Karen Read tells reporters she's willing to testify
Вставка
- Опубліковано 17 чер 2024
- Karen Read told reporters Tuesday that's she willing to testify in her murder trial.
She spoke briefly outside the courthouse.
turnto10.com/news/local/testi...
#karenread #johnokeefe #dedham #norfolkcountysuperiorcourt
-----
NBC 10 WJAR is Southern New England's leading news station, covering news, politics, sports and weather in Rhode Island, Southeastern Massachusetts and Eastern Connecticut, including Providence, Central Falls, Cranston, East Providence, Newport, Pawtucket, Warwick, Woonsocket, Attleboro, Fall River, New Bedford, Taunton and Cape Cod, and surrounding communities.
Our homepage is turnto10.com
Like us on Facebook at / nbc10
Follow us on X at x.com/nbc10
Follow us on Instagram at / nbc10wjar
Download the NBC 10 News app for iOS at
apps.apple.com/us/app/nbc-10-...
Download the NBC 10 News app for Android at
play.google.com/store/apps/de...
Report news to NBC 10 at 401-455-9105 or email news@wjar.com
Share your images and video with NBC 10 at turnto10.com/chimein
No need for her to testify.
There’s no case here, it’s a circus.
It's in her best interest to NOT testify. This interview was just a PR move on her part as it's up to her to testify, not her lawyers.
Defer to her attorneys. She will listen to them.
The lawyer will advise a client not to testify if they believe it’s not necessary, or if it will do more damage than good. Sure, she has the right to testify-but she’ll take the advice of her lawyers first, which is smart on her part. So in a sense, it is up to her lawyers. PR move? Oh stop.
She didn’t mean that it wasn’t her decision. She said she’d defer to her attorneys who are more qualified to determine whether she should or not. She is smart enough to know they know better than
That's because she's guilty and you know it.
@@irongirl8007out of curiosity, what evidence pushed you to believe she’s guilty?
She has absolutely no intent of testifying.
She’s a little too confident. It’s always wise to never assume what a jury will do.
Don't testify ....Period.
That's because she's guilty and you know it.
@@irongirl8007I think the evidence is absolutely in her favour. She’s not guilty
@@Sineadmcd exactly, there is no way she put a 3 inch deep gash in his rear head, gave numerous skull fractures, and tore up his right arm with a taillight. The dog in the house had a bite history. He was beaten in that house and sadly, house was not investigated with luminal to see any blood in that basement before floor replaced. House then sold. Dog rehomed. Everyone’s cell tel traded in day before warrants….they were tipped off.
It’s because of bitter women that she shouldn’t testify. Personal opinions on her demeanor shouldn’t get in the way of the facts.
why
I understand what she means by saying it’s up to her lawyers if they’ll put her up on the stand-because she’s smart enough to take their expert advice. Sure, she can go against their wishes, but she trusts them and will follow what they deem is best.
Exactly!!!
she’s lying once again. it’s always up to the defendant not the lawyers.
@@enzoinfinity1she said she would defer to her lawyers . what part of that don't you understand . besides everything else in this case 🙄🤬🤡
@@enzoinfinity1she doesn’t want to - too many difficult questions for her! ⚖️
The reasonable doubt is too strong! No need to testify!
They need to prove it. She does not have to help them at all
Remain silent
She didnt do it
The prosecution needed to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt which in my opinion, they have not.
She really should stop talking to the press. It's dumb. I'm sure her lawyers have told her not to talk to the media. It's foolish.
Her lawyers will be out of frame mate, they know what they're doing.
She loves the attention can't you see?
no chance she testifies
She won’t testify !
Karen keep quiet. You r getting too confident. Let the case proceed, let the attys handle it, please.
Yes you're right why does she keep talking to media???be silent and just walk !showing confidence isn't the right move for her!
@@sibelc.380 She can’t help herself!! It’s insane!
It’s up to her, not her attorneys.
If you pay for an attorney, listen to their advice unless you are a FOOL.
@@AM.000 yes, she would have a very hard time on the stand so she definitely should not testify. The decision is actually up to her. She was making it seem like it’s up to attorneys.
She just bugs the heck out of me. She loves being the center of attention.
It’s a murder case against her. By definition she is the center of attention.
