How the Talentless Matt Walsh Became Popular
Вставка
- Опубліковано 3 чер 2023
- Matt Walsh is one of those guys who has succeeded in spite of having little to no talent. He's walking proof that to make it in the rightwing media space, all you need to do is hate the right people in a pithy way once. And then coast on that for as long as possible.
Check out the channels of the trans creators highlighted in this video:
@AdequateEmily
@Aranock
@BellamyJay
@KatyMontgomerie
@JessieGender1
@LilySimpson
You can find Jessie's videos here:
• The Manipulations of M...
• Debunking Matt Walsh’s...
Follow me on Twitter: / josenotajay
Contribute to my Patreon: / joseonyoutube
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @josebird
Thumbnail concept by fluttr.me
Sources
www.scientificamerican.com/ar...
www.cbsnews.com/sanfrancisco/...
innocenceproject.org/exonerat...
deathpenaltyinfo.org/database...
www.mediamatters.org/matt-wal...
www.rollingstone.com/politics...
www.washingtonpost.com/educat...
www.thestranger.com/queer/202...
americanindependent.com/poll-...
www.socialnews.xyz/2023/05/08...
www.cbsnews.com/news/cbs-news...
rollcall.com/2023/03/31/repub...
www.pewresearch.org/social-tr...
www.ettingermentum.news/p/the...
translegislation.com/
journals.plos.org/plosone/art...
1702150311.1673627498#epidemic-numbers
www.themarshallproject.org/20...
globalnews.ca/news/9393280/ca...
www.independent.co.uk/news/uk... - Розваги
![Wolfram Physics Project: Working Session Wednesday, Apr. 29, 2020 [Finding Black Hole Structures]](/img/n.gif)
Matt Walsh is the kind of guy to sit in his car and rant about how 16 year olds should get pregnant
Oh wait...
💯
Damn you! You made the joke before I could!
Really emphasizing ‘fertility’
Matt and EDP can get along quite well
Matt Walsh has the same vibe as those adults who would volunteer to help with the youth group, and end up developing a legitimate rivalry with some 15-year-old smart-ass.
Basically the interaction of Miguel O hara and Miles Morales 💀
@@Friendomationshell, even Miles and Miguel would have a healthier rivalry then whoever Matt Walsh has beef with for the week
Fr
YUUUUUUP. WELL PUT
And also grooming and preying on a 15yo girl.
Matt walsh is the kinda dude to call everyone "soy" while looking like a composite photo of every 2010s soy latte drinking, blog writing hipster on the planet.
Lol seriously he looks like a soyjak meme with the open mouth.
15 years ago ppl on Fox News would have called him “metrosexual”
IKR, he’s a literal facist but he looks like such a lib
Wow, amazing point there
Insulting one's looks is a low blow, but I need to point out that pictures of 'younger'/short bearded Matt, make him look like IRL chudjak
if you wanna break a pro-death penalty person's brain, just tell them that they must really trust the government a lot
some people deserve it
👏🏽
Retarded comment; the government is not a monolith. Right-wingers have a tendency to trust unanimous jury decisions to convict a little more than unaccountable, faceless bureaucrats.
@@jackjames7283you must really trust the government to discern that :)
@stick6969 not really. I'm just saying some people disver it
The failed artist to fascist pipeline has a LONG history.
Fun fact: much like a certain contemporary who’s known to have never satisfied his wife, Goebbels was a failed movie screenwriter.
If you consider magicians artists. 😂
@@warlordofbritannia Adam Schiff
@@warlordofbritannia All that morphine probably gave him ED.
@@icemachine79 That was Goering actually. Understandable mistake though because the Nazi high command all kind of blends together into a big deranged freak show lol.
a reminder that matt walsh defended a child predator josh duggar not that long ago. every accusation is a confession
And Matt Walsh describes HIMSELF as a theocratic fascist. He's disgusting.
Not just Duggar. He ran cover for pretty much every pedophile priest in the Catholic Church.
Death penalty for Josh Duggar then? No appeals, quick and public the way Walsh would want it.
@@DahVoozel I don't think you understood or maybe you are being obtuse on purpose. matt walsh can't say shit because he defends child predators so this "what he would want" nonsense goes out the window because he doesn't actually care about kids and contributes to their harm by defending josh duggar. he doesn't want to give them the death penalty if they are actual predators who are overwhelmingly straight cis men. They just want to accuse any random innocent lgbt person or supportive place they don't like. Like threatening to bomb children's hospitals because nothing says save the kids like child massacres, not that the right isn't okay with that.
he just wants to kill random innocent lgbt people and accuse them of being pdfiles while he gives real pedophiles a pass if they share the same identity. So forget what matt has to say because he's a hypocrite maybe we should give matt the death penalty and josh duggar since you and him are unironically proposing it then we would be taking care of the real groomers. Then the rest of us sane anti fascist people who don't believe in Abrahamic gods can move on
Wow, you guys are the absolute worst. You presented nothing against his message. Weak af.
walsch is the kind of guy to say "science says there are only two genders" and then say that evolution is fake
In other words, only caring about science when it seemingly conforms to his beliefs.
@@eliesh3833 yep. i wouldn't be surprised if I see a headline about Matt Walsh making an anti-evolution documentary. really seems like something he'd do, considering how crazy he already is.
@@eliesh3833not caring about science but using a madd up fantasy of it when it's convenient
"i can't provide an argument, i call other person names, i win."
So if you gave a brick a couple of million years, it will eventually develop a CONSCIOUSNESS? It also has some problematic implications similar to the political philosophy of Machiavelli and Hobbes. If humans are just very smart animals, then it isn't immoral for the powerful to do what they want. Also, the whole gender debate has to do with procreation. Sure, there are many different gender expressions, but only men and women can procreate. The phenomenon of transgenderism could not exist anywhere at anytime until the Industrial Revolution except amongst some aristocrats. Even then, it was crossdressing, not full-on genital surgery.
his beard always looks glued on
Its his moms bush trimmings
@@soioioioioioio34good lord! Good heavens! Heavens to Bettsy! WE DONT DO THAT! Ugh, why is he savouring his mother's pubic hair in the corners of his lips every time he sucks into a succulent lasagna, why?? How do you know this, are you clairvoyant? Lol bye tee hee hee 🤭🤗🫣🥰✂️
@soioioioioioio34 I don’t normally lol at YT comments but this one got me 😆
I wouldn't be surprised if he dyes it. He strikes me as an individual that's self conscious about that kind of petty shit.
He looks like a squirrel died on his face and he never bothered to clean it up
Matt "15 year olds are peak fertility" Walsh is very concerning when he approaches children
Any guy who say women being more the younger they are more fertile is a red flag that a clear sign something wrong with them
Didn't he say "17 to 24" at 16:00
@@metawarp7446 he did in that clip. He's also went on about how 16 year olds are adults and teenagers in general have been considered adults for most of human history so you can read between the lines there. I'm not saying Matt Walsh is for sure a pedophile but he sure does spend a lot of time spouting pedophile talking points.
I genuinely expect him to be arrested for molesting his daughter at some point in the next 12 years.
@@TerrenceNowickijfc you didn’t have to say it that blunt
matt walsh trying and failing to talk about 'logic' and come off as 'manly' is the peak tier cringe that I feast on
Dude, if you are a true neutralist you would find walsh to be a small fish. TYT, Crowder, Kimmel, Jones are just a few off the top of my head that are literally leagues above him in cringe.
I guess I am calling you a young tribalist.
@Seldomheardabout nahh, they seem intentionally over the top for me. Matt seems to actually think he comes off as clever and manly which is what makes him cringe for me. But hey, plenty of cringe to go around my guy
@@trevorwiley5098 A fair assertion. Well played.
