The information given here may be 10 or 20 years outdated. Most of the planes have newer versions with better characteristics. For example - F/A 18 Hornet has already built 3 generations of newer F/A Super Hornet - Block 1, 2 and 3. F-15 is now in versions: Silent Eagle, Strike Eagle and the most recent F-15EX.
There are 3 types of attack aircraft, the strategic target type of which most of these are. The second is tactical aircraft which strike targets in the area beyond the immediate ground combat area, then the third which are close air support which take place in the immediate ground combat area. For the first the F-15 strike eagle and the newer F-35 excel. For the second the Su-34, the F-16 and F-18 Super Hornet are best and for close air support the A-10 wins the prize. These are my opinions only!
@Duminica Septembrie Really, and you base this CLAIM on what evidence. In the pure ground attack roll, nothing beats the Warthog. The Ukrainians knock the Su-25 out of the sky with impunity. It isn't as survivable as the A-10. Now, SU-25s are not even allowed to attack straight away. They come in low and "toss" their bombs and rockets over their own troops and hope it will hit Ukrainian positions. This spray and pray approach is highly ineffective and ends up hitting their own troops. At low altitudes, the A-10 is much more maneuverable and several times more survivable than the Su-25. The SU-25 is, at best, a cheap imitation of the A-10. You need to expand your sources because the ones you have now are embarrassing you.
The video is good only some details: SU-24 / F-15 E, SU-34, Mirage 2000 D/N, F-111, Tornado IDS are deep penetrator aircraft behind enemy lines AMX-1, F/A-18, JHC-7, F-2, SuperEtendard, TU-22M3, SU-34 are aeronaval missile strikers and attack aircraft A-10, SU-25, A-37, AV-8 Harrier II, MiG-27, SU-39 Are attack Ground support antitank aircraft and support troops B-1, TU 160, F-111, B-2, Mirage IV, Avro Vulcan are heavy bombers and deep penetrator strategic bombers
Where is the A- 10 ? And what about Rafales or Gripen ? A-10 is the better plane specialized for ground attack, and Rafales and Gripen are multiroles whith great ground attack capacities, even nuclear for the Rafale ...
Where are the A10, SU25 and the Rafale ? They are able to attack on the ground. The A10 is considered the best American ground attack aircraft even though it is old. And the Rafale is currently considered the best airplane in the world for export
22 года назад во время бомбардировки НАТО сербы первыми в мире сбили невидимый F 117 A ракетами «Нева S 125». Затем был сбит второй бомбардировщик, а третий еле долетел до Германии. К сожалению, мы не знали, что они «невидимы». Даже если бы у нас был С 300, не было бы ни НАТО, ни США авиация.. Serbia=Russia
Зато США развлили наш СССР по щелчку пальца... И спасибо скажи им за ленд-лиз, и за гуманитарную помощь в ссср, благодаря им выжило пол россии на их окорочка.
well done USA ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairchild_Republic_A-10_Thunderbolt_II#/media/%D0%A4%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BB:Kim_campbell_damage_a10.jpg well done Russia ua-cam.com/video/fOaTEDYJmi0/v-deo.html (1:48)
* Definitely; I absolutely agree to a hundred percent with you - The Fabulous A-10 WARTHOG is the True unbeatable Steppenwolf of the skies and airspace! Th Benjaminsson - Sweden - - 🇸🇪🇸🇪 - -
@@triiky6195 c’est un avion multi rôles, il peut aussi bien faire de la reconnaissance, du bombardement, du combat aérien, de l’escorte… il peut tout faire et c’est pour ça qu’il est de loin le meilleur avion de combat du monde.
@@redgb859 oui, c'est lui qui aurait du prendre la place de la cafetière volante f35. Ceux qui l'ont acheté sous la pression américaine et leur faiblesse, leur lacheté face à eux vont le regretter amèrement. ( Plus de 700 défauts de conception, dont 6 graves.) Good Luck.
