I’m 99% sure she was exclusively thinking of it as a cost. It is a big deal but it’s mostly upside. Same way dark hole destroying your own cards is a big deal but often in the direction of being positive.
@@SDREHXC i mean it is not a cost because no one plays it in a deck that doesn't gain from a discard to circumvent that, though i have never seen anyone play it period in recent memory
@@SDREHXC Needing to discard for cost is _almost_ always a downside even in modern Yu-Gi-Oh!. There are some cards where it's an upside/neutral (like Opening Of The Spirit gates which lets you immediately summon a discarded 0/0 fiend or recycle a discarded continuous spell) but for generic removal like this it's almost purely a downside (even if you have ways to do stuff with cards in GY; if you're playing a deck that does a lot of that you're probably not lacking ways to get cards _into_ the GY either). With Dark Hole the situation is a bit different. If you're playing it primarily to remove your opponents monsters it destroying your own monsters would be a downside, you'd rather play Raigeki in that case. Dark Hole is often played over Raigeki not because it destroying your own monsters is an upside, you're putting it into your deck because you _mainly_ want to use it to destroy your own monsters and it _also_ destroying your opponents monsters is the "bonus" effect. If we're playing a format where people don't summon floodgates on our side of the field and we actually _want_ a destruction board breaker you play Raigeki over Dark Hole (which some going 2nd decks over the last couple of years absolutely have done). There is _absolutely_ no scenario in which you're playing Lightning Vortex over Raigeki, which you would if discarding for this type of effect was ever regarded as an upside. I think you may confuse this with cards like Forbidden Droplet, where the sending for cost can occasionally be an upside, but that's when you use it to send cards from field. If you send cards from hand it's nearly always a minus, neutral at best if you send something with a good GY effect.
Bringing up the extra deck when discussing Alpha was not gaslighting. That is absolutely relevant for discussing the card. I might have mentioned other things too, but still.
@@Farfabeing 1000% honest if Alpha was a quick effect it would in fact be in contention to be one of the best board breaker monsters. While pank can pop backrow as well, being able to bounce monsters back to the ed bypasses floating effects. Then again fenrir being able to banish facedown is better it requires your opponent to play into it.
@@Farfa If it means anything to, I absolutely second that you didn't gaslight and you didn't do anything wrong here. You provided additional context for Allie to consider without giving the game away. It's a fine line to walk, but I think you got there.
9:09 no, she was right. It pings its new owner (which is the opponent) for 1000 unless they sacrifice their other monsters, which is exactly what she said
@@hdhgjhjdvjBasically in his video about questioning a host if a card is good/meta in modern Yu-Gi-Oh there was a discrepancy for what is considered modern for a particular card. It was this nicher pendulum card not really played currently or much in the master duel era of Yu-Gi-Oh but it had topped a lot pre 2020 I believe. Basically the viewers' opinion on what modern was that if it could be considered a playable card more so currently, whereas farfa was considering modern to be having topped a good number of times, post Mr5 or something like that. He did get a good bit of flack from commenters since they felt the guest was cheated out over this card. Farfa did make a follow up video something along the lines of my biggest drama (it wasn't that serious)
@@hat_sauce3846i never understood the complaining, since while rescue hamster is indeed a good card being good dosent mean modern and i agree that hamster is modern, anything post pend i see as modern given the changes to design the game has seen since
I feel like that one is maybe more up in the air. Yes, Pank is currently on the limited list and Fenrir isn't, but people HAVE been vouching for him to be for several lists in a row because of how splashable he is as a going second card that also just +1s you literally for free if you draw him going first.
I would just describe Link Summoning as: _"The Link Rating is how many monsters you must send to the GY. You can reduce this number by counting other Link Monsters as multiple materials."_ Obviously there's more nuance, but for people on this videos who don't play Yugioh, this is all they really need to know.
@@vitaliypiasta7837pretty good I'd say, keep in mind that what they're referring to is that for every malice monster (main and extra deck) they have an effect that if they are banished you can pay some LP to summon them back
If yall think Farfa gaslighting is bad you guys haven't watched a Cimoooo video 😭Farfa is so fair in these discussions and gives very relevant information based on their assessments of the card
I think Accesscode is the meanest card on the list, because with certain decks it's only half the story. You can run Transcode and Update Jammer to make it a strictly better card.
I know Allie said not to come for her in the comments, but if a monster's power is equal to its difficulty to summon then Spirit of the Pharaoh would be an instant win card that also give you a million dollars when successfully summoned courtesy of Mr. Konami
i just thought about this... the M∀LICE archetype can abuse the accesscode banish to reborn themselves. for example HEARTS OF CRYPTER gets banished, pays 900, comes back at 5k atk and you used her to pop 1 with accesscode, wich is boosted by his own effect too.. and them being all cyberse monsters makes it all the easier to summon.