@@Seldomheardabout
Slow day? Nothing better to do?
@@markwilliams2620 Just got back from camping and saw this video. You are also here buddy. Awesome addition to the conversation btw. I'm sure people love you in rl.
I love how Matt “pedophile nazi” Walsh fanboys in the comment section provide no counter arguments while simultaneously says things like “Jealous much?” or “W Transphobia”…
Trans people don't even exist, wdym?
Where?
@@jojogodtier Just sort the comments by "newest". There should be plenty.
He deletes, the actual arguments
@@Evil_Jyanok, so what’s your argument then? If he deletes the good ones
"We should listen to the science. But we don't need to talk about the science, we know what it says". Brilliant. Walsh clearly showing how "listening to the science" just means "what I believe/want the science to say" and not actually engaging with scientific literature in any way
Men can't be woman and woman can't be men. Science is science
@@Kainewall “thE SCieNce” you scream, doing the same thing as Walsh, not even debunking anything
@@thegoldavenger.3829 how do you debunk stupidity? with facts. simple.
@@Kainewall Where? Where are the facts? I see no linked scientific articles debunking transgenderism, in either your comment or Matt’s video. You can’t just claim “science” and automatically win, you need evidence to back it up, that’s literally how science works!
@@thegoldavenger.3829 I guess basic biology and chromosomes. women have XX and men have XY. you cant change your gender because gender is down to the genetic level . Just cause you pretend you're a woman doesn't mean you are one. Can you show proof backing up transgerderism?
(without the emotional blackmail)
Excellent video as always Jose, and thank you for the shout-out
Thanks for adding your voice and for all the great work you do!
Thank you for educating people about trans issues even though you'd rather just talk about Star Trek.
Hey, big fan of both here. Keep the great job. By the way, Jessie don't let anyone tell You that there's a lot of Star Trek content, there's not such thing as "too much" Star Trek content.
What is a woman?
@@JoseBird What is a woman?
Matt Walsh is the kind of guy that slows down a little too much at a school zone
Your side literally calls everyone you disagree with a pedo. You might be the baddies.
@@Seldomheardabout dude. You just described conservatives crying groomer at everyone
@@willywonka7812 Groomer and pedo are very different terms. But your side thinks words are violence, so I guess you might disagree with that assertion as well.
@@Seldomheardabout Your side courts nazis.
@Seldomheardabout But your side has so many charges of pedo come out. This is MAP Walsh we are talking about
Matt Walsh thinking 16 year olds are basically adults says a lot about him. Namely, he hasn't gotten any more mature since he was 16.
Not funny
@@Evil_Jyanlol. It is and it’s true. Lol.
I mean, it's true. @@Evil_Jyan
@@Alejandro-eq7xq gay
@@Evil_Jyan Yes and?
He has no charisma. No interesting ideas.
And now he's selling creepy plushies of himself in a diaper.
He's suppressing some intense stuff about himself.
Selling plushies of himself in a diaper is bordering on Nickelodeon levels of barely disguised fetish.
Has anyone ever asked his followers what his personality is? Because I sure as hell don't know.
You have no charisma or interesting ideas if you think males have any place in women's sacred spaces.
@@SleeperInTravel lol. Kid trans women are women not men. Lol. When will you accept this fact? The only reason you don’t agree with it is because republicans brainwashed you. lol.
Really the worst thing about walsh is that he has no reason to be as popular as he is. He has no talent. He looks like an average karen that you would see at the movie theatre.
He has nothing of interest to add to any big debates or controversies. On Joe Rogan, about half way through the podcast, walsh filibusters and repeats talking points that joe already disproved about gay marriage. Also just like crowder (who has now been exposed) something about walsh makes me extremely suspicious, like something isnt right.
Walsh writing that progressives are obsessed with worshipping the self even tho "I hate it because its not like me" is the whole reason of existence for conservative philosophy
Thats because they project/identife themself withe "god", creating a worldview where they and everyone like them is always selfles and good and everybody else is selfish and evil.
this dude is a complete narcissist i'd be shocked if he doesn't force his wife to make s@cr1fices him every day.
Conservative imagination indeed
No, the basis is “I don’t have to go by your social construct, you fascist pig
@@Mulletdog1 gender is a social construct. It only exists because you say it does
Walsh is proof that Shapiro and the Daily Wire have incredible marketing teams and influence because without them this man wouldn’t be known by anyone. Deeply boring, uncharismatic, inherently miserable. He would be a no name on UA-cam if he wasn’t one of Ben’s personal pet projects.
The daily wire doesn't need marketing. It's like Prager U. The people who watch that type of bilge are the people who already have their minds made up and want their beliefs reinforced. They could put ANYONE on who's willing to speak ill of non white people, trans people, the LGBT community in general, and democrats. As long as you're willing to unabashedly do that the audience will tune in.
All right wing propaganda is astroturfed by fossil fuel billionaires.
Money from grifting old people will get you that
All subjective. I do though enjoy how eager he is for truth and understanding of Americas Trans Mental health issue.
There's billionaires who stand to benefit from right wing economic policies funding this stuff because culture war nonsense is supposed to win them elections
matt walsh is the type of guy to talk about fertile 16 year olds and defend a pedophile while calling everyone else a groomer
Disinformation
I don't like Matt Walsh, but you don't think you know him. I am not a fan of influencers to be fair.
For fascists every accusation is just an admission of guilt.
@@nizzie16 Can you define what a fascist is in your own words?
Should he discuss INFERTILE 16yos??
Is it okay for YOU to talk aboyt ANY 16yo?
If so, why?
Calling his arguments childish are an insult to children. My nephews spend more time thinking about subjects than he does. They are very young children.
Exactly, my 11 year old cousin has more common sense than this dude
I'm always reminded of how Lindsay Ellis commented that while Gaston isn't a three-dimensional character in the 1991 adaptation of Beauty and the Beast, that doesn't mean his story has nothing to learn from. Sometimes society simply loves to reward bullies and is easily swayed by people launching panic campaigns.
Sometimes we see connections even when there are none.
Then Disney responded to bad faith criticism by giving Gaston PTSD
The beast was a privileged elite kidnapper. So…
@@Seldomheardabout do you sub just to complain in comments
@@ThaFashionAssassin I believe that means it’s a case of everyone sucks here
He doesn’t just ignore research that contradicts his claims, sometimes he baselessly calls that research fake
People like him and “scientific” racists love to spam links to research papers that are either irrelevant or contradict what they say because they either don’t read them or don’t have the background knowledge to actually comprehend them.
@@davidbowman2001 Oh yeah, I’ve definitely seen him disregard studies with comments that show he never even bothered to read the abstract. Absolute clown man
Dude couldn't read a study even if he wanted to. He has a high school diploma but poses as an expert its wild what he gets off. He's uneducated on the topics he tries to discuss on top of operating in bad faith bad combo
@@davidbowman2001 You don't even need to research with these people, they will give you the research that proves them wrong. Their scientific illiteracy is terrifying.
Haven't seen a single example of this, can you provide one?
imagine hearing somebody literally talk about demons in politcs and then taking them seriously.
You guys are the dem
As a Catholic myself, he will have egg on his face when he finally reads what we are supposed to think about the death penalty.
Exactly! Christian teachings teach about rehab and REPENT! Death penalty snatches a person's right to repent, and also disturbs God's plans for the person! A civilized and functioning society punishes people in order for them to turn around. I mean, look at Norway's example on crime! Life imprisonment without parole is also cruel. Make it 5-10 years for a felony or for multiple charges altogether and let's turn on a new page. Aand prisons must be reformed in order for rehab to be effectively applied!
