Лучший боевой самолет-тот который выполнил задачи и вернулся на базу. У первых двух экземпляров, так называемого топа, так называемого рейтинга, небоевых потерь авиации больше чем их участия в боях.
How you decide which is Best ? which characteristics you used? Are you engineer or pilot? why i should believe, there is no fact just pictures with length and weight.
@@yvanchaine3223 And what is it then? Of course its a fighter. Original Mig-31 is long range fighter interceptor and Mig-31BM is multirole fighter because they add precision bombing capability to him.
When you say "compared", I expect price, maintenance price, weapon capacity and diversity, maneuverability, range, what can achieve, how fast can be deployed, , and ultimately how many battle won over a period.
@@JoanLorenzo79 still, if you're going to give only a few types of specs on these planes why would you choose length and weight and not something like top speed, armament, and something else that sets it apart from aircraft?
Precisely. All those factors, yes. Eventually, only its success rate in battles counts. Most of these 'whizzo' machines will never actually be deployed in battle. Nations will buy and maintain them at a huge price. Already obsolescent, in a short while they will be obsolete
@@ChristopherDwane Think again, don’t you get it? Do you? he can do another video o the topics that you want, that’s just the appetizer. Another video another thousand views: that means another money.
MiG-31 is a dedicated look-down/shoot-down capable interceptor, designed to protect Russia's vast northern expanses from the threat of submarine and/or bomber-launched cruise missiles coming in from the high arctic. It is top of its game in the world, in that regard, but NOT a "fighter" in the sense of being an aircraft specifically concerned with wresting air superiority from other fighters (in most scenarios, it would never realistically expect to encounter short-ranged 'fighters' over the vast Russian arctic). While an impressive aircraft in its time, the F-15C/D/E would not be a realistic contender with the 4.5-gen' and beyond: 4.5-gen' and above would likely render it completely blind with their advantage in embedded EW tech. Rafale and E2000 I am okay with except that I would have put Rafale over E2000. Both are multi-roles, with at least as much emphasis on air superiority as other roles, although the Rafale is the stealthier aircraft (the E2000 was not particularly designed for stealth at all whereas the Rafale was designed with the mantra, "as stealthy as possible without compromise to performance"). While the F/A-18C/D were true multi-roles in the sense of having adequate dog fighting capability, the F/A-18E/F sacrificed much of the legacy series' dog fighting performance in favor of greater capacity for air-to-surface ordnance (remember, they were designed to replace not just the F/A-18C/D but, in a single type, the A-6E). The F-35, likewise, is a strike aircraft 'capable' of air-to-air combat...similar, in turn, to the J-20. The only real "fighters" on this list, in terms of aircraft with a primary or, at least, "equal" (where multi-role) emphasis on air superiority, are the F-15C/D, E2000, Rafale, Su-35, Su-57, and F-22. To make up a list of ten, in terms of ten aircraft with primary or at least equal emphasis on air superiority, I'd expand to: MiG-29 "Fulcrum-C," F-16C/D, F-15C/D Su-27 "Flanker-B," E2000, Rafale, Su-35 "Super Flanker," Saab Gripen-E (bizarre omission - arguably top of the lot in EW capability), Su-57, F-22. That's if you were picking single aircraft for a single pilot. On a force-wide scale, taking budget into account? Su-57 may well be more practical than the F-22, just as the T-34 was more practical than the Panther.
the f-15 is definitely a competitor for 4.5 gen aircraft... the rafale, gripen, and typhoon all have giant vertical rudders that basically destroy their stealth. also, what makes you think that the su-27 is better than the f-15? The f-15 has a better t/w, better dogfighting capabilities, a better radar, better missiles, and better range. The su-27 has an AoA limiter of about 29 degrees, while the f-15 does not have an AoA limiter, and the su-27 and bleeds speed much quicker than the f-15. the top speed of the f-15 is mach 2.5, while the su-27 has a top speed of about, from what i could find, mach 2.35. the su-27 is also a much larger aircraft.
@@potatopower707 I've flew both the typhoon and f-15 and boy o boy did I have wet pants both times absolutely incredible. I'm due to fly on the Virgin galatic in 2025 and it's going to be out this world ( literally ) I'm so lucky to have the chance to go into outer space 😇😇😇😇
You completely forgot the Swedish JAS-39 Gripen E that is an INCREDIBLE multi-role fighter (Hunting,Attack and Survilance) STOL (Short Take Of And Landing) It recently outmanuver and scored 2.5 per unit against US F-15!!!
As others have said, the Mig 31 is a interceptor. My major disagreement with this video is about the F15. With a combat record that it has and years of service it should have been at least at number 6. It's a better fighter than the F18...
I agree with your first point but the F18 is superior to the F15, If we are talking combat record then yes the F15 is better but the F18 is more maneuverable, it has newer technologies and is largely multirole for attack, dogfighting, Navy and more.
Sziasztok, szerintem az F-35 Lightning II jobb mint az F22 Raptor, de harci teszteken a Felon (SU-35) legyőzte mind a kettőt, a gépekben a gyár által delegált berepülőpilóták ültek. Azon kívül a SU-57 képes ember nélkül, kötelékben is repülni...Technikai adatokat is közölhettek volna...
Indonesians prefer Russian-made fighters; Indonesian Airforce had operated Soviet-built fighters and bombers in 1960s, such as MiG15, 17, 21 and Ilyushin 16. Now in our inventory are Sukhoi-27s and 30s withe 35s scheduled to be sent in near future. However, we have also been operating US-made F-16s, British Hawk and C-130s, four A400Ms will also come soon. We have sufficient experience in operating Russian-made fighters thus it is somewhat difficult to accept that S-35 is put on the 8th place...
Crap? Get serious bro, we've got sufficient experience using Soviet- and Russian-made hardwares...see, even today you can still see MiG-21 fighters remain in the operational inventories in some countries, stand ready alongside 4.5 generation fighters.
Very bad ranking. Amazing, can't resist commenting. Ranking probably based on inappropriate criteria. Always difficult to rank but the Europhiter Typhoon better ranked than the Rafale from Dassault Aviation is really not serious. Likewise the F-35 better classified than the excellent Sukhoi SU-57 ... For me, in a very general way, for multi-role: Rafale Dassault excellent on many aspects / Sukhoi SU-57 very powerful also / F-22 for its stealth (without post-combustion) (interest of the stealth limited in many situations) (very very expensive plane).
..The F35 was a money pit, political grift. Similar to the Litorral warships seasoned sea admirals BEGGED congress NOT to build. The did anyway.. Wasteful cost SHOULD be the first consideration. Edit...turns out, F35s are only good for airshows.
The ranking was based on utter ignorance. Whoever did the video has no idea about jet fighters, he just compiled other videos and made this one, that is all. He could do the same comparing chocolate cakes or hair styles.
@GeBoi Correct, this video was made by parasites who know nothing and just copy and paste other people's work. They do that because UA-cam does not check intellectual property violations, there are many junk videos like this one.
Чисто патриотическое американское топ! помоему тут самолёты выбрались в топ по паспорту и внешней красоте! с какого перепуга рафали, ф15, ф18 и ещё некоторые лучше су35?
Кобра Пугачёва это секретное оружие? F 22 его стратегия убрать цель до того как сам будет обнаружен. В контактный бой ему и вступать не придётся. Технология делает разницу. Петля классная история на парад!
