I'd like to pretend the mistimed beep at 11:18 was a deep artistic statement about the futility of trying to censor one's own work. But it was just a silly editing mistake that snuck into the very last version of this video. It just wouldn't be a José video without at least one silly editing mistake, and I'm just glad this one is harmless!
Hey, question. The video thumbnail said that this was an introduction to the worst book. Does this mean that you plan to cover this book more in the future?
@@JoseBird There is another book, similar though not the same, called When It Was Dark by. Guy Thorn. Another weird right-wing hyper Christian text that seems to have the same level of paranoia and conspiracy mongering, but, it seems, from what you said about this book, it also has that strange attribute of being an almost inverted critique of its own premises when you get to the end; strange that such books can't help but be so crazed as to underhandedly refute themselves.
The military officers at the the top of the food chain certainly love authoritarian men or woman, they are more than happy to overthrow the democracies of their own countries for it, the foot soldiers are other thing, is a more muddle shades of grey field. Historically always have been this way. The only place were exist moral military officers are in fiction, because in the real world, everyone bend the knee.
@@the4thindustrialrevolution225 you think being in a fight makes you knowledgeable about what war is like…? I can’t even comprehend how unbelievably stupid this is
@@ChangedMyNameFinally69 I think all sides of the political spectrum have vulgar and childish individuals, the sad part is that they're usually the ones that scream the loudest
@@Kobolds_in_a_trenchcoat ... unless they're doing it with explicit reference to this book in a way that makes clear everyone agrees this book is awful - like make him the hero, and his namer the villain, or something like that? [I just balk at hard-line proscriptions in creative media like that...]
@@dwc1964 that's fair, I was just taking the "new rule" part from a long running joke forum that had an ever expanding list of increasingly absurd scenarios that players/dms are no longer allowed to do. It was started here theglen.livejournal.com/389635.html (I think that link is to a newer part of the list but it should link directly to the start and the original military inspiration list) but quickly was adopted by these people (still running today) forums.giantitp.com/showthread.php?175909-Any-Things-I-may-no-longer-do-while-playing.
“Atheists deep down believe in god” Hell! This reminds me of God’s Not Dead, where the atheist dies, finally believing god, and the Christians around him see this as a GOOD THING, as he’s breathing his final breath!!
There IS a phenomenon called like... rainbow soldiers or something. Where the saying "There are no atheists in a foxhole" applies But there's also people who lose their faith in battle, so maybe the whole thing is just bullshit tribalism
That's generally true, as far as it goes, in the sense that the dominant religious views of your culture will always influence you on an unconscious level even if you don't agree with them consciously.
You forgot the reveal where said atheist is _actually_ just hating god because his mom died! God I fucking hate that movie more the more I think about it.
Don't Fret Marcus, it isn't a coincidence it is just that racist morons are just incredibly uncreative and lazy. Their brains were probably in overdrive trying to think of a good name like "The Village".
I’ve always been in the camp that socialists should never pretend to be centrists. Then we just hide behind masks like the fascists. If we truly believe our ideas, then we don’t have to play pretend about them.
I doubt José actually respects the propaganda itself in any significant amount, rather just the act itself of not trying to hide itself. The propaganda really doesn't deserve overall respect just for a single aspect of it.
Thomas Urech so true. This is needed especially because I believe it may lead to the creation of a 3rd party to combat the dem/rep monopoly not that Green Party bs.
I tried reading this book once, because I had heard it was influential. But I couldn’t finish it. I was struck by two things: 1) just how blatantly racist it is, in a really gross, brazenly self-incriminating way, and 2) how poorly written it is. It’s just such a ramble of propaganda and ideology, it’s not a remotely readable book. Hearing this review, I was curious to hear how it ended, but I can see the tone or pace of the book barely changes. It begins as a boring, slow, racist rant without any real plot or characters and apparently never stops being that.
Yeah I just finished it after months of on and off reading. There is nothing about it which is notable enough to finish, just a depressing read that is venomously hateful.
@Cole S translation. I don’t mean to say it was horribly written or anything. Perhaps I shouldn’t of said Poorly, itjust kind of reminded me of Celine but know where near as good.
This is a very confusing thing. Christianity has a very specific stance towards charity. Selfishness is effectively murder. It's like they love Ayn Rand but also love the self-righteousness that is associated with the most unaware of Christians.
They only love the things about Christian history that run counter to the spirit of Christianity. They despise actual charity, mercy, and humility. They care nothing about silence and repentance. But they love kings and gilt and "holy war".
Extremely devout right-wing Christians like the idea of charity but not the practice. Mostly due to their belief that their own wealth and success is god-given and the poor’s lack thereof is also god’s will.
@@Mordrevious They absolutely love charity - as long as they can deduct it from their taxes,[*] and then use those very tax claims to prove that they're the most charitable. [*] Thus sticking the taxpayer with the bill. Which would be totally fine by me - if we could just cut out the middleman, tax the rich directly, and allocate the tax money properly to begin with.
As with every single other religion, philosophy or ideology, there are two sides - the side that is about all-inclusive solidarity and wishes to abolish the divisions between us that pit us against one another, and the side that is about dividing "us" vs "them" and asserting power and dominion over the designated "them" or just "getting rid of" them. Which side will win out? The side that is fed.
As soon as I heard that name I was like "surely in the comments someone posted 'You thought it was just another poorly thought out character in this racist screed but IT WAS ME, DIO!"
Video postscript: This is the book Lauren Southern cites as her favorite book (she may be the person most closely associated with this book at the moment). She mentioned it in quite a few of her videos, and has stated it had the biggest influence on her political/social views, why she became an activist and why her mission as an activist was to pretty much exclusively to spread the Great Replacement consipracy. She claimed to not be a racist (hiding it - poorly - behind dogwhistles and lies that have been debunked about as thoroughly as a lie can be debunked), and pretty routinely threw out the "the left labled me a racist because they call everyone who says facts they don't like a racist" reactionary NPC line of dialogue - but even without her dogwhistles getting outed and the "facts" she cited getting proven to be just made up BS to help push her agenda by quite a few people, it should have been pretty clear to anyone familiar with TCotS what she actually stood for just by her constantly mentioning how much she loves this book. I wouldn't be surprised if she came out and said her second favorite book was the Turner Diaries...
@Lucius Sulla No one here said that population demographics aren't changing. For the great replacement to be true one has to accept many assumptions: the change is intentional, that the change is a problem, that race isn't a social construct, that whiteness is a purity that other races dirty, that America is a white country, that white people should only be in relationships with white people, that a change in skin color changes one's history.
The fear of the Other is inherently reactionary and completely ahistorical. If we gave into that fear most other ethnic groups and most animal species would be dead
@uwau "even whites, if they weren't from his hometown." - He was hung up about specific ethnic groups, probably the immigrants of his day. I think he had a short story in which some sketchy immigrants broke into a cursed house and got their comeuppance (An Italian, a Portuguese, and a Romanian walk into a haunted house...). I like to say he wasn't a white nationalist, because he wasn't that inclusive.
The book sounds so blatantly aggressive and backwards I keep assuming it was written in the colonial era like the 1800s but then modern things crop up like radio shows and the Air Force and I’m reminded that this was written in the 1970s.
And "The Turner Diaries" was published in 1978. Even "Mein Kampf" was written in an era (1920s) when Western liberals were beginning to turn against racism - if they hadn't already before. But then, books like these are primitive by nature - as ridiculous as those medieval travelogues that described monsters and weird humanoid creatures living in foreign lands. But I think these books SHOULD be read. Shunning them because of their content without even opening them is an act of self-censorship, and in its own way as narrow-minded as the attitudes expressed in the books themselves. It's not as if reading this book will automatically turn a person into a genocidal lunatic, any more than reading a Gothic horror novel will turn someone into a sadistic torturer. I think these books should be enjoyed as a sort of depraved, surreal fiction, in much the same way that pornography is enjoyed. Besides, if every library in the world had a copy of each of these books, people could read them for free and wouldn't have to fund their creators by buying them.
Raspail was clearly prophetic and had the right kind of eyes to analyze the seeds of modern anti-white leftists and the swarming invasion from Africa and all other 3rd world shitholes.
@@SeasideDetective2 primitive books are.more.true because they reflect a primitive nature. Modernity has provided comforts that made us forget our true nature. "Overcoming" your primitive nature is based purely on convenience. Just wait until it's no longer convenient for you to live as youre used to living and you'll start becoming more primitive. Perhaps you're a supernatural being though....
You know one of the major reasons Watchmen is so cool? Alan Moore really gets you in the head of a violent Crypto-fascist and is able to make you understand him. There's nothing more boring than political literature where the author thinks everybody secretly believes the same thing they do.
It's hard to see Rorscach as a fascist, though. A fascist demands absolute obedience to authority, and Rorscach is clearly breaking the law and winds up in jail because of it. What's more, a fascist characteristically believes in some great phenomenon outside of himself: his country, his religion, his race, etc. Rorschach doesn't believe in anything beyond his private resentment of sexual deviants, which he feels not because of moral outrage, but just because he was an illegitimate child and his mommy slapped him one time.
Pretty sure Rorschach is supposed to be an example of how the poor are left to rot and turn to violence to preserve themselves. He's literally a homeless man whose life has been ruined by drug abuse and poverty, leaving him with no view of the world but through hatred, fear, and cynicism. He's even put in prison under false circumstances after being literally framed by a rich man.
@@SeasideDetective2 Fascists don't believe in absolute authority to the state, at least not inherently, it's all about the dynamic with the in-group and out-group, that then uses the state as a means of achieving hegemony, by that logic the Nazi party wasn't fascist because they were militant way before they took power. Hell, even Hitler got arrested
@@SeasideDetective2 Seconding Some dude here. Fascism isn't loyalty to a specific authority or even ideal. It's loyalty to the methodologies of violence, which is why there are both leftist and right-wing fascists, and why it's so difficult to define fascism in a society brainwashed in the global service of and desensitized to, violence. It's defined by the mob, the bully, the narcissist. "Might makes right" and where individual strength is flagging, the individual seeks the power of the mob and the cultivator of the power of the mob seeks worship versus understanding so as to maintain a safe distance from even the appearance of momentary criticism or human vulnerability. Even racism is a front for a far more insidious attitude of supremacy that begins to seep into the minds of every pre-verbal child in this toxic civilization when they first start to hear the words "stupid", "ugly" or "gross". All of it invokes the indigenous critique, which is exactly what fascists seek to silence. I could go on...
Two stumps for eyes and a third, flabby stump for a mouth. No teeth, no jaw, just a stump covering a cavernous gullet. Five stumps on either hand, each connected to the torso stump by arm stumps.
@@ChangedMyNameFinally69 No they don't, you're basing that off some pretty limited Muslim engagement with the nazis in the Balkans by some Albanian and Bosnians and a bit of sympathy from some Arab nationalists. Thats it. They actually had far more engagement from Catholics. The nazis had as much respect for Islam as they did for Christianity at the core of their ideology, which was zero. Their end goal was aryan neo paganism, they were just pragmatic when it came to getting help here and there for their genocidal lebensraum plans.
@@nektarios5291 Wut? I'm making a joke about fascists being moronically suicidal. And I see Nazis occasionally jerk off radical Islam (not the Sunni or Shia variants mind you) when they want to be sexist and Anti-Semitic, though they also pass around the "grooming gang" myth.
@@nektarios5291 Yes, a lot of it was political expediency. The Serbs, the Croats, and the Bosniaks were all Slavs - and thus, strictly speaking, "subhuman" to the Nazis - but the Croats and Bosniaks were just as vicious (and arguably more so) toward foreigners - ESPECIALLY Serbs - as the Germans were. So the Nazis fudged the truth a bit, claiming that because the Croats were Catholic rather than Orthodox and wrote in Latin script rather than Cyrillic, they were more "Aryan" than the Serbs; and because the Muslim Bosniaks (who were closely allied with the Croats in any case) were anti-Semitic, they were effectively "Aryans" as well. The main point, however, was that the Croats and Bosniaks were pro-Austrian (an ethnically German country and Hitler's homeland), while the Serbs were pro-Russian - and of course, Russia was by far the largest Slavic country and pretty much the Antichrist in the minds of the Nazis for its Judaism and Communism as well as its Slavic-ness.