@@Urmapleleaf it's hard for none Christians to believe that. My father is a Nazi like an actual Nazis and he goes on and on about how God loves the death penalty because it dose how often does it solve basic problems with indiscriminate killing.
I hope you escape that cult.
@@Fuzzypotato2you must be fun at parties
@@beegsquare4123you must be the sarcastic asshole at a party that nobody invited
The part about girls marrying in their teens before 1950 is not true either. The age in which people married actually has varied over time. In the 1920s most people got married in their late 20s, similar to now.
yeah and even when teens got married back in the 50s it was typically to age appropiate people not creepy 30 soimething men.
Matt Walsh was born in 1986, long after both the 20s and 50s. Why does he see that as superior
It’s basically the argument creepy people use for the age of consent lol. Like yeah in some countries 14 year olds can do it, but is with other people around that age
My grandmother, born in the 20’s, married at 24, her husband was 26. When they left the church, an old lady went, “Ah, they’re marrying children now!”
This because they both looked much younger but it shows that people back then did not always go find the idea of teens marrying to be fine.
@@StarWarsAddict527
He was born in '86, but that most likely meant his parents were kids/ teens during the Civil Rights era and we all know the resentment racist white folks felt about that movement.
imagine being a grown man that has discussed the fertility of young teenagers shouting about gay people being groomers. tragic
Is anyone shocked if Matt is either gay or has a ton of underage porn on his labtop
That's literally everyone that's shouting about trans people being groomers.
And let's get it right, it's trans people that Walsh attacks the most, don't leave us out of the statement in favour of gay people when we're the ones under the heaviest fire.
And be wrong about it too 💀
“About the fertility of young” ask Lauren for his source and then breath a sign of relief when you realize they agree calling the lgbt pedos is cool
@@wacawaka1802 huh? he has said that on several podcasts. he thinks sixteen is peak "fertility" age
Matt is extraordinarily lazy. He literally has his own TV show and cannot be bothered to learn about the subjects of the day he's supposed to know so much about, that he can debunk them instantly. But instead he just reads the headlines, forms a basic, snarky argument against them, and moves on. I cannot fathom this level of sheer laziness.
He does go into detail, yall just like ignoring points, and discrediting basic facts with your emotions
@@Skullwithnobrainlol. No kid he doesn’t. Lol. He’s an extremely obvious con artist who only tells lies. lol.
@@DarrenSnider con artist?
@@Skullwithnobrain lol. Yes kid Walsh is a con artist. In fact he’s so obviously a con artist that you’re a drooling moron if you cant see it. Lol
@@DarrenSnider
lol
I remember how Walsh responded to the UA-camr Sam Collins criticizing his book because Walsh was deliberately misleading on how transition for kids work. In the book, The "scary" Doctor has a big saw and Sam rightly pointed that Kids don't receive Gender Affirming surgery and Matt tried to respond "Well, yeah, but they are using harmful drugs to transition!" . So he knows how transition works for kids, but decides to use the saw in the book so that he can scare kids to be anti trans.
Jazz Jennings
A trans person will never be a REAL woman. Even feminists at least agree on that 🤣 like how dumb do you have to be to believe you can magically just call yourself a woman while having a penis…like what the actual fu.k 🤮
All good and rational people should be anti-trans
@@donkeyparadise9276 They were 19 when they got the surgery lma
Let’s be honest, he never truly intended that book to be for kids
Hate sells. Especially when hate is a distraction.
Talking about the guy who was shot for suspected shoplifting. Here in the UK, I have seen 2 60+ year old ladies wrestle someone out of a store for shoplifting (full on thrown to the ground). That heathy, young, male guard did not need a gun to stop shoplifters.
It amazes me that people think Hitler was equivalent to American liberals or true leftists i.e. communists and socialists. Hitler was a right wing extremist who despised left leaning and communist Germans. Facts don’t care about your feelings or opinions, Daily Wire. Maybe make sure your info is accurate :)
No, the reason is because the left is the one trying to take guns away, anti-free speech (hate speech), use violence to silence the opposition through antifa whether it be canceling or physical, and are racist towards white people.
@@asamisaito
Anti free speech such as facing consequences for you screaming the n-word ?
Antifa ? Can we get stats on that first?
Racism toward white people ? How ? By pointing out how systemic racism affects minorities ?
@@asamisaitolol. Kid the left is pro free speech. lol. It’s the right that is against it. Lol. Seriously kid only drooling morons say the left is anti free speech. lol.
The most embar rassing thing was finding out that he is not playing a character imagine that being who you are.
Don't be fooled. He's definitely playing a character. He's just good at not revealing his true self to the public. From my personal observation a supposedly heterosexual man who goes that far out of their way to attack a specific group such as trans people usually has a .repressed attraction to what they are claiming to take issues with. I'd be willing to bet my bottom dollar there's A big ole stash of TG porn stored on a hard drive somewhere hidden away in Matt's abode. 😎💯
Being who I am, I imagined that.
My apologies. I understood your sentence just fine, but had to add the comma because I can't help myself.
imagine teaching people not to accept themselves, and to under go medical procedures that will cause them a life time of grief.
@@danielm6871 Uh, exactly? We should be teaching people to accept themselves and undergo treatment that relieves their symptoms and results in better quality of life?
@@danielm6871 Are you one of those _"8 year olds are getting top surgery!"_ nutters?
I find Mathew interesting in the fact that he has so much unearned confidence, he is probably the most arrogant human being I have ever seen, which is made so much worse when he knows absolutely nothing on the topics he talks about.
The Dunning-Kruger effect is a real bastard, isn't it?
Hoo boy let me tell you about Dr. Jordan Bernt Peterson lol
@The Dude A man of such intellectual prowess he thought milking fetish porn was a nefarious CCP plot to steal men's sperm lol
@@gaiusjuliuspleaser Don't remind me lmao
@@Vanq22114 yeah wait for the pedocon effect. every accusation is a confession with people like matt walsh after he defended a child predator josh duggar not long ago
90 seconds in and I immediately understand why he grew a beard. It still doesn't make him look less like a pedophile, mind you.
All men should grow beards, and there was no evidence presented for Matt being a pedophile.
There are many pedos in the LGBTQ plus community
Right? He looked terrible without it
@@toothlesstoe You are defending a proven child groomer. Stay away from children.
Dude has got one of the weakest chins I've ever seen in my life.
Matt talking about pedos in jail, menahwile Matt also talks about lowering consent ages.
Sauce?
@@Evil_Jyansource**
@@calebmanuel17 i can't say that word
@@Evil_Jyan ok
Because if they lower age of consent, Matt won’t be a pedophile anymore
What I appreciate most about this is that you made a noble sacrifice by exposing yourself to matt walsh content for us. I'll never forget your selflessness.
What is a woman?
@@donkeyparadise9276a social construct
@@donkeyparadise9276I keep seeing your troll-ass replies, get a life mate
@@donkeyparadise9276What is a man ?
@@donkeyparadise9276women are those people who run away screaming in horror whenever you show up somewhere.
The most surprising part of this whole video is Matt Walsh talking shit about people who let their dogs sleep in bed with them. It must get lonely being that full of hatred and disdain
Never mind that - what about those people who don't put their cats out at night - mental or what?!!!
@Mark Daly people who keep their cats inside at night are very smart. Outdoor cats have a significantly shorter average lifespan than indoor cats and are subject to a bunch of potential health issues that indoor cats are unlikely to experience. Hard to get run over by a car when you're inside a house 🤷♀️
@@molliemicrobeI think a cat being able to express its true nature is important. I really hate animals being cooped up. I would ban zoos, and definitely caged birds. It hurts my soul to see the spirit of an animal being suffocated. I don't think your assertions sway me very much, I'm afraid.