This is a very unprofessional compilation, it seems entirely that its creator is biased, unprofessionally unprepared. Compared to a fighter jet bomber, dilettante idiocy. First, we should ask those who understand this. (a retired Major General)
As usual, the author did not understand the topic of the video. Okay, we put an American fighter (gaining air superiority or as they are called in the US air force tactical fighter). Why are there no specialized aircraft in the review - su-25 Russia, A-10 Thunderbolt??? I don't remember exactly about the NATO aircraft, but the su-24 and su-34 are a different type of combat aircraft
@@thirdworldrider6991.. I'm not a computer genius, but it does seem like a merching of 2, 3 different aircrafts. It's most likely a fake picture, created just to catch peoples interest. The thumbnail aircraft, most probably dosen't exist. It looks cool though, but A LOT of thumbnails used are fakes.
@@gaytwink442 It was without weapons, just amical fight... I know that you can't admit that you have shit planes, but it's the reality, dude ... As in Pikes Peak, the best records are french ...
Bad video, where is the a-10 thuderbolt and the su-25? Most of the planes like the Mitsubishi f-2 the f-18 hornet and the f-15 eagle are not atack aircrafts they are more like a fighter aircraft
@@kimjongun9913 Are you seriously? A-10 Thunderbolt II: US Invasion of Grenada, Gulf War, NATO Operation Against Serbia, War in Afghanistan, Invasion of Iraq. SU-25: Afghan War (1979-1989), Iran-Iraq War (1980-1988), Civil War in Angola (1975-2002), Gulf War (1991), Abkhaz War (1992-1993), Karabakh War (1991-1994), First Chechen War (1994-1996), War in Congo (1997-2002), Ethiopian-Eritrean Conflict (1998-2000), Second Chechen War (1999-2000), Conflict in Macedonia (2001), French-Ivoire conflict (2004), Russia-Georgia conflict (2008), Armed conflict in eastern Ukraine (since 2014), Russia in Syria (since 2015), Azerbaijan-Armenia war (2020). In what wars were the Mitsubishi F-2 used?
So let me get this straight, they use a Tomcat in the thumbnail but no footage in the upload as click bait?!!! Really shows that that is STILL the CHAMPION of ALL Fighters!!! Shame.
@@floridaboy3539 The first F-22s had an oxygen problem. I assume that has been resolved. With the Russian Blackjack around, we still need an interceptor. The F-14 production was killed because of maintenance costs.
@@lab-acreation7304 A week ago???? This is surprising. Most of these A/C are old or very old (some of them are not produced anymore or totally retired: :SEPECAT Jaguar for exemple). And talking about the Mirage when the Rafale is there to replace it is surprising especially for the oldest version of the Mirage. For me it was a very old video dedicated to A/C of the late 1990.
@@Vorhawks no country except India uses Jaguar. I think it has been added due to it's atomic bomb dropping ability. It is only plane able to drop atomic bombs
@@amarjeetkaur5568 Jaguar is retired for most countries that had this A/C, in 2021. I even thought that India had already, like France, replaced the Jaguars by Rafales in 2021. Whatever, this video is extremely old.
Саня - это вообще не какой-то рейтинг, а надуманная отсебятина! Даже интересно с каких таких пор, вдруг F-15 лучший самолет, когда даже Су -27, его уже изначально полностью превосходил?! Просто смех, а не рейтинг!!!
@@ragnaarlobrok2543 Well well well. It's a good list but I prefer the sci-fi fighter aircraft. But I need to choose from the real word I choose the: Eurofihter Typhoon Harrier Jump Jet B1 Lancer Northrop B2 F117 Nighthawk SU34 Ok two of them is a strategic bomber but anyway they looks good they are so dangerous!
Ну как, как ... можно радоваться.. у нас даже фронтовой бомбардировщик на 5 месте среди штурмовиков, что уж говорить о су-25 :) Он вообще походу абсолютный чемпион получается :)
There isn't a whole hell of a lot that is going to still want to take their chances with a F-15 but with F-22 and now F-35 in the picture, the way war is fought in the sky has completely changed , although the enemy has yet to figure out how or why .
You have inserted Mitsubishi F-2 instead of F-16 Fighting Falcon into the ranking.What about Saab Gripen, EF-2000, Mig-29? Are they worse than the Tornado,SU-24 or anothers?
