@@Charlie94781 the only mythology is evolutionary stories that are not based on scientific investigation that can be falsified but is pure imagination.
@@jockyoung4491 Actually many of the scientists that founded the various fields of scientific inquiry ...those who literally wrote the books on those fields of study were men and women of faith. Read a book on great scientists in history.
It was to make people think for themselves which is why the Lord God took away the hearing the words. Amos 8:11-13. 11: Behold, the days come, saith the Lord GOD, that I will send a famine in the land, not a famine of bread, nor a thirst of water, but of hearing the word of the LORD: 12: And they shall wander from sea to sea, and from the north even to the east, they shall run to and fro to seek the word of the LORDm and shall not find it. 13: In that day shall the fair virgins and young men faint for thirst.
As a scientist that has been integral and diligent in an industry bent on publishing fiction wilder than Grimm's Fairytales, I can say watching this video was so refreshing with the energy and effort and scale of work exactly how I have applied myself in my own research. Now as a Christian and not the atheist, I would really enjoy being a part of such a team. Really appreciated.
What evidence lead you to believe that any god exists, much less the christain god? How did you apply the scientific method to the bible to verify its claims?
@@2l84me8 this question is getting quite tedious, I am astounded at how patient some people are at just having the discussion. Can we for a moment change the focus to your views? Where are the evidences of your claims against christianity? What evidence can you give that God doesn't exist? There have been countless findings, studies and tests done that prove the bible and christianity. Now it's the skeptics turn, please prove scientifically and objectively that there is no god and that christianity is complete garbage. Give us objective evidence and not subjective evidence.
A number of years ago, I saw a video by a Christian geologist that explained a mini Grand Canyon that was formed during the Mount St.Helen eruption that most geologists would say took eons to form.
As I mentioned in my first comment, I am a hobby prospector. Every prospector knows that any mineral/rock that has been in flowing water for more than 3-5 years is absolutely rounded. In fact, that is how we identify river stones. The fact that this quartz is jagged means it was not weathered for very long at all. Love this, thank you.
@jonathanrussell1140 You do understand that weathered can mean the rock has been rounded/smoothed by flowing water. Ie rocks in a rainwater run off. The two are not mutually exclusive.
@kaisguda Sure, that's possible if you agree with the premise laid out in the video. It becomes irrelevant if billions of years are true. Since each layer is supposedly laid down over many, many years by wind, water, and errosion, then compressed and solidified. We shouldn't see any jagged or sharp edges. Yet, if the premise is true and it was laid down and covered up rapidly, we would expect what is shown in the video.
Dr. Snelling, my brother Andrew, we had a couple conversations at the ICC in Cedarville and it was there that you impressed me as a modern day young David slaying the giant. I LOVED this 2 part 3 plus hour presentation! Thank you! It’s amazing! It’s perfect apologetics! PLEASE CONSIDER MAKING A SHORT VERSION for people who don’t know you well enough to understand that time spent listening to you is a gift from God!
Yes, you have faith in these people to make your faith in something else more realistic in your perspective. There's nothing scientific that any of these people do.
@@SK-bw2cv Have your faith, that's okay. But you need to stop pretending or roleplaying that blind faith and starting with conclusions regardless of where the evidence points is doing science. These organizations and people are not science communicators. They're religious preachers and little else.
The heavier “debris” falls out first. Explains the big boulders of white water rafting in Colorado. Explains The 3 bent layers in the Grand Canton also. Bottom Layer has larger particles and the finest layer on top. Thank you for helping me To see what creates these bent Rock formations. I’ve been noticing them All my life all Around as ive traveled wondering HOW
@@StudentDad-mc3pu it only takes 12” of water to move an SUV or a truck. A river can move boulders. There is much more force behind a Tsunami. The more force. The bigger the boulder it can move. I can definitely see it happening. If you’ve never made wild clay I guess that would explain why you can’t see that sedimentary layers after years of being under pressure would turn to rock just like petrified wood😂
@@GypsADaisy Have you personally seen a river move boulders? Where is this Tsunami comming from? Trucks have boyance rocks do not, they sit underneath water. This is an entire fantasy you have constructed.
@@GypsADaisy no, there are multiple layers that the grand canyons consist of. Each showing their own geological time. The formation of the grand canyons show that 5 or 6 million years ago, the colorado river cut through the plateau which had been uplifted, leading to millions of years worth of rock erosion, weathering and freeze-thaw events, all of which leading up to the canyon structure we see today. The fact that there are multiple different geological layers proves that there wasn't a flood, since that would have been 1 and 1 only event. Not to mention that even if there was such a flood, there would've been thousands of canyons all around the world, and that floods alone aren't able to cause them to form.
@@headytone bullying? This channel has been misrepresenting science-- several fields of science-- for a long, long time now. It is essential that people shine a light on this nonsense.
Really like how Dr Andrew begins by saying that we first believe the Bible, and then we go out and explore how evidence in the world are consistent with what we read in the Bible, not the other way round. And that's what faith is! "blessed are they that have not seen, and yet have believed." (John 20:29) "Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen." (Hebrews 11:1) Sharing a message I read: How did life come about? Can something come out of nothingness? Did a single cell evolve to form extremely complex organisms, plants, animals and even us, human beings? If so, where did all this new information to form something more complex come from? How did chance produce such order, intelligence, intricacy and awesome design? Even more intriguing, where did the first cells come from and what gave life to them? Is life something tangible that can be explained by the finiteness of science? Who was there at the beginning who could possibly shed some light on the origin of life? God, who has no beginning and ending, existed before time did. He tells us in the Bible the story of how life came about. He created it by His wisdom and for His glory. “In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.” (Genesis 1:1) In fact, God says that people have no excuse to deny His existence, clearly manifested in His Creation! “The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.” (Psalm 14:1) “For the invisible things of Him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse.” (Romans 1:20) “All things were made by Him; and without Him was not any thing made that was made.” (John 1:3) Would you believe the infallible and immutable God who has revealed to you in His Word that He created the world? Or would you believe the hypotheses of fallible men who weren’t even there at the beginning of time? Don’t take your chances - trust in the living God who never lies. The eternity of your soul is at stake. “For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son (Jesus), that whosoever believeth in Him should not perish, but have everlasting life.” (John 3:16)
@@Sl15555 Wrong. We say, first believe in evidence and reason. Nobody has any incentive to believe evolution if it wasn't true. Nobody would have even thought of such a thing if evidence and reason had not made it obvious. Assuming the Bible is true is by definition not scientific.
@@jockyoung4491Ohhh come on now, let’s be honest lol. I think we both know that enlightenment era atheists had an axe to grind with you know who. I mean, Einstein himself intentionally fudged the numbers to deny the beginning of space-time. We both know this is a thing on both sides of the issue.
Well done! Thankyou for so diligently researching and documenting your work, Dr Andrew Snelling. I still have copies of the magazine Creation Ex Nihilo from the 90s which you, Ken Ham and others founded. I was a new Christian back then and God used you mightily, through that publication, to strengthen my faith in His existence. And He still is using you in this way. Oh, and don't be shy to be excited at these amazing discoveries. Blessings and thanks from Australia 🦘❤
I applaud your hard work and tenacity with committing to this research project. Ironically, I only became aware of your "young earth" videos as a result of UA-cam recommendations from watching other geology videos for a college Geology class. Having recently taken that class it's interesting to compare the many theories proposed in that class against the 20+ hours of AiG content I've seen so far. Just out of curiosity, how does the young earth model account for hotspots, especially as they are presented as proof for slow-moving tectonic plates (thinking about the Hawaiian Islands chain formation and evidence for the movement of the Yellowstone hotspot)?
Read up on Walt Brown's hydroplate theory and the pioneering work of Dr. John Baumgardner...who has modeled subduction of the Earth's crust and rapid tectonic movements of meters per second during the Noahic Flood. His computer models have even place the continents where they are today as a result of these movement. Regarding the Hawaiian islands, read up on how fast those islands are eroding away each year. Some of them are said to be 5.1 to 65 million years old but at current erosion rates...they would not have existed a million years ago...despite volcanic growth.
@@nathancook2852 if you want to remain in ignorance that is your choice. Hosea 4:6 “My people are destroyed from lack of knowledge. Because you have rejected knowledge, I also reject you as my priests; because you have ignored the law of your God, I also will ignore your children.”
17:11 it’s pretty clear how the bends was made. Apparently we haven’t found the original layer from the beginning of Genesis. The bends was formed from the flood. The half of layers below the bends was formed from the start of the flood. The layers covering the start of the bends was sediment layers laid in the ripples of devastation from the draining of the flood as layers of sediment settled into the newly formed ripples. Doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure that out
Thank you so much Dr Snelling and Team for all the work that has gone into this research. I’m excited to see how this is looking very much to prove the post-flood scenario. I look forward now to separate presentations aimed at the various specific audiences, eg. kids, lay adults as yet undecided about the time-line arguments, fellow specialist geologists etc.. I was getting impatient with all the repetition about location, hand-waving, tangential explananations about microscopes and techniques etc., all of which need stating of course. Your passion stands out a mile! I’d like to share your findings with skeptics but feel this unedited presentation rambles far too much. I repeat I am excited and thankful to God you now have so much compelling evidence and look forward to the distillation for general and specific audiences. Fifteen minutes?
@@paulbriggs3072He's probably talking about the effects you see looking at the Grand Canyon from space, which looks like a giant lightning bolt carved it. The same is true of Mars with Valles Marineris. Birkeland Currents connect all the planets to the sun with incredible amounts of energy flowing through them, so the planets are electrically charged, hence all the craters on the moon and geological effects such as these canyons, Olympus Mons, the giant hexagons on Saturn/Neptune, hexagon-shaped craters, the auroras, etc.
Never did I dispute the millions of years of erosion theory, BUT THEN I seen it in person and immediately my first thought was whatever created this was ferocious. Without any doubt. Common sense tells you.
I'm not a geologist, but here's a recent thought I had. In order for the evolutionist story to be true with the Grand Canyon, the whole area would have had to ha e been covered in water, dried up, covered in water, dried up, over and over again to form all those layers with fossils. Isn't that right? Where do they think the sediment for all those layers came from? It's one thing to say the river carved the canyon, but explaining the layers is a whole different ball game. Maybe I'll research their point of view on this.
Yes, that's exactly what happened. The main layers of the Canyon are Paleozoic, laid down over 300 million years. But there are gaps where sea level fell or the local land area rose above it, and there was erosion rather than deposition. These are represented by the breaks between different color layers. This may be a bit oversimplified, but that's the basic idea.
Evolutionists are now saying there was an ocean channel that ran from Texas through to Canada. Between that and their 2 million years of continuous rainfall they’re dancing dangerously close to the truth 😂
@@donjdanielsjr I'm not sure about Texas. But there were definitley ocean channels in the West at various times. The Grand Canyon layers were deposited on a continental shelf.
@@donjdanielsjr The lowest sedimentary layer is Cambrian, so around 500 million years ago. The highest part of the Canyon was over 200 million years ago, so everything above that has been eroded away (but the layers can still be seen to the north). The area was a continental shelf that was above or below sea level at various times.
@@seanvogel8067 no, it is not an appeal to anything. It is actually how societies work. You know, like when you have a health problem, you go to a specialist. If you don't know anything about auto repair and you have a major car problem, you take your vehicle to somebody who knows what they are doing. Scientists work in specialized fields. You can't just say they are wrong about this or that simply because what they discover conflicts with your beliefs.
