Complex Aircraft Systems

Поділитися
Вставка

КОМЕНТАРІ • 43

  • @daytonasixty-eight1354
    @daytonasixty-eight1354 5 років тому +13

    Thank you. I made it all the way up to commercial ASEL training and I didn't know to check instruments, placards, paperwork, etc. Thanks for spending 20 minutes on that.

  • @jandrews1157
    @jandrews1157 3 роки тому +12

    Nearly 2 minutes of seizure-inducing intro music and visuals.

  • @kylezimmerman9185
    @kylezimmerman9185 6 років тому +3

    Excellent explanation of the landing gear system. This was my primary resource for studying the Arrow systems for my Commercial ASEL.

  • @javarenas
    @javarenas 2 роки тому +18

    Pre-flight - 2:37
    Post-Flight - 32:09
    Fuel System - 34:10
    Landing Gear - 46:05
    Constant Speed Prop - 1:06:00

    • @Mr_Bones.
      @Mr_Bones. 2 місяці тому

      Thank you sir 🙏

  • @Hwantastic22
    @Hwantastic22 6 років тому +3

    UND materials always satisfy me with super details explanations. It is really helpful for Arrow system. THX!!

  • @gregjenkins7979
    @gregjenkins7979 7 років тому +29

    LOL not sure how happy line service is about cleaning my windshield.

  • @adamriggen7269
    @adamriggen7269 3 роки тому +1

    Excellent explanations. Studying for my CFI initial exam and this helps a lot. Thanks.

  • @eliasabebe9952
    @eliasabebe9952 3 роки тому

    It's among the best explanations made for the subject.10Q.

  • @Dogfight2000
    @Dogfight2000 8 років тому

    Great explanation. Thank you!

  • @Aeroguide
    @Aeroguide 7 років тому +6

    Well done on the demonstration. Will help on my Commercial checkride coming up. All hail the Piper Arrow IV lol!

    • @infotechsailor
      @infotechsailor 7 років тому +3

      only flown warriors. looking forward to learning the arrow, I hear its basically a heavy warrior with retracts

    • @Aeroguide
      @Aeroguide 7 років тому

      Yeah, T or Conventional Tail makes a difference as well. I would recommend conventional

  • @felixtorres1895
    @felixtorres1895 Рік тому

    Very thorough and very professional.

  • @robinsteiner9961
    @robinsteiner9961 4 роки тому

    Great video!!! A super valuable resource!

  • @jinwoopark3101
    @jinwoopark3101 4 роки тому

    Thanks for the great tutorial.

  • @DVellaio
    @DVellaio 7 років тому

    Congrats. Very complete!

  • @SangahNoona
    @SangahNoona 6 років тому +1

    Thank you thank you thank you!

  • @cpuwolf
    @cpuwolf 6 років тому

    UND maintenance ....super detail. thanks

  • @robertmackay4613
    @robertmackay4613 7 років тому +4

    Differential throw ailerons deflect at a greater angle upwards than downwards to combat the effects of adverse yaw

  • @neilrampersad4291
    @neilrampersad4291 6 років тому

    Great video.

  • @stephenyoungblood3683
    @stephenyoungblood3683 8 років тому

    Very well done!

  • @TravelsWithIan
    @TravelsWithIan 4 роки тому +1

    I wish you could remake the exact same video but just better quality. 240P is so terrible OH MY GOD. I appreciate the information though, very helpful.

  • @ecorocdrone614
    @ecorocdrone614 4 роки тому

    great, congratulations colleague !!

  • @blkpylut
    @blkpylut 8 років тому +2

    I should really pay attention to this since I flew the Arrow regularly. hahaha

  • @larsmaage1
    @larsmaage1 2 роки тому

    Great video and explenation!!

  • @LostInSpace175
    @LostInSpace175 3 роки тому

    AWESOME AWESOME AWESOME!

  • @danduset
    @danduset 7 років тому +2

    great teacher,you should do ground school for the majors.

  • @uscg906
    @uscg906 5 років тому

    Love the old fashioned Super8 video?

  • @johnscarry6112
    @johnscarry6112 4 роки тому +3

    Why is it that every UND video has annoying music playing while the instructor is talking? This one isn’t as bad as many of the others. I fly an Arrow so I thought this would be a good video to watch but the music was too distracting.

  • @timbo1163
    @timbo1163 7 років тому

    Rather confusing point regarding fuel at 17:03.....you say, "100 is typically green, and 80 is red in color". Yet the 100 fuel in your had is blue. (Blue is 100 low lead.) I guess when you say 100 is typically green you are implying it's use is more prevalent than the blue 100LL you have in your hand. Anyway, I had to replay that for clarification. Thanks for the video. Very informative.

    • @daytonasixty-eight1354
      @daytonasixty-eight1354 5 років тому +1

      For the record. The red fuel 80/82 is no longer available anywhere in the united states. It's been this way for over a decade. I've flown in about 30 different states and hundreds of airports. I have seen ONCE 100 (green) being sold from a pump. It's almost not worth talking about anymore since 100LL is really the only piston fuel available unless you are diesel in which case you use jet-A. So in short, if you can't fly on 100LL and don't have a motor gas STC you aren't flying anywhere. Unless of course you want to order big drums and pump fuel for yourself, but then you always have to return to your home airport. No long XC.

  • @aryank2000
    @aryank2000 5 років тому

    Classic

  • @zacharycahill2314
    @zacharycahill2314 11 місяців тому +1

    you speak so fast that I had to put the playback speed on.

  • @Elein967
    @Elein967 3 роки тому +2

    240p, we meet again.....

  • @LeneMar-zg3hc
    @LeneMar-zg3hc 6 місяців тому

    我看到你也想做跨境電商是嗎

  • @mytech6779
    @mytech6779 Рік тому

    Great preflight walkthrough.
    The "octane" information was highly inaccurate. Correctly called "anti-knock rating" and there are several scales and test methods, it is correct that static compression ration is one of the factors but not as bluntly as presented, the fuel distribution has only minor relation to the required AKR; and even if it did, this is engine has injectors at each cylinder so fuel distribution is actually quite good.
    The systems info is pretty good overall, but it would be better to leave out the explanations of the finer details. Both because they are not relevent to the pilot in any practical sense, and because the mix of idealized book theory and urban legend does not accurately represent the real complications of practical engineering values thus pointless to memorize at that level of detail.(Sort of like significant digits when taking measurments.)
    eg, the milspec number for the hydraulic fluid is meaningless because the pilot is not going to do hydraulic maintenance, let alone on the flight line with no service manual.
    Yes, 14.7:1 is a stoiciometric mix for an average gasoline blend. However, the mechanic is not tuning this engine to idle at that mix for a number of reasons which I won't go into here; instead it would be tuned for certain operating characteristics that likely put it a little on the rich side.

  • @randymartin9876
    @randymartin9876 5 років тому

    Long, boring music intro. Otherwise good.

  • @drizzt197three
    @drizzt197three 5 років тому +2

    Don't have patience for the stupid MTV intro.

  • @weaslll-4358
    @weaslll-4358 3 роки тому

    this is depressing

  • @Aventicus
    @Aventicus 7 років тому +3

    Extremely terrible music!

  • @manmatharajangunaratnam6869
    @manmatharajangunaratnam6869 6 років тому

    Very well done!