It drives me NUTS how people blow their nose, scratch their heads (maybe other things), have their hands full of who knows what from subway poles and door knobs AND THEN go take the body of Christ with those same hands. Very few people clean their hands prior. I am glad a priest has no right to deny communion on the tongue. Shall this occur, reach out to your Bishop.
I have seen someone rub their hands together like they were trying to get rid of crumbs out their hands, after they had put the body of Christ in their mouth. The lack of reverence is shocking. The Priest has to wash his hands before he can touch the body of Christ. So it makes no sense that people receiving the body of Christ can do so with dirty hands.
@@erikriza7165 Before Vatican 2 Catechumens would receive salt on their tongue in preparation for baptism. “Salt of wisdom” to purify the mouth and to signify the wisdom and understanding that come from faith.
The laity have done this to me yesterday at the church. It was the lady who gave the communion to me. I already opened my mouth yesterday but she refused it and I, opened my palm and received him. That's why I always prefer going to the priest to receive him on the tounge with reverence.
@@nathanielramos5338 The laity should not give out the Holy Sacrament, that is also an abomination. And if I were you, I'd have put my hands behind my back to clearly show that woman that I will not put Jesus on my hands.
@@baldwinthefourth4098 I don't really know why she refused it. Some ministers of the Holy Communion let the parishioners he/she can receive communion in the tongue.
Point is. Only the holy touch GODs body. No lay person. FACT " the Apostles were holy men People have dirty hands. They drop the host, & dont pick it up, take it to give another. Even jamed in pocket. Yes I talk to priests, we talk of things. They are saddened by what they see. The disrespect of the host. Inappropriate dress. Etc.
Hi, I will tell you some places where you could recieve communion on tounge. But you would have to do it while you are standing. You can knell at your pew before going. Go to Holy Spirit catholic church in hemet ca at the 11:00 that would be in there parish hall for right now because they are doing a little construction because they were able to raise enough money to rebuild the church a little bit.. There is one more church that you could go to. Which would be at Saint Anthony's Catholic Church in San Jacinto Ca at any of there masses. But if you were to go to go to a eucharistic minister or a preist that had a disease they will not be able to have you go up to them and have you recieve holy communion on the tounge while you are standing that is just because they do not want to get more sick or even accidentally get you sick. So just be aware of that. I will always recieve communion on the tounge at almost every mass that I go to and if they will let me recieve holy communion on the tounge while standing that is what I would do every time when they allow that.
I am Orthodox and the communion by hand is a outright blasphemy and heresy. We partake in the communion with the blood and body of Christ given by the priest with a golden or silver spoon directly carefully administer not to fall down from the chalice; It is the most sacred Miracle that the Christian receive. And here one cannot take the communion unless we first Fasts for days or at least 3 day or 1 week, pray and then go to confession. At the confession the Priest reads on the book of prayer that calls us to confess the sins to Christ our Doctor on our knees we listen to him and when he calls our name we say it slowly as he reads through the prayer book. The prayer is called Molifta and after the confession can begin. After the Confession you may receive the blood and body of Christ when the Priest calls us during the Divine Liturgy : With the fear of God, with Faith and Love
We have intinction at our Ordinariate parish, and the pastor only allows reception on the tongue. He also only allows standing to receive if you have great difficulty kneeling. (The only ones I've seen stand for Communion are those over 85 or those who have had knee/limb surgery. EVERYONE else kneels, even if it takes them a little while to get down or back up again with assistance.
That is why people do not like Intinction. It does not allow the possibility of receiving in the hand. It would put thousands of extraordinary ministers for the distribution of Holy Communion (who wrongly call themselves "Eucharistic Ministers") out of work.
I am almost every single time able to recieve commuion on the tounge. And when I am able to I will always do that. But sadly they had to change one rule you can just not knell. But I can recieve holy communion on the tounge while standing that is at almost every single mass that I go to. The only time that they would deney that would just be if one of the eucharistic ministers, or priests, or even maybe deacons, would just be if they have some sort of disease or health issuses, the reason why that they would do that at that time, would just be so that they do not get anymore sick as they already are or even because they would not want you to get sick at all either.