Not to be rude but the F-2 isn't a Fighter Aircraft there's three different types Attack, Fighter, and Defense, and the F-2 isn't made for Air to Ground combat it's made for Air to Air and only 1 out of 3 missiles it can carry is Air to Ground. Jets that are made for swift moving, and made for shooting enemy's down quickly are Attack Jets
Acho que esse vídeo se refere as naves que realmente tiveram história em guerras (apenas acho), acho que o F22 deveria ser citado, mas não sei se ele chegou a ser empregado em alguma missão.
Подборку делали не очень компетентные в этой области специалисты. Реальные штурмовики вообще не показаны, ИЛ-2 и СУ-25 ГРАЧ. Все остальные бомбардировщики или истребители-бомбардировщики. Залповый сброс боеприпасов ИЛ-2 был мощнее чем у многих показанных в ролике дорогих и красивых "игрушек".
Главное показать "серьёзные" картинки, а "пипл схавает" )). Как там Апина пела? Я его слепила из того что было... Вот к этому ролику прям 100% подходит.
A-10 Warthog uses for ground targets as well. However, the A-10 was designed for close air support (CAS) of friendly ground troops, attacking armored vehicles and tanks, and providing quick-action support against enemy ground forces. Its class is different from ones which were told on this video.
@@chilasaebube3263 Of course, they are all military platforms which are used for attack purposes in battles. But, A-10' s don't use in same sorts of tasks with F-15' s and similar ones. Their intended purposes and basic capabilities are different from each other.
De quand date exactement cette vidéo ? Sans doute etait-elle crédible voici quelques décennies mais pas en 2020, année où la plupart des chasseurs présentés étaient retirés du service !
The information given here may be 10 or 20 years outdated. Most of the planes have newer versions with better characteristics. For example - F/A 18 Hornet has already built 3 generations of newer F/A Super Hornet - Block 1, 2 and 3. F-15 is now in versions: Silent Eagle, Strike Eagle and the most recent F-15EX.
Do not pay attention ... It's the Russians who made the rating so that they can put their shit of the 80s of development in 2nd place ....
Su57 f22 raptor f35
@@ΣπυρίδωνΑποστολάκης su 57 is not stealth. Its engines and avionics do not meet the stealth standard.
@@ΣπυρίδωνΑποστολάκης nd the su 57 is still considered a prototype that did not pass all the tests. Already 15 years...
@@igorkom8163 video is only for srealth fighters? i didnt see it brother sorry
There are 3 types of attack aircraft, the strategic target type of which most of these are. The second is tactical aircraft which strike targets in the area beyond the immediate ground combat area, then the third which are close air support which take place in the immediate ground combat area. For the first the F-15 strike eagle and the newer F-35 excel. For the second the Su-34, the F-16 and F-18 Super Hornet are best and for close air support the A-10 wins the prize. These are my opinions only!
А су25?
@@СтепанКолодин-к5ц what do you mean cy25?
@Duminica Septembrie Really, and you base this CLAIM on what evidence. In the pure ground attack roll, nothing beats the Warthog. The Ukrainians knock the Su-25 out of the sky with impunity. It isn't as survivable as the A-10. Now, SU-25s are not even allowed to attack straight away. They come in low and "toss" their bombs and rockets over their own troops and hope it will hit Ukrainian positions. This spray and pray approach is highly ineffective and ends up hitting their own troops. At low altitudes, the A-10 is much more maneuverable and several times more survivable than the Su-25. The SU-25 is, at best, a cheap imitation of the A-10. You need to expand your sources because the ones you have now are embarrassing you.
SU-24 это не штурмовик, а фронтовой бомбардировщик. штурмовик это SU-25 (грач), рейтинг наверное в USA готовили, им откуда знать такие тонкости
К тому же он скоре советский...
№ 1 - это СУ-57 ... просто американо-западный блок стесняется это признать, как этот канал ...
🤣🤣🤣 русская авиация по сравнению сша,дермо😉
@@temo7776 ну это мы узнаем на войне, тю тю тю
@@narduksakha6843 niriaxi vi a ne voini🤣🤣🤣
The video is good only some details:
SU-24 / F-15 E, SU-34, Mirage 2000 D/N, F-111, Tornado IDS are deep penetrator aircraft behind enemy lines
AMX-1, F/A-18, JHC-7, F-2, SuperEtendard, TU-22M3, SU-34 are aeronaval missile strikers and attack aircraft
A-10, SU-25, A-37, AV-8 Harrier II, MiG-27, SU-39 Are attack Ground support antitank aircraft and support troops
B-1, TU 160, F-111, B-2, Mirage IV, Avro Vulcan are heavy bombers and deep penetrator strategic bombers
Only you forgot about Tu-95 "Bear".
