what it can do.
@@MrHallTV Again, all the movies that come to Netflix, Apple, and Walt Disney
Filmed up to 1000 NITS
Broadcast up to 1000NITS
So what is relevant about the 3000NITS screen ????
I think ..and I could be wrong here but mastering for 1000/4000 nits is for full screen. These TVs can only hit 2100nits at the 3%/10% window. We’re a long way from maxing out the potential.
NO
@@ClementEgan
Again, all the movies that come to Netflix, Apple, and Disney
Filmed up to 1000 NITS
Broadcast up to 1000NITS
So what is relevant about the 3000NITS screen ????