It's very fun that at first Allie was thinking about pank as only being good when you're behind the other opponent and completely forgot that most times when you're going second, your opponent will have at least 1 monster on board and you won't have any. She completely forgot about the start of the game and looked at it completely from a mid to end game mindset. I feel like everyone has to constantly remind other tcg players that yugioh is significantly faster than the games they usually play and that mid and endgame concepts don't work in the same way that they do in other card games.
Exactly what i thought too! They are so close in power level that alpha is sometimes used as the third-fourth-fifth copy of pankratops in blind second decks.
But in a vacuum, alpha isn't gonna get the mileage pank will. I've won games off 2-3 copies of pank. Alpha not being a quick REALLY hurts how good it could've been. Not saying alpha is bad. But id say it's a 60/40 split between the two tbh.
Every single card in this video is good. Pank is just generally better than alpha in most scenarios. Even if you have more beasts you can and _want to_ return, that still doesn't make up for the fact it's an ignition effect which is too much downside vs pank, not to mention it can be used to out things like skill drain. You'd pretty much only use alpha over pank for things like small world, and even that's a bit hard to justify since they're both earths.
Sure, but outside their decks, Alpha can`t be used if you're not pairing it with beast/beast warriors and winged beasts, while Pankratops doesn't really need other Dinowrestler for anything. You just need that your opponent have more monsters than you and itself as a tribute for removal.
Alpha isn't great in it's own tri-type though because there are rarely enough GOOD bounce targets. Do I really want to bounce my tri-brigades to my hand where I can't use them for link material? No, probably not.
The things to learn from this are: 1) Card advantage is huge in YGO. So discarding one for cost is very significant. 2) The Normal Summon is also pretty important. 3) Quick effect destruction / negates are very strong. 4) Non-respondable disruption effects are powerful. 5) Position switching is not strong, if it isn't either coupled with a negate or face-down (which is a pseudo negate).
honestly as a yugioh player had i not known dark hole was on the banlist i would have guessed vortex too possibly cuz the ability to pitch a floater on command is REALLY busted in certain decks and thats probably why she "undervalued the cost" so I don't blame her.
I liked the last one since both of those cards were/are meta for the exact same reason of winning the game right then and there. Maybe Farfa could have given a little more context on Sword's ability to switch position on something and how it was almost never used on an opponents monster but their own monster to enable OTKs.
"Wow, it seemed like you were completely ignoring one sentence making this card broken" the man says while showing Allie two cards with a short novel of text each
@@tails512 Genuine question, could you theoretically Genex Ally Changer a Link Monster to Divine (or another attribute switching card) before linking off for Accesscode, to give a theoretical 7 Banish maximum?
@@tails512 i really am genuinely questioning if you think i was serious with this. like she didn't even think close to it being used more than once and even then the diff between 6 and 7 is negative percentages
Farfa, you could just tell the participants that they're able to ask questions whenever they feel like it. Then you let them figure stuff out and also let them have oversights, in case those happen. In that case, you'd only need to step in on your own if someone misunderstands a card completely, e.g. Or you just make the show more about the psychological side with all the gaslighting, that works, too
1.: Dark hole was pretty obvious because 1: card advantage is very important, and 2: being able to destroy our own monsters can in some cases be very important for them to function properly, so we can use their graveyard effects. 2.: Volcanic Queen is searchable, which is an advantage, but Gameciel can be put in any deck. In a Volcanic deck, Queen is better, in any other, Gameciel. I was technically thinking Gadarla would appear there to be fair, as Gadarla is the Kaiju I use the most. Being wind / insect fits some of my decks much better. Radian is another that I use a lot for being dark. Sometimes Kumongouse for bing an earth insect. I generally use Kaijus in the decks where I use Small World, as targets for Small World bridges. Than again, why would you put the Queen in deffense? Put it in attack. Attacking over 2500 is still pretty easy for most decks, and that way you can deal battle damage. 3.: Pankratops vs Alpha? So destroy vs bounce? But hey, Alpha is better for 2 reasons. 1.: many stuff has destruction protection. 2.: Alpha comes back. 3.: Alpha is a level 8, Pankratops is a level 7, and there are better rank 8 plays that there are rank 7-s. Than again, Big Eye is a thing, so rank 7-s can be pretty damn useful too. But for that, I guess Galaxy-Eyes Cypher Dragon isan option, it just makes you give up most of your battle phase. I'd pick Alpha for mostly the first 2 reasons, unless it's a dino deck. In dinos, I do believe that Pankratops is searchable, so in that specific condition, pankratops. Another reasonwhy I'd pick Alpha, is that I actually have 2 copies of it, while I have no Pankratops. 25th anniversary packs gave me both of those alphas. I still don't see ANY reason why we'd play either of them in a way that leaves them on the field though. They're perfectly fine materials for combo plays. On this one, I don't agree with you. 4.: Accesscode all the way. Less restrictive summoning condition, and is one of the go-to game enders I go for in most if not all the decks where I link climb. Provided I have to climb that high. In Traptrix, I usually stop at Atypus on link-3, as she's technically more useful for Traptrix endboards. But I do have Accesscode in most decks where I run any links. Not Speedroids, for those, I have only their own archetye specific link monster. Overall, I'd say that her answers show very much that she's not used to games ending in 2-3 turns on average, and hence even if not intentionally, doesn't calculate with cards not needing deffense, or deffensive utilities like swapping opponent's monsters into deffense, if they're meant for taking out the opponent in the turn they're summoned.