The Su-57 is better than the F-35 and F-22. The Su-35 also deserves a top spot in the rankings. And nowhere did I see the MiG-29, which, although old, is one of the most successful fighters.
@david smith specs doesn't matter, how they perform in real combat is what matters especially aircrafts of equal specs not like the USA who used their Air Suppiority to Bully smaller nations.
The Su-57 is incorporated with 3D thrust vectoring controls that give the aircraft better agility and maneuverability at high speed and altitudes. The Su-57 3D thrust vectoring control capability is deemed to be better than that of the F-22 Raptor.
@@Олег-ж7б4г Рамсы попутал дружище.Ыранзузского там ни чего нет.Это на суперджетах французские движки были ( и то только горячая часть), теперь и этот недостаток устранили.
@@mohamadoubambaniang7734 The other countries are looking at other fighters because we won't sell the F22 to ANY foreign country... Not even our closest allies... And countries like Turkey were taken off the list for sale of F35 because they broke an agreement to not buy air defense systems from Russia. Japan is developing their fighter from the Northrop/Douglas YF23 that competed and lost against the F22 for the USAF contract. The F22 crash problems were caused by an inadequate life support system causing pilots to lose consciousness... It's been updated and no crashes since.
Cute comment, but kidding aside, the REAL Red Baron was a seriously formidable many times over ace pilot. When he was finally shot down, he was buried by the enemy (us) with honors. It was a different time, that's for sure. And now you've got me singing that stupid song...10, 20, 30 ,40, 50 or more ... Cheers. Oh, and the Baron flew a Fokker triplane. There used to be a joke that ended "Yes mam, but these 'fokkers' were flying Messerschmitts. You can probably get the gist from that.
The Dassault Rafale is under estimated. It has won all the very last worldwide competitions: singapore, south korea, switzerland and india. It deserves to be at least on the podium!
The most funny part of this vid is specs of a-craft consisting only of lengh and weight. Sure these are quite major qualities, but for fighter air superiority a-craft there are much more fundamentally important qualities
Where there is a stupidy or a patriotism?. F-22 and F-35 are on duty. even more, they fight! Russian and chinese 5th gen. machines are still deveoloped or in tests.
@@jackiejones6246 Who are they fighting ? With third world countries that have neither air power nor air defense ? You only fight there, and so the spirit is not enough ! Even Kim was scared, and he just showed the missiles....
On special versions of the MiG-25, 29 world records were set, including an absolute record for flight altitude - 37650 meters and speed - 3494 km / h. What can we say about Russian aviation of the 21st century. Subjective list
@@blaizellee4441 А мы очень хорошо видим голосование Украины и США против резолюции ООН запрещающей героизацию нацизма.Слава Украине и Хай Гитлер несется из ваших уст нескрываемо.
Как я рад что в западных странах такие "эксперты", какого будет их удивление когда самый слабый из списка МИГ-31 вооруженный гиперзвуковой ракетой в одиночку потопит авианосец с десятками F-35. Или Су-35 который легко вырубает своими РЭБ радары натовских истребителей, что и показали их встречи, когда на радарах Су хорошо видны были F-35, а вот те его не обнаружили. Про Су-57 там вообще беспилотный вариант внедряется, кроме того это единственный в мире истребитель способный управлять ударными стелс беспилотниками при помощи искусственного интеллекта, ну, конечно, гиперзвуковые ракеты, сверхманевренность, и мощнейшие системы РЭБ, которые показали что ПВО стран НАТО не способно его обнаружить на Украине, где этот истребитель активно тестировался.
Су-57 оснащен трехмерным управлением вектором тяги, которое придает самолету лучшую маневренность и маневренность на высоких скоростях и высотах. Возможности управления вектором тяги Су-57 3D считаются лучше, чем у F-22 Raptor.
An den Autor dieses Beitrages. Lesen Sie sich alle Komentare gründlichst. Dann werden Sie hoffentlich erkennen wieviel MEHR an Sachverstand notwendig war und ist um so ein spezielles Video richtig, gut zumachen.
МиГ-31 10 место......)))) хот эти самолёты и с 81 года на вооружении, но кажется до сих пор нет машин, способных двумя парами контролировать воздушное пространство протяжённостью по фронту до 1100 км. с самого начала ни каких вопросов не осталось. далее смотрел не более чем красивые картинки с самолётами.
@@electroaimant5402 I was actually working for a subcontractor doing the FLIR for the YF23, the OTHER competitor in the Advanced Tactical Fighter competition. The 23 lost, our FLIR won and got put on the F22 platform (it was supposed to be a whole or nothing package win, but they changed it after they saw our capabilities). I was actually working in the building and lab where they were designing, integrating, and pre-testing that FLIR, but I was working on a different, much lower performance FLIR, on a boring build-to-print contract from GE...bummer. Whole point of that, finally (I know), is that the 23 was a much better looking bird than the F22, outperformed it in most respects, too, but contract awards are really fickle sometimes. My guess is this one had to do with current production levels and capabilities of the two companies, compared...who knows. None of the 5th gen fighters are gorgeous, by any standard (RCS considerations), but the 23 was DEFINITELY the better looking of the two, MHO.
@@bryanhawk6052 Bryan, I'm sure I SHOULD be getting that reference, but I'm at a loss. If it's a joke, sorry, because I am fully aware it ruins the whole thing to have to explain it to someone being slow on the uptake. Maybe it will hit me when I stop thinking about it. I have been accused of OVER thinking things many many times. ;-)
It's not just the aircraft. It's also the weapons systems and the combination of those two plus other features like countermeasures, stealth, etc. A good question to ask is, "What's the range and dependability of their air-to-air missiles? And how are they guided?
Su 35,29,28,57 worst that the one of Ukrainian mig 29 :-) checked by Ukrainian AirForce. russian Hellicopter k 52 worth that Stinget :-) All legend about russian army,aircrafts ect is destroyed by Ukrainians :-)
Good joke ,my top ten 1.- Su-57 in your video is clearly visible ísť the best fighter ,2.- Su-37 , 3.- F-22, 4.- Eurofighter ,5.- Rafael ,6.- F-35, 7.- Jas 39 Gripen, 8-F - 16Viper, 9.-Su -27 ,10.- F-18 Hornet .Have a Nice day 😃
Ну список так себе. Пентагон, видимо, спонсировал. Су-57, превосходящий почти по всем параметрам F-35, вдруг много ниже последнего. И второй вопрос - а все представленные западные истребители вывезут против российской Р-37?
South Korean Jet can’t replace to top 10 jets. How they win Russia? Also, they can be demolish 10 years later by people. KF-21 is not fighter now, it will replace at ROKAF on 2026. Replace to top 10 jets on 4 years by not good technology.
Lemme fix it 1. F 22 2. Su 57 3. J 20 it maybe not stealth becuz of canard wings in that case it will be 4.5 gen and mive down to No. 5 4. Su 75 5. F 35 6. Su 35 7.F 15 8. Jas 39 Gripen 9.F 16 fighting falcon 10.Eurofighter Typhoon
Каким образом все эти чудеса могут помочь в реальном боестолкновении,где выигрывает тот ,кто раньше обнаружит противника и пустит более точную и высокотехнологичную ракету и которого не могут засечь ,произвести радиолакационный захват и наведение средства ПВО потенциального противника.