It saddens me to see how the rich culture of India- with all its philosophies, religions, architectures etc.- gets reduced to Kalkutta, or more specifically, the slums of Kalkutta.
India’s Fragmented Society Was Once a Melting Pot The period of intermarriage overlaps with a time of huge social upheavals in India, including the collapse of the ancient Indus civilization........
Worse in a way, the Turner Diaries was published anonymously Jean Raspail is a highly respected author in France, member of the academy the whole deal.
@@KaceyRepublic Its so strange because the guy isnt your average nationalist who never left his country, he was a globe trotter and wrote many books about foreign cultures.
@@KaceyRepublic, Is or was? I have a hard time imagining the Camp of Saints being a popular work or seen as literary classic by the mainstream in modern day France. Also we know who wrote the Turner Diaries. It was William Pierce, an infamous American Neo Nazi.
So yeah as for the favorite book it is a French book that fortunately is not whatever this is. It is The Little Prince and I genuinely recommend it to everyone. It is a book that you maybe heard about but never read and you definitely should. It is short, like 70 pages, but my god is it beautiful.
The members of the village, the village people if you would, do not admit women into their ranks. They are focused on pride for their identities, and will not be brainwashed by the mainstream telling them that they are lesser for how they were born. I wonder if they have uniforms?
18:48 It's amazing how even in their own fan fictions a Nazi's conscience is screaming at him to stop. Even within the logic of their own worlds, where fascism is supposedly glamorized, they're written as doing something indefensible on even the most basic, human level.
I have to say, all through your readings of the text I'm imagining a film adaptation where some crazy racist people see one thing, while everyone else sees something else. Like that bit where the activist in India is trampled to death it cuts to that same guy sitting in the embassy watching the story of his death being talked about by some Alex Jones type youtuber... maybe looking around during the screed, wondering if this is some kind of practical joke being played on him by his Colleagues.
The population of France in 2020 is estimated to be about 67 million. Even if a million refugees did hit the beaches a 1/67 ratio is hardly swamping. (I'm not sure what the population of France was in 1975. The Internet says 50 million? 1/50 isn't a great ratio either.) The average cruise ship can carry... what? 3000 people? More or less? It would take 334 such ships to carry 1 million people. That's a lot of ships. A lot of torpedoes if you wanted to deal with them that way. More ships would be needed if the ships aren't designed to hold people. Where do these ships come from? Once the first few are taken over it wouldn't be long before the captains are ordered to leave the area. And who pilots the captured ships? How many crew would remain on board? Are all the pilots and other crew forced to work? How much fuel is required for this journey? And yes, food. How long before it's all eaten and the passengers starve? Is cannibalism next? 1,000,000 becomes 500,000, then 250,000... None of this book makes any sense.
Are you suggesting that if *a million people* suddenly enter a country with the area, population and population density of France, it wouldn't make a noticeable impact on the social infrastructure? Because it really obviously would.
@@patavinity1262 I'm saying it's impact would not be dramatic. Not in the way the novel/Right-wingers suggest. Society wouldn't fall. It would change, but keep on going. Imagine, well, anything with say 300 members. A school system, a job, a theater group. Add five or six people to that group. How devastated is it? How irrevocably changed is it? Sure it would be awkward at first if they didn't speak the language or had different customs. But they would adapt soon enough. People conform to the larger culture, that's why regional culture is so slow to change.
Funny how everybody in this comment section needs to interpret every single detail of the book as literally as possible, just so they can make some pedantic "point" about some perceived inconsistency.
For a book like this, using a bible quote is quite odd, I guess the guys Christian but still, the bibles position on migration is literally the opposite of this guys ideas, Idk how he could use a quote from the bible unironically.
Christians and people who claim to be christian have been using the bible for that sort of thing for almost as long as the book has existed. The bible says "slaves obey your master," so it must think that slavery is OK, even though it doesn't say that slavery is good and even if it did the form of slavery at the time it was written was different. The bible caries a lot of power, and for much of western civilization, and in many ways even now if you wanted to make an argument having the bible agree with it was vital to actually spreading it. What's important to understand, and what you clearly do, is that just because someone says the bible says something doesn't mean that it does.
@@andscifi you're wrong there was chattel slavery in the bible, you're confusing how Israelites should treat fellow Israelis under their law and how they should treat outsiders.
No it isnt odd at all. The catholic church has a long tradition of being the gate keeper of knowledge. Cherry picking whatever served themself - like making up rules about 40 days of fastimg where you should eat fish ... and the church just happened to be heavily invested in the fish industry. Context was irrelevant because the peasants couldnt check. They just had to believe what they were told. Even if they could read, they neither had access to literature nor could read latin in which most important stuff was written. The church's power to do that has greatly diminished since the renessaince introducing the printing press and translation the bible into languages of the commoners. But that tradition to pick and chose lives on in the church and amongst christians. Tbf there may be some positive to discarding the bad parts and keeping the good.
The degree of vitriol and idiocy inherent in such a forcefully-written text is just horrifying. Not to mention the massive hypocrisy of a stuck-up catholic - a follower of a man who preached giving everything you owned away to others and evangelizing on the basis of love and understanding - who hates charity. It's so jarring to hear any of the passages from the book. How on Earth could anyone ever in any way defend Bannon as anything but a fascist when he references and praises such a text? AND WHY DOES RASPAIL'S WIKI PAGE NOT MENTION HIS HORRIFYING OVERT RACISM?!
oh god yes, I just started listening and had to stop the video at the description of 'turd eater's' child. just... the pure hatred in that description of a CHILD. that's a description I'd expect of a D'n'D monster, not a human being
When is this book set? That old french professor apparently joined the KKK and the Civil war, was still in fighting shape during the Mahdi Rebellion (1890s), but then we discover that the Enola Gay pilot died of old age by the time of the book? Is he more than a hundred years old and still not completely senile? Wtf?
I think he was merely fantasizing about fighting in those wars/joining the KKK, the same way he fantasizes about being a crusader. He himself didn’t do any of those things but by god wishes he was there to. It ironically shows that white supremacists are all about those glory days but have no intention to actually do the things that bring “glory”. All glory no work. That’s actually a rather universal human failing -for things unrelated to white supremacist violence- and the author would have better spent his time examining why a white supremacist is too scared to be a “kool KKK member” in the modern age. He could have kept his disgusting politics intact AND included a call to action to make his readers “kool KKK members” AND actually contributed something to literature that every graduate student would have to begrudgingly read despite its horrible politics (similar to say, Lolita). Also it would 900% be “the school shooters’ guide how to go through with it” so thank god he just wrote what he did. Then again he goes around shooting people at the end so idk what the message is
I think Thomas Urech is right in that it's mostly fantasy, but I think there's also supposed to be an element of emblematic Symbolism. Old French Man is briefly being an avatar of the Western Soldier the book keeps talking about, and in that moment, he's talking about being the Western Soldier in all the ways the Western Soldier killed non-whites.
@@52flyingbicycles Ironically, in 1999, the author signed to oppose the war in Serbia the petition "Europeans want peace", launched by the collective "Non à la guerre"("No to war").
@Kathy Kat the only war they'd enjoy is a good ol' imperial machine gun vs spears, because those are the only ones where you can wallow in victory whilst never being in danger
The thing I find fascinating is that when non fascists write about fascism (Warhammer 40k, Starship Troopers) it’s a version about solidarity, Humanity overcoming any obstacle. Unfortunately real fascism is just sad people, locked in a bunker, hating everyone outside it as they lose a war they started.
Warhammer 40k and Starship Troopers (the movie and the animated cartoon) are satires, parodies of fascist and right-wing policies and ideas, it funny that some of the hardcore white nationalist fans of Warhammer 40k love the Empire unironically and not realise that is a satire of their beliefs.
@@TheKeyser94 The fact that the very fascistic Empire is also the closest to a big good WH4K have is also used to cement the fact that this universe is extremely shitty.
The Empire was the source of all evil as well as the facade of the war against evil. The entire Warhammer universe would not exist in it's current form if the solidarity the Empire worshipped was an achievable goal. As a proven absurd goal it's no less mindless in it's appeals to authority than the chaos it sought to destroy, who distilled that need for loyalty down to pain, the prison of the self and death. The armies of light and darkness in that universe are the epitome of fascism, the beauty of the storytelling there is it's plausibility as a metaphor of human political drama. Yep, just repeating what you guys already wrote. I'm funny that way.
Exactly. I used to think that, for instance, how the Galactic Empire in Star Wars is portrayed was very “irreal and without nuance”. The last 5 years convinced me that it might be the most realistic thing in Star Wars. Including wasting resources in building a planet destroying battle station, which I previously thought it was simply cartoonishly evil I now think “yeah, no they would totally do that” - The thing is that distancing and 20+ years of tv documentaries on how the n*zis where “evil geniuses” (looking at you History Channel) kinda created a very wrong picture. Now I get it, fascists are very fucking dumb actually, cartoonishly dumb. Like H*tler liked to nickname himself “The Wolf”, what a massive dork.
PlatinumAltaria the Old Testament is certainly authoritarian in the laws section, but also has a lot of messages about loving the stranger for you were strangers in the land of Egypt. The New Testament, especially in the book of acts was about the apostles (apart from Jesus’s brother who was the leader of the Jerusalem branch and stayed “Jewish”) breaking down the strict Jewish traditions and opening up to non Jews, also the early church (before Rome got its hands on it) was very communistic in how it redistributed wealth in the communities, if I remember right the whole “from each according to his ability to each according to his needs” was inspired by words from the book of acts, Acts 4:32-35 was a big inspiration for early proto-left wing movements like the Taborites, to write the whole bible off as fascistic is a very surface level analysis (no disrespect intended), rather the prime message is about humility and charity, remember when the Pharisees try catching Jesus out and ask him what the greatest commandment is, his response sums up what being “Abrahamic” should be about
19:32- I am now deeply curious if the author had any kind of military experience, because Wikipedia is insufficiently describing his life and I'm leaning toward "He did nothing"
In the famous blog post by John Rogers where he identified the 27% Crazification Factor, there's a discussion between him and his friend Tyrone in which they talk about a speech Bush had just given. Tyrone: Reading here, the speech boiled down to two points -- John: Who cares? The Spain-to-Indonesia thing should automatically invalidate the whole speech. I don't care how good your investment advisor is, he can spend three hours reviewing mutual funds, as soon as he says "And of course, we can put your money into the Easter Bunny's Egg Upgrades", he is out of -- I presume Tyrone cut him off from saying "here", "my employ", "consideration", or "his mind". I bring this up because it's apparently still uncivil to say that Bannon, Miller, King, and le Pen are white supremacists. But I don't care how reasonable your politician is, they can spend three hours saying how it's only CULTURE they're talking about, as soon as they say "and I join the Ku Klux Klan to murder myself some blacks" they are out of the Good People club. In the case of this book that explicitly has no value beyond propaganda and is explicitly racist, we don't need to discuss whether anyone who recommends it as something to read to understand the modern world is a racist or a white supremacist. They have recommended you put your money into the Easter Bunny's Egg Upgrades and are out of whatever John Rogers was about to say.
It has never been about culture. It has always been about color. They would rather persecute a law abiding dark skinned citizen and let a white criminal break free.
I'd love for these people to spend a month in my country. Most people lack plumbing and electricity. These are HUMAN BEINGS seeking out a better future not faceless ISIS monsters. I was raised Canadian and am as culturally Canadian as everyone else and guess what I'm first generation immigrant on my dad's side and second generation refugee on my mom's side. The only difference between me and my peers is my skin colour.