@@travisbicklepopsicle , I agree with you about going to specialists, But the fact that they are specialists doesn’t mean they’re right all the time. It just means they are more likely to be right on a general basis in their specialty area. Your argument assumes that creation scientists are not real scientists. That is a misconception. It’s also important to distinguish between people who believe in creation versus creation scientists. There is also a difference between the data and the science, and on the other hand, the interpretation of the data. Since we’re using data collected in the present, it has to be interpreted. My final thought is that although I believe in young earth creation, I’m not sure some of the things being discussed require one worldview or another. Oh wait, one more thing to throw in there: consensus isn’t science.
@@seanvogel8067 Just calling someone a "creation scientist" implies that they are not real scientists, otherwise we would just call them scientists. What would make "creation scientists" different? By their own admission, they start with the "truth" of the Bible, and seek research that will confirm that. That's not real science.
Here's an idea: Go ahead and mix up copies of all the photos without labels, but coded. Then ask a uniformitarian geologist to sort them out and label them. Then give him a letter grade on his performance.
I remember being taught in Geography lessons that the Grand Canyon was carved out by the Colorado river, but I always thought there was something more to it that would have created such a massive canyon, and that something would be like the Global Flood depicted in the Bible. Thanks Dr Andrew for your eye-opening research, may God bless your labour and save souls for His glory!
Yes, you are correct about the first part. There was more that created the canyon formation over millions of years. 1 flood that lasted 100 or so days isn't able to leave even a centimetre of a mark on large rock layers. Instead if you listened closely enough in your geography classes, millions of years after the plateau has been carved out by the river, there were also periods were the water had frozen and thawed up, along with other weathering effects that the rock had taken affects from, leading to the canyon formations.
There'd also be uniformity and deposition throughout the canyons, if there was a global flood, but we don't see any evidence of that. Instead, the canyons exhibit complex patterns of erosion, where different layers of the canyons were shown to have eroded at different rates and through different ways, all of which indicates that there wasn't 1 flood that did this, but that there were different periods of erosion and deposition.
Also, don't you find it a bit strange that there are only a few canyon distributions around the world? Do theists expect that in a global event which should lead to multiple canyon formations, in their logic?
@@sentinel_nightcrawler We'll probably leave that to the geologists to explain why. I'm not a geologist but it could depend on the location's geology before the flood, there are some countries that mainly have granite rock formations and little sedimentary rock for example. The biblical flood wasn't just a flood that covered the earth, it was a catastrophic flood that formed mountains and valleys, changing the earth's topography - you have to study the Bible for the details. Dr Andrew's video also just gave a long explanation why the sedimentary layers at the Grand Canyon couldn't have taken millions of years to form if you have listened to the whole thing, the evidence doesn't explain our assumptions of millions of years.
@@blue-dc4hl oh, so you're trusting researchers who say that earth is billions of years old instead of creationist quacks, when you mention geologists? Sounds like a cop-out to your argument. I'm talking about other sedimentary rock formations that snelling hadn't taken into account. If there was a global flood which covered all of the sedimentary rock layers, why aren't there any canyons formed thereafter? Also the fact that snelling hadn't considered exactly what the composition of a rock layer would be had there been a flood, shows his lack of genuine research of rocks in general. I wonder if Snelling or Andrew have ever mentioned that if there ever was a global flood, then not only the grand canyons, but also all sedimentary layers would have uniform layers of erosion and distribution. But since the grand canyons exhibit complicated structures of erosion, we can look at what layer has eroded at which rate.
I love this work. I hobby prospect for gold, so I witness many of the concepts mentioned, especially stratification. The only question I have, is what evidence do we have of rapid deposition not allowing for stratification? I would like to be able to have references available. Thank you. Keep up the awesome work.
I think it does, but based on material type. Point me to what you're talking about in the video? Personally I don't like the broad claims being made but such is the way of "science" in the modern world. I used to hobby prospect for gold! Then state regulations destroyed the hobby ugh I miss it.
If all this work is only published in the Answers Research Journal, no mainstream geologists will read it. It would have been better to submit it to a mainstream geology journal.
Those mainstream geologists were part of the cabal that attempted to stop this worthy research in the beginning by denying Dr. Snelling permits in the first place. They do not want real scientific research .....if it goes against their dogma ie evolution.
@@nathancook2852because that's where the specific folds were where the dating has been done. Those folds aren't outside the park. Saying he could just go get samples from the same layer outside the park shows you aren't paying ANY attention to what he's saying. And they did find something new. It has been supposed that the folds happened due to ductile deformation and his research found that was not the case. That's his point.
@@tathyaanveshan3399 I don't know about the details, but his conclusions are definitely not scientific. There is nothing in the Grand Canyon that even remotely suggests a young Earth.
@@jockyoung4491the Colorado River, as we know it regardless of time doesn't display the footprint it would for that length of time. What the shape of the canyons displays looks like a massive blasting force causing sudden catastrophic Chang Which then left behind the trickle that is the current Colorado in the bottom of the openings it busted and blasted first. We used to mess around with a sand table and a water hose in geology and ecology class in junior high school in the lab, I remember the stuff that would do .
😂 *The Enuma Elish would later be the inspiration for the Hebrew scribes who created the text now known as the biblical Book of Genesis.* Prior to the 19th century CE, the Bible was considered the oldest book in the world and its narratives were thought to be completely original. In the mid-19th century CE, however, European museums, as well as academic and religious institutions, sponsored excavations in Mesopotamia to find physical evidence for historical corroboration of the stories in the Bible. ***These excavations found quite the opposite, however, in that, once cuneiform was translated, it was understood that a number of biblical narratives were Mesopotamian in origin.*** *Famous stories such as the Fall of Man and the Great Flood were originally conceived and written down in Sumer,* translated and modified later in Babylon, and reworked by the Assyrians ***before they were used by the Hebrew scribes for the versions which appear in the Bible.*** ***In revising the Mesopotamian creation story for their own ends, the Hebrew scribes tightened the narrative and the focus but retained the concept of the all-powerful deity who brings order from chaos.*** Marduk, in the Enuma Elish, establishes the recognizable order of the world - *just as God does in the Genesis tale* - and human beings are expected to recognize this great gift and honor the deity through service. *"Enuma Elish - The Babylonian Epic of Creation - Full Text - World History Encyclopedia"* *"Sumerian Is the World's Oldest Written Language | ProLingo"* *"Sumerian Civilization: Inventing the Future - World History Encyclopedia"* ("The Sumerians were the people of southern Mesopotamia whose civilization flourished between c. 4100-1750 BCE." "Ancient Israelites and their origins date back to 1800-1200 BCE.") *"The Myth of Adapa - World History Encyclopedia"* Also discussed by Professor Christine Hayes at Yale University in her 1st lecture of the series on the Hebrew Bible from 8:50 to 14:30 minutes, lecture 3 from 28:30 to 41:35 minutes, lecture 4 from 0:00 up to 21:30 minutes and 24:00 up to 35:30 minutes and lecture 7 from 24:20 to 25:10 minutes. From a Biblical scholar: "Many stories in the ancient world have their origins in other stories and were borrowed and modified from other or earlier peoples. *For instance, many of the stories now preserved in the Bible are* ***modified*** *versions of stories that existed in the cultures and traditions of Israel’s* ***older*** *contemporaries.* Stories about the creation of the universe, a cataclysmic universal flood, digging wells as land markers, the naming of important cultic sites, gods giving laws to their people, and even stories about gods decreeing the possession of land to their people were all part of the cultural and literary matrix of the ancient Near East. *Biblical scribes freely* ***adopted and modified*** *these stories as a means to express their own identity, origins, and customs."* *"Stories from the Bible"* by Dr Steven DiMattei, from his website *"Biblical Contradictions"* ------------------------------------------------------------------ In addition, look up the below articles. *"Yahweh was just an ancient Canaanite god. We have been deceived! - Escaping Christian Fundamentalism"* *"Debunking the Devil - Michael A. Sherlock (Author)"* *"The Greatest Trick Religion Ever Pulled: Convincing Us That Satan Exists | Atheomedy"* *"Zoroastrianism And Persian Mythology: The Foundation Of Belief"* (Scroll to the last section: Zoroastrianism is the Foundation of Western Belief) *"10 Ways The Bible Was Influenced By Other Religions - Listverse"* *"January | 2014 | Atheomedy"* - Where the Hell Did the Idea of Hell Come From? *"Retired bishop explains the reason why the Church invented "Hell" - Ideapod"* Watch *"The Origins of Salvation, Judgement and Hell"* by Derreck Bennett at Atheologica (Sensitive theists should only watch from 7:00 to 17:30 minutes as evangelical Christians are lambasted. He's a former theist and has been studying the scholarship and comparative religions for over 15 years) *"Top Ten Reasons Noah’s Flood is Mythology - The Sensuous Curmudgeon"* *"Forget about Noah's Ark; There Was No Worldwide Flood | Bible Interp"* *"The Search for Noah’s Flood - Biblical Archaeology Society"* *"Eridu Genesis - World History Encyclopedia"* *"The Atrahasis Epic: The Great Flood & the Meaning of Suffering - World History Encyclopedia"* Watch *"How Aron Ra Debunks Noah's Flood"* (8 part series debunking Noah's flood using multiple branches of science) *"The Adam and Eve myth - News24"* *"Before Adam and Eve - Psychology Today"* *"Gilgamesh vs. Noah - Wordpress"* *"Old Testament Tales Were Stolen From Other Cultures - Griffin"* *"Parallelism between “The Hymn to Aten” and Psalm 104 - Project Augustine"* *"Studying the Bible"* - by Dr Steven DiMattei (This particular article from a critical Biblical scholar highlights how the authors of the Hebrew Bible used their *fictional* god as a mouthpiece for their own views and ideologies) *"How do we know that the biblical writers were* ***not*** *writing history?"* -- by Dr Steven DiMattei *"Contradictions in the Bible | Identified verse by verse and explained using the most up-to-date scholarly information about the Bible, its texts, and the men who wrote them"* -- by Dr. Steven DiMattei
@@StudentDad-mc3pu Student, you are just ignoring all the evidence that shows Evolution is a fairy-tale for grown-ups who wish to ignore the fact that God will judge them for how they lived this life he so lovingly created for them. Please repent, and start believing in your Creator - Jesus Christ, today.
I wished I had you as a professor instead I had a lazy one that was more focused on research rather than teaching. I still received a B so I survived. But God directed me to creation science and I'm really glad he did! I needed to combine my bible reading with my science interests cause that's how he designed me. Thank you Dr. Snelling God bless!
@@jockyoung4491 That is an appeal to popularity. The evidence is there and just as There are scientists with PHDS and fancy degrees. Who argue for evolution There are scientist with the same phds and degrees. Who argue against it. It is up to you to do the research as to whose Evidence is the most profound in my opinion. It is obviously that of creation scientist.