She’s guilty 100%
She wanted John to give her "more" attention. According to her text to Higginsm she doesn't really like kids. IMO, she was trying to get into the good graces of John's family & friends. This was the main reason she took care of the kids.
It's UP TO YOU!!!!!!
To leave it up to the attorneys IS up to her.
But it is essentially up to attorneys. You're paying them for expertise.
If they said "definitely testify" then she would likely do it even if it felt wrong.
Why testify if her lawyers don’t recommend it? She can give all the interviews she wants once she’s acquitted.
Gonna be a good book
she's so manipulative, she actually thinks we are stupid to not know it's HER choice if she testifies!
I think all she is saying is she will follow their advice. She's responsible.
She’s not going to testify but she had to run to the media and make it look like it’s going to be her lawyers’ decision when she doesn’t take the stand. OP is spot on. This was pure manipulation.
@@trickortrump3292 Manipulation at its finest!!
I wanna hear from her so do a lot of people
….just wait for the book and Netflix docuseries
@@lowellianhellian9788 nah those could be bias
Karen has nothing to hide! Unlike the Dirty Cops Involved 👮♂️ 😂
She's guilty.
@@rachelmarie7705yes, Jen McCabe is super guilty and look like a 💀
@@rachelmarie7705So are you.
She's responsible. She should take the stand.
@@rachelmarie7705😂
What she said was….ill defer to my lawyers 🙄🙄 not that she will
Apart from the fact you didn't spell "I'll" correctly, you're missing the fact that "I'll" is short form of "I will"
So your own argument I validates itself with correct spelling and understanding of the words being used.
I'm glad you're not her Attorney.
@jovialpunch Pulling someone up for their grammar and then having a typo in your snooty reply is hilarious. What she said makes perfect sense, with or without the missing apostrophe.
"I will defer to my lawyers" (about testifying)
"Not that she will" (testify)
You're welcome.
@@HighlandBhoy exactly, thank you.
Thanks for clearing up nothing, appreciate your snooty reply back.
Crux of it, you're both still wrong.
Quick, get your flags out, wave 'em around!
I liked that she spoke. Before we hear her only through her pissed off voice messages to John. Smart move.
It's uo to her if she wants to testify not her attorney, my bet is she won't.
If a client trusts his attorney, he will base the decision of whether to testify on the attorney's expertise and experience.
It's up to the attorney if you believe they have your best interest in mind, otherwise you can always request to testify.
With the judge being on team Lally a k Proctor, is best she does not testify.
Her attorney will advise if she should or not, a smart person listens to their attorney that has experience.
So you’re wrong. It’s not up to her if she listens to her lawyers.. listening to your lawyer means you trust them.
That would be a wrong move.
And i hate the term "Smoking Mirrors" or "Railroaded" makes me cringe lol
It’s smoke and mirrors. Not smoking! It means no there there.
@@Xislandgirl Whatever you knew what I meant
have you watched the trial the only thing they have proved is John O keefe died. There is still no evidence that shows she is the person that did it. The prosecution is spending more time on the google search of Jen Mc Cabe. That dog Chloe was involved in something here.
Do you even know what you meant? If you can't write it, how can you say it?
@@Joh605I would hate a saying I don’t understand also.
"I'm an outspoken person", "I speak up for myself" NOT "I'm an honest and trustworthy person", "I tell the truth". Listen to the brazen womans words.
I agree with Karen I cannot believe they even brought this case, it has all the Hallmark's of a head job trying to cover up for the cops who actually killed her boyfriend
Please let her testify. 😅
She won't of course. Her lawyers will not let her destroy months of cover up for her.
case is over anyway
Karen, there is a case against you. And it’s a serious one.
No, there's serious charges against her, but the case is about as solid as the drool from Chloe the dog biting JO arm 😉
She should keep her mouth shut
stop it
Mat truth be revealed. We sure don't want to die in our sins. We've all sinned and fallen short. But repentance is a worthwhile goal. GOD is love and He loves justice.
DONT TESTIFY
She certainly spoke up when she thought she hit him with the car.
You believe that testimony as it was presented? 😂😂😂
She said to her dad she backed up and hit something (John). She called Kerry and said "John's dead". Her own words prove her guilt!