Beautiful aircraft.
Ok, I'm from Russia 🇷🇺.
This is video for cartoons fans.
They just forget Rafale!
Rafale wins all demonstrations but no, no Rafale. Funny americans!
SU 27, MiG 29.
Where is the A- 10 ? And what about Rafales or Gripen ? A-10 is the better plane specialized for ground attack, and Rafales and Gripen are multiroles whith great ground attack capacities, even nuclear for the Rafale ...
a-10 is bad please stop being fanboys
Where are the A10, SU25 and the Rafale ? They are able to attack on the ground. The A10 is considered the best American ground attack aircraft even though it is old. And the Rafale is currently considered the best airplane in the world for export
A10 & SU25's both suck lmao gtfo brrt fanboy
Bəli düz deyirsiniz
Bro Rafale is fighters
Ces avions sont spécifiquement des avions d'attaque au sol.le Rafale,en passant le meilleur avion au monde,est un avion multirôle.
22 года назад во время бомбардировки НАТО сербы первыми в мире сбили невидимый F 117 A ракетами «Нева S 125».
Затем был сбит второй бомбардировщик, а третий еле долетел до Германии. К сожалению, мы не знали, что они «невидимы».
Даже если бы у нас был С 300, не было бы ни НАТО, ни США авиация..
Serbia=Russia
malo sutra
No serbe
Milos retourne travailler s'il te plaît c'est pas pour toi comme pour moi , c'est pour les riches .
Зато США развлили наш СССР по щелчку пальца... И спасибо скажи им за ленд-лиз, и за гуманитарную помощь в ссср, благодаря им выжило пол россии на их окорочка.
@@СуперМэн-ъ2н за ленд-лиз спасибо. Но не больше. А за окорочка - иди в ж...у
Zastrasujuce besmislena lista!
As an attack aircraft, nothing beats an A-10 Warthog!
well done USA
ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairchild_Republic_A-10_Thunderbolt_II#/media/%D0%A4%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BB:Kim_campbell_damage_a10.jpg
well done Russia
ua-cam.com/video/fOaTEDYJmi0/v-deo.html (1:48)
* Definitely; I absolutely agree to a hundred percent with you - The Fabulous A-10 WARTHOG is the True unbeatable Steppenwolf of the skies and airspace!
Th Benjaminsson - Sweden - - 🇸🇪🇸🇪 - -
A-10 is CAS.
Fantastic VDO post ❤
The rafale is better than the jaguar or mirage 2000
Ce n'est pas un avion d'attaque mais de combat
@@triiky6195, sois plus clair ou pédagogue, indique la différence entre un avion d'attaque et de combat ?
@@triiky6195 c’est un avion multi rôles, il peut aussi bien faire de la reconnaissance, du bombardement, du combat aérien, de l’escorte… il peut tout faire et c’est pour ça qu’il est de loin le meilleur avion de combat du monde.
@@redgb859 oui, c'est lui qui aurait du prendre la place de la cafetière volante f35.
Ceux qui l'ont acheté sous la pression américaine et leur faiblesse, leur lacheté face à eux vont le regretter amèrement.
( Plus de 700 défauts de conception, dont 6 graves.)
Good Luck.
ua-cam.com/video/zLC73Wf3DoY/v-deo.html
Make Your Choice
ua-cam.com/video/YTIkLtAp1o8i/v-deo.html
Love to all countries from india 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
We love India too from Egypt ❤️❤️
What?? So no mention of A10, even an unmanned reaper is a better ground attack aircraft than some of these.
Yep, and also Su-25 are not mentioned, A-10 and Su-25 are comparable counterparts
don't make sense no more )) no a10,no su-25 , they are dogfighters in this case, not this 10th
Trully I thought first place A10, second Su-25. Keyword is modern ish??