*What The Father has spoken will never change, His promises are still good and our prayers are still answered! Hallelujah!!! But as impossible as this sounds, like so many of the true stories in scripture, our bibles have all been supernaturally changed by Satan in the last several years, right in our homes, in the fulfillment of prophecy. It's being done to prepare for the reign of the antichrist. All languages and all translations have been changed along with concordances, encyclopedias, dictionaries, history books, the original Hebrew, Greek, Latin and Aramaic manuscripts. Even the Dead Sea Scrolls have been changed!* *I'm 71, was saved when I was 10, and have read only the exact same copy of the King James bible my church gave me in 1961. (This does not mean I was a King James onlyist but now I'm glad I never read other ones or I might not have noticed the changes as soon.) I had memorized many scriptures from it through the years. Then in 2014 I started seeing changes in it that I couldn't explain. I had never owned a computer or heard of the Mandela Effect back then. But after being given my first computer in 2016 I finally found out why I had been noticing all of the oddities that I couldn't explain. I then started diligently studying what should actually have been called the "Daniel 7:25 effect". That's where God said He would give the antichrist the power to do this. (Change times and laws, history and scripture) We're seeing many end time prophecies being fulfilled SUPERNATURALLY! This is some of the "lying signs and wonders" God told us He would give the AC power to perform which would even deceive His very elect, if it were possible in 2nd Thessalonians chapter two!* *God said in the end of days, (NOW!) that He would send us a famine for hearing His words in Amos **8:11** and that He would give the antichrist the ability to do this in Daniel 7:25. In Daniel 12:4 & 12:9 He told him to seal his book until the end days. He told John **_not_** to seal his book because the end time is at hand in Revelation 22:10. One of the Greek definitions of ''seal'' in Strongs concordance is “to protect from Satan”. He also told us to “hide His words in our hearts”, which meant memorize, if not word for word at least the essence of what was written, because He knew this was going to happen.* *God commanded us to "prove all things", and people **_better_** obey Him, especially on this subject. I urge you to research this. There are many brothers and sisters making videos about the changes with more proof of what was originally written and I have lots more about this in my playlist 👉 which can be found by typing in (PROOF OF BIBLE CHANGE RESIDUE JUNKIE 1)* 👈 *I've continued to stay in God's word by reading what has been documented to be what used to be written and what Satan has been changing. Soon Amos **8:12** will be fulfilled too and we won't be able to find God's word anymore, and the only way it can happen is by not being able to see these videos and PDF written lists of documented changes like the one at (amos)(8)(.)(org)* *May God bless all who read this with eyes to see this incredible faith strengthener, and how close we are to our Saviour's return!!!!* *P.S. Everyone is going to learn about this one way or the other. I'm just trying to keep so many people from hearing Jesus explain it to them at the Gate. If you ask for them at the address on my about page I will send you links for 17 films that absolutely prove the snake bite is the mark. And yt hates me, they won't notify me of replies and won't post my answers so write me at residue junkie in one word at g mail for lots more info yt would never allow you to see.* ❤✝️💪 *P.P.S. YT will not notify me if you reply here so write me at residue junkie in one word at g mail.*
Also for the benefit of those who have not listened to the whole video (although you really should), here's a very brief summary (AIG to correct if it's wrong, thanks): Fossil records at the Grand Canyon show burrowing traces of trilobites and worms. How were the "footprints" of these organisms which would have been rapidly eroded preserved? Rapid burial and not millions of years would have done this.
Did it take millions of years of deposition for the rock layers in the Grand Canyon to form? What caused the bends in the rock layers - were they folded by pressure/heat 450 million years after the sediment layers were cemented? What does recent research tell us?
If it indeed took millions of years, we would expect settling of larger grains with separation from the smaller grains. Yet, rock samples collected from the Grand Canyon show the random mixing of different sized grains without evidence of settling, indicating that there was no time for sorting of the grains due to rapid deposition of the rock layers. Muscovite is soft mineral that is easily destroyed. Yet is it found preserved in quartz of the rock samples, indicating that they were deposited rapidly with the sediment grains before they could be destroyed. K-feldspar, which is softer than quartz, was also found preserved, indicating that deposition was so rapid that K-feldspar was not eroded away by the harder quartz grains.
If the bends in the sedimentary rock layers happened after external pressure and heat were applied to the dried layers, we should expect to see evidence of metamorphosis in the rock bends with disturbance of the quartz cement holding the sand grains together. We would also expect rock in the bends to be compacted with less porosity due to the exerted pressure. However, the rock samples show otherwise - the quartz cement holding the grains together always appeared intact with no evidence of being disturbed/shattered. This shows that the rock layers were likely bent while they were still wet and pliable, and not after they had been dried out for millions of years with pressure/heat later being applied to bend them. The quartz cement was the last to form after the rock layers were bent when water dried out from the rock after the Flood. Porosity of rock samples in the bends were also similar to that of samples collected away from the bends, again proving the same point. The K-feldspar grains and muscovite flakes which would be affected by heat also show no signs of metamorphism in the bends.
The observational evidence is overwhelmingly consistent with rapid catastrophic deposition of these sediment layers, expected at the beginning of the Global Flood recorded in the Bible. It does not support the above assumption of millions of years. Trust God and His Word. “In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.” (Genesis 1:1)
@annieoaktree6774 They were made while these creatures were moving under the silt they were being covered with. The amount of water that covered the earth in only 40 days and nights reached a height of over 3 miles in that amount of time. It was over 17,000 feet high. The water pressure at that depth is staggering. That's about 425 feet of water level per day, or almost 18 feet of depth per hour. If you watch the videos of the Japanese tsunami he referred to, you'll see how destructive even a few feet of water in motion is. If you've ever gone to the bottom of the deep end of a pool, you can feel the pressure just that amount of water produces. Imagine the incredibly rapid pressure build-up of the amount of water that fell during the flood hours and days. That much water in motion would easily be able to carve out canyons and move vast amounts of material around.
@annieoaktree6774 Lol obviously they wouldn't wait to do that until all the water had risen to its maximum height. It took over a month for all that water to accumulate.
Great point. Assuming the forces currently at play (erosion, geothermal, magnetic) it would take millions of years. It is possible that it could have been longer or shorter if there were other forces at play some point in the past, but without some extraterrestrial forces, and just using the forces we calculate today. Yes millions of years would be the assumed timeline @@nathancook2852
"Pangaea" occurred in the middle of the flood, when the continents had broken up and bounced together on the other side of the earth and then drifted away from each other afterwards again
So i have a question wr have lots of photos of expansion zone but only animation of subduction zones. Doesnt look like the subduction theory was ever proven.. whats your view on the earth growing.... and the small earth theory
Love it. You are so brilliant and enthusiastic, I did A level geology, many years ago, believed everything, the lecturers told us, only about 10 years ago woke up ,to a young earth. Been a born again Christian for 35 years and the conflict between millions of years and the Genesis account of creation therefore never made sense. But now it does absolutely love it and yes I am excited. Thank you so much your brilliant 😊 Praise God ❤️
Awesome video. Can we have your thoughts on how opal forms in seashells in Australia? I believe the flood is when opal formed. A rainbow remi nder in rock v God's promise to not flood the whole world agai n.
The writers of the Bible were talked to by God an entrusted to write his words. You haven't heard God because you didn't write the Bible and demonstrate a lack of religion.
I know why YOU never hear from God. Because of this statement you made. Why would God talk to you when you don't believe or have faith in God? God talks to those who believe and have faith. You clearly don't, so that's on you. 🤷♀️
@asullivan72: You are wrong, I had a religious upbringing. I wanted to know God but eventually I realised I only ever heard from people telling me what I should believe. Religion, I’m afraid, is very human centric.
I don't recall if he says this alone proves the great flood so much as proves the predictions made by the view were correct, and that the evidence of ancient earth theories that require heat to bend rocks are incorrect.
I find it amazing they denied your application to do science like everyone else. They can't stand up to scrutiny, or even allow basic curiosity to flourish. And we all know why.
At first they denied it because there were similar rocks outside the park and they didn't want him defacing a National Park for such a poor scientific hypothesis.
Creationists always seem to want to talk about The Grand Canyon. Maybe one could answer how chalk deposits such as the White Cliffs of Dover were formed? Conventional geology says that these were formed by millions of years of plankton deposits.
Are there any AIG videos that don't seek to deceive my confusing Atheism (lack of belief in gods as there is no evidence to such their existence) and Geology (the study of rocks)?Atheists don't tend to talk to anyone about geology, unlike geologists, and I suspect few geologists discuss the existence or otherwise of any gods. I'm Atheist, and an amateur geologist, but I'm very much an exception to the rule. There is absolutely zip evidence for anything that looks like the flood of the Bible, and well does this channel know it.
It's not just AIG. Creationists always (and probably intentionally) equate science with atheism. They don't undersatnd the difference between scence and faith.
Atheism depends completely on the idea of deep time and thus NEEDS geology to prove that the earth is old. What atheist believes the earth is a) eternal b) flat c) 6000 years old?
@@cosmictreason2242 Most atheist probably don't know much about science either way, just like most theists don't. But theism and atheism are about faith, and therefore have nothing to do with science. Time is not a NEED. Time is just a fact.
Yes. Dr. James Tour did a publish on the origin of life without bringing up God. And challenged any scientist to challenge him. If you are sincere in your question and curiosity of discovery regardless of the outcome. Check him out. You can look up his publish the origin of life by Dr. James Tour. It's very scientific. Way over my head. He is a Jew. He is a Christian. But he only uses science to explain stuff. He is a world renown scientist. Voted too 50 minds of our time. He is well respected in the science community. He is also a genius. I hope you find his work and I think you will respect what you read even if you come away with different opinions.
Our family did a fantastic creationist tour of the Grand Canyon and learned so much. It is so obvious those layers were created in the Great Flood, the rocks cry out as a testimony to mankind that God's judgement is real.
'It's obvious these layers were created in the great flood' Excellent, vigorous scientific work.. well done. A person does not need to be a geologist. All you need to do is visit the Grand Canyon on vacation and you'll learn everything you need to know. (Meant to say 'rigorous', but I'm sure it was vigorous as well)
That's fine, but just don't claim science supports it when it doesn't. Christianity can still be true without misrepresenting science. Just stick to faith.
@@jockyoung4491 The historical record shows that everyone spread out from Mesopotamia. Ancient history is essential for everyone to know, especially the sixteen original civilizations… from the sixteen grandsons of Noah. Learn ancient history before trying to learn science. 1. The first inhabitants of Italy (K) Tubal 2. Thracians (L) Tiras 3. Siberians (N) Meshek 4. East Asians (O) Magog 5. Medes (PQ) Madai 6.. Western Europeans (R) Gomer 7. Mediterranean Greek sea people (T) Javan 8. Hebrews and Arabic (IJ) Arphaxad 9. Elamites (H) Elam 10. Assyrians (G) Asshur 11. Arameans (F1) Aram 12. Lydians (F2) Lud 13. Cushites (AB, C) Cush 14. Egyptians (E3) Mitzrayim 15. Canaanites (E2, D) Canaan 16. Original North African Phoenicians (E1) Phut The D haplogroup descendants of Canaan migrated east through Tibet all the way to Japan. The C haplogroup descendants of Nimrod migrated to South Asia, the Pacific, Mongolia and all the way to the Americas along with Q haplogroup descendants of Madai ancestor of the Medes. The A maternal mtDNA haplogroup belonging to the N lineage accompanied the Q paternal haplogroup in the Americas. The C&D maternal haplogroups belong to the M lineage. The B maternal haplogroup seems to have crossed the Pacific Ocean. The Mediterranean paternal R1b and the maternal X2a also found in Galilee represent an Atlantic crossing of the Phoenicians in the days of King Solomon considering also the Mediterranean paternal haplogroups of T, G, I1, I2, J1, J2, E and B in addition to the R1b in Native American Populations. J1 and J2 is Arabs and Jews. (I1 is Dan, I2 is Asher) Of course there is the Cohen modal haplotype of J1 P58 which identifies the IJ lineage of Hebrews and Arabs that are descended from Arphaxad. J2 M172 is the descendants of the House of David and Solomon.