Reason why I say never receive communion on the hand is because they're a small particles that get on your hands and you don't want to drop those on the floor. Also I believe churches should have like a kneeling area to receive The body of Christ and then receive the blood of Christ. Also have one of those trays that collect particles of the body of Christ I don't think nobody should ever receive it on the hand at all for this reason thoughts?
The thumbnail to this video illustrates the issue of the particles of the body of our Lord being dropped and walked all over. After Vatican 2 some Churches removed their Altar Rails. With the call for more reverence, some of those Churches are providing kneelers for those that wish to receive Communion, kneeling and on the tongue. The 'Paten' or 'Communion-Plate' should always be used during Commuion so that no particles of the body of Christ shall be lost. Receiving in the hand not only increases the risk of particles of the body of Christ being lost, it creates opportunities for those with ill intent towards the body of Christ, to not consume and then leave the Church with the Eucharist intact to commit acts of sacrilege. In the early years of the Church, Communion in the hand was practiced. This was later changed to receiving Commuion, kneeling and on the tongue as to protect the body of Christ and to promote more reverence.
When Communion in the hand was permitted, reverence was already gone. Most people do not do it in the prescribed way. Some people do not "receive" the Host. They snatch it out of the Priest's hand. The practice was born in disobedience, like Altar girls was. People did it before it was allowed.
@@edykiantolol7546 I was not at the Last Supper. I know what I see when i go to Mass on Sunday. I know what I have seen in every Church I have been in for the last 60 years. And I know what I used to see.
Your generation began the softening of the will of Catholics in this nation; now your generation seeks to make people think it’s okay to disobey the Vicar of Christ. Please repent.
@@edykiantolol7546 i am not talking just about how we receive the Host. I am talking about the general lack of reverence. People used to be more reverent when they were in Church. They prayed more. They had the rest of the week, and the rest of the world, to talk to each other.
Bro would rather die as a schismatic and outside the Church (Extra Ecclesiam Nula Sallus), than keep faith in the promise that the gates of hell will not triumph over the Holy Church.
Wrong, the early distributed the eucharist on the hand similarly how it is done in the ordinary form. The church chooses the form and what is wrong and right, not you. I say this as someone who's never recieved the eucharist in the hand.
I am allowed to recieve communion on the tounge at my church and just a couple of times they did not allow me to do that but most of the time I was able to and that would be at a novus ordo mass. They will allow you to recieve on the tounge at the 11:00 at Holy Spirit catholic church in hemet, and also will allow you to do that at any of the masses at saint anthony's catholic church in San Jacinto. I will always recieve on the tounge if I am allowed to which is normally all of the time. Those church would be in california. But they will only allow you to recieve on the tounge while you are standing. You can just kneel when you go up to recieve communion. I believe that I have the right to recieve commuion on the tounge every time I go to mass. Let's end with a prayer that I love. In the name of the father and of the son and of the holy spirit omen. Next part is in Latin. Gloria patri et fillio et spiritui sancto et sicuit in principio et nunc in semper et in a secula seclorum omen. In nomine patris et filli et spiritui sancti omen.
This is outraging unless those parishes have specific exceptions for not complying with the law on this. We need to do something about this. How can I help
There are NO circumstances for denying communion on the tongue. This is what happens when a Pope rewards irreverent, disobedient behaviour. No ground should have been given, the disobedient Bishop's should have been punished for such behaviour. Instead they were rewarded and given an 'Indult' to allow them to continue to distribute communion in the hand. And now communion in the hand is seen as the norm. Just to compound the issue, the introduction of Eucharistic ministers has furthered the irreverence. We have seen all kinds of sacrilegious Mass, from clown, skateboard, dj's, etc. The freedom that Priest have been given in the new form of Mass has enabled this. Speaking up about these issues gets you labelled "Trad" like it's meant to be a bad thing. All we can do is to keep raising awareness, we can write to our Bishops, then HOPE they do something positive about it. We have to PRAY that reverance becomes the norm again. This is a leadership issue, everything we are seeing is the result of poor leadership.