@@sandrah0330yes she backed up and hit John's car which is on video. In the same video you can see her hit the breaks. You can clearly see it's entirely red. If 47 pieces were missing it would have looked like a cop's flashlight coming out of the back of her car. One of the few honest officers stated he saw it cracked and not in 47 pieces. When the defense presents its case will you come back tell us more about her being guilty 🙄🤡
@@ToniInSussex you believe in the conspiracy??
Yes…she did.
WHY IS SHE TALKING TO THE MEDIA?
I hope she doesn't 😅 she doesnt need to. Save it for the movie when you are free.
It's up to her whether she testifies or not
Not to her attorneys. However the attorneys will advise her not to testify
It's never up to the attorneys whether you testify Karen. By law, whether you testify is solely up to you. Your attorneys can make suggestions only.
I think by saying it’s up her lawyers she knows it’s up to her but she’s also smart enough to weight what her attorneys say when it comes down to it.
No way Jackson is putting her on the stand. She is not calm, cool and collected. Terrible prosecution, even if she did it. She will walk and sue Canton!
I fear John O'Keefe's death will never be solved 😢
Oh, it’s solved - Albert’s, McCabes, MSP, Canton PD all Blue Line Mafia.
Even if she did hit he fell the dog Chloe was someone involved.
Totally innocent!!!!!!!!!!!! COPS COVER UP!!!
Sure, as if 50 or more people are ALL in on it.
@@Arlo360 no, not 50. Just a few. The blue line, protecting procture. The others are just testifying to the evidence procture gave them. They're just dupes.😊
@@paulaheckman9928 You may be right, but I don't think so.
@paulaheckman9928 That’s what you fail to understand. The cover up can't be just a few people. It has to be massive for everything to be covered up the way you people think it's covered up. And the bigger it gets, the more preposterous it looks.
@@diver291 well, I'm entitled to my opinion, just like you. And many many others agree... so 🖕 you. 😉
She doesn't need to. Her attorneys have done great. She's innocent. The damn alberts and McCabe's and that stupid ATF guy and their buddies are guilty
God bless and protect you Karen!🙏🙏🙏 And RIP Officer O'Keefe 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
We are standing beside you , Karen. ❤️ 🙏
God doesn't bless killers and murderers, and John's family wants his killer locked up , which is KAREN
🤡
So Karen wins and sues Canton PD, Mass State Police, Proctor, makes more money from book and Netflix series.
Wonder what the chances of her getting hit with a wrongful death civil lawsuit are? Jackson is probably five steps ahead of this….
This is for show, for all the jurors’ ‘friends’ … Karen Read says she’d love to testify … you can only mess up this no hitter by talking about it
This case screams reasonable doubt!
She doesn’t need to take the stand for state left room for reasonable doubt. But, I get it. She is not hiding anything and not shy to testify to her innocents. I wouldn’t be afraid to testify if I was framed either.
Karen knew laly was was this bad she defense herself. Like Dale Brookes
Her proir media interviews about the case went into detail and there is nothing that the public needs more.
Please get up there and testify. No case against you, with accusations as harsh as "they planted tail light pieces" you now have taken on some burden of proof. No planted evidence means you did it! plain and simple. God I hate her and hope she has to answer for her drunken out of control, drinking with medications that dont mix w alcohol, running people over blacked out behavior.
Cops plant evidence to make convictions easier. The problem is that they didn't realize there was video evidence and witnesses that only saw a crack in her taillight vs it being completely broken. She doesn't need to say a word, when the videos provide proof that you could still see the headlight in the morning and in the afternoon after his death.
Geez bad take
shut up Trooper Proctor.
Yeah right. She wants to testify . 🙄
this is so returtled man!
I would love for her to testify.....
She knows what happened. She's responsible. The "frame up" defense is incredulous. But its all they got.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Then why did they hesitate to turn over phones? Why destroy old phones? Why make such lousy witnesses on stand?🤔
@@paulaheckman9928 Why do you feel the need to up vote your own comment? Ya, I can see.
@@paulaheckman9928 Another wacko who thinks up voting their own response is not going to get noticed.
@@Arlo360 bootlicks are the worst. ugh
Chloe the German Shepherd was driving the Lexus. Ran into John, then proceeded to bite him. 😅 Fetch my shoe girl. Woof woof.🐕🦺
This is NOT funny...a human being isnt alive anymore.....