A few aircraft I thought should be on this list weren't mentioned. Some aircraft listed are designed to take on an interceptor role as well.
This is a very unprofessional compilation, it seems entirely that its creator is biased, unprofessionally unprepared. Compared to a fighter jet bomber, dilettante idiocy. First, we should ask those who understand this. (a retired Major General)
Valid reason Sir. Very true!
Kd o greepen f 39
F2 speed 2400kmh ???
I think he must have been playing Ace Combat 7 when he compiled the list.
So is the best of the best 👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
This is more fighters than attack aircraft. It also seems very out of date.
Let l
For me the Rafal is the best definitely 🇫🇷👍✌
exactly RAFALE is AIRCRAFT very good THE BEST ON THE BEST
Pour moi c'est plutôt un bœuf bourguignon qui sera meilleur pour mon pallé .
As usual, the author did not understand the topic of the video. Okay, we put an American fighter (gaining air superiority or as they are called in the US air force tactical fighter). Why are there no specialized aircraft in the review - su-25 Russia, A-10 Thunderbolt??? I don't remember exactly about the NATO aircraft, but the su-24 and su-34 are a different type of combat aircraft
You forgot the Rafale!
Top of the top currently.
Multi-role aircraft.
It even has nuclear capability ...
exactly
Le rafale est bien évidement l'avion le meilleur du monde le plus performant c'est la raison pour laquelle les autres pays veulent l'acheter
@@micheldilly8531 pour l'instant je manque d'argent pour l'acheter, peut être quand je serai chef de quelques choses .
The thumbnail looked like my dream upgrade of F-14 Tomcat.... Tomcat 2.0 😍
thats an SU 34 in the tumbnail
@@thirdworldrider6991.. Eh, i know my planes, and that is NOT an SU 34.
@@PpAirO5 ok patrick what is it?
@@thirdworldrider6991.. I'm not a computer genius, but it does seem like a merching of 2, 3 different aircrafts. It's most likely a fake picture, created just to catch peoples interest. The thumbnail aircraft, most probably dosen't exist.
It looks cool though, but A LOT of thumbnails used are fakes.
@@PpAirO5 its most similar to f15 and SU 34.
А где остается Су-25? And where does the Su-25 stay?
The rafale is the best , its all :D
RU r incredibles! 😳
True with meteor missile no contest...6 targets at the same time.
That tomcat concept I clicked on. Super sick... Bring that back, modernized with the original 1986 vibe.
F15 Eagle - always and forever and only the unbeatable one!!
F15 vs Rafale 7 lose on 10 ... :)
@@chrisgac4989 a f15 has never been shot down due to enemy action.
do some research before talking please
@@gaytwink442 It was without weapons, just amical fight...
I know that you can't admit that you have shit planes, but it's the reality, dude ...
As in Pikes Peak, the best records are french ...
I miss F-14 Tomcat at this moment.
Bad video, where is the a-10 thuderbolt and the su-25?
Most of the planes like the Mitsubishi f-2 the f-18 hornet and the f-15 eagle are not atack aircrafts they are more like a fighter aircraft
maybe this video a real attack aircraft ever fighting in war .
@@kimjongun9913 Are you seriously?
A-10 Thunderbolt II: US Invasion of Grenada, Gulf War, NATO Operation Against Serbia, War in Afghanistan, Invasion of Iraq.
SU-25: Afghan War (1979-1989), Iran-Iraq War (1980-1988), Civil War in Angola (1975-2002), Gulf War (1991), Abkhaz War (1992-1993), Karabakh War (1991-1994), First Chechen War (1994-1996), War in Congo (1997-2002), Ethiopian-Eritrean Conflict (1998-2000), Second Chechen War (1999-2000), Conflict in Macedonia (2001), French-Ivoire conflict (2004), Russia-Georgia conflict (2008), Armed conflict in eastern Ukraine (since 2014), Russia in Syria (since 2015), Azerbaijan-Armenia war (2020).
In what wars were the Mitsubishi F-2 used?
Nice video!
Vous la sortez d'où votre liste des années 80 ????? Eh............. on est en 2020 !!! Revenez parmi nous on est au 21° siècle !!!
С каких пор f15 самолёт зделаный для завоевания превосходства в небе, стал лучшим ударным самолётом???