For a short time, the early church liturgy was Greek, communion was received on the hand and priest/prebyters were allowed to marry if they chose too. At our church, people receive the Holy Eucharist, the body of Christ on the tongue if they choose too, or on the hand if they choose too. The tongue is no holier than the hand and vice versa. Romans chapter 14 13-23, though I know that Paul is talking about general food in these verses, Paul said throught the Holy Spirit, that one should not be a stumbling block for his brother as stated in verse 13, seems to apply here. In fact the first 12 verses of chapter 14 applies as well. Again, I know Paul is talking about food in general, but it seems to apply here in the liturgy of the church. When I die and face my maker, Jesus Christ, I don't think that He will be asking me about my opinion, about receiving the Holy Eucharist on the hand or the Holy Eucharist on the tongue. God bless.
Pretty sure that for the first couple of centuries communion was received by hand especially since it was a loaf of bread broken , don't think there were wafers in those days . As time went by these new modalities were taken up , but not in the early church .
@@miguelsemidei7619 And I stated not in a hand. It's disrespecting GOD. The past doesntvdidcate what's proper. Notice they corrected the error of putting into unholy hands. As the offical language of the Mass was Latin. Peter/Paul began the church in Rome .
Both the bleeding woman and the harlot were ritually unclean but dared to touch the Lord, and through their faith were healed. The Lord degraded Himself to assume our fallen flesh to illumine and save us. Now in His resurrected glorious flesh He assumes bread and wine to illumine and save us from within. “Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for you cleanse the outside of the cup and of the plate, but inside they are full of extortion and rapacity. You blind Pharisee! first cleanse the inside of the cup and of the plate, that the outside also may be clean. “Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for you are like whitewashed tombs, which outwardly appear beautiful, but within they are full of dead men’s bones and all uncleanness. - Matthew 23:25-27. There are many who receive communion in the hands and are well pleasing to the Lord because they allow Him to cleanse them from within. There are many who kneel and receive on the tongue who eat their own judgement because outwardly they appear to be righteous but inwardly their hearts a hard in their self righteousness.
I in no way think Priests should be denying communion on the tongue or while kneeling, nor that communion in the hand is the best way to celebrate but many of us need to examen ourselves and see if we are hardening our hearts and denying the awesome incomprehensible nature of our God. It is incomprehensible that the King of all gestated in a Virgins womb. It is folly to our worldly minds that Life itself suffered death so that all might truly live. We must consider these things and see Christ in the mundane, for it was in the Incarnation’s mundane nature that many missed the King of Kings in their presence.
And for your own souls sake assume that they who lack the proper reverence are ignorant and through your faith, hope and love radiate the Brightness of Him that makes you receive on the tongue and knee. Anger kills your neighbor. Calling your neighbor a fool puts you in danger of hell.
The apostles must have distributed the communion by hands only. For intinction then yes you must receive it on tongue as there is a significant risk that the wine will drop from the soaked bread
@@equine2020 really ? A few hours after receiving the body of Christ on the hand one of this 'holy men' denied Jesus 3 times. Most of them run away and hidden somewhere when Jesus was being crucified. Not too many lay people can be said of doing the same
I'm sure it doesn't matter. It was done at the Last Supper. What a thing to OBSESS over! I sense Christ would be appalled at the absolute waste of emotion and time devoted to nitpicking over this nonsense! Outrageous. Call it what is is.
At the last supper, Jesus HIMSELF gave to the hands of his disciples His body and precious blood in His memory. Everything since is dogma, and it's very ugly here including the bad priests. The first commandment is love God, after that love each other as yourself.
No it is not. Every time when I am able to that is what I always do if they allow me to do that. You are a really bad influence on all of these people. Say sorry to all of them right now to everybody that you have said that to before.
If Jesus being stepped on isn’t a big problem, I don’t know what is. I find particles of the Holy Eucharist on the floor of the church frequently, which isn’t accounting for the particles people brush off on their clothes, or that get stuck to their shoes. There is no problem that could be more important than this.
When Jesus broke the bread, he GAVE it to his apostles. Where does it says in the Bible that he placed it on the tongue? I'ts about sharing and doing this in the name of Christ to remember him. These so called rightious christians here, freaking out over this, it's ridiculous. He who is without sin...