The historical record shows that everyone spread out from Mesopotamia. Ancient history is essential for everyone to know, especially the sixteen original civilizations… from the sixteen grandsons of Noah. Learn ancient history before trying to learn science. 1. The first inhabitants of Italy (K) Tubal 2. Thracians (L) Tiras 3. Siberians (N) Meshek 4. East Asians (O) Magog 5. Medes (PQ) Madai 6.. Western Europeans (R) Gomer 7. Mediterranean Greek sea people (T) Javan 8. Hebrews and Arabic (IJ) Arphaxad 9. Elamites (H) Elam 10. Assyrians (G) Asshur 11. Arameans (F1) Aram 12. Lydians (F2) Lud 13. Cushites (AB, C) Cush 14. Egyptians (E3) Mitzrayim 15. Canaanites (E2, D) Canaan 16. Original North African Phoenicians (E1) Phut The D haplogroup descendants of Canaan migrated east through Tibet all the way to Japan. The C haplogroup descendants of Nimrod migrated to South Asia, the Pacific, Mongolia and all the way to the Americas along with Q haplogroup descendants of Madai ancestor of the Medes. The A maternal mtDNA haplogroup belonging to the N lineage accompanied the Q paternal haplogroup in the Americas. The C&D maternal haplogroups belong to the M lineage. The B maternal haplogroup seems to have crossed the Pacific Ocean. The Mediterranean paternal R1b and the maternal X2a also found in Galilee represent an Atlantic crossing of the Phoenicians in the days of King Solomon considering also the Mediterranean paternal haplogroups of T, G, I1, I2, J1, J2, E and B in addition to the R1b in Native American Populations. J1 and J2 is Arabs and Jews. (I1 is Dan, I2 is Asher) Of course there is the Cohen modal haplotype of J1 P58 which identifies the IJ lineage of Hebrews and Arabs that are descended from Arphaxad. J2 M172 is the descendants of the House of David and Solomon.
This is a marvelous example of forensic geological science and should be both taught and further researched. It would be a great follow-up to take some of those samples and subject them to the estimated heat and pressure of evolutionary geologists and then show the deformations and healing that would have occurred, just to put the cherry on the top of the findings and observations. As an aside, concrete does not dry out - it cures, and the cementitious binder is not the remnants after drying, it is the cement bonded with the water to create the "koosh-ball-like" structure that holds the granules, sediment, and aggregate to one another.
I think they can grasp it, but they cannot allow themselves to be honest about this. It's part of the indoctrination of creationists to make them thing all of science is either its own religion, or ''atheist dogma''. They cannot be honest about this at all costs.
Atheists have no positions on anything. It’s the most intellectually lazy belief system of all. Yes, I know atheism is a “lack of belief”, insert eye roll here.
Out near Wee Jasper in NSW there are limestone layers that fold back on themselves like a crumpled carpet. No cracks or splintering at all. Folder when wet! Also, the Grose and jamison rivers (both small streams) cut through the blue mountains west of Sydney. Darwin saw this and used it to convince him of deep time bit the rivers cut through the range, just like grand canyon. Evidence of the flood here in Australia too! Thanks Dr Snelling for helping me see these things with fresh eyes.
The Bible clearly states that God (the Word Jesus Christ) created everything in six literal 24 hr days (Yom is the Hebrew word used). Exodus 10:1 For in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the LORD blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it. God did not rest for millions or billions of years on day seven as an example for man to follow. God created Adam along with all land creatures on day six of the creation week. The Bible goes on to provide the genealogy of Adam to Jesus the Christ...giving the ages of those in between which we add up to determine the age of the Earth which is some 6000 years old. Sometime after day six of creation ...Adam sinned and the Bible states theat nature groaned. The Bible further states that the wages of sin is death. Adam's sin created the conditions for death. If you believe that the Earth is millions of years old them you put death before Adam came on the seen. Since Jesus came to redeem mankind from Adam's original sin, Jesus would not have had to come since death and disease existed before Adam came on the seen. Therefore the universe and the Earth being millions of years old is just not scriptural. Either you believe in the infallibility of God's preserved word or you believe in man's word. As for me and my house...we will serve the Lord.
Ron Wyatt found Noah’s ark and all kinds of anchor stones on the MountainS of Ararat. Also rediscovered Sodom and Gamora and the Red Sea crossing and the mountain God sat on and talked to Moses face to face. In Saudi Arabia. The stone that he struck and got water out of and also the ark of the covenant. He was really trying to show us that God meant what He said. The ark was right under where Jesus was sacrificed. So He did indeed anoint the Most Holy . God is awesome.
Ironic you mention Ron Wyatt in the AiG channel. Wyatt said the ark was found at Ararat, Turkey. That was later refuted. Even AiG says the ark was not found. Did you know that? He was an pseudo-archeologist active at 60's to 80's. His findings where never published in peer-reviewed journal of archeology. That's because they wouldn't stand it. Wyatt's claims have been described as "fraudulent", in the category of trash which one finds in tabloids such as the National Enquirer (Letter from Joe Zias). Wyatt was criticized by scientists, historians, biblical scholars, and some creationists, and is not considered credible by professional archaeologists and biblical scholars.
I think if you want to put the nail in the coffin, then you should bend a sample under heat and pressure to demonstrate the difference between rocks bent when wet versus those that would be bent after they've hardened.
“Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat: because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it.” Matthew 7:13-14 KJV
Great video, Dr. Snelling! We are honored to have worked with you and AiG in the Grand Canyon all these years. You're a true ROCK star!
💛
@@nateloper What fantastic work!! You guys are awesome!
The mythical deluge never happened
@@Charlie94781 the only mythology is evolutionary stories that are not based on scientific investigation that can be falsified but is pure imagination.
Snelling proves that belief in God can make you into a liar.
In the last days knowledge shall be increased
God bless
Amen!
@@jockyoung4491 Actually many of the scientists that founded the various fields of scientific inquiry ...those who literally wrote the books on those fields of study were men and women of faith. Read a book on great scientists in history.
It was to make people think for themselves which is why the Lord God took away the hearing the words.
Amos 8:11-13.
11: Behold, the days come, saith the Lord GOD, that I will send a famine in the land, not a famine of bread, nor a thirst of water, but of hearing the word of the LORD:
12: And they shall wander from sea to sea, and from the north even to the east, they shall run to and fro to seek the word of the LORDm and shall not find it.
13: In that day shall the fair virgins and young men faint for thirst.
Amen 🙏 🙏 🙏 and what was hidden in the dark is being revealed in the light
@@newcreationinchrist1423 I bet you think that is really deep and meaningfull.
As a scientist that has been integral and diligent in an industry bent on publishing fiction wilder than Grimm's Fairytales, I can say watching this video was so refreshing with the energy and effort and scale of work exactly how I have applied myself in my own research. Now as a Christian and not the atheist, I would really enjoy being a part of such a team. Really appreciated.
Hello brother I'd like to speak with you I was once a skeptical athiest as well, do you have discord?
What a shame Snelling did radiometric dating for the uranium exploration industry in Australia. He knows how to do it properly.
Where is the evidence for the claims within Christianity?
What evidence lead you to believe that any god exists, much less the christain god?
How did you apply the scientific method to the bible to verify its claims?
@@2l84me8 this question is getting quite tedious, I am astounded at how patient some people are at just having the discussion. Can we for a moment change the focus to your views? Where are the evidences of your claims against christianity? What evidence can you give that God doesn't exist? There have been countless findings, studies and tests done that prove the bible and christianity. Now it's the skeptics turn, please prove scientifically and objectively that there is no god and that christianity is complete garbage. Give us objective evidence and not subjective evidence.
A number of years ago, I saw a video by a Christian geologist that explained a mini Grand Canyon that was formed during the Mount St.Helen eruption that most geologists would say took eons to form.
No you did not.
If it was formed during the eruption then nobody thinks it took eons to form
@@jockyoung4491welcome to creationism then
@@cosmictreason2242
What did anything I said have to do with creationism?
@@kevinkelly2162How would you know what he watched or didn't watch? I've watched videos explaining that very thing.
Amen. Halleluyah. Thankful for your perseverance in this geological area. Lord bless.🙏😇🤗
As I mentioned in my first comment, I am a hobby prospector. Every prospector knows that any mineral/rock that has been in flowing water for more than 3-5 years is absolutely rounded. In fact, that is how we identify river stones. The fact that this quartz is jagged means it was not weathered for very long at all. Love this, thank you.
Or it has been a low energy environment with very slow rate of erosion and degredation.
Which is it? Flowing water or weathering?
@jonathanrussell1140 You do understand that weathered can mean the rock has been rounded/smoothed by flowing water. Ie rocks in a rainwater run off. The two are not mutually exclusive.
@kaisguda Sure, that's possible if you agree with the premise laid out in the video. It becomes irrelevant if billions of years are true. Since each layer is supposedly laid down over many, many years by wind, water, and errosion, then compressed and solidified. We shouldn't see any jagged or sharp edges. Yet, if the premise is true and it was laid down and covered up rapidly, we would expect what is shown in the video.
Dr. Snelling, my brother Andrew, we had a couple conversations at the ICC in Cedarville and it was there that you impressed me as a modern day young David slaying the giant. I LOVED this 2 part 3 plus hour presentation! Thank you! It’s amazing! It’s perfect apologetics! PLEASE CONSIDER MAKING A SHORT VERSION for people who don’t know you well enough to understand that time spent listening to you is a gift from God!
Yes, it's apologetics, not science.
Thank God for people like Dr. Snelling and organizations like AIG. Helping our faith to grow. Thank you.
They're helping creationists be illiterate on science and very confident in their illiteracy.
Yes, you have faith in these people to make your faith in something else more realistic in your perspective. There's nothing scientific that any of these people do.
@@Creationism-is-pseudoscience 🥱
@Laughingatsciencedeniers 🍌🐒 cumfromnothingsquirtedoutoafishesbut.
@@SK-bw2cv Have your faith, that's okay. But you need to stop pretending or roleplaying that blind faith and starting with conclusions regardless of where the evidence points is doing science. These organizations and people are not science communicators. They're religious preachers and little else.
The heavier “debris” falls out first. Explains the big boulders of white water rafting in Colorado. Explains
The 3 bent layers in the Grand Canton also. Bottom
Layer has larger particles and the finest layer on top. Thank you for helping me
To see what creates these bent
Rock formations. I’ve been noticing them
All my life all
Around as ive traveled wondering HOW
Because those big bolders were floating - right! This is utter nonsense.
@@StudentDad-mc3pu it only takes 12” of water to move an SUV or a truck. A river can move boulders. There is much more force behind a Tsunami. The more force. The bigger the boulder it can move. I can definitely see it happening. If you’ve never made wild clay I guess that would explain why you can’t see that sedimentary layers after years of being under pressure would turn to rock just like petrified wood😂
@@GypsADaisy Have you personally seen a river move boulders? Where is this Tsunami comming from? Trucks have boyance rocks do not, they sit underneath water. This is an entire fantasy you have constructed.
@@GypsADaisy Thanks for the attempt at patronising me. However, the education required is all on the story-teller in the video.
@@GypsADaisy no, there are multiple layers that the grand canyons consist of.
Each showing their own geological time.
The formation of the grand canyons show that 5 or 6 million years ago, the colorado river cut through the plateau which had been uplifted, leading to millions of years worth of rock erosion, weathering and freeze-thaw events, all of which leading up to the canyon structure we see today.