При форсаже двух двигателей выделяется максимум тепловой энергии ,ракеты противника ее прекрасно видят тепловой головкой наведения , так что Отдыхай и кури бамбук,это не цирк с представлениями.
Bonjour, avec quels critères avez vous établi ce classement ? J'espère que ce n'est pas seulement avec la longueur, la masse... Un bon avion de chasse, ce n'est pas uniquement un bel avion puissant, manœuvrant qui va vite, c'est avant tout un vecteur, une plateforme qui embarque un système d'arme actif et passif efficace en vrai sous le feu. Les meilleurs sont ceux qui ont réussi à intégrer avec succès un système d'armes haute performance (radar, optronique, contre mesure, signature radar discrète-invisible, armement..etc), dans une cellule hyper fiable motorisée avec le bon réacteur (puissant, économique, super croisière). Tout cela à un coût d'achat et d'exploitation contenus... Avouons que cela est très compliqué car certains critères sont opposés aux autres, essayer donc de faire un cercle carré ;-) . Enfin, tant qu'à faire, il serait peut-être pertinent que le tandem vecteur-système ai été validé avec succès par l'épreuve du feu...pour de vrai. L'époque des dog fight entre avions puissants hyper manœuvrant est révolue, la majorité des engagements se font aujourd'hui au delà de l'Horizon, d'où l'importance d'avoir un gros puissant système d'armes fiables donc peu sensibles aux coutre mesures adverses. Construire de beaux puissants avions hyper manœuvrant qui font le show dans les meeting aérien est un chose, en construire qui traverseront l'épreuve du feu avec succès en est une autre. Cette description est pour moi ce qui se rapproche le plus d'un "meilleur avion de chasse". Certains avions de votre liste s'en approche, mais d'autres en sont pour l'instant encore loin et ne sont pas à la bonne place dans ce classement. Quelques exemples parmi d'autres: Les F35 sont de vrais furtifs dont les défauts sont petit à petit corrigés. a terme ce sera un bon chasseur bombardier malgré un coût prohibitif à l'achat et à l'heure de vol . Les pays qui en sont dotés sont aujourd'hui obligés de réduire les heures de vol par année au strict minimum, ce qui pourrait engendrer à terme un soucis de qualification pour les pilotes concernés et une difficulté à l'engager dans un conflit à haute intensité. Ne surtout pas oublier que le pays du constructeur garde la main sur les appareils. Hors de question de l'utiliser dans un conflit sans l'aval du pays qui vous la fournis... Les versions améliorées du Su 27 ont du mal à l'export depuis quelques années bien avant la reprise du conflit ukrainien. Et cela malgré des qualités indéniables. Des clients historiques à l'instar de l'Inde ont annulé des commandes de Su35 au profit d'avions européens. Le rapport indien consultable sur internet expliquant ce revirement pointe le coût non maitrisé de l'heure de vol, de la maintenance et les insuffisances du système d'arme des appareils russes. Ce pays ayant dans sa flotte militaire, des appareils russes et occidentaux, il peut donc les comparer . Exemple: Lors des vols d'entrainement mettant en œuvre les différent chasseurs de leur flotte, les Sukhoi était systématiquement détectés par les radars des chasseurs d'origine occidentale bien avant que les avions russes ne les voient... Le beau J20 chinois n'est pas encore à maturité en raison de soucis de motorisation (manque de puissance, de fiabilité, de sobriété, pas de super croisière et discrétion radar insuffisante des moteurs. Les motoristes de l'empire du milieu ont encore du retard par rapport à leurs homologues occidentaux, même si ils apprennent vite. Quid de la signature radar réelle? Idem pour le Su 57 que la propagande Russe surcote allègrement à la limite de la supercherie. Pour moi, un des plus beaux avions du monde, surpuissant, hyper manœuvrant mais malheureusement pas furtif...pour l'instant. Ceux qui ont pu le voir de près sur un meeting savent que l'intrados et l'extrados sont hérissés de rivets et de boulons pas suffisamment lissés, les joints entre les différents panneaux de la cellule ne sont pas sérés et régulier, ne parlons même pas de la peinture et de la motorisation. Ces détails à eux seuls, tuent la furtivité. Pire, c'est le seul aspirant furtif qui n'a pas de soute à armement entre ses nacelles à réacteurs. C'est pour cela qu'il a une taille de guêpe et de belles et pures lignes à l'inverse de ses petits camarades furtifs aux gros ventre (F22, F35, J20, aspirants furtifs coréens, japonais, turques..etc). Mais Bravo à Sukhoi pour le design et les performances pures. Malheureusement pas de soute = emport de l'armement sous pilonnes de voilure = Bye bye la furtivité ! N'étant pas fini, ni furtif et en même temps très cher à l'achat et à l'utilisation, le gouvernement russe préfère lui éviter avec raison l'épreuve du feu... J'espère que ces différents arguments que je pense objectifs et solides apporteront à certains de relativiser ce classement qui est pour moi plus théorique qu'opérationnel.
The Gripen, Rafale and Eurofighter all have substantially better turn rate, both instantaneous and sustained, than an F-16 in most if not all situations (speed, altitude, etc.). The F-22 would probably also outmaneuver an F-16.
@@boumgharmhand9956 lol. against new radars & electronic warfare systems the su35 would be hit before his radar detected modernized F-15 and F-16 foes with real and experienced pilots...
The Su 57 is the most beautiful jet I never seen
Ikr
Esteblistado no esta actualizado le faltan varios aviones como el chek-mate
@@carlosmolina9202check mate isn't even put in producing
The rating was compiled by patients of the clinic for the mentally ill
🤣🤣🤣
По заказу пентагона😂
@user-bq3sฃฃฃฃ❤❤ไฟ// k7ks7z
Exactly. They are all excellent but it is impossible to say which is the best.
Today, speed no longer counts, but maneuverability and agility.
What do you know? you can't even compile what's in your neighbours grocery drawer.
Лучший боевой самолёт это тот, что показал свои качества в реальном бою.
Согласен. Рейтинг- полная хрень
Этот рейтинг по ценам видать,самые дорогие как всегда америкосовские))
Лучший боевой самолет-тот который выполнил задачи и вернулся на базу. У первых двух экземпляров, так называемого топа, так называемого рейтинга, небоевых потерь авиации больше чем их участия в боях.
Danke!
How you decide which is Best ?
which characteristics you used?
Are you engineer or pilot?
why i should believe, there is no fact just pictures with length and weight.
SU-57 is my favorite, saya suka bentuk desain sama sound nya itu. pokok nya burung besi bgt lah
Русские и китайцы молодцы!! 🌼❤
Остальным - не плакать! 🍦
Su57-su35😍
Creativity in design, grace and lightness
Su57 better then su35 /:
The MiG-31 isn't a multirole fighter, it's a long-range, all-weather, supersonic interceptor.
Mig-31BM is multirole original 31 is not.
Never the less, it's not a fighter.
@@yvanchaine3223 And what is it then? Of course its a fighter. Original Mig-31 is long range fighter interceptor and Mig-31BM is multirole fighter because they add precision bombing capability to him.
Yeah, it’s a fighter. There are different fighter roles, but they are all fighters.