Th extra deck detail was not gaslighting. it is 100% relevant. I think what got her is that he brought it up later during her analysis instead of outright saying, when she was reading Alpha: oh btw any monsters that are coming from the extra deck are going back there since they cant be in your hand to begin with.
Not just Crypto, full on NFT aswell and it is a pure scam, they targeted Hearthstone players as ambassendors for a while now and she takes part into this grift.
Technically your opponent can response something to the Accesscode Talker's when his attempts to summon, so you still can respond with something like Solemn Judgment or Solemn Strike etc.
Farfa: i can't think of any link monster who can bet banished by accesscode and generate advantage Me: For now.... Cant wait to see the kind of BS we can do with Malice when we get the deck here
Only now with the MALICE cards that resummon themselves to the field, they also Link lock you and 1 of the Links banishes at speed spell 4 if you banish something
with the tier 1 meta threat orcust you could use accesscode banish effect to banish a orcust link and resummon it with world wands for example. thats like a benefit i guess. but the new malice will abuse the banish thing
She’s the Linker E-boy! I usually don’t watch guess-is-card-good-or-bad vids, but the questions were fair because it was a comparison of cards that fill the same niche.
I feel like telling her to ignore the rest of Gameciel was a mistake. Ignoring Kaiju counters doesn't generally come up, but the rest of the Kaiju mechanic frequently comes up.
Nah I don't think so, unless your deck has like a big number of kaijus the multiple control thing is irrelevant, the main purpose is almost always problematic spot removal. Plus, any time I suggest a card might be slightly weaker or stronger depending on what the guest initially believes, it's obviously gaslighting and I'm a terrible person for it. So I tried to stay way more hands off this episode rather than over explain before their guesses. 😅
Also, I think Gameciel is the only Kaiju that actually uses its Kaiju counter effect. People will activate Waterfront, build up counters over the course of their combo, search Gameciel, and summon it with Saryuja.
I haven’t seen the answer to the first yet as of writing this. I feel like Dark Hole is better. No cost and you can play it before you have summoned any monsters. Board wipe your opponents front row and then summon all your own
I think more than the gaslighting, these vids just showcase just how fucked the YGO card texts are. No bullet points, no keywords, no separation of effects (which confused Allie what the "can't be responded to" applied to), and just overall mind bogglingly difficult to digest and read.
Farfa is not gaslighting TECHNICALLY. Farfa is giving information that is not clear to the other person, but that does not stop the other person from debating everything that is available to be asked or even considered. It just shows people on the fence about something can be swayed more towards one side by good details of one side just because they do not realize the better ones of the other; This is not a gaslight but a simple side-effect of someone having to guess what is better but not being allowed to be more obvious about what specific details show the truth in the context of Yugioh as a whole.
U know what would be very helpful for these non-Yugioh players: demonstrate the card summon/effect activation straight up in MD. I think this would be extremely effective for both Farfa and the guests as they can visualize how the cards would be used, all the while still doesn’t make it too obvious as they are not familiar with the game themselves. It also helps Farfa with the TLDR @Farfa
I heard theres a new TCG starting up so I am eagerly awaiting for the day that Farfa collabs with MBT_Elestrals to see the POV of a brand new TCG And its new content creators! Also Farfa drawing attrntion to certain parts of the cards while saying ignore some ia actually a fitting thing since alot of cards has effects that reads powerful but ends up being bad in comparison to the other one
Gameciel's second effect may be mostly irrelevant, but I've been playing a Runick Kaiju deck in Master Duel and that card specific card has been just completely shutting everyone down
Fuck the quick effect. If crashing and normal removal can solve your problem you don't have a problem. Bouncing an extra deck boss with banish/destruction protection or op GY effects is worth a lot more even if it comes up less often. I don't give a shit about dino boy.