№ 1 - это СУ-57 ... просто американо-западный блок стесняется это признать, как этот канал ...
@@rakeyantaryanto7703 тогда уж лучший ударный ту 160)
@@grigoriitrambickii7197 ДАТЬ СОГЛАСИЕ
Already the thumbnail is off, that jet it was put out of service many years ago.
You have no idea about attacking aircraft
Warplanes from Russia are good but warplanes from the Nato are better and this will never change! Long live Nato! Long live freedom!
Мали бути штурмувики, а змішали і бомбардувальники і винищувачі
@@frankmueller6522 hahahaha,nice joke dude,there is nothing about freedom when we talk about war,only death and pain,you better wake up.
@@frankmueller6522 Nacistische Amerikanische Teroristische Organisation kürzer NATO
@@wolfmax1403 It's Very Cool 👍👍👍
Nice video
Wow who put this together? I assume it’s a history lesson.
İ thing f22 typhoon rafale gripen and F16 should be on list
They are fighter jets not attack aircrafts.
There is a difference between fighters and attack aircrafts.
F-2 is literally a F-16 but with a different name
Su-24 - front boomber. Do you mean su-25? you call it "Frogfoot" , we call it "Rook" or flying tank. ua-cam.com/video/5cmQXxtz-s0/v-deo.html (5:30 + )
The Americans called it a mosquito spray plane until the elite ship Donald Cook met and met the plane :)
@@acabozic1247 it was not advantage of this jet, it was electronic countermeasures system Khibiny.
Only F15 ..The Best 👍🏼👌🏻
So let me get this straight, they use a Tomcat in the thumbnail but no footage in the upload as click bait?!!! Really shows that that is STILL the CHAMPION of ALL Fighters!!! Shame.
also they miscategorized other MRF as attack aircraft.
Probably the mist pooular due to the movie Top Gun. F-22 is far superior to the F-14. Not even close.
@@floridaboy3539 The first F-22s had an oxygen problem. I assume that has been resolved. With the Russian Blackjack around, we still need an interceptor. The F-14 production was killed because of maintenance costs.
@@beornthebear.8220 Great information.
Nem imaginava q o Brasil estivesse entre os dez
Hey i think you forgot the Rafale product by dassault and the new version of mirage 2000
It is obviously a VERY old video. :-) Probably it as been made in late 80 or mid 90. Many other ground attack A/C are missing.
@@Vorhawks no, it was a week ago
@@lab-acreation7304 A week ago???? This is surprising. Most of these A/C are old or very old (some of them are not produced anymore or totally retired: :SEPECAT Jaguar for exemple). And talking about the Mirage when the Rafale is there to replace it is surprising especially for the oldest version of the Mirage. For me it was a very old video dedicated to A/C of the late 1990.
@@Vorhawks no country except India uses Jaguar. I think it has been added due to it's atomic bomb dropping ability. It is only plane able to drop atomic bombs
@@amarjeetkaur5568 Jaguar is retired for most countries that had this A/C, in 2021. I even thought that India had already, like France, replaced the Jaguars by Rafales in 2021.
Whatever, this video is extremely old.
hi. very very very very very very good. thanks
су-24 это не штурмовик, а фронтовой бомбардировщик. В топку засуньте свой рейтинг... .
И какое это имеет значение, если у Кореи армия лучше, чем у России
Про всех но ни одного классического штурмовика авторы вообще не в теме
Warplanes from Russia are good but warplanes from the Nato are better and this will never change! Long live Nato! Long live freedom!
@@frankmueller6522 мечтай.
Саня - это вообще не какой-то рейтинг, а надуманная отсебятина! Даже интересно с каких таких пор, вдруг F-15 лучший самолет, когда даже Су -27, его уже изначально полностью превосходил?! Просто смех, а не рейтинг!!!