Or stratosphere interceptor
When you say "compared", I expect price, maintenance price, weapon capacity and diversity, maneuverability, range, what can achieve, how fast can be deployed, , and ultimately how many battle won over a period.
Me too. Not just showing us useless videos
He said “Compiled” not Compared. Listen carefully.
@@JoanLorenzo79 still, if you're going to give only a few types of specs on these planes why would you choose length and weight and not something like top speed, armament, and something else that sets it apart from aircraft?
Precisely. All those factors, yes. Eventually, only its success rate in battles counts. Most of these 'whizzo' machines will never actually be deployed in battle. Nations will buy and maintain them at a huge price. Already obsolescent, in a short while they will be obsolete
@@ChristopherDwane Think again, don’t you get it? Do you? he can do another video o the topics that you want, that’s just the appetizer. Another video another thousand views: that means another money.
Су-57 первое места самолёт номер 1
Были бы представлены в ролике ТТХ , можно бы было сравнить...
top1=szu-57, top2=J-20
I’m here for the thumbnail!
MiG-31 is a dedicated look-down/shoot-down capable interceptor, designed to protect Russia's vast northern expanses from the threat of submarine and/or bomber-launched cruise missiles coming in from the high arctic. It is top of its game in the world, in that regard, but NOT a "fighter" in the sense of being an aircraft specifically concerned with wresting air superiority from other fighters (in most scenarios, it would never realistically expect to encounter short-ranged 'fighters' over the vast Russian arctic). While an impressive aircraft in its time, the F-15C/D/E would not be a realistic contender with the 4.5-gen' and beyond: 4.5-gen' and above would likely render it completely blind with their advantage in embedded EW tech. Rafale and E2000 I am okay with except that I would have put Rafale over E2000. Both are multi-roles, with at least as much emphasis on air superiority as other roles, although the Rafale is the stealthier aircraft (the E2000 was not particularly designed for stealth at all whereas the Rafale was designed with the mantra, "as stealthy as possible without compromise to performance"). While the F/A-18C/D were true multi-roles in the sense of having adequate dog fighting capability, the F/A-18E/F sacrificed much of the legacy series' dog fighting performance in favor of greater capacity for air-to-surface ordnance (remember, they were designed to replace not just the F/A-18C/D but, in a single type, the A-6E). The F-35, likewise, is a strike aircraft 'capable' of air-to-air combat...similar, in turn, to the J-20. The only real "fighters" on this list, in terms of aircraft with a primary or, at least, "equal" (where multi-role) emphasis on air superiority, are the F-15C/D, E2000, Rafale, Su-35, Su-57, and F-22. To make up a list of ten, in terms of ten aircraft with primary or at least equal emphasis on air superiority, I'd expand to: MiG-29 "Fulcrum-C," F-16C/D, F-15C/D Su-27 "Flanker-B," E2000, Rafale, Su-35 "Super Flanker," Saab Gripen-E (bizarre omission - arguably top of the lot in EW capability), Su-57, F-22. That's if you were picking single aircraft for a single pilot. On a force-wide scale, taking budget into account? Su-57 may well be more practical than the F-22, just as the T-34 was more practical than the Panther.
a wonderful unbiased comment , I fully share your opinion
The biggest comment I have ever seen.
and the medal for the biggest dickhead goes toooo
the f-15 is definitely a competitor for 4.5 gen aircraft... the rafale, gripen, and typhoon all have giant vertical rudders that basically destroy their stealth. also, what makes you think that the su-27 is better than the f-15? The f-15 has a better t/w, better dogfighting capabilities, a better radar, better missiles, and better range. The su-27 has an AoA limiter of about 29 degrees, while the f-15 does not have an AoA limiter, and the su-27 and bleeds speed much quicker than the f-15. the top speed of the f-15 is mach 2.5, while the su-27 has a top speed of about, from what i could find, mach 2.35. the su-27 is also a much larger aircraft.
@@potatopower707 I've flew both the typhoon and f-15 and boy o boy did I have wet pants both times absolutely incredible. I'm due to fly on the Virgin galatic in 2025 and it's going to be out this world ( literally ) I'm so lucky to have the chance to go into outer space 😇😇😇😇
Ming 31/Su 35/Su 57...and Greek Pilots...Inferno..😉😉😉
and Su-30sm)на счет греческих пилотов тоже согласен!турки хорошо запомнили это)))
@@NickosSuperfrensh mirage yes
Su-57 gave me the best impression. He seem so smooth 👌
su 25
@@serdarsahin3833 su 47
@@MrSUMAD MAYBE
Такой обзор 1 апреля должен был выйти)))
Согласен бро. Ему не самолеты сравнивать, а писи в садике,блять.
Да, СУ57 побывал во всех горячих точках мира!!!
@@ОлександрШепель-з8к сколько су57 в Рашке? 5? 7?
9
@@СашаГригорьев-в4с 1 принят на вооружение
You completely forgot the Swedish JAS-39 Gripen E that is an INCREDIBLE multi-role fighter (Hunting,Attack and Survilance) STOL (Short Take Of And Landing) It recently outmanuver and scored 2.5 per unit against US F-15!!!
It was A recent Combined Warexercise between the U.S and sweden where The "Kill ratio" was incrediblie 2,5 F-15 per 1 JAS 39 Gripen E!!!
Sweden . The best military technology. The best intelligence, reconnaissance and counterintelligence...But they prefer to be quiet about that...
I'm french and I say Bravo to Sweden to have built a so efficient fighter !!
@@umbramodo8672 the weakest people
With the MBDA Meteor and IRIS-T a absolutly deadly machine
Су57самый лучший из всех самолётов.
не, раптор по сильнее будет, может даже старый томкет сможет за сушкой погонятся
@@ИванУчаев-л7к причём здесь ф 35 если мы про раптор говорили 🤨
Су-57 более манёвренный, чем f-35 и раптор
@@ИванУчаев-л7к я бы поспорил, да и прикол ф35 в том, что ф35 сушку намного раньше найдёт, а пилоту су прийдётся глазами а не радаром его находить
Конечно ьы же проверил это на диване@@kaktus6364
J20 looks so nice, but has never been tested by the war, need to certify it is workable during the real battle field
" Su-57 vs F-22 , F-15 vs Su-35 , TYPHOON vs J-20 , F-18 vs RAFALE " . These're great combinations.
the stupidest rating I've seen
@@chieftainofthemoroccosindi1685 www
@@wowo312 I'm about the video.
As others have said, the Mig 31 is a interceptor. My major disagreement with this video is about the F15. With a combat record that it has and years of service it should have been at least at number 6. It's a better fighter than the F18...
I agree with your first point but the F18 is superior to the F15, If we are talking combat record then yes the F15 is better but the F18 is more maneuverable, it has newer technologies and is largely multirole for attack, dogfighting, Navy and more.
@@titan1286 KO
Sziasztok, szerintem az F-35 Lightning II jobb mint az F22 Raptor, de harci teszteken a Felon (SU-35) legyőzte mind a kettőt, a gépekben a gyár által delegált berepülőpilóták ültek. Azon kívül a SU-57 képes ember nélkül, kötelékben is repülni...Technikai adatokat is közölhettek volna...