I'm afraid Chloe was taken to a "farm" in Vermont over the rainbow bridge.
Imo, you are completely out of line. Disgusting.
@@teebee9232😢 I hope not
@@ToniInSussex no doubt , what a pig.
That is so stupid to do, they HAVE TO PROVE the case, she doesn't have to DISPROVE, and one juror was excused because she said she didn't like her, more like, I can't stand ya, type feeling and she could do that to the rest of them if she testifies. She's not a likeable person, but the State has to prove how vicious she really is.
You know this.. how?🤔
@@paulaheckman9928 Absolutely right... these bootlickers are a hinderance to the changes needed.
Like Casey Anthony.
DON’T TESTIFY KAREN, AS YOU SAID THERE’ S NO CASE AGAINST YOU…SO NO NEED TO WASTE YOUR BEAUTY WORRYING ABOUT IT! LEAVE EVERYTHING TO “BUSTER” JACKSON.
Youve gone through everyone elses private life including their childrenS....THERE is a case against YOU!
it was disgusting when Lally forced the kids to testify
WE SUPPORT YOU KAREN!!!!! 💙💜
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
An abusive and narcissistic person, who wanted to kill their partner would never ask, “could I have hit him?” This shows that she’s a caring person. If you’ve watched the full trial and have come to the conclusion of guilt, you are not a decent person. You cannot lock people away for the rest of their life with the lack of evidence in this case and so many questions!
The trial is not over yet.
Guilty
She should listen to her attorneys to not testifying. Hes been thru this, he knows whats best, she hasn't.
She thinks she is some type of famous person…. Horrible optic in my view
She won’t appear as a witness she will have to lie under oath but I guess she’s desperate
Do you really think she’s bothered about lying under oath 🤯. More likely because there will be too many difficult questions!!
you re desperate !!! 🤣🤣🤣 have you seen how many lies these clown prosecutors witness have spwed UNDER OAT And you re worried about Karen Read !!!mind blowing , go back to the basement you escaped from 👀
The cops are dirty and the state has proven ZERO. But she should stop smiling in court and looking GUILTY AS HELL. I have to keep telling myself to not judge this case based on how she acts during this trial. If i was her defense team i would recommend that she atops puckering her NO LIPS and smiling and just out right looking guilty
Let her is no like Laly can handle her. Weakest case ever. One month. Of texts and Aruba how many drinks she is right everything personal nothing about what happened Because they don't have anything
What? Were you home schooled or maybe a cop? I couldn't understand your incoherent fragmented thoughts.
@@sallyvella7012objection. argumentative.
@@sallyvella7012that’s how I feel about all the Alberts and McCabe, they all talk like they share the same brain cell 😂 bang bang!!! KO!
@@leslie4551 thanks
@@sallyvella7012 I went to the Laly School of Law
Think of how many times this biased judge railroaded other cases.. she needs to step down after this… she needs investigated but I also read she can’t be held accountable for anything.. insane
I THINK SHE GUILTY a jealous woman who knew her relationship was ending .. she's a ' fatal '
side note: 1. the way she went off on the God daughter in Aruba, very telling huge red flag. 2. Searching for missing officer, there he is there he is! In snow-covered road no one else could see? 3.I think i hit him with my car!!! 4. The barage of texts & calls I'm a 24-hour period harassing the poor guy. 5. How long to die search 6am & more
2nd: Note: I had a friend who was hit by a car going 5 miles faster then the defendant he was a total wreck his head was swollen like a watermelon.
Bruises & broken bones, everywhere miracle he survived
You have not watched the full trial. My goodness, you sound crazy. The kind of crazy that deems people guilty over phone calls and getting upset!
Red solo cups. No blood on her car. No attempt to identify the other dna in blood on John's clothing. Amateur accident reconstruction. Multiple witnesses stating a "cracked" tail light opposed to the obliterated one we see. No photos taken immediately upon seizure of SUV. Statements of witnesses evolving across testimony. Butt dials. Rehomed dog. Rehomed phones. Rehomed home. Michael Proctor. Could go on and on really. The prosecution haven't produced, and they are almost finished, a shred of evidence that proves her guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Not guilty.