You left out the Warhog A10 ground attack aircraft - the best one ever
Yeah R.I.P hoggy
The top3 is so badas. My favourite attack aircrafts from the list are the tornado (number 3) and the SU34 (number 2
1) .Tornado ids
2) .Su-34 Fullback
3) .F- 15 E Strike Eagle
4). SU-24 Fencer
5). F-18 Super Hornet
6). F-16 Block 50- 52
7). Jas-39 Gripen
8). AMX-ACOL
9). AV8 B-Plus Harrier II
10) Sepecat Jaguar
@@ragnaarlobrok2543 Well well well. It's a good list but I prefer the sci-fi fighter aircraft. But I need to choose from the real word I choose the:
Eurofihter Typhoon
Harrier Jump Jet
B1 Lancer
Northrop B2
F117 Nighthawk
SU34
Ok two of them is a strategic bomber but anyway they looks good they are so dangerous!
El cicne blanco tupolev 160 best the best
@daAnder71 Ok
@@ricardogil8975 Nálam a B1 Lancer és a Harrier jumpjet viszi a prímet a Tu-160 gyakorlatilag egy orosz Concorde. Hello from Hungary! 😆😆😆
Interesting list.
They were all good 20 years ago. Now they are toast.
yep these planes wont survive on the modern battlefield ,
Where is F-22 raptor? and F16 and F14 tomcat?
5:43 - маленькая поправка.
СУ 24 не штурмовик а фронтовой бомбардировщик.
Также как и Су 34 это точный бомбардировщик,а не штурмовик,им нужно было включить сюда Су 25
@@marshal9268 Грача?
@@VLADIMIR-61REG да
@@marshal9268 сегодня ГРАЧ показал как он может летать и уходить от пзрак-СТИНГЕР
Вот это спецы, только один штурмовик!
C'est leur propagande.
This video is at least 25 years old.
Su-34 is not assault aircraft, it is tactical frontline bomber
Уж точно не штурмовик. Странное видео
Number 7 is the f16 falcon
Это штурмовики? А как тогда назвать А-10, Су-25, Су-39...
Ну как, как ... можно радоваться.. у нас даже фронтовой бомбардировщик на 5 месте среди штурмовиков, что уж говорить о су-25 :) Он вообще походу абсолютный чемпион получается :)
Where is the F22 Raptor and the Rafale ?
nonsense ;) where is the A-10 , Su-25, Tornado IDS ....
who cares ;))
ну как это и у америки вдруг.....всё....НЕ САМОЕ ЛУЧШЕЕ.....даже чуть не письнул от смеха...даже тапочки заржали....
where is the Rafale guys??
There isn't a whole hell of a lot that is going to still want to take their chances with a F-15 but with F-22 and now F-35 in the picture, the way war is fought in the sky has completely changed , although the enemy has yet to figure out how or why .
SU -25 ??? Very good
The Rafale 🇫🇷✊🇫🇷
Where's "Rafale" in your list ?
It is not here. But you can find it in Pakistani museum.😂😂😂
@@IpremiumSsarcasmi have you a rafale ? This plane is the best in Europe. How Many country are buying the rafale ? 😉
@@yannicklebreton4683 Yes it is the best, but the operator do matter.
This looks like a video that should have been made in 1995. I was expecting the F22 to be #1.
Su35,33,34,57....
Hahaha, infact! In my opinion f-2000 at second Place and f-22 at first place
Su - 24 product buy USSR , interesting video . 😎
Not "buy" - just "by" , Comrade :) And , yep they mix up su-25 and su-24 as front fighter / front bomber
@@akaStrem Su - 25 attack aircraft Su - 24 front bomber . 😎
Why Blackburn Buccaneer isn't listed ?
Штурмовик с одним двигателем?вы шутите?два!и разнесенных!
Это вообще не штурмовики,по крайней мере в российской классификации.
MITSUBISHI F2 is so cool !!
cette classification date des année 1990 ?
Bertrand robin taudou grave, c'est à ses demander si il si connais vraiment en aviation
Thanks
Wrong classification for 2020 top aircrafts......
F15 Eagle One of the Best Aircraft ✊✊
when was this video made? all the fighters are totally outdated. you can't be told that these are the 10 best fighters of 2020😂😂😂
U pravu si
That's old garbage opportunity 😂
Yeah like I saw SEPECAT Jaguar and I was like: "Uhm, it's older than my parents"
Woeful information
You have inserted Mitsubishi F-2 instead of F-16 Fighting Falcon into the ranking.What about Saab Gripen, EF-2000, Mig-29? Are they worse than the Tornado,SU-24 or anothers?