Как Рашка за кудахтала обидели не ихняя хуй ня лучше оказалося металлолом 😂😂😂
Good content keep it up friend ☺️
Indonesians prefer Russian-made fighters; Indonesian Airforce had operated Soviet-built fighters and bombers in 1960s, such as MiG15, 17, 21 and Ilyushin 16. Now in our inventory are Sukhoi-27s and 30s withe 35s scheduled to be sent in near future. However, we have also been operating US-made F-16s, British Hawk and C-130s, four A400Ms will also come soon. We have sufficient experience in operating Russian-made fighters thus it is somewhat difficult to accept that S-35 is put on the 8th place...
Ow
Indo need to decide which direction we would go. Now we also bought Rafaele. Too much variations. High cost of training & maintenance
So Indonesians prefer crap. We see in the Ukraine war how crap russian technology is
Crap? Get serious bro, we've got sufficient experience using Soviet- and Russian-made hardwares...see, even today you can still see MiG-21 fighters remain in the operational inventories in some countries, stand ready alongside 4.5 generation fighters.
@@starseed8087 no kidding supply them with some US and European tank defense and they done also they can't have any moral left.
And the F-16 didn’t make the list. It’s an older fighter and still a strong fighter.
F 16 is the best flying machine ever made
Indian Mig fucked F16
@@alimunim7542 MiG-29 is better.
Proof of this is the new MiG-35, which is currently being developed. It is based on the MiG-29.
@@abhisheksrivastav1951 Indian Mig fucked F16... with an pakistanian pilot inside who just was busy praying for ramadan
@@abhisheksrivastav1951 ya tea is fantastic lolzzz
Very bad ranking. Amazing, can't resist commenting. Ranking probably based on inappropriate criteria.
Always difficult to rank but the Europhiter Typhoon better ranked than the Rafale from Dassault Aviation is really not serious. Likewise the F-35 better classified than the excellent Sukhoi SU-57 ...
For me, in a very general way, for multi-role:
Rafale Dassault excellent on many aspects / Sukhoi SU-57 very powerful also / F-22 for its stealth (without post-combustion) (interest of the stealth limited in many situations) (very very expensive plane).
..The F35 was a money pit, political grift. Similar to the Litorral warships seasoned sea admirals BEGGED congress NOT to build. The did anyway.. Wasteful cost SHOULD be the first consideration. Edit...turns out, F35s are only good for airshows.
Junk Chengdu on 4th seems bribed video
The ranking was based on utter ignorance. Whoever did the video has no idea about jet fighters, he just compiled other videos and made this one, that is all. He could do the same comparing chocolate cakes or hair styles.
Su57 is junk.
@GeBoi Correct, this video was made by parasites who know nothing and just copy and paste other people's work. They do that because UA-cam does not check intellectual property violations, there are many junk videos like this one.
どの年式の製品でしょうか？ 火器管制電子対抗システムは現在J20に対してどのように戦っているのでしょうか？
Gripen E / F should be on this list!
exactly
I'm from Brazil and I was outraged by this
Yes! That is number one!
Quand vous mettez le fer a repasser le plus cher du monde à la deuxième place on a des doutes sur le sérieux du classement .
Number 1 : Toyota Camry
Land Rover.
ford edsel...
nissan march^^
Nissan (Autotec Japan) Be-1.
Kia Rio
Danke für das tolle Video
Чисто патриотическое американское топ! помоему тут самолёты выбрались в топ по паспорту и внешней красоте! с какого перепуга рафали, ф15, ф18 и ещё некоторые лучше су35?
А с чего это ф 15 и ф 18 ХУЖЕ сьарого советского су 35 ???
@@taiza461 советский?)))серьезно?)))сырой?)))
F-35 у которого 250 недоделок, один из лучших?
С КАКОГО ПРЕРЕПУГА СОВЕТСКОГО? ЧЕМ ОНИ ЛУТШЕ?
Они по мирным лучше всех работают. Такая у них классификация.
Как только F-22 сделает кобру Пугачева!) Сразу станет первым!) А пока он первый по стоимости....
Кобра Пугачёва это секретное оружие? F 22 его стратегия убрать цель до того как сам будет обнаружен. В контактный бой ему и вступать не придётся. Технология делает разницу. Петля классная история на парад!
Что сможет сделать ф22 без сопровождения(ДРЛО, интернет)?
Нет смысла ставить рейтинг,всегда решается в реальном бою.Не дай бог.
😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@Ramons577
Надо же, он против человеческих смертей. Действительно, до слёз.
@@SuperSlant då ahujennij reiting
Да ахуенный рейтинг 😂🤡😂💩с кресла можно упасть ☠️☠️☠️
@@Ramons577
Ты действительно уверен, что понял контекст?
😳😳
Wow... !!! My best friend, Great Good... !!! I wish you every day of your development.
Су 35 как минимум на 3 месте! Это рейтинг безмозглого человека!
А по манёвренности американцы и рядом не валялись!
@@Rus-he3mw1le5s - Аминь!!!
За то по тяго вооруженности,дальности и авионике
Су 35 еще недосамолет. Летает да и ладно.
Это вообще не рейтинг. Личное мнение какого то вододела.
The Su-57 is better than the F-35 and F-22. The Su-35 also deserves a top spot in the rankings.
And nowhere did I see the MiG-29, which, although old, is one of the most successful fighters.
dreaming!?
I’m glad we have the rite to voice our opinions but we don’t know the real specs of any of these aircraft.
The Big1 the exterior copied F35,.
@@VũNgo-Hanoi Bariloche Argentina Bariloche Argentina
@david smith specs doesn't matter, how they perform in real combat is what matters especially aircrafts of equal specs not like the USA who used their Air Suppiority to Bully smaller nations.
@@densleycunningham7208 sorry you missed my point
The Su-57 is incorporated with 3D thrust vectoring controls that give the aircraft better agility and maneuverability at high speed and altitudes. The Su-57 3D thrust vectoring control capability is deemed to be better than that of the F-22 Raptor.
як це,авионика на су 57 французька,а краще ніж у раптора))))
@@Олег-ж7б4г
Write in english what you say?
@@Олег-ж7б4г Рамсы попутал дружище.Ыранзузского там ни чего нет.Это на суперджетах французские движки были ( и то только горячая часть), теперь и этот недостаток устранили.
@@Олег-ж7б4г на гиляку дуй, скотиняка. Точнее в Бахмут защищать ридную мойву. 😂
not remember that the F22 made a strong impression against the Rafales in November 2009 .... it has been improved since?
When it shows the number 1, the F-22 Raptor, after it states country of origin as USA, the video footage is of a F-15E, not a F-22.
Su 35 no 8?You have no idea of fighters.
at least big 3 i guess
@iosif makrinakis He made this list as he wanted, even if he doesnt know nothing about airplanes..
Chinese Chengdu junk in top 5 ??? Hahaha , that country can not have the capabilities og making a microwave last more than 3 years . A joke .
@@Hanss8814 you just like a joker，funny
@@mohamadoubambaniang7734 The other countries are looking at other fighters because we won't sell the F22 to ANY foreign country... Not even our closest allies... And countries like Turkey were taken off the list for sale of F35 because they broke an agreement to not buy air defense systems from Russia. Japan is developing their fighter from the Northrop/Douglas YF23 that competed and lost against the F22 for the USAF contract. The F22 crash problems were caused by an inadequate life support system causing pilots to lose consciousness... It's been updated and no crashes since.