@@samsmoot1 Cats aren't a wild animal, they're pretty domesticated and highly invasive. It's not just a question of the animal's safety, but of the entire ecosystem. I recommend you do a quick Google search and investigate how they've destroyed native ecosystems in Australia, that's a great case study of what they do pretty much everywhere. If you provide cats with a stimulating environment inside they can fully express their "true nature" without destroying actual nature. when the fix for their ecological damage also improves their wellbeing it seems like a no-brainer.
I definitely agree with what you say about zoos, but zoos mostly contain wild animals and are not comparable to domesticated pets being kept in loving houses.
I know very little about birds but from what I understand, if their wings are not clipped and they're allowed to fly in the house during most of the day it's not really any different from putting a dog in a crate, which behavioral experts largely agree is completely fine and actually keeps them safe at night (probably even more of a factor with birds since they can access a lot more potential hazards than a dog) so unless you're completely against pets I don't see how getting rid of bird cages is possible.
Yeah my dogs sleep
With my two boys and I wouldn’t have it any other way, Matt Walsh probably sucks as a dog owner also because his dogs refuse to chase cars down to kill them
Granted, I was already a dyed-in-the-wool progressive, but Walsh’s rhetoric and the right’s obsession with people’s genitals has only made me more understanding and supportive of trans issues.
The left's obsession with children's genitals not an issue for you then? Porn in schools- you like, yes? And men in elaborate frocks twerking at 5-year olds your thing, is it? The right dislikes these things, the left adores them. It's mostly this kiddy grooming we don't like.
if only your beliefs were close enough to reality to be worth disagreeing with
The right doesn't care about people's genitals. They care about radical (unproven and totally inappropriate for children) gender theory being taught to children, and the social contagion that it's created that has led to a massive increase in medical interventions that have insidious long term effects.
@@714acedeck You're going to die alone and this is what you'll have to look back on as you slip into the infinite void. That you totally gottem in the youtube comments by going "nuh uh you're crazy."
@@714acedeckoh man I’ll have to steal that to use on someone that actually earned it
So Matt Walsh thinks 16 year old girls are old enough to get married and have kids but 16 year old trans kids are too young to take puberty blockers? Yet getting married and having kids at 16 will definitely change your body and life while (most) effects of puberty blockers are reversible.
Puberty blockers aren't reversible, and they aren't natural like marriage is.
Exactly. It's incoherent. He wants women to be trapped in marriages before they're old enough to know better (he's also against no-fault divorce) and he's personally offended by gender-non-conformity. It's all about control.
@supercrazylegs1 It's not really being trapped since both parties should know what the purpose of marriage is, and what they're getting into and why. Since the purpose of marriage is to facilitate a stable family structure, it makes sense that no-fault divorce ought to be illegal, since destroying your family will never be beneficial to society, especially to the ones directly affected by your selfishness.
Also, "gender-nonconformity" is a nonsensical concept, since presenting yourself as if you were the opposite sex doesn't change anything about what you are.
@@toothlesstoe Stay away from high schools and middle schools.
@supercrazylegs1 That's not really an argument for anything nor does it have anything to do with what I just said.
Try again?
*Matt Walsh calling for the death penalty for child sex criminals*
Damn, poor guy’s got a lot of self-hatred
I mean I guess we should oblige him right?
Was this before or after he made excuses for the Duggars?
So you are pro child sex offender?
I mean I do think he has a bit of point there its just that the death penalty getting even one innocent person is worse to me than paying tax dollars to keep said people alive
@@S.D.323unfortunate problem. If the penalty is always death, what reason would the criminals have to keep the kids alive?
Personally, I find Walsh’s recent rise in popularity to be rather disturbing particularly due to how joyless his style is. His stuff doesn’t have Shapiro’s smugness, or Crowder’s supposed “humor”, or Peterson’s labyrinth of words. He is terrible at making his contents entertaining in any way other than a dry indignation for being wrong. The fact that he became popular is a sign that their audience no longer need any sugarcoat, and are consuming contents purely out of anger at this point.
True. I think Walsh is the "Enough is enough"- Guy. It shows that right wing audiences can't even have a laugh anymore. They have fully developed into a joyless, hateful, angry mob
matt walsh is like the unfunniest conservative commentator. even as someone who doesn’t like the other ones, they still manage to be unintentionally funny. matt walsh is just a pure demon
So maybe you should stop making so many people (who just a few years ago would've had their views described as normal and self evident), angry. No? If Walsh is so scary and a threat, then actively pushing regular people into his arms because he's telling them things they already believe and want to hear, can't be a good idea right?
@@frankdayton731 If you make people angry just by existing, they wheren't so normal to begin with.
@@frankdayton731 er, what?
if Walsh's followers already believe what he says, how are they being pushed into his arms by anyone?
what are you advocating for, exactly? that we shouldn't hurt the feelings of bigots? that's not really an option, since "people existing" is enough to set them off
This is the same man who said African Americans should be glad his people brought us to America while also disregarding the fact that my people were brought to America as slaves. 🤦♂
I had to laugh when I realized my dog was sleeping at my feet, on my bed while being called a savage for it by Matt Walsh. I've never been happier to be called a savage
If my dog sleeping in my bed makes me a savage, I don't want to be civilized.
If Matt Walsh hates you I see that as a win.
Having a dog to sleep with in winter is one of the great joys in life. But Mat is probably one of those people who will tell his kids their dead dog is not in heaven because the Bible teaches that animals don't have souls.
Matt Walsh sleeps with dogs, just not like how most people do
My dog would, without question, try to bite Matt Walsh if we ever crossed paths. Therefore, my dog deserves his place on my bed.
To be fair, most shock jocks are talentless. They just can’t grow a beard like Matt can.
Ben Shapiro has tried so many times 😭
So can the people of Duck Dynasty. Big freaking deal. Are they expecting an award for "being a 'real man'"?
Matt is the Dollar Store Mike Figueredo.
@@VicGeorge2K6 they are a bunch of rich frauds who found a gullible audience that just have to hear them say how much they love Jesus
a sh1tty beard that barely covers his kitten chin.
Walsh isnt a podcaster or even a talk radio host, hes a monologist. Walsh doesnt talk TO anyone, he talks AT his audience bec he doesnt stand up to the slightest resistance. He hilariously fell flat on his face on Rogan's show like 6 months ago when Joe challenged Walsh's false assertions about the rates of transitions
"Some important context here is that Shapiro is Jewish and Matt Walsh's boss" hit me like a fucking truck omg
matt walsh gives me dark vibes idk. like there’s something deeply wrong with him, and not just the obvious stuff like transphobia and other bigotry. there’s something about his soul that’s rotten.
that's most conservatives
If I had never heard of Walsh, I'd doubt the existence of ontological evil. As it stands, I'm not so sure. His cruelty is truly inhuman.
That would be because as a human being he is 1,000% irredeemable.
He's consumed by self hatred over his lack of traditional masculinity. Hence the lumberjack costume
@@ms.aelanwyr.ilaicos For me, the ur example is Michael Knowles. Psychopathic individual, absolutely dead behind those eyes. Hope his neighbours keep a close eye on their pets.
You'll notice in mathews so called documentary when Mathew talks to people he agrees with, he listens, he reinforces their ideas, doesn't challenge them, expands on what they said and even adds visual aids to support their point. When it's someone he doesn't agree with, he edits their answers, even skipping through it because he deems it too long, argues with them, puts up graphics afterwards trying to refute their point. There was no earnest look at what people actually think, it was just an excerise in reinforcing his preconceived beliefs
It’s almost like the whole “documentary” was made in bad faith since he already had his mind made up about who is a woman and just wanted to make anti trans propaganda to cash in on bigots with disposable income.