I feel like pankratops and alpha are too close in power levels to give a newer player. Of course pank is better, but it’s kinda unfair to expect a newer player to judge which is better, there should be a bigger gap between the cards
The gap between pank and alpha is pretty significant. Alpha has only ever been played in niche numeron OTK decks competitively. Pank was a staple 3 of side deck card in many topping decks for years and even was on the ban list. Of course a newer player might see them as close in power, Allie is a little more experienced in yugioh by now so I made more difficult choices for sure!
To be fair yugioh is the only game that can two cards with the same line of text and not mean the same thing like she seen the your opponent can not respond part and assumed that this was a blanket statement that held true to the whole cards effects 😂
the G in YGO stands for Gaslight
you are right
You
Gaslight
Opponent
Improvise, Gaslight, Overcome
So ymprovise ? @@BelphegorXVI
@@Zueztea Actually I didn't even try to match the acronym, but yeah lol
Let's see if Gaslighter, Malebranch of the Burning Abyss is at it once again!
edit. HE IS!
Love that name
Farfa, formerly know as GaslightYGO
The sex bots are the only true Farfa fans, they get here before anybody else.
And they all use 🍭 🌥 emojis
Lol
"Discarding a card doesn't sound like that big of a deal"
*chuckles in Yu-Gi-Oh*
I’m 99% sure she was exclusively thinking of it as a cost. It is a big deal but it’s mostly upside. Same way dark hole destroying your own cards is a big deal but often in the direction of being positive.
@@SDREHXCnice iblee you got there, would be a shame if it did nothing
@@SDREHXC i mean it is not a cost because no one plays it in a deck that doesn't gain from a discard to circumvent that, though i have never seen anyone play it period in recent memory
@@SDREHXC Needing to discard for cost is _almost_ always a downside even in modern Yu-Gi-Oh!. There are some cards where it's an upside/neutral (like Opening Of The Spirit gates which lets you immediately summon a discarded 0/0 fiend or recycle a discarded continuous spell) but for generic removal like this it's almost purely a downside (even if you have ways to do stuff with cards in GY; if you're playing a deck that does a lot of that you're probably not lacking ways to get cards _into_ the GY either).
With Dark Hole the situation is a bit different. If you're playing it primarily to remove your opponents monsters it destroying your own monsters would be a downside, you'd rather play Raigeki in that case. Dark Hole is often played over Raigeki not because it destroying your own monsters is an upside, you're putting it into your deck because you _mainly_ want to use it to destroy your own monsters and it _also_ destroying your opponents monsters is the "bonus" effect. If we're playing a format where people don't summon floodgates on our side of the field and we actually _want_ a destruction board breaker you play Raigeki over Dark Hole (which some going 2nd decks over the last couple of years absolutely have done). There is _absolutely_ no scenario in which you're playing Lightning Vortex over Raigeki, which you would if discarding for this type of effect was ever regarded as an upside.
I think you may confuse this with cards like Forbidden Droplet, where the sending for cost can occasionally be an upside, but that's when you use it to send cards from field. If you send cards from hand it's nearly always a minus, neutral at best if you send something with a good GY effect.
"I have been playing Card Games for 9 years"
"Discarding a card doesn't seem like that big of a deal"
Bringing up the extra deck when discussing Alpha was not gaslighting. That is absolutely relevant for discussing the card. I might have mentioned other things too, but still.
The gaslight comments showed up 30 seconds after the video uploaded don't worry, it's become a meme at this point 🤣
@@Farfabeing 1000% honest if Alpha was a quick effect it would in fact be in contention to be one of the best board breaker monsters. While pank can pop backrow as well, being able to bounce monsters back to the ed bypasses floating effects. Then again fenrir being able to banish facedown is better it requires your opponent to play into it.
@@Farfa Dont let him gaslight you it was 10 seconds
@@AustinAnderson-d2s you're right, if alpha was a different card it would in fact potentially be better than pank
@@Farfa If it means anything to, I absolutely second that you didn't gaslight and you didn't do anything wrong here. You provided additional context for Allie to consider without giving the game away. It's a fine line to walk, but I think you got there.
"Borrelsword is slightly harder to summon, therefore it makes sense that it's abilities are stronger"
It does make sense to everyone except Konami
Tbf accesscode came out 2 years after borrelsword came out.
Commenters: he's gaslighting
Farfa: Gaslighting isn't even real. You're making that up
I cant wait for the Farfa teaches Allie swordsoul stream and then we can have Rarran vs Allie
If she wants to learn, she should probably practice with him by using the starting deck a little bit
Nay, teach her Branded and let the LORE battle commence.
I can feel the Gaslight, even before starting the video
Man i smell the Gaslight in the video
A key skill required for Yu-Gi-Oh
Ok acesscode vs borrelsword was evil
Gatekeep, Gaslight, Fartfa
gatekeep? at least make a meme comment which makes sense!
