Milo Murphy's Law - Cavendish and Dakota History and Theories

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 9 лип 2024
  • This is just a video of me talking about Cavendish and Dakota's histories and I also talk about some theories too.
    My social media stuff,
    Twitter - / tigerofftopic
    Music used in this video
    ---------------------------------------------
    BACK IN SUMMER by Nicolai Heidlas Music / nicolai-heidlas
    Creative Commons - Attribution 3.0 Unported- CC BY 3.0
    creativecommons.org/licenses/...
    Music promoted by Audio Library • Video
    Maestro Tlakaelel
    • Video
    l u v t e a (acoustic revisit) by autumn keys / autumnkeys
    Creative Commons - Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported - CC BY-SA 3.0
    creativecommons.org/licenses/...
    Music promoted by Audio Library • l u v t e a (acoustic ...
    View of the Valley
    Outro,
    I Get Up - John Isaac
    Sources!
    ------------------
    www.theguardian.com/education...
    www.barstandardsboard.org.uk/...
    www.qlts.com/blog/profession/...
    www.criminaljusticedegreescho...
    www.brightnetwork.co.uk/caree...
    www.findamasters.com/advice/f...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 105

  • @tigerofftopic2048
    @tigerofftopic2048  4 роки тому +55

    0:40 Shoot, made a small mistake. Drowssap is Dakota's mother's maiden name, not his maiden name. Hope that small mistake didn't ruin the whole video! Me being a bit of a perfectionist, this small mistake makes me want to just scrap the video, fix it, then upload it again, but ugh. it's such a small mistake, it's not worth the hassle. So yeah, Drowssap is Dakota's mother's maiden name.

    • @Adrex-iq4hx
      @Adrex-iq4hx 3 роки тому

      I will forgive you but my OCD won't

    • @phineasfacingforward3460
      @phineasfacingforward3460 3 роки тому

      This was very well made! Enjoyed this!

    • @ateium2409
      @ateium2409 3 роки тому

      @Sir. Simon X Ig his age ∈(0,100) years

    • @heathertoomey7068
      @heathertoomey7068 3 роки тому +2

      btw, Cavendish studied time travel for 20 "cycles". He didn't say years.
      (It could mean semesters, or trimesters, or moon cycles (months)).

    • @tigerofftopic2048
      @tigerofftopic2048  3 роки тому +1

      @@heathertoomey7068 ​ @Heather Toomey Usually in the way he said it, it would be interpreted as 20 years. (And in the French version, Cavendish says "I didn't study time travel for a duration of 20 years of my life to go around pushing a cart filled with pistachios). To me it just makes more sense since time travel must be a very hard job to get. If it only took 20 months/semesters there would be way more people becoming time travelers just to win the lottery and hide somewhere in the past. And there must be a lot of things to learn to become a time traveler. Remember, Cavendish knows how to fix their time machine, time-related gadgets (like the age-regressor ray), and he can fly a plane which was probably part of his studies.

  • @The2ndDimension
    @The2ndDimension 4 роки тому +62

    I NEVER NOTICED THE THREE GLASSES HOLES WERE MISSING

  • @andykawaii8488
    @andykawaii8488 4 роки тому +83

    I think we can all agree that we need a new season with more cavendish and dakota :D

  • @heathertoomey7068
    @heathertoomey7068 3 роки тому +23

    11:12 while Savannah insults them, Dakota looks to Cavendish to checking if he is sad, rather than worrying about himself.

  • @cheebuu3360
    @cheebuu3360 4 роки тому +75

    Tiger: Why would Dakota be so willing to save Cavendish's life? Hahaha, well...
    Me: OMG THEY WERE GA-
    Tiger: DAKOTA IS A MURDERER

  • @LadyJuse
    @LadyJuse 4 роки тому +52

    Interesting ideas!
    My main takeaway from them being from the future is we don't know how the education system works; so they could have gotten out of school a lot earlier.
    The idea that Dakota already lost a partner is one that is very interesting to me and does make sense. If he couldn't be there for his first partner, he's gonna be there for his new one.
    And I agree, we really need to see Cavendish caring for Dakota a lot more. My thoughts are that he should be in a situation where he is forced between either saving Dakota or getting a promotion. His obsession with getting one, gaining recognition could serve as a narrative means to show how much Dakota means to him.