Wrong... you don't know ow me.. I'm going by what I've heard .. I'm subject to have an opinion unless you are a Drmocrat? 🤣
He was on top
Of the snow. Yet all the people in the house saw her suv leaving that night, but no one witnessed her hit John?! Yeah, sure. Butt calls all over damn place, strange Higgins at police station in the early hours after a funeral in NY and late night drinking, destroyed phones, Library camera footage missing, sally port footage missing, inverted video presented in court, the 2:27 a.m. search-“hos long to die in cold.” And so much more, way too much to list! Those are dog bites on Johns arm, that’s why they sold their home of many years and got rid of Chloe. They have no evidence against Karen Reed! The non corrupt cop from the city nearby, said her tail was cracked, not shattered. Being upset does not equal murder! You want to lock her up
because you are a toxic crime junkie who gets high from seeing innocent people locked up.
@@1beatlesactually I’m a free thinker who doesn’t vote for insanity, aka Biden. You don’t sound reasonable at all.
Don't testify.
She didn't do it and even if some say she did it wasn't murder. This is an overcharged case. She is not compelled to testify let the state prove their case. I don't think they can.
Yep, way too much reasonable doubt.
Seven weeks in and nothing.
case is over. Lies and corruption in Canton have been exposed for 27 days. The governor needs to step in
Casey Anthony got a not guilty verdict. Karen is also going to get a not guilty verdict.
She’s such a liar
Proctor, the McCabes, the Alberts, and nasty old Huggins committed perjury on the stand and changed their testimony over and over. Not to mention they all had amnesia 😂 plus she doesn’t need to prove anything to the like ten people who don’t believe her.
Dont testify Karen...it would be anger resentment driven. U don't need to ..ur case is won😊
Weird to comment as the defendant. But tracks with her hubris.
You misspelled *innocence 😊
It must be tough to not testify in a case like this especially when you have something to say to all involved. I'd be the same way, sometimes best to be silent.
She certainly has something to say- like apologizing to all the innocent people she blamed for her crime.
Lyin Narcisist!!
GUILTY 🤬
Exactly 💯
It’s not “up to the attorneys”, Karen - if you are innocent you would be ‘chomping at the bit’ to get on the stand and testify your innocence. How easy would that be! If you really are “factually innocent”, your highly paid attorneys will understand you can’t wait to personally testify. Or may be you don’t really want to. Justice for Officer John O’Keefe ⚖️💔
After she's found not guilty she can say whatever she wants. She doesn't have to prove anything to the jury.
@@BrokebutCreative Repeating yourself, or the contrived conspiracy, doesn’t alter simple EVIDENCE ⚖️ …. (Ok so you edited your comment about repeating yourself 👍🏼)
@@BrokebutCreative From behind a glass panel with a telephone receiver in her hand 👍🏼⚖️
The evidence of...? What evidence says guilt? And hey, when she's walking free because the CW put on a shit case, it will be the CWs fault. Mrs. McCabe amd the Albert's are going to be spending a lot on attorneys soon and I'm here for it.
@@BrokebutCreative Direct (including forensic) & circumstantial evidence, which not only proves KR’s guilt but totally exonerates Jen McCabe’s so called 2:27 web search. That analysis perfectly matches JMcC’s testimony about her tel. use in the early hours before KR rang her to commence her cover story. (Consequently, not that an answer to this Q. is now needed but: “what are the odds of JMcC googling exactly the same worded Q. at 2:37 as that Karen Read asked her to Google for her at 6:23?” - that would mean KR is also in on the conspiracy to frame herself 🙂↔️) … The data from the Lexus Infotainment Centre is absolutely damning - even though there had been an attempt to stop it being retrieved (?! KR’s brother works for Lexus for those who like conspiracies ….) delaying the analysis for over a year wait for further developed technology to do access the data.
She is guilty. However the highly expensive PR & propaganda onslaught (destroying innocent lives & earning big buck donations from much worse off cult-like followers) undertaken by KR & her complicit wealthy immediate family has definitely been successful prior to trial in brainwashing those who can be ‘got at’ & those who choose to financially benefit from social media fame. Justice may still not be served depending on whether jury members have followed all the rules during jury selection & service. I pray it is for John McKeefe & his family 💔⚖️
She is a coward
You know her personally?
She’s guilty as sin and there’s no way she’ll testify!