Herb615 I think there are studies on this. The brain structure of bigots and facists, I mean. It may be a dangerous idea, that these kinds of people can never change, but it makes sense that they may be more likely to buy into certain ideologies
@@useroffline9999 there is a direct correlation between greater grey matter in leftists and larger amygdala in conservatives. There is also a myth about intelligence. Intelligence is not memory or logic. I intelligence is more so tied to empathy, creativity, and imagination. Logic is such a small piece of what intelligence is, that IQ tests might as well be an intelligence horoscope.
@@JoelRiter let's not go eugenics here. people are hateful because of what they're taught and what they value, not because of some wild brain restructuring that just HAPPENS to fit sometimes
@@QuikVidGuy like I said, direct correlation. Never said anything about eugenics. It does help us better understand conservative ideologies and how they can be quite literally passed on via genetics. Culture does play a major role. Most people don't understand what culture actually is (at least from an academic point of view). Culture are the expectations of the environment and other people. My favorite example is bugs. Given humans are omnivores, insects are one of the most nutritious food sources for humans. However, despite knowing this, I cannot get myself to eat them based on culture. The expectation created is that people do not eat bugs and to do so is vile. Now, there is this myth of American individuality. It is an aspect of American culture that sees people as hyper atomized. An expectation of both success and failure being the sole responsibility of the individual has existed for a long time now. This despite how much society and other people influence who we are and where we are. So yes, while there are a multitude of reasons for the conservative ideology, they tend to stem from fear or greed.
This would honestly be an amazing satirical movie if taken with the unreliable narrator approach. You can imagine the village living in paranoia as literally France just continues normally but they are too crazed to see that
Scared of foreigners. Scared of the poor. Scared of the unfortunate. And terrified of the prospect of having to live with people who might challenge their worldview and sense of dominance. These books are written by cowards.
@Randy Barat hasn't Paris always been overrun with rats and poverty? I seem to remember that from various classical literary works written in different periods of time. I mean, if your overlords are consistently greedy bastards, how's that poor people's fault?
@@kategrant2728 I never read the article, but I once saw a headline about hitler having a scat fetish and so i choose to believe it for exactly the 40 seconds it takes to mention it here
@@anonlurker723 To be honest I never finished it. It got somewhat repetitive and nonsensical in the final act. Starts off a good disaster novel and descends into farce as the european reaction makes no real sense, which on reflection might be the point...
@@desperatemohammedantheworl5833 I agree. Althoguh I can understand preventing mass amounts of illegal immigration, the caricatures depicted of non-whites are just appalling and far from accurate. Furthermore, like you stated the book is far from realistic and it would be impossible for this to ever take place, like there is no way mankind is that dumb lol.
I dunno, it seems Jose thought more highly of the craft of this one than Comrade Slime did about Herr Turner's Diary But yeah, watching these two relatively back-to-back, I think I've had my dose of racist lit reviews for ... awhile
I’ve read them both and I can tell you beyond a shadow of a doubt that while Jose’s criticism of the book is completely accurate it’s still a much more competent piece of literature over the Turner Diaries. It isn’t a good book, but the Turner Diaries is pathetically bad when it comes to any standard of Aesthetics.
Wait why France? France had nothing to do with Indian colonization, it would make more sense of they went after England. This stories premise by itself is ridiculous
Goddamn. This book is so absurdly over the top with its racism and colonialism that it almost seems like satire. I'm really glad an American Congressman and a presidential advisor think this is a good book that should be taken seriously and read by all. 😬 Great video.
Really loved this video. I'd never heard of this book before, which seems pretty crazy given the amount I can see it lining up with the worldview of the new populist right. I was also thankful to have something to take my mind off the protests, thanks big guy
As a french follower, I can tell you that your prononciation of french names is awful, but not as much as my prononciation of english names. As for Jean Raspail, no, it's not ironic, it's pretty much a kind of manifesto for his ideas. He is a royalist reactionnary, he is involved in the formation of far right medias, and a proud member of the "Parti des forces nouvelles", a neofascist micro-party close to Marine le Pen's Rassemblement National. He is exactly what he seems to be: an ultrareactionnary scumbag. The thing is, he is also a recognized writer, with an audience into a more mainstream right media (he publised tribunes in the big right-wing journal "Le Figaro", to rant about immigration mostly). We seem to have a real problem of semi-mainstream authors with overt far-right political opinions here, I'm afraid.
I love how these books always have a statement like "white genocide is super real you guys, which is why I'm writing this fictional book based on nothing."
@@paulanderson6834 1. Your ludicrous predictions actually don't have basis in reality. 2. Literally all of the ancestors of all of humanity came from Africa.
@@michaelavanessian8558 1. Again, assuming nothing drastic happens, most Europeans will be a plurality in their own country by the mid to late 21st century. If you can provide any contradictory projections please do so. 2. This is absolutely unrelated.
Hearing about this book is psychic damage but I would like to hear more. Also, if France didn't do colonialism, it wouldn't have had anything to fix in the world. Don't play the game of empires; there is no way to win.
The thing that really gets me about the xenophobia in France and the UK is that the people they try to kick out, the people they treat as subhuman are almost always people from the places France and the UK colonized. They stole these people's resources, land, language, culture, often their lives, and now the formerly colonized go to the colonized nation looking for better lives and they just get shit on.
I'd argue that the game of empires succeeded quite well for the few who won it. A small band of bandit empires gorges and gluts themselves on the resources and blood of weaker or more trusting nations as they pillage and rampage their way across the globe, building a parasitic relationship of a mafia and their victims. Even to this day the vast majority of the nations at the top of the charts in wealth and influence are the children of the very same butchers, thieves, and murderers who install dictators, cut down revolts, takes slaves, and ravages the world for resources. How far would the human race have come had the zeal in the age of discovery had been for sharing the precious science and education with the world instead of the destruction of culture after culture that instead could have spent their time contributing to the full potential of humanity instead of suffering beneath the whips of slavers and imperialistic leeches? France, England, America, these nations have won the game of empires and for it, humanity has lost.
if immigration is karma for colonialism, then why are Germany, Ireland, Sweden & Norway getting migrants too if they didn't colonize/had little to no colonies?
Your are a saint for subjecting yourself to this garbage so that you can summarize it for the rest of us! I can barely finish a book I like! This must have been like torturing yourself solely for our benefit!
I came into this video with an earnest curiosity about this writer's POV, like maybe he has some valid criticisms, and then we get to "turd eater", "living in a nonstop orgy" and describing what sounds like a disabled child as a monster and I was just like "ohhh... oh, you have no idea what you're talking about..."
I don't mean to be that guy, but I don't like gatekeeping art. I don't think that the term should refer to "stuff I like". This book's disgusting, but it's still a book.
Bro, I literally just finished Ezekiel yesterday and I don't know how anyone could not take it as a metaphor. I guess it's because they didn't actually read it. Firstly, it's Gog *from* Magog, not two dudes. Secondly, he gets killed by God three times in the *poem* describing him.
You must have the patience of a saint. If I tried to read this book I would struggle not to rip it to pieces. And I would certainly set it on fire and dance around it in some creepy pagan ritual after I've read it despite my deep respect for most books.
Funny, I was just thinking about 'that kooky racist novel' that I read way back and what do you know, José has a video about that. Another small bit of synchronicity: The author of the book passed away two weeks after this video was uploaded.
You know, every time I think I'm ready to see someone talk about racist literature, I swallow that fat pill of regret afterwards. I don't understand this book or the people it's meant for. I don't think anyone truly could, however. These are the people who will never truly know that compassion grants happiness; just that they have a burning hole in their heart that they fill with myth and delusion. I mean, just look at they're longing to be part of the armies of old Europe, without realizing that life for the rest of society was abject human misery akin to their fictional portrayal of the refugees. They'd rather spit shine the shoes of a tyrant king, than have to share the world with non-whites. On a side note, this is how my country(USA) is behaving at the current moment. There is a group of people who will dogmatically follow and worship the words of a decaying septuagenarian, mostly to preserve the fantasy that life could return to simplicity and whiteness. They're so desperate to see this world, that they're willing to stop taking necessary medicines or just flat out inject bleach in their eyeballs.
@@paulanderson6834 fascists are our enemies, among many others. Scapegoating is blaming a group for every problem, that they're obviously not responsible for.
@@paulanderson6834 while some leftist would do that i wouldn't. I would blame _most_ problems on capitalism though. I can defend it too. Fascism is one of those problems in fact.
@@grahamcarpenter5135 It honestly does seem kinda interesting, if abhorrent and horrific. Not enough so for me to want to check it out, but it seems more interesting than say the Turner Diaries.
It's like.. Lovecraftian but even more overtly racist. And that's saying something. The bitch really tried to describe distinct people with lives and personalities as a eusocial, parasitic colony and described it like Lovecraft would.
It's Lovecraftian in the sense that there's undoubtebly a large, secretive contingent of powerful individuals who agree with it that we are arguably powerless to stop.
19:06 I'm starting to think this book thinks the solution to every problem is murder. I could, for example, have trouble opening a pickle jar, and in real life I would just wipe of the jar for a better grip, but in this book the solution would somehow involve the death of some innocent random person. Which is a a terribly tragedy, isn't a solution to my problem, and the worst part is I still have no pickles! (it was a dark statement, that last line was to try and make it slightly less dark, I don't even like pickles)
My favorite book is Aristotle and Dante Discover the Secrets of the Universe by Benjamin Alire Sáenz. It's very poetic and in many ways wish fulfillment. It's about two gay hispanic teenagers growing up in Texas and their love story. It has a happy ending I promise, and while there are a lot of themes, the one that sticks out most to me is how hate crimes effect the people who love those directly involved. Spoiler warning: Ari's (much older) brother is in prison for killing a trans woman, and Ari spends much of the novel trying to figure out what he did and why his parents almost pretend he doesn't exist. Ari also punches (and feels murderous intent towards) a group of boys who beat up Dante in an alley when they caught him kissing another boy. It's not apologetic towards those who commit hate crimes so much as humanizing towards both sides. An acknowledgment that only pain comes from hate crimes.
I'd love to see commentary streams or further discussion! Thank you for subjecting yourself to this vile book so nobody else has to, I hope you get to enjoy something much better now.
I knew Camp of the Saints was bad, I never realized it was that bad. From the (unflattering) description given in the book, it seems like "Turd-Eater's" son is physically disabled. So lets throw casual ableism to the pile of disgusting stuff in this book.
I find it especially ironic that he'd name a character hell bent on preserving "western culture" Constantine Dragasis because if he even took a cursory glance at the west's history of interaction with the Byzantine empire then perhaps he'd have seen the sacking of Constantinople by the 4th crusade, and the total refusal of the west to come to any meaningful aid of the Byzantines unless they accepted unification and subjugation by the Church in Rome, which the later emperors even attempted, all to for absolutely zero help to ever materialise... Fast forward 400 years later and when Greece finally did get independence we got a Bavarian prince imposed as a monarch... I really wish these idiots would stop trying to claim Greece as their cultural antecedent then treating us as a neocolonial plaything to be dictated to
Conservatives: every military man loves war! General of the Army Dwight D. Eisenhower: Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed. Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed. This world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children. The cost of one modern heavy bomber is this: a modern brick school in more than 30 cities. It is two electric power plants, each serving a town of 60,000 population. It is two fine, fully equipped hospitals. It is some fifty miles of concrete pavement. We pay for a single fighter with a half-million bushels of wheat. We pay for a single destroyer with new homes that could have housed more than 8,000 people. . . . This is not a way of life at all, in any true sense. Under the cloud of threatening war, it is humanity hanging from a cross of iron
12:20 Actius was a Roman pantomime actor in the late 1st Century. Flavius Aetius, on the other hand, was the eminently capable Roman commander who famously lead a coalition of Romans, Goths, and assorted barbarians against the forces of Atilla the Hun in 451. If this Raspail guy has such a creepy boner for these historical figures, he should at least get their names right…
Gonna pull a Whoopi here... Let's call it "fascist". While it IS a racist narrative, it's also clearly violence porn that fascists need to explore acceptable kinks to practice on, like racial, culture and religious targets. Don't think for a second they would stop at killing off all the non-white, non-Christians. They'll kill all their slaves when it comes down to no other targets, until no one is left.