  • @stefan6347
    @stefan6347 4 роки тому +52

    I would love a spin-off of just Cavendish and Dakota time travelling from The Cretaceous period to Ancient Rome or even to Present day. And if by the first season the writers exhausted any time period to go to, they could just start season two with them being P.I.G. agents and go on weird alien adventures. And they could throw actual counter agents to counter them or maybe made them the B-plot with Brick and Savannah as their nemesis.

    • @MiloMurphysLaw
      @MiloMurphysLaw 3 роки тому +6

      I mean if they need a B-plot to make it more interesting they could just include Doof and Perry again. And maybe even have a C-plot about other characters from P&F or MML

    • @doraeos
      @doraeos 3 роки тому +3

      @@MiloMurphysLaw but didnt doof gave up on evil what will they do?

    • @MiloMurphysLaw
      @MiloMurphysLaw 3 роки тому +2

      @@doraeos have you seen MML season 2? Even after he turned good he was still in the show.

    • @doraeos
      @doraeos 3 роки тому +1

      @@MiloMurphysLaw i know he took all the screentime but perry was kinda so extra in mml i never felt like he was there because he had a little screentime while doofenshmirtz had more screentime than the main characters

    • @akoalabear239
      @akoalabear239 3 роки тому +3

      Honestly I'd be a bit disappointed if this was the way they chose to go, i love Dakota and Cavendish but I also love Milo and his friends! However Would I still watch the crap out of a Dakota and Cavendish show? Yes. Yes I would.

  • @slickyt5929
    @slickyt5929 4 роки тому +25

    Milo Murphy’s Law and Phineas and Ferb are 2 of the best shows ever created!

  • @elliottheuselessgoldfish8236
    @elliottheuselessgoldfish8236 3 роки тому +15

    I DON'T THINK YOU UNDERSTAND HOW HAPPY IT MAKES ME TO KNOW THAT CANONICALLY DAKOTA IS THE REASON PARKING TICKETS EXIST.

  • @FlusteredBushStudios
    @FlusteredBushStudios 3 роки тому +8

    yess this is what i’ve been thinking all along! Cavindesh makes us think that Dakota is careless and stupid but if you pay attention it seems like Cavandish is the careless one. I mean he did die like 100 times

  • @Masatisan
    @Masatisan 4 роки тому +15

    "Cycles" doesn't necessarily mean years, it could be like a "term" or a "semester" in school, which where im from, there's usually 4 terms and 2 semesters per year. Personally I have a headcanon that the reason Cav seems so much older than Dakota at their "current" age (when they seemed so much closer to the same age in the past) is because "barrister in the queens court" was a mission he did on his own (for whatever reason) and it took him a lot longer to complete than expected (I pin it at 7-10 years), its also why the other agents and block don't really respect him. I put Dakota at early 20s when they met, and Cav closer to 30, so originally they would have been 7-10 years apart and now they are 14-20 . ALSO pretty sure it was the "destroyed earths second moon" thing that got them demoted. I also think they've been partners for around 7-10 years of linear time, which actually works out to about one cav-death per month.

  • @reyveneditsqueen119
    @reyveneditsqueen119 4 роки тому +16

    We can all agree THAT they are just made for each other.....

  • @beaverduck9921
    @beaverduck9921 4 роки тому +21

    I love your analisis theories. If Dakota's old partner died, he could've started with saving him and not eating a burito. Or even after saving Cavendish a few times he could've saved his old partner. So probably his old partner just left him.

    • @tigerofftopic2048
      @tigerofftopic2048  4 роки тому +10

      Thanks! I feel like since it's against the rules to go back in time to save your partner, that's why Dakota didn't do it. But he deiced to go for it with Cavendish because he didn't want to lose another partner. And if he decided that after saving Cavendish, he would go save his old partner, then he wouldn't have met Cavendish. He would have to undo their entire friendship if he were to go back in time to save his first partner.