The only documentary he made was what is a woman.
Do you by the way have an answer that is logically consistent?
That doesn't for example use the word to explain itself and that you could actually place as a definition in a law to for example identify when someone commits sexism or which prison a person accused of assault should go to etc?
If you ever watch any human being having a convo- they all do this. But when its people you hate (like Walsh), you tend to see it more.
I am basically saying you are either 16, or failed high school.
To be fair, some people are excellent conversationalists and do not do this. But they are quite exceptional.
@@sparkzbarcaa woman is someone who crosses the street when they see you walking towards them
@@sparkzbarca the author of the book "The exhaustion of women" has a great definition. Just read the book :)
I'd call Matt Walsh a douche but those actually do good things for women.
Matt Walsh helps women a lot
Like how? How does Matt Walsh help women?
@@wacawaka1802 💯
@@adamstiles1154 by knowing they are NOT dangerous mentally ill men who pretend to be women....
@@adamstiles1154 they aren’t being pushed with a social construct
You know. I find interesting to show that the reason why anti-trans legistration pass so easily on red states isn't because people there care so much about trans issues, but because they don't care enought to oppose it. I was unaware of this fact, but it really makes sense now that you shown me. Apathy and indiferent really is what aloud the worst of humanity to happen.
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good people to do nothing.
There's also the "sick of this 'woke stuff'" burnout expressed by many alleged "centrist" and even "liberal" folks who ig don't have any friends who are LGBTQ+ &/or bipoc or just... can somehow not see the seriousness of these issues. And I think it's by design, by the regressives. Obscure, overwhelm, & o...[3rd thing; idk, I'm tired].
When actions/ policies doesn't directly involve "you" it's much easier to filter it out as "background noise." And it holds especially true when there's a lot of people too busy trying to survive to afford the time to contemplate anything beyond themselves.
Matthew over here is the absolute MASTER of presenting genuinely disturbing, horrific rhetoric as "common sense facts" that apparently can't be argued with
probably because he sounds so boring. He's like that incredibly dull geography teacher you had at school. The one who never seemed to socialise with the other teachers cos he was also a creep and unpleasant.
“Common sense” is often used by people who appeal to intuition when they don’t have data on their side. It’s anti intellectualism. Appeal to “muh gut.” It’s creationist logic. “Were you there?”
It takes a lot of hubris to believe the universe is limited by your puny imagination.
You remember how every left wing organization lied about every facet of covid? Or do you just hate people on one side? Asking for a friend.
His views on America's Trans Mental Health issues are interesting.
I sure do love the party of "common sense." I don't have to explain myself because the people around me think the same thing. :)
I think that's the best way to discribe him a below Mediocre individual that somehow failed upwards and now we have to talk about this insecure unintelligent man child.
Are we talking about Matt still or Elon ?😂
@@divineintervention212 Sad that this applies to so many people in the public eye.
Your kind spawned such scenarios where mediocrity could ask one question and destroy a whole movement.
But then you cry and become dogmatists like him.
Your ilk will be known as the final straw that broke our backs. History will not be kind.
@@divineintervention212 Elon didn't fail upwards at least. He was just rich and lucky, but mostly rich, no matter how much he tries to deny that helped him.
There’s an awesome book that examines this phenomenon more deeply, Mediocre: The Dangerous Legacy of White Male America by Ijeoma Oluo, I definitely recommend it. I listened to the audio version, narrated by the author, really fabulous.
The color analogy for sex as a spectrum is excellent and I will be saving it for reference, thank you.
I got chills with your last line at the end. Its less about fighting a certain man and mire about fighting a certain moment.
I was in traditionalist Catholic circles in 2010-2013, and even the some of the most devout folks in those communities thought of Matt Walsh as a cruel, hard right asshole. I was shocked when someone who I knew was as reviled as him gained so much prominence.
You should go back to church. You’ll find no solace here
Wait, the same MAP walsh who "saves" children by subjecting them to terror threats when they're just trying to recover from illness was well known as an intolerable piece of shit before getting famous? And the only people who could even stomach such a nauseating maggot are the political party of racism, misogyny, intolerance, and sheer cruelty? You liberals will expect us to believe anything!
I was too, and I used to follow him. I was mostly there for his more religious pieces where he was calling for more reverence from Christians. The red flags never looked red until the 2016 election. Definitely should have seen it coming, but I was very ignorant then.
@@starguardlux2874He said something fairly interesting during his last show... he claimed that only Leftists (specifically LGBTQI people) see themselves as self-made gods who worship themselves, and the difference between them and religious people is that religious people would never worship a human being as a god.
I found this amusing. I mean, Jesus? Buddha, even? He'd probably say the first one at least doesn't count because it's his religion and well, Jesus actually *was* God, despite being a person. To which one should reply, "Isn't that worshiping a human as a god?"
To be honest, I'm a Matt Walsh fan too but he makes some stupid comments sometimes and has some pretty bad takes.
@@bink if you're a Matt Walsh fan your opinion can be immediately discarded hombre
Matt Also said he liked colonization but forgets he's Irish decent who were colonized and enslaved, oppressed, murdered by famine and invasions. Something tells me if was alive back then he'd be a west Brit.
I think it's really sad when someone who seemed like a bright, caring young-person changes gears so abruptly that they become a hateful, childish bigot and that new horrible persona overshadows the kind, thoughtful person they once were. It's like their old self that was full of potential good was snuffed out.
So it's always refreshing to find out people like Matt Walsh were always scum.
Politics brings the worse out of people
😂 🥂 well done, well done!
Being angry for a living must make for a pretty sad life. Hope the money he makes is worth it.
The only things that such people do with that amount of money is they either squander it away or they move it around for tax evasion purposes or to avoid paying compensation in a lawsuit.
Walsh is the kind of guy who talk about defending his home with a gun but shits his pants in plane turbulence
Okay and?
That's a bad analogy
So he really needs a gun then right?
@@seakermac5800because he’s weak without one.
@mr.x2567 some people theorize that type of behavior is pretty much like a metaphor for carrying an additional big penis
I was chatting with some Walsh stan the other day and asked them to define 'female' while showing their work and accounting for edge cases. They responded that Walsh had already dealt with that, so I went digging to find whatever pearls of wisdom Walsh might be dropping. There's a clip of him engaging with a trans woman EMT who steps up to the mic at one of his Q&As. The entire conversation can be summed up by two sentences: "Biological researchers would disagree with you [that sex is binary." "Then they're full of shit." The audience cheered and clapped. This, apparently, is what passes for insightful argument on the right -- a simple assertion backed by no evidence while refusing to engage with the other side's points. It fills me with both rage and despair.
Walshrus the sealion and his army of trained seals
I had a conversation with a Walsh Stan who acknowledged that his belief in demons being real was silly but acted like we should still take him seriously over actual scientists.
If you don’t know the difference between a man and a woman you know nothing about anything
He's cartoonishly evil, why is it legal for these people to have any relevance
@@tekkokagi6009 you’re asking why it’s legal to speak freely about your opinion in on societal and political issues but don’t ask why it’s legal to castrate and mutilate kids? Independents will not be voting for dems after this shift and I’m so happy you all played yourselves
It's only a matter of time before Matt ends up on the wrong end of a billion dollar lawsuit just like Alex Jones.
I hope so
oh to see that glorious day
Insha'Allah
Seems likely at this rate.
or in jail for well we know his views on 15 year old kids.