Ridiculous. Everyone knows that the Sopwith Camel is the best, and that Snoopy is the second best pilot.
Biggles and Buck Danny are the best pilots!
No es tan cierta esa encuet
Cute comment, but kidding aside, the REAL Red Baron was a seriously formidable many times over ace pilot. When he was finally shot down, he was buried by the enemy (us) with honors. It was a different time, that's for sure. And now you've got me singing that stupid song...10, 20, 30 ,40, 50 or more ... Cheers. Oh, and the Baron flew a Fokker triplane. There used to be a joke that ended "Yes mam, but these 'fokkers' were flying Messerschmitts. You can probably get the gist from that.
SU 57 best F35
@@editor.ivan04 I think you are attempting to bring seriousness to a sarcasm/silly comment thread. ;-)
Good day thanks for the support and help 🙂
Roses are red
Violets are blue
I came for the thumbnail and so did you
The Dassault Rafale is under estimated. It has won all the very last worldwide competitions: singapore, south korea, switzerland and india. It deserves to be at least on the podium!
🤣🤣
that aircraft shouldnt even be in the top 10 , and what about the f16?
It's not even close to the SU-57 F-22 or F-35 stop doing drugs
@@TOXXIC_VENOM6666 your drug is the anglo-saxon propaganda that you swallow without having a critical mind
@@labechamel75 wasn't your country destroyed by the Saxons 😂 clearly you're a clueless individual
Сушки вообще то впереди всякого рейтинга, су 35 а су57 вообще вне конкуренций ближайщие лет 20-30
Гонишь что ли? Это хлам!
ЭТО ТЕБЕ КИСЕЛЕВ СКАЗАЛ 😂😂😂
@@АугустоПиночет-м7ж по сравнению с чем?))) С украинской авиацией???)))
Марат, ты со своими овцами на пастбище сравниваешь?
@@ZZTOP414 Ты свою пшеницу фуражную с украинской лучше сравни ослик!!! хаха
Good flying work with good manuevers 💙
СУ 57 👈🇷🇺👍✌
Иди ударься об стенку, вася🤣 клоуны русские, вы только болтать умеете. Или на мирные не вооружённе народы бомбы сбрасывать.
@@СитиСити-ю7и Это вы об американцах, как мирное население ковровыми бомбордировками.... в Ираке?
The most funny part of this vid is specs of a-craft consisting only of lengh and weight. Sure these are quite major qualities, but for fighter air superiority a-craft there are much more fundamentally important qualities
The best pilot is the best plane.
Oops! M Best Pilot is TANGO-1 (Turkish) , search it 👍🏻 , this sitution Red Flag 👍🏻
Search Tango1 and Red Flag 🙌🏻
не поспоришь. Самолет - инструмент в руках мастера.
Илья Пивоваров write English
The plane in the hands of a good master is a weapon. A plane in the hands of a bad pilot is not a weapon.
Илья Пивоваров true 👍🏻
Super video
.
Я понимаю патриотизм автора, но не до наглядной глупости же !!! 🤣
Where there is a stupidy or a patriotism?. F-22 and F-35 are on duty. even more, they fight! Russian and chinese 5th gen. machines are still deveoloped or in tests.
@@jackiejones6246 Ролик не о дежурстве, или серийных, а о лучших истребителях !!!
F35 не доработанный шлак.
@@rusrast А F 22 отработанный )
@@jackiejones6246 Who are they fighting ?
With third world countries that have neither air power nor air defense ?
You only fight there, and so the spirit is not enough !
Even Kim was scared, and he just showed the missiles....
On special versions of the MiG-25, 29 world records were set, including an absolute record for flight altitude - 37650 meters and speed - 3494 km / h. What can we say about Russian aviation of the 21st century. Subjective list
Yeah we are getting a good look at Russian air superiority in Ukraine what a embarrassment.
@@blaizellee4441 you are dumb to think Russia will use full force military equipment and soldiers for Ukraine.
nice
To big to heavy there’s a few fighters that would fly circles around them you want a Ferrari not a big old Cadillac
@@blaizellee4441 А мы очень хорошо видим голосование Украины и США против резолюции ООН запрещающей героизацию нацизма.Слава Украине и Хай Гитлер несется из ваших уст нескрываемо.
Russia TV: 1 Su 57; 2 Su 35
Usa TV: 1 F22; 2 F35
Just 4 laugh. 🤣🤣🤣
RUIIEWS:IWNNI3.:8380YUMIYSNNIHUM.IKO.123IRI
Как я рад что в западных странах такие "эксперты", какого будет их удивление когда самый слабый из списка МИГ-31 вооруженный гиперзвуковой ракетой в одиночку потопит авианосец с десятками F-35. Или Су-35 который легко вырубает своими РЭБ радары натовских истребителей, что и показали их встречи, когда на радарах Су хорошо видны были F-35, а вот те его не обнаружили. Про Су-57 там вообще беспилотный вариант внедряется, кроме того это единственный в мире истребитель способный управлять ударными стелс беспилотниками при помощи искусственного интеллекта, ну, конечно, гиперзвуковые ракеты, сверхманевренность, и мощнейшие системы РЭБ, которые показали что ПВО стран НАТО не способно его обнаружить на Украине, где этот истребитель активно тестировался.
пусть продолжают верить в свою исключительность, это нам только на руку)
The fact that the F-15 is STILL in the top 10 after 47 years of existence is amazing and a credit to how powerful the U.S. air force is.
🤣
Вы ещё удивитесь,насколько сильны наши ребята,и,лучше,не спорте,а просто примите к сведению
Наслаждайтесь
Ihr habt ja auch genug Technik von den Russen gestohlen
Помню рейтинги готовности стран мира к епидемиям, США и Англия были на 1 и 2 месте, реальность показала, что они одни из хутших)))
С каких это пор миг-31 и су-35 на последних местах смешно,су-57 на третьем месте бред
Скрепы в чайнике ?
?
У тебя мозги промиты что ли?
А су57 на вооружении имеется?
eurofighter is the best f22 is strong as f22 in second place
Су-57 оснащен трехмерным управлением вектором тяги, которое придает самолету лучшую маневренность и маневренность на высоких скоростях и высотах. Возможности управления вектором тяги Су-57 3D считаются лучше, чем у F-22 Raptor.
😍i love Russia 🇷🇺
Halo, is this Music video and the Planes are backround statistics ? Great !
The Gripen NG should be the 8th in the ranking.
I think J-20 and Su-57 are superb..
j20 pos fail at dogfight
@@dudedude869
J-20 will be shoot all Nato and American fighters, time will show everything.
Хаха......это же просто рейтинг самых красиво покрашеных самолетов по мнению аффтара с плохим зрением)))))
ua-cam.com/video/YFO7JhCpYkE/v-deo.html
Только начал смотреть и немного в шоке от того, что самый быстрый истребитель в мире он поставил на десятое место. Что же там дальше будет?!))
Понятно после 8 места смысла нет смотреть это просто... ua-cam.com/video/N6tOzE6Dj8g/v-deo.html
@@ПетрПетрович777 Может это был обратный отсчет?