For anyone curious going off their numbers, there were about 118,000,000 million white people in 1940. Today it's at about 192,000,00. So less percentage wise but still more than anyone else. So no, doesn't seem like it's happened or is happening.@user-fy6kr7yr9c
I sought this out because I am reading a book about American conservatives and it mentioned that this is a book Steve Bannon quotes often, and provided some of what the book offered. I was curious and wanted to know more about the source. I'm reeling. It's so much worse than described. Thank you for the video, it was a great resource and well-made.
Just discovered your channel this weekend. I've watched several of your vids so far and have been very impressed. Thank you for stomaching this... so we don't have to. Much respect!
God one of the people in the dutch parlemaint openly endorsed this book... he also talks about cultural marxist and globalism and none of the dutch pay it any mind, i feel like im the only one who sees the ticking time bomb he is
Something tells me most people don't know much of anything about this book. Same goes with other far right talking points cultural marxism globalism etc. If he had said Mein Kampf and talked about judeo-bolshevism then someone would have noticed. But Camp of the saints most don't even know about it.
God, I grew up in the SSPX. That cult is so... devious. I'm familiar with so much of this rhetoric, as I wasted my entire childhoof being a loyal slave to it. It's horrific.
Thanks for taking the "bullet" in reading these, I know I couldn't stomach reading these but it's always good to know where all these come from. Take care and stay safe 😎 🍻 🤘
Sacrebleu!!! Just heard of turner's diary a few days ago and now you are telling me, a French teacher teaching French in France, that we had our own white supremacists fanfiction all along?!?
Your point near the end about irony was hanging on my mind the whole time. Like, if the speech by the one named Indian character wasn't surrounded by text explicitly directing it as in support of white supremacy, the whole thing it was saying about people being willing to betray their race for the hope of some meager acceptance by white people sounded like it could have been clipped out of Huey Newton or something. Minus the parts where he says "my people are monstrous" and all that. It would have to be framed as the exact opposite sentiment - that doing such a thing is detrimental to the world instead of a result of proper training - but the phrases used are very... flexible
After seeing several of Jose's reviews of conservative book, I notice a funny trend: even in a world of fiction, where the authors have total control, conservatism still loses! The conservative heroes lose here, in Ben Shapiro's book, in Glenn Beck's novel. That's so fascinating to me. It does paint me a picture of an ideology that even at the height of its power is obsessed with the idea that defeat is right around the corner.
re: "I notice a funny trend: even in a world of fiction, where the authors have total control, conservatism still loses! " Christianity in a nutshell, where every pope for the first 300 years was crucified ... is that losing? What does that say as a precedent for the future?
Honestly I think various extremist authors, both left and right, had their sides lose. Sure, their point is to be "bleak", but honesty aren't they trying bot to pitch in a self-defeating idea?
@@applesandgrapesfordinner4626 re: "I think various extremist authors" There is either centrist, or left. The 'left' always works to project or demon ize the oppo, so there is always that. See, the 3rd r i k e was a socialist enterprise. Making it left. Either you are freedom-goal oriented, or not. Either mankind has a soul, or as the left works it - all animal, and zero soul.
My favorite book is probably The Life and Times of The Wicked Witch of The West by Gregory Maguire also know as the book the hit musical Wicked is based on. It deals a lot with discrimination, the complicated role religion plays in people's lives, and has a hell of a lot of brief queer insights that are really surprising and interesting for a book published by a white guy in 1995
I am only like, 9 minutes in and I am instantly lost. The Last Chance Armada is from India right? Like the former British colony that won it's independence and champions personal freedom and is now a capitalist democracy that's economy is built on modern industry and technology? We're talking about the same India right? I literally do not know how you can get more "western values" than India man. This book is dumb.
@@availanilathe book is xenophobic and dumb but in the 1970s India was less developed than it now and was heavily stereotyped in western media as being incredibly poor. But it’s interesting how nowadays right wingers fixate much more on Africans and Arabs.
wow - I didn't expect 'cuck' to also be present in this book from about half a century ago... this is, thankfully, the only parallel between this book and the present narrative of the fascists...
I would like to point out that Machefer's name could translate to two things: - if you separate it into "mâche fer", it means "munch(ing?) iron" -but I just remembered that it is a word by itself. the definition is "solid waste from the combustion of hard coil (or sometime aparently of household garbage)". So this guy is either named "munching iron", or "burnt garbage".
I like the idea of an ironic reading. Especially with the racists' town/encampment in the south of France bombed out of existence by the government in the end?
I'd like to pretend the mistimed beep at 11:18 was a deep artistic statement about the futility of trying to censor one's own work. But it was just a silly editing mistake that snuck into the very last version of this video. It just wouldn't be a José video without at least one silly editing mistake, and I'm just glad this one is harmless!
Hey, question. The video thumbnail said that this was an introduction to the worst book. Does this mean that you plan to cover this book more in the future?
I assumed "muddled" was just some kind of insult or slur in another part of the world
@@captaintomato5433 I'm considering a follow-up, it depends on what sort of script I can put together and what sort of demand there might be.
@@JoseBird There is another book, similar though not the same, called When It Was Dark by. Guy Thorn. Another weird right-wing hyper Christian text that seems to have the same level of paranoia and conspiracy mongering, but, it seems, from what you said about this book, it also has that strange attribute of being an almost inverted critique of its own premises when you get to the end; strange that such books can't help but be so crazed as to underhandedly refute themselves.
@uwau celcius of farenheit
"Every military man loves war!" - Definitely the words of someone who's never fought.
The military officers at the the top of the food chain certainly love authoritarian men or woman, they are more than happy to overthrow the democracies of their own countries for it, the foot soldiers are other thing, is a more muddle shades of grey field. Historically always have been this way. The only place were exist moral military officers are in fiction, because in the real world, everyone bend the knee.
"definitely the words of someone who's never fought" said someone who has never been in a fight before ironically.
@@the4thindustrialrevolution225 you think being in a fight makes you knowledgeable about what war is like…? I can’t even comprehend how unbelievably stupid this is
@@umno9830 you can't comprehend another perspective? I guess that's why you're illiterate. Read again.
@@the4thindustrialrevolution225 also do you actually believe that?
the "Turd Eater" sounds like a third rate bad guy thought up by a third rate dungeon master for a game of D&D
New rule, if the dm makes a character called "the turd eater", they are no longer the dm.
It's hilarious how vulgar and childish the far-right are
@@ChangedMyNameFinally69 I think all sides of the political spectrum have vulgar and childish individuals, the sad part is that they're usually the ones that scream the loudest
@@Kobolds_in_a_trenchcoat ... unless they're doing it with explicit reference to this book in a way that makes clear everyone agrees this book is awful - like make him the hero, and his namer the villain, or something like that? [I just balk at hard-line proscriptions in creative media like that...]
@@dwc1964 that's fair, I was just taking the "new rule" part from a long running joke forum that had an ever expanding list of increasingly absurd scenarios that players/dms are no longer allowed to do. It was started here theglen.livejournal.com/389635.html (I think that link is to a newer part of the list but it should link directly to the start and the original military inspiration list) but quickly was adopted by these people (still running today) forums.giantitp.com/showthread.php?175909-Any-Things-I-may-no-longer-do-while-playing.
“Atheists deep down believe in god”
Hell! This reminds me of God’s Not Dead, where the atheist dies, finally believing god, and the Christians around him see this as a GOOD THING, as he’s breathing his final breath!!
There IS a phenomenon called like... rainbow soldiers or something. Where the saying "There are no atheists in a foxhole" applies
But there's also people who lose their faith in battle, so maybe the whole thing is just bullshit tribalism
thats what i thought of too
That's generally true, as far as it goes, in the sense that the dominant religious views of your culture will always influence you on an unconscious level even if you don't agree with them consciously.
You forgot the reveal where said atheist is _actually_ just hating god because his mom died!
God I fucking hate that movie more the more I think about it.
You can tell the writers don’t have at least one atheist friend. That’s why they make strawman and bullshit.
The "turd eater" sounds like a character an elementary school kid would write.
Or a D-list South Park character
Batman's most feard villain.
And the other elementary school kids would find it a tad immature.
and we're talking an elementary school that doesn't include middle
His enemy is the peepee poopoo man
"They live in a Fascist commune in the South of France..."
Me: Huh, kinda like The Villiages in South Florida-
"Called The Villiage"
Me: wtf
I thought it was a call for a Nouveau Vichy France
Thought Slime did a great video about another fascist fanfiction.
Don't Fret Marcus, it isn't a coincidence it is just that racist morons are just incredibly uncreative and lazy. Their brains were probably in overdrive trying to think of a good name like "The Village".
Don't forget, it's also almost exclusively populated with old people.
Hey I live in Florida but have never heard about this
Can you please explain
Gotta agree with Jose about respecting propaganda that isn’t shy about being propaganda.
It’s like when fascists call themselves fascists. They’re still bad, but at least they’re not cowards
I’ve always been in the camp that socialists should never pretend to be centrists. Then we just hide behind masks like the fascists. If we truly believe our ideas, then we don’t have to play pretend about them.
I doubt José actually respects the propaganda itself in any significant amount, rather just the act itself of not trying to hide itself. The propaganda really doesn't deserve overall respect just for a single aspect of it.
Thomas Urech besides people are gonna call you a socialist anyway if you promote economic equality, might as well preempt it
Thomas Urech so true. This is needed especially because I believe it may lead to the creation of a 3rd party to combat the dem/rep monopoly not that Green Party bs.
I tried reading this book once, because I had heard it was influential. But I couldn’t finish it. I was struck by two things: 1) just how blatantly racist it is, in a really gross, brazenly self-incriminating way, and 2) how poorly written it is. It’s just such a ramble of propaganda and ideology, it’s not a remotely readable book. Hearing this review, I was curious to hear how it ended, but I can see the tone or pace of the book barely changes. It begins as a boring, slow, racist rant without any real plot or characters and apparently never stops being that.
Yeah I just finished it after months of on and off reading. There is nothing about it which is notable enough to finish, just a depressing read that is venomously hateful.
@Cole S translation. I don’t mean to say it was horribly written or anything. Perhaps I shouldn’t of said Poorly, itjust kind of reminded me of Celine but know where near as good.
I enjoyed reading Camp of the Saints.
@@久しぶりこんにちは Hello, racist!
@@久しぶりこんにちは why
Sure it’s bad, but is it worse than My Immortal?
Yes, yes it.
The protag of My Immortal is technically a big tiddy goth gf, so it's got that going for it, while this book has nothing.
@@peterprime2140 Big tiddy goth gf ftw
My Immortal is mostly harmless, this atrocity of a book is used to justify abhorrent actions.
Yes.
My Immortal is a fun read. Most wouldn't call it good, but it's still very enjoyable.
This book exists on the edge of physically painful to read.
My Immortal is at least so bad it’s good. This book just pushes disgusting bigoted rhetoric.
This is a very confusing thing. Christianity has a very specific stance towards charity. Selfishness is effectively murder. It's like they love Ayn Rand but also love the self-righteousness that is associated with the most unaware of Christians.
They only love the things about Christian history that run counter to the spirit of Christianity. They despise actual charity, mercy, and humility. They care nothing about silence and repentance. But they love kings and gilt and "holy war".
Extremely devout right-wing Christians like the idea of charity but not the practice. Mostly due to their belief that their own wealth and success is god-given and the poor’s lack thereof is also god’s will.
"Who is my neighbor?"