The fact that there are multiple different geological layers proves that there wasn't a flood, since that would have been 1 and 1 only event. Not to mention that even if there was such a flood, there would've been thousands of canyons all around the world, and that floods alone aren't able to cause them to form.
I'll place my bets on the Rock of Ages before I submit to the cult of evolution.
Why don't you think evolution is true? If it's because of your faith, then say so. But there is no scientific evidence against evolution.
@@headytone
I am not bullying anyone. I am discussing science. Disagreement is not bullying
@@headytone bullying? This channel has been misrepresenting science-- several fields of science-- for a long, long time now.
It is essential that people shine a light on this nonsense.
@@travisbicklepopsicle You have not said one word to refute the evidence he presented. You've got nothing by hyperbole to add to the discussion.
@@alantasman8273
He didn't present evidence for a global flood, so what's to refute? Yes, the layers were once wet. We already knew that
Thank you to you and your team's and behind-the-scene staff and extras for all your diligent work!
Stop thanking charlatans for making illiterate people. Its embarrassing.
They haven't explained the geological layering of the canyons.
This fraud uses radiometric dating when it suits him
Keep up the great work ✝️🔨
Snelling is a jackass.
Absolutely outstanding! Great job!!
Even the rocks cry out "There is a God!"
Prophesy spoken and prophesy fulfilled.
They cry out "God is a mass murderer!"
@@georg7120God is the creator of all life🤔He can take who or whatever silly
@@Justinn.777 amen! Good response and very true! 😊
@@newcreationinchrist1423Yes🙏🏽🩵God Bless You!
Amen AIG 🙂🙏 and thank you, Dr. Snelling
Really like how Dr Andrew begins by saying that we first believe the Bible, and then we go out and explore how evidence in the world are consistent with what we read in the Bible, not the other way round. And that's what faith is! "blessed are they that have not seen, and yet have believed." (John 20:29) "Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen." (Hebrews 11:1)
Sharing a message I read:
How did life come about? Can something come out of nothingness? Did a single cell evolve to form extremely complex organisms, plants, animals and even us, human beings? If so, where did all this new information to form something more complex come from? How did chance produce such order, intelligence, intricacy and awesome design? Even more intriguing, where did the first cells come from and what gave life to them? Is life something tangible that can be explained by the finiteness of science? Who was there at the beginning who could possibly shed some light on the origin of life?
God, who has no beginning and ending, existed before time did. He tells us in the Bible the story of how life came about. He created it by His wisdom and for His glory. “In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.” (Genesis 1:1) In fact, God says that people have no excuse to deny His existence, clearly manifested in His Creation!
“The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.” (Psalm 14:1)
“For the invisible things of Him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse.” (Romans 1:20)
“All things were made by Him; and without Him was not any thing made that was made.” (John 1:3)
Would you believe the infallible and immutable God who has revealed to you in His Word that He created the world? Or would you believe the hypotheses of fallible men who weren’t even there at the beginning of time? Don’t take your chances - trust in the living God who never lies. The eternity of your soul is at stake. “For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son (Jesus), that whosoever believeth in Him should not perish, but have everlasting life.” (John 3:16)
@@Sl15555
Wrong. We say, first believe in evidence and reason. Nobody has any incentive to believe evolution if it wasn't true. Nobody would have even thought of such a thing if evidence and reason had not made it obvious. Assuming the Bible is true is by definition not scientific.
Amen ;) Godspeed
"blessed are they that have not seen, and yet have believed" applies to email from Nigeria.
Then it is NOT science, is it?
@@jockyoung4491Ohhh come on now, let’s be honest lol. I think we both know that enlightenment era atheists had an axe to grind with you know who. I mean, Einstein himself intentionally fudged the numbers to deny the beginning of space-time. We both know this is a thing on both sides of the issue.
Well done! Thankyou for so diligently researching and documenting your work, Dr Andrew Snelling.
I still have copies of the magazine Creation Ex Nihilo from the 90s which you, Ken Ham and others founded. I was a new Christian back then and God used you mightily, through that publication, to strengthen my faith in His existence. And He still is using you in this way.
Oh, and don't be shy to be excited at these amazing discoveries. Blessings and thanks from Australia 🦘❤
I applaud your hard work and tenacity with committing to this research project. Ironically, I only became aware of your "young earth" videos as a result of UA-cam recommendations from watching other geology videos for a college Geology class. Having recently taken that class it's interesting to compare the many theories proposed in that class against the 20+ hours of AiG content I've seen so far. Just out of curiosity, how does the young earth model account for hotspots, especially as they are presented as proof for slow-moving tectonic plates (thinking about the Hawaiian Islands chain formation and evidence for the movement of the Yellowstone hotspot)?
Read up on Walt Brown's hydroplate theory and the pioneering work of Dr. John Baumgardner...who has modeled subduction of the Earth's crust and rapid tectonic movements of meters per second during the Noahic Flood. His computer models have even place the continents where they are today as a result of these movement. Regarding the Hawaiian islands, read up on how fast those islands are eroding away each year. Some of them are said to be 5.1 to 65 million years old but at current erosion rates...they would not have existed a million years ago...despite volcanic growth.
Personally I don't see a contradiction
God has never steered me wrong when I trust him at his word. No reason to doubt! Jesus is Lord and he's coming back again.
Well done Mr Snelling, I enjoyed learning from you.
@@nathancook2852 You are a known fraud...see how much effort that took....no evidence whatsoever.
@@nathancook2852 if you want to remain in ignorance that is your choice. Hosea 4:6 “My people are destroyed from lack of knowledge. Because you have rejected knowledge, I also reject you as my priests; because you have ignored the law of your God, I also will ignore your children.”
You enjoy being lied to and misinformed?. Whatever makes you feel closer to some god, I guess.
Thank you so much for this incredible work and your persistance ❤🙏 God bless
17:11 it’s pretty clear how the bends was made. Apparently we haven’t found the original layer from the beginning of Genesis. The bends was formed from the flood. The half of layers below the bends was formed from the start of the flood. The layers covering the start of the bends was sediment layers laid in the ripples of devastation from the draining of the flood as layers of sediment settled into the newly formed ripples. Doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure that out
It’s pretty clear you’re not a rocket scientist or geologist either.
God makes you stupid. My advice is stay away from God.
Excellent 🤔 thank you ✝️🙏💜
Absolutely marvelous! Glory be to God, our Creator!!
Thank you so much Dr Snelling and Team for all the work that has gone into this research. I’m excited to see how this is looking very much to prove the post-flood scenario.
I look forward now to separate presentations aimed at the various specific audiences, eg. kids, lay adults as yet undecided about the time-line arguments, fellow specialist geologists etc..
I was getting impatient with all the repetition about location, hand-waving, tangential explananations about microscopes and techniques etc., all of which need stating of course.
Your passion stands out a mile!
I’d like to share your findings with skeptics but feel this unedited presentation rambles far too much.
I repeat I am excited and thankful to God you now have so much compelling evidence and look forward to the distillation for general and specific audiences. Fifteen minutes?
Truth, don’t forget about large atmospheric electrical discharges
Please explain that in this context.
@@paulbriggs3072 major mechanism of Canyon and geologic fissure creation in minutes
?@@paulbriggs3072
@@paulbriggs3072He's probably talking about the effects you see looking at the Grand Canyon from space, which looks like a giant lightning bolt carved it. The same is true of Mars with Valles Marineris. Birkeland Currents connect all the planets to the sun with incredible amounts of energy flowing through them, so the planets are electrically charged, hence all the craters on the moon and geological effects such as these canyons, Olympus Mons, the giant hexagons on Saturn/Neptune, hexagon-shaped craters, the auroras, etc.
Never did I dispute the millions of years of erosion theory, BUT THEN I seen it in person and immediately my first thought was whatever created this was ferocious. Without any doubt. Common sense tells you.
Thank you for all your hard work Dr. Snelling. Your research has strengthened my faith.
I'm not a geologist, but here's a recent thought I had. In order for the evolutionist story to be true with the Grand Canyon, the whole area would have had to ha e been covered in water, dried up, covered in water, dried up, over and over again to form all those layers with fossils. Isn't that right? Where do they think the sediment for all those layers came from? It's one thing to say the river carved the canyon, but explaining the layers is a whole different ball game. Maybe I'll research their point of view on this.
Yes, that's exactly what happened. The main layers of the Canyon are Paleozoic, laid down over 300 million years. But there are gaps where sea level fell or the local land area rose above it, and there was erosion rather than deposition. These are represented by the breaks between different color layers. This may be a bit oversimplified, but that's the basic idea.
Evolutionists are now saying there was an ocean channel that ran from Texas through to Canada. Between that and their 2 million years of continuous rainfall they’re dancing dangerously close to the truth 😂
@@donjdanielsjr
I'm not sure about Texas. But there were definitley ocean channels in the West at various times. The Grand Canyon layers were deposited on a continental shelf.
@@jockyoung4491what were the time periods?
@@donjdanielsjr
The lowest sedimentary layer is Cambrian, so around 500 million years ago. The highest part of the Canyon was over 200 million years ago, so everything above that has been eroded away (but the layers can still be seen to the north). The area was a continental shelf that was above or below sea level at various times.
Thank you for your spectacular explanation. I live in Brazil and I've been learned a lot with Answers in Genesis.
@@nathancook2852, hmmm. Is that an ad hominem fallacy, or an appeal to authority fallacy?
@@seanvogel8067
It's a "real scientists actually know what they are doing" common sense.
Like: "I only let real surgeons cut me open"
@@seanvogel8067 no, it is not an appeal to anything. It is actually how societies work. You know, like when you have a health problem, you go to a specialist. If you don't know anything about auto repair and you have a major car problem, you take your vehicle to somebody who knows what they are doing.
Scientists work in specialized fields. You can't just say they are wrong about this or that simply because what they discover conflicts with your beliefs.
@@travisbicklepopsicle , I agree with you about going to specialists, But the fact that they are specialists doesn’t mean they’re right all the time. It just means they are more likely to be right on a general basis in their specialty area. Your argument assumes that creation scientists are not real scientists. That is a misconception. It’s also important to distinguish between people who believe in creation versus creation scientists. There is also a difference between the data and the science, and on the other hand, the interpretation of the data. Since we’re using data collected in the present, it has to be interpreted. My final thought is that although I believe in young earth creation, I’m not sure some of the things being discussed require one worldview or another. Oh wait, one more thing to throw in there: consensus isn’t science.
@@seanvogel8067
Just calling someone a "creation scientist" implies that they are not real scientists, otherwise we would just call them scientists. What would make "creation scientists" different? By their own admission, they start with the "truth" of the Bible, and seek research that will confirm that. That's not real science.
Here's an idea: Go ahead and mix up copies of all the photos without labels, but coded. Then ask a uniformitarian geologist to sort them out and label them. Then give him a letter grade on his performance.
There are no "uniformitarian geologists" any more.
@@jockyoung4491 Very well. Ask a deep time geologist.
This is a bombshell!!!
Even if it were correct, it would not be significant.
@@jockyoung4491 every correction of mainstream priesthood is significant
@@nathancook2852 we don’t have space for a empty claims
@@estimatingonediscoveringthree
What is being corrected? We already knew the layers were wet at one time. That's how they became layers.
@@jockyoung4491 uniformitarian mechanisms
I remember being taught in Geography lessons that the Grand Canyon was carved out by the Colorado river, but I always thought there was something more to it that would have created such a massive canyon, and that something would be like the Global Flood depicted in the Bible. Thanks Dr Andrew for your eye-opening research, may God bless your labour and save souls for His glory!