@@rasyidhamka1054 p
An den Autor dieses Beitrages. Lesen Sie sich alle Komentare gründlichst. Dann werden Sie hoffentlich erkennen wieviel MEHR an Sachverstand notwendig war und ist um so ein spezielles Video richtig, gut zumachen.
С этим списком я категорически не согласен автор видео видимо что то курит
Этот список полная Хрень
Chanchil... согласен с вами...где Су-30СМ,Су-33(27К), Су 37,МиГ-29СМТ,Миг-35,а... где?
Да он по ходу тормоз, пургу несёт, наши самолёты настоящие, не то что их игрушки
МиГ-31 10 место......)))) хот эти самолёты и с 81 года на вооружении, но кажется до сих пор нет машин, способных двумя парами контролировать воздушное пространство протяжённостью по фронту до 1100 км. с самого начала ни каких вопросов не осталось. далее смотрел не более чем красивые картинки с самолётами.
@@German8871 Миг 31 доработка Миг 25 1969года
.
@@swij00 тридцать первый совершенно другая машина. В корне. Всё равно, что паровоз доработка утюга...
"АВТОР ЧТО ТО КУРИЛ КОГДА СОСТАВЛЯЛ РЕЙТИНГ , ЯВНО НЕ ДЕШЁВОЕ"
Ага,что-то типа дешёвой конопли....
WOW, a Russian channel that gives it straight. Kudos, dude! Nice job. Some nice Russian aircraft, as well. Always liked the looks of Russian jets.
Yes, the SU35...what a beauty.Slim and elegant. I love it.
@@electroaimant5402 I was actually working for a subcontractor doing the FLIR for the YF23, the OTHER competitor in the Advanced Tactical Fighter competition. The 23 lost, our FLIR won and got put on the F22 platform (it was supposed to be a whole or nothing package win, but they changed it after they saw our capabilities).
I was actually working in the building and lab where they were designing, integrating, and pre-testing that FLIR, but I was working on a different, much lower performance FLIR, on a boring build-to-print contract from GE...bummer.
Whole point of that, finally (I know), is that the 23 was a much better looking bird than the F22, outperformed it in most respects, too, but contract awards are really fickle sometimes. My guess is this one had to do with current production levels and capabilities of the two companies, compared...who knows. None of the 5th gen fighters are gorgeous, by any standard (RCS considerations), but the 23 was DEFINITELY the better looking of the two, MHO.
@@MrJdsenior red hour glass!
@@bryanhawk6052 Bryan, I'm sure I SHOULD be getting that reference, but I'm at a loss. If it's a joke, sorry, because I am fully aware it ruins the whole thing to have to explain it to someone being slow on the uptake. Maybe it will hit me when I stop thinking about it. I have been accused of OVER thinking things many many times. ;-)
@@bryanhawk6052 Too much time, maybe? I await the DUH, and head slap that is likely coming.
It's not just the aircraft. It's also the weapons systems and the combination of those two plus other features like countermeasures, stealth, etc. A good question to ask is, "What's the range and dependability of their air-to-air missiles? And how are they guided?
Good point! It’s all things put together that make up the fighter plane.
Dassault Rafale better than su-35 and F-22 Raptor better than su-57!?I want to see it.
Su 35,29,28,57 worst that the one of Ukrainian mig 29 :-) checked by Ukrainian AirForce.
russian Hellicopter k 52 worth that Stinget :-)
All legend about russian army,aircrafts ect is destroyed by Ukrainians :-)
Good joke ,my top ten 1.- Su-57 in your video is clearly visible ísť the best fighter ,2.- Su-37 , 3.- F-22, 4.- Eurofighter ,5.- Rafael ,6.- F-35, 7.- Jas 39 Gripen, 8-F - 16Viper, 9.-Su -27 ,10.- F-18 Hornet .Have a Nice day 😃
не дай нам Бог, когда нибудь, встретиться в бою...там будет видно кто на десятом, кто на третьем, кто на первом
Согласен. Такие списки составляются ради просмотров. По каким критериям - не ясно.
Su57 the BEST
из этого списка. на первом месте будут те самолеты, которых просто будет больше в боевом строю....
лучше конечно на практике не проверять , даже если бы сушка лучшей оказалась , война - хреновая вещь , это не спорт
только русские не хотят проверять, кто круче в бою... Остальные олени просто не в курсе что отгребут по полной!!!
Ну список так себе. Пентагон, видимо, спонсировал. Су-57, превосходящий почти по всем параметрам F-35, вдруг много ниже последнего.
И второй вопрос - а все представленные западные истребители вывезут против российской Р-37?
I want to know where u got the thumb nail pic
韩国的最垃圾^_^
@@何禾禾-e9y MGM?
Рейтинг по стоимости))
👍 точно
Рейтинг не по существу,нет Су-30СМ,Су-37, МиГ-29СМТ, Миг-35!!!??? Тоже мне знаток хренов!
Браво!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Аааа...Ты купишь ЗОЛОТОЙ молоток,чтоб лучше гвозди забивались????
@@ХристоХристов-ь2т !p
Nice F 15 at the beginning of the F 22 montage and where is the SU 37 at.?
F35 It is a big obese hornet.
Thanks for the info thanks.
Mig 31 is the best interceptor in the world no other can do better
👍
True
j20 in fact is special bomber/AWAC/refueler killer
This is awesome air fighter get, with 360 rotational speed
I think 10 years later KF 21 will replace one of the top 10 jets.
젠22보다 더 좋습니다
이제 나와 무시해서
10대에 넣지 않했습니다
South Korean Jet can’t replace to top 10 jets. How they win Russia? Also, they can be demolish 10 years later by people. KF-21 is not fighter now, it will replace at ROKAF on 2026. Replace to top 10 jets on 4 years by not good technology.
Can not
นดนุ้ยสอน
Lemme fix it
1. F 22
2. Su 57
3. J 20 it maybe not stealth becuz of canard wings in that case it will be 4.5 gen and mive down to No. 5
4. Su 75
5. F 35
6. Su 35
7.F 15
8. Jas 39 Gripen
9.F 16 fighting falcon
10.Eurofighter Typhoon
The raptor is just a beautiful plane!
Beautiful and strong!
@@thxblxck3937 totally!!
@@getothechoppa114 Russia dont even have a chance against US
@@thxblxck3937 no probably not lol. America's navy has more jets then most countries air forces lol
@@getothechoppa114 😂
R u mad? Su-35 in no 8. how funny!!!
List is a joke 😂
Yes
Yes
It's a gigantic joke.
It’s propaganda
a joke that has 6.5 mil views
Interesting jobs
Beautiful ships
Наши хвостом в перед умеют кобра та же полицейский разворот запросто, а эти только прямо😄
Каким образом все эти чудеса могут помочь в реальном боестолкновении,где выигрывает тот ,кто раньше обнаружит противника и пустит более точную и высокотехнологичную ракету и которого не могут засечь ,произвести радиолакационный захват и наведение средства ПВО потенциального противника.
При форсаже двух двигателей выделяется максимум тепловой энергии ,ракеты противника ее прекрасно видят тепловой головкой наведения , так что Отдыхай и кури бамбук,это не цирк с представлениями.
Главное у них - неуязвимость, маневренность, ударная сила и , конечно, мастерство пилота (+удача). А развороты и задний ход - детские игрушки.
Су 57 супер
Really awesome cover photo. Looks like a Macross jet.