@@Mordrevious They absolutely love charity - as long as they can deduct it from their taxes,[*] and then use those very tax claims to prove that they're the most charitable.
[*] Thus sticking the taxpayer with the bill. Which would be totally fine by me - if we could just cut out the middleman, tax the rich directly, and allocate the tax money properly to begin with.
As with every single other religion, philosophy or ideology, there are two sides - the side that is about all-inclusive solidarity and wishes to abolish the divisions between us that pit us against one another, and the side that is about dividing "us" vs "them" and asserting power and dominion over the designated "them" or just "getting rid of" them. Which side will win out? The side that is fed.
"King Dio?" I must have missed this part of JoJo
Basically Eyes of Heaven
Dio: I reject my humanity, Iris!
Well, there is the bit where all the Nazis show up.
As soon as I heard that name I was like "surely in the comments someone posted 'You thought it was just another poorly thought out character in this racist screed but IT WAS ME, DIO!"
@@captaintomato5433 I reject my western values iris!
> There is also a Russian name I butcher
I finally feel represented in a Jose video!
Video postscript: This is the book Lauren Southern cites as her favorite book (she may be the person most closely associated with this book at the moment). She mentioned it in quite a few of her videos, and has stated it had the biggest influence on her political/social views, why she became an activist and why her mission as an activist was to pretty much exclusively to spread the Great Replacement consipracy.
She claimed to not be a racist (hiding it - poorly - behind dogwhistles and lies that have been debunked about as thoroughly as a lie can be debunked), and pretty routinely threw out the "the left labled me a racist because they call everyone who says facts they don't like a racist" reactionary NPC line of dialogue - but even without her dogwhistles getting outed and the "facts" she cited getting proven to be just made up BS to help push her agenda by quite a few people, it should have been pretty clear to anyone familiar with TCotS what she actually stood for just by her constantly mentioning how much she loves this book. I wouldn't be surprised if she came out and said her second favorite book was the Turner Diaries...
+
dmore454 Of course this is her favorite book.
Lauren simmonsen... She's a J pretending to be a whitey
That's why it was familiar
@Lucius Sulla No one here said that population demographics aren't changing.
For the great replacement to be true one has to accept many assumptions: the change is intentional, that the change is a problem, that race isn't a social construct, that whiteness is a purity that other races dirty, that America is a white country, that white people should only be in relationships with white people, that a change in skin color changes one's history.
I'm French and when you mentioned Marine Le Pen I was "Oh... How unexpected..."
I find it crazy how any public organisation can openly approve this piece of fiction. This is no better or more subtle than Mein Kampf.
@@Miraihi Or Lord of the Swastika
If only you'd have been there in New Algiers to calm that whole thing down.
@@Miraihi It's called freedom and because of people like you we are losing freedom.
It's too bad this guy wasn't creative enough to use his fear and disgust for The Other to make something cool, like Lovecraft did
The fear of the Other is inherently reactionary and completely ahistorical. If we gave into that fear most other ethnic groups and most animal species would be dead
@uwau,
Yes, but Lovecraft himself would have thought you were insane if you told him that you believed that Cthulhu was real.
@uwau "even whites, if they weren't from his hometown." - He was hung up about specific ethnic groups, probably the immigrants of his day. I think he had a short story in which some sketchy immigrants broke into a cursed house and got their comeuppance (An Italian, a Portuguese, and a Romanian walk into a haunted house...).
I like to say he wasn't a white nationalist, because he wasn't that inclusive.
@@davidm1926 White isolationist. They're the same but without the ability to play team sports
@Hans Hanzo Would you say that he was a... bundle of issues shambling around in a roughly bipedal approximation of a man?
The too late censorship beep was hilarious.
and also enlightening. now i know i have to lower the audio if i want an effective beep
The book sounds so blatantly aggressive and backwards I keep assuming it was written in the colonial era like the 1800s but then modern things crop up like radio shows and the Air Force and I’m reminded that this was written in the 1970s.
And "The Turner Diaries" was published in 1978. Even "Mein Kampf" was written in an era (1920s) when Western liberals were beginning to turn against racism - if they hadn't already before. But then, books like these are primitive by nature - as ridiculous as those medieval travelogues that described monsters and weird humanoid creatures living in foreign lands.
But I think these books SHOULD be read. Shunning them because of their content without even opening them is an act of self-censorship, and in its own way as narrow-minded as the attitudes expressed in the books themselves. It's not as if reading this book will automatically turn a person into a genocidal lunatic, any more than reading a Gothic horror novel will turn someone into a sadistic torturer. I think these books should be enjoyed as a sort of depraved, surreal fiction, in much the same way that pornography is enjoyed. Besides, if every library in the world had a copy of each of these books, people could read them for free and wouldn't have to fund their creators by buying them.
Raspail was clearly prophetic and had the right kind of eyes to analyze the seeds of modern anti-white leftists and the swarming invasion from Africa and all other 3rd world shitholes.
and yet its coming true.
@@SeasideDetective2 primitive books are.more.true because they reflect a primitive nature. Modernity has provided comforts that made us forget our true nature. "Overcoming" your primitive nature is based purely on convenience. Just wait until it's no longer convenient for you to live as youre used to living and you'll start becoming more primitive. Perhaps you're a supernatural being though....
You know one of the major reasons Watchmen is so cool? Alan Moore really gets you in the head of a violent Crypto-fascist and is able to make you understand him. There's nothing more boring than political literature where the author thinks everybody secretly believes the same thing they do.
It's hard to see Rorscach as a fascist, though. A fascist demands absolute obedience to authority, and Rorscach is clearly breaking the law and winds up in jail because of it. What's more, a fascist characteristically believes in some great phenomenon outside of himself: his country, his religion, his race, etc. Rorschach doesn't believe in anything beyond his private resentment of sexual deviants, which he feels not because of moral outrage, but just because he was an illegitimate child and his mommy slapped him one time.
Pretty sure Rorschach is supposed to be an example of how the poor are left to rot and turn to violence to preserve themselves. He's literally a homeless man whose life has been ruined by drug abuse and poverty, leaving him with no view of the world but through hatred, fear, and cynicism. He's even put in prison under false circumstances after being literally framed by a rich man.
@@SeasideDetective2 Fascists don't believe in absolute authority to the state, at least not inherently, it's all about the dynamic with the in-group and out-group, that then uses the state as a means of achieving hegemony, by that logic the Nazi party wasn't fascist because they were militant way before they took power. Hell, even Hitler got arrested
@@SeasideDetective2 Seconding Some dude here. Fascism isn't loyalty to a specific authority or even ideal. It's loyalty to the methodologies of violence, which is why there are both leftist and right-wing fascists, and why it's so difficult to define fascism in a society brainwashed in the global service of and desensitized to, violence.
It's defined by the mob, the bully, the narcissist. "Might makes right" and where individual strength is flagging, the individual seeks the power of the mob and the cultivator of the power of the mob seeks worship versus understanding so as to maintain a safe distance from even the appearance of momentary criticism or human vulnerability.
Even racism is a front for a far more insidious attitude of supremacy that begins to seep into the minds of every pre-verbal child in this toxic civilization when they first start to hear the words "stupid", "ugly" or "gross". All of it invokes the indigenous critique, which is exactly what fascists seek to silence.
I could go on...
@@johncaccioppo1142 So a person who is violent is fascist, no matter how much they believe in democracy?
8:15 I just want to be there when he was writing this description, deliberating at how many of the kids features would be stumps.
LMAO
You are overestimating the amount of thought that went into this drivel
Two stumps for eyes and a third, flabby stump for a mouth. No teeth, no jaw, just a stump covering a cavernous gullet.
Five stumps on either hand, each connected to the torso stump by arm stumps.
Man for people who love to decry Islam as a death cult, they sure love writing about their own death cults.
That's more Nu-Atheist morons, Nazis LOVE the death cult part of radical Islam
@@ChangedMyNameFinally69 No they don't, you're basing that off some pretty limited Muslim engagement with the nazis in the Balkans by some Albanian and Bosnians and a bit of sympathy from some Arab nationalists. Thats it. They actually had far more engagement from Catholics. The nazis had as much respect for Islam as they did for Christianity at the core of their ideology, which was zero. Their end goal was aryan neo paganism, they were just pragmatic when it came to getting help here and there for their genocidal lebensraum plans.
@@nektarios5291 Wut? I'm making a joke about fascists being moronically suicidal. And I see Nazis occasionally jerk off radical Islam (not the Sunni or Shia variants mind you) when they want to be sexist and Anti-Semitic, though they also pass around the "grooming gang" myth.
@@nektarios5291 Yes, a lot of it was political expediency. The Serbs, the Croats, and the Bosniaks were all Slavs - and thus, strictly speaking, "subhuman" to the Nazis - but the Croats and Bosniaks were just as vicious (and arguably more so) toward foreigners - ESPECIALLY Serbs - as the Germans were. So the Nazis fudged the truth a bit, claiming that because the Croats were Catholic rather than Orthodox and wrote in Latin script rather than Cyrillic, they were more "Aryan" than the Serbs; and because the Muslim Bosniaks (who were closely allied with the Croats in any case) were anti-Semitic, they were effectively "Aryans" as well. The main point, however, was that the Croats and Bosniaks were pro-Austrian (an ethnically German country and Hitler's homeland), while the Serbs were pro-Russian - and of course, Russia was by far the largest Slavic country and pretty much the Antichrist in the minds of the Nazis for its Judaism and Communism as well as its Slavic-ness.
Muslims are based, honestly I agree far more with Islamists than Liberals
It saddens me to see how the rich culture of India- with all its philosophies, religions, architectures etc.- gets reduced to Kalkutta, or more specifically, the slums of Kalkutta.
And it treats the people of those slums as little more than animals, rather than people with motivations, goals, beliefs.
India’s Fragmented Society Was Once a Melting Pot
The period of intermarriage overlaps with a time of huge social upheavals in India, including the collapse of the ancient Indus civilization........
@@grazynap.262 What are you talking about?
@@grazynap.262
You do know that India is still there and was thriving until, you know, the colonizers? And that they’ve made an impressive comeback?
The culture white people gave them before they left for Persia? Yeah, sure.
I'm a fairly devout Muslim. But the first time I read a passage from Le Camp des Saints I audibly gasped: "JESUS CHRIST"
I'm sure Allah understands.
"holy fuck!" is appropriate, too.
KEvron
@nihilismful in fairness, that's a pretty funny joke to steal.
@nihilismful what is the comedy show? That's a good joke.
@nihilismful Technically Jesus is a prophet in Islam who is highly respected. He's just not the true channeler of God or divine at all
So it's basically the french version of "The turner diaries".
Worse in a way, the Turner Diaries was published anonymously Jean Raspail is a highly respected author in France, member of the academy the whole deal.
@@KaceyRepublic I thought there was something wrong with how competent the basic prose is.
@@KaceyRepublic Its so strange because the guy isnt your average nationalist who never left his country, he was a globe trotter and wrote many books about foreign cultures.
@@KaceyRepublic,
Is or was? I have a hard time imagining the Camp of Saints being a popular work or seen as literary classic by the mainstream in modern day France. Also we know who wrote the Turner Diaries. It was William Pierce, an infamous American Neo Nazi.
Anton Fleck,
The Turner Diaries, from what I've heard about it, is even worse than the Camp of Saints, believe it or not.
So yeah as for the favorite book it is a French book that fortunately is not whatever this is. It is The Little Prince and I genuinely recommend it to everyone. It is a book that you maybe heard about but never read and you definitely should. It is short, like 70 pages, but my god is it beautiful.
The members of the village, the village people if you would, do not admit women into their ranks. They are focused on pride for their identities, and will not be brainwashed by the mainstream telling them that they are lesser for how they were born.
I wonder if they have uniforms?
YMCA
They're a camp of real macho men. 😂
But oddly enough, it is their foes who seem to be In the Navy.