True
The Rafale isn't here but it have to be here
@@sosobel5843 RAFALE is very good aircraft THE BEST ON THE BEST
The Rafale french ?
Су 34 это бомбардировщик,как и Су 24,почему в списке нету Су 25 ?
That Tomcat on thumbnail is quite cool
L,,""""
@@juditmatei7701 okl
@@juditmatei7701
. .
Wish the text could be little bit bigger
Jeśli miały być największe to ok, ale na pewno nie najlepsze. Brak f22 raptor?
I do think qualifies as an attack plane, it is pure air dominance fighter. However a-10, f-35 and su-57 are missing.
What about f35 or f22 raptor
Not to be rude but the F-2 isn't a Fighter Aircraft there's three different types Attack, Fighter, and Defense, and the F-2 isn't made for Air to Ground combat it's made for Air to Air and only 1 out of 3 missiles it can carry is Air to Ground. Jets that are made for swift moving, and made for shooting enemy's down quickly are Attack Jets
That's a self cheating comment
you forget a lot of aircrafts like F16I anf f35I, MIG 29+ and more
This is well out of date, few of them not in service anymore with the countries mentioned.
...that s it....the brazilian jet AMX is so ancient aircraft....it took place about thirty year s ago almost...!!...
KF21 보라매는 추후 몇위의 성능으로 평가 받을까
Este top llegó 20 años tarde... donde estan los F35, F22, Grippen, SU57, raffale?
Acho que esse vídeo se refere as naves que realmente tiveram história em guerras (apenas acho), acho que o F22 deveria ser citado, mas não sei se ele chegou a ser empregado em alguma missão.
El Kfir jajaj :U
TOTALMENTE DE ACUERDO
Это фронтовые бомбардировщики или истребители бомбардировщики, штурмовики совершенно другой класс самолётов, это су-25,тандер болт а-10
These are attack aircraft?!! Are you sure?!!
noway ,
3d playes killing me ^))
Le rafale français manque dans la liste
Подборку делали не очень компетентные в этой области специалисты. Реальные штурмовики вообще не показаны, ИЛ-2 и СУ-25 ГРАЧ. Все остальные бомбардировщики или истребители-бомбардировщики. Залповый сброс боеприпасов ИЛ-2 был мощнее чем у многих показанных в ролике дорогих и красивых "игрушек".
Главное показать "серьёзные" картинки, а "пипл схавает" )). Как там Апина пела? Я его слепила из того что было... Вот к этому ролику прям 100% подходит.
Where is su 25 and a-10?
Clickbait..... most of these were fighters
Cách hát của Phúc hiện đại, tinh tế và mang hơi hướng Kpop nhưng lại rất ấm áp, dịu dàng...1 ca khúc tuyệt vời ❤
Lista de 2020 desatualizada !!! KD F22 raptor, Gripen NG , F35 ????
Видео снято интересно. Но с точки зрения оценок,,, большой вопрос.
WHE'RE IS SU25 QRACH,
A10 THUNDER?
Russia makes the most beautiful and capable aircraft in the world!
🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺
Seriously the A 10 warthog was not included so this video is incomplete or should I say legit
A-10 Warthog uses for ground targets as well. However, the A-10 was designed for close air support (CAS) of friendly ground troops, attacking armored vehicles and tanks, and providing quick-action support against enemy ground forces. Its class is different from ones which were told on this video.
@@davidaames1347 so that makes it an excellent attack aircraft
@@chilasaebube3263 Of course, they are all military platforms which are used for attack purposes in battles. But, A-10' s don't use in same sorts of tasks with F-15' s and similar ones. Their intended purposes and basic capabilities are different from each other.
yep, as well as su-25 not included:))) strange competiotion :)
De quand date exactement cette vidéo ? Sans doute etait-elle crédible voici quelques décennies mais pas en 2020, année où la plupart des chasseurs présentés étaient retirés du service !
JF-17 thunder ⚡ B3 stealth.
Super
You forgot the f22, f35, Eurofighter, Raffale, etc.
To su tehnološki promašaji
So Mirage 2000 is better than the Rafale which is missing? I don"t think so.. xD