I find it strange that the turbo hybrid isn’t available in your country on either one. Good power, quieter, and good on fuel. Well over 800km per tank. I’m also surprised that the 10 year Hyundai and Kia warranty that has been around for 20 years hasn’t been implemented either. Or the three years of maintenance included. Seems like the companies are holding back for your market.
Unfortunately here in Australia we are often treated as the dumping ground and arse-end of the motoring world. Until our government gets serious about emission standards not much will change.
If I’m just looking at the interior I’ll choose the Hyundai. You don’t feel like you’re in a base model compared to a Kia with those massive massive bezels
In terms of looks alone I prefer the KIA. 7 years warranty is attractive as for the manual inclusion, it's a bonus for some. The Tucson is a good proposition too but needs to upgrad to 7 year warranty. Well done KIA.
Everyone talks about sx grade to be a sweet spot in sportage range but I didn't find any video review of sx grade. Chasing Cars, would be kind enough to make a video review of it since that's the grade that most of us can afford🙂🙂🙂
My Tucson has 8.3L/100 over 6,000kms. The 6 speed auto is absolutely fine. For most daily things you do, the base engine also absolutely fine. You guys must just thrash these cars to death. It’s not a sports car!
Tom is quite right. Manual transmission really does make a 2L/4cyl that much better to drive. Such a shame that you can't get manual all the way up through the range these days.
The Tucson looks striking. For me though the 1.6TDI sportage from an economy perspective wins out. The issue being Hyundai don't do the diesel hybrid and the petrol hybrid however we'll graduated/refined is not ultimately as efficient. I have long journeys followed by lots of short start / stop trips before returning home via another long journey. I'm heading towards the Kia over a Tucson, Tiguan or Karoq.
I would choose outlander ES .. way better interior & build quality than Kia & Hyundai . More powerful engine ,Plus you get 10 yr warranty if you service through Mitsubishi.
An old 2.0 na eng in a heavy SUV what's the benefit clearly it's not fuel consumption at 11L 100k they may as well droped the V6 or at the very least the 2.5 from the sonata fuel economy would have been the same but a lot more spirited drive
I see NA viewers seem surprised there isn’t a 10 yr warranty in Australia. Try NZ where Hyundai warranty is only 3yr/100k and even the Kia warranty is pretty poor at 5yr/100k. Even Ford and VW (those paragons of reliability *cough*) offer 5yr/unltd in the same market…
....they are essentially the same vehicle 🤔 Both are good but I'd prefer the analogue speedo and tachometer. I also like separate controls for audio and air-conditioning. I certainly don't object to the Kia's overall appearance, at all. But I like both.
@Lee Baines if you are looking for family use don't waste your time and money on the HRV. We have just sold our 2020 and upgrade to the Sportage. It's a large price increase for us but the space is needed. If your a dog family or just running around without kids or prams go look at a seltos
NA 2.0 litre in a vehicle of this size is not a good idea. The 1.6 turbo would be much better but it comes with a DCT which in my opinion is absolutely terrible with its hesitation off the mark and jerkiness. That leaves the diesel which is connected to a proper transmission and the pick of the bunch i reckon. Thanks for the review
Both are excellent vehicles, but that 2.0 donk needs to be put out to pasture permanently. Maybe the 1.6 T-Gdi could become the default petrol ?? Load either of these up & fuel usage in the 2.0 variants ain't gunna be pretty. But one thing to look forward to will be a big upgrade to infotainment systems over the next few months with Kia's Uvo Connnect & Hyundai's BlueLink 2 now here & expected to soon filter into mainstream models. Unfortunately current variants cannot be upgraded as the hardware & operating systems are not compatible with vehicles currently using a different system .
Well the Tuscon takes it for me, because it keeps SO MANY things than paying around 3k more for the hybrid-better model.And because my parents will buy only base models,that's apparently better for me as a back seatter who also cares about the comfort of his parents.
Why not the N-Line Tucson? The Tucson comes in two variants; one which is average looking and one which is amazing. You picked the wrong one here. IMO in the looks department it goes: N-Line Tucson >> Sportage > Regular Tucson
No, I didn’t pick the wrong Tucson for this comparison. This is about base models with maximum value for money - the N Line is $3500 more. You may see that as justified spend, but it then wouldn’t be a base model with maximum value for money
arent these effectively sister cars on the same platform with the same drivetrain? wouldnt it then be a case of which car suits you aesthetically inside and out and what the suspension tune is like and if the price vs. warranty suits you?