18:48 It's amazing how even in their own fan fictions a Nazi's conscience is screaming at him to stop. Even within the logic of their own worlds, where fascism is supposedly glamorized, they're written as doing something indefensible on even the most basic, human level.
They don't see that as "conscience," though. They see it as sentimental weakness.
The reason mainstream people talk about this book still is the lack of a certain four-letter word.
I have to say, all through your readings of the text I'm imagining a film adaptation where some crazy racist people see one thing, while everyone else sees something else. Like that bit where the activist in India is trampled to death it cuts to that same guy sitting in the embassy watching the story of his death being talked about by some Alex Jones type youtuber... maybe looking around during the screed, wondering if this is some kind of practical joke being played on him by his Colleagues.
And the "turd-eater" is actually a heroic figure, single father who rises to the occasion and leads his countrymen to safety or something.
The population of France in 2020 is estimated to be about 67 million. Even if a million refugees did hit the beaches a 1/67 ratio is hardly swamping. (I'm not sure what the population of France was in 1975. The Internet says 50 million? 1/50 isn't a great ratio either.)
The average cruise ship can carry... what? 3000 people? More or less? It would take 334 such ships to carry 1 million people. That's a lot of ships. A lot of torpedoes if you wanted to deal with them that way. More ships would be needed if the ships aren't designed to hold people. Where do these ships come from? Once the first few are taken over it wouldn't be long before the captains are ordered to leave the area. And who pilots the captured ships? How many crew would remain on board? Are all the pilots and other crew forced to work? How much fuel is required for this journey? And yes, food. How long before it's all eaten and the passengers starve? Is cannibalism next? 1,000,000 becomes 500,000, then 250,000...
None of this book makes any sense.
Are you suggesting that if *a million people* suddenly enter a country with the area, population and population density of France, it wouldn't make a noticeable impact on the social infrastructure? Because it really obviously would.
@@patavinity1262
I'm saying it's impact would not be dramatic. Not in the way the novel/Right-wingers suggest. Society wouldn't fall. It would change, but keep on going.
Imagine, well, anything with say 300 members. A school system, a job, a theater group. Add five or six people to that group. How devastated is it? How irrevocably changed is it? Sure it would be awkward at first if they didn't speak the language or had different customs. But they would adapt soon enough. People conform to the larger culture, that's why regional culture is so slow to change.
It’s White Nationalist Jerk Off material, what did you expect?
Funny how everybody in this comment section needs to interpret every single detail of the book as literally as possible, just so they can make some pedantic "point" about some perceived inconsistency.
@@douglasdea637 "People conform to the larger culture." Right, especially in France, model of integration, of "conforming to larger culture".
For a book like this, using a bible quote is quite odd, I guess the guys Christian but still, the bibles position on migration is literally the opposite of this guys ideas, Idk how he could use a quote from the bible unironically.
When has the Biblical position being in direct contrast to the right's interpretation of the Bible stopped them before?
Christians and people who claim to be christian have been using the bible for that sort of thing for almost as long as the book has existed. The bible says "slaves obey your master," so it must think that slavery is OK, even though it doesn't say that slavery is good and even if it did the form of slavery at the time it was written was different.
The bible caries a lot of power, and for much of western civilization, and in many ways even now if you wanted to make an argument having the bible agree with it was vital to actually spreading it.
What's important to understand, and what you clearly do, is that just because someone says the bible says something doesn't mean that it does.
@@andscifi you're wrong there was chattel slavery in the bible, you're confusing how Israelites should treat fellow Israelis under their law and how they should treat outsiders.
No it isnt odd at all. The catholic church has a long tradition of being the gate keeper of knowledge. Cherry picking whatever served themself - like making up rules about 40 days of fastimg where you should eat fish ... and the church just happened to be heavily invested in the fish industry. Context was irrelevant because the peasants couldnt check. They just had to believe what they were told. Even if they could read, they neither had access to literature nor could read latin in which most important stuff was written.
The church's power to do that has greatly diminished since the renessaince introducing the printing press and translation the bible into languages of the commoners. But that tradition to pick and chose lives on in the church and amongst christians.
Tbf there may be some positive to discarding the bad parts and keeping the good.
The bible is very contradictial, also in this aspect
35:45 does raspail think mixed raced people have like alternate personalities, one for each race?
Jeremy Kwek It's like multiple personality disorder. Except instead of multiple personalities living inside of you, it's multiple races lmao.
@@hoominbeeing inside you there are two races
If H. P. Lovecraft wrote a political book, I imagine it would look something like this.
There are no tentacles in it, or shining geometrical forms, so I doubt it
Well it'd depend on the when, he aged out of being racist.
The degree of vitriol and idiocy inherent in such a forcefully-written text is just horrifying. Not to mention the massive hypocrisy of a stuck-up catholic - a follower of a man who preached giving everything you owned away to others and evangelizing on the basis of love and understanding - who hates charity. It's so jarring to hear any of the passages from the book.
How on Earth could anyone ever in any way defend Bannon as anything but a fascist when he references and praises such a text? AND WHY DOES RASPAIL'S WIKI PAGE NOT MENTION HIS HORRIFYING OVERT RACISM?!
oh god yes, I just started listening and had to stop the video at the description of 'turd eater's' child. just... the pure hatred in that description of a CHILD. that's a description I'd expect of a D'n'D monster, not a human being
ck Agreed. The truth that ethnonationalism is an incompetent ideology must hurt a lot to you.
@@flossimoth It sounds like the child is literally already dead
Floss Moth I believe J. R. R. Tolkien ascribed literal orcs more humanity than Raspail did to Indian people
@TheAmarican you complain about the book being racist, yet your last phrase is racist.
When is this book set? That old french professor apparently joined the KKK and the Civil war, was still in fighting shape during the Mahdi Rebellion (1890s), but then we discover that the Enola Gay pilot died of old age by the time of the book? Is he more than a hundred years old and still not completely senile? Wtf?
I think he was merely fantasizing about fighting in those wars/joining the KKK, the same way he fantasizes about being a crusader. He himself didn’t do any of those things but by god wishes he was there to.
It ironically shows that white supremacists are all about those glory days but have no intention to actually do the things that bring “glory”. All glory no work. That’s actually a rather universal human failing -for things unrelated to white supremacist violence- and the author would have better spent his time examining why a white supremacist is too scared to be a “kool KKK member” in the modern age. He could have kept his disgusting politics intact AND included a call to action to make his readers “kool KKK members” AND actually contributed something to literature that every graduate student would have to begrudgingly read despite its horrible politics (similar to say, Lolita). Also it would 900% be “the school shooters’ guide how to go through with it” so thank god he just wrote what he did.
Then again he goes around shooting people at the end so idk what the message is
I think Thomas Urech is right in that it's mostly fantasy, but I think there's also supposed to be an element of emblematic Symbolism. Old French Man is briefly being an avatar of the Western Soldier the book keeps talking about, and in that moment, he's talking about being the Western Soldier in all the ways the Western Soldier killed non-whites.
@@52flyingbicycles Ironically, in 1999, the author signed to oppose the war in Serbia the petition "Europeans want peace", launched by the collective "Non à la guerre"("No to war").
@Kathy Kat the only war they'd enjoy is a good ol' imperial machine gun vs spears, because those are the only ones where you can wallow in victory whilst never being in danger
The thing I find fascinating is that when non fascists write about fascism (Warhammer 40k, Starship Troopers) it’s a version about solidarity, Humanity overcoming any obstacle. Unfortunately real fascism is just sad people, locked in a bunker, hating everyone outside it as they lose a war they started.
Warhammer 40k and Starship Troopers (the movie and the animated cartoon) are satires, parodies of fascist and right-wing policies and ideas, it funny that some of the hardcore white nationalist fans of Warhammer 40k love the Empire unironically and not realise that is a satire of their beliefs.
@@TheKeyser94 The fact that the very fascistic Empire is also the closest to a big good WH4K have is also used to cement the fact that this universe is extremely shitty.
@@NIHIL_EGO nah the orcs are the "best" because atleast they have fun
The Empire was the source of all evil as well as the facade of the war against evil. The entire Warhammer universe would not exist in it's current form if the solidarity the Empire worshipped was an achievable goal. As a proven absurd goal it's no less mindless in it's appeals to authority than the chaos it sought to destroy, who distilled that need for loyalty down to pain, the prison of the self and death.
The armies of light and darkness in that universe are the epitome of fascism, the beauty of the storytelling there is it's plausibility as a metaphor of human political drama.
Yep, just repeating what you guys already wrote. I'm funny that way.
Exactly. I used to think that, for instance, how the Galactic Empire in Star Wars is portrayed was very “irreal and without nuance”. The last 5 years convinced me that it might be the most realistic thing in Star Wars. Including wasting resources in building a planet destroying battle station, which I previously thought it was simply cartoonishly evil I now think “yeah, no they would totally do that” - The thing is that distancing and 20+ years of tv documentaries on how the n*zis where “evil geniuses” (looking at you History Channel) kinda created a very wrong picture. Now I get it, fascists are very fucking dumb actually, cartoonishly dumb. Like H*tler liked to nickname himself “The Wolf”, what a massive dork.
Despite it's constant motioning towards Christianity, this may be the single least Christian book I have ever read.
How anyone who condemns the concept of charity can call themselves Christian is utterly beyond me.
Like... Has he *read* the Bible?
Have you read the bible? It's decidedly pro-racist, and at least tacitly pro-ethnonationalism.
@@PlatinumAltaria How so? It's certainly homophobic, Anti-Semitic, and misogynistic but I never really saw racism in it. Isn't it also pro-immigrant?
PlatinumAltaria the Old Testament is certainly authoritarian in the laws section, but also has a lot of messages about loving the stranger for you were strangers in the land of Egypt. The New Testament, especially in the book of acts was about the apostles (apart from Jesus’s brother who was the leader of the Jerusalem branch and stayed “Jewish”) breaking down the strict Jewish traditions and opening up to non Jews, also the early church (before Rome got its hands on it) was very communistic in how it redistributed wealth in the communities, if I remember right the whole “from each according to his ability to each according to his needs” was inspired by words from the book of acts, Acts 4:32-35 was a big inspiration for early proto-left wing movements like the Taborites, to write the whole bible off as fascistic is a very surface level analysis (no disrespect intended), rather the prime message is about humility and charity, remember when the Pharisees try catching Jesus out and ask him what the greatest commandment is, his response sums up what being “Abrahamic” should be about
@Kathy Kat The New Testament also put a lot of emphasis on including Gentiles and women in the church.
19:32- I am now deeply curious if the author had any kind of military experience, because Wikipedia is insufficiently describing his life and I'm leaning toward "He did nothing"
Everything about this guy's writing screams "chickenhawk".
In the famous blog post by John Rogers where he identified the 27% Crazification Factor, there's a discussion between him and his friend Tyrone in which they talk about a speech Bush had just given.
Tyrone: Reading here, the speech boiled down to two points --
John: Who cares? The Spain-to-Indonesia thing should automatically invalidate the whole speech. I don't care how good your investment advisor is, he can spend three hours reviewing mutual funds, as soon as he says "And of course, we can put your money into the Easter Bunny's Egg Upgrades", he is out of --
I presume Tyrone cut him off from saying "here", "my employ", "consideration", or "his mind".
I bring this up because it's apparently still uncivil to say that Bannon, Miller, King, and le Pen are white supremacists. But I don't care how reasonable your politician is, they can spend three hours saying how it's only CULTURE they're talking about, as soon as they say "and I join the Ku Klux Klan to murder myself some blacks" they are out of the Good People club. In the case of this book that explicitly has no value beyond propaganda and is explicitly racist, we don't need to discuss whether anyone who recommends it as something to read to understand the modern world is a racist or a white supremacist. They have recommended you put your money into the Easter Bunny's Egg Upgrades and are out of whatever John Rogers was about to say.
It has never been about culture. It has always been about color. They would rather persecute a law abiding dark skinned citizen and let a white criminal break free.