Stop with this elitist nonsense. Have you even read the bible? Jesus clearly GAVE the bread to the disciples and then told them to eat it. It doesn't say He fed it to them, doesn't say He put it in their mouth. Matthew 26:26 While they were eating, Jesus took a loaf of bread, and after blessing it he broke it, gave it to the disciples, and said, “Take, eat; this is my body.” Mark 14:22 While they were eating, he took a loaf of bread, and after blessing it he broke it, gave it to them, and said, “Take; this is my body.” Luke 22:19 Then he took a loaf of bread, and when he had given thanks, he broke it and gave it to them, saying, “This is my body, which is given for you. Do this in remembrance of me.” How do we know it was handed to them based on that? OH because He then says the EXACT SAME THING when HANDING them the cup. Matthew26:27 Then he took a cup, and after giving thanks he gave it to them, saying, “Drink from it, all of you; Mark 14: 23 Then he took a cup, and after giving thanks he gave it to them, and all of them drank from it. Luke 22:17 Then he took a cup, and after giving thanks he said, “Take this and divide it among yourselves (He literally tells them to divide the cup themselves and NOT given to each by Him)
I would highly reccomend watching ,Fr Chris Alar, video in regard to this matter very informative. ua-cam.com/video/N_rY0Tj4bYM/v-deo.html
It drives me NUTS how people blow their nose, scratch their heads (maybe other things), have their hands full of who knows what from subway poles and door knobs AND THEN go take the body of Christ with those same hands. Very few people clean their hands prior. I am glad a priest has no right to deny communion on the tongue. Shall this occur, reach out to your Bishop.
I have seen someone rub their hands together like they were trying to get rid of crumbs out their hands, after they had put the body of Christ in their mouth.
The lack of reverence is shocking.
The Priest has to wash his hands before he can touch the body of Christ. So it makes no sense that people receiving the body of Christ can do so with dirty hands.
So true. I agree. But it is also true that most people probably commit more sins with their tongues than they do with their hands.
@@erikriza7165 Before Vatican 2 Catechumens would receive salt on their tongue in preparation for baptism.
“Salt of wisdom” to purify the mouth and to signify the wisdom and understanding that come from faith.
@@arrontaylortalks interesting. I did not recall that. Sounds like we should go back to that.
Only holy men touch the host.
All others are not pure.
Receiving communion on the hand is an abomination! Bring back Communion Rails!
The laity have done this to me yesterday at the church. It was the lady who gave the communion to me. I already opened my mouth yesterday but she refused it and I, opened my palm and received him. That's why I always prefer going to the priest to receive him on the tounge with reverence.
@@nathanielramos5338 The laity should not give out the Holy Sacrament, that is also an abomination. And if I were you, I'd have put my hands behind my back to clearly show that woman that I will not put Jesus on my hands.
@@baldwinthefourth4098 I don't really know why she refused it. Some ministers of the Holy Communion let the parishioners he/she can receive communion in the tongue.
@@baldwinthefourth4098 that is false. Communion on the Hand has been the norm since the early days of the Church.
@@baldwinthefourth4098 also false. Lay people helped with Communion in the early Church. St. Tarcisius is an example.
Point is. Only the holy touch GODs body. No lay person.
FACT " the Apostles were holy men
People have dirty hands. They drop the host, & dont pick it up, take it to give another. Even jamed in pocket.
Yes I talk to priests, we talk of things. They are saddened by what they see. The disrespect of the host.
Inappropriate dress. Etc.
Bring back communion on the tongue
It depends on people. You can receive Jesus in tongue with reverence.
Hi, I will tell you some places where you could recieve communion on tounge. But you would have to do it while you are standing. You can knell at your pew before going. Go to Holy Spirit catholic church in hemet ca at the 11:00 that would be in there parish hall for right now because they are doing a little construction because they were able to raise enough money to rebuild the church a little bit.. There is one more church that you could go to. Which would be at Saint Anthony's Catholic Church in San Jacinto Ca at any of there masses. But if you were to go to go to a eucharistic minister or a preist that had a disease they will not be able to have you go up to them and have you recieve holy communion on the tounge while you are standing that is just because they do not want to get more sick or even accidentally get you sick. So just be aware of that. I will always recieve communion on the tounge at almost every mass that I go to and if they will let me recieve holy communion on the tounge while standing that is what I would do every time when they allow that.
AMEN!!!