Bear, beets, Battlestar galatica vibes
He aint beating the gaslight allegations with this one. lol
Alex and Ramram looking different today. Must be the lighting.
9:09
no, she was right. It pings its new owner (which is the opponent) for 1000 unless they sacrifice their other monsters, which is exactly what she said
yeah he absolutely misled there
Farfa just straight up didn't read the card.
@@JackHugeman he's a real Yu-Gi-Oh player lmao
Funny that he's using pairs of cards to avoid the "What is modern?" discourse.
What is the "What is modern?" discourse?
@@hdhgjhjdvjBasically in his video about questioning a host if a card is good/meta in modern Yu-Gi-Oh there was a discrepancy for what is considered modern for a particular card.
It was this nicher pendulum card not really played currently or much in the master duel era of Yu-Gi-Oh but it had topped a lot pre 2020 I believe. Basically the viewers' opinion on what modern was that if it could be considered a playable card more so currently, whereas farfa was considering modern to be having topped a good number of times, post Mr5 or something like that. He did get a good bit of flack from commenters since they felt the guest was cheated out over this card.
Farfa did make a follow up video something along the lines of my biggest drama (it wasn't that serious)
@@hat_sauce3846i never understood the complaining, since while rescue hamster is indeed a good card being good dosent mean modern and i agree that hamster is modern, anything post pend i see as modern given the changes to design the game has seen since
Ok, Alpha jumpscared me. I was 100% expecting Fenrir.
I feel like that one is maybe more up in the air. Yes, Pank is currently on the limited list and Fenrir isn't, but people HAVE been vouching for him to be for several lists in a row because of how splashable he is as a going second card that also just +1s you literally for free if you draw him going first.
If it was fenrir vs pank there would be a lot more contridictions in the comments I think.
Alpha was the smarter choice anyways. It was really a question of how valuable quick effect is compared to a better effect that's not quick
I want Fenrir at 3, Pank at 3, LS to 3, and Duster to 2.
Put d Barrier to 0
I would just describe Link Summoning as: _"The Link Rating is how many monsters you must send to the GY. You can reduce this number by counting other Link Monsters as multiple materials."_
Obviously there's more nuance, but for people on this videos who don't play Yugioh, this is all they really need to know.
The MALICE cards are going to be cracked with Accesscode. That deck seems like it's going to be a pain in the ass to deal with.
Her Eyes when reading accesscode talker was hilarious
40:50 Now the Malice deck definitely could work with Accesscofe banishing them
I was just thinking that.
How good Malice Link monsters? I'm not deep in Links knowledge
@@vitaliypiasta7837pretty good I'd say, keep in mind that what they're referring to is that for every malice monster (main and extra deck) they have an effect that if they are banished you can pay some LP to summon them back
@@vitaliypiasta7837actually pretty good im personally planing on playing malice unless waifu tax is too high
@@setokaiba822 Waifu tax?
If yall think Farfa gaslighting is bad you guys haven't watched a Cimoooo video 😭Farfa is so fair in these discussions and gives very relevant information based on their assessments of the card
Plus for non yugioh players, it provides more context for why a card is better or worse
He is bad with his analysis 😂😂
Cimo explains the mechanics
@@theghostcreator776 cimo is devious asf. bro wants them to guess wrong. the demon of Babylon wears the coat of the righteous.
Thank you so much farfa for teaching me how to gaslight like a pro.
For those unfamiliar, Parallel TCG is a grift based card game with blockchain integration.
What the actual fuck
@@ROYBGP IKR. It's great.
@@kateslate3228it is not great. So it’s a cash grab disguised as a TCG. The crypto of card games
I heard blockchain, therefore it must be terrible. Will stear clear, Ty for the heads up!
gaslight, gatekeep, chainlink 1 cir target dante chainlink to dante target cir troll despair
I like this format of comparing 2 cards far more than rating random cards.
I think Accesscode is the meanest card on the list, because with certain decks it's only half the story.
You can run Transcode and Update Jammer to make it a strictly better card.
Loving the Allie collabs!
It pains me that Allie said dark hole was a twisting nether effect rather than a wrath effect
"My big obsession is Parallel"
Surely it is because of the gameplays, right? Kappa
From YGOGlasgow to YGOGaslight
You both neglected to realize that Borrelsword can target your own monster and switch it to defense. I still say that Accesscode is better though.
Dont give farfs gaslighting ideas lmao😂😂
Her voice was so soothing I didn't feel time has passed.
I know Allie said not to come for her in the comments, but if a monster's power is equal to its difficulty to summon then Spirit of the Pharaoh would be an instant win card that also give you a million dollars when successfully summoned courtesy of Mr. Konami
i mean holactie also exist, if you can summon that you win the game… literally
@@YukiFubuki. if I managed to summon Holactie I need to win life, not just the game
Farfra helping with the volcanic queen to beat the gaslight accusations.