    • @beaverduck9921
      @beaverduck9921 4 роки тому +2

      @@tigerofftopic2048 Yeah, you're right. But still I think he'd think anyone's life is way more important than the roules

    • @MiloMurphysLaw
      @MiloMurphysLaw 3 роки тому +3

      Maybe there was some reason why he couldn’t go back and save his old partner. Like maybe he died while talking to Mr. Block or another time agent or something so Dakota would’ve gotten caught?
      I mean he does seem like he already knows Brick and Savanna, maybe they were working together with Dakota and his old partner on a mission when his partner died?

    • @heathertoomey7068
      @heathertoomey7068 3 роки тому +5

      Maybe he saved his old partner and then wiped his memory so he wouldn't report him.
      Maybe Dakota left HIM because he was such a stickler for rules that he would tell on him even for that. Maybe that's why he bonds so much to Cavendish, because Cavendish refused to report him when he did something good.

    • @Blizzard0fOz93
      @Blizzard0fOz93 3 місяці тому

      Maybe (and this is just the writer part of me that came up with this, and I’m not super-familiar with the series myself, so take that with a grain of salt) there’s 2 more possible theories: 1- Multiverse Theory could be at work for the first partner, which means that a different Cavendish WAS said partner, or 2- Dakota’s first partner was somehow related to Cavendish, and the loss made him even more deadset on keeping Cavendish alive. Again, I’m not super-familiar with the series, and I’m just basing these ideas on what seems more logical in terms of plot, and not… plot. I mean, I’m looking at this from the writers’ point of view, and not the characters’. Sorry, not very good with words, unless it’s about my obsession with pre-gunpowder weapons and warfare or when I’m working on my stories, lol.

  • @ieda18
    @ieda18 2 роки тому +2

    I think your theory makes sense, and also remembering that Doofenshmirtz was the one who "created" time travel, no wonder why the job is dangerous.

  • @Froginth3bog
    @Froginth3bog 3 роки тому +8

    I'm pretty sure Dan said if it gets more viewership then a season 3 might come out( said on his tiktok )

    • @tigerofftopic2048
      @tigerofftopic2048  3 роки тому +2

      Yup, he also said that on Twitter. If more people watch Milo Murphy's Law on Disney +, there will be a higher chance of it getting another season

  • @SuperDuperJamer
    @SuperDuperJamer 4 роки тому +11

    You know it's gonna be good when they throw out the magnifying glass.
    Interesting theories, and good end card! If you are correct, (and I think you are) I hope we get to see Dakoda's previous partner.
    I loved it so much! Keep it the heck up Tiger!!!
    (the laugh at 2:30 was adorable!!)

    • @tigerofftopic2048
      @tigerofftopic2048  4 роки тому

      Thanks! Glad you enjoyed the video! That laugh was genuine, I felt ridiculous saying, "Doof ages like fine wine" I couldn't help but giggle to myself after saying that line

  • @akoalabear239
    @akoalabear239 3 роки тому +2

    3:44 Anything that can go wrong will go wrong, including early teenage parenthood!
    Also I really like that the only explanation we get in the show to why Dakota is constantly saving his partner is "He's Cavendish, what can you do?"

  • @Deadpool-fh6ve
    @Deadpool-fh6ve 3 роки тому +5

    I have a theory that Cavendish is related to Milo, that's why he has so much bad luck

  • @skinhead-ej8ff
    @skinhead-ej8ff 4 роки тому +5

    How have you only got 300 subs? That's almost criminal for the quality you put out. Just letting you know you have a new dedicated fan that's about to binge your whole channel. Keep it up tiger, this channels gonna blow up soon

  • @heathertoomey7068
    @heathertoomey7068 3 роки тому +2

    12:37 my favorite part

  • @wattsisnaim8111
    @wattsisnaim8111 4 роки тому +8

    Why do you not have more subscribers?! I mean this is quality stuff here!
    Trying to guess age based on physical appearance is tricky. For example, it has been said that the more recent Presidents all aged more than 8 years during their 2 terms, supposedly due to the stress of the job. But if you look at a lot of Hollywood celebrities, they look a lot like they did decades ago! Heck, Tom Cruise is almost 60! Look at him! That's not fair!
    So my theory, that we need more episodes to prove or disprove, is maybe Dakota is actually older than Cavendish!
    Or maybe not.