Walsh is a strange beast. I can't say he isn't talented at all because he gained an audience, and I think his talent is putting on a very good act as the "every man's man". He is relateable. His dry humor, deadpan personality, and no bullshit delivery are oddly effective tactics. He doesn't pull punches and doesn't back down and people respect him for it. I can say I have watched him talk on some topics and I laugh at him complain about tipping and shopping carts and mundane topics and cringey TikTok videos. With that said, the guy is the most "boomer", antiquated, backwards 30-something I have ever seen! His takes on being an adult, marriage, homosexuality, the role of women, the role of men, science, climate change, politics, COVID, and intellectuals is straight out of the 1950's. His views range from silly and outdated to highly dangerous. He is part of the "anti-expert" crowd on the right who pretends like his high school degree is on even par with experts on so many topics. He speaks confidently as an authority on topics he doesn't know much about. He is one of the religious buffoons who hasn't done much thinking about why he believes it. That also said, I don't think he should be underestimated. He knows how to troll people and make the opposition look foolish to his followers by cleverly editing videos and chopping up footage. He knows how to play the left's cringe content and the "check every box" diversity pandering that media is doing now. The Bud Light situation should never have happened, as it exposed the trans movement to tons of mockery. His type of strategy is being used by almost everyone on Daily Wire now and it's not getting less popular.
Great analysis
I've watched Matt since his early days. He lays out a very strong defense of his faith and views in his earliest videos and after awhile I think assumes everyone watching just knows and understands the way he operates.
As to your point about the "anti-expert" crowd, I dont understand how you dont see his point. Everything, I mean ALMOST EVERYTHING that the right was saying about Covid in the beginning that the so-called "experts" were denying, censoring, and silencing (masks didn't stop the virus, the virus came from a lab in china, the lockdowns did more harm than good) has proven to be true now. The mainstream media has as good as admitted it but they don't care to admit it now because they have abandoned that fight and have now put all their firepower behind the alphabet cult in the gender wars.
So can you explain how scientists are correct when they say men can be women? LMFAO
@@toothlesstoeyou know what scientists are right about men becoming. Freddy fazbear. There was this guy, this purple guy and he worked at a pizzeria, but the animatronics there were scary rawr and and then he put kids in the suits and they came alive and then they bit people and then markiplier
Idk I think he has a presence on camera, and the fact that people don't question the table of things he talks about is really weird to me tho. But I believe that station has worked really hard to hit this like "hip vibe". Finding a really nice combination of warm and anti social vibes. The money these guys rake in is on another level. Even matt walshs movie seemed incredible in terms of production value and such-- for what it was.
Your use of cell shading after the color spectrum comment was lovely, a simple and powerful way of showing how important details are obscured when we remove the nuance from a discussion.
All you need to know about him is he spent years struggling to find an audience and finally succeeded when he started doing anti trans stuff so he leaned hard into that. Thats why he does it and will continue to do it. Bigotry gets him money.
What is a woman?
@@oxa5349A female human being.
woah! the two goobers above me seem to be in a bit of a circlejerk! i guess the right has finally gotten a little less homophobic after all
@@oxa5349 The gender of the people that will never touch your pp.
@@oxa5349 u fell for the grift congrats
Maybe it's just me but when I hear Matt say that 16 year old girls should be getting pregnant and raising a family, I get a weirded out.
Statistically speaking, a large percentage of teen mothers are impregnated by adult men. Also, most 16 year old boys can't work full time, can't sign a lease, and can't maintain a household. The undertones of his statement are worrying.
Yeah, thats the plan. Change the meaning of the word grooming so that they can groom children all they want without getting exposed
Thesis 1) Women (really girls) should marry young so they can make with the childbearing and childrearing while the getting is (supposedly) good.
Thesis 2) Children should be raised in 'stable', one-income households where the man is at work all day earning money and the woman is maintaining the home in his (temporary) absence and raising said kids.
Unspoken Thesis 3) Rich men in their adulthood to middle age (because apparently men don't suffer any degeneration in their capacity to sire children as they age, despite what current reproductive science says) should have their 'pick of the litter' when it comes to these women (or girls).
I firmly believe that Matt Walsh believes that rich (white) men should be able to pick whatever young woman (or girl) they want, and because these young women (or girls) would have no capacity to fend for themselves (because of compromised upbringing and lack of independent financial resources), they just have to 'grin and bear it'.
Ooh I really hate the teenagers are “peak” fertility argument.
All people like this mean is that younger eggs are better and deteriorate over time. Therefore teen eggs are better.
By that logic, a woman’s fertility peaks the moment she gets her first period, as that’s the first time her eggs can be released to be fertilised, and it’s all down hill from there. That’s what they are really saying and it’s bloody creepy to say the least, and dehumanising to be more accurate.
Does that mean it’s the peak time for her to get pregnant and become a mother? As someone who got their first period at 10 years, 11 months… I say NO!
It’s such a dehumanising argument. Do they mean peak as in the most stable, emotionally mature, economically sound, educated, in a loving 2 parent home (the 2 parents seems very important to them)? No
They mean peak in terms of carrying their progeny to term. Because they don’t care about the woman, she’s just the life support for the uterus carrying their genes.
@@ginao6810 I would argue they only care about kids instead in so far as they are extensions of themselves. If they actually cared we'd see more actual support for anyone actively raising kids.
@@andrejg4136 very much so. Never found these kinds of men to be real 50/50 hands-on parent either.
I really appreciate how you analyze! Especially the distance you are able to keep from the matter.
Remember: Conservatives care about feelings, not facts
What about the liberals?
@@DigitalProtectionActthe opposite
@@DarrenSnider "Cope"
I don't know how long this has been in development so it may not have been around at the time of writing but the fact Mat is selling a plushie of a baby with his head on it needs to be mentioned for the simple fact that it's weirdest piece of merch I think I've seen from anyone
WTactualF???
Is it like the one that accompanied his comment section segment in the first third of this video when Jose was explaining the breakup of Map's show?
The reason mathew has to constantly use words like "evil" etc. Is because if his audience just heard the articles and news without his prerequisite his audience wouldn't knoe they have to hate some random trans person
@ Alex, I'd have to respectfully disagree. All his audience needs to hear is the word trans. To them it's inherently evil by nature. A trans person could cure cancer and they would still find someway to use illogical mental gymnastics to hate them. That's the entire reason they watch him. They don't want to learn new perspectives. They simply want the perspectives and beliefs they already have reinforced.🤔
You mean like your doing now by assuming he's evil?
The principle of charity would state that Matt Believes that people with gender dysphoria have a mental condition not a physical one and so it does no good at all to have surgery because your body isn't broken.
Matt is if your charitable teaching the idea that trans people need to practice body acceptance.
Heck if your on the left and feel gender and smex are not the same then even you must be confused why we keep doing things to peoples smex organs to treat an apparently completely unrelated gender issue.
Guys like Matt Walsh and Ben Shapiro are so desperate to look masculine and yet fail miserably it's hilarious
Matt Walsh is plenty masculine? Tf are you talking about
@michellemarty7510 Ben Shapiro is taller and more masculine than the guy in your profile pic thing, hands down
@@cajunking5987 Keep telling yourself that 😹😹😹😹😹
@@johannesstephanusroos4969 Ben is 5'6" at best. The man in my picture is 5"8". I'm 5'9". Ben grew his beard to protect the image of masculinity and it's sad and pathetic.
@@johannesstephanusroos4969 not wrong there
Hang on...wtf did Dwayne Wade do?? Is he seriously calling for his harassment for accepting his daughter's transition?????
I don’t think I’ve ever seen Matt Walsh express any emotion.
Edit: I don’t know if it’s because I’m on the spectrum or what. I know he has emotions. Namely disgust and anger. It’s just that he doesn’t really emote when he’s speaking. He speaks in drawling monotone if you know what I mean.
Anger
Disgust
soulless grifting. ghoulish contribution to bigotry regardless if he actually believes it or not
@@AndromedaD yes. Ties in with contempt
Really? Cause his smugness makes him prime r/punchableface material lol.