I never accept the body of Christ into my hands.🙏☘️👏💐🌹✝️🇮🇪✝️
I am Orthodox and the communion by hand is a outright blasphemy and heresy. We partake in the communion with the blood and body of Christ given by the priest with a golden or silver spoon directly carefully administer not to fall down from the chalice; It is the most sacred Miracle that the Christian receive. And here one cannot take the communion unless we first Fasts for days or at least 3 day or 1 week, pray and then go to confession. At the confession the Priest reads on the book of prayer that calls us to confess the sins to Christ our Doctor on our knees we listen to him and when he calls our name we say it slowly as he reads through the prayer book. The prayer is called Molifta and after the confession can begin. After the Confession you may receive the blood and body of Christ when the Priest calls us during the Divine Liturgy : With the fear of God, with Faith and Love
We have intinction at our Ordinariate parish, and the pastor only allows reception on the tongue. He also only allows standing to receive if you have great difficulty kneeling. (The only ones I've seen stand for Communion are those over 85 or those who have had knee/limb surgery. EVERYONE else kneels, even if it takes them a little while to get down or back up again with assistance.
Exactly how Communion should be done.
That is why people do not like Intinction. It does not allow the possibility of receiving in the hand. It would put thousands of extraordinary ministers for the distribution of Holy Communion (who wrongly call themselves "Eucharistic Ministers") out of work.
Yeah they do this at our lady of atonement
I am almost every single time able to recieve commuion on the tounge. And when I am able to I will always do that. But sadly they had to change one rule you can just not knell. But I can recieve holy communion on the tounge while standing that is at almost every single mass that I go to. The only time that they would deney that would just be if one of the eucharistic ministers, or priests, or even maybe deacons, would just be if they have some sort of disease or health issuses, the reason why that they would do that at that time, would just be so that they do not get anymore sick as they already are or even because they would not want you to get sick at all either.
Reason why I say never receive communion on the hand is because they're a small particles that get on your hands and you don't want to drop those on the floor.
Also I believe churches should have like a kneeling area to receive The body of Christ and then receive the blood of Christ.
Also have one of those trays that collect particles of the body of Christ
I don't think nobody should ever receive it on the hand at all for this reason thoughts?
The thumbnail to this video illustrates the issue of the particles of the body of our Lord being dropped and walked all over.
After Vatican 2 some Churches removed their Altar Rails. With the call for more reverence, some of those Churches are providing kneelers for those that wish to receive Communion, kneeling and on the tongue.
The 'Paten' or 'Communion-Plate' should always be used during Commuion so that no particles of the body of Christ shall be lost.
Receiving in the hand not only increases the risk of particles of the body of Christ being lost, it creates opportunities for those with ill intent towards the body of Christ, to not consume and then leave the Church with the Eucharist intact to commit acts of sacrilege.
In the early years of the Church, Communion in the hand was practiced. This was later changed to receiving Commuion, kneeling and on the tongue as to protect the body of Christ and to promote more reverence.
@@arrontaylortalks thank you
When Communion in the hand was permitted, reverence was already gone. Most people do not do it in the prescribed way. Some people do not "receive" the Host. They snatch it out of the Priest's hand. The practice was born in disobedience, like Altar girls was. People did it before it was allowed.
so the apostles were not reverent when receiving the communion from Jesus Himself for the first time?
@@edykiantolol7546 I was not at the Last Supper. I know what I see when i go to Mass on Sunday. I know what I have seen in every Church I have been in for the last 60 years. And I know what I used to see.
Your generation began the softening of the will of Catholics in this nation; now your generation seeks to make people think it’s okay to disobey the Vicar of Christ. Please repent.
@@erikriza7165 So Jesus didn't give the correct examples when giving the bread to the hands of the apostles and not on their tounge?
@@edykiantolol7546 i am not talking just about how we receive the Host. I am talking about the general lack of reverence. People used to be more reverent when they were in Church. They prayed more. They had the rest of the week, and the rest of the world, to talk to each other.
Leave the church who does not accept to give it on the longue only!
Heresy
I think you should work on your grammar
No find a different parish
Bro would rather die as a schismatic and outside the Church (Extra Ecclesiam Nula Sallus), than keep faith in the promise that the gates of hell will not triumph over the Holy Church.
Wrong, the early distributed the eucharist on the hand similarly how it is done in the ordinary form. The church chooses the form and what is wrong and right, not you. I say this as someone who's never recieved the eucharist in the hand.