The Tucson for sure. I cannot stand the rear of the Sportage. Also, the new KIA logo is terrible! They should have stuck with the badge - muuuuuuch nicer IMO.
I would take neither. The KIA interior is woeful with the amount of plastic around the info screen and blanked buttons. Plus a 2 litre N/A lethargic engine in both of them pushing 1500kg (before passengers/luggage) is not a good choice for fuel efficiency or refinement.
comparing the base models ain't fair in terms of what you get for money . . . comparisons should be done on mid variant of the particular car/vehicle being road tested or comparison etc . . .
I find it strange that the turbo hybrid isn’t available in your country on either one. Good power, quieter, and good on fuel. Well over 800km per tank. I’m also surprised that the 10 year Hyundai and Kia warranty that has been around for 20 years hasn’t been implemented either. Or the three years of maintenance included.
Seems like the companies are holding back for your market.
Unfortunately here in Australia we are often treated as the dumping ground and arse-end of the motoring world. Until our government gets serious about emission standards not much will change.
If I’m just looking at the interior I’ll choose the Hyundai. You don’t feel like you’re in a base model compared to a Kia with those massive massive bezels
In terms of looks alone I prefer the KIA. 7 years warranty is attractive as for the manual inclusion, it's a bonus for some. The Tucson is a good proposition too but needs to upgrad to 7 year warranty. Well done KIA.
Everyone talks about sx grade to be a sweet spot in sportage range but I didn't find any video review of sx grade. Chasing Cars, would be kind enough to make a video review of it since that's the grade that most of us can afford🙂🙂🙂
Great review! Thanks for base model comparison, just a thought that comparison should be Auto vs Auto, not Auto vs Manual IMHO.
My Tucson has 8.3L/100 over 6,000kms. The 6 speed auto is absolutely fine. For most daily things you do, the base engine also absolutely fine. You guys must just thrash these cars to death. It’s not a sports car!
Yes if your not flooring it you can achieve 8-9l/100 pretty easily
same model ?
Tom is quite right. Manual transmission really does make a 2L/4cyl that much better to drive. Such a shame that you can't get manual all the way up through the range these days.
I seemed to remember that the Tucson used to have a direct injection 2L engine with 122kw/205Nm.
It still does
I enjoyed watching the Video. My favourite Is the Kia Sportage
Sportage w/ Diesel DT for sure
if you don't need SUV, just buy a vastly superior Kia Cerato GT sedan... for similar money
Should have compared automatic to automatic
The Tucson looks striking. For me though the 1.6TDI sportage from an economy perspective wins out. The issue being Hyundai don't do the diesel hybrid and the petrol hybrid however we'll graduated/refined is not ultimately as efficient. I have long journeys followed by lots of short start / stop trips before returning home via another long journey. I'm heading towards the Kia over a Tucson, Tiguan or Karoq.
Why push the manual when as you mentioned, the vast majority of buyers want auto and are prepared to spend the extra for it?
I would choose outlander ES .. way better interior & build quality than Kia & Hyundai . More powerful engine ,Plus you get 10 yr warranty if you service through Mitsubishi.
I'll take the Hyundai
An old 2.0 na eng in a heavy SUV what's the benefit clearly it's not fuel consumption at 11L 100k they may as well droped the V6 or at the very least the 2.5 from the sonata fuel economy would have been the same but a lot more spirited drive
I wonder for any of the boot filming did the soccer balls come tumbling out? 😅
Hi,
Can you please review Sportage sx plus 2 L petrol? There is no video drive in Australia
Thanks
Why does the 22 sportage look like the old one here in the US. The '23 however looks like the '22 youre reviewing
I see NA viewers seem surprised there isn’t a 10 yr warranty in Australia. Try NZ where Hyundai warranty is only 3yr/100k and even the Kia warranty is pretty poor at 5yr/100k. Even Ford and VW (those paragons of reliability *cough*) offer 5yr/unltd in the same market…
Tucson wins all day. Also don’t like the front end look of the Kia.
....they are essentially the same vehicle 🤔
Both are good but I'd prefer the analogue speedo and tachometer.
I also like separate controls for audio and air-conditioning.
I certainly don't object to the Kia's overall appearance, at all. But I like both.
Sportage interior but Tucson looks.
Very informative vid! Like to see these up against the Seltos or HRV....or has this been done?