    • @tigerofftopic2048
      @tigerofftopic2048  4 роки тому +2

      It is tricky, especially when time travel is involved. Dakota could have aged faster because of him going back in time to save Cavendish. I do like the idea of Dakota being older than Cavendish since sometimes Dakota acts more mature than Cavendish. And it would be a little plot twist. But they intentionally drew Cavendish to look older in the Christmas episode, so I dunno

    • @MiloMurphysLaw
      @MiloMurphysLaw 3 роки тому

      Yeah Paul Rudd looks like he’s barely aged since 1995.

  • @izzyhutzel2530
    @izzyhutzel2530 3 роки тому +13

    Hey i have an idea for a milo murphys law theory you could do, why is saving the pistachios so important? At first it just seems like cavendish and dakota were given the mission juts to keep them busy, but then when they get demoted the job goes to rick and Savannah. They're supposed to be first class agents so why would they be given that mission? Were they just not good at their job? And why send anyone on that mission if it was just busy work? Besides couldn't their boss just have them bring the pistachios directly to the future?
    I feel lile their is definitely something else going on... Though it could be nothing, just seems wierd

    • @tigerofftopic2048
      @tigerofftopic2048  3 роки тому +7

      There is also that incident in the Christmas episode where Mr. Block's future-self tells him to not fire them that night. Then the crossover happens and then Block ends up firing them. So did his future-self know about the pistachon invasion?
      But technically Cavendish and Dakota caused the pistachio invasion by saving that pistachio tree, creating the first pistachion. I guess you can say that Block wanted to fire them for a while, but his future-self told him not to because ever since the first pistachion was created, the world would be destroyed without Cavendish and Dakota. So keeping them around until they fulfill their destiny would be for the best.
      This could be a good idea for a theory if they didn't caused the pistachion invasion. Because then Block could have had his future-self tell him to give Cavendish and Dakota that mission, knowing that they can save the world. Keeping the real reason for their mission a secret to not mess up their destiny and the timeline too much. But if Cavendish and Dakota caused it, then it would be easier to NOT give them the protecting pistachios mission, unless Block's future-self didn't know what caused it, he just knew that if Cavendish and Dakota stick around a little longer, then the world would be saved.
      And like you said, Cavendish and Dakota get demoted. Why didn't Block's future-self stop that from happening? Unless after he demote them, the world is still saved, so Block's future-self allows that to happen thinking that Brick and Savannah will end up saving the world, that's why Cavendish and Dakota didn't get credit for what happened because Block think Brick and Savannah are suppose to save the world, that's why they're still protecting pistachios in season 2 even though the threat is no longer there. Hmmm, maybe there is enough material for some sort of weird theory. But it's a theory that is completely unintentional by the writers, cause this is too convoluted. It's like building a puzzle, connecting all the pieces together, but the image you're left with is not the same as what's on the box, but all the pieces still fix together.
      Sorry for the wall of text, but that's what you get for leaving a comment on my video! RAWR!

  • @heathertoomey7068
    @heathertoomey7068 3 роки тому +3

    Without Dakota, 12:41. Yeah, I don't think Cavendish just died more AFTER he met Dakota.
    Oh, and you forgot the being frozen in ice part.

  • @mr.pinecone6558
    @mr.pinecone6558 4 роки тому +4

    Why doesn't this youtuber have more subscribers

  • @Joe-rz3fd
    @Joe-rz3fd 4 роки тому +8

    They could be 3 years old if they were at any point in their 30s

    • @ecilaflameshe221
      @ecilaflameshe221 3 роки тому +1

      Yeah, I thought of that, too! Cause 31 divided by 10 is 3.1, 39 divided by 10 is 3.9, and both of those and everything inbetween would be considered 3. Besides, Milo says "our three year old parents", so Dakota (and the teacher) wasn't necessarily included.