Yes, you are correct about the first part. There was more that created the canyon formation over millions of years. 1 flood that lasted 100 or so days isn't able to leave even a centimetre of a mark on large rock layers. Instead if you listened closely enough in your geography classes, millions of years after the plateau has been carved out by the river, there were also periods were the water had frozen and thawed up, along with other weathering effects that the rock had taken affects from, leading to the canyon formations.
There'd also be uniformity and deposition throughout the canyons, if there was a global flood, but we don't see any evidence of that. Instead, the canyons exhibit complex patterns of erosion, where different layers of the canyons were shown to have eroded at different rates and through different ways, all of which indicates that there wasn't 1 flood that did this, but that there were different periods of erosion and deposition.
Also, don't you find it a bit strange that there are only a few canyon distributions around the world? Do theists expect that in a global event which should lead to multiple canyon formations, in their logic?
@@sentinel_nightcrawler We'll probably leave that to the geologists to explain why. I'm not a geologist but it could depend on the location's geology before the flood, there are some countries that mainly have granite rock formations and little sedimentary rock for example. The biblical flood wasn't just a flood that covered the earth, it was a catastrophic flood that formed mountains and valleys, changing the earth's topography - you have to study the Bible for the details. Dr Andrew's video also just gave a long explanation why the sedimentary layers at the Grand Canyon couldn't have taken millions of years to form if you have listened to the whole thing, the evidence doesn't explain our assumptions of millions of years.
@@blue-dc4hl oh, so you're trusting researchers who say that earth is billions of years old instead of creationist quacks, when you mention geologists? Sounds like a cop-out to your argument.
I'm talking about other sedimentary rock formations that snelling hadn't taken into account. If there was a global flood which covered all of the sedimentary rock layers, why aren't there any canyons formed thereafter?
Also the fact that snelling hadn't considered exactly what the composition of a rock layer would be had there been a flood, shows his lack of genuine research of rocks in general. I wonder if Snelling or Andrew have ever mentioned that if there ever was a global flood, then not only the grand canyons, but also all sedimentary layers would have uniform layers of erosion and distribution. But since the grand canyons exhibit complicated structures of erosion, we can look at what layer has eroded at which rate.
I love this work. I hobby prospect for gold, so I witness many of the concepts mentioned, especially stratification. The only question I have, is what evidence do we have of rapid deposition not allowing for stratification? I would like to be able to have references available. Thank you. Keep up the awesome work.
I think it does, but based on material type. Point me to what you're talking about in the video? Personally I don't like the broad claims being made but such is the way of "science" in the modern world.
I used to hobby prospect for gold! Then state regulations destroyed the hobby ugh I miss it.
If all this work is only published in the Answers Research Journal, no mainstream geologists will read it. It would have been better to submit it to a mainstream geology journal.
The editors could then dispose of the manuscript in a NY minute.
Those mainstream geologists were part of the cabal that attempted to stop this worthy research in the beginning by denying Dr. Snelling permits in the first place. They do not want real scientific research .....if it goes against their dogma ie evolution.
@@nathancook2852yummy boot mmm
@@nathancook2852because that's where the specific folds were where the dating has been done. Those folds aren't outside the park. Saying he could just go get samples from the same layer outside the park shows you aren't paying ANY attention to what he's saying.
And they did find something new. It has been supposed that the folds happened due to ductile deformation and his research found that was not the case. That's his point.
Mainstream publishers either wont or cant publish creationistic journals. this leaves evolution providers free reign over what's taught and believed.
I read most of the research article a while ago, nice to have a video as well! Good info, God bless
It's not based on actual science.
@@markduell2468please disprove it with science not with a rhetoric.
@@tathyaanveshan3399
I don't know about the details, but his conclusions are definitely not scientific. There is nothing in the Grand Canyon that even remotely suggests a young Earth.
Except for the whole grand canyon itself. If it had taken millions of years the grand canyon simply would not exist. @@jockyoung4491
@@jockyoung4491the Colorado River, as we know it regardless of time doesn't display the footprint it would for that length of time. What the shape of the canyons displays looks like a massive blasting force causing sudden catastrophic Chang Which then left behind the trickle that is the current Colorado in the bottom of the openings it busted and blasted first. We used to mess around with a sand table and a water hose in geology and ecology class in junior high school in the lab, I remember the stuff that would do .
The Bible is 100% correct
Amen
*Nope! But it **_WAS_** before God gave the AC power to destroy it.*
😂
*The Enuma Elish would later be the inspiration for the Hebrew scribes who created the text now known as the biblical Book of Genesis.* Prior to the 19th century CE, the Bible was considered the oldest book in the world and its narratives were thought to be completely original. In the mid-19th century CE, however, European museums, as well as academic and religious institutions, sponsored excavations in Mesopotamia to find physical evidence for historical corroboration of the stories in the Bible. ***These excavations found quite the opposite, however, in that, once cuneiform was translated, it was understood that a number of biblical narratives were Mesopotamian in origin.***
*Famous stories such as the Fall of Man and the Great Flood were originally conceived and written down in Sumer,* translated and modified later in Babylon, and reworked by the Assyrians ***before they were used by the Hebrew scribes for the versions which appear in the Bible.***
***In revising the Mesopotamian creation story for their own ends, the Hebrew scribes tightened the narrative and the focus but retained the concept of the all-powerful deity who brings order from chaos.*** Marduk, in the Enuma Elish, establishes the recognizable order of the world - *just as God does in the Genesis tale* - and human beings are expected to recognize this great gift and honor the deity through service.
*"Enuma Elish - The Babylonian Epic of Creation - Full Text - World History Encyclopedia"*
*"Sumerian Is the World's Oldest Written Language | ProLingo"*
*"Sumerian Civilization: Inventing the Future - World History Encyclopedia"*
("The Sumerians were the people of southern Mesopotamia whose civilization flourished between c. 4100-1750 BCE."
"Ancient Israelites and their origins date back to 1800-1200 BCE.")
*"The Myth of Adapa - World History Encyclopedia"*
Also discussed by Professor Christine Hayes at Yale University in her 1st lecture of the series on the Hebrew Bible from 8:50 to 14:30 minutes, lecture 3 from 28:30 to 41:35 minutes, lecture 4 from 0:00 up to 21:30 minutes and 24:00 up to 35:30 minutes and lecture 7 from 24:20 to 25:10 minutes.
From a Biblical scholar:
"Many stories in the ancient world have their origins in other stories and were borrowed and modified from other or earlier peoples. *For instance, many of the stories now preserved in the Bible are* ***modified*** *versions of stories that existed in the cultures and traditions of Israel’s* ***older*** *contemporaries.* Stories about the creation of the universe, a cataclysmic universal flood, digging wells as land markers, the naming of important cultic sites, gods giving laws to their people, and even stories about gods decreeing the possession of land to their people were all part of the cultural and literary matrix of the ancient Near East. *Biblical scribes freely* ***adopted and modified*** *these stories as a means to express their own identity, origins, and customs."*
*"Stories from the Bible"* by Dr Steven DiMattei, from his website *"Biblical Contradictions"*
------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, look up the below articles.
*"Yahweh was just an ancient Canaanite god. We have been deceived! - Escaping Christian Fundamentalism"*
*"Debunking the Devil - Michael A. Sherlock (Author)"*
*"The Greatest Trick Religion Ever Pulled: Convincing Us That Satan Exists | Atheomedy"*
*"Zoroastrianism And Persian Mythology: The Foundation Of Belief"*
(Scroll to the last section: Zoroastrianism is the Foundation of Western Belief)
*"10 Ways The Bible Was Influenced By Other Religions - Listverse"*
*"January | 2014 | Atheomedy"* - Where the Hell Did the Idea of Hell Come From?
*"Retired bishop explains the reason why the Church invented "Hell" - Ideapod"*
Watch *"The Origins of Salvation, Judgement and Hell"* by Derreck Bennett at Atheologica
(Sensitive theists should only watch from 7:00 to 17:30 minutes as evangelical Christians are lambasted. He's a former theist and has been studying the scholarship and comparative religions for over 15 years)
*"Top Ten Reasons Noah’s Flood is Mythology - The Sensuous Curmudgeon"*
*"Forget about Noah's Ark; There Was No Worldwide Flood | Bible Interp"*
*"The Search for Noah’s Flood - Biblical Archaeology Society"*
*"Eridu Genesis - World History Encyclopedia"*
*"The Atrahasis Epic: The Great Flood & the Meaning of Suffering - World History Encyclopedia"*
Watch *"How Aron Ra Debunks Noah's Flood"*
(8 part series debunking Noah's flood using multiple branches of science)
*"The Adam and Eve myth - News24"*
*"Before Adam and Eve - Psychology Today"*
*"Gilgamesh vs. Noah - Wordpress"*
*"Old Testament Tales Were Stolen From Other Cultures - Griffin"*
*"Parallelism between “The Hymn to Aten” and Psalm 104 - Project Augustine"*
*"Studying the Bible"* - by Dr Steven DiMattei
(This particular article from a critical Biblical scholar highlights how the authors of the Hebrew Bible used their *fictional* god as a mouthpiece for their own views and ideologies)
*"How do we know that the biblical writers were* ***not*** *writing history?"* -- by Dr Steven DiMattei
*"Contradictions in the Bible | Identified verse by verse and explained using the most up-to-date scholarly information about the Bible, its texts, and the men who wrote them"* -- by Dr. Steven DiMattei
@@residuejunkie4321Exactly
Except when it's not.
Very good points. Great that you are matching predictions.
Plan to visit these areas next month. Will be looking for the bending!
It's called folding and it is proof both that the earth is very old as it is the result of very slow tectonic collisions.
@@StudentDad-mc3pu Student, the scientist in this video just disproved your opinion. Please rewind and watch again.
@@statutesofthelord No he didn't, he literally lied about the cause of folding!
@@StudentDad-mc3pu Student, you are just ignoring all the evidence that shows Evolution is a fairy-tale for grown-ups who wish to ignore the fact that God will judge them for how they lived this life he so lovingly created for them.
Please repent, and start believing in your Creator - Jesus Christ, today.
@@StudentDad-mc3puwhere was the lie?
Joe Rogan needs to get you on the podcast to talk about this
I agree but I think he might be taken not seriously unfortunately due to Joe not believing in our lord Jesus christ.
I don't think Joe would have someone on who would upend modern thinking on this stuff. It would be great to see the shock from him when he learned
Speaking truth to power.
Is this a repost of the exact same one that you guys already posted?
No, it's not.
It's the second part
Amen
I wished I had you as a professor instead I had a lazy one that was more focused on research rather than teaching. I still received a B so I survived. But God directed me to creation science and I'm really glad he did! I needed to combine my bible reading with my science interests cause that's how he designed me. Thank you Dr. Snelling God bless!
If you like science, then why not listen to scientists when virtually all of them accept biological evolution as obvious?
@@jockyoung4491 so you speak for all scientists? you sir are an intellectual snob.
@@jockyoung4491 That is an appeal to popularity. The evidence is there and just as There are scientists with PHDS and fancy degrees. Who argue for evolution There are scientist with the same phds and degrees. Who argue against it. It is up to you to do the research as to whose Evidence is the most profound in my opinion. It is obviously that of creation scientist.
Fool
@@MrAuskiwi101 the irony
This is how we should teach this in schools
Not in public schools you're not.
That is the last thing we need.