Why do you think she's guilty as sin? I'm trying to understand both sides
😂
@@whatdoyoulivefor735there’s quite a bit of reasonable doubt. To say their case is airtight and the prosecution has proven their case against her 100%…is strange to me.
And the defense has yet to even present their side yet.
she is guilty of dating down
Seriously! Do you really believe the family killed him Karen, shame on her, she backed over him drunk and angry. Period. She’ll get off there’s no critical thinkers any more!
Obviously youre not a critical thinker 😂😂
@@maureenmclaughlin2652 🤣🤣🤣good one
I've always felt that she hit him by accident. But how do they explain the dog attack on his arm?
@@teebee9232🙄There was no dog attack. There’s nothing to explain. Sheesh.
Hit in the arm and thrown 7 - 30 feet?
And no bruise?
Yeah, right, a car really did hit him. Keep telling yourself that, you being a supposed critical thinker?
Blood dripping vertically onto shirt, front and back and randomly, and even lower than the shit too, doesn't happen when you are knocked down.
She won't testify. I think she is probably innocent but she smirks a lot in court and in the text's she comes across as very needy and high maintenance
She doesn’t need to testify. She clearly isn’t guilty
So if she didn’t do it, then is everyone prepared to blame an innocent family.?
You mean a guilty family!!!!
Family is not on trial.
@@danielfiore8865 they will be...
Either guilty or hung Jury. She will face a civil lawsuit and will have to testify. Along with toilet turd, for obstruction of justice and defamation
E
Man, I thought she’d say, ‘No way I’d testify, I’m not a retahd, like Proctah. I got a convenient bump into John’s Traverse at 5 am to account for”
She's a babe
Smart to leave the decision to the attorneys.
I think her testiying would be needless and spark a wastseful prolonged the cross examination.
It is clear some new trials need to spawn from this case, and not concerning her.
......but she said she hit him over and over
❤ #FreeKarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe
I pray for Ms. Read and her family and I'm so impressed with this woman's grace, the Holy Spirit watches over her, PTL!
As bad as OJ!!
If she's found guilty it would be.
Pamela Smart 2.0
If she wants in the stand let her.. in my opinion she has nothing to hide. Especially when it’s the truth.. good on her
I think she would hold her own. But the reality is whenever a defendant takes the stand, they risk shifting the burden with the jury. Things are going her way, and I think it would be best for her to let it be.
Do not testify, the jury can see the writing on the wall. No need to waste more of their time on this case that shouldn't have gone to court. Reasonable doubt x 50.
No need though Lally may attempt to get the best of her why take the chance, but the attorneys do their thing.. “ They got merchhhhh Lally!”
No testify = 100% guilty
Not 100%. Not even 75%. It’s quite reasonable to have doubt in the prosecution’s case. They have failed to prove her guilt beyond a reasonable doubt and the defense hasn’t even presented their side yet.
I think she would hold her own on the stand. BUT, given the weakness of the evidence, I don’t think she needs to get up there. I am certain her attorneys will advise her not to.
Guilty as charged
😂😂😂😂
Lol k.
If she is guilty then just clear up some points for me please
How did John not have a single broken bone apart from his skull ? Not 1 rib or hip or even bruising ?
Why was all the blood on the front of his hoody not in the ground ?
Not because I’m saying she’s innocent these are just 2 points I cannot see how she hit him with car
Because he could have fallen back n just hit his head n then passed out. But then where did the blood come from? Don't know
@@Summersun34Do you understand the difference between being hit by a car and being run over by a car? You’re expecting injuries to cover his entire body from a hit.
More B.S. If she really wanted to testify with her lies, that's her choice.
The world stands with you, Karen..! . You are so obviously being framed and completely innocent. Sending you strength from South Africa
weird Fall River accent
Awesome to see she is still in such high spirits after all she has been through!! Free Her!!
FKR❤❤❤
That’s right KR tell your truth because they are telling lies about you.
FKR
*WE ARE ALL ON YOUR SIDE KAREN* !!!
Who is we? I am not on no one side and GARF
Nope
@@Esperanza19925 Zip it lady
@@MK-sg3nx *Shh.. Can you hear that? That's the sound of nobody caring what you think*
@@marcopolo9446 TRY TO ZIP ME OK 🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