  • @yaboievan3096
    @yaboievan3096 3 роки тому +2

    13:18 My popcorn was tasting a bit bland, so thanks for all the salt

  • @DenYT1
    @DenYT1 3 роки тому +1

    Milo deserves a lot more attention, a new season would be amazing! Also great video!

  • @28botellasderiqui
    @28botellasderiqui 2 роки тому +1

    Wow, I came here expecting a video, but I found an amazing channel! Even if I don't watch cartoons that often I see the effort you put in the videos. Hope you grow more in this platform!

  • @ReallyGreatCommentary
    @ReallyGreatCommentary 4 роки тому +2

    Hi tiger! I just wanted to say that I really love your videos, Milo is one of my favorite shows and you're one of the few channels that makes videos about it. Keep it up!

  • @-zaktoon4862
    @-zaktoon4862 2 роки тому +3

    Underrated youtuber i hope you come back to youtube

    • @tigerofftopic2048
      @tigerofftopic2048  2 роки тому +3

      Maybe one day I'll find the time. I was fun making these videos, I just don't have the time to do it anymore. But if I do come back, I'll come back stronger than before because I'm still learning how to draw and animate!

    • @-zaktoon4862
      @-zaktoon4862 2 роки тому +2

      @@tigerofftopic2048 waiting then 😃❤

    • @closeyou
      @closeyou Рік тому

      @@tigerofftopic2048 I helped get you to 1000 subscribers.

  • @Valeria-si8jj
    @Valeria-si8jj Рік тому +1

    Me encantó!! 💕

  • @Cheatrunner
    @Cheatrunner 2 роки тому +1

    Thats a great theory. You should probably have more subscribers than 832 because your channel is good

  • @moss9642
    @moss9642 2 роки тому +3

    Tiger, where r u? ;_; I've been waiting in a cave for so long :|

  • @dr.heinzdoofenshmirtz7392
    @dr.heinzdoofenshmirtz7392 3 роки тому +1

    Love your videos !

  • @smallkksmiles4268
    @smallkksmiles4268 4 роки тому +2

    I forgot to stalk and missed the post ;-; but yes I love dis

  • @dinoricky5188
    @dinoricky5188 3 роки тому +2

    More videos please it bing 8 months omg please have more videos

    • @tigerofftopic2048
      @tigerofftopic2048  3 роки тому +1

      Haha, sorry about that. Because of the pandemic I've had to work more, so I haven't had that much free time to make new videos. But I'm still drawing and animating, so at least when I come back, my videos will look even better!

  • @pikasprogaming7550
    @pikasprogaming7550 2 роки тому +2

    dude this is good content u deserve more then 800 subs! nice editing it looks like you put a lot of effort into it I can tell

  • @MrPastorKev
    @MrPastorKev 3 роки тому +1

    This might sound weird but why didn't Dakota go back in time to save his first partner it could be because he was to sad but I'm not sure maby he's partner had to sacrifice himself for the valley and there was no other way to save it so if Dakota would have saved him the valley would be gone

  • @abc-jk8vs
    @abc-jk8vs 3 роки тому

    When's the next episode

  • @TheFansOfFiction
    @TheFansOfFiction Рік тому

    1) 3-years-old can be anything from 3 to 4 years. 3 years 11 months is still 3 years old. So the parents could be up to 40
    2) the fact that Cavendish was a barrister in the _queen's_ court indicates that, in the canon of the show, Queen Elizabeth lives(d) at least another 150 years

  • @mcpiggypigs396
    @mcpiggypigs396 3 роки тому +1

    I'm your 700th sub

    • @dinoricky5188
      @dinoricky5188 3 роки тому

      I’m your 723rd subscriber

    • @closeyou
      @closeyou Рік тому

      I became their 1000 subscriber

  • @PFGFrankly
    @PFGFrankly Рік тому +1

    100th comment. and i hope your ok

  • @Joe-rz3fd
    @Joe-rz3fd 4 роки тому +4

    Dakota's GRANDMOTHER'S maiden name is Drowssap, not his own

    • @tigerofftopic2048
      @tigerofftopic2048  4 роки тому +1

      Ah shoot, it's not his grandmother's maiden name but it is his mother's maiden, not his maiden name. Ugh, I hate making mistakes in my videos. I can't really undo those mistakes after the video is posted

  • @heathertoomey7068
    @heathertoomey7068 3 роки тому +1

    My parents are almost 60 and they don't have wrinkles yet.

