Well, for me the second one is much better then the first one for sure, the acting, the story, cinematography, the coverage is lot more then the first one, of course the first ones budget is 6 million and the second one is 13 million, so obviously Coppola had more funds for the second one for sure had more attention then the first one, and when Coppola is talking about his first and second he is detailing lot of issues during first one, lot of scenes on first one the second crew worked and those are the hiccups for the first one, on second one he had a budget and he has done whatever he wanted to do, on the first one he almost got fired, so I would suggest you to watch when Coppola is talking about how he made those movies, it explains a lot
Well, for me the second one is much better then the first one for sure, the acting, the story, cinematography, the coverage is lot more then the first one, of course the first ones budget is 6 million and the second one is 13 million, so obviously Coppola had more funds for the second one for sure had more attention then the first one, and when Coppola is talking about his first and second he is detailing lot of issues during first one, lot of scenes on first one the second crew worked and those are the hiccups for the first one, on second one he had a budget and he has done whatever he wanted to do, on the first one he almost got fired, so I would suggest you to watch when Coppola is talking about how he made those movies, it explains a lot