The day that happens is the day America loses to the world
That will never happen😂
Thankfully, we don't.
Polaroid =type of camera/film that prints immediately and develops in~30sec
Polarized = what you discibe.
Well put together presentation, thank you.
*What The Father has spoken will never change, His promises are still good and our prayers are still answered! Hallelujah!!! But as impossible as this sounds, like so many of the true stories in scripture, our bibles have all been supernaturally changed by Satan in the last several years, right in our homes, in the fulfillment of prophecy. It's being done to prepare for the reign of the antichrist. All languages and all translations have been changed along with concordances, encyclopedias, dictionaries, history books, the original Hebrew, Greek, Latin and Aramaic manuscripts. Even the Dead Sea Scrolls have been changed!*
*I'm 71, was saved when I was 10, and have read only the exact same copy of the King James bible my church gave me in 1961. (This does not mean I was a King James onlyist but now I'm glad I never read other ones or I might not have noticed the changes as soon.) I had memorized many scriptures from it through the years. Then in 2014 I started seeing changes in it that I couldn't explain. I had never owned a computer or heard of the Mandela Effect back then. But after being given my first computer in 2016 I finally found out why I had been noticing all of the oddities that I couldn't explain. I then started diligently studying what should actually have been called the "Daniel 7:25 effect". That's where God said He would give the antichrist the power to do this. (Change times and laws, history and scripture) We're seeing many end time prophecies being fulfilled SUPERNATURALLY! This is some of the "lying signs and wonders" God told us He would give the AC power to perform which would even deceive His very elect, if it were possible in 2nd Thessalonians chapter two!*
*God said in the end of days, (NOW!) that He would send us a famine for hearing His words in Amos **8:11** and that He would give the antichrist the ability to do this in Daniel 7:25. In Daniel 12:4 & 12:9 He told him to seal his book until the end days. He told John **_not_** to seal his book because the end time is at hand in Revelation 22:10. One of the Greek definitions of ''seal'' in Strongs concordance is “to protect from Satan”. He also told us to “hide His words in our hearts”, which meant memorize, if not word for word at least the essence of what was written, because He knew this was going to happen.*
*God commanded us to "prove all things", and people **_better_** obey Him, especially on this subject. I urge you to research this. There are many brothers and sisters making videos about the changes with more proof of what was originally written and I have lots more about this in my playlist 👉 which can be found by typing in (PROOF OF BIBLE CHANGE RESIDUE JUNKIE 1)* 👈
*I've continued to stay in God's word by reading what has been documented to be what used to be written and what Satan has been changing. Soon Amos **8:12** will be fulfilled too and we won't be able to find God's word anymore, and the only way it can happen is by not being able to see these videos and PDF written lists of documented changes like the one at (amos)(8)(.)(org)*
*May God bless all who read this with eyes to see this incredible faith strengthener, and how close we are to our Saviour's return!!!!*
*P.S. Everyone is going to learn about this one way or the other. I'm just trying to keep so many people from hearing Jesus explain it to them at the Gate. If you ask for them at the address on my about page I will send you links for 17 films that absolutely prove the snake bite is the mark. And yt hates me, they won't notify me of replies and won't post my answers so write me at residue junkie in one word at g mail for lots more info yt would never allow you to see.*
❤✝️💪
*P.P.S. YT will not notify me if you reply here so write me at residue junkie in one word at g mail.*
Praise YHWH!
What if the Bible isn't true?
@@markduell2468*Jesus will make sure all you tares understand this at the Gate before sending you on your way.*
@@markduell2468it is
The only thing you were saved from is rational thought.
Also for the benefit of those who have not listened to the whole video (although you really should), here's a very brief summary (AIG to correct if it's wrong, thanks):
Fossil records at the Grand Canyon show burrowing traces of trilobites and worms. How were the "footprints" of these organisms which would have been rapidly eroded preserved? Rapid burial and not millions of years would have done this.
Did it take millions of years of deposition for the rock layers in the Grand Canyon to form? What caused the bends in the rock layers - were they folded by pressure/heat 450 million years after the sediment layers were cemented? What does recent research tell us?
If it indeed took millions of years, we would expect settling of larger grains with separation from the smaller grains. Yet, rock samples collected from the Grand Canyon show the random mixing of different sized grains without evidence of settling, indicating that there was no time for sorting of the grains due to rapid deposition of the rock layers. Muscovite is soft mineral that is easily destroyed. Yet is it found preserved in quartz of the rock samples, indicating that they were deposited rapidly with the sediment grains before they could be destroyed. K-feldspar, which is softer than quartz, was also found preserved, indicating that deposition was so rapid that K-feldspar was not eroded away by the harder quartz grains.
If the bends in the sedimentary rock layers happened after external pressure and heat were applied to the dried layers, we should expect to see evidence of metamorphosis in the rock bends with disturbance of the quartz cement holding the sand grains together. We would also expect rock in the bends to be compacted with less porosity due to the exerted pressure. However, the rock samples show otherwise - the quartz cement holding the grains together always appeared intact with no evidence of being disturbed/shattered. This shows that the rock layers were likely bent while they were still wet and pliable, and not after they had been dried out for millions of years with pressure/heat later being applied to bend them. The quartz cement was the last to form after the rock layers were bent when water dried out from the rock after the Flood. Porosity of rock samples in the bends were also similar to that of samples collected away from the bends, again proving the same point. The K-feldspar grains and muscovite flakes which would be affected by heat also show no signs of metamorphism in the bends.
The observational evidence is overwhelmingly consistent with rapid catastrophic deposition of these sediment layers, expected at the beginning of the Global Flood recorded in the Bible. It does not support the above assumption of millions of years. Trust God and His Word.
“In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.” (Genesis 1:1)
There are a lot of other good points in the video that are not included in this summary - so you should listen to the Dr Andrew's full presentation
@annieoaktree6774 They were made while these creatures were moving under the silt they were being covered with. The amount of water that covered the earth in only 40 days and nights reached a height of over 3 miles in that amount of time. It was over 17,000 feet high. The water pressure at that depth is staggering. That's about 425 feet of water level per day, or almost 18 feet of depth per hour. If you watch the videos of the Japanese tsunami he referred to, you'll see how destructive even a few feet of water in motion is. If you've ever gone to the bottom of the deep end of a pool, you can feel the pressure just that amount of water produces. Imagine the incredibly rapid pressure build-up of the amount of water that fell during the flood hours and days. That much water in motion would easily be able to carve out canyons and move vast amounts of material around.
Yep, a list of claims and supposition without evidence
@@markd3250 And that much water moving that fast would _eliminate_ any traces of such creatures, whether their remains or traces they left behind.
@annieoaktree6774 Lol obviously they wouldn't wait to do that until all the water had risen to its maximum height. It took over a month for all that water to accumulate.
Glory to God! Dr. Snelling, you and your researchers have done outstanding scientific work!! Amazing evidence!
@nathancook2852 Provide your resource to refute his claim.
Great work. Thank you so much for the excellent work and for sharing.
Before the flood was it Pangea and after the flood the place of the continents are what we have now?
There were other supercontinent cycles before Pangea
what we have now is not just Pangea with oceans. The continents are in different places
@@jockyoung4491 Yes a great flood and the movement of all the platelets to their positions today.
Great point. Assuming the forces currently at play (erosion, geothermal, magnetic) it would take millions of years. It is possible that it could have been longer or shorter if there were other forces at play some point in the past, but without some extraterrestrial forces, and just using the forces we calculate today. Yes millions of years would be the assumed timeline @@nathancook2852
"Pangaea" occurred in the middle of the flood, when the continents had broken up and bounced together on the other side of the earth and then drifted away from each other afterwards again
So i have a question wr have lots of photos of expansion zone but only animation of subduction zones. Doesnt look like the subduction theory was ever proven.. whats your view on the earth growing.... and the small earth theory
Thank for a great presentation.
Love it. You are so brilliant and enthusiastic, I did A level geology, many years ago, believed everything, the lecturers told us, only about 10 years ago woke up ,to a young earth. Been a born again Christian for 35 years and the conflict between millions of years and the Genesis account of creation therefore never made sense.
But now it does absolutely love it and yes I am excited. Thank you so much your brilliant 😊 Praise God ❤️
Oh dear. What a shame you gave up the capacity for critical thought.
Our thoughts are not God's thoughts.
Is there any peer reviews on this yet?
"Peers" from AIG, yes, not peers from actual scientists.
Awesome video. Can we have your thoughts on how opal forms in seashells in Australia? I believe the flood is when opal formed. A rainbow remi nder in rock v God's promise to not flood the whole world agai n.
Even more interesting would be the formation of lead in Zircon crystals.
I like that theory 😊. I'm definitely not a geologist, but that idea is awesome ❤️
Before they knew what rainbows actually are 😂😂😂😂
Excellent work supports the Biblical flood.
The Bible is Man's word. We never hear from God, just people telling us about God...
The writers of the Bible were talked to by God an entrusted to write his words. You haven't heard God because you didn't write the Bible and demonstrate a lack of religion.
I know why YOU never hear from God. Because of this statement you made. Why would God talk to you when you don't believe or have faith in God? God talks to those who believe and have faith. You clearly don't, so that's on you. 🤷♀️
@asullivan72: You are wrong, I had a religious upbringing. I wanted to know God but eventually I realised I only ever heard from people telling me what I should believe. Religion, I’m afraid, is very human centric.
They say it took a long time to form the grand canyon but it didn't take long to form the little grand canyon in Ga. I take God at His word.
People can be hit in the face with the truth, yet most will not see.
Indeed....
Dr whats your position on the Younger Dreyas?
the world wide flood, might be the easiest story in the bible to show never happened at all.
What about the marble mountain (Apuan Alps) in Italy? How might they factor into the flood?
Amen...
We took some rocks from the grand canyon that supposedly was 800 million years old but this flood evidence is making that rock much younger.
How does this prove Noah's flood? It doesn't. This is hilarious.
@@RenzunShark That's not how religion works.
I don't recall if he says this alone proves the great flood so much as proves the predictions made by the view were correct, and that the evidence of ancient earth theories that require heat to bend rocks are incorrect.
Amen!
Excellent video 💯💯👏👏
❤
1:00:58 The photo on the right does look like the gaps are a lot smaller. Definitely a lot less blue.
I find it amazing they denied your application to do science like everyone else. They can't stand up to scrutiny, or even allow basic curiosity to flourish. And we all know why.
At first they denied it because there were similar rocks outside the park and they didn't want him defacing a National Park for such a poor scientific hypothesis.
Creationists always seem to want to talk about The Grand Canyon. Maybe one could answer how chalk deposits such as the White Cliffs of Dover were formed? Conventional geology says that these were formed by millions of years of plankton deposits.
And this is a rock that was not hot like lava.
Thank you and Amen.
God reigns for ever and ever. Yesterday, today & tomorrow always the same
Are there any AIG videos that don't seek to deceive my confusing Atheism (lack of belief in gods as there is no evidence to such their existence) and Geology (the study of rocks)?Atheists don't tend to talk to anyone about geology, unlike geologists, and I suspect few geologists discuss the existence or otherwise of any gods. I'm Atheist, and an amateur geologist, but I'm very much an exception to the rule. There is absolutely zip evidence for anything that looks like the flood of the Bible, and well does this channel know it.
It's not just AIG. Creationists always (and probably intentionally) equate science with atheism. They don't undersatnd the difference between scence and faith.
Atheism depends completely on the idea of deep time and thus NEEDS geology to prove that the earth is old. What atheist believes the earth is a) eternal b) flat c) 6000 years old?