  • @loganstewartskits6571
    @loganstewartskits6571 3 роки тому +1

    Why haven't you been uploading? Did you quit, does it take a long time to edit, or is there something going on?

    • @tigerofftopic2048
      @tigerofftopic2048  3 роки тому

      Mainly haven't been uploading due to work (I have to work more than usual due to COVID). That's the main reason why I pretty much only posted one video this year. BUT, that doesn't mean I'm quitting UA-cam, it just means I'm taking an extra long break for now. I barely have any subscribers so I figured no one would notice if I disappear for a bit but I guess someone did! Thank you for checking up on me!

  • @creamcakecoffee
    @creamcakecoffee 3 роки тому +2

    Dakota does not get enough attention :(

  • @pakboimsal8498
    @pakboimsal8498 3 роки тому +1

    Would you like to have a milo Murphy's law meets sonic the hedgehog

  • @MrCompMaster
    @MrCompMaster 3 роки тому +1

    did you ever get copyright in your videos cause you use so much milow Murphy's law clips please tell cause I am also working on a video on milow murphys law and I have to know

    • @tigerofftopic2048
      @tigerofftopic2048  3 роки тому +1

      Nope, maybe it's because I'm a really small channel. But usually you need a boarder around the video and only use audio from the episode when necessary. Try to avoid using music from episodes because sometimes it'll automatically detected it and strike it even if it's fair use. The main thing is to put as much original stuff into your video for it to be fair use.

    • @MrCompMaster
      @MrCompMaster 3 роки тому

      @@tigerofftopic2048my milow murphys law video is ready,I didn't add any boarder in my video,but it doesn't have any copyright🙄

    • @tigerofftopic2048
      @tigerofftopic2048  3 роки тому +1

      ​@@MrCompMaster Sometimes videos don't get a copyright strike right away after uploading it, but looking at your video, it looks like it's fair use because of all the editing, so you should be fine. Good job!

    • @MrCompMaster
      @MrCompMaster 3 роки тому

      @@tigerofftopic2048 thanks bro 😃,can we be friends ?

    • @DinoRicky
      @DinoRicky Рік тому

      @@tigerofftopic2048 please post more

  • @StriderNeverGivesUp
    @StriderNeverGivesUp 3 роки тому

    You ending

  • @ateium2409
    @ateium2409 3 роки тому +2

    Seriously , *HOW ON EARTH DID UA-cam THINK THAT YOUR TEAL PLATYPUS VIDEO IS MADE FOR KIDS .*
    Now I guess it's going to show up in UA-cam kidz as "Child Friendly"

    • @tigerofftopic2048
      @tigerofftopic2048  3 роки тому +1

      Aw man... Thanks for telling me about it. UA-cam didn't even tell me! Just boom, now it's for kids. I got a comment on it like 4 days ago! So this must have been recent. Now no more comments... Awww... It's been up for a year but now UA-cam decides it's just for kids. Oh well...

    • @ateium2409
      @ateium2409 3 роки тому +1

      @@tigerofftopic2048 Edit : It's no longer marked for kidz.

    • @tigerofftopic2048
      @tigerofftopic2048  3 роки тому

      @@ateium2409 YES! That's weird. Maybe a real person looked through it and unmarked it.

    • @ateium2409
      @ateium2409 2 роки тому +2

      @@tigerofftopic2048 It's again marked as for kids ... Sigh

  • @theboiremastered3382
    @theboiremastered3382 3 роки тому +1

    They have a sibling relationship

  • @cgk5108
    @cgk5108 3 роки тому

    Boy or girl