And fly, and take pictures. Both cheap and not painful.
From Independence Day movie, a Global Defender. Cool looking indeed.
Bonjour, avec quels critères avez vous établi ce classement ?
J'espère que ce n'est pas seulement avec la longueur, la masse...
Un bon avion de chasse, ce n'est pas uniquement un bel avion puissant, manœuvrant qui va vite, c'est avant tout un vecteur, une plateforme qui embarque un système d'arme actif et passif efficace en vrai sous le feu. Les meilleurs sont ceux qui ont réussi à intégrer avec succès un système d'armes haute performance (radar, optronique, contre mesure, signature radar discrète-invisible, armement..etc), dans une cellule hyper fiable motorisée avec le bon réacteur (puissant, économique, super croisière). Tout cela à un coût d'achat et d'exploitation contenus...
Avouons que cela est très compliqué car certains critères sont opposés aux autres, essayer donc de faire un cercle carré ;-) . Enfin, tant qu'à faire, il serait peut-être pertinent que le tandem vecteur-système ai été validé avec succès par l'épreuve du feu...pour de vrai.
L'époque des dog fight entre avions puissants hyper manœuvrant est révolue, la majorité des engagements se font aujourd'hui au delà de l'Horizon, d'où l'importance d'avoir un gros puissant système d'armes fiables donc peu sensibles aux coutre mesures adverses.
Construire de beaux puissants avions hyper manœuvrant qui font le show dans les meeting aérien est un chose, en construire qui traverseront l'épreuve du feu avec succès en est une autre.
Cette description est pour moi ce qui se rapproche le plus d'un "meilleur avion de chasse". Certains avions de votre liste s'en approche, mais d'autres en sont pour l'instant encore loin et ne sont pas à la bonne place dans ce classement.
Quelques exemples parmi d'autres:
Les F35 sont de vrais furtifs dont les défauts sont petit à petit corrigés. a terme ce sera un bon chasseur bombardier malgré un coût prohibitif à l'achat et à l'heure de vol . Les pays qui en sont dotés sont aujourd'hui obligés de réduire les heures de vol par année au strict minimum, ce qui pourrait engendrer à terme un soucis de qualification pour les pilotes concernés et une difficulté à l'engager dans un conflit à haute intensité. Ne surtout pas oublier que le pays du constructeur garde la main sur les appareils. Hors de question de l'utiliser dans un conflit sans l'aval du pays qui vous la fournis...
Les versions améliorées du Su 27 ont du mal à l'export depuis quelques années bien avant la reprise du conflit ukrainien. Et cela malgré des qualités indéniables. Des clients historiques à l'instar de l'Inde ont annulé des commandes de Su35 au profit d'avions européens. Le rapport indien consultable sur internet expliquant ce revirement pointe le coût non maitrisé de l'heure de vol, de la maintenance et les insuffisances du système d'arme des appareils russes. Ce pays ayant dans sa flotte militaire, des appareils russes et occidentaux, il peut donc les comparer . Exemple: Lors des vols d'entrainement mettant en œuvre les différent chasseurs de leur flotte, les Sukhoi était systématiquement détectés par les radars des chasseurs d'origine occidentale bien avant que les avions russes ne les voient...
Le beau J20 chinois n'est pas encore à maturité en raison de soucis de motorisation (manque de puissance, de fiabilité, de sobriété, pas de super croisière et discrétion radar insuffisante des moteurs. Les motoristes de l'empire du milieu ont encore du retard par rapport à leurs homologues occidentaux, même si ils apprennent vite. Quid de la signature radar réelle?
Idem pour le Su 57 que la propagande Russe surcote allègrement à la limite de la supercherie.
Pour moi, un des plus beaux avions du monde, surpuissant, hyper manœuvrant mais malheureusement pas furtif...pour l'instant.
Ceux qui ont pu le voir de près sur un meeting savent que l'intrados et l'extrados sont hérissés de rivets et de boulons pas suffisamment lissés, les joints entre les différents panneaux de la cellule ne sont pas sérés et régulier, ne parlons même pas de la peinture et de la motorisation. Ces détails à eux seuls, tuent la furtivité.
Pire, c'est le seul aspirant furtif qui n'a pas de soute à armement entre ses nacelles à réacteurs. C'est pour cela qu'il a une taille de guêpe et de belles et pures lignes à l'inverse de ses petits camarades furtifs aux gros ventre (F22, F35, J20, aspirants furtifs coréens, japonais, turques..etc). Mais Bravo à Sukhoi pour le design et les performances pures.
Malheureusement pas de soute = emport de l'armement sous pilonnes de voilure = Bye bye la furtivité !
N'étant pas fini, ni furtif et en même temps très cher à l'achat et à l'utilisation, le gouvernement russe préfère lui éviter avec raison l'épreuve du feu...
J'espère que ces différents arguments que je pense objectifs et solides apporteront à certains de relativiser ce classement qui est pour moi plus théorique qu'opérationnel.
nice video, planes are beautiful, but which ones have actual combat experience?
У русских
Су 35 8 место не смешите меня вы с потолка этот топ взяли?
Он вообще в жопе должен быть.
@@sekundant100 , не может - там уже ты сидишь
I almost agree. Only the Su-35 I would move to the 5th place
1
My favourite super multi roles fighter jet is the one and only SWEDEN JAS-39 GRIPEN E👍👍👍💯💯💯👏👏👏❤️❤️❤️
You are so right, nothing compares to it.
- And where does the Wright Brothers "Flyer" fit in all this? Show some respect man!
MyDog Brian its not like they put guns on the wright flyer
@@Spacebaryonyx- Well then,,, ? mabe they should have (machine guns), to level the playing field.
the Saab JAS 39 Gripen was missing from this list.
she not a good aircraft
@@checkmate7745 And you don't know anything about fighters!
JAS 39 Gripen outruns all of the others.
Show me a plane that has a kill ratio better than the F-15.- or can outturn an F-16
The Gripen, Rafale and Eurofighter all have substantially better turn rate, both instantaneous and sustained, than an F-16 in most if not all situations (speed, altitude, etc.). The F-22 would probably also outmaneuver an F-16.
Easy, an su-57 felon is the best plane for dog fight and its stealth, so it's hard to hit from long range
The SU-35 smokes 5 F-15 and 5 F-16 every morning after his breakfast. Remember what happened in Syria's sky.
@@Denis_Jumps how many of them? we're speaking about operating figthers. how many su57 are on duty????
@@boumgharmhand9956 lol. against new radars & electronic warfare systems the su35 would be hit before his radar detected modernized F-15 and F-16 foes with real and experienced pilots...
What exluded Saab JAS 39 Gripen ?
SU 57 exceeds by 10 classes F22 RAPTOR ... can not be compared
On wat fucking planet
Good!
@@singleplayerreview3238 ha,ha,ha ! Unhappy idiot!
@@ponkopanajot5143 f22 Raptor is the Best.
Raptor not best 😂
The hability to fly has notinght to do with the hability to fight. Nothing here show us who`s the best equiped engine to perform the mission.
@ antonio moura this is very true no technical details mentioned, even so flying in training and flying in combat is totally different.
Every barbarian brags about holding a best stick in his hands, until his opponent breaks his head!
گلی گلداری گل شاخه ای چند
Супер ангел ястребы 😎😍🤩