@@cosmictreason2242
Most atheist probably don't know much about science either way, just like most theists don't. But theism and atheism are about faith, and therefore have nothing to do with science.
Time is not a NEED. Time is just a fact.
Yes. Dr. James Tour did a publish on the origin of life without bringing up God. And challenged any scientist to challenge him. If you are sincere in your question and curiosity of discovery regardless of the outcome. Check him out. You can look up his publish the origin of life by Dr. James Tour. It's very scientific. Way over my head. He is a Jew. He is a Christian. But he only uses science to explain stuff. He is a world renown scientist. Voted too 50 minds of our time. He is well respected in the science community. He is also a genius. I hope you find his work and I think you will respect what you read even if you come away with different opinions.
@@jockyoung4491you can't answer questions because your beliefs are all false
How do you explain the Hawaiian islands? Kauai seems much older than the big island?
that's a lot of evidence
@@nathancook2852apparently it can only be science if the conclusions conform to the mainstream views huh?
Our family did a fantastic creationist tour of the Grand Canyon and learned so much. It is so obvious those layers were created in the Great Flood, the rocks cry out as a testimony to mankind that God's judgement is real.
_Our family did a fantastic creationist tour of the Grand Canyon and learned so much_
lol
@@richardgregory3684 what is wrong with you? did your daddy forget to bring condoms to the family reunion? lol
'It's obvious these layers were created in the great flood'
Excellent, vigorous scientific work.. well done.
A person does not need to be a geologist. All you need to do is visit the Grand Canyon on vacation and you'll learn everything you need to know.
(Meant to say 'rigorous', but I'm sure it was vigorous as well)
If Christians would get the truth of the word of God out to the people who need it, life would be so much better.
That's fine, but just don't claim science supports it when it doesn't. Christianity can still be true without misrepresenting science. Just stick to faith.
@@jockyoung4491 I believe the truth. Only your Creator can create you again.
@@jockyoung4491 The historical record shows that everyone spread out from Mesopotamia. Ancient history is essential for everyone to know, especially the sixteen original civilizations… from the sixteen grandsons of Noah. Learn ancient history before trying to learn science.
1. The first inhabitants of Italy (K) Tubal
2. Thracians (L) Tiras
3. Siberians (N) Meshek
4. East Asians (O) Magog
5. Medes (PQ) Madai
6.. Western Europeans (R) Gomer
7. Mediterranean Greek sea people (T) Javan
8. Hebrews and Arabic (IJ) Arphaxad
9. Elamites (H) Elam
10. Assyrians (G) Asshur
11. Arameans (F1) Aram
12. Lydians (F2) Lud
13. Cushites (AB, C) Cush
14. Egyptians (E3) Mitzrayim
15. Canaanites (E2, D) Canaan
16. Original North African Phoenicians (E1) Phut
The D haplogroup descendants of Canaan migrated east through Tibet all the way to Japan. The C haplogroup descendants of Nimrod migrated to South Asia, the Pacific, Mongolia and all the way to the Americas along with Q haplogroup descendants of Madai ancestor of the Medes.
The A maternal mtDNA haplogroup belonging to the N lineage accompanied the Q paternal haplogroup in the Americas. The C&D maternal haplogroups belong to the M lineage. The B maternal haplogroup seems to have crossed the Pacific Ocean.
The Mediterranean paternal R1b and the maternal X2a also found in Galilee represent an Atlantic crossing of the Phoenicians in the days of King Solomon considering also the Mediterranean paternal haplogroups of T, G, I1, I2, J1, J2, E and B in addition to the R1b in Native American Populations. J1 and J2 is Arabs and Jews. (I1 is Dan, I2 is Asher)
Of course there is the Cohen modal haplotype of J1 P58 which identifies the IJ lineage of Hebrews and Arabs that are descended from Arphaxad. J2 M172 is the descendants of the House of David and Solomon.
The historical record shows that everyone spread out from Mesopotamia. Ancient history is essential for everyone to know, especially the sixteen original civilizations… from the sixteen grandsons of Noah. Learn ancient history before trying to learn science.
1. The first inhabitants of Italy (K) Tubal
2. Thracians (L) Tiras
3. Siberians (N) Meshek
4. East Asians (O) Magog
5. Medes (PQ) Madai
6.. Western Europeans (R) Gomer
7. Mediterranean Greek sea people (T) Javan
8. Hebrews and Arabic (IJ) Arphaxad
9. Elamites (H) Elam
10. Assyrians (G) Asshur
11. Arameans (F1) Aram
12. Lydians (F2) Lud
13. Cushites (AB, C) Cush
14. Egyptians (E3) Mitzrayim
15. Canaanites (E2, D) Canaan
16. Original North African Phoenicians (E1) Phut
The D haplogroup descendants of Canaan migrated east through Tibet all the way to Japan. The C haplogroup descendants of Nimrod migrated to South Asia, the Pacific, Mongolia and all the way to the Americas along with Q haplogroup descendants of Madai ancestor of the Medes.
The A maternal mtDNA haplogroup belonging to the N lineage accompanied the Q paternal haplogroup in the Americas. The C&D maternal haplogroups belong to the M lineage. The B maternal haplogroup seems to have crossed the Pacific Ocean.
The Mediterranean paternal R1b and the maternal X2a also found in Galilee represent an Atlantic crossing of the Phoenicians in the days of King Solomon considering also the Mediterranean paternal haplogroups of T, G, I1, I2, J1, J2, E and B in addition to the R1b in Native American Populations. J1 and J2 is Arabs and Jews. (I1 is Dan, I2 is Asher)
Of course there is the Cohen modal haplotype of J1 P58 which identifies the IJ lineage of Hebrews and Arabs that are descended from Arphaxad. J2 M172 is the descendants of the House of David and Solomon.
@@nathancook2852 No
This is a marvelous example of forensic geological science and should be both taught and further researched. It would be a great follow-up to take some of those samples and subject them to the estimated heat and pressure of evolutionary geologists and then show the deformations and healing that would have occurred, just to put the cherry on the top of the findings and observations.
As an aside, concrete does not dry out - it cures, and the cementitious binder is not the remnants after drying, it is the cement bonded with the water to create the "koosh-ball-like" structure that holds the granules, sediment, and aggregate to one another.
atheism and geology are unrelated. how can you not grasp that?
I think they can grasp it, but they cannot allow themselves to be honest about this. It's part of the indoctrination of creationists to make them thing all of science is either its own religion, or ''atheist dogma''. They cannot be honest about this at all costs.
What a truly outstanding video and so well presented .
Millions & billions of years.🤣🤣
Obviously.
@@razark9 "measurably" 🤣
JockYoungLovesSatan 😂😂😂😂
@@TearDownThisWall
Yes, the age of the Earth is measurable. Obviously. That's called science.
@@jockyoung4491 I understand why you feel the need to defend you god "science".
Very thorough, great job. 👍🏼
Atheists have no position on rock layers...geologists do
Cope
Atheists have no positions on anything. It’s the most intellectually lazy belief system of all. Yes, I know atheism is a “lack of belief”, insert eye roll here.
Out near Wee Jasper in NSW there are limestone layers that fold back on themselves like a crumpled carpet. No cracks or splintering at all. Folder when wet! Also, the Grose and jamison rivers (both small streams) cut through the blue mountains west of Sydney. Darwin saw this and used it to convince him of deep time bit the rivers cut through the range, just like grand canyon. Evidence of the flood here in Australia too! Thanks Dr Snelling for helping me see these things with fresh eyes.
This isn’t a question of Christian vs atheist. There are hundreds of millions of Christians who have no problem believing the earth is very old.
The Bible clearly states that God (the Word Jesus Christ) created everything in six literal 24 hr days (Yom is the Hebrew word used).
Exodus 10:1 For in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the LORD blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it. God did not rest for millions or billions of years on day seven as an example for man to follow.
God created Adam along with all land creatures on day six of the creation week. The Bible goes on to provide the genealogy of Adam to Jesus the Christ...giving the ages of those in between which we add up to determine the age of the Earth which is some 6000 years old.
Sometime after day six of creation ...Adam sinned and the Bible states theat nature groaned. The Bible further states that the wages of sin is death. Adam's sin created the conditions for death. If you believe that the Earth is millions of years old them you put death before Adam came on the seen. Since Jesus came to redeem mankind from Adam's original sin, Jesus would not have had to come since death and disease existed before Adam came on the seen.
Therefore the universe and the Earth being millions of years old is just not scriptural. Either you believe in the infallibility of God's preserved word or you believe in man's word. As for me and my house...we will serve the Lord.
Was Adam created as an infant or an adult? Now ask that same question about the earth.
There aren't even that many Christians total
@@cosmictreason2242 There are literally billions…?
@@Gideon-1611 nope
THANK YOU for describing the science so thoroughly.
Evidence?
Anyone who imagines this is evidence, please stay away from jury service. Thanks, from everyone else.
Thank you for a very detailed yet understandable explanation! Thank you for your dedication to the scientific method!
Zero evidence for Noah’s flood. Time saved 1:35:26.
Except all the sediment layers all over the world and the fossils in those layers lol 😅😂
@@christiansoldier77
Huh? The fossil record proves biological evolution. Obviously.
@@jockyoung4491 the fossil record doesn't in any way prove evolution but it is proof of a flood on a global scale
@@christiansoldier77 _Archaeopteryx, Australopithecus,_ and _Tiktaalik_ would like a word with you...
@@burnttoast2790 Umm... None of those prove evolution but you keep on trying lol 🤣
Great. Work dr Snelling.
Ron Wyatt found Noah’s ark and all kinds of anchor stones on the MountainS of Ararat. Also rediscovered Sodom and Gamora and the Red Sea crossing and the mountain God sat on and talked to Moses face to face. In Saudi Arabia. The stone that he struck and got water out of and also the ark of the covenant. He was really trying to show us that God meant what He said. The ark was right under where Jesus was sacrificed. So He did indeed anoint the Most Holy . God is awesome.
Ron Wyatt...lol
And where can we find this evidence? Where is it documented? How is it going to disprove virtually every major field of science?
Ironic you mention Ron Wyatt in the AiG channel. Wyatt said the ark was found at Ararat, Turkey. That was later refuted. Even AiG says the ark was not found. Did you know that? He was an pseudo-archeologist active at 60's to 80's. His findings where never published in peer-reviewed journal of archeology. That's because they wouldn't stand it. Wyatt's claims have been described as "fraudulent", in the category of trash which one finds in tabloids such as the National Enquirer (Letter from Joe Zias). Wyatt was criticized by scientists, historians, biblical scholars, and some creationists, and is not considered credible by professional archaeologists and biblical scholars.
The bible is best understood as metaphoric. It is not a science text. Better to understand the fossil record and isotopic dating techniques.
"Better to understand the fossil record and isotopic dating techniques." ...which completely fits with a young earth.
Evolutionists being wrong about everything as usual
Great work. Keep it coming. Praise God.
This channel thinks The Flintstones was a documentary. And people believe it!? 😂
I think if you want to put the nail in the coffin, then you should bend a sample under heat and pressure to demonstrate the difference between rocks bent when wet versus those that would be bent after they've hardened.
New evidence suggesting jesus was gay. Try to disprove that!
Obviously not. There is no "new evidence" of Jesus.
@@jockyoung4491 yet there has been “new evidence” of other stuff that’s been changing the Bible for centuries
“Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat: because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it.”
Matthew 7:13-14 KJV