I am allowed to recieve communion on the tounge at my church and just a couple of times they did not allow me to do that but most of the time I was able to and that would be at a novus ordo mass. They will allow you to recieve on the tounge at the 11:00 at Holy Spirit catholic church in hemet, and also will allow you to do that at any of the masses at saint anthony's catholic church in San Jacinto. I will always recieve on the tounge if I am allowed to which is normally all of the time. Those church would be in california. But they will only allow you to recieve on the tounge while you are standing. You can just kneel when you go up to recieve communion. I believe that I have the right to recieve commuion on the tounge every time I go to mass. Let's end with a prayer that I love. In the name of the father and of the son and of the holy spirit omen. Next part is in Latin. Gloria patri et fillio et spiritui sancto et sicuit in principio et nunc in semper et in a secula seclorum omen. In nomine patris et filli et spiritui sancti omen.
The Church says it is alright so our listen to her instead of some youtube channel
This is outraging unless those parishes have specific exceptions for not complying with the law on this. We need to do something about this. How can I help
There are NO circumstances for denying communion on the tongue.
This is what happens when a Pope rewards irreverent, disobedient behaviour. No ground should have been given, the disobedient Bishop's should have been punished for such behaviour. Instead they were rewarded and given an 'Indult' to allow them to continue to distribute communion in the hand. And now communion in the hand is seen as the norm. Just to compound the issue, the introduction of Eucharistic ministers has furthered the irreverence.
We have seen all kinds of sacrilegious Mass, from clown, skateboard, dj's, etc. The freedom that Priest have been given in the new form of Mass has enabled this. Speaking up about these issues gets you labelled "Trad" like it's meant to be a bad thing.
All we can do is to keep raising awareness, we can write to our Bishops, then HOPE they do something positive about it. We have to PRAY that reverance becomes the norm again.
This is a leadership issue, everything we are seeing is the result of poor leadership.
For a short time, the early church liturgy was Greek, communion was received on the hand and priest/prebyters were allowed to marry if they chose too.
At our church, people receive the Holy Eucharist, the body of Christ on the tongue if they choose too, or on the hand if they choose too. The tongue is no holier than the hand and vice versa.
Romans chapter 14 13-23, though I know that Paul is talking about general food in these verses, Paul said throught the Holy Spirit, that one should not be a stumbling block for his brother as stated in verse 13, seems to apply here. In fact the first 12 verses of chapter 14 applies as well. Again, I know Paul is talking about food in general, but it seems to apply here in the liturgy of the church.
When I die and face my maker, Jesus Christ, I don't think that He will be asking me about my opinion, about receiving the Holy Eucharist on the hand or the Holy Eucharist on the tongue. God bless.
Except that is was condemned by some early councils
Someone please send this video to Fr. Casey.
Pretty sure that for the first couple of centuries communion was received by hand especially since it was a loaf of bread broken , don't think there were wafers in those days . As time went by these new modalities were taken up , but not in the early church .
And given by holy men
Not ordinary people.
@@equine2020 BUT given in the hand to ordinary people . Although these Holy people were not ordained , just chosen.
@@miguelsemidei7619
What's your point.
@@equine2020 the point being that communion was received in the hand , which is the question this video is asking .
@@miguelsemidei7619
And I stated not in a hand. It's disrespecting GOD.
The past doesntvdidcate what's proper. Notice they corrected the error of putting into unholy hands.
As the offical language of the Mass was Latin. Peter/Paul began the church in Rome .
What a non issue😅
Both the bleeding woman and the harlot were ritually unclean but dared to touch the Lord, and through their faith were healed. The Lord degraded Himself to assume our fallen flesh to illumine and save us. Now in His resurrected glorious flesh He assumes bread and wine to illumine and save us from within. “Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for you cleanse the outside of the cup and of the plate, but inside they are full of extortion and rapacity. You blind Pharisee! first cleanse the inside of the cup and of the plate, that the outside also may be clean. “Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for you are like whitewashed tombs, which outwardly appear beautiful, but within they are full of dead men’s bones and all uncleanness. - Matthew 23:25-27. There are many who receive communion in the hands and are well pleasing to the Lord because they allow Him to cleanse them from within. There are many who kneel and receive on the tongue who eat their own judgement because outwardly they appear to be righteous but inwardly their hearts a hard in their self righteousness.