Walsh is basically a 1990s Rwandan radio host at this point.
He is going to have a "cut the tall trees" moment and its going to get him sued into oblivion so hard his grandchildren will still be paying out damage on the estate.
Matt Walsh is simply just the most basic person i’ve ever seen. He looks like he thinks a beer on a thursday is being adventurous and risky.
The window in his videos are fake because the sky never changes.
Hopefully José touches on how creepy that plushie baby Walsh is
These mfers unironically call themselves the “sweet baby gang”
It looks like it has a sex doll mouth
@@geraldbrowder5806 I’m curious the origin of that because he is not very sweet or baby.
@@summoneddemon Disgusting!
Ima take a wild guess and say he’s backed by a billionaire.
He works for the daily wire, which is funded by the petrochemical billionaires, Dan and Farris Wilks. So you would be correct
@@ej5677 Koch brothers 2.0.
All of them have right wing sugar daddies, if they had to make their money on their own they would fail miserably
@@camelopardalis84 Weren't the Koch brothers relatively liberal on social issues?
@@theprofessionalfence-sitter more libertarian; it's hard to say what their actual held stances were on social issues, but they were more or less willing to let things slide if it didn't interfere with them maximizing their profits.
Matt Walsh has one thing the other far rightists don't have: a voice that is not profoundly annoying.
The "CPAC Speaker" black bar over eyes bit is hilarious, i adore you! Thanks for speaking out for me and people like me.
Walsch having to pretend he wont call Ben a slur as soon as he's out of earshot somehow makes him look even slimier and spineless
I guarantee all of those right wingers Ben Shapiro loves call him every Jewish slur when he is out of the room, he doesn’t get it that even the Jewish people who would have helped the Nazis thinking they were the good ones would still end up being sent to the showers
I think that says more about Ben than it does about Walsh. Ben doesnt realize he is like 4th on the christofascist list. Trans, then gay, then disabled, then the jews.
@@TheModdedwarfare3 I think he probably knows that, he just thinks his wealth will shield him from the consequences if the other shoe drops.
yeah, you have ALL the behind the scenes dirt at the Daily Wire huh? You sit around and dream about these scenes all day huh?
@@wolfshac go outside
I gotta say that I always appreciate José's transparency with his editing of clips and very thorough analysis. While I wish these guys didn't exist to breakdown, I am glad we have someone like José, Jessie, and Joel (just realized all the J names haha) to do so.
Joel? Do you mean big or little? Haver and Varg are also acceptable answers but less relevant here
Why are there so many good Joels lol
@makeitthrough_ i was talkin bout big joel, didn't even know there was another hahaha
@@rooster1090 It's a joke. Big Joel has a secondary channel that he named Little Joel, and we like to have fun pretending that these are two separate entities. The search for Regular-Sized Joel is ongoing.
Has anyone ever asked Matt Walsh why men have nipples?
Check out his "Sweet Baby Gang" and the fact he defended Danny Masterson.
"If clouds didn't want to get yelled at, they wouldn't float over my lawn"-- Matt Walsh
As a former preacher, and bible school student, Matt Walsh reminds me of all of the worst preaching students I ever met. Ones that weren't interested in learning, just looking to be equipped with the tools and "facts" to be able to feel right.
So you think a man can be a woman?
@@toothlesstoedo you think pineapple belongs on pizza?
@angelablue2761 No. And what does that have to do with anything?
@@toothlesstoeGender is not Binary. That is acknowledged by the medical and scientific community. Research shows that Gender Affirming care leads to better mental health.
Sources
Pediatric Gender Identity
Gender-affirming Care for Transgender & Gender Diverse Youth (2020)
Gender-affirming Care Saves Lives (2022) Kareen M. Matouk and Melina Wald
The 'life-saving' science behind gender-affirming care for youth (2022) Yasemin Nicola Sakay
Mental Health Outcomes in Transgender and Nonbinary Youths Receiving Gender-Affirming Care (2022) Diana M. Tordoff, MPH1; Jonathon W. Wanta, MD Arin Collin
So why not just leave Trans people alone?
@@toothlesstoe 'man' and 'woman' are just designations we give for easy separation, they dont have to apply to everything, not in a person. It all encompassing and completely ignores the complexities of not only every human body but the human mind.
You are not defined by your sex, its simply a biological trait you have. To take that to try to suppress peoples rights, decide what other people can/cant do is the real stupid part here.
Only popular with the most bigoted idiotic people on the net , all because he says what THEY wanna say
Transes like you never want to hear what you want to hear though, right?
@@cmonman3639 how old are you?
@@babs_babs What does my age have to do with trans narcissism and hypocrisy?
@@cmonman3639 you talk like your in your shithead teen boy phase.
@@cmonman3639lol what does this even mean? Am I the only one confused here?
One day he'll be old and alone and find that noone wants to lsiten to him anymore,, an he will be forgotten and remeberd as only a vile creature capable of feeling only hate
This entire comment section is hate
@@Augustas1945 Hello Augustas! The diffence between people hating Matt Walsh and people hating random trans people is that trans people as a group have done nothing wrong and you cannot judge them based on the actions of individuals, while Matt Walsh is a lunatic and a genocidal fascist who deserves all the hate he gets and more ❤️ hope this helps!
@@Augustas1945 lol. Nope. Lol. You are just coping with us not falling for his extremely obvious scam. Lol.
@@DarrenSnider it's been 4 months and I'm still coping g. What scam you on about?
@@Augustas1945 lol. Kid if you can’t see that Walsh is scamming you then you need to go back to preschool because it’s obvious you’ve miser everything. lol
I had never even heard about this guy till about 4 months ago, and suddenly he's all over my feed. The walking definition of living mayonnaise. It's as if he has pledged to end charisma as we know it.
I unfortunately discovered him back in 2018 or 2019
One of the best descriptions of him I've ever seen 😂
😂
That is deeply rude to mayonnaise. Mayonnaise is at least useful for some recipes and Walsh is not useful for anything.
@@randomcdude4430 that's not fair man. I'm sure he'd make at least mediocre fertilizer.
Matt Walsh argues in the style of proclaiming that everything more complicated than A=A is somehow pushing an agenda by trying to confuse the reader. In that one Tennessee public hearing he got absolutely grilled at, he essentially kept referring to HRT as chemical castration over and over, and his argument for his own authority on the matter was that he was a "human being with a brain and a soul", i.e. that it was so obvious to him, it must be obvious to everyone else. Not to mention the fundamental conservative mantra, "it used to be this way, so it worked, so it's natural, so it's good". He keeps using that too, all the time.
Notice how people like him can only use examples to try and make an argument.
"Look here a transgeder who hates drag queens. This is the good one."
"Here's another who committed a crime. They're all evil."
"And this one agrees with me. This meas I'm right."
2 mil subscriber content.
He was in front of Congress and claimed that he knows how to read and so that makes him an expert
There seems to be a lot of intersection between conservative ideology and the "(appeal to) personal incredulity" fallacy. "If I don't/can't understand it, then it must be false or not make any objective sense." So whenever people want to make changes that reflect new ways of seeing or understanding things, conservatives may want to push back on those changes specifically because the desire or need for making those changes is based on a shift of understanding something that they themselves couldn't comprehend. So they see no need for such change and consider that change unnecessary or even problematic. And then they resist that change or even try to undo it.