He also just straight up lied to her about volcanic queen's effect.
i just thought about this... the M∀LICE archetype can abuse the accesscode banish to reborn themselves. for example HEARTS OF CRYPTER gets banished, pays 900, comes back at 5k atk and you used her to pop 1 with accesscode, wich is boosted by his own effect too.. and them being all cyberse monsters makes it all the easier to summon.
It's very fun that at first Allie was thinking about pank as only being good when you're behind the other opponent and completely forgot that most times when you're going second, your opponent will have at least 1 monster on board and you won't have any. She completely forgot about the start of the game and looked at it completely from a mid to end game mindset. I feel like everyone has to constantly remind other tcg players that yugioh is significantly faster than the games they usually play and that mid and endgame concepts don't work in the same way that they do in other card games.
Even the order is helping the gaslight went from a pair where quick effect was the main reason for the card wining to the quick effect being bait.
Pank vs alpha that is vile... Both are good in their respective decks
Exactly what i thought too! They are so close in power level that alpha is sometimes used as the third-fourth-fifth copy of pankratops in blind second decks.
But in a vacuum, alpha isn't gonna get the mileage pank will. I've won games off 2-3 copies of pank. Alpha not being a quick REALLY hurts how good it could've been. Not saying alpha is bad. But id say it's a 60/40 split between the two tbh.
Every single card in this video is good. Pank is just generally better than alpha in most scenarios. Even if you have more beasts you can and _want to_ return, that still doesn't make up for the fact it's an ignition effect which is too much downside vs pank, not to mention it can be used to out things like skill drain. You'd pretty much only use alpha over pank for things like small world, and even that's a bit hard to justify since they're both earths.
Sure, but outside their decks, Alpha can`t be used if you're not pairing it with beast/beast warriors and winged beasts, while Pankratops doesn't really need other Dinowrestler for anything. You just need that your opponent have more monsters than you and itself as a tribute for removal.
Alpha isn't great in it's own tri-type though because there are rarely enough GOOD bounce targets. Do I really want to bounce my tri-brigades to my hand where I can't use them for link material? No, probably not.
I NEED MORE CONTENT LIKE THIS, MR. NADHIR. I love this.
*first cards of the episode* "Alright, let's analyze the cards"
Me: "These are one sentence cards. This is gonna be rough."
Treasure town making a musical cameo was sick
The things to learn from this are:
1) Card advantage is huge in YGO. So discarding one for cost is very significant.
2) The Normal Summon is also pretty important.
3) Quick effect destruction / negates are very strong.
4) Non-respondable disruption effects are powerful.
5) Position switching is not strong, if it isn't either coupled with a negate or face-down (which is a pseudo negate).
I would say Gamaciels 2nd effect is important because you get a free summon of your own of any Kaiju.... like Thunderking
Watching her face with Farfa explaining Accesscode was hilarious
honestly as a yugioh player had i not known dark hole was on the banlist i would have guessed vortex too possibly cuz the ability to pitch a floater on command is REALLY busted in certain decks and thats probably why she "undervalued the cost" so I don't blame her.
I liked the last one since both of those cards were/are meta for the exact same reason of winning the game right then and there. Maybe Farfa could have given a little more context on Sword's ability to switch position on something and how it was almost never used on an opponents monster but their own monster to enable OTKs.
"Wow, it seemed like you were completely ignoring one sentence making this card broken" the man says while showing Allie two cards with a short novel of text each
Panks VS Alpha seems like an odd comparison. You'd run them in different decks, right? 7-axis and 8-axis respectively.
farfa once again scamming people by saying there are 6 attributes when there are actually 7 which would clearly make access look better than borrel
Actually there are no Divine link monsters, so there are only 6 attributes Accesscode can banish.
True I sure love banishing divine link monsters for Accesscode effect.
bro doesnt know about Laugh attribute....
@@tails512 Genuine question, could you theoretically Genex Ally Changer a Link Monster to Divine (or another attribute switching card) before linking off for Accesscode, to give a theoretical 7 Banish maximum?
@@tails512 i really am genuinely questioning if you think i was serious with this. like she didn't even think close to it being used more than once and even then the diff between 6 and 7 is negative percentages
Farfa, you could just tell the participants that they're able to ask questions whenever they feel like it. Then you let them figure stuff out and also let them have oversights, in case those happen. In that case, you'd only need to step in on your own if someone misunderstands a card completely, e.g.
Or you just make the show more about the psychological side with all the gaslighting, that works, too
1.: Dark hole was pretty obvious because 1: card advantage is very important, and 2: being able to destroy our own monsters can in some cases be very important for them to function properly, so we can use their graveyard effects.