I'd love for these people to spend a month in my country. Most people lack plumbing and electricity. These are HUMAN BEINGS seeking out a better future not faceless ISIS monsters. I was raised Canadian and am as culturally Canadian as everyone else and guess what I'm first generation immigrant on my dad's side and second generation refugee on my mom's side. The only difference between me and my peers is my skin colour.
Compassion and human decency is a form of emotional intelligence. Remember that bigots are not very smart people.
Herb615 I think there are studies on this. The brain structure of bigots and facists, I mean. It may be a dangerous idea, that these kinds of people can never change, but it makes sense that they may be more likely to buy into certain ideologies
@@useroffline9999 there is a direct correlation between greater grey matter in leftists and larger amygdala in conservatives. There is also a myth about intelligence. Intelligence is not memory or logic. I intelligence is more so tied to empathy, creativity, and imagination. Logic is such a small piece of what intelligence is, that IQ tests might as well be an intelligence horoscope.
@@JoelRiter let's not go eugenics here. people are hateful because of what they're taught and what they value, not because of some wild brain restructuring that just HAPPENS to fit sometimes
@@QuikVidGuy like I said, direct correlation. Never said anything about eugenics. It does help us better understand conservative ideologies and how they can be quite literally passed on via genetics. Culture does play a major role. Most people don't understand what culture actually is (at least from an academic point of view). Culture are the expectations of the environment and other people. My favorite example is bugs. Given humans are omnivores, insects are one of the most nutritious food sources for humans. However, despite knowing this, I cannot get myself to eat them based on culture. The expectation created is that people do not eat bugs and to do so is vile.
Now, there is this myth of American individuality. It is an aspect of American culture that sees people as hyper atomized. An expectation of both success and failure being the sole responsibility of the individual has existed for a long time now. This despite how much society and other people influence who we are and where we are.
So yes, while there are a multitude of reasons for the conservative ideology, they tend to stem from fear or greed.
This would honestly be an amazing satirical movie if taken with the unreliable narrator approach. You can imagine the village living in paranoia as literally France just continues normally but they are too crazed to see that
"Nevermind the rapes and Bastille Day Delivery Trucks mowing you down"!
Paul Verhoven should have gone for this "Novel" first.
@@thirstypilgrim97ah, europeans, known for never bringing any harm to each other at all. it was the "migrants" that did this to us...
@@thirstypilgrim97 That was a truck of peace, and Ebba Åkelund was a racist who deserved it.
@@satouhikou1103 go sit on a cactus.
An endless cavalcade of straw effigies. Not even the "main characters" are people.
"A healthy gulp of death"
Actually, I am feeling thirsty, thanks. *grabs a Coke*
Scared of foreigners. Scared of the poor. Scared of the unfortunate. And terrified of the prospect of having to live with people who might challenge their worldview and sense of dominance.
These books are written by cowards.
@Randy Barat Yes?
Yep
@Randy Barat hasn't Paris always been overrun with rats and poverty? I seem to remember that from various classical literary works written in different periods of time. I mean, if your overlords are consistently greedy bastards, how's that poor people's fault?
I enjoyed read his book. I think France is for the French, not foreigners :)
@@久しぶりこんにちは
Not even white foreigners?
"They just kinda show up, and the French people immediately surrender"
I feel like there's some kind of joke to be made here...
At first I thought it was scat porn. I think I'd prefer that to this garbage
i dont know what that is but i bet my bottom dollars that its better than this
@@kategrant2728 I never read the article, but I once saw a headline about hitler having a scat fetish and so i choose to believe it for exactly the 40 seconds it takes to mention it here
Wow. This book was much, much worse than I was expecting.
Actually it's pretty entertaining.
@@desperatemohammedantheworl5833 lol you’re a reject in society
@@anonlurker723 To be honest I never finished it. It got somewhat repetitive and nonsensical in the final act. Starts off a good disaster novel and descends into farce as the european reaction makes no real sense, which on reflection might be the point...
@@desperatemohammedantheworl5833 I agree. Althoguh I can understand preventing mass amounts of illegal immigration, the caricatures depicted of non-whites are just appalling and far from accurate. Furthermore, like you stated the book is far from realistic and it would be impossible for this to ever take place, like there is no way mankind is that dumb lol.
How about the reality you never expected in Europe the UK and the US ? Much worse as well?
Rad both Jose and thoughtslime reviewing terrible racist lit, and like the turnner dieries this too is horribly written and uncreative
I dunno, it seems Jose thought more highly of the craft of this one than Comrade Slime did about Herr Turner's Diary
But yeah, watching these two relatively back-to-back, I think I've had my dose of racist lit reviews for ... awhile
I’ve read them both and I can tell you beyond a shadow of a doubt that while Jose’s criticism of the book is completely accurate it’s still a much more competent piece of literature over the Turner Diaries. It isn’t a good book, but the Turner Diaries is pathetically bad when it comes to any standard of Aesthetics.
Wait why France? France had nothing to do with Indian colonization, it would make more sense of they went after England. This stories premise by itself is ridiculous
The French did have a minor colonial influence on India but they lost the war for control for India with the British and thus have it up.
Probably because there are a lot of people there. Can't raise up millions in Algeria.
@@organMike Vietnam though?
Goddamn. This book is so absurdly over the top with its racism and colonialism that it almost seems like satire. I'm really glad an American Congressman and a presidential advisor think this is a good book that should be taken seriously and read by all. 😬
Great video.
It should be because its prophetic and we're watching it happen right now.
Really loved this video. I'd never heard of this book before, which seems pretty crazy given the amount I can see it lining up with the worldview of the new populist right. I was also thankful to have something to take my mind off the protests, thanks big guy
As a french follower, I can tell you that your prononciation of french names is awful, but not as much as my prononciation of english names.
As for Jean Raspail, no, it's not ironic, it's pretty much a kind of manifesto for his ideas. He is a royalist reactionnary, he is involved in the formation of far right medias, and a proud member of the "Parti des forces nouvelles", a neofascist micro-party close to Marine le Pen's Rassemblement National. He is exactly what he seems to be: an ultrareactionnary scumbag. The thing is, he is also a recognized writer, with an audience into a more mainstream right media (he publised tribunes in the big right-wing journal "Le Figaro", to rant about immigration mostly).
We seem to have a real problem of semi-mainstream authors with overt far-right political opinions here, I'm afraid.
What exactly is the problem? You can't refute any of his ideas anyway.
Watch me.
This guy sounds like the French version of Willian Lind, another blatant reactionary monarchist trashcan and sad excuse of a "novelist".
LOL an old French dude mentions the Vietcong in a diatribe about foreign invaders. Like look in the mirror, bro.
I love how these books always have a statement like "white genocide is super real you guys, which is why I'm writing this fictional book based on nothing."
Your comment is ridiculous. The population projections are accepted and mainstream. The question is what side you're on.
@@paulanderson6834 id say its payback for colonization and genocide. Cope hard.
@@alexarviso6836 Why do you hate half your ancestors?
Do you need someone to talk to about your self-esteem problems?
@@paulanderson6834 1. Your ludicrous predictions actually don't have basis in reality.
2. Literally all of the ancestors of all of humanity came from Africa.
@@michaelavanessian8558 1. Again, assuming nothing drastic happens, most Europeans will be a plurality in their own country by the mid to late 21st century. If you can provide any contradictory projections please do so.
2. This is absolutely unrelated.
Hearing about this book is psychic damage but I would like to hear more.
Also, if France didn't do colonialism, it wouldn't have had anything to fix in the world. Don't play the game of empires; there is no way to win.
Racism is kidnapping black people and then telling them to leave.
The thing that really gets me about the xenophobia in France and the UK is that the people they try to kick out, the people they treat as subhuman are almost always people from the places France and the UK colonized. They stole these people's resources, land, language, culture, often their lives, and now the formerly colonized go to the colonized nation looking for better lives and they just get shit on.
@nihilismful oh I totally agree. France still extracts major debts from its former colonies. I just didn't bring it up properly. Thank you for that
I'd argue that the game of empires succeeded quite well for the few who won it. A small band of bandit empires gorges and gluts themselves on the resources and blood of weaker or more trusting nations as they pillage and rampage their way across the globe, building a parasitic relationship of a mafia and their victims. Even to this day the vast majority of the nations at the top of the charts in wealth and influence are the children of the very same butchers, thieves, and murderers who install dictators, cut down revolts, takes slaves, and ravages the world for resources. How far would the human race have come had the zeal in the age of discovery had been for sharing the precious science and education with the world instead of the destruction of culture after culture that instead could have spent their time contributing to the full potential of humanity instead of suffering beneath the whips of slavers and imperialistic leeches?
France, England, America, these nations have won the game of empires and for it, humanity has lost.
if immigration is karma for colonialism, then why are Germany, Ireland, Sweden & Norway getting migrants too if they didn't colonize/had little to no colonies?
Your are a saint for subjecting yourself to this garbage so that you can summarize it for the rest of us!
I can barely finish a book I like! This must have been like torturing yourself solely for our benefit!
Holy cow, I've never gotten to a video this quickly.
I came into this video with an earnest curiosity about this writer's POV, like maybe he has some valid criticisms, and then we get to "turd eater", "living in a nonstop orgy" and describing what sounds like a disabled child as a monster and I was just like "ohhh... oh, you have no idea what you're talking about..."
Two weeks after this video was released, the author died. 🦀🦀🦀
Coincidence? I think not.
Omae wa mo shindeiru
It’s been quite a while since I’ve felt truly repulsed by a book... and I’m being generous by calling this.... thing a “book”.
I don't mean to be that guy, but I don't like gatekeeping art. I don't think that the term should refer to "stuff I like". This book's disgusting, but it's still a book.
@@ardvark3131 More like speckled toilet paper
"You thought I was a ridiculous caricature written to push fascist rhetoric... but it was me, Dio!"
Every time I see people take the gig and Magog thing seriously on it's face instead of being a medaphor I think of gork and mork from Warhammer 40k
@uwau You mean a lot more?
Fashes like Warhammer because they don't realize they're being mocked
**OI YA GIT, DON KOMPARE DA BOYZ TO DEZ GITS! WE’Z BETTER THAN DAT!!**
Bro, I literally just finished Ezekiel yesterday and I don't know how anyone could not take it as a metaphor. I guess it's because they didn't actually read it. Firstly, it's Gog *from* Magog, not two dudes. Secondly, he gets killed by God three times in the *poem* describing him.
@@reaganbartels9993 ...God wanted to be real thorough.
You must have the patience of a saint. If I tried to read this book I would struggle not to rip it to pieces. And I would certainly set it on fire and dance around it in some creepy pagan ritual after I've read it despite my deep respect for most books.
T. The most mentally stable liberal
You sound like a very stereotypical liberal white woman.
Funny, I was just thinking about 'that kooky racist novel' that I read way back and what do you know, José has a video about that.
Another small bit of synchronicity: The author of the book passed away two weeks after this video was uploaded.
good riddance tbh
You know, every time I think I'm ready to see someone talk about racist literature, I swallow that fat pill of regret afterwards. I don't understand this book or the people it's meant for. I don't think anyone truly could, however. These are the people who will never truly know that compassion grants happiness; just that they have a burning hole in their heart that they fill with myth and delusion. I mean, just look at they're longing to be part of the armies of old Europe, without realizing that life for the rest of society was abject human misery akin to their fictional portrayal of the refugees. They'd rather spit shine the shoes of a tyrant king, than have to share the world with non-whites.
On a side note, this is how my country(USA) is behaving at the current moment. There is a group of people who will dogmatically follow and worship the words of a decaying septuagenarian, mostly to preserve the fantasy that life could return to simplicity and whiteness. They're so desperate to see this world, that they're willing to stop taking necessary medicines or just flat out inject bleach in their eyeballs.
Thought slime does the Turner diaries and now Jose does le camp. I'm all for attacking the enemy's "theory".