I in no way think Priests should be denying communion on the tongue or while kneeling, nor that communion in the hand is the best way to celebrate but many of us need to examen ourselves and see if we are hardening our hearts and denying the awesome incomprehensible nature of our God. It is incomprehensible that the King of all gestated in a Virgins womb. It is folly to our worldly minds that Life itself suffered death so that all might truly live. We must consider these things and see Christ in the mundane, for it was in the Incarnation’s mundane nature that many missed the King of Kings in their presence.
And for your own souls sake assume that they who lack the proper reverence are ignorant and through your faith, hope and love radiate the Brightness of Him that makes you receive on the tongue and knee. Anger kills your neighbor. Calling your neighbor a fool puts you in danger of hell.
as well as the blood I got it since I was a small boy
Instead of doing 'good practices' in the front of the church, better do good things to others when nobody sees it
I think what we should promote communion on the tounge while standing.
False information here. Communion on the Hand has been around and the norm since the early Church.
trad rats are like protestants, they just sit on the opposite side of aisle
The apostles must have distributed the communion by hands only. For intinction then yes you must receive it on tongue as there is a significant risk that the wine will drop from the soaked bread
Apostles were holy men. Lay people shouldn't touch GODs body.
@@equine2020 really ? A few hours after receiving the body of Christ on the hand one of this 'holy men' denied Jesus 3 times. Most of them run away and hidden somewhere when Jesus was being crucified. Not too many lay people can be said of doing the same
@@edykiantolol7546
What's your point?
@@equine2020that these holy men were just as much sinners as we are.
@@E9819_
So show me someone without sin. Even you.
God chooses His apostles.
If people were still reverent of The Body of Christ would communion in the hand be OK?
I'm sure it doesn't matter. It was done at the Last Supper. What a thing to OBSESS over! I sense Christ would be appalled at the absolute waste of emotion and time devoted to nitpicking over this nonsense! Outrageous. Call it what is is.
Das ist eine Katastrophe!!! Nur durch die Priestershand darf/sollte die Kommunion gegeben werden.
What the actual fuck is that thumbnail bro
At the last supper, Jesus HIMSELF gave to the hands of his disciples His body and precious blood in His memory. Everything since is dogma, and it's very ugly here including the bad priests. The first commandment is love God, after that love each other as yourself.
On the tongue is inappropriate
No it is not. Every time when I am able to that is what I always do if they allow me to do that. You are a really bad influence on all of these people. Say sorry to all of them right now to everybody that you have said that to before.
There are MUCH bigger problems to be wasting this much energy over...
Oh I guess desecration isn't a big deal, except for it being an automatic excommunication.
I know what you mean but this is the love of the true presence, we'll always have other problems.
If Jesus being stepped on isn’t a big problem, I don’t know what is. I find particles of the Holy Eucharist on the floor of the church frequently, which isn’t accounting for the particles people brush off on their clothes, or that get stuck to their shoes. There is no problem that could be more important than this.
When Jesus broke the bread, he GAVE it to his apostles. Where does it says in the Bible that he placed it on the tongue? I'ts about sharing and doing this in the name of Christ to remember him. These so called rightious christians here, freaking out over this, it's ridiculous. He who is without sin...
Stop with this elitist nonsense. Have you even read the bible? Jesus clearly GAVE the bread to the disciples and then told them to eat it. It doesn't say He fed it to them, doesn't say He put it in their mouth.
Matthew 26:26 While they were eating, Jesus took a loaf of bread, and after blessing it he broke it, gave it to the disciples, and said, “Take, eat; this is my body.”
Mark 14:22 While they were eating, he took a loaf of bread, and after blessing it he broke it, gave it to them, and said, “Take; this is my body.”
Luke 22:19 Then he took a loaf of bread, and when he had given thanks, he broke it and gave it to them, saying, “This is my body, which is given for you. Do this in remembrance of me.”
How do we know it was handed to them based on that? OH because He then says the EXACT SAME THING when HANDING them the cup.
Matthew26:27 Then he took a cup, and after giving thanks he gave it to them, saying, “Drink from it, all of you;
Mark 14: 23 Then he took a cup, and after giving thanks he gave it to them, and all of them drank from it.
Luke 22:17 Then he took a cup, and after giving thanks he said, “Take this and divide it among yourselves (He literally tells them to divide the cup themselves and NOT given to each by Him)