2.: Volcanic Queen is searchable, which is an advantage, but Gameciel can be put in any deck. In a Volcanic deck, Queen is better, in any other, Gameciel. I was technically thinking Gadarla would appear there to be fair, as Gadarla is the Kaiju I use the most. Being wind / insect fits some of my decks much better. Radian is another that I use a lot for being dark. Sometimes Kumongouse for bing an earth insect. I generally use Kaijus in the decks where I use Small World, as targets for Small World bridges. Than again, why would you put the Queen in deffense? Put it in attack. Attacking over 2500 is still pretty easy for most decks, and that way you can deal battle damage.
3.: Pankratops vs Alpha? So destroy vs bounce? But hey, Alpha is better for 2 reasons. 1.: many stuff has destruction protection. 2.: Alpha comes back. 3.: Alpha is a level 8, Pankratops is a level 7, and there are better rank 8 plays that there are rank 7-s. Than again, Big Eye is a thing, so rank 7-s can be pretty damn useful too. But for that, I guess Galaxy-Eyes Cypher Dragon isan option, it just makes you give up most of your battle phase. I'd pick Alpha for mostly the first 2 reasons, unless it's a dino deck. In dinos, I do believe that Pankratops is searchable, so in that specific condition, pankratops. Another reasonwhy I'd pick Alpha, is that I actually have 2 copies of it, while I have no Pankratops. 25th anniversary packs gave me both of those alphas. I still don't see ANY reason why we'd play either of them in a way that leaves them on the field though. They're perfectly fine materials for combo plays. On this one, I don't agree with you.
4.: Accesscode all the way. Less restrictive summoning condition, and is one of the go-to game enders I go for in most if not all the decks where I link climb. Provided I have to climb that high. In Traptrix, I usually stop at Atypus on link-3, as she's technically more useful for Traptrix endboards. But I do have Accesscode in most decks where I run any links. Not Speedroids, for those, I have only their own archetye specific link monster.
Overall, I'd say that her answers show very much that she's not used to games ending in 2-3 turns on average, and hence even if not intentionally, doesn't calculate with cards not needing deffense, or deffensive utilities like swapping opponent's monsters into deffense, if they're meant for taking out the opponent in the turn they're summoned.
Th extra deck detail was not gaslighting. it is 100% relevant. I think what got her is that he brought it up later during her analysis instead of outright saying, when she was reading Alpha: oh btw any monsters that are coming from the extra deck are going back there since they cant be in your hand to begin with.
I she the new move animation for Zeus is very cool
Parralel is a crypto card game...
Not just Crypto, full on NFT aswell and it is a pure scam, they targeted Hearthstone players as ambassendors for a while now and she takes part into this grift.
I'm sort of amazed (and perhaps a bit disappointed) you didn't pair Volcanic Queen with Lava Golem. 🤣
This is cool guessing card format than the regular one, Great video
Technically your opponent can response something to the Accesscode Talker's when his attempts to summon, so you still can respond with something like Solemn Judgment or Solemn Strike etc.
Farfa: i can't think of any link monster who can bet banished by accesscode and generate advantage
Me: For now.... Cant wait to see the kind of BS we can do with Malice when we get the deck here
Also because Pank tributes as a cost, it cannot be negated by any targeted monster negate
I literally just finished the one cimoo posted
Only now with the MALICE cards that resummon themselves to the field, they also Link lock you and 1 of the Links banishes at speed spell 4 if you banish something
These comparisions were not fair
with the tier 1 meta threat orcust you could use accesscode banish effect to banish a orcust link and resummon it with world wands for example. thats like a benefit i guess. but the new malice will abuse the banish thing
She’s the Linker E-boy! I usually don’t watch guess-is-card-good-or-bad vids, but the questions were fair because it was a comparison of cards that fill the same niche.
40:30 well now that malice exists this interraction maybe is kinda real now
When he said baronne de fluer was banned i freaked out because i had no clue😢
this format is definitely a lot better than the normal one.
I feel like telling her to ignore the rest of Gameciel was a mistake. Ignoring Kaiju counters doesn't generally come up, but the rest of the Kaiju mechanic frequently comes up.
Nah I don't think so, unless your deck has like a big number of kaijus the multiple control thing is irrelevant, the main purpose is almost always problematic spot removal.
Plus, any time I suggest a card might be slightly weaker or stronger depending on what the guest initially believes, it's obviously gaslighting and I'm a terrible person for it. So I tried to stay way more hands off this episode rather than over explain before their guesses. 😅
@@Farfano gaslight=less fun
Also, I think Gameciel is the only Kaiju that actually uses its Kaiju counter effect. People will activate Waterfront, build up counters over the course of their combo, search Gameciel, and summon it with Saryuja.