When it comes to LGBT identity politics, this is often why conservatives like to bring up the old, tired "basic biology" argument. "Whatever do you mean that there's more to the science of biology than the handful of facts they taught me about the male and female reproductive systems when I was in middle school? You mean that if I were to study biology some more, including at a college/university level, or especially got advanced degrees in biology and studied for professional research, that there could turn out to be more about how human sex works that goes beyond the basics? Nah, preposterous. Middle school biology is all there is and if literal scientists who study this stuff for years and for a career tell me otherwise, I will just dismiss it. Now, if you'll excuse me, I have to go argue with a physicist next because they were talking about subatomic particles called quarks. I know for a fact that there are no such things because all I learned about the inside of an atom from school was just protons, neutrons, and electrons. They're making up stuff too."
So you think it's okay for a boy to be castrated, physically or chemically, if he calls himself a girl?
@@johnwalker1058What is a woman?
Walsh is like all successful apologists. He understands what his audience wants and he gives it to them. Unashamed lying and pandering to the lowest common denominator are the key qualities required and he has them.
You are very angry as well as very confident, so I'm sure you will finally be the one to tell the world what a woman is. So, will you tell us all what a woman is?
And also while you are at it, in the trans cult ideology, explain to me how lesbians exist?
@@thevipez8740lol. Kid there is no trans cult. lol. It’s just scientific facts you refuse to accept. lol. Tell me kid if it was an ideology then why does everyone in the world who knows biology says you’re wrong? Have you ever thought that you’re in the anti science cult?
I was friends with this guy in high school. Went to Franklin high in reisterstown MD. He was a completely different person in HS. Not political or weirdly religious at all. Just kinda chill "bro" kind of guy. Never struck me as all that intelligent, emotionally or otherwise. But I mean, it was high school.
Matt Walsh tweeted that he gets so many death threats, he has 24-hour guards around his family home.
If that's true, it means that he prioritizes attacking trans people over the lives of his wife and children.
Conservatives have a victim mentality even if it’s their fault. Conservatives also lie a lot.
Thoughts and prayers for the security team that has to be around that walking turd.
Thinking about Julius Ceasar for no reason
What’s funny is that he made a similar argument about child friendly drag shows when the club Q shooting happened.
What a childish notion.
Might as well say anyone on the left that gets threats and stands for gay rights cares more about having smex with dudes than protecting than family or whatever.
Walsh believes that society is asking itself questions whose answers matter and it is worth speaking what he sees as truth even if that involves some level of discomfort
I'm somehow not surprised he has issues with people loving their pets, and still surprised he has an opinion on this that he's willing to share like that.
He seems like the kind of guy who thinks the best way to train a dog is to "establish dominance" and "be the alpha." Not surprising at all.
He's not against people loving their pets, he just criticizes people who treat pets as children. There is a difference.
@@SoloMonYamashita-Hermit No there isn't. My cats are my babies. Shove it if you don't like it. :)
@@SoloMonYamashita-Hermit You mean that thing people commonly do as a sign of love? Sounds like something that's not worth pitching a fit about.
@@GB-vw6kr There is a difference.
Your back! My Monday just got a whole lot better! Thanks for posting!
I seem to remember Matt Walsh once bragged about how he had no qualifications for what he's doing.
And yet still makes better point than leftists do, all you need nowadays is basic knowledge of biology and science, something none of you know about
@@Skullwithnobrainin your dreams lmao
@@kotorandcorvid4968 what points did he make that were flawed?
@@Skullwithnobrain it's explained in the fucking video
@@kotorandcorvid4968 tell me
when Mathew says that the left wing defintion of a women is circular well his defintion of "Adult Human Female" is a circular definition. It is considered a ciruclar lexicographic definition. As it uses synonym's and words too closely related to the subject. Even more hilarious is because they think female and women are the exact same thing it makes it even more circular.
Woman = female is just one degree removed from woman = woman
No it doesn't you just don't understand what the definition of female is.
The definition of female is individuals in a species that when things are biologically functioning properly can produce offspring.
Yes there are diseases, there are deformities, that can result in a female that cannot bear children.
Those are however diseases and deformities and abnormalities precisely because they prevent normal healthy expected biological processes that would be there but for the problem.
If you have ovaries and eggs and milk glands and a bajingo and two X chromosomes etc.
Your a female. Your a female by the plurality of evidence not the lack of one.
All the primary and secondary sex characteristics determine your sex as a collective.
This is why for example you can identify a female at a glance with like 99.5% accuracy off just a glance alone.
So no there is no circular logic there.
The problem on the progressive side is that defining a woman by it's nature means that you need to exclude people.
The moment you say what something is, you also say what it isn't and there is no definition which covers everyone they wish to cover and so they have to define woman as "well I mean, you know, you know what a woman is" and use the conservative idea of well it's common sense really to say
It seems you need clarification, so let me explain. There are males and females, and we have short-hand linguistic terms to describe them. So instead of constantly saying, "The adult human female," we shorten it to "the woman." Neat huh! We do this for all animals too! For instance, an adult bovine female is a cow or a heifer. So if I ask, "What is a cow?" you can say, "An adult bovine female that has given birth," instead of "A cow is whoever feels they are a cow." Wow, you learned so much today!
@@Wtiberon this is such an embarrassing admission to lacking any critical thinking/reading comprehension skills….
@@Wtiberon your analogy would only make sense if you were talking about the word mother, not women. Also bovine refers to 10 different animals including types of Antelope, do you think cattle and antelope are the same? Not to mention as someone else pointed out you addressed nothing in my comment.
10+ years ago before Walsh had any semblance of mainstream success he had a blog that was popular with a lot of fundamentalist Christians, that’s how I was first exposed to him. Even as thoroughly brainwashed kid in an extremist Christian environment I disliked Walsh back then because he seemed so mean and misogynistic. I really hate how much I’m still hearing from/about him a decade later😔
I legit only heard of Matt Walsh because I stumbled upon his video of hating people who prefer to have pets/animal companions over kids. Then I heard of him further because I saw clips of him defending pedos and... yeah I'm going to take a guess he's like the Catholic church in hating people who prefer pets/animal companions over kids too ala no kids = they can't rape and molest them. Either way, every video I see of him makes him look like a joyless, likely mean POS trying not to show it in his videos.
I feel your pain mate, I feel your pain.
blabla misoginy. enjoy your cats.
@@susanwjoh0re735 ...what?
@@SlashCampablehe’s Matt Walsh hard core fans what do you expect from him
As a Christian, it BAFFLES me how hard so many Christians go on marriage, especially marriage at a young age. There’s stuff in the Bible about marriage being good, sure, but not as much direct stuff in the New Testament about it as there is about the value of being single and singly devoted to Christ. I’m honestly not advocating for either (though I raise my eyebrow at young marriage tbh) but if they WANT to say they’re biblically based, they should be advocating for lifelong celibacy and service. Just sayin. (Editing for typos - and all of this is based on a culture 2000 years ago, so the applicability isn’t…great)
turn it back on him dont play def play offence
matt walsh hates freedom
I think Matt Walsh has the same appeal to hateful people as Andrew Tate did. People like him because he doesn't dance around his hateful rhetoric, he is straight and direct about it. It's also why Michael Knowles and kind of the Daily Wire as a whole is shifting in the same direction. It's effective to be just straight up hateful and vitriolic because it appeals to angry bigots' true feelings
This has been the project over the last 40+ years. They are boiling down the pro-White, pro-Male, etc. rhetoric down to a point where it's like pure, distilled, 200 proof moonshine.
No wonder so many of them end up blind with rage after awhile, especially in the audience.
Makes it easier to avoid him entirely
The mask is off, the dog whistle is gone, it's just outright hate now. Makes it easier to censor them.
Exactly. And their "kids content" is probably going to be filled with that same Christofascist hate.
And it should be noted, though, that those bigots are only so comfortable being so openly hateful even among eachother, because of how edgelords normalised the ideas behind it all through "shock humour"