Do you mean CRV ? HRV and Seltos are small SUV's
@@mattgerhardt7660 both are at a very similar price point hence the interest the seltos has gone up ridiculously price in the last period
@Lee Baines if you are looking for family use don't waste your time and money on the HRV. We have just sold our 2020 and upgrade to the Sportage. It's a large price increase for us but the space is needed.
If your a dog family or just running around without kids or prams go look at a seltos
NA 2.0 litre in a vehicle of this size is not a good idea. The 1.6 turbo would be much better but it comes with a DCT which in my opinion is absolutely terrible with its hesitation off the mark and jerkiness. That leaves the diesel which is connected to a proper transmission and the pick of the bunch i reckon. Thanks for the review
the hybrid is where its at
I love the Tucson plug In, 265 HP, with all the safety options, panorama sunroof etc etc.
Sportage 8.5/10
Tucson 9/10
Both are excellent vehicles, but that 2.0 donk needs to be put out to pasture permanently. Maybe the 1.6 T-Gdi could become the default petrol ?? Load either of these up & fuel usage in the 2.0 variants ain't gunna be pretty. But one thing to look forward to will be a big upgrade to infotainment systems over the next few months with Kia's Uvo Connnect & Hyundai's BlueLink 2 now here & expected to soon filter into mainstream models. Unfortunately current variants cannot be upgraded as the hardware & operating systems are not compatible with vehicles currently using a different system .
but I think Haval H6 way better then this 2 for GOOD VALUE family car
Well the Tuscon takes it for me, because it keeps SO MANY things than paying around 3k more for the hybrid-better model.And because my parents will buy only base models,that's apparently better for me as a back seatter who also cares about the comfort of his parents.
Why not the N-Line Tucson?
The Tucson comes in two variants; one which is average looking and one which is amazing. You picked the wrong one here.
IMO in the looks department it goes:
N-Line Tucson >> Sportage > Regular Tucson
No, I didn’t pick the wrong Tucson for this comparison. This is about base models with maximum value for money - the N Line is $3500 more. You may see that as justified spend, but it then wouldn’t be a base model with maximum value for money
@@chasingcars Ah I forgot it costs more for the pack on the base model. Was thinking it was $1000 extra across the range.
Weird about not having navigation as my MY16 Optima Si does have it.
arent these effectively sister cars on the same platform with the same drivetrain? wouldnt it then be a case of which car suits you aesthetically inside and out and what the suspension tune is like and if the price vs. warranty suits you?
The Tucson for sure. I cannot stand the rear of the Sportage. Also, the new KIA logo is terrible! They should have stuck with the badge - muuuuuuch nicer IMO.
Would probably wait to see what the new CR-V that's being revealed tomorrow brings to the table.
It would have been better to compare 2 automatics.
When it comes to turbo petrol models both brands need to up the service intervals to 15,000 km . Until then I avoid both brands....
The Kia wins for me hands down 😎
Where can I get that black chasing cars merch Tom ?
Hyundai the best!👍
would've been nice if you could bring up together some German competitors together in this comparison, like the Tiguan or the GLA
The kia sportage is all you need
I would take neither. The KIA interior is woeful with the amount of plastic around the info screen and blanked buttons. Plus a 2 litre N/A lethargic engine in both of them pushing 1500kg (before passengers/luggage) is not a good choice for fuel efficiency or refinement.
can u make a video kia sportage vs lexus Nx/ Rx?
comparing the base models ain't fair in terms of what you get for money . . . comparisons should be done on mid variant of the particular car/vehicle being road tested or comparison etc . . .
I like these base model comparisons because I’m poor 😂
Mum= Kia Dad= Hyundai
Sportage has 12 months waiting
The Kia front end looks stunning. Hyundai meanwhile got the styling very wrong.
I think opposite,actually
Styling is subjective. For me i like both front ends
The Hyundai looks great in the flesh, at least from the front. Can't remember seeing the Kia, if I have it certainly didn't make an impression
Hyundai looks way better imo, more purpose to the design, Kia looks too random
Kia wins, suspension, driving dynamics, road noise and resale value
resale value????
@@radissimo1 I will pay more for this Sportage than the Tucson
@@modernsoccer1860 they basically use the same parts
Sportage
Both are overpriced
No one wants a manual now a days. Best to compare auto v auto. Sorry, didn’t watch the video.
Dumb comparison.. manual compared to an auto..
Gee, you're a glass-half-empty person, aren't you?
The Hyundai looks like an origami project gone wrong...
so do you
@@hristogluharov9763 lol