I haven’t seen the answer to the first yet as of writing this. I feel like Dark Hole is better. No cost and you can play it before you have summoned any monsters. Board wipe your opponents front row and then summon all your own
One of these videos has to include pot of generosity to see how far the gaslighting can go
the kaiju one was not fair lmao
I think more than the gaslighting, these vids just showcase just how fucked the YGO card texts are. No bullet points, no keywords, no separation of effects (which confused Allie what the "can't be responded to" applied to), and just overall mind bogglingly difficult to digest and read.
Jap version text tend to have bullet point to separate effects
jp text is better formatted in structure and how they use numbered circles to differentiate effects from one another
@@YukiFubuki. Insane how we don’t have that in the tcg. Instead we use a sentence to do what one number can.
Farfa is not gaslighting TECHNICALLY. Farfa is giving information that is not clear to the other person, but that does not stop the other person from debating everything that is available to be asked or even considered. It just shows people on the fence about something can be swayed more towards one side by good details of one side just because they do not realize the better ones of the other; This is not a gaslight but a simple side-effect of someone having to guess what is better but not being allowed to be more obvious about what specific details show the truth in the context of Yugioh as a whole.
U know what would be very helpful for these non-Yugioh players: demonstrate the card summon/effect activation straight up in MD. I think this would be extremely effective for both Farfa and the guests as they can visualize how the cards would be used, all the while still doesn’t make it too obvious as they are not familiar with the game themselves. It also helps Farfa with the TLDR @Farfa
She didn't learn Link Summoning during her stream. She learned Synchro Summoning. Farfa didn't even watch her stream.
Splish splash your opinion is trash
I heard theres a new TCG starting up so I am eagerly awaiting for the day that Farfa collabs with MBT_Elestrals to see the POV of a brand new TCG And its new content creators!
Also Farfa drawing attrntion to certain parts of the cards while saying ignore some ia actually a fitting thing since alot of cards has effects that reads powerful but ends up being bad in comparison to the other one
He spoon fed the kaiju to her
Dinowrestler pankahomie goes hard
40:41 Haven’t read MÁLICE yet, huh? 😂
Gameciel's second effect may be mostly irrelevant, but I've been playing a Runick Kaiju deck in Master Duel and that card specific card has been just completely shutting everyone down
Ngl I understand the gaslighting comments after the pank section
22:03 joooo Pokémon mysterie dungeon background music?
I surprised he didn't tell her that link monsters can't be switched into defense mode anyway lol
Why is there Sonic Unleashed soundtrack playing in the background?
Fuck the quick effect. If crashing and normal removal can solve your problem you don't have a problem. Bouncing an extra deck boss with banish/destruction protection or op GY effects is worth a lot more even if it comes up less often. I don't give a shit about dino boy.
i imperm your alpha.
Dino quick effect puts it miles above alpha. Imperm, veiler, apo, etc ruin him.
@@MajinVegito100it can also remove s/t too making it more versatile compared to alpha that can only hit monsters
Acesscode vs Borrelsword was cruel
Farfa forgot about the divine attribute!
Oh boy, new GaslightYGO video dropped
Oh no... NFT card game exposure
Gaslight Garfa returns
did farfa forget that borrelsword can change 1 of YOUR monster to defence as well? thats a pretty important part of the effect.
Farfa as a married man is certainly a gaslighting king
i use to play mathmech that can always have accesscode attack twice and have 3+ attribute link monster to banish😂
So early to a Farfa video, I see more bot comments than actual comments from people
I thought you were bot talking about bots😂
I feel like pankratops and alpha are too close in power levels to give a newer player. Of course pank is better, but it’s kinda unfair to expect a newer player to judge which is better, there should be a bigger gap between the cards
The gap between pank and alpha is pretty significant. Alpha has only ever been played in niche numeron OTK decks competitively. Pank was a staple 3 of side deck card in many topping decks for years and even was on the ban list.
Of course a newer player might see them as close in power, Allie is a little more experienced in yugioh by now so I made more difficult choices for sure!
thats the game! no point in comparing man-eater bug to pank
Yeah how dare he compare such similar cards. The only difference between them is that one was played and the other not
Alpha plus Lava Golem should've been shown in this video to really mess with her
to be honest these werent easy choices, some of these cards were of similar-ish power levels, especially to a none ygo player.
all pairs were similar in nature on purpose
To be fair yugioh is the only game that can two cards with the same line of text and not mean the same thing like she seen the your opponent can not respond part and assumed that this was a blanket statement that held true to the whole cards effects 😂
Acesscode can also pop any card, whereas Borrelsword only hits over monsters.
Borrelsword is better in Yubel
If farfa was a who wants to be a millionaire host, no one would pass the first question😂😂