You are forgetting coldcrashpictures with his analysis of Ayn Rand, Fountainhead. Renegade Cut did a video about Atlas Shrugged while back also.
"The enemy". I thought scapegoating and "othering" was supposed to be a right wing strategy according to you.
@@paulanderson6834 fascists are our enemies, among many others. Scapegoating is blaming a group for every problem, that they're obviously not responsible for.
@@diegosanchez894 You read like the kind of guy that would blame all the world's problems on "fascism". I might be wrong but I doubt it.
@@paulanderson6834 while some leftist would do that i wouldn't. I would blame _most_ problems on capitalism though. I can defend it too. Fascism is one of those problems in fact.
There's something very lovecraftian about this, in every sense of the word.
It's like an entire book of Lovecraft-style racism with none of the cosmic horror that makes Lovecraft's works interesting to read
@@grahamcarpenter5135 It honestly does seem kinda interesting, if abhorrent and horrific. Not enough so for me to want to check it out, but it seems more interesting than say the Turner Diaries.
At least Lovecraft’s stories are creative and not just blatant nutcase propaganda.
It's like.. Lovecraftian but even more overtly racist. And that's saying something. The bitch really tried to describe distinct people with lives and personalities as a eusocial, parasitic colony and described it like Lovecraft would.
It's Lovecraftian in the sense that there's undoubtebly a large, secretive contingent of powerful individuals who agree with it that we are arguably powerless to stop.
And yet again, unsurprisingly, for someone who glorifies war (and death) he himself never went to war
19:06 I'm starting to think this book thinks the solution to every problem is murder. I could, for example, have trouble opening a pickle jar, and in real life I would just wipe of the jar for a better grip, but in this book the solution would somehow involve the death of some innocent random person. Which is a a terribly tragedy, isn't a solution to my problem, and the worst part is I still have no pickles! (it was a dark statement, that last line was to try and make it slightly less dark, I don't even like pickles)
My favorite book is Aristotle and Dante Discover the Secrets of the Universe by Benjamin Alire Sáenz. It's very poetic and in many ways wish fulfillment. It's about two gay hispanic teenagers growing up in Texas and their love story. It has a happy ending I promise, and while there are a lot of themes, the one that sticks out most to me is how hate crimes effect the people who love those directly involved. Spoiler warning: Ari's (much older) brother is in prison for killing a trans woman, and Ari spends much of the novel trying to figure out what he did and why his parents almost pretend he doesn't exist. Ari also punches (and feels murderous intent towards) a group of boys who beat up Dante in an alley when they caught him kissing another boy. It's not apologetic towards those who commit hate crimes so much as humanizing towards both sides. An acknowledgment that only pain comes from hate crimes.
I'd love to see commentary streams or further discussion! Thank you for subjecting yourself to this vile book so nobody else has to, I hope you get to enjoy something much better now.
When you write a book wanting to be like Joan of Arc, but sounding more like Gilles de Rais.
Who's gilles
@@DavidRamirez-se2yt A friend of Joan of Arc. He was accused of demon worshipping and child murdering, in a very biased trial.
@@AlexaRobin21 Wasn't he the guy Bluebeard was based of?
I knew Camp of the Saints was bad, I never realized it was that bad. From the (unflattering) description given in the book, it seems like "Turd-Eater's" son is physically disabled. So lets throw casual ableism to the pile of disgusting stuff in this book.
Panoptical Dreams Might as well. The fact that there are people who have read this shit and agree with every word of it, makes me sick on a new level.
And also possibly has supernatural powers? Like some type of demon-possessed mage in the Bible
I find it especially ironic that he'd name a character hell bent on preserving "western culture" Constantine Dragasis because if he even took a cursory glance at the west's history of interaction with the Byzantine empire then perhaps he'd have seen the sacking of Constantinople by the 4th crusade, and the total refusal of the west to come to any meaningful aid of the Byzantines unless they accepted unification and subjugation by the Church in Rome, which the later emperors even attempted, all to for absolutely zero help to ever materialise... Fast forward 400 years later and when Greece finally did get independence we got a Bavarian prince imposed as a monarch... I really wish these idiots would stop trying to claim Greece as their cultural antecedent then treating us as a neocolonial plaything to be dictated to
Conservatives: every military man loves war!
General of the Army Dwight D. Eisenhower: Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed.
Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed.
This world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children. The cost of one modern heavy bomber is this: a modern brick school in more than 30 cities. It is two electric power plants, each serving a town of 60,000 population. It is two fine, fully equipped hospitals. It is some fifty miles of concrete pavement. We pay for a single fighter with a half-million bushels of wheat. We pay for a single destroyer with new homes that could have housed more than 8,000 people. . . . This is not a way of life at all, in any true sense. Under the cloud of threatening war, it is humanity hanging from a cross of iron
@Iafiv Iv Some love war is a far cry from all soldiers loving war.
12:20 Actius was a Roman pantomime actor in the late 1st Century. Flavius Aetius, on the other hand, was the eminently capable Roman commander who famously lead a coalition of Romans, Goths, and assorted barbarians against the forces of Atilla the Hun in 451. If this Raspail guy has such a creepy boner for these historical figures, he should at least get their names right…
I read "Mein Kampf". But after reading this I can say this actually beat it in how racist it was.
Nice accomplishment. Pad yourself on the back.
Gonna pull a Whoopi here... Let's call it "fascist".
While it IS a racist narrative, it's also clearly violence porn that fascists need to explore acceptable kinks to practice on, like racial, culture and religious targets.
Don't think for a second they would stop at killing off all the non-white, non-Christians. They'll kill all their slaves when it comes down to no other targets, until no one is left.
"in the future, humor will be randomly generated!"
"turd-eater"
So... How's Europe doing today?
Any day now! Great Replacement any day now, a few more decades, a few more centuries. Surely it'll happen!
@@amoryblaine3292 The United States in 1940 was 90% white, today it is 59% white. So yeah, "the great replacement" is obviously happening.
@@amoryblaine3292it’s already happened in the cities bozo
For anyone curious going off their numbers, there were about 118,000,000 million white people in 1940. Today it's at about 192,000,00. So less percentage wise but still more than anyone else. So no, doesn't seem like it's happened or is happening.@user-fy6kr7yr9c
@@sugma3475 people change, societys too. And people like you wont stop that.
I sought this out because I am reading a book about American conservatives and it mentioned that this is a book Steve Bannon quotes often, and provided some of what the book offered. I was curious and wanted to know more about the source. I'm reeling. It's so much worse than described. Thank you for the video, it was a great resource and well-made.
Just discovered your channel this weekend. I've watched several of your vids so far and have been very impressed. Thank you for stomaching this... so we don't have to. Much respect!
The weird thing is that the Lobster Man doesn't quote Raspail in his preachings.
You talking about Jordan Peterson?
Scrolling through the recent comments on this video gave me hope 😂
Keep ‘em’ coming boys!
God one of the people in the dutch parlemaint openly endorsed this book... he also talks about cultural marxist and globalism and none of the dutch pay it any mind, i feel like im the only one who sees the ticking time bomb he is
Something tells me most people don't know much of anything about this book. Same goes with other far right talking points cultural marxism globalism etc. If he had said Mein Kampf and talked about judeo-bolshevism then someone would have noticed. But Camp of the saints most don't even know about it.
Baudet? The most based man in Western Europe? Love that guy
@@declanfeeney7004 nothing "based" on repeating outdated nutzi propaganda.
God, I grew up in the SSPX. That cult is so... devious. I'm familiar with so much of this rhetoric, as I wasted my entire childhoof being a loyal slave to it. It's horrific.
Thanks for taking the "bullet" in reading these, I know I couldn't stomach reading these but it's always good to know where all these come from. Take care and stay safe 😎 🍻 🤘
so basically, the book turns indian refugees into the reavers from firefly?
Sacrebleu!!! Just heard of turner's diary a few days ago and now you are telling me, a French teacher teaching French in France, that we had our own white supremacists fanfiction all along?!?
I feel like the author could have written nothing but racial slurs to get to 100,000 words and it would have just as much value
Your point near the end about irony was hanging on my mind the whole time. Like, if the speech by the one named Indian character wasn't surrounded by text explicitly directing it as in support of white supremacy, the whole thing it was saying about people being willing to betray their race for the hope of some meager acceptance by white people sounded like it could have been clipped out of Huey Newton or something. Minus the parts where he says "my people are monstrous" and all that. It would have to be framed as the exact opposite sentiment - that doing such a thing is detrimental to the world instead of a result of proper training - but the phrases used are very... flexible
After seeing several of Jose's reviews of conservative book, I notice a funny trend: even in a world of fiction, where the authors have total control, conservatism still loses!
The conservative heroes lose here, in Ben Shapiro's book, in Glenn Beck's novel. That's so fascinating to me. It does paint me a picture of an ideology that even at the height of its power is obsessed with the idea that defeat is right around the corner.
re: "I notice a funny trend: even in a world of fiction, where the authors have total control, conservatism still loses! "
Christianity in a nutshell, where every pope for the first 300 years was crucified ... is that losing? What does that say as a precedent for the future?
Honestly I think various extremist authors, both left and right, had their sides lose. Sure, their point is to be "bleak", but honesty aren't they trying bot to pitch in a self-defeating idea?
@@applesandgrapesfordinner4626 re: "I think various extremist authors"
There is either centrist, or left. The 'left' always works to project or demon ize the oppo, so there is always that. See, the 3rd r i k e was a socialist enterprise. Making it left. Either you are freedom-goal oriented, or not. Either mankind has a soul, or as the left works it - all animal, and zero soul.
My favorite book is probably The Life and Times of The Wicked Witch of The West by Gregory Maguire also know as the book the hit musical Wicked is based on. It deals a lot with discrimination, the complicated role religion plays in people's lives, and has a hell of a lot of brief queer insights that are really surprising and interesting for a book published by a white guy in 1995
Too bad every supposedly big gay work of fiction always has despicable main characters.
I am only like, 9 minutes in and I am instantly lost. The Last Chance Armada is from India right? Like the former British colony that won it's independence and champions personal freedom and is now a capitalist democracy that's economy is built on modern industry and technology? We're talking about the same India right? I literally do not know how you can get more "western values" than India man. This book is dumb.
This book is racist and xenophobic. It sounds dumb if you're neither, bit truth like never before deen past biblical times.
@@availanilathe book is xenophobic and dumb but in the 1970s India was less developed than it now and was heavily stereotyped in western media as being incredibly poor. But it’s interesting how nowadays right wingers fixate much more on Africans and Arabs.
wow - I didn't expect 'cuck' to also be present in this book from about half a century ago... this is, thankfully, the only parallel between this book and the present narrative of the fascists...
Do any of these white nationalist books ever end with people living happily ever?
No, because they don't want to be happy, they want everyone else to be more miserable than them.
I would like to point out that Machefer's name could translate to two things: - if you separate it into "mâche fer", it means "munch(ing?) iron"
-but I just remembered that it is a word by itself. the definition is "solid waste from the combustion of hard coil (or sometime aparently of household garbage)".
So this guy is either named "munching iron", or "burnt garbage".
Listening to this...I just want to dig up Raspail and be like "Dude... y'alright? Like, do you need to talk about it?"
I like the idea of an ironic reading. Especially with the racists' town/encampment in the south of France bombed out of existence by the government in the end?
It's like the Turner Diaries, a grown man writing like an edgy teenaged try hard.
Why did you chose Moroccan Ryan Seacrest to be Dio? The picture is a famous Moroccan host lmao
I can't believe I've watched this video like 3 times and slept to it at least once your voice is so calming😍, love youu💙💚
This is happening to Ireland at a rapid rate.
Yeah, it’s not like Irish people emigrated anywhere is it?
@@thadtuiol1717did they, and was it right or wrong? How many wrongs add up to a right?
Irish people weren't considered white a couple of decades ago. Use your empty head and think why that might have been a thing